Upload
gordon-wade
View
220
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Teacher Evaluation Overview
CREC Magnet SchoolsTeacher Academy - 2015
CREC SCHOOLS
Agenda
• Welcome• Overview of the CREC Plan• Examine each Category of the
Model
CREC SCHOOLS
Outcomes
• Understand the Guidelines for Educator Evaluation and Support
• Recognize the design principles and requirements for educator evaluation
• Identify the specific categories of educator evaluation
• Understand how you will be evaluated this year
CREC SCHOOLS
When teachers succeed, students succeed.
Research has proven that no school-level factor matters more to
students’ success than high-quality
teachers and leaders.
CREC SCHOOLS
• Based on multiple standards-based measures of performance
• Promote both professional judgment and consistency
• Foster professional dialogue about student learning
• Aligned to effective, evaluation-based professional learning, coaching, and feedback to support teacher growth and development
Educator Evaluation Design Principles
CREC SCHOOLS
Teacher Evaluation Categories
Teacher refers to any person who serves in a position requiring teacher certification but not an 092.
CREC SCHOOLS
Illustration of Core Requirements of Teacher Evaluation
Student Growth and Development
(45%)
Whole-school Student Learning
Indicators(5%)
Parent Feedback(10%)
Observations of Performance and
Practice(40%)
Student Outcome Rating(50%)
Teacher Practice Rating(50%)
All of these factors are combined to reach your final annual rating (as described in the Connecticut guidelines).
CREC SCHOOLS
Teacher Evaluation Process
Orientation on process
Teacher reflection and goal-setting
Goal-setting conference
Review goals and performance evidence to date
Mid-year conferences
Teacher self-assessment
Scoring
End-of-year conference
Goal-Setting & Planning Mid-Year Check-in End-of-Year Review
By October 15 January/February By June 2*
*If state test data may have a significant impact on a final rating, a final rating may be revised by September 15 when state test data are available.
*Target date for End-of Year is one week before the last student day (must be completed by June 30)
CREC SCHOOLS
Teacher Evaluation Process:Setting and Planning Goals
Orientation Process- teachers provided with information about the evaluation process
Teacher Reflection and Goal Setting- Teacher examines student data, prior year evaluation and survey results and Framework for Teaching (Danielson, 2013) and drafts proposed practice goal, a parent feedback goal, & student learning objectives for the school year.
Goal-setting Conference- Administrator and teacher discuss proposed goals and arrive at a mutual agreement.
CREC SCHOOLS
Teacher Evaluation Process:
Mid-year check-ins
Evaluators and teachers review progress toward goals/objectives at least once during the school year.
Review may result in revisions to strategies or approach being used.
A mutually agreed upon mid-year adjustment of student learning goals may be made.
CREC SCHOOLS
Teacher Evaluation Process: End-of-year Summative Review
Teacher Self-assessmentReviews data/evidence collected and submits self-assessment to evaluator
ScoringCategory ratings generate final summative rating
End-of –year ConferenceEvaluator and teacher meet to discuss all evidence and discuss category rating. Teachers are encourage to bring evidence to support achievement of goalsFollowing conference evaluator assigns summative rating and generates summative report.
CREC SCHOOLS
Guidelines and CREC Model
12
Guidelines for Educator Evaluation Goal-Setting
Observation of Teacher Performance & Practice (40%)No required goal/area of focus
Parent OR Peer Feedback (10%)No required goal
Student Growth and Development (45%)At least 1 but no more than 4 goals/objectives with multiple IAGDs
Whole-School Student Learning Indicators and/or Student Feedback (5%)No required goal
CREC
Observation of Teacher Performance & Practice (40%)One Area of Focus based on Danielson Framework for Teaching
Parent Feedback (10%)1 Goal
Student Growth and Development (45%) 2 Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) with at least one IAGD each
Whole-School Student Learning Indicators (5%)No goal
CREC SCHOOLS
Category # 1 Teacher Performance and Practice
• Forty percent (40%) of a teacher’s evaluation shall be based on observation of teacher practice and performance
• Sample Sources of Evidence:
–Observations –Artifacts, Conferences, Reviews of
Practice
Danielson Framework for Teaching
Teacher Practice
CREC SCHOOLS
Domain 3Instruction
Domain 2Classroom Environment
Domain 3Instruction
3a Communicating with Students3b Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques3c Engaging Students in Learning3d Using Assessment in Instruction3e Demonstrating Flexibility & Responsiveness
Domain 3Instruction
3a Communicating with Students3b Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques3c Engaging Students in Learning3d Using Assessment in Instruction3e Demonstrating Flexibility & Responsiveness
Domain 2Classroom Environment
2a Creating an Environment of Respect & Rapport2b Creating a Culture of Learning2c Managing Classroom Procedures2d Managing Student Behavior2e Managing Physical Space
Domain 2Classroom Environment
2a Creating an Environment of Respect & Rapport2b Creating a Culture of Learning2c Managing Classroom Procedures2d Managing Student Behavior2e Managing Physical Space
Domain 4Engaging in Professional Responsibilities and Teacher Leadership
Domain 1Planning for Active Learning
Domain 4Professional Responsibilities
4a Reflecting on Teaching4b Maintaining Accurate Records4c Communicating with Families4d Participating in a Professional Community4e Growing and Developing Professionally4f Showing Professionalism
Domain 1Planning and Preparation
1a Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy1b Demonstrating Knowledge of Students1c Setting Instructional Outcomes1d Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources1e Designing Coherent Instruction1f Designing Student Assessments
15
Area of Focus
CREC SCHOOLS
Levels of Performance
BELOW STANDARD DEVELOPING PROFICIENT EXEMPLARY
Lack ofUnsafe
HarmfulUnclear
UnawarePoor
Unsuitable
InconsistentPartial
GeneralAttempts
AwarenessModerateMinimal
ConsistentFrequent
SuccessfulAppropriate
ClearPositiveSmooth
SolidSeamless
SubtleSkillful
PreventativeLeadershipStudents
TEACHER DIRECTED SUCCESS
TEACHER DIRECTED SUCCESS
STUDENT DIRECTED SUCCESS
STUDENT DIRECTED SUCCESS
16
CREC SCHOOLS
Number of Observations Year
First and Second year teachers: at least 3 formal, in-class
observations; 2 of which include a pre-conference and ALL of which require a post-conference.Developing /Below Standard teachers: at least 3 formal in-class observations; 2 of which include a pre-conference and all of which include a post-conference.Proficient/Exemplary Teachers: At least 2 formal observations or reviews of practice; 1 of which must be a formal in-class observation.
CREC SCHOOLS
Definition of Formal/Informal Observations
Formal: Observations or reviews of practice that last at least 30 minutes and are followed by a post-conference, which includes both written and verbal feedback.
Informal: Non-scheduled observations or reviews of practice that last at least 10 minutes and are followed by written and/or verbal feedback.
CREC SCHOOLS
Category # 2- Parent Feedback
Ten percent (10%) of a teacher’s evaluation shall be based on parent feedback, including surveys.
Process focuses on: Conducting whole-school parent survey Determine school-level parent focus area based on
survey feedback Teacher and evaluator identifying one related
parent engagement goal Measure progress Determine teacher’s summative rating
CREC SCHOOLS
Parent Feedback GoalExamples: School-Based Goals for Parent Feedback
Examples: Individual Teacher Goals which support School-Based Goals
Increase the percentage of parents who say “Always” to the statement “My child's teacher communicates with parents,” from 68% to 90%.
I will send home progress reports for math with each child every two weeks.
Every other Friday, my 6th grade students will use their work folders to write a brief letter to their parents summarizing their progress in reading and math.
CREC SCHOOLS
Illustration of Core Requirements of Teacher Evaluation
Student Growth and Development
(45%)
Whole-school Student Learning
Indicators(5%)
Parent Feedback(10%)
Observations of Performance and
Practice(40%)
Student Outcome Rating(50%)
Teacher Practice Rating(50%)
All of these factors are combined to reach your final annual rating (as described in the Connecticut guidelines).
CREC SCHOOLS
SLOs fit here
How do SLOs fit into the evaluation system?
CREC SCHOOLS
Student Learning Objectives
• Measure a teacher’s impact on student learning within a given interval of time
• Are grounded in and built on teacher practice
• Measure students’ academic growth• Are standards-based
CREC SCHOOLS
Overview of the Process of Setting Student Learning Objectives
SLO
Pha
se I Learn
about this year’s students SL
O P
hase
II Set Goals for Student Learning SLO
Pha
se II
I
Monitor Students’ Progress
Assess student
outcomes relative
relative to goals
SLO
Pha
se IV
CREC SCHOOLS
Illustration of Core Requirements of Teacher Evaluation
Student Growth and Development
(45%)
Whole-school Student Learning
Indicators(5%)
Parent Feedback(10%)
Observations of Performance and
Practice(40%)
Student Outcome Rating(50%)
Teacher Practice Rating(50%)
All of these factors are combined to reach your final annual rating (as described in the Connecticut guidelines).
CREC SCHOOLS
Illustration of Core Requirements of Teacher Evaluation
Student Growth and Development
(45%)
Whole-school Student Learning
Indicators(5%)
Parent Feedback(10%)
Observations of Performance and
Practice(40%)
Student Outcome Rating(50%)
Teacher Practice Rating(50%)
All of these factors are combined to reach your final annual rating (as described in the Connecticut guidelines).
CREC SCHOOLS
Scoring for Summative
Category Score MultiplierPoints
(Score x Multiplier)
Observation of Teacher Practice 40
Parent Feedback 10
TOTAL TEACHER PRACTICE
Student Growth 45
Whole School Learning Indicator 5
TOTAL STUDENT GROWTH
CREC SCHOOLS
Support and Development Professional Learning Opportunities/Examples
Targeted professional development External learning opportunities Differentiated career pathway Coaching Assisting peers Leading data teams Leading professional development Leading book study groups
28
CREC SCHOOLS
www.crec.org/P21
CREC SCHOOLS
For more information or technical assistance please contact:
School Administrative TeamSchool Complimentary EvaluatorsTEAM MentorGrade Level Team MembersSchool Peers