State Assessment, Mercer

7/28/2019 State Assessment, Mercer

1/48

Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Mercer Elem (27185)

Program Type: Assessment Only

Setting: Suburban

Assessment Name: 27185-Mercer Elementary-FINAL

Assessment Date: 2004-07-08

Cost Set: 2004

Building Name: Mercer Elem

Building Address: 2600 Bartels Rd

Building City: Cincinnati

Building Zipcode: 45244

Building Phone: 513-232-7000

Acreage: 25

Current Grades: K-6

Teaching Stations: 46

Number of Floors: 2

Student Capacity: 760

Current Enrollment: 798

Enrollment Date: 2003-10-01

Enrollment Date is the date in which the current enrollment was taken.

Number of Classrooms: 34

Historical Register NO

Buildings Principal: Frances P Callahan

Building Type: Elementary/Middle

Current Elementary Enrollment: 693

Current Middle Enrollment: 105

Current High Enrollment: 0

Current Career Technical Enrollment: 0

Next Page

Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Mercer Elem (27185) Page 1


2/48

Building Pictures - Forest Hills Local SD(47340) - Mercer Elem(27185)

North elevation photo: East elevation photo:

South elevation photo: West elevation photo:

GENERAL DESCRIPTION

96,707 Total Existing Square Footage

1973 Building Dates

K-6 Grades

798 Current Enrollment

46 Teaching Stations

25 Site Acreage

Mercer Elementary School, which is not on the National Register of Historic Buildings, is a 1973 two story, 96,707 square foot brick school building located in a suburbanresidential setting. The facility was originally constructed as a middle school, and still has the locker rooms that are more typical of a middle school design. The existing facilitydoes not use modular buildings. The structure of the facility is a concrete frame with non-bearing masonry exterior wall construction and brick veneer. Interior walls are acombination on nonbearing masonry and mobile partition walls. The floor system consists of a combination of concrete slab on grade, cast in place concrete, and steel joists withmetal form deck and concrete topping. The roof structure is primarily steel joists with metal deck. The roofing system of the facility is a combination of EPDM, standing seam

metal, and built-up asphalt with gravel ballast, installed in phases from 1997 to present. The ventilation system of the building is generally adequate to meet the needs of theusers. The classrooms are undersized in terms of the current standards established by the State of Ohio. Physical Education and Student Dining spaces consist of oneGymnasium and separate Student Dining. The electrical system for the facility is generally adequate. The facility is equipped with a non-compliant security system. The buildinghas a compliant automatic fire alarm system. The facility is not equipped with an automated fire suppression system. The building is reported to contain asbestos. The overallbuilding is not compliant with ADA accessibility requirements. The school is located on a 25-acre site shared with Turpin High School adjacent to residential properties. Theproperty and playgrounds are partially fenced for security. Access onto the site is unrestricted. Site circulation is poor. There is dedicated space for school buses to load andunload on the site, but loading prohibits vehicular traffic. Parking for staff, visitors and community events is adequate.

Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06Building Pictures - Forest Hills Local SD(47340) - Mercer Elem(27185) Page 2


3/48

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06Building Pictures - Forest Hills Local SD(47340) - Mercer Elem(27185) Page 3


4/48

Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Mercer Elem (27185)

Program Type: Assessment Only

Setting: Suburban

Assessment Name: 27185-Mercer Elementary-FINAL

Assessment Date: 2004-07-08

Cost Set: 2004

Building Name: Mercer Elem

Building Address: 2600 Bartels Rd

Building City: Cincinnati

Building Zipcode: 45244

Building Phone: 513-232-7000

Acreage: 25

Current Grades: K-6

Teaching Stations: 46

Number of Floors: 2

Student Capacity: 760

Current Enrollment: 798

Enrollment Date: 2003-10-01

Enrollment Date is the date in which the current enrollment was taken.

Number of Classrooms: 34

Historical Register NO

Buildings Principal: Frances P Callahan

Building Type: Elementary/Middle

Current Elementary Enrollment: 693

Current Middle Enrollment: 105

Current High Enrollment: 0

Current Career Technical Enrollment: 0

Next Page

Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Mercer Elem (27185) Page 4


5/48

Building Construction Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Mercer Elem (27185)

Name Year Handicapped Access Floors Square Feet

Original Building 1973 no 2 96,707

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06Building Construction Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Mercer Elem (27185) Page 5


6/48

Building Component Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Mercer Elem (27185)

Addition Auditorium CorridorsAgricultural

Education LabGymnasium

MediaCenter

VocationalSpace

StudentDining

Kitchen Natatorium

Original Building (1973) 16967 7069 2292 5381 2120

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06Building Component Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Mercer Elem (27185) Page 6


7/48

Career Technical Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Mercer Elem (27185)

No Career Technical Programs Present

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06Career Technical Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Mercer Elem (27185) Page 7


8/48

Main Assessment Menu - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Mercer Elem (27185)

Building Summary - Mercer Elem (27185)

District: Forest Hills Local SD

Name: Mercer Elem

Address: 2600 Bartels Rd

Cincinnati,OH 45244

Bldg. IRN: 27185

County: Hamilton Area: Cincinnati (1)

Contact: Frances P Callahan

Phone: 513-232-7000

Date Prepared: 2004-07-08 By: Tony Zircher

Date Revised: 2004-10-22 By: Vicki Siwek

Current Grades K-6 Acreage: 25

Proposed Grades N/A Teaching Stations: 46

Current Enrollment 798 Classrooms: 34

Projected Enrollment N/A

Addition Date HA Number of Floors Current Square Feet


Total 96,707

*HA = Handicapped Access

*Rat ing =1 Sat isfactory

=2 Needs Repair

=3 Needs Replacement

*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction

FACILITY ASSESSMENTCost Set: 2004 Rating

DollarAssessment C

A. Heating System 3 $1,108,638.50 -

B. Roofing 2 $10,800.00 -

C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning 1 $0.00 -D. Electrical Systems 2 $430,346.15 -

E. Plumbing and Fixtures 3 $42,100.00 -

F. Windows 3 $206,870.00 -

G. Structure: Foundation 1 $0.00 -

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys 2 $179,770.00 -

I. Structure: Floors and Roofs 1 $0.00 -

J. General Finishes 3 $2,037,968.60 -

K. Interior Lighting 3 $386,828.00 -

L. Security Systems 3 $155,060.50 -

M. Emergency/Egress Lighting 2 $48,353.50 -

N. Fire Alarm 2 $24,176.75 -

O. Handicapped Access 3 $205,470.70 -

P. Site Condition 2 $246,673.30 -

Q. Sewage System 1 $0.00 -

R. Water Supply 1 $0.00 -

S. Exterior Doors 3 $26,500.00 -

T. Hazardous Material 2 $40,785.00 -

U. Life Safety 3 $454,297.75 -

V. Loose Furnishings 3 $386,828.00 -

W. Technology 3 $557,999.39 -

- X. Construction Contingency /Non-Construction Cost

- $1,593,747.09 -

Total $8,143,213.23

CEFPI Appraisal Summary

Section Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating CategoCover Sheet

1.0The School Site 100 67 67% Borderl

2.0Structural and Mechanical Features 200 128 64% Borderl

3.0Plant Maintainability 100 67 67% Borderl

4.0Building Safety and Security 200 159 80% Satisfacto

5.0Educational Adequacy 200 103 52% Borderl

6.0Environment for Education 200 129 65% Borderl

Commentary

Total 1000 653 65% Borderl

C=Under Contract

Renovation Cost Factor 100.44

Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied) $8,179,043

The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary irequested from a Master Plan.

Previous Page

Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06Main Assessment Menu - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Mercer Elem (27185) Page 8


9/48


Original Building (1973) Summary


Name: Mercer Elem


Cincinnati,OH 45244

Bldg. IRN: 27185



Phone: 513-232-7000









Total 96,707



=2 Needs Repair




DollarAssessment C


B. Roofing 2 $10,800.00 -



F. Windows 3 $206,870.00 -








N. Fire Alarm 2 $24,176.75 -







U. Life Safety 3 $454,297.75 -


W. Technology 3 $557,999.39 -


- $1,593,747.09 -

Total $8,143,213.23









Commentary


C=Under Contract






10/48

Facility Assessment

A. Heating System

Description: The existing system for the overall facility is an electric heating system. The gymnasium is equipped with an electric resistance heat onlyair-handling unit that is two years old. The kindergarten area has ceiling mounted electric heat packs for heat and an air-handling unit forventilation and air conditioning. The student dining area has a deck mounted air handling unit for heat and a rooftop mounted condensing unit forair conditioning. Student dining equipment is original in fair to poor condition. The office / music area is heated by electric baseboard. A separatedeck mounted air-handling unit provides cooling with rooftop mounted condensing unit with electric VAV boxes for temperature control. Office /music equipment is original with the exception of the VAV boxes which are 2 years old. Three zones of the academic wing are equipped withrooftop mounted Weathermaker air handling units that provide heat and air conditioning. Units are 2 years old and in good condition. One zone ofthe academic wing is equipped with electric baseboard heaters, with cooling provided by a deck mounted air handling unit and a pad mountedcondensing unit. Room 300 has a separate rooftop mounted system that is 3-4 years old. The system appears to comply with the 15 CFM perperson fresh air requirements of the Ohio Building Code mechanical code and Ohio School Design Manual. The system temperature controls area combination of pneumatic and electric. Temperature controls are original in fair condition. The system does not feature individual temperaturecontrols in all spaces required by the OSDM. The existing system is ducted. The overall heating system is evaluated as being in safe and efficientworking order; although system age implies that long-term life expectancy of the existing system is not anticipated. The structure is partially airconditioned. The site does not contain underground fuel tanks.

Rating: 3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations: Provide new overall heating, ventilating, and air conditioning system in the activities wing to achieve compliance with Ohio Building Code andOhio School Design Manual standards. Provide new DDC type temperature controls in the academic wing to meet Ohio School Design Manualstandards. Replace the ductwork system in the academic wing due to work described in item J.

Item Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1973)96,707 ft

Sum Comments

Other: Remove / Reconfigure / Replace ductwork and controls as required $5.50sq.ft. (Qty) 50,567 Required $278,118.50Academic Wing

Other: HVAC System and controls $18.00sq.ft. (Qty) 46,140 Required $830,520.00Activities WingSum: $1,108,638.50 $1,108,638.50

Electric Baseboard Heater Rooftop Air Handling Unit

Back to Assessment Summary

Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06:Facility Assessment Page 10


11/48

Facility Assessment

B. Roofing

Description: The roof over the academic section is currently being replaced to a built-up asphalt with gravel ballast system. There are small portions ofstanding seam metal roof over the stage storage and Early Childhood Storage areas. The roof over the remainder of the facility is a built-upasphalt with gravel ballast system that was installed in phases from 1997 to 2000. The connecting corridor is equipped with an EPDM roof thatwas reported as installed in 1997. A small section of EPDM roofing exists over the mechanical mezzanine. Age is unknown. There are no Districtreports of current leaking. No signs of past leaking were observed during the physical assessment. Multiple access hatches with ladders that arein good condition are used to gain access to the roof. There were observations of standing water on the roof. Metal flashings are in fair condition.The gutters and downspouts are properly located, and in fair condition. Roof drains are adequate in number, properly located, and in faircondition.

Rating: 2 Needs Repair

Recommendations: The roof over the connecting corridor requires replacement to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines for age of system. Replace the EPDMroofing over the mechanical mezzanine.


Sum Comments

Built-up Asphalt:$6.00sq.ft. (Qty) 1,800 Required $10,800.00Sum: $10,800.00 $10,800.00

Built-Up Roof Connecting Corridor




12/48

Facility Assessment

C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning

Description: The gymnasium is equipped with an electric resistance heat only air-handling unit that is two years old. The kindergarten area has ceilingmounted electric heat packs for heat and an air-handling unit for ventilation and air conditioning. The student dining area has a deck mounted airhandling unit for heat and a rooftop mounted condensing unit for air conditioning. Student dining equipment is original in fair to poor condition.The office / music area is heated by electric baseboard. A separate deck mounted air-handling unit provides cooling with rooftop mountedcondensing unit with electric VAV boxes for temperature control. Office / music equipment is original with the exception of the VAV boxes whichare 2 years old. Three zones of the academic wing are equipped with rooftop mounted Weathermaker air handling units that provide heat and airconditioning. Units are 2 years old and in good condition. One zone of the academic wing is equipped with electric baseboard heaters, withcooling provided by a deck mounted air handling unit and a pad mounted condensing unit. Room 300 has a separate rooftop mounted systemthat is 3-4 years old. The system appears to comply with the 15 CFM per person fresh air requirements of the Ohio Building Code mechanicalcode and Ohio School Design Manual. The system temperature controls are a combination of pneumatic and electric. Temperature controls areoriginal in fair condition. The system does not feature individual temperature controls in all spaces required by the OSDM. The existing system isducted. The overall heating system is evaluated as being in safe and efficient working order; although system age implies that long-term lifeexpectancy of the existing system is not anticipated. Interior doors are not louvered to facilitate corridor utilization as return air plenums. Theoverall system is not fully compliant with Ohio Building Code and Ohio School Design Manual requirements. Dust collection systems are notrequired in this facility. Exhaust systems for Restrooms, Kitchen, Gymnasium, and Storage Rooms are adequate.

Rating: 1 Satisfactory

Recommendations: Provide new overall heating, ventilating, and air conditioning system in the activities wing to achieve compliance with Ohio Building Code andOhio School Design Manual standards. Provide new DDC type temperature controls in the academic wing to meet Ohio School Design Manualstandards. Replace the ductwork system in the academic wing due to work described in item J. Costs for work described is shown in item A.

Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Building (1973)96,707 ft

SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00

Office Condensing Unit Academic Rooftop Units




13/48

Facility Assessment

D. Electrical Systems

Description: The electrical system provided to the overall facility is a 277 / 480 volt, 4000 amp, 3 phase 4 wire system installed in 1973, and is in fair condition.Power is provided to the school by a district owned, pad-mounted transformer located in the rear of the facility, and in fair condition. The panelsystem, installed in 1973, is in fair condition, with limited expansion capability. The classrooms are not equipped with adequate electrical outlets.The typical classroom contains 4 general purpose outlets and dedicated outlets for student and teacher computers. Dedicated outlets are notprovided for classroom televisions. There are restroom spaces that have no electrical outlets. The corridors are equipped with adequate electricaloutlets for servicing. There are adequate GFI protected exterior outlets located around the perimeter of the building. The overall electrical systemmeets Ohio School Design Manual requirements in supporting the current needs of the school. The quantity of outlets is inadequate to meet thefacilitys future needs.


Recommendations: The entire electrical system requires enhancement to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines for classroom capacity, and to facilitate thescope of work outlined in Item J.


Sum Comments

Other: Partial Electrical System Upgrade$4.45sq.ft. Required $430,346.15Upgrade to OSDM standardsSum: $430,346.15 $430,346.15

Main Electrical Panel Pad Mounted Transformer




14/48

Facility Assessment

E. Plumbing and Fixtures

Description: The district reported that the service comes from a tie in at Turpin High School. The service entrance is not equipped with a reduced pressurebackflow preventer at this building. Two water treatment systems are provided. One is not operational, and the other one serves the kitchenequipment only. The treatment system that serves the kitchen is reported to be in fair condition. The other treatment system was not repaired /replaced because the district determined that water quality was such that none was needed. The domestic water supply piping in the facility iscopper in fair condition. The waste piping in the facility is cast iron in fair condition. The facility is equipped with three 120-gallon electric waterheaters in good to fair condition. The school contains 6 restrooms (including locker room) for boys, 7 restrooms (including locker room) for girls,and 9 individual restrooms. Boys restrooms contain 2 ADA and 10 non-ADA wall mounted flush valve toilets, 3 ADA and 15 non-ADA wallmounted flush valve urinals, 2 ADA wall mounted, 14 non-ADA wall mounted and 2 non-ADA countertop lavatories. Girls restrooms contain 2ADA and 23 non-ADA wall mounted flush valve toilets, as well as 2 ADA wall mounted, 12 non-ADA wall mounted, and 6 non-ADA countertoplavatories. Individual restrooms contain 1 ADA and 8 non-ADA wall mounted flush valve toilets, and 2 ADA wall mounted, 6 non-ADA wallmounted, and 1 non-ADA countertop lavatories. The facility is equipped with 1 ADA and 10 non-ADA electric water coolers, in fair condition. Theschool meets the OBC requirements for fixtures. ADA requirements are not met for f ixtures and drinking fountains (see Item O). ProjectLaboratories are not equipped with required gas / compressed air connections, and safety shower / eyewash. Adequate exterior wall hydrants areprovided.


Recommendations: Provide reduced pressure back flow preventer. See Item O for replacement of fixtures related to ADA requirements. Replace the remainder of thecountertop set lavatories, as the assembly will be disturbed when the ADA issues are addressed. Provide a safety shower / eyewash, gasconnections, and compressed air connections to project laboratories.

Item Cost Unit WholeBuilding

Original Building(1973)96,707 ft

Sum Comments

Back Flow Preventer: $5,000.00unit 2 Required $10,000.00

Sink: $1,500.00unit 6 Required $9,000.00(remove / replace)

HIGH BAY/INDUSTRIAL SPACE - LAB TYPES 5,6,7 - Safety Shower/Eyewash - NewInstallation

$2,500.00each 1 Required $2,500.00

HIGH BAY/INDUSTRIAL SPACE - LAB TYPES 5,6,7 - Natural Gas Connections $800.00each 7 Required $5,600.00

HIGH BAY/INDUSTRIAL SPACE - LAB TYPES 5,6,7 - Compressed Air Connections $15,000.00persystem

1 Required $15,000.00

Sum: $42,100.00 $42,100.00

Lavatories Urinal Modifications




15/48

Facility Assessment

F. Windows

Description: The overall facility is equipped with aluminum frame windows with double pane glazing type window system, which was installed in 1973, and isin fair to poor condition. The 1973 windows have seals that are deteriorated and / or broken. The two story corridor that connects the activity wingto the academic wing was originally constructed as an open air corridor / bridge. The corridor was enclosed at a later date with an E.I.F.S. wallsurface and aluminum dual pane windows that are in fair condition. The majority of the entrance doors in the facility are equipped with thermallybroken aluminum frame sidelights and transoms with double pane insulated glazing, in good condition. Some entrance doors are equipped withaluminum frame sidelights and transoms with single pane glazing. The exterior doors in the facility are equipped with hollow metal framesidelights and transoms. Glazing in exterior doors varies with location. Some single pane and some double pane insulated glazing exist. Exteriordoor assembly condition varies from fair to poor. The school does not contain skylights.


Recommendations: Provide a new insulated window system with integral blinds to meet with Ohio School Design Manual requirements. Replace transoms andsidelights as a function of the door assembly replacement in single pane entrance doors and in exterior doors that are single pane or in poorcondition.


Sum Comments

Insulated Glass/Panels: $50.00sq.ft. (Qty) 3,858 Required $192,900.00(with integral blinds)Curtain Wall/Storefront System:$55.00sq.ft. (Qty) 254 Required $13,970.00

Sum: $206,870.00 $206,870.00

Window System Student Dining Area Windows




16/48

Facility Assessment

G. Structure: Foundation

Description: The facility is equipped with a combination of concrete masonry unit and concrete foundation walls on concrete footings. The foundation systemdisplayed one location of settlement that resulted in cracking, and leaking. The settlement occurred at the south corner of the gymnasium. Basedon the perimeter topography, this area appears to have been a fill area in the original construction and settlement has occurred. The district hiredan engineering company to repair the settled area by jacking it back into place. No further settlement has been observed since the repair hasbeen made. The remainder of the foundation system is in fair condition. The District reports that there has been past leaking near the art room,which has been resolved.


Recommendations: Existing conditions require no renovation or replacement at the present time.


SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00

Crack Caused by Foundation Settling Concrete Foundation




17/48

Facility Assessment

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys

Description: The facility is constructed with a concrete frame structure. Exterior walls have a brick veneer on a non-bearing masonry wall system, whichdisplayed locations of deterioration, and is in fair condition. The exterior masonry lacks adequate control joints. The foundation system displayedone location of settlement that resulted in cracking and leaking of the exterior masonry wall. The settlement has been resolved but the uppermasonry requires aesthetic repair. The exterior masonry has not been cleaned and sealed in recent years, and shows evidence of efflorescence.The two story corridor that connects the activity wing to the academic wing was originally constructed as an open air corridor / bridge. Thecorridor was enclosed at a later date with an E.I.F.S. wall surface that is in poor condition. Permanent interior walls are non-bearing concretemasonry units in fair condition. Interior masonry lacks adequate control joints. Mobile partition walls exist in the open concept classroom area.The windowsills are brick, and are in fair to poor condition. The exterior lintels are rusting.


Recommendations: Provide tuckpointing in all areas of mortar deterioration as required. Provide masonry cleaning and sealing through the overall facility. Repairmasonry lintels as required. Repair E.I.F.S. at connecting corridor.


Sum Comments

Tuckpointing: $2.50sq.ft. (Qty) 13,000 Required $32,500.00(wall surface)Exterior Masonry Cleaning: $1.00sq.ft. (Qty) 39,000 Required $39,000.00(wall surface)

Exterior Masonry Sealing: $0.75sq.ft. (Qty) 39,000 Required $29,250.00(wall surface)Install Control Joints $60.00ln.ft. 850 Required $51,000.00

Other: Paint lintels $5.00ln.ft. 3,604 Required $18,020.00scrape and paint

Other: Repair E.I.F.S. $10,000.00allowance Required $10,000.00Repair E.I.F.S.

Sum: $179,770.00 $179,770.00

Deteriorated EIFS Exterior Masonry




18/48

Facility Assessment

I. Structure: Floors and Roofs

Description: The floor construction of the base floor of the facility is a mixture of concrete slab on grade and metal form deck on steel joist type construction,and is in fair condition. Crawl space is located under sections of the facility that have plumbing. The floor construction of the intermediate floors iscast-in-place concrete type construction, and is in fair condition. The roof construction is metal deck on steel joist type construction, and is in faircondition.




SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00

Concrete Framing First Floor Framing




19/48

Facility Assessment

J. General Finishes

Description: The facility has classrooms with carpet flooring, and lay-in acoustic panel (ACT) type ceilings. Walls are painted concrete masonry unit (CMU) onthe exterior and walls connecting classrooms to spaces such as restrooms. The remainder of the interior walls are mobile partition walls withfabric surface. Classroom doors are a function of the mobile partition and lack accessible hardware. Finishes are in fair condition. The academicsection has corridors with carpet type flooring, ACT or plaster type ceilings, and mobile partition wall finishes, and they are in fair condition. Theathletic section has corridors with VCT f looring, CMU walls and ACT or plaster walls. The facility has restrooms with vinyl composition tile (VCT)type flooring, plaster type ceilings, and CMU type wall finishes, and they are in fair condition. The Gymnasium has wood flooring, exposedstructure with metal deck ceiling, and CMU type wall finishes, and they are in fair condition. Gymnasium telescoping stands are in fair condition.Student Dining has asbestos sheet flooring, lay-in translucent panel ceiling, and CMU with acoustic panel type wall finishes, and they are in faircondition. Classroom casework is very limited. Some plastic laminate type construction, is provided, and in fair condition. Classrooms are notprovided adequate chalkboards, markerboards, and tackboards. Condition is limited. The classroom storage cubbies are not adequatelyprovided. The non-classroom doors are a mixture of plastic laminate and metal non-louvered interior doors in fair condition. The toilet partitionsare CMU type construction, are in fair condition, but do not meet ADA requirements. The existing kitchen is full service. The existing Kitchenequipment is original and is in fair condition.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of finishes and casework due to existing conditions and installation of systems outlined in Items A, C, K, L, O, T,and U. Provide complete replacement of kitchen equipment due to age and condition. Provide an allowance for the construction of permanentwalls with accessible doors in the open concept classroom area. Replace existing toilet partitions due to existing conditions and ADArequirements. ADA partitions are replaced in item O.



Sum Comments

Toilet Partitions: $750.00perstall

24 Required $18,000.00(removing and replacing)

Toilet Accessory Replacement $0.20sq.ft . Required $19,341.40(per building area)Partition Open SpaceClassrooms:

$5.50sq.ft. Required $531,888.50(per building sq.ft., CMU in corridors and drywall partitions between classrooms

Total Kitchen EquipmentReplacement:

$105.00sq.ft.(Qty)

2,120 Required $222,600.00(square footage based upon only area of food preparation, serving, kitchenstorage areas and walk-ins. Includes demolition and removal of existing kitchenequipment)

Other: Complete replacement offinishes and casework

$12.85sq.ft.(Qty)

82,892 Required $1,065,162.20Elementary Area

Other: Complete replacement offinishes and casework

$13.10sq.ft.(Qty)

13,815 Required $180,976.50Middle School Area

Sum: $2,037,968.60$2,037,968.60

CMU Toilet Partitions Modified Auditeria Style Space




20/48

Facility Assessment

K. Interior Lighting

Description: The typical Classrooms are equipped with T-8 2x4 lay-in fluorescent fixtures with single level switching. Classroom fixtures are in fair conditionand provide an average illumination of 60 FC, thus complying with the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. The typical Corridors are equippedwith T-8 2x4 lay-in fluorescent fixtures with single level switching. Corridor fixtures are in fair condition and provide an average illumination of40FC, thus complying with the 20 FC recommended by the OSDM. The Gymnasium is equipped with pendant T12 fluorescent fixtures, in faircondition, and providing an average illumination of 20FC, which is less than the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. The Media Center isequipped with T8 fluorescent fixtures mounted above lay-in translucent panels in fair condition, and providing an average illumination of 40FC,which is less than the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. The Student Dining spaces are equipped with T8 fluorescent fixtures mounted abovelay-in translucent panels in fair condition, and providing an average illumination of 78 FC, thus complying with the 50 FC recommended by theOSDM. The service areas are equipped with T8 fluorescent fixture type lighting in fair condition. The typical Administrative spaces are equippedwith 2x4 lay-in T8 fluorescent fixture type lighting in fair condition, and providing adequate illumination based on OSDM requirements. The overalllighting systems of the facility are not fully compliant with Ohio School Design Manual requirements due to condition, inadequate lighting levels,and lack of multilevel switching in appropriate spaces.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of lighting system due to condition, lighting levels, and installation of systems outlined in Items A, C, J, and U.


Sum Comments

Complete Building Lighting Replacement$4.00sq.ft. Required $386,828.00

Sum: $386,828.00 $386,828.00

Art Room Lighting Translucent Panels




21/48

Facility Assessment

L. Security Systems

Description: The facility contains a Moose type security system in fair condition. Motion detectors are provided in offices, corridors, and spaces where 6 ormore computers are located. Some exterior doors are equipped with door contacts. An automatic visitor control system is not provided. OneCCTV camera is provided at the main entry area. CCTV is monitored in Administrative Area with the use of TV, and VCR. The security system isnot adequately provided throughout, and the district identified insecure areas. The system is not fully compliant with Ohio School Design Manualguidelines. The exterior site lighting system is equipped with surface mounted mercury vapor entry lights in fair condition. Pedestrian walkwaysare illuminated with mercury vapor lighting in fair condition. Parking and bus pick-up / drop off areas are illuminated by pole mounted metal halidefixtures in fair condition. The exterior site lighting system provides inadequate coverage.

Rating:3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of security system to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines. Provide enhancement of exterior site lightingsystem to eliminate dark spots around the building and in the staff/visitor parking area, to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines.


Sum Comments

Security System: $1.50sq.ft. Required $145,060.50(complete, area of building)

Other: Partial Exterior Lighting Upgrade$10,000.00allowance Required $10,000.00Enhance site l ighting

Sum: $155,060.50 $155,060.50

Main Security Panel Security Monitor




22/48

Facility Assessment

M. Emergency/Egress Lighting

Description: The facility addition is equipped with an emergency egress lighting system consisting of illuminated exit signs and emergency floodlighting. Thesystem is in good condition, and is provided with appropriate battery backup. The system is adequately provided throughout, and meets OhioSchool Design Manual requirements. Some of the emergency egress lighting is ceiling mounted, while the remainder is wall mounted.


Recommendations: Rework the existing ceiling mounted emergency egress lighting disturbed during work recommended in items A, C, J, K, and U.


Sum Comments

Other: Partial Emergency/Egress Lighting Upgrade$0.50sq.ft. Required $48,353.50Rework exiting system

Sum: $48,353.50 $48,353.50

Emergency Egress Lighting Ceiling Mounted Exit Light




23/48

Facility Assessment

N. Fire Alarm

Description: The facility is equipped with a fire alarm system in fair condition, consisting of manual pull stations, horn, and strobe indicating devices. Thesystem is automatic and is monitored by a third party. The system is equipped with sufficient flow switches, tamper switches, smoke detectors,and heat sensors. The system is adequately provided throughout, and has additional zone capabilities. The system is compliant with OhioBuilding Code, NFPA, and Ohio School Design Manual requirements. The existing system will be disturbed due to work described in item J.


Recommendations: Rework existing system as required by Item J recommendations.


Sum Comments

Other: Relocate f ire alarm $0.25sq.ft. Required $24,176.75Rework as required

Sum: $24,176.75 $24,176.75

Fire Alarm Main Panel Horn Strobe Indicating Device




24/48

Facility Assessment

O. Handicapped Access

Description: Most of the exterior entrances are ADA accessible. Access from the parking / drop-off area to the building entries is not compromised by steps orsteep ramps. Adequate handicap parking is provided. Exterior doors are equipped with ADA hardware. The main entry is not equipped with anADA power assist door. The facility has a total of 6 levels. The main level is accessible from the main entry. The lower level gym / locker roomsand the art room are accessible by use of a chair lift. The second story academic wing is accessible by elevator. The early childhood area and thesplit-level of the academic wing are not accessible. The stage is on the same level as the gym / locker rooms and is accessible. Classroominterior doors are a component of the mobile panel system and are not equipped with ADA hardware. The facility has some doors that are eithertoo narrow or improper ADA clearances. Interior doors are not provided with ADA-compliant hardware. 15 ADA-compliant toilets are required, and5 are currently provided. 15 ADA-compliant lavatories are required, and 7 are currently provided. 6 ADA-compliant urinals are required, and 3 arecurrently provided. 6 ADA-compliant electric water coolers are required, and 1 is currently provided. Toilet partitions are CMU; do not provideappropriate ADA clearances. ADA-compliant accessories are not adequately provided and mounted. ADA signage is not provided on both theinterior and the exterior of the building.


Recommendations: Provide ADA-compliant signage, power assist door opener, chair lifts, electric water coolers, toilets, sinks, urinals, toilet partitions, toiletaccessories, doors and frames, and door hardware to facilitate the schools meeting of ADA requirements. Site issues are corrected in Item P.



Sum Comments

HandicappedHardware:

$350.00set 143 Required $50,050.00(includes installation / hardware only)

Signage: $0.10sq.ft. Required $9,670.70(per building area)Lifts: $12,500.00unit 2 Required $25,000.00(complete)

Electric Water Coolers: $1,800.00unit 5 Required $9,000.00(replacement double ADA)Toilet/Urinals/Sinks: $1,500.00unit 21 Required $31,500.00(replacement ADA)

Toilet Partit ions: $1,000.00stall 9 Required $9,000.00(ADA - grab bars, accessories included)ADA Assist Door &Frame:

$7,500.00unit 1 Required $7,500.00(openers, electrical, patching, etc)

Replace Doors: $3,000.00leaf 15 Required $45,000.00(rework narrow opening to provide 3070 wood door, HM frame, door/light, includes hardware)Replace Doors: $3,750.00leaf 5 Required $18,750.00(rework opening and corridor wall to accommodate ADA standards when door opening is set

back from edge of corridor and cannot accommodate a wheelchair. See diagram)

Sum: $205,470.70 $205,470.70

Mobile Partition Door Elevator




25/48

Facility Assessment

P. Site Condition

Description: The 25 acre steeply sloped site is located in a suburban residential setting with generous tree, shrub, and floral type landscaping. There are noapparent problems with erosion or ponding on the developed portion of the site. Some erosion was evident in the woods. A moderately traveledcity street provides access to the site. A single entrance onto the site leads to a central parking area, which the buses block access to whileloading. Proper separation of bus and other vehicular traffic is not provided. Staff, and visitor parking is facilitated by a 132 space asphalt parkinglot in fair condition, which provides adequate parking for staff members, visitors, and the disabled. The parking lot drainage design, consisting ofappropriate slopes and catch basins, provides adequate evacuation of storm water, and no problems with parking lot ponding were observed.Concrete curbs in good condition are appropriately placed. The main concrete sidewalks are properly sloped, are located to provide a logical flowof pedestrian traffic, and are in fair condition. Some minor sidewalks are excessively sloped. Site fencing is provided to separate the playgroundfrom the wooded area. The playground equipment is in good condition, and on a combination of hard and soft surfaces, with a basketball courtbeing provided on an asphalt surface.


Recommendations: Replace damaged sidewalks. Provide new asphalt wearing course on damaged areas of Mercer parking. Provide replacement of asphalt atparking / bus loop entry to the Mercer area.



Sum Comments

Asphalt Paving: $3.00sq.ft.(Qty)

4,288 Required $12,864.00(including drainage / tear out)

Asphalt Paving / New Wearing Course: $0.56sq.ft.(Qty)

30,830 Required $17,264.80(includes minor crack repair in less than 5% of pavedarea)

Concrete Sidewalk: $4.00sq.ft.(Qty)

5,371 Required $21,484.00(5 in exterior slab)

Base Sitework Allowance for UnforeseenCircumstances

$50,000.00allowance Required $50,000.00Include this and one of the next two. (Applies for wholebuilding, so only one addition should have this item)

Sitework Allowance for Unforeseen Circumstances forbuildings between 0 SF and 100,000 SF

$1.50sq.ft. Required $145,060.50Include this one or the next. (Each addition should havethis item)

Sum: $246,673.30 $246,673.30

Service Entry/Parking Main Playground




26/48

Facility Assessment

Q. Sewage System

Description: The sanitary sewer system is tied in to the municipal system in fair condition. No significant system deficiencies were reported by the schooldistrict or noted during the physical assessment.



Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Building (1973)96,707 ft SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00

Sanitary Waste Piping




27/48

Facility Assessment

R. Water Supply

Description: The domestic water supply system is tied in to the municipal system. The district reported that the two-3inch service lines are served from theTurpin High School service. The facility is not equipped with an automated fire suppression system, and the existing water supply will not provideadequate support for a future system. The domestic water service is not equipped with a water booster pump, and none is required. The systemdoes not provide adequate pressure and capacity for the future needs of the school.


Recommendations: Provide backflow preventers. See Item E for cost.


SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00

Service Entrance Service Entrance




28/48

Facility Assessment

S. Exterior Doors

Description: Entrance doors in the facility are aluminum type construction, mounted on aluminum frames, and in good condition. Entrance doors featurethermally broken/ tempered glass vision panels. Exterior doors in the facility are combination of aluminum type construction, mounted onaluminum frames and hollow metal construction mounted on hollow metal frames. Exterior doors vary with regards to their glazing. Some of whatappear to be original doors have single pane glazing, while what appears to be replacement doors have thermally broken double pane glazing.All glazing appears to be tempered glass where required. There are overhead doors in the facility. Overhead doors are steel type in fair condition.


Recommendations: Replace exterior doors, which are equipped with single pane glazing or are in poor condition. Replace one overhead door. See item F for sidelighand transom replacement.


Sum Comments

Door Leaf/Frame and Hardware:$2,000.00per leaf 12 Required $24,000.00(includes removal of existing)

Overhead doors and hardware: $2,500.00per leaf 1 Required $2,500.00(8 x 10 sectional)Sum: $26,500.00 $26,500.00

Main Entry Single Pane HM Assembly




29/48

Facility Assessment

T. Hazardous Material

Description: The School District provided the AHERA three year reinspection reports, prepared by Paran Consulting Services, Inc., and dated January 2002,documenting known and assumed locations of asbestos and other hazardous materials. Vinyl asbestos floor tile with mastic, and vinyl sheetflooring containing hazardous materials are located in the facility in fair condition. These materials were described in the report to be in non-friablecondition. There are no underground storage tanks on the site. Due to the construction date, there is a potential for lead based paint. Fluorescentlighting will require special disposal.


Recommendations: Remove all hazardous materials, inclusive of asbestos-containing materials in the facility, as noted in the attached Environmental HazardsAssessment. Provide for the testing of paint that has the potential of being lead-based. Provide for disposal of fluorescent lighting.


Sum Comments

Environmental Hazards Form EHA Form

Resilient Flooring Removal - Incl. Mastic $3.00sq.ft. (Qty) 8,650 Required $25,950.00Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform Lead Mock-Ups $1.00per unit 5,000 Required $5,000.00

Special Engineering Fees $1.00per unit 5,000 Required $5,000.00Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Recycling/Incineration $0.05sq.ft. (Qty) 96,707 Required $4,835.35

Other: T Discrepancies from Old EHA System (Renovation only) -$0.35lump sum Required -$0.35T Discrepancies From Old EHA SystemSum: $40,785.00 $40,785.00

VAT Flooring Asbestos Sheet Flooring




30/48

Facility Assessment

U. Life Safety

Description: The facility is not equipped with an automated fire suppression system. Exit corridors are situated such that dead-end corridors are not present.Stair towers are not protected by a two-hour fire enclosure. Guardrails do not meet the 4 inch ball test as required by the Ohio Building Code. Thekitchen hood is equipped with a fire suppression system. There is an adequate number of fire extinguishers that are adequately spaced. Theexisting water supply is provided by a tie-in to the municipal system, and is insufficient to meet the future fire suppression needs of the school.Rooms, with capacity greater than 50, are equipped with adequate egress.


Recommendations: Provide an automated fire suppression system to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines. Provide new handrails to meet the requirementsof the Ohio Building Code. Provide fire-rated enclosure around existing stair tower.


Sum Comments

Sprinkler / Fire Suppression System: $3.25sq.ft. (Qty) 96,707 Required $314,297.75(includes increase of service piping, if required)

Interior Stai rwell Closure: $5,000.00per level 14 Required $70,000.00(includes associated doors, door frames and hardware)Handrails: $5,000.00level 14 Required $70,000.00

Sum: $454,297.75 $454,297.75

Kitchen Hood Suppression Open Stair Tower




31/48

Facility Assessment

V. Loose Furnishings

Description: The typical classroom furniture is mismatched, and in generally fair condition, consisting of student desks & chairs, teacher desk & chair, deskheight file cabinet, reading table, computer workstation, bookcases and wastebasket. The facilitys furniture and loose equipment was evaluatedin item 6.17 in the CEFPI section of this report, and on a scale of 1 to 10 the facility received a rating of 5 due to observed conditions, and due tothe fact that it lacks some of the Design Manual required elements.


Recommendations: Provide for replacement of outdated or inadequate furniture.


Sum Comments

CEFPI Rating 4 to 5$4.00sq.ft. Required $386,828.00

Sum: $386,828.00 $386,828.00

Media Center Open Mobile Partitions




32/48

Facility Assessment

W. Technology

Description: The typical classroom has 3 technology data ports, no phone system, 1 cable port, a television, a VCR, and a PA system that can be initiated byeither party. The Ohio School Design Manual recommends the typical classroom be equipped with the required four technology data ports forstudent use, one data port for teacher use, one voice port with a digitally based phone system, one cable port and monitor, and a 2-way PAsystem that can be initiated by either party. The facility does contain a media distribution center, but does provide computer labs for use bystudents.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of technology systems to meet Ohio School Design Manual requirements.


Sum Comments

Non-OSDM Compliant:$5.77sq.ft. Required $557,999.39

Sum: $557,999.39 $557,999.39

Technology Rack Typical Technology Port




33/48

Facility Assessment

X. Construction Contingency / Non-Construction Cost

Renovation Costs (A-W) $6,549,466.14

7.00% Construction Contingency $458,462.63

Subtotal $7,007,928.77

16.20% Non-Construction Costs $1,135,284.46

Total Project $8,143,213.23

Construction Contingency $458,462.63

Non-Construction Costs $1,135,284.46

Total for X. $1,593,747.09

Non-Construction Costs Breakdown

Soil Borings 0.03% $2,102.38

Agency Approval Fees 0.20% $14,015.86

Construction Testing 0.15% $10,511.89

Printing 0.30% $21,023.79

Advertising 0.05% $3,503.96

Builders Risk 0.20% $14,015.86

Design Professional Compensation 7.50% $525,594.66

CM Compensation 6.00% $420,475.73

Non-Construction Contingency (includes partnering and mediation services) 1.77% $124,040.34

Total Non-Construction Costs 16.20% $1,135,284.46




34/48

School Facility Appraisal

Name of Appraiser Vicki Siwek Date of Appraisal 2004-07-08

Building Name Mercer Elem

Street Address 2600 Bartels Rd

City/Town, State, Zip Code Cincinnati, OH 45244

Telephone Number(s) 513-232-7000

School District Forest Hills Local SD

Setting: Suburban

Site-Acreage 25 Building Square Footage 96,707

Grades Housed K-6 Student Capacity 760

Number of Teaching Stations 46 Number of Floors 2

Student Enrollment 798

Dates of Construction 1973

Energy Sources: Fuel Oil Gas Electric Solar

Air Conditioning: Roof Top Windows Units Central Room Units

Heating: Central Roof Top Individual Unit Forced Air

Hot Water Steam

Type of Construction

Load bearing masonry

Steel frame

Concrete frame

Wood

Steel Joists

Exterior Surfacing

Brick

Stucco

Metal

Wood

Stone

Floor Construction

Wood Joists

Steel Joists

Slab on grade

Structural slab


Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06:School Facility Appraisal Page 34


35/48

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

1.0 The School Site


Points Allocated Points

1.1 Site is large enough to meet educational needs as defined by state and local requirements 25 10

The 25 acre site is shared with Turpin High School. Site size is limited due to high school athletics and sloping topography. The shared site requires 39 acres percurrent enrollment levels.

1.2 Site is easily accessible and conveniently located for the present and future population 20 17

The site is centered within the population it serves and also serves some of the outer perimeter of the District.

1.3 Location is removed from undesirable business, industry, traffic, and natural hazards 10 7

The site has residential surroundings, but the high school generates traffic.

1.4 Site is well landscaped and developed to meet educational needs 10 9

The landscaping is mature and well placed.

1.5 ES Well equipped playgrounds are separated from streets and parking areas 10 9

MS Well equipped athletic and intermural areas are separated from streets and parking

HS Well equipped athletic areas are adequate with sufficient solid-surface parking

The playground is well equipped with hard and soft surfaces available which are away f rom traffic.

1.6 Topography is varied enough to provide desirable appearance and without steep inclines 5 2

Steep inclines cause a portion of the site to be unusable.

1.7 Site has stable, well drained soil free of erosion 5 3

Erosion is visible in the wooded area of the site.

1.8 Site is suitable for special instructional needs, e.g., outdoor learning 5 4

A walking trail is available for educational use.

1.9 Pedestrian services include adequate sidewalk with designated crosswalks, curb cuts, and correct slopes 5 3

Correctly sloped sidewalks, crosswalks and curb cuts exist. Pedestrian access is limited due to damaged sidewalks and steep slopes.

1.10 ES/MS Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking for faculty and staff is provided 5 3

HS Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking is provided for faculty, students, staff and community

Sufficient solid surface parking exists but condition requires work.

TOTAL - The School Site 100 67


Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06:CEFPI Ratings Sheet Page 35


36/48

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features


Structural Points Allocated Points

2.1 Structure meets all barrier-free requirements both externally and internally 15 7

The facility lacks ADA accessibility throughout. Two levels are not accessible.

2.2 Roofs appear sound, have positive drainage, and are weather tight 15 9

Low slope roofing provides adequate drainage. Evidence of ponding was noted. The District reported roof leaks on the area that is currently being replaced.

2.3 Foundations are strong and stable with no observable cracks 10 7

Cracking was observed in the gymnasium foundations. Corrective measures have been made to stabilize.

2.4 Exterior and interior walls have sufficient expansion joints and are free of deterioration 10 6

The facility is not equipped with sufficient expansion joints which has contributed to wall deterioration.

2.5 Entrances and exits are located so as to permit efficient student traffic flow 10 8

Building entrances are properly located for the efficient flow of traffic.

2.6 Building envelope generally provides for energy conservation (see criteria) 10 8

Composite masonry walls, insulated roof, and double pane windows provide an adequate building envelope.

2.7 Structure is free of friable asbestos and toxic materials 10 6

According to the report provided by the District, hazardous materials exist. See the worksheet at the end of this report for a summary of hazardous materials.

2.8 Interior walls permit sufficient flexibility for a variety of class sizes 10 9

Some interior walls are non-bearing partitions which allows for future flexibility. Folding partitions are available for varying class sizes.

Mechanical/Electrical Points Allocated Points

2.9 Adequate light sources are well maintained, and properly placed and are not subject to overheating 15 7

Light fixtures required maintenance. Dark spots were observed in various locations throughout the facility.

2.10 Internal water supply is adequate with sufficient pressure to meet health and safety requirements 15 13

Water supply is from a municipal system and has adequate pressure. The District reported that the water flows through a backflow preventer at Turpin High Schoolprior to entering Mercer Elementary School.

2.11 Each teaching/learning area has adequate convenient wall outlets, phone and computer cabling for technologyapplications

15 5

A typical classroom is equipped with 3 electrical outlets, 0 phone, and 3 computer outlets. The facility does not meet the OSDM technology requirements.



37/48

2.12 Electrical controls are safely protected with disconnect switches easily accessible 10 8

Electrical panels are not located in student occupied areas and are easily accessible.

2.13 Drinking fountains are adequate in number and placement, and are properly maintained including provisions forthe disabled

10 5

The O.B.C. requires one drinking fountain per 100 students. The building capacity requires 8 drinking fountains. The existing facility has 11 drinking fountains. ADArequires that 50 percent of drinking fountains be accessible. 1 of the drinking fountains is accessible.

2.14 Number and size of restrooms meet requirements 10 3

The O.B.C. requires that restrooms be located on every floor and that the maximum travel distance shall not exceed 500 feet. The facility does not have restroomson every floor. The size of public restrooms is such that ADA access is achievable. The size of some individual restrooms is such that ADA access is not possible.

2.15 Drainage systems are properly maintained and meet requirements 10 9

The waste piping is cast iron. The District reported that no problems existed with the drainage system.

2.16 Fire alarms, smoke detectors, and sprinkler systems are properly maintained and meet requirements 10 6

The fire alarm system meets current code requirements. Detection devices are provided. There is no sprinkler system.

2.17 Intercommunication system consists of a central unit that allows dependable two-way communication betweenthe office and instructional areas

10 8

The PA system provides two way communication that can be initiated from either party. A few rooms have malfunction.

2.18 Exterior water supply is sufficient and available for normal usage 5 4

Hose bibbs are located near areas where water is needed.

TOTAL - Structural and Mechanical Features 200 128




38/48

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

3.0 Plant Maintainability


Points Allocated Points

3.1 Windows, doors, and walls are of material and finish requiring minimum maintenance 15 10

Aluminum windows, aluminum and steel doors, and CMU walls require moderate maintenance. Partition walls and doors require more significant maintenance.

3.2 Floor surfaces throughout the building require minimum care 15 10

Typical classrooms have carpet flooring. Typical corridors have carpet or viny composite tile flooring. Typical restrooms have ceramic tile and vinyl composition tileflooring.

3.3 Ceilings and walls throughout the building, including service areas, are easily cleaned and resistant to stain 10 7

The lay-in acoustic ceiling panels are not resistant to stain and must be replaced when damaged. Painted wall surfaces are cleaned easily.

3.4 Built-in equipment is designed and constructed for ease of maintenance 10 8

Built-in equipment is constructed of plastic laminate which requires low maintenance.

3.5 Finishes and hardware, with compatible keying system, are of durable quality 10 5

The hardware has a quality finish and adequate keying system. The hardware is not ADA accessible.

3.6 Restroom fixtures are wall mounted and of quality finish 10 5

Toilets are wall mounted flush valve or floor mounted flush valve. Urinals are wall mounted flush valve. Lavatories are wall mounted and countertop set. ADArequirements are not met. The fixtures are in fair condition.

3.7 Adequate custodial storage space with water and drain is accessible throughout the building 10 6

Custodial closets with mop sink are available throughout the building. Storage is limited.

3.8 Adequate electrical outlets and power, to permit routine cleaning, are available in every area 10 9

Electrical outlets are located as required for cleaning.

3.9 Outdoor light fixtures, electrical outlets, equipment, and other fixtures are accessible for repair and replacement 10 7

Outdoor light fixtures do not provide adequate light levels in all areas. Electrical outlets are conveniently located. Outdoor mechanical equipment is easily accessible.

TOTAL - Plant Maintainability 100 67




39/48

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

4.0 Building Safety and Security


Site Safety Points Allocated Points

4.1 Student loading areas are segregated from other vehicular traffic and pedestrian walkways 15 3

The facility is equipped with a bus loop that shares the vehicular parking entry drive.

4.2 Walkways, both on and offsite, are available for safety of pedestrians 10 7

Correctly sloped sidewalks, with crosswalks and curb cuts exist. Pedestrian access is limited due to steep slopes.

4.3 Access streets have sufficient signals and signs to permit safe entrance to and exit from school area 5 4

School signs are provided to permit safe access.

4.4 Vehicular entrances and exits permit safe traffic flow 5 2

A single entrance for buses and vehicular traffic leads to a central vehicular parking lot that is blocked when buses are loading.

4.5 ES Playground equipment is free from hazard 5 4

MS Location and types of intramural equipment are free from hazard

HS Athletic field equipment is properly located and is free from hazard

The playground is well equipped with hard and soft surfaces available which are away f rom traffic.

Building Safety Points Allocated Points

4.6 The heating unit(s) is located away from student occupied areas 20 17

Electric baseboard heaters are accessible to students. The remainder of heat distribution is away from student interaction.

4.7 Multi-story buildings have at least two stairways for student egress 15 5

Stairways exist to provide the amount of egress required, but they are not in fire rated enclosures per code requirements.

4.8 Exterior doors open outward and are equipped with panic hardware 10 10

Exterior doors open outward per O.B.C. requirements and have panic hardware.

4.9 Emergency lighting is provided throughout the entire building with exit signs on separate electrical circuits 10 10

The exit lighting is powered by battery backup. The system meets current building code standards.

4.10 Classroom doors are recessed and open outward 10 6

Classroom doors are flush with the corridor wall. Doors open outward.

4.11 Building security systems are provided to assure uninterrupted operation of the educational program 10 8

The facility is equipped with a security system with motion detectors, door contacts, and one CCTV with monitor and VCR.



40/48

4.12 Flooring (including ramps and stairways) is maintained in a non-slip condition 5 5

The stairs and ramps have non-slip pads or are carpeted. No slippery areas were identified in the site visit.

4.13 Stair risers (interior and exterior) do not exceed 6 1/2 inches and range in number from 3 - 16 5 4

The stair risers measure 6 3/4 inches and typically fall into the acceptable range.

4.14 Glass is properly located and protected with wire or safety material to prevent accidental student injury 5 5

All glass appeared to be protected as required by code.

4.15 Fixed Projections in the traffic areas do not extend more than eight inches from the corridor wall 5 4

Drinking fountains extend more than the allowable dimension.

4.16 Traffic areas terminate at an exit or a stairway leading to an egress 5 5

There are no dead end corridors in the facility.

Emergency Safety Points Allocated Points

4.17 Adequate fire safety equipment is properly located 15 15

The number of fire extinguishers appears to meet the requirements. The kitchen hood is equipped with a fire suppression system.

4.18 There are at least two independent exits from any point in the building 15 15

Rooms with capacity greater than fifty persons are equipped with two exits. There are no dead end corridors in the facility.

4.19 Fire-resistant materials are used throughout the structure 15 15

The entire building structure is constructed with non-combustible materials.

4.20 Automatic and manual emergency alarm system with a distinctive sound and flashing light is provided 15 15

A code compliant emergency alarm system exists.

TOTAL - Building Safety and Security 200 159




41/48

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

5.0 Educational Adequacy


Academic Learning Space Points Allocated Points

5.1 Size of academic learning areas meets desirable standards 25 12

The average size of classrooms is 763 s.f. compared to 900 s.f. recommended by the OSDM.

5.2 Classroom space permits arrangements for small group activity 15 5

The classrooms are too small to allow for small groups to work affectively.

5.3 Location of academic learning areas is near related educational activities and away from disruptive noise 10 5

The location of the gym, music, cafeteria, and classrooms is adequately separated. Academic functions are grouped together. The open classroom design hasdisruptive noise present.

5.4 Personal space in the classroom away from group instruction allows privacy time for individual students 10 0

No designated personal space is present.

5.5 Storage for student materials is adequate 10 4

Some rooms have cubby areas available for the storage of elementary student supplies. Condition is good. Some rooms have no storage area for students.

5.6 Storage for teacher materials is adequate 10 6

Little casework is provided for teacher material storage. Condition is fair. Some classrooms have cubby area for material storage.

Special Learning Space Points Allocated Points

5.7 Size of special learning area(s) meets standards 15 10

The average size of special education areas is less than that recommended by the OSDM.

5.8 Design of specialized learning area(s) is compatible with instructional need 10 9

Handicap provisions are made in special education areas. Special education areas are equipped with casework and loose equipment specific to instructional need.

5.9 Library/Resource/Media Center provides appropriate and attractive space 10 6

Media center has newer furnishings and attractive space, but no windows or natural light.

5.10 Gymnasium (or covered P.E. area) adequately serves physical education instruction 5 5

The existing gym is 7,069 s.f. compared to 3,500 s.f. recommended by the OSDM.

5.11 ES Pre-kindergarten and kindergarten space is appropriate for age of students and nature of instruction 10 6

MS/HS Science program is provided sufficient space and equipment

The average size of kindergarten classrooms is 870 s.f. compared to 1,200 s.f. recommended by the OSDM.



42/48

5.12 Music Program is provided adequate sound treated space 5 2

The size of the music room is less than the OSDM recommendation. Sound treatment is fair. Band and strings room converted from other classrooms have poorsound treatment.

5.13 Space for art is appropriate for special instruction, supplies, and equipment 5 5

The size of the art room meets the OSDM recommendation. Equipment is in fair condition.

School Facility Appraisal Points Allocated Points

5.14 Space for technology education permits use of state-of-the-art equipment 5 5

Computer lab is appropriately sized for instruction need.

5.15 Space for small groups and remedial instruction is provided adjacent to classrooms 5 5

Small project rooms are located near classrooms.

5.16 Storage for student and teacher material is adequate 5 2

Cubby areas are available for the storage of elementary student supplies. Little casework is provided for teacher material storage.

Support Space Points Allocated Points

5.17 Teachers lounge and work areas reflect teachers as professionals 10 4

Teachers lounge is small with dated furnishings and finishes.

5.18 Cafeteria/Kitchen is attractive with sufficient space for seating/dining, delivery, storage, and food preparation 10 4

The kitchen is significantly smaller than OSDM standards. The cafeteria is a modified design. The size is less than the size recommended by the OSDM. Thefinishes are fair.

5.19 Administrative offices provided are consistent in appearance and function with the maturity of the studentsserved

5 1

Administrative offices do not contain all elements and are smaller than OSDM recommendations.

5.20 Counselors office insures privacy and sufficient storage 5 3

Counselor has private office. Storage space is poor.

5.21 Clinic is near administrative offices and is equipped to meet requirements 5 2

Clinic is equipped with non-ADA toilet and one cot. Location is next to offices.

5.22 Suitable reception space is available for students, teachers, and visitors 5 1

Reception space is too small to adequately serve the need.

5.23 Administrative personnel are provided sufficient work space and privacy 5 1

Administrative area is equipped with secretarial area, offices and records vault only.

TOTAL - Educational Adequacy 200 103



43/48




44/48

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

6.0 Environment for Education


Exterior Environment Points Allocated Points

6.1 Overall design is aesthetically pleasing to age of students 15 12

Building is typical 1970 open concept style structure with interesting window penetrations.

6.2 Site and building are well landscaped 10 9

The landscaping is mature and well placed.

6.3 Exterior noise and poor environment do not disrupt learning 10 9

The surrounding neighborhood is a residential type.

6.4 Entrances and walkways are sheltered from sun and inclement weather 10 7

The main entrance is sheltered, but the secondary entrances are not.

6.5 Building materials provide attractive color and texture 5 3

Exterior masonry is dark shades.

Interior Environment Points Allocated Points

6.6 Color schemes, building materials, and decor provide an impetus to learning 20 8

Carpet color is carried throughout the building. Other colors are very monotone. Mismatched furnishings and varied colors of fixed equiment are disruptive.

6.7 Year around comfortable temperature and humidity are provided throughout the building 15 12

The majority of the facility has heating and cooling systems which provide a year round comfortable environment. The gym is heat only.

6.8 Ventilating system provides adequate quiet circulation of clean air and meets 15cfm VBC requirement 15 12

The existing ventilation system provides fresh air and meets the 15cfm VBC requirement.

6.9 Lighting system provides proper intensity, diffusion, and distribution of illumination 15 5

Light fixtures required maintenance. Dark spots were observed in various locations throughout the facility.

6.10 Drinking fountains and restroom facilities are conveniently located 15 7

The O.B.C. requires one drinking fountain per 100 students. The building capacity requires 8 drinking fountains. The existing facility has 11 drinking fountains. ADArequires that 50 percent of drinking fountains be accessible. One of the drinking fountains is accessible. The O.B.C. requires that restrooms be located on everyfloor and that the maximum travel distance shall not exceed 500 feet. The facility meets the requirement. The size of restrooms is such that ADA access isachievable.

6.11 Communication among students is enhanced by commons area(s) for socialization 10 8

The student dining area provides socialization space.



45/48

6.12 Traffic flow is aided by appropriate foyers and corridors 10 5

Corridors are partly obstructed by doors swinging into the walking space. Corridors meet the OSDM recommended width.

6.13 Areas for students to interact are suitable to the age group 10 8

Cafeteria, gymnasium, media center, and kiva provide a suitable interaction space.

6.14 Large group areas are designed for effective management of students 10 7

Large group areas are provided with a sound system. There are some blind spots in the media center where supervision is limited.

6.15 Acoustical treatment of ceilings, walls, and floors provides effective sound control 10 8

Lay-in acoustic ceilings, masonry walls, and vinyl tile f looring provide fair acoustics.

6.16 Window design contributes to a pleasant environment 10 4

Windows are not available in all areas where OSDM recommends them and are non-operable.

6.17 Furniture and equipment provide a pleasing atmosphere 10 5

The equipment appeared to be mismatched and was in fair condition.

TOTAL - Environment for Education 200 129




46/48

Justification for Allocation of Points

Building Name and Level: Mercer Elem

K-6

Building features that clearly exceed criteria:

1. Wooded nature t rail.

2. Audi torium style kiva.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Building features that are non-existent or very inadequate:

1. Exterior masonry requires maintenance.

2. Open classroom design closed.

3. Dead zone in security.

4. Not ADA accessible.

5. No sprinkler system.

6. Asbestos present.


Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06:Justification for Allocation of Points Page 46


47/48


Building Summary - Mercer Elem (27185)


Name: Mercer Elem


Cincinnati,OH 45244

Bldg. IRN: 27185



Phone: 513-232-7000









Total 96,707



=2 Needs Repair




DollarAssessment C


B. Roofing 2 $10,800.00 -



F. Windows 3 $206,870.00 -








N. Fire Alarm 2 $24,176.75 -







U. Life Safety 3 $454,297.75 -


W. Technology 3 $557,999.39 -


- $1,593,747.09 -

Total $8,143,213.23









Commentary


C=Under Contract




Previous Page



48/48

Environmental Hazards - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Mercer Elem (27185) - Original Building

Environmental Hazards - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Mercer Elem (27185) - Original Building

Owner: Forest Hills Local SD Bldg. IRN: 27185

Facility: Mercer Elem BuildingAdd: Original Building

Date: 2004-07-08 Assessor: Tony Zircher

A. Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) AFM=Asbestos Free Materia

ACM Found Status Quantity Unit Cost Estimated Cost

1. Boiler/Furnace/Breeching Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $15.00 $0.002. Tank/Duct Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $12.00 $0.00

3. Pipe Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $8.00 $0.004. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $25.00 $0.00

5. Acoustical Plaster Removal Not Present 0 $7.00 $0.006. Fireproofing Removal Not Present 0 $20.00 $0.00

7. Hard Plaster Removal Not Present 0 $10.00 $0.008. Gypsum Board Removal Not Present 0 $6.00 $0.00

9. Acoustical Panel Ceiling Removal Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.0010. Resilient Flooring Removal - Incl. Mastic Reported Asbestos-Containing Material 8650 $3.00 $25,950.00

11. Roofing Removal Not Present 0 $2.00 $0.0011 Sum of lines(1-11) Total Abs. Hazard Abatement Cost for Renovation Work $25,950.00

12 Sum of lines(1-9) Total Abs. Hazard Abatement Cost for Demolition Work $0.00

B. Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks None Reported

Tank No. Location Age Product Stored Size Est.Rem.Cost

1 Sum Of Lines(1-0) Total Cost For Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks $0.00

C. Lead-Based Paint (LBP) - Renovation Only Addition Constructed after 19801. Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform Lead Mock-Ups $5,000.002. Special Engineering Fees $5,000.00

3 Sum of lines(1-2) Total Cost for Lead-Based Paint Mock-Ups $10,000.00

D. Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Recycling/Incineration Not ApplicableArea Of Building Addition Square Feet w/Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Unit Cost Total Cost

1 96707 96707 $0.05 $4,835.35

E. Other Environmental Hazards/Remarks None ReportedDescription Cost Estimate

1. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards $0.00

F. Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimate Summaries1. A11, B1, C3, D1, and E1 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Renovation $40,785.35

2. A12, B1, D1, and E1 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Demolition $4,835.35

Documents

State Assessment, Mercer