State Assessment, Maddux

7/28/2019 State Assessment, Maddux

1/51

Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949)

Program Type: Assessment Only

Setting: Suburban

Assessment Name: 21949-Maddux Elementary-FINAL

Assessment Date: 2004-06-03

Cost Set: 2004

Building Name: Maddux Elem

Building Address: 943 Rosetree Lane

Building City: Cincinnati

Building Zipcode: 45230

Building Phone: 513-231-0780

Acreage: 20

Current Grades: K-6

Teaching Stations: 35

Number of Floors: 2

Student Capacity: 417

Current Enrollment: 617

Enrollment Date: 2003-10-01

Enrollment Date is the date in which the current enrollment was taken.

Number of Classrooms: 28

Historical Register NO

Buildings Principal: Stephen Troehler

Building Type: Elementary/Middle

Current Elementary Enrollment: 533

Current Middle Enrollment: 84

Current High Enrollment: 0

Current Career Technical Enrollment: 0

Next Page

Report Generated at 19 May 2005 06Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949) Page 1


2/51

Building Pictures - Forest Hills Local SD(47340) - Maddux Elem(21949)

North elevation photo: East elevation photo:

South elevation photo: West elevation photo:

GENERAL DESCRIPTION

57,930 Total Existing Square Footage

1966,1993 Building Dates

K-6 Grades

617 Current Enrollment

35 Teaching Stations

20 Site Acreage

Maddux Elementary School, which is not on the National Register of Historic Buildings, is a 1966 2-story, 57,930 square foot brick school building located in a suburban residentsetting. The existing facility does not use modular buildings. The structure of the original building is a steel frame and nonbearing masonry wall construction except for theGymnasium, which is brick veneer on masonry bearing wall. The floor system consists primarily of concrete slab on grade with precast concrete used over the basement area.The roof structure is metal deck and steel joists except for the Gymnasium, which has tectum deck. The structure of the 1994 addition contains bearing masonry exterior andinterior wall construction. The floor system consists of concrete slab on grade. The roof structure is metal deck and steel joists. The roofing system over the original building is

EPDM installed in phases over the past 17 years. The roofing system of the addition is built-up with gravel ballast installed in 1994. The ventilation system of the building isinadequate to meet the needs of the users. The classrooms are slightly smaller than the current standards established by the State of Ohio. Physical Education and StudentDining spaces consist of one Gymnasium and separate Student Dining. The electrical system for the facility is inadequate. The facility is equipped with a security system, but itlacks some of the OSFC standard features. The building has a non-compliant fire alarm system. The facility is not equipped with an automated fire suppression system. Thebuilding is reported to contain asbestos. The overall building is not compliant with ADA accessibility requirements. The school is located on a 20 acre site. The property is notfenced for security. Access onto the site is unrestricted. Site circulation is fair. There is space for school buses to load and unload on the site, which is shared with parking. Parkifor staff, visitors and community events is adequate.

Report Generated at 19 May 2005 06Building Pictures - Forest Hills Local SD(47340) - Maddux Elem(21949) Page 2


3/51

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 19 May 2005 06Building Pictures - Forest Hills Local SD(47340) - Maddux Elem(21949) Page 3


4/51

Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949)

Program Type: Assessment Only

Setting: Suburban

Assessment Name: 21949-Maddux Elementary-FINAL

Assessment Date: 2004-06-03

Cost Set: 2004

Building Name: Maddux Elem

Building Address: 943 Rosetree Lane

Building City: Cincinnati

Building Zipcode: 45230

Building Phone: 513-231-0780

Acreage: 20

Current Grades: K-6

Teaching Stations: 35

Number of Floors: 2

Student Capacity: 417

Current Enrollment: 617

Enrollment Date: 2003-10-01

Enrollment Date is the date in which the current enrollment was taken.

Number of Classrooms: 28

Historical Register NO

Buildings Principal: Stephen Troehler

Building Type: Elementary/Middle

Current Elementary Enrollment: 533

Current Middle Enrollment: 84

Current High Enrollment: 0

Current Career Technical Enrollment: 0

Next Page

Report Generated at 19 May 2005 06Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949) Page 4


5/51

Building Construction Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949)

Name Year Handicapped AccessFloorsSquare Feet

Original Building 1966 no 2 53,520

Classroom Addition 1993 yes 1 4,410

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 19 May 2005 06Building Construction Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949) Page 5


6/51

Building Component Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949)

Addition Auditorium C orridorsAgricultural

Education LabGymnasium

MediaCenter

VocationalSpace

StudentDining

Kitchen Natatorium

Original Building (1966) 8634 3299 1210 2404 1432

Classroom Addition (1993) 597

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 19 May 2005 06Building Component Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949) Page 6


7/51

Career Technical Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949)

No Career Technical Programs Present

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 19 May 2005 06Career Technical Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949) Page 7


8/51

Main Assessment Menu - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949)

Building Summary - Maddux Elem (21949)

District: Forest Hills Local SD

Name: Maddux Elem

Address: 943 Rosetree Lane

Cincinnati,OH 45230

Bldg. IRN: 21949

County: Hamilton Area: Cincinnati (1)

Contact: Stephen Troehler

Phone: 513-231-0780

Date Prepared: 2004-06-03 By: Tony Zircher

Date Revised: 2004-11-16 By: Bill Mentges

Current Grades K-6 Acreage: 20

Proposed Grades N/A Teaching Stations: 35

Current Enrollment 617 Classrooms: 28

Projected Enrollment N/A

Addition Date HA Number of Floors Current Square Feet



Total 57,930

*HA = Handicapped Access

*Rat ing =1 Sat isfactory

=2 Needs Repair

=3 Needs Replacement

*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction

FACILITY ASSESSMENTCost Set: 2004 Rating

DollarAssessment C

A. Heating System 3 $1,245,495.00 -

B. Roofing 3 $238,660.00 -C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning 1 $0.00 -

D. Electrical Systems 3 $537,048.00 -

E. Plumbing and Fixtures 3 $322,020.00 -

F. Windows 2 $3,300.00 -

G. Structure: Foundation 1 $0.00 -

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys 2 $65,180.00 -

I. Structure: Floors and Roofs 1 $0.00 -

J. General Finishes 3 $907,846.00 -

K. Interior Lighting 3 $231,720.00 -

L. Security Systems 2 $92,688.00 -

M. Emergency/Egress Lighting 3 $57,930.00 -

N. Fire Alarm 3 $86,895.00 -

O. Handicapped Access 3 $241,793.00 -

P. Site Condition 2 $197,540.00 -

Q. Sewage System 1 $0.00 -

R. Water Supply 1 $0.00 -

S. Exterior Doors 3 $14,000.00 -

T. Hazardous Material 2 $92,183.00 -

U. Life Safety 3 $203,272.50 -

V. Loose Furnishings 3 $173,790.00 -

W. Technology 3 $334,256.10 -

- X. Construction Contingency /Non-Construction Cost

- $1,227,800.34 -

Total $6,273,416.94

CEFPI Appraisal Summary

Section Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating CategoCover Sheet

1.0The School Site 100 83 83% Satisfacto

2.0Structural and Mechanical Features 200 135 68% Borderl

3.0Plant Maintainability 100 69 69% Borderl

4.0Building Safety and Security 200 154 77% Satisfacto

5.0Educational Adequacy 200 129 65% Borderl

6.0Environment for Education 200 136 68% Borderl

Commentary

Total 1000 706 71% Satisfacto

C=Under Contract

Renovation Cost Factor 100.44

Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied) $6,301,019

The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary irequested from a Master Plan.

Previous Page

Report Generated at 19 May 2005 06Main Assessment Menu - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949) Page 8


9/51


Original Building (1966) Summary


Name: Maddux Elem


Cincinnati,OH 45230

Bldg. IRN: 21949



Phone: 513-231-0780










Total 57,930



=2 Needs Repair




DollarAssessment C





F. Windows 2 $0.00 -








N. Fire Alarm 3 $80,280.00 -







U. Life Safety 3 $188,940.00 -


W. Technology 3 $308,810.40 -


- $1,166,222.84 -

Total $5,958,788.14









Commentary


C=Under Contract






10/51


Classroom Addition (1993) Summary


Name: Maddux Elem


Cincinnati,OH 45230

Bldg. IRN: 21949



Phone: 513-231-0780










Total 57,930


*Rating =1Satisfactory

=2 Needs Repair




DollarAssessment C

A. Heating System 3 $94,815.00 -

B. Roofing 3 $0.00 -C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning 1 $0.00 -


E. Plumbing and Fixtures 3 $0.00 -

F. Windows 2 $3,300.00 -


H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys 2 $0.00 -






N. Fire Alarm 3 $6,615.00 -

O. Handicapped Access 3 $441.00 -





T. Hazardous Material 2 $221.00 -

U. Life Safety 3 $14,332.50 -


W. Technology 3 $25,445.70 -


- $61,577.50 -

Total $314,628.80









Commentary


C=Under Contract



The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary isrequested from a Master Plan.



11/51

Facility Assessment

A. Heating System

Description: The existing system for the overall facility is a gas fired hot water system, installed in 1966, and is in fair condition. The two hot water boilers,manufactured by International, were installed in 1966 (1 rebuilt 4 years ago) and are in fair condition. Heating water is distributed to terminal unitsconsisting of unit ventilators, cabinet heaters, and air handlers. The terminal equipment was installed in 1966 and is in fair condition. The 1993addition is an extension of the original hot water unit ventilator system. The system does not comply with the 15 CFM per person fresh airrequirements of the Ohio Building Code mechanical code and Ohio School Design Manual. The pneumatic system temperature controls wereinstalled in 1966 and are in fair condition. The system does not feature individual temperature controls in all spaces required by the OSDM.Louvered interior doors are a violation of the Ohio Building Code, and interior doors in this facility are louvered to facilitate corridor utilization asreturn air plenums. Louvered doors are replaced in Items J and O. The existing system is not ducted. The overall heating system is evaluated asnot being in safe and efficient working order, and long-term life expectancy of the existing system is not anticipated. The structure is not equippedwith air conditioning. The site does not contain underground fuel tanks.

Rating: 3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations: Provide new overall heating, ventilating, and air conditioning system to achieve compliance with Ohio Building Code and Ohio School DesignManual standards. Provide for a ducted system.

Item Cost Unit WholeBuilding

Original Building(1966)53,520 ft

Classroom Addition(1993)4,410 ft

Sum Comments

HVAC System Replacement:$18.00sq.ft. Required Required $1,042,740.00(includes demo of existing system and reconfiguration of pipinglayout and new controls and air conditioning)

Convert To Ducted SystemReplacement

$3.50sq.ft. Required Required $202,755.00(includes cost for vert. & horz. chases, cut openings, soffi ts, etc.)

Sum: $1,245,495.00 $1,150,680.00 $94,815.00

Gymnasium Air Handler Unit Ventilator

Back to Assessment Summary

Report Generated at 19 May 2005 06:Facility Assessment Page 11


12/51

Facility Assessment

B. Roofing

Description: The roof over the original construction is an EPDM system that was installed in three phases (1987, 1992, 1997) and is in fair condition. Thereare District reports of current leaking in the corner of the gymnasium. Signs of past leaking were observed during the physical assessment. Theroof over the 1993 addition is a built-up system with gravel ballast that was installed in 1993, and is in fair condition. There are no District reportsof current leaking. No signs of past leaking were observed during the physical assessment. Access to the roof was gained by ladder. There wereno observations of standing water on the roof. Roof drains are adequate in number, properly located, and in fair condition.


Recommendations: The roof over the original building requires replacement to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines for age of system.

Item Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Building (1966)53,520 ft

Classroom Addition (1993)4,410 ft

Sum Comments

Membrane (all types):$5.00sq.ft. (Qty) 47,732 Required $238,660.00(unless under 10,000 sq.ft.)

Sum: $238,660.00 $238,660.00 $0.00

EPDM Roof Built-Up Roof




13/51

Facility Assessment

C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning

Description: The overall facility is not equipped with an air conditioning system. Multiple rooftop condensing units serve individual areas such as the computerlab, art, music, and office areas. Units vary in age and condition from good to poor. Window units are provided in the library. The ventilationsystem in the overall facility consists of unit ventilators, installed in 1966 / 1994 and in fair condition, providing fresh air to classrooms, and airhandlers, installed in 1966 and in fair condition, providing fresh air to other miscellaneous spaces such as the gymnasium. Interior doors arelouvered to facilitate corridor utilization as return air plenums. The ventilation system does not meet the Ohio Building Code 15 CFM per occupantfresh air requirement. The overall system is not compliant with Ohio Building Code and Ohio School Design Manual requirements. Dust collectionsystems are not required in this facility. Exhaust systems for restrooms, kitchen, and custodial closets are adequate.

Rating:1 Satisfactory

Recommendations: Provide an air conditioning system to meet with Ohio Building Code and Ohio School Design Manual requirements. Pricing included in Item A.

Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Building (1966)53,520 ft


SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Rooftop Condensing Unit Air Conditioning Unit




14/51

Facility Assessment

D. Electrical Systems

Description: The electrical system provided to the overall facility is a 1600 amp, 120/208 volt, 3 phase, 4 wire system installed in 1966, and is in fair condition.The system in the 1994 addition is an extension of the original construction. Power is provided to the school by a utility owned, pad-mountedtransformer located near the mechanical room, and in fair condition. The panel system, installed in 1966 / 1994, is in fair condition, with limitedcapacity for expansion. The classrooms are not equipped with adequate electrical outlets. The typical classroom contains 4 general purposeoutlets and no dedicated outlet for each classroom television, as well as no dedicated outlets for student and teacher computers. All the spaceshave electrical outlets. The corridors are not equipped with adequate electrical outlets for servicing. There are adequate GFI protected exterioroutlets located around the perimeter of the building. The overall electrical system does not meet Ohio School Design Manual requirements insupporting the current needs of the school, and will be inadequate to meet the facilitys future needs.


Recommendations: The entire electrical system in the original building requires replacement to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines for classroom capacity,due to condition and age, and to accommodate the addition of an air conditioning system. Provide additional panels (circuits / outlets) to increasecapacity for the 1994 addition.




Sum Comments

SystemReplacement:

$9.90sq.ft. Required $529,848.00(includes demo of existing system. Does not include telephone or dacable or equipment)

Additional Circuits: $800.00percircuit

4 Required $3,200.00

AdditionalReceptacles

$250.00each 16 Required $4,000.00

Sum: $537,048.00 $529,848.00 $7,200.00

Main Panels Transformer




15/51

Facility Assessment

E. Plumbing and Fixtures

Description: The service entrance is equipped with a reduced pressure backflow preventer in fair condition. A water treatment system is provided for thedishwasher only and is in fair condition. The domestic water supply piping in the overall facility is copper in fair to poor condition. The waste pipingin the overall facility is cast iron in fair condition. The facility is equipped with four 200 gallon hot water storage tanks that are filled by the boiler.The storage tanks are in fair to poor condition. Hot water is not available when the boilers are not operating. The school contains two restroomsfor boys, two restrooms for girls, and f ive restrooms for staff. Boys restrooms contain 1 ADA and 2 non-ADA wall mounted flush valve toilets, noADA and 7 non-ADA wall mounted flush valve urinals, and 5 ADA and 1 non-ADA wall mounted lavatories. Girls restrooms contain 1 ADA and 6non-ADA wall mounted flush valve toilets, as well as no ADA and 6 non-ADA wall mounted lavatories. Staff restrooms contain 2 ADA and 3non-ADA wall mounted flush valve toilets, no urinals, and 2 ADA and 3 non-ADA wall mounted lavatories. There are 14 individual restroomslocated in the classrooms. Each individual restroom contains a non-ADA wall mounted flush valve toilet. Classrooms are equipped with a sinkwith a bubbler. The facility is equipped with 4 ADA and no non-ADA electric water coolers, in good condition. The school meets the OBCrequirements for fixtures. ADA requirements are not met for fixtures. Drinking fountains are not adequately provided. Adequate exterior wallhydrants are provided. Project laboratories for sixth grade classes are not equipped with the required gas, compressed air, or safety shower/eyewash.


Recommendations: Replace water supply piping in the original facility with new copper piping. See Item O for replacement of fixtures related to ADA requirements.Replace remaining plumbing fixtures due to age, condition and work associated with piping replacement. Remove hot water storage tanks andprovide new hot water heater and hot water piping system. Provide gas, compressed air, and safety shower/eyewash in sixth grade projectlaboratories.




Sum Comments

Domestic Supply Piping: $3.50sq.ft. Required $187,320.00(remove / replace)

Domestic Water Heater: $5,100.00per unit 1 Required $5,100.00(remove / replace)Toilet: $1,500.00unit 23 Required $34,500.00(remove / replace) S

Item OUrinal: $1,500.00unit 6 Required $9,000.00(remove / replace)

Sink: $1,500.00unit 42 Required $63,000.00(remove / replace)HIGH BAY/INDUSTRIAL SPACE - LAB TYPES 5,6,7 - SafetyShower/Eyewash - New Installation

$2,500.00each 1 Required $2,500.00

HIGH BAY/INDUSTRIAL SPACE - LAB TYPES 5,6,7 - Natural GasConnections

$800.00each 7 Required $5,600.00

HIGH BAY/INDUSTRIAL SPACE - LAB TYPES 5,6,7 - CompressedAir Connections

$15,000.00persystem

1 Required $15,000.00

Sum: $322,020.00 $322,020.00 $0.00

Wall Mounted Urinals Classroom Sink with Bubbler




16/51

Facility Assessment

F. Windows

Description: The overall facility is equipped with thermally broken aluminum frame windows with double pane insulated glazing type window system, whichwas installed in 2002, and is in good condition. The exterior doors in the original building are equipped with thermally broken aluminum sidelightsand transoms with double pane insulated glazing, in good condition. The exterior doors in the 1994 addition are equipped with hollow metaltransoms with insulated panel, in poor condition. The school does not contain skylights.

Rating: 2 Needs Repair

Recommendations: Replace window transoms in 1994 addition exterior doors.



Sum Comments

Curtain Wall /Storefront System:$55.00sq.ft. (Qty) 60 Required $3,300.00

Sum: $3,300.00 $0.00 $3,300.00

Original Building Windows 1994 Addition Windows




17/51

Facility Assessment

G. Structure: Foundation

Description: The original facility is equipped with concrete foundation walls on concrete footings, which displayed no locations of major settlement, or leaking.Minor spalling of the concrete foundations occurs at some of the building corners, but the foundations are in overall good condition and require norepair. The 1994 addition is equipped with concrete masonry unit foundation walls on concrete footings, which displayed no locations of majorsettlement, cracking, or leaking, and are in good condition. The District reports that there has been past leaking in the mechanical room due to awater main break.

Rating: 1 Satisfactory

Recommendations: Existing conditions require no renovation or replacement at the present time.



SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Concrete Foundation Wall Concrete Foundation Wall




18/51

Facility Assessment

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys

Description: The classroom portion of the original building is equipped with steel columns and beams that support the roof structure. The original facility has abrick veneer on a masonry bearing wall system (gym), steel frame with brick veneer over nonbearing masonry wall (classroom), which displayedlocations of deterioration, and is in fair condition. The 1994 addition has a brick veneer on a masonry bearing wall system, which displayed nolocations of deterioration, and is in good condition. The exterior masonry appears to have appropriately spaced and adequately caulked controljoints in fair condition. The exterior masonry has not been cleaned and sealed in recent years, and shows evidence of mortar deterioration innumerous locations. Interior walls are primarily concrete masonry units, and are in fair condition. Some minor cracking was noted on classroomwing interior walls. The cracking was attributed, by the District, to the new windows. Some additional cracking was noted in the gymnasium. Thecracking appears to be the result of inadequately spaced control joints. The original building window sills are an element of the aluminum windowsystem, and are in good condition. The 1994 addition window sills are stone and in good condition.


Recommendations: Provide tuckpointing in all areas of mortar deterioration as required in the original building. Provide masonry cleaning and sealing as required inthe original building. Replace severely damaged exterior masonry. Repair gymnasium cracking.




Sum Comments

Tuckpointing: $2.50sq.ft.(Qty)

600 Required $1,500.00(wall sur face)

Exterior Masonry Cleaning: $1.00sq.ft.(Qty)

20,000 Required $20,000.00(wall surface)

Exterior Masonry Sealing: $0.75sq.ft.(Qty)

20,000 Required $15,000.00(wall surface)

Replace Brick VeneerSystem:

$21.00sq.ft.(Qty)

840 Required $17,640.00(total removal and replacement including pinning andshoring)

Install Control Joints $60.00ln.ft. 184 Required $11,040.00

Sum: $65,180.00 $65,180.00 $0.00

Original Building Damaged Exterior Wall




19/51

Facility Assessment

I. Structure: Floors and Roofs

Description: The floor construction of the base floor of the overall facility is concrete slab on grade type construction. The east classroom wing appears tohave experienced some settling over the buildings life. There is no crawl space. The floor construction of the second floor of the original buildingis precast concrete planks with concrete topping type construction, and is in fair condition. The roof construction of the gymnasium volume istectum deck on steel joist type construction, and is in fair condition. The roof construction of the remainder of the facility is metal deck on steeljoist type construction, and is in fair condition.





SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Steel Canopy Framing Concrete Floor Settling




20/51

Facility Assessment

J. General Finishes

Description: The original 1966 building has classrooms with vinyl asbestos tile (VAT) flooring, acoustic ceiling tile (ACT) type ceilings, and concrete masonryunit (CMU) type wall finishes all in fair to poor condition. Corridors are terrazzo and VCT type flooring, ACT type ceilings, and CMU type wallfinishes all in fair condition. The restrooms have ceramic tile flooring, ACT type ceilings, and CMU type wall finishes all in fair condition. The 1994addition has classrooms and corridors with VCT type flooring, ACT type ceilings, and CMU type wall finishes all in fair to poor condition. Therestrooms have VCT type flooring, ACT type ceilings, and CMU type wall finishes all in fair condition. Classroom casework throughout is woodtype construction with plastic laminate countertops. Casework is inadequately provided, and in poor condition in the original building andadequately provided, and in good condition in the 1994 addition. Typical Classroom chalkboards, markerboards, and tackboards are in faircondition but are not adequately provided. Classrooms have storage cubbies adequately provided, and in fair condition. The Gymnasium spacehas VCT type flooring, exposed tectum ceilings, and CMU type wall finishes all in poor condition. Gymnasium mobile stands are in fair condition.The facility is equipped with wood louvered interior doors in fair to poor condition. The toilet partitions are metal type construction, and are in faircondition. Student Dining has VAT type flooring, ACT type ceilings, and CMU type wall finishes all in fair to poor condition. The existing kitchen isfull service. The existing kitchen equipment is original to the buildings construction and in fair condition. Glass in display cases and interiorsidelights did not appear to be safety rated.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of finishes and casework in the original building due to condition and installation of systems outlined in Items A, C,D, E, K, N, T, and U. Provide complete replacement of finishes in the 1994 addition due to condition and installation of systems outlined in ItemsA, C, K, N, and U. Replace kitchen equipment due to age and condition. Replace interior doors due to louvers and condition. (See item O forcost). Replace toilet partitions due to condition and to installation of f ixtures outlined in item O. Replace non-compliant wood partitions. Providesafety rated glass in display cases and interior sidelights.



ClassroomAddition (1993)4,410 ft

Sum Comments

Toilet Partitions: $750.00per

stall

4 Required $3,000.00(removing and replacing)

Toilet AccessoryReplacement

$0.20sq.ft. Required $10,704.00(per bui lding area)

Demo and Reinstall DrywallPartitions:

$3.50sq.ft.(Qty)

1,900 Required $6,650.00

Total Kitchen EquipmentReplacement:

$105.00sq.ft.(Qty)

1,432 Required $150,360.00(square footage based upon only area of food preparation, serving,kitchen storage areas and walk-ins. Includes demolition and removal oexisting kitchen equipment)

Other: Complete replacementof finishes and casework

$12.85sq.ft.(Qty)

45,874 Required $589,480.90Elementary

Other: Complete replacementof finishes and casework

$13.10sq.ft.(Qty)

7,646 Required $100,162.60Middle

Other: Complete replacementof finishes

$10.30sq.ft.(Qty)

3,780 Required $38,934.00Elementary

Other: Complete replacementof finishes

$10.60sq.ft.(Qty)

630 Required $6,678.00Middle

Other: Safety Glazing $13.90sq.ft.(Qty)

135 Required $1,876.50Replace plate glass in display cases and interior sidelights

Sum: $907,846.00 $862,234.00 $45,612.00

Media Center Gymnasium



21/51




22/51

Facility Assessment

K. Interior Lighting

Description: The typical classrooms in the original facility are equipped with T-8 surface mounted fluorescent fixtures with dual level switching. Classroomfixtures are in fair condition and provide an average illumination of 65 FC, thus complying with the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. Thetypical classrooms in the 1994 addition are equipped with T-8 2 x 4 lay-in fluorescent fixtures with dual level switching. Classroom fixtures are infair condition and provide an average illumination of 60 FC, thus complying with the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. The typical corridors inthe overall facility are equipped with T-8 lay-in or 2x4 surface mounted fluorescent fixtures. Corridor fixtures are in fair condition and provide anaverage illumination of 45 FC, thus complying with the 20 FC recommended by the OSDM. The gymnasium is equipped with pendant HID typelighting, in fair to poor condition, and providing an average illumination of 30 FC, which is less than the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. TheMedia Center is equipped with surface mount T-8 fluorescent fixture type lighting in fair condition, and providing an average illumination of 68 FC,thus complying with the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. The student dining spaces are equipped with pendant mounted T-8 fluorescentfixture type lighting in fair condition, and providing an average illumination of 26 FC, which is less than the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM.The service areas in the overall facility are equipped with T-8 fluorescent fixture type lighting in fair condition. The typical administrative spaces inthe overall facility are equipped with surface mount T-8 fluorescent fixture type lighting in fair condition, and providing inadequate illuminationbased on OSDM requirements. The overall lighting systems of the facility are not fully compliant with Ohio School Design Manual requirementsdue to age, condition, and due to inadequate lighting levels.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of lighting system due to condition, lighting levels and installation of systems outlined in Items A, C, and U.



Sum Comments

Complete Building Lighting Replacement$4.00sq.ft. Required Required $231,720.00

Sum: $231,720.00 $214,080.00 $17,640.00

Classroom Lighting Additional Classroom Lighting




23/51

Facility Assessment

L. Security Systems

Description: The overall facility contains a Z1100 type security system in fair condition. Motion detectors are adequately provided in offices, corridors, andspaces where 6 or more computers are located. Some exterior doors are equipped with door contacts. An automatic visitor control system is notprovided. CCTV cameras are provided at main entry areas, parking lots, central gathering areas, and main corridors. CCTV is monitored inadministrative area with the use of TV, VCR, and multiplexer. The security system is not fully compliant with Ohio School Design Manualguidelines. The exterior site lighting system is equipped primarily with surface mounted metal halide entry lights in fair to poor condition. Parkingand bus pick-up / drop off areas are illuminated by pole mounted metal halide fixtures in fair condition. The exterior site lighting system providesadequate coverage, but some fixtures appear damaged.

Rating:2 Needs Repair

Recommendations: Provide partial security system upgrade, to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines. Provide replacement of exterior site lighting system, tomeet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines.



Sum Comments

Partial Security System Upgrade:$1.10sq.ft. Required Required $63,723.00(complete, area of building)Exterior Site Lighting: $0.50sq.ft. Required Required $28,965.00building

Sum: $92,688.00 $85,632.00 $7,056.00

Damaged Exterior Light Camera Monitoring System




24/51

Facility Assessment

M. Emergency/Egress Lighting

Description: The overall facility is equipped with an emergency egress lighting system consisting of illuminated exit signs and emergency floodlighting. Thesystem is in fair condition, and is provided with appropriate battery backup. The system is adequately provided throughout, and meets OhioSchool Design Manual requirements.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of emergency / egress lighting system due to work outlined in items J, K, and U.



Sum Comments

Emergency/Egress Lighting:$1.00sq.ft. Required Required $57,930.00(w/ battery pack)

Sum: $57,930.00 $53,520.00 $4,410.00

Egress Lighting Egress Lighting




25/51

Facility Assessment

N. Fire Alarm

Description: The overall facility is equipped with a fire alarm system in fair condition, consisting of manual pull stations, horn and strobe indicating devices.The system is automatic and is monitored by a third party. The system is not equipped with sufficient flow switches, tamper switches, smokedetectors, or heat sensors. The system is not adequately provided throughout. The system is not fully compliant with Ohio Building Code, NFPA,and Ohio School Design Manual requirements.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of fire alarm system to meet NFPA and Ohio School Design Manual guidelines.



Sum Comments

Fire Alarm System:$1.50sq.ft. Required Required $86,895.00(complete new system, including removal of existing)

Sum: $86,895.00 $80,280.00 $6,615.00

Fire Alarm Panel Horn Strobe Indicating Device




26/51

Facility Assessment

O. Handicapped Access

Description: The exterior entrances are ADA accessible. Access from the parking / drop-off area to the building entries is not compromised by steps or steepramps. Adequate handicap parking is provided. Exterior doors are equipped with ADA hardware. The main entry is not equipped with an ADApower assist door. Special provisions for floor level changes in this two story structure have been addressed with the addition of a singleoccupant elevator. Access to the stage is facilitated by a ramp. Some interior doors in the original building are recessed, and are not providedadequate clearances. Interior doors in the original building are not provided with ADA-compliant hardware. 8 ADA-compliant toilets are required,and 4 are currently provided. 8 ADA-compliant lavatories are required, and 3 are currently provided. 4 ADA-compliant urinals are required, andnone are currently provided. 7 ADA-compliant electric water coolers are required, and 4 are currently provided. Toilet partitions are metal, andprovide appropriate ADA clearances. ADA-compliant accessories are not adequately provided throughout. ADA signage is not provided on boththe interior and the exterior of the building.


Recommendations: Provide ADA-compliant signage, power assist door opener, electric water coolers, toilets, sinks, urinals, toilet partitions, toilet accessories, doorsand frames in the original facility to facilitate the schools meeting of ADA requirements. Parking issues are corrected in Item P.




Sum Comments

Signage: $0.10sq.ft. Required Required $5,793.00(per building area)Electric WaterCoolers:

$3,000.00unit 3 Required $9,000.00(new double ADA)

Toilet/Urinals/Sinks: $1,500.00unit 13 Required $19,500.00(replacement ADA)Toilet Parti tions: $1,000.00stall 2 Required $2,000.00(ADA - grab bars, accessories included)

ADA Assist Door &Frame:

$7,500.00unit 1 Required $7,500.00(openers, electrical, patching, etc)

Replace Doors: $1,500.00leaf 80 Required $120,000.00(standard 3070 wood door, HM frame-classroom door/light, includes hardwareReplace Doors: $3,000.00leaf 16 Required $48,000.00(rework narrow opening to provide 3070 wood door, HM frame, door/light,

includes hardware)

Replace Doors: $3,750.00leaf 8 Required $30,000.00(rework opening and corridor wall to accommodate ADA standards when dooropening is set back from edge of corridor and cannot accommodate awheelchair. See diagram)

Sum: $241,793.00 $241,352.00 $441.00

Compliant Restroom Elevator




27/51

Facility Assessment

P. Site Condition

Description: The 20 acre gently sloping site is located in a suburban residential setting with generous tree and shrub type landscaping. There are no apparentproblems with erosion or ponding. The site is bordered by lightly traveled city streets. A single entrance then breaks into separate parking andbus loading areas allowing for proper separation of bus and other vehicular traffic, and one-way bus traffic is provided. Staff, and visitor parking isfacilitated by a 91 space asphalt parking lot in good condition, which provides adequate parking for staff members, visitors, and the disabled. Theparking lot drainage design, consisting of proper slopes and catch basins, provides adequate evacuation of storm water, and no problems withparking lot ponding were observed. Concrete curbs in fair to poor condition are appropriately placed. The front concrete sidewalks are properlysloped, are located to provide a logical flow of pedestrian traffic, and are in fair condition. The rear concrete sidewalks are somewhat steep, arelocated to provide a logical flow of pedestrian traffic, and are in fair condition. The site is not fenced for security. Separation of playground areasfrom vehicular traffic is moderate. The playground equipment is in fair condition, and on a combination of hard and soft surfaces. The athleticfacilities are comprised of a baseball field and soccer nets, and are in fair condition.


Recommendations: Provide new asphalt wearing course over entry drive and bus loop area. Replace damaged concrete curb. Replace miscellaneous damagedconcrete walks. Replace outdated playground equipment.




Sum Comments

Playground Equipment: $1.50sq.ft.(Qty)

18,477 Required 1,523 Required $30,000.00(up to $100,000, per sq.ft. of school)

Removal of existing Playground Equipment: $5,000.00lump sum Required $5,000.00Asphalt Paving / New Wearing Course: $0.56sq.ft.

(Qty)28,640 Required 2,360 Required $17,360.00(includes minor crack repair in less than 5% of

paved area)

Concrete Curb: $15.00ln.ft. 795 Required 65 Required $12,900.00(new)Concrete Sidewalk: $4.00sq.ft.

(Qty)462 Required 38 Required $2,000.00(5 in exterior slab)

Base Sitework Allowance for UnforeseenCircumstances

$50,000.00allowance Required $50,000.00Include this and one of the next two. (Applies fowhole building, so only one addition should havthis item)

Sitework Allowance for UnforeseenCircumstances for buildings between 0 SF and100,000 SF

$1.50sq.ft. Required $80,280.00Include this one or the next. (Each addition shohave this item)

Sum: $197,540.00 $192,806.90 $4,733.10

Entry Drive Outdoor Classroom




28/51

Facility Assessment

Q. Sewage System

Description: The sanitary sewer system is tied into the municipal system in good condition. No significant system deficiencies were reported by the SchoolDistrict or noted during the physical assessment.



Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Building (1966)53,520 ft Classroom Addition (1993)4,410 ft SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Sanitary Lines Manhole




29/51

Facility Assessment

R. Water Supply

Description: The domestic water supply system is tied in to the municipal system, features 4 service, and is in good condition. The facility is not equipped withan automated fire suppression system, and the existing water supply will not provide adequate support for a future system. The domestic waterservice is not equipped with a water booster pump, and none is required. The system provides adequate pressure and capacity for the futuredomestic needs of the school.





SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Service Entrance




30/51

Facility Assessment

S. Exterior Doors

Description: Typical exterior doors in the original facility are either aluminum or hollow metal type construction, mounted on corresponding frames, and in fairto poor condition. Entrance doors in the original facility are aluminum type construction, mounted on aluminum frames, and in good condition.Entrance doors feature thermally broken tempered glass vision panels. One coiling overhead door is in fair condition. Typical exterior doors in the1994 addition are hollow metal type construction, mounted on hollow metal frames, and in poor condition. Typical exterior doors feature singlepane vision panels. Entrance doors in the 1994 addition are hollow metal type construction, mounted on hollow metal frames, and in faircondition. Entrance doors feature single pane vision panels.


Recommendations: Replace 3 exterior doors in the original building and 4 exterior doors in the 1994 addition, due to poor condition.



Sum Comments

Door Leaf/Frame and Hardware:$2,000.00per leaf 3 Required 4 Required $14,000.00(includes removal of existing)

Sum: $14,000.00 $6,000.00 $8,000.00

HM Door in Addition Aluminum Entrance Door




31/51

Facility Assessment

T. Hazardous Material

Description: The School District provided the AHERA three year reinspection reports, prepared by Paran Consulting Services, and dated January 2002,documenting known and assumed locations of asbestos and other hazardous materials. Vinyl asbestos floor tile and mastic, heater mastic, and atransite tabletop containing hazardous materials are located in the original building in fair condition. These materials were described in the reportto be in non-friable condition. There are no underground storage tanks on the site. Due to the construction date, there is a potential for leadbased paint. Fluorescent lighting will require special disposal.


Recommendations: Remove all hazardous materials, inclusive of asbestos-containing materials in the original building, as noted in the attached EnvironmentalHazards Assessment. Provide for the testing of paint that has the potential of being lead-based. Provide for disposal of fluorescent lighting.




Sum Comments

Environmental Hazards Form EHA Form EHA Form

Resilient Flooring Removal - Incl. Mastic $3.00sq.ft.(Qty)

24,940 Required 0 Required $74,820.00

Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform LeadMock-Ups

$1.00per unit 5,000 Required 0 Required $5,000.00

Special Engineering Fees $1.00per unit 5,000 Required 0 Required $5,000.00

Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Recycling/Incineration $0.05sq.ft.(Qty)

50,844 Required 4,410 Required $2,762.70

Other: EHA ACM Other $1.00per unit 4,600 Required $4,600.00heater Mastic & countertop

Other: T Discrepancies from Old EHA System (Renovationonly)

$0.50lumpsum

Required $0.50T Discrepancies From Old EHASystem

Other: T Discrepancies from Old EHA System (Renovationonly) -$0.20lumpsum Required -$0.20T Discrepancies From Old EHASystemSum: $92,183.00 $91,962.00 $221.00

Vinyl Asbestos Floor Tile Asbestos Countertop




32/51

Facility Assessment

U. Life Safety

Description: The overall facility is not equipped with an automated fire suppression system. Exit corridors are situated such that dead-end corridors are notpresent. Stair towers are not protected by a two hour fire enclosure. Guardrails are constructed with vertical bars with less than 4 inch clearanceas required by the Ohio Building Code. The kitchen hood is equipped with a fire suppression system. There is an adequate number of fireextinguishers that are adequately spaced. The existing water supply is provided by a tie-in to the municipal system, and is insufficient to meet thefuture fire suppression needs of the school. Rooms with capacity greater than 50 are equipped with adequate egress.


Recommendations: Provide a new automated fire suppression system to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines. The required service piping increase for thefire suppression system is included in the cost table pricing. Provide new handrails to meet the requirements of the Ohio Building Code. Providefire-rated enclosure around existing stair tower.




Sum Comments

Sprinkler / Fire SuppressionSystem:

$3.25sq.ft.(Qty)

53,520 Required 4,410 Required $188,272.50(includes increase of service piping, i f required)

Interior Stai rwell Closure: $5,000.00per level 1 Required $5,000.00(includes associated doors, door frames andhardware)

Handrails: $5,000.00level 2 Required $10,000.00Sum: $203,272.50 $188,940.00 $14,332.50

Kitchen Hood Unprotected Stair Tower




33/51

Facility Assessment

V. Loose Furnishings

Description: The typical classroom furniture is mismatched, and in generally fair condition, consisting of student desks & chairs, teacher desk & chair, readingtable, computer workstation, bookcases, and wastebasket. The facilitys furniture and loose equipment was evaluated in item 6.17 in the CEFPIsection of this report, and on a scale of 1 to 10 the facility received a rating of 6 due to observed conditions, and due to the fact that it lacks someof the Design Manual required elements.


Recommendations: Provide for replacement of outdated or inadequate furniture.



Sum Comments

CEFPI Rating 6$3.00sq.ft. Required Required $173,790.00

Sum: $173,790.00 $160,560.00 $13,230.00

Cafeteria Furniture Music Furniture




34/51

Facility Assessment

W. Technology

Description: The typical classroom is not equipped with the required four technology data ports for student use, one data port for teacher use, one voice portwith a digitally based phone system, one cable port and monitor to meet Ohio School Design Manual requirements. A 2-way PA system that canbe initiated by either party does not exist. The facility does contain a media distribution center, and provides computer labs for use by students.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of technology systems to meet Ohio School Design Manual requirements.



Sum Comments

Non-OSDM Compliant:$5.77sq.ft. Required Required $334,256.10

Sum: $334,256.10 $308,810.40 $25,445.70

Technology Closet Typical Technology Outlet




35/51

Facility Assessment

X. Construction Contingency / Non-Construction Cost

Renovation Costs (A-W) $5,045,616.60

7.00% Construction Contingency $353,193.16

Subtotal $5,398,809.76

16.20% Non-Construction Costs $874,607.18

Total Project $6,273,416.94

Construction Contingency $353,193.16

Non-Construction Costs $874,607.18

Total for X. $1,227,800.34

Non-Construction Costs Breakdown

Soil Borings 0.03% $1,619.64

Agency Approval Fees 0.20% $10,797.62

Construction Testing 0.15% $8,098.21

Printing 0.30% $16,196.43

Advertising 0.05% $2,699.40

Builders Risk 0.20% $10,797.62

Design Professional Compensation 7.50% $404,910.73

CM Compensation 6.00% $323,928.59

Non-Construction Contingency (includes partnering and mediation services) 1.77% $95,558.93

Total Non-Construction Costs 16.20% $874,607.18




36/51

School Facility Appraisal

Name of Appraiser Bill Mentges Date of Appraisal 2004-06-03

Building Name Maddux Elem

Street Address 943 Rosetree Lane

City/Town, State, Zip Code Cincinnati, OH 45230

Telephone Number(s) 513-231-0780

School District Forest Hills Local SD

Setting: Suburban

Site-Acreage 20 Building Square Footage 57,930

Grades Housed K-6 Student Capacity 417

Number of Teaching Stations 35 Number of Floors 2

Student Enrollment 617

Dates of Construction 1966,1993

Energy Sources: Fuel Oil Gas Electric Solar

Air Conditioning: Roof Top Windows Units Central Room Units

Heating: Central Roof Top Individual Unit Forced Air

Hot Water Steam

Type of Construction

Load bearing masonry

Steel frame

Concrete frame

Wood

Steel Joists

Exterior Surfacing

Brick

Stucco

Metal

Wood

Stone

Floor Construction

Wood Joists

Steel Joists

Slab on grade

Structural slab


Report Generated at 19 May 2005 06:School Facility Appraisal Page 36


37/51

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

1.0 The School Site


Points Allocated Points

1.1 Site is large enough to meet educational needs as defined by state and local requirements 25 20

The 20 acre site is smaller than the 26.5 acres recommended by OSDM for a combination school per current enrollment.

1.2 Site is easily accessible and conveniently located for the present and future population 20 17

The site is centered within the population it serves and allows for many walking students.

1.3 Location is removed from undesirable business, industry, traffic, and natural hazards 10 9

The site has residential surroundings.

1.4 Site is well landscaped and developed to meet educational needs 10 8

The landscaping is mature and well placed.

1.5 ES Well equipped playgrounds are separated from streets and parking areas 10 8

MS Well equipped athletic and intermural areas are separated from streets and parking

HS Well equipped athletic areas are adequate with sufficient solid-surface parking

The playground is well equipped with hard and soft surfaces available which are away from traffic. One piece of equipment is an older wood device that causessplinters.

1.6 Topography is varied enough to provide desirable appearance and without steep inclines 5 4

Gently sloping site provides desirable appearance.

1.7 Site has stable, well drained soil free of erosion 5 5

Soil is free from erosion and appears to be stable.

1.8 Site is suitable for special instructional needs, e.g., outdoor learning 5 5

An outdoor classroom is available.

1.9 Pedestrian services include adequate sidewalk with designated crosswalks, curb cuts, and correct slopes 5 3

Front sidewalks correctly sloped, crosswalks, and curb cuts exist. Some sidewalks toward Weatherridge Avenue limit pedestrian access due to steep slopes.

1.10 ES/MS Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking for faculty and staff is provided 5 4

HS Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking is provided for faculty, students, staff and community

Sufficient solid surface parking exists and is in good condition.

TOTAL - The School Site 100 83


Report Generated at 19 May 2005 06:CEFPI Ratings Sheet Page 37


38/51

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features


Structural Points Allocated Points

2.1 Structure meets all barrier-free requirements both externally and internally 15 9

ADA requirements are met with regards to entry and vertical circulation but many other areas require revision.

2.2 Roofs appear sound, have positive drainage, and are weather tight 15 10

Low slope roofing provides adequate drainage. The District did not report any roof leaks.

2.3 Foundations are strong and stable with no observable cracks 10 8

Minor cracking was observed in the foundations.

2.4 Exterior and interior walls have sufficient expansion joints and are free of deterioration 10 7

The facility is equipped with sufficient expansion joints, but minor wall deterioration was still observed.

2.5 Entrances and exits are located so as to permit efficient student traffic flow 10 9

Building entrances are properly located for the efficient flow of traffic.

2.6 Building envelope generally provides for energy conservation (see criteria) 10 7

Composite masonry walls with poured insulation, insulated roof, and thermally broken windows provide an adequate building envelope.

2.7 Structure is free of friable asbestos and toxic materials 10 6

According to the report provided by the District, hazardous materials exist. See the worksheet at the end of this report for a summary of hazardous materials.

2.8 Interior walls permit sufficient flexibility for a variety of class sizes 10 9

Folding partitions are available for varying class sizes.

Mechanical/Electrical Points Allocated Points

2.9 Adequate light sources are well maintained, and properly placed and are not subject to overheating 15 11

Light fixtures appeared to be well maintained. Darks spots were not observed.

2.10 Internal water supply is adequate with sufficient pressure to meet health and safety requirements 15 7

Water supply is from a municipal system, has a backflow preventer, and has adequate pressure for domestic service, but is insufficient for future fire suppression.

2.11 Each teaching/learning area has adequate convenient wall outlets, phone and computer cabling for technologyapplications

15 6

A typical classroom is equipped with 4 electrical outlets, 0 phone, and 3 computer outlets. The facility does not meet the OSDM technology requirements.

2.12 Electrical controls are safely protected with disconnect switches easily accessible 10 8



39/51

Locked electrical panels are located in student occupied areas.

2.13 Drinking fountains are adequate in number and placement, and are properly maintained including provisions for thedisabled

10 7

The O.B.C. requires one drinking fountain per 100 students. The building capacity requires 6 drinking fountains. The existing facility has 4 drinking fountains. ADArequires that 50 percent of drinking fountains be accessible. 4 of the drinking fountains are accessible.

2.14 Number and size of restrooms meet requirements 10 8

The O.B.C. requires that restrooms be located on every floor and that the maximum travel distance shall not exceed 500 feet. The facility meets the requirement.The size of the restrooms is such that ADA access is achievable.

2.15 Drainage systems are properly maintained and meet requirements 10 9

The waste piping is cast iron. The District reported that no problems existed with the drainage system.

2.16 Fire alarms, smoke detectors, and sprinkler systems are properly maintained and meet requirements 10 2

The fire alarm system does not meet current code requirements. Detection devices are not properly located. There is no sprinkler system.

2.17 Intercommunication system consists of a central unit that allows dependable two-way communication betweenthe office and instructional areas

10 8

The PA system provides two way communication that can be initiated from either party.

2.18 Exterior water supply is sufficient and available for normal usage 5 4

Hose bibbs are located near areas where water is needed.

TOTAL - Structural and Mechanical Features 200 135




40/51

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

3.0 Plant Maintainability


Points Allocated Points

3.1 Windows, doors, and walls are of material and finish requiring minimum maintenance 15 12

Aluminum windows, aluminum, steel, wood doors and CMU walls require moderate maintenance.

3.2 Floor surfaces throughout the building require minimum care 15 10

Typical classrooms have vinyl asbestos or vinyl composite tile flooring. Typical corridors have vinyl asbestos tile or terrazzo flooring. Typical restrooms have ceramictile or vinyl composite tile flooring.

3.3 Ceilings and walls throughout the building, including service areas, are easily cleaned and resistant to stain 10 7

The lay-in acoustic ceiling panels are not resistant to stain and must be replaced when damaged. Painted wall surfaces are cleaned easily.

3.4 Built-in equipment is designed and constructed for ease of maintenance 10 5

Built-in equipment is constructed of plastic laminate and wood which requires maintenance.

3.5 Finishes and hardware, with compatible keying system, are of durable quality 10 6

The hardware does not have a quality finish and is not ADA accessible. Keying system is adequate.

3.6 Restroom fixtures are wall mounted and of quality finish 10 6

Toilets are wall mounted flush valve. Urinals are wall mounted flush valve. Lavatories are wall mounted. ADA requirements are met in four restrooms. The fixtures arein fair condition.

3.7 Adequate custodial storage space with water and drain is accessible throughout the building 10 6

Custodial closets with mop sink are available throughout the building. Storage is limited.

3.8 Adequate electrical outlets and power, to permit routine cleaning, are available in every area 10 9

Electrical outlets are located as required for cleaning.

3.9 Outdoor light fixtures, electrical outlets, equipment, and other fixtures are accessible for repair and replacement 10 8

Outdoor light fixtures provide adequate light levels in all areas. Outdoor mechanical equipment is easily accessible.

TOTAL - Plant Maintainability 100 69




41/51

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

4.0 Building Safety and Security


Site Safety Points Allocated Points

4.1 Student loading areas are segregated from other vehicular traffic and pedestrian walkways 15 12

The facility is equipped with a separate bus loop.

4.2 Walkways, both on and offsite, are available for safety of pedestrians 10 7

Correctly sloped sidewalks, with crosswalks and curb cuts exist in the front of the facility. Pedestrian access is limited due to steep slopes on the WeatherridgeAvenue entrance.

4.3 Access streets have sufficient signals and signs to permit safe entrance to and exit from school area 5 4

School signs are provided to permit safe site access.

4.4 Vehicular entrances and exits permit safe traffic flow 5 4

Single entrance separates into bus loop/delivery/parking area.

4.5 ES Playground equipment is free from hazard 5 4

MS Location and types of intramural equipment are free from hazard

HS Athletic field equipment is properly located and is free from hazard

The playground is well equipped with hard and soft surfaces available which are away f rom traffic.

Building Safety Points Allocated Points

4.6 The heating unit(s) is located away from student occupied areas 20 15

The mechanical room is located away from student areas. Unit ventilators are located in student occupied areas.

4.7 Multi-story buildings have at least two stairways for student egress 15 5

Stairways exist to provide the amount of egress required, but they are not in fire rated enclosures per code requirements.

4.8 Exterior doors open outward and are equipped with panic hardware 10 10

Exterior doors open outward per O.B.C. requirements and have panic hardware.

4.9 Emergency lighting is provided throughout the entire building with exit signs on separate electrical

circuits

10 8

The exit lighting is powered by battery backup.

4.10 Classroom doors are recessed and open outward 10 7

Most classroom doors are recessed with allowable ADA clearances. Doors open outward. Doors are louvered as a function of the mechanical system corridor returnair plenum which is a code violation. Some doors did not have allowable ADA clearances.



42/51

4.11 Building security systems are provided to assure uninterrupted operation of the educational program 10 8

The facility is equipped with a security system with the following features: cameras, CCTV, motion detectors, and door contacts.

4.12 Flooring (including ramps and stairways) is maintained in a non-slip condition 5 4

The stairs do not have non-slip pads. The entry doors did not have step off mats.

4.13 Stair risers (interior and exterior) do not exceed 6 1/2 inches and range in number from 3 - 16 5 5

The stair risers measure 7 inches and typically fall into the acceptable range.

4.14 Glass is properly located and protected with wire or safety material to prevent accidental student injury 5 2

Glass in interior doors, display cases, and exterior door assembly did not appear to be properly protected.

4.15 Fixed Projections in the traffic areas do not extend more than eight inches from the corridor wall 5 4

Drinking fountains extend more than the allowable dimension.

4.16 Traffic areas terminate at an exit or a stairway leading to an egress 5 5

There are no dead end corridors in the facility.

Emergency Safety Points Allocated Points

4.17 Adequate fire safety equipment is properly located 15 15

The number of fire extinguishers appears to meet the requirements. The kitchen hood is equipped with a fire suppression system.

4.18 There are at least two independent exits from any point in the building 15 10

Rooms with capacity greater than 50 persons are equipped with two exits. There are no dead end corridors in the facility. Classrooms that are divided with foldingpartitions, when opened, have a capacity greater than 50 persons and exits are not remote from one another to meet code.

4.19 Fire-resistant materials are used throughout the structure 15 15

The entire building structure is constructed with non-combustible materials.

4.20 Automatic and manual emergency alarm system with a distinctive sound and flashing light is provided 15 10

An emergency alarm system exists, but it is not equipped with all of the code required indicating devices.

TOTAL - Building Safety and Security 200 154




43/51

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

5.0 Educational Adequacy


Academic Learning Space Points Allocated Points

5.1 Size of academic learning areas meets desirable standards 25 20

The average size of classrooms is 876 s.f. compared to 900 s.f. recommended by the OSDM.

5.2 Classroom space permits arrangements for small group activity 15 10

The classrooms are of moderate size allowing for somewhat affective small group arrangements.

5.3 Location of academic learning areas is near related educational activities and away from disruptive noise 10 9

Most classrooms are remote from rooms with noisy functions.

5.4 Personal space in the classroom away from group instruction allows privacy time for individual students 10 4

No designated personal space is present.

5.5 Storage for student materials is adequate 10 8

Cubby areas are available for the storage of elementary student supplies. Condition is fair.

5.6 Storage for teacher materials is adequate 10 5

Some casework is provided for teacher material storage. Condition is fair.

Special Learning Space Points Allocated Points

5.7 Size of special learning area(s) meets standards 15 12

The average size of special education areas is similar to that recommended by the OSDM.

5.8 Design of specialized learning area(s) is compatible with instructional need 10 7

Very few special education provisions are made. Special education classrooms similar to standard classrooms.

5.9 Library/Resource/Media Center provides appropriate and attractive space 10 6

Space is cluttered and not well layed out.

5.10 Gymnasium (or covered P.E. area) adequately serves physical education instruction 5 3

The existing gym is 3,299 s.f. compared to the 3,500 s.f. recommended by the OSDM.

5.11 ES Pre-kindergarten and kindergarten space is appropriate for age of students and nature of instruction 10 9

MS/HS Science program is provided sufficient space and equipment

The average size of kindergarten classrooms is 1,100 compared to 1,200 s.f. recommended by the OSDM.



44/51

5.12 Music Program is provided adequate sound treated space 5 3

The size of the music room is less than the OSDM recommendation. Sound treatment is fair.

5.13 Space for art is appropriate for special instruction, supplies, and equipment 5 4

The size of the art room is less than the OSDM recommendation. Equipment is in good condition.

School Facility Appraisal Points Allocated Points

5.14 Space for technology education permits use of state-of-the-art equipment 5 3

Computer labs are too small for proper arrangement of stations.

5.15 Space for small groups and remedial instruction is provided adjacent to classrooms 5 3

Small project rooms are located near classrooms.

5.16 Storage for student and teacher material is adequate 5 3

Cubby areas are available for the storage of elementary student supplies. Condition is fair. Inadequate casework is provided for teacher material storage. Conditionis fair.

Support Space Points Allocated Points

5.17 Teachers lounge and work areas reflect teachers as professionals 10 4

Teachers lounge is small with dated furnishings and finishes.

5.18 Cafeteria/Kitchen is attractive with sufficient space for seating/dining, delivery, storage, and food preparation 10 4

The kitchen is significantly smaller than the OSDM standards. The cafeteria size is less than the size recommended by the OSDM. The finishes are fair.

5.19 Administrative offices provided are consistent in appearance and function with the maturity of the students

served

5 2

Administrative offices do not contain all the elements and are smaller than OSDM recommendations.

5.20 Counselors office insures privacy and sufficient storage 5 2

Counselor has private office. Storage is poor.

5.21 Clinic is near administrative offices and is equipped to meet requirements 5 4

Clinic is equipped with toilet, sink, and 2 cots. Location is near offices.

5.22 Suitable reception space is available for students, teachers, and visitors 5 2

Reception space is too small to adequately serve the need.

5.23 Administrative personnel are provided sufficient work space and privacy 5 2

Work space is smaller than OSDM recommendations. Some OSDM elements are not provided.

TOTAL - Educational Adequacy 200 129



45/51




46/51

CEFPI Ratings Sheet

6.0 Environment for Education


Exterior Environment Points Allocated Points

6.1 Overall design is aesthetically pleasing to age of students 15 14

Interesting design with good site placement.

6.2 Site and building are well landscaped 10 8

The landscaping is mature and well placed.

6.3 Exterior noise and poor environment do not disrupt learning 10 10

The surrounding neighborhood is a residential type.

6.4 Entrances and walkways are sheltered from sun and inclement weather 10 8

The main entrance is sheltered but the secondary entrances are not. There is a covered walkway which leads to the bus drop area.

6.5 Building materials provide attractive color and texture 5 4

Brick walls with aluminum windows and doors provide attractive appearance.

Interior Environment Points Allocated Points

6.6 Color schemes, building materials, and decor provide an impetus to learning 20 10

Colors are very monotone.

6.7 Year around comfortable temperature and humidity are provided throughout the building 15 8

The facility is equipped with a heating system only. The heating system is in fair condition. Cooling and humidity control are provided in media center, computer lab,art, music and office areas.

6.8 Ventilating system provides adequate quiet circulation of clean air and meets 15cfm VBC requirement 15 9

The existing unit ventilator system does not provide the code required amount of fresh air.

6.9 Lighting system provides proper intensity, diffusion, and distribution of illumination 15 11

Light fixtures appeared to be well maintained. Darks spots were not observed.

6.10 Drinking fountains and restroom facilities are conveniently located 15 7

The O.B.C. requires one drinking fountain per 100 students. The building capacity requires 6 drinking fountains. The existing facility has 4 drinking fountains. ADArequires that 50 percent of drinking fountains be accessible. Four of the drinking fountains are accessible. The O.B.C. requires that restrooms be located on everyfloor and that the maximum travel distance shall not exceed 500 feet. The facility meets the requirement. The size of restrooms is such that ADA access isachievable.

6.11 Communication among students is enhanced by commons area(s) for socialization 10 4

A commons area does exist, but size and decor limits function.



47/51

6.12 Traffic flow is aided by appropriate foyers and corridors 10 9

Corridors are approximately the width that is recommended by the OSDM.

6.13 Areas for students to interact are suitable to the age group 10 4

Media center, gym, and cafeteria are smaller than OSDM guidelines. Commons areas are provided, but limited.

6.14 Large group areas are designed for effective management of students 10 8

Large group areas are not provided with a sound system. There are no blind spots where supervision is limited.

6.15 Acoustical treatment of ceilings, walls, and floors provides effective sound control 10 7

Lay-in acoustic ceilings, masonry walls, and vinyl tile f loor provide fair acoustics.

6.16 Window design contributes to a pleasant environment 10 9

Nicely sized, well placed, well maintained windows contribute to a pleasant environment.

6.17 Furniture and equipment provide a pleasing atmosphere 10 6

The equipment appeared to be mismatched and was in fair condition.

TOTAL - Environment for Education 200 136




48/51

Justification for Allocation of Points

Building Name and Level: Maddux Elem

K-6

Building features that clearly exceed criteria:

1. Outdoor classroom donated by former teacher.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Building features that are non-existent or very inadequate:

1. No f ire suppression system.

2. Hazardous materials in facil ity.

3. Unprotected stair tower.

4. Outdated technology.

5.

6.


Report Generated at 19 May 2005 06:Justification for Allocation of Points Page 48


49/51


Building Summary - Maddux Elem (21949)


Name: Maddux Elem


Cincinnati,OH 45230

Bldg. IRN: 21949



Phone: 513-231-0780










Total 57,930



=2 Needs Repair




DollarAssessment C





F. Windows 2 $3,300.00 -








N. Fire Alarm 3 $86,895.00 -







U. Life Safety 3 $203,272.50 -


W. Technology 3 $334,256.10 -


- $1,227,800.34 -

Total $6,273,416.94









Commentary


C=Under Contract




Previous Page



50/51

Environmental Hazards - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949) - Original Building

Environmental Hazards - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949) - Original Building

Owner: Forest Hills Local SD Bldg. IRN: 21949

Facility: Maddux Elem BuildingAdd: Original Building

Date: 2004-06-08 Assessor: Tony Zircher

A. Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) AFM=Asbestos Free Materia

ACM Found Status Quantity Unit Cost Estimated Cost

1. Boiler/Furnace/Breeching Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $15.00 $0.002. Tank/Duct Insulation Removal

Documents

State Assessment, Maddux