Upload
angelica-gray
View
233
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
11
Fleet Synthetic Training;A Perspective and Way Ahead
7 Sep 117 Sep 11
Fleet Synthetic Training;A Perspective and Way Ahead
7 Sep 117 Sep 11
UNCLASSIFIEDUNCLASSIFIED
SOE
• Introduction• Requirements and Mechanics• FST Strengths and Weaknesses• The Price of Admission; A Perspective on the Future of FST
33
TTGP Facilities
Bldg 59
Bldg 58
Bldg 56
Bldg 24
Bldg 61
Third Fleet
TTGP FCA Manning
PNW3 Contractors
San Diego158 Military25 GS78 ContractorsHawaii
5 Contractors
Det Yoko2 GS10 Contractors
UNCLASSIFIEDUNCLASSIFIED
44
5
TTGP Mission Statement
• As directed by the Fleet Training Strategy, As directed by the Fleet Training Strategy, train Carrier and train Carrier and Expeditionary Strike GroupsExpeditionary Strike Groups in the doctrine, tactics, techniques, and in the doctrine, tactics, techniques, and procedures for operations in an integrated Naval, Joint, and Combined procedures for operations in an integrated Naval, Joint, and Combined environment.environment.
• Conduct Conduct tactical war fighting training for officers en routetactical war fighting training for officers en route assignment as assignment as Strike Group Commanders, Commodores, Air Wing Commanders, Strike Group Commanders, Commodores, Air Wing Commanders, Commanding Officers and Staff Officers. Commanding Officers and Staff Officers.
• As As Commander Pacific FleetCommander Pacific Fleet’’s Executive Agent for the Navy Continuous s Executive Agent for the Navy Continuous Training Environment (NCTE)Training Environment (NCTE),, operate and maintain an extensive operate and maintain an extensive distributed in-port training architecture connecting the Fleet distributed in-port training architecture connecting the Fleet concentration areas in Hawaii, Washington, California and Japan and concentration areas in Hawaii, Washington, California and Japan and provide a persistent node for the Joint National Training Capability provide a persistent node for the Joint National Training Capability (JNTC).(JNTC).
• Provide Provide C4I, supply and security supportC4I, supply and security support to Point Loma tenant to Point Loma tenant commands.commands.
Carrier Strike Groups’ Training Cycle
MIS
SIO
N E
SS
EN
TIA
L T
AS
K L
IST
StrikeGroupCDR &staff
WarfareCDR &staff
Unit
JMET
BASIC PHASE
INTEGRATEDPHASE
SUSTAINMENTPHASE
FST- Unit
Warfare CmdrsCourse
FST – WarfareCmdr
Integrated ASWCourse
Group CmdrTraining
FST – Group Cmdr
COMPTUEX
FALLON
JTFEX
DEPLOYMENT
FST – Operational
FST – Sustainment
Wargame(Sim)
FST(Sim) Live U/W
4 of 9 Integrated work-up events simulation based
FST – Joint
SLAMEX
BMDEX
• Series of exercises covering wide range of training levels
• Scenario based• Scalable• Distributed
– Ships/crews at home station
Fleet Synthetic Training (FST)
Unit
Group
Force
Joint and Coalition Integration
FST Technical Implementation
R
eal W
o rld
C4 I
Sy s
tem
sScenario Generation and Control
JSAF
ExerciseControl
Ships Pierside
TrainingStaff
Shore-Based Trainers
Combat System
SensorOperator
ActionOfficer
Combat System
SensorOperator
ActionOfficer
Simulated Sensors
Exercise Control Comms
TTGP
.
.
BFTT - US Ships
Secure VoIPChat
NC
TE
NC
TE
/ JT
EN
NCTE, JTEN, SIPR,CENTRIXS
ESG
CSG
GCCS
Link 16
Distributed Training Architecture
UNCLASSIFIED
SPQ-9A/B, Mk-23 TASSPQ-9A/B, Mk-23 TASMk-91 NSSMSMk-91 NSSMSAIMS MK-XII IFFAIMS MK-XII IFFSPS-40, 48, 49, 55, 67, 73SPS-40, 48, 49, 55, 67, 73
AWSAWS
BOPCBOPC33
BOPCBOPC22 BFTTBFTT
NAVNAVSIMSIM
RESSRESSLAULAU
SPN-46SPN-46
Combat SystemCombat System
BEWTBEWT
TWCSTWCS
ACDSACDS
Q-89Q-89LAULAU
SSDS MK 1SSDS MK 1
AEGISAEGIS CDSCDS
GCCSGCCS
BOPCBOPC11
SPS-49SPS-49
SPS-48SPS-48
AIMSAIMSMK XII IFFMK XII IFF
DigitalDigitalComputerComputer
BFTT (Future)BFTT (Future)CTACTA
CM/C4ISIM
Lk-4ALk-4ADTSDTS
Lk-16Lk-16TMLTML
Lk-11Lk-11DTSDTS
KG-40KG-40
AMN AMN TSSSTSSS
SQQ-89SQQ-89OBTOBT
WSN-xWSN-x1/2/5/71/2/5/7
SLQ-32SLQ-32A(V) A(V) CECCEC
NAVSSINAVSSIBLK 3BLK 3
SQQ-89SQQ-89
Simulated Nav ElectronicWarfare
UnderseaWarfare
Cooperative Engagement Capability
Strike
DataCollection
Air and SurfaceWarfare
Air ControlSimulation
AEGIS
ShipSelf-Defense
TRNGTRNGLAULAU
LinkSimulation
C2P/C2P/CDLMSCDLMS
GFCPGFCP
Synthetic Theater of WarSynthetic Theater of WarThe BFTT Family of StimsThe BFTT Family of Stims
RESSRESSLink 4A, 11, 16STIM / Sim
TWCSTWCSLAULAU
ACTSACTSMK 50MK 50
SSDS MK 2SSDS MK 2DCMDCM
BFTTBFTTCOMMCOMM
SHIPSHIPCOMMCOMM
INESINES
99
FST Strengths and Weaknesses
• OPFOR is scalable in size and sophistication• Stretches scarce training resources• Provides opportunity to better utilize limited at
sea periods and to rehearse operations• Exercise C2 in kinetic phase of conflict• Flag Officer to console operator fidelity varies
with warfare area• Connectivity subject to at sea issues• Complements live training; not a substitute for
going to sea
1010
FST Strengths and Weaknesses
““This visionary new training methodology is now This visionary new training methodology is now integral to the way we prepare our nations integral to the way we prepare our nations deploying strike groups. It creates a virtual deploying strike groups. It creates a virtual environment in which the Navy stresses critical environment in which the Navy stresses critical Command and Control warfare skills and fine tunes Command and Control warfare skills and fine tunes its basic warfighting competencies without going to its basic warfighting competencies without going to sea.sea.””
““This visionary new training methodology is now This visionary new training methodology is now integral to the way we prepare our nations integral to the way we prepare our nations deploying strike groups. It creates a virtual deploying strike groups. It creates a virtual environment in which the Navy stresses critical environment in which the Navy stresses critical Command and Control warfare skills and fine tunes Command and Control warfare skills and fine tunes its basic warfighting competencies without going to its basic warfighting competencies without going to sea.sea.””
VADM DalyDeputy Commander, US Fleet Forces CommandU.S. Naval Institute Proceedings, Dec 2009
VADM DalyDeputy Commander, US Fleet Forces CommandU.S. Naval Institute Proceedings, Dec 2009
1111
12
Bilateral Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) event integrating Fleet HQ’s, MDA, Army, USAF & Japan (JMSDF/JASDF) units
Hickam AFB 613th AOC
Hickam AFB 613th AOC
FST-J 11-71 (BMD) Feb-Mar 2011
Schriever AFB, CO100th MDB
Schriever AFB, CO100th MDB
Hickam AFB94th AAMDC
Hickam AFB94th AAMDC
Hawaii
Pearl Harbor , HICPF MOCUSS PORT ROYAL USS HOPPER USS CHUNG HOON
Pearl Harbor , HICPF MOCUSS PORT ROYAL USS HOPPER USS CHUNG HOON
Japan
Alaska Agency ParticipationAgency Participation
MDAMDA
Missile DefenseMissile Defense
Integrated Ops CenterIntegrated Ops Center
Joint CommandsJoint Commands
US Pacific CommandUS Pacific Command
US Strategic CommandUS Strategic Command
US Northern CommandUS Northern Command
US Forces JapanUS Forces Japan
Okinawa, JA1-1 ADA Patriot
Okinawa, JA1-1 ADA Patriot
OPFOR OPFOR
(Constructive)(Constructive)•AirAir•SubmarineSubmarine•MissileMissile•SurfaceSurface
OPFOR OPFOR
(Constructive)(Constructive)•AirAir•SubmarineSubmarine•MissileMissile•SurfaceSurface
Yokosuka, JAUSS GEORGE WASHINGTONCSG Staff (CTF 70)C7F MOCUSS BLUE RIDGEUSS SHILOHUSS CURTIS WILBURUSS JOHN S. MCCAINUSS COWPENSUSS LASSEN
Yokosuka, JAUSS GEORGE WASHINGTONCSG Staff (CTF 70)C7F MOCUSS BLUE RIDGEUSS SHILOHUSS CURTIS WILBURUSS JOHN S. MCCAINUSS COWPENSUSS LASSEN
JapanJapanJTF-BMD/JASDF ADCJTF-BMD/JASDF ADCJMSDF MSOJMSDF MSOSDFLTSDFLT66thth Escort Division Escort DivisionJS CHOKAIJS CHOKAIJS ATAGOJS ATAGO
JapanJapanJTF-BMD/JASDF ADCJTF-BMD/JASDF ADCJMSDF MSOJMSDF MSOSDFLTSDFLT66thth Escort Division Escort DivisionJS CHOKAIJS CHOKAIJS ATAGOJS ATAGO
Yokosuka, JATTGP-Det Yoko
Yokosuka, JATTGP-Det Yoko
Pt Loma, CATTGP DTCP
Pt Loma, CATTGP DTCP
13
Australia
Coalition/Joint Forcible Entry Operations (Amphibious/Air Assault) against conventional & irregular OPFOR
Japan
Number Units - 35Number Units - 35
Participants ~ 1,600Participants ~ 1,600
Constructive Joint Forces:Constructive Joint Forces:40 Inf Div, 3 USAF Air Wings, & 40 Inf Div, 3 USAF Air Wings, & CTF 70 (GWSG) (-)CTF 70 (GWSG) (-)Constructive Coalition ForcesConstructive Coalition Forces::HMAS MANOORA, HMAS HMAS MANOORA, HMAS KANIMBLA, HMAS TOBRUK, &KANIMBLA, HMAS TOBRUK, &Regt Battle Group Regt Battle Group
OPFOR Constructive Support OPFOR Constructive Support 1 Enemy CVBG1 Enemy CVBG 6 Ships6 Ships3 Enemy SAGs3 Enemy SAGs 29 Ships29 Ships1 Enemy Sub Gp1 Enemy Sub Gp 4 Subs4 Subs1 Enemy Airbase1 Enemy Airbase 33 A/C33 A/C4 CDCM Sites4 CDCM Sites 4 Batteries4 Batteries6 ADA Companies6 ADA Companies 16 ADA Sites16 ADA Sites1 Enemy Inf Bde1 Enemy Inf Bde 2 Regts/AR 2 Regts/AR Bn/Avn BnBn/Avn Bn2 Irregular Warfare Gps2 Irregular Warfare Gps 16 HVI/HPTs16 HVI/HPTs
TTGP-Det YokoUSS COWPENSUSS FITZGERALD
TTGP-Det YokoUSS COWPENSUSS FITZGERALD
CTF 70 BWC/IWCDESRON 15USS GEORGE WASHINGTONUSS CURTIS WILBURUSS STETHEMUSS MUSTINUSS MCCAMPBELLUSS JOHN S MCCAIN
CTF 70 BWC/IWCDESRON 15USS GEORGE WASHINGTONUSS CURTIS WILBURUSS STETHEMUSS MUSTINUSS MCCAMPBELLUSS JOHN S MCCAIN
CTF 76 (ESG 7)CPR 1131 MEUTACRON 12USS ESSEXUSS HARPERS FERRY
CTF 76 (ESG 7)CPR 1131 MEUTACRON 12USS ESSEXUSS HARPERS FERRY
Sydney, AUSHMAS DARWINCOMAUSATGHMAS WATSON
Sydney, AUSHMAS DARWINCOMAUSATGHMAS WATSON
TTGP DTCC, San DiegoCAOC (3 BCD, TACRON LNO) CTF 72, CTF 74NWDC LNO
TTGP DTCC, San DiegoCAOC (3 BCD, TACRON LNO) CTF 72, CTF 74NWDC LNO
Camp Rilea, OR 116 ACS121 ACS123 ACS
Camp Rilea, OR 116 ACS121 ACS123 ACS
EWTGPAC, JEWL, CoronadoI Corps (FWD)607 ASOG65 FiBLand Comp ExCon Cell
EWTGPAC, JEWL, CoronadoI Corps (FWD)607 ASOG65 FiBLand Comp ExCon Cell
FST-J 10-72 (CTF 76) - May 2010
A Perspective on the Future of FST; The Price of Admission
• Must be compliant with all governing standards– DIS, HLA, etc.
– Be cognizant of data flow rates within the network
• Develop systems with a global view– Not just “trainer-in-a-box” ; never stand alone– Interoperability across architecture is critical– “Plug and Play” is a misnomer under best of circumstances
• Balance fidelity with cost and delivery– Aviation full motion trainer not required for C2 training events– MRT3 as example of what is sufficient for C2 event
A Perspective on the Future of FST;The Price of Admission
• Focused warfare events vice larger force-wide events– BMDEX as signpost for ASW, ASUW, AAW, etc– Work towards Flag to Petty Officer kill chain
• Opportunities for middle-ware solutions– No rearchitecture where elegant middle-ware can resolve
• Tension between resources to support Shore-Based Trainers and resources for Distributed Training– Room for both, however, track record of underestimated support
tail for shore-based trainers
Fleet Synthetic Training, as a complement to at-seaevents, is the key to ensuring readiness in anenvironment of fiscal austerity
Questions ?