8
Metropolitan Planning Council Since 1934, MPC has been dedicated to shaping a more sustainable and prosperous greater Chicago region. As an independent, nonprofit, nonpartisan organization, MPC serves communities and residents by developing, promoting and implementing solutions for sound regional growth. • Equity • Sustainability Economic Competitiveness Policy Promotion Policy Implementation Policy Development

Metropolitan Planning Council

  • Upload
    gari

  • View
    41

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Policy Promotion. Policy Development. Policy Implementation. Metropolitan Planning Council. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

  • Metropolitan Planning CouncilSince 1934, MPC has been dedicated to shaping a more sustainable and prosperous greater Chicago region. As an independent, nonprofit, nonpartisan organization, MPC serves communities and residents by developing, promoting and implementing solutions for sound regional growth.

    Equity

    Sustainability

    Economic Competitiveness

  • Q: Why is rental stock down if population and employment are up?A: Traditional supply and demand not working.

    Affordable housing not located near good jobs, good transit, good schools or other amenities.2000: Wake-up call

  • :

    Greatest deficit of housing for households earning below $20,000 per year

    In many communities, working families cant afford to buy a home, but rental housing does not offer a back-up. There is just not the supply of rental housing to meet the needs. These data are from the census, showing the growth in population and jobs between 1990 and 2000. We did not experience the same relative growth in rental housing.

    Key findings were that the rental housing stock was shrinking, that theres a tremendous deficit of housing affordable to folks earning less than 20k

  • Building leadership

  • Building partnershipsWorking across borders:MunicipalCountyState

  • Rebranding, rethinkingHousing shortages are a drain on the local economy.In Chicagos northern suburbs, just 13% of housing stock is affordable 69% of local workforce.

    Chart1

    298301449

    278353621

    130206690

    1287526358

    Workers

    Homes

    Workers' Income Levels

    # of Workers or Available Homes

    Homes Affordable to Workers by Income Level

    13,020 (16%)

    29,830(36%)

    27,835(33%)

    12,875(15%)

    1,449(4%)

    3,621(9%)

    6,690(18%)

    26,358(69%)

    Sheet1

    WorkersHomes

    Less than $25,00029,8301,449

    $25,000 to $49,99927,8353,621

    $50,000 to $74,99913,0206,690

    $75,000 or Higher12,87526,358

    Sheet1

    Workers

    Homes

    Workers' Income Levels

    # of Workers or Available Homes

    Homes Affordable to Workers by Income Level

    12,875(15%)

    27,835(33%)

    29,830(36%)

    13,020 (16%)

    26,358(69%)

    6,690(18%)

    3,621(9%)

    1,449(4%)

  • Building partnershipsEngaging employers in housing, transportation, and environmental initiatives

  • Possible Employer Incentives

    Federal Tax Deduction Income Tax Credit (works for nonprofits, too) through IHDA: 50 cents on the dollar for EAH investments

    Matching Fund (to double employee benefits) through IHDA: Up to $5,000 match for income-eligible employees

    Payroll Tax Deduction (for companies exploring relocation or expansion options) through DCEO

    New CMAP/CR3 Energy Retrofit (a $3,000 match) for new furnace, insulation, or other energy saving measure that an employer helps and employee to do at home

    New Climate Action Pilot Evaluation (thorough assessment of bottom-line benefits of EAH investments and other commute trip reduction strategies)

  • More information is availableChicago Metropolitan Agency for Planninghttp://www.cmap.illinois.gov/Bob [email protected]

    Metropolitan Planning Councilhttp://www.metroplanning.org/eah/Samantha [email protected]

    Our region certainly doesnt have all the answers. Every day feels like a mix of making progress and back to the drawing board.

    But we have seen some successes in applying thinking thats very consistent with your framework a deep commitment to making simultaneous progress on the three Es economy, equity, and environment plus an insatiable appetite for the best data to drive better decision-making, and a belief (informed by the school of hard knocks) that unusual partnerships can unlock real progress.

    By sharing how programmatic and policy engagement of private sector leaders and collaborations across municipalities have delivered tangible results, I hope to pass on some proven tactics that you can put to work in your regions.**Heres one early example of data driving reforms, from a region-wide study that MPC led in 1999: Many were surprised to learn that over decade of 90s, population and jobs increased in double digits, but the rental stock actually shrunk. Traditional supply and demand were malfunctioning. Multiple NON economic barriers were affecting our market place:

    Lack of private sector or governmental leadership, state incentives, and mandates to inspire and guide action (NEED: leadership) Negative public perceptions of affordable housing (= Cabrini Green) and density (= four letter word) (NEED rebranding and rethinkg) Balkanized local governments, 270 munis in our region and 1300 statewide (NEED partnerships)

    This data has inspired public-private initiatives and multiple new statewide tools, but one fact that depressingly hasnt changed much: apartments are in especially short supply in high job growth areas. And we see that the areas where fast-paced, low-density, transit-isolated growth occurred over the past decade are struggling mightily with home foreclosures and bankrupts governments today. Clearly, our job is not done.

    *If what we NEED is leadership, rebranding/rethinking, and partnerships, then our region attributes whatever success we have had to some of the new and strengthened institutions. Concerns about cost of uncoordinated growth (traffic, jobs-housing mismatch) led to creation of: (name 4 and year)

    Housing solutions may be the most dramatic example of strong, collaborative institutions deploying data creatively to get things done. Housing advocates are the usual suspect, but mayors and employers advocating together for state workforce housing policy -- that grabbed attention. As a result:2002: IL A. H. Tax Credit which gives investors a 50-cent income tax credit for every dollar invested in a.h.2004: A.H. Planning and Appeals Act, modeled on a MA law (one of the few sticks to go along with a bunch of carrots; critical to getting some affluent suburbs to the table)2005: statewide funding mechanism to expand support for rental housing (timing is important)

    We surprised ourselves with what we were able to achieve together, all of this during the term of Illinois then-Governor Rod Blagojevich, who is better known for being on trial for corruption and for appearing on reality-TV shows, than for governing. It goes to show you, that theres no one leadership structure that works and even if youre lacking some public sector leadership, you can still move an aggressive agenda with local employers adding their influential voices.After identifying the lack of affordable housing in the cluster of communities, and with the vocal support of local employers, these towns agreed to work together to address the housing needs. They have formed one of several interjurisdictional efforts around the Chicago region. The clusters of communities highlighted here show the several cross-jurisdictional sub-regional partnerships that are working together to address local housing issues. In all cases, the role of the private sector has been key- providing their voice and committing to invest in EAH to support local housing plans.Here, we used the same data to reframe the debate in a cluster of five affluent suburbs. Being able to document that only 13% of the housing stock (or 5,000 homes) is affordable to people making $50,000 or less, and that those workers comprise a majority of the total local workforce, or 60,000 individuals, really opened the eyes of decision makers.

    Because of the trust we had built through Employer-Assisted Housing direct partnerships, employers like Walgreens, Abbott, Lake Forest College, and Lake Forest Hospital have all stepped up and used their prestigious voices to blunt the predictable not-in-my-backyard reaction when workforce housing developments have been proposed locally. *Ive made a couple references to Employer-Assisted Housing, one of the most powerful examples of an innovative partnership in our region. I met my current Board Chair in 2000 when MPC worked with his west suburban manufacturing plant to customize a downpayment assistance benefit for his workers . . . helped 35 in 1st year, recouped $150,000 cost within a year, plus another $100,000 in savings.

    This CEO talked to his local mayor, asking why am I paying property taxes if youre not doing anything to help my workers afford to live near the plant? Then he talked to the Mayors Caucus. Then he talked to fellow employers, then to the media. Today, more than 70 IL employers offer a similar benefit and weve help,ed 15 other states and regions set up something similar.

    This graphic shows the impact of the University of Chicagos EAH initiative pretty dramatic. Weve calculated pocketbook savings for workers, recruitment and training savings for employers, and GHG emission reductions for all of us. Stories like this attract more companies like CVS.*