6
18 Bulletin • Hospital for Joint Diseases Volume 62, Numbers 1 & 2 2004 Abstract Plate fixation for unstable fractures of the proximal hu- merus has seen mixed results as evidenced by the trials of new methods of fixation. The deltopectoral surgical approach is most frequently used and requires significant muscle retraction and soft tissue stripping to expose the lateral humeral neck. This may contribute to avascular necrosis and fixation failure. Lateral approaches have been limited to 5 cm distal to the acromion because of the course of the anterior branch of the axillary nerve. A recent anatomic study has demonstrated the predict- ability of the position of the axillary nerve as it crosses the anterior deltoid raphe, which allows it to be isolated and protected, and dissection can be extended distally. In addition, no accessory motor branches to the anterior head of the deltoid cross the raphe, so extending an inci- sion through the raphe after protecting the main motor branch of the axillary does not place the innervation to the anterior deltoid at risk. This surgical approach allows exposure of the proximal humerus and indirect reduction of the fracture, with subsequent locking plate fixation, adhering to the principles of biological fixation. W ith the advent of locking plates for fixation of proximal humerus fractures, modification of previously described surgical approaches is essential. The traditional deltopectoral approach for the anterior and lateral shoulder region requires exten- sive soft tissue dissection and muscle retraction to gain adequate exposure to the lateral aspect of the humerus for application of a plate. Poor results following plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures may be related to complete exposure of the fracture fragments and devas- cularization during dissection and plating, or disruption of the critical blood supply to the humeral head. In light of the recent trend toward “biological fixation,” which focuses on fixed-angle screws, percutaneous bridge plat- ing techniques, and avoidance of both fracture exposure and anatomic reduction, 1 new surgical techniques must be developed for proper application of these devices. For access to rotator cuff tears using a mini-open approach, a small raphe-splitting incision from the acromion several centimeters distally has been well de- scribed. 2-5 However, distal extension through the raphe of more than 3 or 4 centimeters has been discouraged because of the risk of damaging the axillary nerve. Re- cently, an anatomic study was performed to characterize the axillary nerve as it crosses the raphe between the middle and anterior heads of the deltoid. 6 The anterior motor branch of the axillary nerve was found to cross the surgical neck at a predictable location relative to both the acromion and the greater tuberosity, and at the level of the raphe no other motor branches crossed to innervate the anterior head of the deltoid (Fig. 1). This data may be useful in allowing a more direct surgical approach to the proximal humerus for plate fixation of fractures. Surgical Technique A skin incision was made beginning at the anterolateral tip of the acromion. It was extended approximately 5 cm distally through the subcutaneous tissue layer to the level of the deltoid muscle (Fig. 2A). The avascular raphe separating the anterior and middle heads of the deltoid was then identified as a white band of connective tissue between the two muscular heads. Immediately adjacent to the raphe’s attachment to the acromion, it was incised A Minimally Invasive Approach for Plate Fixation of the Proximal Humerus Michael J. Gardner, M.D., Matthew H. Griffith, M.D., Joshua S. Dines, M.D., and Dean G. Lorich, M.D. Michael J. Gardner, M.D., Matthew H. Griffith, M.D., Joshua S. Dines, M.D., and Dean G. Lorich, M.D., are in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, NewYork, New York. Correspondence: Michael J. Gardner, M.D., Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, NewYork, NewYork 10021.

A Minimally Invasive Approach for Plate Fixation of … › 45ef › 47cf0982755743cabe...of proximal humerus fractures, modification of previously described surgical approaches is

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: A Minimally Invasive Approach for Plate Fixation of … › 45ef › 47cf0982755743cabe...of proximal humerus fractures, modification of previously described surgical approaches is

18 Bulletin• Hospital for Joint Diseases Volume62,Numbers1&2 2004

Abstract

Plate fixation for unstable fractures of the proximal hu-merus has seen mixed results as evidenced by the trials of new methods of fixation. The deltopectoral surgical approach is most frequently used and requires significant muscle retraction and soft tissue stripping to expose the lateral humeral neck. This may contribute to avascular necrosis and fixation failure. Lateral approaches have been limited to 5 cm distal to the acromion because of the course of the anterior branch of the axillary nerve. A recent anatomic study has demonstrated the predict-ability of the position of the axillary nerve as it crosses the anterior deltoid raphe, which allows it to be isolated and protected, and dissection can be extended distally. In addition, no accessory motor branches to the anterior head of the deltoid cross the raphe, so extending an inci-sion through the raphe after protecting the main motor branch of the axillary does not place the innervation to the anterior deltoid at risk. This surgical approach allows exposure of the proximal humerus and indirect reduction of the fracture, with subsequent locking plate fixation, adhering to the principles of biological fixation.

With the advent of locking plates for fixationofproximalhumerusfractures,modificationofpreviouslydescribed surgical approaches

isessential.The traditionaldeltopectoralapproachfortheanteriorandlateralshoulderregionrequiresexten-sivesofttissuedissectionandmuscleretractiontogainadequateexposuretothelateralaspectofthehumerus

forapplicationofaplate.Poor results followingplatefixationofproximalhumerusfracturesmayberelatedtocompleteexposureofthefracturefragmentsanddevas-cularizationduringdissectionandplating,ordisruptionofthecriticalbloodsupplytothehumeralhead.Inlightoftherecenttrendtoward“biologicalfixation,”whichfocusesonfixed-anglescrews,percutaneousbridgeplat-ingtechniques,andavoidanceofbothfractureexposureandanatomicreduction,1newsurgicaltechniquesmustbedevelopedforproperapplicationofthesedevices. For access to rotator cuff tears using a mini-openapproach, a small raphe-splitting incision from theacromionseveralcentimetersdistallyhasbeenwellde-scribed.2-5However,distalextensionthroughtherapheofmore than3or4centimetershasbeendiscouragedbecauseoftheriskofdamagingtheaxillarynerve.Re-cently,ananatomicstudywasperformedtocharacterizethe axillary nerve as it crosses the raphe between themiddleandanteriorheadsofthedeltoid.6Theanteriormotorbranchoftheaxillarynervewasfoundtocrossthesurgicalneckatapredictablelocationrelativetoboththeacromionandthegreatertuberosity,andattheleveloftheraphenoothermotorbranchescrossedtoinnervatetheanteriorheadofthedeltoid(Fig.1).Thisdatamaybeusefulinallowingamoredirectsurgicalapproachtotheproximalhumerusforplatefixationoffractures.

Surgical TechniqueAskinincisionwasmadebeginningattheanterolateraltip of the acromion. It was extended approximately 5cmdistallythroughthesubcutaneoustissuelayertothelevelofthedeltoidmuscle(Fig.2A).Theavascularrapheseparatingtheanteriorandmiddleheadsofthedeltoidwasthenidentifiedasawhitebandofconnectivetissuebetweenthetwomuscularheads.Immediatelyadjacenttotheraphe’sattachmenttotheacromion,itwasincised

A Minimally Invasive Approach for Plate Fixation of the Proximal Humerus

Michael J. Gardner, M.D., Matthew H. Griffith, M.D., Joshua S. Dines, M.D., and Dean G. Lorich, M.D.

MichaelJ.Gardner,M.D.,MatthewH.Griffith,M.D.,JoshuaS.Dines,M.D.,andDeanG.Lorich,M.D.,areintheDepartmentofOrthopaedicSurgery,HospitalforSpecialSurgery,NewYork,NewYork.Correspondence:MichaelJ.Gardner,M.D.,HospitalforSpecialSurgery,535East70thStreet,NewYork,NewYork10021.

Page 2: A Minimally Invasive Approach for Plate Fixation of … › 45ef › 47cf0982755743cabe...of proximal humerus fractures, modification of previously described surgical approaches is

19 Bulletin• Hospital for Joint Diseases Volume62,Numbers1&2 2004

sharplyfor2cmalongitslengthdistally,enoughtoal-lowtheinsertionofthesurgeon’sfinger.Thesurgeon’sfingerwastheninsertedintotherentintheraphesweptposteriorly to palpate undersurface of the deltoid andraphe. The axillary nerve was readily palpable as acord-likestructurebetweenthedeltoidandhumerusasitexitsthequadrangularspacewiththeposteriorhumeralcircumflexvessels. Onceageneralideaofthenerve’slocationwasobtained,theincisionintheraphewascarefullyextendeddistallybysharpdissection.Deeptotheraphe,approximately6.5cmdistaltotheinferioredgeoftheacromionand3.5cmfromthelateralprominenceofthegreatertuberosity,theaxil-larynerveandposteriorhumeralcircumflexvesselswereidentified,isolated,andprotectedwithavesselloop(Fig.

2B).Withtheneurovascularbundleprotected,theincisionmay be extended distally to the deltoid tuberosity.Thefracturemaybe indirectlyreducedusing ligamentotaxisandKirschnerwiresintheheadandshaftasjoysticks.Afixed-angleplatecanthenbeinsertedalongthelateralneckandshaftfromproximaltodistalunderneaththenerveandvesselswithoutexcessivetension(Fig.3).

DiscussionOperativefixationofproximalhumeralfracturesisin-dicatedinapproximately20%ofcases,themajorityofwhicharethree-andfour-partfracturesaccordingtotheNeerclassification.7Treatmentoptionsvaryfromclosedreductionwithpercutaneouspinningtohemiarthroplastyandtheappropriatemethoddependsonthefracturepat-

Figure 1Examplesofexposureoftheaxillarynerveandposteriorhumeralcircumflexvesselsastheytraversetheanteriordeltoidrapheofarightcadavershoulder.Nootherbranchescrosstheraphetoinnervatetheanteriorheadofthedeltoid.

A B

Figure 2Illustrationoftheextendedanterioracromialapproach.Theincisionbeginsfromtheanterolateralcorneroftheacromionandextendsdistally.Deeptothesubcutaneouslayer,theanteriordeltoidraphe,separatingtheanteriorandmiddleheadsofthedeltoid,isidentified(A).Afterpalpatingtheundersurfaceofthedeltoidtopalpatetheneurovascularbundle,therapheissplitandthenerveisisolatedandprotected(B).

A B

Page 3: A Minimally Invasive Approach for Plate Fixation of … › 45ef › 47cf0982755743cabe...of proximal humerus fractures, modification of previously described surgical approaches is

20 Bulletin• Hospital for Joint Diseases Volume62,Numbers1&2 2004

tern,surgeon’sexperience,andspecificpatientfactorssuchasageandbonequality.Keyprinciplesforobtainingasatisfactoryresultincludestablefixationtoallowearlymobilizationandminimizationofsofttissuedisruptiontopreventfurthervascularcompromise.Complicationssuchasrotatorcuffdysfunction,stiffness,avascularne-crosis,malunion,andnonunionarerelativelycommonwithproximalhumerusfracturesandcanbeasignificantsourceofmorbidity. Theanteriorandmiddleheadsofthedeltoidaresepa-ratedbyanavascularfibrousraphe.8,9Thecourseoftheaxillarynerveafter itexits thequadrilateral spacehasbeen well described,10-16 but its position in relation totheraphehasonlyrecentlybeenreported.6Theanteriormotorbranchoftheaxillarynervecrossesthehumerustransverselyatvariabledistancesasasinglenerveandpenetratesthefasciaofthedeltoidbeforeorafterdividingintoseveralsmallerbranches.8,12Duparcandcolleagues11found that in 12 of 32 shoulders (38%), the anteriortrunkbranchedintosmallermotorbranchesafterentryintotheanteriorheadofthedeltoid,andintheremain-ingspecimensthedivisionoccurredatvariabledistancepriortomuscleentry.Theseinvestigatorsdidnotfocusontheraphespecifically. Innervationofthedeltoidisfromtheaxillarynerve,whicharisesfromtheposteriorcordofthebrachialplex-usandpasses through thequadrilateralspacedividingintoanteriorandposteriorbranches.Theposteriorbranchsends several smaller branches to the teres minor, thedeltoid,andthesuperiorlateralbrachialcutaneousnerve.Theanteriormotorbranchcoursesaroundtheneckofthehumerusandpassesmediallyontheanteriorsurfaceofthesurgicalnecktosupplythemiddleandanteriordeltoidheads.Thelocationsoftheintramuscularbranchesarevariable and when the deltoid is split intramuscularly

formorethanseveralcentimetersdistally,denervationof the anterior head of the deltoid from disruption ofthese fibers invariably occurs. Division of the raphedistally may avoid these problems. It has been shownthatseveralbranchestothemiddleheadfromthemainbranchoccurapproximately9.8mmbeforecrossingtheraphe,themainanteriormotorbranchcrossestherapheasasinglenerve,andthefirstbranchesfromthemaintrunktotheanteriorheadariseapproximately8.5mmaftercrossingtheraphe.6Thus,astherapheisdivided,aslongasthemainanteriormotortrunkisprotected,nootherbranchesareatrisk. Thedeltopectoralapproachforexposureoftheante-riorandlateralshoulderregionhasbeenmostcommonlyusedforplatingoftheproximalhumerus.However,ac-cessingthelateralaspectoftheproximalhumerususingthis approach requires extensive soft tissue dissectionandretraction,asitisanindirectapproachtotheplat-ingzone.Thisislessthanidealforinternalfixationofproximalhumerusfracturesanditfurtherjeopardizesthecompromisedbloodsupplytotheheadofthehumerusandfracturefragments.Ithasbeenadvisedthatanydis-sectionlateraltothedeltoid-pectoralintervalinthedistaldirectionbelimitedtothreetofivecentimetersfromtheacromion to avoid injury to the axillary nerve.8,9,12,17,18Recent data has shown that the anterior motor branchoftheaxillarynervecrossestherapheatapredictablelocationrelativetotheacromionandgreatertuberosity,6whichallowsmoredirectaccesstotheproximalhumerusafterprotectingtheaxillarynerve. Theincidenceofavascularnecrosisafterclosedre-ductionrangesfrom3%to14%inthree-partfracturesandupto34%infour-partfractures.19Surgicalinsultofthesofttissueenvelopeanddirectmanipulationofthefracturefragmentswithdisruptionoftheconsolidatingcallousfurtherincreasethisriskandavascularnecrosismay be as high as 37% following open reduction andinternalfixation.20Theheadofthehumerusisperfusedbybranchesoftheanteriorhumeralcircumflex,posteriorhumeralcircumflex,suprascapular,thoracoacromial,andsubscapulararteries.Theanteriorandposteriorhumeralcircumflexvesselshavebranchesthatdirectlypenetratebone;otherarteriescontributethroughanastamosissys-temswiththecircumflexvessels.Gerberandassociates21reportedthattheanteriorhumeralcircumflexarterywastheonlyarterythatcouldalonesupplytheentirehumeralhead and that the posterior humeral circumflex arterymainlysuppliedthegreatertuberosityandasmallareaofthehumeralheadthroughinterosseousanastamoseswithbranchesoftheanteriorcircumflexartery.Theanteriorcircumflexhumeralarteryarisesfromtheaxillaryarteryaboutonecentimeterdistaltotheinferiorborderofthepectoralismajorandcourseslaterallyalongtheinferiorborderofthesubscapularistendon.Itscourseplacesitatriskwhenastandarddeltopectoralapproachisused,

Figure 3 Demonstration inacadavershoulderof isolating theaxillarynerveandposteriorhumeralcircumflexvessels,followedbyadvancingaplatefromproximaltodistaldeeptotheneuro-vascularbundle.

Page 4: A Minimally Invasive Approach for Plate Fixation of … › 45ef › 47cf0982755743cabe...of proximal humerus fractures, modification of previously described surgical approaches is

21 Bulletin• Hospital for Joint Diseases Volume62,Numbers1&2 2004

particularlywithdistorted anatomy in the settingof afracture.Theposteriorhumeralcircumflexarterypassesthroughthequadrilateralspacewiththeaxillarynerve.

Bothofthesestructuresarereadilyvisualizedandpro-tectedusingtheanterolateralraphe-splittingapproach,andthereisnodissectionmediallynearthecourseofthe

Figure 4A64-year-oldfemalewithosteoporosisfellonherleftsideandsustainedacomminutedproximalhumeralfracture(AandB).Anextendedanterioracromialapproachwasused;theaxillarynerveandvesselswereisolatedandlength,alignmentandrotationofthefracturewereobtained.Alockingplatewasthenapplied(C),towhichthetuberositiesweresuturedanatomically.Apostoperativeradiographshowsanatomicreduction(D).

A B

C D

Page 5: A Minimally Invasive Approach for Plate Fixation of … › 45ef › 47cf0982755743cabe...of proximal humerus fractures, modification of previously described surgical approaches is

22 Bulletin• Hospital for Joint Diseases Volume62,Numbers1&2 2004

criticalanteriorhumeralcircumflexartery. The recent rise in popularity of using fixed-angleplate-screwconstructs toprovidebiologicfixationhasaltered many surgeons’ approach to fracture manage-ment.1,22Theseplatingsystemsactasinternalfixatorsandhavetheadvantageofnotrequiringperiostealstrippingordirectappositionoftheplateontobone.Thefocusisshiftedfromabsolutemechanicalrigiditytobiologicalpreservation.23,24Theplatecanbeinsertedthroughasmallincisionremotetothefracturesite,preservingthesofttissuesandprecludingtheneedfordirectexposureofthefracturefragments.Becausethereisonlypointcontactwithboneandnofrictionisrequiredbetweentheplateandbone,thesedevicesactaspuresplints.Nolongerisatightinterfacebetweentheplateandbonerequiredforstability,ratherloadisdistributedevenlyamongallthebone-screwinterfaces.25Reductionoftemporarycorticalporosisbyvascularpreservationandimprovedmechani-calstabilitywithoutfragmentcompressionaretwoofthekeybenefitsoflockedplating.Thisconceptofflexiblefixationhasbeenshowntopromotecallusformation,1,26,27and animal studies have revealed stronger bone afterhardware removalaswellasdecreasedcomplications,suchasinfectionandstressshielding.27

Asinternalfixationconceptsandtechniquescontinuetoevolve,thedevelopmentofnovelminimally-invasivesurgicalapproachesiscritical.Thedegreeofsofttissuedissectioninherentinthedeltopectoralapproachiscoun-terproductivewhenattemptingtoadheretotheprinciplesofbiologicalfixation.Thisextendedanterioracromialapproachallowsalimitedsurgicalapproachtobeused,preservingtheperiosteum,andwhencoupledwithlockedplating,providesstablefixationtoinitiateindirectbonehealing.28These techniquesmaybeparticularlyusefulinosteoporoticproximalhumerusfractures,wherescrewpurchase may be suboptimal, and in unstable surgicalneck fractures,whichare inherentlyunstable (Fig.4).Thoughfurtherclinicalstudy iswarranted,useof thisapproachmaydecreasecomplicationsandimproveout-comesin theoperative treatmentofproximalhumerusfractures.

References1. PerrenSM:Evolutionoftheinternalfixationoflongbone

fractures:Thescientificbasisofbiologicalinternalfixation:Choosinganewbalancebetweenstabilityandbiology.JBoneJointSurgBr84:1093-1110,2002.

2. BlevinsFT,WarrenRF,CavoC,etal:Arthroscopicassistedrotatorcuffrepair:Resultsusingamini-opendeltoidsplittingapproach.Arthroscopy12:50-59,1996.

3. NorbergFB,FieldLD,SavoieFH,III:Repairoftherotatorcuff:Mini-openandarthroscopicrepairs.ClinSportsMed19:77-99,2000.

4. PollockRG,FlatowEL:Therotatorcuff:Full-thicknesstears:Mini-openrepair.OrthopClinNorthAm28:169-177,1997.

5. Yamaguchi K: Mini-open rotator cuff repair:An updated

perspective.InstrCourseLect50:53-61,2001.6. GardnerMJ,GriffithMH,DinesJS,etal:Theextendedan-

terioracromialapproachtotheproximalhumerus.Inpress,2004.

7. IannottiJP,RamseyML,WilliamsGR,WarnerJJP:Nonpros-theticmanagementofproximalhumerus fractures. JBoneJointSurgAm85:1578-1593,2003.

8. BurkheadWZ,ScheinbergRR,BoxG:Surgicalanatomyoftheaxillarynerve.JShoulderElbowSurg1:31-36,1992.

9. HoppenfeldS,deBoerP:Surgical Exposures in Orthopaedics: The Anatomic Approach.Philadelphia:LippincottWilliamsandWilkins,1994.

10. ZhaoX,HungLK,ZhangGM,LaoJ:Appliedanatomyoftheaxillarynerveforselectiveneurotizationof thedeltoidmuscle.ClinOrthop(390):244-251,2001.

11. DuparcF,BocquetG,SimonetJ,FregerP:Anatomicalbasisofthevariableaspectsofinjuriesoftheaxillarynerve(exclud-ingtheterminalbranchesinthedeltoidmuscle).SurgRadiolAnat19:127-132,1997.

12. KontakisGM,SteriopoulosK,DamilakisJ,MichalodimitrakisE:Thepositionoftheaxillarynerveinthedeltoidmuscle:Acadavericstudy.ActaOrthopScand70:9-11,1999.

13. McFarlandEG,CaicedoJC,KimTK,BanchasuekP:Preven-tionofaxillarynerveinjuryinanteriorshoulderreconstruc-tions:Useofasubscapularismuscle-splittingtechniqueanda review of the literature.Am J Sports Med 30:601-606,2002.

14. LoomerR,GrahamB:Anatomyoftheaxillarynerveanditsrelationtoinferiorcapsularshift.ClinOrthop(243):100-105,1989.

15. KulkarniRR,NandedkarAN,MysorekarVR:Positionoftheaxillarynerveinthedeltoidmuscle.AnatRec232:316-317,1992.

16. TubbsRS,OakesWJ,BlountJP,etal:Surgicallandmarksfortheproximalportionoftheaxillarynerve.JNeurosurg95:998-1000,2001.

17. AbbotLC,SaundersCM,HageyH,JonesEW:Surgicalap-proachestotheshoulderjoint.JBoneJointSurgAm31:235-255,1949.

18. HollinsheadW:Anatomy for Surgeons.NewYork:HarperandRow,1982.

19. ReesJ,HicksJ,RibbansW:Assessmentandmanagementofthree-andfour-partproximalhumeralfractures.ClinOrthop(353):18-29,1998.

20. WijgmanAJ,RoolkerW,PattTW,RaaymakersEL,MartiRK:Openreductionandinternalfixationofthreeandfour-partfracturesoftheproximalpartofthehumerus.JBoneJointSurgAm84:1919-1925,2002.

21. GerberC,SchneebergerAG,VinhTS:Thearterialvasculariza-tionofthehumeralhead:Ananatomicalstudy.JBoneJointSurgAm72:1486-1494,1990.

22. LillH,HeppP,KornerJ,etal:Proximalhumeralfractures:howstiffshouldanimplantbe?Acomparativemechanicalstudywithnewimplantsinhumanspecimens.ArchOrthopTraumaSurg123:74-81,2003.

23. PerrenSM:Evolutionandrationaleoflockedinternalfixatortechnology:Introductoryremarks.Injury32(Suppl2):B3-B9,2001.

24. HoferHP,WildburgerR,SzyszkowitzR:Observationscon-cerning different patterns of bone healing using the Point

Page 6: A Minimally Invasive Approach for Plate Fixation of … › 45ef › 47cf0982755743cabe...of proximal humerus fractures, modification of previously described surgical approaches is

23 Bulletin• Hospital for Joint Diseases Volume62,Numbers1&2 2004

Contact Fixator (PC-Fix) as a new technique for fracturefixation.Injury32(Suppl2):B15-B25,2001.

25. el-SayedA,SaidHG,Abdel-AalA,FaroukO:Lockedplatefixationforfemoralshaftfractures.IntOrthop25:214-218,2001.

26. IlizarovGA:Clinicalapplicationofthetension-stresseffectforlimblengthening.ClinOrthop(250):8-26,1990.

27. KlaueK,FengelsI,PerrenSM:Long-termeffectsofplate

osteosynthesis:Comparisonof fourdifferentplates. Injury31(Suppl2):B51-B62,2000.

28. HertelR,EijerH,MeisserA,etal:Biomechanicalandbio-logicalconsiderationsrelatingtotheclinicaluseofthePointContact-Fixator:Evaluationofthedevicehandlingtestinthetreatmentofdiaphysealfracturesoftheradiusand/orulna.Injury32(Suppl2):B10-B14,2001.