21
How can we approach chlamydia screening with girls & young women? Preliminary findings from CDC focus groups Allison Friedman, MS Division of STD Prevention Centers for Disease Control & Prevention

Background: Chlamydia burden

  • Upload
    edric

  • View
    73

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

How can we approach chlamydia screening with girls & young women? Preliminary findings from CDC focus groups Allison Friedman, MS Division of STD Prevention Centers for Disease Control & Prevention. Background: Chlamydia burden. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Background: Chlamydia burden

How can we approach chlamydia screening with girls

& young women? Preliminary findings from CDC

focus groups

Allison Friedman, MSDivision of STD Prevention

Centers for Disease Control & Prevention

Page 2: Background: Chlamydia burden

Background: Chlamydia burden

Estimated 2.8 million new cases of Chlamydia (CT) in the U.S. each year. [1] Highest rate among 15-to-24 year-old females

CT is treatable w/antibiotics, but usually asymptomatic. Most of those infected do not know or seek testing

CT is a leading cause of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), which can lead to ectopic pregnancy, chronic pelvic pain & infertility.

Annual CT screening recommended for sexually active women <26 yrs.

Yet only ~40% of eligible young women get screened annually. [2]

[1] Weinstock et al., 2004[2] NCQA.(2009). The State of Health Care Quality 2009.

Page 3: Background: Chlamydia burden

To address low rates of CT screening, CDC’s Division of STD Prevention is developing a national social marketing campaign to promote CT screening among sexually active young women , ages 15-25yrs.

African American Caucasian Hispanic

Page 4: Background: Chlamydia burden

Project Background

Project Activities Literature Review (2007)   Exploratory Research (2007-2008)

Phone interviews (n=80) In-person interviews (n=45)

Concept & Message Testing (Nov-Dec 2009) 18 Focus Groups in 4 cities

Page 5: Background: Chlamydia burden

Summary of Exploratory Research Findings

Very few young women had substantial knowledge of CT.

Most were unaware of: CT’s asymptomatic nature, potential to cause infertility Recommendation for routine CT testing Urine test for CT

Perceived Barriers & Benefits to Screening

Barriers Benefits• Fear (testing, positive results, parents finding out)

• Knowing one’s STD status

• Privacy concerns; peer stigma • Ability to take action if positive

• Access • Confirm negative status (reassurance)

• Lack of symptoms/perceived susceptibility

• Being responsible

• Embarrassment

• Lack of awareness

Page 6: Background: Chlamydia burden

Exploratory Research Findings (cont’d)

Young women were motivated by info that increased awareness and perceived susceptibility, severity & risk of disease, while offering simple, actionable solutions:

CT is common & often asymptomatic CT can cause infertility A simple test and cure are available for CT

Page 7: Background: Chlamydia burden

Concept & Message Development

Guided by exploratory research findings & 2 theoretical frameworks Health Belief Model Theory of Planned Behavior

Three main concepts designed to:1. Diminish identified barriers:

Overcome stigma Emphasize ease of testing

2. Empower women3. Emphasize women’s health and infertility, in relation to life

aspirations

Six posters developed to represent these concepts

Page 8: Background: Chlamydia burden

1. Diminishing Barriers: Overcoming Stigma

Page 9: Background: Chlamydia burden

1. Diminishing Barriers:Ease of Testing

Page 10: Background: Chlamydia burden

2. Empowerment

Page 11: Background: Chlamydia burden

3. Women’s Health & Infertility (in context of broader Life Aspirations)

Page 12: Background: Chlamydia burden

Concept/Message Testing Focus Groups Methods

18 focus groups conducted in 4 cities. Participant inclusion criteria:

Young women, ages 15-25yrs African American, Caucasian or Hispanic Working & in school English speaking Sexually active or had sought reproductive health services Mix of income/SES

Segmented by age, race/ethnicity, and school/work status (adults)

Groups also explored dissemination preferences Interviews were transcribed & coded using NVivo2.

Page 13: Background: Chlamydia burden

Participant Demographics

Age15–17 6618–25 56Race/EthnicityAfrican American 40Hispanic 44Caucasian 38

• Total of 122 women participated in focus groups

Page 14: Background: Chlamydia burden

Key Findings: Concept Preferences

1. Woman you want to be (Infertility) most liked & motivating emotional appeal, values positive message, empowering vibrant colors - attention getting

2. Few people talk about it, lots of people do it (Stigma) 2nd most liked everyone is at risk relatable situation focus on female and male

Page 15: Background: Chlamydia burden

General vs. Specific Approach

STD vs. CT: CT slightly preferred: novel, relevant STD brand more recognized

Female vs. Male/Female F focus for infertility, but imagery/messaging should

include M Relationships, partner support = well received

If focus is STD testing, important to include both M & F

Page 16: Background: Chlamydia burden

Key Findings (cont’d) Audiences want:

Relatable people, relationships, contexts, conversations, testimonials

Diversity Alarming statistics (prevalence) w/easy, actionable solutions Direct, upfront messaging & logos

Audiences do not want: Messaging or tone that minimizes seriousness of STDs or

testing Messages suggesting that girls need STD testing & boys do

not

Page 17: Background: Chlamydia burden

Suggested channels of dissemination

Health care facilities Schools Facebook Twitter Health websites Teen & health magazines TV (MTV, BET, VH1) Outdoor advertising Community events

Page 18: Background: Chlamydia burden

Information Sources

CDC Planned Parenthood, health clinics Women’s health organizations Community-based organizations NIH

Page 19: Background: Chlamydia burden

Campaign Website Components

Clinic locator tool Frequently asked questions (FAQs) Personal testimonies, Inspirational quotes Blogs, chat rooms Opportunities to chat w/ or submit a Q to a health

professional Quizzes, polls Public service announcements/videos Hotline for more information

Website should NOT include games

Page 20: Background: Chlamydia burden

Conclusions & Implications Messages should inspire/empower women and normalize

testing

For young women to pay attention to CT & consider behavior change, messaging must: take CT (STD testing) seriously be thought-provoking, tapping into deeper values

Messaging for STD testing should be ‘equal opportunity’ to avoid stigmatizing a particular group

Design: use of bright colors, diverse models, relatable situations/settings

Traditional & new/interactive media tools needed to reach young audiences, but source should be credible/respected

Page 21: Background: Chlamydia burden

Contact Me!

Allison [email protected]

(404) 639-8537