Upload
whitney-mcdonald
View
217
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Identification and Characterization of Enterococcus spp. in Local Surface Waters
Team Microbiology
Advisor: Dr. June MiddletonAssistant: Alex Kohl
Neha Bansal, Laura Decker, Kevin Huang, Ashwinee Ragam, Angela Sekerke, Reema Shah, Sarah Song, Pallavi Yerramilli, Eddie Zhang, Jeremy Zornow
Enterococcus spp. History• Closely related to Streptococcus• Separate genus formed in 1984• 16 different species• Located in intestines of warm-
blooded animals, plants, soil, and water
Characteristics• Gram-positive cocci
• Group D glycerol teichoic acids
• 6.5% NaCl
• Esculin Esculin test
Medical Significance• E. faecium and E. faecalis
• Nosocomial infections– Urinary tract infection– Wound infection– Bacterial endocarditis E. faecium
E. faecalis
Antibiotics: antimicrobial compounds that terminate or impede the proliferation of bacteria derived from certain microorganisms
Selective Toxicity: the ability of an antibiotic to target bacteria without harming the host cells
Antibiotic Resistance
the potential of a microorganism to resist and endure the effects of an antibiotic
Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus spp.
Virulence Factors• The products of any genes that help
bacteria invade and colonize a host.
• Virulence factors work synergistically to help the cell invade a host.
• The more virulence factors a bacterium expresses, the more dangerous it is to our health.
Virulence Factors• Hemolysins
– Compounds that destroy red blood cells.
• Bacteriolysins– Compounds that kill “rival” bacteria, leading to
the dominance of an area by one strain or species.
• Gelatinase– Disassembles gelatins and collagen – the
bacterial cell will then recycle the peptide segments for use among the colonizing bacteria.
Sample Collection
Burnham Pond, Drew Pond, Loantaka Brook, and Whippany River
Culture Isolation
Whippany River1 mL
Whippany River5 mL
Whippany River25 mL
Drew Pond1 mL
Drew Pond5 mL
Drew Pond10 mL
Speciation
Yellow = Fermentation(Positive)
Red = Negative
Sugars Tested:arabinosemannitolmethyl α-D-glucopyranoside (MGP)ribosesorbosesorbitol
Antibiotic Resistance
Antibiotics Tested: cephalothin (30µg/ml) chloramphenicol
(30µg/ml) ciprofloxacin (5µg/ml) erythromycin (15µg/ml) gentamycin (10µg/ml) nitrofurantoin (300µg/ml) penicillin (10µg/ml) streptomycin (10µg/ml) tetracycline (30µg/ml) vancomycin (30µg/ml)
β hemolysis
α hemolysisVirulence Factors
Virulence Factors Tested: Gelatinase Hemolysins Bacteriocins
~ Tested against: Streptococcus mitis PI 519 Enterococcus faecalis ATCC
29212 Enterococcus mundtii O Enterococcus mundtii P Enterococcus mundtii R
Counts
3150
1100 880
240
Comparison of Total Enterococci Levels in Local Water Sources
1
10
100
1000
10000
Whippany River (W) Loantaka Brook (LB) Drew Pond (DREW) Burnham Pond (BP)
Water Source
log
Co
lon
ies
per
100
mL
Relative Abundance
Relative Abundance of Enterococcal Species in Local Water Sources
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Whippany River (n=46) Drew Pond (n=48) Loantaka Brook (n=41) Burnham Pond (n=33)
Water Source
Perc
en
t o
f T
ota
l Is
ola
tes
E. faecium
E. faecalis
E. durans/hirae
E. gallinarum
E. casseliflavus
E. mundtii
Relative Abundance con’t
• Low concentration of Enterococcus faecalis
• High concentration of Enterococcus casseliflavus
• Varying concentrations of Enterococcus faecium
Antibiotic ResistanceRelative Antibiotic Resistance of Total Enterococci in Local Water Sources
0
20
40
60
80
100
Whippany River (n=46) Burnham Pond (n=33) Drew Pond (n=48) Loantaka Brook (n=41)
Water Source
Perc
en T
otal
Isol
ates
Penicillin
Cephalothin
Tetracycline
Streptomycin
Gentamycin
Ciprofloxacin
Vancomycin
Antibiotic Resistance con’t
• High resistance to Penicillin, Cephalothin, Streptomycin
• Moderate resistance to Gentamycin and Vancomycin
• Low resistance to Tetracycline and Ciprofloxacin
Virulence• Majority of Enterococcus from
Whippany River lysed all five of the bacteria
• Majority of Enterococcus from Drew Pond and Loantaka Brook lysed none of the bacteria
• Burnham Pond possessed no colonies of virulent bacteria
Conclusions
• Maximum level of Enterococcus allowed for drinking water is 7 isolates per 100 mL and for bathing water is 100 isolates per 100 mL
• All of the water sources we tested were unsuitable for drinking or bathing
Conclusions con’t• E. faecalis and E. faecium are
nosocomial pathogens (causes of secondary infections in hospitals)
• Only pathogenic species of Enterococcus
Conclusions con’t• Overuse of common antibiotics has led to
high bacterial resistance
• Three antibiotics virtually ineffective in curbing Enterococcus spp. growth– Penicillin– Cephalothin– Streptomycin
• Three antibiotics displayed 100% effectiveness against Enterococcus spp.– Chloramphenicol– Erythromycin– Nitrofurantoin
Conclusions con’t• E. faecalis and E. faecium were found
to have similar resistance patterns
• One main exception – E. faecium displayed susceptibility to vancomycin
Conclusions con’t• Whippany River - large concentration
of E. faecalis and E. faecium
• Enterococcus found in Drew Pond and Loantaka Brook possess lower virulence capability
• Burnham Pond –no isolates of E. faecalis or E. faecium found in pond
Paul Quinn the Bacterial Contamination!!!!!
Fin