Upload
nhs-improving-quality
View
892
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
Version 2 | Internal use only
Thinking about getting data used Ben Page, Chief Executive, Ipsos MORI
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
Our reports have a problem, my friend …
Average number of words
Average number of pages
Average number of standard charts/tables
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
You don’t have to put
all the information on
the slides/in the
report
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
Today’s Presentation
• Background
• Method
• Findings
• Question 1
• Question 2
• Question 3
• ……
• Question 68
• Summary and Conclusions
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
The Brief
MARKET RESEARCH PROJECT
Project Name Do Do MR Job # PIJ02GL010
Category Country(s) Involved Budget (Category or Local)
Upper GI UK Category
RESEARCH BRIEF: (filled in by Project Requestor)
Background:
Gaviscon is the number 1 selling heartburn and indigestion remedy in the UK commanding 34% value share of the market, and growing strongly ahead of a relatively flat marketplace at 17.3% YoY. Gaviscon OTC is viewed by consumers and has traditionally been marketed by Reckitt Benckiser as a treatment for moderate to severe indigestion, commonly termed Heartburn. However, the strong growth achieved over the last few years has come by continuing with the strategy of trading up “dissatisfied antacid users” into the brand from the less efficacious, lower value, higher volume antacid sector. Activities driving this growth through trade-up in the last year have been:
Project Expand – the launch of a limited range of Gaviscon products into full grocery distribution which placed them right next to the antacids that people were buying out of habit, or as the ubiquitous entry point into the category.
Tablets TV – The fire breather creative was developed to make the Gaviscon brand more approachable and less medicinal to antacid users. This was the first time that tablets had been advertised, being the preferred format of the majority of users (65%) and the format that antacid users are used to.
The results have been very impressive, with growth coming from some switching from the main antacid brands (e.g. Rennie), but also by bringing in many new market buyers resulting in a 20-25% increase in category sales within all of the major multiple grocers.
This strategy would only work of course if we maintained our core pharmacy business. Thus far we are only down –0.7% YoY in value terms in pharmacy as a result. Therefore, from a sales perspective these moves have been very
successful. What interests us now is whether our moves, and the introduction of H2s (e.g. Zantac) and
H2/antacid combination products (e.g. Pepcidtwo) into full grocery distribution, have influenced brand perceptions or
the linear brand progression that has been assumed up until know (antacid – alginate – H2). In essence do the
conceptual targets that we have used over the last couple of years still hold and what size is each group.
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
Methodology
• Initially not sure what method to use
• Choices :
1. A full on-line 1000 sample double screen intertwined conjoint analysis with
boosted EM sample and extra points based at the variable interfaces.
• With double twist and tuck?
2. 500 interviews with consumers armed with a piece of paper and a pen
• Issues relating to the method :
• Sample size ?
• Sampling Points?
• Purposive, random probability, stratified?
• Length of Interviews?
• Analysis Software?
• Reporting Package?
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
10 minutes later
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
Method • Initially not sure what method to use
• Choices : 1. A full on-line double screen intertwined conjoint
analysis with boosted sample and extra points based at the variable interfaces. • With double twist and tuck?
2. 500 interviews with citizens armed with a piece of paper and a pen
• Issues relating to the method : • Sample size ?
• Sampling Points?
• Monadic?
• Length of Interviews?
• Analysis Software?
• Reporting Package?
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
ISO9000ISO9000
Project Thistle - US Malt Drinkers Online(10889) - Wave 1 Apr 04 22IpsosIpsos--FocusFocus
NORMALISED BRAND IMAGE SCORESNORMALISED BRAND IMAGE SCORES
Do Do Brand A Brand B Brand C Brand D Brand E Brand F Brand G Brand H Brand I
Base 197 198 193 193 133 143 75 94 82 64
Fashionable 1.55 1.51 0.98 0.99 0.81 0.62 0.71 0.62 0.60 0.58
Stylish 1.31 1.00 1.03 1.00 1.05 0.96 0.89 0.74 0.82 0.57
Traditional 1.21 1.33 0.94 1.03 0.84 0.95 0.77 0.83 0.68 0.98
GVFM 0.97 1.52 1.02 1.03 0.91 0.78 0.82 0.78 0.74 1.14
Darker coloured 1.43 2.04 0.62 0.43 0.66 0.76 0.82 1.27 0.93 1.73
Seen in all bars 2.18 2.33 0.87 1.04 0.49 0.27 0.06 0.07 0.13 0.32
Range of products 0.97 3.32 0.47 0.69 0.99 0.63 0.35 0.28 0.93 0.16
Attractive bottle 1.65 0.80 1.11 0.69 0.81 0.82 1.00 0.99 1.01 1.45
Serious 0.64 0.60 1.05 1.05 1.08 1.23 1.25 1.33 1.13 1.15
Authentic 0.71 0.70 1.02 1.02 1.13 1.17 1.23 1.16 1.19 1.25
Proud to serve 0.78 0.73 1.08 1.16 1.09 1.03 0.99 1.05 1.12 1.12
Gift 1.03 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.02 1.05 0.98 0.98 1.09 0.92
Distinctive taste 0.76 0.67 1.07 0.96 1.02 1.09 1.29 1.34 1.14 1.41
Sophisticated 0.76 0.52 1.06 1.06 1.16 1.21 1.22 1.26 1.15 0.78
Different 0.55 0.52 1.01 1.01 1.04 1.15 1.54 1.52 1.36 1.29
Becoming more popular 0.81 0.99 1.17 1.27 1.14 0.99 0.63 0.74 0.88 0.55
Would recommend 0.66 0.61 1.10 1.13 1.21 1.23 1.21 0.93 1.22 0.72
High quality 0.82 0.75 1.02 0.99 1.06 1.14 1.14 1.12 1.19 1.34
For confident people 0.90 0.78 0.95 1.04 1.07 1.11 1.07 1.18 1.13 1.05
For successful people 0.93 0.73 1.03 1.00 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.10 1.08 0.98
Q5a Please indicate which, if any, of the brands shown here you think each description applies to.
Key to colours:
Positive association - 99% significance level
Positive association - 95% signficance level
Negative association - 95% signficance level
Negative association - 99% significance level
2 = (oi - ei)2
ei
ei = expected frequency
oi = observed frequency
Q1
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI 45“Best Practice” Presentation Workshop – Sept 2004
1
hedonistic 25%
trust/quality/safety
kill germs
decorative
fragrance
convenient
small spaces
says house has odors
Regular Sprays
Fragranced Mists
Concentrated Sprays
Trigger Sprays
Disinfectant Sprays
Electric GelsElectric Oils
Electric Fans
Air Fresh
Decosphere
Crystal Air
Regular Gels / Cones
Adhesives
Carpet products
Candles
Glass candles
Toilet blocks
Incense
1
hedonistic 25%
trust/quality/safety
kill germs
decorative
fragrance
convenient
small spaces
says house has odors
Regular Sprays
Fragranced Mists
Concentrated Sprays
Trigger Sprays
Disinfectant Sprays
Electric GelsElectric Oils
Electric Fans
Air Fresh
Decosphere
Crystal Air
Regular Gels / Cones
Adhesives
Carpet products
Candles
Glass candles
Toilet blocks
Incense
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Satisfaction (%)
Importance of service (%) Base: 1,671 Derbyshire residents aged 16+, interviewed between 20th January – 13th April 2005. For non-universal services satisfaction
is given for users (c.50-c.900 residents for each service)
Preventing youth offending
Care of elderly in their own homes
Road maintenance
Secondary schools
Bus/train services Community safety
Primary schools
B_Line
Protecting consumers (Trading Standards)
Gold card
Adult education
Library and information
services Buxton Museum &
Art Gallery
Registrar BDMs
Youth clubs and other facilities for young people
Social Services – Protecting Vulnerable children
Social Services - Support for people
with mental ill health
Social Services –
Looking after children in
care
Supporting local businesses
Services for people with disabilities
Overall planning for land use
Pavement maintenance
Maintenance of bridle/foot paths/rights of way
Traffic control
Call Derbyshire
Tackling poverty and unemployment
Soc, Ser. – Sup. for fam. children
special needs
Importance of service vs. satisfaction among users
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
Although the pay-to-play model is more efficient at converting gamers to revenue, there are now as many free-to-play gamers.
THE RISE OF FREE-TO-PLAY DATA AND DESIGN BY IPSOS MEDIACT
12.8m # of gamers 2013
10.1m # of gamers 2012
2013 # of gamers 12.8m
2012 # of gamers 11.5m
FREE-TO-PLAY PAY-TO-PLAY
2013
2012
2012 annual revenue
£1,495m
2012 annual ARPU
£130
annual 2013 revenue
£1,572m
annual 2013 ARPU
£123
2012 annual revenue
£160m
2012 annual ARPU
£16
annual 2013 revenue
£123m
annual 2013 ARPU
£14
29% reach
26% reach
reach 29%
reach 23%
UK – INSIGHT REPORT: QUARTER 1 2013
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
60 minutes later
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
Summary and Conclusions
•Obviously, mixed results for the organisation
•Some things good, some bad
•This might be as a result of the changed
methodology
•Major recommendation:
• Needs further investigation/more research
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
What are
we
doing?!!!!!!
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
Our reports have a problem, my friend …
Average number of words
Average number of pages
Average number of standard charts/tables
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
Colgate Herbal White
"Beaver"
755 GRP’s EC
Colgate Total Advanced
Fresh “Sleepers”
600 GRP’s
January February March April May June
Medium 30 6 13 20 27 3 10 17 24 3 10 17 24 31 7 14 21 28 5 12 19 26 2 9 16 23
English Paired :15 30 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
Stand Alone :15
:30 60 60 60 60 30 30 30 30 108108108
French Paired :15 30 30 30 30 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
:30 60 60 60 60 30 30 30 30 108108108
July August September October November December
Medium 30 7 14 21 28 4 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 29 6 13 20 27 3 10 17 24 1 8 15 22
English Paired :15 75 75 75 75 75 75
Stand Alone :15 75 75 125 100 80 75
:30 150 125 100 75 75 75
French Paired :15
:30 150 125 100 75 75 75
Colgate Herbal White
Total Advanced Fresh
XXX Media Expenditure for 2005
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
Primary chequing/
savings RRSP/RRIF
Home/lif e insurance
Secured
Line of Credit
Investment
savings
Mortgages
Unregistered
investments
Unregistered GIC’s
Credit
cards
Unsecured
Lines of Credit
Product-
anchored
insurance
Registered GIC’s
PRODUCT TYPE CUSTOMER
OWNERSHIP SWITCHING?
SHARE GAINS PHYSICAL
DISTRIBUTION
Core (e.g. chequing
accounts
Customers typically
own only one at a
time
High barriers, so
low incidence of
switching
Difficult, as share
needs to be stolen
from competitors in
the saturated
market
Important
Secondary (e.g.
Mortgages)
Customers typically
own only one at a
time
Low barriers but
switching takes
place infrequently
Slow, because of
timing lags inherent
in products
Less important
Tertiary (e.g. Credit
cards, ULOC, GIC)
Customers may
own several at a
time
Low barriers,
frequent switching
Can be rapid, but
losses can be rapid
as well
Unimportant
A nuclear model of financial products and relationships helps to determine new customer product acquisition
sequence. New customers can be relatively quickly acquired using secondary and tertiary products; longer
term relationships are built using core products.
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
0
50
100
150
200
250
7-J
ul-0
2
14
-Jul-02
21
-Jul-02
28
-Jul-02
4-A
ug-0
2
11-A
ug-0
2
18-A
ug-0
2
25-A
ug-0
2
1-S
ep-0
2
8-S
ep-0
2
15-S
ep-0
2
22-S
ep-0
2
29-S
ep-0
2
6-O
ct-
02
13-O
ct-
02
20-O
ct-
02
27-O
ct-
02
3-N
ov-0
2
10-N
ov-0
2
17-N
ov-0
2
24-N
ov-0
2
1-D
ec-0
2
8-D
ec-0
2
15-D
ec-0
2
22-D
ec-0
2
29-D
ec-0
2
5-J
an-0
3
12-J
an-0
3
19-J
an-0
3
26-J
an-0
3
2-F
eb
-03
9-F
eb
-03
16-F
eb-0
3
23-F
eb-0
3
2-M
ar-
03
9-M
ar-
03
16-M
ar-
03
23-M
ar-
03
30-M
ar-
03
6-A
pr-
03
13-A
pr-
03
20-A
pr-
03
27-A
pr-
03
4-M
ay-0
3
11-M
ay-0
3
18-M
ay-0
3
25-M
ay-0
3
1-J
un-0
3
8-J
un-0
3
15-J
un-0
3
22-J
un-0
3
29-J
un-0
3
6-J
ul-0
3
13
-Jul-03
20
-Jul-03
27
-Jul-03
3-A
ug-0
3
10-A
ug-0
3
17-A
ug-0
3
24-A
ug-0
3
31-A
ug-0
3
7-S
ep-0
3
14-S
ep-0
3
21-S
ep-0
3
28-S
ep-0
3
5-O
ct-
03
12-O
ct-
03
19-O
ct-
03
26-O
ct-
03
2-N
ov-0
3
9-N
ov-0
3
16-N
ov-0
3
23-N
ov-0
3
30-N
ov-0
3
7-D
ec-0
3
14-D
ec-0
3
21-D
ec-0
3
Fresh Confidence
"New Pool"
888 Cum GRPs
CTPW "Tooth Fairy"
2896 Cum GRPs
870 419
CTPW "Tooth Fairy"
3689 Cum GRPs 2 in 1 "Ice Cave"
419 Cum GRPs
in 2003 793
Colgate Herbal White
"Beaver"
755 GRPs EC
Colgate Total Advanced
Fresh “Sleepers"
600 GRPs
41
50
37
59
43
19
23
21
38
24
28 28
21
29
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
CLAIMED TV AD AWARENESS
PROVEN RECALL ANY AD
(Q4'03 intrusion index = -2 )
Claimed TV Ad Awareness & Proven Recall - Any XXX -
National Data (160 Females/4wks)
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
Total Region Age A B C A B C
Q4 '02 Q1‘03 Q2‘03 Q3‘03 Q4‘03
West
Ont & Atl Que
18-34 years
35-49 years
50-64 years
(Base: Those who claim to have seen any Colgate ad)
(187) (207) (258) (242) (209) (56)* (115) (38)* (98) (89) (22)*
% % % % % % % % % % %
PROVEN RECALL ANY AD 56 60 64 49 56 61 53 56 60 55 43
Brightens/whitens teeth 27 36 29 32 29 35 25 35 31 33 16 Shows smiling faces/teeth 6 4 8 4 6 5 6 8 6 5 9 Works between brushings 5 3 2 3 2 2 2 0 2 1 0
PROVEN RECALL ATE TOTAL CAMPAIGNS 24 17 30 14 22 23 21 25 19 21 35
Patient trying to talk with dental instruments in mouth 1 1 3 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 0
Lady tells dentist she has been using Colgate 2 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 2 0 0
PROVEN RECALL TOTAL PLUS WHITENING "TOOTH FAIRY"
10 8 17 8 9 9 10 8 8 8 18
PROVEN RECALL COLGATE TOTAL ADVANCED FRESH “SLEEPERS”
3 1 3 8 3 5 0
Shows two couples in bed (in two different apartments) 3 0 3 8 3 4 0
Shows one couple that used Colgate before going to bed and one that didn’t
2 1 2 2 2 2 0
The couple who didn’t use Colgate are far apart in bed/not cuddling in the morning
2 0 1 5 2 2 0
The couple who used Colgate are cuddling/kissing/close together in the morning
2 0 1 5 2 1 0
Says that someone should tell couple (in 7a) to use Colgate (7b is too busy)
1 0 2 0 2 1 0
Shows woman falling out of bed (because of bad breath)
+ 0 0 2 0 1 0
* Caution: Small Base Size
Q.A9ab/9ef Please tell me everything you can remember about the most recent TV ad you saw for xxx Toothpaste. What did it show? What did it say? What was the main thing the ad was
trying to tell you about this brand, besides trying to get you to buy the product?
Detailed Recall for XXX
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
8b. Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, or disagree that…?
“The Package” Personal
Care
All
Category
Top
25% Q2’03
May 26- July 6
Q3’03
July 7 – Sept 28
On Air May 26 -July 27,
Sep 22-28
(Base: Total seen ad & link to Royale) (53) (165) (115) % % %
% % %
A B
% AGREE STRONGLY Creative The ad was very enjoyable to watch 55 54 > 56 > 44 40 51
The ad was very unique and different 53 57 > 57 > 47 45 57
It made the brand seem different from other brands 11 25A = 20 < 30 28 35
What the ad said and showed was interesting to you 31 22 = 30 = 27 29 37
You are getting tired of seeing the ad 4 10 < 5 < 16 15 21
The ad told you something new 6 9 < 9 = 15 19 28 Motivation The ad made you want to buy the brand 6 10 < 11 < 22 21 27 Communication The ad made you feel that the brand is the best combination
of softness and strength 10 13
< 14
< 63
54 72
The ad made you feel confident that choosing this brand would be the best decision in your choice of bathroom tissue 10 13
< 13
< 63
54 72
The ad made you feel that the brand is part of how you care for you and your family 16 17
< 18
< 63
54 72
Equity The ad made the brand appear to have unique or different
features or a distinct image other brands in this category do not have 11 15
< 15
< n/a
29 n/a The ad improved your familiarity and understanding of what
this brand is about 12 15
< 16
= n/a
22 n/a
Don’t try to make the report be
the presentation
Aided Opinions of xxx’s “The Package”
TV Ad
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
ISO9000ISO9000
Project Thistle - US Malt Drinkers Online(10889) - Wave 1 Apr 04 22IpsosIpsos--FocusFocus
NORMALISED BRAND IMAGE SCORESNORMALISED BRAND IMAGE SCORES
Do Do Brand A Brand B Brand C Brand D Brand E Brand F Brand G Brand H Brand I
Base 197 198 193 193 133 143 75 94 82 64
Fashionable 1.55 1.51 0.98 0.99 0.81 0.62 0.71 0.62 0.60 0.58
Stylish 1.31 1.00 1.03 1.00 1.05 0.96 0.89 0.74 0.82 0.57
Traditional 1.21 1.33 0.94 1.03 0.84 0.95 0.77 0.83 0.68 0.98
GVFM 0.97 1.52 1.02 1.03 0.91 0.78 0.82 0.78 0.74 1.14
Darker coloured 1.43 2.04 0.62 0.43 0.66 0.76 0.82 1.27 0.93 1.73
Seen in all bars 2.18 2.33 0.87 1.04 0.49 0.27 0.06 0.07 0.13 0.32
Range of products 0.97 3.32 0.47 0.69 0.99 0.63 0.35 0.28 0.93 0.16
Attractive bottle 1.65 0.80 1.11 0.69 0.81 0.82 1.00 0.99 1.01 1.45
Serious 0.64 0.60 1.05 1.05 1.08 1.23 1.25 1.33 1.13 1.15
Authentic 0.71 0.70 1.02 1.02 1.13 1.17 1.23 1.16 1.19 1.25
Proud to serve 0.78 0.73 1.08 1.16 1.09 1.03 0.99 1.05 1.12 1.12
Gift 1.03 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.02 1.05 0.98 0.98 1.09 0.92
Distinctive taste 0.76 0.67 1.07 0.96 1.02 1.09 1.29 1.34 1.14 1.41
Sophisticated 0.76 0.52 1.06 1.06 1.16 1.21 1.22 1.26 1.15 0.78
Different 0.55 0.52 1.01 1.01 1.04 1.15 1.54 1.52 1.36 1.29
Becoming more popular 0.81 0.99 1.17 1.27 1.14 0.99 0.63 0.74 0.88 0.55
Would recommend 0.66 0.61 1.10 1.13 1.21 1.23 1.21 0.93 1.22 0.72
High quality 0.82 0.75 1.02 0.99 1.06 1.14 1.14 1.12 1.19 1.34
For confident people 0.90 0.78 0.95 1.04 1.07 1.11 1.07 1.18 1.13 1.05
For successful people 0.93 0.73 1.03 1.00 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.10 1.08 0.98
Q5a Please indicate which, if any, of the brands shown here you think each description applies to.
Key to colours:
Positive association - 99% significance level
Positive association - 95% signficance level
Negative association - 95% signficance level
Negative association - 99% significance level
2 = (oi - ei)2
ei
ei = expected frequency
oi = observed frequency
Q1
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI 44“Best Practice” Presentation Workshop – Sept 2004
InnovationInnovation
StrategyStrategy
Innovation Strategy Innovation Strategy –– Done Right Done Right ––
Is Essential to the Innovation ProcessIs Essential to the Innovation Process
ProspectingProspecting
Innovation
Platform 1
Innovation
Platform 2
Innovation
Platform 3
Innovation
Platform 4
•Company/Brand
Strategy
•External & Internal
Scan
•Company/Brand
Strategy
•External & Internal
Scan
Opp’ty
Area 1
Opp’ty
Area 2
Opp’ty
Area 3
Opp’ty
Area 4
Project
4
Project
3
Idea 1
Idea 2
Idea 3
Idea 4
Idea 5
Idea 7
Idea 8
Idea 6
Iterate
Idea
Generation
Develop
Concept,
Product &
Packaging
Project
2
Finalize
PropositionLaunch
Project
1
Innovation
Strategy
Activities
In Phase
Develop
innovation
platforms
Use rich consumer insight
to identify opportunity areas
within each platform
ProspectingIdea
Generation
Generate ideas
within each
opportunity area
“The Funnel”
Resource the most promising
ideas with a team and
a budget: projects
Iterate
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
Packaged is still king when it comes to the value of the video games market. This is particularly true in Q4 due to seasonality. The amount of free app acquisition is reflected in the low value of apps. While Android does not monetise quite as successfully as iOS, Android smartphones and tablets are going to be more prevalent than iPhones and iPads in the coming months, and so the proportion of either free or ‘freemium’ games is likely to increase still further.
VALUE OF GAMES DATA AND DESIGN BY IPSOS MEDIACT
15%
60%
5% 12%
6% 2%
Q4 ‘11
90%
Q4 ‘12
88%
Q4 ‘13
87% 4% 8%
2% 8%
5% 8%
PACKAGED APPS ONLINE
VALUE SHARE "Kid's devices” (e.g. leapfrog)
15%
60%
10% 8% 5% 2%
15%
60%
15% 6% 2% 2%
Tablets Smartphones Handhelds Consoles Computers
ARPU Q4 2012
£27 Packaged
£4 Apps
£9 Online
ARPU Q4 2012
£27 Packaged
£4 Apps
£9 Online
UK – INSIGHT REPORT: QUARTER 1 2013
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
Key issues
• Think hard about what the key messages are for the
audience
• Think hard about how many pages or slides
• What format works best?
• What are the audience like?
• What will you say? What won’t you say?
• What stands out from your experience and analysis
– context!?
• How are you going to make it memorable?
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
Bringing Research to Life
know your audience
illuminate the message
tell the
story
stimulate
the senses
use effects
you need a good
screenplay
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
What matters? How you make them feel….
Experience of making an
appointment
Experience of the GP
Trust/confidence in GP
Getting through on phone
Satisfaction with opening hours
Experience of the nurse
Seeing preferred
GP
Helpfulness of receptionists
Waiting times
63% of the variance explained by the model
Rank
Rela
tive
im
po
rtan
ce
Source: GP Patient Survey, 2013-14
Overall, how would you describe your experience of you GP surgery?
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
Poverty and perception – not much relationship
R² = 0.0885
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Deprivation (IMD score)
Low deprivation Higher deprivation
% s
ayin
g ‘go
od
’ ove
rall
exp
erie
nce
Source: GP Patient Survey, 2013-14 Base: Coastal West Sussex CCG 8,451
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
Look at your outliers?
R² = 0.0885
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Deprivation (IMD score)
Low deprivation Higher deprivation
% s
ayin
g ‘go
od
’ ove
rall
exp
erie
nce
Source: GP Patient Survey, 2013-14 Base: Coastal West Sussex CCG 8,451
Staff on-site:
8 GPs, 6 Practice Nurses
2 Healthcare Assistants
1 District Nurse
From NHS Choices:
“An excellent and efficient practice”
“Staff are friendly and approachable”
“Appointment nightmare”
Staff on-site:
7 GPs, 6 Practice Nurses
1 Healthcare Assistant
2 midwives
1 District Nurse
1 Health Visitor
From NHS Choices:
“GPs are the best”
“I work full time and this surgery will only
work for you if you don’t work”
“Can never get an appointment unless it’s
an emergency”
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
Good overall experience – Worthing bit miserable?
94-95%
Good experience
91-94%
85-91% 81-85% 66-81%
Source: GP Patient Survey, 2013-14 Base: Coastal West Sussex CCG 8,451
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 1 © Ipsos MORI
Sources: Alleyne, R. (11 Feb 2011). Welcome to the information age – 174 newspapers a day. The Telegraph.
we receive
5x as much
information today as we did in 1986
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 1 © Ipsos MORI
9900% on the
internet (since 2007)
400% in literature
(since 1990)
142% in newspapers (between 1985 & 1994)
Sources: Google Trends, Google Ngram Viewer, Zacks, J., Levy, E., Tversky, B., Schinao, D. (2002). Graphs in Print, Diagrammatic Representation and Reasoning, London: Springer-Verlag.
visualised content has increased across all platforms
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 1 © Ipsos MORI
Almost
50% of your brain is involved in visual processing
Sources: Merieb, E. N. & Hoehn, K. (2007). Human Anatomy & Physiology 7th Edition, Pearson International Edition.
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 1 © Ipsos MORI
70% of all your sensory
receptors are in your eyes
Sources: Merieb, E. N. & Hoehn, K. (2007). Human Anatomy & Physiology 7th Edition, Pearson International Edition.
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 1 © Ipsos MORI
We can get the sense of a visual scene in less than
1/10 of a second
Sources: Semetko, H. & Scammell, M. (2012). The SAGE Handbook of Political Communication, SAGE Publications.
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 1 © Ipsos MORI
Colour visuals increase the
willingness to read by
80%
Sources: Green, R. (1989). The Persuasive Properties of Color, Marketing Communications.
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 1 © Ipsos MORI
Sources: Wharton School of Business. ‘Effectiveness of Visual Language’.
50% of the audience were persuaded
by a purely verbal presentation
67% of the audience were persuaded by the verbal presentation that had accompanying visuals
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 1 © Ipsos MORI
Presenting survey data
Design: BBC
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 1 © Ipsos MORI
Illustrating journalistic content
Design: GoSquared.com
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 1 © Ipsos MORI
Simplifying complex issues
Design: The Guardian
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 1 © Ipsos MORI
Comparisons
Design: Bob Al-Green
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 1 © Ipsos MORI
Displaying trends / timelines in clearer ways
Design: Matthew Brown
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 1 © Ipsos MORI
Fun and entertainment
Design: Jing Zhang
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 1 © Ipsos MORI
Infographics at Ipsos MORI
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 1 © Ipsos MORI
Political Monitor
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 1 © Ipsos MORI
Twitter Anniversary
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 1 © Ipsos MORI
Political Monitor Interactive www.ipsos-mori.com/midtermreview
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 1 © Ipsos MORI
Political Monitor Interactive www.ipsos-mori.com/midtermreview
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 1 © Ipsos MORI
Ipsos MORI Top Cities 2013 Interactive www.ipsos-mori.com/topcities
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 1 © Ipsos MORI
Ipsos MORI Top Cities 2013 Interactive www.ipsos-mori.com/topcities
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 1 © Ipsos MORI
Charles Minard
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 1 © Ipsos MORI
Florence Nightingale
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 1 © Ipsos MORI
Dieter Rams German industrial designer closely associated
with the consumer products company Braun and
the Functionalist school of industrial design
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 1 © Ipsos MORI
Design: Bob Al-Green
The 10 principles of good design (aka the Ten Commandments)
Good design
is unobtrusive
Good design
is honest
Good design
makes a product as understandable
Good design
is thorough to the last detail
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 1 © Ipsos MORI
Design: Bob Al-Green
The bad and the ugly
Good design
is honest
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 1 © Ipsos MORI
Ann Summers infographic
The bad and the ugly
Edward Tufte
catastrophe becomes the first principle in bringing colour to information:
Above all, do no
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 1 © Ipsos MORI
http://www.fastcodesign.com/1661889/infographics-of-the-day-the-little-book-of-shocking-global-facts
Edward Tufte
and confusion are not attributes of information, they are failures of
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 1 © Ipsos MORI
Peter Orntoft
Inforgraphics in context
Peter Orntoft
The good
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 1 © Ipsos MORI
http://www.networkosaka.com#sthash.My7FqWDw.dpuf
Global Warming
Derek Kim
The good
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 1 © Ipsos MORI
Issues Index: A history of economic worry
Ipsos MORI
The good
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 1 © Ipsos MORI
Issues Index: A history of economic worry
Ipsos MORI
The good
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 1 © Ipsos MORI
Issues Index:
priorities
Ipsos MORI
The good
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI Version 1 © Ipsos MORI
The process of graphic report or interactive site creation
Narrative Analysis Design Dissemination Brief
Proving a point
Exploring an
issue
Are the
statistics
significant
Keep track
of sources
Fact check
What is
the purpose?
Who is
the audience?
Identifying &
communicating
key messages
Hierarchy
& structure
Selecting an
appropriate
visual language
How is this
going to be
shared with
the world
Version 2 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
The challenge for managers and
leaders– TRY SOMETHING NEW
(but pilot it first)
VERSION 1 | INTERNAL USE ONLY
29/01/13
THE BEST OF 2013 THE WINNERS
BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE
“DATA VISUALISATION WORKING PARTY”
EXCELLENCE IN REPORTING AWARDS - THE BEST OF 2013 | THE WINNERS
TOP 3
REGULAR REPORT
CLIENT REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS PREPARED
BY OUR RESEARCH TEAMS
EXCELLENCE IN REPORTING AWARDS - THE BEST OF 2013 | THE WINNERS
SRI | Wellcome Trust Risk and Rewards 3rd
EXCELLENCE IN REPORTING AWARDS - THE BEST OF 2013 | THE WINNERS
Marketing | Early innovation case study 2nd
EXCELLENCE IN REPORTING AWARDS - THE BEST OF 2013 | THE WINNERS
ASI | Virgin Trains 1st
Ian McKee, Dan Spalding
& Will Reeve
EXCELLENCE IN REPORTING AWARDS - THE BEST OF 2013 | THE WINNERS
TOP 3
ONLINE DELIVERY
PORTALS, INTERACTIVE SITES
AUGMENTED REALITY
EXCELLENCE IN REPORTING AWARDS - THE BEST OF 2013 | THE WINNERS
SRI | Political Monitor Microsite 3rd
EXCELLENCE IN REPORTING AWARDS - THE BEST OF 2013 | THE WINNERS
Ipsos MORI | Top Cities 2nd
EXCELLENCE IN REPORTING AWARDS - THE BEST OF 2013 | THE WINNERS
Ethnography | ECE P&G e-book 1st
Neil Tierney
Oli Sweet
Billie Ing
Jo Ashun
EXCELLENCE IN REPORTING AWARDS - THE BEST OF 2013 | THE WINNERS
TOP 3
HIGH IMPACT
INFOGRAPHICS, ANIMATIONS,
BESPOKE DELIVERABLES
EXCELLENCE IN REPORTING AWARDS - THE BEST OF 2013 | THE WINNERS
Marketing | MasterCard Road To Inclusion 3rd
EXCELLENCE IN REPORTING AWARDS - THE BEST OF 2013 | THE WINNERS
ASI | Neuroscience Invitation 2nd
EXCELLENCE IN REPORTING AWARDS - THE BEST OF 2013 | THE WINNERS
SRI | Generations Sculpture 1st
Hannah Bellamy
Bobby Duffy
VERSION 1 | INTERNAL USE ONLY
29/01/13
THE BEST OF 2013 THE WINNERS
BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE
“DATA VISUALISATION WORKING PARTY”