30
Sorority World

sorority - intrologic.stanford.edu

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    6

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: sorority - intrologic.stanford.edu

Sorority World

Page 2: sorority - intrologic.stanford.edu

Sorority World

Page 3: sorority - intrologic.stanford.edu

Sorority World

Page 4: sorority - intrologic.stanford.edu

Sorority World

Page 5: sorority - intrologic.stanford.edu

Sorority World

Page 6: sorority - intrologic.stanford.edu

Sorority World

Page 7: sorority - intrologic.stanford.edu

Logical Sentences

Page 8: sorority - intrologic.stanford.edu

Logical Sentences

Page 9: sorority - intrologic.stanford.edu

Logical Sentences

Dana likes Cody.Abby does not like Dana.

Dana does not like Abby.Bess likes Cody or Dana.

Abby likes everyone that Bess likes.

Cody likes everyone who likes her.

Nobody likes herself.

Page 10: sorority - intrologic.stanford.edu

Sorority World

Page 11: sorority - intrologic.stanford.edu

Sorority World

Page 12: sorority - intrologic.stanford.edu

Sorority World

Page 13: sorority - intrologic.stanford.edu

Logical Entailment

Page 14: sorority - intrologic.stanford.edu

Possible Worlds

Page 15: sorority - intrologic.stanford.edu

A set of premises logically entails a conclusion if and only if every world that satisfies the premises satisfies the conclusion.

Premises: Conclusions:Dana likes Cody. Bess likes Cody.Abby does not like Dana. Bess does not like Dana.Dana does not like Abby. Everybody likes somebody.Bess likes Cody or Dana. Everybody is liked by somebody.Abby likes everyone that Bess likes.Cody likes everyone who likes her.Nobody likes herself.

Logical Entailment

Page 16: sorority - intrologic.stanford.edu

Checking All Possible Worlds

Page 17: sorority - intrologic.stanford.edu

Proofs

Page 18: sorority - intrologic.stanford.edu

Abby likes everyone that Bess likes.Abby does not like Dana.Therefore, Bess does not like Dana.

Bess likes Cody or Dana.Bess does not like DanaTherefore, Bess likes Cody.

Proofs

Page 19: sorority - intrologic.stanford.edu

A rule of inference is a reasoning pattern consisting of some premises and some conclusions.

If we believe the premises, a rule of inference tell us that we should also believe the conclusions.

Rules of Inference

Page 20: sorority - intrologic.stanford.edu

All of Abby's friends are Bess's friends.All of Bess's friends are Cody's friends. Therefore, all of Abby's friends are Cody's friends.

Sample Rule of Inference

Page 21: sorority - intrologic.stanford.edu

All Accords are Hondas.All Hondas are Japanese. Therefore, all Accords are Japanese.

Sample Rule of Inference

Page 22: sorority - intrologic.stanford.edu

Sample Rule of Inference

All borogoves are slithy toves.All slithy toves are mimsy. Therefore, all borogoves are mimsy.

Sample Rule of Inference

Page 23: sorority - intrologic.stanford.edu

All x are y.All y are z. Therefore, x are z.

Which patterns are correct?How many rules do we need?

Sound Rule of Inference

Page 24: sorority - intrologic.stanford.edu

All x are y.Some y are z.Therefore, some x are z.

Bad Rule of Inference

Page 25: sorority - intrologic.stanford.edu

All Toyotas are Japanese cars.Some Japanese cars are made in America.Therefore, some Toyotas are made in America.

Using Unsound Rule of Inference

Page 26: sorority - intrologic.stanford.edu

All Toyotas are cars.Some cars are Porsches.Therefore, some Toyotas are Porsches.

Using Unsound Rule of Inference

Page 27: sorority - intrologic.stanford.edu

All of Abby's friends are Bess's friends.Some of Bess's friends are Abby's enemies.Therefore, some of Abby's friends are Abby's enemies.

Example: Abby likes Cody, and Bess likes Cody. Bess likes Dana, but Abby does not like Dana.

Using Unsound Rule of Inference

Page 28: sorority - intrologic.stanford.edu

A conclusion is provable for a set of premises if and only if every there is a finite sequence of sentences in which every element is either a premise or the result of applying a sound rule of inference to earlier members in the sequence.

A set of premises logically entails a conclusion if and only if every world that satisfies the premises satisfies the conclusion.

Provability and Entailment

Page 29: sorority - intrologic.stanford.edu

As we shall see, for well-behaved logics, logical entailment and provability are identical - a set of premises logically entails a conclusion if and only if the conclusion is provable from the premises.

This is a very big deal.

Soundness and Completeness

Page 30: sorority - intrologic.stanford.edu