Upload
sara-nolan
View
219
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Limited 1
PART 3 – THE LAW OF CONTRACTS
Chapter 10 – Failure to Create an Enforceable Contract
Prepared by Douglas H. Peterson, University of Alberta
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Limited 2
FAILURE TO CREATE AN ENFORCEABLE CONTRACT
Mistake Misrepresentation Undue Influence Duress
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Limited 3
INTRODUCTION
Even if a contract contains all the essential requirements of a contract it may fail for other reasons
Contract may be defeated due to: Mistake Misrepresentation Undue Influence Duress
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Limited 4
MISTAKE
A state of affairs in which a party (or both parties) has formed an erroneous opinion as to the identity or existence of the subject matter, or of some other important term
An error that destroys consensus Contract does not express parties true
intentions Untrue impression of an essential element Failed to reach a true meeting of the minds
Legal perspective has a narrow interpretation
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Limited 5
MISTAKE
Types of Mistake Mistake of Law Mistake of Fact
Mistake of Law Generally cannot recover for a mistake of
law One is bound to know the law
Only if statute provided for recovery of money paid
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Limited 6
MISTAKE OF FACT
Mistake about the existence of the subject matter Mutual mistake by the parties Generally renders the contract void
because impossible to perform Subject matter of contract did not exist at
time the contract was formed Usually based on a false assumption
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Limited 7
MISTAKE OF FACT
Mistake as to identity of one of the parties May allow a party to avoid contractual
liability Depends if the identity of the person is an
essential element of the contract Personal services contract
Mistaken party must prove both: The mistake was known to the other contractual
party; and The mistake was material (one that matters to
the mistaken party in an important way)
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Limited 8
MISTAKE OF FACT
Mistake as to true nature of contract Non Est Factum – “it is not my doing”
A defense that may allow illiterate or infirm persons to avoid liability on a written agreement if they can establish that they were not aware of the true nature of the document, and were not careless in its execution
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Limited 9
MISTAKE OF FACT
Non Est Factum Very narrow form of mistake Radical difference between what person
thought they were signing and what they signed
Must have been led to believe that document was of a different nature than what was signed
Show were not careless Some infirmity prevented examination of the
document Not apply if mistake is to a matter of degree of
a term 25% interest instead of 10%
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Limited 10
UNILATERAL AND MUTUAL MISTAKE
Unilateral mistake – mistake made by one party to the agreement Usually when one party misleads the other
or is a aware of the mistake Akin to misrepresentation
Allows it to exist or actively encourages the false assumption
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Limited 11
UNILATERAL AND MUTUAL MISTAKE
Mutual mistake – mistake made by both parties
Mistake common to both parties Usually with respect to:
Existence of the subject matter Mistakes as to identity
Mutual mistake Courts use rules of interpretation Will chose the reasonable interpretation
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Limited 12
UNILATERAL AND MUTUAL MISTAKE
Rectification Mistake that renders performance
impossible Can correct mistakes or errors in written
contracts when they are obvious When verbal agreements reduced to writing Written agreement does not reflect true
agreement Must show
Obvious mistake No intervening negotiations or changes
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Limited 13
MISREPRESENTATION
A statement or conduct which is false at the time it is made
Types Innocent Fraudulent By means of Non-disclosure
Remedy – injured party can Rescind the contract (equitable remedy) Sue for damages (tort remedy)
Rescission – the revocation of a contract
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Limited 14
MISREPRESENTATION
Must be a statement of fact and not opinion
Must be material Induced the party to enter into the contact
Reliance Party relied on the misrepresentation
Pre-contractual If placed in the contract it is a term
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Limited 15
INNOCENT MISREPRESENTATION
Representation of a material fact a party honestly believes to be true but discovered to be false after the formation of the contact If material injured party may avoid the contract Courts attempt to put parties back into the
positions they were before the contract Sometimes not possible Goods consumed, value declines, sold to a third party
Innocent misrepresentation can become fraudulent if mistake is discovered and not disclosed
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Limited 16
FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION
A false statement of fact made by a person who knows, or should know,, that it is false, and made with the intention of deceiving another
Deceit – a tort that arises when a party suffers damage by acting upon a false representation made by a party, with the intention of deceiving the other
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Limited 17
FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION
In addition to right of rescission injured party can sue for damages under tort of deceit
Lose right to rescission and damages if take benefits under the contract
Right of rescission may be defeated by third party rights
Requirements Proof of fraud False representation made knowingly, without
belief in its truth or Made with reckless disregard (carelessness)
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Limited 18
MISREPRESENTATION BY NON-DISCLOSURE
General rule – no duty to disclose material facts
Exception: contracts of utmost good faith Active concealment of facts Partial disclosure renders the part
disclosed as false Treated as fraud or intention to deceive
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Limited 19
CONTRACTS OF UTMOST GOOD FAITH
One of the parties is presumed to have means of knowledge which are not assessable to the other
Insurance Require full disclosure by insurance
applicant Insurer knows very little Need proper disclosure to asses risk and
set premium Statutes have imposed limits on innocent
non-disclosure to disallow insurers from avoiding liability on the contract
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Limited 20
CONTRACTS OF UTMOST GOOD FAITH
Partnership Fiduciary relationship
Special relationship contracts Special trust or confidence exists between
parties
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Limited 21
UNDUE INFLUENCE
A state of affairs whereby a person is so influenced by another that the person’s judgment is not his or her own Reduces free will to bargain Voidable contracts Presumed in certain relationships
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Limited 22
UNDUE INFLUENCE
Special Relationships solicitor – client doctor – patient trustee – beneficiary parent – child spiritual advisor – parishioner
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Limited 23
UNDUE INFLUENCE
Presumption of undue influence if special relationship exists Onus shifts to dominant party to show lack
of undue influence Satisfy onus by showing
Fairness of bargain (price paid) Full disclosure was made prior to formation of
contract Weaker party free to get independent advice
Weaker party may avoid the contract and courts grant rescission
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Limited 24
UNDUE INFLUENCE
Weak party must seek rescission within reasonable period of time after coming out from influence or right may be lost
Where presumption does not exists Spouses Court looks to degree of domination and
fairness of bargain struck Guarantees given for another spouse’s
indebtedness
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Limited 25
DURESS
The threat of injury or imprisonment for the purpose of requiring another to enter into a contract or carry out some act Threat to person or close relative Threat to person and not person’s goods
or chattels
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Limited 26.
LAW OF CONTRACT
FAILURE TO CREATE A LEGAL RELATIONSHIP
FLAWEFFECT ON
AGREEMENT
ADDITIONAL RIGHTS OF INJURED PARTY
AGREEMENT
Mistake
Innocent Misrepresentation
FraudulentMisrepresentation
Undue Influence
Duress
Void/Voidable
Voidable
Voidable
Voidable
Voidable
Also Tort of Deceit
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Limited 27
SUMMARY
Contract requires true meeting of minds In spite of essential elements of a contract
being present contract may be invalid due to other reasons
Mistake – contract may be void/voidable Identity of parties Existence of subject matter Nature of agreement
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Limited 28
SUMMARY
Misrepresentation If party induced and it is a material matter
contract voidable at option of injured party If fraudulent may sue for damages under
tort of deceit Undue influence or Duress
Contract voidable Injured party must rescind and not
continue to take benefits under the contract