View
229
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
What Is Control?Control:
the process of monitoring activities to ensure that they are being accomplished as planned and of correcting significant deviations.
• control systems are judged in terms of how well they facilitate goal achievement.
• There are three different approaches to designing organizational control systems. (See Exhibit 18.1 on p. 496.):
© Prentice Hall, 2002 18-2
What Is Control?• There are three different approaches to designing
organizational control systems. (See Exhibit 18.1 on p. 496.):
1. market control - emphasizes the use of external market mechanisms to establish standards of performance. E.g., use of price competition, relevant market share to establish standards.
When this approach is used?• useful where products and services are distinct• useful where marketplace competition is considerable• divisions turned into profit centers and judged by the
percentage of total corporate profits each contributes
© Prentice Hall, 2002 18-3
What Is Control? (cont.)Control
2. bureaucratic control - emphasizes organizational authority.
• relies on administrative rules, procedures, and policies.
• depends on standardization of activities, well-defined job descriptions, and other administrative mechanisms such as budgets.
© Prentice Hall, 2002 18-4
What Is Control? (cont.)Control
3. clan control - behavior regulated by shared values, traditions, and other aspects of organizational culture.
• dependent on individual and group to identify expected behaviors and performance measures.
• found where teams are common and technology changes often.
• For example in IUG individuals are well aware of expectations regarding appropriate work behavior and performance standards.
© Prentice Hall, 2002 18-5
© Prentice Hall, 2002 18-6
Control system
Most organizations don’t rely totally on just one of these approaches to designing an effective control system.
Why Is Control Important? Control is the Final Link in the Management Process
– provides the critical link back to planning– only way managers know whether organizational goals
are being met
Permits Delegation of Authority– fear that employees will do something wrong for which
the manager will be held responsible– provides information and feedback on employee
performance
© Prentice Hall, 2002 18-7
StructureHuman Resource Management
Organizing
The Planning-Controlling Link
StandardsMeasurementsComparisonsActions
Controlling
GoalsObjectivesStrategiesPlans
Planning
MotivationLeadershipCommunicationIndividual and Group Behavior
Leading
© Prentice Hall, 2002 18-8
The Control ProcessBackground
– controlling is a three-step process– assumes that performance standards already exist
• specific goals are created in the planning process
Measuring:
How we measure is done through four common sources of information that managers use. Each of these sources has its own advantages and drawbacks.
1. personal observation - permits intensive coverage.– Management By Walking Around (MBWA)– drawbacks - subject to personal biases
» consumes a great deal of time» suffers from obtrusiveness: mistrust
© Prentice Hall, 2002 18-10
The Control Process (cont.)Measuring (cont.)
How We Measure (cont.)
2. statistical reports - numerical data are easy to visualize and effective for showing relationships. Use of graphs, bar charts..
• drawbacks - not all operations can be measured.
• important subjective factors may be ignored.
3. oral reports - includes meetings, telephone calls– may be best way to control work in a virtual
environment
– technology permits creation of written record from oral report
– drawbacks - filtering of information© Prentice Hall, 2002 18-11
The Control Process (cont.)How We Measure (cont.)
4. written reports - often more comprehensive and concise than oral reports
• usually easy to file and retrieve
– comprehensive control efforts should use all four approaches.
© Prentice Hall, 2002 18-12
What We Measure.
what we measure more critical than how we measure. • control criteria applicable to any management situation:
1. employee satisfaction, absenteeism, and turnover.
2. keeping costs within budgets. • control system needs to recognize the diversity of
activities• some activities difficult to measure in quantifiable terms.• most activities can be grouped into some objective
segments that can be measured.• when objective measures are not available, should rely on
subjective\qualitative measures
The Control Process (cont.)
© Prentice Hall, 2002 18-13
The Control Process (cont.)Comparing Comparing is the next step in the control process. 1. It determines the degree of variation between
actual performance and the standard.2. It’s critical to determine the range of variation,
which are the acceptable parameters of variance between actual performance and the standard. (See Exhibit 18.4 on p. 501.)
3. An example of comparing actual performance to standards is shown in Exhibit 18.5 on p. 502.
© Prentice Hall, 2002 18-14
Defining The Acceptable Range Of Variation
AcceptableUpper Limit
Standard
AcceptableLower Limit
Mea
sure
men
t of
Per
form
ance
AcceptableRange ofVariation
t t+1 t+2 t+3 t+4 t+5
Time Period (t)
© Prentice Hall, 2002 18-15
Sales Performance Figures For July, Eastern States Distributors
BrandHeinekenMolsonIrish AmberVictoria BitterLabatt’sCoronaAmstel LightDos EquisTecateTotal cases
Standard* 1,075 630 800 620 540 160 225 80 170 4,300
Actual* 913 634 912 622 672 140 220 65 286 4,464
Over (under)* (162) 4 112 2 132 (20) (5) (15) 116 164
* hundreds of cases
© Prentice Hall, 2002 18-16
The Control Process (cont.)Taking Managerial Action.
• Correct Actual Performance - action taken when the performance variation is unsatisfactory. Example of corrective actions: changing strategy, structure, training, redesigning jobs.
• immediate corrective action - corrects problems at once to get performance back on track.
• basic corrective action - identifies reason for performance variation. corrects the source of variation.
• Revise the Standard - variance results from an unrealistic standard.
• standard, not performance, needs correction
• troublesome to revise the standard downward© Prentice Hall, 2002 18-17
Types Of ControlFeedforward\preventive Control
– prevents anticipated problems
– most desirable type of control
– requires timely and accurate information that often is difficult to get
Concurrent\parallel Control
– takes place while activity is in progress
– corrects problem before it becomes too costly
– best-known form is direct supervision
© Prentice Hall, 2002 18-19
Feedback Control– takes place after the activity is done– problems may already have caused damage or
waste– the most popular type of control
• feedback may be only viable form of control available
– feedback has two advantages• provides meaningful information on the
effectiveness of planning• can enhance employee motivation
Types of Control (cont.)
© Prentice Hall, 2002 18-20
Types Of Control
Input OutputProcesses
Anticipatesproblems
FeedforwardControl
Correctsproblems after
they occur
FeedbackControl
Correctsproblems asthey happen
ConcurrentControl
© Prentice Hall, 2002 18-21
Flexibility
Qualities Of An Effective Control System
StrategicPlacement
UnderstandabilityReasonable
Criteria
EFFECTIVECONTROLSYSTEM
TimelinessMultipleCriteria
CorrectiveAction
Accuracy
EconomyEmphasis onExceptions
© Prentice Hall, 2002 18-22
• methods of controlling people and work can be quite different in other countries. E.g., global companies.
• differences are most marked in the measurement and corrective action steps
• in technologically advanced nations, controls are indirect• in less technologically advanced nations, controls are more
direct• laws in different countries provide different constraints on
corrective action: eg, laying off employees, taking momey out of the country.
• data used for controlling may not be comparable in different countries though for the same company but different branches.
Adjusting Controls for Cultural Differences
© Prentice Hall, 2002 18-24
Workplace Privacy
employers have the right to monitor employee communications, examine employee computers and files, and use surveillance cameras
• reasons for monitoring include prevention of:
1. Recreational\fun on-the-job Web surfing
2. creation of hostile work environments with e-mail
3. security leaks of critical information• Electronic Communications Privacy Act - 1986
• prohibits unauthorized interception\catching of electronic communication
• workplace electronic monitoring is still legal
Contemporary Issues In Control
© Prentice Hall, 2002 18-25
Contemporary Issues In Control (cont.)Workplace Privacy (cont.)
companies are developing and enforcing workplace monitoring policies.
• develop unambiguous computer usage policy.
• inform employees that computers may be monitored.
• provide clear guidelines on acceptable use of company e-mail system and the Web.
© Prentice Hall, 2002 18-26
Workplace Monitoring by employers in US
Track telephone calls (numbers and time spent) 39%Store and review employee e-mail messages 27%Store and review computer files 21%Log computer time and keystrokes entered 15%Record and review telephone conversations 11%Store and review voice-mail messages 6%
© Prentice Hall, 2002 18-27
Contemporary Issues In Control (cont.)Employee Theft
unauthorized taking of company property by employees for their personal use. Up to 85 percent of all organizational theft and fraud is committed by employees.
• is an escalating problem in all types of organizations
• different proposals to explain employee theft. They will depend on who you ask:
1. industrial security - opportunity presents itself due to lack of controls and favorable circumstances
2. criminology - people have financial-based pressures or vice-based pressures (such as gambling debts).
3. clinical psychology - people are able to rationalize any type of behavior. E.g., every one does it.
© Prentice Hall, 2002 18-28
Contemporary Issues In Control (cont.)Workplace Violence
many factors contribute to workplace violence including:
1. employee work driven by time, numbers, and crises.
2. rapid and unpredictable change
3. destructive communication style of manager
4. authoritarian leadership
5. defensive attitude
6. double standards
7. unresolved grievances\complains
8. emotionally troubled employees
9. repetitive, boring work© Prentice Hall, 2002 18-30
Contemporary Issues In Control (cont.)Workplace Violence (cont.)
– contributing factors (cont.)• faulty or unsafe equipment• hazardous work environment• culture of violence
© Prentice Hall, 2002 18-31
Workplace Violence
Witnessed yelling\scream and other verbal abuse 42%Yelled at coworkers themselves 29%Cried over work-related issues 23%Seen someone purposely damage machinesor furniture 14%Seen physical violence in the workplace 10%Struck a coworker 2%
© Prentice Hall, 2002 18-32
© Prentice Hall, 2002 18-33
Discussions Contrast market, bureaucratic, and clan control.
Market control emphasizes the use of external market mechanisms such as price, competition, and relative market share to establish the standards used in the control system. Bureaucratic control emphasizes organizational authority and relies on administrative rules, regulations, procedures, and policies. Clan control regulates employee behavior by means of the shared norms, values, traditions, rituals, beliefs, and other aspects of the organization’s culture.
© Prentice Hall, 2002 18-34
Discussions Why is feedforward control the most desirable type of
control?Feedforward controls are desirable because they allow managers to prevent problems rather than cure them.
What qualities will an effective control system have?An effective control system has the following qualities: accuracy, timeliness, economy, flexibility, understandability, reasonable criteria, strategic placement, emphasis on the exception, multiple criteria, and corrective action.
© Prentice Hall, 2002 18-35
Discussions
What is the role of control in management?
Control is the process of monitoring activities to ensure that they are being accomplished as planned and of correcting any significant deviations.
© Prentice Hall, 2002 18-36
Discussions What would an organization have to do to change its
dominant control approach from bureaucratic to clan? From clan to bureaucratic?
Changing from a bureaucratic approach to a clan approach would entail a radical change in corporate culture because you would be going from a control system that emphasized rules and administrative mechanisms to a control system that emphasized the cultural values, rituals, and beliefs. Changing from a clan approach to a bureaucratic approach would mean having in place the rules, standardized activities, procedures, and other administrative mechanisms that would be used to control employee behavior.