GOVERNMENT OF RAJASTHAN RURAL DEVELOPMENT & …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed-development-and-soil-conservation...1 CHAPTER – 1 INTRODUCTION Jalore 17 (IWMP)

GOVERNMENT OF RAJASTHAN RURAL DEVELOPMENT & PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPARTMENT

(WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT & SOIL CONSERVATION)

NAME OF PROJECT: DETAILED PROJECT REPORT OF (IWMP) 17/11-12 (UNDER INTEGRATED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME)

TOTAL GEOGRAPHICAL AREA : 10086.47 Hac. EFFECTIVE AREA OF PROJECT : 8854 Hac. COST OF PROJECT : 1328.10 Lacs. COST /HA : 15,000/ Hac. BLOCK: BHINMAL DISTRICT: JALORE

SUBMITTED BY- Executive Engineer, DWDU, Jalore PIA:-

Rajasthan Bal Kalyan Samiti - RBKS SIndhari Cercle Bagoda, Jalore (Raj.)

www.rbks.org Email. [email protected]

http://www.rbks.org/

mailto:[email protected]

CERTIFICATE

Certified that the undersigned have proposed the appropriate and need based activities

required in the watershed project area with active participation of beneficiaries along with

consultation of Watershed Committees (WCs). Approval of watershed project plan and DPR has

been obtained from WC, Gram Sabha. The plan and DPR document of IWMP 11-12/Jaloe-17

project, at P.S. Bhinmal District Jalore is technically sound, viable and appropriate for

implementation during the period 2013-14 to 2016-17.

We recommend that this plan be sanctioned and put to implementation.

Signature Signature Signature Signature Signature Signature

Chairman/ Secretary

WC

WDT members Engineer

RBKS, P.S.

Bhinmal

PIA-RBKS

P.S. - Bhinmal

Project

Manager,WCDC

Distt. Jalore

1

2

3

4

Project at a Glance

Name of Project: IWMP/11-12/Jalore-17

Sanction No. & date of Project: 2011-12

Macro & Micro Nos: Cluster Bagoda

Deviation from Project Sanctioned: No

Items As per Project Sanctioned As proposed in DPR

Project Area 8854.00 8854.00

Macro/Micro No NA NA

Name of Gram Panchayats 1. Bagoda

2. Jaisawas

3. Khokha

1. Bagoda

2. Jaisawas

3. Khokha

Name of Villages 1. Bagoda

2. Jaisawas

a. Koridhavecha

b. Kuradhavecha

3. Khokha

1. Bagoda

2. Jaisawas

a. Koridhavecha

b. Kuradhavecha

3. Khokha

Project Cost (Rs in Lakhs) 1328.10 Lakh 1328.10 Lakh

Table of Contents 1 CHAPTER – 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 7

1.1 Location ............................................................................................................................................... 7

1.2 General features of watershed............................................................................................................ 7

1.3 Climatic and Hydrological information ................................................................................................ 9

1.4 Other Development Schemes in the project area ............................................................................. 13

1.5 Details of infrastructure in the project .............................................................................................. 13

1.6 Institutional arrangements (SLNA, DWDU, PIA, WDT, WC, Secretary............................................... 14

1.6.1 WCDC Details ............................................................................................................................. 14

1.6.2 PIA particulars ............................................................................................................................ 14

1.6.3 WDT Particulars: ........................................................................................................................ 15

1.6.4 Details of Watershed Committees (WC) ................................................................................... 15

1.7 Base Line Survey Format for IWMP MIS website .............................................................................. 16

1.8 Methodology of the process ............................................................................................................. 16

1.9 Problems and scope of improvement in the project area ................................................................ 17

2 CHAPTER- II - SOCIO-ECONOMIC FEATURES, PROBLEMS AND SCOPE ..................................................... 20

2.1 Demography Details .......................................................................................................................... 20

2.2 Development Indicators .................................................................................................................... 22

2.3 Land use ............................................................................................................................................. 23

Plain Cultivable Land in southand south-central flood plain regions ........ Error! Bookmark not defined.

Gentle Sloping Cultivable Land .................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.

Small Hillock and Stony Wasteland ........................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

2.4 Agriculture and Horticulture status and fuel availability .................................................................. 24

2.5 Horticulture/Vegetable/Floriculture status....................................................................................... 26

2.6 Land holding pattern ......................................................................................................................... 26

2.7 Livestock status with Per Capita Production ..................................................................................... 27

2.8 Fodder status ..................................................................................................................................... 28

2.9 Farm Implements .................................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.

2.10 NREGS Status ..................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

2.11 Migration details ........................................................................................................................... 29

2.12 Livelihood Details .......................................................................................................................... 30

2.13 Existing SHG ................................................................................................................................... 31

2.14 Ground Water details .................................................................................................................... 31

2.15 Drinking Water Status ................................................................................................................... 32

2.16 Water use efficiency ...................................................................................................................... 32

2.17 Slope details................................................................................................................................... 32

2.18 Water Budgeting ............................................................................................................................ 33

2.19 Soil Details ..................................................................................................................................... 35

2.20 Soil erosion status.......................................................................................................................... 36

2.21 ENERGY ANALYSIS .............................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.

3 CHAPTER –III PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN ....................................................................................... 37

4 CHAPTER – IV ACTIVITY WISE TOTAL ABSTRACT OF COST ............................ Error! Bookmark not defined.

5 CHAPTER –V ANNUAL ACTION PLAN ............................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.

6 CHAPTER – VI EXPECTED OUTCOMES ...................................................................................................... 72

OUTPUT AND RESULTS .......................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

7 CHAPTER –VII TECHNICAL DESIGNS AND ESTIMATES ............................................................................... 75

Title of the Project: Community Based Watershed Development Programme for Livelihood Improvement ....................................................................................................................................................................... 75

7.1 Overall Goal ....................................................................................................................................... 75

7.2 Specific Objectives: ............................................................................................................................ 75

7.3 ORGANISING COMMUNITY ................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

7.4 Functions of VWC .................................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.

8 IMPROVING RESOURCE SITUATION .......................................................................................................... 38

8.1 Land Development ............................................................................................................................ 39

8.1.1 UNDULATING AGRICULTURE LAND- Field Bunding ....................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

8.1.2 GENTLE SLOPE AGRICULTURE LAND .............................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.

8.2 INCREASED ORGANIC MANURE ......................................................................................................... 39

8.3 SCIENTIFIC LIVESTOCK MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................. 49

8.3.1 PROPOSED INTERVENTIONS ...................................................................................................... 49

8.3.2 Animal Health and Vaccination camps ...................................................................................... 49

8.3.3 Silvi-pasture ................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

8.4 Micro-enterprise for landless & Marginal farmers ................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.

8.4.1 Support to Goat rearing Families .............................................................................................. 40

9 Photo Galary ........................................................................................................................................... 106

List of Enclosures

8 .1 Maps

Location –District, block, village, watershed location map

Map of Project with Watershed Boundary demarcation in cadastral map

Land Use Land Cover map

Existing water bodies, DLT

PRA Map (along with photos & paper drawing)

GIS based intervention map

Treatment map ie proposed works on revenue map

8.2 Documents of Agreements:

Proceedings of gram sabha for EPA approval

Proceedings of gram sabha Resolution for committee constitution

Documents related to PRA exercise

Proceedings of gram sabha for DPR approval

Proceedings of Panchayat Samiti General body for DPR approval

Proceedings of Zila Parishad Standing Committee for DPR approval

1 CHAPTER – 1 INTRODUCTION Jalore 17 (IWMP) 11-12 Project is located in Bhinmal Block, of Jalore district. The project area is between

the latitudes 25°11'0"N to 25°22'0"N & longitudes71°58'0"E to 72°8'0" E. It is at a distance of 50 km from its

Block head quarters and 70 Kms from the district head quarters. There are 2343 houses in 5 no. of

habitations in the Project area and other details are given below. The EPA phase initated with 4% of the

approximate budget of the project. The main activities includedunder this EPA pahse included Solar light at

common places, kabristan development, and community tankas for drinking water requirememt were

developed. The following pages bring out problems and propsoed interventions under IWMP, following

principles of integration. While developing this proposal we have used various proformas developed by

IWMP for the purpose of developing understainding aobut the community.

1.1 Location It is at a distance of 50 km from its Block head quarters and 70Kms from the district head quarters. There are 2343 no. of habitations in the Project area and other details are given below.

Figure 1 Location of the Watershed

1.2 General features of watershed

S.No. Name of Project(as per GOI) Jalore IWMP 17/11-12 (a) Name of Catchment Jalore IWMP 17/11-12 (b) Name of watershed area (local name) Bagoda © Project Area 10086.47 Ha (d) Net treatable Area 8854.00 Ha

e) Cost of Project 1328.10 Lakhs f) Cost/hectare Rs. 15000.00 g) Year of Sanction 2011-12 h) Watershed Code Cluster i) No. of Gram Panchayats in project area 3 j) No. of villages in project area 5 k) Type of Project Desert

l) Elevation (metres) - m) Major streams - n) Slope range (%) 0-3%

Table 1 Village wise land details of watershed area

Macro/micro Cluster

Name of Gram Panchayat

Name of Villages Covered

Census code of villages

Area Census (2001)

Area in Watershed Ha

Cluster Bagoda Bagoda 2308400 3442.06 3355

Jaisawas Jaisawas 2308200 2044.92 1531

Koridhavecha 2307700 1664.91 1153

Kuradhavecha 2308300 1158.31 1123

Khokha Khokha 2307600 1776.27 1692

Total - Area of the Cluster 10086.47 8854

The Watershed covers total area of 10086.47 ha and effective watershed area is 8854 ha. The watershed under submission is in cluster approach and the area of watershed is 8854 ha. The village wise details is as follows-

Figure 2 Villagewise land details

Figure 3 Village and Panchayatwise Area distribution in watershed

Bagoda Jaisawas Koridhavecha Kuradhavecha Khokha

Total Area 3442.06 2044.92 1664.91 1158.31 1776.27

Area within watershed 3355.00 1531.00 1153.00 1123.00 1692.00

0.00 500.00

1000.00 1500.00 2000.00 2500.00 3000.00 3500.00 4000.00 Villagewise Total land and Watershed area

Bagoda 38%

Jaisawas

17%

Koridhavecha

13%

Kuradhavecha

13%

Khokha 19%

Villagewsie Land Percent in Watershed Bagoda

38%

Jaisawas 43%

Khokha 19%

Panchayatwsie Land Percent in Watershed

Figure 4 Watershed Map

1.3 Climatic and Hydrological information The watershed falls in Agroclimatic Zone- Arid. The soil texture is Sandy Loam. The average rainfall is

52.7cm. The temperatures in the area are in the range between 35 – 420 C during summer and 23 – 280 C

during winter. The major Kharif crops in the area are Bazra, Jeera, Esabgol, Moong, Caster Rabi crop-

Mustard. Total 5238 ha land is under cultivation 2465 land fallow, 804 land is wasteland, 346.5 land is

irrigated through well. 52% land is under cultivation 25 % land fallow, 8 % land is wasteland, 13% Panchayat

and Pastureland, while 3% land is irrigated through tube wells.

Figure 5 Land Use pattern in Watershed

Cultivated Rainfed

49%

Fallow 25%

Cultivated irrigated

3%

Others 2%

Panchayat & Pasture land

13%

Waste land 8%

Land use pattern in watershed

Figure 6 Land use in hectares

No of households are BPL ( 41.57 % households) 557 are landless households(23.77% households) and 1695

household are small and marginal farmers(72.34% household) .Average land holding in the area is 0.33 ha.

The main source of irrigation is borewells. The average annual rainfall (5 years) in the area is 508.6 mm.

Major streams in the Watershed is Sukari River. The major festivals in the village are Deepavali, Eid & Holi.

At present these villages is having 15538 populations with Communities like Rajput, Muslims, Prajapat,

Meghwal and Others. The area receives annual precipitation from the Southwest monsoon. The rainy

season normally starts in the 2nd week of July and overs in end of August.

Table 2Climatic and Hydrological information Bhinmal Station-No. 108 source GoR ( www.waterresources.rajasthan.gov.in)

1 Average Annual Rainfall(mm) rainfall

Year Average monthly Rainfall(mm) Average Annual

Day wise highest rainfall

June July Aug Sep

1 2011 0 236 300 220 756mm 156mm-12 sep

2 2010 4 347 166 88 733mm 159mm- 26 july

3 2009 26 126 19 0 216mm 53.mm- 18 July-12 july

4 2008 18 178 71 70 383mm 111mm -12July

5 2007 21 204 115 87 455mm 84mm-10 July

6 2006 51 131 645 204 1031mm 128mm 20 Aug

7 2005 20 171 104 160.4 484.4mm 90.2 mm-July 28

8 2004 62 13 141 56 355mm 63mm –Aug 1

9 2003 114.6 444.4 100 2 717.4 mm 91mmJune19

10 2002 92 7 6.2 36.2 141.6mm 32 mm July 26

2 Average Monthly rainfall (last ten years) Bhinmal

Month Rainfall(mm)

i) June 40.86

ii) July 185.7

iii) August 166.72

iv) September 92.3

3 Duration Maximum rainfall intensity (mm) Bhinmal rainfall intensity(mm)

i) 15 minute duration No Data Available

ii) 30 minute duration No Data Available

iii) 60 minute duration No Data Available

Cultivated Rainfed

Fallow Cultivated irrigated

Others Panchayat & Pasture land

Waste land

Area 4891.5 2465.5 346.5 229.34 1349.62 804

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000 Land use pattern in watershed

4 Temperature (Degree C) Bhinmal

Season Max Min

i) Summer Season 42 35

ii) Winter Season 28 23

iii) Rainy Season 35 32

5 Potential Evaporation Transpiration (PET) (mm/day) Bhinmal

Season PET

i) Summer 1.17

ii) Winter 0.53

iii) Rainy 0.31

6 Runoff

i) Peak Rate (cum/hr)

ii) Total run off volume of rainy season (ha.m.) 403mm/yr

iii) Time of return of maximum flood 5 years 10 years In-Year

iv)Periodicity of Drought in village area 2007-09 1998-03

The minimum rainfall is 141.6 mm recorded in year 2002 and maximum rainfall is 1031 mm year 2006. Around 95 % of the annual rainfall in the area occurs during the average rainy days i.e. 18-20 days. The area experiences temperature extremeties as maximum temperature rises upto 48.6 0C (May – June) minimum temperature drops down to 1.6 degree (January). On the whole area experiences a dry hot climate reaching the hyper Semi- Arid conditions. Hot wind blows through out the year especially during summer months namely April-May and June.

Figure 7 Rainfall distributions in Monsoon Months Figure-8 indicates a rising trend in precipitation in the watershed area, while figure -7 indicates that in the

watershed area monsoon months normally peak precipitation occurs in July and August months only. 2002

was the driest year for the area when total precipitation was 141.4 mm only, while wettest month in last ten

years was 2006 with 1031 mm rainfall which was almost 729 % of the driest year precipitation. Ten Year

average presents a precicipation of 485.68 mm. One finds that 10 years analysis indicates one year as

excessive rain, three years excess rain, three years low but average rains and three years as deficit rainfall

years.

June July Aug Sep

2011 0 236 300 220

2010 4 347 166 88

2009 26 126 19 0

2008 18 178 71 70

2007 21 204 115 87

2006 51 131 645 204

2005 20 171 104 160.4

2004 62 13 141 56

2003 114.6 444.4 100 2

2002 92 7 6.2 36.2

Average 40.86 185.74 166.72 92.36

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Rainfall Distribution in Monsoon Months

Figure 8 Average Annual rainfall for last ten years and trend

1.4 Other Development Schemes in the project area Table 3 Other Development Schemes in the project area

Sl No.

Name of Gram Panchayat

No. Of Card Holder

Activity taken under MG NREGA Other Government Schemes

1 Bagora Excavation of Talab/ Nadi Construction of Gravel Road Construction of marginal bund and WHS

TFC, SFC, BRGF, SGSY, IAY, TSC, SDPS, Old Age Pension, State widow pension, Center Old age Pension, IGNDPS, Central Palanhar scheme

2 Jaisawas Excavation of Talab/ Nadi Construction of Gravel Road Construction of marginal bund and WHS


3 Khokha Excavation of Talab/ Nadi Construction of Gravel Road Construction of marginal bund and WHS


Details of infrastructure in the project

Parameters Status

(i) No. of villages connected to the main road by an all-weather road

4

(ii) No. of villages provided with electricity 5

(iii) No. of households without access to drinking water 1092

(iv) No. of educational institutions : Primary – 11 Middle- 3

Secondary- 1 Sr. secondary- 0

Vocational Institution- 0

Primary(P)/ Secondary(S)/ Higher Secondary(HS)/ vocational institution(VI)

(v) No. of villages with access to Primary Health Centre 1 PHC at Bagoda 7 Sub Center

(vi) No. of villages with access to Veterinary Dispensary -

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Average Annual 141.4 661 272 455.4 1031 427 337 171 605 756

Ten Year average 485.7 485.7 485.7 485.7 485.7 485.7 485.7 485.7 485.7 485.7

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200 Rainfall Distribution in Monsoon Months

(vii) No. of villages with access to Post Office 2 villages

(viii) No. of villages with access to Banks 1 village

(ix) No. of villages with access to Markets/ mandis 1 village

(x) No. of villages with access to Agro-industries -

(xi) Total quantity of surplus milk 4700 ltr.

(xii) No. of milk collection centers (U)- NIl (S)- 1 ( Saras )

(PA)- Nil (O)- Direct selling

(e.g. Union(U)/ Society(S)/ Private agency(PA)/ others (O))

(xiii) No. of villages with access to Anganwadi Centre 5 villages

(xiv) Any other facilities with no. of villages (please specify)

No. of villages having Tap water facility available 3 village

No. of villages having well water facility available 5 village

No. of villages having Tank water facility available No village

No. of villages having Tube well water facility available 2 village

No. of villages having Hand pump facility available 2 village

No. of villages having Post Office facility available 2 village

No. of villages having Bus Service facility available 5 village

No. of Agricultural Society 4

Nearest Town Bhinmal

(xv) Nearest KVK Jalore district

(xvi) Co-operative society Yes

(xvii) NGOs No other NGO is working in Project Area

(xviii) Credit institutions

(i) Bank SBBJ at Bagora

1.5 Institutional arrangements (SLNA, DWDU, PIA, WDT, WC, Secretary

1.5.1 WCDC Details

1.5.2 PIA particulars

S.No Particulars Details of WCDC

1 PM ,WCDC Mr. Udaram Rao, Executive Engineer

2 Address with contact no., website PM, WCDC, Dist- Jalore

3 Telephone 8302563718, 02973-222355

4 Fax -

5 E-mail [email protected]

S.No Particulars Details of PIA

1 Name of PIA Mr. Virendra Chaubisa

2 Designation Program Manager

3 Address with contact no., website Near Sindhi Circle, Bagoda

4 Telephone 9983191285

5 Fax -

mailto:[email protected]

1.5.3 WDT Particulars:

1.5.4 Details of Watershed Committees (WC)

6 E-mail jhadolrbks1@ rediffmail.com

SNo

Name of WDT member M/F Age Qualification Experience watershed (Yrs)

Professional training

Role/ Function

1 Mr. Bhagwati Pandit M 30 B.SC. (Ag) 6 Years Yes Agriculture

2 Mr. Yashwant Rao M 32 BE Agriculture 2 Years Yes Technical

3 Miss. Shristi singh F 23 M.S.W 1 year Yes Cap Building

4 Mr. Jayesh Sharma M 30 Diploma in

Veterinary

4 year Yes Animal Husbandry

S.N.

Name of WCs

Date of Gram Sabha for WC

Date of Registration

Designation Name M/F SC/ST/OBC/General

Name of UG/SHG

Educational qualification

1.

Up samiti Jalgrahan Khokha

2/3/12

NA

President Adam Khan M Minority SHG 8th

Secretary Ilias khan M Minority UG 10th

Member Megharam M Gen UG 10th

Modi Devi F SC SHG -

Uda Ram M SC UG -

Roshan Banu / Abu Khan F Minority SHG -

Roshan Banu / Kasam Khan F Minority SHG -

Jamal Khan M OBC SHG -

Sattar khan M OBC UG Lit.

Rahim khan M OBC UG 12th

Elias /Najirkhan M OBC UG 12th

2. Up samiti Jaisawas

5/3/12

NA

President Barkat Khan M Minority UG 8th

Secretary Ismile khan M Minority UG 10th

Member Tararam M ST SHG Lit.

Kalaram M OBC UG Lit

Safeek Moh. M Minority UG 5th

Mafri Devi F SC UG -

Ob singh M Gen. UG 5

Kasna Ram M OBC UG 5

Bargad khan M Minority UG 8

Abu Devi F SC SHG Lit

Ugam Devi F Gen SHG Lit

3 Up Samiti Bagoda

6/3/12 NA President Madan Singh M General UG 12th

Secretary Khevesingh M General UG 10th

Member Luni Devi F ST SHG 5th

Emni Devi F Minority SHG Litertae

1.6 Base Line Survey Format for IWMP MIS website

Project Name:- IWMP 11-12/ Jalore-17 Total Geographical Area of Project – 8854 Ha.

Treatable Area

Wasteland (Lakh Hectares) 0.00804 Rainfed Agricultural Land (Lakh Hectares)

0.05238

Total Cropped Area (Lakh Hectares) 0.07704 Net Sown Area (Lakh Hactares)

0.05238

Total no. of Water Storage Structure 17 Total no. of Water Extracting Units

344

Total storage capacity of water storage structures (cubic meters)

12945.34

No. of Household

SC 319 ST 125

Others 1899

Total Population of the project Area 15538 No. of Household of Landless people 557

Total no. of BPL Household 974

No. of small farmer’s Household 597 No. of Marginal Farmer’s Household 1098

Depth of Ground Water (meters) below Ground level

Pre- monsoon 77.90 Post-monsoon 77.45

No. of person-days of Seasonal Migration

160

Narpat Singh M General SHG 5th

Deep Singh M General SHG 8th

Nafusaram M ST UG Literate

Mohanram M UG Literate

Ratan Singh M General UG Illiterate

Pankhi Devi F SHG Illiterate

1.7 Problems and scope of improvement in the project area

The socio economic conditions of the area can be improved through increased production which can be

achieved through expansion in cultivated area and productivity enhancement. 395 ha land is arable

wasteland and 2465.5 ha is fallow land can be brought under cultivation.

346.5 ha is only irrigated and with efforts this can be increased. The productivity gap of major crops in the

area as compared with district and with areas in the same agro climatic zones indicate potential to increase

the productivity. The demonstration of improved package of practices, improved varieties, increased

irrigation facilities and soil conservation measures under the project can bridge this gap. Due to small land

holdings in the area focus of the project would be on diversification in agriculture (horticulture, vegetables,

green houses, Agro forestry, and fodder crops) and diversification in Livelihoods (Agriculture, Animal

husbandry, self employment). Improved animal Husbandry practices can increase the productivity of

livestock. 735 no of persons migrate due to drought and salty drinking water and business purpose. This

migration can be checked through creation of employment opportunities in the project area through

increase in production and diversification in agriculture and Livelihoods. Present livelihood source are Agro

Forestry, Farming, Livestock development, Carpentry. Possible livelihood interventions under the project are

Agro forestry, Horticulture, Farming through drip and sprinkler system, livestock development through

animal health camp and AI, carpentry providing revolving fund through SHG, poultry provided with revolving

fund through SHG. The major problems, as stated by community are low productivity of cultivated land,

large area under wasteland category, lack of water for cattle drinking and irrigation. Farmers are aware of

the factors causing low productivity, but do not have resources to address those issues. Stress migration due

to a lack of labour opportunities. Due to poor internal connectivity transport to agriculture fields is

difficult.The overall socio-economics of the area faces following problems

Low investment capacity of individual families and effective resource management owing to lack of

knowledge sharing groups, cooperatives or organization Poor knowledge base about the improved and integrated practices of agriculture Low productivity of crops due to; Low fertility level; Use of local verities; Traditional practices in crop

production; Low consumption of fertilizers and in proper use of fertilizer and Moisture stress Poor market linkages & Storage facilities due to typical nature of terrain. Poor cattle management practices such as loss of Fodder and nutrition, high risk of diseases and

mortality, lower production milk, draught power and meat and poor breed management Limited work opportunities (no additional work skills)

Moisture stress faced by crops due to arable behavior of the rainfall and un sufficient amount.

Soil erosion due to uncontrolled wind velocity.

Poor vegetative over on non-arable lands.

Low availability of livestock fodder All these problems put together provide less work opportunities for families who are already deprived of sufficient resources and ultimately in less production in the area. These can be grouped as problems related to

Land Resources are not developed properly to provide sufficient biomass production (agriculture & fodder);

Higher dependency on cultivation leading to limited work opportunities beyond monsoon period.

Large area is in encroached by wind blown sand leading to “high Erosion specially during summer months”

This makes more and more families vulnerable and they get pushed below this line. Thus the project activities planned are to address small and medium scale important interventions in agriculture and allied system which can yield increased productivity and help these families to sustain their livelihood. Table 4 Problem Analysis in watershed

Present Status Causes Problem

Area Problem identification

Live

liho

od

an

d

eco

no

my

Lack of earning opportunity in the area. Low skills People have to migrate as wage labour. Un-exploited skills in (weaving , patchwork and Mojari making) Poor leadership

Low education & Inherited Poverty due to poor assets. Poor capacity and lack of self confidence Lower level of awareness

Hu

man

an

d

Inst

itu

tio

nal

R

eso

urc

es

Community organization. VWCs formed in all villages. The villagers have decided the structure. VWCs at present are resourceless.

Low level of social and political awareness-towards value oriented development. Polarization in the community

Wat

er

Drinking water resources/structure (both private and community owned) are lying abandoned. Community lacks motivation for the maintenance of community resources

Management of water structure does not figure as a common responsibility.

Contribution concept is no more in practice.

Live

sto

ck

Production is not increasing even as number of livestock keeps increasing. Fodder supply is insufficient. Attack of seasonal disease Lack of treatment both preventive and curative.

Low quality of breed Poor health and health care facilities Poor quality of fodder in the area

Lan

d a

nd

A

gric

ult

ure

Sandy Soil Wind Erosion Sand Encroachment Vegetation in non-arable lands do not get sufficient moisture support for growth

Loss of vegetation Soil erosion Change in land use pattern (utilizing private pasture land for agriculture purpose) Poverty

Veg

etat

ion

Fo

dd

er

and

Fu

el Lack of management causing poor fodder

availability in villagers. Fuel wood is also not available as per requirement.

Population increase of livestock has caused pressure on fodder supply. Decreasing tree cover in the area Poor common pasture

Soci

al a

nd

P

olit

ical

en

viro

nm

ent

Polarization of the community reducing the unity among the community. Biased Village politics at Panchayat level ignores the poor. Cooperative practices are minimal

Collective decision taking in development activities is non-existent because of self-seeking vested interests.

Key Livelihood areas

Main Problems

Agriculture Limited availability of water sources for irrigation

Lack of technical know how

Poor Investment capacity of farmers for land development

Undulated topography, Saindy Soil and Sand encroachment

Decreasing productivity and less availability of organic manure

Poor moisture retention in soil

Animal Husbandry

Low productive breed

Limited fodder availability

Limited livestock treatment facilities

Lack of sufficient drinking water sources specially during summer

Lack of knowledge and skills for improved animal husbandry

Labour Less employment opportunities at local level

Higher cost for seeking employment opportunities in outside areas

Exploitation by work providers

Lack of skill and unorganized sector

Service sector Lack of quality and vocational education

Less opportunities at local level

Lack of professional education

Lack of knowledge about the opportunities and know-how

Business Lack of investment capital

Lack of information and know-how and Skill

Lack of value addition and processing

Social Pressure

Poor Market Linkages

2 CHAPTER- II - SOCIO-ECONOMIC FEATURES, PROBLEMS AND SCOPE

2.1 Demography Details The watershed is comparised of five villages namely Bagoda, Jaisawas, Koridhavecha, Kuradhavecha and Khoka belonging. These villages are furhter scattered in different dhanis (hamlets) as individual family houses located in their own lands.

Total Population

Male Female Total SC ST Others

8116 7422 15538 2115 826 12597

Table 5 Population Details

S.No. Name of Village Male Female Total SC ST Others

1 Bagoda 2863 2616 5479 1149 171 4159

2 Jaisawas 1178 1135 2313 638 183 1492

3 Koridhavecha 823 794 1617 162 355 1100

4 Kuradhavecha 1281 1129 2410 99 112 2199

5 Khokha 1971 1748 3719 67 5 3647

Total 8116 7422 15538 2115 826 12597

The total no. of population in the cluster watershed is 15538 in 2343 households making the average family size 6.63 no. The major caste in the area is Rajput, Muslim, prajapat, Meghwal etc. 974 No of households are BPL(41.57%households) 557 are landless households (23.77% households) and 1695 household are small and marginal farmers(72.34%household) .Average land holding in the area is 0.33 ha.

Bagoda Jaisawas Koridhavecha Kuradhavecha Khokha Total

Others 4159 1492 1100 2199 3647 12597

ST 171 183 355 112 5 826

SC 1149 638 162 99 67 2115

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Community Composition in Watershed

Figure 9 Sex ratio in watershed community

Household Details

Name of Village

BPL household

L. Less

Small Farmer

M. Farmer

Total household

SC household

ST household

Bagoda 318 195 250 429 910 190 30

Jaisawas 98 76 96 165 351 105 32

Koridhavecha 278 97 47 82 233 27 58

Kuradhavecha 105 76 89 154 332 16 20

Khokha 175 113 141 242 517 11 1

Total 974 557 623 1072 2343 349 141

Table-4 about the Poor families in this region have limited land holding and are not capable of developing these lands as good cultivable land. In the village houses are set according to caste groups and one find that it looks like a planned sattlement as per castewise house goups.


Male 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000

Female 914 963 965 881 887 914

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Sex ratio in different Villages


Male 2863 1178 823 1281 1971

Female 2616 1135 794 1129 1748

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500 Male-Female Population

The major festivals in the village are Holi, Deewali, Dashara, Id, Raksha Bandhan, Gangur, & Krishna-Janmashtami.

In project area 4611.12 ha is single cropped area and 346.5 ha. is irrigated area. The main source of irrigation is well and tube well. The average annual rainfall (5 years) in Bhinmal block is 508.6 mm.

2.2 Development Indicators

S. No. Development Indicators State Jalore Project Villages

1 Per capita income (Rs.) 16260 --- Poor

2 Poverty ratio 22 28.61 Poor

3 Literacy (%) 67.06 % 55.58 % Poor

4 Sex Ratio 926 951 Poor

5 Infant Mortality Rate 79 88 Poor


BPL 318 98 278 105 175

SC 190 105 27 16 11

ST 30 32 58 20 1

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Vulnerable Family Situation in Watershed


Others 36 14 7 13 21 91

Land less 195 76 97 76 113 557

M.F 429 165 82 154 242 1072

S.F 250 96 47 89 141 623

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100% Landholding based Classification of Family in Watershed

6 Maternal Mortality Ratio 677 650 Poor

7 Percentage Decadal Growth 21.44 % 26.31 % Poor

8 Institutional Delivery 31.52 % 20.40 % Poor

The above table indicates (poor,average,good) socio economic conditions.

2.3 Land use

Land Use Total area in Ha.

Private Panchayat Government Community Total

Agriculture Land 8743.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 8743.56

Temporary Fallow 2465.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 2465.50

Permanent Fallow 1040.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 1040.06

Cultivated Rainfed 5238.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5238.00

Cultivated irrigated 2514.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 2514.15

Net Sown Area 4103.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 4103.15

Net Area sown more than once 626.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 626.88

Forest Land 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Waste Land 637.05 0.00 0.00 80.48 717.53

Pastures 0.00 309.56 86.62 0.00 396.18

Others 130.38 30.00 48.66 20.15 229.19

Total 9510.99 339.56 135.28 100.63 10086.46

The project area has 637.05 ha of cultivable wasteland 3505.56 ha of fallow land (total 4142.61ha) can be

brought under cultivation if organic carbon source can be provided through provision of vegetative barriers,

nitrogen fixing trees, organic composting methodolies, availability of water through Tanka etc. and also

through demonstration of rainfed varieties of crops. 309.56 ha is under pasture and can be brought under

vegetative cover, with reasonable effort. WHS (Tanka), afforestation of wastelands and Pasture

development will be taken up on these lands.

Figure 10 Different land use category total and treatable area

Temporary Fallow

Permanent Fallow

Cultivated Rainfed

Waste Land Pastures Others

Total Area 2465.5 1040.06 5238 717.53 396.18 229.19

Treatable 2465.5 1040.06 4234.73 717.53 396.18 0

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000 Different category of land and treatable area

Pasture development the land use table shows that there is 396.18 hectare pasture land ( %). This

emphasizes the need for taking up pastureland development works through sowing of promising species of

grasses and plantation. Total area is 10086.47 ha and treatable area is 8854 ha. Arable land in the watershed

7703.5 ha single cropped (kharif crop) is 4611.12 and only 626.88 ha double cropped. The main Kharif crop is

Bajra with Kharif pulses, cluster bean and till cultivation some area. The main crop of Rabi is mustard,

isabgol, Jeera.

Figure 11 Total Land and treatable land in the watershed

2.4 Agriculture and Horticulture status and fuel availability

Table 2.4 .a Agriculture and Horticulture status and fuel availability Sl No. Crop Sown Variety Area (Ha) Production

( Ton) Project Area Production (Kg per Ha.)

State Production (Kg per Ha.)

Kharif

1 Caster Avni 193 115.8 600 997

2 Bajra WCC 75, Raj 171

3780 2646 700 679

3 Moong/ Moth K851/Jadiya 1205 482 400 312

4 Other 60 24 400

Rabi

1 Mustard T-59 320 256 800 1203

2 Zeera RJ 19 165 66 400 339

3 Esabgol RI 89 106.88 42.75 400 476

4 Other 35

Table 2.4.b Abstract of cropped Area (ha)

Table 6 Crop Rotation Practiced in the watershed

Bajra Wheat Cluster Bean Fallow

Non-arable Arable Total

Total 1342.9 8743.56 10086.46

Treatable 1113.71 7740.29 8854.00

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

Total Area and Treatable Area

Abstract of cropped Area(ha)

Area under Single crop 4611.12

Area under Double crop 626.88

Area under Multiple crop 0

Bajra Fallow Til Fallow Moong Mustered Caster Caster Moong Fallow Moth Fallow Fallow Jeera/Isabgoal Crop varieties and potential forproduction enhancement

Crop Present Varieties Potential Varieties Bajra WCC 75, Raj 171 HHB-67, RCB-2 Moong Non discript Certified Mustard Non descript Certified Wheat Lokwan Certified Jeera/Isabgoal Non discript Certified The above table shows that only 626.88 ha. is double cropped area. Also the crop rotation shows that fallow

lands are there. This indicates that there is scope for change in crop rotation in fields where there are fallow

lands through Soil and Water conservation measures, crop demonstration and diversification in agriculture.

Soil and Water conservation measures besides putting fallow lands under cultivation can change the area

under single cropping to double and multiple cropping.

Table 2.4.c Productivity Gap Analysis (The table can also be given in bar chart form)

Analysis of the above table indicate that besides national gap there is wide gap in productivity within state and even within same agro climatic zones. The reasons for this variation are

Caster Bajra Moong Mustard Zeera Esabgol

India 800 886 280 1095 300 350

Rajasthan 997 679 312 1203 339 476

ACZ 400 750 450 1250 500 600

District 800 750 450 1250 500 600

Project Area 600 700 400 800 400 400

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400 Comperative productivity for Main crops

Name of the crop

Productivity kg/ha

India Highest Average in

Rajasthan

Highest Average of Agro climatic zone District Project Area

Caster 800 997 400 800 600

Bajra 886 679 750 750 700

Moong/ Moth 280 312 450 450 400

Mustard 1095 1203 1250 1250 800

Zeera 300 339 500 500 400

Esabgol 350 476 600 600 400

The farmers are using varieties WCC-75, Raj 171 of Bajra, whereas the recommended varieties like HHB-67, RCB-2 provide good yield.

Lack of Availability of good quality seeds of desired crop and variety in adequate quantities and time to the farmers.

Availability of water for cultivation The productivity gap and reasons of it indicate potential to increase the productivity through crop demonstration .Crop demonstrations would be carried out on improved crops/ varieties, improved agronomic practices. INM, IPM, Mixed cropping, distribution of fodder seed mini kit. Demonstration of improved methods and economics of fodder crops cultivation and also distribution foundation seeds of Forage Crops for further multiplication, introduction of fodder crops in the existing crop rotations.

2.5 Horticulture/Vegetable/Floriculture status Horticulture and vegetables cultivation could be more economical to Small and marginal farmers with irrigation source. For large farmers with no irrigation facility Horticulture/vegetables will be promoted in a part of land with farm pond / Tanka construction. The following activities will be more beneficial for small land holdings and for diversification and income for large farmers

Table 2.5 Existing area under horticulture/Vegetables/Floriculture (ha)

Activity Area Species Varieties Recommended varieties Production

Horticulture Nil Nil Nil Pomegranate

Nil Nil Nil Citrus

Nil Nil Nil

Vegetables Nil Nil Nil Chili

Nil Nil Nil Bottle gard, strip gard,

Nil Nil Nil

Floriculture Nil Nil Nil

Nil Nil Nil

Nil Nil Nil

Medicinal Plants Nil Nil Nil Asavgandha

2.6 Land holding pattern Table 2.6 Land holding Pattern in project area

Name of Village Bpl house hold Total hh L. Less Small Farmer M. Farmer

Bagora 318 910 195 250 429

Khokha 175 517 113 141 242

Jaisavas 98 351 76 96 165

Koridhavecha 278 233 97 47 82

Kuradhavecha 105 332 76 89 154

Total 974 2343 557 623 1072

72.34 % land holdings belong to small and marginal farmers who own 35 % of total cultivated area.

Horticulture/vegetables could be more economical to Small and Marginal farmers with no irrigation facility.

Horticulture/vegetables will be promoted in a part of land with farm pond/Tanka construction. The following

activities will be more beneficial for small land holdings and for diversification and income for large farmers.

Horticulture plantation, Medicinal and floriculture: As discussed earlier . Horticulture/vegetables could be

more economical to Small and marginal farmers with irrigation source. Also the project area has good

potential for medicinal crops like Sonamukhi, Isabgol, Ashwagandha, Khus, Mehandi etc.

Agro forestry plantation: To increase the income of farmers and also for shelter belt plantation as wind

velocity is high in the project area.

Setting of Vermi Compost Units - Keeping in view the side effect of residues of chemicals and fertilizers on

human health the emphasis would be on cultivation of organic produce through motivating farmers and

providing assistance for production of organic input, vermi compost.

Production and distribution of quality seed – There is need to ensure that good quality seed is available for

cultivators for which adequate seed production would be initiated in watershed areas with the assistance of

private sector and agriculture department technologies

Sprinklers and pipelines for efficient water management practices emphasis on demonstration of sprinklers

with adequate financial support and convergence/private partnership.

Drip irrigation Drip irrigation will be promoted in all horticulture plantations, vegetables, for rational use of

irrigation higher yields and quality produce.

Proposed area for horticulture/Vegetables/Floriculture (ha)

Activity Area Species Varieties Recommended varieties Production

Horticulture 40 Ha. Pomegranate, Anvla, Lemon, Ber

Local Grafted -

Vegetables 80 family Seasonal vegetables Local Recommended by CAZRI -

Floriculture 20 family Rose, Marigold Local Recommended by CAZRI -

Cash Crop Promotion

900 family Moong, Mustard, Gram

Local Recommended by CAZRI -

Medicinal Plants

30 family Ashvagandha, Khus Local Recommended by CAZRI -

2.7 Livestock status with Per Capita Production Table 2.7 Livestock Status - animals/milk production / average yield

S. No. Description of animals

Population in No.

Yield(milk/mutton/Wool)

Equ. cow units

Dry matter requirement per year (7Kg

per animal per day)

Total requirement

in Ton

1 Cows 2944

Indigenous 2907 4 ltr per day 2907 7427385 7427.4

Hybrid 37 6 ltr per day 37 94535 94.5

2 Buffaloes 4954 4- 6.5 ltr per day 4954 12657470 12657.5

3 Goat 4859 20 Kg. per bucks 2429.5 6207372.5 6207.4

4 Sheep 6201 430 gm wool 3100.5 7921777.5 7921.8

5 Camel 57 - 57 145635 145.6

6 Poultry 310 300 Rs. Per chicken NA

7 Piggery 81 31 kg. NA

8 Horse 8 - 8 20440 20.4

Total 34474615 34474.6

Table 2.7 gives The area is having fodder deficiency. Total no. of animals is 34697. Total requirement is fodder 34474.6 Ton and fodder production is 24418 Ton fodder deficit 10056.6 Ton. Goat and buffalo based economy. Animals are mainly used for cultivation, milk, and meat production. There are indigenous cows only and no crossbreed. Types of animals also linked with caste group, schedule tribe prefer to keep goats, while baffaloes are mainly owned by Patel and Rajputs. Land under the category of grassland (private and common) are mostly facing erosion problem which do have very thin soil covery and stone exposures are frequent. Under climatic variations, it is impossible for any small holder to make a living out of livestock and crop production under rainfed conditions. The most critical time for fodder availability is from April to June when most of the straw from kharif crops and the grass cut in November is used up. There are quite a few fodder trees scattered all over the village land but their use (leaves, twigs, seedpods) is limited to goats and buffaloes under feed emergency operations. Cultivation of fodder crop is limited sorghum and cluster beans limited and other practices on fodder management practices such as feed-menzers, hay making and chaff-cutter, which can help in 40 –50 % saving of fodder, are not practiced. This provides a good scope for scientific approach in enhancing productivity of pastureland. In spite of the large number of livestock, production is less hence increase in productivity across all species, is a major challenge. To reduce production of unproductive cattle and improve the productivity by improving the breeds by breeding management following activities will be taken up-

Castration

Artificial insemination

Distribution of superior Breeding bulls for use in Cattle and Buffalo

Vaccination Camp

2.8 Fodder status Besides breed improvement other animal husbandry practices like better health, hygiene and feeding practices can increase productivity of livestock. Hence Activities like Animal health camps ,Urea-Molasses treatment demonstration ,demonstration of improved methods of conservation and utilization of Forage crops are proposed. Table 2.8 Existing area under fodder (ha)

S.No Item Unit Area/Quantity

1 Existing Cultivable area under Fodder Ha 350/ 2450

2 Production of Green fodder Tonns/year 29/870

3 Production of Dry fodder Tonns/ Year 40/20000

4 Area under Pastures Ha 549/1098

5 Production of fodder Tonns/year 24418

6 Existing area under Fuel wood Ha 1/1125

7 Supplementary feed Kgs/ day

8 Silage Pits No

9 Availability of fodder quintals 24418

10 Deficiency/excess of fodder

quintals 10056.6

Cattle care also not proper because per day 5 to 6 kg fodder and 2 kg cattle feed given to only milking cow and all other cattle depends on open grazing. In the village peple have not much participated in cattle immunization and other animal husbandry facilities. Around 12 families do posses tractors. Cultivation is generally done without manur in khariff it is applied only in case of irrigated crops. Due to low fertilifty in many if the fields the manure demand for agriculture fields is high as good as 1000 tractor trolley per bigha. The table above shows there is fodder deficiency (Requirement is 34474.6 and availability is 24418. To minimize the large and expanding gap between feed and fodder resource availability and demand there is need for

Increase in area under fodder crops

Increase in productivity of fodder crops

Development of pastures

And reduction in large number of livestock production through replacement by few but productive animals

2.9 Agriculture implements Farm mechanization and seed banks: As discussed earlier some land holdings belong to small and marginal

farmers who own only some of total cultivated area so owning of big farm implements by individual farmers

is not economical so SHG would be promoted to buy farm implements and rent to farmer

Table 2.9 Agriculture implements

2.10 NREGA Status - No. of Card Holder, activities taken so far, employment status

NREGA running in Project area and all convergence plan with the NREGA. People having a Job card of Panchyat under the Rojgar Garanti Scheme and regularly people connect with the job work plan by Government time to time.

2.11 Migration details

As reflected in table below one finds that from all the project villages all together 735 youth migrates nearly

150-170 (almost half of the year) to Mumbai and around in search of occupation. Major problem reflected

by people in the area that salinity of water and lack of sufficient water is the main reason behind this

migration.

Table 2.11 Migration Details

Name of village

No. of persons

migrating

No. of days per year of migration

Major reason(s)

for migrating

Distance of destination of

migration from the village (km)

Occupation during

migration

Income from such occupation (Rs. in lakh)

Bagora, Jaisawas, Koridhavecha, Kuradhavecha,

735 150-170 Due to Drought,

Salty drinking

500-1000 km Labour, Service, Business

50000- 2.5 Lakh

S. No Implements Nos.

1 Tractor 17

2 Sprayers-manual/ power 35

3 Cultivators/Harrows 0

4 Seed drill 0

5 Any Other 0

Khokha water, for business

The migration can be check by creation of employment opportunities, enhancing farm level economy, increases the income of the people engaged in animal husbandry by dairy, poultry and marketing and value addition.

2.12 Livelihood Details In the watershed area most of the families depend on agriculture and animal husbandry as key occupation. Though Average land holding is .735 ha but most of the land is of rainfed and private pasture category, and income from land is very low as agriculture production is low. Similarly yield from milk producing livestock are low; though number of cattle, goats, and sheep averages 14 per family. Almost all the families have incussed indebtness to sustain life and meet social commitments people, and average outstanding unorganised loans are around 20000/family. Following paragraph gives some details about the agiculture in the watershed which indicates that if people have to come out of the vicious circle of poverty, incomes from agriculture and animal husbandry have to go up. The existing livelihoods activities are given below

Table 2.12 (a)Major activities (On Farm)

Name of activity No of House holds Average annual income from the

Cultivators 548 50000 above

Dairying 730 50000 above

Poultry 35 5000

Piggery 5 5000

Goatry/Sheep

Landless Agri. Labourers 88 10000 - 15000

Others

(d) ON FARM AND OFF FARM OTHER INCOME GENERATING ACTIVITIES. Village craft and skills:- No. of families practicing in village crafts is as under

Table 2.12(b)Major activities (Off Farm)

Name of activity Households/individuals Average annual income from the

Artisans 2 50000

Carpenter 5 70000

Blacksmith 2 30000

Leather Craft 13 10000

Porter 8 10000

Mason 139 25000

Others specify (Cycle Repair ,STD,Craft etc)

15 25000

Others

The efforts for increase in income through off farm activities will be made under livelihood component through assistance to SHG or individuals

2.13 Existing SHG Table 2.13( a ) Status of Existing SHG

S.No Panchayat Name of SHG

Member Activity involved

Monthly income

Fund available

Assistance available

Source of assistance

Training received

1 Jaisawas Jagriti SHG

11 Saving 1100 - - - Yes

2 Pragati SHG

11 Saving 1100 - - - Yes

3 Utthan SHG

11 Saving 1100 - - - Yes

4 Samridhi SHG

11 Saving 1100 - - - Yes

5 Khokha Vikas SHG

11 Saving 1100 - - - Yes

6 Aakash SHG

11 Saving 1100 - - - Yes

7 Jeevan SHG

11 Saving 1100 - - - Yes

8 Sarthak SHG

11 Saving 1100 - - - Yes

9 Bagoda Sunda Mata SHG

10 Saving 1100 - - - Yes

10 Prakash SHG

10 Saving 1100 - - - Yes

11 Laxmi Bai SHG

10 Saving 1100 - - - Yes

12 Durga SHG

10 Saving 1100 - - - Yes

The table indicates existence of number of groups in the area also these need to be strengthened through trainings and financial assistance. Type of User Group formed in all three Panchayats

Agriculture Conservation – 5 member Non Agriculture Conservation- 5 member Stream Treatment -5 member Horticulture Demonstration and Pasture Development Work- 5 member Livestock Development work- 5 member

II – Technical Details

2.14 Ground Water details Table 2.14 Ground Water

S.No Source No. Functional depth

Dry Area irrigated

Water availability (days)

i) Dug wells 99 50 meters 99 -

ii) Shallow tube wells -

iii) Pumping sets -

iv) Deep Tube Wells 245 265 meter 39 4142.61 120

Total 344

2.15 Drinking Water Status

Table 2.15 Availability of drinking water

S.No Name of the village

Population DW requirement Ltrs./day1

No of GLRs

No of Private tube wells

Water Supply Situation

DW status

1 Bagoda 5479 219160 1

245

459085

Requirement of water avlebility

2 Jaisawas, 2313 92520 2

3 Koridhavecha 1617 64680 2

4 Kuradhavecha 2410 96400 1

5 Khokha 3719 148760 1

Total 15538 621520 7 245 459085

As indicated in the table above as for as human consumption is concerned at the rate of 40 litres/person/day

total requirement works out to be 621.520 cum. Present DWSS includes GLR constructed in allthe five villages.

These GLS are part of PHED supply systems developed using deep tube wells are supply in 459.085 Cum.

Besides this there are around 245 deep tube wells located in individual hamlets (Dhanis) which are 265 meter

deep and are source of DW for nearly 600 families.

GLR’s are located at critical points where houses are in concentration or main village. Water is supplied every

3rd

day for a period of 3 to 4 hours and GLS is filled up. Majority of the GLR in the watershed are of capacity

25000 liters capacity.

DW sources are also used for addressing drinking water need of cattle also.

2.16 Water use efficiency Table 2.16 Water Use efficiency

Name of major crop

Area (Hectare)

through water saving

devices(Drip/Sprinklers)

through water conserving agronomic practices#

Any other (pl. specify) Total

All the crops Sprinklers – 600 Fm

– 2514.15 ha 0.00 0.00 2514.15

The tables above indicate need for judicious use of available Water.

Encouraging optimum use of water through installation of sprinklers on other operational wells

2.17 Slope details Table 2.17 Slope details

S. No

Slope percentage

Area in hectares

1 0 to 3%

7215

1 As per 40 liters/day/person

> 25%, 0, 0%

3 to 8%, 1333, 15%

Area based on Slope Percent

2 3 to 8%

1333

3 8 to 25%

306

4 > 25% 0

Total 8954

As most of the area has slope less than 3% construction of contour bunds can solve the problem of water erosion in agriculture fields and protect washing of top soil and manures/fertilisers

2.18 Water Budgeting Table 2.18 Water Budgeting To propose the total number of water harvesting structure, it is necessary to do water budgeting of area i.e. how much total run – off is available, out of which how much as being already stored in existing structures and how much balance is available for storage. As per guideline, maximum 75% of balance available run – off is to be stored and 25% of balance available run – off is to be allowed to flow in the drainage line. In the proposed are, the various water harvesting structure have been constructed. The surface runoff has been stored in the structures. For estimation/ water budgeting the proposed watershed area has been divided as follows: Good Catchment: Average Catchment: 8854 Hac. Bad Catchment: Average annual precipitation (Rainfall) for the watershed is 485.68 mm thus per hectare available precipitation is = 4856.8 cum of considering the sandy-loam nature of soil available runoff of 0.2 co-efficient =and interpolation method proportion of estimated runoff from catchment per ha is 97.14 cum Total available runoff(cum) use Stranges table Rain fall 485.68 mm

Type of Catchment Area in ha. Yield of runoff from catchment per ha.(cum.) use Stranges table

Total Runoff in cum

Good

Average 10086.46 97.14 979798.7

Bad

Total 979798.7

Runoff trapped in existing structures

S.No. Name No. Storage Capacity (cum)

i) WHS(earthen)

ii) Khadin/Talab 3 12527.82

iii) Farm Ponds 14 417.52

iv) Tanka 1000 18000.00

v) Anicuts - -

Total 30945.34

Runoff to beTrapped in proposed structures:

S.No. Name No. Storage Capacity (cum) Total cum

i) WHS(earthen)

ii) Khadin/Talab

iii) Farm Ponds

iv) Tanka 696 25 17400.00

v) Anicuts

Total 17400.00

Runoff trapped in existing & proposed structures = 30945.34+ 17850 = 48795.34 % Runoff trapped = Total runoff trapped x 100 /Total available runoff= 4.92 %

Area Ha

Average Rainfall m Ha m

effective rains *0.5

Ham runoff 2% rainfall only

Cum percolates

Present capacity

Proposed Harvest

10086.46 0.49 4898.79 2449.40 97.97987 2351.42 3.09 1.74

As in the area most of the precipitation does not get converted in the form of runoff, rather it disappears in

Loam, sandy-loam and sandy soil. As indicated in above table of the 97.98 ham runoff generated is spread

over in small patches here and there. Water amounting 2351.42 ham is percolated used by nearly 600

familes who owns 245 tubewells, and poor families are not able to access this water. Thus provision of

agriculture tanka for poor families will help them capture the small quantity of water and used it for agro-

horticulture and agro-forestry purposes to improve production. The proposed structures all together will

tape only 4.92% of the generated runoff.

2.19 Soil Details Table 2.19 Soil details

Soil Profile

S.No. Major Soil Classes Area in hectares

1 Loam 7120

2 Sandy Loam 1095

3 Sandy 639

Soil Depth :

B Depth (Cms.) Area in hectares

1 0.00 to 7.50

2 7.50 to 45.00 5648

3 > 45.00 3206

C Soil fertility Status Kg/ha Recommended

N 50-70 80-90

P 20-30 40-50

K 10-15 20-30

Micronutrients 10-500 PPM 100-500 ppm

The analysis of table shows need to improve and maintain soil fertility. Soil health card to every farmer every crop season will be provided, which will include the recommendation for Application micro nutrient and fertilizers.The need is:

To check land degradation mainly due to wind erosion

To reduce excessive biotic pressure by containing the number and increase of livestock and

fodder wastage

To check Faulty agriculture techniques and improve water use effciency

To check Uncontrolled grazing and develope cattle trough

To check erosive velocity of wind, wind break, agro-forestry, would be taken up.

2.20 Soil erosion status Table 2.20 Erosion details

Cause Type of erosion

Area affected (ha)

Run off(mm/ year)

Average soil loss (Tonnes/ ha/ year)

Water erosion

A Sheet 5755 26 15-20

B Rill 2649

C Gully 450

Sub-Total 8854

Wind erosion NA

Total for project 8854 26 15-20

3 CHAPTER –III PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN The Activities are indicative addition /deletion in activities will be as per local conditions

A) Preparatory phase activities Capacity Building Trainings and EPA

The IEC activities like Kalajathas, Group meetings, door to door campaign, slogans and wall writings etc. were carried out in all the habitations of cluster Watershed. A series of meetings were conducted with GP members, community and discussed about the implementation of IWMP programme. User groups were also formed. Grama Sabhas were conducted for approval of EPA (Village), for selecting the watershed committee and approval of DPR.

S.no Name of the Gram Panchayat Date on which Grama Sabha approved EPA

1 Bagoda 19/11/12

2 Jaisawas 20/11/12

3 Khokha 20/11/12

The Activities are indicative addition /deletion in activities will be as per local conditions

1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

S. No.

Names of village

Amount earmarked

for EPA ( Lakh)

Entry Point Activities planned

Estimated cost

( Lakh)

Expenditure incurred

Balance Expected outcome

Actual outcome

1 Bagoda 3.48 15.96

Solar light Tanka

.218 1.33

3.31 .17 15.96

Lighting in Bagoda Increase in Drinking water

Light is started in Project area

2 Jaisawas 5.23 6.35 3.95 3.95 2.66

Solar light Kabristhan Kori Cooprative Socity Wall Dargah Kori Development Tanka

.218 6.35 3.95 3.95 1.33

4.97 .26 6.35 3.95 3.95 2.66

Lighting in Bagoda Protaction of Area Protaction of Area Protaction of Area Increase in Drinking water


5 Khokha 2.18 7.80

Solar light Kabristhan Development Khokha

.218 2.07 .10 7.80

Lighting in Bagoda Protaction of Area


Total

The PRA exercise was carried out in all the villages on the dates shown below:

S.no Name of the village/Habitation Date on which PRA conducted

1 Bagoda November, December 2012

2 Jaisawas November, December 2012

3 Koridhavecha November, December 2012

4 Kuradhavecha November, December 2012

5 Khokha November, December 2012

Transact walk were carried out involving the community for Social mapping, Resource mapping. Detailed discussions and deliberations with all the primary stakeholders were carried out. Socio-economic survey was carried out during July to October 2012 period covering all the households and primary data on demography, Land holdings, Employment status, Community activities was collected as mentioned in chapter 2.. State remote sensing department was assigned the work of preparing various thematic layers using Cartosat-1 and LISS-3 imageries for Creation, development and management of geo-spatial database depicting present conditions of land (terrain), water and vegetation with respect to watershed under different ownerships at village level

CAPACITY BUILDING Long term sustainability of any watershed or NRM intervention and its effectivity depends on capacity of community and its interactive skills on various components and departments of development in government. Thus in watershed development plan along with physical structure one more important component is “Building Capacity, Developing Knowledge and Skill Building” of community. Hence, in order to support holistic development of the area various CBOs such as WCT and SHGs needs further strengthening, so that even after completion of implementation the community itself can under take phase in case of resources development management of such resources developed under the project. Awareness campaign with regular follow-up including innovative adult learning method like visual methods of dissemination of information will be used intensively. Farmers Seminars at local level will also organized by inviting outside experts in different sectors, with following themes

Self Help Group maintenance and record keeping

Agriculture-Animal husbandry in Resources management

Conservation approach and cost economic approach in NRM

Medicines & aromatic plantation and Vegetable gardening etc.

Improved agriculture technologies SHG group/ User groups will be provided intensive inputs on varied issues like modern equipment, preparing, Low External Input Sustainable Agriculture, Organic Manure, Seed Selection etc. These trained people will work as resource personal for other people in villages. Training programs for farmers including farming women will be organized on a regular basis, covering themes of agriculture like field preparation, agro-forestry, Agro-horticulture, seed treatment, sowing, organic manure preparation, critical stages of irrigation, crop water relationship, mixed and inters cropping, appropriate land use system, value addition, post harvest technology. Agriculture is a program of patience and technicality, which demands for a day-to-day involvement of the individuals (family level or community level), thus a high level of motivation and skill transfer is necessary component of the project as shown in Key components. In order to capacitate community we proposed following training

Watershed Development – Components Project has initiated land and water management through motivation and sharing of information and supporting poor families in developing their land resource base through soil conservation measures. IMPROVING RESOURCE SITUATION2 At watershed large area is under highly degraded condition and facing threat of further degradation, thus critical areas will be treated with suitable SWC measures and drainage line treatments in order to prevent run-off and soil losses due to wind erosion. SWC measures are planned in each hamlet considering land capabilities, characteristics and actual field condition only after discussing with farmer. Main thrust of

2 Details about the planned interventions are givne in Proforma - 10

watershed development work is to develop capacity of such land to its utmost and sustainable productivity through following components.

Treatment for Arable Land The cultivable lands are facing problem of low organic carbon content and wind erosion, and sand dune encroachment in the identified watershed. Thus field will be supported with two specific components Vegetative Wind Breaks cum field bunds: Most of the arable land have field bunds in the form of shrubs only, this expose them to high wind erosion. Thus project will deploy the concept of Vegetative Wind Break along the bunds which runs east-west. In this, plants like Neem, Ardu, Khejari, Sisam, Drumstick and other tall plants will be planted every 2 meters. Arable-Tanka: In this area most of the precipitation moves out in sandy and sandy-loam soil without much of the production. Thus agriculture fields are normally dependant on rainfed conditions and they are not able to venture in sustainable production initiatives like agro-horticulture. Thus to support community for taking up interventions like Agro-horticulture and VWB it is proposed to harvest water by constructing Arable-Tanka. Each Tanka will hold 22400 liters which can be used to under-take agro-horticulture to the tune of 50 plants particularly during summer months.

Treatment of Non Arable Land The non-arable land of the area is heavily eroded and one hardly find any vegetation on such land. This land has a moderate to steep gradient and is open for grazing. For this kind of hard soil area we are proposing to take-up micro basins/Thavla around existing root stock of various plants which have potential for growth. Non-arable-Tanka cum Cattle water trough: In this area most of the precipitation moves out in sandy and sandy-loam soil without much of the production. Thus cattle enroute to grazing areas do not get proper drinking water facilities. Thus to support community for proper animal husbandry, Tanka with Kheli will be developed. Each tanka will harvest 22400 liters which can be used to support dirnking water need. These Tanka will also be supported with filling through tubewells and DWSS.

INCREASED ORGANIC MANURE As indicated in PRA exercise the total input of chemical fertilizer in the area is very high and it is very important aspects in complete cycle in Agriculture-Animal Husbandry-AAS the supply of organic manure used to be regular but presently the cycle is breached and the quality of land is at high risk and the production pressure is further degrading soil. Application of chemical fertilizer is year-by-year proving non-practical and non-economic. In such condition increased production of organic manure at local level can only help community. Therefore this project is to address the issue of availability of organic manure with focus at reducing losses, quality improvement and increased production. This will require demonstration of different technologies such as NADEP, Vermi-composting, and Liquid Manuring Tank, use of Nitrogen fixing plants on bunds. Arid Horticulture (Arid Agri-Horti-Forestry) This activity will try to address cultivable, non-cultivable and marginal land. Major thrust would be on dry land horticulture. Therefore we would emphasize upon selection of the species which are indigenous, drought resistant and fast growing. For this purpose the probable species mix will be as following: Fruit bearing ones: Aonla Ber Bael Gundi etc. In the agricultural fields with good soil depth, seedlings of ANNAR, ANVALA can also be tried. Apart from fruit bearing saplings some fodder trees can also be considered for plantation. These include Siris, Neem, Subabool, Bamboo and timber trees like Teak, Eucalyptus etc. Salient features of the activity:

a) Only seedlings would be provided which establish well under the local agro-climatic conditions.

b) All agronomic measures to encourage survival of the plants to be used e.g. i) Pit size (2.5 ft *2.5 ft *2.5 ft) to facilitate proper plant establishment ii) Providing pitcher (ged) near roots i.e. base of each plant to ensure the moisture availability

during summer months for initial 3-4 years. iii) Provision of tree guard (made of bamboo) to ensure proper protection of the plants. Pori

should be reinforced with thorns etc. for keeping the protection effective. In the hilly part of the area, under rain fed conditions, intercropping with horse grass, hamata grass, millets can be done. However, in such model, we should follow landscape planning strictly to enhance survival rate.

Individual Support for Landless and poorest Families

Goat Rearing Families In the project area some families are highly vulnerable due to landless, thus one finds them keeping one or two goats for emergency situations. Keeping one or two goats are normally not cost economic as they have to engage at least one person for taking care of them. Thus project will identify 11 poorest families and provide them for support of four additional goats+ one buck to make it a unit of minimum five. Project would provide goats of six to eight months which cost Rs. 5000 each and buck of 6000. It is expected that this support will help poor families by initiating the cycle of earning from goat rearing to the tune of 10000 to 12000 annual.

Sheep Rearing Families In the project area some families are highly vulnerable due to limited, thus one finds them keeping limited sheep for emergency situations. Keeping one or two sheep are normally not cost economic as they have to engage at least one person for taking care of them. Thus project will identify 14 number poorest families and provide them for support of five additional sheep+ one ram to make it a unit of minimum five. Project would provide goats of six to eight months which cost Rs. 4000 each and buck of 5000. It is expected that this support will help poor families by initiating the cycle of earning from sheep rearing to the tune of 5000 to 6000.

Support to Masons In the project area around 102 families are inovled in construction industry locally and outside area. Some of them do not posses required implements, thus they do not get propeor works. Thus to help such families, project have conceived to help such enthusiastic youth who plant to participate in Mason work more professionally.

Potter-

In the project area around Same families are inovled in Pot making locally and outside area. Some of them do not posses required implements, thus they do not get propeor works. Thus to help such families, project have conceived to help such enthusiastic youth who plant to participate in pot making more professionally.

Black smith In the project area around same families are inovled in Iron work locally and outside area. Some of them do not posses required implements, thus they do not get propeor works. Thus to help such families, project have conceived to help such enthusiastic youth who plant to participate in Iron working more professionally. Carpanter

In the project area around Same families are inovled in Furniture making locally and outside area. Some of them do not posses required implements, thus they do not get propeor works. Thus to help such families, project have conceived to help such enthusiastic youth who plant to participate in Furniture making more professionally.

Cycle repair

In the project area around Ssome families are inovled in Cycle reparing local area. Some of them do not posses required implements, thus they do not get propeor works. Thus to help such families, project have conceived to help such enthusiastic youth who plant to participate in Cycle reparing work more professionally.

Foot wear

In the project area around Same families are inovled in Foot making locally and outside area. Some of them do not posses required implements, thus they do not get propeor works. Thus to help such families, project have conceived to help such enthusiastic youth who plant to participate in foot making more professionally.

Table- List of approved Training Institutes@ for Capacity Building in the project area 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

S. No.

Name of Stake holders

Name of Institute

Full Address with contact

no., website & e-mail

Designation of Head of Institute

Type of Institute

#

Area(s) of specialization$ Accreditation details

1 PIAs IGPRI IGPRS, Nehru place, Jaipur

Director GOR 1. Watershed Development 2. Institutional Arrangement 3. Technical input 4.Others

Government of Rajasthan Approved

2 WDTs CAZRI, AFRI

Jodhpur Director GOI Method for watershed development in desert area Horticulture development in Arid resign

GOI

3 UGs RBKS KVK

BJS Colony Jodhpur

Secretary Non government

Maintain of asset, Role and responsibility of UG, Active participants in community work and village, sustainable of UG and that working

Registered society under rule 1958

4 SHGs RBKS

BJS Colony Jodhpur


Concept of SHG, Benefit of SHG, Role of Members, role of 3 Post, Livelihood promotion through SHG, Micro enterprising through SHG, concept of Federation, Benefit of Federation, Sustainable SHG concept, Government benefit for SHG


5 WCs RBKS BJS Colony Jodhpur


1.Role and responsibility of WCs 2.Importance in Watershed program, 3.Sustainable development process through community development, 4. Livelihood promotion through VWC capacity improvement 5.Water conservation/ Ground water & Forestry 6.livelihoods/ entrepreneurship development


6 GPs RBKS

BJS Colony Jodhpur


1.Role and responsibility of GP, 2.Importance in Watershed program, 3. Sustainable development process through community development, 4.Livelihood promotion through GP capacity improvement 5. Agriculture development 6. Horticulture development


7 Community

RBKS BJS Colony Jodhpur


1. Watershed development process and its importance 3. Role of community in watershed development program 4.WDF and that’s importance in watershed program 5. Livestock development and its benefit 6. Micro finance activities and that’s benefit 7. Fodder production and that’s importance in watershed 8. community mobilization for government scheme 9. Linkages with departments Horticulture, livestock, agriculture etc. 10.AH//Ground water/ entrepreneurship development


8 PM/SLNA

IGPRI IGPRS, Nehru place, Jaipur

Director GOR 1. Watershed Development 2. Institutional Arrangement 3. Technical input & Others

Government of Rajasthan Approved

Table- Capacity Building activities in the project (PHYSICAL & FINANCIAL) *4% OF TOTAL PROJECT COST.

1 2 3 4 5 6

S.

N

o.

Project

Stakehold

ers

Total

no. of

person

s

No. of persons to be trained during project period No. of Training to be organized during project period No. of person days to be trained during project period

I year II year III year IV year V year Total I year II year III year IV year V year Total I year II year III year IV year V year Total

1 PIAs 3 3 3 3 3 3 15 6 10 6 6 2 30 18 30 18 18 6 90

2 WDTs 4 4 4 4 4 4 20 2 6 4 3 0 15 8 24 16 12 0 60

3 UGs 10 50 50 50 50 50 250 20 40 10 15 15 100 1000 2000 500 750 750 5000

4 SHGs 292 300 800 300 220 0 1620 50 90 30 15 15 200 15000 72000 9000 3300 0 99300

5 WCs 3 3 3 3 3 3 15 6 10 6 5 3 30 18 30 18 15 9 90

6 GPs 3 500 1000 400 400 200 2500 10 15 10 3 2 40 5000 15000 4000 1200 400 25600

7 Communi

ty

15532 800 1500 1500 700 500 5000 15 60 60 40 25 200 12000 90000 90000 28000 12500 232500

8 EXPOSUR

E TOUR

(INTER

STATE)

300 0 200 100 0 0 300 0 2 1 0 0 3 0 400 100 0 0 500

9 EXPOSUR

E TOUR

(INTRA

STATE)

50 0 50 50 0 0 100 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 50 50 0 0 100

10 PM/SLNA 6 6 6 6 6 0 24 3 4 3 0 0 10 18 24 18 0 0 60

11 TOTAL

PHYSICAL

- 1666 3616 2416 1386 760 9844 112 238 131 87 62 630 33062 179558 103720 33295 13665 363300

12 TOTAL

FINANCIA

L

- - - - - - - - 31.8 9.54 6.36 2.65 2.65 53 - - - - - -

Table-, Education & Communication (IEC) activities in the project area (1% of total Project cost.)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

S. No.

Activity Executing Agency

Allocation out of 1% of total Project cost

60% 18% 12% 5% 5% Total Expected Outcome

I Yr. II Yr. III Yr. IV yr. V Yr. (may quantify, wherever possible)

1 ekWMy #QVkWi okVj gkjosZfVx LVªDplZ ¼iapk;r lfefr ,oa jktho xkW/kh lsok dsUnz ;k vU; iapk;r lfefr Lrjh; utnhdh ljdkjh Hkou ½

RBKS 0-20 1.59372 0.47812 0.31874 0.13281 0.13281 2.6562 Community understand Rooftop Water Harvesting

concept

2 tyxzg.k {ks= xfrfof/k;kas dks n’kkZrk gqvk POP / CLAY / WOOD / PLASTIC ls cuk gqvk ekWMyA

RBKS 0-10 0.79686 0.23906 0.15937 0.06641 0.06641 1.3281 Community understand watereshed and its

activities 3 MhLiys cksMZs@IysxDlh cksMZ@ RBKS

4 okWy isfUVax&tyxzg.k xfrfof/k;ksa] y{;ks o izkfIr vkfn dks n’kkZrh gqbZ A

RBKS 0-25 1.99215 0.59765 0.39843 0.16601 0.16601 3.32025 Community understand and aware all aspect of

watershed 5 tyxzg.k fodkl laca/kh eqfnzr iEiysVl@fyQysVl@pkVZ@iksLVj@vkfnA

RBKS

6 Ukkjk ys[ku RBKS

7 lQyrk dh dgkuh;ksa dh ohfM;ksaxzkQh@QksVksxzkQh@ y?kqfQYe ,oa d`"kdks ls lk{kjkrdkj @ okrkZ A

RBKS 0-15 1.19529 0.35859 0.23906 0.09961 0.09961 1.99215 The process of watershed and success help others to replicate the good learning 8 fucU/k o okn&fookn izfr;ksfxrk RBKS

9 jsfM;ksa@nwjn’kZu ij okrkZ o foKkiu RBKS

10 lkaLd`frd R;kSgkj @ esys vkfn ds volj ij iznZ’kuh RBKS 0.1 0.79686 0.23906 0.15937 0.06641 0.06641 1.3281 Community understand and aware all aspect of

watershed 11 uqDdM+ ukVd RBKS

12 dViqryh izn’kZu RBKS

13 jkf= xks"Bh RBKS 0.2 1.59372 0.47812 0.31874 0.13281 0.13281 2.6562 Community understand and aware all aspect of

watershed 14 Hkw laj{k.k lIrkg RBKS

15 psruk jSyh RBKS

16 tyxzg.k fodkl dk lans’k nsus okys lkaLd`frd dk;ZØe RBKS

17 d`"kd fnol dk vk;kstu ,oa {ks= Hkze.k fnol dk vk;kstu bR;kfn

RBKS

18 dqy 1 7.9686 2.39058 1.59372 0.66405 0.66405 13.281

WAPCOS was assigned the work of preparing various thematic layers using Cartosat-1 and LISS-3 imageries for Creation, development and management of geo-spatial database depicting present conditions of land (terrain), water and vegetation with respect to watershed under different ownerships at village level

Various thematic layers provided by WAPCOS are:

Digitised Khasara maps of the villages falling in project area.

Base maps (transport network, village/boundaries, and settlements).

Land Use / Land cover map. Based on GIS thematic layers, Field visits , PRA and analysis of benchmark data (as discussed in chapter 2) final Treatment plan on revenue map for implementation has been framed. Thus each intervention identified has been marked on revenue map (map enclosed in DPR).The GIS based intervention map, PRA based intervention map are also enclosed.

B) Livelihood Action Plan (LAP):

An awareness programme has been undertaken at Gram Sabha for communication & sensitization of the target beneficiaries. Livelihood Action Plan is a pre requisite for availing the funds under the livelihood component. LAP has been prepared by the PIA in consultation with WDT, WC & the members of SHG,SC/ST, women, landless/ assetless households. Details of funds available & their utilisation are as under:

(i) Total project cost Rs 1328.10 Lacs.

(ii) Funds available under livelihood component are 9% of total project cost Rs 119.53 Lacs.

(a) Seed money for SHGs as revolving fund = Rs 71.71 Lacs.

(Minimum 60% of livelihood component)

- No. of SHG to be formed 270 Nos.

--- No of persons (members) in SHGs 1620 Nos.

(b) Seed money for enterprising individuals = Rs. 11.95 Lacs

(Maximum 10% of livelihood component)

-- No of persons identified as enterprising individuals 147 Nos.

S. Item Numbers Revolving fund % of LAP

1 SHG

a Existing 22 5.5 4.60

b New 270 66.21 55.39

Sub Total 292 71.71

2 Enterprising individuals 147 11.95 10.00

3 Enterprising SHG/Federations of SHG 25 35.86 30.00

Total 119.53 100.00

Proposed Activities (On Farm)*

Name of activity* No of SHGs Revolving fund

Fisheries 0 0

Dairying 60 15

Poultry 7 1.31

Piggery 0 0

Goatry 30 7.5

Bee keeping 0 0

Sericulture 0 0

Nursery 0 0

Maize dehusker 0 0

Dal mill 5 1.25

Oil mill 5 1.25

Others (specify) 160 40

Total 267 66.31

Proposed Major activities (Off Farm)**

Name of activity* No of SHGs Revolving fund

Artisans 0 0

Carpenter 1 0.2

Blacksmith 0 0

Leather Craft 0 0

Porter 0 0

Mason 2 0.2

Eco tourism 0 0

Agro processing 5 1.25

Candle making 4 0.8

Dona Pattal 2 0.5

Sewing / Knitting 8 2

Tea Stall 1 0.15

General Store 2 0.3

Mobile repair 0 0

Mechanic / Misc. shop 0 0

Others (specify) 0 0

Total 25 5.4

List of persons & Proposed Activities (10% of (9%)

S. No. Activity Proposed Name of

Person

Category

SC /ST /Others

Project fund

Revolving

Contribution

1 Carpenter 12

OBC / Other 96000.00 9600.00

2 Black smith 9

OBC 86400.00 8640.00

3 Cycle repair 13

SC /ST /Others 104000.00 10400.00

4 Potter 6

Other 72000.00 7200.00

5 Mason 76

SC /ST /Others 304000.00 30400.00

6 Foot wear 2

SC 24000.00 2400.00

7 Small Ruminant Goat (25+1=26 No) Sheep (20+1=21No.) 14

SC /ST /Others

350000.00 35000.00

8 Goat Unit ( 5) 11

SC /ST /Others 286000.00 28600.00

9 Other 1 SC /ST /Others 5711.18 571.12

Total 12085721.18 132811.12

(c) Funds for Enterprising SHG/Federations of SHG

(Maximum 30 % of livelihood activities)= Rs 35.86 Lacs

The funding for major livelihood activities will enable the enterprising SHGs/SHG federation to avail a composite

loan for undertaking major livelihood activities or to upscale activities as recommended by the WC & approved

by WCDC in consultation with line departments.

Details of enterprising SHG/federation are given below:

S.No. Name of SHG/ SHG federation

Project Name Project Cost in lacs

Grant in aid 50% of project cost or 2 lacs whichever is less

Bank loan

1 After the formation of SHG

After the formation of SHG

107.57 35.86 35.86

* Details of project activities can be prepared in coming years after formation of SHG federation or as the case

may be.

C) Production Plan:

An awareness programme has been undertaken at Gram Sabha for communication & sensitization of the target beneficiaries. Production System & micro enterprises Action Plan is pre-requisite for availing the funds under the Production System & micro enterprises component. Production plan has been prepared by the PIA in consultation with WDT, WC & the members of Users Group. Details of funds available & their utilisation are as under:

Total project cost Rs. 1328.10 Lacs. Funds available under Production System & Micro enterprises component is 10% of total project cost= Rs132.81 Lacs.

I Arable Land Production System

No. of house holds

Cost of activity WDF

(1) Demonstration work by agri deprtment 4% 0 5312400.00 0.00

(2) Agro Forestry(Per/100 plants) No. 70 3620 74200.00

(3) Horticulture Wadi No. 60 28010 1372800.00

(4) Homestead Kitchen Garden No. 1272 600 0.00

(6) ii Vermi Compost Unit No. 54 23510 693150.00

(10) HDPE/ PVC Pipe (15000 Rs. pipe per farmer) mt. 0 15000 0.00

Total - 0 0 0.00

III Live Stock Management 0 0 0.00

(1) TR to AH Department 2% 0 2656200.00 0.00

(2) Mangers Distribution No. 940 3000 0.00

Awareness Programme

Slogan Wall Painting

Scientific Animal Husbandry Practices; Seminars / Debates / Pamphlet distribution/ Stickers/ Chetana Rally

Broadcasting / Telecasting Film Show

Visit- intra/ inter/ out of State/ Abroad

Fortnightly Meetings with Livestock keeper to discuss and decide all breedable females to be covered

SCIENTIFIC LIVESTOCK MANAGEMENT

This intervention is planned to support present occupation system in the area. As agriculture and animal husbandry are the main stays of life. But due to poor situation of access to animal husbandry services following two activities are proposed in this project. In this watershed secondary occupation of poor families (small and marginal farmers) is livestock rearing. The main focus of project will be on reducing input cost while increasing production efficiency. In this region cows and goats are most common animals, but due to low meat value and milk production they are not able to get proper value. Sheep and Marwari Goat are dual-purpose variety and help poor farmers to raise their income with an average of Rs. 6000 to Rs. 10000 for one animal. .

PROPOSED INTERVENTIONS

Livestock rearing has always been an inseparable livelihood component in the rural areas along with agriculture. This always proves to be one of the major sources of cash income through sale of animals and animal products (like milk, manure, skin etc.). Apart from this, bullocks provide most of the farm power and almost entire organic matter that is added to local agricultural fields as ‘manure’ comes from animal refuse.

Creation of Disease Free Zone: Livestock’s health coverage As animal husbandry is another occupation which helps community to sustain their livelihood, but most of the people do not follow proper health check-up for most of their animals. Thus to bring element of proper health management under animal husbandry it is planned to support for animal health check-up and vaccination camps. This component would be organized by involving animal husbandry department so that people are linked to department and developed linkages will continue further.

Establishment of Pashudhan Seva Kendra (PSK) (Convergence with peer department)

Deworming to reduce worm load and enhance disease resistance. (Convergence with peer department)

Distribution of mineral mixture. (Convergence with peer department)

Free of Cost Vaccination in IWMP area Livestock for H.S., B.Q., F.M.D., PPR, ETV and Sheep Pox.

Ensure Hygenic measures to check Zonosis.(DAH/ IWMP)

Construction of Animal Sheds with Manger and Portable Manger With accessories

Provision of Cattle Water Troughs

Infertility Management: To ensure Livestock’s Productivity

Expansion of AI Coverage/ reduction in no.of infertile females

PCPD+ COMBAT INFERTILITY+ CAMPS INFERTILITY RLDB+ CAMPS INFERTILITY SC COMPONENT

Breed Improvment: To ensure Livestock’s Productivity enhancement

A.I. (Convergence with peer department)

Convergence with peer Department/DAH/Agriculture/ATMA/ Board/ Trust/ Goseva

An Assistance to control Malnutrition: Protein Supplementation

Feed & fodder production enhancement.

ANNUAL ACTION PLAN : PIA will prepare annual action plan in the month of January indicating outgoing

liabilities as well as new projects which they wish to take during next financial years & will submit to PM(WCDC).

These plans will be placed for approval at P.S. (Standing Committee of Production and Agriculture) & Z.P.

(Standing Committee of Production) level every year. While preparing Annual Action Plan (AAP) if rates of labour

or material in DPR increased or decreased changed rates will be applicable for preparing AAP & the effect of

same can be met by converging the remaining works with other schemes.

Proposed Development Plan

Bagoda Jaisawas

S.No Activity Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost

Cost from Project Fund

Convergence Fund

Beneficiary contribution Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost


Convergence Fund

Beneficiary contribution

1.00 2.00

3.00 4.00 5.00

6.00 7.00

8.00

9.00

3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00

7.00 8.00 9.00

A I Administration cost 0.10 - -

50.33 50.33 -

- - - 57.11

57.11 - -

II Monitoring 0.01 - -

5.03 5.03 -

- - - 5.71

5.71 - -

III Evaluation 0.01 - -

5.03 5.03 -

- - - 5.71

5.71 - -

SubTotal 0.12 - -

60.39 60.39 -

- - - 68.53

68.53 - -

B I Preparatory Phase (Entry Point Activity)

0.04 - -

20.13 20.13 -

- - - 22.84

22.84 - -

II Institution And Capacity Building 0.05 - -

25.16 25.16 -

- - - 28.55

28.55 - -

III Preparation of Detailed Project Report (DPR)

0.01 - -

5.03 5.03 -

- - - 5.71

5.71 - -

Total 0.10 - -

50.33 50.33 -

- - - 57.11

57.11 - -

Grant Total 1 0.22 - -

110.72 110.72 -

- - - 125.63

125.63 - -

C

Watershed Development Works (NRM)

0.56

Arable Land Conservation Measures -

(1.00) Evaluation Hac. 973.00 3,550.00 34.54 31.09 -

3.45 1,040.00 3,550.00 36.92

33.23 - 3.69

(2.00) Earthen Bund with Pitching No. - 58,500.00 - - - - - 58,500.00 - - - -

(3.00) Dug out Pond No. - 30,000.00 - - - - - 30,000.00 - - - -

(4.00) Water Harvesting Tanka No. 265.00 99,500.00 263.68 237.31

129.35

26.37 300.00 99,500.00 298.50

268.65 129.35 29.85

(5.00) Wasteweir No. - 24,000.00 - - - - - 24,000.00 - - - -

Total - 1,238.00 - 298.22 268.39

129.35

29.82 1,340.00 - 335.42

301.88 129.35 33.54

II Non Arable Land Conservation Measures

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

(1.00) Ditch Cum Bund Fencing Mt. - 114.00 - - -

- - - - - - -

(4.00) Earthen Bund with Pitching No. - 58,500.00 - - - - - - - - - -

(5.00) Dug out Pond No. - 30,000.00 - - - - - - - - - -

(6.00) Water Harvesting Tanka - B21 No. 15.00 99,500.00 14.93 13.43 -

1.49 20.00 99,500.00 19.90

17.91 - 1.99

(7.00) Wasteweir No. - 24,000.00 - - - - - - - - - -

Total - - - 14.93 13.43 -

1.49 - - 19.90

17.91 - 1.99

III Drainage Line Treatment - - - - - - - - - - - - -

(1.00) Earthen Bund with Pitching No. - 58,500.00 - - - - - - - - - -

(2.00) Wasteweir No. - 24,000.00 - - - - - - - - - -

Total - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Total Watershed Development Works 56% - - -

313.14 281.83

129.35

31.31 - - 355.32

319.79 129.35 35.53

D Production Measure 0.10 - - - - -

- - - - - - -

I Arable Land Production System - - - - - - - - - - - - -

(1.00) Crop Demonstration

0.04 - -

20.13 18.12 -

2.01 - - 22.84

20.56 - 2.28

(2.00) Agro Forestry(Per/100 plants) No. 30.00 3,620.00

1.09 0.98 -

0.11 30.00 3,620.00 1.09

0.98 - 0.11

(3.00) Horticulture Wadi No. 20.00 28,010.00

5.60 5.04 -

0.56 30.00 28,010.00 8.40

7.56 - 0.84

(4.00) Homestead Kitchen Garden No. 780.00 600.00

4.68 4.21 -

0.47 342.00 600.00 2.05

1.85 - 0.21

(6.00) ii Vermi Compost Unit No. 10.00 23,510.00

2.35 2.12 -

0.24 24.00 23,510.00 5.64

5.08 - 0.56

###### HDPE/ PVC Pipe (15000 Rs. pipe per farmer) mt. - 15,000.00 - -

15.00

- - 15,000.00 - - 15.00 -

Total - - - - - -

- - - - - - -

III Live Stock Management - - - - - - - - - - - - -

(1.00)

Distribution of Buffalo bulls 0.02 - -

10.07 9.06 -

1.01 - - 11.42

10.28 - 1.14

(2.00) Mangers Distribution

No. 400.00 3,000.00 12.00 10.80 -

1.20 400.00 3,000.00 12.00

10.80 - 1.20

Total 10% - - - 55.91 50.32

15.00

5.59 - - 63.45

57.10 15.00 6.34

Total Production System 0.09 - - - - -

- - - - - - -

Revolving Fund to SHGs 60% - - - 27.18 27.18 -

- - - 30.84

30.84 - -

For Federation of SHS 30% - - - 13.59 13.59 -

- - - 15.42

15.42 - -

For Individual Enterpreneurs 10% - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Service sector :- 1. Carpenter No. 5.00 8,000.00

0.40 0.36 -

0.04 5.00 8,000.00 0.40

0.36 - 0.04

Khokha

Quantity Total Cost


Convergence Fund Beneficiary Contribution

Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost Cost from Project Fund Convergence Fund


10.00 11.00 12.00 13.00 14.00 15.00 16.00

17.00 18.00 19.00 20.00

- - 25.38 25.38 - - - 132.81 132.81 - -

- - 2.54 2.54 - - - 13.28 13.28 - -

- - 2.54 2.54 - - - 13.28 13.28 - -

- - 30.46 30.46 - - - 159.37 159.37 - -

- - 10.15 10.15 - - - 53.12 53.12 - -

- - 12.69 12.69 - - - 66.41 66.41 - -

- - 2.54 2.54 - - - 13.28 13.28 - -

- - 25.38 25.38 - - - 132.81 132.81 - -

- - 55.84 55.84 - - - 292.18 292.18 - -

2. Black smith No. 3.00 9,600.00 0.29 0.26 -

0.03 3.00 9,600.00 0.29

0.26 - 0.03

3. Cycle repair No. 6.00 8,000.00 0.48 0.43 -

0.05 5.00 8,000.00 0.40

0.36 - 0.04

4.Potter No. 2.00 12,000.00 0.24 0.22 -

0.02 2.00 12,000.00 0.24

0.22 - 0.02

5. Mason No. 30.00 4,000.00 1.20 1.08 -

0.12 30.00 4,000.00 1.20

1.08 - 0.12

6. Foot wear No. 1.00 12,000.00

0.12 0.11 -

0.01 1.00 12,000.00 0.12

0.11 - 0.18

Small Live Stock (i) Sheep

No. 5.00 25,000.00 1.25 1.13 -

0.13 7.00 25,000.00 1.75

1.58 -

(ii) Goat No. 4.00 26,000.00 1.04 0.94 -

0.10 5.00 26,000.00 1.30

1.17 - 0.13

Other Micro Enterprises. - - -

0.02 0.02 -

0.00 - - 0.01

0.01 - 0.00

Total of 9% - - -

45.80 45.30 -

0.50 - - 51.96

51.39 - 0.57

Consolidation - - -

15.10 15.10 -

- - - 17.13

17.13 - -

Total 3% - - 15.10 15.10 -

- - 17.13

17.13 - -

Grand Total - Total -

540.67 503.26

144.35

37.41 Total - 613.49

571.05 144.35 42.45

-

-

356.30 3,550.00 12.65 11.38 - 1.26 2,369.30 84.11 75.70 - 8.41

- 58,500.00 - - - - - - - - -

- 30,000.00 - - - - - - - - -

136.00 99,500.00 135.32 121.79 79.60 13.53 701.00 697.50 627.75 338.30 69.75

- 24,000.00 - - - - - - - - -

492.30 - 147.97 133.17 79.60 14.80 3,070.30 781.61 703.44 338.30 78.16

- - - - - - - - - - -

- 114.00 - - - - - - - - -

- 58,500.00 - - - - - - - - -

- 30,000.00 - - - - - - - - -

10.00 99,500.00 9.95 8.96 - 1.00 45.00 44.78 40.30 - 4.48

- 24,000.00 - - - - - - - - -

- - 9.95 8.96 - 1.00 - 44.78 40.30 - 4.48

- - - - - - - - - - -

- 58,500.00 - - - - - - - - -

- 24,000.00 - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - -

- - 157.92 142.13 79.60 15.79 - 826.38 743.74 338.30 82.64

- - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - -

- - 10.15 9.14 - 1.02 - 53.12 47.81 - 5.31

10.00 3,620.00 0.36 0.33 - 0.04 70.00 2.53 2.28 - 0.25

10.00 28,010.00 2.80 2.52 - 0.28 60.00 16.81 15.13 - 1.68

150.00 600.00 0.90 0.81 - 0.09 1,272.00 7.63 6.87 - 0.76

20.00 23,510.00 4.70 4.23 - 0.47 54.00 12.70 11.43 - 1.27

- 15,000.00 - - 15.00 - - - - 45.00 -

- - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - -

- - 5.08 4.57 - 0.51 - 26.56 23.91 - 2.66

140.00 3,000.00 4.20 3.78 - 0.42 940.00 28.20 25.38 - 2.82

- - 28.19 25.37 15.00 2.82 - 147.55 132.80 45.00 14.76

- - - - - - - - - - -

- - 13.71 13.71 - - - 71.72 71.72 - -

- - 6.85 6.85 - - - 35.86 35.86 - -

- - - - - - - - - - -

2.00 8,000.00 0.16 0.14 - 0.02 12.00 0.96 0.86 - 0.10

3.00 9,600.00 0.29 0.26 - 0.03 9.00 0.86 0.78 - 0.09

2.00 8,000.00 0.16 0.14 - 0.02 13.00 1.04 0.94 - 0.10

2.00 12,000.00 0.24 0.22 - 0.02 6.00 0.72 0.65 - 0.07

16.00 4,000.00 0.64 0.58 - 0.06 76.00 3.04 2.74 - 0.30

- 12,000.00 - - - - 2.00 0.24 0.22 - 0.02

2.00 25,000.00 0.50 0.45 - 0.05 14.00 3.50 3.15 - 0.35

2.00 26,000.00 0.52 0.47 - 0.05 11.00 2.86 2.57 - 0.29

- - 0.03 0.03 - 0.00 - 0.06 0.06 - 0.01

- - 23.09 22.84 - 0.25 - 120.86 119.53 - 1.33

- - 7.61 7.61 - - - 39.84 39.84 - -

- 7.61 7.61 - - - 39.84 39.84 - -

Total - 272.66 253.79 94.60 18.86 Total 1,426.82 1,327.42 383.30 98.72

CHAPTER IV

ACTIVITY WISE TOTAL ABSTRACT OF COST

STATE: RAJASTHAN UNIT COST: RS. 15000/- Hac.

DIS TRICT: JALORE GEOGRAPHICAL AREA: 8854 Hac.

AGROCLIMATIC ZONE: EFFECTIVE AREA: NAME OF THE BLOCK: Bhinmal (I) ARABLE LAND:7703.5 HAC.

NAME OF WATERSHED: JALORE IWMP 17/11-12 (II) NON ARABLE LAND: 1150.5 Hac. CATEGORY OF WATERSHED: DESERT AREA TOTAL : 8854 Hac

IRRIGATION PERCENTAGE: 4.49% TOTAL COST:

132810000 Lakh

S.No

Activity Unit Quantity Unit Cost

Total Cost Labour Material Cost from Project Fund

Convergence Fund

Beneficiary contributio

n

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

A I Administration cost 10% 0 0 132.81 132.81 0.00

II Monitoring 1% 0 0 13.28 13.28 0.00

III Evaluation 1% 0 0 13.28 13.28 0.00

SubTotal 12% 0 0 159.37 159.37 0.00 0.00

B I Preparatory Phase (Entry Point Activity) 4% 0 0 53.12 53.12 0.00 0.00

II Institution And Capacity Building 5% 0 0 66.41 66.41 0.00 0.00

III Preparation of Detailed Project Report (DPR) 1% 0 0 13.28 13.28 0.00 0.00

Total 10% 0 0 132.81 132.81 0.00 0.00

Grant Total 1 22% 292.18 0.00 0.00 292.18

C Watershed Development Works (NRM)

56%

Arable Land Conservation Measures

(1) Vegetative Barrier Hac. 2369 3550 84.11 23.22 60.89 75.70 8.41

(2) Earthen Bund with Pitching No. 0 58500 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

(3) Dug out Pond No. 0 30000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

(4) Water Harvesting Tanka No. 701 99500 697.50 181.28 516.22 627.75 338.30 69.75

(5) Wasteweir No. 0 24000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 3070.30

0 781.61 204.50 577.11 703.44 338.30 78.16


0.00 0.00

(1) Ditch Cum Bund Fencing Mt. 0 114 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00


(5) Dug out Pond No. 0 30000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

(6) Water Harvesting Tanka - B21 No. 45 99500 44.78 11.64 33.14 40.30 4.48

(7) Wasteweir No. 0 24000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 44.78 11.64 33.14 40.30 0.00 4.48

III Drainage Line Treatment 0.00 0.00


(2) Wasteweir No. 0 24000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total Watershed Development Works 56% 826.38 216.13 610.25 743.74 338.30 82.64

D Production Measure 10% 0.00 0.00

I Arable Land Production System 0.00 0.00 0.00

(1) Demonstration work by agri deprtment 4% 0 0 53.12 0.00 0.00 47.81 0.00 5.31

(2) Agro Forestry(Per/100 plants) No. 70 3620 2.53 0.74 1.79 2.28 0.00 0.25

(3) Horticulture Wadi No. 60 28010 16.81 13.73 3.56 15.13 0.00 1.68

(4) Homestead Kitchen Garden No. 1272 600 7.63 0.00 7.63 6.87 0.00 0.76

(6) ii Vermi Compost Unit No. 54 23510 12.70 6.93 5.76 11.43 0.00 1.27

(10) HDPE/ PVC Pipe (15000 Rs. pipe per farmer) mt. 0 15000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.00 0.00

Total - 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

III Live Stock Management 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

(1) TR to AH Department 2% 0 0 26.56 0.00 0.00 23.91 0.00 2.66

(2) Mangers Distribution No. 940 3000 28.20 0.00 12.00 25.38 0.00 2.82

Total 10% 147.55 21.40 30.75 132.80 45.00 14.76

Total Production System 9% 0.00 0.00

Revolving Fund to SHGs 60% 71.72 0.00 0.00 71.72

For Federation of SHS 30% 35.86 0.00 0.00 35.86

For Individual Enterpreneurs 10% 0.00 0.00

Service sector :- 1. Carpenter

No. 12 8000 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.86 0.10

2. Black smith No. 9 9600 0.86 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.09

3. Cycle repair No. 13 8000 1.04 0.00 0.00 0.94 0.10

4.Potter No. 6 12000 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.07

5. Mason No. 76 4000 3.04 0.00 0.00 2.74 0.30

6. Foot wear No. 2 12000 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.02

Small Live Stock (i) Sheep(5+1=6 No.)

No. 14 25000 3.50 0.00 0.00 3.15 0.35

(ii) Goat(4+1=5No.) No. 11 26000 2.86 0.00 0.00 2.57 0.29

Other Micro Enterprises. 0 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.01

Total of 9%

120.86 0.00 0.00 119.53 0.00 1.33

Consolidation 39.84 0.00 0.00 39.84

Total 3% 39.84 0.00 0.00 39.84

Grand Total Total 1426.82 237.54 640.99 1327.42 383.30 98.72

CHAPTER IV

ACTIVITY WISE TOTAL ABSTRACT OF COST G.P. JESAWAS



AGROCLIMATIC ZONE: EFFECTIVE AREA: NAME OF THE BLOCK: Bhinmal (I) ARABLE LAND: 3312.31 HAC. NAME OF WATERSHED: JALORE IWMP 17/11-12 (II) NON ARABLE LAND: 494.69 Hac.

CATEGORY OF WATERSHED: DESERT AREA TOTAL : 3807 Hac IRRIGATION PERCENTAGE: 4.49% TOTAL COST:

57105000 Lakh

S.No Activity Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost Labour Material Cost from Project Fund

Convergence Fund

Beneficiary contributio

n

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 9 10 11


II Monitoring 1% 0 0 5.71 5.71 0.00

III Evaluation 1% 0 0 5.71 5.71 0.00

SubTotal 12% 0 0 68.53 68.53 0.00 0.00




Total 10% 0 0 57.11 57.11 0.00 0.00

Grant Total 1 22% 126 0 0 126


56%


(1) Vegetative Barrier Hac 1040 3550 36.92 10.19 26.73 33.23 3.69


(3) Dug out Pond No. 0 30000 0.00 0.00 0.00

(4) Water Harvesting Tanka 292 from Program and 130 from Other scheme of Government No. 300 99500 298.50 77.58 220.92 268.65 129.35 29.85

(5) Wasteweir No. 0 24000 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 1340.000 335.42 87.77 247.65 301.88 129.35 33.54


(1) Ditch Cum Bund Fencing Mt. 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00

(4) Earthen Bund with Pitching No. 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00

(5) Dug out Pond No. 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00

(6) Water Harvesting Tanka with Khel No. 20 99500 19.90 5.17 14.73 17.91 1.99

(7) Wasteweir No. 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 19.90 5.17 14.73 17.91 0.00 1.99

III Drainage Line Treatment


(2) Wasteweir No. 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00


D Production Measure 10%


(1) Demonstration work by agri deprtment 4% 0 0.00 22.84 0.00 0.00 20.56 2.28

(2) Agro Forestry(Per/100 plants) No. 30 3620.00 1.09 0.32 0.77 0.98 0.11

(3) Horticulture Wadi No. 30 28010.00 8.40 6.86 1.78 7.56 0.84

(4) Homestead Kitchen Garden No. 342 600.00 2.05 2.05 1.85 0.21

(6) Vermi Compost Unit No. 24 23510.00 5.64 0.49 5.16 5.08 0.56

(10) HDPE/ PVC Pipe (15000 Rs. pipe per farmer) mt. 0 15000.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.00

Total - 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

III Live Stock Management 0.00 0.00 0.00

(1) TR to AH Department 2% 0 0.00 11.42 10.28 0.00 1.14

(2) Mangers Distribution No. 400 3000.00 12.00 12.00 10.80 1.20

Total 10% 63.45 7.67 21.76 57.10 15.00 6.34

Total Production System 9%

Revolving Fund to SHGs 60% 30.84 30.84

For Federation of SHS 30% 15.42 15.42

For Individual Enterpreneurs 10%


No. 5 8000 0.40 0.36 0.04

2. Black smith No. 3 9600 0.29 0.26 0.03

3. Cycle repair No. 5 8000 0.40 0.36 0.04

4.Potter No. 2 12000 0.24 0.22 0.02

5. Mason No. 30 4000 1.20 1.08 0.12

6. Foot wear No. 1 12000 0.12 0.11 0.01


No. 7 25000 1.75 1.58 0.18

(ii) Goat(4+1=5No.) No. 5 26000 1.30 1.17 0.13

Other Micro Enterprises. 0.01 0.01 0.00

Total of 9%

51.96 0.00 0.00 51.39 0.00 0.57

Consolidation 17.13 17.13

Total 3% 17.13 0.00 0.00 17.13


CHAPTER IV

ACTIVITY WISE TOTAL ABSTRACT OF COST G.P. Bagoda



AGROCLIMATIC ZONE: EFFECTIVE AREA: NAME OF THE BLOCK: Bhinmal (I) ARABLE LAND:2919.047 HAC. NAME OF WATERSHED: JALORE IWMP 17/11-12 (II) NON ARABLE LAND: 435.953 Hac. CATEGORY OF WATERSHED: DESERT AREA TOTAL : 3355 Hac


50325000 Lakh


Convergence Fund


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11


II Monitoring 1% 0 0 5.03 5.03 0.00

III Evaluation 1% 0 0 5.03 5.03 0.00

SubTotal 12% 0 0 60.39 60.39 0.00 0.00




Total 10% 0 0 50.33 50.33 0.00 0.00

Grant Total 1 22% 110.72 0.00 0.00 110.72


56%




(3) Dug out Pond No. 0 30000 0.00 0.00 0.00

(4) Water harvesting Tanka 260 from Project and 130 from other Government scheme No. 265 99500 263.68 68.53 195.15 237.31 129.35 26.37

(5) Wasteweir No. 0 24000 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 1238.000 298.22 78.06 220.15 268.39 129.35 29.82


(1) Ditch Cum Bund Fencing

Mt. 0 114 0.00 0.00 0.00


(5) Dug out Pond No. 0 30000 0.00 0.00 0.00

(6) Water Harvesting Tanka with Khel No. 15 99500 14.93 3.88 11.05 13.43 1.49

(7) Wasteweir No. 0 24000 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 14.93 3.88 11.05 13.43 0.00 1.49



(2) Wasteweir No. 0 24000 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00




(1) Demonstration work by agri deprtment 4% 0 0 20.13 18.12 2.01

(2) Agro Forestry(Per/100 plants) No. 30 3620 1.09 0.32 0.77 0.98 0.11

(3) Horticulture Wadi No. 20 28010 5.60 4.58 1.19 5.04 0.56

(4) Homestead Kitchen Garden No. 780 600 4.68 4.68 4.21 0.47

(6) ii Vermi Compost Unit No. 10 23510 2.35 2.15 0.20 2.12 0.24

(10)

HDPE/ PVC Pipe (15000 Rs. pipe per farmer) mt. 0 15000 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.00

Total - 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00


(1) TR to AH Department 2% 0 0 10.07 9.06 0.00 1.01

(2) Mangers Distribution No. 400 3000 12.00 10.80 1.20

Total 10% 55.91 7.04 6.84 50.32 15.00 5.59

Total Production System 9%





No. 5 8000 0.40 0.36 0.04

2. Black smith No. 3 9600 0.29 0.26 0.03

3. Cycle repair No. 6 8000 0.48 0.43 0.05

4.Potter No. 2 12000 0.24 0.22 0.02

5. Mason No. 30 4000 1.20 1.08 0.12

6. Foot wear No. 1 12000 0.12 0.11 0.01


No. 5 25000 1.25 1.13 0.13

(ii) Goat(4+1=5No.) No. 4 26000 1.04 0.94 0.10


Total of 9%

45.80 0.00 0.00 45.30 0.00 0.50


Total 3% 15.10 0.00 0.00 15.10


CHAPTER IV

ACTIVITY WISE TOTAL ABSTRACT OF COST G.P. KHOKHA



AGROCLIMATIC ZONE: EFFECTIVE AREA: NAME OF THE BLOCK: Bhinmal (I) ARABLE LAND:1472.13 HAC. NAME OF WATERSHED: JALORE IWMP 17/11-12 (II) NON ARABLE LAND: 219.86 Hac. CATEGORY OF WATERSHED: DESERT AREA TOTAL : 1692 Hac


25380000 Lakh


Convergence Fund Beneficiary contribution

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

A I Administration cost 10% 0 0 25 25 0

II Monitoring 1% 0 0 3 3 0

III Evaluation 1% 0 0 3 3 0

SubTotal 12% 0 0 30 30 0 0

B I Preparatory Phase (Entry Point Activity) 4% 0 0 10 10 0 0

II Institution And Capacity Building 5% 0 0 13 13 0 0

III Preparation of Detailed Project Report (DPR) 1% 0 0 3 3 0 0

Total 10% 0 0 25 25 0 0

Grant Total 1 22% 56 0 0 56


56%




(3) Dug out Pond No. 0 30000 0.000 0.000 0.000

(4) Water Harvesting Tanka 292 from Program and 130 from Other scheme of Government No. 136 99500 135.320 35.169 100.151 121.788 80 13.532

(5) Wasteweir No. 0 24000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Total 492.300 148 39 109 133 80 15


(1) Ditch Cum Bund Fencing

Mt. 0 114 0.000 0.000 0.000


(5) Dug out Pond No. 0 30000 0.000 0.000 0.000

(6) Water Harvesting Tanka With Khel No. 10 99500 9.950 2.586 7.364 8.955 0.995

(7) Wasteweir No. 0 24000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Total 9.950 2.586 7.364 8.955 0.000 0.995



(2) Wasteweir No. 0 24000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Total 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000




(1) Demonstration work by agri deprtment 4% 0 0 10.152 9.137 1.015

(2) Agro Forestry(Per/100 plants) No. 10 3620 0.362 0.106 0.256 0.326 0.036

(3) Horticulture Wadi No. 10 28010 2.801 2.288 0.593 2.521 0.280

(4) Homestead Kitchen Garden No. 150 600 0.900 0.900 0.810 0.090

(6) ii Vermi Compost Unit No. 20 23510 4.702 4.297 0.405 4.232 0.470

(10) HDPE/ PVC Pipe (15000 Rs. pipe per farmer) mt. 0 15000 0.000 0.000 15 0.000

Total - 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000


(1) TR to AH Department 2% 0 0 5.076 4.568 0 0.508

(2) Mangers Distribution No. 140 3000 4.200 3.780 0.420

Total 10% 28.193 6.691 2.154 25.374 15.000 2.819

Micro Entriprisis 9%





No. 2 8000 0.160 0.144 0.016

2. Black smith No. 3 9600 0.288 0.259 0.029

3. Cycle repair No. 2 8000 0.160 0.144 0.016

4.Potter No. 2 12000 0.240 0.216 0.024

5. Mason No. 16 4000 0.640 0.576 0.064

6. Foot wear No. 0 12000 0.000 0.000 0.000


No. 2 25000 0.500 0.450 0.050

(ii) Goat(4+1=5No.) No. 2 26000 0.520 0.468 0.052


Total of 9%

23.095 0.000 0.000 22.844 0.000 0.254


Total 3% 7.614 0.000 0.000 7.614


Rajasthan Bal Kalyan Samiti Jhadol

CHAPTER -V (A)

S.No

Activity Unit Quantity

Unit Cost

Total Cost

Cost from

Project Fund

Convergence Fund

Benefic

iary contribution

2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total

Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin

1

2.00 3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

9.00

A I

Administration cost 0.10

-

-

132.81

132.81

-

12.00

26.56

12.00

26.56

12.00

26.56

12.00

26.56

12.00

26.56

60.00

132.81

II Monitoring 0.01

-

-

13.28

13.28

-

12.00

2.66

12.00

2.66

12.00

2.66

12.00

2.66

12.00

2.66

60.00

13.28

III Evaluation 0.01

-

-

13.28

13.28

-

12.00

-

12.00

3.32

12.00

3.32

12.00

3.32

12.00

3.32

60.00

13.28

SubTotal 0.12 -

-

159.37

159.37

-

-

36.00

29.22

36.00

32.54

36.00

32.54

36.00

32.54

36.00

32.54

180.0

0

159.37

B I

Preparatory Phase (Entry Point Activity) 0.04

-

-

53.12

53.12

-

-

53.12

-

53.12

II

Institution And Capacity Building 0.05

-

-

66.41

66.41

-

-

0.60

39.84

0.18

11.95

0.12

7.97

0.05

3.32

0.05

3.32

1.00

66.41

III

Preparation of Detailed Project Report (DPR) 0.01

-

-

13.28

13.28

-

-

13.28

13.28

Total 0.10 -

-

132.81

132.81

-

-

0.60

106.2

5

0.18

11.95

0.12

7.97

0.05

3.32

0.05

3.32

1.00

132.81

Grant Total 1 0.22

292.18

292.18 -

-

135.4

7

44.49

40.51

35.86

35.86

292.18


0.56


(1)

Vegetative Barrier Hac.

2,369.

30

0.04

84.11

75.70

8.41 -

-

710.79

22.71

473.86

15.14

473.86

15.14

710.79

22.71

2,369.

30

75.70

(2)

Earthen Bund with Pitching No.

-

-

-

-

-

-

- -

- -

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(3) Dug out Pond No.

-

-

-

-

-

-

- -

- -

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(4)

Water Harvesting Tanka No.

701.0

0

1.00

697.50

627.75

338.30

69.75 -

-

160.00

143.28

300.00

268.65

150.00

134.33

91.00

81.49

701.0

0

627.75

(5) Wasteweir No.

-

-

-

-

-

-

- -

- -

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Total

3,070.

30

781.61

703.44

338.30

78.16 -

-

870.79

165.99

773.86

283.79

623.86

149.46

801.79

104.20

3,070.

30

703.44

II

Non Arable Land Conservation Measures

-

(1)

Ditch Cum Bund Fencing

Mt. -

-

-

-

-

- -

- -

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(4)


-

-

-

-

-

-

- -

- -

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(5) Dug out Pond No.

-

-

-

-

-

-

- -

- -

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(6)

Water Harvesting Tanka No.

45.00

1.00

44.78

40.30

4.48

-

-

10.00

8.96

10.00

8.96

10.00

8.96

15.00

13.43

45.00

40.30

(7) Wasteweir No.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

6.00

-

4.00

-

4.00

-

2.00

-

16.00

-

Total

44.78

40.30 -

4.48

-

-

16.00

8.96

14.00

8.96

14.00

8.96

17.00

13.43

61.00

40.30

III

Drainage Line Treatment

-

-

(1)


-

-

-

-

-

-

-

10.00

-

15.00

-

10.00

-

7.00

-

42.00

-

(2) Wasteweir No.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

10.00

-

15.00

-

10.00

-

7.00

-

42.00

-

Total -

-

-

-

-

-

-

20.00

-

30.00

-

20.00

-

14.00

-

84.00

-

Total Watershed Development Works 56%

826.38

743.74

338.30

82.64

-

-

906.79

174.94

817.86

292.74

657.86

158.42

832.79

117.63

3,215.

30

743.74

D Production Measure 0.10

-

-

I

Arable Land Production System

-

-

-

(1)

Demonstration work by agri deprtment 0.04

-

53.12

47.81

-

5.31

-

- -

- -

-

-

-

-

-

-

47.81

(2

Agro Forestry(Per/100 No.

70.00

0.04

2.53

2.28

-

0.25

-

-

31.00

1.01

20.00

0.65

16.00

0.52

4.00

0.13

71.00

2.31

) plants)

(3)

Horticulture Wadi No.

60.00

0.28

16.81

15.13

-

1.68

-

-

15.00

3.78

17.00

4.29

15.00

3.78

15.00

3.78

62.00

15.63

(4)

Homestead Kitchen Garden No.

1,272.

00

0.01

7.63

6.87 -

0.76

-

-

400.00

2.16

500.00

2.70

351.00

1.90

400.00

2.16

1,651.

00

8.92

(6)

ii Vermi Compost Unit No.

54.00

0.24

12.70

11.43

-

1.27

-

-

20.00

4.23

20.00

4.23

10.00

2.12

-

-

50.00

10.58

(10)

HDPE/ PVC Pipe (15000 Rs. pipe per farmer) mt.

-

0.15

-

-

45.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Total -

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

III

Live Stock Management

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(1)

TR to AH Department 0.02

-

-

26.56

23.91

-

2.66

-

-

-

-

-

-

23.91

(2)

Mangers Distribution

No.

940.0

0

0.03

28.20

25.38 -

2.82

-

-

300.00

8.10

300.00

8.10

200.00

5.40

100.00

2.70

900.0

0

24.30

Total 10%

147.55

132.80

45.00

14.76 -

-

766.00

19.28

857.00

19.97

592.00

13.71

519.00

8.77

2,734.

00

133.46

Livilihood Activities 0.09

-

-

Revolving Fund to SHGs 60%

71.72

71.72

0.20

-

0.20

28.69

0.20

14.34

0.20

14.34

0.20

14.34

1.00

71.72

For Federation of SHS 30%

35.86

35.86

0.20

-

0.20

14.34

0.20

7.17

0.20

7.17

0.20

7.17

1.00

35.86


Service sector :- 1. Carpenter No.

12.00

0.08

0.96

0.86

0.10

-

-

2.00

0.14

4.00

0.29

4.00

0.29

2.00

0.14

12.00

0.86

2. Black smith No.

9.00

0.10

0.86

0.78

0.09 -

-

3.00

0.26

3.00

0.26

3.00

0.26

-

-

9.00

0.78

3. Cycle repair No.

13.00

0.08

1.04

0.94

0.10 -

-

5.00

0.36

4.00

0.29

4.00

0.29

-

-

13.00

0.94

4.Potter No.

6.00

0.12

0.72

0.65

0.07 -

-

3.00

0.32

1.00

0.11

1.00

0.11

1.00

0.11

6.00

0.65

5. Mason No.

76.00

0.04

3.04

2.74

0.30 -

-

25.00

0.90

15.00

0.54

20.00

0.72

16.00

0.58

76.00

2.74

6. Foot wear No.

2.00

0.12

0.24

0.22

0.02

-

-

1.00

0.11

1.00

0.11

-

-

2.00

0.22

Small Live Stock (i) Sheep(5+1=6 No.) No.

14.00

0.25

3.50

3.15

0.35

-

- -

-

5.00

1.13

5.00

1.13

4.00

0.90

14.00

3.15

(ii) Goat(4+1=5No.) No.

11.00

0.26

2.86

2.57

0.29

-

-

5.00

1.17

2.00

0.47

2.00

0.47

2.00

0.47

11.00

2.57

Other Micro Enterprises.

0.06

0.06

0.01

-

0.06

-

-

-

-

0.06

Total of 9%

120.86

119.53 -

1.33

0.40

-

43.40

46.24

35.40

24.70

40.40

24.88

25.40

23.71

145.0

0

119.53

Consolidation

39.84

39.84 -

-

-

-

-

-

39.84

Total 3%

39.84

39.84

-

-

-

- -

- -

-

-

-

-

-

-

39.84

Grand Total Total

1,426.8

2

1,327.42

383.30

98.04

134.7

8

284.28

377.24

232.19

185.29

1,328.76

4 CHAPTER – VI EXPECTED OUTCOMES

1 2 3 4 5 6

S. No. Item Unit of measurement

Pre-project Status Expected Post-project Status

Remarks

1 Status of water table (Depth to Ground water level)

Meters 85-87 mtr 82-84 mtr.

2 Ground water structures repaired/ rejuvenated

No. 17 17

3 Quality of drinking water Description TDS and Fluoride & other chemical problem in water

Rain water will be used for drinking through 696 tanka

4 Availability of drinking water

Description 14 tanka 746 tanka

5 Change in irrigated Area Ha 2514.15 ha. 2650 Ha.

6 Change in cropping/ land use pattern

Ha. Bajra, caster, moong, mustard, zeera are main crop

Cash crop, Vegetable, Horticulture will be promoted

7 Area under agricultural crop

Ha 5238 Ha 6100 ha. 5115.22 ha. 879.78 ha.

I Area under single crop

Ha 4611.12 Ha.

Ii Area under double crop

Ha 626.28 Ha.

Iii Area under multiple crop

Ha 5238 Ha 6100ha

8 Change in cultivated Area Ha 5238 ha 6100 ha.

9 yield of major crops of area

Name of the Crop Current status Expected post project status

Area (ha) Productivity (kg/ ha) Area (ha) Productivity (kg/ ha)

Kharif Caster 193 600 250 800

10 production of major crops of area

Bajra 3780 700 4200 750

Moong/Moth 1205 400 1500 450

Others 60 150

Rabi Others 35

Mustered 320 800 500 1250

Zeera 165 400 255 500

Esabgol 106.88 400 229.78 600

Zaid/Other season Bajra 0 0 105 750

11 Area under vegetation Ha - -

12 Area under horticulture Ha 0.00 40 Ha.

13 Area under fuel Ha 20 Ha. 50 Ha.

14 Area under Fodder Ha 20 ha. 50 Ha.

15 Fodder production Kg. 2450 kg/ha 3500 kg/ha

16 Milk production Litres/day Cow- 4 lt./day Buffalo- 6.5 Lt./Day

6 lt. /day 8 Lt./ Day

17 SHGs Active No. 22 292

18 No. of livelihoods No. 50 500

19 Income Rs. in lakh .20 to .40 .40 to .50

20 Migration No. 735 200

21 SHG Federations formed No. No 18

Critical Assumption

No severe droughts/ unexpected floods/ natural disasters

Adequate funds are allocated for the same and released on time.

There is no significant pest/ disease attack, and if so, then it will have been contained before irreversible damage is

done.

Adverse market conditions do not persist long.

Sound macro-economic and growth conditions continue and the benefits are widely distributed particularly in the

rural areas.

Facilitating agencies and resource providers have the required competent staff so that timely and appropriate

technical advice and services are provided to farmers whenever required.

The Capacity Building Plan is implemented, monitored and modified to address evolving needs and feedback from

participants.

The execution of the Women’s Empowerment Pedagogy is regularly monitored by the District and State level Implementing Agencies

Means of Verification of indicators

Baseline surveys like household income ,expenditure, health and nutrition etc at the beginning, mid-term and end

of the project period

Annual participatory assessment by communities during project period.

Regular project monitoring reports prepared by project monitoring teams/ agencies.

Membership and other Records, Minutes of Meetings maintained by the SHGs, WCs/ Individual

beneficiaries/project-related village and local bodies/PRIs.

External review missions

Data maintained by Government department (Revenue, Agriculture, Groundwater, Irrigation, Animal Husbandry

5 CHAPTER –VII TECHNICAL DESIGNS AND ESTIMATES

Title of the Project: Community Based Watershed Development Programme for Livelihood Improvement

5.1 Overall Goal

The Overall goal of this project is to facilitate sustainable livelihoods for resource poor community in the Desert Region.

5.2 Specific Objectives:

1. To Promote Integrated Land and Water Resources Development and Management to sustain land based production system

2. Preventing valuable Soil from erosion 3. Capacitating community for better-input management in Agriculture-Animal husbandry 4. Organising Community and enhancing community skill on Sustained Livelihood Technologies through Self

Help Concept

Technical designs and estimates for proposed activities.-

For Estimates GKN of Jalore district is used. For Production System activities, rates provided by the Department are

used. For Livelihood activities, project norms are provided by the Department.

MODEL ESTIMATE

uke ty xzg.k {ks=& tkyksj 17 ¼I.W.M.P½

dk;Z dk uke& tylaxzg.k Vkadk

Tanka for Bagoda Panchyat

{kerk 22446 yhVj

Ø-la-

fooj.k ek=k bdkbZ

nj jkf”k

Je dqy Je dqy

1 uhao] [kkbZ rFkk ukyk vkfn ds fy,

1-5 eh- xgjkbZ rd feV~Vh dh

[kqnkbZ djuk] ry dks dwVuk]ikuh

Mkyuk cxy dks laokjuk [kqnh

feV~Vh dks ckgj fudkyuk uhao Hkjus

ds ckn [kkyh LFkkuks dks iqu% feV~Vh

ls Hkjuk rFkk cph gqbZ feV~Vh dks 50

ehVj dh nwjh rd fuLrkj.

i l[r] fpduh]dadj feV~Vh esa 15.17 ?k-eh- 89.00 89.00 1350.13 1350.13

ii fo?kfVr p~Íku

¼ft-Lr-nj-vuq-2010 la”kks- ist la- 5

vkbZVe la- 2c l n½ 13.21 ?k-eh- 141.00 141.00 1862.61 1862.61

2

i feV~Vh dh 1-5 eh- ls 4-5 eh-

vfrfjDr mBku ds fy,

9.52 ?k-eh- 36.75 36.75 349.86 349.86

3 lhesUV dkadzhV uhao ;k Q”kZ esa 40

fe-eh- ek dh iRFkj feV~Vh@bZVs

lhesUV jsr elkyk esa 1 lhesUV]4 jsr

% 8 feV~Vh vuqikr esa feykdj

Mkyuk rFkk dqVkbZ djuk rjkbZ

lesrA

¼ft-Lr-nj-vuq-2010la”kks- ist la-6

vkbZVe la- 11v½ 9.50 ?k-eh- 285.00 2084.00 2707.50 19798.00

4 lsUVfjax&”kVfjax dk vkj-lh-lh- Nr]

Lysc] che]NTts fyUVy vkfn Mkyus

ds fy, yxuk 4-5 ehVj ÅapkbZ rd

ds fy, rFkk gVkuk vkfn fo”ks’k

fooj.k ds vuqlkj

¼ft-Lr-nj-vuq-2010 la”kks- ist la-10

vkbZVe la- 45½ 26.84 o-eh- 31.05 128.00 833.38 3435.52

5 lhesUV dkdzhaV 1%1%5%3 feJ.k dh

izofyr lhesaV dkdzhaV esa Mkyuk

rFkk vkiwfrZ djuk] Nr dh Lyse]

NTts] che] fyVy vkfn esa]nckuk]

rjkbZ djuk rFkk lrg dks 1 % 3

lhesUV elkys ls lery djuk

lesar ijUrq LVªh rFkk “kVfjax dh

dher vyx ls 4.29 ?k-eh- 674.00 3978.00 2891.46 17065.62

¼ft-Lr-nj-vuq-2010 la”kks- 37 A

6 uhao rFkk dqlhZ esa izFke Js.kh bZVks

dh fpukbZ lhesUV ctjh 16 ;k 18

elkys esa e; cxy dh f>jh can

djus rFkk rjkbZ lesrA

lhesUV elkyk 1%6

¼ft-Lr-nj-vuq-2010la”kks- ist la-7

vkbZVe la-16 v½ 5.31 ?k-eh- 444.00 3782.00 2357.64 20082.42

7 lhesUV IykLVj nhokj ij 1%4

vuqikr esa lhesUV ctjh feykdj

dj tksMks dks dqjsnus rFkk rjkbZ

lfgr 20 fe-eh-

¼ft-Lr-nj-vuq-2010 la”kks- ist la-

13 vkbZVe la- 67c½ 33.88 o-eh- 50.52 116.00 1711.62 3930.08

8 iRFkj ds fljny ¼fyVy½ dh vkiwfrZ

dj] fpukbZ esa mi;ksx dh xbZ

elkys esa mls yxkukA


vkbZVe la- 31½ 2.10 o-eh- 199.00 1183.00 417.90 2484.30

9 vOoy ntsZ dh iRFkj dh ifÍ;ks dh

Nr Mkyuk]Åij RkFkk uhps ls tksMks

esa iRFkj dh phi ds lkFk 1%4

vuqikr esa lhesUV elkys ls Hkjuk


vkbZVe la- 36½ 9.41 o-eh- 307.00 986.00 2888.87 9278.26

10 50 eh-eh- eksVkbZ esa lhesUV dadzhV

1%2%4 feJ.k ftlesa 1 lhesaV 2 ctjh

4 iRFkj dh ;k bZV dh 12 eh-

ukHkh; fxV~Vh ds lkFk feykdj

Mkyuk]dwVuk]nckuk rFkk rjkbZ vkfn

lesrA

¼ft-Lr-nj-vuq-2010 la”kks- ist la-

11 vkbZVe la- 58v½ 16.71 o-eh- 101.00 244.00 1687.71 4077.24

11 lhesaV IykLVj nhokj ij 1%6 vuqikr

esa lhesaV&ctjh feykdj tksMks dks

dqjsnus rFkk rjkbZ lesrA 25 eh-eh

¼ft-Lr-nj-vuq-2010la”kks-istla-

13vkbZVe la- 68c½ 78.69 o-eh- 86.43 151.00 6801.18 11882.19

12 ,Y;wfefu;e dk <Ddu

¼0.45×0.45)

¼cktkj nj½

1.00 ux 0 1000.00 0.00 1000.00

;ksx 25859.86 96596.23

tksMk 3% dUVkstsUlh 2897.89

;ksx 99494.12

ykxr Je Hkkx 25859.86

ykxr lkexzh Hkkx 73634.26

dqy ;ksx 99494.12

say 99500.00

MODEL ESTIMATE



{kerk 22446 yhVj

Ø-la-

fooj.k y-xpkS-xx- = dqy ek=k

1 uhao] [kkbZ rFkk ukyk vkfn ds fy,

1-5 eh- xgjkbZ rd feV~Vh dh

[kqnkbZ djuk] ry dks dwVuk]ikuh

Mkyuk cxy dks laokjuk [kqnh

feV~Vh dks ckgj fudkyuk uhao Hkjus

ds ckn [kkyh LFkkuks dks iqu% feV~Vh

ls Hkjuk rFkk cph gqbZ feV~Vh dks 50

ehVj dh nwjh rd fuLrkj.k djukA

i l[r] fpduh]dadj feV~Vh esa Vakdk& /4×(3.35)2×1.50=13.21?k-eh-

vkxksj& /4×(9.50)2 &(9.05)2×0.30= 1.96

;ksx=15.17 ?k-eh

ii fo?kfVr p~Íku

Vakdk&/4×(3.35)2×1.50=13.21?k-eh-

2 i feV~Vh dh 1-5 eh- mBku ds

vfrfjDr 4-5 eh- dh xgjkbZ rd dh

mBku ds fy,

13.21 ?ku-eh-

3 lhesUV dkadzhV uhao ;k Q”kZ esa 40

fe-eh- ek dh iRFkj feV~Vh@bZVs

lhesUV jsr elkyk esa 1 lhesUV]4 jsr

% 8 feV~Vh vuqikr esa feykdj

Mkyuk rFkk dqVkbZ djuk rjkbZ

lesrA

Vakdk& /4×(3.35)2×0.15=1.32?k-eh-

vkxksj /4×[(9.05)2 x(3.50)2]×0.15=8.20 ?k-eh-

;ksx=9.52 ?k-eh

4 lsUVfjax&”kVfjax dk vkj-lh-lh- Nr]

Lysc] che]NTts fyUVy vkfn Mkyus

ds fy, yxuk 4-5 ehVj ÅapkbZ rd

ds fy, rFkk gVkuk vkfn fo”ks’k

fooj.k ds vuqlkj

×3.05×2.85=26.84o-eh

5 lhesUV dkdzhaV 1%1%5%3 feJ.k dh

izofyr lhesaV dkdzhaV esa Mkyuk

rFkk vkiwfrZ djuk] Nr dh Lyse]

NTts] che] fyVy vkfn esa]nckuk]

rjkbZ djuk rFkk lrg dks 1 % 3

lhesUV elkys ls lery djuk

lesar ijUrq LVªh rFkk “kVfjax dh

dher vyx ls

/4×[(3.35)2 x(3.05)2]×2.85=4.29?k-eh-

6 uhao rFkk dqlhZ esa izFke Js.kh bZVks

dh fpukbZ lhesUV ctjh 16 ;k 18

elkys esa e; cxy dh f>jh can

djus rFkk rjkbZ lesrA

lhesUV elkyk 1%6

/4×[(3.50)2 x(3.05)2]×0.60=1.38?k-eh-

/4×[(9.50)2 x(9.05)2]×0.60=3.93 ?k-eh-

;ksx=5.31 ?k-eh


vuqikr esa lhesUV ctjh feykdj

dj tksMks dks dqjsnus rFkk rjkbZ

lfgr 20 fe-eh-

×3.05×2.85 =27.29 o-eh-

×3.50×0.60 = 6.59 o-eh-

;ksx=33.88 o-eh-

8 iRFkj ds fljny ¼fyVy½ dh vkiwfrZ

dj] fpukbZ esa mi;ksx dh xbZ

elkys esa mls yxkukA

2×3.50×0.30=2.10 o-eh-

9 vOoy ntsZ dh iRFkj dh ifÍ;ks dh

Nr Mkyuk]Åij RkFkk uhps ls tksMks

esa iRFkj dh phi ds lkFk 1%4

vuqikr esa lhesUV elkys ls Hkjuk

/4×(3.50)2=9.61 o-eh-

?kVk;k 0-45×0.45 =0.20 o-eh-

=9.41 o-eh-

10 50 eh-eh- eksVkbZ esa lhesUV dadzhV

1%2%4 feJ.k ftlesa 1 lhesaV 2 ctjh

4 iRFkj dh ;k bZV dh 12 eh-

ukHkh; fxV~Vh ds lkFk feykdj

Mkyuk]dwVuk]nckuk rFkk rjkbZ vkfn

lesrA

/4×(3.05)2=7.30 o-eh-

/4×(3.50)2=9.61 o-eh-

;ksx= 16.71 o-eh-

?kVk;k 0-45×0.45 =0.20 o-eh-

=16.71 o-eh-

11 lhesaV IykLVj nhokj ij 1%6 vuqikr

esa lhesaV&ctjh feykdj tksMks dks

dqjsnus rFkk rjkbZ lesrA ¼c½ 20 eh-

eh

/4×[(9.50)2 x(3.50)2]=61.23 o-eh-

9.50×0.30=8.94 o-eh-

9.05×0.30=8.52 o-eh-

;ksx =78.69 o-eh-

12 ,Y;wfefu;e dk <Ddu (0.45×0.45) ¼cktkj nj½

1 uax

MODEL ESTIMATE



Tanka for Jesawas Panchyat

{kerk 22446 yhVj

Ø-la-

fooj.k ek=k bdkbZ

nj jkf”k

Je dqy Je dqy

1 uhao] [kkbZ rFkk ukyk vkfn ds

fy, 1-5 eh- xgjkbZ rd feV~Vh

dh [kqnkbZ djuk] ry dks

dwVuk]ikuh Mkyuk cxy dks

laokjuk [kqnh feV~Vh dks ckgj

fudkyuk uhao Hkjus ds ckn

[kkyh LFkkuks dks iqu% feV~Vh ls

Hkjuk rFkk cph gqbZ feV~Vh dks

50 ehVj dh nwjh rd fuLrkj.

i l[r] fpduh]dadj feV~Vh esa 15.17 ?k-eh- 89.00 89.00 1350.13 1350.13

ii fo?kfVr p~Íku

¼ft-Lr-nj-vuq-2010 la”kks- ist

la- 5 vkbZVe la- 2c l n½ 13.21 ?k-eh- 141.00 141.00 1862.61 1862.61

2

i feV~Vh dh 1-5 eh- ls 4-5 eh-

vfrfjDr mBku ds fy,

9.52 ?k-eh- 36.75 36.75 349.86 349.86

3 lhesUV dkadzhV uhao ;k Q”kZ esa

40 fe-eh- ek dh iRFkj

feV~Vh@bZVs lhesUV jsr elkyk

esa 1 lhesUV]4 jsr % 8 feV~Vh

vuqikr esa feykdj Mkyuk rFkk

dqVkbZ djuk rjkbZ lesrA

¼ft-Lr-nj-vuq-2010la”kks- ist

la-6 vkbZVe la- 11v½ 9.50 ?k-eh- 285.00 2084.00 2707.50 19798.00

4 lsUVfjax&”kVfjax dk vkj-lh-lh-

Nr] Lysc] che]NTts fyUVy

vkfn Mkyus ds fy, yxuk 4-5

ehVj ÅapkbZ rd ds fy, rFkk

gVkuk vkfn fo”ks’k fooj.k ds

vuqlkj


la-10 vkbZVe la- 45½ 26.84 o-eh- 31.05 128.00 833.38 3435.52

5 lhesUV dkdzhaV 1%1%5%3 feJ.k

dh izofyr lhesaV dkdzhaV esa

Mkyuk rFkk vkiwfrZ djuk] Nr

dh Lyse] NTts] che] fyVy

vkfn esa]nckuk] rjkbZ djuk

rFkk lrg dks 1 % 3 lhesUV

elkys ls lery djuk lesar

ijUrq LVªh rFkk “kVfjax dh

dher vyx ls

¼ft-Lr-nj-vuq-2010 la”kks- 37

A 4.29 ?k-eh- 674.00 3978.00 2891.46 17065.62

6 uhao rFkk dqlhZ esa izFke Js.kh

bZVks dh fpukbZ lhesUV ctjh

16 ;k 18 elkys esa e; cxy

dh f>jh can djus rFkk rjkbZ

lesrA

lhesUV elkyk 1%6


la-7 vkbZVe la-16 v½ 5.31 ?k-eh- 444.00 3782.00 2357.64 20082.42


vuqikr esa lhesUV ctjh

feykdj dj tksMks dks dqjsnus

rFkk rjkbZ lfgr 20 fe-eh-


la- 13 vkbZVe la- 67c½ 33.88 o-eh- 50.52 116.00 1711.62 3930.08

8 iRFkj ds fljny ¼fyVy½ dh

vkiwfrZ dj] fpukbZ esa mi;ksx

dh xbZ elkys esa mls yxkukA


la- 8 vkbZVe la- 31½ 2.10 o-eh- 199.00 1183.00 417.90 2484.30

9 vOoy ntsZ dh iRFkj dh ifÍ;ks

dh Nr Mkyuk]Åij RkFkk uhps

ls tksMks esa iRFkj dh phi ds

lkFk 1%4 vuqikr esa lhesUV

elkys ls Hkjuk


la- 9 vkbZVe la- 36½ 9.41 o-eh- 307.00 986.00 2888.87 9278.26

10 50 eh-eh- eksVkbZ esa lhesUV

dadzhV 1%2%4 feJ.k ftlesa 1

lhesaV 2 ctjh 4 iRFkj dh ;k

bZV dh 12 eh- ukHkh; fxV~Vh

ds lkFk feykdj

Mkyuk]dwVuk]nckuk rFkk rjkbZ

vkfn lesrA


la- 11 vkbZVe la- 58v½ 16.71 o-eh- 101.00 244.00 1687.71 4077.24

11 lhesaV IykLVj nhokj ij 1%6

vuqikr esa lhesaV&ctjh

feykdj tksMks dks dqjsnus rFkk

rjkbZ lesrA 25 eh-eh


13vkbZVe la- 68c½ 78.69 o-eh- 86.43 151.00 6801.18 11882.19


¼0.45×0.45)

¼cktkj nj½ 1.00 ux 0 1000.00 0.00 1000.00

;ksx 25859.86 96596.23


;ksx 99494.12



dqy ;ksx 99494.12

say 99500.00

MODEL ESTIMATE



{kerk 22446 yhVj

Ø-la-



fy, 1-5 eh- xgjkbZ rd feV~Vh

dh [kqnkbZ djuk] ry dks

dwVuk]ikuh Mkyuk cxy dks

laokjuk [kqnh feV~Vh dks ckgj

fudkyuk uhao Hkjus ds ckn

[kkyh LFkkuks dks iqu% feV~Vh ls

Hkjuk rFkk cph gqbZ feV~Vh dks

50 ehVj dh nwjh rd fuLrkj.k

djukA


vkxksj& /4×(9.50)2 &(9.05)2×0.30= 1.96

;ksx=15.17 ?k-eh

ii fo?kfVr p~Íku

Vakdk&/4×(3.35)2×1.50=13.21?k-eh-


vfrfjDr 4-5 eh- dh xgjkbZ

rd dh mBku ds fy,

13.21 ?ku-eh-





vuqikr esa feykdj Mkyuk rFkk

dqVkbZ djuk rjkbZ lesrA

Vakdk& /4×(3.35)2×0.15=1.32?k-eh-

vkxksj /4×[(9.05)2 x(3.50)2]×0.15=8.20 ?k-eh-

;ksx=9.52 ?k-eh

4 lsUVfjax&”kVfjax dk vkj-lh-lh-

Nr] Lysc] che]NTts fyUVy

vkfn Mkyus ds fy, yxuk 4-5

ehVj ÅapkbZ rd ds fy, rFkk

gVkuk vkfn fo”ks’k fooj.k ds

vuqlkj

×3.05×2.85=26.84o-eh









dher vyx ls

/4×[(3.35)2 x(3.05)2]×2.85=4.29?k-eh-





lesrA

lhesUV elkyk 1%6

/4×[(3.50)2 x(3.05)2]×0.60=1.38?k-eh-

/4×[(9.50)2 x(9.05)2]×0.60=3.93 ?k-eh-

;ksx=5.31 ?k-eh





×3.05×2.85 =27.29 o-eh-

×3.50×0.60 = 6.59 o-eh-

;ksx=33.88 o-eh-




2×3.50×0.30=2.10 o-eh-

9 vOoy ntsZ dh iRFkj dh ifÍ;ks

dh Nr Mkyuk]Åij RkFkk uhps

ls tksMks esa iRFkj dh phi ds

lkFk 1%4 vuqikr esa lhesUV

elkys ls Hkjuk

/4×(3.50)2=9.61 o-eh-

?kVk;k 0-45×0.45 =0.20 o-eh-

=9.41 o-eh-





ds lkFk feykdj


vkfn lesrA

/4×(3.05)2=7.30 o-eh-

/4×(3.50)2=9.61 o-eh-

;ksx= 16.71 o-eh-

?kVk;k 0-45×0.45 =0.20 o-eh-

=16.71 o-eh-




rjkbZ lesrA ¼c½ 20 eh-eh

/4×[(9.50)2 x(3.50)2]=61.23 o-eh-

9.50×0.30=8.94 o-eh-

9.05×0.30=8.52 o-eh-

;ksx =78.69 o-eh-


1 uax

MODEL ESTIMATE



Tanka for Khokha Panchyat

{kerk 22446 yhVj

Ø-la-

fooj.k ek=k bdkbZ

nj jkf”k

Je dqy Je dqy


fy, 1-5 eh- xgjkbZ rd

feV~Vh dh [kqnkbZ djuk] ry

dks dwVuk]ikuh Mkyuk cxy

dks laokjuk [kqnh feV~Vh dks

ckgj fudkyuk uhao Hkjus ds

ckn [kkyh LFkkuks dks iqu%

feV~Vh ls Hkjuk rFkk cph gqbZ

feV~Vh dks 50 ehVj dh nwjh

rd fuLrkj.

i l[r] fpduh]dadj feV~Vh esa

15.17 ?k-eh- 89.00 89.00 1350.13 1350.13

ii fo?kfVr p~Íku


la- 5 vkbZVe la- 2c l n½ 13.21 ?k-eh- 141.00 141.00 1862.61 1862.61

2 i feV~Vh dh 1-5 eh- ls 4-5

eh- vfrfjDr mBku ds fy, 9.52 ?k-eh- 36.75 36.75 349.86 349.86





vuqikr esa feykdj Mkyuk

rFkk dqVkbZ djuk rjkbZ

lesrA


la-6 vkbZVe la- 11v½ 9.50 ?k-eh- 285.00 2084.00 2707.50 19798.00

4 lsUVfjax&”kVfjax dk vkj-lh-

lh- Nr] Lysc] che]NTts

fyUVy vkfn Mkyus ds fy,

yxuk 4-5 ehVj ÅapkbZ rd

ds fy, rFkk gVkuk vkfn

fo”ks’k fooj.k ds vuqlkj


la-10 vkbZVe la- 45½ 26.84 o-eh- 31.05 128.00 833.38 3435.52







elkys ls lery djuk lesar 4.29 ?k-eh- 674.00 3978.00 2891.46 17065.62


dher vyx ls

¼ft-Lr-nj-vuq-2010 la”kks- 37

A





lesrA

lhesUV elkyk 1%6


la-7 vkbZVe la-16 v½ 5.31 ?k-eh- 444.00 3782.00 2357.64 20082.42






la- 13 vkbZVe la- 67c½ 33.88 o-eh- 50.52 116.00 1711.62 3930.08





la- 8 vkbZVe la- 31½ 2.10 o-eh- 199.00 1183.00 417.90 2484.30

9 vOoy ntsZ dh iRFkj dh

ifÍ;ks dh Nr Mkyuk]Åij

RkFkk uhps ls tksMks esa iRFkj

dh phi ds lkFk 1%4 vuqikr

esa lhesUV elkys ls Hkjuk


la- 9 vkbZVe la- 36½ 9.41 o-eh- 307.00 986.00 2888.87 9278.26





ds lkFk feykdj


vkfn lesrA


la- 11 vkbZVe la- 58v½ 16.71 o-eh- 101.00 244.00 1687.71 4077.24




rjkbZ lesrA 25 eh-eh


13vkbZVe la- 68c½

78.69 o-eh- 86.43 151.00 6801.18 11882.19


¼0.45×0.45)

¼cktkj nj½

1.00 ux 0 1000.00 0.00 1000.00

;ksx 25859.86 96596.23


;ksx 99494.12



dqy ;ksx 99494.12

say 99500.00

MODEL ESTIMATE



{kerk 22446 yhVj

Ø-la-



fy, 1-5 eh- xgjkbZ rd

feV~Vh dh [kqnkbZ djuk] ry

dks dwVuk]ikuh Mkyuk cxy

dks laokjuk [kqnh feV~Vh dks

ckgj fudkyuk uhao Hkjus ds

ckn [kkyh LFkkuks dks iqu%

feV~Vh ls Hkjuk rFkk cph gqbZ

feV~Vh dks 50 ehVj dh nwjh

rd fuLrkj.k djukA


vkxksj& /4×(9.50)2 &(9.05)2×0.30= 1.96

;ksx=15.17 ?k-eh

ii fo?kfVr p~Íku

Vakdk&/4×(3.35)2×1.50=13.21?k-eh-


vfrfjDr 4-5 eh- dh xgjkbZ

rd dh mBku ds fy,

13.21 ?ku-eh-





vuqikr esa feykdj Mkyuk

rFkk dqVkbZ djuk rjkbZ

Vakdk& /4×(3.35)2×0.15=1.32?k-eh-

vkxksj /4×[(9.05)2 x(3.50)2]×0.15=8.20 ?k-eh-

;ksx=9.52 ?k-eh

lesrA

4 lsUVfjax&”kVfjax dk vkj-lh-

lh- Nr] Lysc] che]NTts

fyUVy vkfn Mkyus ds fy,

yxuk 4-5 ehVj ÅapkbZ rd

ds fy, rFkk gVkuk vkfn

fo”ks’k fooj.k ds vuqlkj

×3.05×2.85=26.84o-eh









dher vyx ls

/4×[(3.35)2 x(3.05)2]×2.85=4.29?k-eh-





lesrA

lhesUV elkyk 1%6

/4×[(3.50)2 x(3.05)2]×0.60=1.38?k-eh-

/4×[(9.50)2 x(9.05)2]×0.60=3.93 ?k-eh-

;ksx=5.31 ?k-eh





×3.05×2.85 =27.29 o-eh-

×3.50×0.60 = 6.59 o-eh-

;ksx=33.88 o-eh-




2×3.50×0.30=2.10 o-eh-

9 vOoy ntsZ dh iRFkj dh

ifÍ;ks dh Nr Mkyuk]Åij

RkFkk uhps ls tksMks esa iRFkj

dh phi ds lkFk 1%4 vuqikr

esa lhesUV elkys ls Hkjuk

/4×(3.50)2=9.61 o-eh-

?kVk;k 0-45×0.45 =0.20 o-eh-

=9.41 o-eh-





ds lkFk feykdj


vkfn lesrA

/4×(3.05)2=7.30 o-eh-

/4×(3.50)2=9.61 o-eh-

;ksx= 16.71 o-eh-

?kVk;k 0-45×0.45 =0.20 o-eh-

=16.71 o-eh-




rjkbZ lesrA ¼c½ 20 eh-eh

/4×[(9.50)2 x(3.50)2]=61.23 o-eh-

9.50×0.30=8.94 o-eh-

9.05×0.30=8.52 o-eh-

;ksx =78.69 o-eh-


1 uax

MODEL ESTIMATE FOR A VERMI-COMPOST UNIT

S. No. Particulars Quantity Unit Rate (Rs) Amount (Rs)

1 Wooden Ballies (3 m long) 20 no 70 1400

2 Wooden Ballies (4 m long) 25 no 80 2000

3 Shade mats for covering the roof 125 Sqm 40 5000

4 Binding wire for tying wooden ballies and mats 20 Kg 45 900

5 Labour charges for erection of shades 10 No. 135 2025

7 Weighing scale (100 Kg capacity) 1 No. 2500 2500

9 Worms @ 3 kg per ton 30 Kg 100 3000

10 Formation of vermi-bed with agro-waste, cowdung and worms 20 bed 300 6000

Total 22825

3% 684.75

23509.75

Say 23510

ykxr rdehuk

uke ty xzg.k {ks=& Jodhpur 58

¼I.W.M.P½

dk;Z dk uke&d̀f"k Hkwfe okfudh vojks/k ikS/kkjksi.k

ikS/kks dh

la[;k%

100

Ø-

la- fooj.k

ek=k bdkbZ

nj jkf”k

Je dqy Je dqy

1

45x45x45 lseh- eki ds xM~Ms djuk

dBksj feV~Vh 400 xM~Ms@gSDVj

100 la[;k 6.60 6.60 660.00 660.00

2

ikS/ks jksi.k djuk 100 la[;k 3.20 3.20 320.00 320.00

3 ikS/kksa dh dher 108 la[;k - 10.00 - 1080.00

4

ikS/kksa dk ifjogu ikS/ks HkjkbZ ,oa [kkyh

djkbZ lfgr 5 fd0eh- nwjh rd ds fy,

108

la[;k@1000

- 908.21

98.09

5 ikuh fiykuk 1-90 izfriks/kk izfrokj

100 la[;k

9.50 9.50

950.00

6 fuUnkbz XkqM+kbZ 100 1.30 1.30 130.00

5 ikS/ks jksi.k ds le; Mh,ih Mkyuk 5 fd-xzk- - 15.00 - 75.00

6 nhed fu;U=.k gsrq ,UMksalYQku 4%

pw.kZ 10 fd-xzk- - 12.00 - 120.00

;ksx 980.00 3433.09


;ksx 3536.08

ykxr Je Hkkx 980.00


dqy ;ksx 3536.08

Say 3550.00

ykxr rdehuk

uke ty xzg.k {ks=&

Jodhpur 58 ¼I.W.M.P½

dk;Z dk uke&d`f"k Hkwfe ij okfudh ikS/kkjksi.k

ikS/kks dh

la[;k%

100

Ø-

la- fooj.k

ek=k bdkbZ

nj jkf”k

Je dqy Je dqy

1

45x45x45 lseh- eki ds xM~Ms

djuk dBksj feV~Vh 400

xM~Ms@gSDVj 100 la[;k 6.60 6.60 660.00 660.00

2 ikS/ks jksi.k djuk 100 la[;k 4.00 4.00 400.00 400.00

3 ikS/kksa dh dher 108 la[;k - 10.00 - 1080.00

4 ikS/kksa dk ifjogu ikS/ks HkjkbZ

,oa [kkyh djkbZ lfgr 5

fd0eh- nwjh rd ds fy, 108

la[;k@1000

- 908.21

98.09

5 ikS/ks jksi.k ds le; Mh,ih

Mkyuk 5 fd-xzk- - 15.00 - 75.00

5 ikuh fiykuk 1-90 izfriks/kk

izfrokj 100 la[;k

9.50 9.50

950.00

6 fuUnkbz XkqM+kbZ 100 1.30 1.30 130.00

6 nhed fu;U=.k gsrq

,UMksalYQku 4% pw.kZ 10 fd-xzk- - 12.00 - 120.00

;ksx 1060.00 3513.09


;ksx 3618.48



dqy ;ksx 3618.48

Say 3620.00

Wadi Estimate

Crop 1 Anola

Crop 2 Lemon/Pomegra

nate Drumstick/Custard Apple

Border Plantation

Neem, Bamboo, Casia, Su-babul, Adusa, Havan etc

Spacing: 7 * 7 Spacing: 5 * 5 9 * 9

Density : 35 Density : 5 Density : 20

Variety : Varieties :

(Amt in Rs)

Subject/operations

Year-01- Establishment Year-02 Year-03 Year 04 Year 05

Total Unit Qty Rate Value Qty

Value

Qty

Value Qty Value Qty Value

A. Material

1.a Grafts of Crop 1

No 10 40.0 400 4 160 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.00 560

b. Grafts of Crop 2 No 10 40.0 400 4 160 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.00 560

c. Border Plants ( av.cost)

No 20 8.0 160 20 160 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.00 320

2.Fertilizers and manures

0 0 0.0 0.00 0

N kg 20 20.0 400.00 0 0 0.0 0.00 400

P kg 20 20.0 400.00 0 0 0.0 0.00 400

K kg 20 7.0 140.00 0 0 0.0 0.00 140

Compost kg 400 2.5 1000 200 500 100

250 100 250.0 0 0.00 2000

Other, if any kg 0 0 0 0.0 0.00 0

3. PP chemicals No 20 15.0 300 30 450 0 0.0 0.00 750

5.Pitchers (Irrigation)

No 40 20.0 800 0 0 0.0 0.00 800

B.Labour 0 0 0.0 0.00 0

7.Ploughing ( Bullocks)

Day 0 0 0 0.0 0.00 0

8.Digging of pits Man-day

10 147.0 1470 0 0 0.0 0.00 1470

9.Filling of Pits and Planting

Man-day

6 125.0 750 0 0 0.0 0.00 750

10.Weeding and maintenance of basin

Man-day

8 150.0 1200 8 1200 8 1200 8 1200.0 0 0.00 4800

11.Application of Fertilizers PPChemi.

Man-day

4 150.0 600 4 600

3 450

3 450.0

0 0.00 2100

12.Irrigation Man-day

10 200.0 2000 12 2400 10

2000 10 2000.0 0 0.00 8400

13.Animal traction Man-day

4 240.0 960 5 1200 5 1200 5 1200.0 0 0.00 4560

Total Cost per wadi

10980 683

0 5100 5100 0 28010

ykxr rdehuk

Name of watershed – Name of Work– Home stead kitchen graden

Name of Gram panchayat: S.No Name of Vegitable Seed Quantity Rate Amount

1 Various seeds 20 gm 100/10 200.00

2 Small implements 1 set 200 200.00

3 Watering cane 1 200 200.00

Total 600.00

CHAPTER - VIII Enclosures -

a. Location –District - JALORE, block - Bhinmal, village, watershed location map

b. Map of Jalore 17 / 11-12 IWMP Project

c. PRA Map (along with photos & paper drawing)

d. Treatment map (Indicate proposed works)

e. Information on Soils, Soil fertility, Land capability, Soil chemical problems like salinity, alkalinity

f. Land Use Land Cover map

g. Information on existing water harvesting structures & well inventory along with GPS co-ordinates.

h. High resolution, latest Remote Sensing Satellite data

Documents of Agreements: Proceedings of gram sabha for EPA approval

Proceedings of gram sabha Resolution for committee constitution

Proceedings of gram sabha for DPR approval

Proceeding of Standing Committee of P.S. for DPR approval.

Proceeding of Standing Committee of Z.P. for DPR approval.

Assistant Engineer, PIA

WD&SC P.S.-----------

Project Manager, WCDC

WD&SC.Distt.--------------

Potential in the area-

a. The area known for milk production but collection and market is not available for production. Milk required the cold storage but in the project area no cold storage is available and processing is big potential to enhance livelihood of farmer in the area.

b. Caster is major crop in the area but market is far and people are not aware therefore farmer not getting benefit. Processing of caster for value addition help to get good income.

c. Gavar production is another potential for the area which is having good price. d. Medicinal Plant is another area which need to improve like ISABGOAL, ASHAVGANDHA, Avnla, Tulsi etc . e. Fruit promotion is another potential which can be major livelihood in project area like Pomegranate, Lemon etc. f. Bazra is major kharif crop in project area and production can be increase with proper agriculture intervention.

Lessons and Learning

We learn that people are aware about water scarcity and best management of available water. They know about sprinkler and drip irrigation but access to these water saving device were lacking and project team help them to understand the process and fulfilling the formalities to get it on subsidy rate.

Case Study Jagtaram is farmer of Kudadavecha village of Jaisawas Gram Panchyat. He has 3 ha. cultivated land and half ha. Land was irrigated. Our project team help him to file the form for acquiring subsidy benefit for sprinkler. Now his 1 ha. Land id irrigated and he is taking Bajra as rabi crop in 1 ha.

Community Views and Interviews Cluster project will help to change people’s life. For integrated approach used in cluster watershed villagers says “ Taka ro kam hoi to Pani pivan ne vela woi meetho pani” ( Tanka construction help to get drinking water) “ Kheti bataan bataovla to manne tha padela or veso kam hoi to Nipjela” ( Sharing of Agriculture information help to understand and working accordingly results in increase of production). Farmer is positive way for change traditional practices in farming system. People will agree to support for all type of redial change in agriculture and other practices.

6 Photo Galary

View of Project area in Rainy session View of Project area in Rainy session

CAP – Under I & CB View of project area- Jaisawas Panchyat

Rainfed Crop in the Area Capacity Building program at Jaisawas Panchyat

MOU SIGNING WITH DWDU AT JALORE PRA MEETING AT JAISAWAS PRA AT KHOKHA

PRA AT JAISAWAS PRA AT JAISAWAS PRA MAP

Community Consultation PRA AT JAISAWAS Community Consultation

PRA MAP PRA MAP PRA MAP

Problem in Jaisawas Panchayat Problem List in Khokha Panchayat

View at Dry Bagoda Pond Bus stand Khokha

Chapter- VIII :- GIS MAP