25
Successful Farming Sprayer Calibration Project Robert E. Wolf Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology Bio & Ag Engineering Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering

Successful Farming Sprayer Calibration Project Robert E. Wolf Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology Bio & Ag Engineering Kansas

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Successful Farming Sprayer Calibration Project Robert E. Wolf Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology Bio & Ag Engineering Kansas

Successful Farming Sprayer Calibration Project

Robert E. Wolf

Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology

Bio & Ag Engineering

Kansas State University

Biological and Agricultural Engineering

Page 2: Successful Farming Sprayer Calibration Project Robert E. Wolf Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology Bio & Ag Engineering Kansas

Calibration!!!!

Ensuring that the spray output is what it is supposed to be!

Page 3: Successful Farming Sprayer Calibration Project Robert E. Wolf Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology Bio & Ag Engineering Kansas

Calibration/Nozzle Selection:

• What is the first step?• Use label to select the

– application volume– product rate

• Choose an appropriate travel speed - MPH

• Effective width of application– nozzle spacing

• Calculate GPM – Flow rate per nozzle

• Select the correct size of nozzle!

Page 4: Successful Farming Sprayer Calibration Project Robert E. Wolf Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology Bio & Ag Engineering Kansas

Page 9 – Turbo Flat-fan

Page 12 – XR Fat-fan

Page 15 – AI Flat-fan

Nozzle Selection Chart:Nozzle Selection Chart:

Page 5: Successful Farming Sprayer Calibration Project Robert E. Wolf Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology Bio & Ag Engineering Kansas
Page 6: Successful Farming Sprayer Calibration Project Robert E. Wolf Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology Bio & Ag Engineering Kansas

Checking for accuracy

• Check several new nozzles– flow rate within 5-7% of desired output?

• Check flow rate frequently– adjust pressure to compensate for small

changes output due to wear

• Replace nozzles & recalibrate when:– output > 7% change from new nozzle– when pattern becomes uneven

Page 7: Successful Farming Sprayer Calibration Project Robert E. Wolf Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology Bio & Ag Engineering Kansas

Nozzle types tested: Spraying Systems/TeeJet - newly purchasedXR11003, TT11003, AI11003, TTJ11003, and TTI11003XR= conventional, TT = chamber, AI = venturi (air induction), TTJ = double outlet chamber, and TTI = chamber and venturi in combo

Raven 440 Controller: 40 PSI - 10 GPA - 8.9 MPH (radar measured)Distance traveled during test = 726 linear feetTime to travel 726 feet = 56 sec (converts to 8.9 MPH – matches radar)Area sprayed during the test = 1 acre (726 * 60/43,560)Nozzle flow rate – chart standard for 03 orifice = 0.3 gpm at 40 PSI

0.3 gpm converts to 38.4 ounces/min = 0.64 ounces/secondExpected output in test travel time (56s) = 35.8 oz/min/nozzle (0.64 *

56)Suggested error standard (TeeJet) of + or – 5 to 7% from expected

flowWe used + or – 7% as our allowable from expected output

35.8 * .07 = 2.5 ounces35.8 – 2.5 = 33.3 ounces for lower end limit35.8 + 2.5 = 38.3 ounces for higher end limit

Test Parameters

Page 8: Successful Farming Sprayer Calibration Project Robert E. Wolf Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology Bio & Ag Engineering Kansas

Male Catheter Rubber placed over nozzle cap for each collection. Served as the air inlet plug for AI and TTI plugged test in rep 5.

XR

TTTTJ

AI

TTI

Surgical hose on AI

Page 9: Successful Farming Sprayer Calibration Project Robert E. Wolf Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology Bio & Ag Engineering Kansas
Page 10: Successful Farming Sprayer Calibration Project Robert E. Wolf Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology Bio & Ag Engineering Kansas
Page 11: Successful Farming Sprayer Calibration Project Robert E. Wolf Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology Bio & Ag Engineering Kansas

Rate Controller Output - 10 GPA Expected

8.5

9

9.5

10

10.5

Stationary on-the-go on-the-go on-the-go plugged

Collection Method

GP

A

37 nozzles – 4 types (9), 10 GPA, 8.9 MPH, 40 PSI

Page 12: Successful Farming Sprayer Calibration Project Robert E. Wolf Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology Bio & Ag Engineering Kansas

XR 11003 - Reps Averaged

35.6

37.1

35.8

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

Ou

nce

s

stationary bag average expected

red lines = + or - 7% from expected

XR 11003

35.6

36.6

37.4 37.3

35.8

30.031.032.0

33.034.035.036.037.0

38.039.040.0

stationary bag-1 bag-2 bag-3 expected

Collection Method

Ou

nce

s

red lines = + or - 7% from expected

Page 13: Successful Farming Sprayer Calibration Project Robert E. Wolf Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology Bio & Ag Engineering Kansas

TT 11003 - Reps Averaged

31.7

34.3

33.3

35.8

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

Ou

nce

s

stationary bag average bag-venturi plug expected

red lines = + or - 7% from expected

TT 11003

34.3

33.1 33.4 33.4

31.7

35.8

30.031.032.0

33.034.035.036.037.0

38.039.040.0

stationary bag-1 bag-2 bag-3 bag-venturi plug expected

Collection Method

Ou

nce

sred lines = + or - 7% from expected

Page 14: Successful Farming Sprayer Calibration Project Robert E. Wolf Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology Bio & Ag Engineering Kansas

AI 11003 - Reps Averaged

34.733.9

37.9 35.8

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

Ou

nce

s

stationary bag average bag-venturi plug expected

red lines = + or - 7% from expected

Air Induction - AI 11003

34.733.8 33.9 33.9

37.9

35.8

30.031.032.0

33.034.035.036.037.0

38.039.040.0

stationary bag-1 bag-2 bag-3 bag-venturi plug expected

Collection Method

Ou

nce

sred lines = + or - 7% from expected

Page 15: Successful Farming Sprayer Calibration Project Robert E. Wolf Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology Bio & Ag Engineering Kansas

TTJ 11003 Reps Averaged

33.7

31.9

34.1

35.8

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

Ou

nce

s

stationary bag average bag-venturi plug expected

red lines = + or - 7% from expected

TTJ 11003

34.133.4 33.8 33.9

31.9

35.8

30.031.032.0

33.034.035.036.037.0

38.039.040.0

stationary bag-1 bag-2 bag-3 bag-venturi plug expected

Collection Method

On

ces

red lines = + or - 7% from expected

Page 16: Successful Farming Sprayer Calibration Project Robert E. Wolf Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology Bio & Ag Engineering Kansas

TTI 11003

36.835.8

36.2

30.031.032.0

33.034.035.036.037.0

38.039.040.0

stationary bag-venturi plug expected

Collection Method

Ou

nce

s

red lines = + or - 7% from expected

Page 17: Successful Farming Sprayer Calibration Project Robert E. Wolf Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology Bio & Ag Engineering Kansas

37 nozzles – 4 types (9), 35.8 oz. expected, + or - 7% error

10 GPA, 8.9 MPH, 40 PSI

Rep Average for Nozzle Location on Boom

30.0

31.032.0

33.034.0

35.0

36.037.0

38.039.0

40.0

AI

XR AI

TT

J

AI

TT

J

XR TT

TT

TT

J

XR

XR AI

TT

J

AI

TT

XR AI

XR

TT

J

TT

TT

TT AI

XR TT

TT

XR

TT

J

TT

J

TT AI

TT

J

AI

TT

J

XR

TT

J

Boom Locatiion

Ou

nce

s

Page 18: Successful Farming Sprayer Calibration Project Robert E. Wolf Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology Bio & Ag Engineering Kansas

Summary by Nozzle Type - Reps Averaged

30.031.032.033.034.035.036.037.038.039.040.0

XR TT AI TTJ TTI

Ou

nce

s

stationary bag average bag venturi plug expected

red lines = + or - 7% from expected

•37 nozzles – 4 types (9), 35.8 oz. expected, + or - 7% error•10 GPA, 8.9 MPH, 40 PSI

Page 19: Successful Farming Sprayer Calibration Project Robert E. Wolf Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology Bio & Ag Engineering Kansas

Calibration!!!!The next phase!

Ensuring that the spray droplet spectrum is what it is supposed to be to maximize

efficacy while minimizing drift!

Page 20: Successful Farming Sprayer Calibration Project Robert E. Wolf Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology Bio & Ag Engineering Kansas
Page 21: Successful Farming Sprayer Calibration Project Robert E. Wolf Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology Bio & Ag Engineering Kansas

ASABE S-572 Droplet Size Standard

Page 22: Successful Farming Sprayer Calibration Project Robert E. Wolf Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology Bio & Ag Engineering Kansas

See Page 182, TeeJet Catalog 50

Page 23: Successful Farming Sprayer Calibration Project Robert E. Wolf Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology Bio & Ag Engineering Kansas

Droplet Selection/Calibration:

p. 15

Page 24: Successful Farming Sprayer Calibration Project Robert E. Wolf Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology Bio & Ag Engineering Kansas

Disclaimer:

• Brand names appearing in this presentation are for identification and illustration purposes only.

• No endorsement is intended, nor is criticism implied of similar products not mentioned.

Page 25: Successful Farming Sprayer Calibration Project Robert E. Wolf Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology Bio & Ag Engineering Kansas

www.bae.ksu.edu/faculty/wolf/

For more information contact:

[email protected]