20
An Integrated Model of Decision Making and Visual Attention Philip L. Smith University of Melbourne Collaborators: Roger Ratcliff, Bradley Wolfgang

An Integrated Model of Decision Making and Visual Attention Philip L. Smith University of Melbourne Collaborators: Roger Ratcliff, Bradley Wolfgang

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: An Integrated Model of Decision Making and Visual Attention Philip L. Smith University of Melbourne Collaborators: Roger Ratcliff, Bradley Wolfgang

An Integrated Model of Decision Making and Visual

Attention

Philip L. Smith

University of Melbourne

Collaborators: Roger Ratcliff, Bradley Wolfgang

Page 2: An Integrated Model of Decision Making and Visual Attention Philip L. Smith University of Melbourne Collaborators: Roger Ratcliff, Bradley Wolfgang

Attention and Decision Making

● Psychophysical “front end” provides input to decision mechanisms

● Visual search (saccade-to-target) task is attentional task

● Areas implicated in decision making (LIP, FEF, SC) also implicated in

attentional control (e.g., LIP as a “salience map”)

● Visual signal detection: close coupling of attention and decision mechanisms

Page 3: An Integrated Model of Decision Making and Visual Attention Philip L. Smith University of Melbourne Collaborators: Roger Ratcliff, Bradley Wolfgang

Attentional Cuing Effects in Visual Signal Detection

● Posner paradigm, 180 ms cue-target interval

● Orthogonal discrimination (proxy for detection)

● Do attentional cues enhance detectability of luminance targets?

● Historically controversial

Page 4: An Integrated Model of Decision Making and Visual Attention Philip L. Smith University of Melbourne Collaborators: Roger Ratcliff, Bradley Wolfgang

Attentional Cuing Effects in Visual Signal Detection

● Depends on:

– Dependent variable:

● RT or accuracy

– How you limit detectability:

● with or without backward

masks

Page 5: An Integrated Model of Decision Making and Visual Attention Philip L. Smith University of Melbourne Collaborators: Roger Ratcliff, Bradley Wolfgang

Smith, Ratcliff & Wolfgang (2004)

● Detection sensitivity increased by

cues only with masked stimuli

(mask-dependent cuing)

● RT decreased by cues for both

masked and unmasked stimuli

● Interaction between attention and

decisions mechanisms

● Smith (2000), Smith & Wolfgang

(2004), Smith, Wolfgang & Sinclair

(2004), Smith & Wolfgang (2005),

Gould, Smith & Wolfgang (in prep.)

Page 6: An Integrated Model of Decision Making and Visual Attention Philip L. Smith University of Melbourne Collaborators: Roger Ratcliff, Bradley Wolfgang

A Model of Decision Making and Visual Attention

● Link visual encoding, masking, spatial attention, visual short term memory and

decision making

Page 7: An Integrated Model of Decision Making and Visual Attention Philip L. Smith University of Melbourne Collaborators: Roger Ratcliff, Bradley Wolfgang

A Model of Decision Making and Visual Attention

● Link visual encoding, masking, spatial attention, visual short term memory and

decision making

Page 8: An Integrated Model of Decision Making and Visual Attention Philip L. Smith University of Melbourne Collaborators: Roger Ratcliff, Bradley Wolfgang

Visual Encoding and Masking

● Stimuli encoded by low-pass filters

● Masks limit visual persistence of

stimuli

● Unmasked: slow iconic decay

● Masked: Rapid suppression by mask

(interruption masking)

● Smith & Wolfgang (2004, 2005)

Page 9: An Integrated Model of Decision Making and Visual Attention Philip L. Smith University of Melbourne Collaborators: Roger Ratcliff, Bradley Wolfgang

Attention and Visual Short Term Memory

Page 10: An Integrated Model of Decision Making and Visual Attention Philip L. Smith University of Melbourne Collaborators: Roger Ratcliff, Bradley Wolfgang

VSTM Shunting Equation

● Trace strength modeled by

shunting equation (Grossberg,

Hodgkin-Huxley)

● Preserve STM activity after

stimulus offset

● Opponent-channel coding

prevents saturation (bounded

between -b and +b)

● Recodes luminances as

contrasts

Page 11: An Integrated Model of Decision Making and Visual Attention Philip L. Smith University of Melbourne Collaborators: Roger Ratcliff, Bradley Wolfgang

Attentional Dynamics

I. Gain Model. Affects rate of uptake into VSTM:

II. Orienting Model. Affects time of entry into VSTM:

Page 12: An Integrated Model of Decision Making and Visual Attention Philip L. Smith University of Melbourne Collaborators: Roger Ratcliff, Bradley Wolfgang

Attentional Dynamics

I. Gain Model. Affects rate of uptake into VSTM:

II. Orienting Model. Affects time of entry into VSTM:

Page 13: An Integrated Model of Decision Making and Visual Attention Philip L. Smith University of Melbourne Collaborators: Roger Ratcliff, Bradley Wolfgang

Decision Model

Page 14: An Integrated Model of Decision Making and Visual Attention Philip L. Smith University of Melbourne Collaborators: Roger Ratcliff, Bradley Wolfgang

I. (Wiener) Diffusion Model (Ratcliff, 1978)

● VSTM trace strength determines

(nonstationary) drift

● Orientation determines sign of

drift

● Contrast determines size of drift

● Within-trial decision noise

determines diffusion coefficient

● Between-trial encoding noise

determines drift variability

Page 15: An Integrated Model of Decision Making and Visual Attention Philip L. Smith University of Melbourne Collaborators: Roger Ratcliff, Bradley Wolfgang

II. Dual Diffusion (Smith, 2000; Ratcliff & Smith 2004)

● Information for competing responses

accumulated in separate totals

● Parallel Ornstein-Uhlenbeck

diffusion processes (accumulation

with decay)

● Symmetrical stimulus representation

● (equal and opposite drifts)

Page 16: An Integrated Model of Decision Making and Visual Attention Philip L. Smith University of Melbourne Collaborators: Roger Ratcliff, Bradley Wolfgang

Attentional Dynamics (Gain Model)

● Gain interacts with masking to determine VSTM trace

strength via shunting equation

Page 17: An Integrated Model of Decision Making and Visual Attention Philip L. Smith University of Melbourne Collaborators: Roger Ratcliff, Bradley Wolfgang

Gain Model + Diffusion

● Quantile probability plot: RT

quantiles {.1,.3,.5,.7,.9} vs.

probability

● Quantile averaged data

● Correct and error RT

● Drift amplitude is Naka-Rushton

function of contrast (c):

Page 18: An Integrated Model of Decision Making and Visual Attention Philip L. Smith University of Melbourne Collaborators: Roger Ratcliff, Bradley Wolfgang

Gain Model + Diffusion

● 220 data degrees of freedom

● 14 parameters:

– 3 Naka-Rushton drift parameters

– 3 encoding filter parameters

– 2 attentional gains

– 2 drift variability parameters

– 2 decision criteria

– 2 post-decision parameters

Page 19: An Integrated Model of Decision Making and Visual Attention Philip L. Smith University of Melbourne Collaborators: Roger Ratcliff, Bradley Wolfgang

Model Summary

Model Parameters G2 df BICDiffusion, Gain 14 175.9 206 301.7Diffusion, Orienting 14 247.6 206 373.4Dual Diffusion, Gain 15 169.9 205 304.7Dual Diffusion, Orienting 15 183.3 205 318.1

Dual diffusion has same parameters as single diffusion plus additional

OU decay parameter

Page 20: An Integrated Model of Decision Making and Visual Attention Philip L. Smith University of Melbourne Collaborators: Roger Ratcliff, Bradley Wolfgang

Conclusions

● Need model linking visual encoding, masking, VSTM, attention, decision

making

● Stochastic dynamic framework with sequential sampling decision models

● Predicts shapes of entire RT distributions for correct responses and errors,

choice probabilities

● Possible neural substrate? Behavioral diffusion from Poisson shot noise

● Accumulated information modeled as integrated OU diffusion; closely

approximates Wiener diffusion