201109070942290.IndII FGD (1) NPMP Presentation 9 August 2011 Final

7/30/2019 201109070942290.IndII FGD (1) NPMP Presentation 9 August 2011 Final

1/59

DRAFT NATIONAL PORT MASTERPLAN

2011 - 2030

Progress and Ideas 09 August 2011


2/59

2

DRAFT MOT MINISTER REGULATION ON A NATIONAL PORT MASTER PLAN

(NPMP)CONSIDERING THAT:

a. Article 71, Shipping Law No. 17 the year of 2008 and Article 7, 8, and 9 of Government Regulation No 61, the year of 2009 regarding Ports provide that NPMP shall be formulated

b. Based on Article 71 para(4) of the Shipping Law, NPMP shall be decided by the Minister

c. Taking into consideration to the statements as described in a and b above, the NPMP is needed to be stipulated in Minister of Transport Regulation

REFERRING TO:

1. Shipping Law No. 17 the year of 2008

2. Government Regulation No. 61 the year of 2009 regarding Ports

3. President Regulation No 47 the Year of 2009 regarding Establishment and Organization of State Ministers

4. Minister of Transport Regulation No KM 43 the Year of 2005 regarding Organization, and Working Arrangement of the Ministry of Transport as ammended with Minister of

Transport Regulation No 20 the yaer of 2008

Has decided to stipulate: Minister of Transport Regulation regarding NMPM

Article 1

NPMP containing National Port Policy and Port Location Plan and Port Hiearchy is an intergrated part of National Port System

Article 2NPMP provides guidance for stipulating port location, construction, operation and development, and arrangement of a Port

Master Plan

The NPMP is developed with consideration of:

National Spatial Plan, Provincial Spatial Plan, and Local Spatial Plan

Potential for regional economic and socio economic development

Potential for natural resource development

Development of the strategic environment, either domestic or international

Article 3

The NPMP is stipulated for a period of 20 years and should be reviewed and updated every 5 years

If there is a change in the strategic environment, the NPMP may be reviewed more than once every years

Revision of the NPMP may be made based on the five years evaluation

The contain of NPMP is elaborated as described in the Attachment

Article 4

Director General of Sea Transport shall supervise and take further action needed to implement the NPMP

Article 5

This Regulation shall take into effect as the date of enactment.

To promulgate this law to the public, it is hereby ordered to announce the enactment of this Minister of Transport Regulation by placing it in the State Gazette of the Republic Indonesia

Stipulated in Jakarta on the dated of ...... 2011

Minister of Transport

Freddy Numberi


3/59

3

LAMPIRAN : PERMENHUB NO ---- NOPEMBER 2011

PERATURAN MENTERI PERHUBUNGAN

TENTANG: RENCANA INDUK PELABUHAN NASIONAL

Draft Outline Attachment:REGULATION OF MOT MINISTER ON A NATIONAL P ORT MASTER PLAN

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1. Vision of National Port Master plan

1.2. Target 2030

2. PRESENT/CURRENT PORT CONDITIONS

2.1. Policy Framework

2.2. Port Traffic, Facilities and Operations


4/59

4

(2)

LAMPIRAN : PERMENHUB

3. NATIONAL PORT POLICY

4. FUTURE PORT DEVELOPMENT

4.1. Strategic Environment

4.2. Forecast of Indonesia Port Traffic


5/59

5

(3)

LAMPIRAN : PERMENHUB

5. PORT DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

5.1. National Port Development Implementation Plan

5.2. Collector and Feeder Port Implementation Plan

5.3. Human Resources and Institutional Development

5.4. Technology Development for Port Management and

Operation

5.5. Port Development Investments

6. CLOSING STATEMENT


6/59

6

CHAPTER 1 : INTRODUCTION

1.1. Vision of National Port Master plan1.2. Target 2030


7/597

Vision of NPMP

The vision is to create a strong economic base

that provides port planning and development, in

particular as regards with connecting reinventing

of port management in Indonesia includingempowering port authorities competencies,

clear direction and strengthen the main economic

drivers and diversify into new sectors /main

commodities, inclusive connect more developedregions to lagging regions and achieve sustainable

development and targeted economic and social

development measures.


8/598

Target 2030

The 2030 vision encompasses . . . a national port systemthat will contribute to consistently reducinginternational and domestic transport costs by:

Being able to accommodate the ships that will provide the lowest sea-freight costs

Serving ships promptly and effectively without causing undue delay

Ensuring high levels of cargo handling productivity

Optimizing the cost of port service delivery

By 2030, 16 of Indonesias main container ports willneed to provide additional capacity. This includesaccommodation for 9.4 million TEU at Tanjung Priok, 4.3million TEU at Tanjung Perak, 1.9 million TEU atBelawan/Kuala Tanjung and 0.9 million TEU at Makassar.


9/599

Target 2030 (2)

Total investment cost for Indonesias main ports(US$ 19.2 billion):

70-75 % (private sector) and 25-30 % (public sector)

Container,

11,517

Petroleum,

3,470

Coal, 2,491

Cruise, 122


10/5910

CHAPTER 2 : PRESENT/CURRENT PORTCONDITIONS

2.1. Policy Framework

2.2. Port Traffic, Facilities and Operations


11/5911

Policy Framework

Shipping Law No. 17/2008 and GR 61/2009

Masterplan of acceleration and expansion of Indonesiaeconomic development/ Indonesia economic corridor(MP3EI)

National Transportation System (SISTRANAS)

Blueprint of Intermoda/Multimoda Transport KM 15/2010Blueprint National Logistics System (Draft)

National Spatial Plan Act No. 26/2008

Economic Zone of Industries (KEK) Act. No. 39/2009

Investment of Capital Act. No. 25/2007

Fairness of Competation Act. No. 5/1999

Regional Government Act. No. 32/2004

National Development Planning (RPJM, RPJP)

Presidential Regulation No. 67/2005 and 13/2010 (PPP)

International Conventions related to port affair


12/5912

Indonesian Port Traffic by Trade Flow andCargo Type (000s tons) 2009 (= 930 Mil. Ton)

-

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

General

Cargo

Container Dry Bulk Liquid Bulk

Loading 55,430 13,610 123,771 19,675

Unloading 55,430 13,613 123,743 19,675

Export 14,212 30,342 303,133 94,769

Import 18,628 30,658 9,719 41,954

0

00'stons

-20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

140,000

160,000

180,000

General Cargo Container Cargo Liquid Bulk

1999 70,966 27,692 148,644

2009 143,699 88,222 176,072

000'stons

-

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

1999 2009

Dry Bulk 95,176 560,366

000'stons


13/5913

Indonesian Top 50 Ports for Total Traffic byTrade Flow, 2009 (000s tons)

Legend:

Export

Import

Unloading

Loading

60,000

30,000


14/5914

Indonesian Top 50 Ports for Total Traffic byCargo Type, 2009 (000s tons)

Legend:

General Cargo

Container

Dry Bulk

Liquid Bulk

60,000

30,000


15/5915

CHAPTER 3 : NATIONAL PORT POLICY


16/5916

National Port Policy

Greater parcipitation of private sector, fair competition inproviding maritime transport services (including portservices), regional government autonomy, accountabilityof government institution governance, and greater concernfor maritime safety and security and environmental

preservation for the sake of national interest.As node of transportation network, gateway for economic

activities, interfaces of multimodal transport, promotingindustry and trading activities, cargo consolidation centre,promoting wawasan nusantara

Separation of regulator and operator functions (reflectedby establishing of PA/PMU and Port Business Entity)

PA/PMU shall be landlord authority and shall be clearlyreflected in the establishment of PA/PMU

PA shall have a certain degree of autonomy in organizingcommercial port


17/59

17

National Port Policy (2)

Increasing PSP under fair competition environment

PSP could be in term of PPP through concessionagreement or other form of cooperation with PA/PMU

Restructure the status of Pelindo versus the role of PA

landlord organisations and as regulatorsClear guidelines on the formulation of operational

regulations by PA/PMU

The Ministry develops port policies related to: Planning and development of basic infrastructure including port

entrances, lighthouses, aid to navigation, port basin, and breakwater

Planning and development of ports (location, function, type of management

Planning and development of port hinterland connection

Procedure of new port development (greenfield) andnew public terminal shall be clearly formulated


18/59

18

CHAPTER 4 : FUTURE PORT DEVELOPMENT

4.1. Strategic Environment

4.2. Forecast of Indonesia Port Traffic


19/59

19

Future Trend of Port Demand

Method Framework for Traffic Forecasting

Data

Voyage data; maritime traffic by port pair, 2009

Socio economic data (GRDP, population, etc.) & Ports statistics

Growth of specific commodities demand and productions

Modeling

Commodity Type (11 types)

Port-pair OD Matrix Development & Port Demand Identification

Modeling Port Demand by Commodity Type Intl & DomesticTraffic (for national level)

Prediction

Prediction of Future condition (MP3EI, specific commodity trend)

Prediction of Future Port Demand by Commodity Type

Assigning National Port Demand to Specific Ports


20/59

20

Future Trend of Container Demand

International Traffic, Modeling based on Other Countries & Indonesia GDP

Domestic Traffic, by Indonesia GDP

High growth of container demand also resulted from containerization ofgeneral cargo

It is predicted that national container demand on 2030 might reach 29.4Million TEUs of International Traffic (6.2 Million TEUs on 2009) and 18.3

Million TEUs of Domestic Traffic (2.7 Million TEUs on 2009)

-

5,000

10,000

15,00020,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

50,000

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2

026

2

027

2028

20

29

20

30

000'sTEUs

Year

Domestic

International


21/59

21

Future Trend of Port Demand by Commodity Type

Type of cargo Foreign Domestic Total Foreign Domestic Total Foreign Domestic Total Foreign Domestic Total

General Cargo 32,840 110,859 143,699 39,213 148,562 187,775 43,294 180,748 224,043 50,245 242,911 293,155

Container 61,000 27,223 88,222 106,894 65,626 172,519 157,271 100,020 257,291 294,234 183,446 477,680

Dry Bulk 312,852 247,514 560,366 328,918 342,135 671,053 310,318 438,906 749,224 284,436 675,731 960,167

Cement 144 14,941 15,085 6,700 21,925 28,625 8,757 28,655 37,411 14,264 48,947 63,210

Coal 279,303 139,349 418,652 279,303 203,330 482,633 250,000 272,101 522,101 200,000 443,224 643,224

Iron Ore 10,531 91 10,623 13,714 400 14,114 16,686 1,000 17,686 23,537 2,000 25,537

Fertilizer 5,162 30,665 35,828 7,323 39,934 47,257 9,346 48,586 57,932 14,514 68,536 83,050

Grain 3,832 2,343 6,175 4,316 2,639 6,954 4,672 2,885 7,557 5,422 3,348 8,770

Other Dry Bulk 13,879 60,124 74,003 17,562 73,907 91,469 20,858 85,679 106,537 26,700 109,676 136,376

Liquid Bulk 136,723 39,349 176,072 178,042 52,718 230,759 216,653 65,700 282,353 315,952 97,252 413,204

Petroleum& Products 91,110 385 91,495 118,649 501 119,151 144,355 610 144,965 213,681 903 214,584

CPO 22,438 38,485 60,923 30,069 51,574 81,643 37,471 64,271 101,742 55,467 95,136 150,603

Other Liquid Bulk 23,175 479 23,654 29,323 642 29,965 34,827 819 35,646 46,805 1,213 48,017

Total 543,415 424,946 968,361 653,066 609,040 1,262,107 727,537 785,374 1,512,911 944,867 1,199,340 2,144,207

Averag e ann ual gro wth rate (%)

General Cargo - - - 3.0 5.0 4.6 2.0 4.0 3.6 1.5 3.0 2.7

Container - - - 9.8 15.8 11.8 8.0 8.8 8.3 6.5 6.3 6.4

Dry Bulk - - - 0.8 5.5 3.0 (1.2) 5.1 2.2 (0.9) 4.4 2.5

Cement - - - 89.7 6.6 11.3 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.4

Coal - - - - 6.5 2.4 (2.2) 6.0 1.6 (2.2) 5.0 2.1

Iron Ore - - - 4.5 27.9 4.9 4.0 20.1 4.6 3.5 7.2 3.7

Fertilizer - - - 6.0 4.5 4.7 5.0 4.0 4.2 4.5 3.5 3.7

Grain - - - 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.6 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.5

Other Dry Bulk - - - 4.0 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.0 3.1 2.5 2.5 2.5

Liquid Bulk - - -

Petroleum& Products - - - 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

CPO - - - 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0

Other Liquid Bulk - - - 4.0 5.0 4.0 3.5 5.0 3.5 3.0 4.0 3.0

Total - - - 3.1 6.2 4.5 2.2 5.2 3.7 2.6 4.3 3.5

Source: Prepared by Nathan Associates Inc. as described in text.

2020Type of Trade

2030Type of TradeType of Trade

2009 2015Type of Trade


22/59

22


by Economic Corridor Development Area, ForecastingYear 2030 (tons), Base Case

General Cargo

Container

Cement

Coal

Iron Ore

Fertilizer

Grain

Other Dry Bulk

Petrolium& Product

CPO

Other Liquid Bulk

Legend:

500,000

250,000


23/59

23


Assignment to specific port; container in TEUs

5,000,000

2,500,000

2009

2015

2020

2030


24/59

24

Future Trend

Implications of Indonesia Port Traffic Forecast:

By 2020 Indonesia container traffic will be more than double2009 volumes and will double again by 2030.

New and expanded container terminals are urgently requiredin many locations.

Slower growth of dry and liquid bulk traffic means that totalcargo tonnage will only increase by 50 percent by 2020 and

another 50 percent by 2030.

Additional bulk port capacity will be needed in some locationsand may be undertaken by private sector.


25/59

25

Method Frameworkfor InvestmentRequirement

1

Collect and analyze information on existing and planned port facilitiesincluding meters of berth and depth

2

Separate facility data into specialized container facilities, conventionalberths used for containers and general cargo berths

3

Review overall container and general cargo productivity factors by typeand size of facility

4

Estimate existing container and general cargo capacity and compare withexisting throughput (calculate capacity utilization)

5

Identify potential for productivity improvements over time due toimproved operations and more and higher capacity cranes and anothercargo handling equipment

6 Recalculate capacity utilization based on assumed productivity increases

7

If additional capacity needed for container demand and excess capacityexists for general cargo; convert additional conventional berths tocontainer

8

If still additional capacity is needed to accommodate forecastedcontainer demand, assume construction of new berth(s) with a minimumlength of 200m and associated yard and equipment

9 Calculate unit costs for new container berth and associated yard andequipment based on differentiated cost assumptions analysis forindividual ports

10 Calculate investment requirements for additional container capacity fornew construction and for conversion of conventional berths to containeruse

11

Identify specific year that additional capacity needs to come on -line.

12 Identify potential for private sector investment and requirements forpublic investment


26/59

26

CHAPTER 5 : PORT DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION

PLAN

5.1. National Port Development Implementation Plan

5.2. Collector and Feeder Port Implementation Plan

5.3. Human Resources (Implementation Strategy forContinuous and Sustainable Training Program onPort Sector) and Institutional Development

5.4. Technology Development for Port Managementand Operation

5.5. Port Development Investments (Investment PlanDirection)


27/59

27

National Port Development

Implementation Plan

Port Location and Development Needs in 2030

Prioritized Actions for Connectivity and Port

Infrastructure Development to Support the

Program of Indonesia Indonesia EconomicCorridor 2030

a. Port Development Stage in the Short Term

b. Port Development Stage in the Middle Termc. Port Development Stage in the Long Term


28/59

28

Collector and Feeder Port Development

Implementation Plan

The Divestiture Policy Implementation:

Port management capacity building (PMU, Local

Government, DGST)

Funding capital repair and improvement by

central government

Long term liabilities (maintenance including

dredging)


29/59

29

Collector and Feeder Port

Strategy Implementation

Careful clustering of ports

mixing attractive ports

with some less attractive

ports

Provision of additional

subsidy to make the

ports more attractive

A process to deregister

and abandon

unnecessary ports


30/59

30

Institutional Development

How the PA

should be

established

Art 165:3 of the GR

No 61/2009

Internasional best

practices

Art 344 (3) of theShipping Law

No.17/2008

Legal Status as

provided in Shipping

Law

Role and duties

MOTs Letter No. HK003/1/11/Phb 2011

Dated 06/5/2011 to

PELINDOS

Legal

Status

Organization

and working

procedure

Working

area

coverage

MOT Regulation No.

Km 63/2011

Future org. struct

ESTABLISHMENT OF PA


31/59

31

International Best Practices for PortAuthority Organisation

PA is characterized by creating automous PA

which should be:

Financially independent

Have their own personnel scheme

Have a management that is responsible for and

held accountable performance by board


32/59

32

Legal Status of PA (as Provided in theShipping Law)

Full Government Agency (Line agency operatingport)

Its responsibilities directly goes to the TransportMinister

Its personnels are civil servant (PNS)

Its income serves as state income

Its Organization structure based on MENPANRegulation

PA/PMU as a landlord authority shall be clearlyreflected in the establishment of PA/PMU


33/59

33

PAs Role and Duties as Landlord Authorityand Regulator

Right to manage port

land and water area

(Art. 85)

Granting

concession or

otherProviding

land andwater area

Master

Planning

Regulating &

supervising port

land utilization

Providing and

maitaining basic

infra structure

Ensuring safety,security and

environ mental

preservation


34/59

34

Organisation Structure

(Short-Term MENPAN Guidance)

Executive Director

Corporate Services CustomerServices Planning and PortDevelopment

Accounting; Finance/Asst

Mngmt; Legal/Risk Mngt;

Personnel; Purchasing;Payroll; Informt Servics

(MLS; Port Infmt

Services)

Property Mngm; Lease

Agreement/Licences;

Ops Management;Field Offices; Safety/

Security: Corporate

Commnunication

Planning (Master Plan

ning; Strategic Planning)

Marketing and Sales;

Engineering; Environ

mental Management


35/59

35

Future Organisation Structure

(with BLU Status)

Board of Directotrs

Executive Director

Corporate Services Customer ServicesMarketig and

Promotion

Master Planning

and Development


36/59

36

Technology Development for Port

Management and Operation

Adopting International best practices: Providing modern infrastructure

Highly efficient services level (one stop total

services, distribution and logistics consolidation center).

Technology Information Communication (TIC), including

NSW, CITOS, CIMOS, PORTNET, EDI, VTIS, etc.


37/59

37

West Kalimantan No Strategic Ports, regionalports centred around Pontianak (illustration)


38/59

38

Port Development Investments

2015 2020 2030 Total

North SumateraBelawan/Kuala Tanjung 218 218 655 1,092

Teluk Bayur - - - -

Pekanbaru 12 109 - 121

Batam - - 109 109

West Kalimantan

Pontianak - - 100 100

South Sumatera

Palembang - - 154 154

Panjang - - 80 80Jambi - - 80 80

East-Sou th Kalimantan -

Balikpapan - 166 - 166

Samarinda 100 - 100 201

Banjarmasin 56 - 120 177

South Sulawesi

Makassar - - 300 300

Region and port

JavaTg. Perak 697 349 2,441 3,487

Tg. Emas 70 122 610 802

Tg. Priok 731 610 2,926 4,267

Bali- NT

Benoa - - - -

The East -

Bitung - - 131 131

Jayapura - - 81 81Merauke - - - -

Ambon - - 88 88

Pantoloan - - - -

Sorong - - 81 81

Total above ports 1,886 1,574 8,057 11,517

Source: Nathan Associates Inc. as described in text.

2015 2020 2030 Total

Region and port

Container Port Investments for Main Indonesia Container Ports, 2015-2030 (US$ millions)


39/59

39

Port Development Investments (2)

Investment Requirements for Indonesia Main Ports by

Cargo Type, 2011-2030 (US$ million)

Port Container CPO Petroleum Coal Cruise Total

North and West Sumatera

Belawan/Kuala Tanjung 1,092 1,092

Dumai - 124 118 - - 242Teluk Bayur - 257 45 - - 302

Pekanbaru 121 - - - 121

Batam 109 - - - 109

Pembuangan - 134 117 - - 251

Sibolga - 37 16 - - 53

Aceh - 222 - - 222

Bintan - 46 - - 46

Teluk Tapang - 54 - - 54

West K alimantam

Pontianak (S. Pemuju) 100 - - - - 100

Tlk Air - 60 38 - - 98

South Sumatera

Palembang and Environs 154 173 1,106 - 1,433

Panjang 80 22 - - 102

Jambi 80 - - - 80

Bengkulu - 15 14 - - 29

Tlk Semangka - - 137 - - 137Bangka/Belitung - - 663 - - 663


40/59

40




East-So uth Kalimantan

Balikpapan & Environs 166 48 39 578 - 831

Samarinda 201 30 - - - 231Banjarmasin 177 412 199 807 - 1,595

Sangkulirang - - - - -

Sout h -Central Sulawesi

Makassar 300 36 66 - - 402

Pare-Pare - - 54 - - 54

Luwuk and Environs - 7 7 - - 14

Java

Tanjung Priok & Environs 4,267 - 377 - - 4,644Tanjung Perak & Environs 3,487 8 152 - - 3,647

Tanjung Emas 802 - - - -

Pelabuhan Ratu - - - - -

Balongan/Cirebon - - 221 - - 221

Cilacap - - 81 - - 81

Jepara (Tg Jati) - - 184 - - 184

13 Other Locations - - 797 - - 797

Bali-NT

Tanah Ampo - - - 122 122

Port Container CPO Petroleum Coal Cruise Total


41/59

41




The East

Bitung 131 - - - - 131

Jayapura 81 - 15 - - 96Merauke - - 26 - - 26

Ambon 88 - 31 - - 119

Sorong 81 - 17 - - 98

Halmahera (Ujung Pulau) - 10 10 - - 20

Total 11,517 1,649 3,470 2,491 122 19,249

Port Container CPO Petro leum Coal Cruise Total

Container,

11,517

Petroleum,

3,470

Coal, 2,491

Cruise, 122


42/59

42

Indicative Funding Requirements by Private and Public Sector forDevelopment of Port Facilities, 2011-2030 (US$ millions of 2010)

Estimated

Type of Capital Private Private

Facility Requirements Sector Gov't Sector Gov't

Container 11,517 75% 25% 8,638 2,879CPO 1,649 85% 15% 1,402 247

Petroleum 3,470 85% 20% 2,950 694

Coal 2,491 85% 20% 2,117 498

Cruise 122 50% 50% 61 61

Total 19,249 15,168 4,380

Source: Nathan Associates Inc.

Sh are L ikely Fu nd ed b y Amo un t Req uired f ro m


43/59

43

TERIMA KASIH


44/59

44

Main container ports forecasted traffic

2009 2015 2020 2030 2009 2015 2020 2030

North Sumatera

Belawan/Kuala Tanjung 4,062.8 5,309.0 6,334.4 8,288.4 888.4 1,737.3 2,591.0 4,810.4

Teluk Bayur 927.4 1,211.8 1,445.9 1,891.9 42.1 82.3 122.7 227.7

Pekanbaru 229.7 300.2 358.2 468.7 73.1 143.0 213.3 396.0

Batam 2,305.8 3,013.0 3,594.9 4,703.9 104.2 203.7 303.8 564.0

West Kalimantan

Pontianak 338.8 442.7 528.2 691.1 99.2 194.1 289.4 537.4

South Sumatera

Palembang 296.1 386.9 461.7 604.1 62.0 121.2 180.8 335.7

Panjang 760.4 993.7 1,185.6 1,551.3 301.7 590.0 880.0 1,633.7Jambi 140.8 183.9 219.5 287.2 32.0 62.5 93.2 173.0

East-South Kalimantan

Balikpapan 924.7 1,208.3 1,441.7 1,886.4 38.1 74.5 111.1 206.2

Samarinda 639.0 835.0 996.3 1,303.7 95.0 185.9 277.2 514.6

Banjarmasin 809.4 1,057.6 1,261.9 1,651.2 118.0 230.8 344.1 638.9

South Sulawesi

Makassar 1,166.1 1,523.8 1,818.1 2,379.0 456.2 892.0 1,330.4 2,469.9

Java

Tg. Perak 3,763.7 4,918.1 5,867.9 7,678.1 1,744.3 3,411.1 5,087.2 9,444.7

Tg. Emas 703.9 919.8 1,097.4 1,436.0 575.2 1,124.9 1,677.6 3,114.6Tg. Priok 6,686.0 8,736.7 10,424.1 13,639.8 3,922.8 7,671.0 11,440.4 21,239.9

Bali- NT

Benoa 10.0 13.0 15.6 20.3 5.7 11.2 16.7 31.0

The East

Bitung 1,043.2 1,363.1 1,626.5 2,128.3 62.6 122.3 182.5 338.8

Jayapura 63.7 83.3 99.4 130.0 27.8 54.4 81.1 150.5

Merauke 100.8 131.7 157.2 205.7 10.1 19.8 29.5 54.8

Ambon 307.4 401.6 479.2 627.8 15.2 29.8 44.4 82.5

Pantoloan 10.9 14.3 17.0 22.3 3.4 6.6 9.9 18.4

Sorong 319.3 417.3 497.8 651.4 22.0 42.9 64.0 118.9

Total above ports 25,610 33,465 39,929 52,247 8,699 17,011 25,370 47,102


Region and port

GenCar (000 tons) Container (000 TEU)


45/59

45

Container Terminal Berth Capacity Indicators, 2009-2025

Year Type o f Berth

Berth

Length

(m)

Depth

Alon gside

(m)

Berths

per

Terminal

Design

Ship

(TEU)

Berth

Capacity

(TEU/ Berth)

Berth-m

Capacity

(TEU/m)

2009 Multipurpose 150 10-11 2 1,000 100,000 667

2009 Sub Panamax 250 12 3 3,000 350,000 1,400

2012 Panamax 280 14 3 4,500 450,000 1,607

2012 Panamax 280 14 4 4,500 495,000 1,768

2014 Post Panamax I 300 15 3 5,700 500,000 1,667

2014 Post Panamax I 300 15 4 5,700 550,000 1,833

2017 Post Panamax II 350 16 4 8,000 700,000 2,000

2025 Post Panamax III 400 16-18 4 12,000 1,000,000 2,500

Source: Nathan Associates Inc.


46/59

46

Capacity Analysis for Main Indonesian Container Ports, 2015

Leng th TEU/ m Capac it y

(000 teu)

L en gt h TEU/

m

Capacity

(000 teu)

Total Capacity

(000 teu)

Capacity

Utiliz. %

L en gt h To ns /

m

Capacity

(000 tons)

Capacity

Utiliz. %

TEU

(000s)

Berth

(m)

North Su matera

Belawan/Kuala Tanjung 850 1300 1,105 242 650 157 1,262 138% 2,180 2,520 5,493 97% 475 400

Teluk Bayur 222 845 188 - 650 - 188 44% 838 2,520 2,112 57% - -

Pekanbaru - 845 - 217 650 141 141 101% 145 2,520 365 82% 2 36

Batam 845 - 428 650 278 278 73% 1,714 2,520 4,318 70% - -

West Kalimantan

Pontianak 405 845 342 - 650 - 342 57% 422 2,520 1,063 42% - -

South Sumatera

Palembang 266 845 225 - 650 - 225 54% 475 2,520 1,197 32% - -

Panjang 848 975 827 - 650 - 827 71% 532 2,520 1,341 74% - -

Jambi - 845 - 88 650 57 57 110% 350 2,520 883 21% 6 -

East-Sout h Kalimantan 845 650 2,520

Balikpapan - 845 - 98 650 64 64 117% 491 2,520 1,238 98% 11 -

Samarinda - 845 - 234 650 152 152 122% 703 2,520 1,771 47% 34 200

Banjarmasin 240 845 203 156 650 102 304 76% 469 2,520 1,181 90% - 156

South Sulawesi

Makassar 850 1300 1,105 210 650 137 1,242 72% 735 2,520 1,852 82% - -

Java

Tg. Perak 1,870 1300 2,431 235 650 152 2,583 132% 7,281 2,520 18,347 27% 828 800

Tg. Emas 495 1300 644 687 650 446 1,090 103% 384 2,520 969 95% 35 192

Tg. Priok 3,308 1625 5,376 800 650 520 5,896 130% 5,845 2,520 14,729 59% 1,776 1,200

Bali- NT

Benoa - 845 - 41 650 27 27 42% 206 2,520 519 3% - -

The East 845 650 2,520

Bitung 225 845 190 - 650 - 190 64% 1,187 2,520 2,991 46% - -

Jayapura - 845 - 86 650 56 56 98% 128 2,520 324 26% - -

Merauke - 845 - 102 650 66 66 30% 152 2,520 384 34% - -

Ambon - 845 - 58 650 37 37 80% 851 2,520 2,146 19% - -

Pantoloan - 845 - 30 650 20 20 34% 573 2,520 1,444 1% - -

Sorong - 845 - 85 650 55 55 78% 197 2,520 497 84% - -Total above ports 3,165 2,985


Region and port

ConventionalTotal Cont.Container General Cargo

TPK ConventionalAdd iti on al

Cont. Capacity


47/59

47


L en g th TEU/ m C ap ac it y

(000 teu)

L en g th TEU / m C ap ac it y

(000 teu)

Total

Capacity

(000 teu)

Capacity

Utiliz. %

L en g th To n s/ m Cap ac it y

(000 tons)

Capacity

Utiliz. %

TEU

(000s)

Berth

(m)

North Su matera

Belawan/Kuala Tanjung 1,250 1,625 2,031 242 813 197 2,228 116% 2,180 3,528 7,690 82% 363 400

Teluk Bayur 222 1,056 234 - 813 - 234 52% 838 3,528 2,956 49% - -

Pekanbaru - 1,056 - 217 813 176 176 121% 145 3,528 511 70% 37 200

Batam - 1,056 - 428 813 348 348 87% 1,714 3,528 6,046 59% - -

West Kalimantan

Pontianak 405 1,056 428 - 813 - 428 68% 422 3,528 1,489 35% - -

South Su materaPalembang 266 1,056 281 - 813 - 281 64% 475 3,528 1,676 28% - -

Panjang 848 1,625 1,378 - 813 - 1,378 64% 532 3,528 1,877 63% - -

Jambi - 1,056 - 88 813 71 71 131% 350 3,528 1,236 18% 22 -

East-South Kalimantan 1,056 813 3,528

Balikpapan - 1,056 - 98 813 79 79 140% 491 3,528 1,733 83% 32 200

Samarinda 200 1,056 211 234 813 190 402 69% 703 3,528 2,479 40% - -

Banjarmasin 240 1,056 254 156 813 127 380 90% 469 3,528 1,654 76% - -

South Su lawesi

Makassar 850 1,625 1,381 210 813 171 1,552 86% 735 3,528 2,593 70% - -

Java

Tg. Perak 2,670 1,625 4,339 235 813 191 4,529 112% 7,281 3,528 25,686 23% 558 400Tg. Emas 495 1,625 804 687 813 558 1,362 123% 384 3,528 1,356 81% 315 200

Tg. Priok 4,508 2,031 9,157 800 813 650 9,807 117% 5,845 3,528 20,621 51% 1,634 1,000

Bali- NT

Benoa - 1,056 - 41 813 33 33 50% 206 3,528 727 2% - -

The East 1,056 813 3,528

Bitung 225 1,056 238 - 813 - 238 77% 1,187 3,528 4,188 39% - -

Jayapura - 1,056 - 86 813 70 70 117% 128 3,528 453 22% 12 -

Merauke - 1,056 - 102 813 83 83 36% 152 3,528 538 29% - -

Ambon - 1,056 - 58 813 47 47 95% 851 3,528 3,004 16% - -

Pantoloan - 1,056 - 30 813 24 24 40% 573 3,528 2,021 1% - -

Sorong - 1,056 - 85 813 69 69 93% 197 3,528 696 71% - -

Total above ports 2,972 2,400


Region and port

Total Cont.Convent ional Convent ional

Add iti on al Co nt .

Capacity

Container General Cargo

TPK


48/59

48


Length TEU/ m Capac ity

(000 teu)

L en g th TEU/ m C ap ac it y

(000 teu)

Total

Capacity

(000 teu)

Capacity

Utiliz. %

L en g th To n s/ m Cap ac it y

(000 tons)

Capacity

Utiliz. %

TEU

(000s)

Berth

(m)

North Sumatera

Belawan/Kuala Tanjung 1,650 1,625 2,681 242 813 197 2,878 167% 2,180 4,939 10,766 77% 1,932 1,200

Teluk Bayur 222 1,056 234 - 813 - 234 97% 838 4,939 4,139 46% - -

Pekanbaru 200 1,219 244 217 813 176 420 94% 145 4,939 715 66% - -

Batam - 1,219 - 428 813 348 348 162% 1,714 4,939 8,464 56% 216 200

West Kalimantan

Pontianak 405 1,219 494 - 813 - 494 109% 422 4,939 2,084 33% 44 200

South SumateraPalembang 266 1,056 281 - 813 - 281 119% 475 4,939 2,346 26% 55 200

Panjang 848 1,625 1,378 - 813 - 1,378 119% 532 4,939 2,628 59% 256 200

Jambi - 1,056 - 88 813 71 71 243% 350 4,939 1,731 17% 102 200

East-Sout h Kalimantan 1,056 813 4,939

Balikpapan 200 1,056 211 98 813 79 291 71% 491 4,939 2,426 78% - -

Samarinda 200 1,219 244 234 813 190 434 119% 703 4,939 3,471 38% 81 200

Banjarmasin 240 1,219 293 156 813 127 419 152% 469 4,939 2,315 71% 219 200

South Sulawesi

Makassar 850 1,625 1,381 210 813 171 1,552 159% 735 4,939 3,630 66% 918 600

Java

Tg. Perak 3,070 1,625 4,989 235 813 191 5,179 182% 7,281 4,939 35,960 21% 4,265 2,800

Tg. Emas 695 1,625 1,129 687 813 558 1,687 185% 384 4,939 1,899 76% 1,427 1,000

Tg. Priok 5,508 2,031 11,188 800 813 650 11,838 179% 5,845 4,939 28,870 47% 9,402 4,800

Bali- NT

Benoa - 1,056 - 41 813 33 33 93% 206 4,939 1,017 2% - -

The East 1,056 813 4,939

Bitung 225 1,056 238 - 813 - 238 143% 1,187 4,939 5,863 36% 101 200

Jayapura - 1,056 - 86 813 70 70 216% 128 4,939 634 21% 81 200

Merauke - 1,056 - 102 813 83 83 66% 152 4,939 753 27% - -

Ambon - 1,056 - 58 813 47 47 176% 851 4,939 4,205 15% 36 200

Pantoloan - 1,056 - 30 813 24 24 75% 573 4,939 2,829 1% - -

Sorong - 1,056 - 85 813 69 69 173% 197 4,939 975 67% 50 200Total above ports 19,185 12,600


Region and port

Addi ti on al Co nt .CapacityContainer General CargoTPK Conventional Total Cont. Convent ional


49/59

49

West Kalimantan No Strategic Ports, regionalports centred around Pontianak


50/59

50

South Sumatra no Strategic Ports, regional portscentred around Panjang and Palembang


51/59

51

East and South Kalimantan Strategic Ports:Balikpapan, Samarinda and Banjarmasin


52/59

52

South Sulawesi Ports & Terminals centredaround Makassar, no Strategic Ports


53/59

53

Java, South Sumatra Strategic Ports Regions Jakarta(Tanjung Priok) and Surabaya (Tanjung Perak)


54/59

54

Bali, Lombok, Nusa Tenggara and to the southand east No strategic ports


55/59

55

The East Strategic Ports: Bitung, Ambon andSorong


56/59

56

The East Strategic Ports: Bitung, Ambon and


57/59

57

Assumed Indonesian Port ProductivityFactors by Type of Facility, 2009-2030

Type of cargo and terminal 2009 2015 2020 2030

Containers (TEU/ m of berth)

Specialized Terminal

Tanjung Priok 1,250 1,625 2,031 2,031

Other ports over 750,000 TEU 1,000 1,300 1,625 1,625

Other ports 300,000-750,000 TEU 750 975 1,219 1,219

Other ports under 300,000 TEU 650 845 1,056 1,056

Conventional Terminal 500 650 813 813

General cargo (tons/ m of b erth) 1,800 2,520 3,528 4,939



58/59

58

Assumed Indonesian Port Productivity Factorsby Type of Facility, 2009-2030 (2)

Incorporated improvements in the productivityfactors to reflect: projected increases in traffic volumes

increased vessel sizes

provision of higher capacity cranes and more overall cargo-

handling equipment improved training and performance of operators


59/59

Assumed Indonesian Port Productivity Factorsby Type of Facility, 2009-2030 (3)

Productivity is assumed to improve : Container :30 % ( 2009 - 2015) ; 25 % 2015 - 2020.

General cargo : 40 % (2009 through 2030.

This is due to factors cited above, plus the greater use of unitized or

palletized cargo handling in place of individual bags for break-bulk cargo.

The rate of general cargo handling per meter ofberth is only 4.9 thousand tons in 2030,

The handling of containerized cargo at conventional

terminals of 8.1 thousand tons per meter of berth(assuming an average of 10 tons per TEU).

Cargo at a specialized container terminal has anassumed productivity in 2030 of over 20 thousandtons per meter of berth

Documents

201109070942290.IndII FGD (1) NPMP Presentation 9 August 2011 Final