Am. J. Epidemiol.-1999-Li-608-11

  • Upload
    kj0203

  • View
    215

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 Am. J. Epidemiol.-1999-Li-608-11

    1/4

    American Journal of Epidemiology

    Copyright 1999 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health

    All rights reserved

    Vol.149,

    N o.

    7

    Printed in U.S.A.

    A BRIEF ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION

    Maternal Placental Abnormality and the Risk of Sudden Infant Death

    Syndrome

    De-Kun Li and Soora Wi

    To determine whether placental abnormality (placental abruption or placental previa) during pregnancy

    predisposes an infant to a high risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), the authors conducted a

    population-based case-control study using 1989-1 991 California linked birth and death certificate data. They

    identified 2,107 SIDS cases, 96 of whom were diagnosed through autopsy. Ten controls were randomly

    selected for each case from the same linked birth-death certificate data, matched to the case on year of birth.

    Abo ut 1.4 of mothe rs of case s and 0.7 of mothers of controls had either placental abrup tion or placenta

    previa during the index pregnancy. After adjustment for potential confounders, placental abnormality during

    pregnancy was ass ociated with a twofold increase in the risk of SIDS in offspring (odds ratio = 2. 1, 95

    confidence interval1.3-3.1 .The individual effects of placental abruption and placenta previa on the risk of SIDS

    did not differ significantly. An impaired fetal development due to placental abnormality may predispose an infant

    to a high risk of SIDS.

    Am J Epidemiol 1999;

    149:608-11.

    abruptio, placentae; case-control studies; placenta praevia; sudden infant death

    Although changing sleeping position has resulted in

    a reduction of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) in

    many countries (1-6), the etiology for abnormal fetal

    development that predisposes infants to a high risk of

    SIDS remains elusive. Among the potential risk factors

    during pregnancy, intrauterine hypoxia has been

    hypothesized to be an important etiologic factor.

    However, few studies have examined this hypothesis

    (7). Maternal smoking during pregnancy, which,

    among other potential toxicities, could result in chron-

    ic intrauterine hypoxia, has been associated with an

    increased risk of SIDS in offspring (7, 8). Other con-

    ditions that may potentially be related to intrauterine

    hypoxia, such as placental abnormality, cord prolapse,

    and preeclampsia/eclampsia, were much less studied

    (9).

    The placenta is vital for delivering oxygen and

    nutrients to the fetus. An abnormal placental condition

    such as placenta previa (implantation of

    the

    placenta in

    Received for publication March 2, 1998, and accepted for publi-

    cation August 5, 1998.

    Abbreviation: SIDS, sudden infant death syndrome.

    From the Division of Research, Kaiser Foundation Research

    Institute, California Region, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care

    Program, Oakland, CA.

    Reprint requests to Dr. De-Kun Li, Division of Research, Kaiser

    Foundat ion Research Inst i tute, Cal i forn ia Region, Kaiser

    Permanente Medical Care Program, 3505 Broadway, Oakland, CA

    94611.

    the lower uterine segment) or placental abruption (pre-

    mature separation of the normally implanted placenta

    prior to birth) could result in an impaired delivery of

    oxygen and nutrients to the fetus, thus leading to an

    abnormal fetal development due to inadequate supply

    of oxygen and essential nutrients (10-14). To examine

    whether placental abnormality during pregnancy is

    associated with an increased risk of SIDS in offspring,

    we conducted a population-based case-control study

    using the 1989-1991 California linked birth and death

    certificate data.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    During the period of 1989-1991, 2,107 SIDS cases

    with

    International Classification of Diseases

    Ninth

    Revision, Clinical Modification, code 798.0 listed as

    the underlying cause of death were identified from the

    linked California birth and d eath certificate data. More

    than 96 percent of the identified SIDS cases w ere diag-

    nosed through autopsy. Controls were randomly

    selected from infants who did not die from SIDS and

    matched to cases on the year of birth with a 10/1 con-

    trol/case ratio. The information on prenatal diagnoses

    of placental abruption or placenta previa as well as

    other conditions was listed under the category of

    Com plications and P rocedures of Labor and

    Delivery on the birth certificate. Any infant with a

    60 8

    b

    yguestonMarch5,2012

    http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/

    Dow

    nloadedfrom

    http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/
  • 8/12/2019 Am. J. Epidemiol.-1999-Li-608-11

    2/4

    Placental Abnormality and the Risk of SIDS 60 9

    diagnosis of maternal placental abruption or placenta

    previa on the birth certificate was considered to have a

    maternal placental abnormality during pregnancy. The

    information on potential confounders that were avail-

    able from the birth certificate data included maternal

    age,

    race/ethnicity, educational level, parity, prior mis-

    carriage and preterm delivery, maternal sm oking, pres-

    ence of preeclampsia/eclampsia, gestational age at ini-

    tial prenatal visit during the index pregnancy, infant

    low birth weight, sex, and year of birth. The informa-

    tion on paternal age, race/ethnicity, and educational

    level was also available for adjustment.

    An odds ratio w ith its 95 percent confidence interval

    was used to estimate the relative risk of SIDS associated

    with prenatal placental abnormality. Logistic regres-

    sion was used to obtain the estimates after adjustment

    for potential confounders (15).

    RESULTS

    Table presents the characteristics of the study pop -

    ulation. Compared with mothers of controls, mothers

    of SIDS cases w ere more likely to be less than 18 years

    old, to be black, to have had more prior live births and

    more than two prior miscarriages, to have smoked, to

    have had preeclampsia/eclampsia, or to have had inad-

    equate prenatal care during the index pregnancy. In

    addition, they were less likely to have any college ed u-

    cation. SIDS cases were also more likely to have low

    birth weight and to be male compared with controls.

    After adjustment for maternal age, educational level,

    parity, prenatal smoking, prenatal care, and infant sex,

    maternal placental abnormality (placental abruption or

    placenta previa) was associated with a twofold

    increase in the risk of SIDS in offspring (table 2).

    Further adjustment for other potential confounders

    including birth year of infants, maternal race/ethnicity,

    birth interval, a history of miscarriage, preterm deliv-

    ery, preeclampsia/eclampsia during pregnancy, pater-

    nal age, and infant with low birth weight did not mate-

    rially change the estimate. The individual effects of

    abruptio placenta and placenta previa on the risk of

    SIDS do not seem to differ significantly (table 2).

    DISCUSSION

    Limitations of this study need to be kept in mind

    when one interprets the findings. Because the study

    was based on the birth certificate data, the recorded

    diagnosis of placental abruption and placenta previa

    may not be complete. Although no recent quality con-

    trol data are available for the California birth certifi-

    cate data, it is generally expected that the incidence of

    placental abruption and placenta previa is around

    1-1.5 percent (10). Therefore, the incidence of 0.7 per-

    TABLE 1. Characteristics of the study population California

    1996-1997

    Factors

    Maternal age (years)

    35

    Maternal education (years)

    1 2

    Maternal race

    White

    Black

    Asian

    Hispanic

    Pacific Islander

    American Indian

    Other

    Parity (no.)

    1

    2

    3

    >4

    Prior miscarriage (no.)

    0

    1

    2

    >3

    Prior preterm delivery

    Yes

    No

    Prior baby with low birth weight

    Yes

    No

    Prenatal smoking

    Yes

    No

    Gestational age at initial

    prenatal visit (months)

  • 8/12/2019 Am. J. Epidemiol.-1999-Li-608-11

    3/4

    610 LiandWi

    underreporting had to be different between SIDS cases

    and controls. Since the birth certificates were com-

    pleted before the occurrence of SIDS, it is unlikely

    that any differential recording was introduced because

    of the SIDS status. In addition, because SIDS cases

    had a relatively low socioeconomic status, a potential

    differential recording bias, if it existed, would have

    been more likely to result in underreporting of placen-

    tal abnormality in the SIDS group than in the control

    group, leading to attenuation of the observed associa-

    tion between placental abnormality and SIDS risk.

    Furthermore, when placental abnormality was rede-

    fined to include excessive vaginal bleeding before

    labor, the incidence of placental abnormality was

    increased to 1 percent in the control group. How ever,

    the risk of SIDS associated with the redefined placen-

    tal abnormality remained elevated (odds ratio = 1.8, 95

    percent confidence interval

    1.2-2.6 .

    The diagnosis of SIDS in the linked birth and death

    certificate data should be reliable because more than

    96 percent of cases were diagnosed through autopsy,

    and all cases must be verified through a rigorous sys-

    tem before the final diagnosis of SIDS could be

    recorded on the California death certificate.

    It is possible that some potential confounders such

    as prenatal smoking exposure may be underreported

    on the birth certificate, thus resulting in an incom-

    plete control of the potential confounders. However,

    any residual confounding, if it existed, was unlikely

    to be strong enough to explain the observed twofold

    increased risk of SIDS associated with placental

    abruption or placenta previa during pregnancy, for

    the current adjustment for those confounders,

    though incomplete, resulted in essentially no change

    between crude and adjusted odds ratios: 2.0 and 2.1,

    respectively.

    The findings from this study suggest that the placen-

    tal problems during pregnancy may predispose an

    infant to a higher risk of

    SIDS.

    The mechanism for this

    observed association is not known at present. The pla-

    centa provides a fetus with oxygen and essential n utri-

    ents that are vital to normal fetal development.

    Although the etiology of placenta previa is largely

    unknown, it is believed that a need for increased pla-

    cental surface area due to such factors as extensive

    endometrial scarring is probably the driving force for

    the formation of placenta previa (10). Therefore, pla-

    centa previa not only results in the reduced supply of

    oxygen and nutrients to the fetus due to decreased pla-

    cental surface area, suboptimal uterine location, and

    bleeding, but the presence of the condition also indi-

    cates reduced uteroplacental oxygen and delivery of

    nutrients (10). In the case of placental abruption, the

    premature separation of the normally implanted pla-

    centa will result in a decreased surface area for m aternal-

    fetal blood exch ange, thus leading to a reduced supply

    of oxygen and essential nutrients. It is obvious that

    both placental abruption and placenta previa could

    result in or indicate a reduced supply of oxygen and

    essential nutrients to the fetus. Although placental

    abruption may result in acute fetal hypoxia compared

    with placenta previa which more likely leads to chronic

    fetal hypoxia, the effect of fetal hypoxia on fetal devel-

    opment, especially on the neurologic system, in terms

    of duration and intensity is not well understood

    (13,

    16,

    17). It is possible that both severe hypoxia for short

    duration and chronic mild hypoxia can result in fetal

    maldevelopment. Our separate analysis of the individ-

    TABLE 2. Maternal placental abnormality and the risk of sudden infant death syndrome California

    1996-1997

    Factors

    Placental abnormality^

    Yes

    No

    Abruptio placenta

    Yes

    No

    Placental previa

    Yes

    No

    Cases

    (n = 2,028)

    No .

    28

    2,000

    16

    2,000

    13

    2,000

    1.4

    98.6

    0.8

    99.2

    0.7

    99.3

    Controls

    (n = 21,037)

    No .

    146

    20,891

    80

    20,891

    69

    20,891

    *

    0.7

    99.3

    0.4

    99.6

    0.3

    99.7

    Odds

    ratiof

    2.1

    1.9

    2.3

    95

    confidence

    interval

    1.3-3.1

    1.1-3.3

    1.3-4.3

    * Subjects with m issing data on the adjusted variables were excluded.

    t Odd s ratio adjusted for m aternal age, educational level, parity, prenatal sm oking, prenatal care, and infant's

    sex. Further ad justme nt for birth year of infant, materna l race, birth interval, a history of miscarriage, preterm deliv-

    ery, preeclampsia during pregnancy, paternal age, and infant with low birth weight did not materially alter the esti-

    mate.

    XIncluding abruptio placenta and placental previa. One case and three controls had both conditions.

    Am J Epidemiol

    Vol. 149, No. 7, 1999

    b

    yguestonMarch5,2012

    http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/

    Downloadedfrom

    http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/
  • 8/12/2019 Am. J. Epidemiol.-1999-Li-608-11

    4/4

    Placental Abnormality and the Risk of SIDS 611

    ual effects of placental abruption and placenta previa

    on the risk ofSIDSdid not differ significantly (table 2).

    Depending on the severity of the placental abnor-

    malities, various damages to fetal development includ-

    ing death may occur (12, 13 , 18, 19). Althoug h the

    exact types of damages to live births by the placental

    abnormalities during pregnancy are not well docu-

    mented, the central nervous system is probably a

    potential target because of the effect of fetal hypoxia

    (13,

    18). A defective cardiorespiratory con trol system

    in the brainstem has been hypothesized to be involved

    in the etiology of SIDS (20-25). Therefore, it is con-

    ceivable that some of the neurologic damage could be

    severe enough, though not detectable by autopsy, to

    result in SIDS when extraneous risk factors such as

    prone sleeping position are present. Although the inci-

    dence of placental abruption and placenta previa is

    low, understanding the association of placental abnor-

    mality and the risk of SIDS may enhance our knowl-

    edge of the role of the placenta in determining the risk

    of SIDS as well as other adverse pregnancy outcomes.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    This study was supported in part by a grant from the

    National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

    (CRMC-94-01).

    The authors thank the California Vital Statistics

    Department for making the birth and death certificate data

    available for research.

    REFERENCES

    1. Willinger M, Hoffman HJ, Hartford RB. Infant sleep position

    and risk for sudden infant death syndrome: report of meeting

    held January 13 and 14, 1994, National Institutes of Health,

    Bethesda, MD. Pediatrics 1994;93:814-19.

    2. Dwyer T, Ponsonby ALB, Newman NM, et al. Prospective

    cohort study of prone sleeping position and sudden infant

    death syndrome. Lancet

    99

    ;337:1244-7.

    3. Gormally S, Matthews TG. Sleep position and SIDS in Irish

    infants. Ir Med J 1994;87:58.

    4. Wigfield RE, Fleming PJ, Berry PJ, et

    al.

    Can the fall in Avon's

    sudden infant death rate be explained by changes in sleeping

    position? (see comments). BMJ 1992;304:282-3.

    5.

    Engelberts AC, de Jonge GA, Kostense PJ. An analysis of

    trends in the incidence of sudden infant death in the

    Netherlands 1969-89. JPaediatr Child Health 1991;27:329-33.

    6. Dwyer T, Ponsonby AL, Blizzard L, et al. The contribution of

    changes in the prevalence of prone sleeping position to the

    decline in sudden infant death syndrome in Tasmania (see

    comments). JAMA 1995;273:783-9.

    7. Hoffman HJ, Hillman LS. Epidemiology of the sudden infant

    death syndrome: maternal, neonatal, and postneonatal risk fac-

    tors.Clin Perinatol 1992; 19:717 -37.

    8. Li DK, Daling JR. Maternal smoking, low birth weight, and

    ethnicity in relation to sudden infant death syndrome. Am J

    Epidemiol 1991;134:958-64.

    9. Buck G M, Cookfair DL, Michalek AM, et al. Assessment of

    in

    utero hypoxia and risk of sudden infant death syndrome.

    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1989;3:157-73.

    10.Scott JR. Placenta previa and placental abruption. In: Scott JR,

    Disaia PJ, Hamm ond C B, et al, eds. Danforth's obstetrics and

    gynecology. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company, 1994:

    489-500.

    11. Low J A. The relationship of asphyxia in the mature fetus to

    long-term neurologic function. Clin Obstet Gynecol

    1993;36:82-90.

    12.

    Lam BC, Yeung CY. Perinatal features of birth asphyxia and

    neurologic outcome. Acta Paediatr Jpn 1992;34:17-22.

    13.

    Perlman JM. Systemic abnormalities in term infants following

    perinatal asphyxia: relevance to long-term neurologic out-

    come. C lin Perinatol

    1989;

    16:475-84.

    14.

    Jiang ZD, Tierney

    T S.

    Long-term effect of perinatal and postna-

    tal asphyxia on developing human auditory brainstem respons-

    es : brainstem impairment. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol

    1996;34: l l l -27.

    15. Breslow N E, Day NE, eds. Statistical methods in cancer

    research. Vol I. The analysis of case-control studies. Lyon:

    International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1980. (IARC

    scientific publication no. 32).

    16. Low JA, Simpson LL, Tonni G, et al. Limitations in the clini-

    cal prediction of intrapartum fetal asphyxia. Am J Obstet

    Gynecol 1995;172:801^t.

    17. Low JA, Simpson LL, Ramsey DA. The clinical diagnosis of

    asphyxia responsible for brain damage in the human fetus

    (published erratum appears in Am J Obstet Gynecol

    1992;167:1124). Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992,167:11-15.

    18. Low JA. Relationship of fetal asphyxia to neuropathology and

    deficits in children. Clin Invest Med 1993;16:133^t0.

    19. Williams LJ, Lucci AP. Placental examination can help deter-

    mine cause of brain damage in neonates. Tex Med 199O;86:

    33-8 .

    20 . Hunt CE. The cardiorespiratory control hypothesis for sudden

    infant death syndrome. Clin Perinatol 1992 ;19:757 -72.

    21.

    Schw artz PJ, Stram ba-Ba diale M , Segantini A , et al.

    Prolongation of the QT interval and the sudden infant death

    syndrome (see comments). N Engl J Med 1998;33 8:1709-14.

    22 . Obonai T, Asanuma M, Mizuta R, et al. Evidence of brain

    ischemia in early neonatal sudden death syndrome.

    Neuropediatrics 1997;28:145-8.

    23 .

    Kinney HC, Filiano JJ. Brainstem research in sudden infant

    death syndrome. Pediatrician

    1988;

    15:240-50.

    24 . Willinger M. SID S: a challenge. J NIH Res 1989;1:73-80.

    25 . Filiano JJ, Kinney HC. Sudden infant death syndrome and

    brainstem research. Pediatr Ann 1995;24:379-83.

    Am J Epidemiol

    Vol. 149, No. 7, 1999

    byguestonMarch5,2012

    http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/

    Do

    wnloadedfrom

    http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/