Upload
charissa-santana
View
38
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Looking back to take things forward. Reflections on a language portfolio. Ruth Hatcher, Laurence Millard & David Tual Language Unit , Engineering Department. Presentation overview. Context + problem WHAT AND HOW FEEDBACK from staff and students WHAT NEXT? Conclusion. Introduction. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Looking back to take things forward
Reflections on a language portfolio
Ruth Hatcher, Laurence Millard & David TualLanguage Unit , Engineering Department
Presentation overview
• Context + problem
• WHAT AND HOW
• FEEDBACK from staff and students
• WHAT NEXT?
• Conclusion
Introduction
• The Language Unit & the Language Programme for Engineers
• Our students
• Previous assessment methods (homework and participation)
Our portfolio
• 6 pieces of homework to be submitted either electronically (Google Drive or email) or on paper
• Corrections (following a colour code) and reflections
• Autonomous learning log
Students’ feedback
Students’ feedback
Students’ feedback on using Google Drive
Students’ feedback on using Google Drive
Comments from students who would prefer an alternative means of handing in their work
• “Easier to write German than type it, not good interface”
• “By hand – actually get a feel of writing before the exams – easier + no autocorrect”
• “Prefer to hand write, by completing it online I spent too much time editing it”
• “Submitting written homework is more useful as you can make side notes and easier to refer back”
• “Typed and printed to the teacher, because the feedback in the margin can be useful”
Feedback
PROS
• Easy-to-access repository
• Immediate feedback
• Empowers the students
CONS
• Time consuming
(Time spent on marking homework: average 10.9 minutes, double checking: 5.9, using G drive: 13.5 and 6.7 respectively)
• Requires training of teachers and students
• Allows student to copy and paste from external resources
• More impersonal
What next?
•Add a variety of tasks (covering all 4 skills)
• Moodle vs. Google
• Change the attitude of students and teachers
• Carrying on with monitoring control quality and student satisfaction
Conclusion
What we have learnt:
•The need to explain and train staff & students to use Google Drive (or any other virtual platform)
•The value of continuous assessment
•Set the right expectations
Arising questions to explore further:
•How to best use contact and non-contact time?
Readings
• Cadd, M. (2012). The Electronic Portfolio as Assessment Tool and More: The Drake University Model. IALLT Journal of Language Learning Technologies 42(1), 96-126. http://www.iallt.org/iallt_journal/the_electronic_portfolio_as_assessment_tool_and_more_the_drake_university_model
• Cavanaugh, A.J. & Song, L. (2014). Audio Feedback versus Written Feedback: Instructors and Students’ Perspectives. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 10(1), 122-138. http://jolt.merlot.org/vol10no1/cavanaugh_0314.pdf
• Edwards, D. (2014). Pedagogy First – Technology… Learning and Innovation [weblog]. Retrieved July 2014 from http://dedwards.me/2014/02/15/pedagogy-first-technology/