Shaun McMahon

From:Sent:To:Cc:

Subject:Attachments:

Shaun McMahonWednesday, October 26, 2OL6 2:06 PM

Matt BatorShaun McMahonRed Dot:ltem 0L Zapo BBQ Lighting

L-9 Lighting (a).pdf; sPJ-BL-101_28tc3d47-acb6-40fb-b589-396bd31073b3.pdf

Dear Board Members

please see the attached Red Dots from the applicant on ltemOl on tonight's agenda. These Red Dots constitute the

addition of a new BBQ light which was previously missing from the plans'

Thanks,

Sftøun D. Jvlc1vløñ.onManagement AnalystlCity of DeI Marro5o Camino del MarDel Mar, CAgzot4-2698(858) zSS-573 ext. u63smcmahon@delmar.ca.us

1

ú

Færevæa- ffinåght

SPECIFIGAT¡ON FEATURES

^*iB*:ffi]u,

Finish:

Electrical:

Labels:

Our naturally etched finishes will withstand the test o{ time, All finishes are

individually treated insuring consistency. Our meticulous application results

in a fixture that truly becomes "a one of a kind'l

Available in 8-15V

ETL Standard Wet LabelC-ETL

g1/z'FB-2W-CYL.TA16

"-1 1/a'

21^

All weatherOn / Off switch

Model: SPJ'BL'I01Finish: PVD Satin

BBQ Light

DESCR¡PTION

Õ

Model#;Material:Electrical:Engine:

Lumens:Color Temp:Optic:

MountingLED:

SPJ-BL-1 O1

Solid Brass8-1 5VFB-2W-CYL-TA16ON / OFF Switch lncluded't35

2700KSpot, Flood, Wide Flood,Wide Angle Flood1/2'NPÏNichia

Wet Listed

Wire

3'

(ïÞ,.A',

ORDERING ¡NFORMATION

Finishes llìfattage 0ptics Lumens Golor Temp' Electrical

SPJ-BL-101 PVDS 2W FTf¡f¡D 2700K 8-15V

V = Verde

M = Moss

AG = Aged

MBR = Matte

SB = Satin

GM = Gun ltrdal

B = Black

Brass R = Rusly

Bronze PVI)P= PVD Polished

Brass PVDS = PVD Satin

2W Spot

Flood

Wide Flood

Wide Angle Flood

2700K

4000K

5000K

135

Model#

WWW.SPJLIGHTING.COM

'ls 8-15V

+ f

_ .\g./i.,

...'

,:

.Él

::::: '

"rq

ô

L!:

u) <:OC--)ù--säì>Ñ:U

tltL)ttt-lC-r)tttîrt--CJ)O-ìt\

:j '.

l -l'

'ILOf I

BLOCK 36 _ MAP 43€

LANDSCAPE LIGHTING LEGENDDESCRIPTION VOLT. QUA. WATT, TOTALWATT

NOTES:.&OW FORs OFF EmWRÉ FOR FIÐùUWEMS

- U WOM TO BE ER CODES. & low VoLTAGE to 8E tN WC CONDUtr fO WmtN 1¡OF FI5UE ND MIN OF f,OF SOIL COWR

.& 11OOMÉISIN $NæIÑGTOSEGFIPROECEDNO Sñ d MrN, ÆOW GWE- COoË

- .lruSFOÙER IO IIE IMO HOUSE SYSEM

- FIKUES TO MVÉ GROUilO SPIG. & IIGffiS IO BE DI€@ AT ruES, PAÊS, OR NDSæE FAru€S. NO GENEru MA W& OR UNSH1EÞED UPIIGtrNG SWL SE PROVIOÐ.. & TMNSFOilERS ARÉ IO BÉ MOUWÞ AEHNO WUSMERENOTINUil,

WOSæE CONBqOR SruWRryINilE FIELD FOR BEæRECI WE qUGE, VOLIAGE, SLEMS & BEST LOüIION FORlruSFOruER PHqOCEIL W ¡ æE WftM ND SOUNDSYSEM,

0 8' 16' 24' 32lESCALE:1"=8'-0"

!I +

4F--l

e--

r Y:i:

: : -. -: .- '- - - n:.:-t-=: :.:. çs.-_. .,. :-'-:-*-. ., .

::t::! :: - -: .t r-.:'-

6rfn*¿J

li

I ì ¡l.r- l: rl -.r' r r¡I-"

¡t _i

u u

PROPOSEORESIDENCE

',m:

*iʡt

6

. DOWN LIGHT. FX LUMINARElèl Le-zo¡L¡o-la

o PÂTH LIGHTAUROM MGLIO LED LMG3

^ IN.GROUNDWALKLIGffi@ at,RôRA I tGHl côMÞÂss I DM3

WALL LIGHTâ^ BAOLIGHTv sp.r Êr -ror NÀtr¡Rl ÈRôNzF

DUPLil ONETWCOWRs ÂNn êFt ÞÞôTFcrFD Þt ilG

LED

LÊD

LED

LED

120 V

0

12

7

3w

2

0

21

15

osüe 4irF: 9d10

City of Del Mar

1050 Camino Del Mar, Del Mar, Cali fornia 92014-2698 . Telephone: (858) 755-9313 .Fax: (858) 755-2794 www.delmar.ca.us

TO: City of Del Mar Design Review Board

FROM: Shaun McMahon, Management Analyst

DATE: October 26, 2016

RE: Item 01 – Red Dot (Clarification)

Dear Board Members:

On page one of the Staff Report for Item 01, there was an error in the summary of a change which

was made by the applicant. Line two of the picture below should be amended to read, “The second

floor of the structure was moved an additional 8’6” away from Lower Zapo”.

If you have any additional questions, please feel free to call me at 858-755-9313 ext. 1163.

Shaun McMahon

From:Sent:To:Cc:

Subject:Attachments:

Beth < bethsutterTTT@ gmail.com >

Tuesday, October 25,20L6 2:54 PM

Shaun McMahonBeth SutterRe 1970 Zapo street / red dotFu I lSizeRenderj pg; ATT00001.txt

Hi Shaun

This photo is taken from my living room.It shows how my white water view is being impacted by proposed house.

The DRB meeting is tomorrow evening, as you know.Thank you for getting this photo to board members.Regards

Beth Sutter Allen1986Zapo Street

This email has been scanned for spam and viruses by Proofpoint Essentials. Visit the following link to report this email as

spam:https://usl.proofpointessentials.com/index01.php?mod id=11&mod option=lositem&mail id=lNhdvHp3hHJN&r addr

ess=smcma hon%40delma r.ca.us&report=1

1

\Tr

l-i

Þ

¡i/,lt

\...¡

+

, si.

Matt BATOR

City Planner

City of Del Mar Planning Dpt

2010 Jimmy Durante Blvd#120

DelMar, CA92OI4

Rffi"çffid\.f¡Hm

}cT 24 2016

¿,r,n ¡ n ¡,1j Yt¡ iå 3å,nlïåå, o,p,

October zLst.20t6

Re: DRB 16-028

5t6-522 Stratford Ct

Owner: 516 Stratford Ct LLC

Agent: Zephyr Partners

This letter is intended to state that we remain opposed to the project as-is after viewing the new story

poles and reviewing the updated patented plans available at the Del Mar City Offices on L0/2O/76.

The current project and its gigantic size, whose design is not harmonious with the surrounding

neighborhood we live in, does not preserve the natural state of the current landscaping. lt alters and

affects the primary scenic view from the living room at unit #R. No longer will we be able to enjoy the

quintessential and natural ocean view with the trees in the backdrop from the main room. While going

down the alley bordering522 Stratford and walking along the scenic walkway to watch the sunset, no

longer will passers-by be able to enjoy the feeling of spaciousness of being in nature.

Two cleverly designed one-story homes with basement would be much less intrusive in this

neighborhood and less of a nuisance to nearby neighbors affected.

Mrs. Brescianí-Ludvik purchased the condominium in June 2013, paying close to S100K more than a

comparable unit with little or no ocean view, and now this peaceful and serene natural setting is being

challenged.

As the project manager for Zephyr Partners once stated " Story poles on this one is kind of hard because

of all the buildings on the site"; the same project manager whose original mailing on this project dated

February LTrh 2OL6 was mailed(February 18th 2016) with the City of Del Mar Planning and Community

Development logo on the envelope. When we visited the Planning offices shortly thereafter, we were

told the project had not even been submitted yet and they should not have been sending mail using the

City's address.

Item 04

While extensive documented foreign travels and teachings in the last few months have prevented us

from being able to attend some of the CPP planned events, we regret that a project of this size would be

allowed to move forward.

We enjoy our daily walks along the scenic walkway north and south of the property site under review

and see newer oceanfront construction built in harmony with nature and with respect for the

neighboring community. The massive amount of soil removal and destruction to nature associated withthis project as well as the extensive and extended hardship to our Seacliff Terrace community of which

Mrs. Bresciani-Ludvik is a current Board member would be an additional concern while the construction

phase would be going on. Just getting out of our driveway would be a challenge.

Thank you for taking our concerns into consideration.

Unfortunately Mrs. Bresciani-Ludvik has a conflicting teaching schedule on your next meeting date ofOctober 26th and won't be able to attend.

{f o.,DJ,i, h¡snaaÀ,Ño.dxnk ""JMarilee BRESCIANI-LUDVIK and Robert FANJAS

SEACLI FF TERRACE condominiums

519 STRATFORD CÏ#R

DEL MAR, CA927O4

{-lr r ì lr:;<¡l< \.4;: ì I

Sr,aiË.Jiììl.Jf,jJ artcl *lE¡q¡:þi'¡¡¡

[oltler:;

Inbox l9ll

Junk Irnail

Drafts .ì.ì.t

C) ruew i Reply I

Delete Archive Junk i Swee¡r Move to

Condo photos 2 of 3 Condo photos 2 of 3-l I

Rushing To Yoga Rushiilþ TðVoEaììii,,"!,.ìr?l i'¡'i

Reply i

I\I RYi¿:l:rl i::Ìl íii.,1

You

î'lffiooAUl"'

:!iii,.s iì:i ô Jj i;ì{:lì¡rìt:iìl:r i i.i.(i ñ.iìj i.ìolxrì!i,'.i¡ ¡j¡ S;ìv{¡ ij:: k: {)rìûiìf:ì/ü - P(r: s(l13l

ATT00002.txtìi ì i,ir"r

t!,tArf crg

\,

awc,Lr\'t- t( l¿Í/c¿'þr(tI,^^^j

ATT00003.rxt:ì i 4 irTì\\

AT100004.txI?iiiì i:ìy1..

3 iìiÌn{:iìnìü!ìtr. ill.6 KiÌ¡ i.'r:i'rnl,:lrtì:lii Slv{,'.r:¡ lo aiìùi)lìv.: liij5.)lìJi

J *l

$r;lk:ck N4ail

S.Ð'tlslè Mail ä nd Reþ plstùrì

Folders

Inbox 3$9

.Junk Imail

Drafts ?44

Sent

() ruew I Reply I

Archive Junk I Srveep MÕve to

Condo photos 3 of 3

Adciìæ3Deletê

Condo photos 3 of 3

RYRushing To Yoga

YÔÙ

Rushift TöVogÈ- f,ìd¡j'r, .ì:äl ir'L¡

You

RY

r,ì4 l)Yl{5

ATT00002.txt:ii4 iivtùi

Altoooo3.txrs)v{ì ¡iì¡ Ìû Ònr,llìrìviÌ - irLrrsðifi-Þì'('r:l

Reply I

:l:

.t

¡r iìr:¡Ìiì!ìrrìiiei,; í1ì;: (iij Dûi.{tlQar:i âiiCITI' i AADVANTAGE'

6 ìtìr¡ìhrrìiìr¡t:i il)lÌ {Ìji Dou;nlÌ¿(j rll *\;)wr àil k) ECTO CA

jj"t

üutlcol< Maìì

sec¡*h t\4el a nd Fúþ¡)þùeñ

Folders

Inbox 4ùû

Junk Imåìl

lirôns ¿'t¿t

Se nt ltt)Íts

Delet¡

O ¡le* I Reply ì

Condo phÕtos 1 of 2

Delete Archive Junk I Sweep Move to

À

ti

il

R,YRushing To YogaÌ ¡-r'i¡.,,, .ì:i.ìi í)i',f

You

Condo photos L of 2

DV Rushift f&Voga Reply i

t\ t ì..'c.rr,.ì:2ì llM' ,.r'

i, iìi:rì.r.¡r.,iÌfìt.; iiiiì (iii DJl!nlt.id lli

:iì4 bYtns

ATT00002.txtiJi4 !;vlr',

ATT00003.txt

Srvo äil ti) O¡rtl}r¡vil i:l'r.{Ô}ßþvt¡rs

$ rit3.:hüi{Ìfrts (88 KB) Doi{n¡Ðü(rl :ìll Srsr ùli to Pt.¡s<>lr.;l

j il

ITEM 02

ITEM 2

To: Del Mar Design Review Board

From: Catherine Blair534 15th St., Del Mar

RE: Proposed construction at 539 15th St.

Concerns: Home is not compatible with the neighborhood.

We live directly across the street from the property which is being considered fordevelopment. We have two main concerns regarding the proposed new construction. Wehave gone to City Hall and reviewed the plans for the construction and landscaping. Both ofour concerns are that the project is incompatible with the current “flavor” of theneighborhood.

1) Placement of the home.

The proposed placement of the home is as close to 15th Street as is allowed. Whilethis is indeed within the city guidelines, it is very much in conflict with the placement ofother homes in the area. According to the plans, the view of the property from the streetand other homes will be a large rock home completely unrelieved by significantlandscaping. All other homes have been set back from the street and have significantlandscaping between the home and the street. We strongly encourage the homeowners topush their home back from the street to be more in keeping with the style of theneighborhood.

2) Removal of trees and lack of replacement vegetation

Mature trees and vegetation are a hallmark of the area. The current plans for theproperty are to remove all trees and vegetation, with the exception of the one Torrey Pinetree. The plans show very minimal and small plantings. This will not relieve nor soften theimpact of the large, rock façade of the home. We strongly encourage the homeowners toleave many of the mature Eucalyptus trees and to plant significant vegetation on theproperty between the home and 15th Street to provide a “screen” and to be morecompatible with the other homes in the area. There are many smaller trees availablewhich will add a nice screen while not invading anyone’s view.

Thank you,

Catherine Blair

1

Matt Bator

From: Anne Farrell <AnneF@speakupnow.org>Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 4:24 PMTo: Matt BatorSubject: For distribution to the Design Review Board

To the Design Review Board:

In regards to the project at 539 15th Street, we urge you all to visit the adjacent homes, particularly the Pope,Taylor, and DeFrancesco families, in order to understand their concerns about view (23.08.077H) and privacyimpacts (23.08.072D). We hope that you will also consider the impact of the proposed roof deck that is part ofthe design and how that feature impacts privacy for neighbors—roof decks are never just flat surfaces, theyhave umbrellas, heaters, furniture, and activity that, in a hillside neighborhood, can be seen and heard bymany. We see the roof deck story poles ourselves from inside our house, and we are some distance away.

Furthermore, we would urge you to read the DROs regarding topography, 23.08.076 Regulatory Conclusions –Topography and Landscaping; and also 23.08.077 Regulatory Conclusions – Relationship to Neighborhood, tosee how this project addresses these regulatory conclusions. There is a very particular topography (includingsignificant drainage related to a large area of surrounding homes) on this property that could be disrupted bysuch a large basement, the new swimming pool, and what we presume will be major excavation on the onehand, and major fill of the natural swale at the southwest side of the property, along with removal of most of thetrees on the lot. We are not making a judgment one way or another on these issues, just asking the DRBmembers to consider them, and look at the topography-related DROs, which are rarely used in DRBdeliberations.

One of the special characteristics of our neighborhood, which was developed over a period from around 1938-40, when our house was built, through the 1960s and 1970s (and subsequently as homes were modestlyrenovated), was that each home was sited and constructed in a “stepped manner” up the hill along 15th Streetand Via Alta, so that everyone could share the views, the woodsy character was maintained, and generoussetbacks allowed a sense of privacy. In our neighborhood, there are no roof decks, and only a very fewswimming pools or excessive complexes of outdoor structures that add to more intensive use on a site.

We appreciate that the owners of 539 15th Street have been working on this project a long time, have hadseveral CPPs, have met with neighbors, and have made changes along the way. While we don’t understandwhy the old story poles were left up so long, in this latest iteration, we appreciate that they removed the very talland superfluous chimneys, and changed the plan to plant a new Torrey Pine that could have had view impact forsome neighbors.

But our concern is that this project is one of those that came into the DRB process maxing out on every metric,and in the process impacting the views and privacy of adjacent neighbors. They started out with a two storyhouse then reduced it. The next iteration was a single story but with high ceilings and the roof deck. Intrusioninto the primary protected views of the Pope family is still a problem, even though bit by bit, foot by foot, smallchanges were made. But none of them are truly addressing some of the key concerns of the neighbors. Andthen, after all this, the applicant feels they are at an “impasse.” However, had they started out the process moremodestly, taking first into consideration the impact that the new development would have on the neighbors,perhaps this entire process would not have taken so long. Again, by using this “max-out” strategy, it feels a bitnow like another “death by a thousand cuts”—a strategy that many developers seem to use of late, when goingthrough the DRB process.

2

All of our neighbors are delighted to welcome the new family to 15th Street, and we hope they understand noneof this is personal. But the DRB process is integral and central to why Del Mar is the way it is. The fact thatwe do not have unfettered development is a primary reason that Del Mar does not look like Solana Beach, or LaJolla, or any number of other adjacent communities. All you have to do is cross Del Mar Heights and see whathas happened all along Nob Avenue or any of those streets (which are in the City of San Diego) to understandwhy having strict controls in Del Mar is a benefit, not a punishment.

Finally, we want to thank you for the considerable amount of time that you, as DRB members, spend asvolunteers upholding and respecting our Community Plan and all that it has meant to retaining the charm andunique natural features of Del Mar—and, by the way, making our property values among the highest in coastalCalifornia.

Anne and John Farrell

1415 Via AltaDel Mar CA 92014

This email has been scanned for spam and viruses by Proofpoint Essentials. Click here to report this email asspam.

1

Matt Bator

From: Patricia Rose <PTACHELLA@msn.com>Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 10:18 AMTo: Matt BatorSubject: 1206 Stratford Ct.

Hello Matt,

Further to our conversation this morning, I hearby give permission to you and the Del Mar DRB to enter myproperty at 1216 Stratford Ct. to review the story poles constructed at 1206 Stratford Ct. Committeemembers may enter through the pedestrian gate to the left of the garage and proceed up the stairs to thedeck to see the height and impact of the proposed structure. I have given you the code.

In addition, I would like to make known my concerns regarding this structure:

1.) Are the story poles correct in their height?2.) I am not opposed to the bulk and mass of the structure3.) However, I am opposed to a roof top deck on the portion of the structure that runs parallel to my property.I was unaware until recently, that a roof top spa is planned for this location. My objection is that a rooftop deck will:

Impose on my privacyAllow noise to travel through out the neighborhood as there are no structures that high to stop itNot fit in to the architectural diversity of the neighborhood because it is too high and no other roof decks

are that high ( imagine an umbrella on top of it)

I will be unable to attend the upcoming DRB meeting this month, but please take this email into considerationof my objections. Please feel free to call me with further questions,

Thank you

Patricia Rose1216 Stratford CtDel Mar CA 92014602 421 7659

This email has been scanned for spam and viruses by Proofpoint Essentials. Click here to report this email asspam.

DESCRIPTION

SPECIFICATION FEATURES

Forever Bright

Finish: Our naturally etched finishes will withstand the test of time. All finishes are individually treated insuring consistency. Our meticulous application results in a fixture that truly becomes “a one of a kind”.

Electrical: Available in 8-15V

Labels: ETL Standard Wet Label C-ETL

Wet Listed

BBQ Light

USA-C.COM • CA0AA.01

53* Of Domestic & ForeignComponents

Model: SPJ-BL-101Finish: PVD Satin

Model#:Material: Electrical: Engine:

Lumens:

SPJ-BL-101Solid Brass8-15VFB-2W-CYL-TA16ON / OFF Switch Included 135

Color Temp: 2700KOptic: Spot, Flood, Wide Flood,

Wide Angle FloodMounting: 1/2” NPT.LED: Nichia

WWW.SPJLIGHTING.COM

ORDERING INFORMATION

SPJ-BL-101

Model#

PVDS

V = VerdeM = MossAG = Aged BrassMBR = Matte BronzeSB = Satin Brass

GM = Gun MetalB = BlackR = RustyPVDP = PVD Polished PVDS = PVD Satin

Finishes

2W

2W

Wattage

135

135

Lumens

2700K4000K5000K

2700K

Color Temp.

8-15V

8-15V

Electrical

SpotFlood

Wide FloodWide Angle Flood

FLOOD

Optics

FB-2W-CYL-TA163 1/2”

1 1/2”

3”

21”

3”

Wire

4”

All weatherOn / Off switch