UNIDO ozone depleting substances projects under the

t review

regions

Vienna, 2016

the

UNIDO.

.

ODG

October

iii

CContents..................................................................................................................... v

- ................................................................................................... vii

.................................................................................................................................... viii

...................................................................................................................................... xiv

Introduction....................................................................................................................................... 1

......................................................1..........................................................................................1

...............21.4 program.......................................................................2

1.5. ................................................................................................................................3

1.6. .............................................4

.................................................................................................7

..............................................................................................................................72.2. ..................................................................8

2.3. ................................................................................................................... 10

2.4. ................................................................................................ 11

3.......................................................................................................................... 12

3.1 ....................... 12

3.2 - ....................................................................... 13

3.3 ........................................................................ 17

...................................................................................................................... 19

4.1 .............................................................................................................. 19

4.2 ................................ 21

4.3 .............. 24

4.4 ............................ 30

4.5 ............................................................................. 35

5. ...................................................................................... 39

6. ............................................................................................................................. 47

. ................................................................................................................. 48

B. .................................................................................................................. 71

. ..................................................................... 78

........................................................................................... 82

s....................................................................

........................................................................................ 89

.................................................................................................................................. 91

iv

AAcknowledgements

report.

to countriesp o l

encountered.

I tios Anestis, consultant

v

A5CEITsCFCs ChlorofluorocarbonsCO2CSREUGEF FacilityGHG Green-GWPHCFC HydrochlorofluorocarbonHFAHQ Headquartershr HourIAsIMLFISIDISEDkg KilogramMDIs Metered-M&EMEAsMIPRO [Ecuador]MMTMPMPMLFMLF Protocol]NGOs Non-NIPNOOsNOUsODSsPMPPS/OSS/PROPTC

UNIDO)PTC/ENVSMART -boundSMEs -

vi

UNACEMUNCTADUNDPUNEP United NationsUNIDOWBWMOUSD

vii

-

Term Definition

Baseline

Effectintervention.

Effectivenessachieved.

Efficiency

Impact-

intervention.

Indicator

learned situations.

approach)

Outcome- -

Outputs

Relevance

Risks

Sustainability

viii

EExecu

-

-s

-

•

•

•

por

regarding:

•

• quality.

ix

•

).•

imple•

•

•

BBackground

--

-

- -

chemicals

x

Dev

disbu

me

--

chnologies.

-

-

-

-

•

efficiency;• -OD

•

conformity;•

xi

–-

Co

-noted:

•

s

•

•

Ozon sUNIDO.

• mankind-

•

Generallygreenhouse emissions have been reduced.

• -

•

•

•

•

xii

-

•

•

old).

•

• A - -

xiii

institutions.universities).

-

•

•

bidding.

•

•

•

-

xiv

•

•

•

La

destinatarios.

•

xv

•

tecnológica).•

•

•

•

AAntecedentes

–—

xvi

respectivamente.

clo

•

•

•

xvii

• es.

–—

proPM.

•

participantes.•

•

ONUDI.•

•

invernadero.•

pymes.•

xviii

•

•

• coordinador.

siguientes:

•

ac

•

xix

•

•

• periódicame

productos.

•

ación.

•

xx

• conocimientos,

•

1

1.

“ ”.

-

- -

suentering on

establish

2

that --

- ––

Ibeginning

function .

a 1.4

small--

3

showed

-

O

11.5.

-

--

-climate.

integ-

-

4

11.6.

entrationssome 10-

-- ,

(so- s))

ilinter culminated

,

-

in 1 countries thatassistance.

the that hav

1

5

• United Nations ;• ;• z ;• (WB).

p2

projects.

2

USD

USD

USDsee 1).

1

RRegionpprojects

vvDDisbursement

Europe 74 29,901,183 100

103 91,435,405 100

-USD

-

2

imp -

6

- non-USD

- USD

2)

2 -

RRegionpprojects

vv DDisbursement

Europe 60 6,567,391 100

29 5,253,61695

included

-

. (see 3).

3 -

RRegion--

iinvestment)

NNo.

Europe 17+12 7

Caribbean29+5 12

,

7

The

for 2015.

-

y-

-

-

present provideinfor

-issue

• ;• ;• ;• innovation;• ;

8

•

• implementing

possible in

,questionnaires countr in

.

• C ;•

;• In- ;•

and Europe,in

22.2.

review t r.

n reviewa

its

-

9

s of an are:

- - ’

reversely,objectives;

- etermine whi learntgiving

ensure self-sustainability.

review aims

:

- hadhave

had-

- werequality;

- had

ODSs;-

phase- was- - were

- had

- had

-

- -

-

- implemented.

10

22.3. pproach

- - -

- s b

-

- -

smanagement;

-

- Provisio

- -

advice.

-

wm

- icials.

isits where

experience .

11

22.4. t schedule

h reviewies

- I t- -

Thewere

team

Concurrently, selected

visited and(Argentina, and Herzegovina, Turkey

in to andTurkey the to

4

clarifyingwhich

12

3

3.1

meits sets

s senvironment-

- ing–

-

me

congruence

when

understanding-

applied

- -

butions-

-

strong- chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs)

13

inreceive assistance

its sol agro-

-

-

efficiency;- -

-

-

- -a

33.2 -

-

14

-transiti

-

phase--

-

- --

- -

- -

-

-

phase-

-

-

P

15

- -

-

address- g w potential (GWP)

.

-

--

-ed

16

- -

-

-

dis

-

incre-

-

-

-

-

UNIDO--

-out.

a) - - -4) Phase- FC-

-

-

17

-CO2

refrigerati

2 rs.

b) -

- --

- -

2

-

33.3 t Protocol

t - theinterests - rather it

The includi

.

but

technol

18

parties

-

-

19

4.

4.1

issue

• a

• owing technology

simultaneousenterprises.

• was.

• ve, was

to c•

mankind-chemicals.

•

• ,

• - ofm

• g

• for

allowcould

available.

20

•

services•

•

• l

• •

Divisioncontact

•

• ivision

tech•

-

-

21

44.2

selected waswere received .

1.

1

The UNIDO HQ45

2

2

49 had

22

cent

3

were

activity.

4

ofconsidered

23

10 unsatisfactory4.

ratedt) 45

considered

er

-ODSs - ssatisfact

- satisfa

- - -

-

s

- -

24

44.3

(NOOs)

NOOs

Caribbean 5).

5

O

- 75 attended- 62 involv- 37- 25- 12

- 50- 37 from- 13 from

- 50- 50

-

- 88 were- ;

25

- 100 -- ;

- 100 d25

follows:

- 100 ( 12 d dintroducin

appropriate strategies.- 100 ( 75 d

d- 100 agreed

conventions.- 100 ( 37 d

were owing- 100 ( 25 d

d improved.- 38 d

generating25 12

- 100 - d

- 100 (37 d d

were:

- 86 d

- per cent ded require

and improved 25

- 100 37for complying

- 100

26

- 1250

while 25know.

was

- 75 considered12 .5

cent- 50 d

dagreed acknowledge obenefits.

- 100 d

- 100 ( 25 dd

- 100 ( 50 aware

- 25 t generation25

.5.5

visits.

s:

- 88 ed dphase-

12 agreed- 88 considered d

12- 100 (37 d

d

- 75 (12 dpreparing practices

d

27

, did .5did

- 75d

enterprises while 12.5 did .5 did- 88 -

hno had

12 id

dwere

- 100

- 100 -

- 100 --

concerning were

follows:

- 37.5common

- 12.absent.

- 62.5common

- 37.5 -

37.5 ..5

- 25 know- managementan un

.- 25 considered

problemave o

issues.- 12.5

While 37. per cent25

28

12.5 consider asdid

-

rojects’

- 100 agreed- 100 agreed- 100 agreed d

- 100 agreed wa

- 100 agreed were

- 100 considered we- 100 considered we- 100 considered ad

- 100 considered weindicated.

- 100 .5 d

-- 100 agreed

- 100 agreed

- 100 agreed pappropriate.

29

- 100 agreed

- 57 agreed

- 100 agreed

- 100 agreedguarantees

second place twice.

p

- 75 a12.5

.- 100 ,

prepare- 100

- 100beneficiar was

- 87.5while 12.

- 87.512.

- 25beneficiaries and 37.5 partial

agreed 12.5- 100

stakeholders.- 100 .5

practices.- 100

experts.

30

s:

- 87.5 agreedand 12.5

- 87.5 agreedand 12.5

4.4

was ,

ascertain as Headquarters thoaddres received despite

Offollows:

( 6):

- were

- 16 were- 12

training- 24-

6 Beneficiaries

31

( 7):

- 50 were- 22 were- 8- were

7

- 26- 25

companies- 21 agency- 7- 21

- 27- 52 participate- 42 -out- 14 on-the- in laboratories- 13 othe (

32

- 70 never- 19 1-- 9 3-- 1- 1

manager:

- 70 never- 19 1-- 5 3-- 6

beneficiaries

- 69 never- 18 1-- 5 3-- 1- 7-

ng

8)?

8

- 45- 12- 10 -- 8

d

33

- 25 (equipment)

y.

d owing( 9)

9 beneficiaries

- P- M- G- S- I- E- E- Competitiven was

- E

34

follows:

was rated:- Satisfacto- -

was rated:- - -

was rated:- - -

Programme.

T d

:

10

35

- 97acquired.

- 82

- 85

- 87

10.

44.5

T Alternativain In manufacturing

pre-mixing,, -

-

byAlternativa

Owing totechnologies exports

compliance

-Bosnia UNIDO and

es wereAlternativa.

know- fAlternativa

learnttechnologies EU

important market Alternativa Africa.e visit Alternativa

36

I tAlternativa n

component mixedp panels.

s, ,

Alternativa increased its producinagro-

gro-refrigeration various range

in Herzegovina indicated topromoting

Alternativa’s

above aexperience

environment-

–

issuesy.

37

o l

-

-

approp

-

38

-

-

2 i

39

5.

risin

Recommendations

1. -

2.

-

- standards.

3.

40

m

4. D with equipmentoptions

PPS/OSS/PRO

5. suppliers.

If

foraff

6.

UNIDO

7. medium- -assista

8.

that involves

K

-

41

9.

m PPS/OSS/PRO

10.

11.

ano

12.

42

made.

13.

allowed

14.

15.

16.

43

17.

a) defined, ;

b)

c)

standard.

m

18.

Conclusio

( in with

managers

19.

m

20. for

to

m PPS/OSS/PRO

44

21. apacity-

a)

available-of-

GEF.b) ining-of-

c

22.

-

managers

23.

companies.

45

-

achievements

m s

24.

account

environment.

UNIDO,

25. ItAny

projectit)

26.

and Mexico).

27. that-

- .

46

28. ODSs that UN

Recommendations

29.

activity.

30.

31. A 83had d training

sissue t

32.

47

6. learned

evolves

consideration

assistance in achieving

3) in

technology.

4) Posits

-

5) -

involved

6) fer

7) to cooperate

a conviction

necessary.

8) requirement

- gainedth should

48

A

49

II.

1. -

region

2.

-

• Non-performance

•

• -fund-

3. -

-

4.

5. -

3

6. -

- 3 http://www.unido.org/montreal-protocol.html

50

--

-

7.

- de:

• Phasing- - -

•

• -

•

and• Prov -

sector.

8.

9.

4

10. hydrochloro-

- -

4

51

regions.

11. – –

-- 5.

– - 6

PPerformance iindicators7

agencies

Reports

8

incre

-

12.

5 - -

6 ibid7

8 ibid

52

III.

13. -

14.

15.

16.

-

17.

-

2

18.

-

19. UNIDO

imple -

53

20.

phase-

21. -

22.

23.

se--

- -systems.

IIII.

24. are:

•

projects•

• Protocol-

-•

activities/interventions?

• change?

•

development?

54

•

•

implementationbeyond?9

• activities/interventions?

•

• ing?

•

-

Methodology

25.

-

9 -

- http://www.multilateralfund.org/69/English/1/6912.pdf)

55

i.

26. -

-

include:

• --

a-

• guidelines;

•

-

• • -

•

•

27. -

• -

• •

ii.

28. -

10.

10 P

56

29. -environm

oss-

30.

iii.

31.

-

32.

• -•

iv.

33.

34. Caribbean

• •

•

57

Timing

rd

Reporting

evidence-

prese

:

.

58

A. results:

-

employment.

B.

- -

C.

•

• implementation. -

•

D.

initiatives?

W

activities.

-

59

• (Environment-

•

•

•

destr

•

•

- -

• -

•

60

•

•

-

--

•

•

cooperation.

•

•

--

• -

obligations.•

III

-

61

•

•

whereby

-

inclus -

• -

•

•

MLF.•

62

(ISA)

Title:Home-

Concrete/duration

Location

•

-

• -

•

•

• -

11

•

inforgaps.

•

•

report

8

home-

Home-based

HQ

Home-

11

63

•

-

• -

survey

3Home-

• missions14

LAC/EUR•

2

•

• •

•

•

elaborated•

report•

generated•

7Home-

TTOTAL 334

Education:

susta

Languages

64

65

(ISA)

Title:llocation: Home-

Concrete/

achieved

durationLocation

•

-

• project-

sub-contractors.•

• team

•

cause-

•

gaps.•

•

8

Home-based

Home-based

Home-

66

objectives12 report

ssurvey

•

-• - analyzed 2

Home-

• 9

• 2

•

• report

•

comments•

report

•

conclelaborated

• report

• generated

•

6

Home-

TTOTAL 227

Education:

projec

Languagesasset.

12

67

68

Title: –

Home-based

/Rae>

Concrete/duration

Location

•

-

Bank• -

-contractors.•

•

•

-

•

gaps.•

•

report

8

Home-based

Home-based

Home-

69

objectives13

ssurvey

•

-

• -

survey.

2Home-

•

9

region

• 2

•

•

•

comments•

•

conclelaborated

• report

• generated

•

6Home-

TTOTAL 227

Education:

13

70

need

Languages

competencies:

71

B

Name Institution Location Title

UNIDO Vienna

– PTC/OMD

UNIDO Vienna- PTC/ENV/OD

Mr. UNIDO Vienna- PTC/ENV/MPD

UNIDO Vienna

Rodica- UNIDO Vienna

UNIDO Vienna-

PTC/ENV/ECR

UNIDO Vienna

UNIDO Vienna

UNIDO ViennaODG/EVQ/IEV

UNIDO ViennaODG/EVQ/IEV

TURKEY

TurkeyAnkara

Cooperation

Ankara

Urbanization

Ankara

Ö ümö ündüz

Urbanization

Ankara

Ankara

72

NName IInstitution LLocation TTitle

UNIDO

UNIDO

Ankara

Urbanization

Ankara

Ankara

Industry)

Ankara Manager

Ankara

Konya

Konya

Mr. Konya

Purtek IstanbulManager

Gebze-

Gebze-

Gebze-

polyurethaneIstanbul

polyurethaneIstanbul

Istanbul

Istanbul

Sarajevo

73


(

- MoFTER Sarajevo

Tourism

SarajevoDept

environment

Sarajevo

Alternativa Sarajevo



recycling)

Mostar

Mostar Co-

Sarajevo

Protocol

Tourism

Sarajevo

Mr.

assistance)

74


company

Elektrofrigo

company

Elektrofrigo Refrigeration expert

EECUADOR

EcuadorQuito

Ecuador

(MIPRO)

Quito

efic

(MIPRO)

Quito

(MIPRO)

Quito Asesor

(MIPRO)

Quito

EcuadorQuito

Quito

Quito

Profesional)

Quito

Profesional)

Quito

Profesional)

Quito Bodega

Quito

75


domesticas)

conferencia)

Montreal

Quito

Ecuador)

refrigerantes

(Cumbayá)

Ecuador) (Cumbayá) Industrial

AmbienteQuito

climatico”

Mr.Ambiente

Quito

Mr. Quimipac QuitoRefrigerantes

Unacemconferencia)

(flowers)

QuincheManager

Quinche

Quinche

HilseaChivan

QuitoBiofumigación

Ecuador)

conferencia)

76


AARGENTINA

Sustentable

sostentable

-

sostentable

-

agropecuaria)Metilo

agropecuaria)

Presidente

agropecuaria)

Asesora

agropecuaria)

Abundancia”

agropecuaria)

Abundancia”

SA.

Equipment

77


Equipment

Equipment

–

Equipment

Equipment

Manager

Mantenimiento

Mantenimiento

Independiente

B.A.

Reinhardt Presidente

Giacomino President

Devia

Professor

78

C

-

79

80

panels

81

82

D 14

• • • • • •

(Country/City):

• Yes• No

• Yes• No

• • •

three

7.

• • p manager• Expert• •

8. • design• Training• Procurement• follow-up• •

14 Excerpt from on-line survey

83

9. .question:

N.A.

• dealing

• • coordination/synergies

environmental protection?•

10. Non-- .

• competitiveness• Non-• • • Others

• Yes• No

12.

on

84

E 15

1. (Nombre y apellido) :

(País iudad):

Y Región):

-iimplementación :

• n)• Project implementation and supervision (Implementación y supervisión)• Overall project cycle management (Design, implementation, supervision, monitoring and

evaluation) (Gestión general)• Specific technical inputs (in design and/or implementation & monitoring) and training of

counterparts (Contribuciones técnicas específicas)• Attendance of MP relevant meetings (e.g. Regional NOUs meetings) (Participación en

reuniones de MP)

y (¿CuáSAO?):

• -• -•

1. ):

• •

2. )

• The National Implementation Plan (NIP) for developing ODS phase out projects(El programa nacional de implementacion para destruccion de SAO)

•

•

beneficiarios?)

3. building, -out) (¿ Ud.

-

15 Excerpt from on-line survey

85

Completely agree/Somewhat agree/Do not agree/N/A

•

s•

•

•

• mejorada)

•

•

•

4. -( qué está )


• .

•

.•

industriales).• The projects to legal (L

conttribuyeron .• The projects to

sustainability (economicos).

5. results(¿ sobre

MP?


• The projects contributed to improving energy efficiency and cleaner energy Los proyectoshan contribuido a mejorar la eficiencia energética y energía más limpia

• MP activities have contributed to climate benefits Las actividades de MP han contribuido abeneficios climáticos

• The projects contributed to partnerships between private and public sector Los proyectoshan contribuido a asociaciones entre sector público y privado

86

• The projects contributed to raising awareness among industrial workers, farmers andcommunities about the danger of ODSs Los proyectos han contribuido a aumentarconocimientos de trabajadores en industria, agricultores y comunidad sobre peligros SAO

• The programme cooperated with other international initiatives on similar objectives withinUNIDO (cross organizational activities) or in the area of MP activities El programa hacooperado con otras iniciativas internacionales con objetivos similares

• The projects contributed to generate employment Los proyectos han contribuido agenerar empleos

6. (¿ qué eficazmente?)

Please


• •

•

•

•

• -SAO

7. Activities (¿ qué- sostenibles?)


• MP activities to phase out production and/or consumption of ODSs been successful (Lasactividades de MP para eliminación, producción y consumo de SAO han sido exitosas)

• MP activities generated tangible ex-post benefits, such as improvement in terms of capacity,policy and legislation (Las actividades del MP han generado beneficios como mejora decapacidades, políticas y legislación)

• MP-funded activities led to replication of methods and good practices to other non-ODSsprojects (Las actividades de MP han conducido a la réplica de métodos y buenas prácticasen otros proyectos non-SAO)

8.

/ / / /

• Lack of policy and legal frameworks (Falta de políticas o marco legal)• Poor or unsustainable enforcement capacity (Débil capacidad de hacer cumplir los

reglamentos)• Poor socio-economic incentives (Insuficientes incentivos socio-económicos)• Lack of know-how for ODSs management (Falta de conocimiento para la gestión de SAO)• Low government priority (Baja prioridad del Gobierno)

87

• Lack of awareness of dangers among users leading to lack of behavioural change (Falta deconocimiento de los peligros entre los usuarios)

• Lack of private sector interest (Falta de interes del sector privado)

9. resources

(¿MP?)

question:

Completely agree/Somewhat agree/Do not

• The project preparation process was adequate (La preparación del proyecto fue adecuada)• The project approval process was efficient (El proceso de aprobación fue eficiente)• National / government counterpart has sufficient readiness and capacity (Contrapartes

nacionales o del gobierno tenian suficientes capacidades)• Availability of specific technical consultancy expertise (Disponibilidad de consultores

técnicos especificos)• Adequate contracting and procurement procedures (procedimientos de contratación y

compra adecuados)

10. you related ()


• Project was well designed (El proyecto estaba bien diseñado)• Project coherent in its approach (El proyecto fue coherente en su enfoque)• Project had good linkages between inputs, outputs, outcomes and impact (El proyecto tuvo

buenas relaciones causa-efecto entre insumos, productos, resultados e impacto)• Baselines and milestones were properly indicated (Las líneas de base y los hitos estaban

bien indicados)• Monitoring and evaluation systems adhere to SMART (specific, measurable, attainable,

relevant and time- bound) principles ( istemas de monitoreo y evaluación son SMART(específicos, mesurables, realizables, pertinentes y acotados en tiempo)

• Project documents adequately address the policy and legal framework issues (Losdocumentos del proyecto enfocan los asuntos de política y marco legal)

• Project documents adequately address the institutional and technical capacity issues (Losdocumentos del proyecto enfocan adecuadamente los asuntos institucionales y técnicos)

11. extend you agree about related to valuethrough? (

)


• Project concept and design (Concepto y diseño del proyecto)• Project implementation (Implementación del proyecto)• Local UNIDO representation, if present (Representación local de la ONUDI)• UNIDO's technical expertise (Expertise técnico de la ONUDI)

• Supervision and monitoring of implementation (Supervision y monitoreo de laimplementación)

12.

88

projects?

Completely agree/Somewhat agree/Do not agree/

•

•

• ges

• (E

• H

• (Hubo suficientes nivel de las oficinas nacionales de para supervisiónadecuada)

•

capacitación)• There are sufficient resources beneficiaries (management

suficientes nivel de beneficiarios para participar en cursos decapacitación)

•

•

• Adequate availability national disponibilidad expertosnacionales calificados)

13. ()

Completely agree/Somewhat agree/Do not agree/

• UNIDO Field offices have positively contributed to project implementation (Las oficinas orepresentantes de la ONUDI en los países han contribuido positivamente a laimplementación de los proyectos)

• UNIDO Field offices have positively contributed to project monitoring (Las oficinas orepresentantes de la ONUDI en los países han contribuido positivamente al monitoreo delos proyectos)

14. ( ):

89

F 16

1. Please enter the name of your company/institution (optional)/ Nombre de la empresa oinstitución:

2. Please indicate your location (Country/City)/ País/Ciudad:

3. Year of establishment of your company/institution/Año de establecimiento de laempresa/institución:

4. What is your type of activity? ¿A qué tipo de actividades se dedica?

• Services• Manufacturing• institution• Other (please specify)

5. Number of employees Número de empleados:

• 1 - 5• 6 - 20• 21 - 100• 101 +

6. How did you first learn about the Montreal Protocol and Multilateral Fund activities? ¿Cómo seenteró de las actividades del Fondo Multilateral del Protocolo de Montreal?

7. When (year) did you first learn about the UNIDO-MP programme? ¿En qué año se enteró de losprogramas de ONUDI en el área de MP?

8. Which service(s) did you receive or participate in? ¿En qué tipo de servicios/areas deproyectos de MP ha participado?

9. – NOU?

10. How often have you received visits or met the UNIDO project manager? ¿Con qué frecuencia harecibido visita del project manager de ONUDI?

• 1-• 3-• •

11. How often have you received visits from Technical Experts(s) UNIDO? ¿Con qué frecuenciaha recibido visitas de personal técnico de ONUDI?)

• 1-• 3-• •

12. What has been your experience in the timeliness/delay from the selection untilthe arrival of the equipment to your premises? ¿Qué experiencia ha tenido en 16 Excerpt from on-line survey

90

general con la demora en la entrega de equipamiento?)•

•

•

•

•

13.

• Production•

•

•

• Investments• Employment•

•

•

14.

• UNIDOMPproject strategy/approach (Estrategia de los ONUDI-MP)• N

• G

-MP)•

15. favor indique los siguientes aspectos):

• ¿Seguiráó ODSs?

• ¿Mejoró eó ODSs?

•

¿ -además -

YES/NO

16. How would you rate the assistance received through the project? (¿Cómo calificaría el apoyorecibido de los proyectos ONUDI-MP?)

17.cualquier

ONUDI/MP.

–

-674-65001-

–

Program -905017-51- -1-905017-51-5.

- eserved.

–

- -

Pro/ExCom/75/16.

–-

-–2015.

–-1-84407-473-0.

GEF-

Unite -

91

Documents

UNIDO ozone depleting substances projects under the