12
ACHPR Jurisprudence on Indigenous ACHPR Jurisprudence on Indigenous people people THE ENDOROIS CASE OF KENYA THE ENDOROIS CASE OF KENYA Charles Kamuren chairman Charles Kamuren chairman , Endorois Welfare Council , Endorois Welfare Council

ACHPR Jurisprudence on Indigenous people THE ENDOROIS CASE OF KENYA Charles Kamuren chairman, Endorois Welfare Council

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ACHPR Jurisprudence on Indigenous people THE ENDOROIS CASE OF KENYA Charles Kamuren chairman, Endorois Welfare Council

ACHPR Jurisprudence on Indigenous peopleACHPR Jurisprudence on Indigenous peopleTHE ENDOROIS CASE OF KENYATHE ENDOROIS CASE OF KENYA

Charles Kamuren chairmanCharles Kamuren chairman, Endorois Welfare Council, Endorois Welfare Council

Page 2: ACHPR Jurisprudence on Indigenous people THE ENDOROIS CASE OF KENYA Charles Kamuren chairman, Endorois Welfare Council

The Community & Its Struggle for The Community & Its Struggle for Land & IdentityLand & Identity• Endorois is a minority indigenous community in Kenya, living around Lake Bogoria,

Baringo County.• The community is estimated to be about 60000, having been marginalized over the years

by both British Colonial and Kenya post-impendence governments. • The greater lake Bogoria area is believed to be the original home of the Community.• Land collectively held and used by the community is the most crucial material resource

and source of identity to the community.• Lake Bogoria is significant as a source of water and as the site where community carries

out its religious and cultural rituals.• Between 1974 and 1979, the Kenyan government forceful evicted the Endorois from their

ancestral land to create the world famous Lake Bogoria Game Reserve. • The consequences of this eviction devastated the Endorois’ pastoralist enterprise after

they lost thousands of their livestock owing to a lack of pasture and water. The community’s culture was also negatively affected as was the community’s access to spiritual sites, and important medicinal plants.

• Disconnected from a lake they consider sacred, and denied access to vital medicinal plants only found by the edges of the Lake Bogoria, the community’s right to life was imperilled

•   It was due to the marginalization that the community filed a case first with Kenya courts in the 1990s and then with the African Commission on Human and People’s Rights, Banjul , The Gambia , in 2003, after failing to secure a favourable ruling within the Kenyan corridors of justice.

• The case was, therefore, ruled in favour of the community. The court further granted the community to recover its land grabbed by individuals/state, gain access to Lake Bogoria a place of worship / religious ground, and to take ownership and control of all its ancestral land.

Page 3: ACHPR Jurisprudence on Indigenous people THE ENDOROIS CASE OF KENYA Charles Kamuren chairman, Endorois Welfare Council

Impact of Evictions-historical Connection to L. Bogoria Thwarted

• When rain clouds started swathing the dark hills, they knew it was time to move downhill-back to their ancestral home surrounding Lake Bogoria just in time for planting season and preparing their beehives.

• And at the mountain, they would have a panoramic view of their territory, which bordered Mogotio to the South, Marigat to the North, Sacho to the West and Koileken to the East.

• The members of the Endorois community would, during dry seasons, migrate up the mountain with their livestock to the plentiful pastures in the lush green forest of Mochongoi.

• But those days are no more.

Page 4: ACHPR Jurisprudence on Indigenous people THE ENDOROIS CASE OF KENYA Charles Kamuren chairman, Endorois Welfare Council

Timeline of Key Milestones in the Endorois Struggle1989 – few community elites enquire from elders

on formation of Lake Bogoria Game Reserve, why forced evictions, no compensation, no revenue sharing, no employment etc

Realization that community has been connedSensitized community, petitioned governmentGov’t responds by intimidation, arrest, torture1995 – form EWC (registration denied)1998 –file 1st case high court in 1999 rule in

favour of gov’t. In 2003 resort to ACHPR, Gambia

In February 2nd 2010, The AU Heads of state summit in Addis, adopted the ruling which was in favour of the community

Page 5: ACHPR Jurisprudence on Indigenous people THE ENDOROIS CASE OF KENYA Charles Kamuren chairman, Endorois Welfare Council

Community Organization: Pre-African Commission• Registered organization and owned by

Endorois Indigenous communityMission We strive to promote and facilitate

equitable distribution of resources and culturally wholesome development

1. Endorois elders council2. Religious Forum: Faith based

organizations played key role in conflict resolution and peace building among communities

3. Endorois women forum4. Endorois youth forum

Page 6: ACHPR Jurisprudence on Indigenous people THE ENDOROIS CASE OF KENYA Charles Kamuren chairman, Endorois Welfare Council

Endorois Structures Post-African Commission Goal- to secure community involvement in implementationEWC established 5 committees namely, Endorois women forum Religious leaders forum Lake Bogoria management committee Compensation committee Boundary committee

-These committees are local structures that advocate for implementation of recommendations of ACHPR in the Endorois decision.-The last three committees will be directly involved in the negotiation process as they are recognised by the community. -The committee members were nominated during a meeting organised by EWC in which all the Chiefs, Assistant chiefs, Councillors and Elders from Endorois community attended. Gender, regional representation and professionalism formed the basis of choosing members of these committees

Page 7: ACHPR Jurisprudence on Indigenous people THE ENDOROIS CASE OF KENYA Charles Kamuren chairman, Endorois Welfare Council

Impact of ACHPR’s Decision on Community

Positive impacts Inaugural commemorative ceremony held on 20th

March 2010, brought together the Endorois community, elders from different minority groups in Africa, civil society leaders, government officials which provided a platform to drum up support for implementation of the ruling and increased community visibility

EWC Registration Increased interest by government to fund

development projects in Endorois land e.g. CDF and LATF

Halting of mining of rubiesParliament has raised implementation issues in

one of its recent sessions

Page 8: ACHPR Jurisprudence on Indigenous people THE ENDOROIS CASE OF KENYA Charles Kamuren chairman, Endorois Welfare Council

Impact Continued…Impact Continued… Negative impactsEthnic tensions with dominant

Tugen increasedEncroachment of remaining

Endorois land by other communities continued

Limited access to Lake Bogoria for grazing purposes

Government encouraging division within the community to undermine common voice

Page 9: ACHPR Jurisprudence on Indigenous people THE ENDOROIS CASE OF KENYA Charles Kamuren chairman, Endorois Welfare Council

Challenges

Low capacity for Community to advocate for effective implementation due to poor levels of education

Government not willing/reluctant to address the issues beyond making political promises

Scarce resources to facilitate effective negotiation with the state

High levels of poverty in the community

Page 10: ACHPR Jurisprudence on Indigenous people THE ENDOROIS CASE OF KENYA Charles Kamuren chairman, Endorois Welfare Council

Lessons LearntLessons LearntWomen were instrumental in the

struggleDiscovery of new avenues to advocate

for rights e.g. Local Courts, E.A Court of Justice, ACHPR and African Court

That at times what gov’t accepts not necessarily to be implemented

That ACHPR cases take many years and have no power to enforce their rulings

The community expectations are too much

Page 11: ACHPR Jurisprudence on Indigenous people THE ENDOROIS CASE OF KENYA Charles Kamuren chairman, Endorois Welfare Council

Conclusion Conclusion Urgent need for local, regional, international

civil societies and development partners to play their role in advocating for the implementation of the ACHPR ruling

The Endorois Welfare Council require, technical and financial support to be able to implement the ruling

There is urgent need to capacity build committees that are directly involved in the implementation of the case

The Endorois community acknowledges the support given during our struggle

Page 12: ACHPR Jurisprudence on Indigenous people THE ENDOROIS CASE OF KENYA Charles Kamuren chairman, Endorois Welfare Council

THANK YOUTHANK YOU

Charles Kamuren

ChairmanEndorois Welfare CouncilP.O.BOX 921-20100Nakuru, KenyaTel: 254 722 655451

Email: [email protected]

[email protected]: www.endorois.org