20
2020 Census Outreach Final Report Summary Borders Committee | Item 4 | October 23, 2020 2 3/1/2020 3/31/2020 4/30/2020 5/30/2020 6/29/2020 7/29/2020 8/28/2020 9/27/2020 10/27/2020 Data Collection Ends In Person Follow-Up Census Day Invitations Mailed 2020 Census Timeline 1 2 Borders Committee | Item 4 October 26, 2020 1

2020 Census Outreach Final Report Summary...Tagalog 104,227 Filipino 75,102 Vietnamese 62,526 Arabic 32,754 Chinese 18,160 Cantonese 1,816 Farsi 921 Hmong 364 Other_Language(s) 296

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 1

    2020 Census Outreach

    Final Report SummaryBorders Committee | Item 4 | October 23, 2020

    2

    3/1/2020 3/31/2020 4/30/2020 5/30/2020 6/29/2020 7/29/2020 8/28/2020 9/27/2020 10/27/2020

    Data Collection Ends

    In Person Follow-Up

    Census Day

    Invitations Mailed

    2020 Census Timeline

    1

    2

    Borders Committee | Item 4 October 26, 2020

    1

  • 3

    Outreach Timeline

    4

    Goals

    • Awareness• Access• Self-response

    4

    3

    4

    Borders Committee | Item 4 October 26, 2020

    2

  • 5

    Communities at Risk of Undercount

    • Latinos• African-Americans• Asian Americans• Pacific Islanders• Native Americans• Immigrants/Refugees

    • Farmworkers• People with Disabilities• Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual,

    Transgender, Queer(LGBTQ)

    • Homeless• Children under 5

    6

    Partnership Coordination

    6

    5

    6

    Borders Committee | Item 4 October 26, 2020

    3

  • 7

    Administrative Community BasedOrganization (ACBO)

    • Community‐Based Organizations (CBOs)

    • Ethnic Groups• Seniors/Older Adults• Immigrant/Refugee Community• Farm Workers• People with Disabilities

    • First 5 Representative• Religious Groups• Unions• Homeless • LGBTQ• Veterans• Imperial County

    • Jurisdictions• Elected Officials• Educators• Native Americans/ Tribal 

    Governments• Philanthropy• Business Community• Transit Agencies• Libraries

    US CensusBureau

    CA CensusOffice

    Complete Count Committee

    8

    Services Provided by SANDAG

    8

    7

    8

    Borders Committee | Item 4 October 26, 2020

    4

  • 9

    Activities & Impressions (Part I)Reported Through September 30, 2020

    Activity Completed ImpressionsAdvertising 329 12,423,476 Alert Sign Up 6 9,218 Booths 228 397,271 Canvassing 261 40,037 Census Assistance Centers/Kiosks 66 4,453 Collateral 69 314,835 Convening 73 1,648 Curriculum 2 105 Education Forum 44 3,310 Email 2,954 1,515,613 Event 452 467,362 Fliers 367 269,309 Food/Resource Distribution 272 22,781 Form Completion Assistance 9 339

    Implementation Plan Workshop 22 686

    10

    Activity Completed ImpressionsMailers 9 51,214 Other Media 132 4,073,323 Meeting 250 81,540 Newsletter 13 124,031 Nudge Alert 52 605,745 Other 311 206,167 Phone Banking 246 73,224 Pledge Cards 16 1,531 Social Media 862 1,255,185 Speaking Engagement 175 2,720,728 Texting Campaign 25 55,264 Training Delivery 51 74,908 Translation 3 1,103 Webinar 15 23,100 Total 7,314 24,817,506

    Activities & Impressions (Part II)Reported Through September 30, 2020

    9

    10

    Borders Committee | Item 4 October 26, 2020

    5

  • 11

    Activity Locations

    12

    Activity LocationsNorth County

    11

    12

    Borders Committee | Item 4 October 26, 2020

    6

  • 13

    Activity LocationsSouth County

    14

    HTC ImpressionsReported Through September 30, 2020

    Hard to Count Community (HTC) Impressions

    Asian-Americans & Pacific Islanders (AAPI) 8,984,922

    Seniors/Older Adults 1,528,005

    Immigrants & Refugees 1,480,188

    Latinos 723,876

    People with Disabilities 714,088

    Veterans 683,981

    Limited-English Proficient Individuals and Families 591,550

    Low Broadband subscription rates and limited or no access 142,897

    Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Questioning (LGBTQ) 137,602

    African Americans 56,204

    Middle-Eastern and North Africans (MENA) 54,765

    Homeless Individuals and Families 17,690

    Farmworkers 13,080

    Native Americans & Tribal Communities 6,169

    13

    14

    Borders Committee | Item 4 October 26, 2020

    7

  • 15

    Language ImpressionsReported Through September 30, 2020

    Language Impressions

    Spanish 312,367Mandarin 148,219Tagalog 104,227Filipino 75,102Vietnamese 62,526Arabic 32,754Chinese 18,160Cantonese 1,816Farsi 921Hmong 364Other_Language(s) 296Hindi 65Japanese 40Korean 20Armenian 1Russian 1

    16

    Jurisdiction 2020 Rate 2010 Rate DifferenceCarlsbad 78.8% 73.4% 5.4%Chula Vista 74.8% 69.3% 5.5%Coronado 63.4% 62.2% 1.2%Del Mar 58.9% 61.5% -2.6%El Cajon 73.6% 66.0% 7.6%Encinitas 74.1% 70.7% 3.4%Escondido 74.1% 68.8% 5.3%Imperial Beach 66.7% 64.2% 2.5%La Mesa 75.7% 66.7% 9.0%Lemon Grove 73.1% 68.2% 4.9%National City 69.2% 66.6% 2.6%Oceanside 74.1% 67.2% 6.9%Poway 83.9% 77.1% 6.8%San Diego 74.0% 69.3% 4.7%San Marcos 76.8% 70.0% 6.8%Santee 76.4% 73.7% 2.7%Solana Beach 69.8% 64.5% 5.3%Vista 73.9% 67.3% 6.6%Countywide 73.8% 68.0% 5.8%Statewide 69.6% 73.0% -3.4%Nationwide 66.9% 74.0% -7.1%

    Self-Response RatesAs of October 16, 2020

    15

    16

    Borders Committee | Item 4 October 26, 2020

    8

  • 17

    Response Rates

    18

    Response RatesNorth County

    17

    18

    Borders Committee | Item 4 October 26, 2020

    9

  • 19

    Response RatesSouth County

    20

    Lessons Learned

    20

    19

    20

    Borders Committee | Item 4 October 26, 2020

    10

  • 21

    OperationalAdjustments• Digital communication• Virtual experiences• Car caravans• Videos• Distribution sites• Community resource

    centers• Public service desks• Toolkits

    22

    Successes• Partnerships• Events prior to pandemic• Flexibility in funding• Personal Protective

    Equipment (PPE)• Mobile questionnaire

    assistance• Door hangers• Distributions• Videos• Promotional materials

    21

    22

    Borders Committee | Item 4 October 26, 2020

    11

  • 23

    Challenges

    • Pandemic Facility closures Staffing constraints

    • Branding• Timeline changes

    24

    Questions

    23

    24

    Borders Committee | Item 4 October 26, 2020

    12

  • Cross Border Travel Behavior Survey2019 Results

    Borders Committee | October 23, 2020

    What Information is Presented?

    • Reasons for the Study• Methodology Overview• Key Findings• Next Steps

    2

    1

    2

    Borders Committee | Item 5 October 23, 2020

    1

  • Reasons for the Study

    • Collect updated information of travel behaviors of Mexicoresidents and visitors for the Activity Base Model (ABM)

    • Collect respondents’ willingness to pay a toll for quicker bordercrossing at the future State Route 11/ Otay Mesa East Point ofEntry (POE) from both U.S. and Mexico residents

    3

    Methodology Overview• Ports of Entry

    – San Ysidro– Otay Mesa– Tecate

    • Intercept Survey• Travel Diary Retrieval

    1. Staffed Kiosks on U.S. side2. Secure online survey site3. Telephone interviews4. Smaller sample agreed to use a Global

    Positioning System (GPS) tracker4

    3

    4

    Borders Committee | Item 5 October 23, 2020

    2

  • Methodology (continued)

    Completed Surveys for Demographics & VOT Weighted

    • Goal:– 7,500 intercept surveys

    • Actual:– 7,899 intercept surveys

    Completed Diaries for Modeling Weighted

    • Goal:– 1,500 travel diaries

    • Actual:– 1,911 travel diaries

    5

    Key findings

    6

    5

    6

    Borders Committee | Item 5 October 23, 2020

    3

  • 1. Reasons for weekday cross-border travel differentfor Mexico and U.S. residents

    • Top 5 Reasons for MexicoResidents to Visit the U.S.

    Shopping, 52%

    Work/business, 31%

    Visit a friend or relative,

    9%

    Medical, 2%

    School, 2%

    • Top 5 Reasons for U.S.Residents to Visit Mexico

    Visiting friend/relative,

    54%

    Medical, 12%

    Shopping, 10%

    Vacation, 5%

    Picking up/dropping off passenger, 5%

    Work/business, 5%

    7

    2. After crossing, most trips into the U.S. clusterclose to the U.S. border

    8

    Primary U.S. Destination City

    Percent

    Chula Vista 42.6%

    San Diego 30.1%

    San Ysidro area 5.6%

    La Mesa 3.9%

    Otay Mesa area 3.9%

    National City 2.7%

    El Cajon 1.4%

    7

    8

    Borders Committee | Item 5 October 23, 2020

    4

  • 3. Average weekday crosser visits multiple destinationsand spends about 6 hours while in the U.S.

    3.09 3.35

    2.652.08

    6.28 6.33 6.29

    5.55

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    Overall San Ysidro Otay Mesa Tecate

    Average Number of Stops in U.S. Average Hours Spent in U.S.9

    4. Most of those surveyed crossed into U.S.driving alone or in a carpool

    10

    44% 30% 12% 5% 3% 3%

    9

    10

    Borders Committee | Item 5 October 23, 2020

    5

  • 5. Two-thirds of respondents said they would occasionallyuse the Otay Mesa East tolled crossing in the future

    11

    6. Respondents’ willingness to pay for an expedited crossingwas strongly related to the proposed toll amount

    21.60%

    46.30%

    78.50% 85.90%64.50%

    43.60%

    16.70%11.60%13.80% 10.00%

    4.70% 2.40%

    0.00%

    20.00%

    40.00%

    60.00%

    80.00%

    100.00%

    $20 $10 $5 $3

    Yes, would pay to use No, would not pay to use Not sure, depends12

    11

    12

    Borders Committee | Item 5 October 23, 2020

    6

  • Some closing thoughts on possible data implications

    • More than half of Mexico residents who crossedthe border traveled to the U.S. to shop– Economic impacts on longer border wait times

    • Around 1 in 3 Mexico residents surveyed came tothe U.S. to work– Transportation planning implications to get workers to employment

    centers around the region

    • After crossing into the U.S., most weekday trips occurredin the South County– Closer look at infrastructure and other investments in this part of

    the County

    13

    Next Steps

    • Explore weekend data collection after travel restrictions are lifted• Finalize and release report

    • Use these data to:– Update the Cross-Border Model– Inform SANDAG’s Traffic and Revenue Study for the

    State Route 11 / Otay Mesa East

    14

    13

    14

    Borders Committee | Item 5 October 23, 2020

    7

  • Questions?Grace Miño, M.A.Senior Research AnalystSANDAG

    15

    Dr. Timothy McLarney, Ph.D.PresidentTrue North Research, Inc.

    15

    Borders Committee | Item 5 October 23, 2020

    8

    Item 4Item 5