Upload
karina-narciso
View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
1/48
High Performance Liquid
ChromatographyBarba, Biadomang, Dulos
CHEM 127.1
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
2/48
Caffeine
belongs to a group of
alkaloids called xanthines
sample in this experiment
beverage
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
3/48
HPLC
Before: large columns, large particles, under gravity feed,
manual collection of fractions of eluents
Giddings Prediction: smaller particles, under increased flow
pressure=high plate numbers
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
4/48
HPLC
Csaba Horvath and
colleague S.R. Lipsky
built first HPLC
But, in 1970s
small silanized particlesallowed use of small-
volume columns=high
resolution
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
5/48
Principles
In LC, rate of solute distribution between S.P and M.P
diffusion-controlledto minimize diffusion and time required for the movement of
sample and from interaction sites in the column
smaller eddy diffusion (small A value)
more rapid mass transport between the phases, i.e. high flow
rates (small C value)
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
6/48
HPLC
B is usually small for liquids
small molecular diffusion
A is usually small and almost
constant for liquids
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
7/48
Stationary phase
HPLC microparticles: high-purity silica
low in trace metal content
5 to 10 micrometers in diameter
pore sizes: 60 to 100 angstroms, 300 for large biomolecules
It can be partition (liquid-liquid) or adsorption
liquid S.P: coated on particles or chemically bound
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
8/48
Stationary phase
microporous
10 micrometers
permeable to solvent
e.g. silica gel
perfusion
12 micrometers
larger molecules
nonporous
1.5 to 2.5 micrometers
for complex peptides
ion exchange
chromatography
monolithic columns
polymers
zirconia
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
9/48
Components
Pump
forces the mobile phase
specific flow rate
isochratic or gradient
Injector
introduces liquid sample
autosampler
Column
Stationary phase
Detector
detect eluted
componentschromatogram
Computer
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
10/48
Pump
Isocratic
preparative
Gradient
analysis
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
11/48
Pump
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
12/48
Types of HPLC
Reversed phase
nonpolar S.P. polar M.P.
S.P: aromatic or heterocycles
to provide pi to pi interactions
dispersive forces
Normal phase
polar S.P. nonpolar M.P.
polar forces
Ion exchange
based on charge and size
ionic forces
Size exclusion
based on size
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
13/48
Detection in HPLC
Spectroscopic
UV absorption
MS detection
Refractive Index
RI: measure of moleculesability to deflect light
amount of deflection is
proportional to
concentrationFluorescence
only substance that
fluoresce
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
14/48
Detection in HPLC
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
15/48
HPLC
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
16/48
HPLC can be used for quantitative and qualitative analysis
preparation of pure compounds
trace analysis
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
17/48
HPLC
Examples of HPLC instrumentsMonday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
18/48
HPLC demonstration
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
19/48
Methodology
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
20/48
Preparation of Caffeine Standard
!"#$%&'(#()*$+")+()*#,-").$"/$+,'(&)($."01-").$
2$34456$7"0$8,.9.:$;(&:2?$
2:4?$@:2$,)%$34:4$5
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
21/48
!"#$%&$'()*'*+,+-,./0'
$%&$'1.2'/(,+#345&67&8)0'
*+,+-,./'
9+)98:;8,?@AB'
'
!"#/+-./*+/0'9C.2'9$++*'/(,+D'
$/8./'8)E+-:.)0'(CC.2'FG',.'
$(99'HIJK=&8)9L0'
98&%C,()+.%9C
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
22/48
Determination of Caffeine in Coffee and Tea
!"#$%&"'#()%*+'),'-#."/*"'/*'-).""'
'
012(3'-).""'/*'42(3'5)6'
7#$8'
'
'012(3'+"#'/*'42(3'5)6'7#$8'
'
!"#$%&"'#()%*+'),'-#."/*"'/*'+"#'
'
9/6%+"'+)'(#&8':;'
("+
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
23/48
Determination of Caffeine in Cola Beverage
!"#$"%&'&&()*+%,-./%01(2%&"3"4#+"%)*%&"#5"46%71'4%%#*2%8149:%
#(9"4*#;3"
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
24/48
!"##"$%&'()&%*+%,-%
%
%
,.(/%(0)(/*1(+'2%$3&4%
5"#61+%$7%891:%&"#;(+'%
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
25/48
Results and Discussion
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
26/48
Chromatogram
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
27/48
Peak Area
Area under each single
response
Can be correlated to the
concentration of the sample
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
28/48
Retention time
Distance of the peak maxima
from the injection point
expressed in time units
Serve as identifier for given
analyte on that particular
system
Most easily measurable
parameter
Retention volume (Vr)
!"#
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
29/48
Red time/Void time (t0)
Retention of non-retained analyte
Part of the total analyte retention time that the analyte spends in
the mobile phase moving through the column
Serves as correction factor and allows validation of flow rate
i.e. thiourea, uracil, and NaNO3
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
30/48
Retention Factor (k)
Or capacity factor
Dimensionless, and independent on mobile phase flow rate and
column dimensions
For reproducibility, characteristic of a chromatographic system
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
31/48
Retention Factor (k)
Ratio of reduced retention time to void time
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
32/48
Selectivity factor ()
Ability of chromatographic system to discriminate different
analytes
Ratio of retention factors
Primarily dependent on the nature of the analytes and theirinteraction with the stationary phase
Has to be >1
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
33/48
Resolution
Ratio of distance between two peaks to the average width of
these peaks at baseline
Encompasses both efficiency and selectivity
Has to be 1.5 to be completely separated
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
34/48
Efficiency: Plate theory
Column is considered to be divided into a number of
hypothetical plates
Each plate has finite height (height of effective theoretical plate,
HETP) and the analyte spends a finite time in this plate
Smaller plate height or greater number of plates, more efficient
separation
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
35/48
Efficiency: Plate theory
Measure of chromatographic band broadening
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
36/48
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
37/48
Sensitivity
Limits of detection
lowest quantity of a substance that can be distinguished from
the absence of that substance within a stated confidence limit
Limits of quantification
concentration at which quantitative results can be reportedwith a high degree of confidence
Signal to noise ratio: LOD 3, LOQ 10
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
38/48
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
39/48
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
40/48
Calibration
Internal Standard Calibration
Standards must
have similar in analytical behaviour
not expected to be found in the samples
soluble in the same solvent/eluent
not a degradation product of the sample
not affected by target analytes, surrogates, or by matrix
interferences
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
41/48
Calibration
Internal Standard Calibration
not as useful for GC and HPLC methods with non-MS
detectors, unless the internal standards could be separatedfrom target compounds chromatographically
for determination of caffeine, some internal standards used
are salicylic acid and nicotinic acid
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
42/48
Calculation of Standards
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
43/48
Peak Area vs Concentration
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
44/48
Concentration of Samples
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
45/48
Conclusions
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
46/48
In this experiment, concentration levels of caffeine in tea,
coffee, and cola beverages were determined quantitatively by
HPLC
Obtain chromatogram: x-axis (retention time) and y-axis
(intensity of the response)
Peaks observed were the result of the sample run where the size
of the peak is proportional to the concentration of the analyte
response factor - concentration/area
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
47/48
0.1892 M and 0.1587 M are the caffeine concentrationdetected for Great Taste, 0.008933 M and 0.009751 M
for Lipton, 0.003162 M and 0.003198 M for Pop, and
0.005174 M and 0.0005273 M for Zesto
Average values for both calculated values result a caffeine
concentration of 0.174 M for Great Taste, 9.342 mM forLipton, 3.18 mM for Pop, and 5.491 mM for Zesto
Monday, September 12, 2011
8/3/2019 HPLC rep1
48/48
END