Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.
To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.
1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);
2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.
In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.
Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE:NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
MARGUS MUURISEPP, as Executor for theEstate of HARITA MUURISEPP, deceased,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
ÿX
nMar ond° 20ft
X
NYCAL
I.A.S. PARTÿO
(-HertlerÿINDEX NO. 190527-2012
(Weitz & Luxenberg P.C./March 2015FIFO Cluster)
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERFOR STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS,INC.
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practiee Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto;
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and eross claims against defendant
Standard Motor Products, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkA
i &Frank Ortiz, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003212-558-5500Attorneys for PlaintiffHarita Muuriscpp, deceased
Richard P. O'Leary, Esq;Trontman Sanders LLPThe Chrysler Building405 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10174-0700212-704-6000Attorneys for DefendantStandardMotor Products, Inc.
SO ORDERED,Hftri. Sherry Klein Heitler , ..
HON.PETER R-WOouiUN?//*//
24652632v I
I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK Mar 30
W RE:NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
MINNA SAUR, as Executrix for the Estate ofARTHUR R. SAUR, and MINNA SAUR,Individually,
/Plaintiffs),
-against-
AERCO INTERNATIONAL, INC.,et al.,
Defendants.
-X ÿsss.l.A.S. PART Xfb~0NYCAL
X
INDEX NO. 190334-2012
(Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C./February 2015FIFO Cluster)
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERFOR PARKER-HANNIFINCORPORATION
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Parker-Hannifin Corporation hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant Parker-Hannifin Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto;
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Parker-Hannifin Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
Frank Ortiz, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003212-558-5500Attorneys for PlaintiffArthur R. Saur, deceased
Jchard P. O'Leary, Esq.RichardTroutman Sanders LLPThe Chrysler Building405 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10174-0700212-704-6000Attorneys for DefendantParker-Hannifin Corporation
SO ORDERED,Hon: Sherry Klein Iloitlofr,-,!u TOMhoiT&tcrOToulton
/«ÿ/'ÿ
Active 24652l88v I 999900.952301
1
,''w
1 Hj f f ' ;, 4 - •
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
X
%
IN RE:NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL
I.A.S.PARTXASBESTOS LITIGATION
PATRICK O'SULLIVAN, INDEXNO. 190180-2012
Plaintiff(s), (Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C./February 2015FIFO Cluster)
-against-
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., et' NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
al., JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERFOR STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS,
Defendants. INC.
- X
WHEREFORE, defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto;
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Standard Motor Produets, Ine. be and the same are herehy dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Riehard P. O'Leary, Esq.Troutman Sanders LLP
Frank Ortiz, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003212-558-5500Attorneys for PlaintiffPatrick O 'Sullivan
The Chrysler Building405 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10174-0700212-704-6000Attorneys for DefendantStandardMotor Products, Inc.
SO ORDERED, _Jdon. Sherry Idem IIlHIliÿ.rv\JUÿ
Active 24651959vl 999900.952301
y
' • :i :
' -!/>G!-l
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE:NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
X
NYCAL
I.A.S. PARTÿdS"ÿX (Heitlor, J.)—
INDEX NO. 102380-20UJJENNIFER WHITE, as Executrix for the Estateof GLENN LIMBURG, deceased,
(Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C./Fcbruary 2015FIFO Cluster)Plaintiffs),
-against-NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERFOR STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS,
Defendants. INC.
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto;
ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Standard Motor Products, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Riehard P. O'Leary, Esq.Troutman Sauders LLP
Frank Ortiz, Esq.Weitz & Luxeuberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003212-558-5500Attorneys for PlaintiffGlenn Limburg, deceased
The Chrysler Building405 Lexington AvenueNew York,- NY 10174-0700212-704-6000Attorneys for DefendantStandardMotor Products, Inc.
SO ORDERED,
Aclivc 246508 14v 1 999900.952301
r urfr
-J w
-O.a.L :'Ai/f{
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
- X
IN RE:NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
ROSE MARIENASSO, Individually and asPersonal Representative for the Estate ofDOMEN1C NASSO, deceased,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.
NYCAL
I.A.S. PARTÿX (IIcitlcr,J.)
INDEX NO. 190181-2009
A1£
30°0/u. A/&. ?0i5
Oa
(Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C./February 2015FIFO Cluster)
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERFOR STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS,INC.
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Standard Motor Products, lnc, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
eomplaint against defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto;
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross elaims against defendant
Standard Motor Products, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Frank Ortiz, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003212-558-5500Attorneys for PlaintiffDomenie Nosso, deceased
-J QLichard P. O'Leary, Esq. (JRichard
Troutman Sanders LLPThe Chrysler Building405 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10174-0700212-704-6000Attorneys for DefendantStandardMotor Products, Inc.
SO ORDERED,
mqulTpD * JiS«C»
Active 24651 131vl 999900.952301
i
i
t
/ . v +''
'* A t . v
t
worÿuoiK ,h a3r;iq'.HoM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE:NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
REGINA DELPERCIO, as Executrix for theEstate of ANTHONY DELPERCIO, andREGINA DELPERCIO, individually,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.
-X
NYCALMAR30?n
C°VÿoI.A.S. PART,20 S~6 ÿ
X
INDEXNO. 190040-2009
(Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C./February 2015FIFO Cluster)
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERFOR STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS,INC.
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Standard Motor Produets, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto;
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Standard Motor Products, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Frank Ortiz, Esq.Weitz & Luxeuberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003212-558-5500Attorneys for PlaintiffAnthony DelPercio, deceased
Riehard P..O'Leary, Esq..Troutman Sanders LLPThe Chrysler Building405 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10174-0700212-704-6000Attorneys for DefendantStandardMotor Products, Inc.
*7
SO ORDERED,MAR 16 2015
IIuii. Sliciiy Klein Ilcitlu
HON. PETER H. MOULTONActive 24649980vl 999900.952301
Jl /ÿ*»»«. I__
hum ki-iru jfi s • r'
«'!; J .
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
X Ma*
IN RE:NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
X
NYCAL C
l.A.S. PARTjH?
(HÿitlfL T )-
JOSEPH F. KLEIN, INDEX NO. 119776-2001
Plaintiff(s), ' (Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C./February 2015FIFO Cluster)
-against-
A C. and S., Inc., et a!.,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERFOR STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS,INC.
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
eomplaint against defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto;
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Standard Motor Products, Ine. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Richard P. O'Leary, Esq.Frank Ortiz, Esq.Weitz & Luxeuberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003212-558-5500Attorneys for PlaintiffJoseph F. Klein
Troutman Sauders LLPThe Chrysler Building405 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10174-0700212-704-6000Attorneys for DefendantStandardMotor Products, Inc.
SO ORDERED,
ufcf'"ftfc'fE OULTONMAR 16 2015
Aclivc 24650457v I 999900.952301
» o-<
.!•: ;; r > a;-
- .-. i1,1 *<• i i i. 1 ~i t ,*> .of- {
L
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE:NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
DANIEL A. PRZEPIORA, .
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.C. and S., Inc., et al.,
Defendants.
-X
X
Mÿ3n°°uNryÿ eo's
l.A.S. PARTyS ST& rCÿO/jyrNYCAL
'SOft(Hoitlor, J.)
INDEX NO. 108769-2002
(Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C./March 2015FIFO Cluster)
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERFOR STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS,INC.
'ÿ0/
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. with prejudice, and there heing no opposition
thereto;
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Standard Motor Products, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York.New York
Frank Ortiz, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003212-558-5500Attorneys for PlaintiffDanielA. Przepiora
KÿScuJ f- (PÿcRichard P. O'Leary, Esq.Troutman Sanders LLPThe Chrysler Building405 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10174-0700212-704-6000Attorneys for DefendantStandardMotor Products, Inc.
SO ORDERED. S llhl/S
24652589vl
II
t .
-lo i'Jiy::? } » - ..a2t
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE:NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
X
NYCAL
I.A.S. PARTjXfX (Heitl opprC£
ROSE ANGELA KALACHMAN, asAdministratrix for the Estate of MELVINKALACHMAN, and ROSE ANGELAKALACHMAN, individually,
INDEXNO. 190240-2009
(Weitz & Luxenbcrg, P.C./Mareh 2015FIFO Cluster)
Plaintiffs),
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
-against-NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERFOR STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS,INC.
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant Standard Motor Products, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Praetice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant Standard Motor Produets, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto;
ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross elaims against defendant
Standard Motor Products, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Datei
Riehard P. O'Leary, EsqFrank Ortiz, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003-9536212-558-5500
Troutman Sanders LLPThe Chrysler Building405 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10174-0700212-704-6000Attorneys for Plaintiff
Melvin Kalachman, deceased Attorneys for DefendantStandardMotor Products, Inc.
SO ORDERED, /y-v---ihÿUsHon. Shorry Finn Hpitler . 'ÿON.WERH.MOULTON
Active 24652565vl 999900.9523'
JD.l •>GG7G'?.{.;qh
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION: NYCALi I.A.S. Partÿp
This Doeument Relates to:; Index No.: 190178/14,
ALEXANDER PODHAJSKIAND
KATHERINE PODHAJSKI : NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Nash Engineering Company, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Nash Engineering Company, with prejudice in this
action, and there beingno opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, The Nash Engineering Company, be and the same are herehy dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, Npw York
Joseph Y. WjtfiaiAttornÿMÿr Plaintiffs)Alexander Podhajski and KatheiThe Williams Law Firm,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10167(212) 668-1122
Podhajski
filedMAR 3 0 2015
NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
Laura Hollman, Esq.Attorney for DefendantThe Nash Engineering CompanyMcGivney &Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
HO*1[ouD?*?
505-3947
I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
DENNIS F. MADDALONEAND
PATRICIA MADDALONE
NYCAL.A.s.ÿgp
Index No.: 190234/14,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, George A. Fuller Company, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, George A. Fuller Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, George A. Fuller Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York,2015apr
aintiffiAttorney
filemar 3 0 20)5
OFFICE
Carol Tempesta, Esq.Attorney for Defendant
Dennis F. Maddalone ancTPatricia Maddalone George A. Fuller CompanyMcGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
Weitz & Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
HON. P£TwutreN
i)ÿhs"
1224-439
1
HOm-
'* ii
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.COUNTY OF NEW YORK._
NYCAtIN RE: NEW YORK. COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JOSEPH M. CITRONEAND
MARIE CITRONE
I.A.S. Part
Index No.: 190266/14,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, DAP, Ine., hereby requests summary judgment in the above
entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint
against defendant, DAP, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, DAP, Inc., he and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York,2015
}/0Attorney tor Plamtijf(s) YJoseph M. Citrone and Marie CitroneWeitz & Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, _
aCarol Tempesta, Esq.Attorney for DefendantDAP, Inc.MeGTVNEY & K.LUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
ijiyjIS
HON. PEtER H Wl0ULIs.C. FILEMAR 3 0 2015
604-783
NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
V,>07. i« ÿ ."*>r ' / J! ÿ ,
osi V!" ' f.f ,ÿ .j
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCAL
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190047/14
MARY AMENTASNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, DAP, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the above
entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint
against defendant, DAP, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, DAP, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
•"WIÿ/,2015
SaiAttuiliVÿ IUJ 1
Mary AmentasWeitz & Luxenberg,P.c.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
Carol Tempesta, Esq.Carol Tempesta, Esq.Attorney for DefendantDAP, Inc.McGivney&Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212)509-3456 FILE
SO ORDERED, N8W YOAKCOUNTY gLbrK's OFFICE
604-711
Hrr;-.Dm "
* ÿ .t
/ £ »' I—w>' ' > -v • Tri *-»
' -•J V »/*rs i .
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_
NYCALl.A.S. Partÿ
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Doeument Relates to:
DENNIS F. MADDALONEAND
PATRICIA MADDALONE
Index No.; 190234/14,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all elaims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkQ>(SY" .2015
Attorney for Plaintiff(
filemar 3 0 2015
COUNTÿcÿ°RKÿCLERK'S OFFICEKfcyann.M Cook, Esq.Attorney for Defendant
Dennis F. Maddalone and Patricia Maddalone Tishman Liquidating Corp.MCGlVNEY & KXUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, /PPP?
HON.P£T
'Hi2383-30113
l'\O r tr(.- ' hium"rn~u»rnHii ir •
ÿ~3-L~ ' -''.O(-•
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JOSEPH M. C1TRONEAND
MARIE C1TRONE
NYCAL'I.A.S. Partgf
Index No.: 190266/14,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Duro Dyne Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Duro Dyne Corporation, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Duro Dyne Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New Yorkÿew York,2015
AMar So ?0/5
°Ffii/Q?
Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Joseph M. Citrone and Marie CitroneWeitz & Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Chauvron S. Leotaud, Esq.Attorney for DefendantDuro Dyne CorporationMcGivney &Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED, ?)v//s
25-6820
/
ÿ
W1iV |ii!"ÿ 11 ii
l.r6y »>£>,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S- PaitJP»ÿ».)
This Document Relates to:
ALTON C. CHAPMANAND
FRANCIS CHAPMAN
Index No.: 190293/14,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Zurn Industries, LLC, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Zum Industries, LLC, with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Zum Industries, LLC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York,2015
Aftorney for Plaintiff)?)Alton C. Chapman and Francis ChapmanWeitz & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
FILEDMAR 3 0 2015
NEW YORKOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
Kerr>%aGÿ—€t)ok, Esq.Attorney for DefendantZum Industries, LLCMcGivney <£. Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
-sJ'-L/tspeter R-***& 535-1356
Mor !UOi[W ..4 p-3T3q *04
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_
NYCALINRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Doeument Relates to:
ALEXANDER PODHAJSKIAND
KATHERINE PODHAJSKI
I.A.S. PartÿOIndex No.: 190178/14,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, DAP, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the above
entitled case, pursuant to Civil Praetiee Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint
against defendant, DAP, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, DAP, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York( New York2»H-
Josrepn K/wrtH*aois[bsq.AQopr6y for Plaintiff]Alexander Podhajski and Katherme PodhajskiThe Williams Law Firm,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10167(212) 668-1122
Carol Tempesta, Esq.Attorney for DefendantDAP, Inc.McGivney&Kluger,P.C.SO Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED, filed
HON PETER H.h°*5S MAR 3 0 2015
NEW WWKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
I
f I iI % r\
*\ «.W, . <
! - ÿ "f"• .i. ' ' ' • t
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_INRE: NEW YORK COUNTY : NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
ARTHUR J. SAGEV1CKAND
MARY ANN SAGEV1CK
I.A.S. Part JO' S"OfHertteiTE)—Index No.: 190424/14,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Atwood & MorrillCo., Inc.,with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: NewJ£o$k, New York(O .2015
Q
FILEDMAR 3 0 2015
NEW YORKOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
Attorney forrlaintiff(s)Arthur J. Sageviek and Mary Ann SageviekThe Williams Law Firm,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10167(212) 668-1122
SO ORDERED,
licole Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for DefendantAtwood & MorrillCo., Inc.McGivney&Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
1
hou.pÿ£rH'WOULS-c' 963-2301
*r.>;O c
M»"* , .'** sJi !
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
ARTHUR J. SAGEV1CKAND
MARY ANN SAGEV1CK
NYCALI.A.S. Part VS(Hettlei7±7—
5U
Index No.: 190424/14,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Flowserve Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Practiee Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Flowserve Corporation, with prejudice inthis action, and
there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Flowserve Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs. fileDated: New Yor)c, New York
,2015 MAR 3 0 2015
NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
Attorney for f4amtiff(s)Arthur J. Sageviek and Mary Ann SageviekThe Williams LawFirm,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10167(212) 668-1122
SO ORDERED,
Laura B. HollmarAttorney for DefendantFlowserve CorporationMcGivney &Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
i)ri-//sHON. PETER H.MG5ULTON:
J.S.C. 951-1023
V
r i
L
i ., . I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. PartjKJ(Heillei, r)
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190424/14,
ARTHUR J. SAGEV1CKAND
MARY ANN SAGEV1CK NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there beingno opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: Newjfock,New York<77D ,2015
filed
for Plainriff(s)
;counCOUNfY CLERK'S OFRCE
MAR 8 0 2015NEW YORK
Attorney for Plainriff(s)Arthur J. Sageviek and Mary Ann 5 . w ekThe Williams Law Firm,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10167(212) 668-1122
J. Sageviek and Mary Ann
Laura B. Hollman, Esq.Attorney for DefendantThe Fairbanks CompanyMcGivney &Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212)509-3456
SO ORDERED,
HON. h-M0ULI°c.504-1425
- *,Vj
•" '--!ldq i1nH
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCAL _l.A.S. Part $ °(Heitler, J.]-
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190010/14,
JOHN P. RYANAND
MARY C. RYAN NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' eomplaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all eo-defendants, all elaims and eross elaims against
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: NewÿprkÿNewÿYork
AttomexJÿnaintiff(s} /John P. Ryan and Mary C. Ryan
MAR 3 0 2015
The Williams LawFirm,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10167(212) 668-1122
Laura B. Hollman, Esq.Attorney for DefendantThe Fairbanks CompanyMcGivney &Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED, D//y/s
ViON. peter h.504-1269
.7: .K aSTSR .IA0M
• SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION: NYCAL• l.A.S. Part/Ki'cS~L)
J.)"-This Document Relates to:
Index No.: 190159/14,ROLAND QUASHIE
ANDSAB1E QUASHIE NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Company, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Atwood & Morrill Company, with prejudice in this
action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Atwood & Morrill Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: Ne'
Attorney for Plaintiffÿ
"A* *0 20,5
KerryanmMf-Codk, Esq.Attorney for Defendant
Roland Quashie and Sabie QuashieThe Williams Law Firm,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10167(212) 668-1122
Atwood & Morrill CompanyMcGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED, ijn/i5
963-1982
i
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALl.A.S. Partÿf 5<3(Heitlcr, J.) -
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190159/14,
ROLAND QUASH1EAND
SABIE QUASH1E NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairhanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs. FILEDDated: New York, New York
w4-(0 fc .2OT3-MAR 3 0 2015
NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
Laura B. Hollman, Esq.Attorney for DefendantThe Fairbanks Company
Attorney foF-Plaintiff(s) /Roland Quashie and Sabie Qtiashie
Laura B. Hollman, Esq.Attorney for DefendantThe Fairbanks CompanyMcGrvNEY &Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004 - J(212) 509-3456 '
The Williams LawFirm,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10167(212) 668-1122
SO ORDERED, /7k A
MOULTON504-1304
I
HOTJUC,..! .:•? AhTzM .HOrJ.0.2.1.
a
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_INRE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
ANNE NOLAN
I.A.S. PartÿKf "S#(Beitlcr, J.)-Index No.: 190117/14,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc., herehy requests summary
judgment in the ahove entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New/York, New York~ _ 2015lew/Yorlim
36 ?0/s
Attorney for Plaintiffs)Anne NolanThe Williams LawFirm,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10167(212) 668-1122
SO ORDERED,
licole Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for DefendantAtwood & Morrill Co., Inc.McGivney &Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
'Q?
HON.peter h.MOULTON 963-1981
iflOTJUOM .H PTi'BH .11Or!.0.2.1.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S.PartÿÿO(Hcitlcr, k)
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190117/14,
ANNE NOLANNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there beingno opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all eo-defendants, all elaims and eross claims against
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without eosts.
AttorneyIfcr Plaintiffs)
Dated: New York, New York
P//P .2015
Anne NolanThe Williams LawFirm,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10167(212) 668-1122
Laura B. Hollman, Esq.Attorney for DefendantThe Fairbanks CompanyMcGivney &Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
504-1303
' *ÿ* <2,L9 VOH
1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Partner so
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190268/14,
FRANK P. MIN1CHIN1AND
RACHEL JEAN MIN1CHIN1 NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there heingno opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated:
nichini
Laura B. Hollman, EsqAttorney fcr Plaintiffs) / Attorney for DefendantFrank P. Minichini and Rachel Jean Mfnichini The Fairbanks CompanyThe Williams LawFirm,P.C. / McGrvNEY &Kluger,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th Ploor / 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10167 New York, New York 10004(212) 668-1122 (212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED, -- 311v>5
HON.PE"* W°ULI°£ 504-1375
;Jt;o:V? ,,rj...>. i, ''i'irjtzjq i,ÿ HOf i
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY : NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
VINCENT MARSIAND
JOSEPHINE MARSI
l.A.S. Part$(Heitlei, J.) ÿ
Index No-: 190365/14,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Columbia Boiler Company of Pottstown, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Columbia Boiler Company of Pottstown, with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Columbia Boiler Company of Pottstown, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
ew York,
204Dated: New York, New York
,2015
Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Vineent Marsi and Josephine MarsiWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Carol Tempesta, Esq.Attorney for DefendantColumbia Boiler Company of PottstownMcGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED, -ih/'SHON. PETER H.MOULTON
2572-230
L
MOTjUOM .H HBTaq .MOHo.a.t
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALl.A.S. Part S~£>(Heitler, 1 ) -
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190365/14,
VINCENT MARS1AND
JOSEPHINE MARS1 NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Croll-Reynolds Engineering Company, Inc., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs5 complaint against defendant, Croll-Reynolds Engineering Company, lne.,
with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all elaims and cross claims against
defendant, Croll-Reynolds Engineering Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed
with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: w 'MAR 3 0 2015
SPWn
Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Vineent Marsi and Josephine MarsiWE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Nieole Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for DefendantCroll-Reynolds Engineering Company, lne.McGivney &.Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
NlOUV-TON3/ /•»-/' S
1273-74
,ÿ ÿ l> *' * ri~J 4 '-**4 - 1ÿ1vir I
L
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
VINCENT MARSIAND
JOSEPHINE MARSI
NYCALI.A.S. Partner S~D(-Heillei, J.)—Index No.: 190365/14.
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Zurn Industries, LLC, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Praetice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Zurn Industries, LLC, with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Zurn Industries, LLC, be and the same arc hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs. mP/LDated: New York. New York
ri/1 .2015 uar3o
Attorney for Plaintiffs)Vineent Marsi and Josephine MarsiWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
2015c°unt?ÿork
°%C£Kerrywwa-MfCook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantZurn Industries, LLCMcGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED, l]l7~lIS
HON. PETER H. MOULTON535-1361
D
frlOTJUO;V] .H fi3T3«l HOH.O.S.I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALl.A.S. Partÿtf S°("Hetfler, J.)—
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190397/14,
ZORAN DJOKICAND
VENET1A KONTOGOUR1S NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs5 complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this aetion,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all eo-defendants, all elaims and eross elaims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without eosts. filedDated: New York, New York10- ,2015 MAR 8 0 2015
NIsW VriQlr
Attorney for Plaintiff(s)
COUNIr clews OFF,eg
Kerryann M7 Cook, Esq.Attorney for Defendant
Zoran Djokie and Venetia KontogourisWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Tishman Liquidating Corp.McGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED, ?//V/S
HON. PETER H.MOULTOtt 2383-30136
i
o.s ÿ<-. ÿ.-,ss Mijrl
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL
l.A.S. PartASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 190332/13
LEONARD F. CARPENTER, JR. AND BEVERLYCARPENTER
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Nash Engineering Company, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiff's complaint against defendant, Nash Engineering Company with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant,
Nash Engineering Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
eosts. filed
COUNTY CLERK'S
Laura B. Hollman, Esq.McGlVNEY & Kl.UGER, P.C.Attorneys for Defendants
WKI I7.& LUXÿNBr-RG, P.C.Attorneys for Pratfitiff
Dated: New York, New YorkUardo 4ÿ015
mar 3 0 2015NEW YORK
Leonard F. Carpenter, Jr. and Beverly Carpenter700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5550
Nash Engineering Company80 Broad Street -23rd FloorNew York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
505-3705
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_INRE: NEW YORK COUNTY : NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JOSEPH B. BACCARO, JR.
I.A.S. PartXÿ ÿ
Index No.: 190363/14,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Atwood & MorrillCo., lne., with prejudice inthis action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Ine., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiee and
without eosts. ÿ g
mar 8 0 2015
ÿry'oLemZÿIKAMMjuL
Dated: New_Y°jfc New York(Q ,2015
Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Joseph B. Baeearo, Jr.The Williams Law Firm,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10167(212) 668-1122
Nieole Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for DefendantAtwood & Morrill Co., Ine.McGivney &Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
HON.peTER H- w°ULj.s.c.-jJ/y/s
963-2169
rvp'r*.
HOW bElEH H wonnew
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Partÿatf
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190363/14,
JOSEPH B. BACCARO, JR.NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Flowserve Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Flowserve Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and
there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Flowserve Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
Dated: New_York, New York_</frO .2015
without eosts.
MA* 3 0 20,5
Attorney iQpPlaihtiff(s)Joseph B. Baeearo, Jr.The Williams LawFirm,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10167(212) 668-1122
Laura B. Hollman, Esq.Attorney for DefendantFlowserve CorporationMcGivney&Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED, 7//2-//S"
951-1021
• -"SMi/;r\ÿ .jÿffmsssam*
ÿ*e:LJuo.vt ./..* ' ' '1-41-•, .(
•ÿG/-/
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALl.A-S. PartÿS"0(Hoitlgr, L-)-
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190363/14,
JOSEPH B. BACCARO, JR.NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Nasb Engineering Company, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Nash Engineering Company, with prejudice in this
action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all eo-defendants, all claims and eross elaims against
defendant, The Nash Engineering Company, he and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without eosts.
Dated: New Yaflc, New Yorki/lV .2015v Yo/k, N2/M
FILED
Laura B. Hollman, Esq.
MAR 3 0 2015
NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
Attorney for Plaintiffs)Joseph B. Baccaro, Jr.The Williams LawFirm,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10167(212) 668-1122
Attorney for DefendantThe Nash EngineeringCompanyMcGivney&Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
HON.PETER B/ fWOUL/rON 505-4061
{
I • . .; ; .[ ..Ii MOHV, :;V *
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XInre: NEW YORK CITY :
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :
XThis document relates to:
BRYAN HOCKLER
NYCALI.A, S. Part 3<f C2> <)
Index No.: 190235/13
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREAS, Defendant The Nash Engineering Company requests summary judgment inthe above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practiee Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingPlaintiffs eomplaint against The Nash Engineering Company, with prejudice, and there being noopposition thereto, it is hereby
ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all elaims and cross claims againstThe Nash Engineering Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.
Dated: New York, New York
V/citcli iÿ- ,2oi 5
BreiwanLevy Ko/800 Third Avenue, 1llh FloorNew York, NY 10022Counselfor Plaintiff
Laura Hollman, Esq.MeGivney & Kluger80 Broad Street, Suite 2300,New York, NY 10004Counselfor The NashEngineering Company
SO ORDERED,.
jltonhon.peteb •> s
£Q
$0
{00332695.DOCX} cOÿ
Wo-- < •
' % , * .
Oc.- ' • •' • ' .. « • .
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JOHN D. WALKERAND
CATHERINE MCLEAN WALKER
NYCALl.A.S. Part yf SO
J.)—Index No.: 190163/12,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
FIIPDaled: New York, New York a ™ »
ÿ Isl .20151 MAR 3 0 2015
NEW YORK7. OUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
D-eClCto Laura B. Hollman, Esq.Attorney forPlaintiff(s) Attorney for Defendant
John D. Walker and Catherine MeLean Walker Fairbanks CompanyWeitz & Luxenberg,P C. McGivney & Kluger, P.C.700 Broadway 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10003 New York, New York 10004(212) 558-5500 (212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190293/14,
ALTON C. CHAPMANAND
FRANCIS CHAPMAN NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, The Fairbanks Company, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, The Fairbanks Company, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, The Fairbanks Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York2015
FILEDMAR 3 0 2015
NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Alton C. Chapman and Francis ChapmanWeitz&'Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Laura B. Hollman, Esq.Attorney for DefendantThe Fairbanks CompanyMcGivney &Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456 .
SO ORDERED
.>
I• C' ' ~V*'7 .ÿ»*».—"
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_INRE: NEW YORK COUNTY : NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
ALEXANDER PODHAJSKIAND
KATHERINE PODHAJSKI
l.A.S. Partjo
Index No.: 190178/14,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Flowserve Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practiee Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Flowserve Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and
there heing no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all elaims and cross claims against
defendant, Flowserve Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs. lEODated: N orkyNew York
covÿ gu£
JostAttoiAlex;
The Williams Law Firm,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th FloorNew York, New York 10167(212) 668-1122
Podhajski
Laura Hollman, Esq.Attorney for DefendantFlowserve CorporationMcGivney &Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
HON.ton
PETER - J.S.C,
7Ji-l/IS951-1014
jmmt-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JAMES J. LEVEROCKAND
CHARLOTTE LEVEROCK
l.A.S. PartÿO
Index No.: 190242/14,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs5 complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in tbis action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, tbat upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and eross elaims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New Yorkÿ
i2015
f'L£MAR 3 0 2015
«ÿS5JSE
Attorney for Plaintiff(s) —ÿ
James J. Leveroek and Charlotte LeveroekWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
office
K&pya&n*M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating Corp.McGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
2383-30133
bC] f'r, n~ Or,nac'-+-0j/f
flpPPPÿB*
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKINRE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part$5~ÿ(IItillu,J.) ÿ
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190379/14,
JAMES J. BELLAND
MARGARET BELL NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Flowserve Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Flowserve Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and
there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Flowserve Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without eosts. filedDated:
ms o
rney roe-Plaintiffs)2S J. Bell and Margaret BellWilliams LawFirm,P.C.
lOUNTV
Laura B. Hollman, Esq.Attorney roe-Plaintiffs) Attorney for DefendantJames J. Bell and Margaret Bell Flowserve CorporationThe Williams LawFirm,P.C. \ McGivney&Kluger,P.C.245 Park Avenue, 39th Floor 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10167 New York, New York 10004(212) 668-1122 (212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,_ )1
951-1020
'•<y ;
ÿa-c-t" '"'V-Hvnr-.-'>31 nn.,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
rN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:VrVTAN MARTY,AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE
estate OF HOWARDE.MARTY,andVIVIANMARTY,Individually
NYCAL ÿl.A.S. ParKS)(W&R4)
Index No: 190067/11
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant UnionCarbide Corporation, with prejudice,
and there beingno opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all elaims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
_.2015
FILEMAR 3 0 2015
NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICI
•! .. CharlesTefgusÿi >VpjZ jLÿOTNBERGv PjC.f "-
Attorneys for 'Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yavitz,TEsq.DARGFR ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,
HON
?//z//Speter H.m°ulJ°.c.
M07j»»:J
ÿH"3r3l.HOH
L
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JAMES R. REYNOLDSAND
JEAN REYNOLDS
NYCALI.A.S. ParÿO(Heitler, J.)
Index No.: 113781/02,106690/02
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courtcr & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Praetiee Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter &, Company, Inc., with prejudice in this aetion,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-dcfendants, all claims and cross elaims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York,\New YorkFt
3 F2-1 .2015
UimpjhAMAttorney for PIaintiff(s)James R. Reynolds and Jean ReynoldsWeitz & Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
ÿits 3
jgss*«*
Caitlin Bell, Esq.Attorney for DefendantCourter &, Company, Ine.McGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
HON. PSTSR H. MOUtTON1122-6213
-H h •ri.iq .mom
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
InRe: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
-X
-XThis document relates to:
JOHN RESKER
NYCALI. A. S. Part30(Heitler, J.)
Index No.: 104081/08
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
-X
WHEREAS, Defendant FLOWSERVE CORPORATION ("FLOWSERVE") requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against FLOWSERVE, without prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto, it is hereby
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
FLOWSERVE, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and withoÿccÿtsjÿ EDMAR 3 0 2015
Dated: New York, NewYork3h~Z]20 15
NEW YORKCLERK'S OFFICE
hTichoTas"Novack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG LLP800 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counselfor Plaintiff
Laura Hollman, Esq.McGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005Counselfor Flowserve Corporation
SO ORDERED, iizjis
HON. PETER H; MOULTON
{00355716.DOCX}
MOTJUCM H XTt'W HON.O P: »;
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_
NYCALIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
NICHOLAS COMODO
I.A.S, Part(Heitler, J.)
Index No.: 1 15499/02, 108752/99,111191/96
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
ew York, New6 &\ ,
Dated: Ne\y York, New York2015
FILEMAR 3 0 2015
NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
Attorney for Plaintiffs)Nicholas ComodoWeitz & Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
KerryafiTrM. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTreadwell CorporationMcGivney & Kjluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
?/'T-/lS
HON.peter H.1235-12205
f
/
laIJUOM -H «3T3q ,MOh
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALl.A.S. Part JJ)
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 115499/02,108752/99,
1 1 1 191/96NICHOLAS COMODO
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc.. hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs. filedDated: k
m so 20ÿ
Attorney for Plaintiffs)Nicholas ComodoWeitz & Luxenberg,PC.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Caitlin Bell, Esq.Attorney for DefendantCourter & Company, Inc.McGivney &Kluger,PC.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED, ?]n//S
HON.- PETER H. MOUÿON 1122-12733
mo;,.0.*l. •<< fÿnm .moh
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
RODNEY M.CRIEGO,as Executor for
the Estateof ROGERH.CRIEGO
NYCALl.A.S. Part ÿ0(inrrrmi j i)
Index No: 190061/11
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstÿ
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
,2015
uÿ°Charles jÿrgusonjÿsqfÿWEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yavit# Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,
HuL/Jw-M K .qÿTaq .UGH.0 2 I.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
ELLENBARRETT AND P/4ILBARRETT
NYCALI.A.S. Part
Index No: 190159/11
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Fe\>-IS ,2015
&OnrEsÿ. AAam Ccuptc* , ES9 .& LUXENBERG,P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yavwz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED, 311-i-flS
HON. PETER H.
•"STf' •
•'•1
HC/7_ÿo a.i.
:''' H»3T3q HOH
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
Joseph Giancoia
NYCAL >I.A.S. Part®)
)
Index No: 190236/09
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant UnionCarbide Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant UnionCarbide Corporation, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all elaims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without eosts.
Dated: New York, New York file-.2015
New ione,
twoicV
Charles FergusfrnrEsq: Judith A.Charles FergusfrnrEsq:WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED, h//~
Hot•WOH
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALl.A.S. Part g)(TUMI i, I)
This Document Relates to:
PaulNardellaIndex No: 190149/09
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are herehy dismissed with prejudice and
without eosts.
Dated: New York, New York
ijv
ergusion, Egg. Kje&
,2015 »•*Charle'TFerguson, Eÿih- Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,
HON. PETER H. MoULTONJ.S.Ck
HOH' bEif:« H' '1.0'A
j
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCAL *l.A.S. Part*30(KfftTi'ii , j.)(KfftTTii, j.
This Document Relates to:
Richard BartellNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Index No: 190356/09
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Coiporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without eosts.
Dated: New York, New York
ms « ÿj\f .2015NiVV YQSK
CGUMTt GLEBES OFFICE
Attorneys tor Flaintttt700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Charles Ferguson, Esq,: t3~Au?2f/ bSQ. Judith A. YaVitzTEsq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C/ DARGER ERRANTEDARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLP
Attorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED, Qtl J//'7/5'VlON- PeTEB ' J'S'C"
0
ÿ'Or I'jr.>_
*** .....ÿÿmoh
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE;NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Doeument Relates to:
FirminoMarques
NYCALl.A.S, Part §0
Index No: 190058/11
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practiee Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without eosts.
FDated: New York, New York
iH • .2015
-Gharles Ferguson, Esq. & Judith A. YavrdÿBsq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C. DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Union Carbide Corporation700 Broadway 116 East 27lh Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500, . (212)452-5300
SO ORDERED,
hON. PETER H. IWOULTONdvS.C/
0.2.1,
,.., ,';1 Hÿ .ran .WOH
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
rN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
Jorge Hernandez
NYCAL vl.A.S. Part 30
Index No: 190272/09
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,i
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all eo-defendants, all elaims and eross elaims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without eosts.
Dated: New York, New York
_, 2015
3rguson, Esq. Coper, -'i LUXENBERG, P.C. r A
attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yavqfz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,
HON.PETER H.MOULTON
i'lGVjVO.'jQ <i r)3T3ÿ MOH.0.2.1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
Gennaro DelPrete
NYCAL1.A.S. PartÿO(
Index No: 190080/09
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs eomplaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all claims and eross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without eosts.
Dated: New York, New York
Fa>. 3ÿ _, 2015
WEITÿr-LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
f \V.It*1*
Jot**Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27lh Street, 12,h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,
HON. PETER «.M0UL™c.
WOTjUom h R3T3q moh
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCAL /I.A.S. Part '30
This Document Relates to:Index No: 105993/08
Henry HaeringNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practiee Law and Rules Seetion 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant UnionCarbide Corporation, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without eosts.
Gjgflnesjjpfÿcon, Esq-.JGT.WEjÿ& LUXENBERG, P.C.ÿrfforneys for Plaintiff
laÿecWfi;coarfittfr Coper, JuditbA.WEjÿ& LUXENBERG, P.C. r U DARGER ERRANTEÿrfforneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Union C
Dated: New York, New York
F~ek -3S~ _,2015
ÿrfforneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,
Y*w
•r
• -y
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
Stanley Makowski
NYCAL .I.A.S. Part&(HTjilHi,!)
Index No: 104445/08
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant UnionCarbide Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without eosts.
Dated: New York, New York
Charles Fergusen, Esq:WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
CO
Judith A. Yavftz? Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,
M°TJUoWu — —•O.a.L -H .tfOH
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALl.A.S. ParH$3
This Document Relates to:
Joseph ErricoNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
Index No: 104141/08
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment inthe above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that uponnotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without eosts.
Dated: New York, New York
Cnaries rerguson-irsq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.
Judith A. .aviw,,1.04.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27(h Street, 12,h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
r-nUNTV
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
HON. PETER H. M°UL™c
-- »
I
H n3T3q M°H
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
Frank Carlson
NYCAL -I.A.S. PartÿO(J
Index No: 105647/08
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant UnionCarbide Corporation, with prejudice,
and tbere being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without eosts.
Dated: New York, New York
~P{\Q(CitVM 2015
F !LE
Charles FergusonÿEsq,-WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
COUNT/ ewERK'S OFFICE
Judith A. YavitzJyEsq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,
HON. PETER H.MOULTON7jl-L.fl
I'OTJUOM H R3T39 MOH>' r..( .
I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JAMES GUCK AND JOAN GUCK
NYCALI.A.S. PartÿS-©(HeitleJvJÿ—1
Index No: ig0368/10
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross
claims against defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York_3/ / 6 ,2015v'F
fife
CO'in P. Guinan, Esq.
LEVY KONIGSBERG LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff800 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10022(212) 605-6200
JojaÿtKan B.ÿKromberg, Esq.CHARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPÿttolrieys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
OULTON
'"ÿ - * i - f ÿ ÿ V',ri*jsj <;*\
~ÿ~
'wji;: . .jSJ- Vt _
i
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JOSEPH MAETKE
NYCAL ÿl.A.S. Partif)(IlMftlwUri
Index No: 190373/2014
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTced Corporation hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
V *3- 2015
CharlÿiM. Ferguson, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
S0
£0
___.00ÿ0_Jonathan B.Kromberg, Esq. w
DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,
L<* r"\ ,
v* .<-/
! KOa•'ÿV
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
VINCENT MARSI and JOSEPHINE MARSI
NYCALI.AJLPartÿ)(I
Index No: 190365/2014
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all elaims and cross elaims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without eosts.
Dated: New York, New York
Zh I 2015 1
Cl'ioi'lcs M. FtilgUbuny-Esg. Jonathans©: Kromberg, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C. DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Union Carbide Corporation700 Broadway 116 East 27lh Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500 (212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,
HON.PETER H.MOULTON
MOTjuom hRirj't HonfO.o.L
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALl.A.S. Part
This Document Relates to: Index No: 190268/2014
FRANK P. MIN1CHIN1and RACHELJEANMIN1CHINI
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment
in the ahove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Joseph tf. WifjTams, Esq*-ÿTHE WHLIAMS LAW F1
,2015
Jonatha
Attorneys for Plaintiffs245 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10167(212) 668-1122
DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLFAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,ULTUN
J.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
VINCENT MARSI and JOSEPHINE MARSI
NYCAL yl.A.S. PartSsi
Index No: 190365/2014
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' eomplaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all eo-defendants, all elaims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without eosts.
Dated: New York, New York
an_,2015 f I
-ass—ÿhnrl™? ÿ Fprgnsnn. Esq. flpuf/fyUfh Jonathan Bÿkxomberg, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. OftWh*- DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation700 Broadway 116 East 27lh Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500 (212) 452-5300
SO OFFERED, ÿ?lli-l15
HOJ1J*EVER.m. MOULTONJ.S.C.
HGTJuolvi WOHv) a.L
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
VINCENT MARSI and JOSEPHINE MARSI
NYCALI.A.S. Part &
index No: 190365/2014
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
. WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, lne. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company
n/k/a Bayer Cropscience, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled ease,
pursuant to Civil Practiee Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' eomplaint against
defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company n/k/a Bayer Cropscience,
lne. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all claims and eross claims against
defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulene AG Company n/k/a Bayer Cropseienee,
lne. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
2015 m» 0
sbu-SSSS-"*F.cq JonathanJBfKromberg, Esq.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Amehem Produets, lne.700 Broadway 116 East 27lh Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500 (212)452-5300
SO ORDERED,
HONÿg-STMOULTOWijnj/b
v
"OTJUoMO.S.L M03T3q.MCH
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
ROBERT KLATCHand MARIE KLATCH
NYCAL ÿI.A.S. Part 5$(EeiSpr)
Index No: 190312/2014
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without eosts.
Dated: New York, New York
jX) .2015
I*JI IV
H-
JosephTHE WlÿLlAMS LAW FI1Attorneys for Plaintiffs245 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10167(212) 668-1122
FILMAR 3 0 2015
NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
Jonathan B. Kromberg, Esq.BARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED, ÿyny-?
wv0UL nJ.S.C*
I
MOTJUOfv] .H«3Tdiq MOH.o.a.i,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JOSEPH B.BACCARO,JR.
NYCAL .l.A.S. Part 3$)(UCTfcyJ.)
Index No: 190363/2014
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiff's complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New_York, New York
fO ,2015
V TO
%
Joseph F. W4Hiams,~ESq.THE WffllAMS LAW FUAttorneys for Plaintiff245 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10167(212) 668-1122
FSLEDMAR 3 0 2015
MEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
Jonathans. Kromberg, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27lh Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,
honTeterPm°ulJON
MOrJUOM HR3T3R MOHU
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALl.A.S.Part?
This Document Relates to: Index No: 190178/2014
ALEXANDER PODHAJSKI and KATHERINEPODHAJSKi
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Praetice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all eo-defendants, all claims and eross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: " 1 w 1 Ff LEO
Joseph(PjJÿVTlUams, Esq.THE WILLIAMS LAW
MAR 3 0 2015
NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
Attorneys for Plaintiffs245 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10167(212) 668-1122
Jonathan B.Kromberg, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27,h Street, 12,h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED, -—WipiMfNlOULTONHON. PETEK j.S.C.
ÿOTjuom h !-0.e.tM -ÿh3Tdq M0H
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
TN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOSLITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
WILLIAM J. NEWMAN & NORMAN NEWMAN
NYCAL —I.A.S. Part£D(Heitler, J.)
Index No: 190425/12
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC, formerly known as Dana Corporation
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Praetice Law
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Dana Companies,
LLC, formerly known as Dana Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Dana Companies, LLC, formerly known as Dana Corporation be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without eosts.
Dated: New York, New York
~$llU .2015
FILEDMAR 3 0 201SNEW YdFlK
COUNTY dlERFt'S ©FFiCf
John P. Guinan, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff800 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10022(212) 605-6200
Jonathatyp' Kromberg, Esq.DARQER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC, formerlyknown as Dana Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,
y\ON-
•Ini5
HqhH .M«n„ '''yC
* -Onrj0ii
9'V.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
William J. Newman & Norman Newman
NYCALIAS. Partfe(Heitler, J.)
Index No: 190425/12
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross
claims against defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York,/New York,2015
orK,/iNe\
3//(o
John P. Guinan, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff800 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10022(212) 605-6200
nleMAR 3 0 2015
YORKeOtJNTY GijRK'S OFFICE
Jonath'an B. Kromberg, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,
VAOH-P
c
* /Uo-- <•*»fr)47 i.'7
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOSLITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
GEORGE P. LEWIS
NYCALI.A.S. Part$)(Heitler, J.)
Index No: 190191/13
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiee and
without eosts.
Dated: New York, New York
3/iU ,20)5
F8 LEMAR 30 2015NEW YORKOUNTY CLERK'SOFFICE
lohn P. Guinan, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff800 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10022(212) 605-6200
SO ORDERED,
Judith ÿYavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttÿneys for Union Carbide Corporation1 IffEast 27th Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
HON
?jalis-
frofrr b-..,,u. "r.ÿ c-• ÿ.'O/ ?f f f" " ÿ '• /
5*•ftfj
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOSLITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
GEORGE P. LEWIS
NYCALl.A.S. Pari
-fHeitler,
Index No: 190191/13
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York3/1(3 ,201s
file"Ai> a » m
°PPIGEn P. Guinan, esq.
LEVY KONIGSBERG LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff800 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10022(212) 605-6200
Jonathaiyk' Kromberg, Esq.
DARKER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12,h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED
/ **
O p , ÿ**7 L> ,-_
*o«
r
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
HARRY MOORE and MARY MOORE,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, INC.,et al., includingBLACKMER,
Defendants.
NYCAL
Index No. 190288/13
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
fileMAR 8 0 20)5
NSw YORKCOUNTY CLIfWa OFFICE
WHEREFORE, defendant Blackmer hereby requests summary judgment in the above-
entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practiee Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs
complaint against defendant Blackmer with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Blaekmer be and the same are bereby dismissed with prejudiee and without eosts.
Dated o/k, New York
Joseph P.245 Park Avenue - 39lh FloorNew York, New York 10167Attorneysfor PlaintiffsAlexander andKatherine Podhajski(212) 668-1122
SO ORDERED,Mom Sh
MALABY & BRADLEY, LLC
Gritee De Mario, Esq.1sfajiroadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038Attorneysfor Defendant Blackmer(212) 791-0285
oMsJ.s.c.
k£<rn U- - rs'CmnriQu
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
ASHWORTH DOWE,
Plaintiff,
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ET AL,including, MORSE DIESEL, INC.
Defendants,
NYCALl.A.S. Part><5<S"0(Heitler, I)
Index No. 190159/13
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
F!L EMAR 80 2015
NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs
complaint against defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-elaims against defendant
Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York,2015
MAs—-JDavkhHÿarry, Esq. %f/ •
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC. V
Attorneysfor PlaintiffAshworth Dowe700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Rosario Chetta,Rosario Chetta, esq.MALABY & BRADLEY, LLCAttorneysfor DefendantMorse Diesel, Inc.150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038(212) 791-0285
SO ORDERE
j.s.c
Dated:-ÿ /(X.
4
• k./ 'i, n.:i <•1o
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_____
x
IN RE NEW YORK CITY NYCALASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A. S. Partÿtf
(Hoitlon J.) ÿ
____x
ROBERT V. KESAR and MARILYN KESAR, Index No. 190020-201S
Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY-against- JUDGMENT
FiLEDA.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS Co. et al., includingSUPERIOR BOILER WORKS, INC., g q
Defendants. NEW YORK
_________X COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
WHEREFORE, defendant SUPERIOR BOILER WORKS, INC., hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against SUPERIOR BOILER WORKS, INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
SUPERIOR 80ILER WORKS, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, Ntew Ybrk
- 6!7/0H
Patti Burshtyn, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
Ax ÿ -_Tasha LaSpina, Esq.Malaby & Bradley, LLCAttorneys for Superior Boiler Works, Inc.150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, NY 10038
°"WRE0-H
<TV"
o.a.t,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK-COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCAL
MAUREEN MUCCI,
Plaintiff,
-against-
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION as successor bymerger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., et al., includingBLACKMER,
Defendants.
Index No. 190371/13
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Blackmer hereby requests summary judgment in the above-
entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Seetion 3212, dismissing plaintiffs
complaint against defendant Blackmer with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross elaims against
defendant Blaekmer be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New
ILLIA
Joseph RWAllama/Esq.245 Park Averiue - 39lh FlooiNew York, New York 10167'Attorneysfor PlaintiffsAlexander and Katherine Podhajski(212) 668-1122
FS LEDMAR 3 0 2015
NEW YORKMALABY & BRADLEY, I<§<§jntY CLERK'S OFFICE
ee De Mario, Esq.50 Broadway, Suite 600
New York, New York 10038Attorneysfor Defendant Blackmer(212) 791-0285
SO ORDERED, V'7'/1 c
«oe,t H HrlTBq .itOK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALIAS Part 30
X (Heitler, J.)INRE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
RAYMOND J. TURNER and ROSE TURNER INDEX NO:190038/2014
Plaintiff(s),
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al
-against- NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION
Defendant(s) AND ORDERX
WHEREFORE, defendant Armstrong International, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled action, pursuant to CPLR3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant
Armstrong International, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
Armstrong International Ine., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without eosts.
Dated: White Plains, New York
THOMAS M/feÿVENTANOLa Sorsa & BeneventanoAttorney for Defendant
Bellueÿ& Fox LLPAttorney for Plaintiff
La Sorsa & BeneventanoAttorney for DefendantARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL,INC.3 Barker Avenue, White Plains,NY 10601Tel: (914) 682-3300
546 Fifth Avenue - 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Tel: (212) 681-1575
SO ORDERED,
BonTÿÿ-tooui-tonJ.SiC*
MAR 3 0 2015
NEW YORKeOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
rl RBT3q '/iOH
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
ROBERT TEAGUE,
NYCALIAS Part J0S*2>
/C£INDEX NO: 190131/2013
-against-
Plaintiff(s), NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
3M COMPANY, Individually andas Successor to MinnesotaMiningandManufacturing Company,et al.
Defcndant(s)X
WHEREFORE, defendant Armstrong International,Inc.hereby requests summary judgment
inthe above entitled action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant
Armstrong International, Inc.with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
Armstrong International Inc.,be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DatedrWhite:\
ains,New York
BeMuck & Fox LLPAttorney for Plaintiff5&6 Fifth Avenue -4Ui FloorNew York, NY 10036Tel: (212) 681-1575
THOMAS M. BENEVENTANOLa Sorsa & BeneventanoAttorney for DefendantARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL,INC.3 Barker Avenue, White Plains,NY 10601Tel: (914) 682-3300
SO ORDERED,
V MOli
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NYCALCOUNTY OF NEW YORK IAS Part yd
X .(Heitler, J..)INRE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
SULPICE CHAMBLIN AND ELSIE CHAMBLIN INDEX NO: 190262/13
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
3M COMPANY, Individually and as Successor to MinnesotaMiningandManufacturing Company, et al.
Defendant(s)X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Armstrong International, Ine. hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant
Armstrong International, Ine.with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all elaims and cross-claims against defendant
Armstrong International Ine.,be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: White Plains,New YorkJyCcrAhpx SO,
Be/mack & Fox LLPAttorney for Plaintiff546 FifthAvenueNew York, NY 10036Tel: (212)681-1575
4th Floor
THOMAS M. BENEVENTANOLa Sorsa & BeneventanoAttorney for DefendantARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL,INC.3 Barker Avenue, White Plains,NY 10601Tel: (914) 682-3300
SO ORDERED
QULTONJ.S.C.
OOÿ
1 •»
I
I
' Kgtjul.,. (-{'niii'sqo.a.i,
MOM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
MAUREENWRIGHT, as Administratrixfor the Estateof WILLIAM WRIGHT
NYCALI.A.S. Part(Iloitlcr, J.)
Index No: 190440/11
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Seetion 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs. F IL: New Yprk, New York
2015: New Yp
Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
MAR 3 0 2015
NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,
f
HOTJUOM M K3T3q .MOW
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALl.A.S. Part#5°(Hoitlcr, J.)
This Document Relates to:Index No: 107168/02
DonaldD.Wilson NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,
and there beingno opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without eosts. F S L D
& LUXENBERG, P.C.vitz, Esq.
MAR 8 0 2015
NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
Frank Qrtiz/fcsefc, ÿWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C
Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27lh Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, A-
H0KWEffÿQULJsC.
> A
MOTJUCM\H'ÿ3T3«? .WOK.o.e.t
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. PartjXfG"5
This Document Relates to: Index No: 107168/02
DonaldD.Wilson NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc.,hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant Amchem Products, Inc., with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Amchem Products, Inc.,he and the same are herehy dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
FIL
Judith A. YavitzTHslFrank Ortiz, Esq.
MAR 3 0 2015
NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,ÿ/2ÿ ÿ/( l/IS
fegygft H. MOULTON
MOTJJOM H H3Tijq .MOk• 'C.o
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
MARY G. WELLDORN,as Administratrixfor the Estateof JOHN TOTH
NYCALI.A.S. Part y6ÿ(Heitler, J.)
Index No: 190457/10
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without eosts.
—Dated: New York, New York_,2015
tiz, Esq.Frank OrtizWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
FILEMAR 3 0 2015
NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
Judith A. YavitzTEsq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,
MOULTONJ.S.C,
3/\yis
/\ /I/
,/•
MCTJUCM .H A3r3«l .HOH.Del.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JOHN SULLIVAN
NYCALl.A.S. Part Kf(Heitler, J.)
Index No: 110130/98
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Seetion 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
New Yqrk, New York,2015
Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
FILMAR 3 0 2015
NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED, moultoN 3//yÿr
/ f
*j.a->0,ÿ-j i'i 'I.ii3H HQi-i
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JOHN SULLIVAN
NYCALI.A.S. Part yt S~°(Haitlcr, J.-)
Index No: 111065/98
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York MAR 3 0 2015
Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
Judith A. Yavitz, tisq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27lh Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300----x/n /, <SSiÿLTON ÿ US
* -A/> "V- „ j
ÿ0Tjyof.j
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE:NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JOHN SULLIVAN
NYCALI.A.S. Part #6®
Index No: 111065/98
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc.,hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant Amchem Products, Inc.,with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Amchem Products, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
FILEwithout costs.
Dated-New-YorL New YorkJew-York. New YorktPQ /U .2015
Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,Hon. Sherry K. Hoitlcr.
HON- PETER H.MOULTONJ.S.C.
•3/t Vts
W*.* * «, «». 0*w .it.D 3I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
EILEENC,SKELTON, Individuallyand asExecutrix for theEstateof DONALD T,
SKELTON
NYCALI.A.S. Partus'0(Hertlefr*}Index No: 103009/08
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without eosts.
Dated: New York, New York FILEIS2015
Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C,
Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500
MAR 3 0 2015
Niw YORKCOUNTY eURk'S OFFICE
Judith A. Yavitz/Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,
'V
»•> , • .- L-
t
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xInRe: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
—xThis Docnment Relates To:
Frank Ayala and Margarita Ayala,
."•"Jl5partNYCALI.A.SPart3ft 5"(Iltillu,J.)"
P)Index No,: 190524-11
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
3D
WHEREFORE, defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against CARRIER CORPORATION, with prejudice, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without eosts.
Dated: New York, New Yorki: New YorK. New Yop-
t)anaM. Northeraft,Weitz & Luxenberg P.C.Attorney for Defendant700 BroadwayNew York, New York 1 0003
FILEMAR 30 2015vpv
COUNTY CLERK'o OFFICEVirginia Squitieri, Esq.WLLSON, ELSER, MOSKOW1TZEDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantCARRIER CORPORATION150 East 42nd StreetNew York, New York, 10017FileNo. 10557.01217
SO ORDEREDarwiouLTON
J.S.C.
3(1x/,5
L_ _
MOTjUOSW A i P.313H HUH.CJ.c.t
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALl.A.S. Part6o
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190093/09,
IRVING BERGSOHNNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this aetion, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all claims and eross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York.2015
.JJSSS'TfOWr\ ortiz.Attorney for Plaintiffs)Irving BergsohnWeitz & Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Attorney for DefendantTreadwell CorporationMcGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED, l/lT-llS
1235-22809
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALl.A.S. Part lx)(ttciiwiÿJ.)
This Document Relates to:
Index No.: 190093/09,
IRVING BERGSOHNNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courtcr & Company, lne., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs5 complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
file©Dated: New York, New YorktmiT ,2015
•viQiwfi
s\N yQftK
Attorney for P!aintiff(s)Irving BergsohnWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Caitlin Bell, Esq.Attorney for DefendantCourter & Company, lne.McGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED, _?//?/ is
1122-23192
7*Oÿ-ÿs
'r .
J » i
•foA,'
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALl.A.S. Part
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 107221/02,
EDWARD S. BARRIOAND
FRANCES BARRIO NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., herehy requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York±fl)QlS_,2015
Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Edward S. Barrio and Frances BarrioWeitz <£. Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Nicole Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman LiquidatingCorp.mcGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
2383-25559C
-Hÿ .< -Jr
l-; i1JUGM -H n27a? >*GH
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.COUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALl.A.S. PartÿO(Hate?*)
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 107221/02,
EDWARD S. BARRIOAND
FRANCES BARRIO NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same arc hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
-ttQWA Ottu-
Dated: New York, New York,2015
KeiAttorney for DefendantTreadwell CorporationMcGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
Attorney for Plaintiff(s)Edward S. Barrio and Frances BarrioWeitz &. Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
SO ORDERED, —1235-5910
ÿ • J* ,
(ÿ'
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
EDWARD S. BARRIOAND
FRANCES BARRIO
NYCAL .l.A.S. Part|p
Index No.: 107221/02,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this aetion,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York-veb \T .2015
TfQNf)Attorney for Plaintiffs)Edward S. Barrio and Frances BarrioWeitz 8l Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
a#*0*Caitlin Bell, Esq.Attorney for DefendantCourter & Company, Inc.McGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
3//2.//S"
HON. PETER H.MOUL.TOWJ.S>C*
1122-6405
i%,
y'0\ wGA) .H HliTiiq HOH•0.3.t
i
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_
NYCALIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
DAVID JOSEPH BARNESAND
TERRY L. BARNES
l.A.S. Part<56(ngUllniEJ.)
Index No.: 114779/04,106578/02
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs5 complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without eosts.
Dated: New York, New YorkVftVÿ ,2015
F!LEMAR 3 0 2015
NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
ÿQ(\WWmAttorney for Plaintiff(s)David Joseph Barnes and Terry L. BamesWeitz & Luxenbcrg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Nicole Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating Corp.McGivney &Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
HON.P
?,
moulton1l-LjI:
2383-27010
ft
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_
NYCALIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
DAVID JOSEPH BARNESAND
TERRY L. BARNES
l.A.S. Part4)0(Ffeatanÿ-J.)
Index No.: 114779/04,106578/02
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Trcadwcll Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
eomplaint against defendant, Treadwel! Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and eross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are herehy dismissed with prejudiee and
without eosts.
Dated: New York, New YorkrgO\S_.2015 file
ms oNEW YOW
-nQt\YS QCtiz-Attorney for Plaintiff(s)David Joseph Barnes and Terry L. BarnesWeitz & Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
COUNTYKerÿaau-MÿCook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTreadwell CorporationMcGivney &Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456-
SO ORDERED,
HON.PE.T£R H- W°ULJ.S.C.1235-8008
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK_IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY : NYCAL
ASBESTOS L1T1GATJON
This Doeument Relates to:
DAVID JOSEPH BARNESAND
TERRY L. BARNES
1.AJ3. PartiJxTÿ)
Index No.: 114779/04,106578/02
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Praetiee Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and eross elaims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without eosts.
Dated: New York, New York
VShLS—,2015
n-t0f\ViAttorney for Plaintiffs)David Joseph Barnes and Terry L. BarnesWeitz &. Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
FILEMAR 3 0 2015NEW YORK
GLgftK'8 0FFI6E
ÿaitlin Bell, Esq.Attorney for DefendantCourter & Company, lne.McGivney & Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
7.plisHON, PETER H.MOULTON
J.S.C. 1122-8505
P'ttjtf
MOTJUOM ,H HDTÿq ,1/1Oil.0.3.1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.COUNTY OF NEW YORK_IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Doeument Relates to:
CALVIN W. ANDREASS1AND
IDA D. ANDREASS1
l.A.S. Parkjio"
Index No.: 114995/98,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and eross claims against
..defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs. FILEDMAR 3 0 2015
Dated: New York, New York
- 2015
NEW YORK/COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
Calvin W. Andreassi and Ida D. AndreassiWeitz & Luxenberg,PC.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
]aaj6LNicole Wesselmann, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating Corp.McGivney &Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C. 2383-23475
y/ WO
m ii iwMiiii>rrfflttTWiiyfl i
i ÿ"C/iVi .."t W.j , „j v. 0-<S.L
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
CALVIN W. ANDREASS1AND
IDA D. ANDREASSl
NYCALl.A.S. PartJlO '
/I 1-1ÿ.1--I •>
Index No.: 114995/98,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courier <£_ Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter &. Company, Inc., be and the same are herchy dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkNew York, New Yori«
\K~ .2015
FILEMAR 3 0 2015
NEW YORKOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
riUufLAttorney for Plaintiff(s)Calvin W. Andreassi and Ida D. AndreassiWeitz & Luxenberg,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
.aitlhfbell, Esq.Attorney for DefendantCourter & Company, Inc.McGrvNEY &Kluger,P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C. 1122-7357
L
0ÿv
67.fiHj* tn«9fyff'ÿÿfr f
ÿ»»ÿV,.«ÿjj,J_j,,i«v, i
I,\
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCAL
ÿ
l.A.S. Part(3$0(HeM»»fc)
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 1 14995/98,
CALVIN W. ANDREASSIAND
IDA D. ANDREASSI NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without eosts. FILEDDr ' w- w- k
MAR 3 0 2015
NEW YORK"ounty clerksoffice
naMAAttorney for Plaintiffs)Calvin W. Andreassi and Ida D. AndreassiWEITZ & LUXENBERG,PC.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Attorney for DefendantTreadwell CorporationMcGivney &Kluger,PC.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,
HON.PETER H.MOULTON 1235-6861
NASmi,M«AAX'aU
'-''ÿ'ÿJ ,1,0,<£M
' 1 '' " *'•' i!Or/
t
TMe:CC(jpk)2/13/15
Our File NoS-5027-01
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE:NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION,
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
Thomas Kimkowski
NYCALI.A.S. PartnerSo(IlcitlciW.)
INDEXNO.101889/01
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Praetiee Law
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company ofNew York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company ofNew York, Inc., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York 2/23jIS
. —-"Than Alvarado, Esq.WE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
Timothy tyyMcCann, Esq.DAVID M. SANTORO, ESQ.Attorney for DefendantConsolidated Edison Company of NewYork, Inc.4 Irving PlaceNew York, NY 10003-3598
SO ORDERED:Hon. Sherry Klein HfHON-pETE ' ' * "3/W(S
FILEMAR 3 0 2015
NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
*I
tfOrjUUfvlM fl:JTi3'>.o.e.t' ÿ0/./
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALIAS Part
ÿX (Hcitler, JfrINRENEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
THOMAS LEAHY and EVELYNLEAHY INDEX NO: 190162/09
Plaintiff(s),
3M COMPANY, et al.
-against-NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
Defendant(s)X
WHEREFORE, defendant Armstrong International, Inc.hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant
Armstrong International, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
Armstrong International Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: White Plains, New York
THOMAS M.ÿENEÿENTANOLa Sorsa & BeneventanoLa Sorsa & BeneventanoAttorney for DefendantARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL,INC.3 Barker Avenue, White Plains, NY 10601Tel: (914) 682-3300
Attorney for Plaintiff546 Fifth Avenue -4Ih FloorNew York, NY 10036Tel: (212) 681-1575
motjucm .Hÿir.rnn mom.or i> ÿ
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALIAS PartX6ÿ6
X (Hcitlcr, J.-)-INRE NEW YORK COUNTYASDESTOS LITIGATION lTHOMAS LEAHY and EVELYN LEAHY INDEX NO: 190162/09
Plaintiff(s),
3M COMPANY, ct al.
-against-NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
Defcndant(s)X
WHEREFORE, defendant Armstrong International, Inc.hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant
Armstrong International,Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
Armstrong International Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: White Plains, New York
THOMAS M.ÿENEÿENTANOLa Sorsa & BeneventanoAttorney for DefendantARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL,INC.3 Barker Avenue, White Plains, NY 10601Tel: (914) 682-3300
Attorney for Plaintiff546 Fifth Avenue - 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Tel: (212) 681-1575
SO ORDERED, S XSv ÿ
J.S.C.
r
MOTJilOM .M ri;lT-V'J MOW,0.2.1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE 0F NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
"his Document Relates To:
NYCALl.A.S. Part2Qr£'D
(FfciRci', J.)~
Index No: 127888/02102380/03
Glenn Limburg
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY,with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs. mm
n — fILEDated: j t"ÿ1' ÿ
New York, NY
Frank Ortiz, Esq.WE1TZ <5L LUXENBERG PCAttorney for Plaintiff700 Broadway, 7th FloorNew York, NY 10003
MM 3 0 2015
OFRCsVirginia Squicrcri, Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantA.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY150 East 42nd StreetNew York, NY 10017File No. 05335.29709
SO ORDERED,
k MOULTONJ.S.C.
65 1 5789v. I
MOTJu'GM .H RBTBq .MOM.0.8.L
I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
James R. Reynolds
NYCAL.I.A.S.Pait>0
(HfritllTj I)
Index No: 106690/021 13781/02
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section3212. dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY,with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.
oi —(,sNew York, NY
Dated:
Hank Ortiz, Esc£ hfoJD$Vtyt?\-0&CfctQWEITZ & LUXENBERG PCAttorney for Plaintiff700 Broadway,New York, NY 10003
7lh Floor
fil
Virginia Squitieri. Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantA.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY150 East 42nd StreetNew York, NY 10017File No. 05335.25352
MAR 3 0 2015
NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
SO ORDERED,
HON.hETER H. M0UL.T0NJ.S.C.
3/<*/i s
65 15858v.1
f
T2*CHOiT bE.LEB H* WOHfiOM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part
ÿ(Hcitlerÿ J.).x
fhis Document Relates To: Index No: 190387/11
George Endelmann, as Administrator for the Estate of AnnEndelmann
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER
x
WHEREFORE, defendant CARRIER CORPORATION hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CARRIER CORPORATION withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-dcfcndants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant CARRIER CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.
±J1_ÿCLERK'S OFFICEVirginia Squitieri, Esq. COUNTY 0Virginia Squitieri, Esq. COUNTYWILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLP
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorney for Plaintiff700 Broadway, 7th FloorNew York, New York 10003 CARRIER CORPORATION
150 East 42nd StreetNew York, New York 10017File No: 10557.01093
Attorney for Defendant
SO ORDERED,_ '
honTÿITh.moulton
5595689v.I
ÿ ÿ r ' ' % -' MOTJ'Jo:*: >i .-.aTjrt .YIOK.o.a.u
i
L
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
NYCALl.A.S. PartX CO(Hcitlcr, J.) ÿ
Index No: 190413/11100904/03105028/03
Francis Goes and Senta Goes NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, incorrectly s/h/a "CARRIERCORPORATION, Individually, and as successor in interest to BRYANT HEATING &COOLING SYSTEMS" (hereinafter "CARRIER CORPORATION"), hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CARRIER CORPORATION withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all codefendant CARRIER CORPORATION, beand without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
•defendants, all claims and cross claims againstand the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
Daniol Blouin, Esq. f*.WE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorney for Plaintiff700 Broadway, 7th FloorNew York, New York 10003
FILEMAR 3 0 2015NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
'irginia Squiteri, Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOW1TZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantCARRIER CORPORATION150 East 42"d StreetNew York, New York 10017File No: 10557.01102
SO ORDERED,
"°"hSpet'STh.moulton5595728V. I
tiOTJUi.s; ! *; a; i ... ,.0.2.1 ' ' -*"OH
jG
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK 000ÿÿoff,csIN RENEW YORK. CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S.ParUStfgÿ{Heitler, J.)
This Doeument Relates To: Index No: 127888/02102380/03
GLENN L1MBURG NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant MCCORD CORPORATION, hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant MCCORD CORPORATION with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant MCCORD CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Frank Ortiz, Esq. sWE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorney for Plaintiff700 Broadway, 71New York, New York 10003
Floor
Armand Kalfayan, Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantMCCORD CORPORATION1 50 East 42nd SlreelNew York, New York 10017File No: 06507.01010
SO ORDERED,MOULTON 3/(l/(S
j.s.c.
,6604933v. 1
N '.in- ,•o.a.L H
L
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK-—- XINRE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X
ÿ$>
GERLINDE TYNAN, Individually and as PersonalRepresentative for the Estate of WILLIAM S.TYNAN,
Plamtiff(s),
-against-
A. 0. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.
Defendants.
Index No. 102033/01
cO'J
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
IAS Part SO
-X
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all elaims and cross claims
against Goodyear Canada Ine. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs
LYNCHDASKALEMERY LLPAttorneys fotJpefendant Goodyear Canada Ine.
By: SJLJULM-e
700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
264 west 40lh StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED:HonTine:HON. P
i/it-IisivJ
J.S.C,
ilvJ i ..0-3 L
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XINRE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX
IMOGENE ARONE, as Personal Representative forthe Estate of RALPH ARONE,
Plaintiffs),
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.X
FILEMAR 3 0 2015
NYCALNiW YORK
COUNTY GLlRK'S OFFICEIndex No.: 190107/09
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon.IAS Partÿe 5"°
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkNew York, New York
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys fojJilainti]
By:..Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.
700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &
ubber Company and GqoÿyeaÿCanada Inc.
Lawrence G. Lee,
264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED: AHorn
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
MO !'Jbuif«i .vioh"> o I
FILEDSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK m8 0 2015
NiW YORKCOUNTY CLlRK'S OFFICENEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCAL
CHARLES BAGGIANO and LOUISEBAGGIANO,
Index Nos.: 106480/93132-167/93100387/03
Plaintiffs),
-against-NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,Hon. Shiny Klein Heiller,IAS Part.30 S&Defendants.
X
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Ine. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all elaims and cross elaims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without eosts.
Dated: New York\ New YorkNew York\ New York
7, X)5
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys fotjikuntiff, Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &
Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada)Ine.
Frank M. Ortiz, Esq. Lawrenee G. Lee, Esq,
700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212)302-2400
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED
AkJ:
I'J
* "'OW
fileSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XINRE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X
NYCAL
MAR 3 0 2015NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
LOIS CARLSEN, as Executrix for the Estate ofCARL T. CARLSEN, and LOIS CARLSEN,Individually,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.
Index Nos.: 116747/07034783/92
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Sherry Klein llcitlcr,IAS Part Kf
X
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all eo-defendants, all elaims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudiee and without costs.
Dated: New YoiNew York, New YorkW\0fCrÿ?0»5
WE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
By:_Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.
700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &Rubber ffompany and Goodyfpr Canada Inc.
%By:Lawrenee G. Lee
264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED: PiytOULTQN O/iz/fSeitler, J.S.C3.S.C.
o
>-'/> ->V , '' - V 7
WOTJLJ°M .H HSTSq.ti
SUPREME COURT OF STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
In Re: New York City Asbestos Litigation
MATTHEW J. CARR as Executor for the Estate ofJAMES WILLIAM CARR, and MATTHEW J. CARRas Executor for the Estate ofJANET A. CARR,
X
X
NYCAL
Plaintiff(s),
•against-
A.C. AND S, FNC., et ah,
Defendants.
Index No.: 111089ÿ OS1.
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. ShfirryIAS PartÿOÿc)
X
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire &. Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Ine. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys foÿHÿntiÿfÿ ÿ m Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &
ubber <£pmpany and Goodyear panada Inc.
Lawrence G. Lee, Esc£
264 West 40th Street ÿ \New York, New York 10018 If cv(212) 302-2400
Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.
700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED:HÿSHfoyKToin Hoitlcr, J.S.C.-
0.3.1. 1 -WOH
SUPREME COURT OF STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
In Re: New York City Asbestos Litigation
WILLIAM A. ESPOS1TO JR, as Administrator forthe Estate of WILLIAM C. ESPOS1TO,
Plaintiffs),
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et a].,
Defendants.
X
X
NYCAL
Index Nos.: 100234/03116291/04
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
Hon. Shciiy Klein Heillei-1AS PartitfSTJ
-X
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkVew York, New York1 5
WE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys faHilainti
By:
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc.
Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.
700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED:
Lawrence G. Lee,
264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 1001(212)302-2400
VM&
HrWQUiTON CO,0ÿ
em Henler, JSÿrJ.S.C.
y
SUPREME COURT OF STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
In Re: New York City Asbestos Litigation
SYLVIA FUGATE, as Personal Exeeutrix for theEstate of FRANKIE FUGATE, and SYLVIA FUGATE,Individually,
Plaintiffs),
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.
X
X
NYCAL
aIndex No.: 190137/00 ÿ7
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
Hon. Shorty Klein Ilcitlcr,IAS PartÿO SO
X
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New Yorki New York.New Yorki New York.
WE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for4UaintifK..
Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.
700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED:
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company and Goodyear £anada Inc.
ByLawrence G. Lee,
264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212)302-2400 V-
c0ÿ•fl-1
* ÿ"N '
ÿ * V
** * • J
MQTJUCivS .;•{ H3'i3.H .MOH*.0.3.1
SUPREME COURT OF STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
InRe: New York City Asbestos Litigation
WILLIAM E. JOYCE and MARTE JOYCE,
Plaintiffs),
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.
X
X
NYCAL
Index No.: 190172/09
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Sherry Iflnin TTrjÿi»r-
1AS Parted S"&X
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all elaims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New Yorki New York(x
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys foÿlaintifL
Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.
700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company and Goodyeat Canada Inc.
Lawrence G. Lee,
264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400
Dated: New York, New York
l/n/tf-SO ORDERED: A
QV,
ooÿ
/ X
4,
* l" »,/ I 2 I 1
' * ' I ,Y » *
.oaf '
' :h< woh
SUPREME COURT OF STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
In Re: New York City Asbestos Litigation
RALPHA. MENENDEZ and MAJOR1E A.MENDENDEZ,
X
X
PIaintiff(s),
-against-
A.C. and S. INC.,etaf,
Defendants.
NYCAL
Index No.: 107208/00
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon.IAS Part yf £"a
X
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodycar Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire &. Rubher
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there heing no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodycar Canada Inc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
WE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
AttorneÿÿP-RlÿÿtÿÿBy:_
Frank M. Ortiz. Esq.
700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Dated: New York, New York
:y<V(5-SO ORDERED:
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &Ruhber Ccftnpany and Goodyeafl Canada lne.
By:Lawrenee G. Lee,
264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 1(212) 302-2400
ltonJ.S.C.
GO'US#**
fly
r
WOTJUOivl .H R3T3q\M6H-
L
SUPREME COURT OF STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
In Re: New York City Asbestos Litigation
WALTER A. RE1LLY (Dec.),
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.
X
X
NYCAL
Index Nos.: 124356/94,100917/08,124374/94, 115998/95 &111041/98
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon.-Sheuy Klein HeitltJi,IAS Part >0ÿ6
X
WHEREFORE, defendants The GoodyearTire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs eomplaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York(wwYV/mWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys
By:
; fotJUaintifffy ÿ
Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.
700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Dated: New York, New York
W<W<5-SO ORDERED:
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &
ubber Company and Goodyear (fpnada Inc.
y.Lawrence G. Lee, Esq.
264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212)302-2400
TLH HrwTOULTON ÿjiS.a goux
w
/
wcTjuo./i .m \mno.ex
SUPREME COURT OF STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
InRe: New York City Asbestos Litigation
EUGENE E. SCHNETTLER, as Executrix for the Estateof ROY F. SCHNETTLER,
Plaintiffs),
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et ah,
Defendants.
X
X
NYCAL
Index No.: 101812/08
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Shorry Kloin Ilcitlcr,IAS Part CO
ÿX
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without eosts.
Dated: New Yortc, New YorkNew Yortc, New York
vfe (C h v 1 201sWE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.AttorneysJfclSilaii
By:Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.
700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Dated: New York, New York
ya/tS—SO ORDERED:
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company and Gq<5dyear/Canada Ine.
Lawrenee G. Lee,
264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10C®(212)302-2400 *
c0
roNJ.S.C.
. V-
I'SOTjUOi-, h MOM.OZA.
SUPREME COURT OF STATE OF NEW YORK.COUNTY OF NEW YORK.
In Re: New York City Asbestos Litigation
KAREN ANNE KELLY as Administratrix for the Estateof JOSEPH P. SWIADOWSKY,
X
X
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.C. and S. INC., et al.,
Defendants.
NYCAL
Index Nos.: 111218/01115633/01
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Shrrry Klein Ilcillu,IAS Part$
X
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all elaims and eross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorlNew York, New YorklY)i5WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.AttorneysJerr4£Laii
By:Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Cpfnpany and Goodyear Canada Inc.
Lawrence G. Lee, Esqÿ
700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Dated: New York, New York
264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212)302-2400
SO ORDERED:GOÿC----J.S.C.
t w-**
f "•••- 1
-v\ ,
I*r \V I t bi<
,0.2,L-iJL.A M OH ..K<OH
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE; NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX
HARRIET BURTON andROBERT BURTON (Dec.),
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et af,
Defendants.
NYCAL
Index No.: 106262/99
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Sherry KlcnrHeuler,IAS Part £"0
•X
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without eosts.
Dated: New Y,ork. New YorkJew York. New York
WE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
By:Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company and Goocbyear Canada lne.
700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Dated: New York, New York
yrz-/fs_
Lawrence G. Lee, Es
264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212)302-2400
SO ORDERED
*&
OÿcJ
•' :mc'h
NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCAL
<pROSEMAR1E DE MAURO as Administratrix forthe Estate of JOSEPH DE MAURO andROSEMAR1E DE MAURO, Individually,
Index Nos.: 125781/99104731/00
-against-
Plaintiff(s), NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
A C and S, INC., et al.,Hon. ShcrryKleiirHeillerrIAS Partÿ Sc)
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated.L
WE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorne Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &
Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc.
Frank M. Ortiz, Esq Lawrence G. Lee, Es<
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP
By:
700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212)302-2400
Dated: New York. New York
SO ORDERED
MO r »? > ' :'»J i .1/04.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX
JOHN J. DUFFY,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
B1RD INCORPORATED, et al.,
Defendants.X
NYCAL
Index No.: 190467/11
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Shoppy Klein Heillei,IAS Part,3ÿ
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DatedUNew york. New York
XjOAÿ2Ax20vSLYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &
WE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
By:M. Ortiz. Esq.Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.
700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED:
Rubber Coippany and Goodyear Canada Ine.
By:Lawrence G. Lee, Esq?
264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018 %(212) 302-2400
cPÿ
J.S.C.
.V
/
HOTJUOW .H H3T3<? MOH,0.3.L
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY "
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X
MARGARET L. FABER, as the Executrix for theEstate of LESLIE FABER, and MARGARET L.FABER, Individually,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al,
Defendants.
NYCAL
Index No.: 109988/02
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Sherry Kloin Hcitlcr,IAS PartXT £"C>
•X
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled ease, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Ine. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Ine. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without eosts.
Dated: New-York. New York
v~muoyu,z0 v ÿWE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.AttorneysÿfrNLIaii
By:Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.
700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Dated: New York, New York
—
SO ORDERED:
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants Tbe Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company and GoodyeaijCanada Ine.
By: t
Lawrenee G. Lee,
..oS"
264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400
DMJ.S.C.
..ÿ2£JiZ&t.T.zzir .v-
IAO fjuUivi J-.p.at
i J'4iOH
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY :
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X
SHEILA HAMILTON, as Administratrix for theEstate of WILLIE J. HAMILTON,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO, et al,
Defendants.
NYCAL
Index Nos.: 121991/99106178/00
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon.IAS Part y$ S3
X
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire &. Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada lne. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New.York, New York
WE1TZ & LUXENBERO, P.C.Attorneÿ®N£la/ouff
By:
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Cofhpany and GoodvearAjanada Inc.
Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.
700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Dated: New York, New York
Lawrence G. Lee,
264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400
ew York, New Y
~>wSO ORDERED:
[ETONJ.S.C.
*
V
!;OT.!UOr.'i .H P.3Y5*! .KOM°'
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX
NORBERT KACZ and AUDREY KACZ,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.C. and S., INC., et al,
Defendants.
NYCAL
Index Nos.: 106709/02115543/02
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Shciiy Klein lliitlu,IAS Part J# SO
X
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Ine. be and the
same are herehy dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New.York, New Yorkÿfhuom
WEITZ &. LUXENBERG, P C.Attorney
By:
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &Rubher Company and Goodyear fianada Inc.
Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.
700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Dated: New York, New York
*ViWV*—
Lawrenee G. Leei
264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212)302-2400
SO ORDERED:
F
ko.'jjjojv: .m ns7Bc! .mo'S "• »*•>r » -.r: MQH
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCAL
KOBLER, F1NN1, Individually and HEIDI JEANCOLAN and LOR1ANN ELLEGATE as Co-Adminstratrices for the Estate ofROBERT BURNS KOBLER,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Index No.: 121894/98
Plaintiffs),
-against-
A.C. and S., FNC., et al., Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler,IAS Part J0T S®
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed witb prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York. New York
WE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendants The GoocWear Tire &
Rubber Gampany and Gooriybar Camada Inc.
By: fJjluJLUjM'Lawrenee G. Lee, Es<Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.
700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED: £ÿ
264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400
K
!40TJUCjV? M RBTBq '.WOH,0.2.1.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XrN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX
HENRY MIKA and ESTHER M1KA,
Plaintiffs),
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et af,
Defendants.
NYCAL
Index No.: 100029/99
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
Hon. Sherry Klein Iieillei,IAS Part 2Ar<£0
X
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire &. Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire <£. Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to- all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: York, New York-2H ,201J
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
By:Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.
LYNCHDASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &Ruhber Company and Goodyear CaiAda Inc.
us
700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Dated: New York, New York3/(L/ (S_
SO ORDERED:
Lawrenee G. Lee, Eÿ
264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400
ÿ1#&
J.S.C.
cPOv
r
MCTJUOM ,H R3T3R .HOB
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XrN RE: NEW YORK CITY :
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X
CHARLOTTE F. OCZEK, Individually and asExecutrix for the Estate of ALOISIUS J. OCZEK,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,
Defendants.
NYCAL
Index No.: 101162/99
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon..Shcrry Klein Ilcitlor,IAS Partÿ S-a-
• X
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Datedi_New York, New YorkI- impw York, New York:
ijWE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.
700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Dated: New York, New York
-yrv>5—SO ORDERED:
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Cdftipany and Goodyear Qfinada Inc.
By:Lawrence G. Lee,
264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212)302-2400
Hon. Sherry Klein Ilcitlcr,J.s.c.-HON. PETER H. MOULTON
J.SC.
-SSJS-**CGÿ
*
ÿ'•O \ JviOftf j*i F-fal,0.8.1,
v\ OH
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY :
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X
JANE D1SALVO, as Executrix for the Estate ofEDWIN C. WILSON, and ANNE WILSON,Individually,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.C. and S-, INC., et a].,
Defendants.
NYCAL
Index Nos.: 107222/02"ÿ113609/02
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Shcay Klein Heitlei,lASParCKf
• X
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and eross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same arc hereby dismissed with prejudice and without eosts.
Datedr-NÿWrYork, New York(20b
WE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys,£ar Plainkff
By:
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &Ruhbcr/Company and G<(o(jyear Gajnada Inc.
'IFrank M. Ortiz, Esq.
700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Dated: New York, New York
% ...SO ORDERED:
Lawrence G. Lee,
264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212) 302-2400
m3 0 lV£>
1
MOTJUOM >'• HBr.iM .WON,:XSX ...
l
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
Salvatore Finazzo
NYCALI.A.S. Partptf.Se>£Hertfei7iT)
Index No: 190129/11
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Praetiee Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs eomplaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all claims and eross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
•2o'5
WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.ÿKSr<ÿ2£eKfr-DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Union Carbide Corporation700 Broadway 116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500 (212)452-5300
SO ORDERED,
J.S.C,V'V-5
MGTJUCivi .n MOH
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
ELBERT HARVEY and WILHELMEHIA HARVEY
NYCALl.A.S.PartXJS°(Heit»err*t-
IndexNo: 104406/2005
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Beazer East, Inc. s/h/a Koppers Industries, Inc., hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Beazer East, Inc., f/k/a Koppers
Company, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Beazer East, Inc., f/k/a Koppers Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed
with prejudice and without costs. F ILDated: New York, New York
3/7 2015NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
MAR 3 0 2015
David J. Ba(iy, Esq. Lm\\MWl>0MiUOWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500
r, Esq.lNTE YAVITZ & BLXU LLP
ftorneys for Beazer East, Ine. s/h/a KoppersIndustries, lne.116 East 27lh Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212)452-5300
SO ORDERED,
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C,
f/JTJ'JCM .H Rin3'-i I10K,»ÿ*.> 'd.L
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK e\VINRE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JOHN SULLIVAN
NYCALI.A.S. Part
Index No: 110130/98 COjts*icgofpcs
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant Amchem Products, Inc., with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Amchem Products, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New Yiork, New,Yorkiork, New, 'kizUreo /LA 2015
Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yavitz, $fcq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27lh Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212)452-5300
ÿ 31nil5-Hon. Sherry K. Ilcitlor- '
HON.PETER H.w0ULJ°e.
0 (,yf>; ' •' '
WOVJÿOA} Hfl~....•3.2.1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
This Document Relates to:
INRE: NEW YORK CITY. ASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part(Heitler, J.)
Index No: 109295/08
CHERYLSMITH,AS FOR THE EstateOF
KENNETHALTON SMITHJR., ANDCHERYL SMITH,Individually
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yavitz, Esjq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,Ikm.'fihcriy K. Ileilter
HON. PETER H. MQULTON
: ... •• • ' 1
ttOTJ'jGM -H Fi3T3q -tfOK.o.ax
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
GEORGE MITCHELL RUSH, as Exeeutorfor the Estate of GEORGE E. RUSH
FNYCALI.A.S. Part(Heitlcr, J.)
Index No: 190454/10GO'
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Seetion 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross elaims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
rork, New York2015
„ Esq.Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Juditb A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,
UOTJi-0.S i. MQH
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALl.A.S. PartXfS"2*
-flleitlu, J.)Index No: 102118/07
This Doeument Relates to:
BILLEJ.ROWLING,AS EXECUTRIX FORTHE
Estateof RAYMONDR.ROWLING,and
BILLIEJ.ROWLING,INDIVIDUALLY
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Praetiee Law and Rules Seetion 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs eomplaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all eo-defendants, all elaims and eross elaims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without eosts.
Dated: New York, New York
~TEh_2_kL,2015
Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500
Ortiz, Esq. Judith A. YavitzfEÿJudith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,Hon. Ouuuy K. Hullo*
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
I
ÿ-A-'.-A •' . I '*
vrjiv.ÿ\;, .;•; rirraq moh*\ •} i
This Document Relates to:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALl.A.S. Part(Heitler, }$Index No: 102948/08
LISA M.PIESIK,as PersonalRepresentative for the Estateof
MICHAELRABIDEAU
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Praetice Law and Rules Seetion 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs eomplaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without eosts.
Dated: New York, New York
PhZM .2015
Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500
Judith A. YaviTzÿsq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12,h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED, /--—_' 34ftoli.T#rIht'H:moulton
J.S.C>
4
tfOTJUOM .H H5T3q .MOH.0.2.1
This Document Relates to:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCAL ÿI.A.S. Part/3<f Sb
Index No: 112277/02 ÿ
WILLIAM X PEACH NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Praetice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross elaims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
_, 2015
Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27,h Street, 12,h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,H. mOULTON
l-10TJUC;V} .H.O.BX
This Document Relates to:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALl.A.S. PartÿSÿ(Heitlor, J.)
Index No: 112277/02
WILLIAM J. PEACH NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practiee Law and Rules Seetion 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs eomplaint against defendant Amchem Products, Inc.,with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Amchem Products, Ine., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated-- New Yorlÿ New York-ÿPpl7L( .2015
Frank Ortiz, Esq Judith A. , _jq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Amehem Products, Inc.116 East 27lh Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
OULTONJ.S.C,
" A , > ÿ
MOTJUOM i!:! RyT3f-i .MOH.0.2.!.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
RALPHE. PAUL
NYCALI.A.S. ParOCf S"°(Hekterr*)-
lndex No: 107400/02
ÿ
******cOÿ
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Daled: New Yprk, New Yorkled: New Y«pKM3E
Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
\UJudith A. Yavira Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27lh Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,Hon. Qliui y IC. Ilcilloi . rnM
ÿln(is
ÿ0.5.1, ,BiT=*).M0H
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE:NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
DENNISF.PADULA AND LYNDA A.PADULA
NYCALl.A.S. Part 5"D(HertlerpL)
Index No: 101177/99
00°
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York"Ten2JJL 2015
Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,
HON, PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
HG iJ'Jix.'/i ./ ! i-•isVai'-i .MOM,v.C»- 1
i
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
DENNIS F.PADULA AND LYNDA A. PADULA
NYCALI.A.S. Part KJ 5*°
..(Hoitlcr, Jÿ-
Indcx No: 101177/99qOÿ
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant Amchem Products, Inc., with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Amchem Products, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated:-Nÿ-york? Npw York.2015
KiUg£Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. YavitZ/Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,
"°ni?ON.PEÿ H/MOUITON
•rg'C'
mow bEiEy h- wonn.oii
rv\/ $
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE:NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
RICHARD L.NASH
NYCALI.A.S. Part(Iloitlcr, f.)
Index No: 106708/02
f \\»
CO
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs eomplaint against defendant Union Carhide Corporation, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross elaims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiee and
without eosts.
_Dated: Npjv,York, New York.,2015
Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. YavitzTusq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27,h Street, 12,h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,Hon. Alieny K. Ileilloi- , ..rtiilTON
HON. PETER H.Wl0ULT™
• . '
STiJU0>''' ÿ H R3TJq -M°H
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
VIRGINIA MORRIS,Individuallyand asExecutrix for the Estateof LESTERMORRIS
NYCALI.A.S. PartM S"ÿ>
Index No: 190154/10
goÿ
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
T .2015
ÿXFrank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212)558-5500
SOORDEKED' iÿS
Judith A. Yavitz,"EsqDARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212)452-5300
T£'ChowbEisy h'wonriow
ÿ *v *
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Partyf £& w
(Heitferr** ÿ
Index No: 117229/07This Document Relates to:
BRYAND.MORREALEAS EXECUTOR FOR THE
Estateof SAMUEL MORREALEIII NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
reh?M _, 2015
Yavit:Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27'h Street, 12'h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,lion. Slieny IC. Ik-itlcr .. ,
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S-C.
i) i
•• , Y '* '
MOTJL'CM .H H373<3 .MOH.0.3.L
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
This Document Relates to:
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part/XfS~£>(Iloitlcr, J.)"
Index No: 123392/97
S. Partitlci1- J> 0U
EDWARD JOHN MORGAN andMARGER1TE MORGAN
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant Dana Companies, LLC with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Dana Companies, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Da . ......"" 1
Fr«W]
At ,700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yavitz./Esq.DARGER ERRANTEAttorneys for Dana CcDARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC116 East 27lh Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,
.. \
'*?0T "/ ÿ* ._ ' JuV.i- i .0 p -ri ft .ÿ .--
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
BART M.MICELIAND JOAN MICELI
NYCALl.A.S. Part XfS*
Index No: 100057/99
,0ÿ
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant UnionCarbide Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Seetion 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all claims and eross elaims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporationbe and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without eosts.
Dated: New York. New YorkÿV2U 2015
Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for UnionCarbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12,h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED, AHnn Shmy K HHtler
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
HGTJoUhl .H fi3T3q .V10H.O.p.l
INRE:NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALl.A.S. Part £?>(Ilcitlor, J.-)
This Document Relates to:Index No: 100057/99
BARTM.MICELIAND JOAN MICELI NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant Amchem Products, Inc.,with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Amchem Products, Inc.,be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: NeatYork, New Yorkted: NfisjiYork, New YorkgeVyZ\X.2ois
Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. YaVitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Amehem Products, Ine.116 East 27,h Street, 12,h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,I.Iuif; Dliuiy K. Heiller
H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
MOTJUOM M aaT39 MOH.0.3X
rN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
SYLVIA MECKEL,as Executrix for the
Estateof MELVYNMECKEL,and SYLVIAMECKEL,Individually
FSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
GO'NYCALl.A.S. PartÿSÿ(HeitiefrF.)Index No: 190411/09
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs eomplaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
.2015
Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27lh Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED, />ÿtytiii. Slitiiy IC. IliitkaC ~ 3/rÿ//C
HON.PETER H.MOULTON -V" /IS
WOTjUuM .h n373q new
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
This Document Relates to:
rN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALl.A.S. Part Kf 6"ÿ
-fHertterrL)Index No: 190003/11
, i r_*i »*
DEBRA BORGERDINGAS EXECUTRIX FOR THE
Estateof MICHAELT.MASTANDREA NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,
and there beingno opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without eosts.
Dated: New York, New York
-r£b9U .2015
Fran .A
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yavftz, EsJudith A. Yavltz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27lh Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,
%moultonj.s.c,
T8CHOW fcElEB H* WOfirV.OH
V/
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK ¥IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
LouisM.Grasek
NYCAL
(Heitler, J.)
Index No: 121777/01 COUNTS CLEW'S
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CcrtainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
eosts.
Dated: New York, New YorkrBB2ÿ2015
Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yavrtz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27,h Street, 12,h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,
(a-
ÿ '
•O.S.I Hÿ'39 .MOW
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
HELEN FALKENMEYER,as Executrixfor the Estateof WILLIAMFALKENMEYER,and HELENFALKENMEYER,Individually
NYCAL
ÿ(Heitler, J.)
Index No: 190116/10
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
eosts. •
ork, New York15
Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Y&tfftz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
S00RDERED' Wis
/ * *'•» /«• • t
hot-'UOMO. :ÿ c
.r\ P'ÿT3q VtO'ri •
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JOANNE EDWARDS, as Exeeutrix for theEstate of ARTHUR R. EDWARDS,Individually _ _
__NYCALl.A.S. Partus'2*(Heftier
Index No: 190395/10
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, tbat upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without eosts.
HatpH- NewfYork,New York.2015
&Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Juditb AfYaJitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27lh Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,
V\ON-P J.S-C' 3//a//<r
II
_ _A (Iÿ "
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK \
This Document Relates to:
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 3$ 5D(Heitler, J.)
Index No: 107099/02
RONALD R. DOEDEMA NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practiee Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs eomplaint against defendant Dana Companies, LLC with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Dana Companies, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without eosts.
D ' * " " .
FiW 1L11Zj <X LUAL1XDJLKU,r.t.
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Y;
DARGER E AVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
Z
SO ORDERED,
ÿ MOULTON
,/u
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
FILE
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. PartXTÿ(BeitieppE}-
MAR 8 0 2015NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEThis Document Relates to: Index No: 117579/02
RONALD R. DOEDEMA NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC hereby requests summary judgment in
tbe above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant Dana Companies, LLC with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all elaims and cross claims against
defendant Dana Companies, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New.York,New York
Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212)558-5500
Judith A. Yav/tz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC116 East 27,h Street, 12,h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,
ft W10ULT0N 3//yÿ
•v
H07JU0M H H3T3S .MOH
F 1 LSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK MAR 30 2015
NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERKS OFFICEIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S.PartXfSfc(IIcitliM, J.)
This Document Relates to: Index No: 106708/02
DONALD D. CIMATO NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without eosts.
few Yosk, New York
k Ortiz, Esa.
? M ÿ 2015
Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27,h Street, I2,h FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK F"-EdIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALl.A.S. Part ÿ6"ÿ(Ilcitlcr, J.)
mar 3 o 2015
This Doeument Relates to:Index No: 106708/02
DONALD D. CIMATO NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Praetiee Law and Rules Seetion 3212, dismissing
plaintiff's eomplaint against defendant Dana Companies, LLC with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all eo-defendants, all elaims and eross elaims against
defendant Dana Companies, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without eosts.
Frank Ortiz. Judith A. Yavitz.Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC116 East 27lh Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, ------r—, ÿ
VTJLiGM H fiJi"3M .MOMr- n.i
L
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK MAR 30 2o,5
INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S.Part2tfS*&(Iloitlu, J.)
This Document Relates to: Index No: 114935/07
SUSAN ANDERSON, AS EXECUTRIX FOR NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYthe Estateof LEONARD ANDERSON, JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERand SUSAN ANDERSON, Individually
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment
in the ahovc-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant Amchem Products, Inc., with prejudice, and there heing
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all elaims and cross claims against
defendant Amchem Produets, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Date
FranWEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yaÿitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for Amehem Products, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED, —- ,KretERH:MOULTON "V'2/C y-
r
\
Y2*C*bQj.cH m ii;onrio!.'i
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
SUSANANDERSON, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE
Estateof LEONARDANDERSON, and
SUSAN ANDERSON, Individually
NYCALl.A.S. PartXS"(Ilcitlcr, J.)
Index No: 114935/07
FileMAR 3 o 2015
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
OFF/CE
WHEREFORE, defendant UnionCarbide Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant UnionCarbide Corporationbe and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
—Dated: New York, New YorkÿVCD7U .2015
Frank Ortiz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith ATYavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVTTZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for UnionCarbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
ÿmoSton V'V<SO ORDERED,
drz (\ÿi *
ItOÿSJOtA .H .MOH.0.2.1,
\
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JAMES R.REYNOLDS AND JEANREYNOLDS
HAR8o1015.A.S. Part yS £& Q0UÿyCLpi2tKHoitlor, J.)
NYCAL1(Hoitlop
Index No: 106690/02°FFICE
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiec and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York3/q ÿ 2015
Fidi'ik Oilu, EslWEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
FILEDMAR 3 0 2015NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
Judith A. Yayuz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU,LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,JJon fteHTkft H. MOULTON
J.S.C.
ÿ.OTjUOiVI a :H3TJcl .HON.o.n.i,
I
HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAtterneys et Law
48 Well StreetSuite 1100NewYerk, NY
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
FRANCIS STOREY AND DAPHNE STOREY
against
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.
IAS. Part#f£~0ÿHettferrd:)
INDEX NO.: 190369/14
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED: 3-/OV 3New York, New York
lUsffASflAH,4sQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO; MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
SO ORDERED:
ADAM DREKSLER, ESQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff(s),FRANCIS STOREY and DAPHNE STOREY700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
filemar 3 0 20I5NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
onoroblo Sherry Klein Iloitlcr-ilnjh
HON
IU OllUliy IMCIII I ICIUgl-,JJ.AH.PEt£RhÿulJS.
r-
MO'i '5 ,AS.lT ""'!v " ,WCM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part;ÿ(Heitlei, J.)
This Document Relates to: INDEX NO.: 05-101827
NANCY GURAL, as Executrix for the Estate ofJOHN BOGIN, and NANCY GURAL, asExecutrix for the Estate of EVAN BOGIN,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
against
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests- summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED [ew Brunswick, NJ
MONICA R. KOSTRZEWArESQHOAGLAND, LONGO, MORAN
VtfWK (TV (\fcbZ-.ESQWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P:C.
DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Nancy Gural, as Executrix for the Estate ofJohn Bogin, and Nancy Gural, as Executrix forthe Estate of Evan Bogin700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys et Law
HOAGLAND, LONGO.
SO ORDERED:
filmar 3 0 2015
48 Well StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
. * I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
NANCY GURAL, as Executrix for the Estate ofJOHN BOGIN, and NANCY GURAL, asExecutrix for the Estate of EVAN BOGIN,
against
A O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
I.A.S. PartÿC(Heltler, J.)-
INDEX NO.: 111052-98
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDOMENTMOTION AHD ORDER
HOAGLAND. LONGO,MORAN. DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law
48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New Yerk, NY
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED: New Brunswick, NJ
'STRteMONICA R.K0STR2EWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneyis for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
TFfANÿtVX-OebT. , ESO.ÿ
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs),Nancy Gural, as Executrix for the Estate ofJohn Bogin, and Nancy Gural, as Executrix forthe Estate of Evan Bogin700 BroadweyNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED: fil jljlsMAR 3 0 2015
NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
HnnnrahlP Sherry f<lein HoiHar
ho«.PetWh.ÿoh
M0Ui••O.,,<-• i
'•<1 •H Wrxq .Mom
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
IAS. Part 3(f{HetttecJ}—
This Document Relates to: INDEX NO.: 05-101533
CRAIG ODLUND, as Executor for the Estate ofDICK ODLUND, and PHYLLIS ODLUND,Individually,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
against
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED: New Brunswick, NJ
MC . :SQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
tTPtNV NY oetiz- , ESQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Craig Odlund, as Executor for the Estate ofDick Odlund, and Phyllis Odlund, Individually700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
MORAN. DUNST& DOUKAS. LLPAttorneys at Law
HOAGLAND. LONGO.
SO ORDERED:
fil
48 Well StreetSuite 1100New York, NY'
MAR 3 0 2015NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
r g,(,.hi ri
r
HOAGLAND. LONGO.MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAtrorneys et Law
48 Well StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE:' NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
NANCY GURAL, as Executrix for the Estate ofJOHN BOGIN, and NANCY GURAL, asExecutrix for the Estate of EVAN BOGIN,
against
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
I.A S. PartaerSS(I loitlor, J.7
INDEX NO.: 113843-94
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED: New Brunswick, NJ
MGNICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLP ÿ
Attorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
-ESQ-WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Nancy Gural, as Executrix for the Estate ofJohn Bogin, and Nanoy Gural, as Executrix forthe Estate of Evan Bogin700 BreadwayNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED:
MAR 3 0 2015
NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
wroblo Sheffy-Kleifl HeitieT"--
J.S.C.
wt,'U Vw
' ' 'ÿcÿq •WQM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
NANCY GURAL, as Executrix for the Estate ofJOHN BOGIN, and NANCY GURAL, asExecutrix for the Estate of EVAN BOGIN,
against
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
I.A.S. PartÿcT(HeftteFr*)-
INDEX NO.: 113632-94
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDOMENTMOTION AND ORDER
HOAOLAND, LONOO.MORAN, DUNST8. DOUKAS. LLPAttorneys et Law
48 We!! StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED: Ne\ew Brunswick, NJ
MONICA R. KGSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
,N- .
WV Oetlÿ.ESQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Nancy Gural, as Executrix for the Estate ofJohn Bogin, and Nancy Gural, as Executrix forthe Estate of Evan Bogin700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED:
F3=joftefabie=S
JJS.C-.
MAR 3 0 2015
NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
ilCTJuOWi .;ÿ*
v"vOM-3.SA-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
ROSEE. BUCKLEY, (dec.),
against
ACandS, INC., et al.,
I.A.S. Part 5"°(44ettterrÿ)—INDEX NO.: 02-114321
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
HOAGLAND. LONGO.MORAN. OUNST& DOUKAS. LLPAttorneys at Law
48 Wall StreetSuite.1100New York. NY
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED: ' New Brunswick, NJ
MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co,48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
SO ORDERED:
-A-l K (XV , ESO.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Rose E. Buckley, (dec.)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
ihlhsHonorable Sherry Klein Ffcttlegÿ
HON. PETER H.MOULTON
FILEDMAR 3 0 2015
NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
'I £ cHOW hEfEH H* ÿC-nriOM
• i*ÿ1/
HOAGLAND. LONGO.MORAN. DUNST& OOUKAS. LLPAtrorneys at Law
48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
ROSE E. BUCKLEY, (dec.),
against
ACandS, INC., et al.,
IAS. Par-tÿiTO-(Heitlor. J.)-'
INDEX NO.: 02-107404
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant tc Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED: Brunswick, NJ
MONICA R. KOSTRZEWf, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST &DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.'48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
SO ORDERED:
0fcfci2. . ESQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Rose E. Buckley, (dec.)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003---ÿ ÿItf/is
Hunuidble SllUfiy Kluin IluiliyLÿ. •• tqM
HON. PETER H.M j s c
FMAR 3 0 2015
coÿryNSRsKOFF(CE
MOTJUCVl-0.2.L .MOH
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. PartÿcT(Hertterr±T
This Document Relates to: INDEX NO.: 122688-93
CRAIG ODLUND, as Executor for the Estate ofDICK ODLUND, and PHYLLIS ODLUND,Individually,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
against
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
______
rft-oet'2- .esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
MONICA R. KOSTRZtWA, ESQHOAGLAND, LONGO, MORAN WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Craig Odlund, as Executor for the Estate ofDick Odlund, and Phyllis Odlund, Individually700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
DUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
48 Well StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
MORAN. DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys et Law
HOAGLAND, LONGO,
SO ORDERED:Honorable Sherry Klein
MAR 3 0 20I5
ÿZS0fficb
(I
Hotÿo.a
T If •
ÿ !4QH
HOAGLAND. LONGO.MORAN. DUNST& DOUKAS. LLPAtrorneys at Law
48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York. NY
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
ANDREW R. NIMMO JR. as Administrator forthe Estate of GEORGE L. NIMMO,
against
ACandS, INC., et al.,
I.A.S. Part SO
INDEX NO.: 02-113435
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED: 2/1Q'/ vS»• ÿ New Brunswick, NJ
MONICA K. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DGUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
ÿ OttiZ- , ESQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Andrew R. Nimmo Jr. as Administrator for theEstate of George L. Nimmo700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED: s/m/s"Honorable Sheri
HON. PE*EF
MAR 3 0 2015NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
f] 4
MOTJUG.Yi .HH2'i'3q.D.3.L hoh
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part
This Document Relates to: INDEX NO.: 02-107220
ANDREW R. NIMMO JR. as Administrator forthe Estate of GEORGE L. NIMMO,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
against
ACandS, INC., et al,,_
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED:2/ÿ'l\leW Brunswick, NJ
M'HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co,48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
ptV- 0£t>Z- , ESQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Andrew R. Nimmo Jr. as Administrator for theEstate of George L. Nimmo700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
MORAN. DUNST& DOUKAS. LLPAttorneys at Law
HOAGLAND. LONGO.
SO ORDERED:-Honorable Slieiiy Klein Hettiefc-- J.r\L\
48 Wall StreatSuite 1100New York. NY
filedmar 3 0 2015
, NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
ir •
ÿ0/vA
<! ts-,•sll/, 1, t,
ÿ Hld<i Mqh
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
JUNE A. END and GEORGE END,
Plaintiffs,
- against -
H.B. FULLER COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.
-X
-XIndex No.: 190075/14/14
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION
l.A.S. Part>0HoaÿShcny IC, Ilcitlcr
-XWHEREFORE, Defendant H.B. FULLER COMPANY (hereinafter "H.B. FULLER"), hereby
requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant H.B. FULLER, with prejudice, and
tbere being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, H.B. FULLER, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to
either party.
Dated: _201 5New York, New York
Carmen St. George, Esq. ( }WEITZ & luxenbergVpj:.Attorneysfor Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
Katrina H. Murphy, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.Attorneysfor DefendantH.B. Fuller Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022(212) 651-7500
-Hon Sherry K,Heitlei~* \\ T
b
motjuom -H rÿran .'/.oh.o.a.t
HUGHLETT A. SMITH and JEAN SMITH,
INRE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
•X
XIndex No.: 19014,...
Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION- against -
H.B. FULLER COMPANY, et al., l.A.S. Partÿ6 STO•Hon. Sherry K. Hcitlcr
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, Defendant H.B. FULLER COMPANY (hereinafter "H.B. FULLER"), hereby
requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Praetice Law and Rules
Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant H.B. FULLER, with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all claims and eross elaims against
Defendant, H.B. FULLER, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to
either party.
Dated: 2015
Carcnen St. George, Esq. Q
NeW York, New York
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
Katrina H. Murphy, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY,LTD.Attorneysfor DefendantH.B. Fuller Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022(212) 651-7500
SO ORDERED,ÿHon. Slicny K. Ilcilloi
HON:PiTiR H: MOUUTON
HOr.jijgy -i'; unifi?.|,
i
RICHARD QUINN,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
x
x Index No.: 190018/14
Plaintiff(s), NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
-against-
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATIONas successor-by-merger to BUFFALO PUMPS,INC., et al.
Hon. Sherry Klein UutlcrDefendants.
x
WHEREFORE, Defendant BW/IP, Inc., hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-
entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practiee Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint
against Defendant BW/IP, Ine., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all elaims and eross elaims against Defendant,
BW/IP, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party.
Dated: New York, New York
Nieole G. N'farkoidtz, Esq.Miehael Faneflÿ Esq!WEITZ & LUXENBERG SEGAL MeCAMBRIDGE SINGER &
New York NY 10003
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 Broadway
MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for Defendant850 Third Avenue, Suite 1 100New York, New York 10022
SO ORDERED, ÿÿÿoUUTON 21{y f ÿ
p , . , r c £ i xn'Of-.
MAR - 9 2015 21
SEGAL MCCAMBRIDGE SINGER & MAHONEY
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OP NEW YORK
xINRE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
x Index No.: 190369/14 °%C£FRANCIS STOREY and DAPHNE STOREY,
PlaintifF(s), NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.
Hon. Sherry Klein HeitlerDefendants.
x
WHEREFORE, Defendant BW/IP, Ine., hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-
entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint
against Defendant BW/IP, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all elaims and cross elaims against Defendant,
BW/IP, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without eosts to either party.
Dated: New York, New York
Adam IWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
New York, NY 10003
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 Broadway
SEGAL MeCAMBRlDGE SINGER &MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for Defendant850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022
-moultonJ.S.C.
SO ORDERED,!If:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
ÿ IL E0x
MAR 3 0 2015IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
X
ALTON C. CHAPMAN and FRANCIS CHAPMAN,
Index No.: 190293/14
-against-Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
AIR &, LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, et. aL l.A.S. ParQXStkm. Cliuiy K. lluitlui
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, Defendant MEADWESTVACO CORPORATION (hereinafter
"MWV"), hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant
MWV, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, MWV, he and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to
cither party.
Dated: New York, New York
Simon Lee,EsqDaniel WassSrbcrg, EsqWE1TZ &. LUXENEBRG, PCAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SEGAL McCAMBRlDGE SINGER& MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for Defendant850 Third Avenue, Suite 1 100New York, New York 10022
(212) 651-7500
SO ORDERED,
W.'tfo.-w .i-iid.I
3T3Q MOM
£ AO W71 . Ik/ W
MAR -5 2015
\\
SEGAL MCCAMBRIDGE SINGER & MAHONEY
TMc:CC(jpk)2/9/15
Our File NoS-4014-14
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE:NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION,
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
KennethMclauchlin
NYCAL °°ÿAfryÿ*0ÿI.A.S. Part c) fw(Ilcitlcr, J.)
INDEXNO.190192/14
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company ofNew York, Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company ofNew York, Inc.,be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without eosts.
Dated: New York, New York 2
. —-'han Alvarado, Esq.
WE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
Timothy tyf/McCann, Esq.DAVID M. SANTORO, ESQ.Attorney for DefendantConsolidated Edison Company of NewYork, Inc.4 Irving PlaceNew York, NY 10003-3598
SO ORDERED:Htm. Sliuny KlcluIIullu1-
HON. PETER H.MOVLJONT(IT-/(5
SiU0;;1"H n5T3ÿ -won
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
DAVIDWILLIAM FAHY,
NYCALIAS Part}6sd n J0 2()ir
-X C0ÿ7yÿOÿQPP>/C£
INDEX NO:I90259/I3
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL,INC.et al.Defcndant(s)
X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Armstrong International, Inc.hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint
against defendant Armstrong International, Inc.with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant Armstrong International Inc.,be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: White Plains, New York
£T*r ÿEarly & Strauss, LLCAttorney for Plaintiff360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, New York 10017
THOMAS M.BfiN&ÿENTANdLaSorsa & BeneventanoAttorney for DefendantARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL,INC.3 Barker Avenue, White Plains, NY 10601Tel: (914) 682-3300
SO ORDERED,iteMaULION 3/d/,s
J.S.C,
MOTJUO.Yi .H nrif3q MCH
"I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK.
INRE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:M1NARD S. FOSTER and THALIA FOSTER,
Plaintiffs),
-against-
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al,
Defendants.
IndexNo.: 190308/14
IA.S.Part><5 SOHon. Slimy K,He!tier
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, Defendant CUMMINS INC., (incorrectly named as CUMMINS ENGINE
COMPANY, INC.) (hereinafter "CUMMINS"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-
entirlcd case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint
against Defendant CUMMINS, with prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant CUMMINS be and the same are hereby dismissed, with prejudiee, and without costs to
either party.
Dated: New York, New York
,2015 mar 30
Patti Burshtyn, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
2015
COUNTYNEw yoRKCORK'S
Joseph James-oianetti, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE SINGER& MAHONEY,LTD. .
Attorneys for CUMMINS INC.850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022 '
(212) 651-7500
SO ORDERED,
HON3fn/ IS
<?.t '"rtciiSQ rv
c
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
NYCALI.A.S. Part S~&(-Hoitlor, J.) -
Index No: 190293/2014
Alton C. Chapman and Francis ChapmanNO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., incorrectly s/h/a "CHEVRONTEXACO CORPORATION" and "CHEVRON U.S.A. Individually, and formerly known asGULF OIL CORPORATION", (hereinafter "CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.") hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-dcfcndants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs. pDated: 9a . f
New York, Nÿ
Daniel Wasscpoerg, bsq.WElTzWutJXENBERG P.C.Attorney for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
o
MAR 3 0 2015
NEW YORKOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
ÿJulie EvarrsrESq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantCHEVRON U.S.A. INC.150 East 42nd StreetNew York, NY 10017File No. 01042.00344
SO ORDERED, T>/l ÿ
6465892V. I
» /3
t:Os A i J/«0W
u
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RENEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
NYCALl.A.S. PartÿK)(Ileitlci, J.)"'
Index- No: 190242/14
James Lcverock NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and RulesSection 3212, dismissing plaintiffs5 complaint against defendant CARRIERCORPORATION, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissedwith prejudice and without costs.
Dated: fs>? ~ ÿ
New York, NY
Daniel Wasscrberg, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG PCAttorney for Plaintiff700 Broadway: 7lh FloorNew York, NY 10003
fileMAR 3 0 2015
NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
Virginia Squiticri, Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOW1TZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantCARRIER CORPORATION150 East 42nd StreetNew York, NY 10017File No. 10557.01646
SO ORDERED,
H.MOULTON 5/(T./|3J.S.C*
640JI47v.|
ftorji•0.2.L
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALl.A.S. Part yt(Hpitler, J )
xThis Document Relates To: Index No: 190140/14
Sergio Hrvatin and Magda Hrvatin NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER
x
WHEREFORE, defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CARRIER CORPORATION, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendants CARRIER CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand wilhou
Jordan C. FBelluck &Attorneys f546 Fifth ANew York,
Dated: \MAR 3 0 2015
ÿNEW YORKNTY CLERK'S C
Wginia Squitieri, Esq
Attorney for DefendantCARRIER CORPORATION150 East 42nd StreetNew York, NY 10017File No.: 10557.01618
WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOW1TZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLP
filed
ÿNEW YORKNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
SO ORDERED, ÿ0ÿ2 A S
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C,
3//V-S-
6143142v. I
r ÿ
lÿOTJUOr/l :H R3T3q .HOH.0.2.1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:X
MA*30?n
NYCALI.A.S. Paiytfg'd{Hcitlcr, J-.)
Index No: 190384/14
ARDESI-11R OMMANI and ELEANOR OMMAN1,
X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CARRIER CORPORATION, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant CARRIER CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without eosts.
Dated: Nriv York ÿ
h-c.-o
n FoxBELHUCKAttor
FpX, LLPPlaintiff
enue, 4lh FloorNY 10036
Virginia Squitieri, Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOW1TZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantCARRIER CORPORATION150 East 42nd StreetNew York, New York 10017Our File No. 10557.01694
SO ORDERED, ÿÿ2 A
__r\/ ,
LJS.C.6456236v.)
/ *\ -HOTJUOM .K RBTBÿ M0l\,03.U
TV/
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
NYCALr.A.S.PartSOÿ(Hullu, J.)
Index No: 190428/2014
John Negri NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CARRIER CORPORATION hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' eomplaint against defendants CARRIER CORPORATION withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendants CARRIER CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without cost#, « B B
_FILE
Dated:
Jordan Fox,Belluek & Fix IIilAttorneys foAPlalj;546 Fifth Aventre
New York, NY 10036
YotfLONYa MAR 3 0 2015
/ NEW YORK// CPUWTY CLERK'S OFFICE
Virginia Squitieri, Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOW1TZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantCARRIER CORPORATION150 East 42ntl StreetNew York, NY 10017File No.: 10557.01701
SO ORDERED, ÿ
J.S.C.
is
6564242v. 1
.r\
MOTJUO.M M HDT3q .MOH.o.n.t
y
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
xThis Document Relates To:
Carleion Johnson and Doris Johnson
x
"""asNYCAL °FFtO£I.A.S, PartÿD
-ÿF+eitlei 3 J.)
Index No: 190125/14
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant MALLET & COMPANY, INC., hereby requestssummary judgment in the abos'e-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and RulesSection 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant MALLET &COMPANY, INC., vvilh prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst defendant MALLET & COMPANY, INC., be and the same are herebydismisÿdpilh prejudice and without costs.
32i/hpJkedk3H -Elizabeth M. Young, Esq. *WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOW1TZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantMALLET & COMPANY, INC.150 East 42nd StreetNew York, NY 10017File No. 15977.00001
VH-lS
orney
SO ORDERED, ÿ2?ÿ—--„ 3//T./J-JcuTLTTlz TTTTTm ' ' 'sÿjflw-Shprry K Hfitlr-r
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
6596552v. 1
V
MOiJuci-A .Ii 93 ! q HOM03l
\
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XINRE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION ÿ3 ftX A, 'W5
LUIG1VILLANI, and ANTHONY VILLANI, as : Index No. 190379/13 ÿUfs/yyÿYqÿAdministrator for the Estate of CAROLINAVILLANI,
Plaintiffs),
-against-
AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC.,et a\.
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
Hon. Sherry K4oia-Heitfei7~IAS Part Cc)
-X
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
WE1TZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs
LYNCHDASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & RubberCompany and Goodyear Canada Inc.
David J. Barry, Esq.UM/l5STH( M-Oc&ttd
700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Alexandra E. Ober, Esq.
264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212)302-2400
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED: _
J.S.C.
-~V
" {'10TJUO.V5 .H Haiijq .WOK*"» o »
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
FfLMa*30NYCAL "u 20J5
I.A.S. Part>$®UN Y0rx
Index No. 190293/2014
ALTON C. CHAPMANNO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, Defendant E. 1. du Pont de Nemours and Company, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company,
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant E. 1du Pont de Nemours and Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkFebruary 12, 2015 .
Daniel Wae&rberg, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
David J. Q6odearl, Esq.LEADER & BERKONLLPAttorneysfor E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company630 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10017(212) 486-2400
SO ORDERED
___Dated: "3/|2-/|<
flSJrfhpEffcRWfaOULTON '-
____J.S.C.
£
£? .o.s.iHOUUOM .H 037BM .MOH
V
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
rN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALl.A.S. Part Mr&o(•Iloitlor, J.)-
This Document Relates to:Index No: 190214/2014
CHARLES C. YOHE and ARLENE YOHENO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York. New York
2015 FILED
Cbartes-M—Fergus6nWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(2\:
•EfiEft
Jona ;, Esq.DAI EYAVITZ & BLAULLPAtto arbide Corporation116 , 2lh Floor
NEW YORK.COUNTY CLEnK o UrFICE
MAR 3 0 2015
New York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,
t
t
' Wv*'.. 1 L ' •-.*
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
CHARLES C. YOHE and ARLENE YOHE
NYCALI.A.S. PartX
-(Hoitlor, £)
Index No: 190214/2014
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' eomplaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without eosts.
Dated: New York, New York
,2015
MAR 3 0 2015
Jonathary#. Kromberg, Esq.Gharles*MTFerguson, Esq/Gharles*MTFerguson, Esq/WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.CAttorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,Hrn/Tihnrrv Y
Jonathary#. Kromberg, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
Hiii/ÿlir i ry Y Hriflrr _K|
HON. PETER H.MOULTON• C/f -T-fiS
ft"O'i i? is l(-— -.vi iÿrracj i/iO;;
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
MARCIANA SALMON, as Administratrix forthe Estate of NORMAN F.SALMON, andMARCIANA SALMON, Individnally
NYCALI.A.S. Part JKJ(Hoitlcr, J.)
Index No: 190116/2014
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Q12b .2015
CharleS-MrFerguson, tsq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
f'L£mar 3 0 2015
QFPlGE
(212) 558-5500
QfrlpAJlAJtt
SO ORDERED,
JonathanJBfj£rofnberg, Esq.DARGER'ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
Hon. Sherry K Tlritlrrÿ Yrttt
3/(ÿ/65
*'K '* * j?.;W - '>•-? / "'t? .Won
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
MARCIANA SALMON, as Administratrix forthe Estate of NORMAN F.SALMON, andMARCIANA SALMON, Individually
NYCALI.A.S. Part yS-(Hcitlcr, J.)
Index No: 190116/2014
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiee and
without eosts.
Dated: New York, New York
.2015 ÿar 30 2015
Charles=MrFergusonrEsq~* (JWEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500 n
Jonathan BÿKromberg, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,Sherry K. Hc&er- T7.
HON. feter h.moulton
» «G 'Tr •,
ÿ0.0,. ÿ* HSTaq .ÿOH
„ I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCGUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
MARCIANA SALMON, as Administratrix forthe Estate of NORMAN F.SALMON, andMARCIANA SALMON, Individually
NYCALI.A.S. Part So(Hcitlcr, J.)
Index No: 190116/2014
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company
n/k/a Bayer Cropscience, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against
defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company n/k/a Bayer Cropscience,
Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company n/k/a Bayer Cropscience,
Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
SI_ ,2015,2kF
Ch'ar-1es-M-Ferguson,ÿEsq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P-C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212)
"M/? 30New
2015
OOUÿSSS'°fFIC£
Jonatbajf'B. Kromberg, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27lh Street, 12lh Floor
>12) 558-5500 fl r>
New York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
S00RDEREtt 3/'V'S
.H K£lT3q i/iOH
L
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
DENNIS F. MADDALONE and PATRICIAMADDALONE
NYCALI.A.S. Part 5"ÿ
.(Heitler, J.)
Index No: 190234/2014
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Praetice Law and Rules Seetion 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without eosts.
Dated: New York, New York
,2015
eoÿ>°pp/1
Gharles=MrFergusonfEsq.£4A/K/f\-ÿ}-Uÿ .Jonathan B.*Kg6fhberg, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C. I0 DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation700 Broadway 116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500 (212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED, ---'
-3/| l/(CHotf 01ieiry-Kr-H«ite 'HON. PETER H.MOULTON
J.S.C.
: -u: . W.-uJQ .HUH.0 r; I.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part(Heitler, J:)
This Document Relates to: Index No: 190234/2014
DENNIS F. MADDALONE and PATRICIAMADDALONE
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company
n/k/a Bayer Cropscience, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against
defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company n/k/a Bayer Cropscience,
Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company n/k/a Bayer Cropscience,
Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkglcK .2015
B/f£romberg, Esq.R ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLP
Gfiaries=MrWEITZ & lualhdliwj,r.ÿ.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Jonathan ECKromberg, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27lh Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,Hon. Sherry IC. Ilcitlor
HON. PETER H WlOULTONJ.S.C.
KotjJOiVi .hH3\33.o.ei
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
rN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS L1TICATION
This Document Relates to:
JOSEPH M.CITRONE and MARIE CITRONE
NYCALl.A.S. Parted(ÿIlcitlcr, J.)
Index No: 190266/2014
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUBGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
_, 2015
filmar 8 0 2015NEW YORK
UNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
Charles'MrFerguson, tsq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Jonatham&T Kromherg, Esq.DARGpR ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,• IlofÿShcrry K. Hoitler
HON. PETER H. MOULTOMrJ.S.C7
3/\t/i5
..I t .MGH.o.z.i
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JOSEPH M.CITRONE and MARIE CITRONE
NYCALI.A.S. Part(Hcitlcr, J.)
Index No: 190266/2014
NOOPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company
n/k/a Bayer Cropscience, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against
defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company n/k/a Bayer Cropscience,
Inc. with prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company n/k/a Bayer Cropscience,
Inc.be and tbe same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
*3/2/" .2015 fileMAR 8 0 2fl|5
"wwjsas1.office
ÿehafl'es"M"Fcrguson, bsq". Jonathan B. Kromberg, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 0 DARGER ERRANTE YAV1TZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.700 Broadway 116 East 27th Street, 12thFloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500 (212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,Shcrrv K. HeitlerN. PETERH. MOULTON
VSGTJL'C*! iifV_jT3q MOH.0,2.1,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
ALTON C. CHAPMAN and FRANCISCHAPMAN
NYCALl.A.S. Part,3<J
-(Hoitlcr; J.)-
lndexNo: 190293/2014
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York p2ÿ.2015
MAR 3 0 2015
— JonathraYB. Kromberg, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. ° ' DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Union Carbide Corporation700 Broadway WÿX 16 East 27,h Street, 12,h FloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500 (212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,
h. jsc.
M0TJliO;v, .»-> .1*1OH.0.5 I.
L
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
ALTON C. CHAPMAN and FRANCISCHAPMAN
NYCALI.A.S. Partÿfll(Heitler, J.) ÿ
Index No: 190293/2014
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies LLC hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practiee Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' eomplaint against defendant Dana Companies LLC with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Dana Companies LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York F S L E Dÿ 2015
MAR 3 0 2015
NEW YORKCLERK'S OFFICE
ChnrifP Mi rnrninonj Fig Jonathan EVÿKfdmberg, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.V ÿexÿexÿÿRGEREiRRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLPAttorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Dana Companies LLC700 Broadway 116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500 (212) 452-5300
—---3/iV/ÿHon. Shorrv K. Heitler . •
_ ' 'SO ORDERED,
Hon. Shorry K. Heitler . .
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S«W«
T3*C4how hK.'HB M" PonnoM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
ALTON C. CHAPMAN and FRANCISCHAPMAN
NYCALI.A.S. PartÿffleitlertTJIndex No: 190293/2014
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation herehy requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed withjrejgdacepand
without costs. F \ ÿÿ
MM* 3 0Dated: New York, New York
V-cV ZU ÿ 2015 YORK
r-€hark?s M. Feigusun, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C. ÿDARG
Jonathan romberg, Esq.ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500
/ Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED, ÿ --- 3/lV/-T
L.
morjuc.v;.hr3T3r .mok
ii
ii
ii
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Doeument Relates to:
ALTON C. CHAPMAN and FRANCISCHAPMAN
NYCALl.A.S. Part>0 5?>(Hoitlcr, Jt)
Index No: 190293/2014
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Produets, lne. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company
n/k/a Bayer Cropseience, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled ease,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against
defendant Amehem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company n/k/a Bayer Cropseience,
Inc. with prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all elaims and cross claims against
defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc AG Company n/k/a Bayer Cropscienee,
Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
,2015
FILEMAR 3 0 2015
NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
_ Chnrlfrn M rnxmnn Enq Jonathanÿ. Kromherg, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. OÿnrTeÿpARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Amehem Produets, lne.700 Broadway 116 East 27lh Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500 (212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,-rion. Sherry K. Hotter
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
MOTJUOiV) .H H31'3q .moh.0.8.1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALl.A.S. Part
ÿ(Hoitlor, J.)
0/*?C£INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to: Index No: 190411/2014
VINCENT S. ROSSI and LINDA ROSSI NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all elaims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
( .2015
s M. Ferguoon, Esq. MZ & LUXENBERG, P.
Charles M. Ferguson, Esq. C&uiWEITZ & LUXENBERG, RC?Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27,h Street, 12lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAULLP•omberg, Esq,
SO ORDERED,
•""FffirefMSTH.MOULTON '' /pJ.S.C.
T2 C*HOVl'.bEJLEd H' WOfirj.OH
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
A
%-X
30INRENEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCAL c?-uÿ/ÿZe°'5l.A.S. PartÿPf
This Document Relates to:
RICHARD C. THOMAS ANDCAROL THOMAS,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A.O. SMITH CORPORATION, et. al.,
Defendants.
•XIndex No.: 13-190150
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
-XWHEREFORE, defendant, CENTRAL PLUMBING SPECIALTIES CO., INC., hereby
requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
§3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant, CENTRAL PLUMBING
SPECIALTIES CO., INC.,with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, CENTRAL PLUMBING SPECIALTIES CO., INC. be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
OArviwy 2015
BRIANEARLY,ESQ. y
EARLY & STRAUSS, LLCAttorneys,for Plaintiffs)RichardThomas and Carol Thomas360 Lexington Avenue, 20th FloorNew York, NY 10017Fax (212) 986-2255
ROBERT B.MARCUSLAW OFFICE OF ROBERT B. MARCUS P C.Attorneys for DefendantCentral Plumbing Specialties Co., Inc.One North Broadway, Suite 412White Plains,NY 10601Fax (914) 993-0251
SO ORDERED:-Js'-*Honr.SKerry Klein Heitler J.S£rr,HON'PETER.H!MOULTON,
MAR 1*
I
5 J >iAHkotjuomÿ' i >'o;*
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to: INDEX NO.: 109974-06
WENDY ARLENE NELSON, as Executrix forthe Estate of ANDREW PAUL,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
against
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al..
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED: New Brunswick, NJ
R. KOSTRZEWA, ESCND, LONGO, MORAN
MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
~R AnY fft- , ESQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Wendy Arlene Nelson, as Executrix for theEstate of Andrew Paul700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED: FiL P n. —<222HOAOLANO, LONOO.MORAN, OUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law
48 Wali StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
2*ÿ
•+1cÿ I • vf • .w ' i I-i .
-;ÿS/ i/* »' .*0/y
HOAGLAND, LONGO.MORAN. DUNST& OOUKAS, LLPAtterneys at Law
48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New Yerk, NY
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATIGN
This Document Relates to:
WENDY ARLENE NELSON, as Executrix forthe Estate of ANDREW PAUL,
against
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
I.A.S. Part 3(f(Heillei, J.) :
INDEX NO.: 132766-93
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being nD opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
2-l\% 11 5DATED: New Brunswick, NJ
4ÿ
MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.43 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
SO ORDERED:
. ESQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Wendy Arlene Nelson, as Executrix for theEstate of Andrew Paul700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
tonoroblo Shorry Kloin Hpitlec
MAR 3 0 2015NEW VORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
H-M°uL].s.c-
IfL* -i-O.q , « ...c t •' • c, •, . -. ÿ
'-•cfv ;-
HOAGLAND. LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys et Law
48 Wei) StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
WENDY ARLENE NELSON, as Executrix forthe Estate of ANDREW PAUL,
against
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
IAS. Part(Hertterrÿr
INDEX NO.: 103379-93
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED: Naw Brunswick, NJ
MONICA R. KOSTR2EWA, ESQ.HOAOLAND, LONGO,WIORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
SO ORDERED:
cnz , esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Wendy Arlene Nelson, as Executrix for theEstate of Andrew Paul700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
Honorable Sherry Kloin Hoitlor
HON
jiduic uncny iviciii i iciuui » t
.peÿhÿ2.c.
mar 3 0 2015NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
HQ;-;-!<ÿ• -> ~ ~
f *Pr-** u
' 'n/
s:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
MA# 30 30g
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
EILEEN C. O'BRIEN, as Executrix for theEstate of WILLIAM O'BRIEN, and EILEEN C.O'BRIEN, Individually,
against
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
I.A.S. PartXSbÿ(Hoitlor, J.) °pp,INDEX NO.: 113843-06
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
zAslvsDATED: New Brunswick, NJ
MONICA R. KOSTRZBWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
TffW rtV 0ÿ2_ , ESQ.ÿ
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Eileen C. O'Brien, as Executrix for the Estateof William O'Brien, and Eileen C. O'Brien,Individually700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
HOAGLAND. LONGO.MORAN. DUNST& DOUKAS. LLPAtrorneys at Law
48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New Yerk. NY
SO ORDERED:onoroblc Sherry Klein Hoitlor .
.peterHON
Mow foF!rw ... ... rac-
HOAGLAND. LONGO.MORAN. DUNST& DOUKAS. LLPAttorneys at Law
48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE; NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
PAUL J. WELLER as the Executor for theEstate of BOYD N. WELLER,
against
ACandS, INC., et al.,
I.A.S. Partptf Sb SOpP/r,(Hoitlor, J.)
INDEX NO.: 02-112292
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED:ÿÿ New Brunswick, NJ
MGNICA R. KOSTRZEWtf, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MGRAN " " ' WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.DUNST & DOUKAS, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Attorneys for Defendant, Paul J. Weller as the Executor for the Estate ofKohler Co. Boyd N. Weller48 Wall Street, Suite 1100 700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10005 New York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED:HHonoroblo Sherry Kloin Hoitlop-
HON. PETER H.WIOULTON
CL-FLY-'
.vioh.D.ax
This Document Applies to:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
CHARLES K. ZAMMIT and RAYE ZAMMIT, his wife,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
URS ENERGY & CONSTRUCTION, f/k/a WashingtonGroup international, Inc., successor in interest toRAYTHEON ENGINEERS & CONSTRUCTORS, INC.and successor in interest to H.K. FERGUSONCOMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.
FIL £ 0mar 3 o 2015 '
Count?cZ10rkOFFICE
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Index No.: 190371/2014
WHEREFORE, defendant URS Energy & Construction, hereby request summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant URS Energy & Construction, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all elaims and cross elaims againstdefendant URS Energy & Construction, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.
Dated: New York, New York(VI<AvCV\ L ,2015
WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER
Attorneysfor Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, New York 10038Telephone: (212)267-3091
Dated: Buffalo,New YorkMarch 9_,2015
DAMON MOREY LLP__
Peter S. Marlette, Esq.Attorneysfor DefendantURSEnergy & Construction200 Delaware Aveuue-Suite 1200Buffalo,New York 14202Telephone: (716) 856-5500
SO ORDERED: _ 3// 9 Doc #2004124.1
J.S.C.
HoffWfBftl- MOULTONJ.S.C-
.. ,I i
j. a;
• • » I it - • i *:r i ; j?*f
' s Z* '>''?'"•£' .' >. /,
. . , ' r- v t- ' ? ct •;
i
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
Inre: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
X: NYCAL
I.A. S. PartÿD(H*""**) ÿKraULUouuÿ
This document relates to: Index No.: 190402/13
Efrain RodriguezNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
•X
WHEREAS, Defendant American International Industries for Clubman requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against American International Industries for Clubman,with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstAmerican International Industries for Clubman, be and tbe same are hereby dismissed withoutprejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
NicholasNovack, Esq.Levy Konigsberg, LLP800 Third Avenue, 11th Floor
L iwrohce Wasserman, EsqG DEfRON & S1LBER, PC3$p Lexington Avenue,
,201
New York, NY 10022Counselfor Plaintiff
New York, NY 10017Counselfor American InternationalIndustriesfor Clubman
FILEDSO ORDERED, f 1IIS
MAR 3 0 2015 HON. PETER H.MOULTOtfNEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
{00355109.DOCX}
15 FEB 27 PH 3:06
GORDON & SiLBER
HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAtterneys at Law
48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
CINDY A. HEUER as Executrix for the Estateof HARRY A. STOCKER, INDIVIDUALLY,
against
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.,
I.A.S. PartX S'OfHnitlnr IÿÿrlWTvlTvTy
INDEX NO.: 190224/10
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
2-Mj 1-5DATED: New Brunswick, NJ
MONICA R. KOSTRZSWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGOvMORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
SO ORDERED
FH™7 pcnflY fcrtx-r , ESQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Cindy A. Heuer as Executrix for the Estate ofHarry A. Stocker, Individually700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
: ?//<;//sFILE
3 0 20I5
°°"nt?ISkoff,cb
Honorable
HON. PE
CL-PLAY-20
» I 1 Ui-j ÿWOH
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
This Document Relates to:
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 3€T"ÿc)fHeitler, J.)
INDEX NO.: 122460-93
CRAIG ODLUND, as Executor for the Estate ofDICK ODLUND, and PHYLLIS ODLUND,Individually,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
against
A.Q. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., etal.,
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgmont in thet
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.«M/i5
DATED: New Brunswick, NJ
MCHOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
, ESQ. ÿ
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),Craig Odlund, as Executor for the Estate ofDick Odlund, and Phyllis Odlund, Individually700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law
HOAGLAND, LONGO,
SO ORDERED:
FIL DHonorable SI1 peter
48 Well.StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
MAR 3 0 2015
NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
r
i
i
*> ->ÿ ii'i I.'•°-ci- "'ÿrÿMQH
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OFNEW YORK
ROBERT WALSH AND JOAN WALSH,Plaintiffs,
v.3MCOMPANY, i/k/a Minnesota Mining andManufacturing Company, et. at,
Defendants.
Index No.: 190501/13
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Viad Corp, individually and as alleged successor-in-interest to
Griscom-Russell Company ("Viad") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint
against defendant Viad only with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant Viad only be and the same are hereby dismissed with'prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkSboifertrtyr ÿ ,201jf
*-«c*
Amber R. LongLevy Konigsberg,LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff800 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10022(212) 605-6200
SO ORDERED.
Fjdneis A. Montbaoh,OUND COTTOXwOLLAN&
GREENGASSAttorneys for Defendant,ViadOne Battery Park PlazaNew York, NY 10004(212) 804-4200
x/ÿ/(S
0oÿ
hor_
h
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
SALLIE POTTERTON, as Administratrix forthe Estate ofMICHAEL EDWARD TAYLOR, andSALLIE POTTERTON
INDEX N0.;190206-20I3
-VS-
BARRASSO & SONS, INC.,ct al.NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, Defendant, Hajoca Corporation, by and through its attorneys, Rawlc &
Henderson up, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212 dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Hajoca
Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notifce to all- co-defendants, all claims and oross claims against
Hajoca Corporation he and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New Yorkhe? i-htber i, 20/y
EARLY & STRAUSS, LLC RAWLE & HENDERSON, LLP
Brian F. Early --—Attorneys for Plaintiff360 Lexington Avenue, 20lh FlNew York, New York 100] 7
•Rfeheityv. fitchJohn C. McMcckin, UAttorneys for Defendant,Hajoca\Cprporation14 WalrStrect14 Wail Street27,h FloorNew York, New York 10005One South Penn SquareWidener Bidg.Philadelphia, PA 19107
SO ORDERED. MAR 16 2015HON. PETER H- MOULTON
\ 4
',ZK <> 1k'r\7........ .won
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALl.A.S. PartJKT Sty/ty-JfSty(Heitler, J.) Qt
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: Index No.: 190375/2014
EVELYN MATOS,
Plaintiff,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY, etal.
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant Kelly-Moore Paint Company hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant Kelly-Moore Paint Company without prejudice, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notiee to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Kelly-Moore Paint Company be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
>,2015
ovack, Esq.Hawkins Parnell Thackston & Young LLPAttorneys for DefendantKelly-Moore Paint Company, lne.600 Lexington Avenue, 8th FloorNew York, NY 10022
Levy Konigsberg, LLPAttorneys for PlaintiffEyelyn Matos800 Third Avenue, 1lIh FloorNew York, NY 10022
SO ORDERED,Hon Sherry KHn Hfitlfr
HON. PETER H. MOULTONj.s.a
I
\
\:ZTS~0:& .H MOH.o.a.L
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK------ xINRE: NEW YORK CITY NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Doeument Relates To:
JAMES J. BASLIAND LAURIE A. BASL1,
ÿx0%C£
Index No.: 190080-14
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Pneumo Abex LLC, successor in interest to Abex Corporation,
incorreetly sued herein as "ABEX CORPORATION, f/k/a American Brake Shoe Company,
(hereinafter "Abex"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingPlaintiffs' complaint against Abex, with
prejudice, there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Abex, be and are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
ÿ .2015ew York, NefoYork
Amber Long, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs800 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 605-6200
Alfred J. Sargcnte, Esq.HAWKINS PARNELL
THACKSTON & YOUNG LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Pneumo Abex LLC, Successor in interestto Abex Corporation600 LexingtonAvenue, 8thNew York, New York 10022-7578(212) 897-9655
SO ORDERED,
MAR 16 2MB
RECEIVEDMAR -v 4 2015
PART 301 1197299V.I
r
£si13:
* ' " If
MOTJUGM ;iM iÿ o.au * '1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
INRE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALl.A.S. Parted'
Index No.: 190039/2014
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
JOSEPH G. MILLER AND CAROL MILLER,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et a].,
_Defendants._WHEREFORE, defendant Oakfahco, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-
entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs
complaint against defendant Oakfabco, Inc.with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Oakfabco, lnc, be and the same are hereby dismissed with/prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York2015
/C£
:ins Parnell Thackston & Young LLPfrneys for Defendantcfaheo, lne.Lexington Avenue, 8th Floor
New York, NY 10022(212) 897-9655
j<
Bellucic mot LLPAttonjeys/for/PlaintiffsJoseph G. Miller and Carol Miller546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 681-1575
/ MAR 11luivJSO ORDERED, / " —-
HON.PETERH.MOULTON
•IA; j
KiTLhiO:*
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK NYCAL
X Index Nos.: 190011/14INRE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX
This Document Relates To: NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONHARALAMBOS M. GATZONIS AND VASILIKI
GATZONIS,Plaintiffs,
vs. mar s 0 2015AIR LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, as Successor byMerger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., et al.,
Defendants.
NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
WHEREFORE,defendant HoosierGasket Corporation,hereby requests summaryjudgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
Plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Hoosier Gasket Corporation, with prejudice,and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Hoosier Gasket Corporation, be and the same are herehy dismissed with prejudice and
Dated:
BELLUCf LANDMANCORSI BALLA1NE & FORD P.C.
/rJ V _ c**Christopher S. Kozaÿ/Esq.Attorneys for DefendantHoosier Gasket Corporation120 Broadway, 27th Floor
Jordan Foj ,Ifeq. jAttorneys 'or tflai utiffs546 Firthiÿ/enue, 4lh FloorNew YoHe NY 10036
Attorneys for DefendantHoosier Gasket Corporation120 Broadway, 27th FloorNew York, NY 10271-0079
So Ordereim Shnrry Klrin Uoitlrr
:ODMA/PCDOCS/DOCSNY/570251.h8W£ter h.moulton\ J.S.C*
RECEIVED TY MAIL
LANDMANCORSI 8ALLAINE & FORD
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NYCALCOUNTY OF NEW YORK IAS Partÿ g"*0
—- X (Hoitlor, J.) ÿ
INRE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
PHYLISS HAUCK,
-against-ADVANCE AUTO PARTS,INC.,et al.
PIaintiff(s),
Defendant(s)X
INDEX NO: 190246/2012
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Armstrong International, Inc.hereby requests summary judgment
inthe above entitled action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs eomplaint against defendant
Armstrong International, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant>
Armstrong International Inc.,be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice aadÿwkhqut c&sis.
Dated: White Plains,New York
Him ÿ
Michael Cofian, Esq.Napoli Bern Ripka Shkolnik &Associates, LLPAttorney for Plaintiff350 FifthAvenue- Suite 7413New York, NY 10118Tel: (212) 267-3700
rMAR 3 0 2015
NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
THOMAS M. BENEVENTANOLa Sorsa & BeneventanoAttorney for DefendantARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC.3 Barker Avenue, White Plains,NY 10601Tel: (914) 682-3300
ed --— y// V/ THon. Slieiry Klein Ilutlcr «—HON. PETER H.MOULTON
4 4 ,
KOTJUCW .H H3Taq .MOH
11FC0USUPREMFCOURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORKX
INRE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCALASBESTOS LITIGATION
XSTEVES. STETSON,
-against-
ALCOA INC., et al.
PlaintifF(s),
Defendants.
Index No. 190489/13
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONAND ORDER
Hon. Sherry KIHn Hftitlftr,IAS Partÿ6 5"0
ÿX
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed
with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
NAPOLl BERN R1PKA &ASSOCIATES LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff
ex. M—
LYNCHDASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire& Rubber Company
By:Christopher Gladd, Esq. Alexandra E. Ober, Esq.
350 FifthAvenue, Suite 7530New York, New York 10018(212) 267-3700
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED:
264 West 40th StreetNew York, New York 10018(212)302-2400 fil
MAR 3 0 2015
ÿon. Sherry Klein Ildllu,J.O.C.
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
NEW YORKCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
WOTJUOWI .H P.3T39 .MOH,0.2.0