Upload
tori
View
112
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
DESIGN OPTION OF THE FLOOD MITIGATION PLAN OF SG. MUDA, SUNGAI MUDA, KEDAH Final Draft REPORT. (September 28, 2006). Scope of Work. (a) Rainfall data in space and time leading to chosen flood events. (b) Runoff discharge and stage records of the chosen events; - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
DESIGN OPTION OF THE FLOOD MITIGATION PLAN
OF SG. MUDA, SUNGAI MUDA, KEDAH
Final Draft REPORT
(September 28, 2006)
Scope of Work
(a) Rainfall data in space and time leading to chosen flood events.
(b) Runoff discharge and stage records of the chosen events;
(c) Computer simulation of the flood events;
(d) Computer simulation of long term river behaviour to determine stretches prone to meandering, hence needing extra protection;
(e) Changes in alluvial river geometry in terms of aggradation and degradation as well as lateral channel migration as a result of the flood events;
(f) Design criteria used for the Flood Control Remediation Plan;
(g) Specific design of the proposed structures including levee protection, riverbank protection works and protection of bridge crossings and other structures.
Contents
• Muda River Flood 2003• Hydrological Modeling• Hydraulic Modeling• Sediment Sampling• River Modeling• Mitigation and Protection Works• Conclusions and Recommendations
Muda Flood 2003
Study Area
October 1998 Flood
Flood Prone Areas (Oct 1998 Flood)
No.
Rainfall Station
District 2/10 3/10 4/10 5/10Total
(2-5 Oct)Total Rainfall(3 Day Max)
ARI (3 day Max)
1 Pulai Baling 20 27 80 46 173 153 Normal
2Kuala Pegang
Baling 43 56 120 27 246 219 5
3Jam. Syed Omar
Kuala Muda
32 79 148 57 316 284 30
4Gunung Jerai
Kuala Muda
147 238 252 128 765 637 >100
5 Sg. PetaniKuala Muda
47 124 177 68 416 369 >100
6 Pendang Kota Setar 34 72 41 15 162 147 Normal
7 Alor Setar Kota Setar 33 60 33 26 151 125 Normal
8 Sik Sik 96 80 220 85 480 396 >100
9 Jeniang Sik 71 90 115 96 372 301 50
10 Kulim Kulim 12 74 242 77 403 392 >100
Summary of Rainfall Distribution for 2003 Flood
Gunung Jerai 525 mm
No. Year Q (m3/s) No. Year Q (m3/s) No. Year Q (m3/s)1 1988 948 11 1976 542 21 1994 2872 1997 928 12 2000 508 22 1975 2793 1998 854 13 1990 464 23 2002 2674 2003 843 14 1983 370 24 1978 2655 1986 838 15 2005 368 25 1974 2516 1999 833 16 1993 349 26 1989 2237 1985 737 17 1996 348 27 1979 1968 1987 650 18 1982 341 28 1981 1769 1980 629 19 2001 321 29 1977 137
10 1984 623 20 2004 314
Sg. Muda @ Ladang Victoria
Sg. Muda @ Syed Omar
No. Year Q (m3/s) No. Year Q (m3/s) No. Year Q (m3/s)1 2003 1340 17 1968 572 33 1983 3932 1988 1225 18 1975 565 34 1991 3823 1996 1070 19 2005 565 35 1987 3774 1998 980 20 1976 549 36 1978 3755 1967 912 21 1969 546 37 1961 3746 1965 861 22 1977 542 38 2004 3407 1973 780 23 2001 539 39 1989 3328 1972 706 24 1971 535 40 1993 3269 1966 661 25 1963 516 41 1992 319
10 1999 651 26 1984 500 42 1986 31511 1964 640 27 1980 480 43 1962 26812 1997 626 28 1979 450 44 1974 26413 2000 626 29 1985 449 4514 2002 612 30 1981 436 4615 1970 602 31 1990 43316 1960 572 32 1982 399
Flood Ranking
Flood Frequency Analyses for Sg. Muda @ Ladang Victoria
Return Period Discharge (m3/s)
DID JICA (1995) REDAC (2006)Gumbel Type I
(Discharge Data from 1960 – 2005)
2 517 536
5 760 810 742
10 916 950 880
25 1125 1053
50 1275 1260 1182100 1423 1340 1309
200 1572 1436
Notes: 1988 Flood – 1225 m3/s (50-100 yr ARI) 1998 Flood – 980 m3/s (25-yr ARI)
2003 Flood – 1340 m3/s (100-yr ARI)
2003 Hydrograph @ Ldg Victoria
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
Hour
Dis
ch
arg
e,
Q(m
3 /s)
Jan Feb Mac Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Q = 1340m3/s
Hydrological Modelling
Hydrological Modeling
Design Flood Hydrograph of 5, 20, 50 and 100 yr ARI
for Sg Muda at Ladang Victoria (JICA, 1995)
Design Flood Hydrograph of 5, 20, 50 and 100 yr ARI
for Sg Muda at Ladang Victoria (Zaaba, 2002)
• DISCHARGE STATION:– Jambatan Syed Omar (5606410)– Ladang Victoria (5505412)
• RAINFALL STATION:– Bt. 27 Jln. Baling (5507076)– Bt. 61 Jln. Baling (5808001)– Jeniang Klinik (5806066)– Komplek Rumah Muda (6108001)
• MODEL SET UP– CALIBRATION –OCTOBER 2003– VALIDATION – NOVEMBER 1998
HEC-HMS
RAINFALL & DISCHARGE STATION LOCATIONS
5806414
BARRAGEJENIANG
5606410
5505412
BARRAGEMUDA
PETANISUNGAI
KETILKUALA
REMANDAM
N
LUMPURKUALA
KEDAH
PINANG
SEMBILAN
PULAU
PERAK
SELANOGOR
NEGERI
MELAKAJOHOR
PAHANG
TERENGGANUKELANTAN
STUDY AREA
5608418
BALING
SCALE
SIK
NAMI
BERIS DAM
DAMMUDA
S.M
UD
A
RAINFALL GAGE WEIGHT
CatchmentArea Weighted Rainfall Stations
(sq.km) 6108001 5808001 5806066 5507076
Nami 1661 0.61 0.27 0.12 -
Sik-Ketil 1718 - 0.34 0.25 0.41
Sidam 616 - - - 1.00
Sg.Muda DS 215 - - 0.07 0.93
Schematic Modelling of Sg Muda Using HEC-HMS
CALIBRATION RESULTS (2003 Flood)
VALIDATION RESULTS (1998 Flood)
Design Peak Discharges Comparisons
Comparison of Hydrograph at Ladang Victoria
Comparison of Hydrograph at Ladang Victoria
0
200400
600
800
10001200
1400
1600
18002000
2200
2400
6 24 42 60 78 90 108 126 144 162 180 198 216 234 252 270 288
Time (h)
Dis
char
ge (
cum
ec)
50 yr (Qmax=1768 cumec)-Hec-Hms100 yr (Qmax=2001 cumec)-Hec-Hms50 yr (Qmax=1815 cumec)-JPZ100 yr (Qmax=2130 cumec)-JPZFlood 2003 (Qmax=1340 cumec)
Hydraulic Modelling with HEC-RAS
Simulated Flood Profiles for Alternative 2 under 50-year and 100-year ARI with
Proposed Bund Levels along Sg. Muda
Study Area
Cross Section at CH 41.2
HEC-RAS Modelling
Cross Section Points of Sg Muda in HEC-RAS Modelling
Tidal @ kedah Pier (1 - 31 Oct 2003)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
6555 6605 6655 6705 6755 6805 6855 6905 6955 7005 7055 7105 7155 7205 7255
Time (Hour)
Hei
gh
t (m
)
Oct
Longitudinal Flood Profile for Sg Muda (Q=1340m3/s)
Muda Barrage Merdeka Bridge
Expressway
BridgeRailway
Bridge Bridge
Pipe
Bridge
Velocities Profile of Sg. Muda (Q=1340m3/s)
Longitudinal Flood Profiles 50 ARI
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40Chainage (km)
Ele
vati
on (
m, L
SD
)
Existing Bed Level Flood 2003 50 yr ARI (HEC-RAS) 50 yr ARI (JPZ) Bund
Longitudinal Section for Sg. Muda Kedah (n = 0.025)
Flood Levels under 1 in 50 yr and 100 yr ARIs, with Proposed Bund Levels for Sg Muda
Node CumulativeDistance
ExistingInvert
Flood Profiles
Proposed Cross Section; EXTRAN-XP (JPZ, 2000)
Existing Cross Section;HEC-RAS (n = 0.025)
50 yr ARI 100 yr ARI Bund
Design HydrographFlood 2003
50 yr ARI 100 yr ARI
CH41 40275 1.09 10.01 10.68 11.01 10.16 10.71 9.32
CH25 24821 0.17 6.77 7.72 8.02 6.85 7.32 5.96
CH14 13142 -2.47 4.50 4.92 5.50 4.76 5.10 4.13
CH3 3413 -3.46 2.46 2.54 3.46 2.31 2.41 1.86
CH2 2152 -2.28 2.17 2.19 3.17 2.22 2.31 1.74
CH1 1294 -2.09 1.84 1.84 2.84 2.10 2.16 1.57
River Mouth
-7.80 1.39 1.39 2.39 1.90 1.90 1.30
Proposed Bund Levels for Sg Muda
Node 50 yr ARI(JPZ, 2000)
Bund(JPZ, 2000)
Flood 2003 Differencein m
CH41 10.01 11.01 9.32 1.69
CH25 6.77 8.02 5.96 2.06
CH14 4.50 5.50 4.13 1.37
CH3 2.46 3.46 1.86 1.60
CH2 2.17 3.17 1.74 1.43
CH1 1.84 2.84 1.57 1.27
River Mouth 1.39 2.39 1.30 1.09
Sediment Sampling
River Bed and Bank Sampling
Site No.
Chainage No.
Name of Location Total Sample
No. of Samples
Bank Material
(left)
Bed Material
Bank Material(right)
M1 Ch. 0.20 River Mouth 8 1 7 0
M2 Ch. 0.80 River Mouth 10 1 7 2
M3 Ch. 1.40 Kg. Sg Deraka 10 1 7 2
M4 Ch. 2.97 Kg. Pulau Mertajam 10 1 7 2
M5 Ch. 4.86 Kuala Muda Bridge 13 3 7 3
M6 Ch. 12.64 Merdeka Bridge 13 3 7 3
M7 Ch. 25.20 Pinang Tunggal Bridge 13 3 7 3
M8 Ch. 39.50 Ladang Victoria Bridge 13 3 7 3
M9 Ch. 23.60 Kuari 1 3 - 3 -
M10 Ch. 25.60 Kuari 2 3 - 3 -
M11 Ch. 31.00 Kuari Kg Pantai Perai 3 - 3 -
M12 Ch. 33.40 Kuari Kg Terat Batu 3 - 3 -
M13 Ch. 36.80 Kg Sidam Kanan 9 1 7 1
M14 Ch. 33.80 Kg Lubok Ekor 9 1 7 1
M15 Ch. 30.80 Kg Pantai Perai 9 1 7 1
M16 Ch. 23.10 Kg Matang Berangan 9 1 7 1
M17 Ch. 21.90 Kg Lahar Tiang 9 1 7 1
Total 147 21 103 23
Bank Material Sampling @ Ch 1.40, Kg. Sg Deraka
Bed Sediment Sampling
Mean Sediment Size for Bed Material
Site No.Chainage
No.Name of Location
D50 (mm)
Left Bank
Main Channel
Right Bank
M1 Ch. 0.20 River Mouth 1 0.900 0.425 -
M2 Ch. 0.80 River Mouth 2 0.216 0.063 0.600
M3 Ch. 1.40 Kg. Sg Deraka 0.063 0.150 0.040
M4 Ch. 2.97 Kg. Pulau Mertajam 0.300 0.300 0.040
M5 Ch. 4.86 Kuala Muda Bridge 0.150 0.150 0.063
M6 Ch. 12.64 Merdeka Bridge 0.090 1.000 0.050
M7 Ch. 25.20 Pinang Tunggal Bridge 0.212 0.425 0.063
M8 Ch. 39.50 Ladang Victoria Bridge 0.212 1.800 0.050
M9 Ch. 23.60 Kuari 1 - 1.180 -
M10 Ch. 25.60 Kuari 2 - 1.000 -
M11 Ch. 31.00 Kuari Kg Pantai Perai - 1.500 -
M12 Ch. 33.40 Kuari Kg Terat Batu - 1.800 -
M13 Ch. 36.80 Kg Sidam Kanan 0.040 1.180 0.036
M14 Ch. 33.80 Kg Lubok Ekor 0.014 0.036 0.020
M15 Ch. 30.80 Kg Pantai Perai 0.050 0.050 2.000
M16 Ch. 23.10 Kg Matang Berangan 0.036 0.036 0.036
M17 Ch. 21.90 Kg Lahar Tiang 0.036 0.212 0.070
Bed Material Sampling
Sand Mining 1 (d/s Pinang
Tunggal)
Jbt Pinang
Tunggal
Jbt Ldg Victoria
Sand Mining 2 (u/s Pinang
Tunggal)
Pantai Perai
(Sand Mining 3)
Sand Mining 4 (Batu Tera)
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
G3A
d50=1.30 mm
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
G5A
d50=2.50 mm
d50=1.20 mm
d50=2.50 mm
Bed Material Sampling
Muara 1
Muara 2
Muara 3
Muara 4
Jbt Kota Kuala Muda
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
0.00 0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
Particle size mm
Pe
rcen
tag
e p
ass
ing
Medium Fine CoarseMedium MediumFine Coarse Fine Coarse CoarseFine
CLAY
COBBLES
SILT GRAVELSAND
63u 212u 425u 1.18mm3.35
6.314 mmBS sieve aperture size, mm
d50=0.11 mm
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
0.00 0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
Particle size mm
Perc
enta
ge p
assin
g
Medium Fine CoarseMedium MediumFine Coarse Fine Coarse CoarseFine
CLAY
COBBLES
SILT GRAVELSAND
63u 212u 425u 1.18mm3.35
6.314 mmBS sieve aperture size, mm
d50=0.10 mm
Bed Load Sampling @ Ladang Victoria
Suspended Load Sampling @ Ladang Victoria
Ladang Victoria (21 August 2006)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle size (mm)
Per
cent
age
Pas
sing
(%
)
Left
Center
Right
Average
d50 = 0.0000095 m
Mean Sediment Size for Suspended Load
Location Date Tt (kg/s) D50 (m)
Ladang Victoria 12 July 2006 12.308 0.00000200
17 July 2006 8.971 0.00000200
26 July 2006 11.262 0.00000440
7 August 2006 8.335 0.00000105
14 August 2006 8.896 0.00000085
21 August 2006 5.387 0.00000095
28 August 2006 4.349 0.00000092
Pinang Tunggal 2 August 2006 16.478 0.00000110
Summary of Data Collection
No. Date Q V B Yo A P R S0 n
Sample ( m3/s ) ( m/s ) ( m ) ( m ) ( m2 ) ( m ) ( m )
LV01 12.07.2006 109.89 0.94 94.0 2.52 111.165 95.150 1.17 0.0002 0.0159
LV02 19.07.2006 47.21 0.71 82.0 1.80 66.835 82.808 0.81 0.0002 0.0174
LV03 26.07.2006 33.12 0.59 80.0 1.53 51.400 80.967 0.63 0.0002 0.0162
LV04 07.08.2006 27.78 0.59 72.0 1.41 55.135 72.827 0.76 0.0002 0.0233
LV05 14.08.2006 24.71 0.53 42.0 1.36 41.31 70.5846 0.59 0.0002 0.0165
LV06 21.08.2006 28.35 0.59 46.0 1.33 45.675 70.5251 0.65 0.0002 0.0171
LV07 28.08.2006 27.18 0.54 48.0 1.57 47.085 68.896 0.68 0.0002 0.0190
River Modelling
Geometry Data
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40Chainage (km)
Ele
vati
on (
m, L
SD
)
Existing Bed Level Flood 2003 50 yr ARI (FL-12)50 yr ARI (JPZ) Bund Predicted Bed Level (FL-12)Predicted Bed Level (JPZ)
Longitudinal Section for Sg. Muda Kedah (n = 0.025)
Flood Levels under 1 in 50 yr ARI, with Proposed Bund Levels for Sg Muda
Sediment Delivery (Flood Oct 2003)
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
0 10 20 30 40
Chainage (km)
Se
dim
en
t D
eliv
ery
(to
ns
)Peak After Flood
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
-200 -150 -100 -50 0 50
Distance (m)
Ele
vati
on (
m)
Predicted Bed Level (Design: ARI-50) Predicted Water Level (Design: ARI-50)Predicted Bed Level (Design: ARI-100) Predicted Water Level (Design: ARI-100)Predicted Bed Level (JPZ: ARI-50) Predicted Water Level (JPZ: ARI-50)Predicted Bed Level (JPZ: ARI-100) Predicted Water Level (JPZ: ARI-100)Existing Bed Level
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
-200 -150 -100 -50 0 50
Distance (m)
Ele
vati
on (
m)
Predicted Bed Level (Design: ARI-50) Predicted Water Level (Design: ARI-50)Predicted Bed Level (Design: ARI-100) Predicted Water Level (Design: ARI-100)Predicted Bed Level (JPZ: ARI-50) Predicted Water Level (JPZ: ARI-50)Predicted Bed Level (JPZ: ARI-100) Predicted Water Level (JPZ: ARI-100)Existing Bed Level
Cross Section Changes (n=0.025)
(a) Ch. 39.50 (M8-Ladang Victoria Bridge)
(b) Ch 31.60 (Kuari Kg
Pantai Perai )
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
-200 -150 -100 -50 0 50
Distance (m)
Ele
vati
on (
m)
Predicted Bed Level (Design: ARI-50) Predicted Water Level (Design: ARI-50)Predicted Bed Level (Design: ARI-100) Predicted Water Level (Design: ARI-100)Predicted Bed Level (JPZ: ARI-50) Predicted Water Level (JPZ: ARI-50)Predicted Bed Level (JPZ: ARI-100) Predicted Water Level (JPZ: ARI-100)Existing Bed Level
Cross Section Changes (n=0.025)
(c) Ch. 25.20 (M7-Pinang Tunggal Bridge )
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
-400 -350 -300 -250 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100
Distance (m)
Ele
vati
on (
m)
Predicted Bed Level (Design: ARI-50) Predicted Water Level (Design: ARI-50)Predicted Bed Level (Design: ARI-100) Predicted Water Level (Design: ARI-100)Predicted Bed Level (JPZ: ARI-50) Predicted Water Level (JPZ: ARI-50)Predicted Bed Level (JPZ: ARI-100) Predicted Water Level (JPZ: ARI-100)Existing Bed Level
(d) Ch. 23.00 (Kg Lahar Tiang)
Cross Section Changes (n=0.025)
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
-200 -150 -100 -50 0 50
Distance (m)
Ele
vati
on (
m)
Predicted Bed Level (Design: ARI-50) Predicted Water Level (Design: ARI-50)Predicted Bed Level (Design: ARI-100) Predicted Water Level (Design: ARI-100)Predicted Bed Level (JPZ: ARI-50) Predicted Water Level (JPZ: ARI-50)Predicted Bed Level (JPZ: ARI-100) Predicted Water Level (JPZ: ARI-100)Existing Bed Level
(e) Ch. 21.90 (M17-Kg Lahar Tiang)
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
-200 -150 -100 -50 0 50
Distance (m)
Ele
vati
on (
m)
Predicted Bed Level (Design: ARI-50) Predicted Water Level (Design: ARI-50)Predicted Bed Level (Design: ARI-100) Predicted Water Level (Design: ARI-100)Predicted Bed Level (JPZ: ARI-50) Predicted Water Level (JPZ: ARI-50)Predicted Bed Level (JPZ: ARI-100) Predicted Water Level (JPZ: ARI-100)Existing Bed Level
(f) Ch. 15.40 (Bumbong Lima)
Mitigation and Protection Works
Sand and Gravel Mining
Kampong Kubang Bedengong Kampong Lubok Segintah
River Sand Mining
Sand Mining Pumping Activity
Bridge Crossing Protection
-Sand mining has caused serious degradation of Sg Muda
-In-stream sand and gravel mining should not be allowed
Channel realignment
Channel Realignment
River Bank Protection
- The stability of the proposed riverbank protection measures can be seriously impacted by sand-gravel mining. In-stream mining activities should be prohibited to ensure stability of the proposed design.
•Diversion to Sg. Merbok not
recommended
• Likely sedimentation
upstream of Muda Barrage
Floodway to Sg. Korok
Diversion to Sg. Korok not
recommended
RECOMMENDATIONS
• The 2003 flood discharge of 1,340 cms is recommended for the design. The bund height should be determined from the flood stage plus freeboard.
• Sand and gravel mining can cause major stability problems to river stabilization structures. In-stream mining should be prohibited. Off-stream mining should be allowed at a minimum distance of 50 m from the bank line.
• The cross section geometry of the channel should not be changed. The realignment of two reaches should be considered: Merdeka Bridge & Kg Lahar Tiang
• The diversions to Sg. Merbok and Sg. Korok are not recommended
Terima Kasih!Terima Kasih!