60
JUNE/JULY 2012 www.govpro.com Reach New Heights at NIGP Forum 2012 in Seattle A PENTON MEDIA publication The official publication of NIGP: The Institute for Public Procurement

GovPro - June/July 2012

  • Upload
    nigp

  • View
    236

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The official publication of NIGP. Check this issue for the latest details on Forum 2012!

Citation preview

Page 1: GovPro - June/July 2012

JUNE/JULY 2012www.govpro.com

Reach New Heights at

NIGP Forum

2012 in Seattle

A PENTON MEDIA publication

The official publication of NIGP: The Institute for Public Procurement

Page 2: GovPro - June/July 2012

"" #!"!%" "!$!%"

%!" !!!!%"" !$!!

& ## # $

"! #$ !#

! !% !

"! %

Page 3: GovPro - June/July 2012

SUBSCRIPTIONS: Free subscriptions to Government

Procurement (ISSN 1078-0769) are limited to public-sector

purchasing professionals. Those qualified may apply by

calling 847-763-9670 or visiting http://www.govpro.com.

Subscriptions for others are available, subject to publisher’s

acceptance, at these rates: U.S. and U.S. possessions, $35/1 year, $45/2 years, $7/single copy; Canada, $40/1 year, $60/2

years, $8/single copy; international, $45/1 year, $70/2 years,

$10/single copy. Send subscription payment (by check or

credit card) to Penton Media Customer Service, Government

Procurement, PO Box 2100, Skokie, IL 60076-7800. For all

customer service inquiries, call 847-763-9670; fax to

847-763-9673; e-mail [email protected]; or

visit: http://www.submag.com/ sub/gp. Buy positive

microfilm or microfiche copies of out-of-print issues from

National Archive Publishing Co. (NAPC), 300 N. Zeeb Rd.,

PO Box 998, Ann Arbor, MI 48106-0998;

phone: 734-302-6500 or 800-420-6272, ext. 6578.LIST RENTALS: To rent circulation lists of Government

Procurement, contact Merit Direct, 333 Westchester Ave., White

Plains, NY 10604; Website: http://www.meritdirect.com/market

COPYING: Permission is granted to users registered with the Copyright Clearance Center Inc. (CCC) to photocopy any article

(except for those in which separate copyright ownership is indicated

on the first page of the article), for a base fee of $1.25 per copy

of the article plus 60 cents per page paid directly to CCC, 222

Rosewood Dr., Danvers, MA 01923. (Code No. 1078-0769/07

$1.25 + .60).

REPRINTS: For customized article reprints, contact:

Wright’s Media, phone: 877-652-5295; email: [email protected]

PUBLISHED: Government Procurement (ISSN 1078-0769) is

published bi-monthly by Penton Media Inc., 9800 Metcalf Ave.,

Overland Park, KS 66212-2216. Canadian Post Publications

Mail agreement No. 40612608. Canada return address: Bleuchip International, PO Box 25542, London, ON N6C 6B2. Canadian

No. R126431964. Copyright© 2012 by Penton Media Inc.

POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Government

Procurement, PO Box 2100, Skokie, IL 60076-7800.

Periodicals postage paid at Shawnee Mission, KS, and at additional mailing offices.

SALES OFFICES ARE LISTED ON PAGE 4.

CONTENTSJUNE/JULY 2012

VOLUME 20, NO. 3IN DEPTH

23 Forum Preview NIGP FORUM 2012: REACHING NEW HEIGHTSOur preview section covers highlights of the upcoming 67th annual NIGP Forum in Seattle, Aug.18-22

41 TransportationNO FEAR OF COMMITMENT AT ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLSThe school district buys transportation fuel a year at a time to get lower pricing but has to accurately project its fuel usage for the year.

BY LARRY ANDERSON

44 Best PracticesMODERNIZING CHARLESTON’S CLASSROOMSProcurement project for school furniture, fi xtures and equipment incorporates sustainable standards, addresses evolving education needs and saves money.

BY LARRY ANDERSON

47 Legal Pro UNTYING THE LEGALISTIC STRAIGHTJACKETCourts generally defer to procurement’s decision-making processes – if they are documented.

BY RICHARD PENNINGTON

PERSPECTIVES

2 Guest Editorial: Embrace public service at Forum.

4 Reader Feedback: Innovation another benefi t of design-build.

HOT TOPICS

7 Associations: Fanning the fl ames of community.

10 NIGP Code: Maryland’s approach to certify small business involvement.

14 Outsourcing: Managing contract risks.

18 Real Estate: Financing structure saves money in New York.

20 Green Purchasing: Back to school.

22 Grounds Maintenance: Minimizing the impact of Tier IV emission rules.

RESOURCES

54 Calendar of Events: Check out upcoming courses.

BACK PAGES

55 Ad Index

56 Fred Marks: Thank your leaders … and be one.

Page 4: GovPro - June/July 2012

2 | JUNE/JULY 2012

PERSPECTIVES [guest column]

PENTON MEDIA INC.

6151 Powers Ferry Road NW, Suite 200 Atlanta, GA 30339 Phone: 770-618-0112 FAX: 913-514-3887

http://www.govpro.com

EDITORIAL STAFF

Bill Wolpin

Editorial Director [email protected]

Larry Anderson

Editor [email protected]

Lindsay Isaacs

Managing Editor [email protected]

Kim Blaski

Production Manager [email protected]

Joan Roof

Audience Marketing Manager [email protected]

Wes Clark

Art Director [email protected]

THE INSTITUTEfor PUBLIC PROCUREMENT

151 Spring St. Herndon, VA 20170-5223 Phone: 703-736-8900 Fax: 703-736-2818

Brent Maas

Marketing Director [email protected]

Cathie Patin

Communications Editor [email protected]

EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD

Debbie Field, CPPO, VCO

Virginia Department of General Services

Yolanda C. Jones, C.P.M., APP

Clark County, Nev.

Jay T. McCleary, CPPB

City of Red Wing, Minn.

Public Servants Doing Public Service

very day, procurement professionals support their communities

by being good stewards of public funds. Just doing the job

of procurement supports the community where procurement

professionals work every day. Additionally, procurement professionals

are giving back to the local community where NIGP Forum is being

held simply by attending. Meetings and conventions generate more

than $11 billion in state and local tax revenue in the United States,

which helps communities thrive and keeps people employed.

Here are several additional opportunities for NIGP

Forum 2012 attendees to “give back:”

Communities in Schools of Seattle (CISS). NIGP is committed to

supporting the local communities where Forum is held, and this year is

partnering with Communities In Schools of Seattle (CISS). CISS works in

public schools to close the achievement gap and bolster graduation rates for

students with high dropout risk factors such as low academic achievement

and poor attendance. Seattle public schools face a 30 percent dropout rate. For

youth of color and low-income youth, the dropout rate is even greater. The

average yearly cost of school supplies for a child is more than $60. This burden

forces many families to decide between feeding their family and purchasing

school supplies. With the help of CISS, this struggle for families is eliminated.

Backpack Drive. NIGP will be conducting a backpack drive at Forum in

Seattle. Attendees can bring a new backpack and fill it with pencils, erasers,

crayons, and paper and help a child in need be prepared for the first day

of school. This year’s Forum falls two weeks before the start of school in

Seattle – perfect timing. Anyone who cannot bring donations to Forum can

take advantage of several office supply stores within walking distance of the

Washington State Convention Center. Donations will be accepted at the NIGP

Registration Center Saturday, August 18, through Monday, August 20. On

Tuesday, August 21, the donation box will be located in the exhibit hall near the

Communities In Schools’ booth. Donations will be transported directly after

the close of the exhibit hall. Exhibitors can also participate by donating leftover

trade show items, gift cards, cash and items included on the schools’ wish lists.

Northwest Harvest. The mission of Northwest Harvest is to provide

nutritious food to hungry people statewide in a manner that respects

their dignity, while fighting to eliminate hunger. Their vision is to

have ample nutritious food available to everyone in Washington State.

Forum attendees are devoting time on Saturday, August 18 (noon to 4

p.m.) to work in their warehouse to package items for their food banks.

Transportation, lunch and a t-shirt are provided to each volunteer.

Let’s gather together to show Seattle what our

NIGP community is all about.

CHERAL JONES is procurement unit manager of Washington

state’s Department of Enterprise Services, Contracts and Legal

Services, Master Contract and Consulting, Olympia, Wash.; and

CARRIE RAWN is director of conferences and meetings for

NIGP: The Institute for Public Procurement, Herndon, Va.

E

Page 5: GovPro - June/July 2012

Over 900,000 products for the ones who get it done.Call. Click. Stop By.® www.grainger.com

Page 6: GovPro - June/July 2012

4 | JUNE/JULY 2012

Reader feedback

Government Procurement welcomes your feedback.

Send letters to: [email protected] or Government Procurement,

6151 Powers Ferry Road NW, Suite 200, Atlanta GA 30339, Attn.: Bill Wolpin.

We reserve the right to edit all letters for clarity, brevity, grammar, punctuation, syntax and style.

PERSPECTIVES [discussion]

GROUP OFFICERS

Gregg Herring

Group Publisher [email protected]

Susie Barroso

Group Marketing Director [email protected]

Joanne Romanek

Online Advertising Specialist [email protected]

ADVERTISING SALES

Dave Gibson

Northeast Region Sales [email protected] Phone: 216-931-9469 NY, NC, NJ, OH, MA, CT, Wash-ington DC, VA, MD, VT, DE, ME, NH, RI, Canada (Eastern), SC, GA

Bill Perry

Midwest Region Sales [email protected] Phone: 770-618-0453 IL,WI, PA, MN, WV, AK, TN, MS, AL, FL

Ron Corey

Midwest Region Sales [email protected] Phone: 248-608-0994 MI, MO, IA, KY, IN, ND, SD, AR, LA, TX, OK

Julie Fincher

Western Region Sales [email protected] Phone: 913-981-6139 CA, KS, CO, AZ, UT, NE, OR, WA, NV, MT, HI, ID, NM, WY, Canada (Western)

CORPORATE OFFICERS

David Kieselstein

Chief Executive Officer [email protected]

Nicola Allais

Chief Financial Officer Executive Vice President [email protected]

Bob MacArthur

Senior Vice President [email protected]

PROCUREMENT PONDERABLE

Here is a response to the last issue’s Procurement Ponderable,

which described your dilemma as a senior civilian contracting

officer called to join a meeting to discuss the problem of smugglers

stopping Coast Guard ships and other watercraft by taking control of

the vessels’ onboard operating systems. After hearing from everyone else

in the meeting, the Deputy Secretary of the Department of Homeland

Security (DHS) turns to you for a practical solution. What do you say?

The following response comes from Steven M. Demel, CPPO,

Tacoma School District Purchasing Manager:

I recommend that we conduct a two-step source selection by inviting technology

companies to propose a practicable solution to this serious strategic problem.

Once proposals are received, I suggest a team of our best people evaluate each

proposal and identify the ones that appear to be feasible. Then the team should

hold separate discussions with each of the companies with a feasible proposal

to ensure each company fully understands our requirements, as well as to make

any necessary refinements to the requirement. Each of these companies would

then be invited to provide a best and final offer. The evaluation team could

then choose to award one or more contracts to the companies deemed most

likely to succeed. Final selection of a full production contract could be based

on delivery and test of working prototypes (“fly before you buy”).

Procurement professionals are key to successful design-build project

delivery, and therefore the Design-Build Institute of America (DBIA) was

very pleased to see the article “The Growth and Growing Pains of Design-

Build Construction” [April/May 2012]. DBIA promotes the value of

design-build project delivery and teaches the effective integration of design

and construction services to ensure success for owners and design and

construction practitioners. The article identified many of the advantages

of design-build as a delivery method, particularly in the wake of natural

or manmade disasters, and in cases where cutting edge or highly complex

facilities are needed. Unfortunately, the article failed to note that innovation,

as well as time and cost savings, is a hallmark of design-build and that this

is one reason design-build is increasingly used for projects like hospitals,

communication facilities, and the other “leading edge” project types cited.

Procurement professionals play a much more significant role in shaping

a project under the design-build method than they do under the traditional

method. Design-build is a different way of doing business and the authors

repeatedly and correctly noted that procurement officials need to understand

> INNOVATION ANOTHER BENEFIT OF DESIGN-BUILD

Continued on page 55

Page 8: GovPro - June/July 2012

ADVANCING EFFICIENCY ADVANCING COMMERCE

) !"

!" !" $ "# ! !" #" '"#"!" !" " ! !" " " "

%!"''"'#

" ''$

" !" %* $ !!$!#"!"$ " !!! # !"'

"'" !" # " '" #"!( " !" ( $ "

"! !" $ "# ! ('# #!" "$&!!

! " ! ' " !# #! ' $ ! $

"! '! !" # " !# !" !#"! $ "

$""$ '"

Explore our prepaid card solutions at mastercard.com/government.

Page 9: GovPro - June/July 2012

www.govpro.com • GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT | 7

T

Fanning the flames of community SHARED CHALLENGES DEFINE COMMON GOALS AND IGNITE A SPIRIT OF UNITY AND MUTUAL ENCOURAGEMENT

By Brent Maas

he Waldo Canyon, Colo., fire that began on June 23 and

blazed for nearly two weeks has been declared the most

destructive fire in the state’s history. In that time, the fire claimed

two lives, displaced 32,000 people, burned over 18,000 acres and

350 homes, and caused $110 million in property damage.

As the largest of the ten major fires in the state, it drew the attention

of the national media and a presidential visit. Perhaps more personally

valuable to those devastated by the fire was the help from strangers across

the region and the state who contributed to a grass-roots relief fund that

quickly grew to more than $420,000. Others came to Waldo Canyon to

cheer on and recognize the sacrificing efforts of the 1,000 emergency

responders who came from 34 states to join the containment effort.

As members of a professional community immediately involved in

emergency preparedness and response, we don’t need to look far before

we identify an immediate friend or friend-of-a-friend who knows — or

is — a victim of the Waldo Canyon fire. So it may not be a surprise that

our own Rocky Mountain Governmental Purchasing Chapter of NIGP

would undertake a fundraising campaign on behalf of the American

Red Cross to support those impacted by the Colorado wildfires.

RMGPA’s efforts bring to life the fundamental nature and value of

professional associations: support of community. At a time when the

association industry is concerned about changing demographics and

the impact of social media and virtual organizations on the traditional

association-membership model, the value of association — of long-

standing relationships and access to personal networks — is immediately

apparent during times of need. Still, it begs the question about the

value of association membership in normal day-to-day challenges.

Our culture formed on principles of independence and individualism,

and today’s technology-powered self-sufficiency has no doubt eroded the

requirement for lasting personal networks to gain access to privileged

information. Compounding that, marketers have unintentionally done

associations a disservice by hi-jacking the meaning of the word membership.

Our understanding of what it means to be a member is undermined by

never-ending retailer enticements of discounts and “special opportunities”

to become a “member” of their frequent buyer’s club. Frequent buyer

PERSPECTIVES [guest column]

Associations’ intrinsic value is their

ability to provide the means to

sustain meaningful relationships.

*Source: RPMG Research Corporation, 2010 Purchasing Card Benchmark Survey Results.©2012 MasterCard. MasterCard, MasterCard Purchase Control, and the

MasterCard Brand Mark are all trademarks of MasterCard International Incorporated.

Reduce costs and increase

operational efficiency with

MasterCard Purchase Control.®

Learn how at

mastercard.com/incontrol.

Page 10: GovPro - June/July 2012

8 | JUNE/JULY 2012

PERSPECTIVES [guest column]

clubs are in fact affinity programs, which mean they offer discounts and

“reward benefits” so that you’ll like them and spend more money with

them versus with a competitor. The impact of these ongoing enticements

is that our experience of membership is defined through short-lived one-

off transactions rather than sustained shared experiences with peers.

Associations often offer members discounts for products and services,

but their intrinsic value is their ability to provide the means to sustain

meaningful relationships. Associations

may employ technology to help

improve members’ ability to

communicate and maintain access

to information and stay connected

across distances, but the ultimate

association member experience is

founded on the community gatherings

we know as chapter meetings,

regional conferences and Forum. Ask

a member why they go to chapter

meetings or national conferences

and you will hear answers like, “It’s

where I go to get connected;” “Being

with 1,000 other professionals who

‘get it’— it’s how I get my professional

batteries recharged;” “I always learn

something new;” or “I get re-energized

when I talk with members from

different parts of the country and find

out we have the same challenges.”

If you haven’t been to Forum before,

or even if you have, take a close look

at the Forum Preview section in this

issue of Government Procurement.

NIGP’s upcoming annual event in

Seattle features over 70 workshops

across four days, our largest exhibitor

roster to-date and a compelling

slate of professional speakers.

Whether recovering from a Waldo

Canyon fire or overcoming mundane

day-to-day operational fires, the

value of membership comes through

in the ready support available from

member peers and the professional

bonds made at chapter and national

events. You’ll find that for every

fire you put out with the assistance

of your association colleagues,

you’re stoking your professional

fire and fanning the flames of our

professional community.

BRENT MAAS is the marketing

director for NIGP: The Institute for

Public Procurement. If you would like

to support RMGPA’s fundraising efforts

on behalf of the Red Cross to benefit

victims of the Colorado wildfires,

visit www.rmgpa.org. Donations are

being accepted through July 27.

Page 11: GovPro - June/July 2012

Ensuring citizen safety and supporting critical business operations are important even during tough economic times. At GSA we offer direct access to a wide range of quality local and global contractors offering products and services at pre-negotiated ceiling prices. Our online tools and customer support specialists are available and ready to help you respond quickly to your state and local needs. GSA helps you generate efficiencies and savings for the American people.

To learn more, call 703-605-9155 or visit www.gsa.gov/stateandlocal.

Law Enforcement & Security

Information Technology

Emergency Response & Recovery

Firefighting Protection

Time, Money, and Lives.Solutions That Save

Page 12: GovPro - June/July 2012

10 | JUNE/JULY 2012

S

Fuel Small Business – Fuel the EconomyMARYLAND’S SIMPLE APPROACH TO CERTIFY AND MANAGE SMALL BUSINESS INVOLVEMENT

By Brittany Devine

HOTTOPICS [NIGP code]

mall businesses are the driving force behind a

strong U.S. economy. More than 60 to 80 percent

of all new jobs come from small businesses. According

to Jim Clifton, author of The Coming Jobs War, there

were about 6 million businesses in the United States

with at least one employee, as of 2007. Businesses

with 500 or fewer employees represent more than 99

percent of these 6 million. Contrary to popular opinion,

it is not jumbo corporations that run and dominate

the economy, but small and mid-sized companies.

Political officials across the country are putting

the full-court press on procurement organizations

to level vendor playing fields and encourage small to

mid-size company growth. Vendors, regardless of size,

should have an equal opportunity to supply goods and

services to the public sector. Economic development

offices are implementing new initiatives and calling

for legislation to stimulate small business growth.

State and local governments are issuing “set-aside”

procurement opportunities for small business.

The State of Maryland understands the impact

its economic engine has on small business and

revamped their eMaryland Marketplace to improve

the landscape for these businesses to compete.

Maryland worked with Periscope Holdings to deploy

BuySpeed’s new Small Business Engine (SBE). The

new automated engine qualifies and certifies vendors

as small business participants within the eMaryland

Marketplace during on-line vendor registration.

In addition, all Maryland vendors now register

with the NIGP commodity code, which helps the state

understand which vendors supply what goods and

services. With the SBE, Maryland not only certifies

small businesses but can now also use the NIGP

Code to report on the specific goods and services that

are provided by small business vendors. Maryland’s

eMarketplace provides a one-stop-shop for vendor

registration, small business certification, solicitation

management and contract management. The state

expects to revive small business involvement through

its consolidated paperless vendor qualifying system.

“Maryland has opened a new door into small

business involvement,” said Maryland Gov. Martin

O’Malley. “This new tool helps the state accomplish

our economic development strategy to generate,

grow and sustain the state’s economy from within.”

Maryland went live with SBE functionality on

February 20, 2012, and already has more than

4,500 small businesses registered in the eMaryland

Marketplace. Small business opportunities have

increased two-fold. Since go-live, an average of 246

new small businesses have enrolled weekly. Forty-six

percent of all vendors now registered in eMaryland

Marketplace are qualified small businesses.

Maryland’s BuySpeed Small Business

Engine, allows the state to:

Maryland’s eMarketplace

provides a one-stop-shop

for vendor registration,

small business certification,

solicitation management

and contract management.

Page 13: GovPro - June/July 2012

!"#$"#"$

!

" #" " $% &

" #

Page 14: GovPro - June/July 2012

12 | JUNE/JULY 2012

> Set configurable vendor qualifying questions

> Certify small business within the system, thus

eliminating paper affidavits and certificates

> Identify small business vendors and extend invitations

to participate in set-aside procurements

> Track contracts awarded to small businesses

> Monitor small business involvement goals

> Send renewal notifications to vendors

> Report expired and renewed small business vendors

Small businesses are not the only classification that can

benefit from the small business engine module. The flexible

nature of the rules-based engine can be used to promote

local, minority, women and veteran-owned businesses.

“Political officials nationwide are instituting programs to

stimulate categorical business participation; however, most

governments lack a way to manage new policies,” said Brian

Utley, President and CEO, Periscope Holdings, Inc. “We’re

pleased to have successfully worked with Maryland to level

their vendor playing field with BuySpeed’s one-stop-shop

for vendor registration, solicitation management, contract/

catalog management and small business certification.”

When small businesses grow, the government tax base

grows. When small businesses shrink, the government tax

base shrinks, slashing entitlements and government programs.

Small businesses are looking for every opportunity to prosper.

Today’s economic headwinds have small, medium and large

businesses fiercely competing for public sector contracts.

Small business initiatives are great in theory; however,

historically someone had to certify, track and monitor

participation. Ultimately, that responsibility has fallen on

procurement, and the concern over how to manage new

initiatives becomes a reality. Who qualifies as a small business?

How am I going to verify small business compliance? How

do I track awards? The common response: I don’t have

available personnel to oversee small business involvement.

Typically, procurement organizations have manually

certified small businesses through paper affidavits and

notarized documents. This tedious task was either outsourced

or most commonly neglected leaving small businesses

overlooked in favor of their large counterparts. In addition,

most procurement systems are not integrated with vendor

pools or solicitation processes, so categorical “set-asides” are

difficult to execute. In the end, opportunities to spur small

business growth are diminished because organizations lack

an efficient way to manage small business involvement.

Success of Maryland’s enhanced marketplace demonstrates

how strengthening small business vendor outreach

can open bid opportunities in which it has previously

been difficult for small businesses to compete.

BRITTANY DEVINE oversees product

marketing for Periscope Holdings, Inc. Contact

her at [email protected].

HOTTOPICS [NIGP code]R E L I A B L E P U R C H A S I N G S U P P O R T, W I T H E V E R Y S T E P.

Purchase with confidence, backed by the steadying hand of TCPN, a network of experienced pros who give you the leverage of more than 30,000 governmental entities. Over 100 years of combined experience, balanced with TCPN’s ability to write the best cooperative contracts in the industry…that’s co-op buying power that never misses a step.

BOOTH # 732 www.TCPN.org

Page 15: GovPro - June/July 2012

©20

12 T

he T

oro

Com

pan

y. A

ll rig

hts

rese

rved

.

The all-new Toro Groundsmaster 360 reinvents the way a mower performs.

This machine utilizes revolutionary Quad-Steer all wheel steering to maximize

productivity. Climb hills with ease. Make 180° turns without tearing turf.

Hug the turns or side hills while mowing in total comfort. Save time without

sacrificing quality. Intuitive controls and unparalleled maneuverability turn work

into play. To learn more visit:

Publicly solicited and awarded national agreement. Available at participating Toro distributors.

U.S. General Services Administration Contract GS-06F-0012R

Page 16: GovPro - June/July 2012

14 | JUNE/JULY 2012

HOTTOPICS [outsourcing]

M

MANAGING CONTRACT RISKS IN OUTSOURCING AGREEMENTS By Kenneth Hayslette

anaging risks in regular governmental

contracts is a challenge. Identifying the

contract risks, trying to develop a practical plan to

prevent or preclude them from occurring, and then

trying to mitigate the impact if an identified risk

occurs are significant challenges in “regular” contracts.

Outsourcing contracts have all of the “regular” risks

associated with any contract – technical, financial,

schedule, and hazards – but each also has its own

special set of risks. An outsourcing agreement is a

situation in which the government decides to contract

with an outside provider to perform services that had

previously been provided by government employees.

Of course, the risk of performance failure is very

significant in an outsourcing agreement. If the

contractor does not perform the services for the

government’s citizens, clients and/or constituents, then

the government has failed in its duties. Sometimes

failure in performance can be life-threatening. Think

about the impact of performance failure in ambulance

services, fire services, or other health and safety

services. If these services are not performed properly

and in a timely manner, people can die. Other services,

such as managing the issuance of automotive tags

or other “administrative” government, are not life-

threatening; however, the impact of nonperformance

on the taxpayers and constituents can be severe.

If an outsourcing contractor embezzles only a few

thousand dollars, what is the impact of that lost

money to the fiscal health of the government? Look

at what has happened to some of the governments

around the nation and their financial situations.

Another special risk issue in outsourcing contracts

is ethical standards, which all government contractors

have a duty to maintain. Because the outsourcing

contractor is a representative of the government, any

breach or apparent breach of ethical standards will

be magnified and reflected back on the government.

The question is: How do we, as public procurement

professionals, analyze and develop a risk management

plan to preclude any ethical, moral or integrity

breaches? Can we write ethical standards into the

contract document? Even if these standards are in

the contract document, how do we monitor and

enforce them? And, if there is an ethical breach in

the performance of the contract, what can we do

to mitigate its impact on future performance of the

contract and upon the reputation of the government?

As a part of the performance risk, the contractor’s

fiscal health is more important in an outsourcing

agreement than in a regular contract. In a regular

contract we usually have the opportunity to go to

another contractor to buy replacement performance.

In an outsourcing agreement, while that option

may be still available, it is much more difficult and

expensive to buy replacement performance when all

of our proverbial eggs are in the contractor’s basket.

The importance of the contract administration/

monitoring function in an outsourcing agreement

is even more significant than in a regular service

contract. Unfortunately, many governments have

outsourced performance of governmental work to

private contractors and have not maintained adequate

staff to administer the contract once it’s been awarded.

Some government leaders think that outsourcing is a

tool to reduce the number of government employees.

This is true; however, the government must maintain

adequate contract administration staff with the

needed knowledge, skills, and resources to properly

monitor and manage the contract, and especially to

address the key risks that have been identified in the

Because the outsourcing

contractor is a representative

of the government, any

breach or apparent breach

of ethical standards will be

magnified and reflected

back on the government.

Page 17: GovPro - June/July 2012

ZZZQMSDFRRSRUJJRSUR

&RPSHWLWLYHO\%LG&RQWUDFW3XUFKDVLQJ6ROXWLRQV

A L i q u i d i t y S e r v i c e s M a r ke t p l a c e

TM

SM

®

)UHH\RXUVHOIRIWKH7LPHFRQVXPLQJSURFHVV&RPSOLFDWHGVSHFLÀFDWLRQV3URFXUHPHQWGHOD\V

1-3$&RQWUDFWVKDYHXQGHUJRQHDQDWLRQDOVROLFLWDWLRQDQGFRPSHWLWLYHELGSURFHVVRQ\RXUEHKDOI$QRFRVWQRREOLJDWLRQRUOLDELOLW\0HPEHUVKLSLVDOO\RXQHHGWRDYRLGUHSHDWLQJWKHZRUNZH·YHDOUHDG\GRQHIRU\RX3OXV\RXU0HPEHUVKLSZLOOJLYH\RXDFFHVVWRRYHUFRPSHWLWLYHO\ELGDZDUGHGFRQWUDFWV

0D[LPL]HHIÀFLHQFLHVDQGMRLQ1-3$WRGD\

<RXUÀUVWVWHS"-RLQWRGD\DWZZZQMSDFRRSRUJJRSUR

5)3"1RWIRUPH

Page 18: GovPro - June/July 2012

16 | JUNE/JULY 2012

outsourcing risk management plan. Otherwise, the

opportunity for contract failure is greatly increased

and therefore the citizens will be dis-serviced.

There’s no simple answer or a single matrix to

plug in information and come up with the ideal risk

management plan. Every outsourcing agreement

is unique. However, there is a magic formula

that you can use to assist you in managing the

risks in an outsourcing contract. Before you start

crafting your RFP, follow the following steps.

> Consider that Murphy was an optimist!

> Think about everything that could go wrong

in the ensuing contract. Write them all down.

> Identify and rank the top 25 potential failures

from your list that would impact the success of

the contract -- and the success of the government

in performing its services for its citizens.

> Think about and write out the risk factors

for each of the first 25 potential failures.

> For each risk factor identified,

answer the following:

> What is the key causative agent

for the risk factor?

> What would trigger the risk factor?

> How can we prevent it?

> How can we mitigate the impacts if it occurs?

> How can we ensure that if something goes wrong

that it has the least amount of impact on the

government and its citizens and constituents?

Now take these ideas and develop your risk

management plan. Include all of the items from your

plan in the performance requirements of the Statement

/ Scope of Work for your Request for Proposals (RFP).

As part of the RFP, ask the potential proposers to

provide their analysis of the potential contract risks

and how would they go about precluding the risk, or

mitigating the impacts if the risk factor becomes reality.

The last and most difficult part –

proactively manage the risks!

If outsourcing contracts were easy, then there

would be no need for procurement professionals.

Contractual risk management is a challenging

concept, but the challenges can be overcome so that all

parties are successful regardless of what occurs.

EDITOR’S NOTE: The author, KENNETH

HAYSLETTE, CPPO, C.P.M., CPCM, Alexandria, Va.,

will be conducting the workshop “Contractual Risk

Management in Outsourcing Agreements” at NIGP

Forum on Wednesday, Aug. 22, from 1:30 to 2:30 p.m.

HOTTOPICS [outsourcing]

Page 19: GovPro - June/July 2012

CertainTeed Gypsum is serious about sustainability.

Team up with the leader in materials that contribute to a sustainable built

environment. We’ll save a seat for you at the head of the table.

Learn more about our award-winning innovations and third-party

certifications by visiting our website. www.CertainTeed.com/Sustainable

Sustainability TeamCERTAINTEED GYPSUM

SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS

RECYCLED CONTENT FIRE SAFETY

MOISTURE &

MOLD RESISTANCE INDOOR AIR QUALITY ACOUSTICS

800-233-8990tXXXDFSUBJOUFFEDPN

300'*/(t4*%*/(t53*.t%&$,*/(t3"*-*/(t'&/$&t'06/%"5*0/4

GYPSUMt$&*-*/(4t*/46-"5*0/t1*1&

Page 20: GovPro - June/July 2012

18 | JUNE/JULY 2012

FINANCING STRUCTURE PROVIDES SAVINGS FOR NEW YORK CITY AGENCY CONSOLIDATIONBy Richard L. Podos

A

HOTTOPICS [real estate]

n innovation in the funding for large-scale

tenant improvements, paid for by financing a

portion of the rent, has enabled the Human Resources

Administration (HRA) of New York City to save

significant dollars and complete a complex transaction

for a 400,000-square-foot facility in downtown

Brooklyn. HRA is the primary Health and Human

Services agency and delivery vehicle in New York.

The project, which included more than $100 million

in construction work for renovations, demonstrates

how municipalities, in the face of unprecedented

budget stringency, can economically and efficiently

complete large, complex transactions that might not

otherwise get done without a large capital outlay

to build out the office space. The time is past when

government agencies could afford to leave money on

the table that is available to fund their operations.

HRA was consolidating three locations into

one and downsizing from approximately 600,000

square feet of office space to reduce budget spend. In

searching for a new location, New York City identified

a former manufacturing building being converted

to office space. The nature of the renovations at the

location, however, required significant construction

work to create an appropriate office environment.

The deal was not able to close until Lance Capital,

in a unique approach, arranged a non-recourse $44

million tenant improvements loan for the building

owner, provided by CGA Capital Corp. The loan was

backed not by the property or other forms of traditional

equity, but by a portion of the rent payable by HRA

under the lease. Bonds tied to the rental stream and

loan were privately placed with institutional investors.

Those bonds, which fully amortize over seven years,

are unrated, but implicitly benefit from the double-A

rating of New York City, resulting in a loan rate just

over 4 percent, much less expensive than traditional

real estate financing. The resulting savings were then

passed on to HRA in a lower rental rate, and further,

the rent is an allowable administrative expense

for federal and state reimbursement purposes.

Tenants typically receive a tenant improvements

contribution from the landlord to perform build-

out and renovations, and the tenant provides capital

for the balance – often 50 percent or more – from

their own budget. In this case, HRA did not want to

make a large up-front expenditure and preferred that

GFI Development, the building owner, take the loan

exposure for the full tenant improvements budget,

perform the build-out and provide a turnkey solution.

Most importantly for NYC and HRA, by funding the

entire tenant improvements budget for the leased

space through the landlord, what

would otherwise have been capital

improvements expenditures

were converted to rent and thus

administrative expense, allowable as

an indirect cost for reimbursement

under federal and state guidelines.

The leasing transaction structure

was reviewed and approved by New

York City’s Department of Citywide

Administrative Services, Office

of Management and Budget, and

Corporation Counsel. All funding

for the tenant improvements

budget under the Lance Capital

structure was deposited into

escrow at the lease closing, to

be controlled by the landlord

during construction but under

The nature of the renovations at 470 Vanderbilt Avenue in downtown Brooklyn required significant construction work to create an appropriate office environment.

Page 21: GovPro - June/July 2012

www.govpro.com • GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT | 19

New York City’s oversight as tenant.

By having the landlord, GFI Development,

assume all ownership, funding, and construction

responsibility for the tenant improvements budget,

New York City was able to avoid a tedious procurement

RFP process and also to save the interest expense

to be incurred if New York City had financed the

build-out itself. While the additional cost of tenant

improvements funding was extremely favorable

compared to typical landlord financing options, the

added and key benefit to the transaction was the fact

that the rent assigned to secure and cover the tenant

improvements funding is approximately 70 percent

reimbursable to New York City via federal and state

reimbursement programs. Standards for determining

costs for Federal awards carried out through grants,

cost reimbursement contracts, and other agreements

with State and local governments are available in 2

CFR Part 225, “Cost Principles for State, Local, and

Indian Tribal Governments (OMB Circular A–87)”.

The Lance Capital lease-based tenant improvements

funding structure is widely applicable for all state

and local governments, in terms of both a low-cost

approach to amortizing build-out and renovation

costs into rent, and even more importantly converting

capital expenditures into reimbursable administrative

expense. Lance Capital is currently focused on

tenant improvements funding as an invaluable

tool for state and local government nationwide,

initially for Health and Human Services-related

reimbursable activity, such as Medicaid, CHIP,

WIC, TANF, etc., but also other opportunities for

federal reimbursement relating to Sustainability,

Education, Transportation, Homeland Security, etc.

Executive offices, OMB, administrative and real

estate departments, etc., should all be focused on

this opportunity: Avoid using budget for tenant

improvements capital expenditures, but where possible

“rentalize” into reimbursable administrative expense.

RICHARD PODOS is the

founder, CEO and President

of Lance Capital LLC, a

specialty corporate real estate

and finance company.

BUILT TOUGH

FOR LIFE ON

THE STREETS.

BBUUIILLTTT TTTOOOUUUGGGGHHHH

FFOORR LLLIIFFFEE OONN

THHEE SSTTRREEEEEETTSS..

While the LSV 800 is street legal on most public roads with speed limits of 35 mph

or less, this isn’t just a joy ride. A 48-volt zero-emissions electric drivetrain,

advanced hydraulic disc braking system and 5.9-cubic-foot cargo bed means this new

crew member can hold its own on the job. Visit Cushman.com/streetlegal to watch

the LSV 800 in action and find an authorized Cushman® low speed vehicle dealer.

© 2012 Textron Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 22: GovPro - June/July 2012

20 | JUNE/JULY 2012

HOTTOPICS [green purchasing]

tudents learn better in greener schools –

schools with improved indoor air quality,

natural light and better materials that save taxpayer

money because of lower building operating costs.

While budgetary limitations make it impossible

for everyone to build new, greener schools,

government purchasers can make it easier for all

schools to buy greener products that help improve

school operations and student performance.

GREENER PRODUCTS AND BETTER

STUDENT PERFORMANCE

Many products purchased for use in schools, including

cleaning products, furniture, computer equipment and

other electronics, have potentially adverse impacts on

indoor air quality. These products release chemicals

into the air that pollute school environments.

While product-related chemical emissions also affect

adults, children’s rapidly growing bodies are particularly

susceptible to chemical exposure-related ailments.

Their respiratory, immune and nervous systems are

still developing and children breathe in a greater

amount of air more rapidly than adults do. Because

they have a faster metabolism, they also absorb and

process these chemicals more rapidly. Finally, children

– who are much shorter than adults – are naturally

closer to the floor, where airborne molecules tend to

suspend for extended periods of time; this increases the

potential for chemical exposure, too. Given the same

amount of chemical exposure, the physical burden on

a child is far greater than the burden on an adult.

Among the most common chemical emissions are

volatile organic compounds (VOCs). VOCs include

known carcinogens, such as formaldehyde and benzene.

Research has shown that children who are exposed

to VOCs are up to four times more likely to develop

asthma – the fastest-growing incurable, chronic

childhood disease – compared to children who are not

exposed. And, according to the Allergy and Asthma

Foundation of America, asthma is responsible for

more than 14 million missed school days each year.

Poor indoor air quality is also linked with

other short- and long-term illnesses, such

as headaches, dizziness and nausea.

BACK TO SCHOOL: BUYING GREENER FOR THE CLASSROOMBy Scot Case

S

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA), schools with better indoor air quality

produce higher student test scores, improved academic

performance and increased productivity. Children

simply learn better in healthier environments.

BUYING GREENER SCHOOL PRODUCTS

Many products commonly used in schools can emit

potentially toxic chemicals, including VOCs. Although

paint, coatings, sealants and adhesives are the products

most often associated with VOCs, there are hundreds

of other common indoor products that also emit these

compounds. Among them are furniture (like desks,

tables and chairs), bookshelves, personal computers,

flooring, cabinetry, drywall, insulation, doors, window

treatments and cleaning/janitorial products.

Luckily for those concerned about student health,

there are several product categories for which it is

quite easy to specify safer, greener alternatives:

Paints. Specify paints meeting either the UL

Environment (cross listed with EcoLogo CCD-048),

Green Seal GS-11, or GREENGUARD Children and

Schools standards. Both the UL Environment and

Green Seal standards focus on multiple environmental

issues, while the GREENGUARD standard focuses

exclusively on protecting indoor air quality.

Cleaning Products. Specify cleaning products

meeting either the UL Environment (cross listed

with EcoLogo CCD-146 or CCD-147), Green Seal

GS-37 or GS-40, or GREENGUARD Children and

Schools standards. Both the UL Environment and

Green Seal standards focus on multiple environmental

issues, while the GREENGUARD standard focuses

exclusively on protecting indoor air quality.

Computers and Office Electronics. Specify

computers meeting the IEEE 1680 standard, preferably

those that have been independently certified as meeting

the standard. The IEEE 1680 standard for computers

addresses indoor air quality, although as a point-based

standard it is possible for products to score highly

without fully addressing indoor air quality concerns.

The GREENGUARD Children and Schools standard

identifies products that meet strict indoor air quality

concerns, including computers and other office

electronic products. The UL Environment standard

(cross listed with EcoLogo CCD-035) addresses

multiple additional environmental criteria for office

electronic products, including printers and copiers.

Furniture. For furniture, specify products

certified as compliant with the ANSI/BIFMA e3

Furniture Sustainability Standard at level 1 or higher.

The ANSI/BIFMA standard addresses a variety of

environmental issues, including indoor air quality.

Page 23: GovPro - June/July 2012

www.govpro.com • GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT | 21

The GREENGUARD Children and Schools standard

focuses exclusively on indoor air quality issues and, as a

result, has more stringent human health requirements.

MEASURING INDOOR AIR QUALITY

Popular green building programs, such as the

Collaborative for High Performance Schools (CHPS)

and LEED for Schools, highlight the importance of good

indoor air quality. They require that building products

meet certain chemical emissions requirements, but

they are not as protective as some suggest is needed.

Many of the product emissions requirements

are based on California’s 01350 Specification

(CA 01350), which aims to address indoor air

quality performance of building materials.

According to Mark Rossolo, Director of Public

Affairs for UL Environment and the GREENGUARD

Environmental Institute, “California 01350 is

certainly a good start, but schools should take a

more comprehensive look because out of tens of

thousands of VOCs in commerce today, CA 01350

imposes emission limits on only 35 or so.”

There is also debate about how VOCs are measured

and assessed for their health impacts. Many products

labeled “low VOC” or “no VOC,” such as paints, have

earned that distinction based solely on their VOC

weight or content – a factor used to assess whether the

product will react with sunlight to produce ground-

level ozone – and not based their VOC emissions.

“This is problematic for two reasons,” says Rossolo.

“First, not all VOCs react with sunlight to produce

ground-level ozone, so ‘low VOC’ or ‘no VOC’ products

can still off-gas potentially toxic chemicals into the

indoor environment; and second, ground-level ozone

is an outdoor environmental issue, not an indoor one.”

To identify products most protective of indoor air

quality, Rossolo and others suggest looking for products

that have been GREENGUARD certified. A list of

GREENGUARD certified products is available on the

GREENGUARD website at www.greenguard.org.

IT’S EASY TO BUY GREEN

Government purchasers have the ability to protect the

health of the 53 million students and 5 million school

staff members learning or working in U.S. schools.

Human health and environmental standards make it

easy to identify the healthier, greener products.

SCOT CASE has been researching and promoting

responsible purchasing for 17 years. He is market

development director for UL Environment. Contact

him via e-mail at scot.case@ulenvironment.

com or in Reading, PA, at 610-779-3770.

n April 19, 2012, Neal Johnson was traveling

west on I-84 near Hood River, Ore., when,

in quick succession, two State Police cars flew past.

Johnson saw a commotion up ahead. “When I got

closer, I could see one of the policemen pulling

something off the road with a rope” she said. Both

lanes ahead were blocked. She came to a halt and, after

waiting several minutes, a State trooper approached

and told her she had two flat tires. What Johnson

had seen the trooper pull from the road turned out

to be a spike strip. The tire deflation device was

thrown across a lane of traffic to stop a car that was

leading the police on a high-speed chase. Johnson

also ran over the strip and punctured both tires on

the passenger side of her four-wheel-drive SUV.

Thanks to a new agreement between State of Oregon

and Les Schwab Tire Centers, getting Johnson’s tires

fixed was easy. The trooper called Les Schwab, dialing

a number printed on a “Spike Strip Damage Solution”

card all troopers now have in their patrol cars. Les

Schwab towed Johnson’s vehicle to the nearest shop

in Hood River and outfitted Johnson’s SUV with

four new tires. She was on her way within an hour

with no money out of pocket. She was entitled to

pro-rated reimbursement for the punctured tires

and got credit for the other two nearly-new tires on

her SUV, so the tire swap came out even. Behind the

scenes, Les Schwab sent a bill for reimbursement to

the State of Oregon Risk Management department.

In the past, Johnson’s experience would have been

much different. Getting the tires fixed would have been

her problem. Once that was done, she would need to

figure out how to submit a claim to State of Oregon

Risk Management. After two or three weeks, Risk

would evaluate the claim and send her a settlement

check. While these incidents typically happen only

about once a year, this was a frustrating situation for

the both the officers and the motorists involved.

The State Police began using the Stop Stick

brand of tire deflation devices in 1996. The strips

use hollow quills that penetrate the tire and act as

valves, releasing air at a safe, controlled rate.

This article was submitted by GREG HOPKINS

of the Oregon State Procurement Office.

NEW PROCESS HELPS INNOCENT SPIKE STRIP VICTIMS

HOTTOPICS [best practices]

O

Page 24: GovPro - June/July 2012

22 | JUNE/JULY 2012

HOTTOPICS [grounds maintenance]

2013 Ushers In Tier IVSOME STRATEGIES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT OF NEW EMISSION RULES

By Grant Young

n 1999, the Environmental Protection Agency

began implementing new emission requirements

for off-road diesel engines between 25 and 74 hp.

The changes since then have occurred in stepped

“tiers” and, while perhaps not noticeable to end-

consumers, have become progressively more stringent.

The final stage of the regulation – Tier IV, effective

Jan. 1, 2013 – represents the most drastic change to

date, and will certainly be noticeable to everyone

in the turf and grounds maintenance industry.

The final implementation of Tier IV will target a

90 percent reduction of PM (particulate matter) and

60 percent reduction in NOx (nitrogen oxides) from

the previous tier. It’s important to note that other

categories of diesel engines have already gone through

compliance (examples: over-the-road trucks and high

horsepower tractors). Because of this, some of the

technologies developed to meet compliance in those

classifications of engines will likely be used as the basis

for meeting the standards in turf equipment. These

technologies include high-pressure fuel injection

systems and various forms of exhaust after-treatment.

Meeting the compliance standards in turf equipment

will likely require the use of one of these technologies,

or perhaps a combination of them. Although it may go

without saying, these technologies will be accompanied

by more sophisticated controllers and electronics

packages, as well as likely changes to the cooling and

other mechanical systems. As you can imagine, both

engine and equipment manufacturers are investing

significant resources to redesign the affected products.

But what does it mean? The implementation of

Tier IV will affect everyone in the turf industry in

the next two years. Primarily, after January 1, 2013,

diesel-powered turf equipment that meets the Tier IV

emissions standards can expect a price increase of at

least 10 to 20 percent, no matter what brand make or

model you choose. The most telling support for this

projection is to look at products in other industries that

have gone through compliance and compare the pricing

pre- and post-compliance. Additionally, the change

in technology will likely be accompanied by more

sophisticated service and maintenance procedures.

The good news, in addition to cleaner air

for our environment, is that there are options,

but you have to act now. Putting a proactive

acquisition plan together now could save your

organization significant dollars in the coming

years. Let’s look at some strategies to consider:

If you are planning to purchase any products in the

25-74 hp range in 2013 (this may include mowers,

utility vehicles, cultivation equipment, sprayers, blowers

etc.), you may want to consider moving that purchase

up to 2012 and avoid the impending price increase.

Similarly, you may want to flip-flop your

existing schedule - move affected products into

2012 and delayed unaffected products to 2013.

For example, if you’re planning to buy a 35 hp

large area rotary mower in 2013 and some smaller

zero turn riders under 25 hp in 2012, it may make

sense to flip-flop the order of these purchases.

With budgets being limited these days, another source

of equipment could be the pre-owned equipment arena.

Finally, explore the possibilities of alternative

energy solutions other than diesel (gas, hybrid,

other). While the feasibility and economics of

these solutions at higher horsepowers remain to be

seen, the new standard on diesel equipment could

invigorate development of these technologies.

The other good news is that your existing

fleet of equipment is grandfathered in to the

new regulations. You will not be required to

retrofit any equipment purchased prior to the

implementation date of January 1, 2013.

Now is the time to act on this information. Making

Tier 4 and its ramifications known at all levels of

your organization will not only help you make the

best equipment decisions to meet your needs, it will

also help you be the best economic steward for your

budgeted money in 2012, 2013, and beyond!

GRANT YOUNG is director of marketing,

commercial equipment at The Toro

Company, South Bloomington, Minn.

I

Page 25: GovPro - June/July 2012

www.govpro.com • GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT | 23

NIGP Forum 2012:

Reaching New Heights

Washington State Convention and Trade Center, Seattle, Wash., August 18-22

> Harnessing an extensive background

in technology, Joel Cherkis leads a team

of sales and technology professionals

who provide global strategic support to

government customers

by delivering solutions

focused on providing

citizen-based services

and enabling government

workplace and data

center modernization.

Cherkis says governments at all levels

are fundamentally rethinking how they

serve their citizens. More entities are

making commitments to change the

lack of transparency and accountability

in their agencies and to transform the

way they operate and interact with

citizens. Central to this mission are the

core goals of dramatically increasing the

openness and transparency of government,

More than 800 public procurement professionals from federal, provincial,

state and local government agencies in the United States and Canada

will converge in Seattle for the 67th Annual Forum and Products

Exposition hosted by NIGP: The Institute of Public Procurement.

Built around the theme “Reaching New Heights,” the meeting will provide opportunities

to network with colleagues and learn from industry leaders and professional speakers.

NIGP’s Forum provides knowledge to empower procurement professionals to meet the

public’s expectations with reduced staff and budgets. Four days of intensive professional

training, networking activities, product exhibits and knowledge sharing will equip

procurement professionals to make a difference through decisive, effective purchasing

programs. Content-rich workshops and knowledge exchanged at Forum enable

attendees to return home strengthened by new ideas and improved professional skills.

FORUM HIGHLIGHTS

Saturday, August 18

Host Committee Social Event:

Tilicum Village: An

Argosy Adventure

(5 – 11 p.m.)

Sunday, August 19

Opening Keynote Speaker

Joel Cherkis, General Manager,

Government and Security,

Microsoft Corp. Worldwide

Public Sector

(8 – 10 a.m.)

Monday, August 20

Products Exposition

(1 – 5 p.m.)

Awards Gala

(6:30 – 9:30 pm..)

Tuesday, August 21

Products Exposition

(9:30 a.m. – 12:30 p.m.)

Wednesday, August 22

Closing General Session

Robyn Bebincasa

(3:15 – 4:45 p.m.)

while also creating new effi ciencies and

innovative ways to engage citizens.

Vernice “Fly Girl” Armour

Who Needs a Runway?

How to Take Off From Where You Are

and Go From Zero to Breakthrough

Monday, August 20, 8:30 – 9:30 a.m.

> Known simply as “Fly Girl,” Vernice

Armour went from beat cop to combat

KEYNOTE SPEAKERS

Joel Cherkis, General Manager,

Government and Security

Microsoft Corp. Worldwide Public Sector

Opening Keynote Speaker

High Performance Government:

The Next Generation of Computing

Sunday, August 19, 8 – 10 a.m.

Page 26: GovPro - June/July 2012

24 | JUNE/JULY 2012

NIGP FORUM 2012

pilot in three years.

Within a year, she

found herself flying

over the deserts of Iraq

supporting the men

and women on the

ground. She served two

tours overseas, becoming America’s first

African-American female combat pilot.

After returning home from combat,

she used her experiences to create a

seven-step process called the Zero to

Breakthrough Success Plan. She now travels

extensively to share this message through

her keynotes, coaching and seminars.

Her passion is helping organizations and

individuals create similar results. Presented

by the NIGP National Business Council.

Mark Scharenbroich, CSP, CPAE

Nice Bike: Making Meaningful

Connections on the Road of Life

Tuesday, August 21, 8:30 – 9:30 a.m.

> Mark Scharenbroich uses an

unconventional approach that includes

knockout humor and personal stories

with universal appeal.

His session focuses

on the relationship

side of creating

results by connecting

people to people -

management to front

line, team member to team member,

and company to customer.

Scharenbroich has built his speaking

career working in both business and

education, discovering how some of the

best organizations and leaders create

a culture that encourages people to

perform at a higher level. His messages

improve employee engagement, help

people to embrace change, enhance

team collaboration, fuel the passion to

serve others and create meaningful

connections. Scharenbroich’s Nice Bike

principle and newly released book by the

same name are driven by two powerful

words and three powerful actions that

make a difference in the lives of others:

Acknowledge, Honor, Connect.

Wednesday, August 22, 8:30 – 10 a.m.

> How Do You Apply the Public

Procurement Values and Guiding

Principles in Your Professional Life?

During this plenary session, speakers

who help you apply these values

into your every day life. The plenary

session provides a brief look into these

topics and each speaker presents a

more detailed “deep dive” workshop

immediately following the plenary.

David Rabiner, CSP

Topic: Obstacles to Leadership

> Excellence in leadership isn’t just

about generating leadership qualities

and checking them off one at a time.

Understanding

the obstacles to

demonstrating those

qualities – the challenges

to overcoming those

obstacles – is critical

for anyone attempting

to evolve as a leader. In this opening

presentation, international speaker

David Rabiner defines leadership

from a practical perspective -- from a

perspective of influence -- and gives

you the incentive to dedicate yourself

to enhancing your own leadership.

He sets the stage for the process of

developing your own leadership plan,

which includes overcoming the obstacles

to peak performance in leadership.

David Rabiner, CSP, is one of the more established and experienced public speakers in the United States. Since 1993, he has been averaging approximately 100 presentations each year. Overall, Rabiner has presented to more than 1,900 groups in 45 states and 12 countries.

Ed Brodow

Topic: Negotiating in Turbulent Times

> In the typical negotiation, both sides

treat each other as the “enemy.” This

is counterproductive and can lead

to problems and

misunderstandings. In

this eye-opening session

by the bestselling author

of Negotiation Boot

Camp, attendees learn

a series of innovative

techniques for creating an atmosphere

of fairness and trust with suppliers and

stakeholders without sacrificing the need

to achieve specific objectives. Emphasis is

on developing “negotiation consciousness,”

the value of listening as a negotiation tool,

adhering to ethical problem-solving, dealing

with supplier tactics, and Ed Brodow’s

Three Rules for Win-Win Negotiating.

Ed Brodow is the world’s top spokesman on the art of negotiation. A nationally recognized television personality, he has appeared as negotiation guru on PBS, ABC News, Fox News, Inside Edition, and Fortune Business Report. Brodow is negotiating consultant to some of the world’s most prominent organizations, including Microsoft, Goldman Sachs, Starbucks, Learjet, Raytheon, Philips, McKinsey, The Gap, Revlon, Zurich Insurance, Mobil Oil, and the Pentagon.

Robyn Benincasa

Closing Speaker

Ordinary People, Extraordinary Result: The

8 Essential Elements of Human Synergy

Wednesday, August 22, 2:45 – 4:15 p.m.

> Robyn Benincasa inspires people to do

amazing things. She has made an art form

of extreme performance by competing

and winning at the

highest levels of sport

and business. Benincasa

has competed in close

to 40 expedition-length

events - gnarly, multiday,

multisport killers such

as Primal Quest and Eco-Challenge. She

has biked through jungles in Borneo,

climbed Himalayan giants in Nepal, trekked

across lava fields in Fiji, rafted rapids in

Chile – and racked up multiple world

championship titles along the way.

In her spare time, Benincasa is a full-time firefighter in San Diego, on the nation’s first all-female crew. She also founded the Project Athena Foundation, a nonprofit dedicated to helping women who have endured medical setbacks achieve their athletic dreams, whether it means climbing Mount Kilimanjaro or running a local 10K. In her keynote session, Benincasa imparts the attitude and mindset that allows groups of ordinary people to accomplish truly extraordinary things together.

Page 27: GovPro - June/July 2012

www.govpro.com • GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT | 25

WORKSHOP TOPICS

The following is a preview of more than

70 workshops planned for Forum:

Avoiding the Front Page of the Newspaper: Why Ethics Matters

> Public agency employees are

regularly faced with ethical decision

making – where do you draw

the line on what is acceptable

versus unacceptable practices?

Evaluating Cooperative Programs

> Due diligence is required to identify

those contracts that may best align

with your specific product or service

requirements and local procurement

ordinances. Get strategy tips and

look at evaluation criteria

The Heart of a Good Request for Proposal (RFP)

> Learn how to construct an entire RFP

in a way that captures the attention of

your potential vendors and effectively

steers them toward submitting a

proposal most responsive to your needs

Procurement’s Next Big Challenge – Construction

> More procurement professionals are

finding themselves in the middle of

a construction project. What specific

requirements should be in the

solicitation document? Get answers

and start building your foundation

Performance Measurements and Services

> A major issue within the shift to best

value procurement is monitoring

results and mitigating the risk to both

parties. Gain an understanding of

how performance measurements

are created and tracked

Procurement Systems and Processes: Choosing an Effective Design

> The breadth and speed of technological,

social, and cultural change is continually

accelerating. Are you keeping up?

For a complete workshop schedule, visit www.nipg/org/forum or email [email protected].

APG ANNUAL MEETING

Airport Purchasing Group (APG)

will host its annual conference August 17

– 18 at the Washington State Convention

and Trade Center, Seattle. Separate

registration required. View the tentative

schedule at www.nigp.org/apgconf

2012 INTERNATIONAL

PUBLIC PROCUREMENT

CONFERENCE

The International Public Procurement

Conference (IPPC) is a global network

of public procurement practitioners

and researchers from more than 100

countries. Its objective is to advance

and share knowledge and best

practices in public procurement.

The biennial conference will be held

at the Sheraton Seattle Hotel and

Washington State Convention Center

August 17 – 19 in conjunction with

the NIGP Annual Forum and Products

Exposition. The conference provides

networking opportunities with high-

level public procurement practitioners

and experts. Participants’ interest in

sharing public procurement knowledge

benefits government, business, and

greater society around the world.

These biennial conferences have

become a forum where practitioners

and researchers (1) share their

knowledge, innovation and best

practices; and (2) build a network

with their international colleagues.

The IPPC is the largest international

public procurement conference dedicated

to academic discourse and practitioner

engagement. Thanks to the fertile

mixture of practical experiences and

academic research, IPPC draws more

than 400 academicians and experienced

professionals from 59 countries. For 2012,

IPPC aims to extend and deepen the

topics of major interest that have their

roots in the first IPPC event held in 2004.

For more information, visit www.nigp.org/ippc5.

PRE-FORUM COURSES

Pre-Forum Courses maximize

educational potential and earn points

toward UPPCC certification and

re-certification. (Space is limited).

Friday, August 17 – Saturday, August 18

> CPPB Prep: Two-Day Course

Instructor: Jeannie Readey, CPPO, CPPB

Contact Hours: 16

UPPCC Re-Certification points: 2

> CPPO Prep: Two-Day Course

Instructor: Lynda Allair, CPPO

Contact Hours: 16

UPPCC Re-Certification points: 2

> Risk Management in

Public Contracting:

Two-Day Course

Instructor: Myra Smith, CPPB

Contact Hours: 16

UPPCC Re-Certification points: 2

INTRODUCTION TO

PUBLIC PROCUREMENT

FOUR-DAY COURSE

Sunday, August 19 – Wednesday, August 22

Instructor: Ed Pabor, CPPO, CDT, C.P.M.

Contact hours: 24; UPPCC

recertification points: 3

> This NIGP foundation course will

be offered over four days within

the context of the Forum schedule.

Individuals wishing to participate in this

course must follow the course schedule

and attend every session in order to

receive credit. Attendees registering

for this course attend each course

session in lieu of Forum educational

sessions. Registration includes many of

the Forum events, including some meal

functions. Please review the schedule

prior to registering for the course.

Separate registration is required.

CHAPTER LEADERSHIP

SERIES

Sunday, August 19, Noon to 5 p.m.

Practicing Effective Leadership

Presented by: Jill McCrory and Steve

Swafford, Leadership Outfitters, LLC

> Using the practical leadership principles

in The Leadership Challenge by Barry

Kouzes and Jim Posner (Model the

Way, Inspire A Shared Vision, Challenge

the Process, Enable Others To Act, and

Encourage the Heart), this program

explores what effective leadership

looks like in the volunteer and work

environments. Although targeted for

NIGP Chapter Members, this workshop

Page 28: GovPro - June/July 2012

26 | JUNE/JULY 2012

> Acme Auto Leasing

> ADT Security Services, Inc.

> AlliedBarton Security Services

> AllSeating

> Altec Industries

> Applied Industrial Technologies

> Association of Educational Purchasing Agencies (AEPA)

> AT&T Mobility

> Aurora Storage Products

> Bank of America

> Bell and Howell

> BidSync

> Bobcat Company

> Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC

> Brother International Corporation

> Canon Business Solutions

> Car Toys, Inc.

> Case IH Agriculture

> Caterpillar

> Century Products LLC

> Cisco Systems, Inc.

> Club Car Inc

> Continental Flooring Company

> CTL

> CTS LanguageLink

> Deltek

> Dun & Bradstreet

> The Sherwin Williams Co.

> Enterprise Holdings E H I

> ESM Solutions

> Fastenal Company

> FedBid, Inc.

> Federal Contracts Corp

> FedEx

> FieldTurf Tarkett

> GameTime

> Garland/DBS, Inc.

> General Services Administration

> GOJO Industries

> GovConnection

> GovDeals

> Government Sourcing Solutions

> Govini

> Grainger Industrial Supply

> Graybar

> GunLocke

> Haworth Inc.

> HD Supply

> Herman Miller, Inc.

> Hertz Equipment Rental

> Husky Trucks, LLC

> Independent Stationers, Inc.

> Info Tech Inc.

> Ion Wave Technologies, Inc.

> Jack Doheny Companies

> John Deere Company

> Kellogg Brown & Root LLC

> Keystone Purchasing Network

> Kimball Office

> Knoll, Inc.

> Kompan, Inc.

> KONE Elevators and Escalators

> Konica Minolta Printing Solutions

> Language Line Services

> LeasePlan USA

> Liquidity Services

> Little Tikes Commercial

> Lowes Companies

> Manpower

> McKesson Medical-Surgical

> Metro Office Solutions

> Milliken

> Mitel Business Systems, Inc.

> National IPA

> National Joint Powers Alliance (NJPA)

> National Office Furniture

> Simplot Partners

> Neopost

> Network Services Company

> ChapterManager

> NIGP

> Office Depot

> Officemax

> Onvia, Inc.

> O’Reilly Auto Parts

> Otis Elevator Company

> Otto Environmental Systems

> Panasonic Computer Solutions

> Paoli

> PEPPM

> Periscope Holdings, Inc.

> Pitney Bowes

> PlanetBids, Inc.

> Point Nationwide/

Gonzalez Alliance

> PPG Architectural Coatings

> Premier

> Property Room.com

> Public Sourcing Solutions

> Redwood Toxicology Laboratory, Inc.

> Ricoh Americas Corporation

> Rubbermaid Commercial Products

> Safeware-Mallory

> Samson Equipment, Inc.

> School Specialty, Inc.

> SciQuest, Inc.

> ServiceWear Apparel

> Sharp Electronics

> Sherwin-Williams Company

> SHI International Corp.

> Simplot Partners

> Spikes Cavell

> Staples Advantage

> Steelcase, Inc.

> Stertil-Koni

> Sunbelt Rentals Inc.

> Tech Depot

> Teknion

> Thatcher Company

> The Cooperative Purchasing Network (TCPN)

> The Gordian Group

> The Hartford

> The Home Depot

> The Public Group

> The Toro Company

> Toter, Inc.

> Tremco Inc.

> UL (Underwriters Laboratories)

> United Rentals

> UPS

> U.S. Communities

> Virco

> Waxie

> Western States Contracting Alliance (WSCA)

> Wright Express

> ZeroChaos

Exhibitors in red are NIGP Premier & Corporate Sponsors

Exhibitor listing as of June 6, 2012. View the complete Exhibitor List at www.nigp.org/exhibitorlist.

NIGP FORUM 2012

NIGP 2012 FORUM EXHIBITORS

Visit more than 130 companies with more than 180 exhibit booths in the exhibit hall.

series is open to all Forum

attendees. For questions

about the Chapter Leadership

Series, contact Jennifer

Steffan at [email protected].

2012 EXECUTIVE

LEADERSHIP

SERIES

WITH DAVID

RABINER

Tuesday, August 21,

Noon to 5 p.m.

> Government purchasing

officials have been given

leadership responsibility

because they have

demonstrated leadership

capabilities and have

earned the privilege to

serve their organizations.

A regular part of the

job involves two things:

(1) follow the letters of the

laws and regulations

(2) have positive working

relationships with

department staff,

department heads,

and elected officials.

Getting departments

to want to work with you

-- early in the process -- and

consider your involvement

to be an important

element of their success is

something peak performing

purchasing officials do.

This program explores the

challenges unique to leadership

in government purchasing and

builds on your leadership skills.

This session has a maximum

capacity of 30 participants.

Registration is $75 and

available on a first-come,

first-serve basis. Advance

registration required.

Page 29: GovPro - June/July 2012

With BuySpeed’s® Small Business Engine, the State of Maryland:

Increased small business opportunities twofold

Has over 4,500 registered small businesses

Certifies small businesses during paperless vendor registration

Identifies small businesses for solicitations

Tracks contracts awarded to small businesses

Lots of People Talk About Helping Small Businesses and Stimulating the Economy. But Maryland Actually Did Something About It...

CALL TODAY: (877) 472-9062WWW.PERISCOPEHOLDINGS.COM

Introducing BuySpeed’s New Small Business Engine

Page 30: GovPro - June/July 2012

Transparent Procurement Process:

(1) The development of the solicitation, evaluation of the responses and award determination are performed by public employees of a political subdivision* that is separate from and independent of the cooperative organization. (Lead Public Agency)

(2) A National Evaluation Team of public procurement professionals from multiple political subdivisions* participate in the creation, evaluation and award process.

(3) All decisions regarding the awarded master agreement, pricing changes etc., are made by the Lead Public Agency NOT the staffof the cooperative.

*A political subdivision is generally defined in most states as local governments created by the states to help fulfill their obligations. Political subdivisions include counties, cities, towns, villages, and special districts such as school districts, water districts, park districts, and airport districts

Some questions you may want to ask prior to using a cooperative that’s “just like U.S. Communities”

s7ERETHESOLICITATIONEVALUATIONANDAWARDALLperformed by employees of a political subdivision that is independent of the cooperative organization?

s7ASTHEPROCUREMENTPROCESSSUBSTANTIALLYsimilar to the process your agency is required to use?

s7HATKINDOFINDEPENDENTOVERSIGHTOFTHEcooperative is in place?

s$OESTHISCONTRACTMEETTHELEGALrequirements of my agency and state?If in doubt ask your attorney.

Oversight and Accountability:

(1) An Advisory Board of over 20 public procurement professionals to ensure processes and methods used are of the highest standards

(2) A Supervisory Board of National Public Associations to oversee the cooperative and to ensure the interests of their public agency members are served and protected.

(3) Annual independent third-party supplier audits to ensure contract compliance.

Public Agency Protection & Supplier Contract Compliance:

(1) Quarterly performance reviews with supplier executives and the Lead Public Agency to evaluate performance and compliance.

(2) Commitments: Corporate, Pricing, Economy& Sales.

(3) Field Program Managers focused on supporting public agencies and resolving problems or concerns.

Visit uscommunities.org/coopstandardsfor a due diligence check list

All CooperativesAre Not the Same

7HAT-AKES53#OMMUNITIES$IFFERENT

7EREJUSTLIKE53#OMMUNITIES

Page 31: GovPro - June/July 2012

For more than 15 years, U.S. Communities has been a leader in providing public agencies and nonprofits the best value in the procurement of goods and services. In doing so, U.S. Communities has never wavered in putting the public agency participants interests first during the solicitation process. We enforce our four key commitments expected of each supplier which separates U.S. Communities from all other cooperatives. Although some suppliers complain U.S. Communities commitments are “too onerous,” we are dedicated to protecting a participating public agency’s ethical, legal, and financial interests at all times.

Some questions you may want to ask prior to using a cooperative that’s “just like U.S. Communities”

s$OESTHECOOPERATIVEMANAGETHESUPPLIERS/RDOTHESUPPLIERSMANAGETHECOOPERATIVE

s7HATKINDOFPUBLICAGENCYPROTECTIONSAREREQUIREDOFTHESUPPLIERS

s(OWMANYSUPPLIERSDOESTHECOOPERATIVEHAVEANDHOWMANYCOOPERATIVESDOESTHESUPPLIERBELONGTO

s(OWDOESTHECOOPERATIVEMANAGESUPPLIERCOMPLIANCENATIONWIDE

s(OWMANYSTAFFDOESTHECOOPERATIVEHAVE

s(OWMANYSTAFFPERSUPPLIERDOESTHECOOPERATIVEHAVE

Corporate Commitment: 4HISENABLES53#OMMUNITIESTOACCESSTHETOPSUPPLIEREXECUTIVESTORESOLVEPROBLEMSANDIMPROVEPRODUCTSSERVICEANDPRICINGONBEHALFOFOURPUBLICAGENCYPARTICIPANTS

Pricing Commitment:9OUCANHAVEPEACEOFMINDKNOWINGTHATYOUAREACCESSINGTHESUPPLIERSLOWESTOVERALLPRICINGTHATTHEYOFFERTOPUBLICAGENCIES9OUWONTFINDOUTLATERTHATYOUCOULDHAVEGOTTENABETTERDEALBYGOINGTOBIDORACCESSINGADIFFERENTCONTRACTVEHICLEHELDBYTHATSUPPLIER

7HATSINACommitment?

!LLOFTHESEAREMYBESTDEAL

Visit uscommunities.org/coopstandardsfor a due diligence check list

Economy Commitment:4HISENSURESTHATTHESUPPLIERISWILLINGANDABLETOPROVIDEYOUWITHTHENECESSARYDATADOCUMENTATIONANDANALYSESTHATYOUNEEDTOVALIDATEYOURDECISIONTOUTILIZETHEIR53#OMMUNITIESCONTRACT

Sales Commitment:4HISREQUIRESTHESUPPLIERSSALESFORCETOBEAWAREOFANDKNOWLEDGEABLEABOUTTHEIR53#OMMUNITIESCONTRACT4HISENSURESTHATYOUWILLBEABLETOGETTHEINFORMATIONYOUNEEDANDANSWERSTOYOURQUESTIONSFROMYOURLOCALSALESREPRESENTATIVEREGARDINGTHEPRODUCTSSERVICESPRICINGANDGENERAL4#SCOVEREDUNDERTHECONTRACT

Page 33: GovPro - June/July 2012

PROUD U.S. COMMUNITIES SUPPLIERS,COMMITTE

D TO SERVING PUBLIC AGENCIES

Page 34: GovPro - June/July 2012

32 | JUNE/JULY 2012

Very® SeatingHaworth.com

PROUD U.S. COMMUNITIES SUPPLIERS, COMMITT

ED TO SERVING PUBLIC AGENCIES

Page 35: GovPro - June/July 2012

/RZHU<RXU3URFXUHPHQW&RVWV

U.S. Communities contract #10119 publicly solicited

and awarded by lead agency Maricopa County, AZ.

*No cost to participate.

Register with U.S. Communities to start saving today!

For more information and to register go to: www.Applied.com/uscommunities

or call 1-866-482-4145

With 89 years of experience and 4 million parts, we’ve helped maintenance managers reduce

inventory costs by implementing our inventory management program. We’ve devised solutions to create more efficient systems. We’ve extended the life of machinery by recommending a different bearing for the application. And more. You, too, can enjoy endless

solutions to drive costs down, by partnering with Applied Industrial Technologies and U.S. Communities Government Purchasing Alliance.*

$POUSBDU1SJDJOHt%FFQ1SPEVDU*OWFOUPSZ

4FSWJDFt1SPEVDU&YQFSUJTFt*OWFOUPSZ.BOBHFNFOU

3FQBJS4FSWJDFTt5SBJOJOH

PROUD U.S. COMMUNITIES SUPPLIERS,COMMITTE

D TO SERVING PUBLIC AGENCIES

Page 36: GovPro - June/July 2012

34 | JUNE/JULY 2012

Save resources, time and money on products and services you buy every dayThrough U.S. Communities’ Lead Public Agency, North Carolina

State University’s contract for Food Distribution and Related

Supplies and Services (Contract No. 13924), the Premier

Foodservice program offers participating public agencies the

opportunity to reduce cost through the national distribution

program serviced by US Foods, 90+ individual category contracts

offered by Premier and access to value-added services to address

operational efficiencies.

www.premier-uscommunities.com

About Premier REACHTM

Premier REACH helps organizations like hospitals, colleges and universities, early childhood education and K-12 schools, recreation, and other public agencies manage their supply chain to cut costs while improving performance. Through the program, members can take advantage of industry-leading prices offered through Premier’s contracts, innovative tools, solutions and knowledge-sharing. For more information, please visit www.premierinc.com/reach.

Proud supplier of

Supportingmunicipalities

across the country.

Exclusive auto parts supplier to:

Great people, great products, great prices! SM

888-823-6592 or [email protected]

PROUD U.S. COMMUNITIES SUPPLIERS, COMMITT

ED TO SERVING PUBLIC AGENCIES

Page 37: GovPro - June/July 2012

www.govpro.com • GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT | 35

S

Contract#: 4400001839

Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Equipment

All Departments - One SAFETY Contract.Register now to start saving time, money and lives.

XXX4BGFXBSF.BMMPSZDPNttVTDPNNVOJUJFT!TBGFXBSFNBMMPSZDPN

A trusted IT products and

solutions provider to state and

local government agencies

specializing in: Mobility and

End User Computing, Cloud

Solutions, and Data Center

Modernization.

Stop by the GTSI booth #USC 15

at the NIGP vendor show on the

U.S. Communities Row!

GTSI.com/uscommunities

We’re more than pens

and pencils!

t0ďDF1SPEVDUT4VQQMJFSt/BUJPOBM%JTUSJCVUJPOt&YDFQUJPOBM-PDBM4FSWJDFt$PNQFUJUJWF1SJDJOH

IUUQVTDPNNVOJUJFTJTHSPVQPSH

1SPVEUPCFB64$PNNVOJUJFT4VQQMJFS1BSUOFS

PROUD U.S. COMMUNITIES SUPPLIERS,COMMITTE

D TO SERVING PUBLIC AGENCIES

Page 38: GovPro - June/July 2012

36 | JUNE/JULY 2012

Play. Without Delay.

Purchase a playground through U.S. Communities at best

government pricing and avoid the hassle of a lengthy bid process.

800.235.2440 gametime.com/usc

Less cost. Less time. More play.

Bringing together the way we live and workVisit www.knolluscommunities.com to learn more about Knoll. Our range of products, quality, history and project capabilities make Knoll the best value for our government clients. Our partnership with U.S. Communities guarantees you the best price – every day.

The family of chairs

www.knolluscommunities.com

PROUD U.S. COMMUNITIES SUPPLIERS, COMMITT

ED TO SERVING PUBLIC AGENCIES

Page 39: GovPro - June/July 2012

What’s Hiding in YourStairwell?

A huge opportunity to save energy.

Building code requires stairwells to be

illuminated 24/7, but dimming those lights when

the space is unoccupied can save a lot of energy

and money. A study by Lutron estimates that a

simple stairwell lighting retrofi t can result in up

to 80-82 percent in energy savings.*

Graybar can help you every step of the way –

with energy-saving lighting retrofi ts and much

more. Call 1-800-GRAYBAR today to learn more

about our intelligent energy products or go to

graybar.com/nigp-1.

*Lutron Reading Area Community College Case Study, 2012.

Find out how a college

saved 80 percent.

Download the case study

at graybar.com/nigp-1.

ChallengeReading Area Community College is committed to providing affordable

access, and to meeting the identified educational needs of the

community. Like virtually all educational facilities, the ability to provide

affordable access depends, in part, on keeping operating costs in line

despite increasing energy and facility maintenance costs.Mike Hodowanec, Purchasing Manager, recognized that saving energy

saves money, and worked with Lutron to analyze and evaluate how light

controls could contribute to reduced electricity bills.A walk-through of campus buildings revealed that stairwell lighting stood

out as an obvious place to gain efficiencies. Building code dictates that

stairwells be illuminated 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, but, keeping

those lights on at full brightness all the time results in a significant

amount of wasted energy.Eleven stairwells in five buildings were chosen for the lighting retrofit,

including some stairwells that are typically used for less than two hours

per week. Altogether, these stairwells accounted for 53,000 KWh of

power use, costing more than $5,000 per year.

“Controlling the stairwell lighting was easily quantifiable as a method of

saving energy.”

Mike Hodowanec, Purchasing Manager, Reading Area Community College

photo courtesy of RACC

Project OverviewReading Area Community College (RACC),

Reading, PACollege/University11 stairwells 5 buildings

Lutron stairwell retrofit fixture solution helps RACC save energy and reduce costs.

PROUD U.S. COMMUNITIES SUPPLIERS,COMMITTE

D TO SERVING PUBLIC AGENCIES

Page 40: GovPro - June/July 2012

38 | JUNE/JULY 2012

Contract 11019

hdsupplysolutions.com | 1-855-526-9473

Visit us at NIGP’s 67TH

Annual Forum, Booth #USC38

FREE.

Delivered by professionals. For professionals.

To save you time and

money, our government

support team will help you

reduce procurement lead

times, lower administrative

costs, and take advantage

of our competitively

solicited U.S. Communities

contract—all while providing

free, next-day delivery*

on over 22,000 quality

maintenance and repair

products and services.

It’s an honor to serve you.

ADV-12-6531

Proud Supplier:

* On most orders to most areas. © 2012 HDS IP Holding, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

ACRO SERVICE CORPORATIONTemporary Personnel & Related Services

MANAGED SERVICE PROVIDER (MSP) SERVICES SUPPORTED BY VENDOR MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (VMS)

Acro manages some of the nation’s largest organizations under our MSP/VMS model in various industries which include government, energy, automotive, aerospace, information technology and healthcare

Our MSP program is customizable, allowing clients to recognize sustainable cost reduction and process efficiencies in procurement and management of contract labor

Our flexible delivery of MSP/VMS services fully integrates with client systems using onsite and/or offsite program teams, combined with Acro’s proprietary eXternal Resource Management System (XRMSM)

XRMSM PROVIDES A COMPLETE VMS SOLUTION

Acro’s XRMSM Solution consists of our own web-based VMS system and expert management services to enable firms to achieve substantial program savings through automation

Our XRMSM Solution automates and streamlines the process for procuring and managing all categories of contingent labor

Provides complete requisitioning control to manage supplier distribution and billing rates while ensuring program compliance

SERVICE EFFICIENCIES, COST SAVINGS & SUCCESS

Acro leverages our industry expertise, ISO processes and dedication to help companies gain full control of their external services spend

Clients obtain better targeted pricing and greater value while simplifying and improving the acquisition and management of contingent labor

We continually ensure compliance with client policies and government regulations in order to drive continuous program improvement

Labor makes up a major percentage of state and local government spending each year. What would they think about saving up to 10% annually on these costs and not lose any valuable employee production they count on?

For tailored solutions and results that will exceed your expectations, please contact Kent Stastny, Acro Service Corporation XRMSM Solutions at 734.632.4276 or visit: www.acrocorp.com/uscommunities or www.xrmsolutions.com

Acro’s Other Service Offerings:t4UBGmOH4FSWJDFTt1SFJEFOUJmFE&NQMPZFF4FSWJDFTt*OEFQFOEFOU$POUSBDUPS$PNQMJBODF.BOBHFNFOUt5FDIOPMPHZ$POTVMUJOH

t

t

t

t

t

t

t

t

t

PROUD U.S. COMMUNITIES SUPPLIERS, COMMITT

ED TO SERVING PUBLIC AGENCIES

Page 41: GovPro - June/July 2012

ǠƓŜŜŜƓƓɮɮģƏŔȒ ŔȅƔǭĬǒƻ

tY_9OovŔDŽªƫªƫŔŔȒɚƔĬŔ

ȗqªaŰŰľɮǠ;ŔȒ!ȅƔǭƻŔDŽvŔDŽªƫǒȒǭǒȒªƔǒDŽƫƫȒƔſƏȒŔŔȒɚŔŁƫƫǒƏŔȒȒªŁŔƻªȒƧªȒŔƏŔǭȒǒǭŔȒǒŰƏŔƔȒȒŔǭŔĬƔɚŔǒɛDŽŔȒ

ZǒƻªŔȒɜƏªƔɫŔɣǒȒſŔDŽĬɣaȒſªDŽƔɫªƔǒDŽƔĻɣǒĬªDŽªƧŔªŁɛªDŽªſŔǒŰƏŔĬǒǒǭŔȒªƔɛŔǭȒĬƏªƔDŽſǭǒɜŔȒǒŰǒƻƻDŽƔƔŔǒªĬĬŔŁƔĬǒDŽŔŁȒªŔª;ŔȒɫ!ȅƔǭƻŔDŽvŔDŽªƫƔƏƻǒȒŔƏªDŽǠĻŲɯɯȒŔDŽªƫƔŔƻªɛªƔƫªġƫŔĻ;ŔȒɫ!ȅƔǭƻŔDŽvŔDŽªƫƔªǒDŽŔƓǒǭȒŔǒȒĬŔ

ŁɛªDŽªſŔǒŰĬǒDŽȒªĬƔDŽſɜƔƏ;ŔȒɫ!ȅƔǭƻŔDŽvŔDŽªƫƏȒǒſƏƏŔǒƻƻDŽƔƔŔǭȒǒſȒªƻƔDŽĬƫŁŔĺ īZǒŔȒŰŔŔ īƔĬǒDŽǒŰŰǭġƫƔƏŔŁȒŔªƔƫȒªŔ ī!ɡƔƔDŽſĬǒDŽȒªĬŰƫűƫƫĬǒƻǭŔƔƔɛŔġƔŁȒŔȅƔȒŔƻŔDŽǯƏȒǒſƏLǒƔDŽqǒɜŔȒƏǒȒƔɣDZĞ ī4ƫŔɡƔġƫŔȒŔDŽªƫǭŔȒƔǒŁĻŰȒǒƻǒDŽŔǯǠDZŁªɣǒ ɜŔƫɛŔǯǠ-DZƻǒDŽƏǒȒƫǒDŽſŔȒ ī!ɡĬƫƔɛŔƔDŽĬŔDŽƔɛŔDŽǒǒŰŰŔȒŔŁǒªDŽŁªȒŁȒŔªƔƫĬǒƻŔȒ īŔDŽĬƏƻªȒƧƔDŽſªDŽªƫɣƔªɛªƔƫªġƫŔǭǒDŽȒŔȅŔ

ĞǒDŽȒªĬªƔűŔƏŔĬǒƻǭŔƔƔɛŔġƔŁȒŔȅƔȒŔƻŔDŽƔDŽƻǒªŔqƫŔªŔȒŔɛƔŔɜɣǒȒªŔȎĬǒǒǭŔȒªƔɛŔġɣƫªɜ

_tL<X39Ytt_yY_

<VYXV_X

PROUD U.S. COMMUNITIES SUPPLIERS,COMMITTE

D TO SERVING PUBLIC AGENCIES

Page 42: GovPro - June/July 2012

40 | JUNE/JULY 2012

NO QUOTE REQUIRED. AND YOU CAN QUOTE US ON THAT.THAT’S THE POWER OF THE HOME DEPOT.Our proven relationship with U.S. Communities means your government agency can shop directly at The Home Depot without requesting bids. As a U.S. Communities participant, we will accept your government procurement cards and provide access to our outside sales team to save you even more time.

FOR DETAILS VISIT homedepot.com/gov or call 1-800-589-0690

PROUD U.S. COMMUNITIES SUPPLIERS, COMMITT

ED TO SERVING PUBLIC AGENCIES

The Cooperative Gold StandardGolduscommunities.org/coopstandards

Page 43: GovPro - June/July 2012

www.govpro.com • GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT | 41

IN DEPTH [transportation]

Atlanta Public Schools use an annual

fi xed price contract for diesel fuel and

unleaded gasoline, an approach that

has provided some $2.27 million in

total savings over the last three years

and avoids the impact of price spikes

in the market by ensuring the same per-gallon price all

year. To take advantage of fi xed pricing, the district has to

accurately project how much transportation fuel it will use

over the course of the year, and the contract commits the

district to pay for any unused contracted fuel at year’s end.

Currently, the district has a fi xed price contract of $3.61

per gallon for diesel, used by the district’s fl eet of school

Atlanta’s public school district buys transportation fuel a year at a time to get lower pricing

By Larry Anderson

No Fear of

Commitment

Page 44: GovPro - June/July 2012

42 | JUNE/JULY 2012

IN DEPTH [transportation]

buses, and $3.45 per gallon for unleaded, used by the district’s

“white” fl eet of passenger cars, trucks and maintenance

vehicles. A recent daily spot market price showed $3.78 for

diesel and $3.52 for unleaded (according to U.S. Energy

Information Administration data). All prices are “fully-

loaded” including taxes, fees, delivery charges, etc.

In 2010, the district saved 35 cents per gallon for diesel

and 21 cents per gallon for unleaded, based on comparison of

the locked-in contract prices and the average market prices

for the year. In 2011, the district saved 70 cents per gallon

for diesel and 35 cents per gallon for unleaded for the year.

In addition to better prices, the district is better able

to budget without having to manage against a fl uctuating

market price that is driven by political and environmental

changes. For example, it’s easy to remember how hurricane

Katrina caused a spike in transportation fuel costs.

A LONGER-VIEW APPROACH TO BUYING FUEL

Related to buying transportation fuel, the procurement

department is a partner to the district in providing true

strategic planning. Helping to manage expectations

throughout the upcoming fi scal year allows the district to

focus on what’s most important, educating children. Th e

operations department provides the necessary data on

trends within the district, and the procurement department

helps to develop best-case scenarios to drive solicitations

to get the best quality and price for the district.

When Randall Sellers, Director of Procurement Services,

came to Atlanta Public Schools in 2008, he immediately

did a spend analysis to look for potential savings. Even

then, the budget was getting tighter, and he realized

transportation fuel was a large cost. Of the district’s 50,000

students, about 60 percent ride school buses, whose diesel

fuel needs make up about 90 percent of the district’s

transportation fuel spend, with the unleaded fuel used by

other vehicles taking up the other roughly 10 percent.

In discussions with the transportation director in 2008, Sellers

found that transportation fuel was being purchased on the spot

market. He looked at the last fi ve years and realized that

the volume of fuel was increasing every year. Preliminary

estimates suggested annual savings ranging from $500,000

to $750,000 were possible using a fi xed price contract. Sellers

sold the idea to senior managers and the School Board,

and did a request for proposal (RFP) in 2009. (Georgia law

currently limits the duration of contracts to 12 months. Th e

transportation fuel contracts also have four option years, but

an additional commitment is required for each option year.)

Each solicitation specifi es a particular date and the number

of gallons that will be purchased during the next 12 months

from that date. Suppliers bid a fi xed price for diesel and a fi xed

price for unleaded for the specifi ed amount of fuel during

the 12 months. Because bids are based on projections from a

specifi c date, it can be useful to do the solicitation when the

market appears to be going down rather than up, such as right

before spring break when pricing usually trends down. “If

you look at the trends in the last two years, it’s hard to know

exactly when you are going to get in,” Sellers admitted.

Better pricing comes from leveraging the larger spend, and

by enabling suppliers to combine the purchase from wholesalers

with other large contracts, whether for cities and states or

buying consortia. Such factors mean that bids may vary by 35

to 40 cents, although in 2012 there was a diff erence of only

about 7 cents. Contracts have received as many as six bidders.

TRACKING VOLUME USAGE IS KEY

Th e certainty of budgeting using a fi xed price outweighs

the unlikely possibility that spot prices could go down

drastically during the contract term, says Sellers. “Some

people say it’s a risk, but I don’t think it’s risky. Your

budget is what your budget is, and we have come under

budget every year we have done this,” he said.

Th e biggest sticking point, and perhaps the reason more

entities don’t buy transportation fuel a year at a time, is

that any unused fuel at the end of the contract term has

to be paid for. “We had to make sure our volume was on

point, that we would know exactly where we would be at

the end of the year,” said Sellers. “We fi gured on the low

The biggest sticking

point, and perhaps the

reason more entities

don’t buy transportation

fuel a year at a time, is

that any unused fuel at

the end of the contract

term has to be paid for.

Atlanta Public Schools save at the pump by buying transportation fuel a year at a time for a fi xed price.

Page 45: GovPro - June/July 2012

www.govpro.com • GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT | 43

side because we wanted to make sure we didn’t come under.

In the fi rst year, we were over by 9,000 gallons because of

summer school. We keep track all year on a weekly basis to

make sure we are on track to use everything this year.”

Creating language in the contract on how to settle up at the

end of the year was one challenge of the solicitation. When the

invoice for the year’s fi nal fuel purchase is paid, the district is

committed to “true-up” by paying for the cost of the unused fuel,

which fortunately hasn’t happened yet. Th ere also is language in

the contract acknowledging that fuel purchases are contingent

on continuing receipt of K-12 appropriations and tax revenues.

Other school districts in surrounding Atlanta metro

counties are still buying transportation fuel on the spot

market. Sellers said he has reached out to other districts

about the possibility of doing a combined solicitation (with

potentially even greater savings), but so far without success,

whether because of the need to accurately project fuel usage

a year ahead or possible bureaucratic or legalistic obstacles.

For example, if four districts commit to hit a target and only

one of the four misses, then do the other districts have to

share in paying the shortfall? Th e topic has also come up at

meetings of the Metropolitan Regional Educational Service

Agency (MRESA), and there has been some interest, but

contract diff erences and inconsistent legal requirements

from one district to the next seem to present obstacles.

Another approach Atlanta Public Schools is considering

to lower costs is to buy electricity based on load patterns

of power usage throughout the day. Committing to certain

load levels, such as a lower load at night when the schools

are closed, can decrease prices and drive down costs.

‘DON’T SETTLE FOR THE NORM’

Sellers says his experience with the transportation fuel contract

demonstrates the importance of not accepting the status quo

without questioning if there might be a better approach. “Don’t

settle for the norm,” he said. “Look at diff erent, creative ways.

Look at your spend as a whole, at what you’re paying for and

how you’re paying. Just because you have done it one way in

the past doesn’t mean you have to keep doing it that way.

“Nobody ever said we couldn’t buy fi xed, it’s just that

no one ever tried it here,” he said. When doing a spend

analysis, there are only a few ways to reduce costs – by

rebidding, by negotiating, by avoiding costs, or by looking

at a diff erent model. Th e latter is proving its value at

Atlanta Public Schools. In a guaranteed contract, the

vendor knows they will get their volume and will give a

better price based on that volume. Th e only drawback:

“It’s guaranteed and you have to do it,” said Sellers.

Staples Advantage® can help your agency be more eco-conscious.susta ab e

To sign up, visit StaplesAdvantage.com/statelocalgov.

Being more environmentally responsible doesn’t mean sacrificing value or cleaning performance. Join Staples Advantage for:

UÊÊ/iÊLiÃÌÊÃ>ÛÃÊÊV«iÌiÊ facility solutions

UÊÊÊÜ`iÊÛ>ÀiÌÞÊvÊÃÕÃÌ>>LiÊ«À`ÕVÌÃ

UÊÊÃÌivviVÌÛiÊ-ÕÃÌ>>LiÊ >ÀÌÊLÞÊ-Ì>«iî

cleaning solutions

UÊÊ Ý«iÀÌÊ>`ÛViÊÌÊi«ÊÞÕÊ>ViÛiÊ D® certification

Page 46: GovPro - June/July 2012

44 | JUNE/JULY 2012

IN DEPTH [best practices]

Modernizing Charleston’s Classrooms

Procurement project saves money, incorporates sustainable standards and addresses evolving education needs

By Larry Anderson

Classroom furniture has evolved a lot

since the days of heavy-gauge steel

desks arranged in straight rows all

facing the front of the classroom.

Furniture is changing to reflect new,

more flexible teaching styles and

the realization that there’s no such thing as “one style fits

all.” As educators foster a more cooperative approach and

greater community as ways to boost student achievement,

it’s essential that the classroom environment – including

furniture, fixtures and equipment – keep pace.

Sustainable furniture has also demonstrated its value

to achieve productive learning environments with ample

light, high-quality acoustics and air flow that is safe to

breathe. Incorporating the benefits of the latest trends

New modern, lightweight furniture is used for classrooms and other educational environments by the Charleston County School

District in South Carolina. New furniture offers ergonomic benefits for students and practical benefits for school administrators, such

as the ability to stack chairs on tops of desks for the cleaning crew. Educational trends such as greater cooperation and community

among students are being reflected in furniture configurations that are more flexible and promote student interaction.

Page 47: GovPro - June/July 2012

www.govpro.com • GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT | 45

in green furniture products can promote good indoor

environmental quality and support areas properly

equipped with comfortable, functional furnishings.

Charleston County School District in South Carolina

sought to take all these factors into consideration when it

began the “21st Century Classroom Modernization Program”

five years ago in conjunction with a capital building program

involving construction of 18 schools between 2005 and

2009. Leading the classroom modernization initiative, the

district’s construction procurement team developed and

established standards for sustainable furniture, fixtures and

equipment for elementary, middle and high schools. The new

standards are geared to support the learning and teaching

climate and classroom activities for existing and newly

constructed facilities. “We knew we needed to get out of our

comfort zone for the project to be successful,” remembers

Tammie Yeadon, Construction Procurement Supervisor.

DEVELOPING NEW STANDARDS

Charleston County School District undertook classroom

modernization to ensure that physical settings are conducive

to the continuous and changing needs of the learning

community. The technical infrastructure must support

current and future mobile and fixed technical equipment and

enable the sharing of all data types. All learning spaces must

provide the necessary elements that allow for instruction

and learning at all times and be mobile and flexible to

adapt to changes in the teaching and learning activities.

To develop new standards, the construction procurement

team held focus group meetings with stakeholders

(maintenance, procurement staff, information technology

[IT] staff, education staff, parent volunteers) to learn

about evolving classroom needs. “It’s important that we

include stakeholders in the process,” said Yeadon.

A dozen or so focus group meetings were held in 2006 and

2007, including five to 10 people in each group. Discussions

centered around what furniture would support education needs,

what’s comfortable, and how furniture can impact the learning

climate. Attention also centered on minimizing variables to

achieve more equity across the district while still allowing

each school to maintain its individuality. The district also

emphasized lower per-unit costs while maintaining good quality.

“We asked ourselves questions such as how would the

classroom be used? Would the furniture support a student-

centered classroom? Would it be appropriate given new

trends in technology? Would it accommodate new teaching

technologies such as iPads and smart boards?” said Yeadon.

The district also released a Request for Information (RFI)

to the public inviting suppliers across the nation to submit

green furniture products. The selection team narrowed the

products to those with the desired specifications, i.e., those

that are sustainable, flexible, adaptable, safe and lightweight.

The district held its first Furniture Vendor’s Fair at the

2008 Summer Leadership Conference, when District staff

was able to examine the quality and functionality of more

than 250 pieces of equipment provided by manufacturers

for office, classroom, media center, computer lab and

miscellaneous spaces. Participants evaluated the furniture

using a rating system. Yeadon said her department also

visited other education furniture exhibits to get a broader

view of what’s available in the market, talking to various

manufacturers to assess their quality and flexibility.

Also considered was how well the furniture could hold up

to possible rough treatment by students: would it bend or

scratch? The realities of classrooms today require desks to be

moved around by students, so the new furniture had to be

lightweight and easy to move without creating a safety issue.

Ergonomics were also considered. A doctor was invited in

to speak about the value of sustainable products and the role

of ergonomic furniture to encourage students to pay better

attention and to focus. The district became better educated

about the value of collaborative learning environments.

“You have to have a holistic point of view,” said

Yeadon. “You don’t want anything that is toxic in your

environment, but you also want to look at materials, how

the furniture is built, what’s inside the laminate tops. We

looked at samples.” Suppliers also did presentations about

their manufacturing methods to enable comparison.

FORMULATING THE ACQUISITION STRATEGY

Based on the research, Charleston County School

District adopted “Seven Essentials of Learning for the

Sustainable Furniture Approach.” The essentials include

a learner-centric environment and the abilities to adapt

to programs and personalize learning conditions. Other

factors are community connections, aesthetics, safety and

collaboration. The District’s Sustainable Furniture, Fixtures

and Equipment Standardization Approach also meets the

Environmentally Preferable Purchasing (EPP) and the district’s

stakeholders’ expectation of achieving savings. Suppliers

were evaluated based on GREENGUARD certification

and adherence to ISO 14001 environmental standards.

An acquisition strategy position paper, approved by district

management, guided the selection of furniture, fixtures and

equipment (FF&E) to modernize Charleston’s school facilities.

The district proposed using the Invitation for Bid

procurement method. Construction procurement formulated

standardized “packages” of furniture, fixtures and equipment

for elementary school, middle school, and high school,

defining all the components and facilitating the bulk purchase

process. There were also an office package, a music package,

a science and art package and a cafeteria furniture package.

Item numbers of approved products were specified, along

with the make and model, a picture of the product and the

quantity of the bulk purchase. All bids included costs such as

delivery and installation and project management services.

Page 48: GovPro - June/July 2012

46 | JUNE/JULY 2012

IN DEPTH [best practices]

“We look at the value for the money, the suitability, the

durability, the safety, the ease of use,” said Yeadon. Factors

also include the possible effect of furniture on the schools’

flooring – lightweight furniture must have castors or the

ability to glide across vinyl composition tile (VCT) floors

without damage. Chairs need to be stackable and/or easily

put on top of the desk to clear way for the cleaning crew.

“Testing the little things can help avoid a big issue,” she said.

These standards were used for purchasing furniture, fixtures

and equipment (FF&E) for all school levels, supporting the

learning and teaching climate of classroom activities for

existing and newly constructed schools. Buying the furniture

in “bulk” took advantage of the larger buy to receive better

pricing. Comparison between submitted prices and catalog

prices show FF&E group price savings ranging from 50

to 56 percent. Bid prices include the cost of shipping and

installation, whereas list prices do no. At the end of the Capital

Building Project Closeout, the District saved approximately

$4 million of FF&E with the bulk purchasing bid.

STILL WORK LEFT TO DO

“My job is more than just purchasing the furniture,” said

Yeadon. “I try to get the best value by looking at the total

concept. I connect the focus groups with the manufacturers.

We have to be able to identify and assess trends.”

Yeadon is proud that Charleston is ahead of the

curve related to classroom modernization and on

par with forward-looking districts nationally.

Classroom modernization in Charleston also extends to

existing schools, which are progressing based on availability of

funds. “We’re strategically focused on upgrading various areas

that are approved by Charleston County School District,” said

Yeadon. Current furniture purchases across the board are being

made according to the established standards. The effort is five

years old now, and Yeadon says there is still work left to do.

“You have to engage your staff and stakeholders and make

them a part of the process,” said Yeadon. “As procurement,

we are there to make sure the money is well spent and there

is quality and value. You have to engage stakeholders to

make real changes.” She acknowledges the role and support

of other departments, including the academic team and

the capital building team, in implementing the program.

“Some people have ideas and don’t know how to get

them implemented. You have to have support around you

on a senior level,” Yeadon said. “We’re customer-focused.

The academic team and the procurement department work

together to identify trends that exist out there and identify

other possibilities being offered in the education market.”

Our most popular product is compliance.Shop at PSS and you can piggyback on a growing list of competitively solicited contracts by lead public agencies in compliance with generally accepted public procurement standards. PSS is the place to find what you need and a better way to buy it:

s4HEEASIESTFASTESTWAYTOSAVEON everything from office supplies and computers to furniture and flooring.

s.OPARTICIPATIONFEE

s0ARTOF%DUCATIONAL)NSTITUTIONAL#OOPERATIVE0URCHASINGA YEAR OLDNOT FOR PROlTGROUPPURCHASINGORGANIZATION

s,EVERAGEOURBUYINGPOWERANDSTREAMLINEcompliant purchasing.

Visit www.publicsourcing.org to start saving on the things you need.

Furniture

Office Supplies

Technology

Flooring

Maintenance

Compliance

Page 49: GovPro - June/July 2012

www.govpro.com • GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT | 47

IN DEPTH [legal pro]

Untying the Legalistic

Straightjacket

Courts generally defer to procurement’s decision-making processes – if they are documented

By Richard Pennington

A Rhode Island court decision recently

used the phrase “legalistic straightjacket”

in an opinion that demonstrated

judicial sensitivity to the challenges

procurement officials face in making

decisions. This article looks at recent

bid protest cases that illustrate how far courts go to preserve

the discretion exercised by procurement professionals.

COURTS EXERCISE GREAT CARE IN

INJUNCTIONS AGAINST AWARDS

The “legalistic straightjacket” phrase has been a part of the

Rhode Island bid protest lexicon since 1970. The phrase was

used again in a 2005 bid protest case involving two health care

plan providers vying for the state’s business. [Blue Cross &

Blue Shield of Rhode Island v. Najarian, 865 A.2d 1074 (Rhode

Island Supreme Court, 2005)] In Blue Cross, the trial court had

sustained a protest against the award and issued an injunction

against the execution of the contract. The Supreme Court

reversed, noting that while the contract award perhaps was not

handled perfectly (at least partly because the department was

understaffed), nevertheless a “fair and open bid process was

conducted in good faith, and we must afford a presumption of

correctness to the State’s decision. Any mistakes made during

the process simply do not rise to the level of palpable abuse of

discretion.” To hold otherwise, the court reasoned, “would place

the Judiciary in the position of litigating the award of every state

and municipal contract and would place public officials in charge

of awarding such contracts in the ‘legalistic straightjacket’.”

This court decision illustrates the great care taken in

overturning award decisions. In the author’s experience,

courts are reluctant to overturn executive agency decisions

without clear evidence that a substantial error was made.

THE PROPER EXERCISE OF DISCRETION HAS LIMITS

Two 2012 cases illustrate other courts’ views of the range of

discretion. In Ohio, an evaluation committee determined that

an offeror proposing on the Columbus Airport Authority’s

baggage handling system was not responsible. [Glidepath, LLC

v. Columbus Regional Airport Authority, 2012 Ohio 20 (Ohio

Court of Appeals, 2012)] The court upheld the determination,

finding the responsibility analysis comprehensive. The airport’s

finance director was a member of the evaluation committee.

Financial statements and Dun & Bradstreet reports were

analyzed. The committee also considered reports about late

payments to subcontractors and evidence that the company

had limited project management experience. The court

concluded that it would not substitute its judgment and would

“presume that the Airport performed its duties in a lawful

manner … [The Airport] made qualitative determinations

regarding Glidepath’s resources, capacity, and overall ability

to perform the project. Based upon our review, the Airport’s

responsibility determination was supported by logic and reason.”

Still, sometimes the process looks otherwise to a court. A

Virginia court decision considered the fact that different reasons

were given during debriefings for the protester’s not winning

the contract. [Professional Building Maintenance Corp. v. School

Board of County of Spotsylvania, No. 110410 (Virginia Supreme

Court, 2012)] In that case, the county held two post-award

meetings with the vendor. As the court saw the meetings, the

first emphasized a weakness in the company’s environmentally

preferable purchasing program. In the second meeting,

Page 50: GovPro - June/July 2012

48 | JUNE/JULY 2012

IN DEPTH [legal pro]

BUILDING EQUIPMENT THAT CREATES OPPORTUNITIES

With its new wider and more ergonomic infeed, the Morbark® Beever™ M12R eagerly welcomes and chips branchy material, with less need for sawing and groundwork. So you save time and money with a powerful chipper that:

t'FFET#FUUFS – Self-reversing auto-feed with hydraulically assisted down-pressure gives you crushing power to spare, while feeding at the most efficient horsepower ratio.

t$IJQT#FUUFS – The 25% wider opening, combined with hydraulically assisted down-pressure, feeds the drum smoothly at a consistent speed, giving you more-uniform, high-quality chips with less dust!

t5ISPXT#FUUFS – The boxed air chamber increases air flow through the system, throwing chips faster and farther, and allowing you to fill your truck quickly.

The Morbark Beever M12R is part of a full line of heavy-duty industrial tree and brush chippers from the leader in the industry. Learn more about our machines and our extensive product support network at www.morbark.com.

.PSF$IJQT-FTT8PSL

SEE THE FULL LINE AT

WWW.MORBARK.COM

MODELS

AVAILABLE9

according to the court’s findings, the

county raised different reasons for the

company’s not being successful: issues

of responsibility, problems with the plan

for transitioning from the incumbent

contractor, and concerns about the

method of conducting background

checks. The justices found that the award

decision was arbitrary and capricious.

On the other hand, a New Jersey

case illustrates the common deference

given to procurement professionals’

decisions to cancel solicitations. [A&A

Industrial Piping, Inc. v. County of Passaic,

A-4902-10T4 (New Jersey Supreme

Court, 2012)] In A&A, bids had been

received for upgrades to the heating,

ventilation, air conditioning, and fire

protection systems for the county jail.

A&A protested the intended award to the

low bidder on various grounds, including

the fact that the apparent awardee

was not prequalified by the county to

perform structural steel or HVAC work.

The county realized it inadvertently

had omitted prequalification of

contractors in the solicitation terms

and conditions. The county cancelled

the solicitation. A&A sued.

The court sustained the county’s

decision, agreeing with the trial court

judge that the county did not abuse its

discretion in determining that it needed

to rebid the project to ensure that only

prequalified contractors worked on the

project. The court reasoned that the

county’s cancellation and re-solicitation

decision put potential bidders on an

equal footing – ensuring that they

had a common understanding of the

qualification requirements. “[T]here

can be no judicial declaration of

invalidity in the absence of clear abuse

of discretion,” the court concluded.

PUTTING THE BEST FACE ON

PROCUREMENT DECISIONS

Judges do not want to second-guess

procurement decisions. Still, they have

a responsibility – like procurement

professionals – to safeguard equity

and integrity in the process.

In the bid protest context, courts

generally defer to procurement

decisions if they are not arbitrary and

capricious. “Arbitrary” and “capricious”

are terms that suggest there was no

considered judgment: decisions were

made on a whim without analysis,

reasoning or application of standards.

Remember that local laws,

ordinances, or policies may have

specific requirements, but here

are approaches that help courts

understand how discretion was properly

exercised in a contract award:

Document key decisions. If your

Page 51: GovPro - June/July 2012

www.govpro.com • GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT | 49

statutes or ordinances refer to “findings”

or “determinations,” courts look for

memoranda that document key decisions.

Even if laws do not require written

determinations, the procurement file

should “tell the story.” Remember that

the first impression of disappointed

bidders, their counsel, and courts is

gained from the procurement file. Include

brief memoranda that recite the rule and

explain the rationale for key decisions like

rejection of bids that are not responsive,

correction of bid mistakes, waivers of

minor irregularities, and determinations

that bidders are not responsible.

Brief evaluation members about the

importance of following the process

and the fact that their evaluation

comments will be subject to review by

disappointed bidders (in many if not

most states). Better yet, on complex

requests for proposal (RFP) projects,

use an evaluation plan that clearly aligns

with the RFP’s evaluation language.

Be on the lookout for evaluation

comments or documents that do

not make sense. For example, wide

variations in past experience evaluations

from poor to outstanding can be a

red flag during a company’s review of

the procurement file. An evaluator’s

strike-out, change, and “reconsidered

after discussion” comment helps show

considered judgment. Numerical scores

(if used) don’t have to be identical –

evaluators can disagree about application

of criteria – but unexplained, unexpected

variations can raise questions. Make

sure that evaluators talk about wide

initial evaluation disparities and that the

procurement file shows that they did.

Use a succinct evaluation

memorandum that tracks the RFP

language and summarizes the strengths

of the winning offer. Highlight why

the winning proposal won using RFP

evaluation factors as the guide. If an

offer wasn’t as strong in one area, say

so. It shows a balanced evaluation.

(Said another way, don’t just let the

spreadsheet – if you use numerical

ratings -- speak for itself entirely.

People decide. Spreadsheets don’t!)

&T ,BS-OMENT2ATING,B-AXIMUM#APACITY

,)&4-//2%S4RUCK-OUNTED#RANE,)&4-//2%S

4RUCK-OUNTED#RANE&T ,BS-OMENT2ATING,B-AXIMUM#APACITY

s&T0OWER%XTENSIONs#ONTINUOUS2OTATIONs(EX"OOMs7IRELESS2EMOTE#ONTROLs(IGH3PEED0LANETARY'EAR7INCHs!LLSTANDARDFEATURESOFTHISNEWCRANE

,IFTMOOREMANUFACTURESELECTRICANDHYDRAULICCRANESWITHCAPACITIESTO,BS

(OUSTON4EXASs &!8 WWWLIFTMOORECOM

,)&4-//2%).#,)&4-//2%).#

Be prepared for RFP post-award

debriefings and have one person lead

the discussion. We owe industry (who

often spends a lot of money and time

developing proposals) an explanation

about how they can improve proposals.

Some states (and the federal government)

require debriefings by law under certain

circumstances. An inconsistency between

a debriefing and the procurement file puts

a chink in the armor of court deference

to procurement professional discretion.

FILES SHOULD DESERVE DEFERENCE

Your state laws will vary, but in

my experience the court decisions

in this article illustrate common

themes nationally. If your experience

differs significantly, talk with

your counsel about why.

NIGP has given you the tools

to tell a compelling procurement

story in your procurement file that

should convince a court not to put

you in a “legalistic straightjacket.”

At NIGP Forum this year, think

and talk about the special role that

procurement professionals play

in fostering an equitable, effective

and efficient public procurement

system. Do the decisions in your

procurement files deserve the deference

that courts often give them?

RICHARD PENNINGTON,

CPPO, C.P.M., J.D., LL.M. is an NIGP

Individual Member and NIGP Instructor.

He served as an assistant attorney

general (procurement and contract

law and litigation) and State Purchasing

Director for the State of Colorado.

He retired from the practice of

public procurement law in 2010.

Page 52: GovPro - June/July 2012

50 | JUNE/JULY 2012

EXHIBITORS SHOWCASE

BOOTH: USC3

Company Address:

39209 West Six Mile

Road, Suite 250

Livonia, Michigan 48152

www.acrocorp.com/uscommunities

Contact: Kent Stastny,

Director, MSP Solutions

[email protected]

734-632-4276 – direct phone

Founded in 1982, Acro Service

Corporation is a leading global

provider of a complete range of

staffi ng, technology and consulting

solutions for all labor categories,

including IT, engineering, light

industrial, clerical, professional

and administration. Additionally,

we have a dedicated team

supporting the unique needs of

local, state, and federal government

agencies. Acro is a pioneer in

the creation and use of offshore

software development centers

and has 33 offi ces worldwide.

Acro has a proven and

industry leading Managed Service

Provider (MSP) solution that

enables our clients to streamline

and optimize their contingent

workforce related processes and

cost (spend). Acro’s state-of-the-

art VMS system, XRMSM System

automates the total life cycle of

contingent workforce utilization

(procurement-to-pay or P2P cycle)

through a hosted web-based

service that is customized for each

client’s unique requirements.

BOOTH: USC6

Company Address:

1 Applied Plaza

Cleveland, OH 44115

1-877-279-2799

Applied Industrial Technologies

understands that in these tough,

economic times, you’re responsible

for cutting costs. We can help you

lower your cost of procurement

and make ordering maintenance

products easy through our

value-added services, technical

expertise, multiple ordering

methods, and partnership with

the U.S. Communities cooperative

(contract #11019). Learn how

Applied® can help you stretch

your budget dollar at www.

applied.com/uscommunities.

BOOTH: 24

Company Address:

34 N. Meramec Avenue

St. Louis, MO 63105

www.graybar.com

Contact:

[email protected]

With decades of experience

in supply chain management

and more than 240 stocking

locations throughout North

America, Graybar has a long track

record of helping our customers

improve their bottom-line results.

You can count on Graybar for

quality products, reliable service

and innovative solutions. We

earn our customers’ trust every

day by demonstrating integrity

and delivering real value. As

an employee-owned company,

our people have a stake in

our long-term success—and

yours. Find out how Graybar

can work to your advantage.

ACRO SERVICE

CORPORATION

APPLIED INDUSTRIAL

TECHNOLOGIESGRAYBAR

Page 53: GovPro - June/July 2012

www.govpro.com • GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT | 51

BOOTH: USC19

Company address:

One Haworth Center

Holland, MI 49423-9576

Contact:

www.haworth.com

www.organicworkspaces.com

www.haworthcollection.com

@haworthinc

www.facebook.com/haworthinc

Haworth is a global leader in

the design and manufacture

of offi ce furniture and organic

workspaces, including raised access

fl oors, moveable walls, systems

furniture, seating, storage and

wood casegoods. Family-owned,

Haworth is headquartered in

Michigan and serves markets

in more than 120 countries.

BOOTH: USC38

Contact:

www.hdsupplysolutions.com/usc

1-877-610-6912

[email protected]

At HD Supply Facilities

Maintenance, our government

support team will help you

reduce procurement lead

times, lower administrative

costs, and take advantage of

our competitively awarded U.S.

Communities contract. Offering

government agencies access to

free, next-day delivery on over

22,000 quality maintenance

and repair products, and robust

e-procurement capabilities we can

help save you time and money.

BOOTH: N/A

Company address:

MasterCard Worldwide

2000 Purchase Street

Purchase, NY 10577

MasterCard Worldwide, a

leading global payments solutions

company, is a driving force at the

heart of commerce—enabling

global transactions and bringing

insights into the payments

process to make commerce

faster, more secure, and more

valuable to everyone involved.

HAWORTH HD SUPPLYMASTERCARD

WORLDWIDE

Page 54: GovPro - June/July 2012

52 | JUNE/JULY 201220JUNE/J 1252 | J JULY 252 | JUNE/JULY 2012JUNE/JUL

BOOTH: 521

Company Address:

211 East 7th Street

Suite 1100

Austin, TX 78701

877-472-9062

www.periscopeholdings.com

Contact:

Ken McFarland

VP Sales & Marketing

512-666-9387

[email protected]

Periscope Holdings, Inc. is a

leading provider of public sector

procurement solutions, serving

customers nationwide. We work

to eradicate waste and bring

value to every dollar spent by our

clients. Our solutions streamline

processes, increase effi ciency,

decrease expenditures and

create transparency. Periscope

offers BuySpeed™ an enterprise

eProcurement software suite,

rated #1 for public sector use by

Gartner; it’s designed to manage

vendors, requisitions, solicitations,

purchase orders, contracts and

inventory. We also serve as the

sole custodian of the NIGP

Commodity/Services Code and

offer consultative services.

BOOTH: 732

Company address:

11280 West Rd.

Houston, Texas 77065

As a trusted national governmental

purchasing cooperative, TCPN

provides access to one of the

largest pools of purchasing

potential…saving time, cost and

compliance worries for educational

and governmental entities. Our

wide range of vendors offers large

and small entities the same best

value pricing as the largest buyers–

even from national vendors!

BOOTH: USC39

Company Address:

9711 Washingtonian Blvd., Ste 100

Gaithersburg, MD 20878

www.uscommunities.org

Contact:

Chris Robb

(571) 243-1651

(925) 933-8457 Fax

U.S. Communities cooperative

purchasing program is the

gold standard when it comes

to honest and effective public

procurement. For more than

15 years, U.S. Communities has

been committed to serving and

protecting a participating public

agency’s ethical, legal, and fi nancial

interest at all times. The program

delivers comprehensive business

solutions that help agencies

maximize cost control and

improve operational effi ciencies

and performance. To learn

more about U.S. Communities

visit www.uscommunities.org.

PERISCOPE

HOLDINGS, INC

TCPN (The Cooperative

Purchasing Network)U.S. COMMUNITIES

EXHIBITORS SHOWCASE

®

Page 55: GovPro - June/July 2012

!#*"&* &"*)$* )&'*'&'*)$* )$'*&#)$ !"&)#

Page 56: GovPro - June/July 2012

54 | JUNE/JULY 2012

RESOURCES [calendar of events]

Face-2-Face Courses

SEPT.

Contract Administration

Date: Sept. 24 – 26Location: Austin, TexasInstructor: Kirk Buffington, CPPO, C.P.M, MBAHosted by: Texas Association of Public Purchasers Chapter of NIGP

Contract Administration

Date: Sept. 25 – 27Location: Overland Park, Kan.Instructor: David Nash, CPPO, CPPBHosted by: Mid-America Council of Public Purchasing Chapter of NIGP

Contract Administration

Date: Sept. 26 -28Location: Centennial, Colo.Instructor: Joyce Foster, CPPO, CPPBHosted by: Rocky Mountain Governmental Purchasing Association Chapter of NIGP

Contract Administration

Date: Sept. 26 -28Location: Fairfax, Va.Instructor: Sally Barkley, CPPO, C.P.M., MBAHosted by: Virginia Association of Governmental Purchasing, Inc. Chapter of NIGP

Contracting for

Construction Services

Date: Sept. 13 -14Location: McKinney, TexasInstructor: Kenneth Hayslette, CPPO, C.P.M., CPCMHosted by: Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex Chapter of NIGP

CPPB Prep

Date: Sept. 13 – 14Location: Wilsonville, Ore.Instructor: Robin Rickard, CPPO, OPBCHosted by: Oregon Public Purchasing Association, Inc. Chapter of NIGP

CPPB Prep

Date: Sept. 27-28Location: Miami, Fla.Instructor: Sharon Lewis, CPPB, C.P.M., VCOHosted by: Greater Miami Chapter of NIGP, Inc.

CPPO Prep

Date: Sept. 17 – 18Location: Jackson, Miss.Instructor: Jennie Readey, CPPO, CPPBHosted by: Mississippi

Association of Governmental Purchasing and Property Agents Chapter of NIGP

CPPO Prep

Date: Sept. 20-21Location: Tallmadge, OhioInstructor: Kirk Buffington, CPPO, C.P.M., MBAHosted by: Central Ohio Organization of Public Purchasers Chapter of NIGP

CPPO Prep

Date: Sept. 26-27Location: Thunder Bay, Ont.Instructor: Jennie Readey, CPPO, CPPBHosted by: Ontario Public Buyers Association, Inc. Chapter of NIGP

Developing and

Managing RFPs

Date: Sept. 19-21Location: Richmond, Va.Instructor: Ronald King, CPPO, CPPB, VCOHosted by: Virginia Association of Governmental Purchasing, Inc. Chapter of NIGP

Effective Contract

Writing

Date: Sept. 26 -27Location: Victoria, B.C.Instructor: Michael Kolodisner, CPPOHosted by: Cascadia Chapter of NIGP

Introduction to Public

Procurement

Date: Sept. 11-13Location: Des Moines, IowaInstructor: Bill Davison, CPPOHosted by: Iowa Public Procurement Association, Inc. Chapter of NIGP

Introduction to Public

Procurement

Date: Sept. 12 - 14Location: Frankfort, Ky.Instructor: Peter Rigterink, CPPO, CPPB, VCOHosted by: Kentucky Public Procurement Association

Managing Your End

Users and Suppliers

Date: Sept. 27Location: Thunder Bay, Ont.Instructor: Michael Bevis, CPPO, JD, CPSM, C.P.M., PMPHosted by: Ontario Public Buyers Association Seminar Site

Protests and Disputes:

What’s a Buyer To Do?

Date: Sept. 26

Location: Thunder Bay, Ont.Instructor: Michael Bevis, CPPO, JD, CPSM, C.P.M., PMPHosted by: Ontario Public Buyers Association Seminar Site

Risk Management in

Public Contracting

Date: Sept. 26 – 27Location: Albuquerque, N.M.Instructor: Kenneth Hayslette, CPPO, C.P.M., CPCMHosted by: New Mexico Public Procurement Association Chapter of NIGP

Strategic Procurement

Planning

Date: Sept. 5 -7Location: Columbus, OhioInstructor: Barbara Johnson, CPPO, CPPBHosted by: Central Ohio Organization of Public Purchasers Chapter of NIGP

Strategic Procurement

Planning

Date: Sept. 5 – 7Location: Norristown, Pa.Instructor: Edmund Grant, CPPO, CPPB, RPPOHosted by: Pennsylvania Public Purchasing Association Chapter of NIGP

World Class

Procurement Practices

Date: Sept. 14Location: Norman, Okla.Instructor: Darin Matthews, CPPO, C.P.M.Hosted by: Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement, Inc. Chapter of NIGP

OCT.

Adding Value to the

Procurement Process

Date: Oct. 3Location: Baton Rouge, La.Instructor: Darin MatthewsHosted by: Louisiana Chapter of NIGP

Change Management

for the Procurement

Professional

Date: Oct. 17-18Location: Midwest City, Okla.Instructor: Leslie Vallie, CPPOHosted by: Oklahoma Association of Public Procurement, Inc. Chapter of NIGP

Contract Administration

Date: Oct. 1 – 3Location: Edmonton, AlbertaInstructor: Ken Babich, BCom, CPPOHosted by: Canada West Chapter of NIGP

Contract Administration

Date: Oct. 15-17Location: City of Brantford, Ont.Instructor: Stan Gal, CPPO, CPPBHosted by: Ontario Public Buyers Association, Inc. Chapter of NIGP

Contracting for

Construction Services

Date: Oct. 2-3Location: Chesterfield, Va.Instructor: Edward Pabor, CPPO, CDT, C.P.M.Hosted by: Virginia Association of Governmental Purchasing, Inc. Chapter of NIGP

Contracting for Public

Sector Services

Date: Oct. 10 – 11Location: Austin, TexasInstructor: David Nash, CPPO, CPPBHosted by: Texas Association of Public Purchasers Chapter of NIGP

CPPB Prep

Date: Oct. 15-16Location: Norristown, Pa.Instructor: Lynda Allair, CPPOHosted by: Pennsylvania Public Purchasing Association Chapter of NIGP

Legal Aspects of

Public Procurement

Date: Oct. 24-26Location: Columbia, S.C.Instructor: James Davis, CPPO, MBAHosted by: South Carolina Association of Governmental Purchasing Officials Chapter of NIGP

Managing Your End-

Users and Suppliers

Date: Oct. 17Location: Des Moines, IowaInstructor: Darin Matthews, CPPO, C.P.M.Hosted by: Iowa Public Procurement Association, Inc. Chapter of NIGP

Marketing 101 For The

Procurement Professional

Date: Oct. 5Location: Tampa, Fla.Instructor: Paul Brennan, CPPOHosted by: Tampa Bay Area Chapter of NIGP

Page 57: GovPro - June/July 2012

www.govpro.com • GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT | 55

ADVERTISER INDEX

ADVERTISER ........................................................ PAGE

ACRO SERVICE CORPORATION ............................................38

APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES ..............................33

CARQUEST .....................................................................................34

CERTAINTEED GYPSUM, INC. ..................................................17

ELECTRALED, INC. .......................................................................16

E-Z-GO .............................................................................................19

FABENCO, INC. ..............................................................................8

FORD MOTOR COMPANY .......................................................11

GAMETIME ......................................................................................36

GRAINGER ........................................................................................3

GRAYBAR ........................................................................................37

GTSI CORP. .....................................................................................35

HAWORTH INCORPORATED ................................................32

HD SUPPLY FACILITIES MAINTENANCE ..............................38

HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL CORPORATION ................39

IMAGING SUPPLIES COALITION ..............................................5

INDEPENDENT STATIONERS, INC. ........................................35

INTIRION-MICROFRIDGE ...................................................... IBC

JOHN DEERE ................................................................................IFC

KNOLL, INC. ...................................................................................36

LIFTMOORE INC. ..........................................................................49

MASTERCARD INTERNATIONAL ........................................6, 7

MORBARK INC .............................................................................48

NATIONAL JOINT POWERS ASSOCIATION.......................15

PERISCOPE HOLDINGS..............................................................27

PREMIER INC. .................................................................................34

PUBLIC SOURCING SOLUTIONS ...........................................46

SAFEWARE-MALLORY ...............................................................35

SERVICEWEAR APPAREL ...........................................................31

SIEMENS ......................................................................................... BC

STAPLES ADVANTAGE .................................................................43

TCPN ................................................................................................12

THE GARLAND COMPANY, INC. ............................................34

THE HOME DEPOT ......................................................................40

TORO COMPANY .......................................................................13

U.S. COMMUNITIES......................................................... 28-29, 30

U.S. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION .......................9

ZEP, INC ...........................................................................................36

Protests and Disputes:

What’s a Buyer To Do?

Date: Oct. 12Location: Austin, TexasInstructor: David Nash, CPPO, CPPBHosted by: Texas Association of Public Purchasers Chapter of NIGP

Strategic Procurement

Planning

Date: Oct. 17 -19Location: McKinney, TexasInstructor: Edmund Grant, CPPO, CPPB, RPPOHosted by: Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex Chapter of NIGP

Online Courses

Developing and

Managing RFPs

Date: Sept. 4 – Nov. 6Registration Deadline: Aug. 28

Contracting for Public

Sector Services

Date: Sept. 12 – Oct. 31Registration Deadline: Sept. 5

Contract Administration

Date: Sept. 20 – Nov. 22Registration Deadline: Sept. 13

that, yet they failed to provide any concrete insight into how

procurement professionals can get the best possible design-

build project by setting the groundwork for the kind of truly

integrated project that satisfies owner and stakeholder needs.

For example, DBIA has long espoused the view that the

predominant factor in the selection of a design-builder should

be the qualifications of the design-build team. Owners who

choose their design-builders based largely on qualifications

reap substantial benefits – such as increased teamwork,

proactive behavior, and collaboration – that contribute to

project success. These benefits are well-understood by federal

and state agencies. For decades federal and state agencies

have selected their design professionals through qualifications

under the Brooks Act and “mini” Brooks Acts, and have

developed shortlists based on the qualifications of design-

builders proposing under a best value procurement process.

In instances where qualifications-based selection (QBS) is not

viable, DBIA advises using a two-step design-build for projects

that are large or technically complex. The two-step process

relies on an RFQ phase to select the three most qualified

teams to submit proposals. The corresponding RFP should

thoroughly outline project requirements via performance

specifications, establish the criteria for award, and determine

the winning team through a best value selection process.

DBIA educates both owner agencies and their procurement

staffs on how to maximize design-build project delivery

through a synergistic, three-pronged approach that includes:

> Performance requirement that clearly articulate

owners’ needs while providing flexibility,

opportunities for creativity and accountability;

> Source selection processes that ensure

the right team gets the job; and

> Rewards for high performance through aspirational

contracts with awards and incentives.

Yes, it is a different approach that even seasoned procurement

officials may initially feel challenged by. However, these

are the best practices that have been used to successfully

procure numerous and highly complex public projects

including the recently completed renovation of the Pentagon

and the Department of Energy’s much heralded net-zero

National Renewable Resources Laboratory in Golden,

Colo. I have attended numerous Owners-Only Forums at

DBIA’s conferences in which procurement officials have

testified to the success of DBIA best practices even as they

acknowledge that a “mental shift” away from the traditional

design-bid-build mindset is required by all parties involved.

These professionals, from agencies large and small, and

representing federal, state, and local governments, were

excited by design-build not only because it is a cost-effective

means of delivering value to the public but also because

design-build represents an opportunity for engagement

and professional satisfaction beyond business as usual.

— Susan Hines, Managing Director Public

Relations and Information, Design-Build

Institute of America, Washington, D.C.

Continued from page 4

Page 58: GovPro - June/July 2012

56 | JUNE/JULY 2012

BACK PAGES [fred marks]

FREDERICK MARKS, CPPO, VCO, is a retired purchasing officer who has held positions as a supervising buyer for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey as well as director of material management for Northern Virginia Community College. Contact Marks at [email protected].

here have been volumes written about professionalism but I would like to explore

the responsibility we take on with our professionalism. Purchasing is not for the

faint of heart; it’s a control position in management with awesome responsibilities, tough

decisions and challenges. It’s for the “look them in the eye” and “stand by your decision”

personality. The weak and wimpy are looked down upon and rarely last long.

Responsibility is knowing the importance of being forthright when confronting a

difficult situation, of not sending an e-mail or a note (or worse yet, having someone else

do it for you), when a phone call or personal visit will solve the problem. It’s not using

position power and undue influence to further a personal agenda. There can be no ego in

what we do! It’s explaining your decisions and not using others to fight your battles.

The monies we collect for our organizations come largely from public funding. We have a

responsibility to treat them as public, even though they may be considered private funds. It

is appropriate and professional for those responsible for expenditures to have a public money

mindset when approving expenditures and contractual agreements. It’s unprofessional and

irregular to use an organization’s money for expenses that exceed the limits of most public

agencies’ protocols. If you are unclear about a situation, use the gold standard of asking yourself

“what would my membership think and how would they react if they knew what I was doing?”

It’s unspoken, and perhaps uncomfortable to discuss, but there is a personal

element of respect and civilized behavior toward each other, both interpersonally

and professionally, that we need to maintain and constantly reinforce.

We have a responsibility to pass the spirit of involvement and volunteerism along to those who come

after us. We have a responsibility to share our moral and ethical capital with our organizations. As

public servants we are taught from the first day to do more for our profession.

The sharing of information and advice among purchasing professionals

sets us apart. Phone calls and e-mails about professional subjects are always

returned with the best and most candid advice the sender can offer.

There is a dual responsibility when we elect those who represent

us on the governing boards of our organizations. Our responsibility

is to elect the very best we have, those with whom we entrust our

destiny. We ask these elected board members to look into the future

and determine where we go as a profession in the next years, and they

have a responsibility to work, think, research, discuss and lead us.

In every chapter and in our national organizations there is a core group of

people who work without credit or ego; without compensation, often paying

to attend classes and conferences out of their own pockets, but with a devotion

to the profession and a desire to help. They are the ones that get up early and

stay late at events. They hand out programs, collect tickets, do the heavy lifting

and are the most reliable of our group. And they recognize the value of what

they do for the profession. They take it as a responsibility. Next time you see one of these special

people at an event that is seamless, make sure you thank them. And if you have never been one of

them, now is the time to start. It’s rewarding for its own sake. Just knowing that you are contributing

is a high form of professionalism. It’s the first step in the ladder of leadership. Poll your board

members and you will find most started as that person on a committee who did the grunt work.

Thank your leaders … and be one

T

Page 59: GovPro - June/July 2012

/ŶƟƌŝŽŶŽƌƉŽƌĂƟŽŶϮŶŶĞƩĞZŽĂĚ^ƵŝƚĞϯ&ŽdžďŽƌŽDϬϮϬϯϱ;ဒϬϬϲϯϳϳϱϲϳǁǁǁŵŝĐƌŽĨƌŝĚŐĞĐŽŵ$ŐŽƉƌŽDŝĐƌŽ&ƌŝĚŐĞΠĂŶĚ^ĂĨĞWůƵŐΠĂƌĞƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚƚƌĂĚĞŵĂƌŬƐŽĨ/ŶƟƌŝŽŶŽƌƉŽƌĂƟŽŶΞ/ŶƟƌŝŽŶŽƌƉŽƌĂƟŽŶϮϬϭϮ

ŝŶŽŶĞĐŽŶǀĞŶŝĞŶƚĂƉƉůŝĂŶĐĞDŝĐƌŽ&ƌŝĚŐĞΠǁŝƚŚ

^ĂĨĞWůƵŐΠ allows you to chill and heat your food

ĂŶĚĐŚĂƌŐĞLJŽƵƌĞǀĞƌLJĚĂLJĞůĞĐƚƌŽŶŝĐƐƐƵĐŚĂƐĐĞůů

ƉŚŽŶĞƐůĂƉƚŽƉƐDWϯƉůĂLJĞƌƐĂŶĚĚŝŐŝƚĂůĐĂŵĞƌĂƐ

dŚĞŵŽƐƚƉŽƉƵůĂƌĐŽŵďŝŶĂƟŽŶĂƉƉůŝĂŶĐĞŝŶ

ŵĞƌŝĐĂŽīĞƌƐƚŚĞƐĂĨĞƚLJĂŶĚĞŶĞƌŐLJĐŽŶƐĞƌǀĂƟŽŶ

ďĞŶĞĮƚƐǁŝƚŚ^ĂĨĞWůƵŐΠƚĞĐŚŶŽůŽŐLJ

dŚŝƐŝƐŶŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƌLJƌĞĨƌŝŐĞƌĂƚŽƌDŝĐƌŽ&ƌŝĚŐĞΠǁŝƚŚ

^ĂĨĞWůƵŐΠƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐ,

(10-Year WarrantyKƵƌŽŶ)ƐŝƚĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞŽŶůLJĂĚĚƐ

ƚŽǁŚĂƚŝƐďLJĨĂƌĂŶŝŶĚƵƐƚƌLJďĞƐƚǁĂƌƌĂŶƚLJ

(Safe Plug® Technology: ƉĂƚĞŶƚ)ƉĞŶĚŝŶŐƉŽǁĞƌ

ŵĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚƐLJƐƚĞŵƚŚĂƚĐŽŶƐĞƌǀĞƐĞŶĞƌŐLJĂŶĚ

ƉƌĞǀĞŶƚƐĐŝƌĐƵŝƚŽǀĞƌůŽĂĚƐ

( ƵĂůŚĂƌŐŝŶŐ^ƚĂƟŽŶMakes it easy and

ĐŽŶǀĞŶŝĞŶƚƚŽĐŚĂƌŐĞƉĞƌƐŽŶĂůĞůĞĐƚƌŽŶŝĐĚĞǀŝĐĞƐ

( ŶĞƌŐLJĸĐŝĞŶƚŽŶƐĞƌǀĞĞŶĞƌŐLJƐĂǀĞƵƟůŝƟĞƐ

ĂŶĚƉƌŽƚĞĐƚƚŚĞĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚ

The Comforts of Home

Page 60: GovPro - June/July 2012

Answers for infrastructure.

www.usa.siemens.com

Saving energy shouldn’t

mean depleting capital.Let Siemens fund your facility improvements with energy savings.

Aging equipment, sustainability goals and rising

operational costs can add to the pressure to make

energy upgrades. And finding capital to fund the

improvements can be almost impossible. How

can you finance upgrades without capital funds?

Siemens can help you do more with less. With

Siemens performance-based contracts, improvements

are funded by the very energy savings they produce.

This means you can immediately start state-of-the-art

equipment upgrades. Our professionals build custom

solutions to help you lower your operating expenses and

reach sustainability goals. Plus, Siemens guarantees 0%

capital expense to you. If energy-saving goals are not

met, Siemens pays the difference. And 100% of excess

savings are yours to keep. Contact us today and start

making energy efficiency work for you.