State Assessment, Turpin

7/28/2019 State Assessment, Turpin

1/55

Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Turpin High (68502)

Program Type: Assessment Only

Setting: Suburban

Assessment Name: 68502 - Turpin High-FINAL

Assessment Date: 2004-06-22

Cost Set: 2004

Building Name: Turpin High

Building Address: 2650 Bartels Rd

Building City: Cincinnati

Building Zipcode: 45244

Building Phone: 513-232-7770

Acreage: 25

Current Grades: 9-12

Teaching Stations: 56

Number of Floors: 3

Student Capacity: 1173

Current Enrollment: 1075

Enrollment Date: 2003-10-01

Enrollment Date is the date in which the current enrollment was taken.

Number of Classrooms: 45

Historical Register NO

Buildings Principal: Peggy Johnson

Building Type: High

Current Elementary Enrollment: 0

Current Middle Enrollment: 0

Current High Enrollment: 1075

Current Career Technical Enrollment: 0

Next Page

Report Generated at 17 May 2005 10Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Turpin High (68502) Page 1


2/55

Building Pictures - Forest Hills Local SD(47340) - Turpin High(68502)

North elevation photo: East elevation photo:

South elevation photo: West elevation photo:

GENERAL DESCRIPTION

195,833 Total Existing Square Footage

1976,1976,1999,1999,1999,2001Building Dates

9-12 Grades

1,075 Current Enrollment

56 Teaching Stations

25 Site Acreage

Turpin High School, which is not on the National Register of Historic Buildings, is a 1976 three story, 195,835 square foot school building located in a suburban residential settingThe existing facility does not use modular buildings. The structure of the original facility contains a concrete frame and non-load bearing masonry type exterior wall construction,with a combination of non-bearing masonry and partition wall with gypsum board type wall construction in the interior. The floor systems consist of concrete slab on grade for thebase floors throughout and intermediate floors of precast concrete with concrete topping in the original, and steel joist with metal form deck and concrete topping on the additionThe roof structure is a combination of concrete planks with concrete topping or metal decking on steel joists. The roofing system is a combination of built-up, metal, asphalt roll

and rubber roofing systems, installed in phases over the last 15 years. The ventilation system of the building is generally adequate to meet the needs of the users. The classroomare undersized in terms of the current standards established by the State of Ohio. Physical Education and Student Dining spaces consist of a Gymnasium, a natatorium, and anarea for wrestling. Student Dining occurs in a separate area that opens into the corridor to provide a commons. The electrical system for the facility is generally adequate. Thefacility is equipped with a non-compliant security system. The building has a non-compliant automatic fire alarm system. The auditorium addition is equipped with an automatedfire suppression system. The remainder of the facility does not have an automated fire suppression system. The building is reported to contain asbestos. The overall building is ncompliant with ADA accessibility requirements. The school is located on a 25-acre site shared with Mercer Elementary School adjacent to residential properties. The property isnot fenced for security. Access onto the site is unrestricted. Site circulation is fair to poor. The space for school buses to load and unload is the access for the vehicular traffic.Parking for staff, visitors and community events is inadequate.

Report Generated at 17 May 2005 10Building Pictures - Forest Hills Local SD(47340) - Turpin High(68502) Page 2


3/55

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 17 May 2005 10Building Pictures - Forest Hills Local SD(47340) - Turpin High(68502) Page 3


4/55

Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Turpin High (68502)

Program Type: Assessment Only

Setting: Suburban

Assessment Name: 68502 - Turpin High-FINAL

Assessment Date: 2004-06-22

Cost Set: 2004

Building Name: Turpin High

Building Address: 2650 Bartels Rd

Building City: Cincinnati

Building Zipcode: 45244

Building Phone: 513-232-7770

Acreage: 25

Current Grades: 9-12

Teaching Stations: 56

Number of Floors: 3

Student Capacity: 1173

Current Enrollment: 1075

Enrollment Date: 2003-10-01

Enrollment Date is the date in which the current enrollment was taken.

Number of Classrooms: 45

Historical Register NO

Buildings Principal: Peggy Johnson

Building Type: High

Current Elementary Enrollment: 0

Current Middle Enrollment: 0

Current High Enrollment: 1075

Current Career Technical Enrollment: 0

Next Page

Report Generated at 17 May 2005 10Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Turpin High (68502) Page 4


5/55

Building Construction Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Turpin High (68502)

Name Year Handicapped Access F loors S quare Feet

Natatorium 1976 no 1 6,793

Original Building 1976 no 3 159,562

Addition 1999 yes 2 10,736

Auditorium Fixed Seating Addition 1999 yes 1 4,546

Auditorium Stage & Suppport Addition 1999 yes 1 5,066

Athletic Addition 2001 yes 2 9,130

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 17 May 2005 10Building Construction Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Turpin High (68502) Page 5


6/55

Building Component Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Turpin High (68502)

Addition Auditorium CorridorsAgricultural

Education LabGymnasium

MediaCenter

VocationalSpace

StudentDining

Kitchen Natatorium

Natatorium (1976) 6793

Original Building (1976) 26909 15115 5405 1293 5311 3932

Addition (1999) 3541

Auditorium Fixed Seating Addition (1999) 4546

Auditorium Stage & Suppport Addition (1999) 5066

Athletic Addition (2001) 1186

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 17 May 2005 10Building Component Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Turpin High (68502) Page 6


7/55

Career Technical Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Turpin High (68502)

No Career Technical Programs Present

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 17 May 2005 10Career Technical Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Turpin High (68502) Page 7


8/55

Main Assessment Menu - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Turpin High (68502)

Building Summary - Turpin High (68502)

District: Forest Hills Local SD

Name: Turpin High

Address: 2650 Bartels Rd

Cincinnati,OH 45244

Bldg. IRN: 68502

County: Hamilton Area: Cincinnati (1)

Contact: Peggy Johnson

Phone: 513-232-7770

Date Prepared: 2004-06-22 By: Tony Zircher

Date Revised: 2005-05-17 By: Bill Mentges

Current Grades 9-12 Acreage: 25

Proposed Grades N/A Teaching Stations: 56

Current Enrollment 1075 Classrooms: 45

Projected Enrollment N/A

Addition Date HA Number ofFloors

Current SquareFeet




Auditorium Fixed SeatingAddition

1999 yes 1 4,546

Auditorium Stage & SuppportAddition

1999 yes 1 5,066


Total 195,833

*HA = Handicapped Access

*Rating =1 Satisfactory

=2 Needs Repair

=3 Needs Replacement

*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction

FACILITY ASSESSMENTCost Set: 2004 Rating

DollarAssessment C

A. Heating System 1 $0.00 -

B. Roofing 1 $0.00 -

C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning 2 $586,800.00 -

D. Electrical Systems 2 $471,600.00 -

E. Plumbing and Fixtures 2 $21,000.00 -

F. Windows 2 $2,200.00 -

G. Structure: Foundation 1 $0.00 -

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys 2 $137,900.00 -

I. Structure: Floors and Roofs 1 $0.00 -

J. General Finishes 3 $2,952,152.10 -K. Interior Lighting 3 $674,768.00 -

L. Security Systems 2 $242,833.90 -

M. Emergency/Egress Lighting 2 $84,346.00 -

N. Fire Alarm 1 $0.00 -

O. Handicapped Access 3 $661,436.50 -

P. Site Condition 2 $124,200.60 -

Q. Sewage System 1 $0.00 -

R. Water Supply 1 $0.00 -

S. Exterior Doors 3 $48,000.00 -

T. Hazardous Material 2 $117,722.00 -

U. Life Safety 3 $786,326.25 -

V. Loose Furnishings 3 $381,534.00 -

W. Technology 3 $1,064,530.38 -

- X. Construction Contingency /Non-Construction Cost - $2,033,677.48 -

Total $10,391,027.21

CEFPI Appraisal Summary

Section Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating CategoCover Sheet

1.0The School Site 100 65 65% Borderl

2.0Structural and Mechanical Features 200 148 74% Satisfacto

3.0Plant Maintainability 100 67 67% Borderl

4.0Building Safety and Security 200 133 67% Borderl

5.0Educational Adequacy 200 106 53% Borderl

6.0Environment for Education 200 156 78% Satisfacto

Commentary

Total 1000 675 68% Borderl

C=Under Contract

Renovation Cost Factor 100.44

Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied) $10,436,747

The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary requested from a Master Plan.

Previous Page

Report Generated at 17 May 2005 10Main Assessment Menu - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Turpin High (68502) Page 8


9/55


Original Building (1976) Summary


Name: Turpin High


Cincinnati,OH 45244

Bldg. IRN: 68502



Phone: 513-232-7770








Current SquareFeet





1999 yes 1 4,546


1999 yes 1 5,066


Total 195,833


*Rating =1 Sat isfactory

=2 Needs Repair




DollarAssessment C



C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning 2 $586,800.00 -

D. Electrical Systems 2 $471,600.00 -


F. Windows 2 $2,200.00 -




J. General Finishes 3 $2,935,439.60 -K. Interior Lighting 3 $638,248.00 -








S. Exterior Doors 3 $48,000.00 -

T. Hazardous Material 2 $117,265.00 -

U. Life Safety 3 $734,576.50 -


W. Technology 3 $920,672.74 -

- X. Construction Contingency /Non-Construction Cost - $1,943,508.69 -

Total $9,930,311.87









Commentary


C=Under Contract






10/55


Natatorium (1976) Summary


Name: Turpin High


Cincinnati,OH 45244

Bldg. IRN: 68502



Phone: 513-232-7770








Current SquareFeet





1999 yes 1 4,546


1999 yes 1 5,066


Total 195,833


*Rat ing =1 Satisfactory

=2 Needs Repair




DollarAssessment C



C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning 2 $0.00 -

D. Electrical Systems 2 $0.00 -

E. Plumbing and Fixtures 2 $0.00 -

F. Windows 2 $0.00 -


H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys 2 $0.00 -


J. General Finishes 3 $0.00 -K. Interior Lighting 3 $0.00 -

L. Security Systems 2 $0.00 -

M. Emergency/Egress Lighting 2 $0.00 -


O. Handicapped Access 3 $679.30 -

P. Site Condition 2 $0.00 -



S. Exterior Doors 3 $0.00 -

T. Hazardous Material 2 $0.00 -

U. Life Safety 3 $22,077.25 -


W. Technology 3 $0.00 -

- X. Construction Contingency /Non-Construction Cost - $8,843.60 -

Total $45,186.15









Commentary


C=Under Contract



The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary irequested from a Master Plan.



11/55


Addition (1999) Summary


Name: Turpin High


Cincinnati,OH 45244

Bldg. IRN: 68502



Phone: 513-232-7770








Current SquareFeet





1999 yes 1 4,546


1999 yes 1 5,066


Total 195,833



=2 Needs Repair




DollarAssessment C




















U. Life Safety 3 $0.00 -


W. Technology 3 $61,946.72 -


Total $139,566.61









Commentary


C=Under Contract






12/55


Auditorium Fixed Seating Addition (1999) Summary


Name: Turpin High


Cincinnati,OH 45244

Bldg. IRN: 68502



Phone: 513-232-7770








Current SquareFeet





1999 yes 1 4,546


1999 yes 1 5,066


Total 195,833


*Rating =1Satisfactory

=2 Needs Repair




DollarAssessment C











L. Security Systems 2 $0.00 -











W. Technology 3 $0.00 -


Total $11,304.45









Commentary


C=Under Contract






13/55


Auditorium Stage & Suppport Addition (1999) Summary


Name: Turpin High


Cincinnati,OH 45244

Bldg. IRN: 68502



Phone: 513-232-7770








Current SquareFeet





1999 yes 1 4,546


1999 yes 1 5,066


Total 195,833



=2 Needs Repair




DollarAssessment C





















V. Loose Furnishings 3 $0.00 -

W. Technology 3 $29,230.82 -


Total $43,272.48


Section PointsPossible

PointsEarned

Percentage RatingCategory

Cover Sheet


2.0Structural and MechanicalFeatures

200 148 74% Satisfacto





Commentary


C=Under Contract



The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summaryrequested from a Master Plan.



14/55


Athletic Addition (2001) Summary


Name: Turpin High


Cincinnati,OH 45244

Bldg. IRN: 68502



Phone: 513-232-7770








Current SquareFeet





1999 yes 1 4,546


1999 yes 1 5,066


Total 195,833


*Rating =1Satisfactory

=2 Needs Repair




DollarAssessment C










J. General Finishes 3 $16,712.50 -K. Interior Lighting 3 $36,520.00 -










U. Life Safety 3 $29,672.50 -


W. Technology 3 $52,680.10 -


Total $221,385.66









Commentary


C=Under Contract






15/55

Facility Assessment

A. Heating System

Description: The existing system for the original construction is an electric hot water system, installed in 1976, and is in fair condition. The 4 electric hot waterboilers, manufactured by Peerless, were installed in 1976 and are in fair condition. Heating water is distributed to terminal units consisting of airhandlers. The original building is divided into three separate wings. A wing, which contains the gymnasium, natatorium, and locker room areas isnot equipped with air conditioning. Heating and ventilation is provided by air handling units that are original. B wing (center classroom section)and C wing (commons, music department and additional classrooms) are air conditioned. They are served by a 2 year old Marley cooling tower.B wing has two 4-5 year old roof mounted air handling units that serve the various floors of the classroom structure. B wing also has a separatecondensing unit that serves the office area. C wing has one 3 year old roof mounted air handling unit, and one original deck mounted air handlingunit that serves the student dining area. Original building equipment is generally in good to fair condition. The auditorium has two original roofmounted carrier condensing units, an original deck mounted chiller, and three original deck mounted air handling units. The auditorium additionequipment is in good condition. The athletic addition is equipped with an original pad mounted condensing unit, 1 original rooftop mounted airhandling unit serving the locker rooms and a deck mounted air handling unit serving the weight room. Interior doors are not louvered to facilitatecorridor utilization as return air plenums. The ventilation system appears to meet the Ohio Building Code 15 CFM per occupant fresh airrequirement. The terminal equipment was installed during the various stages of construction and is in fair condition. The T.A.C. digitaltemperature control system is in fair condition. The system appears to feature individual temperature controls in all spaces required by theOSDM. The existing system is ducted. The overall heating system is evaluated as being in safe and efficient working order, and long term lifeexpectancy of the existing system is anticipated. The site does not contain underground fuel tanks.

Rating: 1 Satisfactory

Recommendations: Existing conditions require no renovation or replacement at the present time. See item C for enhancements to the air conditioning system.

Item CostUnitWholeBuilding

Natatorium(1976)6,793 ft

Original Building(1976)159,562 ft

Addition(1999)10,736 ft

Auditorium Fixed SeatingAddition (1999)4,546 ft

Auditorium Stage & SuppportAddition (1999)5,066 ft

Athletic Addition(2001)9,130 ft

SumComme

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Rooftop Air Handling Unit Rooftop Air Handling Units

Back to Assessment Summary

Report Generated at 17 May 2005 10:Facility Assessment Page 15


16/55

Facility Assessment

B. Roofing

Description: The roof over the original construction is a combination of asphalt built-up with gravel ballast, EPDM, asphalt roll, and metal roofing systems thatwere installed in phases over the past 15 years and are in good condition. The auditorium is equipped with a metal roof over sloped areas and anEPDM roof over low slope areas. The auditorium roofing was installed in 1999 during the construction. The athletic addition is equipped with aballasted EPDM roof that was installed during the construction. There are no District reports of current leaking. No signs of past leaking wereobserved during the physical assessment. Access to the auditorium roof was gained by access hatch with access ladder that are in goodcondition. The main roof was accessed through an exterior door located in a stair tower. There were minor observations of standing water on theroof. Metal flashings are in good condition. The gutters and downspouts are properly located, and in fair condition. Roof drains are adequate innumber, properly located, and in fair condition.


Recommendations: Existing conditions require no renovation or replacement at the present time.








SumComme

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Various Roofing Various Roofing




17/55

Facility Assessment

C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning

Description: The majority of the original construction is equipped with a central air conditioning system in fair condition. The original building is divided intothree separate wings. A wing, which contains the gymnasium, natatorium, and locker room areas is not equipped with air conditioning. One 7-8year old condensing unit serves the AD office. Ventilation is provided by air handling units that are original. B wing (center classroom section) andC wing ( commons, music department and additional classrooms) are air conditioned. They are served by a 2 year old Marley cooling tower. Bwing has two 4-5 year old roof mounted air handling units that serve the various floors of the classroom structure. B wing also has a separatecondensing unit that serves the office area. C wing has one 3 year old roof mounted air handling unit, and one original deck mounted air handlingunit that serves the student dining area. Original building equipment is generally in good to fair condition. The auditorium has two original roofmounted carrier condensing units, an original deck mounted chiller, and three original deck mounted air handling units. The auditorium additionequipment is in good condition. The athletic addition is equipped with an original pad mounted condensing unit, 1 original rooftop mounted airhandling unit serving the locker rooms and a deck mounted air handling unit serving the weight room. One window unit was identified in thedietician office. Interior doors are not louvered to facilitate corridor utilization as return air plenums. The ventilation system appears to meet theOhio Building Code 15 CFM per occupant fresh air requirement. The original system will require enhancement to be compliant with Ohio SchoolDesign Manual requirements. A dust collection system is provided in this facility but the educational program no longer requires it. Exhaustsystems for Restrooms, Kitchen, Gymnasium are adequate.

Rating: 2 Needs Repair

Recommendations: Provide an air conditioning system in A wing. Replace the office area condensing unit. Replace the student dining air handling unit.

Item Cost Unit WholeBuilding




Auditorium FixedSeating Addition(1999)4,546 ft

Auditorium Stage &Suppport Addition(1999)5,066 ft

AthleticAddition(2001)9,130 ft

Sum Comments

Other: Airconditioningsystem

$12.00sq.ft.(Qty)

48,900Required

$586,800.00A Wing, Office aStudent Dining

Sum: $586,800.00 $0.00 $586,800.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Cooling Tower Auditorium Condensing Unit




18/55

Facility Assessment

D. Electrical Systems

Description: The facility is equipped with three separate electrical services. Each service is a 480 volt, 800 amp, 3 phase 4 wire service. Two services wereinstalled in 1976 for the original building and are in fair condition. One service was installed in 1999 for the auditorium addition and is in goodcondition. The system in the athletic addition is an extension of the original construction. Power is provided to the school by multiple utility owned,pad-mounted transformers located around the perimeter of the building, and in good condition. The panel system, installed with each phase ofconstruction, is in fair condition, and has limited capacity for expansion. The classrooms are not equipped with adequate electrical outlets. Thetypical classroom contains 3 general-purpose outlets. The quantity of dedicated outlets for technology does not meet the OSDM requirements.There are some restroom spaces that have no electrical outlets. Specialized spaces do not have the quantity of outlets recommended by theOSDM. The corridors are equipped with adequate electrical outlets for servicing. There are adequate GFI protected exterior outlets locatedaround the perimeter of the building. The overall electrical system does not meet Ohio School Design Manual requirements in supporting thecurrent needs of the school, and will require enhancement to meet the future needs of the facility.


Recommendations: Provide additional panels, circuits, and outlets to comply with OSDM recommendations.








Sum Comments

PanelReplacement:

$3,000.00unit 6 Required $18,000.00(power or l ightinsub-panel only)

AdditionalCircuits:

$800.00percircuit

252 Required $201,600.00

AdditionalReceptacles

$250.00each 1,008 Required $252,000.00

Sum: $471,600.00 $0.00 $471,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Auditorium Transformer Main Electrical Panel




19/55

Facility Assessment

E. Plumbing and Fixtures

Description: The service entrance is equipped with a reduced pressure backflow preventer in fair condition. A water treatment system is provided and is in faircondition. The domestic water supply piping in the overall facility is copper in good condition. The waste piping in the overall facility is cast iron infair condition. The original building has 2-120 gallon, 10 year old electric water heaters and 2-500 gallon original holding tanks with original waterheater in fair condition. The athletic addition has a holding tank with electric water heater in good condition. The auditorium has 3-15 gallonelectric water heaters in good condition. The school contains 12 restrooms for boys, 13 restrooms for girls, and 14 individual restrooms for staff.Boys restrooms contain 11 ADA and 11 non-ADA wall mounted flush valve toilets, 4 ADA and 25 non-ADA wall mounted flush valve urinals, and21 ADA and 5 non-ADA wall mounted lavatories. Girls restrooms contain 15 ADA and 22 non-ADA wall mounted flush valve toilets, as well as 17ADA and 11 non-ADA wall mounted and 5 non-ADA countertop lavatories. Individual restrooms contain 2 ADA and 12 non-ADA wall mountedflush valve toilets, 1 ADA and 2 non-ADA wall mounted urinals, and 3 ADA and 11 non-ADA wall mounted lavatories. The facility is equipped withno ADA and 6 non-ADA drinking fountains, as well as 3 ADA and 14 non-ADA electric water coolers, in fair condition. The athletic locker roomshave shower fixtures in fair condition. ADA compliant showers are provided. The school meets the OBC requirements for quantity of fixtures. ADArequirements are not met for fixtures and drinking fountains (see Item O). Science Classrooms are equipped with gas connections and safetyshower / eyewash in fair condition. Compressed air connections are not available for use in the science classrooms. Adequate exterior wallhydrants are provided.


Recommendations: See Item O for replacement of fixtures related to ADA requirements. Replace remainder of countertop set lavatories due to work recommended intem O. Provide compressed air system in science classrooms.



OriginalBuilding(1976)159,562 ft



Auditorium Stage& SuppportAddition (1999)5,066 ft


Sum Comment

Sink: $1,500.00unit 4 Required $6,000.00(remove /replace)

HIGH BAY/INDUSTRIAL SPACE -LAB TYPES 5,6,7 - CompressedAir Connections

$15,000.00persystem

1 Required $15,000.00

Sum: $21,000.00 $0.00 $15,000.00 $6,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

ADA Complaint Restroom Plumbing Fixtures




20/55

Facility Assessment

F. Windows

Description: The original facility is equipped with thermally broken aluminum frame windows with double pane insulated glazing type window system, whichwas installed in 1976, and is in fair condition. The entrance doors in the original facility are equipped with aluminum frame sidelights andtransoms with single pane glazing, in fair condition. The auditorium addition is equipped with thermally broken aluminum frame windows withdouble pane insulated glazing type window system, which was installed in 1999, and is in good condition. The entrance doors in the auditoriumaddition are equipped with thermally broken aluminum frame sidelights and transoms with double pane insulated glazing, in good condition. Theathletic addition is not equipped with windows or doors with sidelights. The school does contain an aluminum skylight in good condition.


Recommendations: Replace single pane transoms and sidelights in exterior doors of the original facility as a function of the door replacement.



OriginalBuilding (1976)159,562 ft


Auditorium FixedSeating Addition (1999)4,546 ft

Auditorium Stage &Suppport Addition (1999)5,066 ft


Sum Comme

CurtainWall/StorefrontSystem:

$55.00sq.ft.(Qty)

40 Required $2,200.00

Sum: $2,200.00 $0.00 $2,200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Auditorium Addition Window Original Building Window




21/55

Facility Assessment

G. Structure: Foundation

Description: The overall facility is equipped with concrete foundation walls on concrete footings, which displayed no locations of major settlement, cracking, orleaking, and is in good condition. The District reports that there has been no past leaking.



Item CostUnitWholeBuilding Natatorium(1976)6,793 ft






SumComme

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Exposed Foundation Wall Auditorium Foundation Wall




22/55

Facility Assessment

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys

Description: The original facility has a brick veneer on a nonbearing masonry wall system, which displayed locations of deterioration, and is in fair condition.The exterior masonry appears to lack control joints in typical locations. The exterior masonry has not been cleaned and sealed in recent years,and shows evidence of mortar deterioration at window sills and along the northeast side. Original building interior walls are non-bearing concretemasonry units at restrooms, stairs, kitchen, and locker rooms. The remainder of the interior walls (corridors, classrooms, offices) are metal studwith gypsum board and are in fair condition. Interior masonry is typically in short sections, which do not require control joints. The original buildingwindows were equipped with deep brick windowsills that were experiencing water penetration. Aluminum break metal modifications were made atall windows where problems existed, and are in fair condition. The auditorium and athletic additions have a brick veneer on a masonry wallsystem, which displayed no locations of deterioration, and is in good condition. The exterior masonry appears to have appropriately spaced andadequately caulked control joints in good condition. The exterior masonry has not yet needed to be cleaned and resealed, showing no evidenceof mortar deterioration. The auditorium and athletic additions have concrete masonry unit interior walls and are in good condition. Interiormasonry appears to have adequately spaced and caulked control joints in good condition. The storefront window system extends to the concretefoundation and is in good condition. The exterior lintels are in fair condition. The school does have sufficient expansion joints, and they are in faircondition.


Recommendations: Provide tuckpointing in all areas of mortar deterioration as required. Provide masonry cleaning and sealing as required in the original facility.Provide aluminum break metal sill to match existing masonry sill retrofit as required in the original facility. Provide additional masonry controljoints where required on the original facility and athletic addition.








Sum Comments

Tuckpointing: $2.50sq.ft.(Qty)

15,500Required

$38,750.00(wall surface)

Exterior MasonryCleaning:

$1.00sq.ft.(Qty)

46,600Required


Exterior MasonrySealing:

$0.75sq.ft.(Qty)

46,600Required


Install ControlJoints

$60.00ln.ft. 100 Required 60 Required $9,600.00

Other: AluminumSills

$8,000.00allowance Required $8,000.00ProvideAluminum sills match

Sum: $137,900.00 $0.00 $134,300.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,600.00

Stained Exterior Masonry Exterior Masonry




23/55

Facility Assessment

I. Structure: Floors and Roofs

Description: The floor construction of the base floor of the overall facility is concrete slab on grade construction, and is in good condition. There is no crawlspace. The floor construction of the intermediate floors of the original facility is precast concrete planks with concrete topping on a cast-in-placeconcrete column and beam frame, and is in good condition. The roof construction over a portion of the original facility is precast concrete plankswith concrete topping on a cast-in-place concrete column and beam frame, and is in good condition. The remainder of the original building roofconstruction is metal deck on steel joist on a steel beam frame, in good condition. The athletic addition has metal form deck on steel joist for thesecond floor framing and metal deck on steel joists for the roof framing. The auditorium has a steel framing with metal deck type construction, andis in good condition.

Rating:1 Satisfactory









SumComme

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Pre-Cast Concrete on Concrete Frame Steel Joist & Metal Deck




24/55

Facility Assessment

J. General Finishes

Description: The original facility has classrooms with carpet flooring, lay-in acoustic ceiling tile (ACT) type ceilings, and gypsum board interior wall finishes,and they are in fair condition. The original facility has corridors with carpet and terrazzo type flooring, ACT type ceilings, and concrete masonryunit (CMU) or gypsum board type wall finishes, and they are in fair condition. The original facility has restrooms with terrazzo flooring, gypsumboard ceilings, and CMU type wall finishes, and they are in fair condition. The Gymnasium has a wood floor, exposed structure with tectum deckceiling, and CMU wall finishes, and they are in fair condition. Lower gymnasium telescoping stands are in good condition. Upper stands are in faircondition. Student Dining, located in the original building, has terrazzo flooring, ACT type ceilings, and CMU type wall finishes, and they are in faircondition. Classroom casework in the original facility is not provided. Some specialty classrooms contain wood type construction casework withplastic laminate tops that is in fair condition. Classrooms are not provided adequate chalkboards, markerboards, and tackboards. Boards are infair condition. The lockers are adequately provided, and in fair to poor condition. The original facility is equipped with asbestos core metal cladnon-louvered interior doors in fair condition. The toilet partitions are CMU with wood doors, and are in fair condition. The existing kitchen is fullservice. The existing Kitchen equipment is in fair condition. The athletic addition has a weight room with a rubber floor, CMU walls and ACTceiling in good condition. The auditorium addition has an auditorium with carpet or concrete flooring, CMU walls, and ACT ceiling, in goodcondition, and corridors with VCT or ceramic tile flooring, CMU walls, and ACT ceilings, in good condition. The Natatorium has concrete floors,acoustic CMU type walls and exposed concrete ceilings all in fair condition.

Rating: 3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations: In the original building, provide complete replacement of finishes and casework due to installation of systems outlined in Items A, C, D E K, M, N,T and U. Provide interior doors in the original building due to work described in item T. See item O for door replacement costs. Provide for thereplacement of kitchen equipment due to age. Replace two toilet partitions that will be disturbed due to work described in item O. Replace theacoustical ceiling in the athletic addition due to work described in Item U.




Addition(1999)10,736ft

AuditoriumFixed SeatingAddition (1999)4,546 ft

AuditoriumStage &SuppportAddition (1999)

5,066 ft


Sum Comments

Acoustic Ceiling: $3.50sq.ft.(Qty)

4,775Required

$16,712.50(partial finish - tear out and replaper area)

CompleteReplacement ofFinishes andCasework:

$15.60sq.ft. Required $2,489,167.20(high school, with removal ofexisting)

Toilet Partitions: $750.00perstall

2 Required $1,500.00(removing and replacing)

Toilet AccessoryReplacement

$0.20sq.ft. Required $31,912.40(per building area)

Total KitchenEquipmentReplacement:

$105.00sq.ft.(Qty)

3,932 Required $412,860.00(square footage based upon onlarea of food preparation, servingkitchen storage areas andwalk-ins. Includes demolition anremoval of existing kitchenequipment)

Sum: $2,952,152.10$0.00 $2,935,439.60 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $16,712.50

Typical Classroom Natatorium



25/55




26/55

Facility Assessment

K. Interior Lighting

Description: The typical Classrooms in the overall facility are equipped with T-8 2x4 lay-in fluorescent f ixtures with dual level switching. Classroom fixtures arein fair condition and provide illumination from 40-120FC, compared with the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. The typical Corridors in theoverall facility are equipped with T-8 2x4 lay-in fluorescent fixtures with single level switching. Corridor fixtures are in fair condition and provide anaverage illumination of 35FC, thus complying with the 20 FC recommended by the OSDM. The Gymnasium, auditorium and natatorium spacesare equipped with pendant mercury vapor type lighting, in fair condition, and providing an average illumination of 20FC, which is less than the 60FC recommended by the OSDM. The Media Center is equipped with 2x4 lay-in T-8 fluorescent fixture type lighting in fair condition, and providingan average illumination of 78FC, thus complying with the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. The Student Dining spaces are equipped with 1x4suspended T-8 fluorescent fixture type lighting in fair condition, and providing an average illumination of 45FC, which is less than the 50 FCrecommended by the OSDM. The service areas in the overall facility are equipped with T-8 fluorescent fixture type lighting in fair condition. Thetypical Administrative spaces in the overall facility are equipped with 2x4 lay-in T-8 fluorescent fixture type lighting in fair condition, and providingadequate illumination based on OSDM requirements. The overall lighting systems of the facility are not fully compliant with Ohio School DesignManual requirements due to inadequate lighting levels.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of lighting system in the original building and athletic addition due to lighting levels and installation of systemsoutlined in Items U and J.








Sum Comme

Complete BuildingLighting Replacement

$4.00sq.ft. Required Required $674,768.00

Sum: $674,768.00 $0.00 $638,248.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $36,520.00

Corridor Lighting Gymnasium Lighting




27/55

Facility Assessment

L. Security Systems

Description: The overall facility contains a DSC type security system in good condition. Motion detectors are adequately provided in offices, corridors, andspaces where 6 or more computers are located. Exterior doors are equipped with door contacts. An automatic visitor control system is notprovided. CCTV cameras are provided at main entry areas, central gathering areas, and main corridors. CCTV is monitored in AdministrativeArea with the use of TV, VCR, and multiplexer. The security system is not adequately provided throughout, and the system is not fully compliantwith Ohio School Design Manual guidelines. The exterior site lighting system is equipped with a combination of metal halide and mercury vaporlight fixtures entry lights in fair condition. Pedestrian walkways are illuminated with mercury vapor fixtures in fair condition. Parking and buspick-up / drop off areas are illuminated by pole mounted fixtures in fair condition. The exterior site lighting system provides adequate coverage.

Rating:2 Needs Repair

Recommendations: Provide a partial security system upgrade that includes an automatic visitor control system to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines.Provide partial replacement of the exterior site lighting system to replace damaged fixtures and to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines.







AthleticAddition (2001)9,130 ft

Sum Comments

Partial SecuritySystem Upgrade:

$1.10sq.ft. Required Required Required Required $202,943.40(complete, area obuilding)

Other: PartialExterior LightingUpgrade

$0.25sq.ft. Required $39,890.50Replace damagedfixtures and upgra

Sum: $242,833.90 $0.00 $215,408.70 $11,809.60 $0.00 $5,572.60 $10,043.00

CCTV Monitors CCTV Camera




28/55

Facility Assessment

M. Emergency/Egress Lighting

Description: The overall facility is equipped with an emergency egress lighting system consisting of illuminated exit signs and emergency floodlighting. Thesystem is in fair condition, and is provided with appropriate battery backup. The system is adequately provided throughout, and meets OhioSchool Design Manual requirements. Some of the emergency egress lighting is ceiling mounted. Recessed fluorescent lighting is available onseparate circuits for night lighting.


Recommendations: Rework existing system to allow for work to stair towers and due to replacement of ceilings in item J.








Sum Comments

Other: PartialEmergency/Egress LightingUpgrade

$0.50sq. ft. Required Required $84,346.00Replacedisturbeddevices.

Sum: $84,346.00 $0.00 $79,781.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,565.00

Emergency Egress Lighting Emergency Lighting




29/55

Facility Assessment

N. Fire Alarm

Description: The overall facility is equipped with a fire alarm system in good condition, consisting of manual pull stations, horn and strobe indicating devices.The system is automatic and is monitored by a third party. The system is equipped with sufficient flow switches, tamper switches, smokedetectors, and heat sensors. The system is adequately provided throughout and does not have additional zone capabilities. The system iscompliant with Ohio Building Code, NFPA, and Ohio School Design Manual requirements.










SumComme

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Typical Horn/Strobe Pull Station




30/55

Facility Assessment

O. Handicapped Access

Description: The main exterior entrances are ADA accessible. Access from the parking / drop-off area to the building entries is not compromised by steps orsteep ramps. Adequate handicap parking is provided. Entrance doors are equipped with ADA hardware, but some secondary exterior doors arenot. The main entry is not equipped with an ADA power assist door. This multistory building has a series of compliant elevators that access everyfloor. A corridor ramp on the lower level does not have ADA required handrails. Access to the stage is facilitated by a ramp. Some originalbuilding interior doors are recessed without adequate clearances. Original building doors are not provided with ADA-compliant hardware. Interiordoors of the additions have appropriate size, clearances and hardware. 39 ADA-compliant toilets are required and 25 are currently provided. 39ADA-compliant lavatories are required and 23 are currently provided. 15 ADA-compliant urinals are required and 2 are currently provided. 12ADA-compliant electric water coolers are required, and 3 are currently provided. Toilet partitions are CMU or metal type construction. Some toiletpartitions do not provide appropriate ADA clearances. ADA-compliant accessories are not adequately provided in the original building. ADAsignage is not provided in the original building or the athletic addition.


Recommendations: Provide ADA-compliant signage, power assist door opener, electric water coolers, toilets, sinks, urinals, toilet partitions, toilet accessories,handrails, doors and frames in the overall facility to facilitate the school meeting ADA requirements. Note the asbestos core interior doors thatwere described in item T are replaced in this section. Parking issues are corrected in Item P. Toilet accessories are replaced in item J.





AuditoriumFixed SeatingAddition(1999)4,546 ft

AuditoriumStage &SuppportAddition (1999)5,066 ft


Sum Comments

Signage: $0.10sq.ft. Required Required Required $17,548.50(per building area)

Electric WaterCoolers:

$3,000.00unit 9 Required $27,000.00(new double ADA)

Toilet/Urinals/Sinks: $1,500.00unit 43 Required $64,500.00(replacement ADA)

Toilet Partitions: $1,000.00stall 1 Required $1,000.00(ADA - grab bars, accessoriesincluded)

ADA Assist Door &Frame:

$7,500.00unit 1 Required $7,500.00(openers, electrical, patching, etc)

Replace Doors: $1,500.00leaf 250 Required2Required

$378,000.00(standard 3070 wood door, HMframe-classroom door/light, includeshardware)

Replace Doors: $3,750.00leaf 44 Required $165,000.00(rework opening and corridor wall toaccommodate ADA standards whendoor opening is set back from edge corridor and cannot accommodate awheelchair. See diagram)

Other: RampHandrails

$37.00ln.ft. 24 Required $888.00(clear anodized alum.)

Sum: $661,436.50 $679.30 $656,844.20 $3,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $913.00

Elevator Accessing Seven Levels Door Lacks Clearance and Hardware




31/55

Facility Assessment

P. Site Condition

Description: The 25 acre sloped site is located in a suburban residential setting with generous tree, shrub, and floral type landscaping. There are problemswith erosion near the athletic addition. No ponding problems were identified. The site is accessed by a moderately traveled city street. The site isaccessed by buses and cars by a single entrance. Cars park in a centralized parking lot with the buses looping around the parking lot to drop offat Mercer Elementary and at Turpin High. Cars that are parked in the centralized lot are blocked in during bus loading times. There is a separateentrance that accesses a separate vehicular parking area. Additional parking occurs in a series of lots that are somewhat remote from the SchoolStaff, visitor, and student parking is facilitated by multiple asphalt parking lots in varying conditions. The parking lots provide a total of 419 spaceswhich does not provide adequate parking for staff members, visitors, and the disabled. The parking lot drainage design, consisting of appropriateslopes and catch basins, provides adequate evacuation of storm water, and no problems with parking lot ponding were observed. Concrete curbsin fair condition are appropriately placed. Concrete sidewalks are properly sloped, are located to provide a logical flow of pedestrian t raffic, andare in fair condition. Fencing is provided around athletic fields only. No security fencing is provided. The athletic facilities are comprised of footballstadium with all weather track, tennis courts, baseball fields, and practice fields, and are in good condition.


Recommendations: Replace asphalt on entry drive. Provide asphalt parking in existing gravel lot near baseball fields. Provide asphalt access drive around athleticaddition to cooling tower (also eliminates erosion condition). Provide new wearing course on asphalt lots as required. Replace damaged concretewalks. Provide additional parking spaces to meet OSDM standards.








Sum Comments

Asphalt Paving: $3.00sq.ft.(Qty)

12,745Required

1,262Required

729Required

$44,208.00(including drainage /tear out)

Asphalt Paving / NewWearing Course:

$0.56sq.ft.(Qty)

67,749Required

6,709Required

3,877Required

$43,867.60(includes minor crackrepair in less than 5%paved area)

Existing ParkingSpaces

-$925.00per unit 419 Required -$387,575.00(subtract per existingparking space)

Additional ParkingSpaces Required forHigh

$388.50perstudent

1,075Required

$417,637.50($925 per parkingspace; 0.42 spaces phigh school student)

Concrete Sidewalk: $4.00sq.ft .(Qty)

1,211Required

120Required

69 Required $5,600.00(5 in exterior slab)

Other: PDiscrepancies FromOld Parking SpacesSystem

$462.50lumpsum

Required $462.50P Discrepancies FromOld Parking SpacesSystem

Sum: $124,200.60 $0.00 $111,543.44 $8,023.04 $0.00 $0.00 $4,634.12

Aerial Photo Overview of Site




32/55

Facility Assessment

Q. Sewage System

Description: The sanitary sewer system is tied in to the municipal system in fair condition. No significant system deficiencies were reported by the schooldistrict or noted during the physical assessment.



Item CostUnitWholeBuilding Natatorium(1976)6,793 ft






SumComme

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Manhole Manhole




33/55

Facility Assessment

R. Water Supply

Description: The domestic water supply system is tied in to the municipal system, features 4 inch service, and is in good condition. The auditorium is equippedwith an automated fire suppression system, for which the existing water supply provides adequate support. The remainder of the facility is notequipped with an automated fire suppression system, and the existing water supply will not provide adequate support for a future system. Thedomestic water service is not equipped with a water booster pump, and none is required. The system provides adequate pressure and capacityfor the future needs of the school.










SumComme

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Water Service Entrance Fire Department Connection




34/55

Facility Assessment

S. Exterior Doors

Description: Entrance doors in the original facility are aluminum type construction, mounted on aluminum frames, and in fair condition. Entrance doors featuresingle pane vision panels. Typical exterior doors in the original facility are hollow metal type construction, mounted on hollow metal frames, and infair to poor condition. Typical exterior doors are not equipped with vision panels. Exterior doors in the athletic addition are hollow metal typeconstruction, mounted on hollow metal frames, and in good condition. Entrance doors in the auditorium addition are aluminum type construction,mounted on aluminum frames, and in good condition. Entrance doors feature thermally broken tempered glass vision panels. Typical exteriordoors in the auditorium addition are hollow metal type construction, mounted on hollow metal frames, and in good condition. Typical exteriordoors are not equipped with vision panels. There is an aluminum overhead door in the auditorium addition that is in good condition.

Rating:3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations: Replace the single pane entrance doors in the original building. See item F for transom and sidelight replacement. Replace the original buildingexterior doors that are in poor condition.








Sum Comments

Door Leaf/Frameand Hardware:

$2,000.00perleaf

24 Required $48,000.00(includes remoof existing)

Sum: $48,000.00 $0.00 $48,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Auditorium Addition Exterior Doors Main Entry Door




35/55

Facility Assessment

T. Hazardous Material

Description: The School District provided the AHERA three year reinspection reports, prepared by Paran Consulting Services, Inc., and dated January 2002,documenting known and assumed locations of asbestos and other hazardous materials. Vinyl asbestos floor tile and mastic and Fire doorscontaining hazardous materials are located in the original facility in fair condition. These materials were described in the report to be in non-friablecondition. There are no underground storage tanks on the site. Due to the construction date, there is a potential for lead based paint. Fluorescentlighting will require special disposal.


Recommendations: Remove all hazardous materials, inclusive of asbestos-containing materials in the original facility, as noted in the attached EnvironmentalHazards Assessment. Provide for the testing of paint that has the potential of being lead-based. Provide for disposal of fluorescent lighting.








Sum Comments

Environmental Hazards Form EHA Form EHA Form Resilient Flooring Removal - Incl.Mastic

$3.00sq.ft.(Qty)

28,695Required

0 Required $86,085.00

Estimated Cost For AbatementContractor to Perform LeadMock-Ups

$1.00perunit

5,000Required

0 Required $5,000.00

Special Engineering Fees $1.00perunit

5,000Required

0 Required $5,000.00

Fluorescent Lamps & BallastsRecycling/Incineration

$0.05sq.ft.(Qty)

143,606Required

9,130Required

$7,636.80

Other: EHA ACM Other $1.00perunit

14,000Required

$14,000.00Fire Doors

Other: T Discrepancies from OldEHA System (Renovation only)

$0.50lumpsum

Required $0.50T DiscrepanciesFrom Old EHASystem

Other: T Discrepancies from OldEHA System (Renovation only)

-$0.30lumpsum

Required -$0.30T DiscrepanciesFrom Old EHASystem

Sum: $117,722.00 $0.00 $117,265.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $457.00

Asbestos Core Door Asbestos Tile Floor




36/55

Facility Assessment

U. Life Safety

Description: The original facility and the athletic addition are not equipped with an automated fire suppression system. The auditorium is equipped with a codecompliant fire suppression system. Exit corridors are situated such that dead-end corridors are present in the Level C music area. There areclassrooms that must exit through another room, which is a building code violation. Stair towers are not protected by a two-hour fire enclosure.Guardrails do not meet the 4? ball test as required by the Ohio Building Code. The kitchen hood is equipped with a fire suppression system.There are an adequate number of fire extinguishers that are adequately spaced. The existing water supply is provided by a tie-in to the municipalsystem, and is insufficient to meet the future f ire suppression needs of the school. Rooms with capacity greater than 50 are not all equipped withadequate egress.

Rating:3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations: Provide automated fire suppression system in the original facility and the athletic addition to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines. Thefunding for the fire suppression system includes the cost to increase the water service piping. Provide new handrails and guardrails to meet therequirements of the Ohio Building Code. Provide fire-rated enclosure around existing stair towers. Reprogram existing closet or office area tocorridor and provide a new exterior exit door and exterior stair tower in the upper level music area to eliminate the existing dead-end corridorcondition. Move location of the second egress door in band room C309 to eliminate the existing dead-end corridor condition. Rework walls andprovide appropriate doors in the lower level Art rooms and computer room to eliminate existing code violations for egress through adjoiningrooms. Provide second means of egress doors to the outside in rooms C106 and C104 to meet Ohio Building Code egress requirements forrooms with a capacity of greater than 50 people.




Addition(1999)10,736ft

AuditoriumFixed SeatingAddition (1999)4,546 ft

AuditoriumStage &SuppportAddition (1999)5,066 ft


Sum Comments

Sprinkler / FireSuppression System:

$3.25sq.ft.(Qty)

6,793Required

159,562Required

9,130Required

$570,326.25(includes increase oservice piping, if

required)Interior Stairwell Closure: $5,000.00per level 13 Required $65,000.00(includes associate

doors, door framesand hardware)

New Exterior StairEnclosure

$42,500.00per level 2 Required $85,000.00(all inclusive)

Other:Handrails/Guardrails

$40,000.00allowance Required $40,000.00Replacenon-compliantsystems

Other: Dead EndCorridor

$10,000.00allowance Required $10,000.00Correct as required

Other: ProvideIndependent Egress toCorridor

$16,000.00allowance Required $16,000.00(rework walls toprovide corridor andegressway to room

Sum: $786,326.25 $22,077.25 $734,576.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $29,672.50

Non-Complaint Guardrail System Open Stairwell




37/55

Facility Assessment

V. Loose Furnishings

Description: The typical classroom furniture is mismatched, and in generally fair condition, consisting of student desks & chairs, teacher desk & chair, deskheight file cabinet, computer workstation (varies), bookcases (varies), wastebasket. The facilitys furniture and loose equipment was evaluated initem 6.17 in the CEFPI section of this report, and on a scale of 1 to 10 the facility received a rating of 7 due to observed conditions, and due tothe fact that it lacks some of the Design Manual required elements.


Recommendations: Provide for replacement of outdated or inadequate furniture.








Sum Comme

CEFPIRating 7

$2.00sq.ft. Required Required Required Required Required $381,534.00

Sum: $381,534.00 $13,586.00 $319,124.00 $21,472.00 $9,092.00 $0.00 $18,260.00

Student Desks Loose Equipment




38/55

Facility Assessment

W. Technology

Description: The typical classroom is not equipped with the Ohio School Design Manual required four technology data ports for student use, one data port forteacher use, one voice port with a digitally based phone system, one cable port and monitor. A 2-way PA system that can be initiated by eitherparty does exist. The facility does not contain an instructional delivery center, but computer labs are provided for student use.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of technology systems to meet Ohio School Design Manual requirements.





Auditorium FixedSeating Addition (1999)4,546 ft



Sum Comme

Non-OSDMCompliant:

$5.77sq.ft. Required Required Required Required $1,064,530.38

Sum: $1,064,530.38$0.00 $920,672.74 $61,946.72 $0.00 $29,230.82 $52,680.10

Technology Drop Technology Closet




39/55

Facility Assessment

X. Construction Contingency / Non-Construction Cost

Renovation Costs (A-W) $8,357,349.73

7.00% Construction Contingency $585,014.48

Subtotal $8,942,364.21

16.20% Non-Construction Costs $1,448,663.00

Total Project $10,391,027.21

Construction Contingency $585,014.48

Non-Construction Costs $1,448,663.00

Total for X. $2,033,677.48

Non-Construction Costs Breakdown

Soil Borings 0.03% $2,682.71

Agency Approval Fees 0.20% $17,884.73

Construction Testing 0.15% $13,413.55

Printing 0.30% $26,827.09

Advertising 0.05% $4,471.18

Builders Risk 0.20% $17,884.73

Design Professional Compensation 7.50% $670,677.32

CM Compensation 6.00% $536,541.85

Non-Construction Contingency (includes partnering and mediation services) 1.77% $158,279.85

Total Non-Construction Costs 16.20% $1,448,663.00




40/55

School Facility Appraisal

Name of Appraiser Bill Mentges Date of Appraisal 2004-06-22

Building Name Turpin High

Street Address 2650 Bartels Rd

City/Town, State, Zip Code Cincinnati, OH 45244

Telephone Number(s) 513-232-7770

School District Forest Hills Local SD

Setting: Suburban

Site-Acreage 25 Building Square Footage 195,833

Grades Housed 9-12 Student Capacity 1,173

Number of Teaching Stations 56 Number of Floors 3

Student Enrollment 1075

Dates of Construct ion 1976,1976,1999,1999,1999,2001

Energy Sources: Fuel Oil Gas Electric Solar

Air Conditioning: Roof Top Windows Units Central Room Units

Heating: Central Roof Top Individual Unit Forced Air

Hot Water Steam

Type of Construction

Load bearing masonry

Steel frame

Concrete frame

Wood

Steel Joists

Exterior Surfacing

Brick

Stucco

Metal

Wood

Stone

Floor Construction

Wood Joists

Steel Joists

Slab on grade

Structural slab


Report Generated at 17 May 2005 10:School Facility Appraisal Page 40


41/55

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

1.0 The School Site


Points Allocated Points

1.1 Site is large enough to meet educational needs as defined by state and local requirements 25 10

The 25 acre site, which is shared with Mercer Elementary School, is less than the 46 acres the OSDM recommends based on the current enrollment.

1.2 Site is easily accessible and conveniently located for the present and future population 20 18

The site is located on the north end of the community it serves.

1.3 Location is removed from undesirable business, industry, traffic, and natural hazards 10 8

The site is adjacent to residential surroundings.

1.4 Site is well landscaped and developed to meet educational needs 10 9

The landscaping is mature and well placed.

1.5 ES Well equipped playgrounds are separated from streets and parking areas 10 7

MS Well equipped athletic and intermural areas are separated from streets and parking

HS Well equipped athletic areas are adequate with sufficient solid-surface parking

The site is equipped with a football stadium, track, baseball fields, soccer, and tennis courts which are in fair to good condition. The parking is inadequate.

1.6 Topography is varied enough to provide desirable appearance and without steep inclines 5 2

Steep inclines cause a portion of the site to be unusable.

1.7 Site has stable, well drained soil free of erosion 5 3

Erosion is visible in the rear of the site near the f itness addition.

1.8 Site is suitable for special instructional needs, e.g., outdoor learning 5 2

Site is large enough for outdoor learning, but none exists.

1.9 Pedestrian services include adequate sidewalk with designated crosswalks, curb cuts, and correct slopes 5 3

Sidewalks, crosswalks and curb cuts exist. Some damaged sidewalks require repair. Pedestrian access is limited due to steep slopes.

1.10 ES/MS Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking for faculty and staff is provided 5 3

HS Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking is provided for faculty, students, staff and community

The amount of parking does not meet OSDM standards and the condition requires work.

TOTAL - The School Site 100 65


Report Generated at 17 May 2005 10:CEFPI Ratings Sheet Page 41


42/55

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features


Structural Points Allocated Points

2.1 Structure meets all barrier-free requirements both externally and internally 15 10

ADA requirements are met with regards to entry and vertical circulation, but many other areas require renovation.

2.2 Roofs appear sound, have positive drainage, and are weather tight 15 12

Sloped roofing provides adequate drainage. Evidence of ponding was noted. The District did not report any roof leaks.

2.3 Foundations are strong and stable with no observable cracks 10 9

No cracking was observed in the foundations.

2.4 Exterior and interior walls have sufficient expansion joints and are free of deterioration 10 7

The facility is equipped with sufficient expansion joints, but wall deterioration was still observed.

2.5 Entrances and exits are located so as to permit efficient student traffic flow 10 7

Main building entrances are properly located for the efficient flow of traffic. Athletic entrances are awkwardly located.

2.6 Building envelope generally provides for energy conservation (see criteria) 10 9

Composite masonry walls, insulated roof, and thermally broken windows provide an adequate building envelope.

2.7 Structure is free of friable asbestos and toxic materials 10 6

According to the report provided by the District, hazardous materials exist. See the worksheet at the end of this report for a summary of hazardous materials.

2.8 Interior walls permit sufficient flexibility for a variety of class sizes 10 7

Interior walls are non-bearing drywall partitions which allows for future flexibility.

Mechanical/Electrical Points Allocated Points

2.9 Adequate light sources are well maintained, and properly placed and are not subject to overheating 15 15

Light fixtures appeared to be well maintained and are properly placed so that dark spots were not observed and fixtures are not likely to overheat.

2.10 Internal water supply is adequate with sufficient pressure to meet health and safety requirements 15 12

Water supply is from a municipal system, has a backflow preventer, and has adequate pressure for the current domestic needs of the facility. The service is notsized to adequately supply a future fire suppression system.

2.11 Each teaching/learning area has adequate convenient wall outlets, phone and computer cabling for technologyapplications

15 7

A typical classroom is equipped with 4 electrical outlets, 0 phone, and 3 computer outlets. The facility does not meet the OSDM technology requirements.

Report Generated at 17 May 2005 10:CEFPI Ratings Sheet Page 42


43/55

2.12 Electrical controls are safely protected with disconnect switches easily accessible 10 6

Electrical panels are located in student occupied areas.

2.13 Drinking fountains are adequate in number and placement, and are properly maintained including provisions forthe disabled

10 4

The O.B.C. requires one drinking fountain

Documents

State Assessment, Turpin