Upload
dean-turgeon
View
164
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
LEED & NECBEnergy Perspective: Different Animals?
PRESENTED BY: DEAN TURGEON RET, CGD, LEED AP
SAULO ODUOR PhD, P.Eng, CEng (MCIBSE), CEM, CEC, LEED AP BD+C
WWW.3DENERGY.CA@3DENERGY
2
ABOUT THE PRESENTERS
DEAN TURGEON RET, CGD, LEED® AP- Principal and CEO of 3D Energy Limited (2010) and Vital
Engineering Corp. (2002)- Edmonton Chamber of Commerce Environment Policy Committee- ACTIA Founding Director- AGEA Past President (2007-2010)- ASHRAE - NAC President (2007)- NAIT Alternative Energy Program Developer (2001-Present)- NAIT Sustainable Building Practices Resource Centre (SBPRC)- Canada Green Buildings Council: Programs Chair (2004)- International Building Performance Simulation Association- NAIT Top 50 in 50 recipient- 2010 ASET Technologist of the Year Award- 2010 National Achievement Award CCTT
3
ABOUT THE PRESENTERS
SAULO ODUOR PhD, P.Eng, CEng (MCIBSE), CEM, CEC, LEED AP BD+C- Senior Energy Engineer for 3D Energy Limited- Professional Engineer (APEGA)- Chartered Engineer (Engineering Council, UK)- LEED-AP BD+C- Certified Energy Manager (Association of Energy Engineers)- Certified Business Energy Professional (Association of Energy
Engineers)- Construction Estimator Certified (Canadian Institute of Quantity
Surveyors)
NECB 2011: A VERY BRIEF OVERVIEW (Exp 12/16)
Introducing the National Energy Code of Canada for Buildings 2011
4
NECB 2011: A VERY BRIEF OVERVIEW (Exp 12/16)
NECB 2015 was released December 1, 2015 and is in force December 1, 2016
5
6
ABOUT THE NECB
In 2008, the “Council of the Federation” consisting of Provincial and Territorial Premiers called on NRC to develop a National Energy Code with a target of less than 25% of the previous reference standard – the 1997 MNEC
7
WHY DO WE NEED A NECB?
1997 – Model National Energy Code for Buildings (MNECB)
• Not widely adopted as hoped• Suggested as “best practice” by some provincial
codes• Required by some provinces for the buildings they
own and/or occupy• However, the MNECB was shown to be practical tool
for the Federal Commercial Building Incentive Program (CBIP) and LEED 1.0
8
WHY DO WE NEED A NECB?
Regulatory hurdles for NECB 2011
• Code must be adopted by jurisdiction to become law (See Alberta Regulation 31/2015)
• NECB is not a part of National Building Code (NBC), but a separate document
Note: Part 9 Housing Energy Code is actually a part of NBC and detailed in the ABC under 9.36• It outlines design and construction processes for the lowest level
you will be legally allowed to build from an energy perspective
9
WHY DO WE NEED A NECB?
In March of 2015, the Alberta Safety Codes Regulation was revised to adopt the NECB 2011 into Alberta building code regulation
Other than this regulation, the NECB is not mentioned in any other section other than 9.36 (Residential)
10
WHY DO WE NEED A NECB?
Buildings in Canada do NOTappear to be getting any better – in fact a 2009 study by NRCAN suggests EUI’s were lower in the 60’s and even the 20’s!
*Based on a sampling of buildings built in that era using energy use today.
Ref:Survey ofCommercialandInstitutionalEnergyUse– Buildings 2009,NRCAN
11
HISTORY OF ENERGY CODES – AT A GLANCE
This graph is illustrative only
12
APPLICATION OF NECB-2011
• NECB-2011 is a voluntary code, as are all national model codes, unless/until adopted/adapted by an authority having jurisdiction (AHJ)
• NECB-2011 provides recommended regulations and tables of minimum efficiencies
Where regional standards or regulations exist, they take precedence
13
ADOPTION OF THE NECB
British Columbia and Vancouver (As a Charter City)
ASHRAE 90.1-2010 or NECB-2011
Ontario SB-10 with 3 pathsASHRAE 90.1-2010 + 189.1-2009 envelope5% less energy use than ASHRAE 90.1-201025% less energy use than MNECB-1997
Nova Scotia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba
NECB-2011
14
ADOPTION OF THE NECB
Jurisdictions considering adoption/adaptation of NECB-2011
• Newfoundland & Labrador• New Brunswick• Prince Edward Island• Yukon• Nunavut
• Quebec has developed their own energy code
15
Source:National EnergyCodeforBuildings2011– AppendixA
Chose your Path!
SO WHAT DOES NECB COMPLIANCE LOOK LIKE?
16
Prescriptive• Must meet all prescriptive requirements• Checklists will be available from jurisdictions that adopt
NECB-2011• NECB Compliance Forms will be available from AHJ
Trade-off Paths• Simplified calculations for envelope, HVAC, DWH and lighting• Proposed value must be less than or equal to reference value• Spreadsheet tools available from NRCan
Performance Path• Requires a detailed hourly energy model• Proposed consumption must be less than or equal to
reference
SO WHAT DOES NECB COMPLIANCE LOOK LIKE?
NECB 2011- COMPLIANCE TIMING & REQUIREMENTS
17
NECB 2011- COMPLIANCE TIMING & REQUIREMENTS
18
1) Projects applying for a Building Permit PRIOR to November 01, 2015 are NOT required to demonstrate compliance with the NECB;
2) Projects applying for Building Permit PRIOR to May 01, 2016 are NOT required to demonstrate compliance with the NECB provided a Development Permit Application was accepted by the Authority Having Jurisdiction prior to the November 01, 2015 in force date;
NECB 2011- COMPLIANCE TIMING & REQUIREMENTS
19
3) Projects applying for a Building Permit AFTERNovember 01, 2015 and PRIOR to May 01, 2016 are NOT required to demonstrate compliance with the NECB provided:
• Development Permit Submission was accepted by the Authority Having Jurisdiction prior to the May 01, 2016 NECB Transition Period End date; “and”
• The applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Authority Having Jurisdiction that preparations of the plans and specifications had been **substantially developed prior to the November 01, 2015 in force date of the NECB
NECB 2011- COMPLIANCE TIMING & REQUIREMENTS
20
4) Projects applying for a building permit AFTERMay 01, 2016 ARE REQUIRED to demonstrate compliance with the NECB
NECB 2011- COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTATION
21
COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS
22
COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS
NECB AND LEED COMPLIANCE
• NECB-2011 compliance is based on energy consumption savings; Need only to match consumption in proposed and reference building;
• LEED 2009 compliance is based on energy cost savings; Proposed building performance must exceed reference to qualify;
• LEED v4 compliance is based on energy cost savings; Proposed building performance must exceed reference to qualify (October 31, 2016)
23
COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS
NECB AND LEED COMPLIANCE
To Comply:• For non-LEED projects, apply NECB-2011 only;• For LEED 2009, must comply with both NECB-2011
and LEED 2009 requirements simultaneously:• For NECB compliance, choose NECB-2011 as reference;• For LEED 2009 compliance, choose either MNECB 1997 or
ASHRAE 90-1 2007 as reference• For LEED v4 projects, must comply with both NECB
and LEED v4 requirements:• Choose either NECB-2011, ASHRAE 90.1-2010, or an alternative
compliance path as reference
24
COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS
NECB AND LEED COMPLIANCE
LEED EA Prerequisites
25
ASHRAE 90.1 –2007
MNECB 1997 ASHRAE 90.1 - 2010
NECB-2011
LEED 2009
10% cost (NC); 5% cost (Existing
Bldgs)
23% cost (NC); 19% cost (Existing Bldgs)
N/A N/A
LEED v4 N/A N/A
5% cost (NC); 3%
cost (Existing Bldgs)
5% cost (NC); 3% cost (Existing
Bldgs)
OTHER LEED REQUIREMENTS LEED 2009
LEED 2009
MNECB 1997:• Mandatory provisions of MNECB 1997;• Include all energy costs associated with the project;• Compare with baseline modeled to MNECB 1997;• Default process energy cost is 21% of total energy cost
of baseline building;• No penalty or credit for performance of District Energy
System (DES);
26
OTHER LEED REQUIREMENTS LEED 2009
LEED 2009
ASHRAE 90.1-2007:• Mandatory provisions of ASHRAE 90.1-2007 (Sections
5.4, 6.4, 7.4, 8.4, 9.4, 10.4);• Include all energy costs associated with the project;• Compare with baseline modeled to Appendix G of
ASHRAE 90.1 2007;• Default process energy cost is 25% of total energy cost
of baseline building;• No penalty or credit for performance of DES;
27
OTHER LEED REQUIREMENTS LEED v4
LEED v4
ASHRAE 90.1-2010:• Mandatory requirements include:
• Envelope (insulation, air leakage, envelope properties, fenestration properties, and areas);
• HVAC (minimum equipment efficiencies, load calculations, pump heads)
• Controls (thermostatic, set-points, off-hour, automatic shutdown, setback, ventilation, etc.)
• HVAC system construction, insulation, and leakage (ducts, plenum, pipe)
• Minimum O/A rates shall be same for proposed and reference buildings (G3.1.2.6)
28
OTHER LEED REQUIREMENTS LEED v4
LEED v4
NECB-2011:• Comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2010 mandatory
requirements, in addition to the performance path limitations in NECB (Section 3.4.1.2, 5.4.1.2, and 6.4.1.2):• Section 3.4.1.2: Radiant heating cables imbedded in building
assemblies;• Section 5.4.1.2: HVAC appliances and equipment energy efficiency
requirements;• Section 6.4.1.2: SHW appliances and equipment energy efficiency
requirements;
29
OTHER LEED REQUIREMENTS LEED v4
LEED v4
NECB-2011 (cont’d):• Apply NECB-2011 FDWR limitations to reference
model;• Apply NECB-2011 SRR limitations to reference model;• Model proposed and reference O/A rates as per
ASHRAE 90.1-2010 (G3.1.2.6)
30
OTHER LEED REQUIREMENTS LEED v4
LEED v4
Notes:• For NECB-2011 performance path, but no LEED v4,
mandatory requirements are applied on reference building only.
31
OTHER LEED REQUIREMENTS RENEWABLE ENERGY
RENEWABLE ENERGY
LEED v4:• Projects must meet minimum percent savings before
taking credit for renewable energy systems
NECB-2011:• There is no consideration for the source of energy,
only utility type and quantity are accounted for;
32
EXAMPLES
BUILDING ENVELOPE33
NECB-2011 ASHRAE-90.1-2010Wall R-27 R-15.6Roof R-35 R-20.8
FDWR 29% 40%
Fenestration U-0.387U-0.45 (metal frame)
U-0.35 (Non-metal frame)
EXAMPLES
LIGHTING34
NECB-2011 ASHRAE-90.1-2010Office (enclosed) 11.9 W/m2 11.9 W/m2
Classroom 13.3 W/m2 13.3 W/m2
Patient Room 6.7 W/m2 6.7 W/m2
Food Prep 10.7 W/m2 10.7 W/m2
EXAMPLES
HVAC35
NECB-2011 ASHRAE-90.1-2010SWH-Gas Storage,
>75,000 Btu/h80% Et 80% Et
SWH-Gas Instant.,>200,000 Btu/h
80% Et 80% Et
HW Boilers – Gas 83% Et (300K-2500K Btu/h)83.3% Et (>2500K Btu/h)
80% Et (300K-2500K Btu/h)82% Et (>2500K Btu/h)
Furnace - Gas 81% Et 80% EtAir-cooled AC Units(250K-760K btu/h)
COP-2.87 COP-2.87
Water-cooled AC Units(250K-760K btu/h)
COP-3.16 COP-3.58
LEED POINTS ALLOCATION
LEED 2009 POINTS FOR PERCENTAGE IMPROVEMENT IN ENERGY PERFORMANCE
36
New ConstMNECB 1997
New ConstASHRAE 90.1-2007
Exis. BidgRenos
MNECB 1997
Exis. BidgRenos
ASHRAE 90.1-2007
Points for NC
25% 12% 21% 8% 1 27% 14% 23% 10% 2 28% 16% 25% 12% 3 30% 18% 27% 14% 4 32% 20% 28% 16% 5 33% 22% 30% 18% 6 35% 24% 32% 20% 7 37% 26% 33% 22% 8 39% 28% 35% 24% 9 40% 30% 37% 26% 10 42% 32% 39% 28% 11 44% 34% 40% 30% 12 45% 36% 42% 32% 13 47% 38% 44% 34% 14 49% 40% 45% 36% 15 50% 42% 47% 38% 16 52% 44% 49% 40% 17 54% 46% 50% 42% 18 56% 48% 52% 44% 19
LEED POINTS ALLOCATION
LEED v4 POINTS FOR PERCENTAGE IMPROVEMENT IN ENERGY PERFORMANCE(REFERENCE ASHRAE 90.1-2010 AND NECB-2011)
37
New Construction
Major Renovation Core and Shell
Points (except Schools,
Healthcare)
Points Healthcare Points Schools
6% 4% 3% 1 3 1 8% 6% 5% 2 4 2 10% 8% 7% 3 5 3 12% 10% 9% 4 6 4 14% 12% 11% 5 7 5 16% 14% 13% 6 8 6 18% 16% 15% 7 9 7 20% 18% 17% 8 10 8 22% 20% 19% 9 11 9 24% 22% 21% 10 12 10 26% 24% 23% 11 13 11 29% 27% 26% 12 14 12 32% 30% 29% 13 15 13 35% 33% 32% 14 16 14 38% 36% 35% 15 17 15 42% 40% 39% 16 18 16 46% 44% 43% 17 19 -50% 48% 47% 18 20 -
LEED POINTS ALLOCATION
POINTS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY(CALCULATED FROM FORMULA)
38
Percentage Renewable Energy Points (except CS) Points (CS) 1% 1 1 3% — 2 5% 2 3
10% 3 —
39
40
41
QUESTIONS?PRESENTED BY:
DEAN TURGEON RET, CGD, LEED AP
SAULO ODUOR PhD, P.Eng, CEng (MCIBSE), CEM, CEC, LEED AP BD+C
WWW.3DENERGY.CA@3DENERGY