433
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the selected date. The documents are displayed in no particular order. However, all of these documents are searchable. To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f (Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac); 2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the form field provided and press Enter or Return. In most applications, the first appearance of the index number, the word, or the phrase in the document will be highlighted. Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications, including browsers and PDF viewers.

Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.

To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.

1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);

2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.

In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.

Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.

Page 2: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE:NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

MARGUS MUURISEPP, as Executor for theEstate of HARITA MUURISEPP, deceased,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

ÿX

nMar ond° 20ft

X

NYCAL

I.A.S. PARTÿO

(-HertlerÿINDEX NO. 190527-2012

(Weitz & Luxenberg P.C./March 2015FIFO Cluster)

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERFOR STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS,INC.

X

WHEREFORE, defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practiee Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto;

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and eross claims against defendant

Standard Motor Products, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkA

i &Frank Ortiz, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003212-558-5500Attorneys for PlaintiffHarita Muuriscpp, deceased

Richard P. O'Leary, Esq;Trontman Sanders LLPThe Chrysler Building405 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10174-0700212-704-6000Attorneys for DefendantStandardMotor Products, Inc.

SO ORDERED,Hftri. Sherry Klein Heitler , ..

HON.PETER R-WOouiUN?//*//

24652632v I

Page 3: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

I

Page 4: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK Mar 30

W RE:NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

MINNA SAUR, as Executrix for the Estate ofARTHUR R. SAUR, and MINNA SAUR,Individually,

/Plaintiffs),

-against-

AERCO INTERNATIONAL, INC.,et al.,

Defendants.

-X ÿsss.l.A.S. PART Xfb~0NYCAL

X

INDEX NO. 190334-2012

(Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C./February 2015FIFO Cluster)

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERFOR PARKER-HANNIFINCORPORATION

X

WHEREFORE, defendant Parker-Hannifin Corporation hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant Parker-Hannifin Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto;

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

Parker-Hannifin Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated:

Frank Ortiz, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003212-558-5500Attorneys for PlaintiffArthur R. Saur, deceased

Jchard P. O'Leary, Esq.RichardTroutman Sanders LLPThe Chrysler Building405 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10174-0700212-704-6000Attorneys for DefendantParker-Hannifin Corporation

SO ORDERED,Hon: Sherry Klein Iloitlofr,-,!u TOMhoiT&tcrOToulton

/«ÿ/'ÿ

Active 24652l88v I 999900.952301

Page 5: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

1

,''w

1 Hj f f ' ;, 4 - •

Page 6: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

X

%

IN RE:NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL

I.A.S.PARTXASBESTOS LITIGATION

PATRICK O'SULLIVAN, INDEXNO. 190180-2012

Plaintiff(s), (Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C./February 2015FIFO Cluster)

-against-

AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., et' NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY

al., JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERFOR STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS,

Defendants. INC.

- X

WHEREFORE, defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto;

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

Standard Motor Produets, Ine. be and the same are herehy dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

Riehard P. O'Leary, Esq.Troutman Sanders LLP

Frank Ortiz, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003212-558-5500Attorneys for PlaintiffPatrick O 'Sullivan

The Chrysler Building405 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10174-0700212-704-6000Attorneys for DefendantStandardMotor Products, Inc.

SO ORDERED, _Jdon. Sherry Idem IIlHIliÿ.rv\JUÿ

Active 24651959vl 999900.952301

Page 7: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

y

' • :i :

' -!/>G!-l

Page 8: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE:NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

X

NYCAL

I.A.S. PARTÿdS"ÿX (Heitlor, J.)—

INDEX NO. 102380-20UJJENNIFER WHITE, as Executrix for the Estateof GLENN LIMBURG, deceased,

(Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C./Fcbruary 2015FIFO Cluster)Plaintiffs),

-against-NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERFOR STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS,

Defendants. INC.

X

WHEREFORE, defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto;

ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

Standard Motor Products, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Riehard P. O'Leary, Esq.Troutman Sauders LLP

Frank Ortiz, Esq.Weitz & Luxeuberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003212-558-5500Attorneys for PlaintiffGlenn Limburg, deceased

The Chrysler Building405 Lexington AvenueNew York,- NY 10174-0700212-704-6000Attorneys for DefendantStandardMotor Products, Inc.

SO ORDERED,

Aclivc 246508 14v 1 999900.952301

Page 9: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

r urfr

-J w

-O.a.L :'Ai/f{

Page 10: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

- X

IN RE:NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

ROSE MARIENASSO, Individually and asPersonal Representative for the Estate ofDOMEN1C NASSO, deceased,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.

NYCAL

I.A.S. PARTÿX (IIcitlcr,J.)

INDEX NO. 190181-2009

A1£

30°0/u. A/&. ?0i5

Oa

(Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C./February 2015FIFO Cluster)

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERFOR STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS,INC.

X

WHEREFORE, defendant Standard Motor Products, lnc, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

eomplaint against defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto;

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross elaims against defendant

Standard Motor Products, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

Frank Ortiz, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003212-558-5500Attorneys for PlaintiffDomenie Nosso, deceased

-J QLichard P. O'Leary, Esq. (JRichard

Troutman Sanders LLPThe Chrysler Building405 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10174-0700212-704-6000Attorneys for DefendantStandardMotor Products, Inc.

SO ORDERED,

mqulTpD * JiS«C»

Active 24651 131vl 999900.952301

Page 11: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

i

i

t

/ . v +''

'* A t . v

t

worÿuoiK ,h a3r;iq'.HoM

Page 12: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE:NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

REGINA DELPERCIO, as Executrix for theEstate of ANTHONY DELPERCIO, andREGINA DELPERCIO, individually,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.

-X

NYCALMAR30?n

C°VÿoI.A.S. PART,20 S~6 ÿ

X

INDEXNO. 190040-2009

(Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C./February 2015FIFO Cluster)

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERFOR STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS,INC.

X

WHEREFORE, defendant Standard Motor Produets, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto;

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

Standard Motor Products, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

Frank Ortiz, Esq.Weitz & Luxeuberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003212-558-5500Attorneys for PlaintiffAnthony DelPercio, deceased

Riehard P..O'Leary, Esq..Troutman Sanders LLPThe Chrysler Building405 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10174-0700212-704-6000Attorneys for DefendantStandardMotor Products, Inc.

*7

SO ORDERED,MAR 16 2015

IIuii. Sliciiy Klein Ilcitlu

HON. PETER H. MOULTONActive 24649980vl 999900.952301

Page 13: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

Jl /ÿ*»»«. I__

hum ki-iru jfi s • r'

«'!; J .

Page 14: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

X Ma*

IN RE:NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

X

NYCAL C

l.A.S. PARTjH?

(HÿitlfL T )-

JOSEPH F. KLEIN, INDEX NO. 119776-2001

Plaintiff(s), ' (Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C./February 2015FIFO Cluster)

-against-

A C. and S., Inc., et a!.,

Defendants.

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERFOR STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS,INC.

X

WHEREFORE, defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

eomplaint against defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto;

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

Standard Motor Products, Ine. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Richard P. O'Leary, Esq.Frank Ortiz, Esq.Weitz & Luxeuberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003212-558-5500Attorneys for PlaintiffJoseph F. Klein

Troutman Sauders LLPThe Chrysler Building405 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10174-0700212-704-6000Attorneys for DefendantStandardMotor Products, Inc.

SO ORDERED,

ufcf'"ftfc'fE OULTONMAR 16 2015

Aclivc 24650457v I 999900.952301

Page 15: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

» o-<

.!•: ;; r > a;-

- .-. i1,1 *<• i i i. 1 ~i t ,*> .of- {

L

Page 16: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE:NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

DANIEL A. PRZEPIORA, .

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.C. and S., Inc., et al.,

Defendants.

-X

X

Mÿ3n°°uNryÿ eo's

l.A.S. PARTyS ST& rCÿO/jyrNYCAL

'SOft(Hoitlor, J.)

INDEX NO. 108769-2002

(Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C./March 2015FIFO Cluster)

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERFOR STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS,INC.

'ÿ0/

X

WHEREFORE, defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. with prejudice, and there heing no opposition

thereto;

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

Standard Motor Products, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York.New York

Frank Ortiz, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003212-558-5500Attorneys for PlaintiffDanielA. Przepiora

KÿScuJ f- (PÿcRichard P. O'Leary, Esq.Troutman Sanders LLPThe Chrysler Building405 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10174-0700212-704-6000Attorneys for DefendantStandardMotor Products, Inc.

SO ORDERED. S llhl/S

24652589vl

Page 17: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

II

t .

-lo i'Jiy::? } » - ..a2t

Page 18: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE:NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

X

NYCAL

I.A.S. PARTjXfX (Heitl opprC£

ROSE ANGELA KALACHMAN, asAdministratrix for the Estate of MELVINKALACHMAN, and ROSE ANGELAKALACHMAN, individually,

INDEXNO. 190240-2009

(Weitz & Luxenbcrg, P.C./Mareh 2015FIFO Cluster)

Plaintiffs),

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

-against-NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERFOR STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS,INC.

Defendants.X

WHEREFORE, defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Praetice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant Standard Motor Produets, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto;

ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross elaims against defendant

Standard Motor Products, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Datei

Riehard P. O'Leary, EsqFrank Ortiz, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003-9536212-558-5500

Troutman Sanders LLPThe Chrysler Building405 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10174-0700212-704-6000Attorneys for Plaintiff

Melvin Kalachman, deceased Attorneys for DefendantStandardMotor Products, Inc.

SO ORDERED, /y-v---ihÿUsHon. Shorry Finn Hpitler . 'ÿON.WERH.MOULTON

Active 24652565vl 999900.9523'

Page 19: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

JD.l •>GG7G'?.{.;qh

Page 20: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION: NYCALi I.A.S. Partÿp

This Doeument Relates to:; Index No.: 190178/14,

ALEXANDER PODHAJSKIAND

KATHERINE PODHAJSKI : NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, The Nash Engineering Company, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Nash Engineering Company, with prejudice in this

action, and there beingno opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, The Nash Engineering Company, be and the same are herehy dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, Npw York

Joseph Y. WjtfiaiAttornÿMÿr Plaintiffs)Alexander Podhajski and KatheiThe Williams Law Firm,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10167(212) 668-1122

Podhajski

filedMAR 3 0 2015

NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Laura Hollman, Esq.Attorney for DefendantThe Nash Engineering CompanyMcGivney &Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,

HO*1[ouD?*?

505-3947

Page 21: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

I

Page 22: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

DENNIS F. MADDALONEAND

PATRICIA MADDALONE

NYCAL.A.s.ÿgp

Index No.: 190234/14,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, George A. Fuller Company, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, George A. Fuller Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, George A. Fuller Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York,2015apr

aintiffiAttorney

filemar 3 0 20)5

OFFICE

Carol Tempesta, Esq.Attorney for Defendant

Dennis F. Maddalone ancTPatricia Maddalone George A. Fuller CompanyMcGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

Weitz & Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

HON. P£TwutreN

i)ÿhs"

1224-439

Page 23: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

1

HOm-

'* ii

Page 24: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.COUNTY OF NEW YORK._

NYCAtIN RE: NEW YORK. COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

JOSEPH M. CITRONEAND

MARIE CITRONE

I.A.S. Part

Index No.: 190266/14,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, DAP, Ine., hereby requests summary judgment in the above

entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint

against defendant, DAP, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, DAP, Inc., he and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York,2015

}/0Attorney tor Plamtijf(s) YJoseph M. Citrone and Marie CitroneWeitz & Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, _

aCarol Tempesta, Esq.Attorney for DefendantDAP, Inc.MeGTVNEY & K.LUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

ijiyjIS

HON. PEtER H Wl0ULIs.C. FILEMAR 3 0 2015

604-783

NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Page 25: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

V,>07. i« ÿ ."*>r ' / J! ÿ ,

osi V!" ' f.f ,ÿ .j

Page 26: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCAL

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190047/14

MARY AMENTASNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, DAP, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the above

entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint

against defendant, DAP, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, DAP, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

•"WIÿ/,2015

SaiAttuiliVÿ IUJ 1

Mary AmentasWeitz & Luxenberg,P.c.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500

Carol Tempesta, Esq.Carol Tempesta, Esq.Attorney for DefendantDAP, Inc.McGivney&Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212)509-3456 FILE

SO ORDERED, N8W YOAKCOUNTY gLbrK's OFFICE

604-711

Page 27: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

Hrr;-.Dm "

* ÿ .t

/ £ »' I—w>' ' > -v • Tri *-»

' -•J V »/*rs i .

Page 28: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_

NYCALl.A.S. Partÿ

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Doeument Relates to:

DENNIS F. MADDALONEAND

PATRICIA MADDALONE

Index No.; 190234/14,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all elaims and cross claims against

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkQ>(SY" .2015

Attorney for Plaintiff(

filemar 3 0 2015

COUNTÿcÿ°RKÿCLERK'S OFFICEKfcyann.M Cook, Esq.Attorney for Defendant

Dennis F. Maddalone and Patricia Maddalone Tishman Liquidating Corp.MCGlVNEY & KXUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, /PPP?

HON.P£T

'Hi2383-30113

Page 29: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

l'\O r tr(.- ' hium"rn~u»rnHii ir •

ÿ~3-L~ ' -''.O(-•

Page 30: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

JOSEPH M. C1TRONEAND

MARIE C1TRONE

NYCAL'I.A.S. Partgf

Index No.: 190266/14,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Duro Dyne Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Duro Dyne Corporation, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Duro Dyne Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New Yorkÿew York,2015

AMar So ?0/5

°Ffii/Q?

Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Joseph M. Citrone and Marie CitroneWeitz & Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Chauvron S. Leotaud, Esq.Attorney for DefendantDuro Dyne CorporationMcGivney &Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, ?)v//s

25-6820

/

Page 31: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

ÿ

W1iV |ii!"ÿ 11 ii

l.r6y »>£>,

Page 32: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S- PaitJP»ÿ».)

This Document Relates to:

ALTON C. CHAPMANAND

FRANCIS CHAPMAN

Index No.: 190293/14,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Zurn Industries, LLC, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Zum Industries, LLC, with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Zum Industries, LLC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York,2015

Aftorney for Plaintiff)?)Alton C. Chapman and Francis ChapmanWeitz & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

FILEDMAR 3 0 2015

NEW YORKOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Kerr>%aGÿ—€t)ok, Esq.Attorney for DefendantZum Industries, LLCMcGivney <£. Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

-sJ'-L/tspeter R-***& 535-1356

Page 33: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

Mor !UOi[W ..4 p-3T3q *04

Page 34: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_

NYCALINRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Doeument Relates to:

ALEXANDER PODHAJSKIAND

KATHERINE PODHAJSKI

I.A.S. PartÿOIndex No.: 190178/14,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, DAP, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the above

entitled case, pursuant to Civil Praetiee Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint

against defendant, DAP, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, DAP, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York( New York2»H-

Josrepn K/wrtH*aois[bsq.AQopr6y for Plaintiff]Alexander Podhajski and Katherme PodhajskiThe Williams Law Firm,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10167(212) 668-1122

Carol Tempesta, Esq.Attorney for DefendantDAP, Inc.McGivney&Kluger,P.C.SO Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, filed

HON PETER H.h°*5S MAR 3 0 2015

NEW WWKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Page 35: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

I

f I iI % r\

*\ «.W, . <

! - ÿ "f"• .i. ' ' ' • t

Page 36: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_INRE: NEW YORK COUNTY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

ARTHUR J. SAGEV1CKAND

MARY ANN SAGEV1CK

I.A.S. Part JO' S"OfHertteiTE)—Index No.: 190424/14,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Atwood & MorrillCo., Inc.,with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: NewJ£o$k, New York(O .2015

Q

FILEDMAR 3 0 2015

NEW YORKOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Attorney forrlaintiff(s)Arthur J. Sageviek and Mary Ann SageviekThe Williams Law Firm,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10167(212) 668-1122

SO ORDERED,

licole Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for DefendantAtwood & MorrillCo., Inc.McGivney&Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

1

hou.pÿ£rH'WOULS-c' 963-2301

Page 37: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

*r.>;O c

M»"* , .'** sJi !

Page 38: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

ARTHUR J. SAGEV1CKAND

MARY ANN SAGEV1CK

NYCALI.A.S. Part VS(Hettlei7±7—

5U

Index No.: 190424/14,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Flowserve Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Practiee Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Flowserve Corporation, with prejudice inthis action, and

there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Flowserve Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs. fileDated: New Yor)c, New York

,2015 MAR 3 0 2015

NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Attorney for f4amtiff(s)Arthur J. Sageviek and Mary Ann SageviekThe Williams LawFirm,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10167(212) 668-1122

SO ORDERED,

Laura B. HollmarAttorney for DefendantFlowserve CorporationMcGivney &Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

i)ri-//sHON. PETER H.MG5ULTON:

J.S.C. 951-1023

Page 39: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

V

r i

L

i ., . I

Page 40: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. PartjKJ(Heillei, r)

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190424/14,

ARTHUR J. SAGEV1CKAND

MARY ANN SAGEV1CK NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there beingno opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: Newjfock,New York<77D ,2015

filed

for Plainriff(s)

;counCOUNfY CLERK'S OFRCE

MAR 8 0 2015NEW YORK

Attorney for Plainriff(s)Arthur J. Sageviek and Mary Ann 5 . w ekThe Williams Law Firm,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10167(212) 668-1122

J. Sageviek and Mary Ann

Laura B. Hollman, Esq.Attorney for DefendantThe Fairbanks CompanyMcGivney &Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212)509-3456

SO ORDERED,

HON. h-M0ULI°c.504-1425

Page 41: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

- *,Vj

•" '--!ldq i1nH

Page 42: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCAL _l.A.S. Part $ °(Heitler, J.]-

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190010/14,

JOHN P. RYANAND

MARY C. RYAN NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' eomplaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all eo-defendants, all elaims and eross elaims against

defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: NewÿprkÿNewÿYork

AttomexJÿnaintiff(s} /John P. Ryan and Mary C. Ryan

MAR 3 0 2015

The Williams LawFirm,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10167(212) 668-1122

Laura B. Hollman, Esq.Attorney for DefendantThe Fairbanks CompanyMcGivney &Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, D//y/s

ViON. peter h.504-1269

Page 43: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

.7: .K aSTSR .IA0M

Page 44: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

• SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION: NYCAL• l.A.S. Part/Ki'cS~L)

J.)"-This Document Relates to:

Index No.: 190159/14,ROLAND QUASHIE

ANDSAB1E QUASHIE NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Company, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Atwood & Morrill Company, with prejudice in this

action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Atwood & Morrill Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.

Dated: Ne'

Attorney for Plaintiffÿ

"A* *0 20,5

KerryanmMf-Codk, Esq.Attorney for Defendant

Roland Quashie and Sabie QuashieThe Williams Law Firm,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10167(212) 668-1122

Atwood & Morrill CompanyMcGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, ijn/i5

963-1982

Page 45: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

i

Page 46: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALl.A.S. Partÿf 5<3(Heitlcr, J.) -

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190159/14,

ROLAND QUASH1EAND

SABIE QUASH1E NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairhanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs. FILEDDated: New York, New York

w4-(0 fc .2OT3-MAR 3 0 2015

NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Laura B. Hollman, Esq.Attorney for DefendantThe Fairbanks Company

Attorney foF-Plaintiff(s) /Roland Quashie and Sabie Qtiashie

Laura B. Hollman, Esq.Attorney for DefendantThe Fairbanks CompanyMcGrvNEY &Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004 - J(212) 509-3456 '

The Williams LawFirm,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10167(212) 668-1122

SO ORDERED, /7k A

MOULTON504-1304

I

Page 47: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

HOTJUC,..! .:•? AhTzM .HOrJ.0.2.1.

a

Page 48: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_INRE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

ANNE NOLAN

I.A.S. PartÿKf "S#(Beitlcr, J.)-Index No.: 190117/14,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc., herehy requests summary

judgment in the ahove entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New/York, New York~ _ 2015lew/Yorlim

36 ?0/s

Attorney for Plaintiffs)Anne NolanThe Williams LawFirm,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10167(212) 668-1122

SO ORDERED,

licole Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for DefendantAtwood & Morrill Co., Inc.McGivney &Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

'Q?

HON.peter h.MOULTON 963-1981

Page 49: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

iflOTJUOM .H PTi'BH .11Or!.0.2.1.

Page 50: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S.PartÿÿO(Hcitlcr, k)

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190117/14,

ANNE NOLANNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there beingno opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all eo-defendants, all elaims and eross claims against

defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without eosts.

AttorneyIfcr Plaintiffs)

Dated: New York, New York

P//P .2015

Anne NolanThe Williams LawFirm,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10167(212) 668-1122

Laura B. Hollman, Esq.Attorney for DefendantThe Fairbanks CompanyMcGivney &Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,

504-1303

Page 51: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

' *ÿ* <2,L9 VOH

1

Page 52: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Partner so

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190268/14,

FRANK P. MIN1CHIN1AND

RACHEL JEAN MIN1CHIN1 NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there heingno opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated:

nichini

Laura B. Hollman, EsqAttorney fcr Plaintiffs) / Attorney for DefendantFrank P. Minichini and Rachel Jean Mfnichini The Fairbanks CompanyThe Williams LawFirm,P.C. / McGrvNEY &Kluger,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th Ploor / 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10167 New York, New York 10004(212) 668-1122 (212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, -- 311v>5

HON.PE"* W°ULI°£ 504-1375

Page 53: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

;Jt;o:V? ,,rj...>. i, ''i'irjtzjq i,ÿ HOf i

Page 54: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

VINCENT MARSIAND

JOSEPHINE MARSI

l.A.S. Part$(Heitlei, J.) ÿ

Index No-: 190365/14,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Columbia Boiler Company of Pottstown, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Columbia Boiler Company of Pottstown, with

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Columbia Boiler Company of Pottstown, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

ew York,

204Dated: New York, New York

,2015

Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Vineent Marsi and Josephine MarsiWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Carol Tempesta, Esq.Attorney for DefendantColumbia Boiler Company of PottstownMcGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, -ih/'SHON. PETER H.MOULTON

2572-230

L

Page 55: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

MOTjUOM .H HBTaq .MOHo.a.t

Page 56: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALl.A.S. Part S~£>(Heitler, 1 ) -

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190365/14,

VINCENT MARS1AND

JOSEPHINE MARS1 NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Croll-Reynolds Engineering Company, Inc., hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs5 complaint against defendant, Croll-Reynolds Engineering Company, lne.,

with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all elaims and cross claims against

defendant, Croll-Reynolds Engineering Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed

with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: w 'MAR 3 0 2015

SPWn

Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Vineent Marsi and Josephine MarsiWE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Nieole Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for DefendantCroll-Reynolds Engineering Company, lne.McGivney &.Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,

NlOUV-TON3/ /•»-/' S

1273-74

Page 57: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

,ÿ ÿ l> *' * ri~J 4 '-**4 - 1ÿ1vir I

L

Page 58: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

VINCENT MARSIAND

JOSEPHINE MARSI

NYCALI.A.S. Partner S~D(-Heillei, J.)—Index No.: 190365/14.

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Zurn Industries, LLC, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Praetice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Zurn Industries, LLC, with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Zurn Industries, LLC, be and the same arc hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs. mP/LDated: New York. New York

ri/1 .2015 uar3o

Attorney for Plaintiffs)Vineent Marsi and Josephine MarsiWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

2015c°unt?ÿork

°%C£Kerrywwa-MfCook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantZurn Industries, LLCMcGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, l]l7~lIS

HON. PETER H. MOULTON535-1361

D

Page 59: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

frlOTJUO;V] .H fi3T3«l HOH.O.S.I

Page 60: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALl.A.S. Partÿtf S°("Hetfler, J.)—

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190397/14,

ZORAN DJOKICAND

VENET1A KONTOGOUR1S NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs5 complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this aetion,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all eo-defendants, all elaims and eross elaims against

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without eosts. filedDated: New York, New York10- ,2015 MAR 8 0 2015

NIsW VriQlr

Attorney for Plaintiff(s)

COUNIr clews OFF,eg

Kerryann M7 Cook, Esq.Attorney for Defendant

Zoran Djokie and Venetia KontogourisWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Tishman Liquidating Corp.McGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, ?//V/S

HON. PETER H.MOULTOtt 2383-30136

Page 61: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

i

o.s ÿ<-. ÿ.-,ss Mijrl

Page 62: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL

l.A.S. PartASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 190332/13

LEONARD F. CARPENTER, JR. AND BEVERLYCARPENTER

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Nash Engineering Company, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiff's complaint against defendant, Nash Engineering Company with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant,

Nash Engineering Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

eosts. filed

COUNTY CLERK'S

Laura B. Hollman, Esq.McGlVNEY & Kl.UGER, P.C.Attorneys for Defendants

WKI I7.& LUXÿNBr-RG, P.C.Attorneys for Pratfitiff

Dated: New York, New YorkUardo 4ÿ015

mar 3 0 2015NEW YORK

Leonard F. Carpenter, Jr. and Beverly Carpenter700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5550

Nash Engineering Company80 Broad Street -23rd FloorNew York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,

505-3705

Page 63: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders
Page 64: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_INRE: NEW YORK COUNTY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

JOSEPH B. BACCARO, JR.

I.A.S. PartXÿ ÿ

Index No.: 190363/14,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Atwood & MorrillCo., lne., with prejudice inthis action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Ine., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiee and

without eosts. ÿ g

mar 8 0 2015

ÿry'oLemZÿIKAMMjuL

Dated: New_Y°jfc New York(Q ,2015

Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Joseph B. Baeearo, Jr.The Williams Law Firm,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10167(212) 668-1122

Nieole Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for DefendantAtwood & Morrill Co., Ine.McGivney &Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,

HON.peTER H- w°ULj.s.c.-jJ/y/s

963-2169

Page 65: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

rvp'r*.

HOW bElEH H wonnew

Page 66: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Partÿatf

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190363/14,

JOSEPH B. BACCARO, JR.NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Flowserve Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Flowserve Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and

there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Flowserve Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

Dated: New_York, New York_</frO .2015

without eosts.

MA* 3 0 20,5

Attorney iQpPlaihtiff(s)Joseph B. Baeearo, Jr.The Williams LawFirm,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10167(212) 668-1122

Laura B. Hollman, Esq.Attorney for DefendantFlowserve CorporationMcGivney&Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, 7//2-//S"

951-1021

Page 67: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

• -"SMi/;r\ÿ .jÿffmsssam*

ÿ*e:LJuo.vt ./..* ' ' '1-41-•, .(

•ÿG/-/

Page 68: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALl.A-S. PartÿS"0(Hoitlgr, L-)-

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190363/14,

JOSEPH B. BACCARO, JR.NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, The Nasb Engineering Company, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Nash Engineering Company, with prejudice in this

action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all eo-defendants, all claims and eross elaims against

defendant, The Nash Engineering Company, he and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without eosts.

Dated: New Yaflc, New Yorki/lV .2015v Yo/k, N2/M

FILED

Laura B. Hollman, Esq.

MAR 3 0 2015

NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Attorney for Plaintiffs)Joseph B. Baccaro, Jr.The Williams LawFirm,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10167(212) 668-1122

Attorney for DefendantThe Nash EngineeringCompanyMcGivney&Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,

HON.PETER B/ fWOUL/rON 505-4061

Page 69: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

{

I • . .; ; .[ ..Ii MOHV, :;V *

Page 70: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XInre: NEW YORK CITY :

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :

XThis document relates to:

BRYAN HOCKLER

NYCALI.A, S. Part 3<f C2> <)

Index No.: 190235/13

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREAS, Defendant The Nash Engineering Company requests summary judgment inthe above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practiee Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingPlaintiffs eomplaint against The Nash Engineering Company, with prejudice, and there being noopposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all elaims and cross claims againstThe Nash Engineering Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.

Dated: New York, New York

V/citcli iÿ- ,2oi 5

BreiwanLevy Ko/800 Third Avenue, 1llh FloorNew York, NY 10022Counselfor Plaintiff

Laura Hollman, Esq.MeGivney & Kluger80 Broad Street, Suite 2300,New York, NY 10004Counselfor The NashEngineering Company

SO ORDERED,.

jltonhon.peteb •> s

£Q

$0

{00332695.DOCX} cOÿ

Page 71: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

Wo-- < •

' % , * .

Oc.- ' • •' • ' .. « • .

Page 72: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

JOHN D. WALKERAND

CATHERINE MCLEAN WALKER

NYCALl.A.S. Part yf SO

J.)—Index No.: 190163/12,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

FIIPDaled: New York, New York a ™ »

ÿ Isl .20151 MAR 3 0 2015

NEW YORK7. OUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

D-eClCto Laura B. Hollman, Esq.Attorney forPlaintiff(s) Attorney for Defendant

John D. Walker and Catherine MeLean Walker Fairbanks CompanyWeitz & Luxenberg,P C. McGivney & Kluger, P.C.700 Broadway 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10003 New York, New York 10004(212) 558-5500 (212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED

Page 73: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders
Page 74: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190293/14,

ALTON C. CHAPMANAND

FRANCIS CHAPMAN NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York2015

FILEDMAR 3 0 2015

NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Alton C. Chapman and Francis ChapmanWeitz&'Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Laura B. Hollman, Esq.Attorney for DefendantThe Fairbanks CompanyMcGivney &Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456 .

SO ORDERED

Page 75: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

.>

I• C' ' ~V*'7 .ÿ»*».—"

Page 76: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_INRE: NEW YORK COUNTY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

ALEXANDER PODHAJSKIAND

KATHERINE PODHAJSKI

l.A.S. Partjo

Index No.: 190178/14,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Flowserve Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practiee Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Flowserve Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and

there heing no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all elaims and cross claims against

defendant, Flowserve Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs. lEODated: N orkyNew York

covÿ gu£

JostAttoiAlex;

The Williams Law Firm,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10167(212) 668-1122

Podhajski

Laura Hollman, Esq.Attorney for DefendantFlowserve CorporationMcGivney &Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,

HON.ton

PETER - J.S.C,

7Ji-l/IS951-1014

Page 77: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

jmmt-

Page 78: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

JAMES J. LEVEROCKAND

CHARLOTTE LEVEROCK

l.A.S. PartÿO

Index No.: 190242/14,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs5 complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in tbis action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, tbat upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and eross elaims against

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New Yorkÿ

i2015

f'L£MAR 3 0 2015

«ÿS5JSE

Attorney for Plaintiff(s) —ÿ

James J. Leveroek and Charlotte LeveroekWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

office

K&pya&n*M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating Corp.McGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,

2383-30133

Page 79: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

bC] f'r, n~ Or,nac'-+-0j/f

flpPPPÿB*

Page 80: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part$5~ÿ(IItillu,J.) ÿ

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190379/14,

JAMES J. BELLAND

MARGARET BELL NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Flowserve Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Flowserve Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and

there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Flowserve Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without eosts. filedDated:

ms o

rney roe-Plaintiffs)2S J. Bell and Margaret BellWilliams LawFirm,P.C.

lOUNTV

Laura B. Hollman, Esq.Attorney roe-Plaintiffs) Attorney for DefendantJames J. Bell and Margaret Bell Flowserve CorporationThe Williams LawFirm,P.C. \ McGivney&Kluger,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th Floor 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10167 New York, New York 10004(212) 668-1122 (212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,_ )1

951-1020

Page 81: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

'•<y ;

ÿa-c-t" '"'V-Hvnr-.-'>31 nn.,

Page 82: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

rN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:VrVTAN MARTY,AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE

estate OF HOWARDE.MARTY,andVIVIANMARTY,Individually

NYCAL ÿl.A.S. ParKS)(W&R4)

Index No: 190067/11

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant UnionCarbide Corporation, with prejudice,

and there beingno opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all elaims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

_.2015

FILEMAR 3 0 2015

NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICI

•! .. CharlesTefgusÿi >VpjZ jLÿOTNBERGv PjC.f "-

Attorneys for 'Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavitz,TEsq.DARGFR ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

HON

?//z//Speter H.m°ulJ°.c.

Page 83: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

M07j»»:J

ÿH"3r3l.HOH

L

Page 84: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

JAMES R. REYNOLDSAND

JEAN REYNOLDS

NYCALI.A.S. ParÿO(Heitler, J.)

Index No.: 113781/02,106690/02

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courtcr & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Praetiee Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter &, Company, Inc., with prejudice in this aetion,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-dcfendants, all claims and cross elaims against

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York,\New YorkFt

3 F2-1 .2015

UimpjhAMAttorney for PIaintiff(s)James R. Reynolds and Jean ReynoldsWeitz & Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

ÿits 3

jgss*«*

Caitlin Bell, Esq.Attorney for DefendantCourter &, Company, Ine.McGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,

HON. PSTSR H. MOUtTON1122-6213

Page 85: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

-H h •ri.iq .mom

Page 86: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

-X

-XThis document relates to:

JOHN RESKER

NYCALI. A. S. Part30(Heitler, J.)

Index No.: 104081/08

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

-X

WHEREAS, Defendant FLOWSERVE CORPORATION ("FLOWSERVE") requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against FLOWSERVE, without prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

FLOWSERVE, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and withoÿccÿtsjÿ EDMAR 3 0 2015

Dated: New York, NewYork3h~Z]20 15

NEW YORKCLERK'S OFFICE

hTichoTas"Novack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG LLP800 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counselfor Plaintiff

Laura Hollman, Esq.McGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005Counselfor Flowserve Corporation

SO ORDERED, iizjis

HON. PETER H; MOULTON

{00355716.DOCX}

Page 87: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

MOTJUCM H XTt'W HON.O P: »;

Page 88: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_

NYCALIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

NICHOLAS COMODO

I.A.S, Part(Heitler, J.)

Index No.: 1 15499/02, 108752/99,111191/96

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there

being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

ew York, New6 &\ ,

Dated: Ne\y York, New York2015

FILEMAR 3 0 2015

NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Attorney for Plaintiffs)Nicholas ComodoWeitz & Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

KerryafiTrM. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTreadwell CorporationMcGivney & Kjluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

?/'T-/lS

HON.peter H.1235-12205

f

Page 89: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

/

laIJUOM -H «3T3q ,MOh

Page 90: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALl.A.S. Part JJ)

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 115499/02,108752/99,

1 1 1 191/96NICHOLAS COMODO

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc.. hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs. filedDated: k

m so 20ÿ

Attorney for Plaintiffs)Nicholas ComodoWeitz & Luxenberg,PC.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Caitlin Bell, Esq.Attorney for DefendantCourter & Company, Inc.McGivney &Kluger,PC.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, ?]n//S

HON.- PETER H. MOUÿON 1122-12733

Page 91: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

mo;,.0.*l. •<< fÿnm .moh

Page 92: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

RODNEY M.CRIEGO,as Executor for

the Estateof ROGERH.CRIEGO

NYCALl.A.S. Part ÿ0(inrrrmi j i)

Index No: 190061/11

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstÿ

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

,2015

uÿ°Charles jÿrgusonjÿsqfÿWEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavit# Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

Page 93: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

HuL/Jw-M K .qÿTaq .UGH.0 2 I.

Page 94: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

ELLENBARRETT AND P/4ILBARRETT

NYCALI.A.S. Part

Index No: 190159/11

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

Fe\>-IS ,2015

&OnrEsÿ. AAam Ccuptc* , ES9 .& LUXENBERG,P.C.

Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavwz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, 311-i-flS

HON. PETER H.

Page 95: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

•"STf' •

•'•1

HC/7_ÿo a.i.

:''' H»3T3q HOH

Page 96: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

Joseph Giancoia

NYCAL >I.A.S. Part®)

)

Index No: 190236/09

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant UnionCarbide Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant UnionCarbide Corporation, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all elaims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without eosts.

Dated: New York, New York file-.2015

New ione,

twoicV

Charles FergusfrnrEsq: Judith A.Charles FergusfrnrEsq:WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, h//~

Page 97: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

Hot•WOH

Page 98: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALl.A.S. Part g)(TUMI i, I)

This Document Relates to:

PaulNardellaIndex No: 190149/09

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are herehy dismissed with prejudice and

without eosts.

Dated: New York, New York

ijv

ergusion, Egg. Kje&

,2015 »•*Charle'TFerguson, Eÿih- Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

HON. PETER H. MoULTONJ.S.Ck

Page 99: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

HOH' bEif:« H' '1.0'A

j

Page 100: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCAL *l.A.S. Part*30(KfftTi'ii , j.)(KfftTTii, j.

This Document Relates to:

Richard BartellNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Index No: 190356/09

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Coiporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without eosts.

Dated: New York, New York

ms « ÿj\f .2015NiVV YQSK

CGUMTt GLEBES OFFICE

Attorneys tor Flaintttt700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Charles Ferguson, Esq,: t3~Au?2f/ bSQ. Judith A. YaVitzTEsq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C/ DARGER ERRANTEDARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLP

Attorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, Qtl J//'7/5'VlON- PeTEB ' J'S'C"

Page 101: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

0

ÿ'Or I'jr.>_

*** .....ÿÿmoh

Page 102: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE;NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Doeument Relates to:

FirminoMarques

NYCALl.A.S, Part §0

Index No: 190058/11

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practiee Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without eosts.

FDated: New York, New York

iH • .2015

-Gharles Ferguson, Esq. & Judith A. YavrdÿBsq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C. DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Union Carbide Corporation700 Broadway 116 East 27lh Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500, . (212)452-5300

SO ORDERED,

hON. PETER H. IWOULTONdvS.C/

Page 103: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

0.2.1,

,.., ,';1 Hÿ .ran .WOH

Page 104: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

rN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

Jorge Hernandez

NYCAL vl.A.S. Part 30

Index No: 190272/09

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,i

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all eo-defendants, all elaims and eross elaims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without eosts.

Dated: New York, New York

_, 2015

3rguson, Esq. Coper, -'i LUXENBERG, P.C. r A

attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavqfz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

HON.PETER H.MOULTON

Page 105: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

i'lGVjVO.'jQ <i r)3T3ÿ MOH.0.2.1

Page 106: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

Gennaro DelPrete

NYCAL1.A.S. PartÿO(

Index No: 190080/09

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs eomplaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all claims and eross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without eosts.

Dated: New York, New York

Fa>. 3ÿ _, 2015

WEITÿr-LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

f \V.It*1*

Jot**Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27lh Street, 12,h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

HON. PETER «.M0UL™c.

Page 107: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

WOTjUom h R3T3q moh

Page 108: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCAL /I.A.S. Part '30

This Document Relates to:Index No: 105993/08

Henry HaeringNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practiee Law and Rules Seetion 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant UnionCarbide Corporation, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without eosts.

Gjgflnesjjpfÿcon, Esq-.JGT.WEjÿ& LUXENBERG, P.C.ÿrfforneys for Plaintiff

laÿecWfi;coarfittfr Coper, JuditbA.WEjÿ& LUXENBERG, P.C. r U DARGER ERRANTEÿrfforneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Union C

Dated: New York, New York

F~ek -3S~ _,2015

ÿrfforneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

Y*w

Page 109: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

•r

• -y

Page 110: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

Stanley Makowski

NYCAL .I.A.S. Part&(HTjilHi,!)

Index No: 104445/08

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant UnionCarbide Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without eosts.

Dated: New York, New York

Charles Fergusen, Esq:WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

CO

Judith A. Yavftz? Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

Page 111: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

M°TJUoWu — —•O.a.L -H .tfOH

Page 112: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALl.A.S. ParH$3

This Document Relates to:

Joseph ErricoNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

Index No: 104141/08

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment inthe above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that uponnotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without eosts.

Dated: New York, New York

Cnaries rerguson-irsq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.

Judith A. .aviw,,1.04.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27(h Street, 12,h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

r-nUNTV

Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

HON. PETER H. M°UL™c

Page 113: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

-- »

I

H n3T3q M°H

Page 114: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

Frank Carlson

NYCAL -I.A.S. PartÿO(J

Index No: 105647/08

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant UnionCarbide Corporation, with prejudice,

and tbere being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without eosts.

Dated: New York, New York

~P{\Q(CitVM 2015

F !LE

Charles FergusonÿEsq,-WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

COUNT/ ewERK'S OFFICE

Judith A. YavitzJyEsq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

HON. PETER H.MOULTON7jl-L.fl

Page 115: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

I'OTJUOM H R3T39 MOH>' r..( .

Page 116: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

JAMES GUCK AND JOAN GUCK

NYCALI.A.S. PartÿS-©(HeitleJvJÿ—1

Index No: ig0368/10

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross

claims against defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York_3/ / 6 ,2015v'F

fife

CO'in P. Guinan, Esq.

LEVY KONIGSBERG LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff800 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10022(212) 605-6200

JojaÿtKan B.ÿKromberg, Esq.CHARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPÿttolrieys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

OULTON

Page 117: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

'"ÿ - * i - f ÿ ÿ V',ri*jsj <;*\

~ÿ~

'wji;: . .jSJ- Vt _

i

Page 118: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

JOSEPH MAETKE

NYCAL ÿl.A.S. Partif)(IlMftlwUri

Index No: 190373/2014

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTced Corporation hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

V *3- 2015

CharlÿiM. Ferguson, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

S0

£0

___.00ÿ0_Jonathan B.Kromberg, Esq. w

DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

Page 119: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

L<* r"\ ,

v* .<-/

! KOa•'ÿV

Page 120: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

VINCENT MARSI and JOSEPHINE MARSI

NYCALI.AJLPartÿ)(I

Index No: 190365/2014

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all elaims and cross elaims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without eosts.

Dated: New York, New York

Zh I 2015 1

Cl'ioi'lcs M. FtilgUbuny-Esg. Jonathans©: Kromberg, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C. DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Union Carbide Corporation700 Broadway 116 East 27lh Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500 (212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

HON.PETER H.MOULTON

Page 121: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

MOTjuom hRirj't HonfO.o.L

Page 122: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALl.A.S. Part

This Document Relates to: Index No: 190268/2014

FRANK P. MIN1CHIN1and RACHELJEANMIN1CHINI

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment

in the ahove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

Joseph tf. WifjTams, Esq*-ÿTHE WHLIAMS LAW F1

,2015

Jonatha

Attorneys for Plaintiffs245 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10167(212) 668-1122

DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLFAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,ULTUN

J.S.C.

Page 123: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders
Page 124: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

VINCENT MARSI and JOSEPHINE MARSI

NYCAL yl.A.S. PartSsi

Index No: 190365/2014

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' eomplaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all eo-defendants, all elaims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without eosts.

Dated: New York, New York

an_,2015 f I

-ass—ÿhnrl™? ÿ Fprgnsnn. Esq. flpuf/fyUfh Jonathan Bÿkxomberg, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. OftWh*- DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation700 Broadway 116 East 27lh Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500 (212) 452-5300

SO OFFERED, ÿ?lli-l15

HOJ1J*EVER.m. MOULTONJ.S.C.

Page 125: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

HGTJuolvi WOHv) a.L

Page 126: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

VINCENT MARSI and JOSEPHINE MARSI

NYCALI.A.S. Part &

index No: 190365/2014

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

. WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, lne. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company

n/k/a Bayer Cropscience, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled ease,

pursuant to Civil Practiee Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' eomplaint against

defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company n/k/a Bayer Cropscience,

lne. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all claims and eross claims against

defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulene AG Company n/k/a Bayer Cropseienee,

lne. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

2015 m» 0

sbu-SSSS-"*F.cq JonathanJBfKromberg, Esq.

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Amehem Produets, lne.700 Broadway 116 East 27lh Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500 (212)452-5300

SO ORDERED,

HONÿg-STMOULTOWijnj/b

Page 127: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

v

"OTJUoMO.S.L M03T3q.MCH

Page 128: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

ROBERT KLATCHand MARIE KLATCH

NYCAL ÿI.A.S. Part 5$(EeiSpr)

Index No: 190312/2014

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without eosts.

Dated: New York, New York

jX) .2015

I*JI IV

H-

JosephTHE WlÿLlAMS LAW FI1Attorneys for Plaintiffs245 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10167(212) 668-1122

FILMAR 3 0 2015

NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Jonathan B. Kromberg, Esq.BARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, ÿyny-?

wv0UL nJ.S.C*

Page 129: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

I

MOTJUOfv] .H«3Tdiq MOH.o.a.i,

Page 130: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

JOSEPH B.BACCARO,JR.

NYCAL .l.A.S. Part 3$)(UCTfcyJ.)

Index No: 190363/2014

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiff's complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New_York, New York

fO ,2015

V TO

%

Joseph F. W4Hiams,~ESq.THE WffllAMS LAW FUAttorneys for Plaintiff245 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10167(212) 668-1122

FSLEDMAR 3 0 2015

MEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Jonathans. Kromberg, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27lh Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

honTeterPm°ulJON

Page 131: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

MOrJUOM HR3T3R MOHU

Page 132: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALl.A.S.Part?

This Document Relates to: Index No: 190178/2014

ALEXANDER PODHAJSKI and KATHERINEPODHAJSKi

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Praetice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all eo-defendants, all claims and eross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: " 1 w 1 Ff LEO

Joseph(PjJÿVTlUams, Esq.THE WILLIAMS LAW

MAR 3 0 2015

NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Attorneys for Plaintiffs245 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10167(212) 668-1122

Jonathan B.Kromberg, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27,h Street, 12,h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, -—WipiMfNlOULTONHON. PETEK j.S.C.

Page 133: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

ÿOTjuom h !-0.e.tM -ÿh3Tdq M0H

Page 134: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

TN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOSLITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

WILLIAM J. NEWMAN & NORMAN NEWMAN

NYCAL —I.A.S. Part£D(Heitler, J.)

Index No: 190425/12

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC, formerly known as Dana Corporation

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Praetice Law

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Dana Companies,

LLC, formerly known as Dana Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Dana Companies, LLC, formerly known as Dana Corporation be and the same are

hereby dismissed with prejudice and without eosts.

Dated: New York, New York

~$llU .2015

FILEDMAR 3 0 201SNEW YdFlK

COUNTY dlERFt'S ©FFiCf

John P. Guinan, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff800 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10022(212) 605-6200

Jonathatyp' Kromberg, Esq.DARQER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC, formerlyknown as Dana Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

y\ON-

•Ini5

Page 135: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

HqhH .M«n„ '''yC

* -Onrj0ii

9'V.

Page 136: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

William J. Newman & Norman Newman

NYCALIAS. Partfe(Heitler, J.)

Index No: 190425/12

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross

claims against defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York,/New York,2015

orK,/iNe\

3//(o

John P. Guinan, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff800 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10022(212) 605-6200

nleMAR 3 0 2015

YORKeOtJNTY GijRK'S OFFICE

Jonath'an B. Kromberg, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

VAOH-P

Page 137: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

c

* /Uo-- <•*»fr)47 i.'7

Page 138: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOSLITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

GEORGE P. LEWIS

NYCALI.A.S. Part$)(Heitler, J.)

Index No: 190191/13

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiee and

without eosts.

Dated: New York, New York

3/iU ,20)5

F8 LEMAR 30 2015NEW YORKOUNTY CLERK'SOFFICE

lohn P. Guinan, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff800 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10022(212) 605-6200

SO ORDERED,

Judith ÿYavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttÿneys for Union Carbide Corporation1 IffEast 27th Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

HON

?jalis-

Page 139: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

frofrr b-..,,u. "r.ÿ c-• ÿ.'O/ ?f f f" " ÿ '• /

5*•ftfj

Page 140: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOSLITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

GEORGE P. LEWIS

NYCALl.A.S. Pari

-fHeitler,

Index No: 190191/13

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York3/1(3 ,201s

file"Ai> a » m

°PPIGEn P. Guinan, esq.

LEVY KONIGSBERG LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff800 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10022(212) 605-6200

Jonathaiyk' Kromberg, Esq.

DARKER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12,h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED

Page 141: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

/ **

O p , ÿ**7 L> ,-_

*o«

Page 142: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

r

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

HARRY MOORE and MARY MOORE,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, INC.,et al., includingBLACKMER,

Defendants.

NYCAL

Index No. 190288/13

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

fileMAR 8 0 20)5

NSw YORKCOUNTY CLIfWa OFFICE

WHEREFORE, defendant Blackmer hereby requests summary judgment in the above-

entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practiee Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against defendant Blackmer with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Blaekmer be and the same are bereby dismissed with prejudiee and without eosts.

Dated o/k, New York

Joseph P.245 Park Avenue - 39lh FloorNew York, New York 10167Attorneysfor PlaintiffsAlexander andKatherine Podhajski(212) 668-1122

SO ORDERED,Mom Sh

MALABY & BRADLEY, LLC

Gritee De Mario, Esq.1sfajiroadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038Attorneysfor Defendant Blackmer(212) 791-0285

oMsJ.s.c.

Page 143: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

k£<rn U- - rs'CmnriQu

Page 144: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

ASHWORTH DOWE,

Plaintiff,

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL,including, MORSE DIESEL, INC.

Defendants,

NYCALl.A.S. Part><5<S"0(Heitler, I)

Index No. 190159/13

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

F!L EMAR 80 2015

NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-elaims against defendant

Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York,2015

MAs—-JDavkhHÿarry, Esq. %f/ •

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC. V

Attorneysfor PlaintiffAshworth Dowe700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Rosario Chetta,Rosario Chetta, esq.MALABY & BRADLEY, LLCAttorneysfor DefendantMorse Diesel, Inc.150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038(212) 791-0285

SO ORDERE

j.s.c

Dated:-ÿ /(X.

4

Page 145: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

• k./ 'i, n.:i <•1o

Page 146: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_____

x

IN RE NEW YORK CITY NYCALASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A. S. Partÿtf

(Hoitlon J.) ÿ

____x

ROBERT V. KESAR and MARILYN KESAR, Index No. 190020-201S

Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY-against- JUDGMENT

FiLEDA.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS Co. et al., includingSUPERIOR BOILER WORKS, INC., g q

Defendants. NEW YORK

_________X COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

WHEREFORE, defendant SUPERIOR BOILER WORKS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against SUPERIOR BOILER WORKS, INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

SUPERIOR 80ILER WORKS, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: New York, Ntew Ybrk

- 6!7/0H

Patti Burshtyn, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

Ax ÿ -_Tasha LaSpina, Esq.Malaby & Bradley, LLCAttorneys for Superior Boiler Works, Inc.150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, NY 10038

°"WRE0-H

Page 147: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

<TV"

o.a.t,

Page 148: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK-COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCAL

MAUREEN MUCCI,

Plaintiff,

-against-

AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION as successor bymerger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., et al., includingBLACKMER,

Defendants.

Index No. 190371/13

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Blackmer hereby requests summary judgment in the above-

entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Seetion 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against defendant Blackmer with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross elaims against

defendant Blaekmer be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New

ILLIA

Joseph RWAllama/Esq.245 Park Averiue - 39lh FlooiNew York, New York 10167'Attorneysfor PlaintiffsAlexander and Katherine Podhajski(212) 668-1122

FS LEDMAR 3 0 2015

NEW YORKMALABY & BRADLEY, I<§<§jntY CLERK'S OFFICE

ee De Mario, Esq.50 Broadway, Suite 600

New York, New York 10038Attorneysfor Defendant Blackmer(212) 791-0285

SO ORDERED, V'7'/1 c

Page 149: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

«oe,t H HrlTBq .itOK

Page 150: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALIAS Part 30

X (Heitler, J.)INRE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

RAYMOND J. TURNER and ROSE TURNER INDEX NO:190038/2014

Plaintiff(s),

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al

-against- NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION

Defendant(s) AND ORDERX

WHEREFORE, defendant Armstrong International, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled action, pursuant to CPLR3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant

Armstrong International, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

Armstrong International Ine., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without eosts.

Dated: White Plains, New York

THOMAS M/feÿVENTANOLa Sorsa & BeneventanoAttorney for Defendant

Bellueÿ& Fox LLPAttorney for Plaintiff

La Sorsa & BeneventanoAttorney for DefendantARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL,INC.3 Barker Avenue, White Plains,NY 10601Tel: (914) 682-3300

546 Fifth Avenue - 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Tel: (212) 681-1575

SO ORDERED,

BonTÿÿ-tooui-tonJ.SiC*

MAR 3 0 2015

NEW YORKeOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Page 151: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

rl RBT3q '/iOH

Page 152: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

ROBERT TEAGUE,

NYCALIAS Part J0S*2>

/C£INDEX NO: 190131/2013

-against-

Plaintiff(s), NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

3M COMPANY, Individually andas Successor to MinnesotaMiningandManufacturing Company,et al.

Defcndant(s)X

WHEREFORE, defendant Armstrong International,Inc.hereby requests summary judgment

inthe above entitled action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant

Armstrong International, Inc.with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

Armstrong International Inc.,be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DatedrWhite:\

ains,New York

BeMuck & Fox LLPAttorney for Plaintiff5&6 Fifth Avenue -4Ui FloorNew York, NY 10036Tel: (212) 681-1575

THOMAS M. BENEVENTANOLa Sorsa & BeneventanoAttorney for DefendantARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL,INC.3 Barker Avenue, White Plains,NY 10601Tel: (914) 682-3300

SO ORDERED,

Page 153: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

V MOli

Page 154: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NYCALCOUNTY OF NEW YORK IAS Part yd

X .(Heitler, J..)INRE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

SULPICE CHAMBLIN AND ELSIE CHAMBLIN INDEX NO: 190262/13

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

3M COMPANY, Individually and as Successor to MinnesotaMiningandManufacturing Company, et al.

Defendant(s)X

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Armstrong International, Ine. hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant

Armstrong International, Ine.with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all elaims and cross-claims against defendant

Armstrong International Ine.,be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: White Plains,New YorkJyCcrAhpx SO,

Be/mack & Fox LLPAttorney for Plaintiff546 FifthAvenueNew York, NY 10036Tel: (212)681-1575

4th Floor

THOMAS M. BENEVENTANOLa Sorsa & BeneventanoAttorney for DefendantARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL,INC.3 Barker Avenue, White Plains,NY 10601Tel: (914) 682-3300

SO ORDERED

QULTONJ.S.C.

OOÿ

Page 155: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

1 •»

I

I

' Kgtjul.,. (-{'niii'sqo.a.i,

MOM

Page 156: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

MAUREENWRIGHT, as Administratrixfor the Estateof WILLIAM WRIGHT

NYCALI.A.S. Part(Iloitlcr, J.)

Index No: 190440/11

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Seetion 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs. F IL: New Yprk, New York

2015: New Yp

Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

MAR 3 0 2015

NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

Page 157: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

f

HOTJUOM M K3T3q .MOW

Page 158: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALl.A.S. Part#5°(Hoitlcr, J.)

This Document Relates to:Index No: 107168/02

DonaldD.Wilson NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,

and there beingno opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without eosts. F S L D

& LUXENBERG, P.C.vitz, Esq.

MAR 8 0 2015

NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Frank Qrtiz/fcsefc, ÿWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C

Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27lh Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, A-

H0KWEffÿQULJsC.

Page 159: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

> A

MOTJUCM\H'ÿ3T3«? .WOK.o.e.t

Page 160: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. PartjXfG"5

This Document Relates to: Index No: 107168/02

DonaldD.Wilson NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc.,hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant Amchem Products, Inc., with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Amchem Products, Inc.,he and the same are herehy dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

FIL

Judith A. YavitzTHslFrank Ortiz, Esq.

MAR 3 0 2015

NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,ÿ/2ÿ ÿ/( l/IS

fegygft H. MOULTON

Page 161: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

MOTJJOM H H3Tijq .MOk• 'C.o

Page 162: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

MARY G. WELLDORN,as Administratrixfor the Estateof JOHN TOTH

NYCALI.A.S. Part y6ÿ(Heitler, J.)

Index No: 190457/10

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without eosts.

—Dated: New York, New York_,2015

tiz, Esq.Frank OrtizWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

FILEMAR 3 0 2015

NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Judith A. YavitzTEsq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

MOULTONJ.S.C,

3/\yis

Page 163: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

/\ /I/

,/•

MCTJUCM .H A3r3«l .HOH.Del.

Page 164: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

JOHN SULLIVAN

NYCALl.A.S. Part Kf(Heitler, J.)

Index No: 110130/98

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Seetion 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

New Yqrk, New York,2015

Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

FILMAR 3 0 2015

NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, moultoN 3//yÿr

Page 165: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

/ f

*j.a->0,ÿ-j i'i 'I.ii3H HQi-i

Page 166: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

JOHN SULLIVAN

NYCALI.A.S. Part yt S~°(Haitlcr, J.-)

Index No: 111065/98

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York MAR 3 0 2015

Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Judith A. Yavitz, tisq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27lh Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300----x/n /, <SSiÿLTON ÿ US

Page 167: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

* -A/> "V- „ j

ÿ0Tjyof.j

Page 168: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE:NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

JOHN SULLIVAN

NYCALI.A.S. Part #6®

Index No: 111065/98

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc.,hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant Amchem Products, Inc.,with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Amchem Products, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

FILEwithout costs.

Dated-New-YorL New YorkJew-York. New YorktPQ /U .2015

Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,Hon. Sherry K. Hoitlcr.

HON- PETER H.MOULTONJ.S.C.

•3/t Vts

Page 169: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

W*.* * «, «». 0*w .it.D 3I

Page 170: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

EILEENC,SKELTON, Individuallyand asExecutrix for theEstateof DONALD T,

SKELTON

NYCALI.A.S. Partus'0(Hertlefr*}Index No: 103009/08

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without eosts.

Dated: New York, New York FILEIS2015

Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C,

Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500

MAR 3 0 2015

Niw YORKCOUNTY eURk'S OFFICE

Judith A. Yavitz/Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

Page 171: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

'V

»•> , • .- L-

Page 172: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

t

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xInRe: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

—xThis Docnment Relates To:

Frank Ayala and Margarita Ayala,

."•"Jl5partNYCALI.A.SPart3ft 5"(Iltillu,J.)"

P)Index No,: 190524-11

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

3D

WHEREFORE, defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against CARRIER CORPORATION, with prejudice, and there

being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without eosts.

Dated: New York, New Yorki: New YorK. New Yop-

t)anaM. Northeraft,Weitz & Luxenberg P.C.Attorney for Defendant700 BroadwayNew York, New York 1 0003

FILEMAR 30 2015vpv

COUNTY CLERK'o OFFICEVirginia Squitieri, Esq.WLLSON, ELSER, MOSKOW1TZEDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantCARRIER CORPORATION150 East 42nd StreetNew York, New York, 10017FileNo. 10557.01217

SO ORDEREDarwiouLTON

J.S.C.

3(1x/,5

L_ _

Page 173: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

MOTjUOSW A i P.313H HUH.CJ.c.t

Page 174: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALl.A.S. Part6o

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190093/09,

IRVING BERGSOHNNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this aetion, and there

being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all claims and eross claims against

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York.2015

.JJSSS'TfOWr\ ortiz.Attorney for Plaintiffs)Irving BergsohnWeitz & Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Attorney for DefendantTreadwell CorporationMcGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, l/lT-llS

1235-22809

Page 175: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders
Page 176: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALl.A.S. Part lx)(ttciiwiÿJ.)

This Document Relates to:

Index No.: 190093/09,

IRVING BERGSOHNNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courtcr & Company, lne., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs5 complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

file©Dated: New York, New YorktmiT ,2015

•viQiwfi

s\N yQftK

Attorney for P!aintiff(s)Irving BergsohnWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Caitlin Bell, Esq.Attorney for DefendantCourter & Company, lne.McGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED, _?//?/ is

1122-23192

Page 177: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

7*Oÿ-ÿs

'r .

J » i

•foA,'

Page 178: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALl.A.S. Part

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 107221/02,

EDWARD S. BARRIOAND

FRANCES BARRIO NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., herehy requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York±fl)QlS_,2015

Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Edward S. Barrio and Frances BarrioWeitz <£. Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Nicole Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman LiquidatingCorp.mcGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,

2383-25559C

Page 179: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

-Hÿ .< -Jr

l-; i1JUGM -H n27a? >*GH

Page 180: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.COUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALl.A.S. PartÿO(Hate?*)

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 107221/02,

EDWARD S. BARRIOAND

FRANCES BARRIO NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there

being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same arc hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

-ttQWA Ottu-

Dated: New York, New York,2015

KeiAttorney for DefendantTreadwell CorporationMcGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Edward S. Barrio and Frances BarrioWeitz &. Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500

SO ORDERED, —1235-5910

Page 181: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

ÿ • J* ,

(ÿ'

Page 182: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

EDWARD S. BARRIOAND

FRANCES BARRIO

NYCAL .l.A.S. Part|p

Index No.: 107221/02,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this aetion,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York-veb \T .2015

TfQNf)Attorney for Plaintiffs)Edward S. Barrio and Frances BarrioWeitz 8l Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

a#*0*Caitlin Bell, Esq.Attorney for DefendantCourter & Company, Inc.McGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

3//2.//S"

HON. PETER H.MOUL.TOWJ.S>C*

1122-6405

Page 183: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

i%,

y'0\ wGA) .H HliTiiq HOH•0.3.t

i

-

Page 184: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_

NYCALIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

DAVID JOSEPH BARNESAND

TERRY L. BARNES

l.A.S. Part<56(ngUllniEJ.)

Index No.: 114779/04,106578/02

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs5 complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without eosts.

Dated: New York, New YorkVftVÿ ,2015

F!LEMAR 3 0 2015

NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

ÿQ(\WWmAttorney for Plaintiff(s)David Joseph Barnes and Terry L. BamesWeitz & Luxenbcrg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Nicole Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating Corp.McGivney &Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,

HON.P

?,

moulton1l-LjI:

2383-27010

Page 185: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

ft

Page 186: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_

NYCALIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

DAVID JOSEPH BARNESAND

TERRY L. BARNES

l.A.S. Part4)0(Ffeatanÿ-J.)

Index No.: 114779/04,106578/02

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Trcadwcll Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

eomplaint against defendant, Treadwel! Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there

being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and eross claims against

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are herehy dismissed with prejudiee and

without eosts.

Dated: New York, New YorkrgO\S_.2015 file

ms oNEW YOW

-nQt\YS QCtiz-Attorney for Plaintiff(s)David Joseph Barnes and Terry L. BarnesWeitz & Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

COUNTYKerÿaau-MÿCook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTreadwell CorporationMcGivney &Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456-

SO ORDERED,

HON.PE.T£R H- W°ULJ.S.C.1235-8008

Page 187: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders
Page 188: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS L1T1GATJON

This Doeument Relates to:

DAVID JOSEPH BARNESAND

TERRY L. BARNES

1.AJ3. PartiJxTÿ)

Index No.: 114779/04,106578/02

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Praetiee Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and eross elaims against

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without eosts.

Dated: New York, New York

VShLS—,2015

n-t0f\ViAttorney for Plaintiffs)David Joseph Barnes and Terry L. BarnesWeitz &. Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

FILEMAR 3 0 2015NEW YORK

GLgftK'8 0FFI6E

ÿaitlin Bell, Esq.Attorney for DefendantCourter & Company, lne.McGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

7.plisHON, PETER H.MOULTON

J.S.C. 1122-8505

Page 189: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

P'ttjtf

MOTJUOM ,H HDTÿq ,1/1Oil.0.3.1

Page 190: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.COUNTY OF NEW YORK_IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Doeument Relates to:

CALVIN W. ANDREASS1AND

IDA D. ANDREASS1

l.A.S. Parkjio"

Index No.: 114995/98,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and eross claims against

..defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs. FILEDMAR 3 0 2015

Dated: New York, New York

- 2015

NEW YORK/COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Calvin W. Andreassi and Ida D. AndreassiWeitz & Luxenberg,PC.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

]aaj6LNicole Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating Corp.McGivney &Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,

HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C. 2383-23475

Page 191: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

y/ WO

m ii iwMiiii>rrfflttTWiiyfl i

i ÿ"C/iVi .."t W.j , „j v. 0-<S.L

Page 192: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

CALVIN W. ANDREASS1AND

IDA D. ANDREASSl

NYCALl.A.S. PartJlO '

/I 1-1ÿ.1--I •>

Index No.: 114995/98,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courier <£_ Company, Inc., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Courter &. Company, Inc., be and the same are herchy dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkNew York, New Yori«

\K~ .2015

FILEMAR 3 0 2015

NEW YORKOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

riUufLAttorney for Plaintiff(s)Calvin W. Andreassi and Ida D. AndreassiWeitz & Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

.aitlhfbell, Esq.Attorney for DefendantCourter & Company, Inc.McGrvNEY &Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED

HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C. 1122-7357

L

Page 193: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

0ÿv

67.fiHj* tn«9fyff'ÿÿfr f

ÿ»»ÿV,.«ÿjj,J_j,,i«v, i

I,\

Page 194: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCAL

ÿ

l.A.S. Part(3$0(HeM»»fc)

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 1 14995/98,

CALVIN W. ANDREASSIAND

IDA D. ANDREASSI NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there

being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without eosts. FILEDDr ' w- w- k

MAR 3 0 2015

NEW YORK"ounty clerksoffice

naMAAttorney for Plaintiffs)Calvin W. Andreassi and Ida D. AndreassiWEITZ & LUXENBERG,PC.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Attorney for DefendantTreadwell CorporationMcGivney &Kluger,PC.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,

HON.PETER H.MOULTON 1235-6861

Page 195: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

NASmi,M«AAX'aU

'-''ÿ'ÿJ ,1,0,<£M

' 1 '' " *'•' i!Or/

Page 196: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

t

TMe:CC(jpk)2/13/15

Our File NoS-5027-01

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE:NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION,

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

Thomas Kimkowski

NYCALI.A.S. PartnerSo(IlcitlciW.)

INDEXNO.101889/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Praetiee Law

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company ofNew York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company ofNew York, Inc., be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York 2/23jIS

. —-"Than Alvarado, Esq.WE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

Timothy tyyMcCann, Esq.DAVID M. SANTORO, ESQ.Attorney for DefendantConsolidated Edison Company of NewYork, Inc.4 Irving PlaceNew York, NY 10003-3598

SO ORDERED:Hon. Sherry Klein HfHON-pETE ' ' * "3/W(S

FILEMAR 3 0 2015

NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Page 197: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

*I

tfOrjUUfvlM fl:JTi3'>.o.e.t' ÿ0/./

Page 198: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALIAS Part

ÿX (Hcitler, JfrINRENEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

THOMAS LEAHY and EVELYNLEAHY INDEX NO: 190162/09

Plaintiff(s),

3M COMPANY, et al.

-against-NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

Defendant(s)X

WHEREFORE, defendant Armstrong International, Inc.hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant

Armstrong International, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

Armstrong International Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: White Plains, New York

THOMAS M.ÿENEÿENTANOLa Sorsa & BeneventanoLa Sorsa & BeneventanoAttorney for DefendantARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL,INC.3 Barker Avenue, White Plains, NY 10601Tel: (914) 682-3300

Attorney for Plaintiff546 Fifth Avenue -4Ih FloorNew York, NY 10036Tel: (212) 681-1575

Page 199: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

motjucm .Hÿir.rnn mom.or i> ÿ

Page 200: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALIAS PartX6ÿ6

X (Hcitlcr, J.-)-INRE NEW YORK COUNTYASDESTOS LITIGATION lTHOMAS LEAHY and EVELYN LEAHY INDEX NO: 190162/09

Plaintiff(s),

3M COMPANY, ct al.

-against-NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

Defcndant(s)X

WHEREFORE, defendant Armstrong International, Inc.hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant

Armstrong International,Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

Armstrong International Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: White Plains, New York

THOMAS M.ÿENEÿENTANOLa Sorsa & BeneventanoAttorney for DefendantARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL,INC.3 Barker Avenue, White Plains, NY 10601Tel: (914) 682-3300

Attorney for Plaintiff546 Fifth Avenue - 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Tel: (212) 681-1575

SO ORDERED, S XSv ÿ

J.S.C.

Page 201: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

r

MOTJilOM .M ri;lT-V'J MOW,0.2.1

Page 202: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE 0F NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

"his Document Relates To:

NYCALl.A.S. Part2Qr£'D

(FfciRci', J.)~

Index No: 127888/02102380/03

Glenn Limburg

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY,with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs. mm

n — fILEDated: j t"ÿ1' ÿ

New York, NY

Frank Ortiz, Esq.WE1TZ <5L LUXENBERG PCAttorney for Plaintiff700 Broadway, 7th FloorNew York, NY 10003

MM 3 0 2015

OFRCsVirginia Squicrcri, Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantA.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY150 East 42nd StreetNew York, NY 10017File No. 05335.29709

SO ORDERED,

k MOULTONJ.S.C.

65 1 5789v. I

Page 203: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

MOTJu'GM .H RBTBq .MOM.0.8.L

I

Page 204: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

James R. Reynolds

NYCAL.I.A.S.Pait>0

(HfritllTj I)

Index No: 106690/021 13781/02

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section3212. dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY,with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.

oi —(,sNew York, NY

Dated:

Hank Ortiz, Esc£ hfoJD$Vtyt?\-0&CfctQWEITZ & LUXENBERG PCAttorney for Plaintiff700 Broadway,New York, NY 10003

7lh Floor

fil

Virginia Squitieri. Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantA.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY150 East 42nd StreetNew York, NY 10017File No. 05335.25352

MAR 3 0 2015

NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

SO ORDERED,

HON.hETER H. M0UL.T0NJ.S.C.

3/<*/i s

65 15858v.1

Page 205: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

f

T2*CHOiT bE.LEB H* WOHfiOM

Page 206: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part

ÿ(Hcitlerÿ J.).x

fhis Document Relates To: Index No: 190387/11

George Endelmann, as Administrator for the Estate of AnnEndelmann

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER

x

WHEREFORE, defendant CARRIER CORPORATION hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CARRIER CORPORATION withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-dcfcndants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant CARRIER CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.

±J1_ÿCLERK'S OFFICEVirginia Squitieri, Esq. COUNTY 0Virginia Squitieri, Esq. COUNTYWILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLP

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorney for Plaintiff700 Broadway, 7th FloorNew York, New York 10003 CARRIER CORPORATION

150 East 42nd StreetNew York, New York 10017File No: 10557.01093

Attorney for Defendant

SO ORDERED,_ '

honTÿITh.moulton

5595689v.I

Page 207: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

ÿ ÿ r ' ' % -' MOTJ'Jo:*: >i .-.aTjrt .YIOK.o.a.u

i

L

Page 208: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

NYCALl.A.S. PartX CO(Hcitlcr, J.) ÿ

Index No: 190413/11100904/03105028/03

Francis Goes and Senta Goes NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, incorrectly s/h/a "CARRIERCORPORATION, Individually, and as successor in interest to BRYANT HEATING &COOLING SYSTEMS" (hereinafter "CARRIER CORPORATION"), hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CARRIER CORPORATION withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all codefendant CARRIER CORPORATION, beand without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

•defendants, all claims and cross claims againstand the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

Daniol Blouin, Esq. f*.WE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorney for Plaintiff700 Broadway, 7th FloorNew York, New York 10003

FILEMAR 3 0 2015NEW YORK

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

'irginia Squiteri, Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOW1TZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantCARRIER CORPORATION150 East 42"d StreetNew York, New York 10017File No: 10557.01102

SO ORDERED,

"°"hSpet'STh.moulton5595728V. I

Page 209: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

tiOTJUi.s; ! *; a; i ... ,.0.2.1 ' ' -*"OH

Page 210: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

jG

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK 000ÿÿoff,csIN RENEW YORK. CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S.ParUStfgÿ{Heitler, J.)

This Doeument Relates To: Index No: 127888/02102380/03

GLENN L1MBURG NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant MCCORD CORPORATION, hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant MCCORD CORPORATION with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant MCCORD CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

Frank Ortiz, Esq. sWE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorney for Plaintiff700 Broadway, 71New York, New York 10003

Floor

Armand Kalfayan, Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantMCCORD CORPORATION1 50 East 42nd SlreelNew York, New York 10017File No: 06507.01010

SO ORDERED,MOULTON 3/(l/(S

j.s.c.

,6604933v. 1

Page 211: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

N '.in- ,•o.a.L H

L

Page 212: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK-—- XINRE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X

ÿ$>

GERLINDE TYNAN, Individually and as PersonalRepresentative for the Estate of WILLIAM S.TYNAN,

Plamtiff(s),

-against-

A. 0. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.

Defendants.

Index No. 102033/01

cO'J

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

IAS Part SO

-X

WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all elaims and cross claims

against Goodyear Canada Ine. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs

LYNCHDASKALEMERY LLPAttorneys fotJpefendant Goodyear Canada Ine.

By: SJLJULM-e

700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

264 west 40lh StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED:HonTine:HON. P

i/it-IisivJ

J.S.C,

Page 213: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

ilvJ i ..0-3 L

Page 214: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XINRE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX

IMOGENE ARONE, as Personal Representative forthe Estate of RALPH ARONE,

Plaintiffs),

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.X

FILEMAR 3 0 2015

NYCALNiW YORK

COUNTY GLlRK'S OFFICEIndex No.: 190107/09

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon.IAS Partÿe 5"°

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkNew York, New York

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys fojJilainti]

By:..Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.

700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &

ubber Company and GqoÿyeaÿCanada Inc.

Lawrence G. Lee,

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED: AHorn

HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

Page 215: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

MO !'Jbuif«i .vioh"> o I

Page 216: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

FILEDSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK m8 0 2015

NiW YORKCOUNTY CLlRK'S OFFICENEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCAL

CHARLES BAGGIANO and LOUISEBAGGIANO,

Index Nos.: 106480/93132-167/93100387/03

Plaintiffs),

-against-NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,Hon. Shiny Klein Heiller,IAS Part.30 S&Defendants.

X

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Ine. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all elaims and cross elaims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without eosts.

Dated: New York\ New YorkNew York\ New York

7, X)5

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys fotjikuntiff, Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &

Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada)Ine.

Frank M. Ortiz, Esq. Lawrenee G. Lee, Esq,

700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212)302-2400

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED

Page 217: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

AkJ:

I'J

* "'OW

Page 218: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

fileSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XINRE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X

NYCAL

MAR 3 0 2015NEW YORK

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

LOIS CARLSEN, as Executrix for the Estate ofCARL T. CARLSEN, and LOIS CARLSEN,Individually,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.

Index Nos.: 116747/07034783/92

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Sherry Klein llcitlcr,IAS Part Kf

X

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all eo-defendants, all elaims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudiee and without costs.

Dated: New YoiNew York, New YorkW\0fCrÿ?0»5

WE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

By:_Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.

700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &Rubber ffompany and Goodyfpr Canada Inc.

%By:Lawrenee G. Lee

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED: PiytOULTQN O/iz/fSeitler, J.S.C3.S.C.

Page 219: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

o

>-'/> ->V , '' - V 7

WOTJLJ°M .H HSTSq.ti

Page 220: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

In Re: New York City Asbestos Litigation

MATTHEW J. CARR as Executor for the Estate ofJAMES WILLIAM CARR, and MATTHEW J. CARRas Executor for the Estate ofJANET A. CARR,

X

X

NYCAL

Plaintiff(s),

•against-

A.C. AND S, FNC., et ah,

Defendants.

Index No.: 111089ÿ OS1.

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. ShfirryIAS PartÿOÿc)

X

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire &. Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Ine. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys foÿHÿntiÿfÿ ÿ m Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &

ubber <£pmpany and Goodyear panada Inc.

Lawrence G. Lee, Esc£

264 West 40th Street ÿ \New York, New York 10018 If cv(212) 302-2400

Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.

700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED:HÿSHfoyKToin Hoitlcr, J.S.C.-

Page 221: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

0.3.1. 1 -WOH

Page 222: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

In Re: New York City Asbestos Litigation

WILLIAM A. ESPOS1TO JR, as Administrator forthe Estate of WILLIAM C. ESPOS1TO,

Plaintiffs),

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et a].,

Defendants.

X

X

NYCAL

Index Nos.: 100234/03116291/04

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

Hon. Shciiy Klein Heillei-1AS PartitfSTJ

-X

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkVew York, New York1 5

WE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys faHilainti

By:

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc.

Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.

700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED:

Lawrence G. Lee,

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 1001(212)302-2400

VM&

HrWQUiTON CO,0ÿ

em Henler, JSÿrJ.S.C.

Page 223: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

y

Page 224: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

In Re: New York City Asbestos Litigation

SYLVIA FUGATE, as Personal Exeeutrix for theEstate of FRANKIE FUGATE, and SYLVIA FUGATE,Individually,

Plaintiffs),

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.

X

X

NYCAL

aIndex No.: 190137/00 ÿ7

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

Hon. Shorty Klein Ilcitlcr,IAS PartÿO SO

X

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New Yorki New York.New Yorki New York.

WE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for4UaintifK..

Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.

700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED:

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company and Goodyear £anada Inc.

ByLawrence G. Lee,

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212)302-2400 V-

c0ÿ•fl-1

Page 225: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

* ÿ"N '

ÿ * V

** * • J

MQTJUCivS .;•{ H3'i3.H .MOH*.0.3.1

Page 226: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

InRe: New York City Asbestos Litigation

WILLIAM E. JOYCE and MARTE JOYCE,

Plaintiffs),

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.

X

X

NYCAL

Index No.: 190172/09

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Sherry Iflnin TTrjÿi»r-

1AS Parted S"&X

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all elaims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New Yorki New York(x

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys foÿlaintifL

Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.

700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company and Goodyeat Canada Inc.

Lawrence G. Lee,

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400

Dated: New York, New York

l/n/tf-SO ORDERED: A

QV,

ooÿ

Page 227: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

/ X

4,

* l" »,/ I 2 I 1

' * ' I ,Y » *

.oaf '

' :h< woh

Page 228: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

In Re: New York City Asbestos Litigation

RALPHA. MENENDEZ and MAJOR1E A.MENDENDEZ,

X

X

PIaintiff(s),

-against-

A.C. and S. INC.,etaf,

Defendants.

NYCAL

Index No.: 107208/00

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon.IAS Part yf £"a

X

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodycar Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire &. Rubher

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there heing no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodycar Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

WE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

AttorneÿÿP-RlÿÿtÿÿBy:_

Frank M. Ortiz. Esq.

700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: New York, New York

:y<V(5-SO ORDERED:

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &Ruhber Ccftnpany and Goodyeafl Canada lne.

By:Lawrenee G. Lee,

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 1(212) 302-2400

ltonJ.S.C.

GO'US#**

Page 229: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

fly

r

WOTJUOivl .H R3T3q\M6H-

L

Page 230: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

In Re: New York City Asbestos Litigation

WALTER A. RE1LLY (Dec.),

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.

X

X

NYCAL

Index Nos.: 124356/94,100917/08,124374/94, 115998/95 &111041/98

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon.-Sheuy Klein HeitltJi,IAS Part >0ÿ6

X

WHEREFORE, defendants The GoodyearTire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs eomplaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York(wwYV/mWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys

By:

; fotJUaintifffy ÿ

Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.

700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: New York, New York

W<W<5-SO ORDERED:

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &

ubber Company and Goodyear (fpnada Inc.

y.Lawrence G. Lee, Esq.

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212)302-2400

TLH HrwTOULTON ÿjiS.a goux

Page 231: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

w

/

wcTjuo./i .m \mno.ex

Page 232: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

InRe: New York City Asbestos Litigation

EUGENE E. SCHNETTLER, as Executrix for the Estateof ROY F. SCHNETTLER,

Plaintiffs),

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et ah,

Defendants.

X

X

NYCAL

Index No.: 101812/08

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Shorry Kloin Ilcitlcr,IAS Part CO

ÿX

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without eosts.

Dated: New Yortc, New YorkNew Yortc, New York

vfe (C h v 1 201sWE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.AttorneysJfclSilaii

By:Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.

700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: New York, New York

ya/tS—SO ORDERED:

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company and Gq<5dyear/Canada Ine.

Lawrenee G. Lee,

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10C®(212)302-2400 *

c0

roNJ.S.C.

Page 233: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

. V-

I'SOTjUOi-, h MOM.OZA.

Page 234: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF STATE OF NEW YORK.COUNTY OF NEW YORK.

In Re: New York City Asbestos Litigation

KAREN ANNE KELLY as Administratrix for the Estateof JOSEPH P. SWIADOWSKY,

X

X

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.C. and S. INC., et al.,

Defendants.

NYCAL

Index Nos.: 111218/01115633/01

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Shrrry Klein Ilcillu,IAS Part$

X

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all elaims and eross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorlNew York, New YorklY)i5WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.AttorneysJerr4£Laii

By:Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Cpfnpany and Goodyear Canada Inc.

Lawrence G. Lee, Esqÿ

700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: New York, New York

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212)302-2400

SO ORDERED:GOÿC----J.S.C.

Page 235: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

t w-**

f "•••- 1

-v\ ,

I*r \V I t bi<

,0.2,L-iJL.A M OH ..K<OH

Page 236: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE; NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX

HARRIET BURTON andROBERT BURTON (Dec.),

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et af,

Defendants.

NYCAL

Index No.: 106262/99

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Sherry KlcnrHeuler,IAS Part £"0

•X

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without eosts.

Dated: New Y,ork. New YorkJew York. New York

WE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

By:Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company and Goocbyear Canada lne.

700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: New York, New York

yrz-/fs_

Lawrence G. Lee, Es

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212)302-2400

SO ORDERED

*&

OÿcJ

Page 237: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

•' :mc'h

Page 238: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCAL

<pROSEMAR1E DE MAURO as Administratrix forthe Estate of JOSEPH DE MAURO andROSEMAR1E DE MAURO, Individually,

Index Nos.: 125781/99104731/00

-against-

Plaintiff(s), NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

A C and S, INC., et al.,Hon. ShcrryKleiirHeillerrIAS Partÿ Sc)

Defendants.X

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated.L

WE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorne Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &

Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc.

Frank M. Ortiz, Esq Lawrence G. Lee, Es<

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP

By:

700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212)302-2400

Dated: New York. New York

SO ORDERED

Page 239: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

MO r »? > ' :'»J i .1/04.

Page 240: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX

JOHN J. DUFFY,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

B1RD INCORPORATED, et al.,

Defendants.X

NYCAL

Index No.: 190467/11

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Shoppy Klein Heillei,IAS Part,3ÿ

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DatedUNew york. New York

XjOAÿ2Ax20vSLYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &

WE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

By:M. Ortiz. Esq.Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.

700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED:

Rubber Coippany and Goodyear Canada Ine.

By:Lawrence G. Lee, Esq?

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018 %(212) 302-2400

cPÿ

J.S.C.

Page 241: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

.V

/

HOTJUOW .H H3T3<? MOH,0.3.L

Page 242: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY "

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X

MARGARET L. FABER, as the Executrix for theEstate of LESLIE FABER, and MARGARET L.FABER, Individually,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al,

Defendants.

NYCAL

Index No.: 109988/02

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Sherry Kloin Hcitlcr,IAS PartXT £"C>

•X

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled ease, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Ine. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Ine. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without eosts.

Dated: New-York. New York

v~muoyu,z0 v ÿWE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.AttorneysÿfrNLIaii

By:Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.

700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED:

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants Tbe Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company and GoodyeaijCanada Ine.

By: t

Lawrenee G. Lee,

..oS"

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400

DMJ.S.C.

..ÿ2£JiZ&t.T.zzir .v-

Page 243: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

IAO fjuUivi J-.p.at

i J'4iOH

Page 244: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY :

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X

SHEILA HAMILTON, as Administratrix for theEstate of WILLIE J. HAMILTON,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO, et al,

Defendants.

NYCAL

Index Nos.: 121991/99106178/00

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon.IAS Part y$ S3

X

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire &. Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada lne. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New.York, New York

WE1TZ & LUXENBERO, P.C.Attorneÿ®N£la/ouff

By:

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Cofhpany and GoodvearAjanada Inc.

Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.

700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: New York, New York

Lawrence G. Lee,

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400

ew York, New Y

~>wSO ORDERED:

[ETONJ.S.C.

*

Page 245: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

V

!;OT.!UOr.'i .H P.3Y5*! .KOM°'

Page 246: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX

NORBERT KACZ and AUDREY KACZ,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.C. and S., INC., et al,

Defendants.

NYCAL

Index Nos.: 106709/02115543/02

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Shciiy Klein lliitlu,IAS Part J# SO

X

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Ine. be and the

same are herehy dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New.York, New Yorkÿfhuom

WEITZ &. LUXENBERG, P C.Attorney

By:

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &Rubher Company and Goodyear fianada Inc.

Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.

700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: New York, New York

*ViWV*—

Lawrenee G. Leei

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212)302-2400

SO ORDERED:

F

Page 247: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

ko.'jjjojv: .m ns7Bc! .mo'S "• »*•>r » -.r: MQH

Page 248: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCAL

KOBLER, F1NN1, Individually and HEIDI JEANCOLAN and LOR1ANN ELLEGATE as Co-Adminstratrices for the Estate ofROBERT BURNS KOBLER,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Index No.: 121894/98

Plaintiffs),

-against-

A.C. and S., FNC., et al., Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler,IAS Part J0T S®

Defendants.X

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed witb prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York. New York

WE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendants The GoocWear Tire &

Rubber Gampany and Gooriybar Camada Inc.

By: fJjluJLUjM'Lawrenee G. Lee, Es<Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.

700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED: £ÿ

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400

Page 249: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

K

!40TJUCjV? M RBTBq '.WOH,0.2.1.

Page 250: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XrN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX

HENRY MIKA and ESTHER M1KA,

Plaintiffs),

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et af,

Defendants.

NYCAL

Index No.: 100029/99

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

Hon. Sherry Klein Iieillei,IAS Part 2Ar<£0

X

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire &. Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire <£. Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to- all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: York, New York-2H ,201J

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

By:Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.

LYNCHDASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &Ruhber Company and Goodyear CaiAda Inc.

us

700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: New York, New York3/(L/ (S_

SO ORDERED:

Lawrenee G. Lee, Eÿ

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400

ÿ1#&

J.S.C.

cPOv

Page 251: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

r

MCTJUOM ,H R3T3R .HOB

Page 252: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XrN RE: NEW YORK CITY :

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X

CHARLOTTE F. OCZEK, Individually and asExecutrix for the Estate of ALOISIUS J. OCZEK,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.C. & S., INC., et al.,

Defendants.

NYCAL

Index No.: 101162/99

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon..Shcrry Klein Ilcitlor,IAS Partÿ S-a-

• X

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Datedi_New York, New YorkI- impw York, New York:

ijWE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.

700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: New York, New York

-yrv>5—SO ORDERED:

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Cdftipany and Goodyear Qfinada Inc.

By:Lawrence G. Lee,

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212)302-2400

Hon. Sherry Klein Ilcitlcr,J.s.c.-HON. PETER H. MOULTON

J.SC.

-SSJS-**CGÿ

Page 253: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

*

ÿ'•O \ JviOftf j*i F-fal,0.8.1,

v\ OH

Page 254: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY :

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X

JANE D1SALVO, as Executrix for the Estate ofEDWIN C. WILSON, and ANNE WILSON,Individually,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.C. and S-, INC., et a].,

Defendants.

NYCAL

Index Nos.: 107222/02"ÿ113609/02

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Shcay Klein Heitlei,lASParCKf

• X

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and eross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same arc hereby dismissed with prejudice and without eosts.

Datedr-NÿWrYork, New York(20b

WE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys,£ar Plainkff

By:

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &Ruhbcr/Company and G<(o(jyear Gajnada Inc.

'IFrank M. Ortiz, Esq.

700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Dated: New York, New York

% ...SO ORDERED:

Lawrence G. Lee,

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400

m3 0 lV£>

Page 255: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

1

MOTJUOM >'• HBr.iM .WON,:XSX ...

l

Page 256: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

Salvatore Finazzo

NYCALI.A.S. Partptf.Se>£Hertfei7iT)

Index No: 190129/11

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Praetiee Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs eomplaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all claims and eross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

•2o'5

WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.ÿKSr<ÿ2£eKfr-DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Union Carbide Corporation700 Broadway 116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500 (212)452-5300

SO ORDERED,

J.S.C,V'V-5

Page 257: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

MGTJUCivi .n MOH

Page 258: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

ELBERT HARVEY and WILHELMEHIA HARVEY

NYCALl.A.S.PartXJS°(Heit»err*t-

IndexNo: 104406/2005

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Beazer East, Inc. s/h/a Koppers Industries, Inc., hereby

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Beazer East, Inc., f/k/a Koppers

Company, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Beazer East, Inc., f/k/a Koppers Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed

with prejudice and without costs. F ILDated: New York, New York

3/7 2015NEW YORK

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

MAR 3 0 2015

David J. Ba(iy, Esq. Lm\\MWl>0MiUOWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500

r, Esq.lNTE YAVITZ & BLXU LLP

ftorneys for Beazer East, Ine. s/h/a KoppersIndustries, lne.116 East 27lh Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212)452-5300

SO ORDERED,

HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C,

Page 259: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

f/JTJ'JCM .H Rin3'-i I10K,»ÿ*.> 'd.L

Page 260: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK e\VINRE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

JOHN SULLIVAN

NYCALI.A.S. Part

Index No: 110130/98 COjts*icgofpcs

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant Amchem Products, Inc., with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Amchem Products, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New Yiork, New,Yorkiork, New, 'kizUreo /LA 2015

Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavitz, $fcq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27lh Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212)452-5300

ÿ 31nil5-Hon. Sherry K. Ilcitlor- '

HON.PETER H.w0ULJ°e.

Page 261: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

0 (,yf>; ' •' '

WOVJÿOA} Hfl~....•3.2.1

Page 262: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

This Document Relates to:

INRE: NEW YORK CITY. ASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part(Heitler, J.)

Index No: 109295/08

CHERYLSMITH,AS FOR THE EstateOF

KENNETHALTON SMITHJR., ANDCHERYL SMITH,Individually

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavitz, Esjq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,Ikm.'fihcriy K. Ileilter

HON. PETER H. MQULTON

: ... •• • ' 1

Page 263: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

ttOTJ'jGM -H Fi3T3q -tfOK.o.ax

Page 264: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

GEORGE MITCHELL RUSH, as Exeeutorfor the Estate of GEORGE E. RUSH

FNYCALI.A.S. Part(Heitlcr, J.)

Index No: 190454/10GO'

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Seetion 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross elaims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

rork, New York2015

„ Esq.Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Juditb A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

Page 265: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

UOTJi-0.S i. MQH

Page 266: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALl.A.S. PartXfS"2*

-flleitlu, J.)Index No: 102118/07

This Doeument Relates to:

BILLEJ.ROWLING,AS EXECUTRIX FORTHE

Estateof RAYMONDR.ROWLING,and

BILLIEJ.ROWLING,INDIVIDUALLY

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Praetiee Law and Rules Seetion 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs eomplaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all eo-defendants, all elaims and eross elaims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without eosts.

Dated: New York, New York

~TEh_2_kL,2015

Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500

Ortiz, Esq. Judith A. YavitzfEÿJudith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,Hon. Ouuuy K. Hullo*

HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

Page 267: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

I

ÿ-A-'.-A •' . I '*

vrjiv.ÿ\;, .;•; rirraq moh*\ •} i

Page 268: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALl.A.S. Part(Heitler, }$Index No: 102948/08

LISA M.PIESIK,as PersonalRepresentative for the Estateof

MICHAELRABIDEAU

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Praetice Law and Rules Seetion 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs eomplaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without eosts.

Dated: New York, New York

PhZM .2015

Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500

Judith A. YaviTzÿsq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12,h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, /--—_' 34ftoli.T#rIht'H:moulton

J.S.C>

Page 269: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

4

tfOTJUOM .H H5T3q .MOH.0.2.1

Page 270: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCAL ÿI.A.S. Part/3<f Sb

Index No: 112277/02 ÿ

WILLIAM X PEACH NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Praetice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross elaims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

_, 2015

Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27,h Street, 12,h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,H. mOULTON

Page 271: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

l-10TJUC;V} .H.O.BX

Page 272: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

This Document Relates to:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALl.A.S. PartÿSÿ(Heitlor, J.)

Index No: 112277/02

WILLIAM J. PEACH NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practiee Law and Rules Seetion 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs eomplaint against defendant Amchem Products, Inc.,with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Amchem Products, Ine., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated-- New Yorlÿ New York-ÿPpl7L( .2015

Frank Ortiz, Esq Judith A. , _jq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Amehem Products, Inc.116 East 27lh Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

OULTONJ.S.C,

Page 273: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

" A , > ÿ

MOTJUOM i!:! RyT3f-i .MOH.0.2.!.

Page 274: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

RALPHE. PAUL

NYCALI.A.S. ParOCf S"°(Hekterr*)-

lndex No: 107400/02

ÿ

******cOÿ

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Daled: New Yprk, New Yorkled: New Y«pKM3E

Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

\UJudith A. Yavira Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27lh Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,Hon. Qliui y IC. Ilcilloi . rnM

ÿln(is

Page 275: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

ÿ0.5.1, ,BiT=*).M0H

Page 276: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE:NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

DENNISF.PADULA AND LYNDA A.PADULA

NYCALl.A.S. Part 5"D(HertlerpL)

Index No: 101177/99

00°

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York"Ten2JJL 2015

Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

HON, PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

Page 277: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

HG iJ'Jix.'/i ./ ! i-•isVai'-i .MOM,v.C»- 1

i

Page 278: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

DENNIS F.PADULA AND LYNDA A. PADULA

NYCALI.A.S. Part KJ 5*°

..(Hoitlcr, Jÿ-

Indcx No: 101177/99qOÿ

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant Amchem Products, Inc., with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Amchem Products, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated:-Nÿ-york? Npw York.2015

KiUg£Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. YavitZ/Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

"°ni?ON.PEÿ H/MOUITON

Page 279: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

•rg'C'

mow bEiEy h- wonn.oii

rv\/ $

Page 280: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE:NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

RICHARD L.NASH

NYCALI.A.S. Part(Iloitlcr, f.)

Index No: 106708/02

f \\»

CO

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs eomplaint against defendant Union Carhide Corporation, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross elaims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiee and

without eosts.

_Dated: Npjv,York, New York.,2015

Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. YavitzTusq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27,h Street, 12,h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,Hon. Alieny K. Ileilloi- , ..rtiilTON

HON. PETER H.Wl0ULT™

Page 281: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

• . '

STiJU0>''' ÿ H R3TJq -M°H

Page 282: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

VIRGINIA MORRIS,Individuallyand asExecutrix for the Estateof LESTERMORRIS

NYCALI.A.S. PartM S"ÿ>

Index No: 190154/10

goÿ

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

T .2015

ÿXFrank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212)558-5500

SOORDEKED' iÿS

Judith A. Yavitz,"EsqDARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212)452-5300

Page 283: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

T£'ChowbEisy h'wonriow

ÿ *v *

Page 284: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALI.A.S. Partyf £& w

(Heitferr** ÿ

Index No: 117229/07This Document Relates to:

BRYAND.MORREALEAS EXECUTOR FOR THE

Estateof SAMUEL MORREALEIII NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

reh?M _, 2015

Yavit:Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27'h Street, 12'h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,lion. Slieny IC. Ik-itlcr .. ,

HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S-C.

Page 285: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

i) i

•• , Y '* '

MOTJL'CM .H H373<3 .MOH.0.3.L

Page 286: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

This Document Relates to:

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part/XfS~£>(Iloitlcr, J.)"

Index No: 123392/97

S. Partitlci1- J> 0U

EDWARD JOHN MORGAN andMARGER1TE MORGAN

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant Dana Companies, LLC with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Dana Companies, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Da . ......"" 1

Fr«W]

At ,700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavitz./Esq.DARGER ERRANTEAttorneys for Dana CcDARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC116 East 27lh Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

Page 287: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

.. \

'*?0T "/ ÿ* ._ ' JuV.i- i .0 p -ri ft .ÿ .--

Page 288: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

BART M.MICELIAND JOAN MICELI

NYCALl.A.S. Part XfS*

Index No: 100057/99

,0ÿ

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant UnionCarbide Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Seetion 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all claims and eross elaims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporationbe and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without eosts.

Dated: New York. New YorkÿV2U 2015

Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for UnionCarbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12,h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, AHnn Shmy K HHtler

HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

Page 289: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

HGTJoUhl .H fi3T3q .V10H.O.p.l

Page 290: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

INRE:NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALl.A.S. Part £?>(Ilcitlor, J.-)

This Document Relates to:Index No: 100057/99

BARTM.MICELIAND JOAN MICELI NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant Amchem Products, Inc.,with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Amchem Products, Inc.,be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: NeatYork, New Yorkted: NfisjiYork, New YorkgeVyZ\X.2ois

Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. YaVitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Amehem Products, Ine.116 East 27,h Street, 12,h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,I.Iuif; Dliuiy K. Heiller

H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

Page 291: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

MOTJUOM M aaT39 MOH.0.3X

Page 292: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

rN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

SYLVIA MECKEL,as Executrix for the

Estateof MELVYNMECKEL,and SYLVIAMECKEL,Individually

FSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

GO'NYCALl.A.S. PartÿSÿ(HeitiefrF.)Index No: 190411/09

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs eomplaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

.2015

Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27lh Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, />ÿtytiii. Slitiiy IC. IliitkaC ~ 3/rÿ//C

HON.PETER H.MOULTON -V" /IS

Page 293: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

WOTjUuM .h n373q new

Page 294: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

This Document Relates to:

rN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALl.A.S. Part Kf 6"ÿ

-fHertterrL)Index No: 190003/11

, i r_*i »*

DEBRA BORGERDINGAS EXECUTRIX FOR THE

Estateof MICHAELT.MASTANDREA NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,

and there beingno opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without eosts.

Dated: New York, New York

-r£b9U .2015

Fran .A

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavftz, EsJudith A. Yavltz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27lh Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

%moultonj.s.c,

Page 295: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

T8CHOW fcElEB H* WOfirV.OH

V/

Page 296: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK ¥IN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

LouisM.Grasek

NYCAL

(Heitler, J.)

Index No: 121777/01 COUNTS CLEW'S

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CcrtainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

eosts.

Dated: New York, New YorkrBB2ÿ2015

Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavrtz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27,h Street, 12,h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

Page 297: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

(a-

ÿ '

•O.S.I Hÿ'39 .MOW

Page 298: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

HELEN FALKENMEYER,as Executrixfor the Estateof WILLIAMFALKENMEYER,and HELENFALKENMEYER,Individually

NYCAL

ÿ(Heitler, J.)

Index No: 190116/10

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

eosts. •

ork, New York15

Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Y&tfftz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

S00RDERED' Wis

Page 299: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

/ * *'•» /«• • t

hot-'UOMO. :ÿ c

.r\ P'ÿT3q VtO'ri •

Page 300: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

JOANNE EDWARDS, as Exeeutrix for theEstate of ARTHUR R. EDWARDS,Individually _ _

__NYCALl.A.S. Partus'2*(Heftier

Index No: 190395/10

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, tbat upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without eosts.

HatpH- NewfYork,New York.2015

&Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Juditb AfYaJitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27lh Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

V\ON-P J.S-C' 3//a//<r

Page 301: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

II

_ _A (Iÿ "

Page 302: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK \

This Document Relates to:

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 3$ 5D(Heitler, J.)

Index No: 107099/02

RONALD R. DOEDEMA NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practiee Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs eomplaint against defendant Dana Companies, LLC with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Dana Companies, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without eosts.

D ' * " " .

FiW 1L11Zj <X LUAL1XDJLKU,r.t.

Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Y;

DARGER E AVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

Z

SO ORDERED,

ÿ MOULTON

Page 303: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

,/u

Page 304: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

FILE

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. PartXTÿ(BeitieppE}-

MAR 8 0 2015NEW YORK

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEThis Document Relates to: Index No: 117579/02

RONALD R. DOEDEMA NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC hereby requests summary judgment in

tbe above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant Dana Companies, LLC with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all elaims and cross claims against

defendant Dana Companies, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New.York,New York

Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212)558-5500

Judith A. Yav/tz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC116 East 27,h Street, 12,h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

ft W10ULT0N 3//yÿ

Page 305: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

•v

H07JU0M H H3T3S .MOH

Page 306: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

F 1 LSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK MAR 30 2015

NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERKS OFFICEIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S.PartXfSfc(IIcitliM, J.)

This Document Relates to: Index No: 106708/02

DONALD D. CIMATO NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without eosts.

few Yosk, New York

k Ortiz, Esa.

? M ÿ 2015

Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27,h Street, I2,h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

Page 307: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders
Page 308: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK F"-EdIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALl.A.S. Part ÿ6"ÿ(Ilcitlcr, J.)

mar 3 o 2015

This Doeument Relates to:Index No: 106708/02

DONALD D. CIMATO NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Praetiee Law and Rules Seetion 3212, dismissing

plaintiff's eomplaint against defendant Dana Companies, LLC with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all eo-defendants, all elaims and eross elaims against

defendant Dana Companies, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without eosts.

Frank Ortiz. Judith A. Yavitz.Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC116 East 27lh Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, ------r—, ÿ

Page 309: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

VTJLiGM H fiJi"3M .MOMr- n.i

L

Page 310: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK MAR 30 2o,5

INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S.Part2tfS*&(Iloitlu, J.)

This Document Relates to: Index No: 114935/07

SUSAN ANDERSON, AS EXECUTRIX FOR NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYthe Estateof LEONARD ANDERSON, JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERand SUSAN ANDERSON, Individually

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment

in the ahovc-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant Amchem Products, Inc., with prejudice, and there heing

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all elaims and cross claims against

defendant Amchem Produets, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Date

FranWEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yaÿitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Amehem Products, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, —- ,KretERH:MOULTON "V'2/C y-

Page 311: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

r

\

Y2*C*bQj.cH m ii;onrio!.'i

Page 312: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

SUSANANDERSON, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE

Estateof LEONARDANDERSON, and

SUSAN ANDERSON, Individually

NYCALl.A.S. PartXS"(Ilcitlcr, J.)

Index No: 114935/07

FileMAR 3 o 2015

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

OFF/CE

WHEREFORE, defendant UnionCarbide Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant UnionCarbide Corporationbe and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

—Dated: New York, New YorkÿVCD7U .2015

Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith ATYavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVTTZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for UnionCarbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

ÿmoSton V'V<SO ORDERED,

Page 313: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

drz (\ÿi *

ItOÿSJOtA .H .MOH.0.2.1,

\

Page 314: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

JAMES R.REYNOLDS AND JEANREYNOLDS

HAR8o1015.A.S. Part yS £& Q0UÿyCLpi2tKHoitlor, J.)

NYCAL1(Hoitlop

Index No: 106690/02°FFICE

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiec and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York3/q ÿ 2015

Fidi'ik Oilu, EslWEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

FILEDMAR 3 0 2015NEW YORK

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Judith A. Yayuz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,JJon fteHTkft H. MOULTON

J.S.C.

Page 315: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

ÿ.OTjUOiVI a :H3TJcl .HON.o.n.i,

I

Page 316: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAtterneys et Law

48 Well StreetSuite 1100NewYerk, NY

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

FRANCIS STOREY AND DAPHNE STOREY

against

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.

IAS. Part#f£~0ÿHettferrd:)

INDEX NO.: 190369/14

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: 3-/OV 3New York, New York

lUsffASflAH,4sQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO; MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

SO ORDERED:

ADAM DREKSLER, ESQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff(s),FRANCIS STOREY and DAPHNE STOREY700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

filemar 3 0 20I5NEW YORK

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

onoroblo Sherry Klein Iloitlcr-ilnjh

HON

IU OllUliy IMCIII I ICIUgl-,JJ.AH.PEt£RhÿulJS.

r-

Page 317: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

MO'i '5 ,AS.lT ""'!v " ,WCM

Page 318: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

I.A.S. Part;ÿ(Heitlei, J.)

This Document Relates to: INDEX NO.: 05-101827

NANCY GURAL, as Executrix for the Estate ofJOHN BOGIN, and NANCY GURAL, asExecutrix for the Estate of EVAN BOGIN,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

against

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests- summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED [ew Brunswick, NJ

MONICA R. KOSTRZEWArESQHOAGLAND, LONGO, MORAN

VtfWK (TV (\fcbZ-.ESQWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P:C.

DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Nancy Gural, as Executrix for the Estate ofJohn Bogin, and Nancy Gural, as Executrix forthe Estate of Evan Bogin700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys et Law

HOAGLAND, LONGO.

SO ORDERED:

filmar 3 0 2015

48 Well StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Page 319: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

. * I

Page 320: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

NANCY GURAL, as Executrix for the Estate ofJOHN BOGIN, and NANCY GURAL, asExecutrix for the Estate of EVAN BOGIN,

against

A O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

I.A.S. PartÿC(Heltler, J.)-

INDEX NO.: 111052-98

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDOMENTMOTION AHD ORDER

HOAGLAND. LONGO,MORAN. DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law

48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New Yerk, NY

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: New Brunswick, NJ

'STRteMONICA R.K0STR2EWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneyis for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

TFfANÿtVX-OebT. , ESO.ÿ

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs),Nancy Gural, as Executrix for the Estate ofJohn Bogin, and Nancy Gural, as Executrix forthe Estate of Evan Bogin700 BroadweyNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED: fil jljlsMAR 3 0 2015

NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

HnnnrahlP Sherry f<lein HoiHar

ho«.PetWh.ÿoh

Page 321: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

M0Ui••O.,,<-• i

'•<1 •H Wrxq .Mom

Page 322: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

IAS. Part 3(f{HetttecJ}—

This Document Relates to: INDEX NO.: 05-101533

CRAIG ODLUND, as Executor for the Estate ofDICK ODLUND, and PHYLLIS ODLUND,Individually,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

against

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: New Brunswick, NJ

MC . :SQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

tTPtNV NY oetiz- , ESQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Craig Odlund, as Executor for the Estate ofDick Odlund, and Phyllis Odlund, Individually700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

MORAN. DUNST& DOUKAS. LLPAttorneys at Law

HOAGLAND. LONGO.

SO ORDERED:

fil

48 Well StreetSuite 1100New York, NY'

MAR 3 0 2015NEW YORK

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Page 323: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

r g,(,.hi ri

Page 324: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

r

HOAGLAND. LONGO.MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAtrorneys et Law

48 Well StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE:' NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

NANCY GURAL, as Executrix for the Estate ofJOHN BOGIN, and NANCY GURAL, asExecutrix for the Estate of EVAN BOGIN,

against

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

I.A S. PartaerSS(I loitlor, J.7

INDEX NO.: 113843-94

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: New Brunswick, NJ

MGNICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLP ÿ

Attorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

-ESQ-WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Nancy Gural, as Executrix for the Estate ofJohn Bogin, and Nanoy Gural, as Executrix forthe Estate of Evan Bogin700 BreadwayNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED:

MAR 3 0 2015

NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

wroblo Sheffy-Kleifl HeitieT"--

J.S.C.

Page 325: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

wt,'U Vw

' ' 'ÿcÿq •WQM

Page 326: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

NANCY GURAL, as Executrix for the Estate ofJOHN BOGIN, and NANCY GURAL, asExecutrix for the Estate of EVAN BOGIN,

against

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

I.A.S. PartÿcT(HeftteFr*)-

INDEX NO.: 113632-94

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDOMENTMOTION AND ORDER

HOAOLAND, LONOO.MORAN, DUNST8. DOUKAS. LLPAttorneys et Law

48 We!! StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: Ne\ew Brunswick, NJ

MONICA R. KGSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

,N- .

WV Oetlÿ.ESQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Nancy Gural, as Executrix for the Estate ofJohn Bogin, and Nancy Gural, as Executrix forthe Estate of Evan Bogin700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED:

F3=joftefabie=S

JJS.C-.

MAR 3 0 2015

NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Page 327: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

ilCTJuOWi .;ÿ*

v"vOM-3.SA-

Page 328: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

ROSEE. BUCKLEY, (dec.),

against

ACandS, INC., et al.,

I.A.S. Part 5"°(44ettterrÿ)—INDEX NO.: 02-114321

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

HOAGLAND. LONGO.MORAN. OUNST& DOUKAS. LLPAttorneys at Law

48 Wall StreetSuite.1100New York. NY

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: ' New Brunswick, NJ

MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co,48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

SO ORDERED:

-A-l K (XV , ESO.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Rose E. Buckley, (dec.)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

ihlhsHonorable Sherry Klein Ffcttlegÿ

HON. PETER H.MOULTON

FILEDMAR 3 0 2015

NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Page 329: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

'I £ cHOW hEfEH H* ÿC-nriOM

• i*ÿ1/

Page 330: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

HOAGLAND. LONGO.MORAN. DUNST& OOUKAS. LLPAtrorneys at Law

48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

ROSE E. BUCKLEY, (dec.),

against

ACandS, INC., et al.,

IAS. Par-tÿiTO-(Heitlor. J.)-'

INDEX NO.: 02-107404

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant tc Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: Brunswick, NJ

MONICA R. KOSTRZEWf, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST &DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.'48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

SO ORDERED:

0fcfci2. . ESQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Rose E. Buckley, (dec.)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003---ÿ ÿItf/is

Hunuidble SllUfiy Kluin IluiliyLÿ. •• tqM

HON. PETER H.M j s c

FMAR 3 0 2015

coÿryNSRsKOFF(CE

Page 331: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

MOTJUCVl-0.2.L .MOH

Page 332: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

I.A.S. PartÿcT(Hertterr±T

This Document Relates to: INDEX NO.: 122688-93

CRAIG ODLUND, as Executor for the Estate ofDICK ODLUND, and PHYLLIS ODLUND,Individually,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

against

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

______

rft-oet'2- .esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

MONICA R. KOSTRZtWA, ESQHOAGLAND, LONGO, MORAN WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Craig Odlund, as Executor for the Estate ofDick Odlund, and Phyllis Odlund, Individually700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

DUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

48 Well StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

MORAN. DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys et Law

HOAGLAND, LONGO,

SO ORDERED:Honorable Sherry Klein

MAR 3 0 20I5

ÿZS0fficb

Page 333: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

(I

Hotÿo.a

T If •

ÿ !4QH

Page 334: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

HOAGLAND. LONGO.MORAN. DUNST& DOUKAS. LLPAtrorneys at Law

48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York. NY

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

ANDREW R. NIMMO JR. as Administrator forthe Estate of GEORGE L. NIMMO,

against

ACandS, INC., et al.,

I.A.S. Part SO

INDEX NO.: 02-113435

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: 2/1Q'/ vS»• ÿ New Brunswick, NJ

MONICA K. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DGUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

ÿ OttiZ- , ESQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Andrew R. Nimmo Jr. as Administrator for theEstate of George L. Nimmo700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED: s/m/s"Honorable Sheri

HON. PE*EF

MAR 3 0 2015NEW YORK

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Page 335: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

f] 4

MOTJUG.Yi .HH2'i'3q.D.3.L hoh

Page 336: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

I.A.S. Part

This Document Relates to: INDEX NO.: 02-107220

ANDREW R. NIMMO JR. as Administrator forthe Estate of GEORGE L. NIMMO,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

against

ACandS, INC., et al,,_

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED:2/ÿ'l\leW Brunswick, NJ

M'HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co,48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

ptV- 0£t>Z- , ESQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Andrew R. Nimmo Jr. as Administrator for theEstate of George L. Nimmo700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

MORAN. DUNST& DOUKAS. LLPAttorneys at Law

HOAGLAND. LONGO.

SO ORDERED:-Honorable Slieiiy Klein Hettiefc-- J.r\L\

48 Wall StreatSuite 1100New York. NY

filedmar 3 0 2015

, NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Page 337: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

ir •

ÿ0/vA

<! ts-,•sll/, 1, t,

ÿ Hld<i Mqh

Page 338: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

JUNE A. END and GEORGE END,

Plaintiffs,

- against -

H.B. FULLER COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

-X

-XIndex No.: 190075/14/14

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION

l.A.S. Part>0HoaÿShcny IC, Ilcitlcr

-XWHEREFORE, Defendant H.B. FULLER COMPANY (hereinafter "H.B. FULLER"), hereby

requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant H.B. FULLER, with prejudice, and

tbere being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, H.B. FULLER, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to

either party.

Dated: _201 5New York, New York

Carmen St. George, Esq. ( }WEITZ & luxenbergVpj:.Attorneysfor Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

Katrina H. Murphy, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.Attorneysfor DefendantH.B. Fuller Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022(212) 651-7500

-Hon Sherry K,Heitlei~* \\ T

b

Page 339: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

motjuom -H rÿran .'/.oh.o.a.t

Page 340: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

HUGHLETT A. SMITH and JEAN SMITH,

INRE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

•X

XIndex No.: 19014,...

Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION- against -

H.B. FULLER COMPANY, et al., l.A.S. Partÿ6 STO•Hon. Sherry K. Hcitlcr

Defendants.X

WHEREFORE, Defendant H.B. FULLER COMPANY (hereinafter "H.B. FULLER"), hereby

requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Praetice Law and Rules

Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant H.B. FULLER, with prejudice, and

there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all claims and eross elaims against

Defendant, H.B. FULLER, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to

either party.

Dated: 2015

Carcnen St. George, Esq. Q

NeW York, New York

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500

Katrina H. Murphy, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.Attorneysfor DefendantH.B. Fuller Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022(212) 651-7500

SO ORDERED,ÿHon. Slicny K. Ilcilloi

HON:PiTiR H: MOUUTON

Page 341: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

HOr.jijgy -i'; unifi?.|,

i

Page 342: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

RICHARD QUINN,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

x

x Index No.: 190018/14

Plaintiff(s), NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

-against-

AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATIONas successor-by-merger to BUFFALO PUMPS,INC., et al.

Hon. Sherry Klein UutlcrDefendants.

x

WHEREFORE, Defendant BW/IP, Inc., hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-

entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practiee Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

against Defendant BW/IP, Ine., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all elaims and eross elaims against Defendant,

BW/IP, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party.

Dated: New York, New York

Nieole G. N'farkoidtz, Esq.Miehael Faneflÿ Esq!WEITZ & LUXENBERG SEGAL MeCAMBRIDGE SINGER &

New York NY 10003

Attorneys for Plaintiff700 Broadway

MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for Defendant850 Third Avenue, Suite 1 100New York, New York 10022

SO ORDERED, ÿÿÿoUUTON 21{y f ÿ

Page 343: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

p , . , r c £ i xn'Of-.

MAR - 9 2015 21

SEGAL MCCAMBRIDGE SINGER & MAHONEY

Page 344: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OP NEW YORK

xINRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

x Index No.: 190369/14 °%C£FRANCIS STOREY and DAPHNE STOREY,

PlaintifF(s), NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.

Hon. Sherry Klein HeitlerDefendants.

x

WHEREFORE, Defendant BW/IP, Ine., hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-

entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

against Defendant BW/IP, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all elaims and cross elaims against Defendant,

BW/IP, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without eosts to either party.

Dated: New York, New York

Adam IWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

New York, NY 10003

Attorneys for Plaintiff700 Broadway

SEGAL MeCAMBRlDGE SINGER &MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for Defendant850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022

-moultonJ.S.C.

SO ORDERED,!If:

Page 345: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders
Page 346: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

ÿ IL E0x

MAR 3 0 2015IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

X

ALTON C. CHAPMAN and FRANCIS CHAPMAN,

Index No.: 190293/14

-against-Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITION

SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

AIR &, LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, et. aL l.A.S. ParQXStkm. Cliuiy K. lluitlui

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, Defendant MEADWESTVACO CORPORATION (hereinafter

"MWV"), hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant

MWV, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, MWV, he and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to

cither party.

Dated: New York, New York

Simon Lee,EsqDaniel WassSrbcrg, EsqWE1TZ &. LUXENEBRG, PCAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SEGAL McCAMBRlDGE SINGER& MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for Defendant850 Third Avenue, Suite 1 100New York, New York 10022

(212) 651-7500

SO ORDERED,

Page 347: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

W.'tfo.-w .i-iid.I

3T3Q MOM

£ AO W71 . Ik/ W

MAR -5 2015

\\

SEGAL MCCAMBRIDGE SINGER & MAHONEY

Page 348: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

TMc:CC(jpk)2/9/15

Our File NoS-4014-14

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE:NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION,

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

KennethMclauchlin

NYCAL °°ÿAfryÿ*0ÿI.A.S. Part c) fw(Ilcitlcr, J.)

INDEXNO.190192/14

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company ofNew York, Inc.

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company ofNew York, Inc.,be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without eosts.

Dated: New York, New York 2

. —-'han Alvarado, Esq.

WE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

Timothy tyf/McCann, Esq.DAVID M. SANTORO, ESQ.Attorney for DefendantConsolidated Edison Company of NewYork, Inc.4 Irving PlaceNew York, NY 10003-3598

SO ORDERED:Htm. Sliuny KlcluIIullu1-

HON. PETER H.MOVLJONT(IT-/(5

Page 349: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SiU0;;1"H n5T3ÿ -won

Page 350: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

DAVIDWILLIAM FAHY,

NYCALIAS Part}6sd n J0 2()ir

-X C0ÿ7yÿOÿQPP>/C£

INDEX NO:I90259/I3

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL,INC.et al.Defcndant(s)

X

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Armstrong International, Inc.hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

against defendant Armstrong International, Inc.with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,

Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendant Armstrong International Inc.,be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.

Dated: White Plains, New York

£T*r ÿEarly & Strauss, LLCAttorney for Plaintiff360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, New York 10017

THOMAS M.BfiN&ÿENTANdLaSorsa & BeneventanoAttorney for DefendantARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL,INC.3 Barker Avenue, White Plains, NY 10601Tel: (914) 682-3300

SO ORDERED,iteMaULION 3/d/,s

J.S.C,

Page 351: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

MOTJUO.Yi .H nrif3q MCH

Page 352: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

"I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK.

INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:M1NARD S. FOSTER and THALIA FOSTER,

Plaintiffs),

-against-

AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al,

Defendants.

IndexNo.: 190308/14

IA.S.Part><5 SOHon. Slimy K,He!tier

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant CUMMINS INC., (incorrectly named as CUMMINS ENGINE

COMPANY, INC.) (hereinafter "CUMMINS"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-

entirlcd case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint

against Defendant CUMMINS, with prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant CUMMINS be and the same are hereby dismissed, with prejudiee, and without costs to

either party.

Dated: New York, New York

,2015 mar 30

Patti Burshtyn, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500

2015

COUNTYNEw yoRKCORK'S

Joseph James-oianetti, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE SINGER& MAHONEY,LTD. .

Attorneys for CUMMINS INC.850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022 '

(212) 651-7500

SO ORDERED,

HON3fn/ IS

Page 353: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

<?.t '"rtciiSQ rv

Page 354: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

c

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

NYCALI.A.S. Part S~&(-Hoitlor, J.) -

Index No: 190293/2014

Alton C. Chapman and Francis ChapmanNO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., incorrectly s/h/a "CHEVRONTEXACO CORPORATION" and "CHEVRON U.S.A. Individually, and formerly known asGULF OIL CORPORATION", (hereinafter "CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.") hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-dcfcndants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs. pDated: 9a . f

New York, Nÿ

Daniel Wasscpoerg, bsq.WElTzWutJXENBERG P.C.Attorney for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

o

MAR 3 0 2015

NEW YORKOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

ÿJulie EvarrsrESq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantCHEVRON U.S.A. INC.150 East 42nd StreetNew York, NY 10017File No. 01042.00344

SO ORDERED, T>/l ÿ

6465892V. I

Page 355: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

» /3

t:Os A i J/«0W

Page 356: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

u

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RENEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

NYCALl.A.S. PartÿK)(Ileitlci, J.)"'

Index- No: 190242/14

James Lcverock NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and RulesSection 3212, dismissing plaintiffs5 complaint against defendant CARRIERCORPORATION, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissedwith prejudice and without costs.

Dated: fs>? ~ ÿ

New York, NY

Daniel Wasscrberg, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG PCAttorney for Plaintiff700 Broadway: 7lh FloorNew York, NY 10003

fileMAR 3 0 2015

NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Virginia Squiticri, Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOW1TZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantCARRIER CORPORATION150 East 42nd StreetNew York, NY 10017File No. 10557.01646

SO ORDERED,

H.MOULTON 5/(T./|3J.S.C*

640JI47v.|

Page 357: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

ftorji•0.2.L

Page 358: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALl.A.S. Part yt(Hpitler, J )

xThis Document Relates To: Index No: 190140/14

Sergio Hrvatin and Magda Hrvatin NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER

x

WHEREFORE, defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CARRIER CORPORATION, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendants CARRIER CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand wilhou

Jordan C. FBelluck &Attorneys f546 Fifth ANew York,

Dated: \MAR 3 0 2015

ÿNEW YORKNTY CLERK'S C

Wginia Squitieri, Esq

Attorney for DefendantCARRIER CORPORATION150 East 42nd StreetNew York, NY 10017File No.: 10557.01618

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOW1TZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLP

filed

ÿNEW YORKNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

SO ORDERED, ÿ0ÿ2 A S

HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C,

3//V-S-

6143142v. I

Page 359: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

r ÿ

lÿOTJUOr/l :H R3T3q .HOH.0.2.1

Page 360: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:X

MA*30?n

NYCALI.A.S. Paiytfg'd{Hcitlcr, J-.)

Index No: 190384/14

ARDESI-11R OMMANI and ELEANOR OMMAN1,

X

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant CARRIER CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without eosts.

Dated: Nriv York ÿ

h-c.-o

n FoxBELHUCKAttor

FpX, LLPPlaintiff

enue, 4lh FloorNY 10036

Virginia Squitieri, Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOW1TZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantCARRIER CORPORATION150 East 42nd StreetNew York, New York 10017Our File No. 10557.01694

SO ORDERED, ÿÿ2 A

__r\/ ,

LJS.C.6456236v.)

Page 361: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

/ *\ -HOTJUOM .K RBTBÿ M0l\,03.U

Page 362: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

TV/

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

NYCALr.A.S.PartSOÿ(Hullu, J.)

Index No: 190428/2014

John Negri NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CARRIER CORPORATION hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' eomplaint against defendants CARRIER CORPORATION withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendants CARRIER CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without cost#, « B B

_FILE

Dated:

Jordan Fox,Belluek & Fix IIilAttorneys foAPlalj;546 Fifth Aventre

New York, NY 10036

YotfLONYa MAR 3 0 2015

/ NEW YORK// CPUWTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Virginia Squitieri, Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOW1TZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantCARRIER CORPORATION150 East 42ntl StreetNew York, NY 10017File No.: 10557.01701

SO ORDERED, ÿ

J.S.C.

is

6564242v. 1

Page 363: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

.r\

MOTJUO.M M HDT3q .MOH.o.n.t

Page 364: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

y

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

xThis Document Relates To:

Carleion Johnson and Doris Johnson

x

"""asNYCAL °FFtO£I.A.S, PartÿD

-ÿF+eitlei 3 J.)

Index No: 190125/14

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant MALLET & COMPANY, INC., hereby requestssummary judgment in the abos'e-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and RulesSection 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant MALLET &COMPANY, INC., vvilh prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst defendant MALLET & COMPANY, INC., be and the same are herebydismisÿdpilh prejudice and without costs.

32i/hpJkedk3H -Elizabeth M. Young, Esq. *WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOW1TZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantMALLET & COMPANY, INC.150 East 42nd StreetNew York, NY 10017File No. 15977.00001

VH-lS

orney

SO ORDERED, ÿ2?ÿ—--„ 3//T./J-JcuTLTTlz TTTTTm ' ' 'sÿjflw-Shprry K Hfitlr-r

HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

6596552v. 1

Page 365: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

V

MOiJuci-A .Ii 93 ! q HOM03l

\

Page 366: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XINRE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION ÿ3 ftX A, 'W5

LUIG1VILLANI, and ANTHONY VILLANI, as : Index No. 190379/13 ÿUfs/yyÿYqÿAdministrator for the Estate of CAROLINAVILLANI,

Plaintiffs),

-against-

AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC.,et a\.

Defendants.

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

Hon. Sherry K4oia-Heitfei7~IAS Part Cc)

-X

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

WE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs

LYNCHDASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany and Goodyear Canada Inc.

David J. Barry, Esq.UM/l5STH( M-Oc&ttd

700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Alexandra E. Ober, Esq.

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212)302-2400

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED: _

J.S.C.

Page 367: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

-~V

" {'10TJUO.V5 .H Haiijq .WOK*"» o »

Page 368: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

FfLMa*30NYCAL "u 20J5

I.A.S. Part>$®UN Y0rx

Index No. 190293/2014

ALTON C. CHAPMANNO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant E. 1. du Pont de Nemours and Company, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company,

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendant E. 1du Pont de Nemours and Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkFebruary 12, 2015 .

Daniel Wae&rberg, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

David J. Q6odearl, Esq.LEADER & BERKONLLPAttorneysfor E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company630 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10017(212) 486-2400

SO ORDERED

___Dated: "3/|2-/|<

flSJrfhpEffcRWfaOULTON '-

____J.S.C.

Page 369: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

£

£? .o.s.iHOUUOM .H 037BM .MOH

Page 370: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

V

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

rN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALl.A.S. Part Mr&o(•Iloitlor, J.)-

This Document Relates to:Index No: 190214/2014

CHARLES C. YOHE and ARLENE YOHENO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York. New York

2015 FILED

Cbartes-M—Fergus6nWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(2\:

•EfiEft

Jona ;, Esq.DAI EYAVITZ & BLAULLPAtto arbide Corporation116 , 2lh Floor

NEW YORK.COUNTY CLEnK o UrFICE

MAR 3 0 2015

New York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

Page 371: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

t

t

' Wv*'.. 1 L ' •-.*

Page 372: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

CHARLES C. YOHE and ARLENE YOHE

NYCALI.A.S. PartX

-(Hoitlor, £)

Index No: 190214/2014

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' eomplaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without eosts.

Dated: New York, New York

,2015

MAR 3 0 2015

Jonathary#. Kromberg, Esq.Gharles*MTFerguson, Esq/Gharles*MTFerguson, Esq/WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.CAttorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,Hrn/Tihnrrv Y

Jonathary#. Kromberg, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

Hiii/ÿlir i ry Y Hriflrr _K|

HON. PETER H.MOULTON• C/f -T-fiS

Page 373: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

ft"O'i i? is l(-— -.vi iÿrracj i/iO;;

Page 374: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

MARCIANA SALMON, as Administratrix forthe Estate of NORMAN F.SALMON, andMARCIANA SALMON, Individnally

NYCALI.A.S. Part JKJ(Hoitlcr, J.)

Index No: 190116/2014

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

Q12b .2015

CharleS-MrFerguson, tsq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

f'L£mar 3 0 2015

QFPlGE

(212) 558-5500

QfrlpAJlAJtt

SO ORDERED,

JonathanJBfj£rofnberg, Esq.DARGER'ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

Hon. Sherry K Tlritlrrÿ Yrttt

3/(ÿ/65

Page 375: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

*'K '* * j?.;W - '>•-? / "'t? .Won

Page 376: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

MARCIANA SALMON, as Administratrix forthe Estate of NORMAN F.SALMON, andMARCIANA SALMON, Individually

NYCALI.A.S. Part yS-(Hcitlcr, J.)

Index No: 190116/2014

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiee and

without eosts.

Dated: New York, New York

.2015 ÿar 30 2015

Charles=MrFergusonrEsq~* (JWEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500 n

Jonathan BÿKromberg, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,Sherry K. Hc&er- T7.

HON. feter h.moulton

Page 377: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

» «G 'Tr •,

ÿ0.0,. ÿ* HSTaq .ÿOH

Page 378: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

„ I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCGUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

MARCIANA SALMON, as Administratrix forthe Estate of NORMAN F.SALMON, andMARCIANA SALMON, Individually

NYCALI.A.S. Part So(Hcitlcr, J.)

Index No: 190116/2014

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company

n/k/a Bayer Cropscience, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against

defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company n/k/a Bayer Cropscience,

Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company n/k/a Bayer Cropscience,

Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

SI_ ,2015,2kF

Ch'ar-1es-M-Ferguson,ÿEsq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P-C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212)

"M/? 30New

2015

OOUÿSSS'°fFIC£

Jonatbajf'B. Kromberg, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27lh Street, 12lh Floor

>12) 558-5500 fl r>

New York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

S00RDEREtt 3/'V'S

Page 379: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

.H K£lT3q i/iOH

L

Page 380: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

DENNIS F. MADDALONE and PATRICIAMADDALONE

NYCALI.A.S. Part 5"ÿ

.(Heitler, J.)

Index No: 190234/2014

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Praetice Law and Rules Seetion 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without eosts.

Dated: New York, New York

,2015

eoÿ>°pp/1

Gharles=MrFergusonfEsq.£4A/K/f\-ÿ}-Uÿ .Jonathan B.*Kg6fhberg, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C. I0 DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation700 Broadway 116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500 (212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, ---'

-3/| l/(CHotf 01ieiry-Kr-H«ite 'HON. PETER H.MOULTON

J.S.C.

Page 381: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

: -u: . W.-uJQ .HUH.0 r; I.

Page 382: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part(Heitler, J:)

This Document Relates to: Index No: 190234/2014

DENNIS F. MADDALONE and PATRICIAMADDALONE

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company

n/k/a Bayer Cropscience, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against

defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company n/k/a Bayer Cropscience,

Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company n/k/a Bayer Cropscience,

Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkglcK .2015

B/f£romberg, Esq.R ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLP

Gfiaries=MrWEITZ & lualhdliwj,r.ÿ.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Jonathan ECKromberg, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27lh Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,Hon. Sherry IC. Ilcitlor

HON. PETER H WlOULTONJ.S.C.

Page 383: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

KotjJOiVi .hH3\33.o.ei

Page 384: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

rN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS L1TICATION

This Document Relates to:

JOSEPH M.CITRONE and MARIE CITRONE

NYCALl.A.S. Parted(ÿIlcitlcr, J.)

Index No: 190266/2014

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUBGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

_, 2015

filmar 8 0 2015NEW YORK

UNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Charles'MrFerguson, tsq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Jonatham&T Kromherg, Esq.DARGpR ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,• IlofÿShcrry K. Hoitler

HON. PETER H. MOULTOMrJ.S.C7

3/\t/i5

Page 385: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

..I t .MGH.o.z.i

Page 386: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

JOSEPH M.CITRONE and MARIE CITRONE

NYCALI.A.S. Part(Hcitlcr, J.)

Index No: 190266/2014

NOOPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company

n/k/a Bayer Cropscience, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against

defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company n/k/a Bayer Cropscience,

Inc. with prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company n/k/a Bayer Cropscience,

Inc.be and tbe same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

*3/2/" .2015 fileMAR 8 0 2fl|5

"wwjsas1.office

ÿehafl'es"M"Fcrguson, bsq". Jonathan B. Kromberg, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 0 DARGER ERRANTE YAV1TZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.700 Broadway 116 East 27th Street, 12thFloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500 (212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,Shcrrv K. HeitlerN. PETERH. MOULTON

Page 387: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

VSGTJL'C*! iifV_jT3q MOH.0,2.1,

Page 388: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

ALTON C. CHAPMAN and FRANCISCHAPMAN

NYCALl.A.S. Part,3<J

-(Hoitlcr; J.)-

lndexNo: 190293/2014

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York p2ÿ.2015

MAR 3 0 2015

— JonathraYB. Kromberg, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. ° ' DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Union Carbide Corporation700 Broadway WÿX 16 East 27,h Street, 12,h FloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500 (212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

h. jsc.

Page 389: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

M0TJliO;v, .»-> .1*1OH.0.5 I.

L

Page 390: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

ALTON C. CHAPMAN and FRANCISCHAPMAN

NYCALI.A.S. Partÿfll(Heitler, J.) ÿ

Index No: 190293/2014

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies LLC hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practiee Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' eomplaint against defendant Dana Companies LLC with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Dana Companies LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York F S L E Dÿ 2015

MAR 3 0 2015

NEW YORKCLERK'S OFFICE

ChnrifP Mi rnrninonj Fig Jonathan EVÿKfdmberg, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.V ÿexÿexÿÿRGEREiRRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Dana Companies LLC700 Broadway 116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500 (212) 452-5300

—---3/iV/ÿHon. Shorrv K. Heitler . •

_ ' 'SO ORDERED,

Hon. Shorry K. Heitler . .

HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S«W«

Page 391: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

T3*C4how hK.'HB M" PonnoM

Page 392: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

ALTON C. CHAPMAN and FRANCISCHAPMAN

NYCALI.A.S. PartÿffleitlertTJIndex No: 190293/2014

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation herehy requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed withjrejgdacepand

without costs. F \ ÿÿ

MM* 3 0Dated: New York, New York

V-cV ZU ÿ 2015 YORK

r-€hark?s M. Feigusun, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C. ÿDARG

Jonathan romberg, Esq.ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500

/ Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, ÿ --- 3/lV/-T

L.

Page 393: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

morjuc.v;.hr3T3r .mok

ii

ii

ii

Page 394: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Doeument Relates to:

ALTON C. CHAPMAN and FRANCISCHAPMAN

NYCALl.A.S. Part>0 5?>(Hoitlcr, Jt)

Index No: 190293/2014

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Produets, lne. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company

n/k/a Bayer Cropseience, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled ease,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against

defendant Amehem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company n/k/a Bayer Cropseience,

Inc. with prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all elaims and cross claims against

defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company n/k/a Bayer Cropscienee,

Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

,2015

FILEMAR 3 0 2015

NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

_ Chnrlfrn M rnxmnn Enq Jonathanÿ. Kromherg, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. OÿnrTeÿpARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Amehem Produets, lne.700 Broadway 116 East 27lh Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500 (212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,-rion. Sherry K. Hotter

HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

Page 395: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

MOTJUOiV) .H H31'3q .moh.0.8.1

Page 396: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALl.A.S. Part

ÿ(Hoitlor, J.)

0/*?C£INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to: Index No: 190411/2014

VINCENT S. ROSSI and LINDA ROSSI NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all elaims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

( .2015

s M. Ferguoon, Esq. MZ & LUXENBERG, P.

Charles M. Ferguson, Esq. C&uiWEITZ & LUXENBERG, RC?Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27,h Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLP•omberg, Esq,

SO ORDERED,

•""FffirefMSTH.MOULTON '' /pJ.S.C.

Page 397: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

T2 C*HOVl'.bEJLEd H' WOfirj.OH

Page 398: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY

A

%-X

30INRENEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCAL c?-uÿ/ÿZe°'5l.A.S. PartÿPf

This Document Relates to:

RICHARD C. THOMAS ANDCAROL THOMAS,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A.O. SMITH CORPORATION, et. al.,

Defendants.

•XIndex No.: 13-190150

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

-XWHEREFORE, defendant, CENTRAL PLUMBING SPECIALTIES CO., INC., hereby

requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

§3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant, CENTRAL PLUMBING

SPECIALTIES CO., INC.,with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, CENTRAL PLUMBING SPECIALTIES CO., INC. be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

OArviwy 2015

BRIANEARLY,ESQ. y

EARLY & STRAUSS, LLCAttorneys,for Plaintiffs)RichardThomas and Carol Thomas360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Fax (212) 986-2255

ROBERT B.MARCUSLAW OFFICE OF ROBERT B. MARCUS P C.Attorneys for DefendantCentral Plumbing Specialties Co., Inc.One North Broadway, Suite 412White Plains,NY 10601Fax (914) 993-0251

SO ORDERED:-Js'-*Honr.SKerry Klein Heitler J.S£rr,HON'PETER.H!MOULTON,

MAR 1*

Page 399: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

I

5 J >iAHkotjuomÿ' i >'o;*

Page 400: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to: INDEX NO.: 109974-06

WENDY ARLENE NELSON, as Executrix forthe Estate of ANDREW PAUL,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

against

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al..

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: New Brunswick, NJ

R. KOSTRZEWA, ESCND, LONGO, MORAN

MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

~R AnY fft- , ESQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Wendy Arlene Nelson, as Executrix for theEstate of Andrew Paul700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED: FiL P n. —<222HOAOLANO, LONOO.MORAN, OUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law

48 Wali StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

Page 401: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

2*ÿ

•+1cÿ I • vf • .w ' i I-i .

-;ÿS/ i/* »' .*0/y

Page 402: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

HOAGLAND, LONGO.MORAN. DUNST& OOUKAS, LLPAtterneys at Law

48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New Yerk, NY

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATIGN

This Document Relates to:

WENDY ARLENE NELSON, as Executrix forthe Estate of ANDREW PAUL,

against

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

I.A.S. Part 3(f(Heillei, J.) :

INDEX NO.: 132766-93

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being nD opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

2-l\% 11 5DATED: New Brunswick, NJ

4ÿ

MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.43 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

SO ORDERED:

. ESQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Wendy Arlene Nelson, as Executrix for theEstate of Andrew Paul700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

tonoroblo Shorry Kloin Hpitlec

MAR 3 0 2015NEW VORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

H-M°uL].s.c-

Page 403: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

IfL* -i-O.q , « ...c t •' • c, •, . -. ÿ

'-•cfv ;-

Page 404: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

HOAGLAND. LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys et Law

48 Wei) StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

WENDY ARLENE NELSON, as Executrix forthe Estate of ANDREW PAUL,

against

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

IAS. Part(Hertterrÿr

INDEX NO.: 103379-93

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: Naw Brunswick, NJ

MONICA R. KOSTR2EWA, ESQ.HOAOLAND, LONGO,WIORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

SO ORDERED:

cnz , esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Wendy Arlene Nelson, as Executrix for theEstate of Andrew Paul700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

Honorable Sherry Kloin Hoitlor

HON

jiduic uncny iviciii i iciuui » t

.peÿhÿ2.c.

mar 3 0 2015NEW YORK

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Page 405: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

HQ;-;-!<ÿ• -> ~ ~

f *Pr-** u

' 'n/

s:

Page 406: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

MA# 30 30g

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

EILEEN C. O'BRIEN, as Executrix for theEstate of WILLIAM O'BRIEN, and EILEEN C.O'BRIEN, Individually,

against

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

I.A.S. PartXSbÿ(Hoitlor, J.) °pp,INDEX NO.: 113843-06

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

zAslvsDATED: New Brunswick, NJ

MONICA R. KOSTRZBWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

TffW rtV 0ÿ2_ , ESQ.ÿ

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Eileen C. O'Brien, as Executrix for the Estateof William O'Brien, and Eileen C. O'Brien,Individually700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

HOAGLAND. LONGO.MORAN. DUNST& DOUKAS. LLPAtrorneys at Law

48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New Yerk. NY

SO ORDERED:onoroblc Sherry Klein Hoitlor .

.peterHON

Page 407: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

Mow foF!rw ... ... rac-

Page 408: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

HOAGLAND. LONGO.MORAN. DUNST& DOUKAS. LLPAttorneys at Law

48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE; NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

PAUL J. WELLER as the Executor for theEstate of BOYD N. WELLER,

against

ACandS, INC., et al.,

I.A.S. Partptf Sb SOpP/r,(Hoitlor, J.)

INDEX NO.: 02-112292

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED:ÿÿ New Brunswick, NJ

MGNICA R. KOSTRZEWtf, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MGRAN " " ' WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.DUNST & DOUKAS, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Attorneys for Defendant, Paul J. Weller as the Executor for the Estate ofKohler Co. Boyd N. Weller48 Wall Street, Suite 1100 700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10005 New York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED:HHonoroblo Sherry Kloin Hoitlop-

HON. PETER H.WIOULTON

CL-FLY-'

Page 409: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

.vioh.D.ax

Page 410: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

This Document Applies to:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

CHARLES K. ZAMMIT and RAYE ZAMMIT, his wife,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

URS ENERGY & CONSTRUCTION, f/k/a WashingtonGroup international, Inc., successor in interest toRAYTHEON ENGINEERS & CONSTRUCTORS, INC.and successor in interest to H.K. FERGUSONCOMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

FIL £ 0mar 3 o 2015 '

Count?cZ10rkOFFICE

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Index No.: 190371/2014

WHEREFORE, defendant URS Energy & Construction, hereby request summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant URS Energy & Construction, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all elaims and cross elaims againstdefendant URS Energy & Construction, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.

Dated: New York, New York(VI<AvCV\ L ,2015

WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER

Attorneysfor Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, New York 10038Telephone: (212)267-3091

Dated: Buffalo,New YorkMarch 9_,2015

DAMON MOREY LLP__

Peter S. Marlette, Esq.Attorneysfor DefendantURSEnergy & Construction200 Delaware Aveuue-Suite 1200Buffalo,New York 14202Telephone: (716) 856-5500

SO ORDERED: _ 3// 9 Doc #2004124.1

J.S.C.

HoffWfBftl- MOULTONJ.S.C-

Page 411: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

.. ,I i

j. a;

• • » I it - • i *:r i ; j?*f

' s Z* '>''?'"•£' .' >. /,

. . , ' r- v t- ' ? ct •;

Page 412: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

i

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

Inre: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

X: NYCAL

I.A. S. PartÿD(H*""**) ÿKraULUouuÿ

This document relates to: Index No.: 190402/13

Efrain RodriguezNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

•X

WHEREAS, Defendant American International Industries for Clubman requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against American International Industries for Clubman,with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstAmerican International Industries for Clubman, be and tbe same are hereby dismissed withoutprejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

NicholasNovack, Esq.Levy Konigsberg, LLP800 Third Avenue, 11th Floor

L iwrohce Wasserman, EsqG DEfRON & S1LBER, PC3$p Lexington Avenue,

,201

New York, NY 10022Counselfor Plaintiff

New York, NY 10017Counselfor American InternationalIndustriesfor Clubman

FILEDSO ORDERED, f 1IIS

MAR 3 0 2015 HON. PETER H.MOULTOtfNEW YORK

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

{00355109.DOCX}

Page 413: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

15 FEB 27 PH 3:06

GORDON & SiLBER

Page 414: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAtterneys at Law

48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

CINDY A. HEUER as Executrix for the Estateof HARRY A. STOCKER, INDIVIDUALLY,

against

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.,

I.A.S. PartX S'OfHnitlnr IÿÿrlWTvlTvTy

INDEX NO.: 190224/10

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

2-Mj 1-5DATED: New Brunswick, NJ

MONICA R. KOSTRZSWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGOvMORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

SO ORDERED

FH™7 pcnflY fcrtx-r , ESQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Cindy A. Heuer as Executrix for the Estate ofHarry A. Stocker, Individually700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

: ?//<;//sFILE

3 0 20I5

°°"nt?ISkoff,cb

Honorable

HON. PE

CL-PLAY-20

Page 415: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

» I 1 Ui-j ÿWOH

Page 416: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

This Document Relates to:

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

I.A.S. Part 3€T"ÿc)fHeitler, J.)

INDEX NO.: 122460-93

CRAIG ODLUND, as Executor for the Estate ofDICK ODLUND, and PHYLLIS ODLUND,Individually,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

against

A.Q. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., etal.,

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgmont in thet

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.«M/i5

DATED: New Brunswick, NJ

MCHOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

, ESQ. ÿ

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Craig Odlund, as Executor for the Estate ofDick Odlund, and Phyllis Odlund, Individually700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law

HOAGLAND, LONGO,

SO ORDERED:

FIL DHonorable SI1 peter

48 Well.StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

MAR 3 0 2015

NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Page 417: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

r

i

i

*> ->ÿ ii'i I.'•°-ci- "'ÿrÿMQH

Page 418: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OFNEW YORK

ROBERT WALSH AND JOAN WALSH,Plaintiffs,

v.3MCOMPANY, i/k/a Minnesota Mining andManufacturing Company, et. at,

Defendants.

Index No.: 190501/13

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Viad Corp, individually and as alleged successor-in-interest to

Griscom-Russell Company ("Viad") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled

case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

against defendant Viad only with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendant Viad only be and the same are hereby dismissed with'prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkSboifertrtyr ÿ ,201jf

*-«c*

Amber R. LongLevy Konigsberg,LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff800 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10022(212) 605-6200

SO ORDERED.

Fjdneis A. Montbaoh,OUND COTTOXwOLLAN&

GREENGASSAttorneys for Defendant,ViadOne Battery Park PlazaNew York, NY 10004(212) 804-4200

x/ÿ/(S

0oÿ

Page 419: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

hor_

h

Page 420: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

SALLIE POTTERTON, as Administratrix forthe Estate ofMICHAEL EDWARD TAYLOR, andSALLIE POTTERTON

INDEX N0.;190206-20I3

-VS-

BARRASSO & SONS, INC.,ct al.NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant, Hajoca Corporation, by and through its attorneys, Rawlc &

Henderson up, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212 dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Hajoca

Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notifce to all- co-defendants, all claims and oross claims against

Hajoca Corporation he and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New Yorkhe? i-htber i, 20/y

EARLY & STRAUSS, LLC RAWLE & HENDERSON, LLP

Brian F. Early --—Attorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington Avenue, 20lh FlNew York, New York 100] 7

•Rfeheityv. fitchJohn C. McMcckin, UAttorneys for Defendant,Hajoca\Cprporation14 WalrStrect14 Wail Street27,h FloorNew York, New York 10005One South Penn SquareWidener Bidg.Philadelphia, PA 19107

SO ORDERED. MAR 16 2015HON. PETER H- MOULTON

Page 421: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

\ 4

',ZK <> 1k'r\7........ .won

Page 422: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALl.A.S. PartJKT Sty/ty-JfSty(Heitler, J.) Qt

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: Index No.: 190375/2014

EVELYN MATOS,

Plaintiff,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY, etal.

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant Kelly-Moore Paint Company hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant Kelly-Moore Paint Company without prejudice, and there

being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Kelly-Moore Paint Company be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice

and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

>,2015

ovack, Esq.Hawkins Parnell Thackston & Young LLPAttorneys for DefendantKelly-Moore Paint Company, lne.600 Lexington Avenue, 8th FloorNew York, NY 10022

Levy Konigsberg, LLPAttorneys for PlaintiffEyelyn Matos800 Third Avenue, 1lIh FloorNew York, NY 10022

SO ORDERED,Hon Sherry KHn Hfitlfr

HON. PETER H. MOULTONj.s.a

Page 423: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

I

\

\:ZTS~0:& .H MOH.o.a.L

Page 424: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK------ xINRE: NEW YORK CITY NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Doeument Relates To:

JAMES J. BASLIAND LAURIE A. BASL1,

ÿx0%C£

Index No.: 190080-14

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Pneumo Abex LLC, successor in interest to Abex Corporation,

incorreetly sued herein as "ABEX CORPORATION, f/k/a American Brake Shoe Company,

(hereinafter "Abex"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingPlaintiffs' complaint against Abex, with

prejudice, there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Abex, be and are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

ÿ .2015ew York, NefoYork

Amber Long, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs800 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 605-6200

Alfred J. Sargcnte, Esq.HAWKINS PARNELL

THACKSTON & YOUNG LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Pneumo Abex LLC, Successor in interestto Abex Corporation600 LexingtonAvenue, 8thNew York, New York 10022-7578(212) 897-9655

SO ORDERED,

MAR 16 2MB

RECEIVEDMAR -v 4 2015

PART 301 1197299V.I

Page 425: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

r

£si13:

* ' " If

MOTJUGM ;iM iÿ o.au * '1

Page 426: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALl.A.S. Parted'

Index No.: 190039/2014

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

JOSEPH G. MILLER AND CAROL MILLER,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et a].,

_Defendants._WHEREFORE, defendant Oakfahco, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-

entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against defendant Oakfabco, Inc.with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Oakfabco, lnc, be and the same are hereby dismissed with/prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York2015

/C£

:ins Parnell Thackston & Young LLPfrneys for Defendantcfaheo, lne.Lexington Avenue, 8th Floor

New York, NY 10022(212) 897-9655

j<

Bellucic mot LLPAttonjeys/for/PlaintiffsJoseph G. Miller and Carol Miller546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 681-1575

/ MAR 11luivJSO ORDERED, / " —-

HON.PETERH.MOULTON

Page 427: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

•IA; j

KiTLhiO:*

Page 428: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK NYCAL

X Index Nos.: 190011/14INRE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX

This Document Relates To: NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONHARALAMBOS M. GATZONIS AND VASILIKI

GATZONIS,Plaintiffs,

vs. mar s 0 2015AIR LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, as Successor byMerger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., et al.,

Defendants.

NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

WHEREFORE,defendant HoosierGasket Corporation,hereby requests summaryjudgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

Plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Hoosier Gasket Corporation, with prejudice,and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Hoosier Gasket Corporation, be and the same are herehy dismissed with prejudice and

Dated:

BELLUCf LANDMANCORSI BALLA1NE & FORD P.C.

/rJ V _ c**Christopher S. Kozaÿ/Esq.Attorneys for DefendantHoosier Gasket Corporation120 Broadway, 27th Floor

Jordan Foj ,Ifeq. jAttorneys 'or tflai utiffs546 Firthiÿ/enue, 4lh FloorNew YoHe NY 10036

Attorneys for DefendantHoosier Gasket Corporation120 Broadway, 27th FloorNew York, NY 10271-0079

So Ordereim Shnrry Klrin Uoitlrr

:ODMA/PCDOCS/DOCSNY/570251.h8W£ter h.moulton\ J.S.C*

Page 429: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

RECEIVED TY MAIL

LANDMANCORSI 8ALLAINE & FORD

Page 430: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NYCALCOUNTY OF NEW YORK IAS Partÿ g"*0

—- X (Hoitlor, J.) ÿ

INRE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

PHYLISS HAUCK,

-against-ADVANCE AUTO PARTS,INC.,et al.

PIaintiff(s),

Defendant(s)X

INDEX NO: 190246/2012

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Armstrong International, Inc.hereby requests summary judgment

inthe above entitled action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs eomplaint against defendant

Armstrong International, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant>

Armstrong International Inc.,be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice aadÿwkhqut c&sis.

Dated: White Plains,New York

Him ÿ

Michael Cofian, Esq.Napoli Bern Ripka Shkolnik &Associates, LLPAttorney for Plaintiff350 FifthAvenue- Suite 7413New York, NY 10118Tel: (212) 267-3700

rMAR 3 0 2015

NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

THOMAS M. BENEVENTANOLa Sorsa & BeneventanoAttorney for DefendantARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC.3 Barker Avenue, White Plains,NY 10601Tel: (914) 682-3300

ed --— y// V/ THon. Slieiry Klein Ilutlcr «—HON. PETER H.MOULTON

Page 431: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

4 4 ,

KOTJUCW .H H3Taq .MOH

Page 432: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

11FC0USUPREMFCOURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

COUNTY OF NEW YORKX

INRE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCALASBESTOS LITIGATION

XSTEVES. STETSON,

-against-

ALCOA INC., et al.

PlaintifF(s),

Defendants.

Index No. 190489/13

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER

Hon. Sherry KIHn Hftitlftr,IAS Partÿ6 5"0

ÿX

WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed

with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

NAPOLl BERN R1PKA &ASSOCIATES LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff

ex. M—

LYNCHDASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire& Rubber Company

By:Christopher Gladd, Esq. Alexandra E. Ober, Esq.

350 FifthAvenue, Suite 7530New York, New York 10018(212) 267-3700

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED:

264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212)302-2400 fil

MAR 3 0 2015

ÿon. Sherry Klein Ildllu,J.O.C.

HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

Page 433: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2015. 3. 30. · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

WOTJUOWI .H P.3T39 .MOH,0.2.0