Upload
tranduong
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Project Organization
NIRAS A/S •Henrik Engdal Steffensen •Charlotte Riis •Anders G. Christensen
GSI ENVIRONMENTAL, US
•Charles Newell •David Adamson •Shahla Farhat
The Capital Region of Denmark •Mads Terkelsen •Peder Johansen
The Municipality Gladsaxe •Claus Frydenlund
ATV Vintermøde 2015 10-03-2015
What is matrix diffusion
• Matrix diffusion is a term used to describe transport of contaminants
• Storage & release from low k-layers
• Underestimation of the source life time
• Matrix diffusion is typical not integrated into groundwater models
ATV Vintermøde 2015 10-03-2015
Effects of Matrix Diffusion
Initial
Release
Loading
Stage
Back
Diffusion
Stage C
B
A
ATV Vintermøde 2015 10-03-2015
Project Objective
The overall objective of this project is to investigate the influence of matrix diffusion at 3 sites
on risk, on selection of remediation technique for source and plume on estimating clean-up criteria
ATV Vintermøde 2015 10-03-2015
Project activities
√ Phase 1. Kick-off meeting and final scoping of activities: finished
√ Phase 2. Collection of field data and evaluation: finished
℗ Phase 3. Modelling and evaluation of transport processes in the plumes: in progress
© Phase 4. Development of paradigm/framework for future projects and final report: after phase 3
We will here look at data from one site where depth specific sampling using the GeoProbe system has been used (MiHPT-logs, soil coring, groundwater sampling and detailed subsampling at the cm-scale)
ATV Vintermøde 2015 10-03-2015
Geological cross section site A
Groundwater flow direction
Clay Till
Sand
Sand
Clay Till
Clay/silt
GVS
sekundært
magasin
GVS
primært
magasin
P&T and Airsparging has been in operation for more than 10 years, but this reevaluation of the contamination has shown DNAPL also in the deeper secondary aquifer
P&T and IAS
ATV Vintermøde 2015 10-03-2015
Factory
South North
Sand
Clay/Clay till
Clay till
Top soil
Sand
Initial Conceptual Site Model & High Resolution Characterization Profiles
DN
AP
L?
Groundwater flow direction
MI1
02
MI1
01
MI1
03
GVS
primært
magasin
Kraftig jord- og grundvandsforurening
Svag jord- og grundvandsforurening
GVS
sekundært
magasin
ATV Vintermøde 2015 10-03-2015
Results MI101 Source area (DNAPL)
17
16
15
Sand
Clay, silty
Clay, silty
Sand
Sand, with silt
Sand
Tetrachlorethylen (mg/kg DW) 10 102 103 104 105 106
Sample analysed
40
.00
0
2.3
00
1.5
00
Ele
vati
on
(m
)
Cor. HPT Pressure (kPa) 100 200 400 600
DNAPL
ATV Vintermøde 2015 10-03-2015
San
d
Cla
y, s
ilty
Cla
y, s
and
y Sa
nd
Results MI102 Near Source (-DNAPL)
Corr. HPT Pressure (kPa) 50 100 150 200
Tetrachlorethylen (mg/kg DW) 0 10 20 30 40 50
XSD (µVx105)
Ele
vati
on
(m
)
18
17
16
EC
ATV Vintermøde 2015 10-03-2015
Results MI103 Plume (-DNAPL)
Tetrachlorethylen (mg/kg DW) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Cor. HPT Pressure (kPa) 100 200 400 600
19
16
17
18
Ele
vati
on
(m
)
XSD Max (µVx105) 1 2 3 4
PID Max (µVx105) 1 2 3
ATV Vintermøde 2015 10-03-2015
Lessons Learned
• Continuous core sampling for detailed geological
description is necessary (Sonic Drill, Dual Tube, Single steel
tube sampling)
• Important to measure hydraulic pressure (HPT) through
the whole profile two distinguish low-K and high-K zones.
• High vertical resolution = high number of soil analysis in
order to “deconstruct” the loading history over time.
• MiHPT enables detailed correlation between
contamination and the hydrostratigraphy
ATV Vintermøde 2015 10-03-2015
• A very localized conceptual model are needed and will
complement the more overall site conceptual model.
Phase 3 and 4
• To calculate the back diffusion from low-k layers to transmissive zones (aquifers) based on the results from phase 2.
• Risk assessment • Evaluation of further remedial actions, • Calculation of clean up criteria
Practical challenge to set up a model which can handle • Contaminant transport in groundwater aquifers • Back diffusion • Vertical advective transport
ATV Vintermøde 2015 10-03-2015
Remediation scenarios Preliminary modelling results
Factory
South North
Sand
Clay/Clay till
Clay till
Top soil
Sand
Groundwater flow direction
ATV Vintermøde 2015 10-03-2015
Possible scenarios: - Clean up the sand only
(P&T)
- Also reduce mass stored in the low-K zones (clay) by 90%
16-03-2015
Run 5: No DNAPL, Sand Completely Remediated, Clay Remediated 90% T = 50 years
Run 3: No DNAPL, Sand Completely Remediated, Clay Unremediated T = 0.01 day
Run 3: No DNAPL, Sand Completely Remediated, Clay Unremediated T = 50 years
Remediation scenarios Preliminary modelling results
ATV Vintermøde 2015