Upload
tejana
View
53
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Concepts and Operationalisation of Pro-Poor Growth: A Usable PPG Index . EADI Conference, Bonn 26 June 2014. Mario Negre German Development Institute World Bank Research Group. Outline. Introduction Defining PPG PPG operationalisation and indices A usable PPG index - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Concepts and Operationalisation of Pro-Poor Growth:
A Usable PPG Index
EADI Conference, Bonn 26 June 2014
Mario Negre
German Development InstituteWorld Bank Research Group
© 2012 German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE)
Outline
1. Introduction2. Defining PPG3. PPG operationalisation and indices4. A usable PPG index5. PPG Performance6. Case Study7. Conclusions
2
© 2012 German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE)
Introduction
Inequality increasingly recognised as key factor for Poverty Reduction... (and perhaps for growth?)
Ravallion (2001): i) g 7x more Pov reducing when Ineq
ii) ↑ Ineq ↓ Pov reduction rate
IMF: ↓ net Ineq robustly correlated with faster and more durable growth, for a given level of redistribution (Berg, Ostry and Zetelmeyer, 2012) – somewhat flimsy evidence (Kraay, forthcoming)
Somewhat contradictory evidence from cross-country literature (Dollar and Kraay, 2002; Kraay, 2006; Dollar, Kleineberg and Kraay, 2013)
Otherwise increasing academic evidence (political science, governance, stability, etc)
3
© 2012 German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE)
Defining PPG
Approaches: Absolute Poverty reducing growth Relative Disproportionally benefiting the poor
Absolute approach reductio ad absurdum:
Pro-Poor = Pro-Nonpoor !
4
© 2012 German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE)
PPG Operationalisation
Shapley Decomposition (1953; Game Theory) Shorrocks (1999) generalisation for Poverty: It calculates the marginal impact on
poverty of “eliminating each contributing factor in sequence, and then assigns to each factor the average of its marginal constributions in all possible sequences.”
Exact Decomposition:
5
∆ 𝑃 𝑖𝑗=𝐺𝑖𝑗+𝑅 𝑖𝑗
𝐺𝑖𝑗=12 [𝑃 (µ 𝑗 ,𝐿 𝑗 (𝑝 ) )−𝑃 (µ𝑖 ,𝐿 𝑗 (𝑝 ) )+𝑃 (µ 𝑗 ,𝐿𝑖 (𝑝 ) )−𝑃 (µ𝑖 ,𝐿𝑖 (𝑝 ) ) ]
𝑅𝑖𝑗=12 [𝑃 (µ𝑖 ,𝐿 𝑗 (𝑝) )− 𝑃 (µ𝑖 ,𝐿𝑖 (𝑝 ) )+𝑃 (µ 𝑗 ,𝐿 𝑗 (𝑝 ) )−𝑃 (µ 𝑗 ,𝐿𝑖 (𝑝 ) ) ]
© 2012 German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE)
PPG Indices
Kakwani and Pernia‘s (2000) Kakwani, Son and Khandker (2004)
+ per capita growth - per capita growth Poverty Equivalent Growth Rate (PEGR)
Limitations: Lack of comparability (+ vs. - growth)
Φ+, Φ- → ±∞ when G → 0, R → -G
Φ falls into two non-contiguous intervals for recessions (one of them not accounted for in Kakwani and Pernia (2000))
Other problems of lack of meaning and monotonicity in PEGR
6
𝛷=𝐺+𝑅𝐺 𝛷=
𝐺𝐺+𝑅 𝛾∗=𝛷𝛾
© 2012 German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE)
Problems with the Kakwani and Pernia’s index:
For the case of anti-nonpoor per capita recession:
i)
ii)
Unaccounted for
7
0<|𝑅|<|𝐺|⇒ 𝐺𝐺+𝑅→ { 1 𝑖𝑓 |𝑅|→0∞ 𝑖𝑓 |𝑅|→|𝐺|
⇒∅∈ (1 ,∞ )
0<|𝐺|<|𝑅|⇒ 𝐺𝐺+𝑅→ {−∞ 𝑖𝑓 |𝑅|→00 𝑖𝑓 |𝑅|→∞
⇒∅∈ (−∞ ,0 )
{𝐺>0𝑅<0
© 2012 German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE)
Problems with the PEGR:1. First, when 2. Second, in per capita recessionsi) Anti-poor recession
The correct result should be:
ii) Anti-nonpoor recession with
The correct result should be:
8
∅→∞𝐺>0
𝛾∗=∅𝛾
{𝐺>0𝑅>0
⇒∅∈ (0,1 )⇒|𝛾∗|<|𝛾| h𝑤𝑖𝑡 𝛾∗ ,𝛾<0
|𝛾∗|>|𝛾|
|𝑅|<|𝐺|
{𝐺>0𝑅<0
⇒∅∈ (1 ,∞ )⇒|𝛾∗|>|𝛾| h𝑤𝑖𝑡 𝛾∗ ,𝛾<0
|𝛾∗|<|𝛾|
© 2012 German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE)
iii) Anti-nonpoor recession with
with increasing over the interval The correct result should be: and decreasing over this interval
9
|𝑅|>|𝐺|
{𝐺>0𝑅<0
⇒∅∈ (−∞ ,0 )⇒|𝛾∗|>0
𝛾∗ 𝑅∈ (−∞ ,−𝐺 )|𝛾∗|>0
© 2012 German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE)
A usable PPG Index
Φ = - R general for any poverty measure or income level
(Poverty Bias of Growth)
Based on PPG relative approach
PPG should satify these porperties:i) It is + (-) when
ii) It is zero when
10
𝛾𝑝𝑜𝑜𝑟>𝛾>𝛾𝑛𝑜𝑛𝑝𝑜𝑜𝑟 (𝛾𝑝𝑜𝑜𝑟<𝛾<𝛾𝑛𝑜𝑛𝑝𝑜𝑜𝑟 )𝛾𝑝𝑜𝑜𝑟=𝛾=𝛾𝑛𝑜𝑛𝑝𝑜𝑜𝑟
© 2012 German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE)
What about using the Headcount Index (H)?
If all the poor increase their income
without going above the poverty line and the nonpoor experience no change
it should be PPG but RH=0 because H didn‘t change
Thus, it doesn‘t satisfy desirable properties
11
© 2012 German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE)
What about using the Poverty Gap (PG)?It satisfies properties and it can be mathematically linked to: (For the case of constant population and number of poor)
Substituting
in
it can be shown that
12
𝑅𝑃𝐺=1
2𝑧𝑁 (𝛾−𝛾𝑝𝑜𝑜𝑟 )(1+ 11+𝜇 )∑
𝑖
𝑞
𝑥1𝑖
𝛾𝑝𝑜𝑜𝑟>𝛾>𝛾𝑛𝑜𝑛𝑝𝑜𝑜𝑟
iq
i
ii
n
i
i
zxz
nzxI
zxz
nPPG
111
11
1
1
2212
2
112 ,,,,
21 xzPxzPxzPxzPR
© 2012 German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE)
…if you don’t believe me:
If the population and the number of poor remain unchanged, N1 = N2 = N and q1 = q2 = q and the growth in the mean of the poor can be defined as:
13
2 1 2 1
11
2
12
21
12
2
1
2
111121 q
i
q
i
q
i
q
iiiii xz
Nxz
Nxz
Nxz
NzR
2 1
11
2
12
2
1
2
12112121 q
i
q
iiiPG xz
Nxz
NzR
q
iiiPG xx
zNR 2
2
11
1
2 1121
1
1
2
q
ii
q
ii
p
x
x
11
2
q
iiiPG xx
zNR 21 1
11221
q
iipPG x
zNR 11
1121
© 2012 German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE)
RPG < 0 Pro-Poor Growth
RPG > 0 Pro-NonPoor Growth
If G > 0 Anti-Poor/NonPoor Recession (also cases with positive per capita growth but higher population growth)
PPG Rate:
14
𝛾∗=𝛾+𝜗∅=𝛾−𝜗 𝑅𝑃𝐺
© 2012 German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE)
Pro-Poor Performance
Φt = Φ / t to compare pro-poorness over time Φ that would have beeen necessary to meet a given target PG reduction
(halving, eradicating)
Φ that would be necessary to achieve a target given a forecast economic growth
15
Poverty Gap Target-based Pro-Poor Performance Trend
© 2012 German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE)
Example - Honduras
ϕPG > 0 Pro-Poor Growth
ϕPG < 0 Pro-Nonpoor Growth
16
© 2012 German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE) 17
Halving 1992‘s PG by 2015 with 2004-7 growth
© 2012 German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE)
Why using this PPG Index? Because…
It‘s based on the relative approach it works – it measures:
• if g is pro-poor• how pro-poor it is
Even politicians can understand it: “how distributional shifts affect the PG“ It focuses on what happens to the poor (or those below a chosen income) –
unlike Gini, GIC or SP It’s a monitoring and assessment tool over time It’s calculable with current datasets (expenditure/consumption)
18
© 2012 German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE)
Thank you.
19