54
1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

1Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

Page 2: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

2Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks (WMSNs)

Networks of wirelessly interconnected devices that allow retrieving video and audio streams, still images, and scalar sensor data.

Also able to store process in real-time, correlate and fuse multimedia data originated from heterogeneous sources.

Page 3: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

3Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

(a) Single-tier flat, homogeneous sensors, distributed processing,centralized storage

(b) Single-tier clustered, heterogeneous sensors, centralized processing, centralized storage

(c) Multi-tier, heterogeneous sensors,distributed processing, distributed storage

Internet Internet

Gateway

Multimedia processing hub

Video sensor

Audio sensorHigh end videosensor

Wireless gateway

LEGEND

Storage hub

Sink

Scalar sensor

Wireless Multimedia Sensor NetworksE. Gurses, O. B. Akan, "Multimedia Communication in Wireless Sensor Networks," Annals of Telecommunications , vol. 60, no. 7-8, pp. 799-827, July-August 2005.I.F. Akyildiz, T. Melodia, K. Chowdhury, “A Survey on Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks”, Computer Networks (Elsevier), March 2007.S. Misra, M. Reisslein, and G. Xue. A Survey of Multimedia Streaming in Wireless Sensor Networks, IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 10(3), 2008

Page 4: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

4Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

Video Sensors High-end

Stargate board interfaced with a medium resolution camera

Stargate hosts an 802.11 card and a MICAz mote that functions as gateway to the sensor network

Low-end MicaZ interfaced with Cyclops low

resolution camera CmuCam3

Page 5: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

5Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

Stargate + Garcia = Multimedia Mobile Sensor

Mobile

Onboard IR Sensors

Pan-tilt Camera

Stargate

Connects to a MICAz network

Onboard Linux Operating System

Page 6: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

6Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

CPU

POWER UNIT

MEMORY SENSORS

CAMERA

SCALAR SENSORS

MOBILITY/ ACTUATION UNIT

SERVOS

MOTORS

COMMUNICATION SUBSYSTEM

SYSTEM SOFTWARE AND MIDDLEWARE

NETWORKINTERFACE

STACK

LOCATION MANAGEMENT

MOTION CONTROLLER

NETWORK SYNCHRONIZATION

COORDINATION SUBSYSTEM

AUDIO

ENERGY HARVESTING

Multimedia Sensor Hardware

Page 7: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

7Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

APPLICATIONS Tracking Home Automation Environmental monitoring Multimedia Surveillance Sensor Networks (against crime

and terrorist attacks, law enforcement agencies to monitor areas, public events, private properties and borders).

Page 8: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

8Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

APPLICATIONS Storage of Potentially Relevant Activities.

Thefts, car accidents, traffic violations Make video/audio streams or reports available for future query

Traffic Avoidance, Enforcement and Control Systems Smart parking advice systems Monitor the flow of vehicular traffic on highways (avg. speed, no. of

cars) Monitor accidents for subsequent accident scene analysis

Page 9: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

9Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

APPLICATIONS Advanced Health Care Delivery

Patients will carry medical sensors to monitor parameters such as body temperature, blood pressure, pulse oximetry, breathing activity

Automated Assistance for the Elderly and Family Monitors

Environmental Monitoring (acoustic and video feeds)

Person Locator Services (locate missing persons)

Industrial Process Control

Page 10: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

10Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

WMSNs CHALLENGES Resource Constraints

Sensor devices are constrained in terms of battery, memory processing capability, and achievable data rate

Variable Channel Capacity

Application-Specific QoS Requirements

High Bandwidth Demand

Data rate for sensors 250Kbps; much more higher rates are required for multimedia sensors

Page 11: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

11Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

WMSNs CHALLENGES Multimedia Source Coding Techniques

Uncompressed raw video streams require excessive BW

e.g., a single monochrome frame in the NTSC-based Quarter Common Intermediate Format (QCIF, 176x120), requires around 21 Kbytes, and at 30 frames/sec, a video stream requires over 5 Mbps!

Traditional video coding techniques are based on the idea of reducing the bit rate generated by the source encoder by exploiting source statistics

Page 12: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

12Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

WMSNs CHALLENGES Encoders --> intra-frame compression techniques

Reduce redundancy within one frame

Leverage inter-frame compression (also known as predictive encoding or motion estimation)

Predictive encoding requires

Complex encoders

Powerful processing algorithms

High energy

Not suited for low-cost multimedia sensors

Page 13: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

13Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

WMSNs CHALLENGES Multimedia In-network Processing.

Need for new multimedia in-network processing algorithms

New architectures for collaborative, distributed, and resource-constrained processing

Increase the system scalability Reduce redundant informationMerge data from multiple views, on different media,

and with multiple resolutions

Page 14: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

14Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

WMSNs CHALLENGES Power Consumption

Multimedia applications produce high volumes of data, which require high transmission rates, and extensive processing

Integration with Internet (IP) Architecture and Other Wireless Technologies (to retrieve useful information from anywhere and at any time)

Protocols, algorithms and architectures Maximize the network lifetime AND Provide the QoS required by the application

Page 15: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

15Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

Examples of Deployed WMSNs Panoptes

W. Feng, B., Code, E. Kaiser, M. Shea, L. Bavoil, “Panoptes: Scalable Low Power Video Sensor Networking Technologies”, Proc. of ACM Multimedia Conf., Nov 2003.

SensEye P. Kulkarni, D. Ganesan, P. Shenoy, “SensEye: A Multi-tier Camera Sensor

Network”, Proc. of ACM Multimedia, Nov. 2005

IrisNet IrisNet (Internet-scale Resource-Intensive Sensor Network Services)

S. Nath, Y. Ke, P. Gibbons, B. Karp and S. Seshan, ”A Distributed Filtering Architecture for Multimedia Sensors”, Intel Tech. Rept, Aug 2004.

Page 16: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

16Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

Panoptes Environmental observation and surveillance applications

Intel StrongARM PDA platforms with a Logitech webcam

Video sensors are high-end devices with Linux, 64 Mbytes of memory connected through 802.11 cards.

Spatial compression (but not temporal), distributed filtering, buffering, and adaptive priorities for the video stream.

Page 17: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

17Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

SensEye

Tier 1

Tier 2

Tier 3

Scalar Sensors + Mote

Low-res cam + Mote

Webcam + Stargate

Video stream

handoff

wakeup

wakeup

Page 18: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

18Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

IrisNet Wide-area sensor network

Internet-like queries to video and other data on this infrastructure

Video sensors and scalar sensors are spread throughout the environment, and collect potentially useful data.

User views the sensor network as a single unit that can be queried

Each query operates over data collected from the sensor network

Allows simple Google-like queries as well as more complex queries involving arithmetic and database operators

Page 19: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

19Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

COMMUNICATION PROTOCOLS

Application LayerApplication Layer

Transport LayerTransport Layer

Network LayerNetwork Layer

Data Link LayerData Link Layer

Physical LayerPhysical LayerP

ow

er M

an

age

me

nt P

lan

eP

ow

er M

an

age

me

nt P

lan

e

Ta

sk M

an

age

me

nt P

lan

eT

ask

Ma

nag

em

en

t Pla

ne

Page 20: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

20Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

Application Layer Provide traffic management and admission control

functionalities Perform source coding according to application

requirements and hardware constraints, by leveraging advanced multimedia encoding techniques

Provide flexible and efficient system software Provide primitives for applications to leverage collaborative,

advanced in-network multimedia processing techniques

Page 21: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

21Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

TRAFFIC CLASSES Differentiation between traffic types

Integrated Traffic: (AUDIO, VIDEO, DATA, STILL IMAGE)

Delay in/sensitive

Jitter in/sensitive

Loss in/sensitive

Different data rate requirements

How to guarantee delay bounds and jitter bounds?

How to realize data aggregation?

Explore the tradeoffs between quality and energy consumption!!

Page 22: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

22Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

TRAFFIC CLASSES Real-time, Loss-tolerant, Multimedia Streams

Delay-tolerant, Loss-tolerant, Multimedia Streams

Real-time, Loss-tolerant, Data

Real-time, Loss-intolerant, Data

Delay-tolerant, Loss-intolerant, Data

Delay-tolerant, Loss-tolerant, Data

Page 23: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

23Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

OPEN RESEARCH ISSUES ON APPLICATION LAYER While theoretical results on Slepian-Wolf and Wiener-Ziv

coding exist since thirty years, there is still a lack of practical solutions

The net benefits and the practicality of these techniques still need to be demonstrated

Need to fully explore the tradeoffs between the achieved fidelity and energy consumption

Page 24: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

24Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

Transport Layer Protocols Overview

TCP/UDP and TCP Friendly Schemes Application Specific and Non-standard Protocols

• TCP may be preferred over UDP

unlike traditional wireless networks

• Compatible with the TCP rate control

mechanism, e.g.. STCP, MPEG-TFRCP

• Spatio-temporal reporting

• Adjusting of reporting

frequency based on

current congestion levels

e.g. ESRT

Reliability Congestion Control Use of Multipath• Better load balancing and

robustness to channel state

variability.

• Need to regulate multiple

sources monitoring the same

event

e.g. CODA, MRTP

• Per-packet delivery

guarantee for selected

packet types

• Redundancy by caching

at intermediate nodes

e.g. RMST, PSFQ, (RT)2

Page 25: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

25Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

OPEN RESEARCH ISSUES IN TRANSPORT LAYER Tradeoff between Reliability and Congestion Control

Real-Time Communication Support

Relation between Multimedia Coding Rate and Reliability

Page 26: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

26Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

NETWORK LAYER (ROUTING SOLUTIONS) Network conditions that leverage channel and link statistics

Construct paths based on packet priorities

Specialized protocols for real-time streaming that use spatio-temporal forwarding

Page 27: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

27Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

Network Condition Based Metrics

• Position wrt sink

• Radio characteristics

• Error rate

• Residual energy

• Backlogged packets

Traffic Class Based

Metrics

• QoS profiles/Traffic

classes

• Dropping rate

• Latency tolerance

• Desired bandwidth

Real Time Streaming Based Metrics

• Spatio-temporal character

• Probabilistic delay guarantees

Routing Algorithms Overview

Page 28: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

28Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

Recent Solutions QoS Routing Based on Network Conditions

L. Savidge, H. Lee, H. Aghajan, A. Goldsmith, “QoS Based Geographic Routing for Event Driven Image Sensor Networks,” Proc of BASENETs, Oct. 2005

K. Akkaya and M Younis, “An Energy Aware QoS Routing Protocol for WSNs”, Proc. of ICDSW, 2003.

Routing Protocols with Support for Streaming

T. He, J. Stankovic, C. Lu, T. Abdelzaher, “A Spatio Temporal Communication Protocol for WSNs” IEEE Tr. on Parallel and Distributed Systems, Oct 2005.

Page 29: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

29Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

Recent Solutions MMSPEED:

E. Felemban, C. G Lee, E. Ekici “MMSPEED: Multipath Multi-speed Protocol of QoS Guarantees of Reliability and Timeliness in WSNs”, IEEE Tr. on Mobile Computing, June 2006

Page 30: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

30Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

Open Research Issues in NETWORK LAYER While current research directions make an effort to provide real-time

streaming, they are still “best effort” services.

Giving firm delay guarantees in a dynamically changing network is a difficult problem and yet is important for seamless viewing of the multimedia frames.

MMSPEED takes the step towards this end by adopting a probabilistic approach… more research needed !!!

Page 31: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

31Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

Open Research Issues in NETWORK LAYER Identification of the optimal routing metrics

Most routing protocols that consider more than one metric, such as energy, delay etc., form a cost function that is then minimized.

The choice of the weights for these metrics need to be undertaken

Further work is needed to shift this decision making process and network tuning from the user end into the network

Page 32: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

32Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

MAC LAYER Channel access policies

Scheduling and buffer management

Error control

Page 33: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

33Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

Contention Free

Single Channel• TDMA -like

• Better control for multimedia

design parameters

• Simple hardware, operation

• MIMO technology

e.g.. STE, EDD

Contention Based• Coordinate sleep/awake

cycles

• Bursty nature of

scheduling may lead to

jitters

e.g.. S-MAC, T-MAC

Multi-channel• Better bandwidth utilization

• Hardware assumptions

• Channel switching delay may be

a consideration in end to end

latency

e.g.. STEM, RATE-EST, CMAC

Overview of MAC Layer Protocols

Page 34: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

34Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

CHANNEL ACCESS POLICIES Main causes of energy loss

Packet collisions

Subsequent re-transmissions

Overhearing packets

Idle listening

CHANNEL ACCESS IMPORTANT

Page 35: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

35Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

Contention-Based MAC Protocols Most contention-based protocols have a single-radio architecture.

Alternate between sleep cycles (low power modes with transceiver switched off) and listen cycles (for channel contention and data transmission).

Primary concern saving energy, at the cost of latency and by leading to throughput degradation

NOT AN ACCEPTABLE TRADEOFF FOR WMSN !

Page 36: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

36Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

Problems of Contention-Based MAC Protocols A sophisticated duty cycle calculation based on permissible

end-to-end delay needs to be implemented

Coordinating the sleep-awake cycles between neighbors is generally accomplished through schedule exchanges.

Overhead of passing frequent schedules also needs investigation in light of the ongoing high data rate video/audio messaging.

Page 37: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

37Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

Problems of Contention-Based MAC Protocols Video traffic exhibits an inherent bursty nature and can lead

to sudden buffer overflow at the receiver.

By choosing to send a burst of data during the listen cycle, T-MAC shows performance improvement over S-MAC, but at the cost of monopolizing a bottleneck node.

Such an operation could well lead to strong jitters and result in discontinuous real-time playback.

Page 38: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

38Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

Contention-Free Protocols Clusterhead (CH) or sink helps in slot assignment, querying

particular sensors and maintaining time schedules.

These protocols can be easily adapted for multimedia transmission !!!

Page 39: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

39Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

OPEN MAC RESEARCH ISSUES TDMA schedules within a cluster can be easily devised

Problem is more difficult when individual CHs are not in direct range of the sink

inter-cluster multi-hop communication needed!!

Page 40: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

40Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

OPEN MAC RESEARCH ISSUES Need non-overlapping slot assignment for all neighboring

clusters

NP-complete by reduction to an instance of graph coloring

Development of efficient heuristics is an open issue

Page 41: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

41Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

OPEN MAC RESEARCH ISSUES Effect of clock drift if the slot duration is small and rigid

time synchronization is required for best performance

Network scalability

Page 42: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

42Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

OPEN MAC RESEARCH ISSUES TDMA schedules must be able to accommodate high node

densities

As channel capacity in TDMA is fixed, only slot durations or number of slots in a frame may be changed keeping in mind the number of users and their respective traffic types.

Page 43: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

43Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

FURTHER LINK LAYER OPEN RESEARCH PROBLEMS

ERROR CONTROLFEC Which one?ARQ Depends !!Hybrid ARQ ??

Multimedia Packet Size Optimization !!

Page 44: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

44Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

PHYSICAL LAYER: Ultra Wide Band Communication UWB: as a signal with either a fractional bandwidth of

20% of the center frequency or 500 MHz (when the center frequency is above 6 GHz).

The FCC calculates the fractional bandwidth as

2(fH – fL ) / (fH + fL)

where fH represents the upper frequency of the -10 dB emission limit and fL represents the lower frequency limit of the -10 dB emission limit

Page 45: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

45Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

PHYSICAL LAYER: Ultra Wide Band Communication Low Power Consumption

High Data Rate

Higher immunity to the multi-path fading

Page 46: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

46Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

PHYSICAL LAYER: Ultra Wide Band Communication Time-Hopping Impulse Radio UWB (TH-IR-UWB)

MultiCarrier UWB (MC-UWB) based on OFDM

Page 47: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

47Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

Time-Hopping Impulse Radio UWB (TH-IR-UWB) Send very short duration pulses (in the order of hundreds of

picoseconds) to convey information

Time is divided into frames, each of which is composed of several chips of very short duration

Each sender transmits one pulse in a chip per frame only, and multi-user access is provided by pseudo-random time hopping sequences (THS) that determine in which chip each user should transmit

Page 48: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

48Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

MultiCarrier UWB (MC-UWB) based on OFDM Well-suited to avoid interference because its carrier

frequencies can be precisely chosen to avoid narrowband interference to or from narrowband systems

However, implementing a MC-UWB front-end power amplifier can be challenging due to the continuous variations in power over a very wide bandwidth

Moreover, when OFDM is used, high-speed FFT processing is necessary, which requires significant processing power and leads to complex transceivers

Page 49: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

49Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

TH-IR-UWB TH-IR-UWB signals require fast switching times for the

transmitter and receiver and highly precise synchronization

The RF front-end of an TH-IR-UWB system may resemble a digital circuit, thus circumventing many of the problems associated with mixed-signal integrated circuits.

Simple TH-IR-UWB systems can be very inexpensive to construct

Page 50: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

50Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

WHY IR-UWB for WMSNs? It enables high data rate, very low power wireless

communications, on simple-design, low-cost radios (carrierless, baseband communications)

Its fine delay resolution properties are appropriate for wireless communications in dense multipath environment, by exploiting more resolvable paths

Page 51: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

51Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

WHY IR-UWB for WMSNs? Provides large processing gain in presence of interference

Provides flexibility, as data rate can be traded for power spectral density and multi-path performance

Finding suitable codes for THS is trivial (as opposed to CDMA codes), and no assignment protocol is necessary

Page 52: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

52Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

WHY IR-UWB for WMSNs? Integrated MAC/PHY solutions are possible

Interference mitigation techniques allow realizing MAC protocols that do not require mutual temporal exclusion between different transmitters.

Simultaneous communications of neighboring devices are feasible without complex receivers as required by CDMA

Page 53: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

53Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

OPEN RESEARCH ISSUES ONPHYSICAL LAYER How to efficiently share the medium in UWB multi-hop

networks?

How to provide provable latency and throughput bounds to multimedia flows in an UWB environment

Develop analytical models to quantitatively compare different variants of UWB to determine trade-offs in their applicability to high data rate and low power consumption devices such as multimedia sensors

Page 54: 1 Wireless Sensor Networks Akyildiz/Vuran Chapter 15: Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

54Wireless Sensor Networks

Akyildiz/Vuran

OPEN RESEARCH ISSUES ONPHYSICAL LAYER Integrate UWB with advanced cognitive radio techniques to

increase the spectrum utilization

For example, UWB pulses could be adaptively shaped to occupy portions of the spectrum that are subject to lower interference