19
1 EE 554, HW#3, Spring 2020, Dr. McCalley, Due Tuesday 2/25. SOLUTIONS 1. We argued in class that, for a 2-pole machine, the mutual inductances for rotor windings in quadrature (e.g., LFG, LFQ, LGD, LDQ) are zero because the flux from one winding does not link with the coils of the other winding. Explain, using a physical structure of a 4-pole machine together with a drawing of d-axis flux lines, why the d-axis flux does not link with the q-axis windings. Solution: Consider a four-pole configuration, as shown below. Consider if we could cut the rotor along the blue dashed line in the center of the above figure, then we could lay the four different poles out side-by-side as shown below (here, there is no significance to the colors of the colored vertical bars on either side of each pole). In studying the lines of flux in the above figure, it is easy to see that most lines of flux are perpendicular to the q-axis winding. The only exception to this are the two lines shown in the very center of the concentric flux-circles. However, these two would cancel each other since they will be equal but opposite direction. The implication of this is the D-axis windings do not link with Q-axis windings. D1 d N S D1 d D2 D2 Q1 Q1 Q2 Q2 STATOR ROTOR

STATORhome.engineering.iastate.edu/~jdm/ee554/EE554-2020... · ) are zero because the flux from one winding does not link with the coils of the other winding. Explain, using a physical

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    17

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: STATORhome.engineering.iastate.edu/~jdm/ee554/EE554-2020... · ) are zero because the flux from one winding does not link with the coils of the other winding. Explain, using a physical

1

EE 554, HW#3, Spring 2020, Dr. McCalley, Due Tuesday 2/25.

SOLUTIONS

1. We argued in class that, for a 2-pole machine, the mutual inductances for rotor windings in quadrature (e.g., LFG,

LFQ, LGD, LDQ) are zero because the flux from one winding does not link with the coils of the other winding. Explain,

using a physical structure of a 4-pole machine together with a drawing of d-axis flux lines, why the d-axis flux does

not link with the q-axis windings.

Solution:

Consider a four-pole configuration, as shown below.

Consider if we could cut the rotor along the blue dashed line in the center of the above figure, then we could lay the

four different poles out side-by-side as shown below (here, there is no significance to the colors of the colored vertical

bars on either side of each pole).

In studying the lines of flux in the above figure, it is easy to see that most lines of flux are perpendicular to the q-axis

winding. The only exception to this are the two lines shown in the very center of the concentric flux-circles. However,

these two would cancel each other since they will be equal but opposite direction. The implication of this is the D-axis

windings do not link with Q-axis windings.

D1

d

N

S D1

d

D2

D2

Q1

Q1 Q2

Q2

STATOR

ROTOR

Page 2: STATORhome.engineering.iastate.edu/~jdm/ee554/EE554-2020... · ) are zero because the flux from one winding does not link with the coils of the other winding. Explain, using a physical

2

2. Problem 4.1

Parks transformation is an orthogonal one because P-`=PT. This question

requests that we observe what happens to the voltage equations when we

use a transformation that is not orthogonal. In fact, the original trans-

formation used by Park in his 1929 paper was not orthogonal. Let’s try it.

0

0 0

abc abc abc abc n

FGDQFGDQ FGDQ FGDQ

v iR v

v R i

Applying the Q-transformation, we get

4 4 4 4

0 0 0 00

0 00 0 0 0

term 1 term 2 term 4term 3

abc abc abc abc n

FGDQFGDQ FGDQ FGDQ

Q Q Q Qv iR v

v R iU U U U

Term 1:

0

4

0

0

dqabc abc

FGDQ FGDQFGDQ

Qv vQ v

v vvU

Term 2:

4

0 0

00

abc abc

FGDQ FGDQ

Q iR

R iU

But

10 0

4 4

0 00 0

dq dqabc abc

FGDQ FGDQFGDQ FGDQ

i ii iQ QU Ui ii i

Substitution yields

Page 3: STATORhome.engineering.iastate.edu/~jdm/ee554/EE554-2020... · ) are zero because the flux from one winding does not link with the coils of the other winding. Explain, using a physical

3

10

44

0 0 0000

dqabc

FGDQ FGDQ

iQ R QUR iU

110 0

4

0 00000

abc dq dqabc

FGDQFGDQ FGDQFGDQ

QR i iQR QQRU i iR

Before, when using transformation P, at this point we had 1

abcPR P

, and

because P is orthogonal and Rabc is diagonal, it is true that PRabcP-1=Rabc,

assuming Rabc also has equal diagonal elements (i.e., so that ra=rb=rc=r). Here,

however, Q is not orthogonal therefore we must do the math. For this we

need Q-1. You can get this using the method of cofactors. Then…

1

1 1 11 cos sin0 02 2 22

cos cos 120 cos 120 0 0 1 cos 120 sin 1203 0 0sin sin 120 sin 120 1 cos 120 sin 120

2 2 22cos cos 120 cos 120

3 sin sin 120 sin 120

abcQR Q

rr

r

r r r

r r rr r r

1 cos sin1 cos 120 sin 1201 cos 120 sin 120

3 0 02 0 02 30 0 0 0

23 0 030 02

abc

rr

r r Rrr

This is a nice surprise! Why did it happen? Does it mean that QAQ-1=A works

for any diagonal matrix A independent of whether Q is orthogonal or not?

No! Careful analysis of the math above will show that, if ra≠rb≠rc, we would

have obtained something quite different. Our conclusion is that QAQ-1=A if A

Page 4: STATORhome.engineering.iastate.edu/~jdm/ee554/EE554-2020... · ) are zero because the flux from one winding does not link with the coils of the other winding. Explain, using a physical

4

is diagonal and with equal elements on the diagonal. Does this work for any

matrix Q or just this one?

Answer: Let A=kU where k is the element along the diagonal (in our case,

k=r). Then QAQ-1=QkUQ-1=kQUQ-1=kQQ-1=kU=A. We should have noticed this

at the beginning to save ourselves some work!

Therefore:

110 0

4

0

0 00000

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0

abc dq dqabc

FGDQFGDQ FGDQFGDQ

d

q

F F

G G

D D

Q Q

QR i iQR QQRU i iR

iririr

r ir i

r ir i

Now let’s go to term 3.

4

0

0

abc abc

FGDQFGDQ

Q Q

U

Using the same analysis we used in class for P, we find:

1

0 0abc dq dqQ QQ

And so term 3 is

Page 5: STATORhome.engineering.iastate.edu/~jdm/ee554/EE554-2020... · ) are zero because the flux from one winding does not link with the coils of the other winding. Explain, using a physical

5

-10 0dq

4

Term 3bTerm 3a

0 QQ λ

00

abc abc dq

FGDQFGDQFGDQ

Q Q

U

Let’s work on Term 3b. Given that

Re Re

1 1 12 2 22

cos cos 120 cos 1203 sin sin 120 sin 120

/ 2

Q

t

we can compute the derivative of Q:

0 0 02sin sin 120 sin 120

3 cos cos 120 cos 120Q

2

10 0 0 1 cos sin2

sin sin 120 sin 120 1 cos 120 sin 1203 cos cos 120 cos 120 1 cos 120 sin 120

0 0 0 0 0 04 3 2

0 0 0 09 2 3

3 20 0 0 0

2 3

QQ

And then 1

0dqQQ becomes

Page 6: STATORhome.engineering.iastate.edu/~jdm/ee554/EE554-2020... · ) are zero because the flux from one winding does not link with the coils of the other winding. Explain, using a physical

6

01

0

0 0 0 0

2 20 0

3 32 2

0 03 3

dq d q

q

d

QQ

Then Term 3 becomes

0

-10 0dq

Term 3bTerm 3a

02

32

QQ λ30

0000

qd

qabc dq d

FFGDQFGDQ

G

D

Q

Q

Now let’s get term 3a. From the lecture notes (see pp. 24-25 of “macheqts”),

0

4 4

110 0

14 4

0 00 0

0 00 0

dqabc abcaa aR

FGDQ FDQGRa RRFGDQ

aa aRdq dqaa aR

Ra RR FGDQ FDQGRa RR

Q Q iL LiL LU U

QL Q QLi iQ L L QL L i iU U L Q L

Again, from lecture notes (p. 2 of “macheqts,” eq. L-ex), we have cos 2 [ cos 2( 30 )] [ cos 2( 150 )] cos

[ cos 2( 30 )] cos 2( 120 ) [ cos 2( 90 )] cos( 120 )[ cos 2( 150 )] [ cos 2( 90 )] co

a S m S m S m F

b S m S m S m F

c S m S m S m

F

G

D

Q

L L M L M L MM L L L M L MM L M L L L

s 2( 240 ) cos( 240 )cos cos( 120 ) cos( 240 )sin sin( 120 ) sin( 240 ) 0cos cos( 120 ) cos( 240 )sin sin( 120 ) sin( 240 ) 0

F

F F F F

G G G

D D D R

Q Q Q

MM M M LM M MM M M MM M M

sin cos sinsin( 120 ) cos( 120 ) sin( 120 )sin( 240 ) cos( 240 ) sin( 240 )

0 00

0 00

G D Q a

G D Q b

G D Q b

FR

GG Y

DD

QY Q

M M M iM M M iM M M i

iMiL MiLiM L

where the submatrices of the inductance matrix are defined as

aa aR

Ra RR

L LL L

Page 7: STATORhome.engineering.iastate.edu/~jdm/ee554/EE554-2020... · ) are zero because the flux from one winding does not link with the coils of the other winding. Explain, using a physical

7

Now we have to evaluate each of the terms in the 2x2 matrix 1

00

1

dq aa aR dq

FDQGRa RRFGDQ

QL Q QL iiL Q L

This is tedious, but we must do it. So here we go.

Submatrix (1,1):

1

1 1 1cos [ cos(2( 30))] [ cos(2( 150))]2 2 22

cos cos 120 cos 120 [ cos(2( 30))] cos(2( 120)) [ cos(2( 90))]3 [ cos(2( 150))] [sin sin 120 sin 120

aa

S m S m S m

S m S m S m

S m

QL Q

L L M L M LM L L L M LM L

1 cos sin1 cos 120 sin 120

cos(2( 90))] cos(2( 240)) 1 cos 120 sin 120S m S mM L L L

1 1 1[ 2 ] [ 2 ] [ 2 ]

2 2 2 1 cos sin2 3 3 3[ ]cos( ) [ ]cos( 120) [ ]cos( 120) 1 cos 120 sin 1

3 2 2 23 3 3

[ ]sin( ) [ ]sin( 120) [ ]sin( 120)2 2 2

S S S S S S

S m S S m S S m S

S m S S m S S m S

L M L M L M

L L M L L M L L M

L L M L L M L L M

201 cos 120 sin 120

3[ 2 ] 0 0

2 0 022 3 3 3

0 [ ] 0 0 03 2 2 2

3 3 30 0 [ ] 0 0

2 2 2

S SS S

S m S S m S

S m S S m S

L ML M

L L M L L M

L L M L L M

Now we define:

0

3 32 ; ;

2 2S S d S m S q S m SL L M L L L M L L L M

Then

01

0

0 00 00 0

aa dqd

q

LQL Q L L

L

Submatrix (1,2):

1 1 1cos sin cos sin2 2 22

cos cos 120 cos 120 cos( 120) sin( 120) cos( 120) sin( 120)3 cos( 240) sin( 240) cos( 240) sin( 240)sin sin 120 sin 120

F G D Q

ar F G D Q

F G D Q

M M M MQL M M M M

M M M M

And this is the same thing we

obtained using P (see p. 27 of

“macheqts” notes).

Page 8: STATORhome.engineering.iastate.edu/~jdm/ee554/EE554-2020... · ) are zero because the flux from one winding does not link with the coils of the other winding. Explain, using a physical

8

0 0 0 00 0 0 02 3 3

0 0 0 03 2 2 0 0

3 30 0

2 2

F D F D

G Q

G Q

M M M MM M

M M

Submatrix (2,1):

1

cos cos( 120) cos( 240)1 cos sinsin sin( 120) sin( 240)1 cos 120 sin 120cos cos( 120) cos( 240)1 cos 120 sin 120sin sin( 120) sin( 240)

F F F

G G GRa

D D D

Q Q Q

M M MM M M

L Q M M MM M M

30 0

23

0 02

30 0

23

0 02

F

G

D

Q

M

M

M

M

Submatrix (2,2): This submatrix does not change. It is given by

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

F R

G Yrr

R D

Y Q

L M

L ML

M L

M L

So the term 3a is found by differentiating the below expression: 0

0

1

0 0

1

0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

30 0 0 0

23

0 0 0 02

30 0 0 0

23

0 0 0 02

d F D

q G Q

d

F F R qdq aa aR dq

FFDQGFGDQ G G YRa RR

D

G

D R DQ

Q Y Q

L

L M MiL M Mi

M L M iQL Q QL i

ii M L ML Q L i

iM M L

i

M M L

We can then differentiate both sides to obtain:

Page 9: STATORhome.engineering.iastate.edu/~jdm/ee554/EE554-2020... · ) are zero because the flux from one winding does not link with the coils of the other winding. Explain, using a physical

9

0

0

0

0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

30 0 0 0

23

0 0 0 02

30 0 0 0

23

0 0 0 02

d F D

q G Q

d

F F R qdq

F

G G YFGDQG

DD R D

Q

Q Y Q

L

L M MiL M Mi

M L M i

iM L M

i

iM M L

i

M M L

It is important to observe at this point that QLar≠[LarQ-1], i.e., the lower

left 4x3 submatrix is not the transpose of the upper right 3x4

submatrix. Using the P transformation does result in PLar=[LarP-1]. The

significance of this is that the elements in the submatrices represent

mutual inductances; for a physically realizable circuit, it must be the

case that Mij=Mji. Thus, the P transformation results in a system that

can be physically realized, but the Q transformation does not. You can

obtain the correct answers either way, but with the P transformation,

you can actually draw a circuit that corresponds to the equations and

thus better conceptualized the various relationships.

Finally, we express term 4:

4

0

000

1 1 12 2 22

cos cos 120 cos 1203 sin sin 120 sin 120

n n

n

n n

n

Q v Qv

U

vQv v

v

Page 10: STATORhome.engineering.iastate.edu/~jdm/ee554/EE554-2020... · ) are zero because the flux from one winding does not link with the coils of the other winding. Explain, using a physical

10

The product of the second row and vn, or of the third row and vn, will

include a summation of symmetrical components, which will be zero!

So the only non-zero element in Qvn will be the product of the first row

of Q and vn, i.e., the first element of the term 4 vector, which is

1 1 1

3 3 3

n

n n

n

vv vv

But recall from our circuit the voltage equation indicates that:

)()( cbanncbannnnn iiiLriiiiLriv (**)

Also, recall that from the Park’s transformation iodq=Qiabc that

1 1 12 2 22

cos cos 120 cos 1203 sin sin 120 sin 120

a

odq abc b

c

ii Qi i

i

And therefore the i0 current is:

0 0

2 1 1 1 1( ) ( ) ( ) 3

3 2 2 2 3a b c a b c a b ci i i i i i i i i i i ; 0( ) 3a b ci i i i

And so equation (**) above becomes

0 03 3n n nv i r L i

The problem asks us to express the voltage equations similar to

equation (4.39) in VMAF. Recall our originally transformed voltage

equations, below.

Page 11: STATORhome.engineering.iastate.edu/~jdm/ee554/EE554-2020... · ) are zero because the flux from one winding does not link with the coils of the other winding. Explain, using a physical

11

44 4 4

0 0 00 0

0 0 00 0 0

term 1 term 2 term 4term 3

abc abc abc abc n

FGDQFGDQ FGDQ FGDQ

Q Q Qv iR vP

v R i UU U U

We have done all the work necessary to express each term. Making those

substitutions, we obtain:

0

0

0

Term 1

Term 2

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 030 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 230 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0

d F D

q G Q

dF F R

qdq

F FG

FGDQ G G

D D

Q Q

LL M M

L M Mirir M L Mirv

r iM Lv r i

r ir i

00 0

Term 3b

Term 3a

02 3 3

032 0

00 3 0003 00 0 0 0 002

030 0 0 0

2

n nqd

q

dF

G YG

DD R D

Q

Q Y Q

i i r L iiiiMii

M M Li

M M L

Term 4

On page 8 of this solution, we wrote:

0

0

1

0 0

1

0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

30 0 0 0

23

0 0 0 02

30 0 0 0

23

0 0 0 02

d F D

q G Q

d

F F R qdq aa aR dq

FFDQGFGDQ G G YRa RR

D

G

D R DQ

Q Y Q

L

L M MiL M Mi

M L M iQL Q QL i

ii M L ML Q L i

iM M L

i

M M L

From this we may extract the following two equations:

d d d F F D D

q q q G G Q Q

L i M i M i

L i M i M i

Substitution of the previous equations into Term 3b of the voltage equations

results in

Page 12: STATORhome.engineering.iastate.edu/~jdm/ee554/EE554-2020... · ) are zero because the flux from one winding does not link with the coils of the other winding. Explain, using a physical

12

0

0

0

Term 1

Term 2

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 030 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 230 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0

d F D

q G Q

dF F R

qdq

F FG

FGDQ G G

D D

Q Q

LL M M

L M Mirir M L Mirv

r iM Lv r i

r ir i

0

Term 3a

Term 3b

0

30 0 0 0

23

0 0 0 02

02

( )32

( )3

0000

d

q

FG Y

G

DD R D

Q

Q Y Q

q q G G Q Q

d d F F D D

iiiiMii

M M Li

M M L

L i M i M i

L i M i M i

0 0

Term 4

3 3000000

n ni r L i

Compare to the answer we got when using P:

0 0

0

Term 1 Term 2

0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

a

d db

d F Dq qc

F F F

G G

D D

Q Q

v ir

Lv irL kM kM

v ir

v r i

r i

r i

r i

0

Term 3a

0 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 0

03 3

2 23 3

2 20000

d

qq G Q

F F R F

G G YG

D R D

Q Y Q D

Q

q q G G Q Q

d d F F D D

i

i

iL kM kM

kM L M ikM L M

ikM M LkM M L i

i

L i M i M i

L i M i M i

0 0

Term 3bTerm 4

3 3

0

0

0

0

0

0

n nr i L i

Terms 1 and 2 are the same; term 3a differs (and is not symmetric!);

term 3b is also a bit different; term 4 is the same.

Page 13: STATORhome.engineering.iastate.edu/~jdm/ee554/EE554-2020... · ) are zero because the flux from one winding does not link with the coils of the other winding. Explain, using a physical

13

3. Problem 4.2

4. Problem 4.6

This problem is asking us to take a step which is the same as a step taken in

obtaining term 3a in our voltage equation when using the “P” transformation.

See eq. (tve4) on pg. 23 of “macheqts” which has

Page 14: STATORhome.engineering.iastate.edu/~jdm/ee554/EE554-2020... · ) are zero because the flux from one winding does not link with the coils of the other winding. Explain, using a physical

14

4 term3b term3a term2 term1 term

000

000

1000

dqdq

FDQG

dq

FDQG

dq

FDQG

abc

FDQG

dq nPP

i

i

R

R

v

v

We started this work by looking at term 3a, but without the derivatives (indeed, this is exactly (4.20) in your text for which this problem asks us to verify). This will be

0

4

00

dqabc

FGDQFGDQ

PU

and then replacing the flux linkage quantities on the right with their equivalent inductance*current expressions results in

0

4 4

0 00 0

dqabc abcaa aR

FGDQ FDQGRa RRFGDQ

iL LP PiU U L L

And finally, replacing the abc currents on the right using 1

0

4

00

dqabc

FGDQ FGDQ

ii Pi iU

we obtain

100

4 4

0 00 0

dqdqaa aR

Ra RR FGDQFGDQ

iL LP PU L L iU

which results in

FDQG

dq

RRRa

aRaa

FDQG

dq

i

i

LPL

LPPLP 0

1

10

Again, from lecture notes (p. 2 of “macheqts,” eq. L-ex), we have

Page 15: STATORhome.engineering.iastate.edu/~jdm/ee554/EE554-2020... · ) are zero because the flux from one winding does not link with the coils of the other winding. Explain, using a physical

15

cos 2 [ cos 2( 30 )] [ cos 2( 150 )] cos[ cos 2( 30 )] cos 2( 120 ) [ cos 2( 90 )] cos( 120 )[ cos 2( 150 )] [ cos 2( 90 )] co

a S m S m S m F

b S m S m S m F

c S m S m S m

F

G

D

Q

L L M L M L MM L L L M L MM L M L L L

s 2( 240 ) cos( 240 )cos cos( 120 ) cos( 240 )sin sin( 120 ) sin( 240 ) 0cos cos( 120 ) cos( 240 )sin sin( 120 ) sin( 240 ) 0

F

F F F F

G G G

D D D R

Q Q Q

MM M M LM M MM M M MM M M

sin cos sinsin( 120 ) cos( 120 ) sin( 120 )sin( 240 ) cos( 240 ) sin( 240 )

0 00

0 00

G D Q a

G D Q b

G D Q b

FR

GG Y

DD

QY Q

M M M iM M M iM M M i

iMiL MiLiM L

where the submatrices of the inductance matrix are defined as

aa aR

Ra RR

L LL L

Submatrix (1,1) 1

1 1 1

cos 2 [ cos(2( 30))] [ cos(2( 150))]2 2 22cos cos( 120) cos( 120) [ cos(2( 30))] cos(2( 120)) [ cos(2( 90))]

3 sin sin( 120) sin( 120) [ cos(2(

aa

S m S m S m

S m S m S m

S m

PL P

L L M L M LM L L L M LM L

1cos sin

22 1

cos( 120) sin( 120)3 2150))] [ cos(2( 90))] cos(2( 240))

1cos( 120) sin( 120)

2

S m S mM L L L

2 0 03

0 02

30 0

2

S S

S m S

S m S

L M

L L M

L L M

Now we define:

0

3 32 ; ;

2 2S S d S m S q S m SL L M L L L M L L L M

Then

01

0

0 00 00 0

aa dqd

q

LPL P L L

L

Submatrix (1,2) 1 1 1

cos sin cos sin2 2 22cos cos( 120) cos( 120) cos( 120) sin( 120) cos( 120) sin( 120)

3 sin sin( 120) sin( 120) cos( 240) sin( 240) cos( 240) sin( 240)

F G D Q

aR F G D Q

F G D Q

M M M M

PL M M M M

M M M M

0 0 0 0

3 30 0

2 2

3 30 0

2 2

mF D

G Q

M M L

M M

Page 16: STATORhome.engineering.iastate.edu/~jdm/ee554/EE554-2020... · ) are zero because the flux from one winding does not link with the coils of the other winding. Explain, using a physical

16

Submatrix (2,1)

1

1cos sin

cos cos( 120) cos( 240) 22 1sin sin( 120) sin( 240)

cos( 120) sin( 120)cos cos( 120) cos( 240) 3 2sin sin( 120) sin( 240) 1

cos( 120) sin( 120)2

F F F

G G GRa

D D D

Q Q Q

M M MM M M

L PM M MM M M

30 0

2

30 0

2

30 0

2

30 0

2

F

GT

m

D

Q

M

M

L

M

M

So the desired matrix relation of (4.20) is given by 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

dd d F D

qq q G Q

F F F R F

G G G Y G

D D R D D

Q Q Y Q Q

iL

iL kM kM

iL kM kM

kM L M i

kM L M i

kM M L i

kM M L i

5. Problem 4.11

Page 17: STATORhome.engineering.iastate.edu/~jdm/ee554/EE554-2020... · ) are zero because the flux from one winding does not link with the coils of the other winding. Explain, using a physical

17

6. Problem 4.12

Equation (4.20) is

00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

dd d F D

qq q G Q

F F F R F

G G G Y G

D D R D D

Q Q Y Q Q

iL

iL kM kM

iL kM kM

kM L M i

kM L M i

kM M L i

kM M L i

from which we obtain: 3 3

2 2

3 3

2 2

d d d F F D D

q q q G G Q Q

L i M i M i

L i M i M i

7. Problem 4.18

Page 18: STATORhome.engineering.iastate.edu/~jdm/ee554/EE554-2020... · ) are zero because the flux from one winding does not link with the coils of the other winding. Explain, using a physical

18

Page 19: STATORhome.engineering.iastate.edu/~jdm/ee554/EE554-2020... · ) are zero because the flux from one winding does not link with the coils of the other winding. Explain, using a physical

19