40
School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams [email protected] www.geog.leeds.ac.uk/people/.o.duke- williams/

School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams [email protected]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

School of GeographyFACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT

Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure

Oliver Duke-Williams

[email protected]

www.geog.leeds.ac.uk/people/.o.duke-williams/

Page 2: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

Counting migrants and groups of migrants

• Migrants move from origins to destinations

• People may move singly or in groups

• Up until the 2001 Census, migrants were counted (in the Census) in two ways

• As individual migrants

• As wholly moving households

Page 3: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

A wholly moving household

Page 4: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

Wholly moving households or not?

Page 5: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

Counting migrants in the 2001 Census

The 2001 Census introduced the concept of the moving group

• Migrants within households are grouped on the basis of their common origins

Page 6: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

Moving groups

Page 7: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

Absolute numbers of migrants

0

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

700,000

0-4

5-9

10-1

4

15-1

9

20-2

4

25-2

9

30-3

4

35-3

9

40-4

4

45-4

9

50-5

4

55-5

9

60-6

4

65-6

9

70-7

4

75-7

9

80-8

4

85-8

9

90+

Age

Mig

ran

ts

Male Female

Migrants within UK, 2000-1 Source: 2001 Census Special Migration Statistics

Page 8: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

Migration rates

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

3500-

4

5-9

10-1

4

15-1

9

20-2

4

25-2

9

30-3

4

35-3

9

40-4

4

45-4

9

50-5

4

55-5

9

60-6

4

65-6

9

70-7

4

75-7

9

80-8

4

85-8

9

90+

Age

Mig

ran

ts /

100

0 p

erso

ns

Male Female

Migrants within UK – rates per 1000 at destination, 2000-1 Source: 2001 Census Special Migration Statistics

Page 9: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

Absolute numbers of migrants by origin type

0

200,000

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

1,200,000

0-4

5-9

10-1

4

15-1

9

20-2

4

25-2

9

30-3

4

35-3

9

40-4

4

45-4

9

50-5

4

55-5

9

60-6

4

65-6

9

70-7

4

75-7

9

80-8

4

85-8

9

90+

Age

Mig

ran

ts

UK district Unknown Outside UK

Migrants within and into UK, 2000-1 Source: 2001 Census Special Migration Statistics

Page 10: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

Migration connectivity

Migration connectivity is a simple measure of how well places are connected to other places

• It is affected by geography, but useful for comparing alternative characteristics given a fixed geography

Page 11: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

Origin connectivity

oic_wmhh3

0.01 - 0.08

0.09 - 0.13

0.14 - 0.21

0.22 - 0.31

0.32 - 0.48

oic_whmm1

0.01 - 0.13

0.14 - 0.20

0.21 - 0.28

0.29 - 0.38

0.39 - 0.70

oic_whmm2

0.01 - 0.10

0.11 - 0.16

0.17 - 0.23

0.24 - 0.33

0.34 - 0.57

Page 12: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

Destination connectivity

dic_whmm3

0.01 - 0.09

0.10 - 0.13

0.14 - 0.19

0.20 - 0.27

0.28 - 0.44

dic_whmm1

0.00 - 0.13

0.14 - 0.21

0.22 - 0.31

0.32 - 0.48

0.49 - 0.90

dic_whmm2

0.01 - 0.10

0.11 - 0.16

0.17 - 0.23

0.24 - 0.33

0.34 - 0.51

Page 13: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

About the BHPS

The British Household Panel Survey

• A multi-purpose panel survey

• Interviews all adults in a set of representative households

• First wave in 1991: 5,500 households, 10,000 individuals

Page 14: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

BHPS: Migrants

The BHPS is a useful source of information about migrants

• Individuals are tracked over many years

• The household context is clear

• Respondents are asked about intentions to migrate, and about reasons for recent migration events

Limitations

• The sample size is small

• The geography is limited

• Migration tends to be a cause of attrition in longitudinal data sets

Page 15: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

BHPS data studied

Individuals from wave J (2000-1) were studied

• This roughly matches the transition period over which migration is recorded in the 2001 Census

• The data were linked to the next wave, in order to identify those who had moved during the period

Page 16: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

Characteristics of migrants in the BHPS

Net balances by region, for movers within UK

Region Outflow Inflow Net gain

Inner London 244 246 2

Outer London 514 514 0

R. of South East 1736 1728 -8

South West 846 852 6

East Anglia 395 402 7

East Midlands 794 811 17

West Midlands Conurbation 348 352 4

R. of West Midlands 489 483 -6

Greater Manchester 380 376 -4

Merseyside 177 180 3

R. of North West 429 434 5

South Yorkshire 235 229 -6

West Yorkshire 315 314 -1

R. of Yorks & Humberside 324 323 -1

Tyne & Wear 222 226 4

R. of North 362 365 3

Wales 2548 2567 19

Scotland 3010 3026 16

Northern Ireland 146 146 0

Total 13633 13633 0

Page 17: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

Characteristics of migrants in the BHPS

All respondents are asked when they moved to their present address

• Data are highly dominated by recent moves

• Other moves tend to be within last 10 years or so

• The same pattern is apparent in other waves

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1930 1950 1970 1990

Year moved to present address

Co

un

t

1

10

100

1000

10000

1970 1980 1990 2000

Year moved to present address

Co

un

t

Page 18: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

Characteristics of migrants in the BHPS

Age profile of migrants

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

0 20 40 60 80 100

Age

Fre

qu

ency

0

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

700,000

0-4

5-9

10-1

4

15-1

9

20-2

4

25-2

9

30-3

4

35-3

9

40-4

4

45-4

9

50-5

4

55-5

9

60-6

4

65-6

9

70-7

4

75-7

9

80-8

4

85-8

9

90+

Age

Mig

ran

ts

Male Female

Page 19: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

Wishes to move

Separate questions ask whether respondents would

• prefer to move

• expect to move within the next year

Prefers to move? Frequency Percent

Don't know 191 1%

Stay here 9915 66%

Prefer to move 4975 33%

Total 15081 100%

Expect to move in next yearFrequencyPercent

Don't know 641 4%

Yes 2073 14%

No 12367 82%

Total 15081 100%

Page 20: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

Preference and expectation

How to preference and expectation relate to each other?

Prefer to move?

Expect to move  

Don't know Yes No Total

Don't know 19% 18% 63% 191

Stay here 2% 6% 91% 9915

Prefer to move 8% 29% 64% 4975

Page 21: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

Prefer to move

Does preference vary by age or sex?     Age group

Prefer to move 16-24 25--44 45-64 65+

Male

Don't know 1% 2% 1% 1%

Stay here 57% 54% 66% 78%

Prefer to move 37% 40% 27% 18%

Total 1071 2752 2119 1235

Female

Don't know 2% 1% 1% 1%

Stay here 54% 58% 69% 79%

Prefer to move 42% 39% 27% 17%

Total   1213 3108 2417 1688

Page 22: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

Does preference vary by household type?

Prefer to move? Age group  

16-24 25-44 45-64 65+

Single Non-Elderly

Don't know 2% 2% 2% 0%

Stay here 55% 50% 62% 67%

Prefer to move 43% 48% 35% 33%Base 148 448 486 3

Single Elderly

Don't know 2% 1%

Stay here 75% 84%

Prefer to move 23% 15%

Base     104 1133

Page 23: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

Prefer to move? Age group   16-24 25-44 45-64 65+

Couple No ChildrenDon't know 2% 1% 1% 1%Stay here 53% 59% 73% 79%Prefer to move 45% 40% 26% 20%Base 251 1073 1725 1357

Couple: dep childrenDon't know 1% 1% 1% 0%Stay here 60% 60% 70% 90%Prefer to move 39% 39% 29% 10%Base 738 3054 751 20

Couple: non-dep childrenDon't know 2% 1% 1% 0%Stay here 57% 56% 71% 82%Prefer to move 41% 42% 28% 18%Base 450 344 910 135

Page 24: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

Prefer to move? Age group  

16-24 25-44 45-64 65+

Lone par: dep children

Don't know 2% 2% 2% 0%

Stay here 53% 52% 57% 64%

Prefer to move 45% 46% 41% 36%

Base 220 460 104 11

Lone par: non-dep children

Don't know 1% 2% 1% 1%

Stay here 66% 50% 69% 85%

Prefer to move 33% 48% 30% 14%

Base 127 122 183 104

Page 25: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

Prefer to move? Age group  

16-24 25-44 45-64 65+

2+ Unrelated adults

Don't know 2% 3% 5% 0%

Stay here 58% 54% 52% 80%

Prefer to move 40% 44% 43% 20%

Base 208 112 21 15

Other Households

Don't know 0% 0% 0% 2%

Stay here 47% 50% 68% 72%

Prefer to move 53% 50% 32% 26%

Base 58 64 87 53

Page 26: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

Is expectation realised?

How well does an expectation of a move predict an actual move?

• Link waves

• Compare expect to move vs. actual move status

• Can look at:

• Preference to move

• Expecting to move

PreferenceIndividual

mover status   Total

Non-moverMover

within GB

Don't know 86% 14% 164

Stay here 95% 5% 9068

Prefer to move 82% 18% 4395Total 91% 9% 13627

Expectation

Individual mover status   Total

Non-moverMover within

GB

Don't know 86% 14% 561

Yes 53% 47% 1679

No 97% 3% 11387Total 91% 9% 13627

Page 27: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

What about a year later?

What about a year later?

• Are expected moves deferred?

Expectation

Individual mover status  Total

  Non-mover Mover within GB  

Don't know 84% 16% 385

Yes 73% 27% 696

No 95% 5% 9101

Total 93% 7% 10182

PreferenceIndividual mover status

  Total

  Non-moverMover within

GB  

Don't know 84% 16% 116

Stay here 95% 5% 7150Prefer to move 88% 12% 2916

Total 93% 7% 10182

Page 28: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

Reasons stated for moving

1. Those who expected to move and did move

2. Those who did not expect to move, but did move

Page 29: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

Reasons for moving

Stated reasons for an actual move incude employment reasons (various) and non-employment related

 Moved for employment

reasonsExpected to

move Yes No Total

Yes 20% 80% 257

No 10% 90% 100

 Moved for

employment reasons  

Preference Yes No Total

Don't know 24% 76% 21

Stay here 10% 90% 383

Prefer to move 11% 89% 761

Page 30: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

Non-employment reasons

Look at reasons for moving amongst those who expected to move and did move

Reason Frequency PercentOther 34 14%Mve to college 33 14%Mve in wth partn 30 13%Evicted, reposs 19 8%Split from partn 15 6%Larger accom 12 5%Smaller accom 11 5%Better accom 10 4%Job reasn, self 9 4%Closr fam, friend 8 3%Own accom 8 3%Mve from family 7 3%Wants change 6 3%To specfc place 6 3%Job reasn, othr 5 2%Mve in wth family 4 2%Area unsafe 4 2%Area unfriendly 4 2%Buy accom 3 1%Left college 2 1%Dislkd area 2 1%Mve in wth friend 1 0%Retirement 1 0%Health reasons 1 0%To rural envirn 1 0%Total 236 236

Page 31: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

Reasons for moving

What about those who moved, but had not expected to do so?

Reason Frequency Percent

Other 11 12%

Split from partn 10 11%

Larger accom 10 11%

Evicted, reposs 9 9%

Smaller accom 9 9%

Better accom 9 9%

Mve in wth partn 7 7%

Mve to college 6 6%

Own accom 6 6%

Mve in wth family 3 3%

Mve from family 3 3%

Health reasons 3 3%

Other aspects 2 2%

To specfc place 2 2%

Closr fam, friend 1 1%

Job reasn, self 1 1%

Dislkd prev acc 1 1%

Area unfriendly 1 1%

Dislkd area 1 1%

Total 95 95

Page 32: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

Reasons for moving

Are reasons for moving different for those who do / do not move?

• If respondents indicated that they would like to move, they were asked for reasons why

• Did those who followed through on this wish quote different reasons?

  Individual mover status  Reason to move Non-mover Mover within GB

Larger accom 16% 16%Other 5% 9%Dislikes area 10% 8%Own accommodation 3% 6%Feels isolated 5% 5%Other aspects 5% 5%To specific area 8% 5%Area unsafe 5% 5%Family reasons 4% 5%To buy somewhere 1% 5%Smaller/cheaper acc 3% 4%Unfriendly area 6% 4%Wants a change 5% 4%Another type 3% 3%Better accom 2% 3%Reduce travelling 1% 2%Occupation reasons 1% 2%To rural environ 6% 2%Noise 2% 2%No stairs 3% 2%Dislikes accom 1% 1%For childs education 1% 1%Traffic 2% 1%From urban environ 1% 1%Health reasons 0% 0%Retirement 0% 0%More privacy 1% 0%No reason 0% 0%Total 3590 794

Page 33: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

Reasons for moving

Do stated reasons for moving vary by household type?

• Look at most commonly cited reasons by individuals in different household types

Household type Reasons PercentSingle Non-elderly Mve to college 17%

Other 11%

Split from partn 11%

Base 160

Single-elderly Health reasons 22%

Closr fam, friend 16%

Evicted, reposs 11%  Base 37

Page 34: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

Reasons for moving

Household type Reasons PercentCouple No Children Mve in wth partn 20%

Buy accom 11%

Smaller accom 8%

Base 340

Couple: dep children Larger accom 28%

Other 12%

Mve in wth partn 9%

Base 364

Couple: non-dep children Smaller accom 15%

Other 12%

Split from partn 10%  Base 41

Household type Reasons Percent

Lone par: dep children Split from partn 25%

Other 13%

Evicted, reposs 13%

Base 55

Lone par: non-dep children Split from partn 20%

Evicted, reposs 20%

Mve in wth family 20%

  Base 20

Page 35: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

Household type Reasons Percent

2+ Unrelated adults Evicted, reposs 23%

Mve to college 21%

Better accom 11%

Base 73

Other Households Other 22%

Evicted, reposs 17%

Mve in wth partn 17%

  Base 23

Page 36: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

Effect of migration

To what extent has migration been associated with a change in circumstances?

Page 37: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

RG Social class

Do migrants experience a change in Registrar General’s Social Class?

RG Social Class Wave J Wave K Change

Professional occ 46 50 9%

Managerial & technical occ 233 252 8%

Skilled non-manual 177 170 -4%

Skilled manual 146 137 -6%

Partly skilled occ 110 105 -5%

Unskilled occ 26 25 -4%

Armed forces 1 0 -100%

Page 38: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

Tenure

Change in tenure

• Using all persons

• Use person 1 only

Tenure Wave J Wave K Change

Owned Outright 140 145 4%

Owned with Mortgage 502 529 5%

Local Authority rented 171 142 -17%

Housing Assoc. rented 49 62 27%

Rented from Employer 18 18 0%

Rented private unfurnished 132 127 -4%

Rented private furnished 186 174 -6%

Tenure Wave J Wave K Change

Owned Outright 97 91 -6%

Owned with Mortgage 325 319 -2%

Local Authority rented 123 98 -20%

Housing Assoc. rented 35 40 14%

Rented from Employer 13 13 0%

Rented private unfurnished 89 93 4%

Rented private furnished 121 148 22%

Page 39: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

Change in household type

• Select movers in wave K

• Compare household type in wave K with household type wave J

• Fluctuations to household type due to age of children

• Moves out of families into households of unrelated adults

Household type Wave J Wave K Change

Single Non-Elderly 971 986 2%

Single Elderly 1115 1150 3%

Couple No Children 2077 2163 4%

Couple: dep children 1926 1931 0%

Couple: non-dep children 617 547 -11%

Lone par: dep children 554 479 -14%

Lone par: non-dep children 262 255 -3%

2+ Unrelated adults 133 153 15%

Other Households 100 91 -9%

Page 40: School of Geography FACULTY OF EARTH & ENVIRONMENT Relationships between migration, commuting and household structure Oliver Duke-Williams o.w.duke-williams@leeds.ac.uk

Conclusions

• BHPS permits detailed analysis of relationships between migrants and their household context

• Demonstrates changes in household structure associated with migration events

• Motivations for moving are many and varied