OUR PASTS – III108

Have you ever thought of how children lived about twohundred years ago? Nowadays most girls from middle-classfamilies go to school, and often study with boys. On growingup, many of them go to colleges and universities, and takeup jobs after that. They have to be adults before theyare legally married, and according to law, they can marryanyone they like, from any caste and community, andwidows can remarry too. All women, like all men, can vote

and stand for elections. Ofcourse, these rights arenot actually enjoyed byall. Poor people have littleor no access to education,and in many families,women cannot choosetheir husbands.

Two hundred years agothings were very different.Most children weremarried off at an early age.Both Hindu and Muslimmen could marry morethan one wife. In someparts of the country,widows were praised if they

chose death by burning themselves on the funeral pyre oftheir husbands. Women who died in this manner, whetherwillingly or otherwise, were called “sati”, meaning virtuouswomen. Women’s rights to property were also restricted.Besides, most women had virtually no access to education.In many parts of the country people believed that if awoman was educated, she would become a widow.

Women, Caste and Reform9

Fig. 1 – Sati, painted byBalthazar Solvyn, 1813

This was one of the manypictures of sati painted by theEuropean artists who cameto India. The practice of satiwas seen as evidence of thebarbarism of the East.

109

Differences between men and women were not theonly ones in society. In most regions, people were dividedalong lines of caste. Brahmans and Kshatriyas consideredthemselves as “upper castes”. Others, such as tradersand moneylenders (often referred to as Vaishyas) wereplaced after them. Then came peasants, and artisanssuch as weavers and potters (referred to as Shudras).At the lowest rung were those who laboured to keepcities and villages clean or worked at jobs that uppercastes considered “polluting”, that is, it could lead tothe loss of caste status. The upper castes also treatedmany of these groups at the bottom as “untouchable”.They were not allowed to enter temples, draw waterfrom the wells used by the upper castes, or bathe inponds where upper castes bathed. They were seen asinferior human beings.

Over the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, manyof these norms and perceptions slowly changed. Let ussee how this happened.

Working Towards ChangeFrom the early nineteenth century, we find debates anddiscussions about social customs and practices taking ona new character. One important reason for this wasthe development of new forms of communication. For thefirst time, books, newspapers, magazines, leaflets andpamphlets were printed. These were far cheaper andfar more accessible than the manuscripts that you haveread about in Class VII. Therefore ordinary people couldread these, and many of them could also write andexpress their ideas in their own languages. All kinds ofissues – social, political, economic and religious – couldnow be debated and discussed by men (and sometimesby women as well) in the new cities. The discussionscould reach out to a wider public, and could becomelinked to movements for social change.

These debates were often initiated by Indian reformersand reform groups. One such reformer was RajaRammohun Roy (1772-1833). He founded a reformassociation known as the Brahmo Sabha (later knownas the Brahmo Samaj) in Calcutta. People such asRammohun Roy are described as reformers because theyfelt that changes were necessary in society, and unjustpractices needed to be done away with. They thoughtthat the best way to ensure such changes was bypersuading people to give up old practices and adopt anew way of life.

WOMEN, CASTE AND REFORM

ActivityCan you think of theways in which socialcustoms and practiceswere discussed in thepre-printing age whenbooks, newspapers andpamphlets were notreadily available?

OUR PASTS – III110

Rammohun Roy was keen to spread the knowledgeof Western education in the country and bring aboutgreater freedom and equality for women. He wrote aboutthe way women were forced to bear the burden ofdomestic work, confined to the home and the kitchen,and not allowed to move out and become educated.

Changing the lives of widowsRammohun Roy was particularly moved by the problemswidows faced in their lives. He began a campaignagainst the practice of sati.

Rammohun Roy was well versed in Sanskrit, Persianand several other Indian and Europeon languages. Hetried to show through his writings that the practiceof widow burning had no sanction in ancient texts.By the early nineteenth century, as you have read inChapter 7, many British officials had also begun tocriticise Indian traditions and customs. They weretherefore more than willing to listen to Rammohun whowas reputed to be a learned man. In 1829, sati was banned.

The strategy adopted by Rammohun was used bylater reformers as well. Whenever they wished tochallenge a practice that seemed harmful, they tried tofind a verse or sentence in the ancient sacred textsthat supported their point of view. They then suggestedthat the practice as it existed at present was againstearly tradition.

Fig. 2 – Raja Rammohun Roy,painted by Rembrandt Peale, 1833

Fig. 3 – Hook swingingfestival

In this popular festival,devotees underwent apeculiar form of sufferingas part of ritual worship.With hooks piercedthrough their skin theyswung themselves ona wheel. In the earlynineteenth century, whenEuropean officials begancriticising Indian customsand rituals as barbaric,this was one of the ritualsthat came under attack.

111

“We first tie them down to the pile”

Rammohun Roy published many pamphlets to spread hisideas. Some of these were written as a dialogue between theadvocate and critic of a traditional practice. Here is onesuch dialogue on sati:

ADVOCATE OF SATI:

Women are by nature of inferior understanding,without resolution, unworthy of trust … Many ofthem, on the death of their husbands, become desirousof accompanying them; but to remove every chanceof their trying to escape from the blazing fire, inburning them we first tie them down to the pile.

OPPONENT OF SATI:

When did you ever afford them a fair opportunity ofexhibiting their natural capacity? How then can youaccuse them of want of understanding? If, afterinstruction in knowledge and wisdom, a person cannotcomprehend or retain what has been taught him, wemay consider him as deficient; but if you do noteducate women how can you see them as inferior.

ActivityThis argument wastaking place morethan 175 years ago.Write down thedifferent argumentsyou may have heardaround you on theworth of women.In what ways havethe views changed?

WOMEN, CASTE AND REFORM

Fig. 4 – Swami DayanandSaraswati

Dayanand founded the Arya Samajin 1875, an organisation thatattempted to reform Hinduism.

For instance, one of the most famous reformers,Ishwarchandra Vidyasagar, used the ancient texts tosuggest that widows could remarry. His suggestion wasadopted by British officials, and a law was passed in1856 permitting widow remarriage. Those who wereagainst the remarriage of widows opposed Vidyasagar,and even boycotted him.

By the second half of the nineteenth century, themovement in favour of widow remarriage spread to otherparts of the country. In the Telugu-speaking areas ofthe Madras Presidency, Veerasalingam Pantulu formedan association for widow remarriage. Around the sametime young intellectuals and reformers in Bombaypledged themselves to working for the same cause.In the north, Swami Dayanand Saraswati, who foundedthe reform association called Arya Samaj, also supportedwidow remarriage.

Yet, the number of widows who actually remarriedremained low. Those who married were not easilyaccepted in society and conservative groups continuedto oppose the new law.

Source 1

OUR PASTS – III112

Girls begin going to schoolMany of the reformers felt that education for girls wasnecessary in order to improve the condition of women.

Vidyasagar in Calcutta and many other reformersin Bombay set up schools for girls. When the firstschools were opened in the mid-nineteenth century,many people were afraid of them. They feared thatschools would take girls away from home, prevent themfrom doing their domestic duties. Moreover, girls hadto travel through public places in order to reach school.Many people felt that this would have a corruptinginfluence on them. They felt that girls should stayaway from public spaces. Therefore, throughout thenineteenth century, most educated women were taughtat home by liberal fathers or husbands. Sometimeswomen taught themselves. Do you remember what youread about Rashsundari Debi in your book Socialand Political Life last year? She was one of those whosecretly learned to read and write in the flickering lightof candles at night.

In the latter part of the century, schools for girlswere established by the Arya Samaj in Punjab, andJyotirao Phule in Maharashtra.

In aristocratic Muslim households in North India,women learnt to read the Koran in Arabic. They weretaught by women who came home to teach. Somereformers such as Mumtaz Ali reinterpreted verses fromthe Koran to argue for women’s education. The firstUrdu novels began to be written from the late nineteenthcentury. Amongst other things, these were meant toencourage women to read about religion and domesticmanagement in a language they could understand.

Women write aboutwomenFrom the early twentiethcentury, Muslim womenlike the Begums of Bhopalplayed a notable role inpromoting education amongwomen. They founded aprimary school for girls atAligarh. Another remarkablewoman, Begum RokeyaSakhawat Hossain startedschools for Muslim girls inPatna and Calcutta. She

Fig. 5Ishwarchandra Vidyasagar

Fig. 6 – Students of Hindu MahilaVidyalaya, 1875

When girls’ schools were firstset up in the nineteenth century,it was generally believed that thecurriculum for girls ought to beless taxing than that for boys.The Hindu Mahila Vidyalaya wasone of the first institutions toprovide girls with the kind oflearning that was usual for boysat the time.

113

was a fearless critic of conservative ideas, arguingthat religious leaders of every faith accorded an inferiorplace to women.

By the 1880s, Indian women began to enteruniversities. Some of them trained to be doctors, somebecame teachers. Many women began to write andpublish their critical views on the place of women insociety. Tarabai Shinde, a woman educated athome at Poona, published a book, Stripurushtulna,(A Comparison between Women and Men), criticisingthe social differences between men and women.

Pandita Ramabai, a greatscholar of Sanskrit, felt thatHinduism was oppressive towardswomen, and wrote a book aboutthe miserable lives of upper-casteHindu women. She founded awidows’ home at Poona to provideshelter to widows who had beentreated badly by their husbands’relatives. Here women weretrained so that they could supportthemselves economically.

Needless to say, all this morethan alarmed the orthodox. Forinstance, many Hindu nationalists

felt that Hindu women were adopting Western ways andthat this would corrupt Hindu culture and erode familyvalues. Orthodox Muslims were also worried aboutthe impact of these changes.

As you can see, by the end of the nineteenth century,women themselves were actively working for reform.They wrote books, edited magazines, founded schoolsand training centres, and set up women’s associations.From the early twentieth century, they formed politicalpressure groups to push through laws for female suffrage(the right to vote) and better health care and educationfor women. Some of them joined various kinds ofnationalist and socialist movements from the 1920s.

In the twentieth century, leaders such asJawaharlal Nehru and Subhas Chandra Bose lent theirsupport to demands for greater equality and freedomfor women. Nationalist leaders promised that therewould be full suffrage for all men and women afterIndependence. However, till then they asked womento concentrate on the anti-British struggles.

Once a woman’shusband has died...

WOMEN, CASTE AND REFORM

Fig. 7Pandita Ramabai

Source 2

In her book,Stripurushtulna,

Tarabai Shinde wrote:

Isn’t a woman’s lifeas dear to her as yoursis to you? It’s as ifwomen are meant tobe made of somethingdifferent from menaltogether, made fromdust from earth orrock or rusted ironwhereas you and yourlives are made fromthe purest gold. …You’re asking me whatI mean. I mean once awoman’s husband hasdied, … what’s in storefor her? The barbercomes to shave allthe curls and hairoff her head, just tocool your eyes. … Sheis shut out fromgoing to weddings,receptions and otherauspicious occasionsthat married womengo to. And why allthese restrictions?Because her husbandhas died. She isunlucky: ill fate iswritten on herforehead. Her face isnot to be seen, it’s abad omen.

Tarabai Shinde, Stripurushtulna

OUR PASTS – III114

Law against child marriageWith the growth of women’s organisationsand writings on these issues, the momentumfor reform gained strength. Peoplechallenged another established custom –that of child marriage. There were a numberof Indian legislators in the Central LegislativeAssembly who fought to make a lawpreventing child marriage. In 1929 the ChildMarriage Restraint Act was passed withoutthe kind of bitter debates and struggles thatearlier laws had seen. According to the Actno man below the age of 18 and womanbelow the age of 16 could marry.

Caste and Social ReformSome of the social reformers we have been discussingalso criticised caste inequalities. Rammohun Roytranslated an old Buddhist text that was critical ofcaste. The Prarthana Samaj adhered to the tradition ofBhakti that believed in spiritual equality of all castes.In Bombay, the Paramhans Mandali was founded in1840 to work for the abolition of caste. Many of thesereformers and members of reform associations werepeople of upper castes. Often, in secret meetings, thesereformers would violate caste taboos on food and touch,in an effort to get rid of the hold of caste prejudice intheir lives.

There were also others who questioned the injusticesof the caste social order. During the course of thenineteenth century, Christian missionaries begansetting up schools for tribal groups and “lower”-castechildren. These children were thus equipped with someresources to make their way into a changing world.

At the same time, the poor began leaving theirvillages to look for jobs that were opening up in thecities. There was work in the factories that were comingup, and jobs in municipalities. You have read about

Fig. 8 – Bride at the age of eight

This is a picture of a child bride at the beginning ofthe twentieth century. Did you know that even todayover 20 per cent of girls in India are married belowthe age of 18?

115

the expansion of cities inChapter 6. Think of thenew demands of labour thiscreated. Drains had to bedug, roads laid, buildingsconstructed, and citiescleaned. This required coolies,diggers, carriers, bricklayers,sewage cleaners, sweepers,palanquin bearers, rickshawpullers. Where did this labourcome from? The poor fromthe villages and small towns,many of them from low castes,began moving to the cities where there was a newdemand for labour. Some also went to work in plantationsin Assam, Mauritius, Trinidad and Indonesia. Work inthe new locations was often very hard. But the poor,the people from low castes, saw this as an opportunityto get away from the oppressive hold that upper-castelandowners exercised over their lives and the dailyhumiliation they suffered.

WOMEN, CASTE AND REFORM

Who could produce shoes?Leatherworkers have been traditionally held incontempt since they work with dead animalswhich are seen as dirty and polluting. During theFirst World War, however, there was a hugedemand for shoes for the armies. Caste prejudiceagainst leather work meant that only thetraditional leather workers and shoemakers wereready to supply army shoes. So they could askfor high prices and gain impressive profits.

There were other jobs too. The army, for instance,offered opportunities. A number of Mahar people, whowere regarded as untouchable, found jobs in the MaharRegiment. The father of B.R. Ambedkar, the leader ofthe Dalit movement, taught at an army school.

Fig. 9 – A coolie ship, nineteenthcentury

This coolie ship – named JohnAllen – carried many Indianlabourers to Mauritius wherethey did a variety of forms of hardlabour. Most of these labourerswere from low castes.

Fig. 10 – Madigas making shoes, nineteenth-centuryAndhra Pradesh

Madigas were an important untouchable caste ofpresent-day Andhra Pradesh. They were experts atcleaning hides, tanning them for use, and sewingsandals.

OUR PASTS – III116

Demands for equality and justiceGradually, by the second half of the nineteenth century,people from within the “lower” castes began organisingmovements against caste discrimination, and demandedsocial equality and justice.

The Satnami movement in Central India, foundedby a leader named Ghasidas who came from a “low”caste, worked among the leatherworkers and organiseda movement to improve their social status. In easternBengal, Haridas Thakur’s Matua sect worked among“low” caste Chandala cultivators. Haridas questionedBrahmanical texts that supported the caste system.In what is present-day Kerala, a guru from among“low” caste Ezhavas, Shri Narayana Guru, proclaimed

the ideals of unity of all peoplewithin one sect, a single casteand one guru.

All these sects were foundedby leaders who came from“low” castes and workedamongst them. They tried tochange those habits andpractices among “low” casteswhich provoked “upper” castes’contempt. They tried to createa sense of self-esteem amongstthe lower castes.Fig. 12 – Shri Narayana Guru

Activity1. Imagine that you are

one of the studentssitting in the schoolveranda and listeningto the lessons. Whatkind of questionswould be rising inyour mind?

2. Some people thoughtthis situation wasbetter than the totallack of education foruntouchable people.Would you agree withthis view?

No place insidethe classroomI n t h e B o m b a yPresidency, as late as1829, untouchables werenot allowed into evengovernment schools.When some of thempressed hard for thatright, they were allowedto sit on the verandaoutside the classroomand listen to the lessons,without “polluting” theroom where upper-casteboys were taught. Fig. 11 – Dublas of Gujarat carrying mangoes to the market.

Dublas laboured for upper-caste landowners, cultivating theirfields, and working at a variety of odd jobs at the landlord’s house.

117WOMEN, CASTE AND REFORM

GulamgiriOne of the most vocal amongst the “low-caste” leaderswas Jyotirao Phule. Born in 1827, he studied in schoolsset up by Christian missionaries. On growing up hedeveloped his own ideas about the injustices of castesociety. He set out to attack the Brahmans’ claim thatthey were superior to others, since they were Aryans.Phule argued that the Aryans were foreigners, whocame from outside the subcontinent, and defeated andsubjugated the true children of the country – those whohad lived here from before the coming of the Aryans.As the Aryans established their dominance, they beganlooking at the defeated population as inferior, as low-caste people. According to Phule, the “upper” casteshad no right to their land and power: in reality, theland belonged to indigenous people, the so-calledlow castes.

Phule claimed that before Aryan rule there existed agolden age when warrior-peasants tilled the land andruled the Maratha countryside in just and fair ways.He proposed that Shudras (labouring castes) andAti Shudras (untouchables) should unite to challengecaste discrimination. The Satyashodhak Samaj, anassociation Phule founded, propagated caste equality.

Fig. 13 – Jyotirao Phule

“Me here and you over there”

Phule was also critical of the anti-colonial nationalism that waspreached by upper-caste leaders. He wrote:

The Brahmans have hidden away the sword of theirreligion which has cut the throat of the peoples’ prosperityand now go about posing as great patriots of their country.They … give this advice to ... our Shudra, Muslim andParsi youth that unless we put away all quarrelling amongstourselves about the divisions between high and low in ourcountry and come together, our ... country will never makeany progress ... It will be unity to serve their purposes,and then it will be me here and you over there again.

Jyotiba Phule, The Cultivator’s Whipcord

In 1873, Phule wrote a book named Gulamgiri,meaning slavery. Some ten years before this, theAmerican Civil War had been fought, leading to the endof slavery in America. Phule dedicated his book to all

Source 3

ActivityCarefully readSource 3. What doyou think JyotiraoPhule meant by“me here and youover there again”?

OUR PASTS – III118

“We are alsohuman beings”

In 1927, Ambedkar said:

We now want to go tothe Tank only to provethat like others, we arealso human beings …Hindu society shouldbe reorganised on twomain principles –equality and absenceof casteism.

Source 4

Fig. 14 – The gateway to theMadurai temple, drawn byThomas Daniell, 1792

“Untouchables” were notallowed anywhere near suchgateways until the templeentry movement began.

those Americans who had fought to free slaves, thusestablishing a link between the conditions of the“lower” castes in India and the black slaves inAmerica.

As this example shows, Phule extended hiscriticism of the caste system to argue against allforms of inequality. He was concerned about theplight of “upper”-caste women, the miseries of thelabourer, and the humiliation of the “low” castes.This movement for caste reform was continued inthe twentieth century by other great dalit leaderslike Dr B.R. Ambedkar in western India and E.V.Ramaswamy Naicker in the south.

Who could enter temples?Ambedkar was born into a Mahar family. As a child

he experienced what caste prejudice meant ineveryday life. In school he was forced to sitoutside the classroom on the ground, and wasnot allowed to drink water from taps thatupper-caste children used. After finishingschool, he got a fellowship to go to the US forhigher studies. On his return to India in 1919,he wrote extensively about “upper”-castepower in contemporary society.

In 1927, Ambedkar started a templeentry movement, in which his Mahar castefollowers participated. Brahman priestswere outraged when the Dalits used waterfrom the temple tank.

Ambedkar led three such movementsfor temple entry between 1927 and 1935.His aim was to make everyone see thepower of caste prejudices within society.

119WOMEN, CASTE AND REFORM

The Non-Brahman movementIn the early twentieth century, the non-Brahmanmovement started. The initiative came from thosenon-Brahman castes that had acquired accessto education, wealth and influence. They argued thatBrahmans were heirs of Aryan invaders from thenorth who had conquered southern lands fromthe original inhabitants of the region – theindigenous Dravidian races. They also challengedBrahmanical claims to power.

E.V. Ramaswamy Naicker, or Periyar, as hewas called, came from a middle-class family.Interestingly, he had been an ascetic in his earlylife and had studied Sanskrit scriptures carefully.Later, he became a member of the Congress, only toleave it in disgust when he found that at a feastorganised by nationalists, seating arrangementsfollowed caste distinctions – that is, the lower casteswere made to sit at a distance from the upper castes.Convinced that untouchables had to fight for theirdignity, Periyar founded the Self Respect Movement.He argued that untouchables were the trueupholders of an original Tamil and Dravidian culturewhich had been subjugated by Brahmans. He feltthat all religious authorities saw social divisionsand inequality as God-given. Untouchables had tofree themselves, therefore, from all religions in orderto achieve social equality.

Periyar was an outspoken critic of Hindu scriptures,especially the Codes of Manu, the ancient lawgiver,and the Bhagavad Gita and the Ramayana. He saidthat these texts had been used to establish theauthority of Brahmans over lower castes and thedomination of men over women.

These assertions did not go unchallenged. Theforceful speeches, writings and movements of lower-caste leaders did lead to rethinking and some self-criticism among upper-caste nationalist leaders. Butorthodox Hindu society also reacted by foundingSanatan Dharma Sabhas and the Bharat DharmaMahamandal in the north, and associations like theBrahman Sabha in Bengal. The object of theseassociations was to uphold caste distinctions as acornerstone of Hinduism, and show how this wassanctified by scriptures. Debates and struggles overcaste continued beyond the colonial period and arestill going on in our own times.

Periyar on women

Periyar wrote:

Only with the arrival ofwords such as TharaMukurtham our womenhad become puppets inthe hands of theirhusbands … we endedup with such fatherswho advise theirdaughters ... that theyhad been gifted awayto their husbands andthey belong to theirhusband’s place. Thisis the … result ofour association withSanskrit.

Periyar, cited in PeriyarChintahnaikal

Source 5

Fig. 15 – E.V. RamaswamyNaicker (Periyar)

ActivityWhy does caste remainsuch a controversial issuetoday? What do youthink was the mostimportant movementagainst caste in colonialtimes?

OUR PASTS – III120

The Veda SamajEstablished in Madras (Chennai) in 1864, the Veda Samajwas inspired by the Brahmo Samaj. It worked to abolish castedistinctions and promote widow remarriage and women’seducation. Its members believed in one God. They condemnedthe superstitions and rituals of orthodox Hinduism.The Aligarh MovementThe Mohammedan Anglo-Oriental College, founded by Sayyid AhmedKhan in 1875 at Aligarh, later became the Aligarh Muslim University.The institution offered modern education, including Western science, toMuslims. The Aligarh Movement, as it was known, had an enormous impactin the area of educational reform.

Fig. 17Henry Derozio

Fig. 20 – Khalsa College, Amritsar, established in 1892 by theleaders of the Singh Sabha movement

Fig. 19Sayyid Ahmed Khan

Fig. 18Swami Vivekananda

Organising for reform

The Brahmo SamajThe Brahmo Samaj, formed in 1830, prohibited all forms of idolatry and sacrifice,believed in the Upanishads, and forbade its members from criticising otherreligious practices. It critically drew upon the ideals of religions – especially ofHinduism and Christianity – looking at their negative and positive dimensions.Derozio and Young Bengal

Henry Louis Vivian Derozio, a teacher at Hindu College, Calcutta, in the 1820s,promoted radical ideas and encouraged his pupils to question all authority.Referred to as the Young Bengal Movement, his students attacked tradition

and custom, demanded education for women andcampaigned for the freedom of thought and expression.The Ramakrishna Mission and VivekanandaNamed after Ramakrishna Paramhansa,Swami Vivekananda’s guru, the Ramakrishna Mission stressed the ideal ofsalvation through social service and selfless action.The Prarthana SamajEstablished in 1867 at Bombay, the Prarthana Samaj sought to removecaste restrictions, abolish child marriage, encourage the education ofwomen, and end the ban on widow remarriage. Its religious meetingsdrew upon Hindu, Buddhist and Christian texts.

Fig. 16 – KeshubChunder Sen –one of the mainleaders of theBrahmo Samaj

The Singh Sabha MovementReform organisations of the Sikhs,the first Singh Sabhas were formed atAmritsar in 1873 and at Lahore in 1879.The Sabhas sought to rid Sikhism ofsuperstitions, caste distinctions andpractices seen by them as non-Sikh.They promoted education amongthe Sikhs, often combining moderninstruction with Sikh teachings.

121

ELSEWHERE

Black slaves and white plantersYou have read about how Jyotirao Phule established a connection in his book Gulamgiribetween caste oppression and the practice of slavery in America. What was this systemof slavery?

From the time that European explorers and traders landed in Africa in theseventeenth century, a trade in slaves began. Black people were captured and broughtfrom Africa to America, sold to white planters, and made to work on cotton andother plantations – most of them in the southern United States. In the plantationsthey had to work long hours, typically from dawn to dusk, punished for “inefficientwork”, and whipped and tortured.

Many people, white and black, opposedslavery through organised protest. Indoing so, they invoked the spirit of theAmerican Revolution of 1776, exhorting:“See your Declaration, Americans! Do youunderstand your own language?” In hismoving Gettysburg Address, AbrahamLincoln held that those who had foughtslavery had done so for the cause ofdemocracy. He urged the people to strivefor racial equality so that “governmentof the people, by the people, for thepeople, shall not perish from the earth”.

Fig. 21 – Slave Sale, South Carolina, USA, 1856

Here you see potential buyers examining Africanslaves at an auction.

Let’s imagineImagine you are ateacher in the schoolset up by RokeyaHossain. There are 20girls in your charge.Write an account ofthe discussions thatmight have takenplace on any one dayin the school.

Let’s recall

1. What social ideas did the following people support.

Rammohun Roy

Dayanand Saraswati

Veerasalingam Pantulu

Jyotirao Phule

Pandita Ramabai

Periyar

Mumtaz Ali

Ishwarchandra Vidyasagar

WOMEN, CASTE AND REFORM

OUR PASTS – III122

2. State whether true or false:

(a) When the British captured Bengal they framedmany new laws to regulate the rules regardingmarriage, adoption, inheritance of property, etc.

(b) Social reformers had to discard the ancient textsin order to argue for reform in social practices.

(c) Reformers got full support from all sections ofthe people of the country.

(d) The Child Marriage Restraint Act was passedin1829.

Let’s discuss 3. How did the knowledge of ancient texts help the

reformers promote new laws?

4. What were the different reasons people had for notsending girls to school?

5. Why were Christian missionaries attacked bymany people in the country? Would some peoplehave supported them too? If so, for what reasons?

6. In the British period, what new opportunities openedup for people who came from castes that wereregarded as “low”?

7. How did Jyotirao the reformers justify their criticismof caste inequality in society?

8. Why did Phule dedicate his book Gulamgiri to theAmerican movement to free slaves?

9. What did Ambedkar want to achieve through thetemple entry movement?

10. Why were Jyotirao Phule and Ramaswamy Naickercritical of the national movement? Did theircriticism help the national struggle in any way?