25

RAHN Resinas Fotocurables

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Resinas fotocurables

Citation preview

  • CPIPC September 2012 Meeting

  • UV/LED Curing in Graphic Arts Applications

    Eileen Jaranilla-TranRAHN-Group

  • Introduction

    UV/LED curing is recently-developed technology

    Offering improved process speeds, capabilities and product performance Enabling the use of thinner, more heat-sensitive substrates Reducing harmful process byproducts such as ozone and mercury Capable of reducing total cost of operations

    395nm

  • Presentation UV Energy Curing Basics A verbal Introduction The Light Spectrum The UV/LED light source Measurement of UV/LED Power Photoinitiators for UV/LED Example Formulations Conclusion

  • The Light

    UV radiation VIS light radiation IR radiation25-30% 5-10% 60-65%

  • Photochemistry The UV SpectrumThe UV Range

    UVV 700-400 nm = visible light range(dental applications)

    UVA 400-315 nm = long wave lengths(through cure of thick layers)

    UVB 315-280 nm = medium wave lengths(bulk cure)

    UVC 280-200 nm = short wave lengths(surface cure)

    VUV 200-100 nm = vacuum UV, not useful inenergy curing due to atmospheric gas absorption

  • Ink, Coating, Adhesive Thickness

    UVC UVB UVA UVV

    Substrate

    200-280nm 280-315nm 315-380nm 400-450nm

    Where The UV Goes - Relative Penetration

  • Light-Emitting Diodes (LEDs) LEDs are semiconductor diodes that emit light when an electric current is

    applied in the forward direction of the device.

    The output is a form of electroluminescence where incoherent* and narrow-spectrum light is emitted.

    LEDs are usually a small area (less than 1mm-2mm) light source, with optics added on top of the chip to shape the radiation pattern and assist in reflection.

    * Electromagnetic radiant energy not all of the same phase, and possibly also consisting of various wavelengths.22

  • Advantages of UV/LED Technology

    Size of 1 LED

  • SLM Technology

    Advantages of SLM (Semiconductor Light Matrix) LEDs:

    Cooler More intense Longer life Precise control The full-intensity lifetime of SLM devices is expected to be 15,000+ hours

    compared to less than 2,000 hours with traditional mercury arc lamps

    Power consumption is typically 30-40% less than that of equivalently-intense Hg lamps, reducing heat generation and total power consumption

    SLM arrays can be constructed to irradiate a wider area more uniformly than traditional Hg lamps, enabling new applications such as web curing of photopolymers using UV SLMs

  • Energy Efficiency: UV/LED vs. Mercury Lamps

    Barely over 25% of the radiant energy from a conventional arc lamp is useful UV output

    The majority of the energy is wasted as visible light (>10%) and heat (>50%)

  • UV/LED Power

    UV/LED units are modular and can be added together to increase power output in a relatively small area (e.g. 3 x 8 W/cm2 LED blocks together total 24 W/cm2)

    Total power output depends on temperature control, life time, and electrical control of the UV/LED lamp

    Standard UV dose measurement devices have a gap from 390-395 nm

    Distance of UV/LED lamp from substrate will influence total power available at the surface closer is better. This is not problematic because the UV/LED unit generates far less heat than mercury arc lamps and temperature is easily controlled. But, UV/LED lamps WILL get hot!

    365nm

  • UV/LED Power

    Power is a valid comparative parameter because all measurements were collected over the same time

    The UV/LED lamps produce significant power around the defining wavelength with intensity being nearly equal

  • IntroductionThe Challenge: Photoinitiator Choice Most PIs have maximum absorbance below 395nm where the most

    common and cost-effective UV/LED lamps irradiate

    Unlike medium pressure mercury lamps, UV/LEDs have very narrow output spectra:

    The upside: UV/LED lamps do not have an entirely monochromatic spectrum and PIs have broad absorbance bands including wavelengths other than the maxima

  • Photoinitiators for UV/LED: Which One?

    PI Max. Absorption [nm]GENOCURE* BDMM 230/325

    GENOCURE* BAPO 365

    GENOCURE* TPO 380

    GENOCURE* LTM 253/368

    GENOCURE* TPO-L 370

    GENOCURE* CQ 470

    GENOCURE* BDK 252

    GENOCURE* PMP 307

    GENOCURE* DMHA 247/277

    GENOCURE* ITX 259/383

    GENOCURE* EHA 228/311

    GENOCURE* DETX 261/384

    Exctinction Spectrum G* BDMM

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    200 250 300 350 400 450 500wavelength [nm]

    Extin

    ctio

    n 365 395

    Based on absorbance spectra, the PI candidates chosen were:TPO, BDMM, ITX and BAPO

    A thorough study of PI types, amounts, lamp output, etc. was undertaken.

  • Photoinitiator Absorbance Spectra

  • Based on absorbance spectra, ITX>BAPO>TPO>BDMM

    BAPO, TPO >> BDMM with much lower yellowing among Norrish Type I candidates

    ITX (Type II) is very reactive, but too yellow for OPV and whites

    Surface cure is challenging for UV/LED in air

    Photoinitiators for UV/LED

    The semi-quantitative study with both 365 nm and 395 nm Phoseon water-cooled 8 W/cm2 units concluded the following:

  • Photoinitiators for UV/LEDA detailed DOE was run in 2011 to fully quantify the results seen in theprevious study. A mixture design with center and axial points on abenchmark CLEAR formulation was tested with a Phoseon 395 nm8W/cm2 variable power, water-cooled curing unit. After all of the numberswere crunched, Type I PI was better than Type II (ITX with MEA) andBAPO was the best PI by far.

  • Pigment Transmission Spectra

    Figures from W. Arthur Green, Industrial Photoinitiators, CRC Press, 2010.

    Once pigment is introduced, trends change. Chemistry cannot trump physics: where PI competes for light with pigment, reactivity suffers.

  • Cure: 40m/min; LED 395; 6W/cm2, (i.e. 100mJ/cm2)Yellowing : Db 1.9Film thickness: 12mm

    OPV

    Ingredient [%]

    G* 3456 42.5

    M500 35

    G* TPO 7.5

    Sensitizer1 15

    OPV, 12 mm; 6W/cm2 LED 395nm

    Run#Reactivity LED air

    [m/min] DbReactivity LED

    Inert[m/min]

    DbReactivity UV

    Fusion[m/min]

    Db

    OPV 37 40 1.9 300 0.9

    OPV 33 90 4.0 n.m. -

    OPV 32 15 3.3 > 200 2.0

    1. Inerting boosts reactivity and reduces yellowing2. Reactivity for standard Hg-UV lamp is significantly higher3. Sensitizer 1 improves reactivity significantly4. ITX has a very strong boost effect, but yellowing is high5. Highly reactive oligomers and monomers are also fast under UV/LED

    OPV 37:

  • InkJet InkInkjet Ink; 12mm, 6W/cm2 LED 395nm

    Run# ColourReactivity

    air [m/min]Reactivity UV

    Fusion [m/min]Reactivity

    Inert [m/min]

    ColourDensity

    IJ 16 Yellow 16 17 2.00

    IJ 9 Magenta 18 33 23 2.54

    IJ 17 Cyan 26 > 108 2.02

    IJ 19 Black 17 20 1.70

    Surface cure is faster than through cure (adhesion and fingernail) Color densities are not optimized and are, in general, too high BAPO is approximately 5X more efficient than BDMM

  • Flexographic InkFlexographic Ink; 6W/cm2 LED 395nm, app. 1mm,

    Run# ColourReactivity air

    [m/min]Reactivity UV Fusion

    [m/min]Colour Density

    F27 Yellow 32 > 110 1.55

    F31 Magenta 50 > 110 1.52

    F29 Cyan 60 > 110 1.86

    F36 Black 25 75 1.77

    F35 White 35 65 b-value:5.5

    Inerting has no effect in tested black flexographic ink

    Raven Black 1060 shows a higher reactivity than Special Black 250

    Low yellow, opaque white is feasible with some photoinitiator modification Short Investigation of LED 395 vs. 365:

    o Standard photoinitiator cocktail with BDMM with UV/LED 395 6X fastero Standard photoinitiator cocktail with BAPO with UV/LED 395 10X faster

  • Conclusion Fast acrylates under conventional UV lamps are also fast with UV/LED Yellowing is problematic for OPV and white, but when the formulation is

    optimized a reasonable cure can be realized Black and Yellow colors are the most difficult to cure Selection of black pigment is important Norrish Type II Photoinitiator are effective to achieve good surface cure Overall system cure speed is optimized by careful selection of

    photoinitiators AND acrylate components!

    Starting Point Formulations with competitive cure for OPV, Flexo and Ink Jet Inks are available

  • Thank you for your attention!

    CPIPC September 2012 MeetingUV/LED Curing in Graphic Arts ApplicationsIntroductionPresentationThe LightPhotochemistry The UV SpectrumWhere The UV Goes - Relative PenetrationLight-Emitting Diodes (LEDs)Advantages of UV/LED TechnologySLM TechnologyEnergy Efficiency: UV/LED vs. Mercury LampsUV/LED PowerUV/LED PowerIntroductionPhotoinitiators for UV/LED: Which One?Photoinitiator Absorbance SpectraPhotoinitiators for UV/LEDPhotoinitiators for UV/LEDPigment Transmission SpectraOPVInkJet InkFlexographic InkConclusion