Portfolio structure & Performance - A study on Selected Financial Organization in Sri Lanka

  • Upload
    cpmr

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 Portfolio structure & Performance - A study on Selected Financial Organization in Sri Lanka

    1/7

    www.cpmr.org.in Opinion: International Journal of Business Management 16

    ISSN: 2277-4637 (Online) | ISSN: 2231-5470 (Print) Opinion Vol. 2, No. 2, December 2012

    Portfolio structure & Performance-

    A study on Selected Financial Organization

    in Sri Lanka

    Pratheepkanth. P*

    Dr. T. Velnampy**

    ABSTRACT

    The main objective of the study is to identify the

    impact of Portfolio structure on Performance, In

    the present study, Portfolio structure [i.e., Income

    from Deposit, Income from pawning, Income from

    loan as independent variable and Performance (i.e.,

    Net Profit, Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) and

    Return on Equity (ROE)] as the dependent variable

    are considered. In order to select the sample,

    convenience sampling techniques method is used.

    The study suitably used both secondary data.

    Operational hypotheses are formulated, results

    revealed that Portfolio system has a positive

    association with Performance. Further, Portfolio

    structure is enhanced by Income from Deposit,

    Income from pawning, Income from loan in the

    selected financial institutions where the beneficial

    impacts are observed on Performance. Therefore,they have to pay more attention for tuning Portfolio

    structure techniques. This study would hopefully

    benefit the academicians, researchers, policy-makers

    and practitioners of Sri Lanka and other similar

    countries through exploring the impact of Portfolio

    structure on profitability, and pursuing policy to

    improve the current status of it.

    Keywords: Portfolio structure, Performance,

    Financial Organization

    I. BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE

    The banking sector has become extremely competitivepowerful industry in the world today. There are so many

    different banks are functional for their business. Such

    as commercial banks, saving banks, development banks

    etc.. The Commercial banks which are large sub sector

    in the financial market. These banks are providing

    various services to the people, and to economic

    development. In order to provide various service to

    economic development, bank should concern its

    financial system, loan system, information system so and

    so, In which that the portfolio system is very important

    aspects to the bank to perform their business efficiently,and also to compete with competitors in the world. The

    portfolio system defines capital arrangements Any

    banking institution care operated their business process

    for aim of profit. So the profitability of every banking

    *Lecturer, ** Professor

    Faculty of Management Studies & Commerce, University of Jaffna, Sri Lanka.

  • 7/29/2019 Portfolio structure & Performance - A study on Selected Financial Organization in Sri Lanka

    2/7

    www.cpmr.org.in Opinion: International Journal of Business Management 17

    ISSN: 2277-4637 (Online) | ISSN: 2231-5470 (Print) Opinion Vol. 2, No. 2, December 2012

    institution is dependent on its total advances portfolio.

    Power evaluation of this portfolio has made banks

    vulnerable to rise in non performing advances which is

    turn has led to liquidity problem effecting profitability.

    The survival of a firms depends very much on itsability to generate returns from its investments

    (Mustapha & Mooi, 2001). Capital expenditures

    required in investment normally involve large sums of

    money and the benefits of the expenditures may extend

    over the future. Utilizing a systematic capital budgeting

    process would enhance capital expenditures decisions

    (Mustapha & Mooi, 2001).

    Now a day investments of Financial Institutions are

    considered as a very important aspects of the

    development of any country. It is and investment only

    the main profit of such banks depends. In conformity tothis principal analysis on port folio management of

    Financial Institutions is launched. The main motive behind

    this survey is to analysis the organized and arranged

    methodology adapted to the achieve development, profit

    and reduce the risk and manage the risk.

    After the ending of the 30 years continuous domestic

    war Sri Lankan companies are entering into a new era,

    especially in the North East part of Sri Lanka is needed

    to develop infrastructural facilities. For the long term

    financial management development Portfolio analysis willbe life blood of the development of the companies.

    Therefore this study is very needed for the Financial

    Intuitions

    II. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

    According to financial theory, the objective of the firm

    is to maximize the wealth of its shareholders. The optimal

    investment decision is hence the one that maximizes the

    present value of shareholders wealth (Copeland

    ,Thoman & Weston, 1992). Sophisticated Portfolio

    procedures can under the assumption of economic

    rationality all be regarded as means, which a firm uses

    in order to fulfill its objective, i.e., to maximize

    shareholders wealth. This fact indicates that firms can

    increase or even maximize its shareholder wealth by

    using sophisticated Portfolio system analysis

    RQ1-

    Why there is disproportion of the portfolio

    structure of bank continuously for the recent fast?

    III. LITERATURE REVIEW

    A review of the risk management literature indicates thatboth the definition of risk and also our understanding of

    the term risk management have evolved over time. Spira

    and Page (2003) chart in some detail the evolution of

    risk definitions from the pre-seventeenth century

    onwards. In pre-rationalism times risk was seen as a

    consequence of natural causes that could not be

    anticipated or managed, but with more modern, scientific

    based thinking there emerged a view that risk was both

    quantifiable and manageable via the judicious use of

    avoidance and protection strategies. Risk management

    became institutionalized with the application of science

    (Beck, 1998) and in the process the public were led to

    expect risks to be managed. As a consequence, risk

    management led to some diffusion of responsibility for

    the adverse effects of risk whilst the notion of

    accountability required some demonstration of risk

    management effort (Spira and Page, 2003) Roland

    Robinsons(1962) insightful analysis is an excellent

    example of the traditional banking approach. Robinson

    sought to describe methods of achieving the mos

    profitable employment of commercial bank findsconsistent with safety. For him, there methods

    essentially consist of setting and following a hierarchy

    of priorities in the employment of bank funds. The

    priorities in decending order are legally required

    reserves,secondary reserves, customer credit demands

    and open market investment for income.

    Bank Performance and Credit risk management

    (Takang Felix Achou, Ntui Claudine Tenguh,2008). The

    axle of this study is to have a clearer picture of how

    banks manage their credit risk. This leads to conclude

    that banks with good credit risk management policies

    have a lower loan default rate and relatively higher

    interest income. This thesis takes a fast look on Banking

    and Credit risk management and further probes into

    bank risk exposure, assessment, management and

    control. An attempt will be made to unfold the use of

  • 7/29/2019 Portfolio structure & Performance - A study on Selected Financial Organization in Sri Lanka

    3/7

    www.cpmr.org.in Opinion: International Journal of Business Management 18

    ISSN: 2277-4637 (Online) | ISSN: 2231-5470 (Print) Opinion Vol. 2, No. 2, December 2012

    some risk management, evaluation and assessment tools,

    models, and techniques.

    Bank Portfolio Model and Monetary Policy in

    Indonesia (Doddy Zulverdi, Iman Gunadi, and Bambang

    Pramono, August 2006) This paper analyzes the banksbehavior in selecting its portfolio composition and its

    impact on the effectiveness of monetary policy

    transmission process in Indonesia. they employ an

    analytical model of the banking portfolio behavior based

    on microeconomic theory to understand how banks

    portfolio behavior in maximizing its profit links to the

    efficacy of monetary policy. This study finds that micro

    banking condition and prudential regulation affects the

    effectiveness of monetary policy. This study also finds

    structural changes in banks and borrowers have altered

    the smoothness and effectiveness of monetary policy toencourage the economic growth and hindered the

    process of economic recovery. As perception on risk

    has large impact in supporting the effectiveness of the

    monetary policy, effort to reduce risk through the

    formation as credit bureau, credit guarantee scheme,

    and rating agencies is critical as it will improve

    transparency and availability of debtor information.

    Banks Loan Portfolio diversification(Csongor

    David,Curtis Dionne, University of Gothenburg,2005)

    This paper is a qualitative study about how large bankin Sweden manage their loan portfolis. And found that

    the majority of large banks in to a certain degree

    intuitively diversify their loan portfolio. On the othr hand,

    they found that due to the practical complexities the

    banks do not manage using loan portfolio diversification.

    Due to the size of these large banks it is assumed that

    loan portfolio diversification will happen naturally.

    Measuring and handling risk -how different financial

    institutions face the same problem( Sarah Rrden &

    Kristofer Wille, Mlardalen University ,2010) The

    objective of this research paper is to understand howdifferent financial institutions handle and attempt to

    reduce risk in order to optimize portfolio returns for

    their clients, as well as highlight contrasts. This analysis

    has highlighted that each company uses different theories

    in different ways, because the level of trust in the models

    explaining risk varies among the institutions. In other

    words, which models are used and why depends on

    the philosophy of the firm. Since financial models are

    built on the idea that investors act rationally, many of

    the models do not hold in times of crisis when humans

    act irrationally. Modern Banking and Strategic PortfolioManagement (Reza G. Hamzaee, Missouri, Western

    State University & Walden University Bob Hughs,

    Missouri Western State University) Hodgmans(1963)

    view banks are concerned not only with the composition

    of their asset portfolio but also with the relationship

    between deposits and loan over time. Hodgmans work

    is useful for understanding such aspects of contemporary

    banking as prime rate conventions and compensating

    balance requirements. Chambers and Charnes (1961)

    improved upon this informal traditional analysis by

    suggesting a linear programming frame work. Byintroducing interest rate in an objective function and by

    viewing the hierarchy of traditional decision rules as

    constraints they produced a model of bank behavior

    that consistent with both traditional theory and

    maximization of bank profits. The important of random

    deposit variations for the determination of banks

    optimum portfolio was first suggested by

    Edgeworth(1988). Porter applied an inventory model

    to descripe bank portfolio behavior under uncertainity.

    Porters model suggest that a bank maximizes expected

    profits will generally hold a diversified portfolio in an

    uncertain world. He also demonstrate that if bank profits

    are random variable, that is, determined by the joint

    probability distribution describing deposits flows and

    assets yield, then profit maximization, liquidity and capital

    certainity are insight ful constructs for modelking bank

    behavior (Bank Management and Portfolio Behaviour-

    Donald D.Hester, James L. Pierce, New Haven and

    London, Yale University Press, )

    IV. OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

    The study is considered the following objectives.

    To identify the portfolio system of Financial

    Institutions of Sri Lanka

    To manage the various risk securing the market

    share of Financial Institutions

  • 7/29/2019 Portfolio structure & Performance - A study on Selected Financial Organization in Sri Lanka

    4/7

    www.cpmr.org.in Opinion: International Journal of Business Management 19

    ISSN: 2277-4637 (Online) | ISSN: 2231-5470 (Print) Opinion Vol. 2, No. 2, December 2012

    To identify its risk and return preference of

    Financial Institutions

    To compare its desired relationship among the

    portfolio structure

    It is summarize the objectives of this study is find

    out the impact of Portfolio system on firms performance

    and attempts to provide information on the current

    portfolio system utilized by Sri Lankan Financial firms

    V. DATA COLLECTION

    The secondary data were used to the study. The data

    required for the study means gathered from the annual

    report of the respective company through the website

    and journals books, etc

    VI. SAMPLING DESIGN

    The study will use data of listed financial companies in

    the CSE, Sri Lanka, as the sample. In order to select

    the sample, stratified random sampling method is used.

    Companies with missing data are will be excluded from

    the study. The study also will exclude the financial and

    securities sector companies, as their financial

    characteristics and use of leverage will substantially

    different from other companies. After eliminating outliers,

    the sample size is 10 companies are selecting for thisstudy

    (1)Citizen Developments Bank, (2) Sampath Bank, (3)

    Central Finance, (4) Nation Trust Bank, (5) Seylan

    Bank, (6) National Development Bank, (7) DFCC, (8)

    LB Finance, (9) Hatton National Bank, (10)

    Commercial Bank of Ceylon

    VII. HYPOTHESES

    A large and a well developed literature were interested

    to the survey of the gains and costs of the Diversificationstrategy (Comment and Jarrel (1995), Denis and al

    (1997), Rajan and al (1998), Rajan and Zingales (2000),

    Bhagat and al (1999), Campa and al (2002). Despite a

    general agreement that seems to be observed concerning

    the negative impact of the diversification strategy on the

    performance of the firm (Lang and Stulz (1994), Berger

    and Ofek (1995) does not allow us to decide on the

    nature of this relationship and therefore justifies new

    tests

    H1: Portfolio analysis are significantly correlated with

    firms performance

    VIII. METHODOLOGY

    Five years data representing the period of 2006- 2010

    were used to measure the portfolio and performance of

    selected finance Companies in Sri Lanka. In a way the

    following measures were used to measure the portfolio

    and performance.

    8.1 Correlation Analysis

    Correlation is concern describing the strength ofrelationship between two variables. In this study the

    correlation co-efficient analysis is under taken to find

    out the relationship between Portfolio System and

    performance. It shows the amount of relationship exis

    between Portfolio System and performance

    Table 1

    Multiple correlation matrix

    ID IL IP NP ROI ROCE

    Income from 1

    Deposit (ID)

    Income from 0.160 1

    Loan (IL)

    Income from 0.291** 0.321 1

    Pawning (IP)

    Net profit 0.124** 0.184* 0.264 1

    (NP)

    Return on 0.413** 0.529** 0.485* 0.315 1

    Investment

    (ROI)

    Return on 0.264 0.654* 0.111** 0.614** 0.241** 1

    Capital

    Employed

    Table 1 shows the relationship between the

    variables. Accordingly Income from Deposit is

    correlated with NP, ROI and ROCE with the r-values

    of 0.124, 0.413 and 0.264 which are significant at 0.01

    levels. Similarly the correlation value between Income

  • 7/29/2019 Portfolio structure & Performance - A study on Selected Financial Organization in Sri Lanka

    5/7

    www.cpmr.org.in Opinion: International Journal of Business Management 20

    ISSN: 2277-4637 (Online) | ISSN: 2231-5470 (Print) Opinion Vol. 2, No. 2, December 2012

    from Loan (IL) and NP, ROI and ROCE is 0.184,

    0.529, 0.654 which is significant at 0.01 levels. These

    indicate that Income from Deposit (ID)and Income from

    Loan (IL) are associated with determinants of firms

    performance.

    8.2 Regression Analysis

    Regression analysis is used to test the impact of

    performance on Portfolio of the listed financial companies

    traded in Colombo stock exchange

    Table 2

    Model R R Square Adjusted Std.Error

    R Square of the

    Estimate

    1 0.360a 0.129 0.098 0.32306

    The above table shows the weak positive correlation

    between the portfolio and net profit.

    Table 3

    Model Un standardized Standardized

    Coefficients Coefficients

    B Std.Error Beta t sig

    1(constant) 0.187 0.073 2.556 0.016

    portfolio 0.047 0.023 0.360 2.039 0.051

    The above table indicates the coefficient of

    correlation between the portfolio and net profit. Multiple

    r2 is 0.1296. only 1.29% of variance of net profit is

    accurate by the portfolio. But, remaining 98.21% of

    variance with net profit is attributed to other factors.

    8.3 Portfolio and ROI

    Table 4

    Model R R Square Adjusted Std.Error

    R Square of the

    Estimate

    1 -0.101 0.038 -0.023 0.36514

    The above table shows the weak negative

    correlation between the portfolio and ROI.

    Table 5

    Model Un standardized Standardized

    Coefficients Coefficients

    B Std.Error Beta t sig1(constant) 0.124 0.083 1.498 0.145

    portfolio -0.015 0.026 -0.110 -0.584 0.564

    The above table indicates the coefficient of

    correlation between the portfolio and ROI. Multiple r2

    is 0.010. Only 1.0% of variance of net profit is accurate

    by the portfolio. But, remaining 99 % of variance with

    ROI is attributed to other factors

    8.4 Portfolio and ROCE

    Table 6

    Model R R Square Adjusted Std.Error

    R Square of the

    Estimate

    1 -0.196 0.038 -0.025 115.19484

    The above table shows the weak native correlation

    between the Portfolio and ROCE.

    Table 7

    Model Un standardized Standardized

    Coefficients Coefficients

    B Std.Error Beta t sig

    1(constant) 31.283 26.050 1.201 0.240

    portfolio -4.563 8.250 -0.104 -0.553 0.585

    The above table indicates the coefficient of

    correlation between the portfolio and ROCE. Multiple

    r2 is 0.038. Only 3.8% of variance of ROCE is accurate

    by the portfolio. But, remaining 96.2% of variance with

    ROCE is attributed to other factors

    IX. FINDING

    The overall result of efficiency and effectiveness

    performance of portfolio system has high view in the

    portfolio structure. According to the system the efficiency

  • 7/29/2019 Portfolio structure & Performance - A study on Selected Financial Organization in Sri Lanka

    6/7

    www.cpmr.org.in Opinion: International Journal of Business Management 21

    ISSN: 2277-4637 (Online) | ISSN: 2231-5470 (Print) Opinion Vol. 2, No. 2, December 2012

    and effectiveness performance rate is 60% as high level.

    The research of portfolio management of

    commercial bank, the researcher finds out the following

    according to the secondary data.

    The researcher can observe that there is down inthe (ROCE) return on capital employed of Finance

    Companies in 2010. That is to say that it had been

    observed that the ROCE which was at 18% in 2005,

    had grown up to the level 23% in 2006and in the 2007

    it was 26% There after it had increased by 2% in 2008.

    In other words that ROCE had grown up to the 28% in

    2008. Even though, little increased was in 2009 as 29%.

    Therefore it could be observed that the income derived

    from the assets of Finance Companies is increasing.

    When return on Investment (ROI) of Finance

    Companies is observed, the researcher could see a slight

    increase was in the 2005-2006 but in the 2007it

    decrease to 12.7% after that in the 2008 it increased

    rapidly to 17%. But in the 2009 & 20q0 small decrease

    was taking. That is ROI appeared at 15% in 2010 and

    Analyzing these data it could be observed that there

    was high fluctuation in the earning capacity of the Finance

    Companies during the last five years.

    More over during the past five years the ROCE/

    ROI of the Finance Companies never reach the ranges

    between 70% to 100% for the past five years period.Since 2006 to 2010 over 100% is seen. But if that

    establishment had reached its ROCE/ROI between

    ranges of the 70% to 100% it would have efficiency of

    capitalization. However, during the past five years as

    the ratio of ROCE/ROI of Finance Companies did not

    reached a range between 70% and 100%. It could be

    determined that its capital has not used efficiency and

    also during the past five years the EPS ratio indicates

    slight decreases.

    Then, when a Finance Companies reaches its capital

    adequacy ratio, it could invest its capital on risk or riskfree investments. At present in year 2009 the capital

    base is recognized as 10% requirement. It is observed

    that the Finance Companies has sufficiency in capital

    base during the past five years. Its goal must be Tier I

    over 7% and Tier II over 10%. However it seems that

    the capital base of Finance Companies reaches its target

    during the past 5 years. This emphasizes that the Finance

    Companies has acquired its capital requirements.

    X. RECOMMENDATIONSRecommendations are the main objective of any

    research. If there is a problem, there will be some

    recommendation to reduce it.

    The following recommendations are given by the

    researcher about the portfolio management of

    Companies.

    The Finance Companies can helps by way o

    granting high amounts of loans to its customers

    for what it must receive proper security to reducing

    the amount of risk associated with the loan. It canlend and invest some other mean full resources

    could increase its income.

    The Finance Companies wishes to earn high profi

    and less risk by way of reducing the amount of

    high risk loans which are given by the Finance

    Companies, it helps to reduce the total amount

    bad debts. That may be utilized to risk less loans

    or any other safety investment. By this way it could

    increase its profit and reduce the level of risk.

    By introducing different variety of new fixeddeposits to its customers it can increase its own

    long term fund and also by investing these funds

    to long term investments it could arrange the

    portfolio structure efficient way that will help to

    make more profit.

    It should obtain more liquidity assts from the

    alternative investment opportunities and also i

    should correct the deviation between the liquidity

    and profitability it help to the management to

    maintaining the portfolio structure effectively.

    Based on the new technical revolution. The finance

    companies should introduce balance score card

    to measure the efficiency and effectiveness

    performance Commercial bank and also it help

    the executive committee to carry out every financial

    activities efficient and effective way.

  • 7/29/2019 Portfolio structure & Performance - A study on Selected Financial Organization in Sri Lanka

    7/7

    www.cpmr.org.in Opinion: International Journal of Business Management 22

    ISSN: 2277-4637 (Online) | ISSN: 2231-5470 (Print) Opinion Vol. 2, No. 2, December 2012

    XI. REFERENCES

    1. Arbeleche, S. &Dempster, M.A.H. (2003).

    Econometric modelling for global asset and

    liability management. Working Paper, Centre for

    Financial Research, University of Cambridge.

    2. Bodie Z., Kane A., Marcus A. J. Investments

    (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill, NY USA 2005.

    3. Fabozzi F. J. Financial Instuments. John Wiley

    & Sons, NJ USA 2002.

    4. Fama E., MacBeth J. Risk, Return and

    Equilibrium: Empirical Tests, The Journal of

    Political Economy 1973.

    5. Friend I., Blume M. E. The Demand for Risky

    Assets, American Economic Review vol. 65,no. 5, Dec. 1975.

    6. Galstyan M. Management of international

    reserves and the foreign exchange rate, Ph.D.

    thesis, Yerevan 2003.

    7. Markowitz H. Portfolio Selection, Journal of

    Finance vol. 7, no. 1, March 1952.

    8. Markowitz H. The Optimization of a Quadratic

    Function Subject to Linear Constraints, Naval

    Research Logistics Quarterly vol. 3, no. 1-2,March-June 1956.

    9. Nugee J. Foreign Exchange Reserves

    Management, Bank of England Centre for

    Central Banking Studies, Handbook No. 19,

    Nov. 2000.

    10. Pindyck R. Risk aversion and determinants ofstock market behavior, NBER Working Paper

    No. 1921, May 1986.

    11. Schooley D., Worden D. D. Risk Aversion

    Measures: Comparing Attitudes and Asset

    Allocation, Financial Services Review 5(2),

    1996; p. 98.

    12. Sharpe W. F., Alexander G. J. Investments (4th

    ed.). Prentice-Hall, Inc., NJ USA 1990.

    13. Scherer, A. (2002). Portfolio construction andrisk budgeting. Risk Books

    14. Wilkie, A. D. (1986). A stochastic investment

    model for actuarial use. Transactions of the

    Faculty of Actuaries, 39, 391-403.

    15. Wilkie, A. D. (1995). More on a stochastic asset

    model for actuarial use. British Actuarial Journal,

    1, 777-964.