Upload
victoria-murray
View
217
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
European Cooperative Network for European Cooperative Network for Research, Diagnosis and Therapy of Parkinson´s DiseaseResearch, Diagnosis and Therapy of Parkinson´s Disease
EuroPaEuroPaMIDTERM REVIEWMIDTERM REVIEW
WORK PACKAGE 3WORK PACKAGE 3Patient RegistryPatient Registry
MEMBERS OF THE REGISTRY MEMBERS OF THE REGISTRY GROUPGROUP
PARTNER 13:PARTNER 13: Werner Poewe (WP3 Leader, Innsbruck)Werner Poewe (WP3 Leader, Innsbruck)
Cecilia Peralta (WP3 Project Manager, InnsbruckCecilia Peralta (WP3 Project Manager, Innsbruck))
PARTNER 1:PARTNER 1: Wolfgang Oertel (Coordinator, WP1, Marburg)Wolfgang Oertel (Coordinator, WP1, Marburg)
Regina Wick (Senior Project Manager, WP1, Marburg)Regina Wick (Senior Project Manager, WP1, Marburg)
PARTNER 8:PARTNER 8: Cristina Sampaio (Contractor, Lisbon)Cristina Sampaio (Contractor, Lisbon)
PARTNER 3:PARTNER 3: Olivier Rascol (WP4 Leader, Toulouse)Olivier Rascol (WP4 Leader, Toulouse)
PARTNER 9:PARTNER 9: Paolo Barone (Contractor, Naples)Paolo Barone (Contractor, Naples)
PARTNER 5:PARTNER 5: Markus Stoll (CIO, Berlin, WP2)Markus Stoll (CIO, Berlin, WP2)
MAIN TASKS MAIN TASKS RESPONSABILITIESRESPONSABILITIES
Establishment of an European registry of Parkinson´s Disease Establishment of an European registry of Parkinson´s Disease
patientspatients
Development of the Minimal Data Set (MDS)Development of the Minimal Data Set (MDS)
Incorporation of existing registriesIncorporation of existing registries
Oversight of patient entry (in cooperation with all EuroPa Oversight of patient entry (in cooperation with all EuroPa
membersmembers
Quality control of data entryQuality control of data entry
MILESTONES WP3MILESTONES WP3
Time Due Completed
Milestones Ongoing
Minimal Data Set
month 12
Start of Data Entry
month 18
Registry Policy
month 6
First 1000 patients
month 30
First 4000 patients
month 36
STRUCTURE OF STRUCTURE OF MINIMAL DATA SET MINIMAL DATA SET
Part A:Part A: Patient Data Patient Data
Part B:Part B: Clinical Data Clinical Data
Part C:Part C: Drug History Drug History
Part D:Part D: Current Treatment Current Treatment
Part E:Part E: Clinical Trial History Clinical Trial History
MINIMAL DATA SETB Clinical Data
As assessed at time of current examination
B1.
Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) stage
For Patients on drug therapy use ON value
B2.UPDRS II
Use historical information of the previous week, regarding overallperformance (ON and OFF combined).
B3. UPDRS III
For Patients on drug therapy use ON value
For items B4 through B19 in case of any doubt or lack of information,answer NO.For definitions and diagnostic criteria click HELP.
MINIMAL DATA SET
Yes No
B4. Motorfluctuations
If YES specify:B4.1 wearing-off
B4.2 ON-OFF fluctuations
B5. ON-period dyskinesias
If YES specify:disabling
B6. OFF-period dystonia
If YES specify:disabling
B7. Freezing of gait
MINIMAL DATA SET
Yes No
B9. Dementia
B10. Psychosis
B11. Depressive disorder
If YES specify:B11.1 past
B11.2 current
B12. Orthostatic hypotension
B13. Male erectile dysfunction
MINIMAL DATA SET
Yes No
B14. Urinary incontinence
B15. Chronic constipation
B16. Sleep disorders
If YES specify:B16.1 insomnia
Rate YES in case of subjective complaint of poor sleepirrespective of cause.
B16.2 daytime sleepiness
Rate YES in case of subjective complaint or caregiverobservation of daytime sleepiness/sedation.
Yes No
B16.3 REM behaviour disorder
YES only in accordance with the ICSDcriteria (at least Minimal Criteria B plus C).
MINIMAL DATA SET Yes No
B17. PD related pain
Rate YES with any score above zero on item 17 ofUPDRS II.
B18. Currently on anti-parkinsonian medication
B19. Deep brain surgery
B20. First degree relative with PD or tremor
If YES specify:parent
sibling
B21. DNA sample available
ActivelyRecruiting
Entering intotheelectronicaldatabase
Ethicalapproval/dataprotectionapproval
Waitingfor dataprotectionapproval
Recruitmentnot started
Marburg x x xLondon x x xGroningen x x xInnsbruck x xPrague x x xNaples x x xTel Aviv x x xBarcelona x xLund x xLisbon x X
Toulouse x x
CENTER STATUSCENTER STATUS
BREAKDOWN OF PATIENTS BREAKDOWN OF PATIENTS ACCORDING CENTERSACCORDING CENTERS
0102030405060708090
100
Mar
burg
Nap
les
Inns
bruc
k
Lond
on
Gro
ning
en
Tel A
viv
Pra
gue
Marburg
Naples
Innsbruck
London
Groningen
Tel Aviv
Prague
N= 513N= 513
BREAKDOWN OF PATIENTS BREAKDOWN OF PATIENTS ENTERED ELECTRONICALLYENTERED ELECTRONICALLY
Marburg
Tel Aviv
London
Groningen
Prague
Naples
MarburgMarburg9696
Tel AvivTel Aviv3737
LondonLondon7474
GroningenGroningen2020
PraguePrague1818
NaplesNaples7979
N= 324 N= 324
WEEKLY RATE OF PATIENT ENTRYWEEKLY RATE OF PATIENT ENTRY
40004000
10001000
400400
0 0
Month 18 Month 30 Month 36Month 18 Month 30 Month 36
mean weekly entry of 3 patients 7 centersmean weekly entry of 3 patients 7 centersmean weekly entry of 3 patients all centersmean weekly entry of 3 patients all centersmean weekly entry of 5 patients all centersmean weekly entry of 5 patients all centers
397
19091909
2773277343574357
1008100815841584
26402640
REGISTRY ENTRYREGISTRY ENTRY
Activate all centers Activate all centers
Switch to electronical entry for all centresSwitch to electronical entry for all centres
Redefine sampling procedureRedefine sampling procedure
Approve Registry PolicyApprove Registry Policy
Create National NodesCreate National Nodes
MEASURES TO INCREASE ENTRY RATEMEASURES TO INCREASE ENTRY RATE
Define a centre-specific random sampling Define a centre-specific random sampling procedureprocedure
Based on the outpatient population seen over Based on the outpatient population seen over April- May- June 2003 in each centre, estimate a April- May- June 2003 in each centre, estimate a reasonable weekly entry rate (%) and sample size reasonable weekly entry rate (%) and sample size
SAMPLING PROCEDURESAMPLING PROCEDURE- New version-- New version-
WEEKLY RATEWEEKLY RATESAMPLE SIZESAMPLE SIZE
CENTRE WEEKLY OUTPATIENT SAMPLING RATE CENTRE WEEKLY OUTPATIENT SAMPLING RATE RATE average 3 months (25%)RATE average 3 months (25%)
MarburgMarburg 2020 5 5
LondonLondon 1515 4 4
NaplesNaples 2424 6 6
InnsbruckInnsbruck 2323 5 5
PraguePrague 3030 7 7
ToulouseToulouse 3030 7 7
LisbonLisbon 2222 5 5
Tel AvivTel Aviv 10 10 3 3
GroningenGroningen 10 10 3 3
BarcelonaBarcelona 41 41 10 10
Lund Lund 12 12 3 3
TOTALTOTAL 237237 58 (5 mean) 58 (5 mean)
SAMPLING PROCEDURESAMPLING PROCEDURE- New Version-- New Version-
EachEach centre defines its own random sampling centre defines its own random sampling procedureprocedure
Weekly entry rate of the random out-patient Weekly entry rate of the random out-patient sample will be set at 25% of the weekly outpatient sample will be set at 25% of the weekly outpatient populationpopulation
Patients entered outside the sampling procedure Patients entered outside the sampling procedure will be coded separatelywill be coded separately
Minimal Data Set
A Patient Data
A1. Patient randomly selected according to Sampling Procedure?
A2. Patient recruited as out-patient yes no
A3. Date of birth
A4. Gender
A5. Date of examination
A6. Diagnosis:
Please enter patients diagnosed with iPD only. The other options are given in case the diagnosis is revisedat a later date.
iPDMSA
CBD
PSP
drug-induced
parkinsonism
others:
A7. Time of symptom onset:If mont not known, enter NK for month.
female male
mm-yyyy
dd-mm-yyyy
yes no
ALLOCATIONS OF HUMAN ALLOCATIONS OF HUMAN RESOURCESRESOURCES
20 of 48 person months funded have been used 20 of 48 person months funded have been used
by May 2003by May 2003
24 of 86 person months for permanent staff have been24 of 86 person months for permanent staff have been
used by May 2003used by May 2003
Work Package 3
WP 3 SUMMARY
7 out of 11 centres are actively recruiting patients7 out of 11 centres are actively recruiting patients
6 centres have started electronical data entry6 centres have started electronical data entry
5 centres are waiting for data/ethic committee approval 5 centres are waiting for data/ethic committee approval
Minimal Data Set was developed and updatedMinimal Data Set was developed and updated
First 1000 patients will be achieved by month 30First 1000 patients will be achieved by month 30
Centre specific sampling procedure defined Centre specific sampling procedure defined
Final version of the Registry Policy mailed to all centresFinal version of the Registry Policy mailed to all centres