19
Lisabon.070531 Magnus Klofsten Linköping University Sweden Technology Transfer Through Entrepreneurship: A Swedish Good Practice

Lisabon.070531 Magnus Klofsten Linköping University Sweden Technology Transfer Through Entrepreneurship: A Swedish Good Practice

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Lisabon.070531 Magnus Klofsten Linköping University Sweden Technology Transfer Through Entrepreneurship: A Swedish Good Practice

Lisabon.070531

Magnus KlofstenLinköping University

Sweden

Technology Transfer Through Entrepreneurship:

A Swedish Good Practice

Page 2: Lisabon.070531 Magnus Klofsten Linköping University Sweden Technology Transfer Through Entrepreneurship: A Swedish Good Practice

Lisabon.070531

Agenda

The Linköping region Entrepreneurship in the academic

context A good practice Success factors Conclusions and future aspect An illustrative group work

Page 3: Lisabon.070531 Magnus Klofsten Linköping University Sweden Technology Transfer Through Entrepreneurship: A Swedish Good Practice

Lisabon.070531

Knowledge-based regional development (stages)

Inception (1980-85; idea about a new regional development model)

Implementation (1986-1995; starting new activities)

Consolidation and adjustment (1996-2000; integration of hard and soft activities)

Self sustaining growth (2001-; avoiding decline– create continuous redevelopment)

Etzkowitz & Klofsten, (2005)

Page 4: Lisabon.070531 Magnus Klofsten Linköping University Sweden Technology Transfer Through Entrepreneurship: A Swedish Good Practice

Lisabon.070531

What is entrepreneurship?

Entrepreneurship is an attitude or approach to management or life that starts with opportunity; it is a framework with which to look at the world regardless of what you do in the world

(Carsrud, 2005)

Page 5: Lisabon.070531 Magnus Klofsten Linköping University Sweden Technology Transfer Through Entrepreneurship: A Swedish Good Practice

Lisabon.070531

Academic entrepreneurship:

Three levels

The entrepreneurial university - creation and maintenance of an enterprising culture

Entrepreneurship - a subject itself Training entrepreneurship - starting new

businesses

(Klofsten (2000), Journal of European Industrial Training, 24(6&7), p. 337-344)

Page 6: Lisabon.070531 Magnus Klofsten Linköping University Sweden Technology Transfer Through Entrepreneurship: A Swedish Good Practice

Lisabon.070531

The growth and developmentprocess

Page 7: Lisabon.070531 Magnus Klofsten Linköping University Sweden Technology Transfer Through Entrepreneurship: A Swedish Good Practice

Lisabon.070531

How we work

Traditional business support

CIE

Page 8: Lisabon.070531 Magnus Klofsten Linköping University Sweden Technology Transfer Through Entrepreneurship: A Swedish Good Practice

Lisabon.070531

Programmes and activities

1.

2.

3.

4.

4. Networking Activities

3. Management Groups

2. Development Programme

1. Entrepreneurship and New Business Development Programme (ENP)

Start Early development Later development

Growth anddevelopment

Time

Page 9: Lisabon.070531 Magnus Klofsten Linköping University Sweden Technology Transfer Through Entrepreneurship: A Swedish Good Practice

Lisabon.070531

Networking activities

Seminars Meeting SMIL Focus groups Social events SMIL Management leaders

school www.smil.se

Page 10: Lisabon.070531 Magnus Klofsten Linköping University Sweden Technology Transfer Through Entrepreneurship: A Swedish Good Practice

Lisabon.070531

ENP(results since 1994)

50 programmes 2000 persons involved 500 new ventures 75% are starting 70% are surviving 20% are growing (over 5 people) Major acquisitions: Kreatel and Ventall

2006

Page 11: Lisabon.070531 Magnus Klofsten Linköping University Sweden Technology Transfer Through Entrepreneurship: A Swedish Good Practice

Lisabon.070531

ENP in Sweden

Page 12: Lisabon.070531 Magnus Klofsten Linköping University Sweden Technology Transfer Through Entrepreneurship: A Swedish Good Practice

Lisabon.070531

The ENP process

Page 13: Lisabon.070531 Magnus Klofsten Linköping University Sweden Technology Transfer Through Entrepreneurship: A Swedish Good Practice

Lisabon.070531

Philosophy behind ENP

Own venture idea Drive before idea Customer and market focus Neutral training arena Openness Connection to a network

Page 14: Lisabon.070531 Magnus Klofsten Linköping University Sweden Technology Transfer Through Entrepreneurship: A Swedish Good Practice

Lisabon.070531

Idea development

Klofsten (2005), Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, p. 105-119

Page 15: Lisabon.070531 Magnus Klofsten Linköping University Sweden Technology Transfer Through Entrepreneurship: A Swedish Good Practice

Lisabon.070531

Idea evaluation

Klofsten (2005), Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, p. 105-119

Page 16: Lisabon.070531 Magnus Klofsten Linköping University Sweden Technology Transfer Through Entrepreneurship: A Swedish Good Practice

Lisabon.070531

Success factors in entrepreneurship support Use people that really understand the

entrepreneurial processes Drive and engagement Satisfy real needs A strategic focus An anchored position Collaborative mindset Credibility and openness Long term commitment

Page 17: Lisabon.070531 Magnus Klofsten Linköping University Sweden Technology Transfer Through Entrepreneurship: A Swedish Good Practice

Lisabon.070531

CONCLUSIONS

When measuring success of an entrepreneurship programme there are three levels to take into consideration:

Individual Organisation Societal level

Be patient - inspired entrepreneurs will do their job - results will arrive…

Page 18: Lisabon.070531 Magnus Klofsten Linköping University Sweden Technology Transfer Through Entrepreneurship: A Swedish Good Practice

Lisabon.070531

Why being involved? - the academic point of view

Synergies Knowledge Money Image Network Fun/inspiration

Page 19: Lisabon.070531 Magnus Klofsten Linköping University Sweden Technology Transfer Through Entrepreneurship: A Swedish Good Practice

Lisabon.070531

Future aspects to deal with in the entrepreneurship support system

The ongoing institutionalisation process Changes in collaboration (external and

internal) The measure of success Integration backwards and forwards Avoiding bureaucratisation