NatJourn MMTC NN 101410

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/8/2019 NatJourn MMTC NN 101410

    1/7

    Broadband, FCC, Net Neutrality,Wireless

    Wednesday, October 13, 2010 11:36 AM

    Stakeholders Take Predictable Stands In Open NetComments

    By Juliana Gruenwald

    Stakeholders involved in the debate over the FCC's proposed open Internet rules appear to be lining up along predictable lines on

    whether net neutrality rules should apply to wireless and specialized broadband services.

    Several groups filed comments this week with the FCC, which is seeking input on whether wireless broadband and specialized

    services should be exempted from proposed rules that would bar broadband providers from discriminating against Internet

    content. The deadline for initial comments was Tuesday and reply comments are due by Nov. 4.

    Free Press, one of the most vocal advocates for net neutrality rules, voiced concern about exempting wireless and specialized

    services from open Internet rules.

    "Specialized services, to the extent that they are not voice or video services already under the panoply of Title II and VI consumer

    protections, are at this stage merely a hypothetical, one that could be used as a loophole for carriers to evade open Internet

    protections," the group said in its comments with the FCC. When it comes to wireless services, Free Press said the FCC should not

    allow the Internet "to be broken up into an open wired network and a closed wireless network."

    A coalition of public interest groups led by Media Access Project offered similar comments on whether to exempt wireless

    services, saying "whatever the distinctions between different networks and network architectures, it is imperative that the same

    principles and rules apply to wired and wireless networks alike."

    When it comes to specialized services, the coalition urged caution, saying this category should not be used as way to avoid open

    Internet rules. The groups, which include the Benton Foundation, Center for Media Justice, Consumers Union, New America

    Foundation and Public Knowledge, said these services are still "undefined at present" and urged the FCC to initiate a separate

    proceeding to "consider the scope of the category at greater depth."

    Meanwhile, broadband providers maintained their call for the status quo, arguing against any rules that might stifle broadband

    investment and innovation. "Specialized and wireless broadband services are delivering, and will continue to deliver, untold

    benefits to consumers and the economy if the commission maintains a hospitable regulatory environment for such services,"

    AT&T said in its comments with the commission.

    AT&T also argued that Free Press' claim that specialized services are hypothetical is "misinformed." The company noted that

    AT&T and other broadband providers already offer subscription video services to millions of consumers now and "will

    imminently offer many other types of specialized services as well," such as telepresence services, telemedicine applications that

    permit videos and high-definition images to be transmitted in real time, and utility meters and smart-grid devices.

  • 8/8/2019 NatJourn MMTC NN 101410

    2/7

    The National Cable and Telecommunications Association echoed AT&T's concerns about any new regulations, saying "adoption of

    [net neutrality] rules at this time would do nothing to promote the commission's objectives and would instead have only the

    counterproductive effects of stifling investment, innovation, and consumer value." However, if the FCC does move forward with

    rules, NCTA said they should apply to both wireline and wireless providers.

    The Open Internet Coalition, which favors net neutrality regulations, agreed that the rules should not exempt wireless providers.

    The coalition -- which includes Internet firms such as Amazon, Google and Twitter and industry and public interest groups such

    as the American Library Association, Electronic Retailing Association and Public Knowledge -- added in a statement that "while

    network operators have not made a compelling case for the creation of a category of specialized services, if the commission were

    to create such a category it should be subject to a non-discrimination rule."

    A coalition of minority and civil rights groups voiced concern in their FCC comments that the network neutrality rules could

    exacerbate the digital divide by limiting innovation, particularly when it comes to wireless broadband. The coalition noted that

    many minorities currently obtain broadband Internet service through their wireless phones.

    "The FCC has both a legal and moral duty to ensure that its proposed rules do not - in their very 'neutrality' - lock into place and

    perpetuate the vast and current racial disparities in broadband access, adoption, and informed use," the coalition, which includes

    the Minority Media and Telecommunications Council, National Black Caucus of State Legislators, U.S. Hispanic Chamber of

    Commerce and other groups, said.

    Leave a response

    Leave a response

    More in TechnologyGo to section

    October 14, 2010 | Hotline On Call

    Starting Lineup: Reid Gets Ready To Rumble

    October 14, 2010 | Hotline

    Debate Night In America

    October 14, 2010 | Hotline

    Labor Pains

    October 14, 2010 | Hotline

    Not Ruling It In, But Not Ruling It Out

    October 14, 2010 | Hotline

    Trade Ya

    Advertisement

  • 8/8/2019 NatJourn MMTC NN 101410

    3/7

    Advertisement

    Stay Connected

    Subscribe to this blog

    Subscribe to comments for this post

    What is RSS?

    Contributors

    Juliana Gruenwald

    Got a story idea? Send a note

    Archives

    October 2010

    Report: Landline-Only Polls May Be Biased

    FCC: Consumer Complaints About Cell Phone Bills On Rise

    Court To Hear Arguments In Amazon Sales Tax Case

    Genachowski Touts 'Bill Shock' Proposal

    Groups Aim To Make Privacy A Campaign Issue

    View all entries from October

    September 2010

    August 2010

    July 2010

    June 2010May 2010

    April 2010

    March 2010

    February 2010

    January 2010

    December 2009

    November 2009

    October 2009

    September 2009

  • 8/8/2019 NatJourn MMTC NN 101410

    4/7

  • 8/8/2019 NatJourn MMTC NN 101410

    5/7

  • 8/8/2019 NatJourn MMTC NN 101410

    6/7

    Humor

    ICANN

    Immigration

    Innovation

    Intellectual Property

    International

    Internet Freedom

    Internet Gambling

    Labor

    White House

    Wireless

    YouTube Debates

    digitalfuture

    gadgets

    internet governance

    nanotechnology

    piracy

    reports

    video

    Blogs

    Hotline On Call

    Starting Lineup: Reid Gets Ready To Rumble

    October 14, 2010 7:37 am

    Congressional Connection Poll

    For Campaigning Help, Thanks, But No Thanks

    October 05, 2010 7:05 pm

    Experts

    Experts: Economy

    Any Silver Linings In Jobs Report?

    Latest response: Jeffrey FrankelOctober 12, 2010 6:52 pm

    Experts: Education

    Community Colleges: Where To Start?

    Latest response: Chad WickOctober 13, 2010 11:21 pm

    Experts: Energy & Environment

    What Can The U.S. Do To Cut Carbon?

    Latest response: Mark BernsteinOctober 13, 2010 1:50 am

    Experts: Health Care

    Will Americans Change Behavior For Reform Law?

    Latest response: Kenneth E. ThorpeOctober 13, 2010 6:28 pm

    Experts: National Security

    Jones' Legacy: Adult Supervision Or A General Marginalized?

    Latest response: Col. W. Patrick LangOctober 12, 2010 2:06 pm

    Experts: Transportation

    Talkin' About A Rail-Volution?

    Latest response: Nathaniel P. Ford Sr.October 13, 2010 7:57 pm

    Advertisement

  • 8/8/2019 NatJourn MMTC NN 101410

    7/7

    About Contact Employment Reprints & Back Issues Privacy Policy Advertising

    Copyright 2010 by National Journal Group Inc.

    The Watergate 600 New Hampshire Ave., NW Washington, DC 20037

    202-739-8400 fax 202-833-8069 NationalJournal.com is an Atlantic Media publication.