Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
2020 Census Outreach
Final Report SummaryBorders Committee | Item 4 | October 23, 2020
2
3/1/2020 3/31/2020 4/30/2020 5/30/2020 6/29/2020 7/29/2020 8/28/2020 9/27/2020 10/27/2020
Data Collection Ends
In Person Follow-Up
Census Day
Invitations Mailed
2020 Census Timeline
1
2
Borders Committee | Item 4 October 26, 2020
1
3
Outreach Timeline
4
Goals
• Awareness• Access• Self-response
4
3
4
Borders Committee | Item 4 October 26, 2020
2
5
Communities at Risk of Undercount
• Latinos• African-Americans• Asian Americans• Pacific Islanders• Native Americans• Immigrants/Refugees
• Farmworkers• People with Disabilities• Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual,
Transgender, Queer(LGBTQ)
• Homeless• Children under 5
6
Partnership Coordination
6
5
6
Borders Committee | Item 4 October 26, 2020
3
7
Administrative Community BasedOrganization (ACBO)
• Community‐Based Organizations (CBOs)
• Ethnic Groups• Seniors/Older Adults• Immigrant/Refugee Community• Farm Workers• People with Disabilities
• First 5 Representative• Religious Groups• Unions• Homeless • LGBTQ• Veterans• Imperial County
• Jurisdictions• Elected Officials• Educators• Native Americans/ Tribal
Governments• Philanthropy• Business Community• Transit Agencies• Libraries
US CensusBureau
CA CensusOffice
Complete Count Committee
8
Services Provided by SANDAG
8
7
8
Borders Committee | Item 4 October 26, 2020
4
9
Activities & Impressions (Part I)Reported Through September 30, 2020
Activity Completed ImpressionsAdvertising 329 12,423,476 Alert Sign Up 6 9,218 Booths 228 397,271 Canvassing 261 40,037 Census Assistance Centers/Kiosks 66 4,453 Collateral 69 314,835 Convening 73 1,648 Curriculum 2 105 Education Forum 44 3,310 Email 2,954 1,515,613 Event 452 467,362 Fliers 367 269,309 Food/Resource Distribution 272 22,781 Form Completion Assistance 9 339
Implementation Plan Workshop 22 686
10
Activity Completed ImpressionsMailers 9 51,214 Other Media 132 4,073,323 Meeting 250 81,540 Newsletter 13 124,031 Nudge Alert 52 605,745 Other 311 206,167 Phone Banking 246 73,224 Pledge Cards 16 1,531 Social Media 862 1,255,185 Speaking Engagement 175 2,720,728 Texting Campaign 25 55,264 Training Delivery 51 74,908 Translation 3 1,103 Webinar 15 23,100 Total 7,314 24,817,506
Activities & Impressions (Part II)Reported Through September 30, 2020
9
10
Borders Committee | Item 4 October 26, 2020
5
11
Activity Locations
12
Activity LocationsNorth County
11
12
Borders Committee | Item 4 October 26, 2020
6
13
Activity LocationsSouth County
14
HTC ImpressionsReported Through September 30, 2020
Hard to Count Community (HTC) Impressions
Asian-Americans & Pacific Islanders (AAPI) 8,984,922
Seniors/Older Adults 1,528,005
Immigrants & Refugees 1,480,188
Latinos 723,876
People with Disabilities 714,088
Veterans 683,981
Limited-English Proficient Individuals and Families 591,550
Low Broadband subscription rates and limited or no access 142,897
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Questioning (LGBTQ) 137,602
African Americans 56,204
Middle-Eastern and North Africans (MENA) 54,765
Homeless Individuals and Families 17,690
Farmworkers 13,080
Native Americans & Tribal Communities 6,169
13
14
Borders Committee | Item 4 October 26, 2020
7
15
Language ImpressionsReported Through September 30, 2020
Language Impressions
Spanish 312,367Mandarin 148,219Tagalog 104,227Filipino 75,102Vietnamese 62,526Arabic 32,754Chinese 18,160Cantonese 1,816Farsi 921Hmong 364Other_Language(s) 296Hindi 65Japanese 40Korean 20Armenian 1Russian 1
16
Jurisdiction 2020 Rate 2010 Rate DifferenceCarlsbad 78.8% 73.4% 5.4%Chula Vista 74.8% 69.3% 5.5%Coronado 63.4% 62.2% 1.2%Del Mar 58.9% 61.5% -2.6%El Cajon 73.6% 66.0% 7.6%Encinitas 74.1% 70.7% 3.4%Escondido 74.1% 68.8% 5.3%Imperial Beach 66.7% 64.2% 2.5%La Mesa 75.7% 66.7% 9.0%Lemon Grove 73.1% 68.2% 4.9%National City 69.2% 66.6% 2.6%Oceanside 74.1% 67.2% 6.9%Poway 83.9% 77.1% 6.8%San Diego 74.0% 69.3% 4.7%San Marcos 76.8% 70.0% 6.8%Santee 76.4% 73.7% 2.7%Solana Beach 69.8% 64.5% 5.3%Vista 73.9% 67.3% 6.6%Countywide 73.8% 68.0% 5.8%Statewide 69.6% 73.0% -3.4%Nationwide 66.9% 74.0% -7.1%
Self-Response RatesAs of October 16, 2020
15
16
Borders Committee | Item 4 October 26, 2020
8
17
Response Rates
18
Response RatesNorth County
17
18
Borders Committee | Item 4 October 26, 2020
9
19
Response RatesSouth County
20
Lessons Learned
20
19
20
Borders Committee | Item 4 October 26, 2020
10
21
OperationalAdjustments• Digital communication• Virtual experiences• Car caravans• Videos• Distribution sites• Community resource
centers• Public service desks• Toolkits
22
Successes• Partnerships• Events prior to pandemic• Flexibility in funding• Personal Protective
Equipment (PPE)• Mobile questionnaire
assistance• Door hangers• Distributions• Videos• Promotional materials
21
22
Borders Committee | Item 4 October 26, 2020
11
23
Challenges
• Pandemic Facility closures Staffing constraints
• Branding• Timeline changes
24
Questions
23
24
Borders Committee | Item 4 October 26, 2020
12
Cross Border Travel Behavior Survey2019 Results
Borders Committee | October 23, 2020
What Information is Presented?
• Reasons for the Study• Methodology Overview• Key Findings• Next Steps
2
1
2
Borders Committee | Item 5 October 23, 2020
1
Reasons for the Study
• Collect updated information of travel behaviors of Mexicoresidents and visitors for the Activity Base Model (ABM)
• Collect respondents’ willingness to pay a toll for quicker bordercrossing at the future State Route 11/ Otay Mesa East Point ofEntry (POE) from both U.S. and Mexico residents
3
Methodology Overview• Ports of Entry
– San Ysidro– Otay Mesa– Tecate
• Intercept Survey• Travel Diary Retrieval
1. Staffed Kiosks on U.S. side2. Secure online survey site3. Telephone interviews4. Smaller sample agreed to use a Global
Positioning System (GPS) tracker4
3
4
Borders Committee | Item 5 October 23, 2020
2
Methodology (continued)
Completed Surveys for Demographics & VOT Weighted
• Goal:– 7,500 intercept surveys
• Actual:– 7,899 intercept surveys
Completed Diaries for Modeling Weighted
• Goal:– 1,500 travel diaries
• Actual:– 1,911 travel diaries
5
Key findings
6
5
6
Borders Committee | Item 5 October 23, 2020
3
1. Reasons for weekday cross-border travel differentfor Mexico and U.S. residents
• Top 5 Reasons for MexicoResidents to Visit the U.S.
Shopping, 52%
Work/business, 31%
Visit a friend or relative,
9%
Medical, 2%
School, 2%
• Top 5 Reasons for U.S.Residents to Visit Mexico
Visiting friend/relative,
54%
Medical, 12%
Shopping, 10%
Vacation, 5%
Picking up/dropping off passenger, 5%
Work/business, 5%
7
2. After crossing, most trips into the U.S. clusterclose to the U.S. border
8
Primary U.S. Destination City
Percent
Chula Vista 42.6%
San Diego 30.1%
San Ysidro area 5.6%
La Mesa 3.9%
Otay Mesa area 3.9%
National City 2.7%
El Cajon 1.4%
7
8
Borders Committee | Item 5 October 23, 2020
4
3. Average weekday crosser visits multiple destinationsand spends about 6 hours while in the U.S.
3.09 3.35
2.652.08
6.28 6.33 6.29
5.55
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Overall San Ysidro Otay Mesa Tecate
Average Number of Stops in U.S. Average Hours Spent in U.S.9
4. Most of those surveyed crossed into U.S.driving alone or in a carpool
10
44% 30% 12% 5% 3% 3%
9
10
Borders Committee | Item 5 October 23, 2020
5
5. Two-thirds of respondents said they would occasionallyuse the Otay Mesa East tolled crossing in the future
11
6. Respondents’ willingness to pay for an expedited crossingwas strongly related to the proposed toll amount
21.60%
46.30%
78.50% 85.90%64.50%
43.60%
16.70%11.60%13.80% 10.00%
4.70% 2.40%
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
100.00%
$20 $10 $5 $3
Yes, would pay to use No, would not pay to use Not sure, depends12
11
12
Borders Committee | Item 5 October 23, 2020
6
Some closing thoughts on possible data implications
• More than half of Mexico residents who crossedthe border traveled to the U.S. to shop– Economic impacts on longer border wait times
• Around 1 in 3 Mexico residents surveyed came tothe U.S. to work– Transportation planning implications to get workers to employment
centers around the region
• After crossing into the U.S., most weekday trips occurredin the South County– Closer look at infrastructure and other investments in this part of
the County
13
Next Steps
• Explore weekend data collection after travel restrictions are lifted• Finalize and release report
• Use these data to:– Update the Cross-Border Model– Inform SANDAG’s Traffic and Revenue Study for the
State Route 11 / Otay Mesa East
14
13
14
Borders Committee | Item 5 October 23, 2020
7
Questions?Grace Miño, M.A.Senior Research AnalystSANDAG
15
Dr. Timothy McLarney, Ph.D.PresidentTrue North Research, Inc.
15
Borders Committee | Item 5 October 23, 2020
8
Item 4Item 5