1
Figure 2. Applying the Cycle: A Written Procedure Genre Building Knowledge of the Field Modelling the Text Bibliography Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. Routledge. Paltridge, B. (2001). Genre and the language learning classroom. University of Michigan Press. Rose, D. (2012). Genre in the Sydney school. The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis, 209-225. Scaffolding Procedure Genres with Teaching-Learning Cycles Introduction Variously known as the teaching-learning cycle or the curriculum cycle, this pedagogy grew out of the Sydney School of genre studies. It was originally an ‘explicit teaching’ alternative to process approaches to empower marginalized primary students (Gibbons, 2002) comprising the four stages outlined in Figure 1, detailed in Figure 2. It is Vygotskian, assuming that language is mediated through expert-novice and peer social interactions as learners move towards mastery of the genre through repetitions of the cycle and shared experiences (Hyland, 2007; Rose, 2010). Social interactions and shared experience are highlighted in the practice described here by applying the cycle to science and engineering group projects and a written procedure (process) genre (Figure 2). The genre features, including cultural context and social function, are highlighted by students working with one genre in two modes, as they recast relatively simple “situationally embedded” spoken instructions into a highly elaborated written report (Gibbons, 2002, p. 42). Task 1: 1. Show picture of a finished motor. 2. Present jumbled steps of process taken from video. 3. Groups check vocabulary, discuss possible order of steps. Task 1 1. Analyze models of same genres in a different field (Making a slingshot). 2. Give spoken instructions of how to make slingshot. 3. Arrange jumbled written description of how to make a slingshot. Task 2 Note linguistic/stylistic similarities (sequence transitions, purpose, method, means) and differences (verb forms, tense, elaborated transitions). (Spoken) How to make a sling shot 1. First, divide disposable chopsticks in half by pulling them apart. 2. Then, put the two chopsticks back together again by hand and join them about 10mm from one end with a rubber band. 3. Next, divide another pair of chopsticks and cut one roughly in half, about 70cm long, with a cutter. 4. … (Written) Procedure for making a slingshot The procedure for making a sling shot consisted of the following steps. First, chopsticks were divided by pulling them apart, and then the two chopsticks were put back together again by hand. Next, a rubber band was wound around the two chopsticks about 10mm from their ends in order to secure them together. After securing them, another chopstick was split, then one piece was cut Task 1 1. Groups make an electric motor. l Use instructions from YouTube for language and technical reference. 2. Keep lab notes (flow chart) l What they actually did. l Include problems and solutions (debugging). l In spoken style. Task 2: 1. Watch YouTube video at home. 2. Put steps in correct order. 3. Note verb forms and tense. 4. Enter new vocab into vocab notebooks. 5. Check with peers and teacher in next class. Figure 1. The Systemic Teaching and Learning Cycle (Hammond et al. 1992, p. 17, in Paltridge, 2001, p. 31) Task 1 Write a written report on making a motor. The first draft: l Use the group-constructed lab notes. l Change linguistic forms and structure from spoken to written mode. Task 2 Peer check, both in group and among groups. Write a second draft. Joint Construction of Text Independent Construction of Text Task 2 1. Groups test and compare motors. l Do they meet specs? l Which motor has highest specs? Conclusion l After completing the cycle, another cycle of the same genre should be completed. l In this course, the procedure genre is repeated as an embedded genre within the macro-genre “engineering lab report. l That project includes another embedded genre, “extended definition.” 2. Practice Task 3 Exercises: l changing linguistic and stylistic features from spoken to written mode. l Irregular verbs become a major linguistic focus. Task 3 Teacher check, write a third draft. Submit lab notes, outline, all drafts. Colin Rundle Soka University, WLC [email protected] 1. Theory

Scaffolding Procedure Genres with Teaching-Learning …jaltcue.org/files/CUE_ESP/CUEESP2017/Posters/2017-CUE-ESP-Sessio… · Genre and the language learning classroom. ... (Figure

  • Upload
    trananh

  • View
    222

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Scaffolding Procedure Genres with Teaching-Learning …jaltcue.org/files/CUE_ESP/CUEESP2017/Posters/2017-CUE-ESP-Sessio… · Genre and the language learning classroom. ... (Figure

Figure 2. Applying the Cycle: A Written Procedure Genre

Building Knowledge of the Field Modelling the Text

Bibliography Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom. Portsmouth,

NH: Heinemann. Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. Routledge. Paltridge, B. (2001). Genre and the language learning classroom. University of Michigan Press. Rose, D. (2012). Genre in the Sydney school. The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis, 209-225.

Scaffolding Procedure Genres with Teaching-Learning Cycles

IntroductionVariouslyknownastheteaching-learningcycleorthecurriculumcycle,thispedagogygrewout

oftheSydneySchoolofgenrestudies.Itwasoriginallyan‘explicitteaching’alternativetoprocessapproachestoempowermarginalizedprimarystudents(Gibbons,2002)comprisingthefourstagesoutlinedinFigure1,detailedinFigure2.ItisVygotskian,assumingthatlanguageismediatedthroughexpert-noviceandpeersocialinteractionsaslearnersmovetowardsmasteryofthegenrethroughrepetitionsofthecycleandsharedexperiences(Hyland,2007;Rose,2010).

Socialinteractionsandsharedexperiencearehighlightedinthepracticedescribedherebyapplyingthecycletoscienceandengineeringgroupprojectsandawrittenprocedure(process)genre(Figure2).Thegenrefeatures,includingculturalcontextandsocialfunction,arehighlightedbystudentsworkingwithonegenreintwomodes,astheyrecastrelativelysimple“situationallyembedded”spokeninstructionsintoahighlyelaboratedwrittenreport(Gibbons,2002,p.42).

Task1:1. Showpictureofa

finishedmotor.2. Presentjumbledsteps

ofprocesstakenfromvideo.

3. Groupscheckvocabulary,discusspossibleorderofsteps.

Task11. Analyzemodelsofsamegenresinadifferentfield(Making

aslingshot).2. Givespokeninstructionsofhowtomakeslingshot.3. Arrangejumbledwrittendescriptionofhowtomakea

slingshot.Task2Notelinguistic/stylisticsimilarities(sequencetransitions,purpose,method,means)anddifferences(verbforms,tense,elaboratedtransitions).

(Spoken)Howtomakeaslingshot

1. First,dividedisposablechopsticksinhalfbypullingthemapart.

2. Then,putthetwochopsticksbacktogetheragainbyhandandjointhemabout10mmfromoneendwitharubberband.

3. Next,divideanotherpairofchopsticksandcutoneroughlyinhalf,about70cmlong,withacutter.

4. …

(Written)ProcedureformakingaslingshotTheprocedureformakingaslingshotconsistedofthefollowingsteps.First,chopsticksweredividedbypullingthemapart,andthenthetwochopstickswereputbacktogetheragainbyhand.Next,arubberbandwaswoundaroundthetwochopsticksabout10mmfromtheirendsinordertosecurethemtogether.Aftersecuringthem,anotherchopstickwassplit,thenonepiecewascut

Task11. Groupsmakeanelectricmotor.l UseinstructionsfromYouTubefor

languageandtechnicalreference.2. Keeplabnotes(flowchart)l Whattheyactuallydid.l Includeproblemsandsolutions

(debugging).l Inspokenstyle.

Task2:1. WatchYouTubevideo

athome.2. Putstepsincorrect

order.3. Noteverbformsand

tense.4. Enternewvocabinto

vocabnotebooks.5. Checkwithpeersand

teacherinnextclass.

Figure 1. The Systemic Teaching and Learning Cycle (Hammond et al. 1992, p. 17, in Paltridge, 2001, p. 31)

Task1Writeawrittenreportonmakingamotor.Thefirstdraft:l Usethegroup-constructedlabnotes.l Changelinguisticformsandstructurefrom

spokentowrittenmode.

Task2Peercheck,bothingroupandamonggroups.Writeaseconddraft.

Joint Construction of Text

Independent Construction of Text

Task21. Groupstestandcompare

motors.l Dotheymeetspecs?l Whichmotorhashighest

specs?

Conclusionl Aftercompletingthecycle,anothercycleofthesamegenreshouldbecompleted.l Inthiscourse,theproceduregenreisrepeatedasanembeddedgenrewithinthemacro-genre“engineeringlab

report.l Thatprojectincludesanotherembeddedgenre,“extendeddefinition.”

2.Practice

Task3Exercises:l changinglinguisticandstylisticfeaturesfrom

spokentowrittenmode.l Irregularverbsbecomeamajorlinguisticfocus.

Task3Teachercheck,writeathirddraft.Submitlabnotes,outline,alldrafts.

ColinRundleSokaUniversity,[email protected]

1.Theory