School Configuration Committee(SCC)

May 25, 2011

1

2

February 20, 2008 Study Session to Review Five (5) Options

February 27, 2008 Superintendent Recommended movingforward (3)Options to next phase for further study (costs, boundary, implementation):

K-6, 7-8, 9-12K-6, 7-9, 10-12, 7-12 (current)K-6, 7-8, 9-12, 7-12

February – June SC3 reviewed costs, space, capacity and facilities

June 18, 2008 Superintendent stated…the most desired options would include moving 9th graders to OHS and CKHS, space permitting…noted the District would revisit enrollment analysis and a demographic study (not later than 2011-12) and study school reconfiguration and possible closure in an appropriate future year.

2007-08 Secondary Configuration School Closure Study Committee (SC3)

Agenda Agenda

Introductions

Group Norms and Voting

Meeting Dates

Past Secondary School Configuration Review and History

Purpose – School Configuration Committee 2011

Problem – School Configuration Committee 2011

Phases of the Work

Timeline

The Way Ahead Next Agenda

Communication

3

SCC By Position

6 Secondary (1 each school) parents 6 Elementary Parents 5 Elementary certificated staff 2 Elementary classified staff 5 Secondary certificated staff 3 Secondary classified staff 2 High School, 2 Junior High, 2 Elementary School Administrators CKESP, CKCA, CKEA Presidents (non-voting) 6 Central Office/Departments Administrators (non-voting & voting)

4

Elementary Parents and Staff Secondary Parents and Staff

Parents:Michelle Johnson, PI Melanie Almeida, WOAngie Filipsic, CVAnn Sveen, GM *Anne Lunden, JPAnne Hoftiezer, SR

Classified Staff:Kari Clithero, CO Robin Schoenburg, SI

Certificated Staff:Denyse Hemmersbach, EMDebbie Allensworth, EHPhilip Weatherby, BR Sheri Shipe, CCTim McNett, CV

SCC By Position By Name

Parents:Michelle Heyser KSS *Shirley Grisby, CKJHJ.R. Hernandez, FVJHMary McGannon, OHSLaura Murray, RIJHLaurie Moore, CKHS

Classified Staff:Jo Conner, CKHSCarla Yenko, FVJH Linda Roberts, CKJH

Certificated Staff:Jeremy Faxon, FVJHEmily Fairall, KLSSRandy Templeton, CKHSAndy Campbell, FVJHMatt Stanford, RIJH

5

SCC By Position By Name

Association Presidents Cheri Mlodzik ,CKESP(non-voting) Kirstin Nicholson, CKEA

Nate Andrews, CKCA

Junior High Administrators: Susan JungJodie Woolf

High School Administrators: Doyle ClouserSteve Coons

Elementary Administrators: Greg ClevenJulie McKean

Central Office Peggy Ellis /Departments: Franklyn MacKenzie

Jeanne Beckon (non voting)Katie Coleman

Committee Leads: Director of Operations Patti Woolf (non voting)Executive Director of Business and Operations David McVicker (non voting)

6

FacilitiesInfrastructure

Task Force Resource Steering Committee

SCHOOL BOARD

SUPERINTENDENT

Capital Projects LevyLevy Facts Communication

Task Force Resource SY10-11

BudgetDevelopment

Parent Access

Diversity Advisory

TechnologyAdvisory

School Configuration

Budget Development Team

Grounds, MaintenanceFacilities

Special EdPre School

Literacy

DISReorganization

Senate Bill 6696

In Planning “New” For SY 10-11

House Bill 2776

Decision-making bodiesDevelops Options/Recommendations

7

StrategicPlanning

Title IX

= Indicates that

Item is complete

Secondary Configuration Committee: Summary

Completed study during school year 2007-08 (Part A)

Recommendation: move 9th grade from CKJ, RJH, FJH to CKHS & OHS and maintain KSS 7-12

Given resource constraints, space available at CKHS & OHS, and capital costs for CKHS & OHS expansion (lab space), reconfiguration was deferred (Part A) and to be reviewed 24-36 months out

K-8 configuration intentionally was not completely analyzed and remains unresolved (Part B)

8

Rationale for Moving 9th Grade Up

High School credit and requirements begin in 9th grade

Academic offerings in 9-12 provide more access to students

Increased interventions options at HS level before 10th

grade assessments

Co-curricular options facilitate 9th graders playing up

Curriculum is aligned 9-12 at the state and national level

Grades 9-12 align with highly qualified teaching certification requirements

Only 7 districts currently are configured with a JH (7-9) program. Three have determined to move to 6-8 and two, including CK, are in a study.

9

Problem Given our educational needs, declining enrollment,

future facility needs and limited resources, we may not have the most effective K-8 school configuration considering all factors for implementation of a revised K-12 program.

10

So that … Vision, Mission, Goals…

School Configuration CommitteePurpose

Based upon educational research, and the needs of CKSD and our community, analyze K-8 configuration

Provide options for a recommendation not later than school year 2012-13

11

School ConfigurationFour Phases

Phase I Configuration Options K-8 (Part B)

Support Plans

Phase II Cost of Options K-12

(Integrate 9-12 work with K-8)

Phase III Boundary Options K-12

Phase IV Implementation Options K-12

12

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 2011 2012

SY 11-12

Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun2012 2013

School Configuration

SY 12-13

Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 2013 2014

SY 13-14

Decision

SCC Meeting

SSL

SchoolConfiguration

Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 2014 2015 SY 14-15

Implement New Evaluations

JP Opening 13

The Way Ahead Next Meeting:

Mon, September 26

Next Agenda Topics

Communication Recommendation

Links to research

14