Upload
gibreelchamcha
View
44
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Innovation at Nypro
Citation preview
1
Managing Innovation Managing Innovation at Nypro, Inc. (A)at Nypro, Inc. (A)
Dongyuan ZhuDongyuan ZhuXingxing LiuXingxing Liu
Ye WangYe Wang
22
AgendaAgenda
Company overview Perceived management problems/issues Alternatives Recommendation Discussion questions Reference
33
Company OverviewCompany Overview
The fifth largest custom injection molder in the world, and the largest non-automotive molder.
Three divisions: Healthcare Electronics/communications Customer/industrial
Strategically aligned with customers base Building plants near customers in vital markets
Striving for uniform world-class technology at all plants. Highly decentralized organization
44
Perceived management problems/issuesPerceived management problems/issues
Company facing a shifting basis of competition which was speed and variety in the future.
Lankton perceived a new market for Nypro, and was considering how and where to disseminate the revolutionary molding machine, NovaPlast, across the company.
Company having the challenge of being innovative while keeping consistent across plants.
55
The alternatives of adopting NovaPlastThe alternatives of adopting NovaPlastAlternative 1: building a new plantAlternative 1: building a new plant
Strengths Most popular with senior management Engineering efficiency Centralizing development would facilitate personal oversight of
project Being done rather quickly
Weaknesses Transportation costs Against current philosophy of being decentralized No successful experience
66
The alternatives of adopting NovaPlastThe alternatives of adopting NovaPlast Alternative2: scatter across the networkAlternative2: scatter across the network
Strengths Close-to-customer manufacturing particularly important in the
market segment Allows for the pontential to capture more market share Puts more engineers and marketers to work on exploiting the
NovaPlast Better technology would emerge
Weaknesses Against economy of scale philosophy Unproven technology and no clear indication of its feasibility
77
The alternatives of adopting NovaPlastThe alternatives of adopting NovaPlast Alternative3: apply internal market effect, focus on Alternative3: apply internal market effect, focus on making it successful at a single plant.making it successful at a single plant. Strengths
Could be implemented rather quickly Allow for engineering/efficiency to be gathered Could evaluate how resource planning systems
interoperate Use “internal market” for innovation
Weaknesses Time consuming to deploy if research shows that the
flexibility is required in other international markets
88
The alternatives of adopting NovaPlastThe alternatives of adopting NovaPlast Alternative4: not use NovaPlastAlternative4: not use NovaPlast
Strengths The niche market identified and capability allows
company to compete in market
Weakness Avoids taking advantage of the strengths,
innovation Not dealing with problem of the changing market
and competition
99
RecommendationRecommendation
Go with making NovaPlast successful at a single plant.
-Less weakness
-Allows flexibility towards others Short term
-Continue with evaluation
-Continue pursuing orders
-Gather data relating to effectives and efficiency Long term
- Decide on long term deployment strategy
1010
Discussion questionsDiscussion questions
Is NovaPlast a disruptive or sustaining innovation for Nypro? A new-market disruption
What is Nypro’s process to implement new innovations? Following four steps
Nypro had a good process for exploiting sustaining innovation but not for the disruptions? CEO needs to stand astride the interface between
mainstream business units and new disruptive growth businesses.
1111
Process of implementing innovationsProcess of implementing innovations
Find the actually occurred process innovations.
Select the most important innovations which can
implement in other plants.
Find the ways to transfer the innovation from the
original team to other teams and plants.
Nypro sets up the new rules of the innovation.
1212
ReferenceReference
Clayton M. Christensen, Michael Overdorf. Meeting the Challenge of Disruptive Change. Harvard Business Review Article. Mar 1, 2000.
13
Thank you!Thank you!
Questions?Questions?
Dongyuan, Xingxing & Ye, March 10, 2008.Dongyuan, Xingxing & Ye, March 10, 2008.