49
Preliminary Design Review Tony Burnette Trevor Fitch Sheryl Gillow Sigitas Rimkus Simon Stam

Preliminary Design Review

  • Upload
    nailah

  • View
    33

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Preliminary Design Review. Tony Burnette Trevor Fitch Sheryl Gillow Sigitas Rimkus Simon Stam. PDR Agenda. Introduction Foundation Analysis Roof Truss Analysis Hydronic Subsystem Analysis Building Thermal Analysis Solar Collector Analysis. Introduction. Evanston. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Preliminary Design Review

Preliminary Design Review

Tony BurnetteTrevor FitchSheryl Gillow

Sigitas RimkusSimon Stam

Page 2: Preliminary Design Review

•Introduction

•Foundation Analysis

•Roof Truss Analysis

•Hydronic Subsystem Analysis

•Building Thermal Analysis

•Solar Collector Analysis

PDR Agenda

Page 3: Preliminary Design Review

Introduction

Page 4: Preliminary Design Review

EvanstonSuburb of Chicago, IL

60201

Image Courtesy of:www.bonusround.com

Page 5: Preliminary Design Review

Foundation Analysis

Page 6: Preliminary Design Review

Soil Properties

Ashkum (Silty Clay Loam)Ashkum (Silty Clay Loam)

DensityDensity 0.06322 lb/in3 (wet)

Load CapacityLoad Capacity 13.88 psi

Frost LineFrost Line 27 in

Data Courtesy of:“Soil Survey of Du Page County, IL”

Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1981

Page 7: Preliminary Design Review

Properties of Concrete

Tensile StrengthTensile Strength 3.4 ksi

Compressive StrengthCompressive Strength 4 ksi

Data Courtesy of:“Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary”

ACI Committee 318, 2008

Page 8: Preliminary Design Review

Foundation Profile

Page 9: Preliminary Design Review

Thickness Thickness (in)(in)

Effective Effective Area (inArea (in22))

CompressiCompressive Stress ve Stress

(lb/in(lb/in22))

Factor of Factor of SafetySafety

Can soil Can soil support?support?

88 13184 8.19 488.30 yes

99 14796 7.30 548.00 yes

1010 16400 6.59 607.41 yes

1111 17996 6.00 666.52 yes

1212 19584 5.51 725.33 yes

Page 10: Preliminary Design Review

Thickness Thickness (in)(in)

Moment of Moment of Inertia (inInertia (in44))

Tensile Tensile Stress Stress (lb/in(lb/in22))

Factor of Factor of SafetySafety

Steel Steel needed?needed?

88 153312.00 667.60 5.09 no

991724976.0

0593.42 5.73 no

10101916640.0

0534.08 6.37 no

11112108304.0

0485.53 7.00 no

12122299968.0

0445.07 7.64 no

Page 11: Preliminary Design Review

Insulating Concrete Forms

•Rigid plastic foam forms

•Hold concrete in place during curing

• Serve as thermal insulation after the concrete sets

Image Courtesy of:www.pouredfoundations.com

Page 12: Preliminary Design Review

ICF Benefits• Energy savings

•Qualifies for a tax credit

• Increases interior comfort

•Controls moisture, air leaks, mold, and pests

•Reduces sound transmissions

• Ease of finishing the basement

•Drywall can be nailed directly to foam

•Cost competitive with poured concrete

• Environmentally friendly

Page 13: Preliminary Design Review

ICF Drawbacks

•Installation costs may be higher than traditional concrete

•Insect problems may occur if installed incorrectly

•Relatively unknown to officials and inspectors

Page 14: Preliminary Design Review

Roof Truss Analysis

Page 15: Preliminary Design Review

Loads on Roof

•All roofing materials

•Flat plate collectors

•Snow

•Wind load

Page 16: Preliminary Design Review

Pairwise Comparison

GoalsGoals CostCost StrengthStrength StorageStorage AngleAngle TotalTotal

CostCost 0 1 0 1

StrengthStrength 1 1 1 3

StorageStorage 0 0 0 0

AngleAngle 1 0 1 2

Page 17: Preliminary Design Review

Design Compromises

•Number of trusses

•Desired factor of safety

•Beam thickness

•Theoretical load estimate

•Durability

•Insulation

Page 18: Preliminary Design Review

Forces in Truss

F G

C

BA

D

E

X

hY

Image Courtesy of:www.saskaschools.ca

Page 19: Preliminary Design Review

Forces in TrussMemberMember Force (lb)Force (lb) StateState

AA Compression

BB 0Zero Force

Member

CC Compression

DD Compression

EE Tension

FF Tension

GG Tension

Page 20: Preliminary Design Review

Lumber ChoicesStrength Strength

(Psi)(Psi)Eastern Eastern

White PineWhite PineEngelmann Engelmann

SpruceSpruce Douglas FirDouglas Fir Ponderosa Ponderosa PinePine

TensileTensile 305 348 350 406

CompressiCompressive Yieldve Yield

508 406 450 740

ShearShear 899 590 880 1160

Data Courtesy of:www.matweb.com

Page 21: Preliminary Design Review

Hydronic Subsystem

Analysis

Page 22: Preliminary Design Review

Goals

•Provide domestic hot water at 150 °F

•Prevent freezing of working fluid

Page 23: Preliminary Design Review

Piping Options

•Copper

•PVC

Page 24: Preliminary Design Review

System Options

•Purchase a kit

•Kit contains almost everything needed for the hydronic system

•Extra parts can be purchased if needed

•Purchase all components individiually

Page 25: Preliminary Design Review

Recommendations

•Copper piping

•Glycol based working fluid

•Water tank with a heat exchanger

Page 26: Preliminary Design Review

Building Thermal Analysis

Page 27: Preliminary Design Review

Image Courtesy of:www.energy.gov

Page 28: Preliminary Design Review

Weather Data

Data Courtesy of:www.noaa.gov

Page 29: Preliminary Design Review

Insulation

Page 30: Preliminary Design Review

Image Courtesy of:www.energy.gov

Page 31: Preliminary Design Review

Insulation Types• Blankets

• Standard “Pink Panther” insulation

• Available in standard sizes

• Loose-Fill

• Same material as blanket insulation

• Blown into hard to reach areas

• Rigid-Foam

• Very effective in tight spaces and cold climates

• Up to twice as insulating as blanket insulation

• Foam-in-Place

• Same material as rigid-foam insulation

• Used around window and door frames

Page 32: Preliminary Design Review

Data Courtesy Of:www.energy.gov

Page 33: Preliminary Design Review

Windows

Page 34: Preliminary Design Review

Image Courtesy of:www.energysavers.gov

Page 35: Preliminary Design Review

Window Frames• Metal Frames

• Light and almost maintenance free

• Very poor insulating material

• Composite Frames

• Same structural and thermal properties as wood

• Resist moisture and decay

• Fiberglass Frames

• Can be filled with insulation

• Superior thermal performance to wood or vinyl

• Vinyl Frames

• Good thermal performance and low maintenance

• Tendency to crack in temperature extremes

• Paint fades in sunlight

• Wood Frames

• Insulate fairly well

• Require a lot of maintenance

• Susceptible to moisture and decay

Page 36: Preliminary Design Review

Window Glazing and Glass

•Gas Fills

•Heat-Absorbing Tints

•Insulated

•Low-Emissivity Coatings

•Reflective Coatings

•Spectrally Selective Coatings

Page 37: Preliminary Design Review

Doors

Page 38: Preliminary Design Review

Exterior Doors

•Steel skin with insulating core

•Provides higher R-value than solid wood door

•Weatherstripping further increases the R-value

Page 39: Preliminary Design Review

Miscellany

Page 40: Preliminary Design Review

Air Sealing• Prevents heat from escaping through

cracks in the wall

• Air sealing techniques

• Air barriers

• Block air movement through a wall

• Airtight drywall

• Caulking

• Weatherstripping

Page 41: Preliminary Design Review

Moisture Control• Keep untreated

wood from touching soil

• Provide ample drainage

• Install air sealing gaskets

• Install insect shields

Image Courtesy of:www.energysavers.gov

Page 42: Preliminary Design Review

Ventilation• Removes air pollutants and moisture

• Three basic strategies

• Natural ventilation

• Air escaping through cracks and vents

• Whole-house ventilation

• Controlled air movement through fans and duct systems

• Spot ventilation

• Controlled air movement through localized exhaust fans

Page 43: Preliminary Design Review

Solar Collector Analysis

Page 44: Preliminary Design Review

Collector Slope

Page 45: Preliminary Design Review

Panel Area

Page 46: Preliminary Design Review

Test Intercept

Page 47: Preliminary Design Review

Test Slope

Page 48: Preliminary Design Review

Potential Vendors

ManufacturerManufacturer Surface Area per Surface Area per CollectorCollector

Optimized Number Optimized Number of Collectorsof Collectors

Beijing Sunda Solar Beijing Sunda Solar Energy TechEnergy Tech

38.96 ft2 10

Enerworks Inc.Enerworks Inc. 28.97 ft2 14

Schuco Schuco International KGInternational KG

23.05 ft2 18

SunEarth IncSunEarth Inc 37.08 ft2 11

Page 49: Preliminary Design Review

Questions?