OSFC Report, Maddux Elementary School

8/13/2019 OSFC Report, Maddux Elementary School

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/osfc-report-maddux-elementary-school 1/54

Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem

Program Type Expedited Local Partnership Program (ELPP)

Setting Suburban

Assessment Name Maddux Elementary School (21949) FINAL

Assessment Date 2013-08-22

Cost Set: 2013

Building Name Maddux Elem

Building IRN 21949

Building Address 943 Rosetree Lane

Building City Cincinnati

Building Zipcode 45230

Building Phone 513-231-0780

Acreage 20.00

Current Grades: K-6

Teaching Stations 35

Number of Floors 2

Student Capacity 417

Current Enrollment 615

Enrollment Date 2013-08-20

Enrollment Date is the date in which the current enrollment was taken.

Number of Classrooms 28

Historical Register NO

Building’s Principal Mr. Stephen Troehler

Building Type Elementary/Middle

Next Page

Report Generated at 29 Oct 2013 08Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem Page 1



Building Pictures - Forest Hills Local SD(47340) - Maddux Elem(21949)

North elevation photo: East elevation photo:

South elevation photo: West elevation photo:

GENERAL DESCRIPTION

61,662 Total Existing Square Footage

1966,1993 Building Dates

K-6 Grades

615 Current Enrollment

35 Teaching Stations

20.00 Site Acreage

Maddux Elementary School, which is not on the National Register of Historic Buildings, and originally constructed in 1966, is a 2 story, 61,662 square foot brick school buildinglocated in a suburban residential setting. The existing facility features a conventionally partitioned design, and does utilize one modular building. The structure of the overall facilcontains a steel frame with brick veneer on a non-load bearing masonry type exterior wall construction, with concrete masonry units, brick, glazed block, metal stud framedpartitions with gypsum board, wood framed partitions with wood paneling and operable partition type wall construction in the interior. The base floor system of the overall facility concrete slab on grade type construction. The floor system of the first floor located under the Gymnasium consists of precast concrete planks with concrete topping typeconstruction. The roof structure of the overall facility, except for over the Gymnasium, is metal form deck on steel joist type construction. The roof structure over the Gymnasium tectum deck on steel joist type construction. The roofing system over the 1966 Original Construction is a fully adhered EPDM membrane roof that was installed in phases in 1981992, and 1997. The roofing system over the 1993 Addition is a modified asphalt built-up roof with gravel wear coat that was installed in 1993. The ventilation system of thebuilding is inadequate to meet the needs of the users. The Classrooms are inadequately sized in terms of the current standards established by the State of Ohio. PhysicalEducation and Student Dining spaces consist of one Gymnasium and separate Student Dining. The electrical system for the facility is inadequate. The facility is equipped with anon-compliant security system. The building has a compliant manual and automatic fire alarm system. The facility is not equipped with an automated fire suppression system. Thbuilding is reported to contain asbestos and other hazardous materials. The overall building is not compliant with ADA accessibility requirements. The school is located on a 20acre site adjacent to residential properties. The property and playgrounds are partially fenced for security. Access onto the site is unrestricted. Site circulation is fair. There isdedicated space for school buses to load and unload on the site. Parking for staff, visitors and community events is adequate.

According to reports from the District, the building was originally designed to have the front facing northwest. The building entry is currently oriented from the southeast.

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 29 Oct 2013 08Building Pictures - Forest Hills Local SD(47340) - Maddux Elem(21949) Page 2



Building Construction Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949)

Name Year Handicapped Access Floors Square Feet

Original Construction 1966 no 2 57,257

Classroom Addition 1993 yes 1 4,405

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 29 Oct 2013 08Building Construction Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949) Page 3



Building Component Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949)

AdditionAuditorium

FixedSeating

CorridorsAgriculturalEducation

Lab

PrimaryGymnasium

MediaCenter

VocationalSpace

StudentDining

Kitchen NatatoriumIndoorTracks

AdultEducation

BoardOffices

OutsideAgencies

AuxiliaryGymnasiu

OriginalConstruction(1966)

8128 3239 1209 2398 1386

ClassroomAddition (1993)

448

Total 0 8,576 0 3,239 1,209 0 2,398 1,386 0 0 0 0 0 0

Master PlanningConsiderations

There are no readily evident site conditions that might significantly affect master planning. An outdoor Classroom is provided on thenorthwest side of the building, with a covered shelter and metal site furniture.

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 29 Oct 2013 08Building Component Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949) Page 4



Existing CT Programs for Assessment Next Page

Previous Page

Program Type Program Name Related Space Square Feet

No Records Found

Legend:

Not in current design manual

In current design manual but missing from assessment

Report Generated at 29 Oct 2013 08:<Untitled> Page 5



Main Assessment Menu - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949)

Building Summary - Maddux Elem (21949)

District: Forest Hills Local SD

Name: Maddux Elem

Address: 943 Rosetree Lane

Cincinnati,OH 45230

Bldg. IRN: 21949

County: Hamilton Area: Southwestern Ohio (1)

Contact: Mr. Stephen Troehler

Phone: 513-231-0780

Date Prepared: 2013-08-22 By: Julie Apt

Date Revised: 2013-10-29 By: Julie Apt

Current Grades K-6 Acreage: 20.00

Proposed Grades N/A Teaching Stations: 35

Current Enrollment 615 Classrooms: 28

Projected Enrollment N/A

Addition Date HA Number of Floors Current Square Feet



Total 61,662

*HA = Handicapped Access

*Rating =1 Satisfactory

=2 Needs Repair

=3 Needs Replacement

*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction

FACILITY ASSESSMENTCost Set: 2013 Rating

DollarAssessment C

A. Heating System 3 $2,103,907.44 -

B. Roofing 3 $439,820.71 -C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning 2 $35,831.00 -

D. Electrical Systems 3 $1,000,774.26 -

E. Plumbing and Fixtures 2 $85,400.00 -

F. Windows 2 $32,889.00 -

G. Structure: Foundation 2 $33,897.50 -

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys 2 $194,995.25 -

I. Structure: Floors and Roofs 1 $0.00 -

J. General Finishes 3 $1,700,220.98 -

K. Interior Lighting 3 $308,310.00 -

L. Security Systems 3 $144,905.70 -

M. Emergency/Egress Lighting 3 $61,662.00 -

N. Fire Alarm 2 $4,000.00 -

O. Handicapped Access 3 $339,412.40 -

P. Site Condition 3 $536,237.40 -

Q. Sewage System 1 $0.00 -

R. Water Supply 1 $0.00 -

S. Exterior Doors 3 $22,500.00 -

T. Hazardous Material 3 $83,326.70 -

U. Life Safety 3 $310,518.40 -

V. Loose Furnishings 3 $184,986.00 -

W. Technology 3 $699,209.56 -

- X. Construction Contingency / Non-Construction Cost

- $2,033,286.06 -

Total $10,356,090.36

CEFPI Appraisal Summary

Section Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating CategoCover Sheet — — — —

1.0 The School Site 100 82 82% Satisfacto

2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features 200 133 67% Borderl

3.0 Plant Maintainability 100 68 68% Borderl

4.0 Building Safety and Security 200 145 73% Satisfacto

5.0 Educational Adequacy 200 117 59% Borderl

6.0 Environment for Education 200 124 62% Borderl

LEED Observations — — — —

Commentary — — — —

Total 1000 669 67% Borderl

Enhanced Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimates

C=Under Contract

Renovation Cost Factor 98.14

Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied) $10,163,467

The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary requested from a Master Plan.

Previous Page

Report Generated at 29 Oct 2013 08Main Assessment Menu - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949) Page 6




Original Construction (1966) Summary


Name: Maddux Elem


Cincinnati,OH 45230

Bldg. IRN: 21949



Phone: 513-231-0780










Total 61,662


*Rat ing =1 Sat isfactory

=2 Needs Repair




DollarAssessment C

A. Heating System 3 $1,953,608.84 -


D. Electrical Systems 3 $929,281.11 -

E. Plumbing and Fixtures 2 $85,400.00 -

F. Windows 2 $27,151.00 -




J. General Finishes 3 $1,596,101.30 -




N. Fire Alarm 2 $4,000.00 -

O. Handicapped Access 3 $338,531.40 -





T. Hazardous Material 3 $83,282.60 -

U. Life Safety 3 $296,422.40 -


W. Technology 3 $649,259.53 -


- $1,897,950.06 -

Total $9,666,786.53













C=Under Contract


Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied) $9,486,984

The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary irequested from a Master Plan.





Classroom Addition (1993) Summary


Name: Maddux Elem


Cincinnati,OH 45230

Bldg. IRN: 21949



Phone: 513-231-0780










Total 61,662


*Rating =1Satisfactory

=2 Needs Repair




DollarAssessment C

A. Heating System 3 $150,298.60 -


D. Electrical Systems 3 $71,493.15 -

E. Plumbing and Fixtures 2 $0.00 -

F. Windows 2 $5,738.00 -




J. General Finishes 3 $104,119.68 -




N. Fire Alarm 2 $0.00 -

O. Handicapped Access 3 $881.00 -





T. Hazardous Material 3 $44.10 -

U. Life Safety 3 $14,096.00 -


W. Technology 3 $49,950.03 -


- $135,336.00 -

Total $689,303.83













C=Under Contract


Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied) $676,482

The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary isrequested from a Master Plan.




Facility Assessment

A. Heating System

Description: The existing system for the 1966 Original Construction is a natural gas fired heated water boiler type system, installed in 1966, and is in faircondition. The existing system in the 1993 Addition is an extension of the 1966 Original Construction. The overall facility is a 2-pipe heating onlytype system, without a capacity for cooling operation, which is not compliant with the OSDM requirements for basic system type. The two (2)flexible watertube boilers, manufactured by Cleaver-Brooks, were installed in 1998 and are in fair condition. Heating water is distributed toterminal units consisting of unit ventilators, cabinet heaters, unit heaters, and air handlers. The terminal equipment is original to each addition andis in fair condition. The system does not appear to comply with the 15 CFM per person fresh air requirements of the Ohio Building Codemechanical code and Ohio School Design Manual. The pneumatic and electric type system temperature controls are original to each addition andare in fair to poor condition. The system does not feature individual temperature controls in all spaces required by the OSDM. The overall systemdoes not feature any central energy recovery systems. The facility is equipped throughout with louvered interior doors to facilitate Corridorutilization as return air plenums. See Items J and O for replacement of doors. The existing system in the Gymnasium of the 1966 OriginalConstruction is ducted, but the ductwork cannot be integrated into a possible future system due to arrangement, air volume, and routing ofexisting ductwork. The existing systems in the remainder of the 1966 Original Construction and in the 1993 Addition are not ducted, and floor tostructural deck heights will accommodate the installation of properly sized ductwork for a future Ohio School Design Manual approved system.The overall heating system is evaluated as not being in safe and efficient working order, and long term life expectancy of the existing system isnot anticipated. The structure is not equipped with central air conditioning. The site does not contain underground fuel tanks.

Rating: 3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations: Provide new overall heating, ventilating, and air conditioning system to achieve compliance with Ohio Building Code and Ohio School DesignManual standards. Replace existing ductwork in the Gymnasium of the 1966 Original Construction to facilitate eff icient exchange of conditionedair. Convert the remainder of the 1966 Original Construction and the 1993 Addition to ducted systems to facilitate efficient exchange ofconditioned air.

Item Cost Unit WholeBuilding

OriginalConstruction (1966)57,257 ft!

ClassroomAddition (1993)4,405 ft!

Sum Comments

HVAC SystemReplacement:

$26.12sq.ft. Required Required $1,610,611.44(includes demo of existing system and reconfiguration of piping layout andnew controls, air conditioning)

Convert To DuctedSystem

$8.00sq.ft. Required Required $493,296.00(includes cost for vert. & horz. chases, cut openings, soffits, etc. Must be usin addition to HVAC System Replacement if the existing HVAC system isnon-ducted)

Sum: $2,103,907.44$1,953,608.84 $150,298.60

Natural Gas Fired Heated Water Boilers Heating Water Unit Heaters

Back to Assessment Summary

Report Generated at 29 Oct 2013 08:Facility Assessment Page 9



Facility Assessment

B. Roofing

Description: The roof over the 1966 Original Construction is a fully adhered EPDM Carlisle membrane system that was installed in phases in 1987, 1992, and1997, and is in good condition. The roof over the 1993 Addition is a modified asphalt built-up system with gravel wear coat that was installed in1993, and is in fair condition. There are no District reports of current leaking. No signs of past leaking were observed during the physicalassessment. Access to the roof was gained by an extension ladder. Fall safety protection cages are not required and are not provided. Therewere observations of standing water on the roof. Metal cap flashings and copings are in good condition. Roof storm drainage is addressedthrough a system of roof drains, which are properly located, and in good to fair condition. The roof is not equipped with overflow roof drains,except over the 1993 Addition, though they are not required on this building. No problems requiring attention were encountered with any roofpenetrations. There are no covered walkways attached to this structure.


Recommendations: The roof over the overall facility requires replacement to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines for age of system. New flashing is includedin roof replacement. Provide new roof access hatch in the Loading Dock area to facilitate access to all levels of low slope roof surfaces. Providetapered Insulation to facilitate positive drainage to the roof drains.


Original Construction(1966)57,257 ft!

Classroom Addition(1993)4,405 ft!

Sum Comments

Membrane (all types): $8.27sq.ft.(Qty)

48,190 Required 3,983 Required $431,470.71(unless under 10,000 sq.f t.)

Roof Insulation: $4.50sq.ft.(Qty)

1,000 Required $4,500.00(tapered insulation for limited area use tocorrect ponding)

Roof Access, Ladder & FallProtection Cage:

$3,850.00each 1 Required $3,850.00(provide when no roof access currently exist

Sum: $439,820.71 $406,881.30 $32,939.41

Typical Roof Over the 1966 Original Construction Typical Roof Over the 1993 Addition





Facility Assessment

C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning

Description: The overall facility is not equipped with a central air conditioning system. The facility is not equipped with any window units. Isolated roomsystems consisting of multiple ducted split HVAC units (with the condensing units located on the roof) are provided throughout the 1966 OriginalConstruction and 1993 Addition, including the Art and Music Rooms, Lab, and Administrative Offices locations. The system is original to eachaddition, with incremental upgrades, and is in fair condition. A Mitsubishi ductless split AC system is provided to a single Classroom location. Theventilation system in the overall facility consists of unit ventilators and air handlers, original to each addition and in fair to poor condition, providingfresh air to Classrooms, and air handlers, installed in 1966 and in fair to poor condition, providing fresh air to other miscellaneous spaces, such asGymnasiums, Student Dining, and Media Center. Relief air venting is provided by louvered interior doors, air handlers, central relief fans, andducted roof top HVAC units. The ventilation system does not appear to meet the Ohio Building Code 15 CFM per occupant fresh air requirement.The overall system is not compliant with Ohio Building Code and Ohio School Design Manual requirements. Dust collection systems are notrequired in this facility. The Art program is equipped with a kiln, and existing kiln ventilation is inadequate. General building exhaust systems forRestrooms, Storage Rooms, Art Rooms, and Custodial Closets are inadequately placed, and in fair condition.

Rating: 2 Needs Repair

Recommendations: Provide an air conditioning system to meet with Ohio Building Code and Ohio School Design Manual requirements. Pricing included in Item A.Replace general building exhaust systems in the overall facility due to age and condition. Replace the existing kiln ventilation system to supportthe Art program.




Sum Comments

Kiln Exhaust System: $5,000.00each 1 Required $5,000.00

Other: General BuildingExhaust System

$0.50sq.ft . Required Required $30,831.00Replace general building exhaust systems in the overall facildue to age and condition.

Sum: $35,831.00 $33,628.50 $2,202.50

Ductless Split AC System Unit Ventilators





Facility Assessment

D. Electrical Systems

Description: The electrical system provided to the 1966 Original Construction is a 120/208 volts, 1,600 amp, 3 phase, 4 wire system installed in 1966, and is infair condition. The system in the 1993 Addition is an extension of that found in the 1966 Original Construction. Power is provided to the school bya single utility owned, pad-mounted transformer located outside the Mechanical Room, and in fair condition. The panel system, installed in 1966,with upgrades in 1993, is in fair condition, but cannot be expanded to add additional capacity. The Classrooms are not equipped with adequateelectrical outlets. The typical Classroom contains five (5) general purpose outlets, zero (0) dedicated outlets for each Classroom computer, andzero (0) dedicated outlets for each Classroom television. Some Classrooms are equipped with as many as six (6) general purpose outlets, whileothers are equipped with as few as three (3) general purpose outlets. There are not any spaces that have no electrical outlets. The Corridors areequipped with adequate electrical outlets for servicing. Adequate GFI protected exterior outlets are not provided around the perimeter of thebuilding. The facility is not equipped with an emergency generator. Adequate lightning protection safeguards are not provided. Stage lightingpower system including control panel, breakers, and dimmers is inadequately provided, in fair condition and does not meet OSDM requirements.The overall electrical system does not meet Ohio School Design Manual requirements in supporting the current needs of the school, and will beinadequate to meet the facility’s future needs.


Recommendations: The entire electrical system requires replacement to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines due to condition and age, lack ofOSDM-required features, and to accommodate the addition of an air conditioning system. Provide an emergency generator, with funding includedin the electrical system replacement. Provide adequate lightning protection safeguards in the overall facility, including associated groundingsystem, with funding included in the electrical system replacement. Provide control panel, dimmers, and breakers to support the Stage lightingsystem.


OriginalConstruction(1966)57,257 ft!


Sum Comments

System

Replacement:

$16.23sq.ft. Required Required $1,000,774.26(Includes demo of existing system. Includes generator for life safety systems. Doe

not include telephone or data or equipment) (Use items below ONLY when the entsystem is NOT being replaced)

Sum: $1,000,774.26$929,281.11 $71,493.15

Main Electrical Distribution Panel Pad Mounted Transformer





Facility Assessment

E. Plumbing and Fixtures

Description: The service entrance is equipped with a reduced pressure back flow preventer in fair condition. A water treatment system is provided and is ingood condition, though none is needed. The domestic water supply piping in the overall facility is copper, is original to each addition, and is ingood condition. The waste piping in the overall facility is cast iron, is original to each addition, and is in good condition. The facility is equippedwith two State Industries 100 gallon gas water heaters, installed in 2007, and are in good condition. The school contains 1 Large Group Restroomfor boys, 1 Large Group Restroom for girls, no Locker Room Restrooms for boys, no Locker Room Restrooms for girls, 2 Restrooms associatedwith specialty Classrooms, and 3 Restrooms for staff. Boys’ Large Group Restroom contains 1 ADA and 1 non-ADA wall mounted flush valvetoilets, no ADA and 7 non-ADA wall mounted flush valve urinals, as well as no ADA and 5 non-ADA wall mounted lavatories. Girls’ Large GroupRestroom contains 1 ADA and 6 non-ADA wall mounted flush valve toilets, as well as no ADA and 5 non-ADA wall mounted lavatories. No LockerRoom Restrooms are provided in this facility. Staff Restrooms contain 2 ADA and 1 non-ADA wall mounted flush valve toilet, no urinals, as wellas 2 ADA and 1 non-ADA wall mounted lavatories. Condition of fixtures is good. The facility is equipped with no wall mounted drinking fountains,but has 4 ADA and no non-ADA electric water coolers, in fair condition. The 25 Elementary Classrooms are equipped with no ADA and 25non-ADA sink mounted type drinking fountains, in good to fair condition. Special Education Classroom is equipped with the required Restroomfacilities. Kitchen is not equipped with the required Restroom. Heath Clinic is equipped with the required Restroom, and fixtures are in goodcondition. Kindergarten Classrooms are equipped with Restroom facilities, and fixtures are in good condition. Kitchen fixtures consist of 2 singlecompartment sinks, 1 triple compartment sink, 1 dishwasher, 1 disposal, 1 garbage washer, and 1 pot filler, which are in good condition. TheKitchen is not equipped with a grease interceptor. The Kitchen is provided the required 140 degree hot water supply via a booster type waterheater, which is in good condition. The school meets the OBC requirements for fixtures. Relative to LEED requirements, the school is notequipped with low flow type fixtures. Per OBC and OSDM requirements this facility should be equipped with 12 toilets, 4 urinals, 14 lavatories, 27Classroom sink mounted drinking fountains, and 7 electric water coolers. Observations revealed that the school is currently equipped with 18toilets, 7 urinals, 24 lavatories, 25 Classroom lavatories with sink mounted drinking fountains, and 4 ADA electric water coolers. ADArequirements are not met for fixtures and drinking fountains (see Item O). Custodial Closets are properly located and are adequately providedwith required service sinks or floor drain sinks, which are in good to fair condition. Science Classrooms / Project Laboratories are equipped withrequired gas connection, but not equipped with required utility sink, compressed air connections, and safety shower / eyewash. Due to existinggrade configuration, no Biology or Chemistry Classroom acid waste systems are required. Adequate exterior wall hydrants are provided.


Recommendations: To facilitate the school’s compliance with OBC and OSFC fixture requirements, provide 3 new electric water coolers and 1 new grease interceptofor the Kitchen. Due to age, condition, LEED, and OSFC requirements, provide 7 new electric water coolers and 77 new low flow flush valves andfaucets. See Item O for replacement of fixtures related to ADA requirements. Provide the Science Classroom with the required utility sink,compressed air connection, and safety shower / eyewash station. Kitchen and Locker Room Restrooms and Showers corrected in Item O.




Sum Comments

Electric water cooler: $3,000.00unit 7 Required $21,000.00(double ADA)Replace faucets and flush valves $500.00per unit 77 Required $38,500.00(average cost to

remove/replace)

HIGH BAY/INDUSTRIAL SPACE - LAB TYPES 5,6,7 - SafetyShower/Eyewash - New Installation

$2,500.00each 1 Required $2,500.00

HIGH BAY/INDUSTRIAL SPACE - LAB TYPES 5,6,7 - UtilitySink

$2,400.00unit 1 Required $2,400.00

HIGH BAY/INDUSTRIAL SPACE - LAB TYPES 5,6,7 -Compressed Air Connections

$15,000.00persystem

1 Required $15,000.00

HIGH BAY/INDUSTRIAL SPACE - LAB TYPES 5,6,7 - GreaseTrap or Oil Interceptor

$6,000.00each 1 Required $6,000.00

Sum: $85,400.00 $85,400.00 $0.00




Typical Classroom Lavatory with Sink Mounted Drinking Fountain Kitchen Garbage Disposal





Facility Assessment

F. Windows

Description: The overall facility is equipped with thermally broken aluminum frame windows with double glazed insulated glazing type window system, whichwas installed in 2002, and is in good condition. The window system features operable windows throughout the building, and operable windowsare equipped with opening limiters in good condition and insect screens in good to fair condition. Window system seals are in good condition, withno air and water infiltration being experienced. Window system hardware is in good condition. The window system features surface mountedshades and blinds, which are in good to fair condition. This facility is not equipped with any curtain wall systems. This facility does not feature anyglass block windows. The exterior doors in the 1966 Original Construction are equipped with thermally broken aluminum and hollow metal framesidelights and transoms with tempered single pane and double glazed insulated glazing, in good to fair condition. Exterior door vision panels inthe 1966 Original Construction are tempered single pane and double glazed insulated glazing, in good to fair condition. The exterior doors in the1993 Addition are equipped with hollow metal frame transoms with insulated metal panels, in good to fair condition. Exterior door vision panels inthe 1993 Addition are tempered double glazed insulated glazing. The school does not contain skylights. The school does not contain clerestories.Interior glass is not OSDM-compliant due to non-compliance with current Ohio Building Codes. Window security grilles are not provided forground floor windows. There is not a Greenhouse associated with this school.


Recommendations: Replace window transoms and sidelights at exterior doors of the overall facility. Replace single pane vision panels at exterior doors as required inthe 1966 Original Construction. Replace surface mounted blinds and shades in the overall facility. Replace damaged or missing insect screens asrequired in the overall facility. Replace non-compliant interior glazing.




Sum Comments

Other: Replace DamagedInsect Screens

$8.00sq.ft.(Qty)

486 Required 90 Required $4,608.00Replace damaged or missing insect screens as required in the overallfacility.

Other: Replace InteriorGlazing

$25.00sq.ft.(Qty)

159 Required 14 Required $4,325.00Replace non-compliant interior glazing.

Other: Replace SingleGlazed Transoms andSidelights

$28.00sq.ft.(Qty)

121 Required 63 Required $5,152.00Replace window transoms and sidelights at exterior doors of the overallfacility.

Other: Replace Single PaneExterior Door Vision Panels

$28.00sq.ft.(Qty)

13 Required $364.00Replace single pane vision panels at exterior doors as required in the 19Original Construction. Replace surface mounted blinds and shades in thoverall facility.

Other: Replace SurfaceMounted Blinds and Shades

$8.00sq.ft.(Qty)

1,942 Required 363 Required $18,440.00Replace surface mounted blinds and shades.

Sum: $32,889.00 $27,151.00 $5,738.00

Art Room Windows Typical Classroom Windows





Facility Assessment

G. Structure: Foundation

Description: The overall facility is equipped with concrete grade beam foundation walls on concrete caissons, which displayed no current locations ofsignificant differential settlement, cracking, or leaking, and are in good to fair condition. The District reported that past settlement issues at twoexterior wall locations in the east Classroom wing have been addressed and no new issues have occurred. Areas of minor cracking and spallingwere observed through the overall facility. The District reports that there has been no past leaking. Minor grading or site drainage deficiencieswere noted around the perimeter of the structure that could contribute to foundation deterioration. There are several areas where adjacent yardareas drain towards the building instead of away from the building.


Recommendations: Repair areas of cracking and spalling through the overall facility. Rework yard areas as required to provide positive drainage away from thebuilding.




Sum Comments

Other: Regrade Site to ProvidePositive Drainage

$5.00sq.ft.(Qty)

2,856 Required 610 Required $17,330.00Rework yard areas as required to provide positivedrainage away from the building.

Other: Repair Minor Cracks andSpalled Areas

$7.50sq.ft.(Qty)

1,904 Required 305 Required $16,567.50Repair areas of cracking and spall ing through the overafacility.

Sum: $33,897.50 $28,560.00 $5,337.50

Exposed Concrete Foundation Spalled Area of Exposed Concrete Foundation





Facility Assessment

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys

Description: The overall facility has a steel frame with brick veneer on a non-load bearing masonry exterior wall system, which displayed locations of minordeterioration, and is in good to fair condition. The exterior masonry appears to have inappropriately spaced and adequately caulked control jointsin good to fair condition. Exterior control joints are only provided in the Gymnasium walls. The school does not contain expansion joints and noneare needed, as there is no indication of exterior masonry cracking or separation. Exterior walls in the overall facility are inadequately insulated.Exterior brick veneer masonry walls are non-compliant cavity walls. Weep holes are provided in sufficient quantity at 48’’ on center at the base ofmasonry cavity walls, and are in good to fair condition. Weep holes are not rope type weeps. Vents are not provided. The exterior masonry hasnot been cleaned and sealed in recent years, and shows evidence of mortar deterioration at unit ventilator openings and upper wall areas andhas locations of efflorescence and discoloration. Architectural exterior accent materials consist of exposed concrete, which is in good to faircondition. Installation of new HVAC systems will result in removal of any existing unit ventilators, necessitating the exterior masonry infill ofassociated exterior wall voids. Interior walls are concrete masonry units, brick, glazed block, metal stud framed partitions with gypsum board,wood framed partitions with wood paneling and operable partition walls, and are in good to fair condition. Interior masonry appears to haveinadequately spaced and caulked control joints in good to fair condition. Interior soffits are of gypsum board type construction, and in good to faircondition. The window sills in the 1966 Original Construction are an element of the aluminum window system setting on exposed concrete gradebeams, and are in good condition. The window sills in the 1993 Addition are stone, and are in good to fair condition. The exterior lintels that areobservable are steel. Exposed lintels at the exterior Gymnasium walls are galvanized steel and are in good condition. Exposed lintels at the unitventilator openings are rusting and sagging in poor condition. There is one chimney in fair condition. The facility is equipped with one canopy atthe main entry to the 1966 Original Construction. The canopy is a steel frame and a metal roof deck type construction, and is in good to faircondition. Exterior soffits are of plaster type construction, and in fair condition. The school is provided with a covered conventional loading dock tofacilitate the receipt of product, supplies, and foodstuffs, 50 square feet in size and featuring a pair of standard exterior doors. The dock itself is infair condition, and is equipped with bumper pads mounted on a timber rail. The timber rail is in poor condition. The bumpers are in fair condition.Non code compliant metal railings were observed at the Boiler Room well and the ramp leading to the lower Gymnasium level.


Recommendations: Provide tuckpointing in all areas of mortar deterioration as required through the overall facility. Provide masonry cleaning, sealing and caulking asrequired through the overall facility. Provide masonry repairs as required through the overall facility. Provide masonry infill as required through theoverall facility. Repair masonry chimney as required in the 1966 Original Construction. Recaulk existing control joints. Repoint stone window sillsthrough the 1993 Addition. Prep and paint exposed steel lintels through the overall facility. Repair and paint plaster soffits. Exterior wall insulationdeficiencies are addressed in Item J. Prep and paint canopy at the 1966 Original Construction main entry. Repair loading dock concrete. Replaceloading dock bumpers and timber rail. Replace non code compliant metal railings at the Boiler Room well. Replace non code compliant metalrailings at lower level ramp.




Sum Comments

Tuckpointing: $5.25sq.ft.(Qty)

4,583 Required 930 Required $28,943.25(wall surface)

Exterior Masonry Cleaning: $1.50sq.ft.(Qty)

20,164 Required 3,718 Required $35,823.00(wall surface)

Exterior Masonry Sealing: $1.00sq.ft.(Qty)

20,164 Required 3,718 Required $23,882.00(wall surface)

Exterior Caulking: $5.50ln.ft. 4,773 Required 596 Required $29,529.50(removing and replacing)

Other: Boiler Room RailingReplacement

$110.00ln.ft . 80 Required $8,800.00Replace non code compliant metal rai lings at theBoiler Room well.

Other: Chimney Masonry Repairs $12.75sq.ft.(Qty)

102 Required $1,300.50Repair masonry chimney as required in the 1966Original Construction.

Other: Loading Dock Repairs $15.00sq.ft .(Qty)

50 Required $750.00Repair loading dock concrete.

Other: Masonry Infill $35.00sq.ft.(Qty)

208 Required 31 Required $8,365.00Provide masonry inf ill as required through the overfacility.

Other: Masonry Repairs $12.75sq.ft.(Qty)

2,750 Required 558 Required $42,177.00Provide masonry repairs as required through theoverall facility.

Other: Prep and Paint Canopy $8.00sq.ft.(Qty)

600 Required $4,800.00Prep and paint canopy at the 1966 OriginalConstruction main entry.

Other: Prep and Paint Steel Lintels $8.00ln.ft. 88 Required 16 Required $832.00Prep and paint exposed steel lintels through theoverall facility.

Other: Ramp Railing Replacement $110.00ln.ft. 46 Required $5,060.00Replace non code compliant metal rai lings at lowelevel ramp.

Other: Recaulk Exterior ControlJoints

$5.50ln. ft. 96 Required $528.00Recaulk existing control joints.

Other: Repair and Paint ExteriorPlaster Soffits

$8.00sq.ft.(Qty)

459 Required $3,672.00Repair and paint plaster soffi ts.

Other: Replace Dock Bumpers $75.00each 3 Required $225.00Replace loading dock bumpers and timber rail.

Other: Repoint Stone Sills $5.50ln.ft. 56 Required $308.00Repoint stone window sills through the 1993 AdditiSum: $194,995.25 $168,904.25 $26,091.00




View of Gymnasium Exterior Wall Entry Canopy





Facility Assessment

I. Structure: Floors and Roofs

Description: The floor construction of the base floor of the overall facility is concrete slab on grade type construction, and is in good condition. Terrazzoflooring in the main Corridors of the 1966 Original Construction exhibit some cracking. There is no crawl space. The floor construction of the firstfloor of the overall facility located under the Gymnasium is precast concrete planks with concrete topping type construction, and is in goodcondition. Ceiling to structural deck spaces are sufficient to accommodate HVAC, electrical, and plumbing scopes of work in required renovationsThe roof construction of the overall facility, except for over the Gymnasium, is metal form deck on steel joist type construction, and is in goodcondition. The roof construction over the Gymnasium is tectum deck on steel joist type construction, and is in good condition.

Rating: 1 Satisfactory

Recommendations: Terrazzo repair provided in Item J.

Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Construction (1966)57,257 ft!

Classroom Addition (1993)4,405 ft!

SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Floor Cracking in Corridors of the 1966 Original Construction Typical Roof Structure Of the 1993 Addition





Facility Assessment

J. General Finishes

Description: The overall facility features conventionally partitioned Classrooms with VAT or VCT type flooring, acoustical tile type ceilings, as well as paintedblock type wall finishes, and they are in fair condition. The overall facility has Corridors with terrazzo type flooring, acoustical tile type ceilings, aswell as brick, glazed block, and painted block type wall finishes, and they are in fair condition. The overall facility has Restrooms with quarry tiletype flooring, acoustical tile type ceilings, as well as painted block type wall finishes, and they are in fair condition. Toilet partitions are paintedsteel or plastic, and are in fair condition. Classroom casework in the overall facility is wood type construction with plastic laminate tops, isadequately provided, and in fair to poor condition. The typical Classroom contains 12 lineal feet of casework, and Classroom casework providedranges from 10 to 20 feet. Classrooms are provided adequate chalkboards, markerboards, and tackboards which are in good condition. TheClassroom Storage Closets, located in the Classrooms, are adequately provided, and in fair condition. The Art program is equipped with a kiln ingood condition, and existing kiln ventilation is inadequate. The 1966 Original Construction is equipped with wood louvered interior doors that arerecessed with proper clearances, but without proper ADA hardware, and in fair condition. The 1993 Classroom Addition is equipped with woodnon-louvered interior doors that are flush mounted with proper ADA hardware and clearances, and in fair condition. The Gymnasium space has arubber type flooring, exposed steel frame type ceilings, as well as painted block type wall finishes, and they are in fair condition. Stands are notprovided in the Gymnasium. Gymnasium basketball backboards are a fixed type, and are in good condition. The Media Center has carpet typeflooring, acoustical tile type ceilings, as well as painted block type wall finishes, and they are in fair condition. Student Dining, has VCT typeflooring, vented metal type ceilings, as well as painted block type wall finishes, and they are in fair condition. OSDM-required fixed equipment forStage is adequately provided, and in fair condition. Existing Gymnasium, Student Dining, Media Center, and Music spaces are not provided withappropriate sound attenuation acoustical surface treatments. The existing Kitchen is full service, is undersized based on current enrollment, andthe existing Kitchen equipment, installed in 1966, with incremental upgrades, is in fair condition. The Kitchen hood is in fair condition, and isequipped with the required UL 300 compliant wet chemical fire suppression system. The required 6’’ overhang on all three exposed sides of thecooking equipment is provided by the hood. Kitchen hood exhaust ductwork is of proper construction and material and is installed as required bythe OSDM and OBCMC. A walk-in cooler and freezer are located within the Kitchen spaces, and are in fair to poor condition.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of finishes and casework due to installation of systems outlined in Items A, C, D, E, K, L, M, T, U, W, and due tocondition. Provide for the replacement of interior doors due to condition and work in Item O. Provide for repairs to terrazzo flooring due tocondition. Provide for the replacement of Kitchen equipment due to age and condition. Provide for the replacement of Kitchen hood due to ageand condition. Provide for the replacement of walk-in coolers and freezers in kitchen. Provide for the replacement of toilet partitions andaccessories due to age and condition. Provide for the replacement of Stage equipment due to condition. Provide sound attenuation treatment inthe Gymnasium, Student Dining, Media Center, and Music spaces. Provide for additional exterior wall insulation due to observations in Item H.Provide for the replacement of Laboratory tables due to work in Item T.




Sum Comments

Toilet Partitions: $1,000.00per stall 13 Required $13,000.00(removing and replacing)Toilet Accessory Replacement $0.20sq.ft. Required Required $12,332.40(per building area)

Door, Frame, and Hardware: $1,300.00each 103 Required 9 Required $145,600.00(non-ADA)Terrazzo Floor Repair $25.00sq.ft.

(Qty) 279 Required 21 Required $7,500.00(floor area affected; max. area to be 300 sf)

Additional Wall Insulation $6.00sq.ft.(Qty)

20,164 Required 3,718 Required $143,292.00(includes the furring out of the existing walls, insulation anabuse resistant GWB)

Laboratory Table / Countertop

Replacement

$150.00ln.ft. 2 Required $300.00(Hazardous Material Replacement Cost - See T.)

Walk-in Coolers/Freezers: $29,818.00per unit 2 Required $59,636.00Kitchen Exhaust Hood: $56,000.00per unit 1 Required $56,000.00(includes fans, exhaust & ductwork)Total Kitchen EquipmentReplacement:

$190.00sq.ft.(Qty)

1,386 Required $263,340.00(square footage based upon only existing area of foodpreparation, serving, kitchen storage areas and walk-ins.Includes demolition and removal of existing kitchenequipment)

Other: Acoustical Control $3.00sq.ft.(Qty)

7,822 Required $23,466.00Provide sound attenuation treatment in the Gymnasium,Student Dining, Media Center, and Music spaces.

Other: Complete Replacement ofFinishes and CaseworkElementary School

$15.60sq.ft.(Qty)

49,242 Required 3,789 Required $827,283.60(elementary, per building area, with removal of existing)

Other: Complete Replacement ofFinishes and Casework MiddleSchool

$15.58sq.ft.(Qty)

8,015 Required 616 Required $134,470.98(middle, per building area, with removal of existing)

Other: Stage Equipment $14,000.00allowance Required $14,000.00Provide for the replacement of Stage equipment due tocondition.

Sum: $1,700,220.98$1,596,101.30 $104,119.68




Typical Corridor Finishes Typical Gymnasium Finishes





Facility Assessment

K. Interior Lighting

Description: The typical Classrooms in the overall facility are equipped with T-8 1x4 surface mount and 2x4 lay-in direct fluorescent fixtures with single levelswitching. Classroom fixtures are in fair condition, providing an average illumination of 40 FC, which is less than the 50 FC recommended by theOSDM. The typical Corridors in the overall facility are equipped with T-8 1x4 surface mount direct fluorescent fixtures with single level switching.Corridor fixtures are in fair condition, providing an average illumination of 50 FC, thus complying with the 20 FC recommended by the OSDM. TheGymnasium spaces are equipped with T-8 2x4 suspended fluorescent fixture type lighting, in fair condition, providing an average illumination of40 FC, which is less than the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. The Media Center is equipped with T-8 1x4 surface mount direct fluorescentfixture type lighting in fair condition, providing an average illumination of 61 FC, thus complying with the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. TheStudent Dining spaces are equipped with T-8 1x4 suspended direct fluorescent fixture type lighting with single level switching. Student Diningfixtures are in fair condition, providing an average illumination of 56 FC, thus complying with the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. The Kitchenspaces are equipped with T-8 1x4 surface mount fluorescent fixture type lighting with single level switching. Kitchen fixtures are in fair condition,providing an average illumination of 50 FC, which is less than the 75-80 FC recommended by the OSDM. The Service Areas in the overall facilityare equipped with pendant incandescent and T-8 1x4 surface mount fluorescent fixture type lighting in fair to poor condition. The typicalAdministrative spaces in the overall facility are equipped with T-8 2x4 lay-in direct fluorescent fixture type lighting in fair condition, providingadequate illumination based on OSDM requirements. The overall lighting systems of the facility are not compliant with Ohio School DesignManual requirements due to age and condition, inadequate lighting levels, utilization of incandescent lighting, and lack of multi-level switching.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of lighting system due to age and condition, inadequate lighting levels, lack of multilevel switching, utilization ofincandescent lighting, and installation of systems outlined in Items A, C, J, and U.

Item Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Construction (1966)57,257 ft!


Sum Comments

Complete Building Lighting Replacement$5.00sq.ft. Required Required $308,310.00Includes demo of existing fixtures

Sum: $308,310.00 $286,285.00 $22,025.00

Typical Corridor Fluorescent Light Fixtures Student Dining Fluorescent Light Fixtures





Facility Assessment

L. Security Systems

Description: The overall facility contains a GE NetworX NX-8 motion detector and door contact type security system in fair condition. Motion detectors areadequately provided in main entries, central gathering areas, Offices, main Corridors, and spaces where 6 or more computers are located.Exterior doors are equipped with door contacts. An automatic visitor control system is provided. 8 compliant color CCTV exterior cameras areprovided at main entry areas and parking lots. No interior CCTV cameras are provided. CCTV is monitored in Administrative Area with the use ofa television monitor and Speco Technologies computer based hard disk recording device and multiplexer, which are in good condition. Acompliant computer controlled access control system integrating alarms and video signals, with appropriate UPS backup, is provided. The systemis not equipped with card or biometric readers, but is equipped with a KeriSystems key pad door access control system. The security system isnot adequately provided throughout, and the system is not compliant with Ohio School Design Manual guidelines. The playground fencingrequires attention as the it is not fully compliant with OSDM requirements, since the playground is not fully fenced for security. The exterior sitelighting system is equipped with surface mounted HID metal halide, LED and incandescent entry lights in good to fair condition. Pedestrianwalkways are illuminated with surface mounted HID metal halide fixtures in fair to poor condition. Parking and bus pick-up / drop off areas areilluminated by pole mounted HID metal halide fixtures in fair to poor condition. The exterior site lighting system provides inadequate illuminationdue to insufficient fixture capacity and sparse placement of fixtures.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of security system to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines. Provide partial replacement and enhancementof exterior site lighting system, consisting of additional lighting fixtures and replacement of incandescent lighting, to meet Ohio School DesignManual guidelines. Provide additional playground fencing, funding included in complete replacement of security system.




Sum Comments

Security System: $1.85sq.ft. Required Required $114,074.70(complete, area of building)

Other: Partial Site LightingUpgrade

$0.50sq.ft. Required Required $30,831.00Provide partial replacement and enhancement of exterior sitelighting system.

Sum: $144,905.70 $134,553.95 $10,351.75

Computer Based Hard Disk Recording Device And Multiplexer Key Pad Door Access And Automat ic Visitor Control System





Facility Assessment

M. Emergency/Egress Lighting

Description: The overall facility is equipped with an emergency egress lighting system consisting of non compliant red lettered, LED, plastic constructionilluminated exit signs, and the system is in fair condition. The facility is equipped with emergency egress floodlighting, and the system is in faircondition. The system is provided with appropriate battery backup. The system is adequately provided throughout, meets Ohio Building Coderequirements, but does not meet Ohio School Design Manual requirements.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of emergency / egress lighting system to meet Ohio School Design Manual and Ohio Building Code guidelines.



Sum Comments

Emergency/Egress Lighting:$1.00sq.ft. Required Required $61,662.00(complete, area of building)

Sum: $61,662.00 $57,257.00 $4,405.00

Emergency Egress Floodlighting In the 1966 Original Construction Typical Emergency Egress Lighting System In the 1993 Addition





Facility Assessment

N. Fire Alarm

Description: The overall facility is equipped with a Simplex 4010 addressable type fire alarm system, installed in 2010, and in good condition, consisting ofmanual pull stations, horn and strobe indicating devices, smoke detectors, and heat sensors. The system is automatic and is monitored by a thirdparty. The system is equipped with sufficient audible horns, strobe indicating, smoke detectors and heat sensors. The system is not equippedwith any flow switches and tamper switches. The system thus will not support future fire suppression systems without flow and tamper switches.The system is adequately provided throughout, and does have additional zone capabilities. The system is compliant with Ohio Building Code,NFPA, and Ohio School Design Manual requirements.


Recommendations: Provide flow and tamper switches for a future sprinkler system.




Sum Comments

Other: Tamper and Flow SwitchMonitor Device

$4,000.00persystem

1 Required $4,000.00Provide f low and tamper swi tches for a futuresprinkler system.

Sum: $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $0.00

Typical Manual Pull Stations With Horn And Strobe Indicating Devices Typical Heat Sensor





Facility Assessment

O. Handicapped Access

Description: At the site, there is an accessible route provided from the public right-of-way, the accessible parking areas, and from the passenger unloadingzone to the main entrance of the school. There is an accessible route connecting all or most areas of the site. The exterior entrances are mostlyADA accessible. Access from the parking / drop-off area to the building entries is not compromised by steps or steep ramps. Adequate handicapparking is provided. Exterior doors are equipped with ADA hardware. Building entrances should be equipped with 1 ADA power assist door, andnone are provided. Playground layout and equipment are mostly compliant. On the interior of the building, space allowances and reach rangesare mostly compliant. There is not an accessible route through the building, which does not include protruding objects. Ground and floor surfacesare compliant. Ramps and stairs do not meet all ADA requirements, and are insufficient due to non-compliant guards and handrails. Exterior rampat the Main Entrance does not meet all ADA requirements due to lack of handrails and intermediate landing between runs. Elevation changeswithin the overall facility are facilitated by 1 non-compliant stair tower in good condition, 3 non-compliant steps in good to fair condition, 2non-compliant exterior steps in fair condition, and 2 non-compliant exterior ramps in fair condition. This multistory building has a non-compliantsingle passenger elevator that accesses every floor. Access to the Stage is facilitated by a Corridor at Stage level. Interior doors are recessed,are provided adequate clearances, and are not provided with ADA-compliant hardware in the 1966 Original Construction. Interior doors are notrecessed, are provided adequate clearances, and are provided with ADA-compliant hardware in the 1993 Addition. 18 ADA-compliant toilets arerequired, and 4 are currently provided. 18 ADA-compliant Restroom lavatories are required, and 2 are currently provided. 1 ADA-compliantScience Classroom lab sink is required, and none are currently provided. 4 ADA-compliant urinals are required, and none are currently provided.0 ADA-compliant showers are required, and none are currently provided. 4 ADA-compliant electric water coolers are required, and 4 are currentlyprovided. Toilet partitions are metal and plastic, and do not provide appropriate ADA clearances, except for the 2 Large Group Restrooms and 2Single Restrooms next to the Main Entrance. ADA-compliant accessories are not adequately provided and mounted in the 1966 OriginalConstruction, except for the 2 Large Group Restrooms and 2 Single Restrooms next to the Main Entrance. Mirrors meet ADA requirements formounting heights. Science Classrooms are not compliant with ADA requirements due to non-compliant ADA lab sinks and base cabinets. ArtClassrooms are not compliant with ADA requirements due to non-compliant ADA sinks and base cabinets. Staff, Special Education Classroom,Kindergarten Classroom, and Health Clinic Restrooms are not compliant with ADA requirements due to lack of ADA-compliant accessories andappropriate ADA clearances. ADA signage is not provided on the interior or the exterior of the building.


Recommendations: Provide ADA-compliant signage, 1 power assist door opener, 1 elevator, 13 toilet partitions, 3 toilets, 5 sinks, 4 urinals, and 24 doors and framesin the overall facility to facilitate the school’s meeting of ADA requirements. Replace handrails at steps to the Stage with ADA compliant handrailsEnlarge and reconfigure new single ADA Toilet Rooms for 1 Staff, 2 Special Education Classrooms, 2 Kindergarten Classrooms, and 2 HealthClinic Toilet Rooms, including 7 toilets, 7 sinks and 7 sets of ADA accessories in the 1966 Original Construction. Add 1 new single ADA ToiletRoom for the Kitchen, including 1 toilet, 1 sink, and 1 set of ADA accessories. Replace non-compliant exterior ramp at the Main Entrance. ADAelectric water coolers are corrected in Item E. ADA compliant sink base casework in the Classrooms is corrected in Item J. For interior doors thatare not being replaced under this Item, door hardware to be replaced with funding provided in Item J. Stair tower is corrected in Item U.




Sum Comments

Signage: $0.20sq.ft. Required Required $12,332.40(per building area)Ramps: $40.00sq.ft.

(Qty) 275 Required $11,000.00(per ramp/interior-exterior complete)

Elevators: $42,000.00each 2 Required $84,000.00(per stop, $84,000 minimum)Toilet/Urinals/Sinks: $1,500.00unit 12 Required $18,000.00(replacement ADA)

Toilet Partitions: $1,000.00stall 13 Required $13,000.00(ADA - grab bars, accessories included)

ADA Assist Door & Frame: $7,500.00unit 1 Required $7,500.00(openers, electrical, patching, etc)Replace Doors: $5,000.00leaf 16 Required $80,000.00(rework narrow opening to provide 3070 wood door, HM frame,

door/light, includes hardware)

Replace Doors: $5,000.00leaf 8 Required $40,000.00(rework opening and corridor wall to accommodate ADA standardswhen door opening is set back from edge of corridor and cannotaccommodate a wheelchair.)

Other: ADA Restroom. $10,000.00each 4 Required $40,000.00Add Toilet Room to meet ADA requirements (includes fixtures, wallsdoor and hardware, floor drain, and supply lines from nearby existinRestroom).

Other: ADA Step Handrails $20.00ln.ft. 24 Required $480.00Add ADA compliant handrails at the Stage steps.

Other: Ramp Handrails $20.00ln.ft . 130 Required $2,600.00Add ADA compl iant handrails at the ramps.

Other: Reconfigure ToiletRooms for ADA Accessibility

$10,000.00each 3 Required $30,000.00Enlarge and reconfigure existing Toilet Room to meet ADArequirements (includes fixtures, walls, door and hardware, floor draiand supply lines from existing Restroom).

Other: Removal ofNon-Compliant Ramp

$2.00sq.ft.(Qty)

250 Required $500.00Remove existing exterior ramp at the Main Entrance.

Sum: $339,412.40 $338,531.40 $881.00






Facility Assessment

P. Site Condition

Description: The 20 acre flat site is located in a suburban residential setting with moderate tree, shrub, and floral type landscaping. Outbuildings include twogazebos. There are no apparent problems with erosion or ponding, however it has been reported that ponding has occurred in adjacentresidential properties. The site is bordered by lightly traveled city streets. A single entrance onto the site facilitates proper separation of bus andother vehicular traffic, and one-way bus traffic is provided. A dedicated bus loop is provided for student loading and unloading, which is separatedfrom other vehicular traffic. Staff and visitor parking is facilitated by an asphalt parking lot in fair to poor condition, containing 85 parking places,which provides adequate parking for staff members, visitors, and the disabled. The site and parking lot drainage design, consisting of catchbasins, storm sewers, and sheet drainage provides adequate evacuation of storm water, and no problems with parking lot ponding wereobserved. Concrete curbs in poor condition are appropriately placed. Concrete sidewalks are properly sloped, are located to provide a logical flowof pedestrian traffic, and are in fair condition. Trash pick-up and service drive pavement is heavy duty and is in poor condition, and is notequipped with a concrete pad area for dumpsters. Exterior concrete steps and steel hand rails are provided at the main entrance and loadingdock and are in fair to poor condition. An exterior concrete ramp without a guardrail is provided at the main entrance and is in fair condition.Playgrounds are partially fenced, not separated from vehicular traffic, and are in good condition. The playground equipment is primarilyconstructed of coated steel and high density plastic, and is in fair condition. Generally playground equipment is placed to provide compliant fallzones, and on a compliant wood fiber mulch of sufficient depth. Hard surfaces with a basketball court and painted surfaces are provided on anasphalt surface. The site and playground area is equipped with sufficient tables and benches in fair condition. The athletic facilities are comprisedof two baseball diamonds and a soccer field, and are in fair condition. Site features are suitable for outdoor instruction, which is enhanced throughthe addition of two gazebos. There are no readily evident site conditions that might significantly affect master planning.


Recommendations: Provide for replacement of exterior steps due to condition. Replace exterior handrail/guardrails due to condition. Provide a new concretedumpster pad. Provide for the replacement of existing asphalt paving due to condition. Replace concrete sidewalks as required due to condition.Replace concrete curbs as required due to condition. Playground fencing issues are corrected in Item L. Provide site contingency allowances forunforeseen conditions.

Item Cost Unit Whole

Building

Original

Construction(1966)57,257 ft!

Classroom

Addition (1993)4,405 ft!

Sum Comments

Replace Existing Asphalt Paving (heavy duty): $30.00sq. yard 4,572 Required 345 Required $147,510.00(including drainage / tear out for heavy dutyasphalt)

Replace Existing Asphalt Paving (light duty): $28.00sq. yard 7,711 Required 540 Required $231,028.00(including drainage / tear out for light dutyasphalt)

Concrete Curb: $17.87ln.ft. 223 Required 17 Required $4,288.80(new)

Concrete Sidewalk: $4.69sq.ft.(Qty)

37 Required 3 Required $187.60(5 inch exterior slab)

Exterior Hand / Guard Rails: $42.75ln.ft. 111 Required 9 Required $5,130.00

Replace Concrete Steps: $32.00sq.ft.(Qty)

25 Required $800.00

Base Sitework Allowance for UnforeseenCircumstances

$50,000.00allowance Required $50,000.00Include this and one of the next two. (Applies fwhole building, so only one addition should hathis item)

Sitework Allowance for UnforeseenCircumstances for buildings between 0 SFand 100,000 SF

$1.50sq.ft. Required Required $92,493.00Include this one or the next. (Each additionshould have this item)

Other: Provide dumpster pads. $2,400.00each 2 Required $4,800.00(for three dumpsters)Sum: $536,237.40 $503,457.29 $32,780.11




Asphalt Paving and Concrete Sidewalks Playground Equipment





Facility Assessment

Q. Sewage System

Description: The sanitary sewer system is tied in to the municipal system, and is in good condition. No significant system deficiencies were reported by theschool district or noted during the physical assessment.


Recommendations: Existing conditions require no renovation or replacement at the present time.

Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Construction (1966)57,257 ft! Classroom Addition (1993)4,405 ft! SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Sanitary Waste Piping Sanitary Manhole





Facility Assessment

R. Water Supply

Description: The domestic water supply system is tied in to the municipal system, features 4" service and 4" water meter, which is located in a vault near thestreet, and is assumed to be in good to fair condition. The District was not able to provide water supply flow test data. The existing domestic waterservice appears to meet the facility’s current needs. The facility is not equipped with an automated fire suppression system, and the existingwater supply will not provide adequate support for a future system. The domestic water service is not equipped with a water booster pump, andnone was required. The system does not provide adequate pressure and capacity for the future needs of the school.


Recommendations: Provide a new city water supply line of adequate capacity to support the existing needs of the facility, as well as a future automated firesuppression system. Funding provided in Item U.

Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Construction (1966)57,257 ft!


SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Incoming Domestic Water Service Meter Vault Incoming Domestic Water Service Line





Facility Assessment

S. Exterior Doors

Description: Typical exterior doors in the 1966 Original Construction are aluminum and hollow metal type construction, installed on aluminum and hollow metaframes. Aluminum doors and frames are in good condition. Hollow metal doors and frames are in fair condition. Exterior doors feature singleglazed tempered glass or no vision panels. All aluminum replacement doors are equipped with appropriate hardware. Original hollow metal doorsare equipped with inappropriate hardware. Typical exterior doors in the 1993 Addition are hollow metal type construction, installed on hollowmetal frames. Hollow metal doors and frames are in good to fair condition. Exterior doors feature double glazed tempered glass vision panels.Hollow metal doors are equipped with inappropriate hardware. Entrance doors in the overall facility are aluminum type construction, installed onaluminum frames, and in good to fair condition. The main entrance doors feature single glazed tempered glass vision panels, transoms,sidelights, and appropriate hardware. The facility is not equipped with roof access doors. There is one overhead steel coiling door in fair to poorcondition.


Recommendations: Replace hollow metal exterior doors as required through the overall facility, due to poor condition. Replace overhead door, due to poor condition.Replacement of single glazed door vision panels, transoms and sidelights is addressed in Item F.



Sum Comments

Door Leaf/Frame and Hardware:$2,000.00per leaf 6 Required 4 Required $20,000.00(includes removal of existing)Overhead doors and hardware: $2,500.00per leaf 1 Required $2,500.00(8 x 10 sectional, manual operation)

Sum: $22,500.00 $14,500.00 $8,000.00

Main Entry at the 1966 Original Construction 1966 Original Construction Overhead Door





Facility Assessment

T. Hazardous Material

Description: The School District provided the AHERA three year reinspection reports, prepared by M.A.C. Paran Consulting Services, Inc., and dated January30, 2009, documenting known and assumed locations of asbestos and other hazardous materials. The AHERA Reports referenced only assumedasbestos containing materials. An Enhanced Environmental Hazards Assessment (EEHA) will need to be conducted in order to establishabatement budgets. Vinyl asbestos floor tile and mastic, tank breeching, transite window panels, laboratory tables, and possibly tartan flooringcontaining hazardous materials are located in the 1966 Original Construction in fair condition. These materials were described in the report andopen to observation and found to be in non-friable condition with light damage. There are no underground storage tanks on the site. Due to theconstruction date, there is a potential for lead based paint. Fluorescent lighting will require special disposal.


Recommendations: Remove all hazardous materials, inclusive of asbestos-containing materials in the 1966 Original Construction, as noted in the attachedEnvironmental Hazards Assessment. Provide for the testing of paint that has the potential of being lead-based. Provide for disposal of fluorescentlighting.




Sum Comme

Environmental Hazards Form EHA Form EHA Form —Breeching Insulation Removal $10.00sq.ft.

(Qty) 42 Required 0 Required $420.00

Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform LeadMock-Ups

$1.00per unit 5,000 Required 0 Required $5,000.00

Special Engineering Fees for LBP Mock-Ups $1.00per unit 5,000 Required 0 Required $5,000.00

Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Recycling/Incineration $0.10sq.ft.(Qty)

5,426 Required 441 Required $586.70

Laboratory Table/Counter Top Removal $100.00each 2 Required 0 Required $200.00See JResilient Flooring Removal, Including Mastic $3.00sq.ft.

(Qty) 24,040 Required 0 Required $72,120.00See J

Sum: $83,326.70 $83,282.60 $44.10

VAT Flooring Stage Entry Asbestos Positive Steps





Facility Assessment

U. Life Safety

Description: The overall facility is not equipped with an automated fire suppression system. Exit Corridors are situated such that dead-end Corridors are notpresent. The facility features 1 interior stair tower, which is not protected by a two hour fire enclosure. The facility features 2 exterior concreteramps providing egress from intermediate floors, which are in fair condition. Guardrails are constructed with vertical bars, do not meet the 4’’ balltest, and do not extend past the top and bottom stair risers as required by the Ohio Building Code. The Kitchen hood is in fair condition, and isequipped with the required UL 300 compliant wet chemical fire suppression system. The required 6’’ overhang of the cooking equipment isprovided by the hood. Kitchen hood exhaust ductwork is of proper construction, material, insulation, and installed as required by the OSDM andOBCMC. The cooking equipment is interlocked to shut down in the event of discharge of the fire suppression system. Fire extinguishers areprovided in sufficient quantity. Existing fire extinguishers are adequately spaced. The facility is not equipped with an emergency generator. Theexisting water supply is provided by a tie-in to the municipal system, and is insufficient to meet the future fire suppression needs of the school.Rooms with a capacity greater than 50 occupants are equipped with adequate egress. Combustible wood construction is used as infill formasonry openings in the 1966 Original Construction.


Recommendations: Provide new automated fire suppression system to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines. Provide increased water service of a capacitysufficient to support the fire suppression system, funding included in f ire suppression funding. Provide new emergency generator, with fundingprovided via complete replacement of electrical system in Item D. Provide new handrails to meet the requirements of the Ohio Building Code.Rework existing non-compliant stair tower. Provide 2 exterior stair enclosures. Replace 2 existing exterior concrete ramps due to age andcondition. Provide fire-rated enclosure around existing stair tower. Remove combustible wood construction in the 1966 Original Construction withnon-combustible wall construction.




Sum Comments

Sprinkler / Fire Suppression System: $3.20sq.ft.(Qty)

57,257 Required 4,405 Required $197,318.40(includes increase of service piping, if required)

Interior Stairwell Closure: $5,000.00perlevel

1 Required $5,000.00(includes associated doors, door frames andhardware)

New Exterior Stair Enclosure $42,500.00perlevel

2 Required $85,000.00(all inclusive)

Handrails: $5,000.00level 2 Required $10,000.00

Other: Exterior Ramp $32.00sq.ft.(Qty)

350 Required $11,200.00Replace 2 existing exterior concrete ramps due toage and condition.

Other: Remove and ReplaceCombustible Wall Construction

$10.00sq.ft.(Qty)

200 Required $2,000.00Replace combustible wood wall construction withnon-combustible wall construction.

Sum: $310,518.40 $296,422.40 $14,096.00

Typical Recessed Fire Extinguisher Cabinet Combustible Wood Construction In the 1966 Original Construction





Facility Assessment

V. Loose Furnishings

Description: The typical Classroom furniture is generally mismatched, and in generally poor to fair condition, consisting of student desks & chairs, teacherdesks & chairs, desk height file cabinets, reading tables, computer workstations, bookcases, wastebaskets, cubical partitions, and equipmentcarts. The facility’s furniture and loose equipment were evaluated in item 6.17 in the CEFPI section of this report, and on a scale of 1 to 10 theoverall facility received a rating of 6 due to observed conditions, and due to the fact that it lacks some of the Design Manual required elements.


Recommendations: Provide for replacement of outdated or inadequate furnishings.

Item Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Construct ion (1966)57,257 ft!


Sum Comments

CEFPI Rating 6$3.00sq.ft. Required Required $184,986.00

Sum: $184,986.00 $171,771.00 $13,215.00

Typical Student Tables Typical Teacher Desk





Facility Assessment

W. Technology

Description: The typical Classroom is equipped with one data port for teacher use, one cable port and monitor, and a 2-way PA system that can be initiated byeither party to meet Ohio School Design Manual requirements. The typical Classroom is not equipped with the required four technology dataports for student use and one voice port with a digitally based phone system to meet Ohio School Design Manual requirements. The facility isequipped with an unreliable centralized clock system, and battery operated clocks are used when they are replaced. Specialized electrical andsound system requirements of Gymnasium and Stage are inadequately provided, and in poor condition. Specialized electrical and sound systemrequirements of the Student Dining and Music spaces are not provided. OSDM-compliant computer network infrastructure is not provided.Wireless connection to the internet is provided throughout the facility. The facility does not contain a media distribution center, and does notprovide Computer Labs for use by students, but provides for 6 mobile Computer Labs on secured laptop charging carts. Elevator is equipped witha telephone.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of technology systems to meet Ohio School Design Manual requirements.



Sum Comments

ES portion of building with total SF 50,000 to 69,360$11.51sq.ft. (Qty) 49,250 Required 3,789 Required $610,478.89MS portion of building with total SF < 67,950 $10.29sq.ft. (Qty) 8,007 Required 616 Required $88,730.67

Sum: $699,209.56 $649,259.53 $49,950.03

Non-Compliant Computer Network Infrastructure Typical Classroom TV and VCR





Facility Assessment

X. Construction Contingency / Non-Construction Cost

Renovation Costs (A-W) $8,322,804.30

7.00% Construction Contingency $582,596.30

Subtotal $8,905,400.60

16.29% Non-Construction Costs $1,450,689.76

Total Project $10,356,090.36

Construction Contingency $582,596.30

Non-Construction Costs $1,450,689.76

Total for X. $2,033,286.06

Non-Construction Costs Breakdown

Land Survey 0.03% $2,671.62

Soil Borings / Phase I Envir. Report 0.10% $8,905.40

Agency Approval Fees (Bldg. Code) 0.25% $22,263.50

Construction Testing 0.40% $35,621.60

Printing - Bid Documents 0.15% $13,358.10

Advertising for Bids 0.02% $1,781.08

Builder’s Risk Insurance 0.12% $10,686.48

Design Professional’s Compensation 7.50% $667,905.05

CM Compensation 6.00% $534,324.04

Commissioning 0.60% $53,432.40

Non-Construction Contingency (includes partnering and mediation services) 1.12% $99,740.49

Total Non-Construction Costs 16.29% $1,450,689.76





School Facility Appraisal

Name of Appraiser Julie Apt Date of Appraisal 2013-08-22

Building Name Maddux Elem

Street Address 943 Rosetree Lane

City/Town, State, Zip Code Cincinnati, OH 45230

Telephone Number(s) 513-231-0780

School District Forest Hills Local SD

Setting: Suburban

Site-Acreage 20.00 Building Square Footage 61,662

Grades Housed K-6 Student Capacity 417

Number of Teaching Stations 35 Number of Floors 2

Student Enrollment 615

Dates of Construction 1966,1993

Energy Sources: Fuel Oil Gas Electric Solar

Air Conditioning: Roof Top Windows Units Central Room Units

Heating: Central Roof Top Individual Unit Forced Air

Hot Water Steam

Type of Construction

Load bearing masonry

Steel frame

Concrete frame

Wood

Steel Joists

Exterior Surfacing

Brick

Stucco

Metal

Wood

Stone

Floor Construction

Wood Joists

Steel Joists

Slab on grade

Structural slab


Report Generated at 29 Oct 2013 08:School Facility Appraisal Page 38



CEFPI Ratings Sheet

1.0 The School Site


Points Allocated Points

1.1 Site is large enough to meet educational needs as defined by state and local requirements 25 25

The site is 20 acres compared to 17 acres required by the OSDM.

1.2 Site is easily accessible and conveniently located for the present and future population 20 16

The School is centrally located within the School District, and is easily accessible.

1.3 Location is removed from undesirable business, industry, traffic, and natural hazards 10 8

The site is adjacent to residential uses, and there are no undesirable features adjacent to the School site.

1.4 Site is well landscaped and developed to meet educational needs 10 8

The site is moderately landscaped with mature shade trees, ornamental trees, and shrubs which define the property and emphasize the building entrance.

1.5 ES Well equipped playgrounds are separated from streets and parking areas 10 6

MS Well equipped athletic and intermural areas are separated from streets and parking

HS Well equipped athletic areas are adequate with suff icient solid-surface parking

Playground areas consist of metal or high density plastic type play equipment, which is in fair condition, and is located on wood fiber mulch which is an approved soft surface material. Playground fencing is partially provided and does not separate the playground from vehicular traffic.

1.6 Topography is varied enough to provide desirable appearance and without steep inclines 5 4

The site is gently sloped to provide positive drainage across the site. A flat area is provided to accommodate buildings, perimeter walks, vehicular circulation,parking areas, outdoor play areas, and physical education spaces, and is desirable.

1.7 Site has stable, well drained soil free of erosion 5 4

Soils appear to be stable and well drained, and no erosion was observed.

1.8 Site is suitable for special instructional needs, e.g., outdoor learning 5 4

The site has been developed to accommodate outdoor learning, including benches, gazebos, and picnic tables to facilitate instruction.

1.9 Pedestrian services include adequate sidewalk with designated crosswalks, curb cuts, and correctslopes

5 4

Sidewalks are adequately provided to accommodate safe pedestrian circulation including designated crosswalks, curb cuts, and correct slopes.

1.10 ES/MS Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking for faculty and staff is provided 5 3

HS Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking is provided for faculty, students, staff and community

Adequate parking is provided for faculty, staff, and community, and is located on asphalt pavement in fair to poor condition.

TOTAL - The School Site 100 82


Report Generated at 29 Oct 2013 08:CEFPI Ratings Sheet Page 39



CEFPI Ratings Sheet

2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features


StructuralPoints

AllocatedPoints

2.1 Structure meets all barrier-free requirements both externally and internally 15 10

Entire building is not ADA-compliant.

2.2 Roofs appear sound, have positive drainage, and are weather tight 15 10

The roofs over the 1966 Original Construction are in good condition but require replacement due to age of systems. The roofs over the 1993 Addition are in fair condition but require replacement due to age of systems.

2.3 Foundations are strong and stable with no observable cracks 10 8

Foundations are in good to fair condition with minor areas of cracks and spalling.

2.4 Exterior and interior walls have sufficient expansion joints and are free of deterioration 10 8

Exterior and interior walls are in good to fair condition, requiring some maintenance and repairs.

2.5 Entrances and exits are located so as to permit efficient student traffic flow 10 10

Exits are properly located to allow safe egress from the building.

2.6 Building ’’envelope’’ generally provides for energy conservation (see criteria) 10 4

Building envelope does not meet minimum energy conservation requirements.

2.7 Structure is free of friable asbestos and toxic materials 10 6

The building was constructed in 1966 and is reported to contain non-friable asbestos and other hazerdous materials.

2.8 Interior walls permit sufficient flexibility for a variety of class sizes 10 8

Flexible partition walls have been provided between Classrooms and allow for a variety of class sizes.

Mechanical/ElectricalPoints

AllocatedPoints

2.9 Adequate light sources are well maintained, and properly placed and are not subject to overheating 15 6

Light sources are improperly placed and provide inadequate lighting in some areas. Fixtures are well maintained in most areas. Light fixtures do not appear to be subject to overheating.

2.10 Internal water supply is adequate with sufficient pressure to meet health and safety requirements 15 6

Internal water supply will not support a future fire suppresssion system, but is adequate for current requirements.

2.11 Each teaching/learning area has adequate convenient wall outlets, phone and computer cabling for technologyapplications

15 2

Classrooms have an inadequate number of outlets and data jacks for technology applications.




2.12 Electrical controls are safely protected with disconnect switches easily accessible 10 8

Disconnect switches are adequately provided in required easily accessible locations to allow for safe servicing of equipment.

2.13 Drinking fountains are adequate in number and placement, and are properly maintained including provisions for thedisabled

10 8

Drinking fountains are not adequate in number and placement, and do not meet ADA requirements. Drinking fountains are properly maintained.

2.14 Number and size of restrooms meet requirements 10 9

The OBC requires that Restrooms be located on every floor and that the maximum travel distance shall not exceed 500 feet. The facility meets the requirement.

2.15 Drainage systems are properly maintained and meet requirements 10 10

Adequate drainage systems are provided throughout the facility. Drainage systems are well maintained.

2.16 Fire alarms, smoke detectors, and sprinkler systems are properly maintained and meet requirements 10 7

The facility is not sprinkled. Fire alarm systems are provided with required devices with the exception of flow and tamper switches. Smoke detectors are adequatelyprovided.

2.17 Intercommunication system consists of a central unit that allows dependable two-way communication between theoffice and instructional areas

10 8

The central intercommunication system provides reliable communication between the Administration area and all teaching/learning areas, but is outdated.

2.18 Exterior water supply is sufficient and available for normal usage 5 5

Exterior wall hydrants are adequately provided around the exterior of the facility.

TOTAL - Structural and Mechanical Features 200 133





CEFPI Ratings Sheet

3.0 Plant Maintainability


Points Allocated Points

3.1 Windows, doors, and walls are of material and finish requiring minimum maintenance 15 12

Exterior materials and finishes for doors, windows and walls are durable and require minimal maintenance.

3.2 Floor surfaces throughout the building require minimum care 15 9

Flooring throughout the facility consists of VCT, VAT, terrazzo, sealed concrete, rubber, and quarry tile, which is well maintained throughout the facility.

3.3 Ceilings and walls throughout the building, including service areas, are easily cleaned and resistant to stain 10 6

Lay-in type ceilings are not easily cleaned or resistant to stain. Brick and painted block type wall finishes are easily cleaned and resistant to stain

3.4 Built-in equipment is designed and constructed for ease of maintenance 10 4

Casework consists of wood type construction with plastic laminate tops in fair to poor condition.

3.5 Finishes and hardware, with compatible keying system, are of durable quality 10 7

Door hardware varies throughout the facility, and does not meet ADA requirements.

3.6 Restroom fixtures are wall mounted and of quality finish 10 9

Fixtures are wall mounted and are of good quality.

3.7 Adequate custodial storage space with water and drain is accessible throughout the building 10 9

Custodial storage space is adequately located throughout the facility, including provisions for water and drains.

3.8 Adequate electrical outlets and power, to permit routine cleaning, are available in every area 10 8

Electrical outlets are adequately provided in Corridors and allow for convenient routine cleaning.

3.9 Outdoor light fixtures, electrical outlets, equipment, and other fixtures are accessible for repair and replacement 10 4

Outdoor light fixtures are inadequately provided, but are accessible for repair and replacement. Electrical outlets are inadequately provided around the exterior of thefacility.

TOTAL - Plant Maintainability 100 68





CEFPI Ratings Sheet

4.0 Building Safety and Security


Site Safety Points Allocated Points

4.1 Student loading areas are segregated from other vehicular traffic and pedestrian walkways 15 12

Student loading is separated from vehicular t raffic and pedestrian walkways.

4.2 Walkways, both on and offsite, are available for safety of pedestrians 10 8

Walkways are adequately provided both on and off-site for pedestrian safety.

4.3 Access streets have sufficient signals and signs to permit safe entrance to and exit from school area 5 5

School signs and signals are located as required on adjacent access streets.

4.4 Vehicular entrances and exits permit safe traffic flow 5 2

A single entrance onto the site facilitates proper separation of bus and other vehicular traffic, and one-way bus traff ic is provided.

4.5 ES Playground equipment is free from hazard 5 3

MS Location and types of intramural equipment are free from hazard

HS Athletic field equipment is properly located and is free from hazard

Playground equipment consists of plastic coated steel or high density plastic type equipment in fair condition, appears to be free from hazard, and is located on an approved soft surface material to a sufficient depth.

Building Safety Points Allocated Points

4.6 The heating unit(s) is located away from student occupied areas 20 10

Heating boilers are located in rooms that are not accessible by students. Unit ventilators are located in the Classrooms and other learning areas.

4.7 Multi-story buildings have at least two stairways for student egress 15 10

The building has 1 stair tower, which is not enclosed, and is not ADA and OBC compliant due to lack of compliant handrails and guards.

4.8 Exterior doors open outward and are equipped with panic hardware 10 6

Exterior doors open in the direction of travel and are equipped with panic hardware. Some doors are equipped with inappropriate hardware.

4.9 Emergency lighting is provided throughout the entire building with exit signs on separate electrical

circuits

10 7

Emergency light fixtures and exit signs are not on separate circuits, powered by battery, and are adequately provided.

4.10 Classroom doors are recessed and open outward 10 8

In the 1966 Original Construction, Classroom doors are adequately recessed with proper ADA clearances, and open outward. In the 1993 Addition, Classroom doorsare not adequately recessed, have proper ADA clearances, and open outward.




4.11 Building security systems are provided to assure uninterrupted operation of the educationalprogram

10 7

Security systems are inadequately provided and are in fair condition.

4.12 Flooring (including ramps and stairways) is maintained in a non-slip condition 5 4

VCT, VAT, terrazzo, sealed concrete, rubber, and quarry tile flooring has been well maintained throughout the facility.

4.13 Stair risers (interior and exterior) do not exceed 6 1/2 inches and range in number from 3 - 16 5 5

Stair treads and risers are properly designed and meet requirements.

4.14 Glass is properly located and protected with wire or safety material to prevent accidental studentinjury

5 3

Glass at exterior door transoms and sidelights is tempered for safety. Interior glazing is not code compliant.

4.15 Fixed Projections in the traffic areas do not extend more than eight inches from the corridor wall 5 4

Electric water coolers have not been recessed in the Corridor wall, but meet ADA requirements and do not impede traffic flow in the Corridors.

4.16 Traffic areas terminate at an exit or a stairway leading to an egress 5 4

Exits are properly located to allow safe egress from the building. Stairways empty to the exterior, or adjacent to a Corridor leading to the exterior.

Emergency Safety Points Allocated Points

4.17 Adequate fire safety equipment is properly located 15 10

The facility is not sprinkled. Fire alarm devices are provided adequately. Fire extinguishers are adequately provided.

4.18 There are at least two independent exits from any point in the building 15 12

Multiple exits are provided from Corridors throughout the facility.

4.19 Fire-resistant materials are used throughout the structure 15 12

The overall facility has a steel frame with brick veneer on a non-load bearing masonry exterior wall system, which displayed locations of minor deterioration, and is ingood to fair condition. Interior walls are concrete masonry units, brick, glazed block, metal stud framed partitions with gypsum board, wood framed partitions with wood paneling and operable partition walls, and are in good to fair condition.

4.20 Automatic and manual emergency alarm system with a distinctive sound and flashing light isprovided

15 13

The fire alarm is provided with manual and automatic actuation, and is provided with horn and visual indicating devices in all required areas.

TOTAL - Building Safety and Security 200 145





CEFPI Ratings Sheet

5.0 Educational Adequacy


Academic Learning Space Points Allocated Points

5.1 Size of academic learning areas meets desirable standards 25 15

The average Classroom in the 1966 Original Construction is 864 and 807 SF compared to 900 SF required by the OSDM. The average Classroom in the 1993 Addition is 806 SF compared to 900 SF required by the OSDM.

5.2 Classroom space permits arrangements for small group activity 15 9

Undersized Classrooms do not allow sufficient space for effective small group activities. Small group activity is located in Common space outside the Classrooms

5.3 Location of academic learning areas is near related educational activities and away from disruptive noise 10 6

The Gymnasium is properly isolated from the academic learning areas to reduce distractions. The Music Room is located adjacent to academic learning areas,which can be distracting.

5.4 Personal space in the classroom away from group instruction allows privacy time for individual students 10 4

Undersized Classrooms do not permit privacy time for individual students.

5.5 Storage for student materials is adequate 10 8

Storage cubbies, located in the Classroom, are adequately provided for student storage.

5.6 Storage for teacher materials is adequate 10 8

Casework is adequately provided for storage of teacher materials.

Special Learning Space Points Allocated Points

5.7 Size of special learning area(s) meets standards 15 15

The Special Education Classroom is 1788 SF compared to 900 SF recommended in the OSDM.

5.8 Design of specialized learning area(s) is compatible with instructional need 10 10

Special Education spaces are properly designed to meet instructional needs.

5.9 Library/Resource/Media Center provides appropriate and attractive space 10 4

The Media Center is 1,209 SF compared to 2,153 SF recommended in the OSDM. The Library is not visually appealing and does not provide natural light.

5.10 Gymnasium (or covered P.E. area) adequately serves physical education instruction 5 3

The Gymnasium is 3,239 SF compared to 3,500-5,000 SF recommended in the OSDM.

5.11 ES Pre-kindergarten and kindergarten space is appropriate for age of students and nature of instruction 10 4

MS/HS Science program is provided sufficient space and equipment

Pre-K and Kindergarten spaces are undersized, and do not provide adequate instruction space.




5.12 Music Program is provided adequate sound treated space 5 2

The Music Room is 977 SF compared to 1,800-3,000 recommended in the OSDM.

5.13 Space for art is appropriate for special instruction, supplies, and equipment 5 2

The Art Room is 906 SF compared to 1,200 SF recommended in the OSDM. The Art Room is undersized and does not provide sufficient space for storage of supplies and equipment.

School Facility Appraisal Points Allocated Points

5.14 Space for technology education permits use of state-of-the-art equipment 5 3

The facility is not provided with Computer Labs for student use, provides six mobile Computer Labs on secured carts, but does not meet OSFC requirements fortechnology.

5.15 Space for small groups and remedial instruction is provided adjacent to classrooms 5 5

Common areas are provided in the Corridor outside the Classrooms for small groups and remedial instruction.

5.16 Storage for student and teacher material is adequate 5 4

Casework and storage cubbies have been adequately provided for storage of teacher and student materials.

Support Space Points Allocated Points

5.17 Teacher’s lounge and work areas reflect teachers as professionals 10 4

The Teacher’s Lounge is 386 SF compared to 450-900 SF, for 8-24 staff, recommended in the OSDM.

5.18 Cafeteria/Kitchen is attractive with sufficient space for seating/dining, delivery, storage, and foodpreparation

10 2

The Student Dining space is 2,398 SF compared to 3,000 SF recommended in the OSDM, and is attractive with adequate space for seating. The Kitchen space is

1,386 SF compared to 2,153 SF recommended in the OSDM.

5.19 Administrative offices provided are consistent in appearance and function with the maturity of the studentsserved

5 1

Administrative Offices are not adequately provided for Elementary and Middle School students.

5.20 Counselor’s office insures privacy and sufficient storage 5 2

The Counselor’s Office is 218 SF compared to 120 SF, 85 SF of storage is provided compared to 100 SF, and there is no Conference room compared to the 200 SF, recommended in the OSDM.

5.21 Clinic is near administrative offices and is equipped to meet requirements 5 1

The Clinic is 62 SF compared to 370 SF recommended in the OSDM. The Clinic is located within the Administrative Offices and lacks required equipment.

5.22 Suitable reception space is available for students, teachers, and visitors 5 4

Reception space consists of approximately 263 SF compared to 200-400 SF recommended by the OSDM.

5.23 Administrative personnel are provided sufficient work space and privacy 5 1

The Administrative area consists of approximately 1,311 SF for the principal, assistant principal, secretary, Conference Room, Storage, Copy Room, and Restroom,compared to 2,600 SF recommended by the OSDM.




TOTAL - Educational Adequacy 200 117





CEFPI Ratings Sheet

6.0 Environment for Education


Exterior Environment Points Allocated Points

6.1 Overall design is aesthetically pleasing to age of students 15 12

The building is a utilitarian design with typical detailing, which is aesthetically acceptable.

6.2 Site and building are well landscaped 10 8

The site is moderately landscaped with mature shade trees, ornamental trees, and shrubs which define the property and emphasize the building entrance.

6.3 Exterior noise and poor environment do not disrupt learning 10 8

The site is adjacent to residential uses, and there are no undesirable features adjacent to the school site.

6.4 Entrances and walkways are sheltered from sun and inclement weather 10 8

The main entrance to the School is completely sheltered.

6.5 Building materials provide attractive color and texture 5 4

Exterior building materials consist of brick and concrete, which provides an acceptable color and texture.

Interior Environment Points Allocated Points

6.6 Color schemes, building materials, and decor provide an impetus to learning 20 16

The color palette is comprised of a warm base with accent color of more saturated hues. School colors are reflected in the Gymnasium. The use of repeated colors

and materials gives the building some unity and a sense of consistency.

6.7 Year around comfortable temperature and humidity are provided throughout the building 15 2

The facility is not air conditioned to provide year-round temperature and humidity control.

6.8 Ventilating system provides adequate quiet circulation of clean air and meets 15cfm VBC requirement 15 4

The ventilating systems do not provide an adequate quantity of ventilation air to the spaces. Ventilation systems introduce minimal noise into the teaching and learning areas.

6.9 Lighting system provides proper intensity, diffusion, and distribution of illumination 15 4

The lighting system does not provide proper intensity in some areas. Location of lighting fixtures provides uneven distribution of illumination. Diffusion of illumination is adequately provided by the light fixture lenses in some areas.

6.10 Drinking fountains and restroom facilities are conveniently located 15 12

The OBC requires one drinking fountain per 100 occupants. The building capacity requires 7 drinking fountains. The existing facility has 4 drinking fountains. ADArequires that 50 percent of drinking fountains be accessible. 4 of the drinking fountains are accessible. Classrooms are provided with drinking fountains.

6.11 Communication among students is enhanced by commons area(s) for socialization 10 8

There are areas for students to gather in the Student Dining area and Gymnasium, as well as a small gathering area at the entrance to the school.




6.12 Traffic flow is aided by appropriate foyers and corridors 10 8

Corridors and Foyers are adequately designed for efficient traffic flow.

6.13 Areas for students to interact are suitable to the age group 10 6

There are areas for students to gather in the Student Dining area, Gymnasium, as well as a small gathering areas at exterior yard areas.

6.14 Large group areas are designed for effective management of students 10 8

The Gymnasium is adequately designed to manage large groups of students.

6.15 Acoustical treatment of ceilings, walls, and floors provides effective sound control 10 2

No acoustical treatment has been provided.

6.16 Window design contributes to a pleasant environment 10 8

The windows are fairly well designed to contribute to a pleasant environment.

6.17 Furniture and equipment provide a pleasing atmosphere 10 6

Classroom furniture is mismatched and in fair to poor condition.

TOTAL - Environment for Education 200 124





LEED Observation Notes School District: Forest Hills Local SD

County: Hamilton

School District IRN: 47340

Building: Maddux Elem

Building IRN: 21949

Sustainable Sites

Construction process can have a harmful effect on local ecology, especially when buildings are build on productive agricultural, wildlife or open areas. Several measures can be take however to prevent the impact on undeveloped lands or to improve previously contaminated sites. Appropriate location reduces the need for private transportation and helpto prevent an increase in air pollution. Developing buildings in urban areas and on brownfield sites instead of greenfield locations has economical and environmental benefits.

Controlling stormwater runoff and erosion can prevent the worsening of water quality in receiving bodies of water and the impact on aquatic life. Once the building is constructedit’s important to decrease heat island effects and reduce the light pollution on the site.

(source: LEED Reference Guide, 2001

The amount of asphalt will contribute to a heat island effect for non-roofs (see SS Credit 7.1) and does not effectively maximize open space (see SS Credit 5.2). The size of theparking area exceeds the amount required with 85 parking spaces provided and 68 spaces required (see SS Credit 4.4). Roof surfaces have low reflectance and high thermalemittance and will contribute to a heat island effect. Cool Roofs are not currently utilized to reduce heat island effect (see SS Credit 7.2).

Water Efficiency

In the US ca. 340 billion gallons of fresh water are withdrawn daily from surface sources, 65% of which is discharged later after use. Water is also withdrawn from underground aquifers The excessive usage of water results in the current water deficit, estimated at 3,700 billion gallons. Water efficiency measures in commercial buildings can reduce wateusage by at least 30%. Low-flow fixtures, sensors or using non potable water for landscape irrigation, toilet flushing and building systems are just some of available strategies. Nonly do they result in environmental savings, but also bring about financial benefits, related to lower water use fees, lower sewage volumes to treat and energy use reductions.

(source: LEED Reference Guide, 2001:6

Currently there are no measures to reduce wastewater or water usage. There are not areas in the landscape established to provide on-site retention as needed. Drainage ispredominantly sheet flow toward catch basins which converge into the city storm system. There are minimal landscape features of grass, deciduous trees, conifers, shrubs, andsome flora, with most of the open site being covered with asphalt and concrete. The overall facility does not contain any water-efficient fixtures or appliances to meet LEEDrequirements. The assessment calls for fixture replacement, which would include the addition of electrical flush sensors. In areas where electrical flush sensors could be costly

and difficult to install, battery operated sensors would be best. Roof areas and drains are such that storm water retention / collection will be difficult to achieve.

Energy & Atmosphere

Buildings in the US account for more than 30% of the total energy use and for approximately 60% of electricity. 75% of energy is derived from the burning of fossil fuels, which releases CO2 into the Atmosphere and contributes to global warming. Moreover, coal fired electric utilities release nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide, where the former contributto smog and the latter to acid rain. Other types of energy production are not less harmful. Burning of natural gas produces nitrogen oxides and greenhouse gases as well, nucleapower creates nuclear wastes, while hydroelectric generating plants disrupt natural water flows. Luckily there are several practices that can reduce energy consumption and are environmentally and economically beneficial. Not only will they reduce the air pollution and mitigate global warming thanks to being less dependent on power plants, but also thewill reduce operational costs and will quickly pay back. In order to make the most of those practices, it’s important to adopt a holistic approach to the building’s energy load and integrate different energy saving strategies.


The overall facility is equipped with HVAC equipment that, due to age, condition, and inefficiency, does not provide appropriate energy controls or recovery to meet LEEDrequirements. Most equipment in the overall facility is natural gas fired, but could be updated to electric fired. The District does not produce their own energy or buy energy credito meet LEED requirements. The site is such that solar panel installation could be accomplished.

Material & Resources

The steps related to process building materials, such as extraction, processing and transportation are not environmentally natural, as they pollute the air, water and use natural resources. Construction and demolition wastes account for 40% of the solid waste stream in the US. Reusing existing documents is one of the best strategies to reduce solid

wastes volumes and prevents then from ending up at landfills. It also reduces habitat disturbance and minimizes the need for the surrounding infrastructure. While using new materials one should take into account different material sources. Salvaged materials provide savings on material costs, recycled content material minimizes waste products andlocal materials reduce the environmental impact of transportation. Finally, using rapidly renewable materials and certified wood decreases the consumption of natural resources.Recycling and reusing construction waste is another strategy to be taken into consideration in sustainable design.


The facility does provide for storage and collection of recyclables (see MR Prerequisite 1).

Indoor Environmental Quality

As we spend a big majority of our time indoors, the emphasis should be put on optimal indoor environmental quality strategies while (re)designing a building . Otherwise, a poor IEQ will have adverse effects on occupants’ health, productivity and quality of life. IEQ strategies such as ventilation effectiveness and control of contaminants or a building flush-out prior to occupancy can reduce potential liability, increase the market value of the building but can also result in a significantly higher productivity (16%). Other strategiesinvolve automatic sensors and controls, introducing fresh air to the building or providing lots of daylighting views.


Corridors and Classrooms feature hard, easy to clean surfaces, but do not provide acoustical measure other than ceiling tile (see EQ Credit 9). The overall facility is equipped wHVAC equipment that, due to age, condition, and inefficiency, does not provide appropriate indoor air quality or controls to meet LEED requirements. Existing site / building layocoupled with existing window opening sizes, might make achieving some LEED credits difficult and costly.

Innovation & Design Process

This category is aimed at recognizing projects that implemented innovative building features and sustainable building knowledge, and whose strategy or measure results exceeded those which are required by the LEED Rating System. Expertise in sustainable design is the key element of the innovative design and construction process.


This building does not implement innovative building features and sustainable building knowledge which exceed results which are required by the LEED Rating System.




Justification for Allocation of Points

Building Name and Level: Maddux Elem

K-6

Building features that clearly exceed criteria:

1. An Outdoor Classroom is provided at this facility on the northwest side of the building.

2. WIFI technology is provided throughout the building.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Building features that are non-existent or very inadequate:

1. This facility is not ADA accessible.

2. This facility does not have a fire suppression system.

3. This facility has an unprotected stair tower.

4. This facility is reported to contain asbestos and other hazardous materials.

5. This facility does not provide for Locker Rooms and Science Labs for the 6th Grade.

6.


Report Generated at 29 Oct 2013 08:Justification for Allocation of Points Page 51



Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimates Owner: Forest Hills Local SD

Facility: Maddux Elem

Date of Initial Assessment: Aug 22, 2013

Date of Assessment Update: Oct 29, 2013

Cost Set: 2013

District IRN: 47340

Building IRN: 21949

Firm: SBDP

Scope remains unchanged after cost updates.

Building Addition Addition Area (sf)

Total of Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimates

Renovation Demolition

1966 Original Construction 57,257 $83,282.60 $73,282.60

1993 Classroom Addition 4,405 $44.10 $44.10

Total 61,662 $83,326.70 $73,326.70

Total with Regional Cost Factor (98.14%) — $81,776.82 $71,962.82

Regional Total with Soft Costs & Contingency — $101,755.15 $89,543.56




Environmental Hazards - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949) - Original Construction

Environmental Hazards - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949) - Original Construction

Owner: Forest Hills Local SD Bldg. IRN: 21949

Facility: Maddux Elem BuildingAdd: Original Construction

Date: 2009-01-30 Consultant Name: MAC Paran

A. Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) AFM=Asbestos Free MaterialACM Found Status Quantity Unit Cost Estimated Cost

1. Boiler/Furnace Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $10.00 $0.002. Breeching Insulation Removal Reported Asbestos-Containing Material 42 $10.00 $420.00

3. Tank Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $8.00 $0.004. Duct Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $8.00 $0.005. Pipe Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $10.00 $0.006. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $20.00 $0.007. Pipe Insulation Removal (Crawlspace/Tunnel) Not Present 0 $12.00 $0.008. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal (Crawlspace/Tunnel) Not Present 0 $30.00 $0.009. Pipe Insulation Removal (Hidden in Walls/Ceilings) Not Present 0 $15.00 $0.0010. Dismantling of Boiler/Furnace/Incinerator Not Present 0 $2,000.00 $0.0011. Flexible Duct Connection Removal Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.0012. Acoustical Plaster Removal Not Present 0 $7.00 $0.0013. Fireproofing Removal Not Present 0 $25.00 $0.0014. Hard Plaster Removal Not Present 0 $7.00 $0.0015. Gypsum Board Removal Not Present 0 $6.00 $0.0016. Acoustical Panel/Tile Ceiling Removal Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.0017. Laboratory Table/Counter Top Removal Reported Asbestos-Containing Material 2 $100.00 $200.0018. Cement Board Removal Not Present 0 $5.00 $0.0019. Electric Cord Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $1.00 $0.0020. Light (Reflector) Fixture Removal Not Present 0 $50.00 $0.0021. Sheet Flooring with Friable Backer Removal Not Present 0 $4.00 $0.0022. Fire Door Removal Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.00

23. Door and Window Panel Removal Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.0024. Decontamination of Crawlspace/Chase/Tunnel Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.0025. Soil Removal Not Present 0 $150.00 $0.0026. Non-ACM Ceiling/Wall Removal (for access) Not Present 0 $2.00 $0.0027. Window Component (Compound, Tape, or Caulk) - Reno & Demo Not Present 0 $300.00 $0.0028. Window Component (Compound, Tape, or Caulk) - Reno Only Not Present 0 $300.00 $0.0029. Resilient Flooring Removal, Including Mastic Reported Asbestos-Containing Material 24040 $3.00 $72,120.0030. Carpet Mastic Removal Not Present 0 $2.00 $0.0031. Carpet Removal (over RFC) Not Present 0 $1.00 $0.0032. Acoustical Tile Mastic Removal Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.0033. Sink Undercoating Removal Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.0034. Roofing Removal Not Present 0 $2.00 $0.0035. (Sum of Lines 1-34) Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Renovation Work $72,740.0036. (Sum of Lines 1-12, 14-34) Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Demolition Work $72,740.00

B. Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks None Reported

Tank No. Location Age Product Stored Size Est.Rem.Cost1. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Total Cost For Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks $0.00

C. Lead-Based Paint (LBP) - Renovation Only Addition Constructed after 19801. Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform Lead Mock-Ups $5,000.002. Special Engineering Fees for LBP Mock-Ups $5,000.003. (Sum of Lines 1-2) Total Cost for Lead-Based Paint Mock-Ups $10,000.00

D. Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Recycling/Incineration Not ApplicableArea Of Building Addition Square Feet w/Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Unit Cost Total Cost

1. 57257 5426 $0.10 $542.60

E. Other Environmental Hazards/Remarks None ReportedDescription Cost Estimate

1. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Renovation $0.002. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Demolition $0.00

F. Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimate Summaries1. A35, B1, C3, D1, and E1 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Renovation $83,282.602. A36, B1, D1, and E2 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Demolition $73,282.60

* INSPECTION ASSUMPTIONS for Reported/Assumed Asbestos-Free Materials (Rep/Asm AFM):

a. Unless reported otherwise by the District, materials installed after 1980 are assumed to be asbestos-free.

b. Unless reported otherwise by the District, small quantities (less than 1,000 square feet) of the following materials are assumed to be asbestos free: hard plaster,acoustical plaster and gypsum board systems; acoustical panels and tiles; fireproofing; 12""12" floor tile and mastic.

c. Unless reported otherwise by the District, all roofing materials are assumed to be asbestos-free.

THESE MATERIALS SHOULD BE PROPERLY SAMPLED AND ANALYZED FOR ASBESTOS PRIOR TO DISTURBING THEM.




Environmental Hazards - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949) - Classroom Addition

Environmental Hazards - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Maddux Elem (21949) - Classroom Addition

Owner: Forest Hills Local SD Bldg. IRN: 21949

Facility: Maddux Elem BuildingAdd: Classroom Addition

Date: 2009-01-30 Consultant Name: MAC Paran

A. Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) AFM=Asbestos Free MaterialACM Found Status Quantity Unit Cost Estimated Cost

1. Boiler/Furnace Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $10.00 $0.002. Breeching Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $10.00 $0.00

3. Tank Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $8.00 $0.004. Duct Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $8.00 $0.005. Pipe Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $10.00 $0.006. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $20.00 $0.007. Pipe Insulation Removal (Crawlspace/Tunnel) Not Present 0 $12.00 $0.008. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal (Crawlspace/Tunnel) Not Present 0 $30.00 $0.009. Pipe Insulation Removal (Hidden in Walls/Ceilings) Not Present 0 $15.00 $0.0010. Dismantling of Boiler/Furnace/Incinerator Not Present 0 $2,000.00 $0.0011. Flexible Duct Connection Removal Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.0012. Acoustical Plaster Removal Not Present 0 $7.00 $0.0013. Fireproofing Removal Not Present 0 $25.00 $0.0014. Hard Plaster Removal Not Present 0 $7.00 $0.0015. Gypsum Board Removal Not Present 0 $6.00 $0.0016. Acoustical Panel/Tile Ceiling Removal Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.0017. Laboratory Table/Counter Top Removal Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.0018. Cement Board Removal Not Present 0 $5.00 $0.0019. Electric Cord Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $1.00 $0.0020. Light (Reflector) Fixture Removal Not Present 0 $50.00 $0.0021. Sheet Flooring with Friable Backer Removal Not Present 0 $4.00 $0.0022. Fire Door Removal Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.00

23. Door and Window Panel Removal Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.0024. Decontamination of Crawlspace/Chase/Tunnel Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.0025. Soil Removal Not Present 0 $150.00 $0.0026. Non-ACM Ceiling/Wall Removal (for access) Not Present 0 $2.00 $0.0027. Window Component (Compound, Tape, or Caulk) - Reno & Demo Not Present 0 $300.00 $0.0028. Window Component (Compound, Tape, or Caulk) - Reno Only Not Present 0 $300.00 $0.0029. Resilient Flooring Removal, Including Mastic Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.0030. Carpet Mastic Removal Not Present 0 $2.00 $0.0031. Carpet Removal (over RFC) Not Present 0 $1.00 $0.0032. Acoustical Tile Mastic Removal Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.0033. Sink Undercoating Removal Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.0034. Roofing Removal Not Present 0 $2.00 $0.0035. (Sum of Lines 1-34) Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Renovation Work $0.0036. (Sum of Lines 1-12, 14-34) Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Demolition Work $0.00

B. Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks None Reported

Tank No. Location Age Product Stored Size Est.Rem.Cost1. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Total Cost For Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks $0.00

C. Lead-Based Paint (LBP) - Renovation Only Addition Constructed after 19801. Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform Lead Mock-Ups $0.002. Special Engineering Fees for LBP Mock-Ups $0.003. (Sum of Lines 1-2) Total Cost for Lead-Based Paint Mock-Ups $0.00

D. Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Recycling/Incineration Not ApplicableArea Of Building Addition Square Feet w/Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Unit Cost Total Cost

1. 4405 441 $0.10 $44.10

E. Other Environmental Hazards/Remarks None ReportedDescription Cost Estimate

1. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Renovation $0.002. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Demolition $0.00

F. Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimate Summaries1. A35, B1, C3, D1, and E1 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Renovation $44.102. A36, B1, D1, and E2 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Demolition $44.10

* INSPECTION ASSUMPTIONS for Reported/Assumed Asbestos-Free Materials (Rep/Asm AFM):

a. Unless reported otherwise by the District, materials installed after 1980 are assumed to be asbestos-free.

b. Unless reported otherwise by the District, small quantities (less than 1,000 square feet) of the following materials are assumed to be asbestos free: hard plaster,acoustical plaster and gypsum board systems; acoustical panels and tiles; fireproofing; 12""12" floor tile and mastic.

c. Unless reported otherwise by the District, all roofing materials are assumed to be asbestos-free.