1 3 Dec 2008 Changes from the May 2003 DoDI 5000.2 Policy Flowing from Numerous New/Revised sections of Public Law since 2003 (some with Multiple Requirements)

13 Dec 2008

Changes from the May 2003 DoDI 5000.2

•Policy Flowing from Numerous New/Revised sections of Public Law since 2003 (some with Multiple Requirements)

•Approved Policy Appearing in over 25 Policy Memos and DoD Responses to the GAO, IG, and Congress

•Reference to 10 Updated or Newly Issued DoD Publications

•Consideration of Over 700 Defense Acquisition Policy Working Group (DAPWG) Comments

DoDI 5000.02

Approved 8 December 2008

DoDI 5000.02

2

IOC

Technology Development

Production & Deployment

Operations & Support

FRP DecisionReview

FOCMaterielSolutionAnalysisMateriel Development Decision

User Needs

Technology Opportunities & Resources

Defense Acquisition Management System - 2008

ProgramInitiation

IOCBConcept

RefinementSystem Development

& DemonstrationProduction &Deployment

Operations &Support

C

FRP DecisionReview

FOC

TechnologyDevelopment

ProgramInitiation

Design ReadinessReview

ConceptDecision

User Needs &Technology Opportunities

BA

A

Defense Acquisition Management Framework- 2003

Comparison of 2003 vs. 2008

Focus of major changes

Engineering and Manufacturing Development

Post-CDRAssessment

2

Post PDRAssessment

3 Dec 2008

C

DoDI 5000.02

3

Technology OpportunitiesSource of User Needs

Science & Technology (S&T) activities

• ATDs

• JCTDs

• Joint Warfighting Experiments

Joint Capabilities Integrated Development System (JCIDS)

• Joint Concept of Operations

• Joint integrated architectures

• DOTMLPF analysis

Which lead to:

• Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)

User Needs & Technology Opportunities

Defining Desired CapabilitiesDefining Desired Capabilities

dau user

DOTMLPF = Doctrine, organization, training, materiel, leadership, personnel and facilities

4


The Defense Acquisition Management System 2008

Joint Concepts

Capabilities - Based Assessment

OSD/JCS COCOM FCB

Strategic Guidance

Incremental Development

A

User Needs

Production & Deployment O&S


MDDICD


Engineering & Manuf Development

MaterielSolutionAnalysis

JCIDS Acquisition Process

B C

“Following the Materiel Development Decision (MDD), the MDA may authorize entry into the acquisition management system at any point consistent with phase-specific entrance criteria and statutory requirements.”

CDD CPD

DoDI 5000.02

5

Two strategy approaches to full capability: evolutionary and single-step. • Particular approach chosen depends on:

– Availability of time-phased capabilities in the CDD– Technology maturity– Cost/benefit of incremental fielding vs. single step– Cost of fielding multiple configurations

> Retrofit decisions & cost

> Training

> Supportability

• Acquisition strategy shall address chosen approach• Evolutionary acquisition is the preferred strategy for rapid

acquisition of mature technology

Achieving Full Capability

6

From two processes… To one process…

Evolutionary Acquisition

• Capability delivered in increments, recognizing up front need for future capability improvements

• Each increment:

- depends on mature technology

- is a militarily useful and supportable operational capability

- Successive Technology Development Phases may be needed to mature technology for multiple increments

• Incremental Development: End-state is known; requirements met over time in several increments

• Spiral Development: End-state is not known; requirements for increments dependent upon technology maturation and user feedback.

No spirals!

7

Evolutionary Approach

AoA

EMD Increment 1

Materiel SolutionAnalysis

DAB

DAB

DAB

JROC JROC

Gap

An

alys

is

ICD CPD1

JROC

CDD2

JROC

C

EMDIncrement 2

CPD2

DAB

C

DAB

JROC

CDD3

JROC

EMDIncrement 3 CPD3

DAB

C

B

B

Joint Operating ConceptsJoint Functional Concepts

DoDStrategic Guidance

DAB

A

DAB

A

MDD

Continuous Technology Development and Maturation



JROC

CDD1

DAB

A TechnologyDevelopment

B

DoDI 5000.02

8

The Defense Acquisition Management System

Relationship to JCIDS

Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)

Capability DevelopmentDocument (CDD)

Capability ProductionDocument (CPD)

• The Materiel Development Decision precedes entry into any phase of the acquisition management system

• Entrance Criteria met before entering phase

• Evolutionary Acquisition or Single Step to Full Capability

IOC: Initial Operational CapabilityFOC: Full Operational Capability

PDR: Preliminary Design ReviewCDR: Critical Design ReviewFRP: Full Rate Production

IOCBA



FRPDecisionReview

FOC

Materiel DevelopmentDecision

User Needs

PDR CDR

CDD CPD

ICD

AoA

Pre-Systems Acquisition Systems Acquisition Sustainment

Post CDRAssessment

PDR





Post PDRAssessment

C

or

DoDI 5000.02

9

Materiel SolutionAnalysis

MaterielDevelopmentDecision

Materiel Solution Analysis

Purpose: Assess potential materiel solutions

• Enter: Approved ICD and study guidance for conducting AoA.

• Activities: Conduct AoA, develop Technology Development Strategy (TDS) & draft CDD

• Guided by: ICD and AoA Plan

• Exit: Materiel solution to capability need in ICD recommended by lead component conducting AoA, and phase-specific exit criteria have been satisfied

New terms/requirements in bold blue italics

A

DoDI 5000.02

Material Solution Analysis Phase

INPUTS

OUTPUTS

DoDI 5000.02

11



APurpose: Reduce Technology Risk, Demonstrate Critical Technology on Prototypes, Complete Preliminary Design

Enter: MDA approved materiel solution and TDS; funding for TD phase activities

Activities: Competitive prototyping; develop RAM strategy; conduct Preliminary Design Review (PDR)

Guided by: ICD & TDS and supported by SE planning

Exit: Affordable increment of military-useful capability identified; technology demonstrated in relevant environment; manufacturing risks identified; PDR conducted for candidate solutions; system or increment ready for production within short time frame (normally less than 5 years for weapon systems)


B

DoDI 5000.02

Technology Development Phase

OUTPUTS

INPUTS

•ICD, Draft CDD•Approved Materiel Solution•Exit Criteria•T&E Strategy•Support & MaintenanceConcepts & Technologies•SEP • TDS

•Sys Allocated Baseline • PDR Report • Live-Fire T&E Waiver request (if appropriate)•SEP • PESHE • TRA • TEMP • PPP • LCSP• Risk Assessment • Validated Product• Support & Maint. Objectives & Reqmts• NEPA Compliance Schedule (as required)Inputs to:- Info Support Plan - Acquisition Strategy- CDD -Sys Threat Assessment- Affordability Assessment- Cost & Manpower Est.- KPPs / KSAsDoDI 5000.02

13


Engineering & Manufacturing Development

Purpose: Develop a system or increment of capability, develop an affordable manufacturing process, minimize logistics footprint B

Integrated System Design

System Capability & Manufacturing Process Demonstration

•Enter: Mature Technology; Approved Requirements; Full Funding in FYDP

•Activities: Define system of system functionality & interfaces, complete detailed design, system-level PDR (as needed)/CDR, establish product baseline,

•Guided by: CDD, Acq Strategy, SEP & TEMP

•Exit: Complete system-level CDR and Post-CDR Assessments by MDA

•Enter: Post-CDR Assessment and establishment of initial product baseline

•Activities: Developmental Testing (DT) assesses progress against technical parameters, and Operational Assessments (OA) Against CDD

•Guided by: CDD, Acq Strategy, SEP & TEMP

•Exit: System demonstrated in intended environment using production-representative articles; manufacturing processes demonstrated; meets exit criteria and MS C entrance requirements


Post CDRAssessment

Post PDRAssessment

C

DoDI 5000.02

Engineering & Manufacturing Development Phase

MS B

INPUTS

OUTPUTS

• System Performance Specification• Exit Criteria for the EMDD Phase• Validation Sys Sup & Maint. Objectives & Reqts• Acquisition Program Baseline• CDD • SEP • TEMP • Information Support Plan• Programmatic Environment, Safety, &Occupational Health Evaluation• Product Support Strategy• PPP, System Threat Assessment• Cost & Manpower Est.

• Initial Product Baseline• Test Reports• SEP • PESHE • TRA • TEMP• Risk Assessment• Product Support Element Reqmts• Inputs to:- CPD - Sys Threat Assessment- ISP - Cost & Manpower Est.

DoDI 5000.02

15


FRPDecisionReview


LRIP/IOT&E

C

•Enter: Acceptable performance in DT & OA; mature software; no significant manufacturing risks; approved CPD; refined integrated architecture; acceptable interoperability and operational supportability; demonstration of affordability; fully funded; phased for rapid deployment.

•Activities: IOT&E, LFT&E (If Required) and interoperability testing of production-representative articles; IOC possible

•Guided by: CPD, TEMP, SEP •Exit: System operationally effective, suitable and

ready for full-rate production

•Enter: Beyond LRIP & LFT&E reports (OSD T&E/LFT&E programs) submitted to congress

•Activities: Full-rate production; fielding and support of fielded systems; IOC/FOC

•Guided by: Acq strategy & life cycle sustainment plan

•Exit: Full operational capability; deployment complete

Full-Rate Production & Deployment

Purpose: Achieve an operational Capability that satisfies mission needs

New terms/requirements in bold blue italics DoDI 5000.02

Production and Deployment Phase

INPUTS OUTPUTS

DoDI 5000.02

17


Operations & SupportFOC

Purpose: Execute a support program that meets materiel readiness and operational support performance requirements, and sustains the system in the most cost-effective manner over its total life cycle.

Life Cycle Sustainment Disposal

• Entrance: Approved CPD; approved LCSP; successful FRP Decision

• Activities: Performance-Based Life-Cycle Product Support (PBL) planning, development, implementation, and management; initiate system modifications as necessary; continuing reviews of sustainment strategies

• Guided by: Acquisition Strategy/LCSP

• Activities: Demilitarize and dispose of systems IAW legal and regulatory requirements, particularly environmental considerations and explosives safety

• Guided by: Programmatic Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health Evaluation (PESHE)

New terms/requirements in bold blue italics DoDI 5000.02

Operations and Support PhaseINPUTS OUTPUTS

DoDI 5000.02

19

The Defense Acquisition Management System

Relationship to JCIDS

Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)

Capability DevelopmentDocument (CDD)

Capability ProductionDocument (CPD)

• The Materiel Development Decision precedes entry into any phase of the acquisition management system

• Entrance Criteria met before entering phase

• Evolutionary Acquisition or Single Step to Full Capability

IOC: Initial Operational CapabilityFOC: Full Operational Capability

PDR: Preliminary Design ReviewCDR: Critical Design ReviewFRP: Full Rate Production

IOCBA



FRPDecisionReview

FOC


User Needs

PDR CDR

CDD CPD

ICD

AoA


Post CDRAssessment

PDR





Post PDRAssessment

C

or

DoDI 5000.02

DoDI 5000.02 & Space DoDI 5000.02 & Space Acquisition PolicyAcquisition Policy

• NSS 03-01 referenced specifically in the DoDI 5000.02, dated 8 Dec 08, as follows: – Enclosure 1, References: National Security Space

Acquisition Policy 03-01, "Guidance for DoD Space System Acquisition Process"

– Table 7, Unique Decision Forums: referencing the DSAB

• Mr. Young (USD/AT&L) rescinded NSS 03-01 effective 23 Mar 08– Interim guidance is copy of NSS 03-01 with DSAB changed

to DAB and Key Decision Point changed to Milestone– 120 days to come up with Annex/Enclosure to DoDI 5000.02

Space Programs With USD/AT&L As MDA Operate Under Interim Guidance

Space Policy

“Back to Basics” and Implementing Block Approach

Space Policy

Tailored Process for Space: Life Cycle Comparison

28%

72%

Typical DoD Life Cycle Cost Curve Notional Space Life Cycle Cost Curve

Approx30%

Approx70%

System Development

& LRIP

Production, Operations & Support


System Acquisition

MS“A”

MS“B”

MS“C”

MS“A”

MS“B”

MS“C”

Life Cycle Curve DSMC Acq Log Guide 1997 Notional Life Cycle Curve

Space is DifferentSpace is Different

Launch/leave for 10-15 yrs – perfect first time, every time

Takeoff

Test

Land, fix

Refly

Launch Leave

Aircraft test, land, fix and refly

Phase AConcept

Development


1st Launch

FOCIOC

Pre KDP-A Concept Studies

Upgrade Decision

KeyDecisionPoints:

Phase B Preliminary

Design

Phase CComplete

Design

Phase DBuild & Operations

B

PHASE BApproval

A

PHASE AApproval

C

PHASE CApproval Build

Approval

Follow On Buy

Approval

InitialCDD

Phase AConcept

Development

Phase AConcept

Development


1st Launch

FOCFOCIOCIOC

Pre KDP-A Concept

Studies

Pre KDP-A Concept

Studies

Upgrade DecisionUpgrade Decision

KeyDecisionPoints:

Phase B Preliminary

Design

Phase B Preliminary

Design

Phase CComplete

Design


Phase CComplete

Design


B

PHASE BApproval

BB

PHASE BApproval

A

PHASE AApproval

AA

PHASE AApproval

C

PHASE CApproval

CC


ApprovalBuild Approval

Follow On Buy

Approval

Follow On Buy

Approval

Phase AConcept

Development

Phase AConcept

Development


1st Launch

FOCFOCIOCIOC

Pre KDP-A Concept

Studies

Pre KDP-A Concept

Studies


KeyDecisionPoints:

Phase B Preliminary

Design

Phase B Preliminary

Design

Phase CComplete

Design


Phase CComplete

Design


B

PHASE BApproval

BB

PHASE BApproval

A

PHASE AApproval

AA

PHASE AApproval

C

PHASE CApproval

CC



Follow On Buy

Approval

Follow On Buy

Approval

InitialCDDInitialCDD

Phase AConcept

Development

Phase AConcept

Development

Pre-Systems AcquisitionSystems Acquisition

Sustainment

1st Launch

Pre KDP-A Concept

Studies

Pre-Phase AConcept

Studies


Milestones

Phase B Preliminary

Design

Phase B Preliminary

Design

Phase CComplete

Design


Phase CComplete

Design


BB

PHASE BApproval

BB

PHASE BApproval

AA

PHASE AApproval

AA

PHASE AApproval

CC

PHASE CApproval

CC



Follow On Buy

Approval

Follow On Buy

Approval IOC FOCJROCCDD

JROCCDD

JROCCPD

JROCICD

SRR SDR PDR CDR

TEMPTEMP TEMP

System CO

NO

PSA

rchitectureA

oA Report

Space Acquisition Life CycleSpace Acquisition Life Cycle

Space Policy

Tailored Process for Space: Acquisition Phase Comparison

TechnologyTechnologyDevelopmentDevelopmentApprovalApproval

B C

Production and

Deployment

Operations and Support

IOCIOC FOCFOCJROCJROCICDICD

JROCJROCCDD CDD

JROCJROCCPD CPD

Full Rate Full Rate ProductionProductionApprovalApproval

--

T&E ST

RAT

T&E ST

RAT

TEMP

Concept Refinement


System Development & Demonstration

DoDIDoDI 5000.2 (May 2003)5000.2 (May 2003)

Milestones:Milestones:

Concept Concept DecisionDecision

A

Decision Decision

BB CC

Production and

Deployment

Operations and Support

IOCIOCIOCIOC FOCFOCFOCFOCJROCJROCICDICD

JROCJROCCDD CDD

JROCJROCCPD CPD

Full Rate Full Rate ProductionProductionApprovalApproval

Tech D

ev St

rateg

y

TEMPTEMP

Concept Refinement

Materiel SolutionAnalysis Technology

Development

Technology DevelopmentPhase System Development &

Demonstration

Engineering &Manufacturing Development

DoDIDoDI 5000.2 (May 2003)5000.2 (May 2003)


NSS Acquisition Policy 03-01

Phase B Preliminary

Design

Phase AConcept

Development

SDRSRR


Follow On Buy

Approval

1st Launch

FOCIOC

Pre KDP-A Concept Studies

Upgrade Decision

Milestones

Concept Decision Meeting

JROCICD

Phase CComplete

Design


B

PHASE BApproval

A

PHASE AApproval

C

PHASE CApproval

JROCCDD

JROCCPD

PDR CDR

Build Approval

JROCCDD

InitialCDD

C--

CA--

Comparison of Space and DoD 5000 Life CycleComparison of Space and DoD 5000 Life Cycle

DoDI 5000.02 (8 December 2008)

PDR Post PDRAssessment

Post CDR Assessment

or

Space Policy

Similarities BetweenDoD 5000 & Space Policy

• Key Documentation: ICD, CDD, CPD, AS, ADM, APB, TEMP

• Requirements Process: JCIDS• Reporting: DAES, SARs, and UCRs• DoD Directive 5000.1 is guiding acquisition

policy document• Dollar thresholds for acquisition categories

established by statute– Space – Major Defense Acquisition Program– Non-space – Acquisition Categories I-III

Feb 0327

Key Reasons for Tailoring DOD Acquisition Policy for Space Systems

“Fly Offs”

Low Rate Initial

Production

Hardware mods

after launch

Key Differences Between DoD 5000 & Space Policy

• New Acquisition Model tailored for space systems:– More emphasis on earlier phases of program

development• Program Review Process:

– Defense Acquisition Board (DAB) with single Independent Program Assessment “Peer Review” vs. DAB with OIPT and multiple IIPTs & WIPTs

• Space Policy alters timing of Milestone Reviews

Pre-Systems Acquisition

Enter: Approved ICD and AoA plan

Activity: Conduct AoA based on studies of alternative solutions to the initial concept; Develop Acquisition Strategy

Exit: MDA selects preferred solution to be pursued

Concept Studies

Pre-Systems Acquisition

Pre KDP-A Concept StudiesPre KDP-A Concept Studies

System C

ON

OPS

Architecture

AoA

Report

KeyDecisionPoints:

Concept Decision Meeting

JROCICD

T&

E Strategy

AA

PHASE A Approval

Phase AConcept

Development

Space Policy

Pre-Phase AConcept Studies

• Activities in this phase conducted by Joint Chiefs of Staff and User Major Command (MAJCOM)– There is no System Program Office (SPO) yet– Concept planning to define a new operational capability– Requirements developed through the Joint Capabilities

Integration & Development System (JCIDS) process

• Key Documentation:– Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)– System level Concept of Operations (CONOPS)– Architecture– Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) Report– Test & Evaluation (T&E) Strategy

Space Policy

Phase AConcept Development

SDRSRR

Pre-Systems AcquisitionKeyDecisionPoints:

TE

MP

JROCCDD

Phase-A Concept DevelopmentPhase-A Concept Development

AA

PHASE A Approval

PHASE B Approval

B

Pre-Phase A

Complete Studies

Phase BPreliminary Design

Enter: PM has possible technical solution but has not matured technology; approved ICD

Activities: Mature TechnologyReduction of integration riskSystem Spec and Functional Baseline

Exit: Independent Program Assessment validates strategy

Space Policy

Phase A Concept Development

• Develop a mature concept and architecture for system baseline. Activities include:– Concept & system architecture development– Technology development and maturity assessment– Trade studies– Vulnerability assessment– Risk reduction– Requirements and functional baseline development– Industrial capability assessments for key technologies

• Key Documentation:– Capability Development Document (CDD)– Test and Evaluation Management Plan (TEMP)

Space Policy

Phase AConcept Development, Con’t

• Key Reviews:– System Readiness Review (SRR)

• Ensures system requirements are identified and complete

– System Design Review (SDR)• Defines system performance, functional

characteristics, and component interfaces

– IPA and MS-B Approval

Goal: Solid program baseline for Phase BGoal: Solid program baseline for Phase B

Space Policy

Phase BPreliminary System Design

PDR

Systems Acquisition

KeyDecisionPoints:

Phase-B Preliminary Design

C

PHASE C Approval

PHASE B Approval

B

TE

MP

Phase CComplete Design

Phase AConcept

Development

Enter: PM has specific technical solution ready for design and integration

Activities: Mature Technology to TRL 6Reduction of integration riskPDR

Exit: Independent Program Assessment validates Design Readiness

Space Policy

Phase B Preliminary Design

• Formal program initiation• Conduct risk reduction• Complete technology development

– Technology should be demonstrated in the relevant environments

• Increase confidence in alternative(s)– Assess estimated risk levels– Assess projected performance

• Key Documentation:– TEMP

Space Policy

Phase B Preliminary Design

• Key Reviews:– Preliminary Design Review (PDR)

• Evaluates selected design approach and risk resolution

– IPA and MS-C Approval

Goal: Complete design - Phase CGoal: Complete design - Phase C

Space Policy


Systems Acquisition


JROCCPD

CDR

Build Approval

C

PHASE C Approval

Phase BPreliminary Design


Enter: PM has specific design solution ready for detailed development and CDD

Activities: Mature TechnologyReduction of integration riskCDR

Exit: Independent Program Assessment validates Design

Space Policy


• Complete design activities. Extra design emphasis allows us to:– Increase confidence in alternatives

identified in Phase B– Mitigate risks

• Key Documents– Capability Production Document (CPD)

• Required to proceed to Build Approval

Space Policy


• Key Reviews– Critical Design Review (CDR)

• Evaluates detailed design

– Build Approval• Authorizes fabrication, testing, deploying and

supporting operations for new system• Marks end of design development

GoalGoal: Ready to Build & Deploy: Ready to Build & Deploy

Space Policy

Phase DBuild and Operations

Systems Acquisition Sustainment

Follow On Buy

Approval

1st Launch

IOC

Upgrade Decision



Build Approval

FOC

Enter: PM has detailed design ready for construction and CPD

Activities: Spacecraft Construction1st LaunchIOCIOT&E

Space Policy

Phase D Build and Operations

• Contractor builds system to design– Fabrication, integration, testing, and deployment

• Conduct studies to:– Assess reliability, maintainability, and availability– Resolve hardware or software problems– Maintain performance over the system’s planned life

• Conduct testing of system– Developmental Test and Evaluation– Operational Test and Evaluation

• Launch or deploy system• Sustainment

– Provide operations support– Dispose at the end of useful life

Space Policy

• Key reviews:– Follow On Buy Approval

• Authorizes additional procurements of system– Upgrade Decision

• Authorizes improvements to system

• Key events:– 1st Launch– Initial Operational Capability declaration– Full Operational Capability declaration

Phase DBuild and Operations

GoalGoal: Operational/Sustainable/Affordable System: Operational/Sustainable/Affordable System

Space Policy

• Work with the range you’ll be using– Vehicle, Schedule, Design, Cost,

Safety, Support

Launch

Space Policy

Operational Capability

• Initial Operational Capability (IOC)– An event defined by the User’s

MAJCOM– Represents fielding of the first

operationally effective production unit(s)

• Fully Operational Capability (FOC)– All production units fielded – Systems are supportable and capable

of performing their mission

Space Policy