1
Bacteria [10^5/mL] 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 T [°C] -1.8 -1.4 -1.0 -0.6 Depth [m] 0 100 200 300 400 A B C D E F dSi [μM] 60 65 70 75 Glass sponge environments in the Weddell Sea, Antarctica Motivation & Objective Glass sponges (Porifera, Hexactinellida), one of the oldest existing animal groups 1 , play an important ecological role in Antarctic shelf regions. These marine sessile filter feeders can form vast sponge beds and dominate the benthic biomass in some areas 2 . They provide habitat for a diverse associated fauna 3,4 and play a significant role in silicon cycling 5 and bentho-pelagic coupling 6 . It is still unknown, however, which factors determine their distribution and, therefore, how environmental changes may affect glass sponge communities. The aim of our study was to characterize environments with and without glass sponges and to identify the determining parameters. Methods We conducted video transects with a remotely operated vehicle (ROV) and measured various environmental parameters at corresponding stations in the Weddell Sea during expedition PS82 with RV Polarstern in January/February 2014. To gain a first impression of glass sponge abundance, 20 images from the first hour of each of six transects were randomly extracted, measured and animals were counted. Temperature was derived from CTD measurements and water samples were analyzed for dissolved silicate (dSi) concentration and bacteria abundance. All results shown here are preliminary. 10.9 BREMERHAVEN Am Alten Hafen 26 27568 Bremerhaven Germany www.awi.de References 1 Leys SP, Mackie GO, Reiswig HM (2007) The biology of glass sponges. Adv Mar Biol 52: 1-145. 2 McClintock JB, Amsler CD, Baker BJ, van Soest RWM (2005) Ecology of Antarctic marine sponges: An overview. Integr Comp Biol 45(2): 359-368. 3 Barthel D, Gutt J, Tendal OS (1991) New information on the biology of Antarctic deep-water sponges derived from underwater photography. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 69(3): 303-307. 4 Kunzmann K (1996) Die mit ausgewählten Schwämmen (Hexactinellida und Demospongiae) aus dem Weddellmeer, Antarktis, vergesellschaftete Fauna. Ber Polarforsch 210: 1-93. 5 Gatti S (2002) The role of sponges in high-Antarctic carbon and silicon cycling – a modelling approach. Ber Polarforsch 434, 1-124. 6 Maldonado M, Carmona C, Velásquez Z, Puig A, Cruzado A, López A, Young CM (2005) Siliceous sponges as a silicon sink: An overlooked aspect of benthopelagic coupling in the marine silicon cycle. Limnol Oceanogr 50(3): 799-809. Luisa Federwisch, Nils Owsianowski, Claudio Richter Luisa Federwisch PhD student Biosciences | Bentho-Pelagic Processes contact: [email protected] Rossella antarctica, small Rossella antarctica, large Rossella nuda Rossella racovitzae Rossella villosa Indet. glass sponges Community composition and abundances Glass sponges Demosponges Indet. Sponges Octocorals Hexacorals Crinoids Holothurians Asteroids Echinoids Pycnogonids Worms Decapods Fishes Glass sponge diversity B: 1.32 Ind/m 2 C: 1.30 Ind/m 2 D: 12.1 Ind/m 2 F: 2.41 Ind/m 2 Conclusions Bottom water temperatures and dissolved silicate lower at stations with glass sponges than at stations without them No obvious differences in bottom water bacteria abundance between stations Highest sponge diversity at stations with hard substrate or sponge spicule mats Environmental factors: Temperature, dissolved Silicate, Bacteria Station B (14.4 m 2 ) Station C (10.7 m 2 ) Station A (12.5 m 2 ) Station D (9.6 m 2 ) Station E (14.8 m 2 ) Station F (12.5 m 2 ) Depth 410 m Gravel/mud/debris Strong current No sponges, few cnidarians and mobile benthos Depth 220 m Spicule mats/debris Many sponges, bryozoans, ascidians, octocorals and echinoids Depth 280 m Gravel/stones Extremely high bryozoan cover, many sponges with holothurians and crinoids Depth 410 m Sponge spicule mats Large numbers of sponges, esp. tiny individuals, many asteroids, incl. sponge predators Depth 440 m Mud No glass sponges, few demosponges and octocorals, many crinoids and fishes Depth 330 m Mud/few stones Many ind. of one glass sponge species, many cnidarians and mobile animals Results CTD data © M. Schröder et al. A B C D E F Individuals/m2 0 1 2 10 12 14 16

Luisa Federwisch, Nils Owsianowski, Claudio RichterPowerPoint-Präsentation Author: Luisa Federwisch Created Date: 9/9/2014 12:34:07 PM

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Luisa Federwisch, Nils Owsianowski, Claudio RichterPowerPoint-Präsentation Author: Luisa Federwisch Created Date: 9/9/2014 12:34:07 PM

Bacteria [10^5/mL]

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

T [°C]

-1.8 -1.4 -1.0 -0.6

Dep

th [

m]

0

100

200

300

400

ABCDEF

dSi [µM]

60 65 70 75

Glass sponge environments in the Weddell Sea, Antarctica

Motivation & Objective Glass sponges (Porifera, Hexactinellida), one of the oldest existing animal groups1, play an important ecological role in Antarctic shelf regions. These marine sessile filter feeders can form vast sponge beds and dominate the benthic biomass in some areas2. They provide habitat for a diverse associated fauna3,4 and play a significant role in silicon cycling5 and bentho-pelagic coupling6. It is still unknown, however, which factors determine their distribution and, therefore, how environmental changes may affect glass sponge communities. The aim of our study was to characterize environments with and without glass sponges and to identify the determining parameters.

Methods We conducted video transects with a remotely operated vehicle (ROV) and measured various environmental parameters at corresponding stations in the Weddell Sea during expedition PS82 with RV Polarstern in January/February 2014. To gain a first impression of glass sponge abundance, 20 images from the first hour of each of six transects were randomly extracted, measured and animals were counted. Temperature was derived from CTD measurements and water samples were analyzed for dissolved silicate (dSi) concentration and bacteria abundance. All results shown here are preliminary.

10.9

BREMERHAVEN Am Alten Hafen 26 27568 Bremerhaven Germany www.awi.de

References 1 Leys SP, Mackie GO, Reiswig HM (2007) The biology of glass sponges. Adv Mar Biol 52: 1-145. 2 McClintock JB, Amsler CD, Baker BJ, van Soest RWM (2005) Ecology of Antarctic marine sponges: An overview. Integr Comp Biol 45(2): 359-368. 3 Barthel D, Gutt J, Tendal OS (1991) New information on the biology of Antarctic deep-water sponges derived from underwater photography. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 69(3): 303-307. 4 Kunzmann K (1996) Die mit ausgewählten Schwämmen (Hexactinellida und Demospongiae) aus dem Weddellmeer, Antarktis, vergesellschaftete Fauna. Ber Polarforsch 210: 1-93. 5 Gatti S (2002) The role of sponges in high-Antarctic carbon and silicon cycling – a modelling approach. Ber Polarforsch 434, 1-124. 6 Maldonado M, Carmona C, Velásquez Z, Puig A, Cruzado A, López A, Young CM (2005) Siliceous sponges as a silicon sink: An overlooked aspect of benthopelagic coupling in the marine silicon cycle. Limnol Oceanogr 50(3): 799-809.

Luisa Federwisch, Nils Owsianowski, Claudio Richter

Luisa Federwisch PhD student Biosciences | Bentho-Pelagic Processes contact: [email protected]

Rossella antarctica, smallRossella antarctica, largeRossella nudaRossella racovitzaeRossella villosaIndet. glass sponges

Community composition and abundances

Glass sponges Demosponges Indet. Sponges Octocorals Hexacorals Crinoids Holothurians Asteroids Echinoids Pycnogonids Worms Decapods Fishes

Glass sponge diversity

B: 1.32 Ind/m2 C: 1.30 Ind/m2 D: 12.1 Ind/m2 F: 2.41 Ind/m2 Conclusions Bottom water temperatures and dissolved silicate lower at

stations with glass sponges than at stations without them No obvious differences in bottom water bacteria abundance

between stations Highest sponge diversity at stations with hard substrate or

sponge spicule mats

Environmental factors: Temperature, dissolved Silicate, Bacteria

Station B (14.4 m2)

Station C (10.7 m2)

Station A (12.5 m2) Station D (9.6 m2)

Station E (14.8 m2)

Station F (12.5 m2)

• Depth 410 m • Gravel/mud/debris • Strong current No sponges, few

cnidarians and mobile benthos

• Depth 220 m • Spicule mats/debris Many sponges,

bryozoans, ascidians, octocorals and echinoids

• Depth 280 m • Gravel/stones Extremely high

bryozoan cover, many sponges with holothurians and crinoids

• Depth 410 m • Sponge spicule mats Large numbers of

sponges, esp. tiny individuals, many asteroids, incl. sponge predators

• Depth 440 m • Mud No glass sponges,

few demosponges and octocorals, many crinoids and fishes

• Depth 330 m • Mud/few stones Many ind. of one

glass sponge species, many cnidarians and mobile animals

Results

CTD data © M. Schröder et al.

A B C D E F

Indi

vidu

als/

m2

0

1

2

10

12

14

16