State Assessment, Summit

7/28/2019 State Assessment, Summit

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/state-assessment-summit 1/50

Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Summit Elem (36459)

Program Type: Assessment Only

Setting: Suburban

Assessment Name: 36459-Summit Elementary-Final

Assessment Date: 2004-05-28

Cost Set: 2004

Building Name: Summit Elem

Building Address: 8400 Northport Dr

Building City: Cincinnati

Building Zipcode: 45255

Building Phone: 513-474-2270

Acreage: 15

Current Grades: K-6

Teaching Stations: 38

Number of Floors: 2

Student Capacity: 408

Current Enrollment: 562

Enrollment Date: 2003-10-01

Enrollment Date is the date in which the current enrollment was taken.

Number of Classrooms: 31

Historical Register NO

Building’s Principal: Kathleen Marx

Building Type: Elementary/Middle

Current Elementary Enrollment: 477

Current Middle Enrollment: 85

Current High Enrollment: 0

Current Career Technical Enrollment: 0

Next Page

Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Summit Elem (36459) Page 1



Building Pictures - Forest Hills Local SD(47340) - Summit Elem(36459)

North elevation photo: East elevation photo:

South elevation photo: West elevation photo:

GENERAL DESCRIPTION

62,760 Total Existing Square Footage

1968,1993 Building Dates

K-6 Grades

562 Current Enrollment

38 Teaching Stations

15 Site Acreage

Summit Elementary, which is not on the National Register of Historic Buildings, is a 1968 2 story, 62,760 square foot brick school building located in a suburban residential settinThe existing facility does not use modular buildings. The structure of the original facility contains masonry bearing exterior wall construction, with masonry bearing wallconstruction in the interior. The floor system consists of concrete slab on grade at the lower level and steel joist-metal deck and concrete at the upper level. The roof structure issteel joist with metal deck everywhere except for the gymnasium utilizes tectum deck. The roofing system of the overall facility is a mixture of EPDM and built-up asphalt withgravel ballast, installed in stages from 1984 to 1996. The ventilation system of the building is inadequate to meet the needs of the users. A single story, 3,870 square foot brick

addition was constructed in 1993. The structure of the addition contains masonry bearing exterior wall construction, with masonry bearing wall construction in the interior. The flosystem consists of concrete slab on grade. The roof structure is steel joist with metal deck. The roofing system of the 1993 addition is built-up asphalt with gravel ballast, installein 1993. The classrooms are undersized in terms of the current standards established by the State of Ohio. Physical Education and Student Dining spaces consist of oneGymnasium and separate Student Dining. The electrical system for the facility is inadequate. The facility is equipped with a non-compliant security system. The building has annon-compliant automatic fire alarm system. The facility is not equipped with an automated fire suppression system. The building contains asbestos and other hazardous materiaThe overall building is not compliant with ADA accessibility requirements. The school is located on a 15-acre site adjacent to residential properties. The property and playgroundare not fenced for security. Access onto the site is not restricted. Site circulation is fair. There is space for school buses to load and unload on the site. Parking for staff, visitorsand community events is adequate.

Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06Building Pictures - Forest Hills Local SD(47340) - Summit Elem(36459) Page 2



Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06Building Pictures - Forest Hills Local SD(47340) - Summit Elem(36459) Page 3



Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Summit Elem (36459)

Program Type: Assessment Only

Setting: Suburban

Assessment Name: 36459-Summit Elementary-Final

Assessment Date: 2004-05-28

Cost Set: 2004

Building Name: Summit Elem

Building Address: 8400 Northport Dr

Building City: Cincinnati

Building Zipcode: 45255

Building Phone: 513-474-2270

Acreage: 15

Current Grades: K-6

Teaching Stations: 38

Number of Floors: 2

Student Capacity: 408

Current Enrollment: 562

Enrollment Date: 2003-10-01

Enrollment Date is the date in which the current enrollment was taken.

Number of Classrooms: 31

Historical Register NO

Building’s Principal: Kathleen Marx

Building Type: Elementary/Middle

Current Elementary Enrollment: 477

Current Middle Enrollment: 85

Current High Enrollment: 0

Current Career Technical Enrollment: 0

Next Page

Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Summit Elem (36459) Page 4



Building Construction Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Summit Elem (36459)

Name Year Handicapped Access Floors Square Feet

Original 1968 no 2 58,890

Kindergarten 1993 no 1 3,870

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06Building Construction Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Summit Elem (36459) Page 5



Building Component Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Summit Elem (36459)

Addition Auditorium CorridorsAgricultural

Education LabGymnasium

MediaCenter

VocationalSpace

StudentDining

Kitchen Natatorium

Original (1968) 10143 3327 1537 3288 1884

Kindergarten (1993) 534

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06Building Component Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Summit Elem (36459) Page 6



Career Technical Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Summit Elem (36459)

No Career Technical Programs Present

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06Career Technical Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Summit Elem (36459) Page 7



Main Assessment Menu - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Summit Elem (36459)

Building Summary - Summit Elem (36459)

District: Forest Hills Local SD

Name: Summit Elem

Address: 8400 Northport Dr

Cincinnati,OH 45255

Bldg. IRN: 36459

County: Hamilton Area: Cincinnati (1)

Contact: Kathleen Marx

Phone: 513-474-2270

Date Prepared: 2004-05-28 By: Tony Zircher

Date Revised: 2005-03-09 By: Bill Mentges

Current Grades K-6 Acreage: 15

Proposed Grades N/A Teaching Stations: 38

Current Enrollment 562 Classrooms: 31

Projected Enrollment N/A

Addition Date HA Number of Floors Current Square Feet



Total 62,760

*HA = Handicapped Access

*Rat ing =1 Sat isfactory

=2 Needs Repair

=3 Needs Replacement

*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction

FACILITY ASSESSMENTCost Set: 2004 Rating

DollarAssessment C

A. Heating System 3 $1,349,340.00 -

B. Roofing 3 $217,440.00 -C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning 1 $0.00 -

D. Electrical Systems 3 $583,011.00 -

E. Plumbing and Fixtures 2 $38,100.00 -

F. Windows 3 $173,845.00 -

G. Structure: Foundation 2 $1,600.00 -

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys 2 $61,470.00 -

I. Structure: Floors and Roofs 1 $0.00 -

J. General Finishes 3 $1,006,527.50 -

K. Interior Lighting 3 $251,040.00 -

L. Security Systems 3 $94,140.00 -

M. Emergency/Egress Lighting 2 $31,380.00 -

N. Fire Alarm 3 $88,335.00 -

O. Handicapped Access 3 $489,176.00 -

P. Site Condition 2 $160,426.20 -

Q. Sewage System 1 $0.00 -

R. Water Supply 1 $0.00 -

S. Exterior Doors 3 $24,000.00 -

T. Hazardous Material 2 $134,026.00 -

U. Life Safety 3 $253,970.00 -

V. Loose Furnishings 3 $251,040.00 -

W. Technology 3 $362,125.20 -

- X. Construction Contingency / Non-Construction Cost

- $1,355,645.17 -

Total $6,926,637.07

CEFPI Appraisal Summary

Section Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating CategoCover Sheet ‹ ‹ ‹ ‹

1.0 The School Site 100 82 82% Satisfacto

2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features 200 131 66% Borderl

3.0 Plant Maintainability 100 60 60% Borderl

4.0 Building Safety and Security 200 148 74% Satisfacto

5.0 Educational Adequacy 200 125 63% Borderl

6.0 Environment for Education 200 137 69% Borderl

Commentary ‹ ‹ ‹ ‹

Total 1000 683 68% Borderl

C=Under Contract

Renovation Cost Factor 100.44

Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied) $6,957,114

The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary irequested from a Master Plan.

Previous Page

Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06Main Assessment Menu - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Summit Elem (36459) Page 8




Original (1968) Summary


Name: Summit Elem


Cincinnati,OH 45255

Bldg. IRN: 36459



Phone: 513-474-2270










Total 62,760



=2 Needs Repair




DollarAssessment C





F. Windows 3 $172,415.00 -

G. Structure: Foundation 2 $800.00 -



J. General Finishes 3 $956,659.75 -




N. Fire Alarm 3 $88,335.00 -







U. Life Safety 3 $241,392.50 -


W. Technology 3 $339,795.30 -


- $1,299,049.62 -

Total $6,637,463.45











C=Under Contract








Kindergarten (1993) Summary


Name: Summit Elem


Cincinnati,OH 45255

Bldg. IRN: 36459



Phone: 513-474-2270










Total 62,760


*Rating =1Satisfactory

=2 Needs Repair




DollarAssessment C

A. Heating System 3 $83,205.00 -

B. Roofing 3 $0.00 -C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning 1 $0.00 -

D. Electrical Systems 3 $0.00 -

E. Plumbing and Fixtures 2 $0.00 -

F. Windows 3 $1,430.00 -

G. Structure: Foundation 2 $800.00 -



J. General Finishes 3 $49,867.75 -




N. Fire Alarm 3 $0.00 -






T. Hazardous Material 2 $194.00 -

U. Life Safety 3 $12,577.50 -


W. Technology 3 $22,329.90 -


- $56,595.55 -

Total $289,173.62











C=Under Contract



The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary isrequested from a Master Plan.




Facility Assessment

A. Heating System

Description: The existing system for the original construction is an electric system, installed in 1968, and is in fair to poor condition. Terminal units consistprimarily of unit ventilators and air handlers. The terminal equipment was installed in 1968 and is in fair to poor condition. The 1993 system iselectric powered rooftop units in fair condition. The system does not comply with the 15 CFM per person fresh air requirements of the OhioBuilding Code mechanical code and Ohio School Design Manual. The pneumatic type system temperature controls were installed in 1968 andare in fair condition. The system does not feature individual temperature controls in all spaces required by the OSDM. Louvered interior doors andframes are a violation of the Ohio Building Code, and interior doors in this facility are louvered to facilitate corridor utilization as return airplenums. The existing system is not ducted. The overall heating system is evaluated as not being in safe and efficient working order, andlong-term life expectancy of the existing system is not anticipated. The structure is not equipped with central air conditioning. Some rooftop airconditioning units exist. The site does not contain underground fuel tanks.

Rating: 3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations: Provide new overall heating, ventilating, and air conditioning system to achieve compliance with Ohio Building Code and Ohio School DesignManual standards. Provide new ductwork system. Louvered doors are replaced in Items J and O.

Item Cost Unit WholeBuilding

Original(1968)58,890 ft²

Kindergarten(1993)3,870 ft²

Sum Comments

HVAC System Replacement: $18.00sq.ft. Required Required $1,129,680.00(includes demo of existing system and reconfiguration of piping layout anew controls and air conditioning)

Convert To Ducted SystemReplacement

$3.50sq.ft. Required Required $219,660.00(includes cost for vert. & horz. chases, cut openings, soffi ts, etc.)

Sum: $1,349,340.00 $1,266,135.00 $83,205.00

Unit Ventilator Pneumatic System Control

Back to Assessment Summary

Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06:Facility Assessment Page 11



Facility Assessment

B. Roofing

Description: The roof over the west classroom wing is an EPDM system that was installed in 1993, and is in fair condition. The roof over the remainder of theoriginal building is a built-up system with gravel ballast. The roof was installed in stages; 1984-gym, 1986-music-art-office area, 1988-eastclassroom wing, 1996-faculty lounge-health area. The 1993 addition has a built up system with gravel ballast that was installed in 1993, and is infair condition. There are no district reports of current leaking. No signs of past leaking were observed during the physical assessment. Access tothe roof was gained by access hatch with ladder that are in fair condition. There were observations of standing water on the roof. Roof drains areadequate in number, properly located, and in fair condition. Gravel stops and fascias are aluminum in fair condition.


Recommendations: The roof over the west classroom wing, gym, music-office-art area, and east classroom wing require replacement to meet Ohio School DesignManual guidelines for age of system. Replace aluminum fascias on areas to receive new roofing.

Item Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal (1968)58,890 ft²

Kindergarten (1993)3,870 ft²

Sum Comments

Built-up Asphalt: $6.00sq.ft. (Qty) 34,100 Required $204,600.00

Other: Replace flashing and gravel stops$10.00ln.ft. 1,284 Required $12,840.00(6’’ aluminum mill finish)Sum: $217,440.00 $217,440.00 $0.00

EPDM Roofing Built-Up Roofing





Facility Assessment

C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning

Description: The original construction is not equipped with an air conditioning system. Isolated room systems consisting of electric unit ventilators with airconditioning capabilities are provided in the media center. The office area, the 1993 addition and the music-art remodeling areas are equippedwith rooftop units that have air conditioning capability. The rooftop units are over 10 years old. The ventilation system in the original constructionconsists of unit ventilators, installed in 1968 and in fair condition, providing fresh air to classrooms, and air handlers, installed in 1968 and in faircondition, providing fresh air to other miscellaneous spaces such as the gymnasium. Interior doors are louvered to facilitate corridor utilization asreturn air plenums. The ventilation system does not meet the Ohio Building Code 15 CFM per occupant fresh air requirement. The overall systemis not compliant with Ohio Building Code and Ohio School Design Manual requirements. Dust collection systems are not required in this facility.Exhaust systems for restrooms, kitchen and storage areas are adequate.

Rating: 1 Satisfactory

Recommendations: Provide an air conditioning system to meet with Ohio Building Code and Ohio School Design Manual requirements. Pricing included in Item A.

Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal (1968)58,890 ft²


SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Rooftop AC Unit Unit Ventilator





Facility Assessment

D. Electrical Systems

Description: The electrical system provided to the overall facility is a 277/480 volt, 2000 amp, 3 phase and 4 wire system installed in 1968, and is in faircondition. The system in the 1993 addition is an extension of the original construction. Power is provided to the school by a single utility owned,pad-mounted transformer located in the rear of the school, and in fair condition. The panel system, installed in 1968, is in fair condition, and canbe expanded to add additional capacity. The classrooms are not equipped with adequate electrical outlets. The typical classroom contains 6general purpose outlets. There are some restroom spaces that have no electrical outlets. Other spaces such as gymnasiums, offices, mediacenter, etc lack the quantity of electrical outlets recommended by the OSFC. The corridors are equipped with adequate electrical outlets forservicing. There are adequate GFI protected exterior outlets located around the perimeter of the building. The overall electrical system does notmeet Ohio School Design Manual requirements in supporting the current needs of the school, and will be inadequate to meet the facilitys futureneeds.


Recommendations: The entire electrical system in the original building requires replacement to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines due to condition and ageand to accommodate the addition of an air conditioning system.




Sum Comments

SystemReplacement:

$9.90sq.ft. Required $583,011.00(includes demo of existing system. Does not include telephone or data cable orequipment)

Sum: $583,011.00 $583,011.00 $0.00

Main Electrical Panels Pad Mounted Transformer





Facility Assessment

E. Plumbing and Fixtures

Description: The service entrance is equipped with a reduced pressure backflow preventer. A water treatment system is provided for the kitchen equipmentonly. The domestic water supply piping in the overall facility is copper in fair condition. The waste piping in the overall facility is cast iron in faircondition. The facility is equipped with two gas water heaters with two 1500 gal storage tanks. The tanks and one heater are in fair condition. Theother heater is in good condition. The school contains 3 restrooms for boys, 3 restrooms for girls, and 6 individual restrooms. Boys restroomscontain 1 ADA and 5 non-ADA wall mounted flush valve toilets, 1 ADA and 16 non-ADA wall mounted flush valve urinals, and 1 ADA wallmounted and 3 non-ADA basin type lavatories. Girls restrooms contain 1 ADA and 12 non-ADA wall mounted flush valve toilets, as well as 1 ADAwall mounted and 3 non-ADA basin type lavatories. Individual restrooms contain 0 ADA and 6 non-ADA wall mounted flush valve toilets, nourinals, and 0 ADA and 2 non-ADA countertop and 4 non-ADA wall mounted lavatories. The facility is equipped with 0 ADA and 3 non-ADAdrinking fountains, as well as 3 ADA electric water coolers, in fair condition. The school meets the OBC requirements for fixtures. ADArequirements are not met for fixtures (see Item O). Project Laboratories are not equipped with required gas and compressed air connections, andsafety shower / eyewash. Adequate exterior wall hydrants are provided.

Rating: 2 Needs Repair

Recommendations: See Item O for replacement of fixtures related to ADA requirements. Provide additional lavatories to replace basin type lavatories. Provide gas,compressed air and safety station.




Sum Comme

Sink: $2,500.00unit 6 Required $15,000.00(new)

HIGH BAY/INDUSTRIAL SPACE - LAB TYPES 5,6,7 - Safety Shower/Eyewash - NewInstallation

$2,500.00each 1 Required $2,500.00

HIGH BAY/INDUSTRIAL SPACE - LAB TYPES 5,6,7 - Natural Gas Connections $800.00each 7 Required $5,600.00

HIGH BAY/INDUSTRIAL SPACE - LAB TYPES 5,6,7 - Compressed Air Connections $15,000.00persystem

1 Required $15,000.00

Sum: $38,100.00 $38,100.00 $0.00

Drinking Fountain Wall Mounted Toilets





Facility Assessment

F. Windows

Description: The original building is equipped with aluminum frame windows with single pane glazing type window system, which was installed in 1968, and isin poor condition. The 1993 addition and the music/art remodeling are equipped with aluminum frame windows with double pane insulated glazingtype window system, which was installed in 1993, and is in good condition. A number of exterior doors in the overall facility are equipped withsteel frame sidelights and transoms with single pane glazing, in fair condition. The school does not contain skylights.


Recommendations: Provide a new insulated window system with integral blinds in the original building to meet with Ohio School Design Manual requirements.

Replace window transoms and sidelights in exterior doors of the overall facility.



Sum Comments

Insulated Glass/Panels: $50.00sq.ft. (Qty) 3,181 Required $159,050.00(with integral blinds)

Curtain Wall/Storefront System:$55.00sq.ft. (Qty) 243 Required 26 Required $14,795.00Sum: $173,845.00 $172,415.00 $1,430.00

Original Building Windows Addition Windows





Facility Assessment

G. Structure: Foundation

Description: The overall facility is equipped with concrete foundation walls on concrete footings, which displayed no locations of major settlement, cracking, orleaking, and are in fair condition. Some cracking was noted on the foundation wall exterior corners. This is typically the result of difference inexpansion from brick to concrete.


Recommendations: Repair and seal cracking in foundation walls.



Sum Comments

Other: Repair foundation and seal cracks$800.00allowance Required Required $1,600.00(patch spalled concrete, repair & seal cracks)

Sum: $1,600.00 $800.00 $800.00

Concrete Foundation Concrete Foundation





Facility Assessment

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys

Description: The overall facility has a brick veneer on a masonry bearing wall system, which displayed a few locations of deterioration, and is in fair condition.The south wall of the west classroom wing is moving south (approximately 1 inch from its original location). It is unclear if this is a result of 1993classroom addition or if it is still moving. The front center section has some decorative concrete facade members that appear to be in faircondition. The exterior masonry, with a few exceptions, appears to have appropriately spaced and adequately caulked control joints in faircondition. A few locations of poor caulking were noted. The exterior masonry has not been cleaned and sealed in recent years. Interior walls areprimarily concrete masonry units (metal stud framed partitions with gypsum board in office area) and are in fair condition. Interior masonryappears to have adequately spaced and caulked control joints in fair condition. The windowsills are an element of the aluminum window system,and are in fair condition. The exterior lintels are not open to observation. The school appears to have sufficient expansion joints, and they are infair condition.


Recommendations: Provide masonry cleaning, sealing, and caulking as required in the overall facility. Provide engineering analysis to determine reasons for buildingmovement and if structural deficiencies exist.



Sum Comments

Exterior Masonry Cleaning: $1.00sq.ft. (Qty) 29,140 Required2,700 Required $31,840.00(wall surface)Exterior Masonry Sealing: $0.75sq.ft. (Qty) 29,140 Required2,700 Required $23,880.00(wall surface)

Exterior Caulking: $2.50ln.ft. 300 Required $750.00(removing and replacing)

Other: Engineering Analysis$5,000.00allowance Required $5,000.00(structural analysis on reason of building movement)

Sum: $61,470.00 $56,745.00 $4,725.00

Exterior Wall Separating From Floor Expansion Joint





Facility Assessment

I. Structure: Floors and Roofs

Description: The floor construction of the base floor of the overall facility is concrete slab on grade type construction, and is in fair condition. There is no crawlspace. The floor construction of the second floor of the original building is metal form deck on steel joist type construction, and is in fair condition.The roof construction of the gymnasium section is tectum deck on steel joist type construction, and is in fair condition. The roof construction of theremainder of the facility is metal deck on steel joist type construction, and is in fair condition.


Recommendations: Existing conditions require no renovation or replacement at the present time.



SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Steel Joist with Metal Deck Steel Joist with Tectum Deck





Facility Assessment

J. General Finishes

Description: The original facility has classrooms with vinyl asbestos tile (VAT) type flooring, acoustic tile (ACT) type ceilings, and concrete masonry unit (CMU)type wall finishes, and they are in fair condition. The original facility has corridors with VAT type flooring, ACT type ceilings, and CMU type wallfinishes, and they are in fair condition. The original facility has restrooms with ceramic tile type flooring, ACT type ceilings, and CMU type wallfinishes, and they are in fair to poor condition. The Gymnasium space has wood type flooring, tectum type ceilings, and CMU type wall finishes,and they are in fair condition. Gymnasium telescoping stands are in fair condition. Student Dining, located in the original building, has VAT typeflooring, ACT type ceilings, and CMU type wall finishes, and they are in fair condition. Classroom casework in the original building is wood typeconstruction with plastic laminate tops, is inadequately provided, and in fair to poor condition. Classrooms are provided adequate chalkboards,and tackboards, which are in fair condition. Very small lockers are provided for some students. Classroom storage cubbies are provided, and infair condition. The 1993 addition has classrooms with vinyl composition tile (VCT) type flooring, acoustic tile (ACT) type ceilings, and concretemasonry unit (CMU) type wall f inishes. The floor tile is in poor condition. Walls and ceiling are in good condition. The facility is equipped withwood louvered interior doors in fair to poor condition. The toilet partitions are primarily metal (some plastic) type construction, and are in faircondition. The existing kitchen is full service. The existing kitchen equipment was reported to be in fair condition.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of finishes and casework due to existing conditions and due to the installation of systems outlined in Items A, C, DE, K, L, N, T, and U. Provide for the replacement of kitchen equipment due to age and condition. Interior doors replaced in item O.




Sum Comments

Total Kitchen EquipmentReplacement:

$105.00sq.ft.(Qty)

1,884Required

$197,820.00(square footage based upon only area of food preparation, serving, kitchstorage areas and walk-ins. Includes demolition and removal of existingkitchen equipment)

Other: Complete replacementof finishes and casework

$12.85sq.ft.(Qty)

50,477Required

3,317 Required $691,252.90Elementary

Other: Complete replacementof finishes and casework

$13.10sq.ft.(Qty)

8,413Required

553 Required $117,454.60Middle

Sum: $1,006,527.50$956,659.75 $49,867.75

Gymnasium Typical Classroom





Facility Assessment

K. Interior Lighting

Description: The typical Classrooms in the original facility are equipped with T-8 1x4 surface mount fluorescent fixtures with single level switching. Classroomfixtures are in fair condition and provide an average illumination of 60FC, thus complying with the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. The typicalClassrooms in the addition are equipped with T-8 2x4 lay-in fluorescent fixtures with dual level switching. Classroom fixtures are in good conditionand provide an average illumination of 80FC, thus complying with the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. The typical Corridors in the overallfacility are equipped with T-8 1x4 surface mount fluorescent fixtures with single level switching. Corridor fixtures are in fair condition and providean average illumination of 40FC, thus complying with the 20 FC recommended by the OSDM. The Gymnasium spaces are equipped with T8surface mount fluorescent fixtures type lighting, in fair condition, and providing an average illumination of 45FC, which is less than the 50 FCrecommended by the OSDM. The Media Center is equipped with 1x4 surface mount T8 fluorescent fixture type lighting in fair condition, andproviding an average illumination of 63FC, thus complying with the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. The Student Dining spaces are equippedwith 1x8 suspended T12 fluorescent fixture type lighting in fair condition, and providing an average illumination of 60FC, thus complying with the50 FC recommended by the OSDM. The service areas in the overall facility are equipped with T8 fluorescent fixture type lighting in fair condition.The typical Administrative spaces in the original building are equipped with 1x4 surface mount T8 fluorescent fixture type lighting in fair condition,and providing adequate illumination based on OSDM requirements. The overall lighting systems of the facility are not fully compliant with OhioSchool Design Manual requirements.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of lighting system due to condition, inadequate illumination in Gymnasium, single level switching in the OriginalConstruction, and installation of systems outlined in Items A, C, J, and U.



Sum Comments

Complete Building Lighting Replacement$4.00sq.ft. Required Required $251,040.00

Sum: $251,040.00 $235,560.00 $15,480.00

Typical Classroom Addition Classroom Lighting





Facility Assessment

L. Security Systems

Description: The overall facility contains a security system in fair condition. Motion detectors are adequately provided in corridors and spaces where 6 or morecomputers are located. Exterior doors are equipped with door contacts. An automatic visitor control system is not provided. CCTV cameras arenot provided. The security system is not adequately provided throughout, and the system is not fully compliant with Ohio School Design Manualguidelines. The exterior site lighting system is equipped with surface mounted metal halide entry lights in fair condition. Sidewalks and parkingand bus pick-up / drop off areas are illuminated by a combination of metal halide and mercury vapor pole mounted fixtures in fair condition. Theexterior site lighting system provides adequate coverage for pedestrian walkways and general site requirements.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of security system to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines.



Sum Comments

Security System:$1.50sq.ft. Required Required $94,140.00(complete, area of bui lding)

Sum: $94,140.00 $88,335.00 $5,805.00

Motion Detector Site Lighting





Facility Assessment

M. Emergency/Egress Lighting

Description: The overall facility is equipped with an emergency egress lighting system consisting of illuminated exit signs and emergency floodlighting. Thesystem is in fair condition, and is provided with appropriate battery backup. The system is adequately provided throughout, and meets OhioSchool Design Manual requirements.


Recommendations: Rework/replace any fixtures disturbed in ceiling replacement. Replace battery system as required.



Sum Comments

Other: Partial Emergency/Egress Lighting Upgrade$0.50sq.ft. Required Required $31,380.00Rework existing system

Sum: $31,380.00 $29,445.00 $1,935.00

Battery System Emergency Egress Lighting





Facility Assessment

N. Fire Alarm

Description: The overall facility is equipped with a fire alarm system in fair condition, consisting of manual pull stations, horn and strobe indicating devices.The system is automatic and is monitored by a third party. The system is adequately provided throughout the addition, but does not have all ofthe required detection and indicating devices in the original building. The system is not fully compliant with Ohio Building Code, NFPA, and OhioSchool Design Manual requirements.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of the original building fire alarm system to meet NFPA and Ohio School Design Manual guidelines.



Sum Comments

Fire Alarm System:$1.50sq.ft. Required $88,335.00(complete new system, including removal of existing)

Sum: $88,335.00 $88,335.00 $0.00

Fire Alarm Panel Strobe Light





Facility Assessment

O. Handicapped Access

Description: Some of the exterior entrances are not ADA accessible. Access from the parking / drop-off area to the building entries is currently compromisedby steps, but the district has already contracted for a new entry step / ramp to be installed. Adequate handicap parking is provided. Exterior doorsare equipped with ADA hardware. The main entry is not equipped with an ADA power assist door. The 2-story building has five levels plus astage level. The single story portion is accessible to the first split level two story section by use of a chair lift. The second split level two storysection is not accessible. Access to the stage is not facilitated by a chair lift. Most interior doors are recessed, with adequate clearance. Originalbuilding interior doors are not provided with ADA-compliant hardware. 9 ADA-compliant toilets are required, and 2 are currently provided. 9ADA-compliant lavatories are required, and 2 are currently provided. 3 ADA-compliant urinals are required, and 1 is currently provided. 6ADA-compliant electric water coolers are required, and 3 are currently provided. Most toilet partitions are metal, do not provide appropriate ADAclearances. ADA-compliant accessories are not adequately provided and mounted. ADA signage is not provided on both the interior and theexterior of the building.


Recommendations: Provide ADA-compliant signage, power assist door opener, chair lift, elevator, electric water coolers, toilets, sinks, urinals, toilet partitions, toiletaccessories, doors and frames, in the overall facility to facilitate the schools meeting of ADA requirements. Parking issues are corrected in ItemP. Toilet Accessories are covered in item J.




Sum Comments

Signage: $0.10sq.ft. Required Required $6,276.00(per building area)

Lifts: $12,500.00unit 1 Required $12,500.00(complete)Elevators: $50,000.00each 4 Required $200,000.00(per stop / $100,000 minimum)

Electric WaterCoolers:

$1,800.00unit 3 Required $5,400.00(replacement double ADA)

Toilet/Urinals/Sinks: $1,500.00unit 16 Required $24,000.00(replacement ADA)

Toilet Partitions: $1,000.00stall 7 Required $7,000.00(ADA - grab bars, accessories included)ADA Assist Door &Frame:

$7,500.00unit 1 Required $7,500.00(openers, electrical, patching, etc)

Replace Doors: $1,500.00leaf 110 Required6 Required $174,000.00(standard 3070 wood door, HM frame-classroom door/light, includes hardware)Replace Doors: $3,750.00leaf 14 Required $52,500.00(rework opening and corridor wall to accommodate ADA standards when door

opening is set back from edge of corridor and cannot accommodate a wheelchairSee diagram)

Sum: $489,176.00 $479,789.00 $9,387.00

Chair Lift Improper Door Recess





Facility Assessment

P. Site Condition

Description: The 15 acre sloped site is located in a suburban residential setting with generous tree and shrub type landscaping. There are no apparentproblems with erosion. A small area of ponding was noted between the gymnasium and classroom wing. The site is accessed by moderatelytraveled city street. A single entrance onto the site separates immediately into vehicular parking lots and a combination bus loop/ parking area.Proper separation of bus and other vehicular traffic is not provided. Staff, and visitor parking is facilitated by a 123 space asphalt parking lot in faircondition, which provides adequate parking for staff members, visitors, and the disabled. The parking lot drainage design, consisting ofappropriate slopes and catch basins, provides adequate evacuation of storm water, and no problems with parking lot ponding were observed.Concrete curbs in fair condition and are appropriately placed. Concrete sidewalks are properly sloped, are located to provide a logical flow ofpedestrian traffic, and are in fair condition. The existing site is not fenced. The playground equipment is in good condition, and on a combinationof hard and soft surfaces. The athletic facilities are comprised of soccer and baseball fields, and are in good condition. The main entry steps andthe asphalt entry are in the process of being replaced.


Recommendations: Provide new wearing course on bus loop / staff parking area. Provide new concrete walks to replace asphalt walks near kindergarten addition.Provide new wearing course on service drive and hard surface play area. Replace miscellaneous concrete sidewalks.




Sum Comments

Asphalt Paving / New Wearing Course: $0.56sq.ft.(Qty)

21,038Required

1,382 Required $12,555.20(includes minor crack repair in less than 5% ofpaved area)

Concrete Sidewalk: $4.00sq.ft.(Qty)

2,237Required

147 Required $9,536.00(5 in exterior slab)

Base Sitework Allowance for UnforeseenCircumstances

$50,000.00allowance Required $50,000.00Include this and one of the next two. (Applies forwhole building, so only one addition should havethis item)

Sitework Allowance for UnforeseenCircumstances for buildings between 0 SF and100,000 SF

$1.50sq.f t. Required $88,335.00Include this one or the next. (Each addition shouldhave this item)

Sum: $160,426.20 $159,064.28 $1,361.92

Playground Equipment Bus Loop / Parking Area





Facility Assessment

Q. Sewage System

Description: The sanitary sewer system is tied in to the municipal system in fair condition. No significant system deficiencies were reported by the schooldistrict or noted during the physical assessment.



Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal (1968)58,890 ft² Kindergarten (1993)3,870 ft² SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00





Facility Assessment

R. Water Supply

Description: The domestic water supply system is tied in to the municipal system, features a 4 inch service, and is in fair condition. The facility is not equippedwith an automated fire suppression system, and the existing water supply will not provide adequate support for a future system. The systemprovides adequate pressure and capacity for the current needs of the school.





SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Service Entrance





Facility Assessment

S. Exterior Doors

Description: Entrance doors in the original facility are a combination of aluminum doors, mounted on aluminum frames, and hollow metal doors mounted onhollow metal frames. Aluminum doors are in good condition, while hollow metal doors are in fair to poor condition. Aluminum entrance doorsfeature thermally broken vision panels, while hollow metal doors are single pane. Typical exterior doors in the original facility are hollow metaltype construction, mounted on hollow metal frames, and in fair condition. Typical exterior doors do not have vision panels. Entrance doors in the1993 addition are hollow metal type construction, mounted on hollow metal frames, and in fair condition. Entrance doors feature single panevision panels. Typical exterior doors in the 1993 addition are hollow metal type construction, mounted on aluminum hollow metal frames, and ingood condition. Typical exterior doors feature narrow light vision panels. There is an overhead door in the facility. The overhead door is in faircondition.


Recommendations: Replace the hollow metal entrance doors in the overall facility. Sidelights and transoms are reviewed in item F.



Sum Comments

Door Leaf/Frame and Hardware:$2,000.00per leaf 8 Required 4 Required $24,000.00(includes removal of existing)Sum: $24,000.00 $16,000.00 $8,000.00

Addition Exterior Door Front Entry Doors





Facility Assessment

T. Hazardous Material

Description: The School District provided the AHERA three year reinspection reports, prepared by Paran Consulting Services, Inc., and dated January 2002,documenting known and assumed locations of asbestos and other hazardous materials. Vinyl asbestos floor tile, mastic, and window panelscontaining hazardous materials are located in the original building in fair condition. These materials were described in the report to be innon-friable condition. There are no underground storage tanks on the site. Due to the construction date, there is a potential for lead based paint.Fluorescent lighting will require special disposal.


Recommendations: Remove all hazardous materials, inclusive of asbestos-containing materials in the original building, as noted in the attached EnvironmentalHazards Assessment. Provide for the testing of paint that has the potential of being lead-based. Provide for disposal of fluorescent lighting.


Original (1968)58,890 ft²


Sum Comments

Environmental Hazards Form EHA Form EHA Form ‹

Resilient Flooring Removal - Incl. Mastic $3.00sq.ft.(Qty)

39,045Required

0 Required $117,135.00

Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform LeadMock-Ups

$1.00per unit 5,000 Required 0 Required $5,000.00

Special Engineering Fees $1.00per unit 5,000 Required 0 Required $5,000.00

Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Recycling/Incineration $0.05sq.ft.(Qty)

55,946Required

3,870 Required $2,990.80

Other: EHA ACM Other $1.00per unit 3,900 Required $3,900.00Window Panels

Other: T Discrepancies from Old EHA System (Renovationonly)

$0.50lump sum Required $0.50T Discrepancies From Old EHASystem

Other: T Discrepancies from Old EHA System (Renovationonly) -$0.30lump sum Required -$0.30T Discrepancies From Old EHASystemSum: $134,026.00 $133,832.00 $194.00

Asbestos Window Panel Vinyl Asbestos Floor Tile





Facility Assessment

U. Life Safety

Description: The overall facility is not equipped with an automated fire suppression system. Exit corridors are situated such that dead-end corridors are notpresent. Stair towers are not protected by a two-hour fire enclosure. Guardrails do not meet the 4 inch ball test as required by the Ohio BuildingCode. The kitchen hood is equipped with a fire suppression system. There are an adequate number of fire extinguishers that are adequatelyspaced. The existing water supply is provided by a tie-in to the municipal system, and is insufficient to meet the future fire suppression needs ofthe school. Rooms, with capacity greater than 50, are equipped with adequate egress.


Recommendations: Provide an automated fire suppression system to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines. Provide new handrails to meet the requirementsof the Ohio Building Code. Provide fire-rated enclosure around existing stair tower.



Sum Comments

Sprinkler / Fire Suppression System: $3.25sq.ft. (Qty) 58,890 Required3,870 Required $203,970.00(includes increase of service piping, if required)

Interior Stairwell Closure: $5,000.00per level 4 Required $20,000.00(includes associated doors, door frames and hardwareHandrails: $5,000.00level 6 Required $30,000.00

Sum: $253,970.00 $241,392.50 $12,577.50

Kitchen Hood Unprotected Stair Tower





Facility Assessment

V. Loose Furnishings

Description: The typical classroom furniture is mismatched, and in generally fair to poor condition, consisting of student desks & chairs, teacher desk & chair,file cabinet, computer workstation, bookcases, and wastebasket. The facilitys furniture and loose equipment was evaluated in item 6.17 in theCEFPI section of this report, and on a scale of 1 to 10 the facility received a rating of 5 due to observed conditions, and due to the fact that itlacks some of the Design Manual required elements.


Recommendations: Provide for replacement of outdated or inadequate furniture.



Sum Comments

CEFPI Rating 4 to 5$4.00sq.ft. Required Required $251,040.00

Sum: $251,040.00 $235,560.00 $15,480.00

Classroom Furniture Media Center Furniture





Facility Assessment

W. Technology

Description: The typical classroom is not equipped with the required four technology data ports for student use, one data port for teacher use, one voice portwith a digitally based phone system, one cable port and monitor to meet Ohio School Design Manual requirements. A 2-way PA system that canbe initiated by either party is provided. The facility does not contain a media distribution center, but provides computer labs for use by students.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of technology systems to meet Ohio School Design Manual requirements.



Sum Comments

Non-OSDM Compliant:$5.77sq.ft. Required Required $362,125.20

Sum: $362,125.20 $339,795.30 $22,329.90

Technology Closet Typical Data Outlet





Facility Assessment

X. Construction Contingency / Non-Construction Cost

Renovation Costs (A-W) $5,570,991.90

7.00% Construction Contingency $389,969.43

Subtotal $5,960,961.33

16.20% Non-Construction Costs $965,675.74

Total Project $6,926,637.07

Construction Contingency $389,969.43

Non-Construction Costs $965,675.74

Total for X. $1,355,645.17

Non-Construction Costs Breakdown

Soil Borings 0.03% $1,788.29

Agency Approval Fees 0.20% $11,921.92

Construction Testing 0.15% $8,941.44

Printing 0.30% $17,882.88

Advertising 0.05% $2,980.48

Builder’s Risk 0.20% $11,921.92

Design Professional Compensation 7.50% $447,072.10

CM Compensation 6.00% $357,657.68

Non-Construction Contingency (includes partnering and mediation services) 1.77% $105,509.02

Total Non-Construction Costs 16.20% $965,675.74





School Facility Appraisal

Name of Appraiser Bill Mentges Date of Appraisal 2004-05-28

Building Name Summit Elem

Street Address 8400 Northport Dr

City/Town, State, Zip Code Cincinnati, OH 45255

Telephone Number(s) 513-474-2270

School District Forest Hills Local SD

Setting: Suburban

Site-Acreage 15 Building Square Footage 62,760

Grades Housed K-6 Student Capacity 408

Number of Teaching Stations 38 Number of Floors 2

Student Enrollment 562

Dates of Construction 1968,1993

Energy Sources: Fuel Oil Gas Electric Solar

Air Conditioning: Roof Top Windows Units Central Room Units

Heating: Central Roof Top Individual Unit Forced Air

Hot Water Steam

Type of Construction

Load bearing masonry

Steel frame

Concrete frame

Wood

Steel Joists

Exterior Surfacing

Brick

Stucco

Metal

Wood

Stone

Floor Construction

Wood Joists

Steel Joists

Slab on grade

Structural slab


Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06:School Facility Appraisal Page 35



CEFPI Ratings Sheet

1.0 The School Site


Points Allocated Points

1.1 Site is large enough to meet educational needs as defined by state and local requirements 25 20

The 15 acre site is less than the 16 acres recommended by the OSDM, based on the current enrollment.

1.2 Site is easily accessible and conveniently located for the present and future population 20 18

The site is located on the border of the community it serves.

1.3 Location is removed from undesirable business, industry, traffic, and natural hazards 10 9

The site has residential surroundings.

1.4 Site is well landscaped and developed to meet educational needs 10 9

The landscaping is mature and well placed.

1.5 ES Well equipped playgrounds are separated from streets and parking areas 10 9

MS Well equipped athletic and intermural areas are separated from streets and parking

HS Well equipped athletic areas are adequate with sufficient solid-surface parking

The playground is well equipped with hard and soft surfaces available which are away f rom traffic.

1.6 Topography is varied enough to provide desirable appearance and without steep inclines 5 5

Gently sloping site provides desirable appearance.

1.7 Site has stable, well drained soil free of erosion 5 4

Soil is free from erosion and appears to be stable.

1.8 Site is suitable for special instructional needs, e.g., outdoor learning 5 2

Site is large enough for outdoor learning but none exists.

1.9 Pedestrian services include adequate sidewalk with designated crosswalks, curb cuts, and correct slopes 5 3

Sidewalks, crosswalks, and curb cuts exist. Some steep slopes exist. Pedestrian access is limited due to damaged sidewalks, steep slopes, and inappropriate curb cuts.

1.10 ES/MS Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking for faculty and staff is provided 5 3

HS Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking is provided for faculty, students, staff and community

Solid surface parking exists, but condition requires work.

TOTAL - The School Site 100 82


Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06:CEFPI Ratings Sheet Page 36



CEFPI Ratings Sheet

2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features


Structural Points Allocated Points

2.1 Structure meets all barrier-free requirements both externally and internally 15 5

ADA requirements are met with regards to entry and some vertical circulation, but many other areas require renovation. The northwest classroom addition is not accessible.

2.2 Roofs appear sound, have positive drainage, and are weather tight 15 9

Low slope roofing provides adequate drainage. Evidence of ponding was noted. The District did not report any roof leaks.

2.3 Foundations are strong and stable with no observable cracks 10 7

Minor cracking was observed in the foundations. Cracking was observed at exterior building corners.

2.4 Exterior and interior walls have sufficient expansion joints and are free of deterioration 10 8

The facility is equipped with sufficient expansion joints, but minor wall deterioration was still observed.

2.5 Entrances and exits are located so as to permit efficient student traffic flow 10 7

Building entrances are properly located for the efficient flow of traffic.

2.6 Building ’’envelope’’ generally provides for energy conservation (see criteria) 10 4

Composite masonry walls, insulated roof, and single pane windows provide an inadequate building envelope.

2.7 Structure is free of friable asbestos and toxic materials 10 5

According to the report provided by the District, hazardous materials exist. See the worksheet at the end of this report for a summary of hazardous materials.

2.8 Interior walls permit sufficient flexibility for a variety of class sizes 10 8

Folding partitions are available for varying class sizes.

Mechanical/Electrical Points Allocated Points

2.9 Adequate light sources are well maintained, and properly placed and are not subject to overheating 15 14

Light fixtures appeared to be well maintained. Dark spots were not observed.

2.10 Internal water supply is adequate with sufficient pressure to meet health and safety requirements 15 10

Water supply is from a municipal system, has a backflow preventer, and has adequate pressure for the current needs of the school, but lacks the capacity for future requirements.

2.11 Each teaching/learning area has adequate convenient wall outlets, phone and computer cabling for technologyapplications

15 10

A typical classroom is equipped with 6 electrical outlets, 0 phone, and 3 computer outlets. The facility does not meet the OSDM technology requirements.




2.12 Electrical controls are safely protected with disconnect switches easily accessible 10 6

Electrical panels are located in student occupied areas.

2.13 Drinking fountains are adequate in number and placement, and are properly maintained including provisions for thedisabled

10 9

The O.B.C. requires one drinking fountain per 100 students. The building capacity requires 6 drinking fountains. The existing facility has 6 drinking fountains. ADArequires that 50 percent of drinking fountains be accessible. Two of the drinking fountains are accessible.

2.14 Number and size of restrooms meet requirements 10 6

The O.B.C. requires that restrooms be located on every floor and that the maximum travel distance shall not exceed 500 feet. The facility does not have restrooms on every level. The size of restrooms is such that ADA access is achievable.

2.15 Drainage systems are properly maintained and meet requirements 10 10

The waste piping is cast iron. The District reported that no problems existed with the drainage system.

2.16 Fire alarms, smoke detectors, and sprinkler systems are properly maintained and meet requirements 10 2

The fire alarm system does not meet current code requirements. There is no sprinkler system. Addition has a compliant fire alarm system.

2.17 Intercommunication system consists of a central unit that allows dependable two-way communication betweenthe office and instructional areas

10 6

The PA system provides two way communication, but it can only be initiated by the office.

2.18 Exterior water supply is sufficient and available for normal usage 5 5

Hose bibbs are located near areas where water is needed.

TOTAL - Structural and Mechanical Features 200 131





CEFPI Ratings Sheet

3.0 Plant Maintainability


Points Allocated Points

3.1 Windows, doors, and walls are of material and finish requiring minimum maintenance 15 10

Aluminum windows, steel and wood doors, and CMU walls require some maintenance.

3.2 Floor surfaces throughout the building require minimum care 15 5

Typical classrooms and corridors have vinyl asbestos tile flooring. Typical restrooms have ceramic tile flooring.

3.3 Ceilings and walls throughout the building, including service areas, are easily cleaned and resistant to stain 10 4

The lay-in acoustic ceiling panels are not resistant to stain and must be replaced when damaged. Painted wall surfaces are cleaned easily.

3.4 Built-in equipment is designed and constructed for ease of maintenance 10 4

Built-in equipment is constructed of plastic laminate and wood which requires maintenance. Wood equipment is in fair to poor condition.

3.5 Finishes and hardware, with compatible keying system, are of durable quality 10 5

The hardware has a quality finish and an adequate keying system. The hardware is not ADA accessible.

3.6 Restroom fixtures are wall mounted and of quality finish 10 6

Toilets are wall mounted flush valve. Urinals are wall mounted flush valve. Lavatories are wall mounted or basins. ADA requirements are not met. The fixtures are in fair condition.

3.7 Adequate custodial storage space with water and drain is accessible throughout the building 10 8

Custodial closets with mop sink are available throughout the building. Storage is limited.

3.8 Adequate electrical outlets and power, to permit routine cleaning, are available in every area 10 9

Electrical outlets are located as required for cleaning.

3.9 Outdoor light fixtures, electrical outlets, equipment, and other fixtures are accessible for repair and replacement 10 9

Outdoor light fixtures provide adequate light levels in all areas. Electrical outlets are conveniently located. Outdoor mechanical equipment is easily accessible.

TOTAL - Plant Maintainability 100 60





CEFPI Ratings Sheet

4.0 Building Safety and Security


Site Safety Points Allocated Points

4.1 Student loading areas are segregated from other vehicular traffic and pedestrian walkways 15 5

The facility is equipped with a bus loop that blocks parking in the bus loop.

4.2 Walkways, both on and offsite, are available for safety of pedestrians 10 7

Sidewalks with crosswalks and curb cuts exist. Pedestrian access is limited due to limited off site sidewalks.

4.3 Access streets have sufficient signals and signs to permit safe entrance to and exit from school area 5 4

School signs are provided to permit safe site access.

4.4 Vehicular entrances and exits permit safe traffic flow 5 5

Traffic moved smoothly through the site.

4.5 ES Playground equipment is free from hazard 5 5

MS Location and types of intramural equipment are free from hazard

HS Athletic field equipment is properly located and is free from hazard

The playground is well equipped with hard and soft surfaces available which are away f rom traffic.

Building Safety Points Allocated Points

4.6 The heating unit(s) is located away from student occupied areas 20 14

Unit ventilators are located in student occupied areas.

4.7 Multi-story buildings have at least two stairways for student egress 15 7

Stairways exist to provide the amount of egress required, but they are not in fire rated enclosures per code requirements.

4.8 Exterior doors open outward and are equipped with panic hardware 10 9

Exterior doors open outward per O.B.C. requirements and have panic hardware.

4.9 Emergency lighting is provided throughout the entire building with exit signs on separate electrical circuits 10 8

The exit lighting is powered by battery backup.

4.10 Classroom doors are recessed and open outward 10 6

Classroom doors are recessed with allowable ADA clearances. Doors open outward. Doors are louvered as a function of the mechanical system corridor return air plenum which is a code violation.

4.11 Building security systems are provided to assure uninterrupted operation of the educational program 10 6




The facility is equipped with a security system with door contacts and motion detectors.

4.12 Flooring (including ramps and stairways) is maintained in a non-slip condition 5 3

Not all stairs have non-slip pads. No slippery areas were identified in the site visit, but glazed tile steps would appear to be slippery if wet. The entry doors have stepoff mats.

4.13 Stair risers (interior and exterior) do not exceed 6 1/2 inches and range in number from 3 - 16 5 2

The interior stair risers measure 7 3/8, and do not fall into the acceptable range.

4.14 Glass is properly located and protected with wire or safety material to prevent accidental student injury 5 4

Glass in interior doors and exterior door assembly appeared to be properly protected. Glass in display cases did not appear to be properly protected.

4.15 Fixed Projections in the traffic areas do not extend more than eight inches from the corridor wall 5 4

Drinking fountains extend more than the allowable dimension.

4.16 Traffic areas terminate at an exit or a stairway leading to an egress 5 5

There are no dead end corridors in the facility.

Emergency Safety Points Allocated Points

4.17 Adequate fire safety equipment is properly located 15 14

The number of fire extinguishers appears to meet the requirements. The kitchen hood is equipped with a fire suppression system.

4.18 There are at least two independent exits from any point in the building 15 15

Rooms with capacity greater than fifty persons are equipped with two exits. There are no dead end corridors in the facility.

4.19 Fire-resistant materials are used throughout the structure 15 15

The entire building structure is constructed with non-combustible materials.

4.20 Automatic and manual emergency alarm system with a distinctive sound and flashing light is provided 15 10

An emergency alarm system exists, but it is not equipped with all of the code required indicating devices.

TOTAL - Building Safety and Security 200 148





CEFPI Ratings Sheet

5.0 Educational Adequacy


Academic Learning Space Points Allocated Points

5.1 Size of academic learning areas meets desirable standards 25 20

The average size of classrooms is 840 s.f. compared to 900 s.f. recommended by the OSDM.

5.2 Classroom space permits arrangements for small group activity 15 13

The classrooms are slightly smaller than OSDM guidelines, but are large enough to allow for effective small group activity.

5.3 Location of academic learning areas is near related educational activities and away from disruptivenoise

10 10

The location of the gym, music, cafeteria, and the classrooms is adequately separated. Academic functions are grouped together. No disruptive noise was evident.

5.4 Personal space in the classroom away from group instruction allows privacy time for individualstudents

10 0

No designated personal space is present.

5.5 Storage for student materials is adequate 10 6

Quantity and size of lockers are not appropriate for student capacity and grade level served. Some lockers are too high. Condition is fair. Cubby areas are available for the storage of elementary student supplies. Condition is fair.

5.6 Storage for teacher materials is adequate 10 4

Base cabinets are provided, but no wall cabinets are provided for teacher material storage. Condition is fair.

Special Learning Space Points Allocated Points

5.7 Size of special learning area(s) meets standards 15 12

The average size of special education areas is similar to that recommended by the OSDM.

5.8 Design of specialized learning area(s) is compatible with instructional need 10 5

Very few special education provisions are made. Special education classrooms similar to standard classroom.

5.9 Library/Resource/Media Center provides appropriate and attractive space 10 7

Space is smaller than recommended by OSDM. Good lighting and attractive finishes.

5.10 Gymnasium (or covered P.E. area) adequately serves physical education instruction 5 4

The existing gym is 3,327 s.f. compared to 3,500 s.f. recommended by the OSDM.

5.11 ES Pre-kindergarten and kindergarten space is appropriate for age of students and nature of instruction 10 7

MS/HS Science program is provided sufficient space and equipment




The average size of kindergarten classrooms is 960 s.f. compared to 1,200 s.f. recommended by the OSDM.

5.12 Music Program is provided adequate sound treated space 5 2

The size of the music room is less than the OSDM recommendation. Sound treatment is minimal.

5.13 Space for art is appropriate for special instruction, supplies, and equipment 5 4

The size of the art room is similar to OSDM recommendation. Equipment is in good condition.

School Facility Appraisal Points Allocated Points

5.14 Space for technology education permits use of state-of-the-art equipment 5 5

Computer labs are appropriately sized for instruction need.

5.15 Space for small groups and remedial instruction is provided adjacent to classrooms 5 0

No such space is provided.

5.16 Storage for student and teacher material is adequate 5 3

Quantity and size of lockers are not appropriate for student capacity and grade level served. Some lockers are too high. Condition is fair. Cubby areas are available for the storage of elementary student supplies. Condition is fair. Adequate casework is not provided for teacher material stroage. Condition is fair.

Support Space Points Allocated Points

5.17 Teacher’s lounge and work areas reflect teachers as professionals 10 5

Teacher’s lounge is small with dated furnishings and finishes.

5.18 Cafeteria/Kitchen is attractive with sufficient space for seating/dining, delivery, storage, and foodpreparation

10 8

The kitchen is smaller than OSDM standards. The size is approximately equal to the size recommended by the OSDM. The finishes are fair.

5.19 Administrative offices provided are consistent in appearance and function with the maturity of thestudents served

5 2

Administrative offices do not have all the elements and is smaller than OSDM recommendations.

5.20 Counselor’s office insures privacy and sufficient storage 5 2

Counselor has private office. Storage is limited.

5.21 Clinic is near administrative offices and is equipped to meet requirements 5 3

Clinic is equipped with toilet, sink, and two cots. Location is near offices. Size is smaller than OSDM recommendations.

5.22 Suitable reception space is available for students, teachers, and visitors 5 1

Reception space is too small to adequately serve the need.

5.23 Administrative personnel are provided sufficient work space and privacy 5 2

Administrative area is equipped with secretarial area, offices, conference room, mail/work/copy room, and storage space. The area does not have all the elements and is smaller than OSDM recommendations.




TOTAL - Educational Adequacy 200 125





CEFPI Ratings Sheet

6.0 Environment for Education


Exterior Environment Points Allocated Points

6.1 Overall design is aesthetically pleasing to age of students 15 13

The facility has an attractive design with interesting features.

6.2 Site and building are well landscaped 10 9

The landscaping is mature and well placed.

6.3 Exterior noise and poor environment do not disrupt learning 10 9

The surrounding neighborhood is a residential type.

6.4 Entrances and walkways are sheltered from sun and inclement weather 10 7

The main entrance is sheltered, but the secondary entrances are not.

6.5 Building materials provide attractive color and texture 5 4

Brick building with precast concrete accents provides nice exterior.

Interior Environment Points Allocated Points

6.6 Color schemes, building materials, and decor provide an impetus to learning 20 10

Color schemes are neutral with striping. Somewhat inconsistent with casework.

6.7 Year around comfortable temperature and humidity are provided throughout the building 15 10

The majority of the facility is equipped with a heating system only. The heating system is in fair condition. Cooling and humidity control are not provided in the majority of the facility. Cooling is provided in the media center, offices, music, art and the addition.

6.8 Ventilating system provides adequate quiet circulation of clean air and meets 15cfm VBC requirement 15 10

The existing unit ventilator system does not provide the code required amount of fresh air.

6.9 Lighting system provides proper intensity, diffusion, and distribution of illumination 15 12

Light fixtures appeared to be well maintained. Dark spots were not observed.

6.10 Drinking fountains and restroom facilities are conveniently located 15 13

The O.B.C. requires one drinking fountain per 100 students. The building capacity requires 6 drinking fountains. The existing facility has 6 drinking fountains. ADArequires that 50 percent of drinking fountains be accessible. Two of the drinking fountains are accessible.

6.11 Communication among students is enhanced by commons area(s) for socialization 10 0

No common area exists.




6.12 Traffic flow is aided by appropriate foyers and corridors 10 6

Corridors are narrower than OSDM recommendations.

6.13 Areas for students to interact are suitable to the age group 10 7

Cafeteria, gymnasium, and media center provide a suitable interaction space.

6.14 Large group areas are designed for effective management of students 10 8

There are no blind spots where supervision is limited.

6.15 Acoustical treatment of ceilings, walls, and floors provides effective sound control 10 7

Lay-in acoustic ceilings, masonry walls, and vinyl tile f loor provide fair acoustics.

6.16 Window design contributes to a pleasant environment 10 7

Windows are smaller than OSDM recommended area.

6.17 Furniture and equipment provide a pleasing atmosphere 10 5

The existing facility lacked some of the recommended equipment per OSDM standards. The equipment appeared to be mismatched and was in fair to poor condition.

TOTAL - Environment for Education 200 137





Justification for Allocation of Points

Building Name and Level: Summit Elem

K-6

Building features that clearly exceed criteria:

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Building features that are non-existent or very inadequate:

1. No central air conditioning.

2. Single pane windows.

3. Asbestos present.

4. Non-compl iant fire alarm.

5. Not ADA accessible.

6. No sprinklers.


Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06:Justification for Allocation of Points Page 47




Building Summary - Summit Elem (36459)


Name: Summit Elem


Cincinnati,OH 45255

Bldg. IRN: 36459



Phone: 513-474-2270










Total 62,760



=2 Needs Repair




DollarAssessment C





F. Windows 3 $173,845.00 -

G. Structure: Foundation 2 $1,600.00 -



J. General Finishes 3 $1,006,527.50 -




N. Fire Alarm 3 $88,335.00 -







U. Life Safety 3 $253,970.00 -


W. Technology 3 $362,125.20 -


- $1,355,645.17 -

Total $6,926,637.07











C=Under Contract




Previous Page




Environmental Hazards - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Summit Elem (36459) - Original

Environmental Hazards - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Summit Elem (36459) - Original

Owner: Forest Hills Local SD Bldg. IRN: 36459

Facility: Summit Elem BuildingAdd: Original

Date: 2004-06-28 Assessor: Tony Zircher

A. Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) AFM=Asbestos Free Materia

ACM Found Status Quantity Unit Cost Estimated Cost

1. Boiler/Furnace/Breeching Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $15.00 $0.002. Tank/Duct Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $12.00 $0.00

3. Pipe Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $8.00 $0.004. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $25.00 $0.00

5. Acoustical Plaster Removal Not Present 0 $7.00 $0.006. Fireproofing Removal Not Present 0 $20.00 $0.00

7. Hard Plaster Removal Not Present 0 $10.00 $0.008. Gypsum Board Removal Not Present 0 $6.00 $0.00

9. Acoustical Panel Ceiling Removal Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.0010. Resilient Flooring Removal - Incl. Mastic Reported Asbestos-Containing Material 39045 $3.00 $117,135.00

11. Roofing Removal Not Present 0 $2.00 $0.0011 Sum of lines(1-11) Total Abs. Hazard Abatement Cost for Renovation Work $117,135.00

12 Sum of lines(1-9) Total Abs. Hazard Abatement Cost for Demolition Work $0.00

B. Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks None Reported

Tank No. Location Age Product Stored Size Est.Rem.Cost

1 Sum Of Lines(1-0) Total Cost For Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks $0.00

C. Lead-Based Paint (LBP) - Renovation Only Addition Constructed after 19801. Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform Lead Mock-Ups $5,000.002. Special Engineering Fees $5,000.00

3 Sum of lines(1-2) Total Cost for Lead-Based Paint Mock-Ups $10,000.00

D. Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Recycling/Incineration Not ApplicableArea Of Building Addition Square Feet w/Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Unit Cost Total Cost

1 58890 55946 $0.05 $2,797.30

E. Other Environmental Hazards/Remarks None ReportedDescription Cost Estimate

1. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards $0.00

F. Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimate Summaries1. A11, B1, C3, D1, and E1 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Renovation $129,932.30

2. A12, B1, D1, and E1 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Demolition $2,797.30

Report Generated at 3 May 2005 06:<Untitled> Page 49



Environmental Hazards - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Summit Elem (36459) - Kindergarten

Environmental Hazards - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Summit Elem (36459) - Kindergarten

Owner: Forest Hills Local SD Bldg. IRN: 36459

Facility: Summit Elem BuildingAdd: Kindergarten

Date: 2004-06-28 Assessor: Tony Zircher

A. Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) AFM=Asbestos Free Materia

ACM Found Status Quantity Unit Cost Estimated Cost

1. Boiler/Furnace/Breeching Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $15.00 $0.002. Tank/Duct Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $12.00 $0.00

3. Pipe Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $8.00 $0.004. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $25.00 $0.00

5. Acoustical Plaster Removal Not Present 0 $7.00 $0.006. Fireproofing Removal Not Present 0 $20.00 $0.00

7. Hard Plaster Removal Not Present 0 $10.00 $0.008. Gypsum Board Removal Not Present 0 $6.00 $0.00

9. Acoustical Panel Ceiling Removal Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.0010. Resilient Flooring Removal - Incl. Mastic Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.00

11. Roofing Removal Not Present 0 $2.00 $0.0011 Sum of lines(1-11) Total Abs. Hazard Abatement Cost for Renovation Work $0.00

12 Sum of lines(1-9) Total Abs. Hazard Abatement Cost for Demolition Work $0.00

B. Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks None Reported

Tank No. Location Age Product Stored Size Est.Rem.Cost

1 Sum Of Lines(1-0) Total Cost For Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks $0.00

C. Lead-Based Paint (LBP) - Renovation Only Addition Constructed after 19801. Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform Lead Mock-Ups $0.002. Special Engineering Fees $0.00

3 Sum of lines(1-2) Total Cost for Lead-Based Paint Mock-Ups $0.00

D. Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Recycling/Incineration Not ApplicableArea Of Building Addition Square Feet w/Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Unit Cost Total Cost

1 3870 3870 $0.05 $193.50

E. Other Environmental Hazards/Remarks None ReportedDescription Cost Estimate

1. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards $0.00

F. Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimate Summaries1. A11, B1, C3, D1, and E1 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Renovation $193.50

2. A12, B1, D1, and E1 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Demolition $193.50

Documents

State Assessment, Summit