7
Logistical considerations in the implementation of IMO MARPOL Annex V and IMSBC code London 11 October 2013 Many thanks to all of you who participated in the 11 October workshop hosted by ICMM and Intercargo on implementation of International Mariti me Organization’s marine transport codes in the mining and metals sector. The workshop was an opportunity for all to hear how the IMO operates; which elements of the codes are relevant to the bulk transport of minerals and metals products; how they are changing; and, what are the consequences for the mining and shipping industries. Discussion focussed on recent amendments to Annex V of the MARPOL Convention and changes to the International Maritime Solid Bulk Cargoes Code (IMSBC Code) - both of which now include hazard identification criteria that are directly relevant to mineral products such as ore concentrates. Participants heard from the IMO secretariat on the important role the organization plays while speakers from port authorities, shipping companies and the mining industry outlined the practical requirements for implementation and the way that various groups are working toward implementation. A number of challenges and areas for further investigation were identified including: a desire for greater and more timely awareness of changes in marine transport codes among all stakeholders and the need to ensure that the mining industry is adequately represented at IMO. The need for greater awareness and understanding of available data associated with the assessment of mineral cargoes: much has already been developed to meet the requirements of the UNs Globally Harmonized System of Hazard Classification and Labelling (GHS) this is directly applicable to assessment for MARPOL Annex V but in many cases the connection is not being made. Application of appropriate data also applies to the IMSBC code where industry data developed again for GHS and also for the EU’s chemicals program REACHshould be applied by those revising relevant cargo schedules. This is particularly important for human health effects. The need to ensure availability of adequate port reception facilities to comply with MARPOL Annex V requirements and the importance of ship owners notifying IMO of instances where facilities have not been available. The impact of the revised MARPOL Annex V on port berth capacities needs to be understood. The potential for cargo classification to become list-based rather than remaining the responsibility of the shipper to assess under MARPOL Annex V is seen as a

71_2012_Marpol_Report_Oct_2013.pdf

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 71_2012_Marpol_Report_Oct_2013.pdf

Logistical considerations in the implementation of IMO MARPOL Annex V and IMSBC code

London – 11 October 2013 Many thanks to all of you who participated in the 11 October workshop hosted by ICMM and

Intercargo on implementation of International Maritime Organization’s marine transport

codes in the mining and metals sector.

The workshop was an opportunity for all to hear how the IMO operates; which elements of

the codes are relevant to the bulk transport of minerals and metals products; how they are

changing; and, what are the consequences for the mining and shipping industries.

Discussion focussed on recent amendments to Annex V of the MARPOL Convention and

changes to the International Maritime Solid Bulk Cargoes Code (IMSBC Code) - both of

which now include hazard identification criteria that are directly relevant to mineral products

such as ore concentrates.

Participants heard from the IMO secretariat on the important role the organization plays

while speakers from port authorities, shipping companies and the mining industry outlined

the practical requirements for implementation and the way that various groups are working

toward implementation.

A number of challenges and areas for further investigation were identified including:

a desire for greater and more timely awareness of changes in marine transport codes

among all stakeholders and the need to ensure that the mining industry is adequately

represented at IMO.

The need for greater awareness and understanding of available data associated with

the assessment of mineral cargoes: much has already been developed to meet the

requirements of the UN’s Globally Harmonized System of Hazard Classification and

Labelling (GHS) – this is directly applicable to assessment for MARPOL Annex V but

in many cases the connection is not being made.

Application of appropriate data also applies to the IMSBC code where industry data –

developed again for GHS and also for the EU’s chemicals program ‘REACH’ –

should be applied by those revising relevant cargo schedules. This is particularly

important for human health effects.

The need to ensure availability of adequate port reception facilities to comply with

MARPOL Annex V requirements and the importance of ship owners notifying IMO of

instances where facilities have not been available.

The impact of the revised MARPOL Annex V on port berth capacities needs to be

understood.

The potential for cargo classification to become list-based rather than remaining the

responsibility of the shipper to assess under MARPOL Annex V is seen as a

Page 2: 71_2012_Marpol_Report_Oct_2013.pdf

particular challenge. The inherent variation in composition and the need for tailored

test methods need to be considered in making an accurate assessment…

…and from the maritime perspective the need to understand how a list based

classification system would be used, particularly by regulators and enforcement

agencies, will be critical. A clear understanding by all stakeholders internationally will

be essential.

The need to understand how the differences in ways that the MARPOL Convention

requirements are implemented through national regulation can determine different

requirements for shippers

The need for a common understanding of the practicalities ship owners and

operators face when handling residues, including in washwater, including facilities

and time needed for cleaning.

Discussions concluded with a review of the state of the science for assessing concentrates

and an overview of leading industry efforts that are underway through a number of metals

commodity associations. This section reinforces the importance of the mining and metals

sector taking a consistent approach to characterization of concentrates using the most up to

date scientific concepts.

Bringing together the different industry constituencies enabled a discussion of the roles and

responsibilities for all participants and enabled a frank and open exchange on challenging

issues. ICMM will continue to coordinate with its members and with organizations such as

IMO and Intercargo wherever possible to ensure timely and efficient implementation.

We are very grateful to all who presented their perspectives at the meeting which was

attended by around 100 stakeholders representing mining, metals, shipping and regulatory

interests. A full list of registrants to the meeting is appended to this report. It is hoped that

participants felt the meeting valuable.

Regards,

Ilse Schoeters – Rio Tinto

Ian Harrison – Intercargo

Ben Davies – ICMM

Page 3: 71_2012_Marpol_Report_Oct_2013.pdf

Appendix 1 – Workshop agenda

Workshop Agenda

Logistical considerations in the implementation of IMO MARPOL Annex V and IMSBC code

Institute of Civil Engineers, One Great George Street, London

11 October 2013

09:00 – 16:00

1 Chairs: Ilse Schoeters - Rio Tinto, Ian Harrison - Intercargo

2 Registration, welcome and opening remarks 09:00 – 09:30

3 Background to the IMO, its objectives and the MARPOL Annex V and IMSBC

transport codes

How does the International Maritime Organization (IMO) operate? Which IMO codes are

relevant to the bulk transport or ores and concentrates, what is their scope and how are the

codes administered, updated and implemented?

Alfredo Parroquin-Ohlson, International Maritime Organisation

Ian Harrison, Intercargo Please note there will be opportunity for a panel ‘question and answer’ discussion after each section of the agenda

09:30 – 10:10

4 Relevance of MARPOL for the mining and metals industry

What are the requirements of a mining company shipping ore/concentrate and how might

recent changes this affect the way companies operate? What are the roles of mining

companies, shippers, port authorities and where does responsibility and liability rest?

Ben Davies, ICMM

10:10 – 10:30

Morning coffee 10:20 – 10:50

5 Implementation of MARPOL Annex V

What do the recently adopted amendments to the MARPOL Annex V mean in practice?

What should a company do if its ores and concentrates meet the ‘hazardous to the marine

environment’ criteria? What are the legal responsibilities for shippers and port authorities?

Are adequate port reception facilities available around the world to enable compliance?

Jyrki Vähätalo, Finnish Transport Safety Agency

Brendan Marshall, Mining Association of Canada

Ron Van Gelder Port of Rotterdam

Herman Visser, Oldendorff Carriers

Fiona Gavin, Ince and Co

Olivier Kerbaul, Glencore

10:50 – 12:30

Lunch 12:30

– 13:30

13:30 – 14:30

6 Changes to the IMSBC Code

New hazard criteria are also being adopted under the IMSBC code and will have

14:30 – 15:00

Page 4: 71_2012_Marpol_Report_Oct_2013.pdf

consequences for those shipping mineral and metal concentrates. What do these changes

mean for mining companies and the shipping industry and how should they prepare?

Ilse Schoeters, Rio Tinto

Ian Harrison, Intercargo

Afternoon tea 15:00 – 15:20

7 Characterization of mineral cargoes

What is the “state of the science” in terms of characterization of ores and concentrates and

how does this translate to the MARPOL and IMSBC code criteria? We will hear from

leading commodity association scientists about the extensive research programs that are

underway.

Frank Van Assche, International Zinc Association

Mik Gilles, International Zinc Association

Katrien Delbeke, European Copper Institute

15:20 – 16:00

8 Conclusions 16:00

End

Page 5: 71_2012_Marpol_Report_Oct_2013.pdf

Appendix 2 – Registered participants

Name Affiliation Email address

Maria Lemos Alcyon Shipbroking and Trading Ltd

[email protected]

Christopher Oates Anglo American [email protected]

Peter Gunther Anglo American [email protected]

Gustavo Possel Antofagasta PLC [email protected]

Jehanne Aubert Areva [email protected]

Emilie Lacroix Areva [email protected]

Manuela Ramirez Atlantic Copper [email protected]

Daniela Cholakova Aurubis AG [email protected]

Tim Kurth Aurubis AG [email protected]

Ron Annesley Barrick Gold Corporation [email protected]

Jeremie Louis BHP Billiton [email protected]

Andrew Lewin BHP Billiton [email protected]

Karl-Owe Svensson Boliden AB [email protected]

Alexandra Lundmark Boliden Mineral AB [email protected]

Marcelo Pamplona

Brazilian Representation to IMO

[email protected]

Paul Frost Britannia Refined Metals Ltd. [email protected]

Isabelle Cipriani CETRAGPA [email protected]

Nikisi Lesufi Chamber of Mines South Africa [email protected]

Guillermo Mac-Lean Cia. Minera Doña Inés de Collahuasi SCM

[email protected]

Francisca Dominguez Codelco [email protected]

Gonzalo Cuadra Codelco [email protected]

Victor Perez Codelco [email protected]

Juan C Torres Codelco [email protected]

Andrés Mac-Lean

Comisión Chilena del Cobre

[email protected]

Alfonso Simpson Llosa Compañía Minera Antamina S.A.

[email protected]

Diana Bernedo Quintana Compañía Minera Antamina S.A.

[email protected]

Joaquín Villarino Consejo Minero [email protected]

Carlos Urenda Consejo Minero [email protected]

Carita Rönnqvist DBTG / Port of Kokkola [email protected]

Paulina Riquelme P. EELAW [email protected]

Frédéric Gaidou Eramet S.A. [email protected]

Mark Rachovides Euromines [email protected]

Katrien Delbeke European Copper institute [email protected]

Paola Lancellotti European Shippers Council [email protected]

Jyrki Vähätalo Finnish Transport Safety Agency

[email protected]

Chris Scholl First Quantum Minerals [email protected]

Page 6: 71_2012_Marpol_Report_Oct_2013.pdf

Eric Bourgeois Freeport McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc.

[email protected]

Jim Miller Freeport McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc.

[email protected]

Geanina Gabathuler Glencore [email protected]

Robertus Koot Glencore International AG [email protected]

Saulo Aievoli Glencore International AG [email protected]

Sean FitzGerald Glencore International AG, Nickel Dept

[email protected]

Bianca Smit Glencore International Import B.V.

[email protected]

Francois Blond Glencore Manganese [email protected]

Olivier Kerbaul Glencore Xstrata [email protected]

Cesar Junco Glencore Xstrata [email protected]

Sven Lunsche Gold Fields [email protected]

Elaine Fox Goldcorp [email protected]

Bob Marshall Hudbay Min Inc [email protected]

Aime Harrison ICHCA International [email protected]

Benjamin Davies ICMM [email protected]

John Atherton ICMM [email protected]

Meera Thankey ICMM [email protected]

Sarah Stern ICMM [email protected]

Katsuhiro Mori ICMM [email protected]

Sheila Colwill Imperial Metals Corporation [email protected]

Fionna Gavin Ince and Co [email protected]

Camilo Valdéz Ábrego Industrias Peñoles [email protected]

Luis-Enrique Ortega-Aceves

Industrias Peñoles [email protected]

Talha Qureshi Technical Manager, Blenheim Shipping UK Ltd

[email protected]

Ian Harrison Intercargo [email protected]

Rob Lomas Intercargo [email protected]

Ron Knapp International Aluminium Institute [email protected]

Scott Baker International Copper Association [email protected]

Chris Barrington International Iron Metallics Association

[email protected]

Steve Binks International Lead Association [email protected]

Keven Harlow International Manganese Institute

[email protected]

Alfredo Parroquin-Ohlson

International Maritime Organisation

[email protected]

Frank Van Assche International Zinc Association [email protected]

Mik Gilles International Zinc Association [email protected]

Rebecca Coward ITOPF (INTERCARGO) [email protected]

Georgi Yorgakiev K Line Bulk Shipping (UK) Ltd. [email protected]

Aylin Aksu K Line Bulk Shipping (UK) Ltd. [email protected]

Marcin Szurgot KGHM International Ltd. [email protected]

Bartlomiej Stefanowicz KGHM Polska Miedz S.A [email protected]

Keisuke Ishihara K-Line Bulk Shipping [email protected]

Daniel Krigsman LKAB [email protected]

Page 7: 71_2012_Marpol_Report_Oct_2013.pdf

François Thomas Louis Dreyfus Armateurs [email protected]

Jean-Pierre Laffaye Louis Dreyfus Armateurs [email protected]

Kevin Stone Louis Dreyfus Commodities Metals Suisse S.A

[email protected]

Carlos Sanchez Lundin Mining [email protected]

Nuno Ferreira Lundin Mining [email protected]

Nikolay Topourov Metal Trade Overseas AG [email protected]

Mitchell Hooke Mineral Council of Australia [email protected]

Brendan Marshall Mining Association of Canada [email protected]

Mamoru Minami Mitsubishi Materials [email protected]

Tim Roberts MMG [email protected]

Nigel Hawkins N.W. Johnsen & Co. Inc. [email protected]

Veronika Kohler National Mining Association (USA)

[email protected]

Philip Stephenson Newmont [email protected]

Brian Seamone Newmont Mining Corp [email protected]

Irene Cañas Sierra Nickel Institute [email protected]

Jean-Paul Mertenat Nornik Nickel [email protected]

Mari Järvikivi Nornik Nickel [email protected]

Susanne Vinje

Norsk Hydro ASA

[email protected]

Bene Janssens Nyrstar [email protected]

Anthony Mercuri Nyrstar Sales and Marketing AG [email protected]

Roland Felder Nyrstar Sales and Marketing AG [email protected]

Sandeep Mittal Ocean Partners [email protected]

Madeleine Brar Ocean Partners UK Limited [email protected]

Herman Visser Oldendorff Carriers [email protected]

Dmitry Rychkov Pacific Basin Shipping [email protected]

Ron Gelder Port of Rotterdam [email protected]

Ilse Schoeters Rio Tinto [email protected]

Alastair Fischbacher Rio Tinto [email protected]

Callum Flett Rio Tinto [email protected]

Helen Kean Rio Tinto [email protected]

Sean O’Sullivan Rosia Montana Gold Corporation

[email protected]

Ricardo Veiga Somincar, S.A. – Lundin Mining [email protected]

Keiko Shiozawa Summit Minerals GmbH [email protected]

Yasushi Yuge Summit Minerals GmbH [email protected]

Kaliprasad Varadarajan Tata Steel [email protected]

Kamen Mihaylov TNKC(UK) Limited [email protected]

Lorraine Weller UK Maritime and Coastguard Agency

[email protected]

Karl Lumbers UK P&I Club/Thomas Miller [email protected]

Renata Ervilha Vale S.A [email protected]

Lyle Safronetz Vale [email protected]

James J Dennis Zodiac Maritime London [email protected]