Regular Village Board Meeting Agenda- May 17, 2022 | 1

R e g u l a r V i l l a g e B o a r d M e e t i n g A g e n d a - M a y 1 7 , 2 0 2 2 | 1

1

MEETING NOTICE

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Regular Meeting of the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Tinley Park, Cook and Will Counties, Illinois will be held on Tuesday, May 17, 2022, beginning at 6:30 PM in the Council Chambers at the Village Hall of Tinley Park, 16250 South Oak Park Avenue, Tinley Park, Illinois.

6:30 PM CALL TO ORDER

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ROLL CALL

ITEM #1SUBJECT: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF AGENDA

ACTION: Discussion - Consider approval of agenda as written or amended.

COMMENTS:

ITEM #2SUBJECT: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL VILLAGE BOARD

MEETING HELD ON MAY 3, 2022

ACTION: Discussion: Consider approval of minutes as written or amended.

COMMENTS:

ITEM #3SUBJECT: CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION 2022-R-044 RECOGNIZING BECKY NICHOLS

FOR HER EFFORTS IN STARTING AND MANAGING THE TINLEY PARK FARMERS MARKET - Trustee Mueller

ACTION: Discussion: Consider recognizing and extending appreciation to Becky Nichols for her many contributions to Tinley Park through the creation of and management of the Tinley Park Farmers Market. This Resolution is eligible for adoption.

COMMENTS:


2

ITEM #4SUBJECT: CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION 2022-R-048 DESIGNATING MAY 15TH

THROUGH MAY 21ST AS NATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS WEEK IN THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK - Trustee Mahoney

ACTION: Discussion: Public Works professionals focus on infrastructure, facilities and services that are of vital importance to our community and an integral part of our residents’ everyday lives. The American Public Works Association has celebrated the annual National Public Works Week since 1960, and we in the Village of Tinley Park encourage all citizens and civic organizations to recognize the substantial contributions Public Works personnel make to protect our health, safety, and quality of life.

Consider designating May 15th through May 21st, 2022, as National Public Works Week in the Village of Tinley Park. This Resolution is eligible for adoption.

COMMENTS:

ITEM #5SUBJECT: CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION 2022-R-051 RECOGNIZING THE STATE

FARM INSURANCE COMPANY’S 100TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION - Trustee Brennan

ACTION: Discussion: Consider recognizing State Farm Insurance Company’s 100th Anniversary Celebration. This Resolution is eligible for adoption.

COMMENTS:

ITEM #6SUBJECT: RECEIVE PRESENTATIONS OF THE TINLEY PARK BUSINESS SPOTLIGHT - TK

INSURANCE AND UCP SEGUIN FOUNDATION - President Glotz & Clerk O’Connor

ACTION: Discussion:

1. TK Insurance assists clients with finding health insurance plans that best suit their needs and budgets. We are pleased to welcome Tina Konieczki, owner of TK Insurance, Inc.

2. The mission of the United Cerebral Palsy Seguin Foundation is to raise, grow, steward and distribute funds to programs and services that help children and adults with disabilities achieve their potential, advance their independence, and act as full members of the community. Please join me in welcoming Julie Lerch of UCP Seguin Foundation.

COMMENTS:


3

ITEM #7SUBJECT: CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING BOARD COMMISSION LIAISON APPOINTMENTS

FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023 - President Glotz

ACTION: Discussion: ADVISORY COMMISSION ON LABOR & DEVELOPMENTDennis Mahoney

CIVIL SERVICE William Brady

ECONOMIC COMMERCIALMichael Mueller

ENVIRONMENTALDennis Mahoney

MARKETING Michael Mueller

PLAN Michael Mueller

POLICE PENSION BOARDWilliam Brennan

SENIOR SERVICES William Brady

SISTER CITIES William Brady

VETERANS Colleen Sullivan

HISTORICAL DISTRICTDiane Galante

CRIME PREVENTIONWilliam Brennan

DAREWilliam Brennan

EMERGENCY TELEPHONE & SYSTEM BOARDWilliam Brennan, Board Liaison (Public Safety)Colleen Sullivan, Board Liaison (Finance)William Brady, (Admin & Legal)

COMMENTS:


4

ITEM #8

SUBJECT:

CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023 - President Glotz

ACTION:

Civil Service Martin Gainer, Chair Andre Ashmore, Jr. Jim Guth Economic Commercial Jay Walsh, Chair Dennis Reidy Dino Sanfilippo Richard Osty Christine Obbagy Brian Potter Chris Shoemaker Adam Guldan Daniel Fitzgerald Emergency Telephone SyBoard (ETSB) Trustee William Brennan Trustee Colleen Sullivan Trustee William Brady Pat Carr Matthew Walsh Steve Klotz John Urbanski Lisa Kortum Police Pension Board Carl Lindokken – Trustee Fred Mondt, Trustee Timothy Ehlers – Trustee John Chomiak - Trustee Brad Bettenhausen (Ex Officio) Senior Services Robert Hayes, Chair Vicki Hayes Phyllis Groberski Andy Ashmus Samuel Avalos Frank Williams Celeste Figliulo Theresa Flowers Marisa Harrison* Veterans Doug Rasmussen (William), Chair Norm Pestlin Jim Hudik Karen Tobola Jimmy Hunter Georges Sanon Chris Hansley (AVMRA VFW Aux.) Don Tomich (Marine Corp. League Rep.)

Veterans Continued Robert Bullard (Submarine Rep.) Denise Houdek John Houdek Ken Wrezzes (Associate) John Maher (Associate) Bruce Haffner (Associate) William McNellis (Ex-Officio – Amer. Legion, Commander) Fred Cagle (Ex-Officio – VFW, Commander) Environmental Enhancement Aireen Arellano, Chair Jeffery Loftus Brandon Wigboldy Evan Vogt Nicole Ryan Donna Gillespie Wesley Janicki Meaghan Kern Teagan Wigboldy Roger Zylstra Marketing Daniel Fitzgerald, Chair Al Siegers Michael Sevier Debbie Melchert Julie Dekker Jackie Bobbitt Dennis Suglich Jim Green Kelly Oswald Paul Yedwofski Janet Czuchra (Associate) Garrett Gray (Associate) Courtney Rourke (Associate) Jason Freeland (Associate) Nick Halikias (Associate) Carol Bradtke (Associate) Plan Garret Gray, Chair Eduardo Mani Jim Gaskill Ken Shaw Angela Gatto Kurt Truxal

Plan Continued Andrae Marak Brian Tibbits* Terry Hamilton* Sister Cities Patrick Rea, Chair Lucas Hawley Roxane Tyssen Jim Muller George Rohde Sarah Krause Michele Rons Michael Roche David Niemeyer Julie Dekker (Associate) Kurt Dekker (Associate) Andrae Marak (Associate) Advisory Commission on Labor and Development Josh Weger, Chair Larry Nichols- Vice Chair Dan Ahern Mike Uylaki Mike Lafferty Tom McGrath Frank DiGiovanni Mike Macellaio Henry Malinowski Tony Janowski


5

ITEM #9SUBJECT: CONSIDER APPOINTING BRETT OFTEDAHL TO THE POSITION OF FIRE

INSPECTOR - President Glotz

ACTION: Discussion: Brett joined the Tinley Park Fire Department in 2000 and since has served in numerous fire service positions including Engineer, Public Education Officer, and part-time Fire Inspector. He has worked full-time for the Wheeling Fire Department for over 20 years, holding rank of Lieutenant for the last 11 years.

In addition to holding numerous fire certifications, Brett holds various fire memberships, and has an Associates Degree in Applied Science. He also co-developed a fire safety curriculum for special needs students and enjoys educating the public. He has lived in Tinley Park for 40 years. Consider appointing Brett Oftedahl to the position of Fire Inspector effective June 6, 2022.

COMMENTS:

ITEM #10SUBJECT: CONSIDER APPOINTING KAREN SCHUTT TO THE POSITION OF ANIMAL

CONTROL OFFICER - President Glotz

ACTION: Discussion: Karen initially joined the Police Department in 2004 for 4 years and then returned in 2017 as a part-time Community Service Officer for Animal Control patrolling the Village of Tinley Park to locate, capture, and transport animals running at large and enforcing Village ordinances and other laws and regulations relating to animal control. She has worked with animals for nearly 25 years, is a Certified Veterinary Technician, and worked in an animal hospital for 2 years. She is involved with PAWS, fostering hundreds of animals over the years and has previously served on their board for 5 years. It is recommended that Karen is promoted to the full-time position of Animal Control Officer. Consider appointing Karen Schutt to the position of Animal Control Officer effective May 18, 2022.

COMMENTS:

ITEM #11SUBJECT: CONSIDER APPOINTMENT OF KRISTEN FULLA TO THE POSITION OF 911

DISPATCHER - President Glotz

ACTION: Discussion: Kristen has held various 911 dispatching emergency and non-emergency services for various municipalities and recently transitioned to a centralized 911 call center. She is experienced with handling multiple phone lines, dispatching for MABAS, has a paramedic background, and is LEADS full access certified. Consider appointing Kristen Fulla to the position of 911 Dispatcher effective May 25, 2022.

COMMENTS:


6

ITEM #12SUBJECT: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE FOLLOWING CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS:

A. CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION 2022-R-045 CELEBRATING FATHER JAMES "JAY" FINNO ON THE 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF HIS ORDINATION TO THE PRIESTHOOD.

B. CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION 2022-R-046 APPROVING A GROUND LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK AND STC TWO, LLC FOR 18301 RIDGELAND AVENUE, TINLEY PARK, ILLINOIS (250 SF).

C. CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION 2022-R-047 APPROVING A GROUND LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK AND STC TWO, LLC (18301 RIDGELAND AVENUE, TINLEY PARK, ILLINOIS).

D. CONSIDER ADOPTING ORDINANCE 2022-O-039 APPROVING THE THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE ECONOMIC INCENTIVE AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS AND BANGING GAVEL PROPERTIES LLC. THE AMENDMENT WILL REMOVE THE TIME LIMITATION ON THE TEMPORARY OUTDOOR BEER GARDEN.

E. CONSIDER PAYMENT OF OUTSTANDING BILLS IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,364,017.57 AS LISTED ON THE VENDOR BOARD APPROVAL REPORTS DATED MAY 6 AND 13, 2022.

ACTION: Discussion: Consider approval of consent agenda items.

COMMENTS:

ITEM #13SUBJECT: CONSIDER ADOPTING ORDINANCE 2022-O-025 AMENDING TITLE XI, CHAPTER

112, SECTION 112.22 OF THE TINLEY PARK MUNICIPAL CODE-- AN ORDINANCE DECREASING THE NUMBER OF CLASS "A" LIQUOR LICENSES THAT CAN BE ISSUED IN THE VILLAGE AND INCREASING THE NUMBER OF CLASS AV LIQUOR/VIDEO LICENSES THAT CAN BE ISSUED IN THE VILLAGE (HILLGROVE TAP, 9505 W. 171st STREET) - President Glotz

ACTION: Discussion: The proposed Ordinance would decrease the number of Class A Liquor Licenses that can be issued in the Village by one (1) and increase the number of Class AV Liquor/Video Licenses that can be issued in the Village by one (1). Upon completion of renovations at 9505 W. 171st Street, the applicant will operate a full-service restaurant and bar. Video Gaming for Hillgrove Tap is permitted and the Board’s requirements for a separate, 21+ section of the establishment have been met. This item was discussed at the Committee of the Whole meeting held prior to this meeting. This Ordinance is eligible for adoption.

COMMENTS:


7

ITEM #14SUBJECT: CONSIDER ADOPTING ORDINANCE 2022-O-034 GRANTING VARIATIONS TO

PERMIT A ONE-STORY BUILDING ADDITION FOR A CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED AT 17344 OAK PARK AVENUE - Trustee Mueller

ACTION: Discussion: The Petitioner, Paul Spass, is seeking Variations from the Zoning Ordinance to permit a one-story building addition which does not comply with the requirements of minimum building height, building materials, and architectural guidelines in the Downtown Core zoning district.

The Plan Commission held a Public Hearing on April 21, 2022, and voted 7-0 recommending approval of the Variations request in accordance with plans and findings of fact in the Staff Report. This Ordinance is eligible for adoption.

COMMENTS:

ITEM #15SUBJECT: CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION 2022-R-049 APPROVING AN AMENDED

RIGHT-OF-WAY ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN ELEVATED ENTERPRISES, LLC., AND THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 17344 OAK PARK AVENUE - Trustee Mueller

ACTION: Discussion: The approval of Resolution 2022-R-049 amends the original Resolution 2020-R-098 for an encroachment of 3.51’ to 4.26’ for a brick wall, stairs, and patio area on the Oak Park Avenue right-of-way for property located at 17344 Oak Park Avenue. The applicant is wishing to modify the existing patio of which this agreement reflects those modifications. The agreement shall terminate upon the damage or destruction of 50% or more of the replacement value of the building or other improvements which encroach the Village’s right-of-way.

This item was discussed at the Committee of the Whole meeting earlier this evening. This Resolution is eligible for adoption.

COMMENTS:


8

ITEM #16SUBJECT: CONSIDER ADOPTING ORDINANCE 2022-O-035 GRANTING A VARIATION TO

PERMIT A CORNER FENCE IN A SECONDARY FRONT YARD FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7501 HANOVER DRIVE - Trustee Mueller

ACTION: Discussion: The Petitioner, Eric Schmidt, is seeking a Variation from the Zoning Ordinance to permit a 6-foot high privacy-style fence to encroach ten feet (10’) into the required secondary front yard of their property located in the R-3 (Single-Family Residential) zoning district.

The Plan Commission held a Public Hearing on May 5, 2022, and voted 3-4 recommending denial of the requested Variation in accordance with plans and findings of fact in the Staff Report. This Ordinance is eligible for First Reading.

COMMENTS:

ITEM #17SUBJECT: CONSIDER ADOPTING ORDINANCE 2022-O-036 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR

FINAL APPROVAL OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION FOR THE OAK RIDGE SUBDIVISION - Trustee Mueller

ACTION: Discussion: DR Horton, Inc - Midwest seeks a Special Use Permit for the Final Approval of the Oak Ridge Planned Unit Development and a Final PUD Plat of Subdivision. The approvals allow for a residential development with 81 detached single-family homes, 162 attached single-family townhomes, and a 3-acre park in substantial compliance with the Preliminary approval granted on January 4, 2022.

The Plan Commission held a Public Hearing on May 5, 2022, and voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the Special Use and Final Plat in accordance with the listed plans, recommended conditions, PUD regulations, and Findings of Fact in the Staff Report. This Ordinance is eligible for adoption.

COMMENTS:

ITEM #18SUBJECT: CONSIDER ADOPTING ORDINANCE 2022-O-037 GRANTING STEVEN NOVAK OF

ANYTIME FITNESS A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A COMMERCIAL INDOOR RECREATION USE GREATER THAN 3,500 SQUARE FEET IN FLOOR SPACE AT 17823 80TH AVENUE - Trustee Mueller

ACTION: Discussion: Steven Novak of Anytime Fitness requests a Special Use Permit to operate a fitness center in the B-1 (Neighborhood Shopping) zoning district.

The Plan Commission held a Public Hearing on May 5, 2022, and voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the Special Use in accordance with the listed plans and Findings of Fact in the Staff Report. This ordinance is eligible for adoption.


9

COMMENTS:

ITEM #19SUBJECT: CONSIDER ADOPTING ORDINANCE 2022-O-038 GRANTING VARIATIONS TO

PERMIT A PATIO AND FENCE IN A SECONDARY FRONT YARD FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7240 174th PLACE - Trustee Mueller

ACTION: Discussion: The Petitioner, Jim Stulga, is seeking Variations from the Zoning Ordinance to permit an existing 682 square foot patio and a 5-foot high open-style fence to encroach 25 feet into the required secondary front yard of their property located in the R-4 (Single-Family Residential) zoning district.

The Plan Commission held a Public Hearing on May 5, 2022. They initially voted 6-1 to recommend approval of the fence Variation as requested and 4-3 for the patio request in accordance with plans and findings of fact in the Staff Report.

Upon further discussion, the Plan Commission also considered an alternative motion for the fence variation with a condition that if the patio were to be removed or need replacement, then the fence variation would be voided. The alternative motion would leave the patio non-conforming with no variation approval and would eventually require the patio and fence to come into compliance.

The Plan Commission voted 6-1 on the alternative motion with the condition. The “no” vote on the original motion and the alternative were different commissioners who had each preferred either the less restrictive motion allowing the fence and patio as-is or more restrictive motion with the condition. This Ordinance is eligible for first reading.

COMMENTS:

ITEM #20SUBJECT: CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION 2022-R-050 APPROVING A CONTRACT

BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK AND AUSTIN TYLER CONSTRUCTION FOR THE WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT - DOROTHY LANE & IRONWOOD DRIVE - Trustee Mahoney

ACTION: Discussion: This project consists of replacing the water main, valves, and fire hydrants on Dorothy Lane, 169th Street, Odell Avenue, and Ironwood Drive. There will be approximately 2,500 linear feet of water main replaced at these locations.

Consider awarding a contract to Austin Tyler Construction in the amount of $1,353,353.40. This item was discussed at the Committee of the Whole meeting held previous to this meeting. This Resolution is eligible for adoption.

COMMENTS:


10

ITEM #21SUBJECT: CONSIDER RESOLUTION 2022-R-052 APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF A

HOMELAND SECURITY MOBILE BOLLARD SYSTEM FROM ADVANCED SECURITY TECHNOLOGY (AST) - Trustee Brennan

ACTION: Discussion: On April 18, 2022, the Village was awarded $172,710 in Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) grant funds. This award was made for the purpose of a mobile bollard system used to secure large public event sites from vehicle-borne attacks. Staff is requesting authorization to purchase the bollard system for $172,710 so that it can be delivered in time for various events this summer. This will be a reimbursable expense from awarded UASI funds. This Resolution is eligible for adoption.

COMMENTS:

ITEM #22SUBJECT: RECEIVE COMMENTS FROM STAFF -

COMMENTS:

ITEM #23SUBJECT: RECEIVE COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD -

COMMENTS:

ITEM #24SUBJECT: RECEIVE COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC -

COMMENTS:

ITEM #25SUBJECT: ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS:

A. THE APPOINTMENT, EMPLOYMENT, COMPENSATION, DISCIPLINE, PERFORMANCE, OR DISMISSAL OF SPECIFIC EMPLOYEES OF THE PUBLIC BODY OR LEGAL COUNSEL FOR THE PUBLIC BODY, INCLUDING HEARING TESTIMONY ON A COMPLAINT LODGED AGAINST AN EMPLOYEE OF THE PUBLIC BODY OR AGAINST LEGAL COUNSEL FOR THE PUBLIC BODY TO DETERMINE ITS VALIDITY.

B. COLLECTIVE NEGOTIATING MATTERS BETWEEN THE PUBLIC BODY AND ITS EMPLOYEES OR THEIR REPRESENTATIVES, OR DELIBERATIONS CONCERNING SALARY SCHEDULES FOR ONE OR MORE CLASSES OF EMPLOYEES.

ADJOURNMENT

Meeting of the Board of Trustees – Minutes May 3, 2022 1

MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL BOARD MEETING OF THE TRUSTEES,VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK, COOK AND WILL COUNTIES,

ILLINOIS, HELD MAY 3, 2022

The special meeting of the Board of Trustees, Village of Tinley Park, Illinois, was held in the Council Chambers located in the Village Hall of Tinley Park, 16250 Oak Park Avenue, Tinley Park, IL on May 3, 2022. President Glotz called this meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.

At this time President Glotz led the Board and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance.

Clerk O’Connor called the roll. Present and responding to roll call were the following:

Village President: Michael W. Glotz Village Clerk: Nancy O’Connor

Trustees: William P. Brady

William A. BrennanDiane M. GalanteDennis P. MahoneyMichael G. MuellerColleen M. Sullivan

Absent: Also Present: Village Manager: Patrick Carr Asst. Village Manager: Hannah LipmanVillage Attorney: Paul O’Grady

Motion was made by Trustee Brennan, seconded by Trustee Mahoney to approve the agenda as written or amended for this meeting. Vote on roll call. Ayes: Brady, Brennan, Galante, Mahoney, Mueller, Sullivan. Nays: None. Absent: None. President Glotz declared the motion carried.

Motion was made by Trustee Mueller, seconded by Trustee Brady to approve, and place on file the minutes of the regular and special Village Board Meetings held on April 12 and April 19, 2022. Vote on roll call. Ayes: Brady, Brennan, Galante, Mahoney, Mueller, Sullivan. Nays: None. Absent: None. President Glotz declared the motion carried.

Motion was made by Trustee Brennan, seconded by Trustee Mahoney to PROCLAIM MAY 14, 2022, AS "APRAXIA AWARENESS DAY" IN THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK.

President Glotz asked if there were any comments from members of the Board or public. There were none. Vote on roll call. Ayes: Brady, Brennan, Galante, Mahoney, Mueller, Sullivan. Nays: None. Absent: None. President Glotz declared the motion carried.

Motion was made by Trustee Brennan, seconded by Trustee Sullivan to proclaim JUNE 3, 2022, AS "NATIONAL GUN VIOLENCE AWARENESS DAY" IN THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK.


Page | 11AGENDA - 5/17/2022,... VILLAGE OF TINLEY...


Motion was made by Trustee Mueller, seconded by Trustee Sullivan to adopt and place on file RESOLUTION 2022-R-040 RECOGNIZING MAY AS BUILDING SAFETY MONTH IN THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK. Building Safety Month is sponsored by the International Code Council to raise awareness about planning for safe and sustainable construction; career opportunities in building safety; understanding disaster mitigation, energy conservation; and creating a safe and abundant water supply for all of our benefit.


Motion was made by Trustee Sullivan, seconded by Trustee Brady to adopt and place on file RESOLUTION 2022-R-039 RECOGNIZING MAY 1ST THROUGH MAY 7TH, 2022, AS "MUNICIPAL CLERKS RECOGNITION WEEK" IN THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK. Consider recognizing May 1 through May 7, 2022, "Municipal Clerks Week" and extend appreciation to the members of our Clerk's Office and to all Municipal Clerks for the vital services they perform and their exemplary dedication to the communities they represent.


Motion was made by Trustee Brennan, seconded by Trustee Mueller to adopt, and place on file RESOLUTION 2022-R-041 RECOGNIZING MAY 1ST THROUGH MAY 7TH, 2022, AS "PUBLIC SERVICE RECOGNITION WEEK" IN THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK. Consider recognizing May 1 through May 7, 2022, "Public Service Recognition Week" in honor of the millions of public employees at the federal, state, county, and local levels.


At this time President Glotz and Clerk O’Connor presented the Tinley Park Business Spotlight.

Banging Gavel, 17400 Oak Park Avenue

Motion was made by Trustee Brennan, seconded by Trustee Brady to appoint ZACHARY GRUMAN TO THE POSITION OF MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN. Zachary has been selected as the most qualified candidate for the Public Work’s Street Division opening. He has nearly 3 years of maintenance and equipment operation work experience. He holds a bachelor’s degree in law enforcement and justice administration.




Motion was made by Trustee Mueller, seconded by Trustee Sullivan, to consider THE FOLLOWING STAFF APPOINTMENTS FOR THE 2023 FISCAL YEAR:

Patrick Carr, Village Manager Hannah Lipman, Assistant Village Manager Donna Framke, Marketing Director Kimberly Clarke, Community Development Director Matthew Walsh, Police Chief Stephen Klotz, Fire Services Administrator John Urbanski, Public Works Director Angela Arrigo, Human Resources Director Lisa Kortum, Emergency Management & Communications Director Peterson, Johnson & Murray Chicago, LLC, Village Attorneys

President Glotz asked if there were any comments from members of the Board or public. There were none. Vote on roll call. Ayes: Brady, Brennan, Mahoney, Mueller, Sullivan. Nays: None. Absent: None. Abstain: Galante. President Glotz declared the motion carried.

Motion was made by Trustee Brennan, seconded by Trustee Mahoney, to appoint TRUSTEE MICHAEL G. MUELLER TO SERVE AS PRESIDENT PRO-TEM FOR THE 2023 FISCAL YEAR. President Glotz asked if there were any comments from members of the Board or public. Trustee Brady thanked Trustee Brennan for his work as President Pro-Tem in Fiscal Year 2022. President Glotz thanked Trustee Mueller for taking on this role. Vote on roll call. Ayes: Brady, Brennan, Galante, Mahoney, Mueller, Sullivan. Nays: None. Absent: None. President Glotz declared the motion carried.

Motion was made by Trustee Mueller, seconded by Trustee Mahoney, to adopt and place on file ORDINANCE 2022-O-033 AMENDING TITLE III CHAPTER 30 SECTION 40 OF THE TINLEY PARK MUNICIPAL CODE ENTITLED "STANDING COMMITTEES". This ordinance amends the Standing Committee Structure.

President Glotz asked if there were any comments from members of the Board or public. There were none. Vote on roll call. Ayes: Brady, Brennan, Mahoney, Mueller, Sullivan. Nays: Galante. Absent: None. President Glotz declared the motion carried.

Motion was made by Trustee Sullivan, seconded by Trustee Brennan, to consider THE FOLLOWING STANDING COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS. Consider concurring with the recommendation of President Glotz and appoint the following Standing Committee assignments:



FINANCE COMMITTEE ADMINISTRATION & LEGAL COMMITTEETRUSTEE COLLEEN M. SULLIVAN, CHAIR TRUSTEE WILLIAM P. BRADY, CHAIRTrustee Diane M. Galante Trustee William A. BrennanTrustee Michael G. Mueller Trustee Dennis P. Mahoney

PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEETRUSTEE WILLIAM A. BRENNAN, CHAIR TRUSTEE DENNIS P. MAHONEY, CHAIRTrustee William P. Brady Trustee William P. BradyTrustee Dennis P. Mahoney Trustee William A. Brennan

BUDGET COMMITTEE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEETRUSTEE DIANE M. GALANTE, CHAIR TRUSTEE MICHAEL G. MUELLER, CHAIRTrustee Michael G. Mueller Trustee Diane M. GalanteTrustee Colleen M. Sullivan Trustee Colleen M. Sullivan


Motion was made by Trustee Brady, seconded by Trustee Mahoney to consider approving the following Consent Agenda items:

A. CONSIDER PAYMENT OF IMPACT FEES THROUGH MARCH 2022 IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,175 TO THE TINLEY PARK PARK DISTRICT.

B. CONSIDER A REQUEST FROM ST. JUDE RUNNERS ASSOCIATION TO CONDUCT A TAG DAY FUNDRAISER ON SATURDAY, MAY 28, AND JUNE 25, 2022, AT CERTAIN INTERSECTIONS IN THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK.

C. CONSIDER REQUEST FROM SOUTH SUBURBAN SPECIAL RECREATION ASSOCIATION (SSSRA), TO CONDUCT A RAFFLE FROM JUNE 1 TO SEPTEMBER 1, 2022, AT THE SOUTH SUBURBAN SPECIAL RECREATION ASSOCIATION (SSSRA) ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE, 19110 80TH AVENUE, WITH THE MAXIMUM VALUE OF THE PRIZE NOT TO EXCEED $6000. WINNERS WILL BE DRAWN AT SSSRA ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE.

D. CONSIDER REQUEST FROM GOOD SHEPHERD MANOR, TO CONDUCT A RAFFLE THROUGH JUNE 27, 2022, AT THE ODYSSEY COUNTRY CLUB, 19110 RIDGELAND AVENUE, WITH THE MAXIMUM VALUE OF THE PRIZE NOT TO EXCEED $800. WINNERS WILL BE DRAWN AT THE ODYSSEY COUNTRY CLUB.

E. CONSIDER PAYMENT OF OUTSTANDING BILLS IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,201,388.94 AS LISTED ON THE VENDOR BOARD APPROVAL REPORTS DATED APRIL 22, AND 29, 2022.

President Glotz asked if anyone from the Board would like to remove or discuss any items from the Consent Agenda. No items were removed or discussed. President Glotz asked if there were any comments from members of the public. There were none. Vote on roll call. Ayes: Brady, Brennan, Galante, Mahoney, Mueller, Sullivan. Nays: None. Absent: None. President Glotz declared the motion carried.

Motion was made by Trustee Mueller, seconded by Trustee Mahoney to adopt and place on file ORDINANCE 2022-O-030 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A TOBACCO STORE TO DRIP DROP SMOKES AT 17133 HARLEM AVENUE. Ameer Ihmud, on behalf of Drip Drop Smokes requests a Special Use Permit to operate a Tobacco Store at 17133 Harlem in the B-3 (General Business & Commercial) zoning district.



The Plan Commission held a Public Hearing on April 21, 2022 and voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the Special Use in accordance with the listed plans and Findings of Fact in the Staff Report.


Motion was made by Trustee Mueller, seconded by Trustee Brennan to adopt and place on file ORDINANCE 2022-O-031 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR A SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION FOR ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE FROM THE PARK CENTER PUD AT 15920 HARLEM AVENUE (MCDONALDS). The Petitioner seeks approval of an additional wall sign for the recently renovated McDonald’s Restaurant.

The Plan Commission held a Public Hearing on April 21, 2022 and voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the Special Use in accordance with the plans as listed and Findings of Fact in the Staff Report.


Motion was made by Trustee Mahoney, seconded by Trustee Brennan to adopt and place on file RESOLUTION 2022-R-042 APPROVING A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK AND STEVE SPIESS CONSTRUCTION FOR GREENWAY BLVD. WATER METER VAULT IMPROVEMENTS. This project consists of constructing a new meter vault due to the current location being in conflict when the 80th Avenue road improvement project. The project includes new control panels, SCADA cabinet and components, control valves, adding an emergency water source to New Lenox, and installing fiber optic cables. The new meter vault will also have emergency backup power via the New Lenox Pumphouse. The old meter vault will be partially demolished, filled with flowable fill, and abandoned in place.

Consider awarding a contract to Steve Spiess Construction in the amount of $1,117,842. This item was discussed at the Committee of the Whole meeting held prior to this meeting.


Motion was made by Trustee Mahoney, seconded by Trustee Brennan to adopt, and place on file RESOLUTION 2022-R-036 APPROVING A FOURTH AMENDMENT PCS SITE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK AND STC TWO LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, BY AND THROUGH ITS ATTORNEY IN FACT, GLOBAL SIGNAL ACQUISITIONS III LLC. To allow for additional ground space area, approve the proposed amendment of the existing cell tower lease agreement, located at 7850 183rd Street, with STC Two LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company.

Consider adopting the 4th amendment of the existing cell tower lease agreement with STC Two LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company. This item was discussed at the Committee of the Whole meeting held prior to this meeting.




Motion was made by Trustee Mahoney, seconded by Trustee Sullivan to adopt and place on file RESOLUTION 2022-R-043 APPROVING A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK AND CITY ESCAPE GARDEN AND DESIGN, LLC FOR LANDSCAPE PLANTERS AND BEAUTIFICATION SERVICE. This service contract is for a qualified contractor to coordinate and provide seasonal planter installation and maintenance services, consisting of approximately 70 planters and 140 hanging baskets. Additional plant replacement where needed is also included in this contract. This would be the first year out of the possible three (3) year contract.

Consider awarding a contract to City Escape Garden and Design, LLC in the amount of $215,702. This item was discussed at the committee of the whole meeting held previous to this meeting.


Motion was made by Trustee Mahoney, seconded by Trustee Mueller to adopt and place on file ORDINANCE 2022-O-032 AMENDING CHAPTER 54 OF TITLE V REGARDING RESPONSIBLE BIDDER REQUIREMENTS ON PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS. Staff has reviewed the Responsible Bidder’s Ordinance, which is part of our Purchasing Policy and has some verbiage suggestions for the amended version. There have been a few changes that were recommended by the Labor and Advisory Committee. The final version will include the same additional changes to comply with State law.


President Glotz asked if there were any comments from members of the Staff.

Village Manager Patrick Carr thanked all Village Employees for their hard work and dedication throughout the year. This week the Village is celebrating Public Service Week in honor of those who serve the community.

Police Chief Matt Walsh updated the Board on the two canines received by the Village. These two dogs, Ron and Helmut are in the process of being trained and all is going well.

Marketing Director Donna Framke announced that on Wednesday, May 4th, the Benches on the Avenue will be placed along Oak Park Avenue. That same day, the Tinley Park Business Breakfast will take place at the Tinley Park Convention Center.

President Glotz asked if there were any comments from members of the Board.

Trustee Mueller stated that National Small Business Week begins on May 1st. He reminded everyone to shop at local small businesses.



Clerk O’Connor stated her concerns with comments made by a Board member regarding the lack of information this Board member received from Staff about the budget. Clerk O’Connor noted that this Board member had missed Executive Session meetings where information was shared. The Village President had offered to provide an overview to this Board member of what was discussed at these Executive Session meetings. The Board member could have also made an appointment with the Clerk’s Office to review Executive Session minutes or listen to the meeting recording. Clerk O’Connor shared evidence that Staff did communicate information with this Board member. Clerk O’Connor also stated concerns with accusations made by this Board member against fellow Board members and Staff.

Trustee Galante stated her concerns with the lack of information received about the FY 2023 Budget as she feels she received in the past. She stated concerns that employees may feel harassed by her and that she is timed during her comment time during the meetings.

President Glotz wished everyone a Happy Mother’s Day. He thanked Donna Framke and the Marketing Department for their work with the Business Breakfast, as well as Dan Fitzpatrick and Peter Dumon, from the Tinley Park Convention Center.

President Glotz stated that lawsuit number 17 L 65067, Stephen Eberhardt vs the Village of Tinley Park, was dismissed by Justice Howse.

President Glotz stated concerns about a Board Member abstaining from a vote for staff members. He also stated concerns with quotes in the media made by Board members about staff. He also noted his frustration about Board members feeling excluded from the budget process which begins in November. President Glotz noted that he has provided a role for this Board member on the Budget Committee.

President Glotz asked if there were any comments from members of the public. There were none.

Motion was made by Trustee Mueller, seconded by Trustee Brady, at 7:03 p.m. to adjourn to Executive Session to discuss the following:



Vote on roll call. Ayes: Brady, Brennan, Galante, Mahoney, Mueller, Sullivan. Nays: None. Absent: None. President Glotz declared the motion carried.

Motion was made by Trustee Brennan, seconded by Trustee Mueller to adjourn the Village Board meeting at 7:41 p.m. Vote on roll call. Ayes: Brady, Brennan, Galante, Mahoney, Mueller, Sullivan. Nays: None. Absent: None. President Glotz declared the motion carried.

PLEASE NOTE: Where there is no summary of discussion on any items in the minutes, this reflects that no



discussion occurred other than the introduction of the item.

APPROVED:

_____________________________________ Village President

ATTEST:

_____________________________________ Village Clerk


Tinley Park

Resolution 2022-R-044

A Resolution Recognizing the Accomplishments of Becky Nichols

WHEREAS, Becky Nichols, owner of Evon’s Trophies and Awards in Downtown Tinley, along with a group of active Tinley business people including Dianne Hebel from the Tinley Park Chamber of Commerce, Madeleine Butkus from Photos By Rick and Kate Donovan from Crystal Castle, came together – along with Dick Post from RM Post Realtors and Cindy Sikora of First Midwest Bank - to start the Tinley Park Farmers Market in the summer of 1997; and

WHEREAS, the Tinley Park Farmers Market, which was a collaborative effort of the Oak Park Avenue MainStreet Association, the Tinley Park Chamber of Commerce and the Village of Tinley Park, and for a while included an open-air business expo was formed to bring more attention to Oak Park Avenue, the historic Main Street in the Village of Tinley Park; and

WHEREAS, the core group of women who started the event, affectionately referred to as the “Farmers Market Girls”, which includes Becky, Dianne, and Madeleine – and who were eventually joined by Ellen Clark of Ed & Joe’s Restaurant & Pizzeria and Nancy Ward from Crossmark Printers are still the best of friends to this day; and

WHEREAS, Becky continued to manage the Farmers Market through the 2021 summer season, sacrificing sleep and precious Saturday mornings 20 weeks per year for 25 seasons to run this popular event that has become part of the fabric of the Tinley Park community and continues to this day to bring people to Downtown Tinley.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the President, Clerk, and Board of Trustees of the Village of Tinley Park, Illinois, Cook and Will Counties, on behalf of more than 55,000 citizens, herein represented that the Village of Tinley Park extends its warm thanks to Becky Nichols for her many contributions to Tinley Park through the creation of and management of the Tinley Park Farmers Market, and we all wish her well as she retires from running it.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that copies of this resolution be provided to Becky Nichols and the Tinley Park Historical Society.

ADOPTED THIS 17th day of May, 2022.


Tinley Park

Resolution 2022-R-048A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING MAY 15TH THROUGH MAY 21ST, 2022 AS NATIONAL PUBLIC

WORKS WEEK IN THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK

WHEREAS, Public Works professionals focus on infrastructure, facilities and services that are of vital importance to our community and an integral part of our residents’ everyday lives; and

WHEREAS, Public Works personnel of the Village of Tinley Park are involved in the maintenance, planning, design and construction of streets, transportation facilities, open space, creeks, paths, storm drains, stormwater treatment, public buildings, environmental programs, right-of-way management; emergency planning and response; and

WHEREAS, during this difficult time as we continue to face the coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic, Tinley Park Public Works personnel are essential workers who are continuing to work hard each and every day to keep our community safe and functioning, with various responsibilities related to the COVID-19 response; and

WHEREAS, it is in the public interest for the citizens, civic leaders and children in Tinley Park to gain knowledge of and maintain a progressive interest and understanding of the importance of Public Works infrastructure and services in their respective communities; and

WHEREAS, the support of an understanding and informed citizenry is vital to the efficient operation of Public Works systems; and

WHEREAS, the American Public Works Association has celebrated the annual National Public Works Week since 1960.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the President, clerk and Board of Trustees of the Village of Tinley Park, Illinois, on behalf of more than 55,000 citizens herein represented declare May 15th through May 22, 2022, NATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS WEEK in the Village of Tinley Park and encourage all citizens and civic organizations to recognize the substantial contributions Public Works personnel make to protect our health, safety and quality of life.

ADOPTED THIS 17th day of May,

2022.


Tinley Park

reSOlUTiOn 2022-r-051 reCOGniZinG STaTe Farm inSUranCe COmPany’S

100Th anniverSary CelebraTiOn

WhereaS, State Farm is celebrating its 100th anniversary in 2022; and

WhereaS, The Village of Tinley Park recognizes the positive impact the company and its agents have

on our community as they have been taking care of customers in Illinois since 1922; and

WhereaS, State Farm was founded in the United States on the seventh of June in the year 1922 by G.J.

Mecherle, a farmer in Merna, Illinois; and

nOW, ThereFOre, be iT reSOlveD, by the President, Clerk, and Board of Trustees of the Village of

Tinley Park, Illinois, Cook and Will Counties, on behalf of its citizens, herein represented, do here by declare

June 7, 2022, as State Farm Day in the Village of Tinley Park. The residents of Tinley Park are called upon to

observe this day by demonstrating what being a good neighbor is all about through acts of kindness and making

people feel welcome.

aDOPTeD ThiS _17th day of __May _, 2022.

____________________________________ Michael W. Glotz, Village President

_____________________________________________________ Nancy M. O’Connor, Village Clerk

__________________________________ _______________________________ Trustee William P. Brady Trustee William A. Brennan __________________________________ _______________________________ Trustee Diane M. Galante Trustee Dennis P. Mahoney

__________________________________ _______________________________ Trustee Michael G. Mueller Trustee Colleen M Sullivan


TINLEY PARK BUSINESS SPOTLIGHT

President Glotz and Clerk O'Connor


CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING BOARD COMMISSION LIAISON

APPOINTMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023

President Glotz


COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023

President Glotz


CONSIDER THE APPOINTMENT OF:

BRETT OFTEDAHL - FIRE INSPECTOR

KAREN SCHUTT - ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER

KRISTEN FULLA - 911 DISPATCHER

President Glotz


Tinley Park

Resolution 2022-R-045

A RESOLUTION CELEBRATING FATHER JAMES “JAY” FINNO ON THE 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF HIS ORDINATION TO THE PRIESTHOOD

WHEREAS, Father Finno was born and raised on the southwest side of Chicago. The oldest of five children of James and Rita Finno; and

WHEREAS, he graduated from St. Thomas More Grade School and Leo High School (1964); and

WHEREAS, he completed college and graduate work in theology at the University of St. Mary of the Lake, Mundelein, the seminary for the Archdiocese of Chicago; and

WHEREAS, Father Finno was ordained a priest on May 10, 1972; and

WHEREAS, he served as Associate Pastor of St. Mary, Evanston; Infant Jesus of Prague, Flossmoor; Queen of Apostles, Riverdale; and

WHEREAS, he served as Pastor of St. Lawrence O’Toole parish in Matteson from July 1, 1988 until October of 1999 and served as Dean for three years in the early 1990's; and

WHEREAS, Father Finno founded St. Stephen, Deacon and Martyr Parish in Tinley Park in November 1999. He continues to serve as Pastor Emeritus at St. Stephen after his retirement from the Archdiocese of Chicago in 2018; and

WHEREAS, while he stayed involved with various Archdiocesan and community activities over the years, his main work has always been as a parish priest.; and

WHEREAS, he enjoys reading and sports, particularly baseball. He is a lifelong White Sox fan; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, THAT I, by the President, Clerk, and Board of Trustees of the Village of Tinley Park, Illinois, Cook and Will Counties, on behalf of more than 55,000 citizens, herein represented that the Village of Tinley Park extends its warm thanks to Father James “Jay” Finno for his many contributions to Tinley Park through his service at St. Stephen Deacon and Martyr Parish. Congratulations upon the Golden Anniversary of his Ordination.

ADOPTED THIS 17th day of May 2022.

Page | 26AGENDA - 5/17/2022, A -... VILLAGE OF TINLEY...

THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARKCook County, Illinois Will County, Illinois

RESOLUTIONNUMBER 2022-R-046

A RESOLUTION APPROVING A GROUND LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK AND STC TWO, LLC

FOR 18301 RIDGELAND AVENUE, TINLEY PARK, ILLINOIS (250 SF)

MICHAEL W. GLOTZ, PRESIDENTNANCY O’CONNOR, VILLAGE CLERK

WILLIAM P. BRADYWILLIAM A. BRENNAN

DIANE M. GALANTEDENNIS P. MAHONEY

MICHAEL G. MUELLERCOLLEEN M. SULLIVAN

Board of Trustees

Published in pamphlet form by authority of the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Tinley ParkPeterson, Johnson, & Murray Chicago, LLC, Village Attorneys

200 W. Adams, Suite 2125, Chicago, IL 60606

Page | 27AGENDA - 5/17/2022, B -... VILLAGE OF TINLEY...

VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARKCook County, IllinoisWill County, Illinois

RESOLUTION NUMBER 2022-R-046


FOR 18301 RIDGELAND AVENUE, TINLEY PARK, ILLINOIS (250 SF)

WHEREAS, Section 6(a) of Article VII of the 1970 Constitution of the State of Illinois provides that any municipality which has a population of more than 25,000 is a home rule unit, and the Village of Tinley Park, Cook and Will Counties, Illinois, with a population in excess of 25,000 is, therefore, a home rule unit and, pursuant to the provisions of said Section 6(a) of Article VII, may exercise any power and perform any function pertaining to its government and affairs, including, but not limited to, the power to tax and to incur debt; and

WHEREAS, the Village of Tinley Park (“Village’) desires to enter into a Ground Lease Agreement (“Agreement), attached hereto as Exhibit 1, with STC Two, LLC (herein “STC Two”), for a lease of 250 square feet of ground at 18301 Ridgeland Ave, Tinley Park, Illinois 60477, legally described in Exhibit 1; and

WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities of the Village of Tinley Park, Cook and Will Counties, Illinois, have determined that it is in the best interest of said Village of Tinley Park and its residents to enter into said Agreement with STC Two; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK, COOK AND WILL COUNTIES, ILLINOIS, STATE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: The foregoing recitals shall be and are hereby incorporated as findings of fact as if said recitals were fully set forth herein.

SECTION 2: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Tinley Park hereby approve said Agreement substantially in the form, attached hereto as Exhibit 1, and made a part hereof, and the Village President and/or Village Manager are hereby authorized to execute and memorialize said Agreement, subject to review and revision as to form by the Village Attorney.

SECTION 3: Any policy, resolution, or ordinance of the Village that conflicts with the provisions of this Resolution shall be and is hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict.

SECTION 4: That the Village Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to publish this Resolution in pamphlet form, and this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval, and publication as required by law.


PASSED THIS 17th day of May, 2022.

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

APPROVED THIS 17th day of May, 2022.

____________________________________ VILLAGE PRESIDENT

ATTEST:

__________________________________ VILLAGE CLERK


STATE OF ILLINOIS )COUNTY OF COOK ) SSCOUNTY OF WILL )

CERTIFICATE

I, NANCY O’CONNOR, Village Clerk of the Village of Tinley Park, Counties of Cook

and Will and State of Illinois, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct

copy of Resolution Number 2022-R-046, “A RESOLUTION APPROVING A GROUND LEASE

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK AND STC TWO, LLC FOR

18301 RIDGELAND AVENUE, TINLEY PARK, ILLINOIS (250 SF),” which was adopted by

the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Tinley Park on the 17th day of May, 2022.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the corporate seal of

the Village of Tinley Park this 17th day of May, 2022.

____________________________________NANCY O’CONNOR, VILLAGE CLERK


Site: TINLEY PARK PUMP SUBSTATIONBUN: 875648101460.003503 4864-5538-8178.2 1

GROUND LEASE AGREEMENT

THIS GROUND LEASE AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made effective this _____________ day of ____________, 2022 (“Effective Date”), by and between THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK (“Lessor”), having a mailing address of 16250 S. Oak Park Ave., Tinley Park, Illinois 60477; and STC TWO LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Lessee”), by and through its attorney-in-fact, Global Signal Acquisitions III LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, with a mailing address of 2000 Corporate Drive, Canonsburg, Pennsylvania 15317.

1. Description of Property. Lessor is the owner of certain real property located in Cook County, Illinois. A description of said property is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” (hereinafter “Lessor’s Property”).

2. Lease of Premises and Permitted Use. Lessor hereby leases to Lessee a two hundred fifty (250) square foot portion of Lessor’s Property, as depicted in the sketch attached hereto as Exhibit “B” (labeled therein as “Additional Tower Area”) and legally described on Exhibit “C” attached hereto (the “Leased Premises”), for the purpose of (i) constructing, maintaining and operating communications facilities, including without limitation, tower structures, antenna support structures, fencing, cabinets, meter boards, buildings, antennas, cables, fiber, and equipment (“Improvements”) and (ii) uses incidental thereto, including without limitation testing of any kind and installation of equipment to accommodate new technologies or future innovations for receiving and transmitting signals for Lessee’s use and the use of its sublessees, licensees, and invitees (collectively the “Permitted Use”). It is the intent of the parties that Lessee’s Improvements shall not constitute a fixture.

3. Easements. Lessor hereby grants the following easements and rights-of-way over, under and upon Lessor’s Property to Lessee, Lessee’s employees, agents, contractors, sublessees, licensees and their employees, agents and contractors: (i) a non-exclusive easement over such portions of Lessor’s Property as is reasonably necessary for the construction, repair, maintenance, replacement, demolition and removal of the facility located or to be located upon Leased Premises; (ii) a non-exclusive easement over such portion of Lessor’s Property as is reasonably necessary to obtain or comply with any Approvals (as defined in Section 7); (iii) a non-exclusive access easement in the location shown on Exhibit “B” and legally described on Exhibit “C”, for ingress, egress and construction purposes including without limitation staging, storing and parking of equipment, vehicles, cranes and related materials, seven (7) days per week, twenty-four (24) hours per day, to extend from the nearest public right-of-way to the Leased Premises (“Access Easement”); (iv) non-exclusive utility easements (collectively, the “Utility Easement”) in the location shown on Exhibit “B” and legally described on Exhibit “C”, for the installation, repair, replacement and maintenance of utility wires, poles, cables, conduits and pipes (collectively, the “Easements”). The Easements shall remain in effect during the Lease Term and thereafter for a reasonable period of time for Lessee to remove its improvements.

4. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be for a period of approximately two (2) years (“Lease Term”), commencing on the Effective Date and ending on March 24, 2024.

5. Lessee’s Right to Terminate; Effect of Termination by Lessee. Lessee shall have the right to terminate this Agreement, at any time, without cause, by providing Lessor with one hundred eighty (180) days’ prior written notice. Any monies owed by either party to the other, up to the date of termination, shall be paid within thirty (30) days of the termination date.

6. Rent. As consideration for Lessor entering into this Agreement, Lessee agrees to pay to Lessor an amount of thirty percent (30%) of the rental, license or similar payments actually received by



Lessee from any future unaffiliated third party subtenants, licensees, or grantees of use or occupancy rights in the Leased Premises (each, a “Revenue Subtenant”), within thirty (30) days after receipt of said payments by Lessee (excluding any reimbursement of taxes, construction costs, installation costs or revenue share reimbursement) (the “Additional Rent”). Lessee shall have no obligation for payment to Lessor of such share of rental, license or similar payments if not actually received by Lessee. Non-payment of such rental, license or other similar payment by a Revenue Subtenant shall not be an event of default under this Agreement. Lessee shall have sole discretion as to whether, and on what terms, to sublease, license or otherwise allow occupancy of the Leased Premises and there shall be no express or implied obligation for Lessee to sublease, license or otherwise allow occupancy of the Leased Premises Lessor acknowledges that Lessor shall have no recourse against Lessee as a result of the failure of payment or other obligation by a Revenue Subtenant.

7. Lessor’s Cooperation. During the Lease Term, Lessor shall: (i) cooperate with Lessee in its efforts to obtain all of the certificates, permits, licenses and other approvals that Lessee, in its sole discretion, deems necessary for its intended use of the Leased Premises (“Approvals”), including all appeals; and (ii) take no action that would adversely affect the Leased Premises. Lessor acknowledges that Lessee’s ability to use the Leased Premises is contingent upon Lessee obtaining and maintaining the Approvals. Additionally, Lessor grants to Lessee and its employees, representatives, agents, and consultants a limited power of attorney to prepare, execute, submit, file and present on behalf of Lessor building, permitting, zoning or land-use applications with the appropriate local, state and/or federal agencies necessary to obtain land use changes, special exceptions, zoning variances, conditional use permits, special use permits, administrative permits, construction permits, operation permits and/or building permits. Lessor understands that any such application and/or the satisfaction of any requirements thereof may require Lessor’s cooperation, which Lessor hereby agrees to provide. Lessor shall not do or permit anything that will interfere with or negate any Approvals pertaining to the Improvements or Leased Premises or cause them to be in nonconformance with applicable local, state or federal laws. Lessor agrees to execute such documents as may be necessary to obtain and thereafter maintain the Approvals, and agrees to be named as the applicant for said Approvals.

8. Hazardous Materials.

(A) Lessee’s Obligation and Indemnity. Lessee shall not (either with or without negligence) cause or permit the escape, disposal or release of any Hazardous Materials on or from the Leased Premises in any manner prohibited by law. Lessee shall indemnify and hold Lessor harmless from any and all claims, damages, fines, judgments, penalties, costs, liabilities or losses (including, without limitation, any and all sums paid for settlement of claims, attorneys’ fees, and consultants’ and experts’ fees) arising from the release of any Hazardous Materials on the Leased Premises if caused by Lessee or persons acting under Lessee.

(B) Lessor’s Obligation and Indemnity. Lessor shall not (either with or without negligence) cause or permit the escape, disposal or release of any Hazardous Materials on or from Lessor’s Property or Leased Premises in any manner prohibited by law. Lessor shall indemnify and hold Lessee harmless from any and all claims, damages, fines, judgments, penalties, costs, liabilities or losses (including, without limitation, any and all sums paid for settlement of claims, attorneys’ fees, and consultants’ and experts’ fees) arising from the presence or release of any Hazardous Materials on Lessor’s Property or Leased Premises unless caused by Lessee or persons acting under Lessee.

(C) For purposes of this Agreement the term “Hazardous Materials” means any substance which is (i) designated, defined, classified or regulated as a hazardous substance,



hazardous material, hazardous waste, pollutant or contaminant under any Environmental Law, as currently in effect or as hereafter amended or enacted, (ii) a petroleum hydrocarbon, including crude oil or any fraction thereof and all petroleum products, (iii) PCBs, (iv) lead, (v) asbestos, (vi) flammable explosives, (vii) infectious materials, or (viii) radioactive materials. “Environmental Law(s)” means the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. Sections 9601, et seq., the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. Sections 6901, et seq., the Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. Sections 2601, et seq., the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. 5101, et seq., and the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. Sections 1251, et seq., as said laws have been supplemented or amended to date, the regulations promulgated pursuant to said laws and any other federal, state or local law, statute, rule, regulation or ordinance which regulates or proscribes the use, storage, disposal, presence, clean-up, transportation or release or threatened release into the environment of Hazardous Material.

9. Insurance. Lessee, at its sole expense, shall obtain and keep in force insurance which may be required by any federal, state or local statute or ordinance of any governmental body having jurisdiction in connection with the operation of Lessee’s business upon the Leased Premises. At a minimum, said insurance shall include Commercial General Liability coverage in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 in the aggregate and shall name Lessor as an additional insured. The required limits recited herein may be met by primary and excess or umbrella policies covering other locations. Upon Lessor’s written request, which request shall not exceed once per year, Lessee will provide Lessor with a copy of the certificate of insurance evidencing such coverage.

10. Removal of Obstructions. Lessee has the right to remove obstructions from Lessor’s Property, including but not limited to vegetation, which may encroach upon, interfere with or present a hazard to Lessee’s use of the Leased Premises or the Easements.

11. INTENTIONALLY DELETED.

12. Real Estate Taxes. Lessor shall pay all real estate taxes on Lessor’s Property. Lessee agrees to reimburse Lessor for any documented increase in real estate or personal property taxes levied against Lessor’s Property that are directly attributable to the Improvements constructed by Lessee. Lessor agrees to provide Lessee any documentation evidencing the increase and how such increase is attributable to Lessee’s use. Lessee reserves the right to challenge any such assessment, and Lessor agrees to cooperate with Lessee in connection with any such challenge. Notwithstanding any language in this section to the contrary, Lessee shall not be obligated to reimburse Lessor for any applicable taxes, unless Lessor requests such reimbursement, including any required documentation, within one (1) year after the date such taxes became due.

13. Waiver of Claims and Rights of Subrogation. The parties hereby waive any and all rights of action for negligence against the other on account of damage to the Improvements, Lessor’s Property or to the Leased Premises resulting from any fire or other casualty of the kind covered by property insurance policies with extended coverage, regardless of whether or not, or in what amount, such insurance is carried by the parties. All policies of property insurance carried by either party for the Improvements, Lessor’s Property or the Leased Premises shall include a clause or endorsement denying to the insurer rights by way of subrogation against the other party to the extent rights have been waived by the insured before the occurrence of injury or loss.

14. Default.



(A) Notice of Default; Cure Period. In the event that there is a default by Lessor or Lessee (the “Defaulting Party”) with respect to any of the provisions of this Agreement or Lessor’s or Lessee’s obligations under this Agreement, the other party (the “Non-Defaulting Party”) shall give the Defaulting Party written notice of such default. After receipt of such written notice, the Defaulting Party shall have thirty (30) days in which to cure any monetary default and sixty (60) days in which to cure any non-monetary default. The Defaulting Party shall have such extended periods as may be required beyond the sixty (60) day cure period to cure any non-monetary default if the nature of the cure is such that it reasonably requires more than sixty (60) days to cure, and Defaulting Party commences the cure within the sixty (60) day period and thereafter continuously and diligently pursues the cure to completion. The Non-Defaulting Party may not maintain any action or effect any remedies for default against the Defaulting Party unless and until the Defaulting Party has failed to cure the same within the time periods provided in this Section.

(B) Consequences of Lessee’s Default. In the event that Lessee is in default beyond the applicable periods set forth above, Lessor shall have the right to injunctive relief, to require specific performance of this Agreement and to pursue an action for damages available at law.

(C) Consequences of Lessor’s Default. In the event that Lessor is in default beyond the applicable periods set forth above, Lessee shall have the right to injunctive relief, to require specific performance of this Agreement, to pursue an action for damages, terminate the Lease, vacate the Leased Premises and be relieved from all further obligations under this Agreement; perform the obligation(s) of Lessor specified in such notice, and charge Lessor for any expenditures reasonably made by Lessee in so doing or set-off from rent and payments due hereunder any amount reasonably expended by Lessee as a result of such default.

15. Limitation on Damages. In no event shall either party be liable to the other for consequential, indirect, speculative or punitive damages in connection with or arising from this Agreement, or the use of the Leased Premises, Easements, and/or Utility Easement.

16. Hold Harmless. Each party shall indemnify and defend the other party against, and hold the other party harmless from, any claim of liability or loss from personal injury or property damage arising from the use and occupancy of the Leased Premises or Lessor’s Property by such indemnifying party, its employees, contractors, servants or agents, except to the extent such claims are caused by the intentional misconduct or negligent acts or omissions of the other party, its employees, contractors, servants or agents.

17. Lessor’s Covenant of Title. Lessor covenants that Lessor holds good and marketable fee simple title to Lessor’s Property and the Leased Premises and has full authority to enter into and execute this Agreement.

18. Interference with Lessee’s Business. Lessor agrees that it will not permit the construction, installation or operation on Lessor’s Property of (i) any additional wireless communications facilities or (ii) any equipment or device that interferes with Lessee’s use of the Leased Premises for a wireless communications facility. Each of the covenants made by Lessor in this Section is a covenant running with the land for the benefit of the Leased Premises.

19. Eminent Domain. If Lessor receives notice of a proposed or threatened taking by eminent domain of any part of the land upon which the Leased Premises or Easements are situated, whether through a condemnation lawsuit or the acquisition of land pursuant to the power of eminent domain (a “Taking”), Lessor will notify Lessee of the proposed Taking within five (5) business days of receiving said notice. If



the Taking affects any portion of the Leased Premises or Easements that is less than the entire Leased Premises and Easements (a “Partial Taking”), then Lessee will have the option to either (i) declare the Agreement null and void, effective as of the date of Taking, and thereafter neither party will have any liability or obligation hereunder; or (ii) remain in possession of that portion of the Leased Premises and Easements that will not be taken, in which event there shall be an equitable adjustment in rent on account of the portion of the Leased Premises and Easements so taken. In the event of a Partial Taking, the parties shall enter into any amendment of the Agreement made necessary as a result of the Partial Taking. With respect to any Taking each party shall have the right to contest the Taking and directly pursue an award for their respective interests.

20. Applicable Law. This Agreement and the performance thereof shall be governed, interpreted, construed and regulated by the laws of the State where the Leased Premises is located. The parties agree that the venue for any litigation regarding this Agreement shall be in the state or federal courts in the county where the Leased Premises is located.

21. Notices. All notices hereunder shall be in writing and shall be given by (i) established express delivery service which maintains delivery records, (ii) hand delivery, or (iii) certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested. Notices may also be given by facsimile transmission, provided that the notice is concurrently given by one of the above methods. Notices are effective upon receipt, or upon attempted delivery if delivery is refused or if delivery is impossible because of failure to provide reasonable means for accomplishing delivery. The notices shall be sent to the parties at the following addresses:

Lessor:Village of Tinley Park16250 S. Oak Park Ave.Tinley Park, Illinois 60477

Lessee:STC Two LLCc/o Crown Castle USA Inc.Attn: Legal – Real Estate Department2000 Corporate DriveCanonsburg, Pennsylvania 15317

22. Assignment, Sublease, Licensing and Encumbrance. Lessee shall not assign or transfer this Agreement or sublet all or any portion of the Leased Premises without the prior written consent of Lessor, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Lessee shall have the right to sublease or assign its rights under this Agreement to any of its subsidiaries, affiliates, entities or successor legal entities, or to any entity acquiring substantially all of the assets of Lessee, without notice to or consent of Lessor. Lessee may permit additional parties and co-locators to use the Leased Premises as it may from time to time deem necessary and/or appropriate, provided such use does not materially and adversely interfere with Lessor’s use of Lessor’s Property and, provided, however, no additional parties or co-locators may be granted access to the Leased Premises or be permitted to use the Leased Premises and improvements thereon without the express written consent of Lessor, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed. An effective assignment of this Agreement by Lessee (with Lessor’s consent, if required) shall relieve Lessee from any further liability or obligation. Lessee has the further right to pledge or encumber its interest in this Agreement. Upon request to Lessor from any leasehold mortgagee, Lessor agrees to give the holder of such leasehold mortgage



written notice of any default by Lessee and an opportunity to cure any such default within fifteen (15) days after such notice with respect to monetary defaults and within a commercially reasonable period of time after such notice with respect to any non-monetary default.

23. Mortgages. In the event that the Leased Premises is currently encumbered or shall become encumbered by such a mortgage, Lessor shall obtain and furnish to Lessee a commercially reasonable non-disturbance agreement, in a form reasonably acceptable to Lessee, for each such mortgage, in recordable form. If Lessor fails to provide any non-disturbance agreement, Lessee may withhold and accrue, without interest, the rent and other payments due hereunder until such time as Lessee receives all such documentation.

24. Sale of Property. If Lessor sells all or part of Lessor’s Property, of which the Leased Premises is a part then such sale shall be under and subject to this Agreement.

25. Surrender of Property. Upon expiration or termination of this Agreement, Lessee shall, within a reasonable time, remove all above ground Improvements and restore the Leased Premises as nearly as reasonably possible to its original condition, without, however, being required to replace any trees or other plants removed, or alter the then existing grading.

26. Quiet Enjoyment. Lessor covenants that Lessee, on paying rent and performing the covenants of this Agreement, shall peaceably and quietly have, hold and enjoy the Leased Premises and Easements.

27. Lessor’s Waiver. Lessor hereby waives and releases any and all liens, whether statutory or under common law, with respect to any of Lessee’s property now or hereafter located on the Leased Premises.

28. Miscellaneous.

Recording. Lessee shall have the right to record a memorandum of this Agreement with the appropriate recording officer. Lessor shall execute and deliver such a memorandum, for no additional consideration, promptly upon Lessee’s request.

Entire Agreement. Lessor and Lessee agree that this Agreement contains all of the agreements, promises and understandings between Lessor and Lessee. No oral agreements, promises or understandings shall be binding upon either Lessor or Lessee in any dispute, controversy or proceeding at law. Any addition, variation or modification to this Agreement shall be void and ineffective unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto.

Captions. The captions preceding the Sections of this Agreement are intended only for convenience of reference and in no way define, limit or describe the scope of this Agreement or the intent of any provision hereof.

Construction of Document. Lessor and Lessee acknowledge that this document shall not be construed in favor of or against the drafter by virtue of said party being the drafter and that this Agreement shall not be construed as a binding offer until signed by Lessee.



Partial Invalidity. If any term of this Agreement is found to be void or invalid, then such invalidity shall not affect the remaining terms of this Agreement, which shall continue in full force and effect.

IRS Form W-9. Lessor agrees to provide Lessee with a completed IRS Form W-9, or its equivalent, upon execution of this Agreement and at such other times as may be reasonably requested by Lessee. In the event the Lessor’s Property is transferred, the succeeding Lessor shall have a duty at the time of such transfer to provide Lessee with a completed IRS Form W-9, or its equivalent, and other related paper work to affect a transfer in Rent to the new Lessor. Lessor’s failure to provide the IRS Form W-9 within thirty (30) days after Lessee’s request shall be considered a default and Lessee may take any reasonable action necessary to comply with IRS regulations including, but not limited to, withholding applicable taxes from Rent payments.

Authority. The execution and delivery of this Agreement by Lessor, and the performance of this Agreement by Lessor, have been duly authorized by Lessor, and this Agreement is binding on Lessor and enforceable against Lessor in accordance with its terms. Lessor warrants and represents that neither the execution of this Agreement, nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, will (1) conflict with, or result in a breach of the terms, conditions or provisions of, or constitute a default under, the Lease, or any other agreement or instrument to which Lessor is party or to which Lessor’s Property is subject; or (2) constitute a violation of any applicable judgment, decree or order to which Lessor or Lessor’s Property is subject. Lessor covenants and agrees to defend, indemnify and save and hold harmless Lessee, together with its officers, members, managers, employees, attorneys, representatives, successors and assigns from and against any loss, cost, expense, liability, claim or legal damages (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees) arising out of or resulting from any claim by any third party against Lessee arising from a breach of Lessor’s representations and warranties contained in this paragraph.

[Signature pages follow]



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Lessor and Lessee having read the foregoing and intending to be legally bound hereby, have executed this Agreement as of the day and year this Agreement is fully executed.

LESSOR:

THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK

By:

Name:

Title:

TENANT:

STC TWO LLC,a Delaware limited liability company

By: Global Signal Acquisitions III LLC,a Delaware limited liability company

Its: Attorney-in-Fact

By: __________________________________

Name: __________________________________

Title: __________________________________


Site: TINLEY PARK PUMP SUBSTATIONBUN: 875648101460.003503 4864-5538-8178.2 A-1

EXHIBIT “A”

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LESSOR’S PROPERTY

Land situated in Cook County, Illinois, more particularly described as follows:

Tax Parcel Identification Nos: 31-05-100-015

Common Address: 18301 Ridgeland Ave, Tinley Park, Illinois 60477


Site: TINLEY PARK PUMP SUBSTATIONBUN: 875648101460.003503 4864-5538-8178.2 B-1

EXHIBIT “B”

SURVEY










Site: TINLEY PARK PUMP SUBSTATIONBUN: 875648101460.003503 4864-5538-8178.2 C-1

EXHIBIT “C”

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LEASED PREMISES AND EASEMENTS


LEASED PREMISES

THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF FRACTIONAL SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 35 NORTH, RANGE 13 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, NORTH OF THE INDIAN BOUNDARY LINE, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 88°23'41" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, 532.10 FEET (RECORD = 532.00 FEET) TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE (VACATED BY DOCUMENT NUMBER 97572134); THENCE SOUTH 1°37'05" EAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE AND NORTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, 204.86 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°03'26" EAST, 0.60 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°17'14" EAST, 20.43 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 1°17'14" EAST, 12.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87°18'52" WEST, 20.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1°17'14" WEST, 12.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87°18'52" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

CONTAINING 250 SQUARE FEET (0.006 ACRES), MORE OR LESS.

ACCESS EASEMENT


COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 88°23'41" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, 532.10 FEET (RECORD = 532.00 FEET) TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE (VACATED BY DOCUMENT NUMBER 97572134); THENCE SOUTH 1°37'05" EAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE AND NORTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, 204.86 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°03'26" WEST, 10.88 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 88°03'26" WEST, 37.61 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1°40'46" WEST, 155.15 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF 183RD STREET; THENCE NORTH 88°23'41" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 12.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°40'46" EAST, 143.08 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°03'26" EAST, 25.56 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°56'34" EAST, 12.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

CONTAINING 2,168 SQUARE FEET (0.050 ACRES), MORE OR LESS.

UTILITY EASEMENT

UTILITY EASEMENT "A"

THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF FRACTIONAL SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 35



NORTH, RANGE 13 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, NORTH OF THE INDIAN BOUNDARY LINE, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 88°23'41" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, 532.10 FEET (RECORD = 532.00 FEET) TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE (VACATED BY DOCUMENT NUMBER 97572134); THENCE SOUTH 1°37'05" EAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE AND NORTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, 204.86 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°03'26" EAST, 0.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88°03'26" WEST, 8.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1°12'39" WEST, 154.91 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF 183RD STREET; THENCE NORTH 88°23'41" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 8.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°12'39" EAST, 154.86 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.


UTILITY EASEMENT "B"


COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 88°23'41" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, 532.10 FEET (RECORD = 532.00 FEET) TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE (VACATED BY DOCUMENT NUMBER 97572134); THENCE SOUTH 1°37'05" EAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE AND NORTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, 204.86 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°03'26" EAST, 0.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 88°03'26" EAST, 8.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°17'14" EAST, 32.83 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87°18'52" WEST, 8.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1°17'14" WEST, 32.93 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.


UTILITY EASEMENT "C"


COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 88°23'41" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, 532.10 FEET (RECORD = 532.00 FEET) TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE (VACATED BY DOCUMENT NUMBER 97572134); THENCE SOUTH 1°37'05" EAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE AND NORTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, 204.86 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°03'26" EAST, 0.60 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°17'14" EAST, 32.93 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87°18'52" WEST, 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 77°36'23" WEST, 70.69 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°25'37" WEST, 19.68 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 8°09'49" WEST, 7.29 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87°48'06" WEST, 34.37 FEET; THENCE NORTH



58°23'45" WEST, 44.67 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE, AS RELOCATED; THENCE NORTH 42°25'01" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 13.38 FEET; THENCE NORTH 47°30'32" EAST, 6.57 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 58°23'45" EAST, 53.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87°48'06" EAST, 22.74 FEET; THENCE NORTH 8°09'49" EAST, 7.19 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°25'37" EAST, 29.54 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 77°36'23" EAST, 69.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°17'14" EAST, 10.29 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 1,836 SQUARE FEET (0.042 ACRES), MORE OR LESS.

Part of Tax Parcel Identification Nos: 31-05-100-015




RESOLUTIONNUMBER 2022-R-047


(18301 RIDGELAND AVENUE, TINLEY PARK, ILLINOIS)

MICHAEL W. GLOTZ, PRESIDENTNANCY O’CONNOR, VILLAGE CLERK




Board of Trustees


200 W. Adams, Suite 2125, Chicago, IL 60606

Page | 48AGENDA - 5/17/2022, C -... VILLAGE OF TINLEY...


RESOLUTION NUMBER 2022-R-047


(18301 RIDGELAND AVENUE, TINLEY PARK, ILLINOIS)


WHEREAS, the Village of Tinley Park (“Village’) is currently under a ground leasing agreement with SprintCom, LLC, related to a PCS Site Agreement which is set to expire on March 24, 2024 at 18301 Ridgeland Ave, Tinley Park, Illinois 60477 (“Subject Property”); and

WHEREAS, STC Two, LLC (herein “STC Two”) has become the successor of SprintCom. LLC’s interest in the previous ground lease agreement; and

WHEREAS, STC Two desires to remain a tenant after the expiration of the existing lease, requiring a new ground lease agreement to revise the parties’ landlord-tenant relationship following its expiration; and

WHEREAS, the Village desires to enter into said Ground Lease Agreement (“Agreement), attached hereto as Exhibit 1, with STC Two, for a lease of a maximum of 787 square feet of the Subject Property; and

WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities of the Village of Tinley Park, Cook and Will Counties, Illinois, have determined that it is in the best interest of said Village of Tinley Park and its residents to enter into said Agreement with STC Two; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK, COOK AND WILL COUNTIES, ILLINOIS, STATE AS FOLLOWS:


SECTION 2: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Tinley Park hereby approve said Agreement substantially in the form, attached hereto as Exhibit 1, and made a part hereof,


and the Village President and/or Village Manager are hereby authorized to execute and memorialize said Agreement, subject to review and revision as to form by the Village Attorney.

SECTION 3: Any policy, resolution, or ordinance of the Village that conflicts with the provisions of this Resolution shall be and is hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict.

SECTION 4: That the Village Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to publish this Resolution in pamphlet form, and this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval, and publication as required by law.


AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:



ATTEST:

__________________________________ VILLAGE CLERK



CERTIFICATE

I, NANCY O’CONNOR, Village Clerk of the Village of Tinley Park, Counties of Cook


copy of Resolution Number 2022-R-047, “A RESOLUTION APPROVING A GROUND LEASE

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK AND STC TWO, LLC (18301

RIDGELAND AVENUE, TINLEY PARK, ILLINOIS),” which was adopted by the President and

Board of Trustees of the Village of Tinley Park on the 17th day of May, 2022.



____________________________________NANCY O’CONNOR, VILLAGE CLERK



GROUND LEASE AGREEMENT

THIS GROUND LEASE AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made effective this _____________ day of ____________, 2022 (“Effective Date”), by and between THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK (“Lessor”), having a mailing address of 16250 S. Oak Park Ave., Tinley Park, Illinois 60477; and STC TWO LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Lessee”), by and through its attorney-in-fact, Global Signal Acquisitions III LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, with a mailing address of 2000 Corporate Drive, Canonsburg, Pennsylvania 15317.

RECITALS

WHEREAS, Lessor and Lessee are the current parties under that certain PCS Site Agreement having a date of execution of March 25, 1999, with a commencement date of March 25, 1999, originally by and between SprintCom, Inc., a Kansas corporation (“SprintCom”), as tenant, and Lessor, as landlord (the “Lease”), whereby SprintCom leased certain real property from Landlord, together with access and utility easements, that is more particularly described in the Lease, which is located on a portion of Lessor’s Property (defined below);

WHEREAS, the Lease was amended by that certain Settlement Agreement and Amendment to PCS Site Agreement effective as of December 28, 1998;

WHEREAS, Lessee is the successor in interest under the Lease to SprintCom;

WHEREAS, the current term of the Lease will expire on March 24, 2024, however, Lessee does not wish to renew the Lease and will exercise its option to allow the Lease to expire; and

WHEREAS, Lessee wishes to remain a tenant on Lessor’s Property after expiration of the Lease, and as a condition to doing so, Lessor has required that Lessee to enter into a new ground lease agreement (i.e., this Agreement) to revise and define the parties’ landlord-tenant relationship following the expiration of the Lease.

NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Lessor and Lessee agree as follows:

OPERATIVE PROVISIONS

1. Description of Property. Lessor is the owner of certain real property located in Cook County, Illinois. A description of said property is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” (hereinafter “Lessor’s Property”).

2. Lease of Premises and Permitted Use.

(A) Lessor leases to Lessee a seven hundred eighty seven (787) square foot portion of Lessor’s Property (the “Leased Premises”), as further depicted in the survey attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and as legally described on Exhibit “C” attached hereto, for the purpose of (i) constructing, maintaining and operating communications facilities, including without limitation, tower structures, antenna support structures, fencing, cabinets, meter boards, buildings, antennas, cables, fiber, and equipment (“Improvements”) and (ii) uses incidental thereto, including without limitation testing of any kind and installation of equipment to accommodate new



technologies or future innovations for receiving and transmitting signals for Lessee’s use and the use of its sublessees, licensees, and invitees (collectively the “Permitted Use”). It is the intent of the parties that Lessee’s Improvements shall not constitute a fixture.

(B) In addition to the above grant and lease to Lessee, Lessor is hereby given the right to have Lessee install and/or relocate municipal communications antennas (specifications of which are to be furnished to Lessee) to the communications monopole already constructed on, or to be constructed on, the Leased Premises by Lessee. Any such installation and/or relocation shall be at the sole cost and expense of Lessee, and shall be completed in accordance with plans and specifications approved by Lessee, within such time as is mutually agreeable to the parties hereto.

3. Easements. Lessor hereby grants the following easements and rights-of-way over, under and upon Lessor’s Property to Lessee, Lessee’s employees, agents, contractors, sublessees, licensees and their employees, agents and contractors: (i) a non-exclusive easement over such portions of Lessor’s Property as is reasonably necessary for the construction, repair, maintenance, replacement, demolition and removal of the facility located or to be located upon Leased Premises; (ii) a non-exclusive easement over such portion of Lessor’s Property as is reasonably necessary to obtain or comply with any Approvals (as defined in Section 7); (iii) a non-exclusive access easement in the location shown on Exhibit “B” and legally described on Exhibit “C”, for ingress, egress and construction purposes including without limitation staging, storing and parking of equipment, vehicles, cranes and related materials, seven (7) days per week, twenty-four (24) hours per day, to extend from the nearest public right-of-way to the Leased Premises (“Access Easement”); (iv) non-exclusive utility easements (collectively, the “Utility Easement”) in the location shown on Exhibit “B” and legally described on Exhibit “C”, for the installation, repair, replacement and maintenance of utility wires, poles, cables, conduits and pipes (collectively, the “Easements”). The Easements shall remain in effect during the Lease Term and thereafter for a reasonable period of time for Lessee to remove its improvements.

4. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be for a period of five (5) years (“Initial Term”), commencing on March 25, 2024 (the “Commencement Date”). This Agreement will be automatically renewed for four (4) additional terms (each a “Renewal Term”) of five (5) years each (together the “Lease Term”) unless terminated pursuant to the provisions set forth herein. This Agreement, including all Renewal Terms, if exercised, will expire on March 24, 2049.

5. Lessee’s Right to Terminate; Effect of Termination by Lessee. Lessee shall have the right to terminate this Agreement, at any time, without cause, by providing Lessor with one hundred eighty (180) days’ prior written notice. Any monies owed by either party to the other, up to the date of termination, shall be paid within thirty (30) days of the termination date.

6. Rent.

(A) As consideration for Lessor entering into this Agreement, commencing on the Commencement Date, Lessee shall pay Lessor Twenty Seven Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($27,000.00) per year in rent, to be paid on an annual basis. Rent for each Renewal Term will be the annual rent in effect for the final year of the Initial Term or prior Renewal Term, as the case may be, increased by fifteen percent (15%).

(B) As generally depicted on the survey attached hereto as Exhibit “B”, the Leased Premises contains a certain two hundred fifty (250) square foot area which is labeled therein as the “Additional Tower Area”. In addition to the consideration set forth in Section 6(A) herein, Lessee agrees to pay to Lessor an amount of thirty percent (30%) of the rental, license or similar payments



actually received by Lessee from any current or future unaffiliated third party subtenants, licensees, or grantees of use or occupancy rights in the Additional Tower Area (each, a “Revenue Subtenant”), within thirty (30) days after receipt of said payments by Lessee (excluding any reimbursement of taxes, construction costs, installation costs or revenue share reimbursement) (the “Additional Rent”). Lessee shall have no obligation for payment to Lessor of such share of rental, license or similar payments if not actually received by Lessee. Non-payment of such rental, license or other similar payment by a Revenue Subtenant shall not be an event of default under this Agreement. Lessee shall have sole discretion as to whether, and on what terms, to sublease, license or otherwise allow occupancy of the Additional Tower Area and there shall be no express or implied obligation for Lessee to sublease, license or otherwise allow occupancy of the Additional Tower Area. Lessor acknowledges that Lessor shall have no recourse against Lessee as a result of the failure of payment or other obligation by a Revenue Subtenant.

7. Lessor’s Cooperation. During the Lease Term, Lessor shall: (i) cooperate with Lessee in its efforts to obtain all of the certificates, permits, licenses and other approvals that Lessee, in its sole discretion, deems necessary for its intended use of the Leased Premises (“Approvals”), including all appeals; and (ii) take no action that would adversely affect the Leased Premises. Lessor acknowledges that Lessee’s ability to use the Leased Premises is contingent upon Lessee obtaining and maintaining the Approvals. Additionally, Lessor grants to Lessee and its employees, representatives, agents, and consultants a limited power of attorney to prepare, execute, submit, file and present on behalf of Lessor building, permitting, zoning or land-use applications with the appropriate local, state and/or federal agencies necessary to obtain land use changes, special exceptions, zoning variances, conditional use permits, special use permits, administrative permits, construction permits, operation permits and/or building permits. Lessor understands that any such application and/or the satisfaction of any requirements thereof may require Lessor’s cooperation, which Lessor hereby agrees to provide. Lessor shall not do or permit anything that will interfere with or negate any Approvals pertaining to the Improvements or Leased Premises or cause them to be in nonconformance with applicable local, state or federal laws. Lessor agrees to execute such documents as may be necessary to obtain and thereafter maintain the Approvals, and agrees to be named as the applicant for said Approvals.

8. Hazardous Materials.

(A) Lessee’s Obligation and Indemnity. Lessee shall not (either with or without negligence) cause or permit the escape, disposal or release of any Hazardous Materials on or from the Leased Premises in any manner prohibited by law. Lessee shall indemnify and hold Lessor harmless from any and all claims, damages, fines, judgments, penalties, costs, liabilities or losses (including, without limitation, any and all sums paid for settlement of claims, attorneys’ fees, and consultants’ and experts’ fees) arising from the release of any Hazardous Materials on the Leased Premises if caused by Lessee or persons acting under Lessee.

(B) Lessor’s Obligation and Indemnity. Lessor shall not (either with or without negligence) cause or permit the escape, disposal or release of any Hazardous Materials on or from Lessor’s Property or Leased Premises in any manner prohibited by law. Lessor shall indemnify and hold Lessee harmless from any and all claims, damages, fines, judgments, penalties, costs, liabilities or losses (including, without limitation, any and all sums paid for settlement of claims, attorneys’ fees, and consultants’ and experts’ fees) arising from the presence or release of any Hazardous Materials on Lessor’s Property or Leased Premises unless caused by Lessee or persons acting under Lessee.



(C) For purposes of this Agreement the term “Hazardous Materials” means any substance which is (i) designated, defined, classified or regulated as a hazardous substance, hazardous material, hazardous waste, pollutant or contaminant under any Environmental Law, as currently in effect or as hereafter amended or enacted, (ii) a petroleum hydrocarbon, including crude oil or any fraction thereof and all petroleum products, (iii) PCBs, (iv) lead, (v) asbestos, (vi) flammable explosives, (vii) infectious materials, or (viii) radioactive materials. “Environmental Law(s)” means the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. Sections 9601, et seq., the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. Sections 6901, et seq., the Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. Sections 2601, et seq., the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. 5101, et seq., and the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. Sections 1251, et seq., as said laws have been supplemented or amended to date, the regulations promulgated pursuant to said laws and any other federal, state or local law, statute, rule, regulation or ordinance which regulates or proscribes the use, storage, disposal, presence, clean-up, transportation or release or threatened release into the environment of Hazardous Material.

9. Insurance. Lessee, at its sole expense, shall obtain and keep in force insurance which may be required by any federal, state or local statute or ordinance of any governmental body having jurisdiction in connection with the operation of Lessee’s business upon the Leased Premises. At a minimum, said insurance shall include Commercial General Liability coverage in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 in the aggregate and shall name Lessor as an additional insured. The required limits recited herein may be met by primary and excess or umbrella policies covering other locations. Upon Lessor’s written request, which request shall not exceed once per year, Lessee will provide Lessor with a copy of the certificate of insurance evidencing such coverage.

10. Removal of Obstructions. Lessee has the right to remove obstructions from Lessor’s Property, including but not limited to vegetation, which may encroach upon, interfere with or present a hazard to Lessee’s use of the Leased Premises or the Easements.

11. INTENTIONALLY DELETED.

12. Real Estate Taxes. Lessor shall pay all real estate taxes on Lessor’s Property. Lessee agrees to reimburse Lessor for any documented increase in real estate or personal property taxes levied against Lessor’s Property that are directly attributable to the Improvements constructed by Lessee. Lessor agrees to provide Lessee any documentation evidencing the increase and how such increase is attributable to Lessee’s use. Lessee reserves the right to challenge any such assessment, and Lessor agrees to cooperate with Lessee in connection with any such challenge. Notwithstanding any language in this section to the contrary, Lessee shall not be obligated to reimburse Lessor for any applicable taxes, unless Lessor requests such reimbursement, including any required documentation, within one (1) year after the date such taxes became due.

13. Waiver of Claims and Rights of Subrogation. The parties hereby waive any and all rights of action for negligence against the other on account of damage to the Improvements, Lessor’s Property or to the Leased Premises resulting from any fire or other casualty of the kind covered by property insurance policies with extended coverage, regardless of whether or not, or in what amount, such insurance is carried by the parties. All policies of property insurance carried by either party for the Improvements, Lessor’s Property or the Leased Premises shall include a clause or endorsement denying to the insurer rights by way of subrogation against the other party to the extent rights have been waived by the insured before the occurrence of injury or loss.



14. Default.

(A) Notice of Default; Cure Period. In the event that there is a default by Lessor or Lessee (the “Defaulting Party”) with respect to any of the provisions of this Agreement or Lessor’s or Lessee’s obligations under this Agreement, the other party (the “Non-Defaulting Party”) shall give the Defaulting Party written notice of such default. After receipt of such written notice, the Defaulting Party shall have thirty (30) days in which to cure any monetary default and sixty (60) days in which to cure any non-monetary default. The Defaulting Party shall have such extended periods as may be required beyond the sixty (60) day cure period to cure any non-monetary default if the nature of the cure is such that it reasonably requires more than sixty (60) days to cure, and Defaulting Party commences the cure within the sixty (60) day period and thereafter continuously and diligently pursues the cure to completion. The Non-Defaulting Party may not maintain any action or effect any remedies for default against the Defaulting Party unless and until the Defaulting Party has failed to cure the same within the time periods provided in this Section.

(B) Consequences of Lessee’s Default. In the event that Lessee is in default beyond the applicable periods set forth above, Lessor shall have the right to injunctive relief, to require specific performance of this Agreement and to pursue an action for damages available at law.

(C) Consequences of Lessor’s Default. In the event that Lessor is in default beyond the applicable periods set forth above, Lessee shall have the right to injunctive relief, to require specific performance of this Agreement, to pursue an action for damages, terminate the Lease, vacate the Leased Premises and be relieved from all further obligations under this Agreement; perform the obligation(s) of Lessor specified in such notice, and charge Lessor for any expenditures reasonably made by Lessee in so doing or set-off from rent any amount reasonably expended by Lessee as a result of such default.

15. Limitation on Damages. In no event shall either party be liable to the other for consequential, indirect, speculative or punitive damages in connection with or arising from this Agreement, or the use of the Leased Premises, Easements, and/or Utility Easement.

16. Hold Harmless. Each party shall indemnify and defend the other party against, and hold the other party harmless from, any claim of liability or loss from personal injury or property damage arising from the use and occupancy of the Leased Premises or Lessor’s Property by such indemnifying party, its employees, contractors, servants or agents, except to the extent such claims are caused by the intentional misconduct or negligent acts or omissions of the other party, its employees, contractors, servants or agents.

17. Lessor’s Covenant of Title. Lessor covenants that Lessor holds good and marketable fee simple title to Lessor’s Property and the Leased Premises and has full authority to enter into and execute this Agreement.

18. Interference with Lessee’s Business. Lessor agrees that it will not permit the construction, installation or operation on Lessor’s Property of (i) any additional wireless communications facilities or (ii) any equipment or device that interferes with Lessee’s use of the Leased Premises for a wireless communications facility. Each of the covenants made by Lessor in this Section is a covenant running with the land for the benefit of the Leased Premises.

19. Eminent Domain. If Lessor receives notice of a proposed or threatened taking by eminent domain of any part of the land upon which the Leased Premises or Easements are situated, whether through



a condemnation lawsuit or the acquisition of land pursuant to the power of eminent domain (a “Taking”), Lessor will notify Lessee of the proposed Taking within five (5) business days of receiving said notice. If the Taking affects any portion of the Leased Premises or Easements that is less than the entire Leased Premises and Easements (a “Partial Taking”), then Lessee will have the option to either (i) declare the Agreement null and void, effective as of the date of Taking, and thereafter neither party will have any liability or obligation hereunder; or (ii) remain in possession of that portion of the Leased Premises and Easements that will not be taken, in which event there shall be an equitable adjustment in rent on account of the portion of the Leased Premises and Easements so taken. In the event of a Partial Taking, the parties shall enter into any amendment of the Agreement made necessary as a result of the Partial Taking. With respect to any Taking each party shall have the right to contest the Taking and directly pursue an award for their respective interests.

20. Applicable Law. This Agreement and the performance thereof shall be governed, interpreted, construed and regulated by the laws of the State where the Leased Premises is located. The parties agree that the venue for any litigation regarding this Agreement shall be in the state or federal courts in the county where the Leased Premises is located.

21. Notices. All notices hereunder shall be in writing and shall be given by (i) established express delivery service which maintains delivery records, (ii) hand delivery, or (iii) certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested. Notices may also be given by facsimile transmission, provided that the notice is concurrently given by one of the above methods. Notices are effective upon receipt, or upon attempted delivery if delivery is refused or if delivery is impossible because of failure to provide reasonable means for accomplishing delivery. The notices shall be sent to the parties at the following addresses:

Lessor:Village of Tinley Park16250 S. Oak Park Ave.Tinley Park, Illinois 60477

Lessee:STC Two LLCc/o Crown Castle USA Inc.Attn: Legal – Real Estate Department2000 Corporate DriveCanonsburg, Pennsylvania 15317

22. Assignment, Sublease, Licensing and Encumbrance. Lessee shall not assign or transfer this Agreement or sublet all or any portion of the Leased Premises without the prior written consent of Lessor, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Lessee shall have the right to sublease or assign its rights under this Agreement to any of its subsidiaries, affiliates, entities or successor legal entities, or to any entity acquiring substantially all of the assets of Lessee, without notice to or consent of Lessor. Lessee may permit additional parties and co-locators to use the Leased Premises as it may from time to time deem necessary and/or appropriate, provided such use does not materially and adversely interfere with Lessor’s use of Lessor’s Property and, provided, however, no additional parties or co-locators may be granted access to the Leased Premises or be permitted to use the Leased Premises and improvements thereon without the express written consent of Lessor, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed. An effective assignment of this Agreement by Lessee (with Lessor’s consent, if required) shall relieve Lessee from any further liability or



obligation. Lessee has the further right to pledge or encumber its interest in this Agreement. Upon request to Lessor from any leasehold mortgagee, Lessor agrees to give the holder of such leasehold mortgage written notice of any default by Lessee and an opportunity to cure any such default within fifteen (15) days after such notice with respect to monetary defaults and within a commercially reasonable period of time after such notice with respect to any non-monetary default.

23. Mortgages. In the event that the Leased Premises is currently encumbered or shall become encumbered by such a mortgage, Lessor shall obtain and furnish to Lessee a commercially reasonable non-disturbance agreement, in a form reasonably acceptable to Lessee, for each such mortgage, in recordable form. If Lessor fails to provide any non-disturbance agreement, Lessee may withhold and accrue, without interest, the rent until such time as Lessee receives all such documentation.

24. Sale of Property. If Lessor sells all or part of Lessor’s Property, of which the Leased Premises is a part then such sale shall be under and subject to this Agreement.

25. Surrender of Property. Upon expiration or termination of this Agreement, Lessee shall, within a reasonable time, remove all above ground Improvements and restore the Leased Premises as nearly as reasonably possible to its original condition, without, however, being required to replace any trees or other plants removed, or alter the then existing grading.

26. Quiet Enjoyment. Lessor covenants that Lessee, on paying rent and performing the covenants of this Agreement, shall peaceably and quietly have, hold and enjoy the Leased Premises and Easements.

27. Lessor’s Waiver. Lessor hereby waives and releases any and all liens, whether statutory or under common law, with respect to any of Lessee’s property now or hereafter located on the Leased Premises.

28. Miscellaneous.

Recording. Lessee shall have the right to record a memorandum of this Agreement with the appropriate recording officer. Lessor shall execute and deliver such a memorandum, for no additional consideration, promptly upon Lessee’s request.

Entire Agreement. Lessor and Lessee agree that this Agreement contains all of the agreements, promises and understandings between Lessor and Lessee. No oral agreements, promises or understandings shall be binding upon either Lessor or Lessee in any dispute, controversy or proceeding at law. Any addition, variation or modification to this Agreement shall be void and ineffective unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto.

Captions. The captions preceding the Sections of this Agreement are intended only for convenience of reference and in no way define, limit or describe the scope of this Agreement or the intent of any provision hereof.

Construction of Document. Lessor and Lessee acknowledge that this document shall not be construed in favor of or against the drafter by virtue of said party being the drafter and that this Agreement shall not be construed as a binding offer until signed by Lessee.



Partial Invalidity. If any term of this Agreement is found to be void or invalid, then such invalidity shall not affect the remaining terms of this Agreement, which shall continue in full force and effect.

IRS Form W-9. Lessor agrees to provide Lessee with a completed IRS Form W-9, or its equivalent, upon execution of this Agreement and at such other times as may be reasonably requested by Lessee. In the event the Lessor’s Property is transferred, the succeeding Lessor shall have a duty at the time of such transfer to provide Lessee with a completed IRS Form W-9, or its equivalent, and other related paper work to affect a transfer in Rent to the new Lessor. Lessor’s failure to provide the IRS Form W-9 within thirty (30) days after Lessee’s request shall be considered a default and Lessee may take any reasonable action necessary to comply with IRS regulations including, but not limited to, withholding applicable taxes from Rent payments.

Authority. The execution and delivery of this Agreement by Lessor, and the performance of this Agreement by Lessor, have been duly authorized by Lessor, and this Agreement is binding on Lessor and enforceable against Lessor in accordance with its terms. Lessor warrants and represents that neither the execution of this Agreement, nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, will (1) conflict with, or result in a breach of the terms, conditions or provisions of, or constitute a default under, the Lease, or any other agreement or instrument to which Lessor is party or to which Lessor’s Property is subject; or (2) constitute a violation of any applicable judgment, decree or order to which Lessor or Lessor’s Property is subject. Lessor covenants and agrees to defend, indemnify and save and hold harmless Lessee, together with its officers, members, managers, employees, attorneys, representatives, successors and assigns from and against any loss, cost, expense, liability, claim or legal damages (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees) arising out of or resulting from any claim by any third party against Lessee arising from a breach of Lessor’s representations and warranties contained in this paragraph.

Validity. This Agreement is binding on all parties hereto, however its effectiveness is expressly contingent on the expiration of the Lease.

[Signature pages follow]



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Lessor and Lessee having read the foregoing and intending to be legally bound hereby, have executed this Agreement as of the day and year this Agreement is fully executed.

LESSOR:


By:

Name:

Title:

TENANT:




By: __________________________________

Name: __________________________________

Title: __________________________________


Site: TINLEY PARK PUMP SUBSTATIONBUN: 875648101460.003478 4873-5455-9753.2 A-1

EXHIBIT “A”

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LESSOR’S PROPERTY






EXHIBIT “B”

SURVEY











EXHIBIT “C”

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LEASED PREMISES AND EASEMENTS


LEASED PREMISES

TOWER LEASE


COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 88°23'41" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, 532.10 FEET (RECORD = 532.00 FEET) TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE (VACATED BY DOCUMENT NUMBER 97572134); THENCE SOUTH 1°37'05" EAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE AND NORTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, 204.86 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°03'26" EAST, 0.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 1°17'14" EAST, 32.93 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87°18'52" WEST, 20.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1°17'14" WEST, 12.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87°18'52" WEST, 5.85 FEET; THENCE NORTH 2°30'12" WEST, 20.77 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°03'26" EAST, 26.28 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.


ACCESS EASEMENT


COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 88°23'41" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, 532.10 FEET (RECORD = 532.00 FEET) TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE (VACATED BY DOCUMENT NUMBER 97572134); THENCE SOUTH 1°37'05" EAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE AND NORTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, 204.86 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°03'26" WEST, 10.88 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 88°03'26" WEST, 37.61 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1°40'46" WEST, 155.15 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF 183RD STREET; THENCE NORTH 88°23'41" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 12.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°40'46" EAST, 143.08 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°03'26" EAST, 25.56 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°56'34" EAST, 12.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.




UTILITY EASEMENT

UTILITY EASEMENT "A"


COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 88°23'41" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, 532.10 FEET (RECORD = 532.00 FEET) TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE (VACATED BY DOCUMENT NUMBER 97572134); THENCE SOUTH 1°37'05" EAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE AND NORTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, 204.86 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°03'26" EAST, 0.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88°03'26" WEST, 8.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1°12'39" WEST, 154.91 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF 183RD STREET; THENCE NORTH 88°23'41" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 8.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°12'39" EAST, 154.86 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.


UTILITY EASEMENT "B"


COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 88°23'41" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, 532.10 FEET (RECORD = 532.00 FEET) TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE (VACATED BY DOCUMENT NUMBER 97572134); THENCE SOUTH 1°37'05" EAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE AND NORTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, 204.86 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°03'26" EAST, 0.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 88°03'26" EAST, 8.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°17'14" EAST, 32.83 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87°18'52" WEST, 8.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1°17'14" WEST, 32.93 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.


UTILITY EASEMENT "C"


COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 88°23'41" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, 532.10 FEET (RECORD = 532.00 FEET) TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE (VACATED BY DOCUMENT NUMBER 97572134); THENCE SOUTH



1°37'05" EAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE AND NORTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, 204.86 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°03'26" EAST, 0.60 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°17'14" EAST, 32.93 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87°18'52" WEST, 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 77°36'23" WEST, 70.69 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°25'37" WEST, 19.68 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 8°09'49" WEST, 7.29 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87°48'06" WEST, 34.37 FEET; THENCE NORTH 58°23'45" WEST, 44.67 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE, AS RELOCATED; THENCE NORTH 42°25'01" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 13.38 FEET; THENCE NORTH 47°30'32" EAST, 6.57 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 58°23'45" EAST, 53.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87°48'06" EAST, 22.74 FEET; THENCE NORTH 8°09'49" EAST, 7.19 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°25'37" EAST, 29.54 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 77°36'23" EAST, 69.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°17'14" EAST, 10.29 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 1,836 SQUARE FEET (0.042 ACRES), MORE OR LESS.

Part of Tax Parcel Identification Nos: 31-05-100-015




MEMORANDUM OF LEASE

See Exhibit “A” for Legal Description, Common Address and Parcel No.

THIS MEMORANDUM LEASE (this “Memorandum”) is made this _____ day of ____________________, 2022, by and between THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK (“Landlord”), having a mailing address of 16250 S. Oak Park Ave., Tinley Park, Illinois 60477; and STC TWO LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Tenant”), by and through its attorney-in-fact, Global Signal Acquisitions III LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, with a mailing address of 2000 Corporate Drive, Canonsburg, Pennsylvania 15317.

RECITALS

WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant are parties under that certain Ground Lease Agreement dated as of even date herewith, with a Commencement Date of March 25, 2024 (the “Lease”);

WHEREAS, the parties wish to provide record notice of the existence of the Lease and the status of certain rights and interests thereunder through the recording of this Memorandum in the Public Records of Cook County, Illinois; and

WHEREAS, the Lease pertains to certain real property leased to Tenant together with access and utility easements granted to Tenant more particularly described in the Lease (the “Leased Premises”), located on a portion of Landlord’s property that is more particularly described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated by this reference (“Landlord’s Property”).

OPERATIVE PROVISIONS

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant hereby agree as follows:

1. The recitals hereinabove are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

2. Landlord hereby acknowledges, ratifies, and confirms Tenant’s interest in and to the Lease.



3. The terms and provisions of the Lease are hereby restated and incorporated herein by this reference.

4. The Lease provides that the initial term of the Lease is five (5) years, commencing on March 25, 2024 with four (4) renewal terms of five (5) years each. The term of the Lease, including all renewal terms, if exercised, will expire on March 24, 2049.

5. The Lease pertains to a portion of that certain real property described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto.

6. The parties consent to the recording of this Memorandum in the public records of the county in which the Leased Premises is situated, and agree that this Memorandum shall be executed in recordable form.

7. This Memorandum may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original instrument.

[Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signatures begin on the following page]



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Landlord and Tenant have executed this Memorandum as of the date first written above.

LANDLORD:


By:

Name:

Title:

Date:

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

STATE OF )) SS

COUNTY OF )

On this, the _____ day of _________________, 2022, before me, the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared ___________________________________, who acknowledged him/herself to be the ______________________ of The Village of Tinley Park, and that he/she, being authorized to do so, executed the foregoing Memorandum of Lease for the purposes therein contained.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and official seal.

Notary Public, State of ___________, County of _________ Acting in the County of _____________________________My Commission Expires: ___________________________

[SEAL]


4Site: TINLEY PARK PUMP STATIONBUN: 8756484827-5829-1709 v.2.docx

TENANT:




By:

Name:

Title:

Date:

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

STATE OF TEXAS )) SS

COUNTY OF HARRIS )

On this, the _____ day of _________________, 2022, before me, the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared ___________________________, who acknowledged him/herself to be the ______________________________ of Global Signal Acquisitions III LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, the Attorney in Fact for STC Two LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and that he/she, being authorized to do so, executed the foregoing Memorandum of Lease for the purposes therein contained.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and official seal.

Notary Public, State of Texas, County of Harris My Commission Expires: _________________

[SEAL]

THIS DOCUMENT PREPARED BY: AFTER RECORDING, RETURN TO:

DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLCGiuliano D. Mancini, Esq.400 Renaissance CenterDetroit, MI 48243


A-1Site: TINLEY PARK PUMP STATIONBUN: 8756484827-5829-1709 v.2.docx

EXHIBIT “A”

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LANDLORD’S PROPERTY





Date: May 17, 2022To: Mayor & Village Board

Pat Carr, Village ManagerFrom: Kimberly Clarke, Director of Community Development Subject: Ordinance Approving Third Amendment to Banging Gavel Economic Incentive

Agreement

BackgroundIn May of 2021, Pilsen Breweries, Inc. d/b/a Banging Gavel Brews (BGB) approached the Village to modify their Brew Pub project to allow strictly an outdoor beer garden to operate without the operations of the restaurant. The ordinance adopted allowed a one-time operation of a beer garden. Since then, the developer has secured financing and the project is under construction. During construction they would like to continue the use of the beer garden.

DiscussionThe terms of the third agreement have been modified as follows:

1. BGB shall be entitled to operate the beer garden on a temporary basis from May through November during the construction of the main building. In the event that construction is not complete within 2022, BGB may temporarily continue operation of the beer garden from May to November 2023, or until the Village provides notice to terminate operations.

RECOMMENDATION

Recommend approval of the attached ordinance adopting a third amendment to the Banging Gavel incentive agreement.

Interoffice

Memo

Page | 75AGENDA - 5/17/2022, D -... VILLAGE OF TINLEY...


ORDINANCENO. 2022-O-039

AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE ECONOMIC INCENTIVE AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK,

COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, AND BANGING GAVEL PROPERTIES, LLC THE AMENDMENT WILL REMOVE THE TIME LIMITATION ON THE TEMPORARY

OUTDOOR BEER GARDEN

MICHAEL W. GLOTZ, PRESIDENTNANCY M. O’CONNOR, VILLAGE CLERK




Board of Trustees

_____________________________________________________________________________________Published in pamphlet form by authority of the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Tinley Park


ORDINANCE NO. 2022-R-039

AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE ECONOMIC INCENTIVE AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK,

COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, AND BANGING GAVEL PROPERTIES, LLC THE AMENDMENT WILL REMOVE THE TIME LIMITATION ON THE TEMPORARY

OUTDOOR BEER GARDEN

WHEREAS, the Village of Tinley Park, Cook and Will Counties, Illinois, is a Home Rule Unit

pursuant to the Illinois Constitution of 1970; and

WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities of the Village of Tinley Park, Cook and Will Counties,

Illinois, have considered a third amendment to the Economic Incentive Agreement, a true and correct copy

of such Agreement being attached hereto and made a part hereof as EXHIBIT 1; and


Illinois, have determined that it is in the best interests of said Village of Tinley Park that said Agreement be

entered into by the Village of Tinley Park;

NOW, THEREFORE, Be It Ordained by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of

Tinley Park, Cook and Will Counties, Illinois, as follows:

Section 1: The Preambles hereto are hereby made a part of, and operative provisions of, this

Ordinance as fully as if completely repeated at length herein.

Section 2: That this President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Tinley Park hereby find

that it is in the best interests of the Village of Tinley Park and its residents that the aforesaid Agreement be

entered into and executed by said Village of Tinley Park, with said Agreement to be substantially in the form

attached hereto and made a part hereof as EXHIBIT 1.

Section 3: That the President and Clerk of the Village of Tinley Park, Cook and Will Counties,

Illinois are hereby authorized to execute for and on behalf of said Village of Tinley Park the aforesaid

Agreement.

Section 4: That this Ordinance shall take effect from and after its adoption and approval.

ADOPTED this 17th day of May, 2022, by the Corporate Authorities of the Village of Tinley Park

on a roll call vote as follows:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

APPROVED this 17th day of May, 2022, by the President of the Village of Tinley Park.

Village President

ATTEST:

___________________________ Village Clerk


EXHIBIT 1

THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE ECONOMIC INCENTIVE AGREEMENTby and between

THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK COOK COUNTY, ILLINOISand

BANGING GAVEL PROPERTIES, LLC


STATE OF ILLINOIS )

COUNTY OF COOK ) SS

COUNTY OF WILL )

CERTIFICATE

I, NANCY M. O’CONNOR, Village Clerk of the Village of Tinley Park, Counties of Cook and

Will and State of Illinois, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of

Ordinance No. 2022-R-039, “AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE THIRD AMENDMENT TO

THE ECONOMIC INCENTIVE AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF

TINLEY PARK, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, AND BANGING GAVEL PROPERTIES, LLC

THE AMENDMENT WILL REMOVE THE TIME LIMITATION ON THE TEMPORARY

OUTDOOR BEER GARDEN,” which was adopted by the President and Board of Trustees of the

Village of Tinley Park on May 3, 2022.


the Village of Tinley Park this 3rd day of May, 2022.

____________________________________ VILLAGE CLERK


1

THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE ECONOMIC INCENTIVE AGREEMENT

by and between

THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS

and

BANGING GAVEL PROPERTIES, LLC

THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE ECONOMIC INCENTIVE AGREEMENT is

entered into this 17 day of May 2022, by and between the Village of Tinley Park, an Illinois

municipal corporation (the “Village”), and Banging Gavel Properties, LLC (“BGB”).

PREAMBLE

WHEREAS, the Village and BGB entered into that certain Economic Incentive Agreement,

dated as of March 3, 2017, as adopted by Ordinance No. 17-O-016, and amended by that certain

First Amendment to the Economic Incentive Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2019, as

adopted by Ordinance No. 19-O-082, and amended by that certain Second Amendment to the

Economic Incentive Agreement, dated as of May 18, 2021 as adopted by Ordinance No. 21-O-027

(as hereby amended and may be further amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise from time

to time the “Agreement”), in connection with restoration and rehabilitation of the Historic Vogt

Building into a Brew Pub and the associated incentives; and

WHEREAS, the COVID-19 public health crisis and attendant measures taken to protect

the public health have created an economic challenge to local businesses, including bars and

restaurants, and reduced the availability of financing for such businesses;

WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend certain provisions of the Agreement to allow for

the operation of a temporary beer garden, as well as to amend certain phased construction

milestones; and

WHEREAS, the beer garden will be operated by Pilsen Brewerks, Inc. dba Banging Gavel

Brews as a tenant of Banging Gavel Properties, LLC; and


2

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the representations, warranties, and mutual

agreements set forth herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and

sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows:

AGREEMENT

1. Amendment to Agreement. The Agreement is hereby Amended as follows:

A. Amendment to 2.4 shall read as follows:

2.4. Operation of Temporary Beer Garden. Subject to the terms, conditions and restrictions of

this Agreement and the Village Code, BGB shall be entitled to operate the beer garden on a

temporary basis from May through November during the construction of the main building. In the

event that construction is not complete within 2022, BGB may temporarily continue operation of

the beer garden from May to November 2023, or until the Village provides notice to terminate

operations. BGB shall operate the temporary beer garden substantially in accordance with the Beer

Garden Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein. BGB shall be required to make

meals available, which shall consist of more than the service or sale of packaged foods such as

potato chips, pretzels, peanuts, cheese and crackers, or frozen or premade foods, such as pizzas,

hamburgers, or sandwiches which can be prepared by being heated or warmed in an oven. In the

event that BGB fails to comply with requirements of Sections 2.3 and 3.2 of this Agreement, the

Village may require BGB to terminate operation of the beer garden pending compliance with the

Agreement.

2. Effect of Amendment. This Third Amendment notices and amends the Agreement and the

terms and provisions hereof shall supersede and control over any contrary or conflicting terms and


3

provisions set forth in the Agreement. Except as expressly modified by this Third Amendment, the

Agreement continues and remains in full force and effect.

3. Counterparts. This Third Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of

which, when assembled to include an original or facsimile signature for each party contemplated to sign

this Second Amendment, will constitute a complete and fully executed original. All such fully executed

original or facsimile counterparts will collectively constitute but one agreement.

4. Headings. Section headings contained herein are for convenience or reference only and shall

not govern the interpretation of any of the provisions contained herein.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed

by their duly authorized officers on the above date at Tinley Park, Illinois.

Village of Tinley Park an Illinois municipal corporation

By: ______________________________ Village President

Date: _________________, 2022

ATTEST:

By: _____________________________ Village Clerk

Date: _________________, 2022


4

Banging Gavel Properties, LLC, an Illinois Limited Liability Company

By: _____________________________

Its: _____________________________

Date: _________________, 2022

ATTEST:

By: _____________________________

Its: _____________________________

Date: _________________, 2022


5

EXHIBIT A


05/05/2022Voucher List

Village of Tinley Park1

4:58:41PMPage:vchlist

Bank code : apbank

Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount

196941 5/2/2022 020460 JUST 4 JUMPS EVENT RENTALS 28519 DEPOSIT ON RIDES/ATTRACTIONS FOR THE 20201-35-000-72923 12,445.03VTP-019075

Total : 12,445.03

196942 5/6/2022 020486 ACME/LINGO FLAGPOLES LLC 27171 FLAG POLES AND HARDWARE01-26-025-73112 1,220.00VTP-019113

Total : 1,220.00

196943 5/6/2022 019563 AEP ENERGY INC 3013134248 ACCT#3013134248 UTIL#4384028017 6815 HIC01-26-024-72510 98.17ACCT#3013134259 UTIL#4623055118 19620 88301313425901-26-024-72510 11,129.7308-00-000-72510 157.60ACCT#3013134260 UTIL# 6771163043 87TH AV301313426001-26-024-72510 218.16

Total : 11,603.66

196944 5/6/2022 002734 AIR ONE EQUIPMENT, INC 180508 BREATHING AIR QUALITY TEST 4/21/2201-19-000-72750 150.00

Total : 150.00

196945 5/6/2022 008979 ALECK PLUMBING INC. S132004 DRINKING FOUNTAIN/WATER BOTTLE FILLER30-00-000-75907 2,945.00VTP-019003DRINKING FOUNTAIN AND BOTTLE FILLERS13233830-00-000-75907 2,945.00VTP-019085DRINKING FOUNTAIN/BOTTLE FILLERS13269430-00-000-75907 3,175.00VTP-019104

Total : 9,065.00

196946 5/6/2022 017521 ALL STAR FENCE 22025270 ADJUSTABLE GATE FOR THE PD01-26-025-72520 670.00VTP-018591

Total : 670.00

196947 5/6/2022 020316 AMALGAMATED BANK OF CHICAGO 7757 OBLIGATION BOND,SERIES 2021A60-00-000-96140 118,122.2464-00-000-96140 21,179.42

1Page:

Page | 85AGENDA - 5/17/2022, E -... VILLAGE OF TINLEY...




Bank code : apbank


196947 5/6/2022 (Continued)020316 AMALGAMATED BANK OF CHICAGOOBLIGATION REFUDNING BOND SERIES 2021B775841-00-000-96140 17,993.5033-00-000-96140 19,277.3264-00-000-96140 6,425.9365-00-000-96140 803.8627-00-000-96140 483.13

Total : 184,285.40

196948 5/6/2022 002682 AMERICAN LEGAL PUBLICATION 16639 APRIL 2022 S-36 FOLIO/INTERNET EDITING01-13-000-72791 1.95APRIL 2022 S-36 FOLIO /INTERNET EDITING1668301-13-000-72791 28.00

Total : 29.95

196949 5/6/2022 002628 AMERICAN WATER 042922 APRIL'22 SEWER TREATMENT BROOKSIDE & REL64-00-000-73225 91,621.97

Total : 91,621.97

196950 5/6/2022 014936 AQUAMIST PLUMBING & LAWN 115661 REPLACEMENT OF IRRIGATION BOOSTER PUMP30-00-000-75907 2,260.60VTP-018869RAIN SENSOR INSTALLATION9735701-26-025-72790 275.00

Total : 2,535.60

196951 5/6/2022 020503 ARREDONDO, JULIE Ref001420862 UB Refund Cst #0051209860-00-000-20599 53.66

Total : 53.66

196952 5/6/2022 016477 BARAJAS, JOHN 042722 REIMB AMAZON PURCHES FOR EMA VEHICLES01-21-000-72540 109.93REIMB EMA VEHICLE BATTERY SWITCH05042201-21-000-72530 16.47

Total : 126.40

196953 5/6/2022 010953 BATTERIES PLUS - 277 P51006066 SLA12-12F2 BATTERY14-00-000-74150 163.80

2Page:





Bank code : apbank


(Continued) Total : 163.80196953 5/6/2022 010953 010953 BATTERIES PLUS - 277

196954 5/6/2022 020496 BENCHMARK CONSTRUCTION CO 042922 MCCARTHY PARK LINING PROJECT64-00-000-73800 436,892.00VTP-019125

Total : 436,892.00

196955 5/6/2022 020280 BETTENHAUSEN & ASSOCIATES LLC 043022 FINANCIAL AND ADMIN PROF SVC TWO WEEKS01-15-000-72790 7,385.10

Total : 7,385.10

196956 5/6/2022 012966 BOLING, THOMAS 04-22 SHAREPOINT MAINTENANCE APRIL'2201-16-000-72650 1,500.00

Total : 1,500.00

196957 5/6/2022 015361 BURTON & MAYER INC. 2201039 80TH AVE/HICKORY PARKING TOKENS70-00-000-72310 8,154.00VTP-019032

Total : 8,154.00

196958 5/6/2022 020494 BUTTITTA, STEVE 76208 E-SCHEDULE SOLUTIONS RIGHTS AND INTELL P01-16-000-72655 4,900.00

Total : 4,900.00

196959 5/6/2022 003243 CDW GOVERNMENT INC W371114 HDMI CONVERTER,HP Z2 TWR DVDWR01-16-000-74128 78.50

Total : 78.50

196960 5/6/2022 003229 CED/EFENGEE 4975-1009757 STREET LIGHT MATERIALS01-26-024-73570 14,218.29VTP-018690LIGHT BULBS4975-101165101-26-024-73570 810.00VTP-019094ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES4975-101204801-26-025-73570 1,719.52VTP-019112VTP-018690 RTA30D8B4M18-01 POLE NOT RECE4975-101215501-26-024-73570 -1,438.88CFL LMP,COTRON FLUOR LAMP5025-100459001-26-025-72520 192.20

Total : 15,501.13

3Page:





Bank code : apbank


196961 5/6/2022 014026 CHANDLER SERVICES 28475 SERVICE FOR PIERCE VELOCITY - SERVICE01-19-000-72540 3,998.91E-ONE FIRE APPARATUS -PARTS2848001-19-000-72540 690.80

Total : 4,689.71

196962 5/6/2022 015199 CHICAGO PARTS & SOUND LLC 2J0003522 VERN REPAIR DOOR PANEL PD UNIT 4A01-17-205-72540 80.00PARTS FOR K-9 UNIT2J000353230-00-000-72145 7,177.00PARTS FOR K-9 UNIT CAR2J000358830-00-000-74220 10,266.00ROTOR RR BRAKE STREET - UNIT 753-004953901-26-023-72540 60.20

Total : 17,583.20

196963 5/6/2022 018325 CHICAGO TRIBUNE COMPANY LLC 74072186 SUBSCRIPTION THRU 7/22/2201-14-000-72720 103.50

Total : 103.50

196964 5/6/2022 013820 CINTAS CORPORATION 9174794278 MEDICINE CABINET - PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDIN01-26-025-73117 209.26MEDICINE CABINET - SHOOTING RANGE917479430201-26-025-73117 119.08MEDICINE CABINET - PUMP HOUSE 2917479432801-26-025-73117 30.27MEDICINE CABINET - PW GARAGE917479434701-26-025-73117 263.45MEDICINE CABINET - PD917479436401-26-025-73117 107.70MEDICINE CABINET - PUMP HOUSE 1917479436901-26-025-73117 53.87

Total : 783.63

196965 5/6/2022 017298 COMCAST BUSINESS 145626592 ACCT 930890410 VILLAGE HALL FIBER INTERN01-14-000-72125 982.95VTP-018478ACCT 930890410 VILLAGE HALL FIBER INTERN145626592.

4Page:





Bank code : apbank


196965 5/6/2022 (Continued)017298 COMCAST BUSINESS01-14-000-72125 982.95

Total : 1,965.90

196966 5/6/2022 012057 COMCAST CABLE 8771401810170142 ACCT#8771401810170142 16250 OPA 4/30-5/201-14-000-72125 234.85ACCT# 8771401810296319 PUBLIC SAFETY IN877140181029631901-14-000-72125 244.85ACCT# 8771401810296319 PUBLIC SAFETY IN87740181029631901-14-000-72125 234.85VTP-018413

Total : 714.55

196967 5/6/2022 013878 COMED - COMMONWEALTH EDISON 0363058226 ACCT#0363058226 9340 W 179TH ST 3/25-4/201-26-024-72510 121.72ACCT#2761036017 8317 AMBERLY CT 3/24-4/2276103601701-26-024-72510 54.75ACCT#3214011009 16853 LAKEWOOD DR 3/30-4321401100964-00-000-72510 241.58ACCT#6483053261 17495 S LAGRANGE RD 3/25648305326101-26-023-72510 23.40ACCT#7063131025 7813 174TH ST LIFT STATI706313102564-00-000-72510 89.45ACCT#8363023007 179TH &82ND AVE 3/30-4/836302300760-00-000-72510 243.2564-00-000-72510 243.25

Total : 1,017.40

196968 5/6/2022 020311 COMPUTERSHARE VILLA 01062022 TINL613GO PRINCIPAL & INTEREST27-00-000-96140 502.1033-00-000-96140 20,034.2441-00-000-96140 18,700.0064-00-000-96140 6,678.2465-00-000-96140 835.42TINL811 PRINCIPAL & INTERESTVILLA 01062022.38-00-000-96100 13,200.00

Total : 59,950.00

5Page:





Bank code : apbank


196969 5/6/2022 018311 CONNECTION 72675031 LOGITECH MX MASTER 3 WIRELESS,MICE BO LE01-16-000-74128 113.89USB-C TO HDMI VIDEO ADAPTER7267759101-16-000-74128 76.44DEFENDER BLACK PRO PACK CASE7270839701-16-000-74128 33.71FOSSIL BLACK PRO CASE,IPHONE CHARGER KIT7270839801-16-000-74128 37.03MINI HDMI TO HDMI DONGLE7272841901-16-000-74128 16.86

Total : 277.93

196970 5/6/2022 003635 CROSSMARK PRINTING, INC 86393 BUSINESS BREAKFAST POST CARD,MAILING01-41-045-72954 370.00BUSINESS CARDS - LORENDO,O'HAGAN,MURRAY8648101-19-000-72310 102.65PLACARD RESIDENT LETTER- HANGER,INSERT8650501-14-000-72310 754.00BUSINESS CARDS - R.DELPRIORE8659501-19-000-72310 36.65

Total : 1,263.30

196971 5/6/2022 020498 DAYBELL, MELISSA 050322 REFUND FOR DUPLICATE STICKER PURCHASE06-00-000-79005 25.00

Total : 25.00

196972 5/6/2022 018379 DM INDUSTRIAL JANITORIAL SERV 6932 POLICE STATION CLEANING- APRIL 202201-26-025-72790 3,720.00VTP-019089

Total : 3,720.00

196973 5/6/2022 004009 EAGLE UNIFORM CO INC INV-7616 FIRE MEMBER UNIFORMS (CLASS A&B) - SMITH01-19-000-73610 120.00VTP-019131

Total : 120.00

196974 5/6/2022 004152 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION INC. 6699314 COCKROACH/RODENT,CELING SERVICE -VH01-26-025-72790 573.44COCKROACH/RODENT PROGRAM TP TRAIN STATIO6699315

6Page:





Bank code : apbank


196974 5/6/2022 (Continued)004152 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION INC.01-26-025-72790 86.48

Total : 659.92

196975 5/6/2022 019561 ENDLESS COMMUNICATIONS USA LLC DG-1517 PUSH TO TALK LTE DATA RADIO SVC 5/1-5/3101-42-000-72540 45.76

Total : 45.76

196976 5/6/2022 004019 EVON'S TROPHIES & AWARDS 042722 BUSINESS AWARD - SHEMULIS 30 YRS 202101-41-045-72954 120.00

Total : 120.00

196977 5/6/2022 018480 FARNSWORTH GROUP 233104 0170121.25 VTP SCANNELL INDUS DEV TASK O01-33-310-72790 1,155.000170121.29 VTP OAK RIDGE #29 PROF SVC T23310501-33-310-72790 907.50

Total : 2,062.50

196978 5/6/2022 014784 FLAGSUSA INC. 98499 FLAGS01-26-025-73112 5,048.00VTP-019122

Total : 5,048.00

196979 5/6/2022 012941 FMP 52-510896 FVP BRAKE ROTOR - PD STOCK01-17-205-72540 170.80CONTROL ARM BUSHING PD 3S /STOCK52-51097601-17-205-72540 153.46HUB ASSEMBLY - PD STOCK52-51112801-17-205-72540 256.00

Total : 580.26

196980 5/6/2022 017794 FOSTER & FOSTER, INC. 23334 TRUE COST CALCULATION - J.GARRITY01-14-000-72851 300.00

Total : 300.00

196981 5/6/2022 011611 FOX VALLEY FIRE & SAFETY CO. IN00515830 WIRELESS ALARM MAINTENANCE 3/1-3/31/2214-00-000-72750 8,643.50VTP-018398FIRE ALARM SYSTEM SERVICE -EMA GARAGEIN0051608501-26-025-72854 130.50

7Page:





Bank code : apbank


196981 5/6/2022 (Continued)011611 FOX VALLEY FIRE & SAFETY CO.NEW SMOKE DETECTORS FOR FIRE STATION #4IN0051716001-26-025-72520 487.50VTP-019095

Total : 9,261.50

196982 5/6/2022 020274 FRAME TECH 1 LLC 38747 FRONT ALIGNMENT - PD 3SAM01-17-205-72540 75.00

Total : 75.00

196983 5/6/2022 002877 G. W. BERKHEIMER CO., INC. 7017381 KEY PLEAT MERV- POST 12 HVAC FILTERS01-26-025-72520 130.80

Total : 130.80

196984 5/6/2022 004538 GOLDY LOCKS INC 17281712 LSDA CAM LOCK 1 3/4 "01-26-025-72520 200.00

Total : 200.00

196985 5/6/2022 004493 GORDON FOOD SERVICE INC. 768187843 CREAMER01-26-024-73115 2.8601-26-023-73115 5.7360-00-000-73115 2.0163-00-000-73115 2.0164-00-000-73115 1.71

Total : 14.32

196986 5/6/2022 014491 HANSEN DOOR INC. 11039 ELECTRICAL ISSUE FD#3 GARAGE DOOR01-26-025-72520 435.00

Total : 435.00

196987 5/6/2022 010238 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 2378565 ****2304 GRILL BRUSH COMBO,GRIDDLE COVER01-26-025-73870 41.96****2304 NEXGRILL 4 BURNER GRILL290049401-26-025-73870 349.00****2304 GRILL TOOL KIT SET290049701-26-025-73870 24.98****2304 CLASS B TYPE 3 PACKOUT FIRST AIW88670203201-26-023-73117 64.98

8Page:





Bank code : apbank


196987 5/6/2022 (Continued)010238 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES60-00-000-73117 22.7563-00-000-73117 22.7564-00-000-73117 19.49

Total : 545.91

196988 5/6/2022 020500 HORNER, DENNIS 050422 REFUND VEHICLE STICKER PURCHASED NON-SEN06-00-000-79005 23.50

Total : 23.50

196989 5/6/2022 020495 IL ASSOC OF SCHOOL SOCIAL WKRS 050222 CONVENTION CENTER INCENTIVE OCT'2112-00-000-72986 10,000.00

Total : 10,000.00

196990 5/6/2022 004959 ILLINOIS ASSOC.FOR FLOODPLAIN 11553 MEMBERSHIP#5024583 DUES THRU 5/1/202301-26-023-72720 12.5060-00-000-72720 7.3563-00-000-72720 1.4064-00-000-72720 3.75

Total : 25.00

196991 5/6/2022 005165 ILLINOIS STATE POLICE 20-00396 TINLEY PARK CASE #20-0039684-00-000-20651 1,483.00

Total : 1,483.00

196992 5/6/2022 005165 ILLINOIS STATE POLICE 21-01334 TINLEY PARK CASE #21-0133484-00-000-20651 917.00

Total : 917.00

196993 5/6/2022 005165 ILLINOIS STATE POLICE 21-00281 TINLEY PARK CASE #21-0028184-00-000-20651 664.14

Total : 664.14

196994 5/6/2022 005165 ILLINOIS STATE POLICE 20-00556 TINELY PARK CASE #20-0055684-00-000-20651 226.00

Total : 226.00

196995 5/6/2022 005025 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL INC 1001497303 PLAN REVIEW /INTERP FEES

9Page:





Bank code : apbank


196995 5/6/2022 (Continued)005025 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL INC01-33-300-72844 600.00

Total : 600.00

196996 5/6/2022 005186 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM 10075363 SLA 1005 - BACKUP BATTERIES PD01-17-205-72540 111.80BATTERY - STREET 160 TRAILER31511201-26-023-72540 32.95

Total : 144.75

196997 5/6/2022 005212 J S R ENTERPRISES INC 25625 DRAIN LINE WORK FIRE DPT #4901-26-025-72520 1,542.20

Total : 1,542.20

196998 5/6/2022 011466 JEWEL OSCO 042822 ****8778 LEADERSHIP WORKSHOP SNACKS 4/2801-12-000-72220 28.13SODA05032201-14-000-72974 15.98

Total : 44.11

196999 5/6/2022 015288 KIESLER POLICE SUPPLY IN189458 FEDEP9HST2~01-17-220-73760 1,637.20VTP-018675

Total : 1,637.20

197000 5/6/2022 011214 KLOTZ, STEPHEN 050222 2022 FDIC CONF ENTRY FEE S.KLOTZ01-19-000-72170 82.00PARKING EXPENSE FDIC CONF050222.01-19-000-72170 60.00

Total : 142.00

197001 5/6/2022 018292 KNICKERBOCKER ROOFING & PAVING 20116564 MAIN ROOF AREA SVC TPPD01-26-025-72520 599.21

Total : 599.21

197002 5/6/2022 005349 KORTUM, LISA 042922 REIMB HOTEL FEES FOR IESMA CONF 4/27-4/201-21-000-72170 193.80REIMBURSE UNIFORM/JACKET PURCHASE04302201-21-210-73610 75.24

10Page:





Bank code : apbank


(Continued) Total : 269.04197002 5/6/2022 005349 005349 KORTUM, LISA

197003 5/6/2022 013858 LOWE'S HOME CENTER, INC. 2508015 EXPENDABLE TOOLS01-26-024-73410 1,043.10VTP-019124

Total : 1,043.10

197004 5/6/2022 007100 M. E.SIMPSON COMPANY, INC 38564 LOCATION LEAK SVC 8059 185TH ST 4/7/2260-00-000-72513 275.00WATER ASSESSMENT PROGRAM 4/4-4/19/223856860-00-000-72790 18,502.00VTP-018817

Total : 18,777.00

197005 5/6/2022 013969 MAP AUTOMOTIVE OF CHICAGO 40-664726 HUB ASSEMBLY PD STOCK01-17-205-72540 254.82

Total : 254.82

197006 5/6/2022 020492 MARTINEK, VICTOR 042422 VEHICLE STICKER NO LONGER NEEDED06-00-000-79005 25.00

Total : 25.00

197007 5/6/2022 020322 MASTER AUTO SUPPLY 15030-115552 BRAKE HOSE - SHOP TOOL GREASE HOSE01-26-024-73410 6.4001-26-023-73410 12.8163-00-000-73410 0.9064-00-000-73410 3.8460-00-000-73410 8.07AIR/FUEL SENSOR PD 8A15030-11675001-17-205-72540 79.60O2 SNESOR PD 8A ,STARTER ELECTRICAL UNIT15030-11696801-26-024-72540 -10.0001-17-205-72540 -76.02GASKET - STREET UNIT 7515030-11702101-26-023-72540 10.40STREET WHEEL COVER - UNIT 7515030-11702601-26-023-72540 14.83HYDRAULIC HOSE,GEAR SPECIAL LINE - PW ST15030-11704301-26-024-73410 27.67

11Page:





Bank code : apbank


197007 5/6/2022 (Continued)020322 MASTER AUTO SUPPLY01-26-023-73410 55.3660-00-000-73410 34.8763-00-000-73410 3.8864-00-000-73410 16.61

Total : 189.22

197008 5/6/2022 005645 MEADE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC. 700136 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE - APRIL 202201-26-024-72775 554.85

Total : 554.85

197009 5/6/2022 020501 MEMISOFSKI, SELIMA Ref001420859 UB Refund Cst #00462255; rfnd overpmt60-00-000-20599 53.07

Total : 53.07

197010 5/6/2022 006074 MENARDS 20658 CAR CHARGER, USB, SHARPIES01-26-024-73110 28.94POST MOUNT STANDARD, NYL LOCK NUT, FENDE2068801-26-023-73840 47.85STORAGE ORGANIZER2074001-26-023-73840 6.99CLEARVIEW LATCH BOX, OLD ENG FURN POL2074201-26-025-73580 13.8801-26-023-73870 4.8060-00-000-73870 1.6864-00-000-73870 1.4401-26-024-73870 2.3963-00-000-73870 1.68PLUMBERS PUTTY, KIT CHROME2079701-26-025-73630 55.47LANDSCAPE BLOCK2081101-26-025-73680 5.58METAL CUTTING2085501-26-023-73410 22.68

Total : 193.38

197011 5/6/2022 004518 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES in1705857 TOOL REPLACEMENTS

12Page:





Bank code : apbank


197011 5/6/2022 (Continued)004518 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES01-19-000-73410 148.00VTP-019052

Total : 148.00

197012 5/6/2022 015386 MUNICIPAL GIS PARTNERS, INC 6403 APR'22 GIS STAFFING01-16-000-72652 5,777.5460-00-000-72652 3,639.8563-00-000-72652 404.4364-00-000-72652 1,733.26

Total : 11,555.08

197013 5/6/2022 010810 MUNICIPAL SERV. CONSULTING INC TPCN-4-22 CONS SVC CIMP FOR VTP APRIL'2230-00-000-75812 13,178.1311-00-000-72750 10,835.37PD SIMULCAST RADIO SYSTEM - APRIL 2022TPCN-4-22-PD30-00-000-75812 71,710.00VTP-018685

Total : 95,723.50

197014 5/6/2022 014443 MURPHY & MILLER, INC MC00011335 PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE - 1ST QUARTERLY01-26-025-72790 4,364.47VTP-019130PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE METRA 80TH 1 OFMC0001133601-26-025-72790 889.25VTP-019130PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE - METRA REFR 1MC0001133701-26-025-72790 616.55VTP-019130

Total : 5,870.27

197015 5/6/2022 015723 NICOR 01981510009 ACCT#01981510009 METER 3968968 7780 W 1801-26-025-72511 334.31ACCT#06821610000 METER2769335 6640 167TH0682161000060-00-000-72511 81.2463-00-000-72511 81.2464-00-000-72511 69.63ACCT#12213610004 METER 5031396 7825 W 161221361000401-26-025-72511 623.33ACCT#53463710003 METER 2912216 18241 S 85346371000301-26-025-72511 101.45ACCT#54072310003 METER 5420864 16250 OPA54072310003

13Page:





Bank code : apbank


197015 5/6/2022 (Continued)015723 NICOR01-26-025-72511 1,330.43ACCT#73675410002 METER 3561300 7800 183R7367541000201-26-025-72511 2,057.05ACCT#7443410003 METER 3575402 7700W 183R7443341000301-26-025-72511 49.29ACCT#83523710008 METER 3026205 7980 183R8352371000801-26-025-72511 2,364.39ACCT#96019958527 METER 4582666 7999 W TI9601995852701-26-025-72511 116.42

Total : 7,208.78

197016 5/6/2022 006178 NORMAN'S 76535 PANTS HEM01-21-000-73610 12.00

Total : 12.00

197017 5/6/2022 017646 NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS REGIONAL 200 ANNUAL CRIME LAB MEMBERSHIP01-17-205-72750 82,951.00VTP-019126

Total : 82,951.00

197018 5/6/2022 010135 ONSITE COMMUNICATIONS USA, INC 51893 CIMP - LINE ITEM B30-00-000-75812 8,886.00

Total : 8,886.00

197019 5/6/2022 012575 P & G KEENE ELECTRICAL 223842 REPAIR STARTER STREETS 133 TS-9001-26-023-72540 165.00

Total : 165.00

197020 5/6/2022 006475 PARK ACE HARDWARE 67862/1 ACCT#891432 INV#67862/1 FASTENERS60-00-000-72520 4.0863-00-000-72520 4.08

Total : 8.16

197021 5/6/2022 020298 PEERLESS NETWORK INC 513098 VILLAGE LANDLINE PHONE SERV 4/15-5/1/2201-19-000-72120 3,025.0460-00-000-72120 2,684.5763-00-000-72120 298.28

14Page:





Bank code : apbank


197021 5/6/2022 (Continued)020298 PEERLESS NETWORK INC64-00-000-72120 1,278.3801-17-205-72120 392.7260-00-000-72120 17.1763-00-000-72120 1.7201-14-000-72120 620.0001-11-000-72120 1.6201-12-000-72120 3.7301-17-205-72120 3.7301-19-000-72120 0.8101-26-023-72120 0.9701-26-024-72120 0.9701-33-000-72120 1.9460-00-000-72120 2.4401-12-000-72120 13.7401-14-000-72120 42.9301-15-000-72120 8.5901-17-205-72120 25.7601-19-000-72120 12.0201-19-020-72120 3.4301-26-023-72120 5.1501-26-024-72120 5.1501-33-000-72120 27.4801-35-000-72120 5.1501-42-000-72120 3.43ACCT#VILLAGEO3328 17355 68TH CT 4/22-4/3568201-26-025-72120 64.50

Total : 8,551.42

197022 5/6/2022 006780 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE, INC 310203961 TIRES FD #48 LFI LFO RRI RRO01-19-000-72570 3,944.95(4) TIRES LT265/70QR17/10 FD 140141094632601-19-000-72570 802.64(4) LT26570R17 TRANSFORCE TIRES FD#140141094931101-19-000-72570 664.04VTP-019119RETURN TIRES ORIG INV 41094632641094931301-19-000-72570 -797.64

15Page:





Bank code : apbank


(Continued) Total : 4,613.99197022 5/6/2022 006780 006780 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE, INC

197023 5/6/2022 006507 POSTMASTER, U. S. POST OFFICE 042922 MAY '22 WATER BILLS60-00-000-72110 1,989.3464-00-000-72110 852.57

Total : 2,841.91

197024 5/6/2022 013587 PROSHRED SECURITY 990115913 SHREDDING SERVICES - VH 4/27/2201-14-000-72790 54.50

Total : 54.50

197025 5/6/2022 006850 QUILL CORPORATION 24547588 FOLD OVER CORD A601-35-000-73110 79.02FOLD OVER CARD A62455907301-35-000-73110 87.54AVRY LSR LBL NAME BADGE 4002467269701-35-000-73110 65.44CLASPS,FILE FOLDER,PEN,STENO BOOK,POST I2467358601-33-000-73110 224.06

Total : 456.06

197026 5/6/2022 006361 RAY O' HERRON CO INC 2190947 RIOT HELMET -LEONE01-17-220-73610 160.76K-9 BADGE HOLDER219151501-17-220-73600 13.26

Total : 174.02

197027 5/6/2022 006874 ROBINSON ENGINEERING CO. LTD. 22040393 19-R0866.01 TP 80TH AVE WATER METER VAUL26-00-000-75706 8,099.7521-R0545 TP KIMBERLY HEIGHTS DRAINAGE PL2204039465-00-000-75310 24,000.0021-R0945 TP RIVERWALK IMPROVEMENTS 2/26-2204039518-00-000-72840 13,062.2522-R0351 TP INVEST IN COOK GRANT (DOG PA2204039633-00-000-75205 5,000.0011-320 TP THE BLVD AT CENTRAL STATION (P2204041727-00-000-72840 242.75

16Page:





Bank code : apbank


197027 5/6/2022 (Continued)006874 ROBINSON ENGINEERING CO. LTD.22-R0055 PROF SVC 1/1/22-4/1/222204044665-00-000-72840 1,509.0062-00-000-72840 197.0033-00-000-75205 570.0030-00-000-75810 183.0062-00-000-72840 197.0065-00-000-72840 2,004.50

Total : 55,065.25

197028 5/6/2022 007629 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 042722 WATER,EMPL APPRECIATION FOOD CART60-00-000-73115 3.0963-00-000-73115 3.0964-00-000-73115 2.6501-26-023-73115 8.8301-26-024-73115 4.4201-14-000-72974 404.01PAPERTOWEL,SODA/WATER FOR EMPLOYEE APPRE05032201-26-025-73580 154.5601-14-000-72974 55.34WATER AND ICE FOR EMPLOYEE APPECATION WE05042201-14-000-72974 37.52

Total : 673.51

197029 5/6/2022 018104 SBA STEEL,LLC IN14063019 TOWER SITE RENT #IL46494-A-03 MAY'2260-00-000-72631 201.0263-00-000-72631 201.0264-00-000-72631 201.0201-17-205-72631 402.0301-19-000-72631 335.01

Total : 1,340.10

197030 5/6/2022 020502 SPENGLER, MARY Ref001420861 UB Refund Cst #0045099160-00-000-20599 37.02

Total : 37.02

197031 5/6/2022 015417 SPIEWAK, EDWIN 040322 REIMB ASE RECERT EXAM

17Page:





Bank code : apbank


197031 5/6/2022 (Continued)015417 SPIEWAK, EDWIN60-00-000-72140 64.4063-00-000-72140 64.4064-00-000-72140 55.20

Total : 184.00

197032 5/6/2022 018241 STANARD & ASSOC SA000050224 NATL FIRST LINE SUPERVISOR TEST/NFLST01-41-040-72846 1,790.74

Total : 1,790.74

197033 5/6/2022 007224 STANDARD EQUIPMENT COMPANY P35679 PL-SHIM MAKE/BR STREETS 10AUX01-26-023-72540 211.38

Total : 211.38

197034 5/6/2022 012238 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 3504980690 BUBBLE MAILER01-14-000-73110 8.59DVD/CD SPINDLE AND SLEEVES350498069101-17-205-73110 82.08

Total : 90.67

197035 5/6/2022 015452 STEINER ELECTRIC COMPANY S007130749.001 WP GFI - ELECTRIC01-26-025-73570 82.92

Total : 82.92

197036 5/6/2022 007205 SUBURBAN LABORATORIES INC. 202196 LEAD/COPPER TESTING60-00-000-72865 1,735.3064-00-000-72865 743.70

Total : 2,479.00

197037 5/6/2022 018878 SUPERION LLC 350710 CRYWOLF ALARM MAINT 6/1/22-5/31/23 AND P01-17-215-72655 5,524.19

Total : 5,524.19

197038 5/6/2022 007297 SUTTON FORD INC./FLEET SALES 552060 TUBE ASY BRAKE -STREETS#3301-26-023-72540 53.30KIT,SEAL ASY OIL PD UNIT 16B55220701-17-205-72540 46.00BRACKET ENGINE - PD STOCK MOTOR MOUNTS552208

18Page:





Bank code : apbank


197038 5/6/2022 (Continued)007297 SUTTON FORD INC./FLEET SALES01-17-205-72540 184.92STRAP ASY FUEL TANK RV - STREETS 8055224001-26-023-72540 199.34ARM ASY FRONT PD 3SAM55227601-17-205-72540 270.25

Total : 753.81

197039 5/6/2022 020493 TANIS, JESSICA 042922 REFUND VEHICLE STICKER PAYMENT OVERPAYME06-00-000-79005 20.00

Total : 20.00

197040 5/6/2022 019712 TM TIRE CO INC 140675 (4) P255/70R17 GENERAL HTS TIRES UNIR FI01-19-000-72570 493.48VTP-01911801-19-000-72570 5.00

Total : 498.48

197041 5/6/2022 012187 TOTAL AUTOMATION CONCEPTS, INC W28424 ROOFTOP AT PD01-26-025-72520 801.00

Total : 801.00

197042 5/6/2022 007955 TRAFFIC CONTROL & PROTECTION 111400 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES FOR STREET SIGNS01-26-023-73830 3,629.25VTP-019092

Total : 3,629.25

197043 5/6/2022 014510 TRUGREEN 156233712 AERATION - HARLEM AVE MEDIANS 4/23/2201-26-023-72881 1,294.11VTP-019098AERATION -DOWNTOWN OPA 4/23/2215623847701-26-023-72881 627.07VTP-019098AERATION FIRE HOUSE #47 4/23/2215624048001-26-025-72881 296.66VTP-019098AERATION FIRE HOUSE#4 4/23/2215624286601-26-025-72881 454.76VTP-019098AERATION - PD 4/25/2215627619901-26-025-72881 1,427.34VTP-019098AERATION - PUBLIC WORKS 4/25/2215632308301-26-025-72881 2,321.75VTP-019098

19Page:





Bank code : apbank


197043 5/6/2022 (Continued)014510 TRUGREENAERATION - FIRE HOUSE#3 4/25/2215632897401-26-025-72881 143.89VTP-019098AERATION 80TH AVE TRAIN 4/26/2215642407901-26-025-72881 2,901.75VTP-019098SPRING TREATMENT - MEDIANS OAK PK AVE TO15643137301-26-023-72881 40.00VTP-019047SPRING TREATMENT VH 4/26/2215643137401-26-023-72881 90.00VTP-019047SPRING TREATMENT - 167TH PUMP STATION1564317201-26-023-72881 90.00VTP-019047SPRING TREATMENT - DOWNTOWN TINLEY 4/27/15645884501-26-023-72881 125.00VTP-019047SPRING TREATMENT - FIRE HOUSE #4 4/27/2215652049101-26-023-72881 70.00VTP-019047

Total : 9,882.33

197044 5/6/2022 018759 TYSSEN, ROXANE 032222 REIMB PARKING FOR O'HARE PICKUP E.SPAMME01-41-057-72940 3.00REIMB EXP FOR POLISH LUNCHEON AUG'21 POS032222.01-41-057-72220 158.72REIMBURSEMENT FOR IRISH PARADE SUPPLIES032222..01-41-057-72940 66.91

Total : 228.63

197045 5/6/2022 008057 USA BLUE BOOK 950632 HACH FLUORIDE RGT SPADNS - WATER CHEMICA60-00-000-73550 234.97

Total : 234.97

197046 5/6/2022 011416 VERIZON WIRELESS 9904768782 ACCT#442345192-00001 WATER REPEATER 3/2360-00-000-72127 17.7963-00-000-72127 17.7964-00-000-72127 15.25

Total : 50.83

197047 5/6/2022 006362 VILLAGE OF OAK LAWN 7839 2006 GO BONDS & 2011A GO BONDS60-00-000-73223 23,442.26

20Page:





Bank code : apbank


197047 5/6/2022 (Continued)006362 VILLAGE OF OAK LAWN60-00-000-73222 8,402.20

Total : 31,844.46

197048 5/6/2022 008095 VISSERS COLLISION CENTER 160002656 DRIVERS DOOR DAMAGED FROM REPORTED ACCID01-26-023-72540 1,778.98VTP-019110

Total : 1,778.98

197049 5/6/2022 020499 WAGNER, THOMAS 050422 REIMB VEHICLE STICKER OVER PAID - SENIOR06-00-000-79005 23.50

Total : 23.50

197050 5/6/2022 010165 WAREHOUSE DIRECT WORKPL SOLTNS5226038-0 PAPER01-14-000-73110 238.65LAMINATOR5227029-001-26-025-73110 209.24

Total : 447.89

197051 5/6/2022 018482 WATTS, JERRY 042922 REIMB. HOTEL STAY IESMA TRAINING SUMMIT01-21-000-72170 193.80

Total : 193.80

197052 5/6/2022 011664 WORLDPOINT ECC, INC. 37018 CPR SUPPLIES - TRAINING01-19-020-73606 134.12

Total : 134.12

Bank total : 1,286,702.40112 Vouchers for bank code : apbank

21Page:





Bank code : ipmg


3986 5/3/2022 018837 INSURANCE PROGRAM MANAGERS GRP210526W019 PAYEE-ADVANCED PAIN CONSULTANTS01-14-000-72542 59.77

Total : 59.77

3987 5/3/2022 018837 INSURANCE PROGRAM MANAGERS GRP210731W002 PAYEE-ALIGN NETWORKS INC60-00-000-72542 187.7563-00-000-72542 35.7664-00-000-72542 95.80

Total : 319.31

3988 5/3/2022 018837 INSURANCE PROGRAM MANAGERS GRP210421W008 PAYEE-ALIGN NETWORKS INC01-14-000-72542 3,193.39

Total : 3,193.39

3989 5/3/2022 018837 INSURANCE PROGRAM MANAGERS GRP210421W008-1 PAYEE-ALIGN NETWORKS INC01-14-000-72542 2,591.10

Total : 2,591.10

3990 5/3/2022 018837 INSURANCE PROGRAM MANAGERS GRP210731W002-1 PAYEE-ENCOMPASS SPECIALTY NETWORK60-00-000-72542 5,561.5963-00-000-72542 1,059.3564-00-000-72542 2,837.55

Total : 9,458.49

3991 5/3/2022 018837 INSURANCE PROGRAM MANAGERS GRP210731W002-2 PAYEE-ENCOMPASS SPECIALTY NETWORK60-00-000-72542 834.2463-00-000-72542 158.9064-00-000-72542 425.63

Total : 1,418.77

3992 5/3/2022 018837 INSURANCE PROGRAM MANAGERS GRP210421W008-2 PAYEE-ENCOMPASS SPECIALTY NETWORK01-14-000-72542 1,034.38

Total : 1,034.38

3993 5/3/2022 018837 INSURANCE PROGRAM MANAGERS GRP200803W006 PAYEE-ENCOMPASS SPECIALTY NETWORK01-14-000-72542 258.35

Total : 258.35

22Page:





Bank code : ipmg


3994 5/3/2022 018837 INSURANCE PROGRAM MANAGERS GRP200803W006-1 PAYEE-ENCOMPASS SPECIALTY NETWORK01-14-000-72542 516.70

Total : 516.70

3995 5/3/2022 018837 INSURANCE PROGRAM MANAGERS GRP210731W002-3 PAYEE-GOTTLIEB MIDWEST ANESTHESIOLOGISTS60-00-000-72542 701.0763-00-000-72542 133.5464-00-000-72542 357.68

Total : 1,192.29

3996 5/3/2022 018837 INSURANCE PROGRAM MANAGERS GRP201119W024 PAYEE-PARKVIEW ORTHOPAEDIC GROUP01-14-000-72542 73.48

Total : 73.48

3997 5/3/2022 018837 INSURANCE PROGRAM MANAGERS GRP200803W006-2 PAYEE-PETERSON, JOHNSON & MURRAY01-14-000-72542 106.00

Total : 106.00

3998 5/3/2022 018837 INSURANCE PROGRAM MANAGERS GRP210526W019-1 PAYEE-PETERSON, JOHNSON & MURRAY01-14-000-72542 93.00

Total : 93.00

3999 5/3/2022 018837 INSURANCE PROGRAM MANAGERS GRP190326W026 PAYEE-PETERSON JOHNSON & MURRAY01-14-000-72542 2,451.00

Total : 2,451.00

4000 5/3/2022 018837 INSURANCE PROGRAM MANAGERS GRP190514W019 PAYEE-PETERSON JOHNSON & MURRAY01-14-000-72542 817.00

Total : 817.00

4001 5/3/2022 018837 INSURANCE PROGRAM MANAGERS GRP191105W030 PAYEE-PETERSON JOHNSON & MURRAY01-14-000-72542 43.00

Total : 43.00

4002 5/3/2022 018837 INSURANCE PROGRAM MANAGERS GRP201119W024-1 PAYEE-PRESCRIPTION PARTNERS01-14-000-72542 9.40

Total : 9.40

23Page:





Bank code : ipmg


4003 5/3/2022 018837 INSURANCE PROGRAM MANAGERS GRP201119W024-2 PAYEE-PRESCRIPTION PARTNERS01-14-000-72542 31.06

Total : 31.06

4004 5/3/2022 018837 INSURANCE PROGRAM MANAGERS GRP210421W008-3 PAYEE-VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK01-14-000-72542 1,704.52

Total : 1,704.52

4005 5/3/2022 018837 INSURANCE PROGRAM MANAGERS GRP200803W006-3 PAYEE-VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK01-14-000-72542 1,113.02

Total : 1,113.02

Bank total : 26,484.0320 Vouchers for bank code : ipmg

1,313,186.43Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report132

The Tinley Park Village Board having duly met at VillageHall do hereby certify that the following claims or demandsagainst said village were presented and are approved forpayment as presented on the above listing.

In witness thereof, the Village President and Clerk ofthe Village of Tinley Park, hereunto set their hands.

______________________________Village President

______________________________Village Clerk

______________________________Date

24Page:





Bank code : ap_py


126372 5/13/2022 017391 VSP ILLINOIS PR050122 VSP 30061452 COBRA PMT-APR PMT/MAY COVER86-00-000-20432 11.68

Total : 11.68

Bank total : 11.681 Vouchers for bank code : ap_py

1Page:





Bank code : apbank


197054 5/13/2022 014472 AERO RUBBER COMPANY, INC. 04222022 AERO RUBBER STORAGE ANNUAL FEE 5/1/22-4/01-35-000-72790 12,070.00VTP-019132

Total : 12,070.00

197055 5/13/2022 008979 ALECK PLUMBING INC. S132908 RODDING SVC FD 17355 68TH CT01-26-025-72520 690.00

Total : 690.00

197056 5/13/2022 002628 AMERICAN WATER 4000235472 MAY'22 FLAT MONTHLY FEE64-00-000-73225 455.67

Total : 455.67

197057 5/13/2022 010062 B & H PHOTO. VIDEO .PRO AUDIO 201517442 FLASH FOR NIKON,CANON CAMERA,TRANSCEND 801-17-225-72340 235.40VTP-019105

Total : 235.40

197058 5/13/2022 003166 B & J TOWING AND AUTO REPAIR 20315 SAFETY INSPECTION01-26-024-72266 43.0001-26-023-72266 196.0001-42-000-72266 28.0060-00-000-72266 8.7563-00-000-72266 8.7564-00-000-72266 7.50

Total : 292.00

197059 5/13/2022 010953 BATTERIES PLUS - 277 P51335722 SLA BATTERY FIRE PANEL OPA TRAIN01-26-025-72520 138.52

Total : 138.52

197060 5/13/2022 018807 BAXTER & WOODMAN INC 0234258 190816.60 LAGRANGE RD UTILITY - CS MARC26-00-000-75707 22,835.53

Total : 22,835.53

197061 5/13/2022 002974 BETTENHAUSEN CONSTRUCTION SERV220036 TRUCK TIME FOR HAULING STONE FROM HANSON60-00-000-73860 283.5063-00-000-73860 31.5064-00-000-73860 135.0001-26-023-73860 225.00

2Page:





Bank code : apbank


197061 5/13/2022 (Continued)002974 BETTENHAUSEN CONSTRUCTION SERV70-00-000-73860 75.00TRUCK TIME HAULING WOOD CHIPS TO HOMER,S22003860-00-000-73681 358.3163-00-000-73681 39.8164-00-000-73681 170.6301-26-023-72890 243.75SEMI TRUCK TIME FOR HAULING STONE FROM H22003960-00-000-73860 47.2563-00-000-73860 5.2564-00-000-73860 22.5001-26-023-73860 37.5070-00-000-73860 12.50TRUCK TIME FOR HAULING STONE FROM HANSON22004160-00-000-73860 212.6363-00-000-73860 23.6364-00-000-73860 101.2501-26-023-73860 168.7570-00-000-73860 56.24TRUCK TIME HAULING STREET SWEEPINGS TO H22004260-00-000-73681 55.1363-00-000-73681 6.1364-00-000-73681 26.2501-26-023-72890 37.49

Total : 2,375.00

197062 5/13/2022 002923 BLACK DIRT INC. 1653 DIRT FOR LAWN RESTORATIONS01-26-023-73680 240.00VTP-019121

Total : 240.00

197063 5/13/2022 012907 BORROWDALE, RUSSELL 051022 REIMB: LUNCH,PARKING NIA CONFERENCE 5/1-01-17-205-72170 154.00

Total : 154.00

197064 5/13/2022 003243 CDW GOVERNMENT INC W518599 VIEWSONIC 32 IN CURVED GAMING MONITOR01-16-000-74128 270.19STARTECH FTDI USB TO SERIAL ADAPTERX015781

3Page:





Bank code : apbank


197064 5/13/2022 (Continued)003243 CDW GOVERNMENT INC01-16-000-74128 31.64

Total : 301.83

197065 5/13/2022 003229 CED/EFENGEE 4975-1012249 STREET LIGHT MATERIALS AB SATIN FINISH01-26-024-73570 1,438.88VTP-018690PD BULBS5025-100476201-26-025-72520 58.00

Total : 1,496.88

197066 5/13/2022 015199 CHICAGO PARTS & SOUND LLC 2J0003600 VERN REPAIR DOOR PANEL IN UNIT 5A01-17-205-72540 80.00BATTERY BLDG UNIT 773-004926801-33-300-72540 125.56NOLOCN ACCUMULATOR EMA - 13M3-004960801-21-000-72540 96.90BRAKE PADS - RR BR PD STOCK3-004961601-17-205-72540 180.24FILTER - FD 1502 TAHOE3-004962001-19-000-72540 30.99PRIME GUARD 5W30 STREET 98/94 ELECTRICAL3-004962301-26-024-72540 33.4801-26-023-72540 33.48

Total : 580.65

197067 5/13/2022 003137 CHRISTOPHER B.BURKE ENGINEERNG 174553 01.R160373.00008 POST 5 LIFT STATION RED61-00-000-72840 1,534.0001.R160373.00027 WTER RATE STUDY 3/27-4/17455460-00-000-72840 3,955.7763-00-000-72840 439.5364-00-000-72840 1,883.7001.R160373.00030 WESTERN PRESSURE ZONE -17455526-00-000-75708 536.0001.R160373.00002 INTERIM VILLAGE ENG SVC17455664-00-000-72840 588.5730-00-000-74604 336.0001.R160373.00024 WATER MODEL UPDATE & MA174557

4Page:





Bank code : apbank


197067 5/13/2022 (Continued)003137 CHRISTOPHER B.BURKE ENGINEERNG60-00-000-75813 469.0063-00-000-75813 469.0064-00-000-75813 402.0001.R160373.00031 183RD ST OVERHEAD UTILI17455830-00-000-75801 1,462.9601.R160373.D0025 DOROTHY LN WATER MAIN R17455926-00-000-75705 7,895.0001.R160373.D0026 IRONWOOD DR WATER MAIN17456026-00-000-75704 2,599.0001.R160373.D0029 LAGRANGE RD WATER MAIN17456126-00-000-75708 6,564.67

Total : 29,135.20

197068 5/13/2022 013820 CINTAS CORPORATION 2107874858 MEDICINE CABINET - VILLAGE HALL01-26-025-72790 226.97MEDICINE CABINET - FIRE DPT#46510407474101-19-000-73115 51.75MEDICINE CABINET - PUMP HOUSE510787481401-26-025-72790 29.47MEDICINE CABINET - PUBLIC SAFETY510787483801-26-025-72790 119.81MEDICINE CABINET - PD510787484901-26-025-72790 196.82MEDICINE CABINET - PD510787487901-26-025-72790 52.89MEDICINE CABINET - PUMP HOUSE 2510787489201-26-025-72790 19.94MEDICINE CABINET - PW GARAGE510787489801-26-023-72790 452.03

Total : 1,149.68

197069 5/13/2022 013878 COMED - COMMONWEALTH EDISON 2777112019 ACCT#2777112019 175TH & SANDLEWOOD DR 301-26-023-72510 433.41

Total : 433.41

197070 5/13/2022 018311 CONNECTION 72723416 Z150 MULTIMEDIA SPEAKERS

5Page:





Bank code : apbank


197070 5/13/2022 (Continued)018311 CONNECTION01-19-000-72565 24.03

Total : 24.03

197071 5/13/2022 012410 CONSERV FS, INC. 66048812 CURLEX ERO BLANKET,CONSERV FS SUNNY,CONS01-26-023-73680 373.78

Total : 373.78

197072 5/13/2022 012826 CONSTELLATION NEWENERGY, INC. 62347179201 ACCT#875222 UTIL#3613125002 HARLEM AVE 164-00-000-72510 1,209.88ACCT#875223 UTIL#3670129006 16256 84TH A6234718130164-00-000-72510 363.63ACCT#875224 UTIL#3784068018 18301 RIDGEL6234718360160-00-000-72510 4,183.6163-00-000-72510 4,183.61ACCT#875225 UTIL#4373166015 6640 W 167TH6234720220160-00-000-72510 2,504.5363-00-000-72510 2,504.53ACCT#875227 UTIL#5095140029 171ST & 80TH6235141550164-00-000-72510 6,762.99

Total : 21,712.78

197073 5/13/2022 018234 CORE & MAIN LP Q771261 WESTERN CB REPAIR LID60-00-000-73630 88.2063-00-000-73630 9.8064-00-000-73630 42.00

Total : 140.00

197074 5/13/2022 019396 DE MARCHI, DOMINIC 050922 REIMB: HOTEL,MEALS,FUEL PATROL RIFLE INS01-17-220-72140 947.06

Total : 947.06

197075 5/13/2022 020507 DEMILIO, VASILIK 051122 REFUND VEHICLE STICKER NO LONGER NEEDED06-00-000-79005 25.00

Total : 25.00

197076 5/13/2022 014232 DIGI-KEY CORPORATION 1453109 89512274 LTE CAT4 MODEM

6Page:





Bank code : apbank


197076 5/13/2022 (Continued)014232 DIGI-KEY CORPORATION 145310960-00-000-72120 121.7963-00-000-72120 24.3664-00-000-72120 201.83

Total : 347.98

197077 5/13/2022 004009 EAGLE UNIFORM CO INC INV-7645 FIRE MEMBER UNIFORMS (CLASS A&B) GRANT01-19-000-73610 107.50VTP-019131FIRE MEMBER UNIFORMS (CLASS A&B) CHAPLAIINV-764901-19-000-73610 154.50VTP-019131

Total : 262.00

197078 5/13/2022 016642 EASYTESTMAKER 659613-0623 EASYTESTMAKER PREMIUM 6/27/22-6/26/2301-17-217-73600 79.95

Total : 79.95

197079 5/13/2022 004010 ED & JOE'S PIZZA 050422 PUBLIC SVC RECOG LUNCH 5/4/2201-12-000-72974 1,355.51BENCHES ON THE AVE RECEPTION05062201-35-000-72923 557.75

Total : 1,913.26

197080 5/13/2022 020508 ENTERPRISE FLEET MANAGEMENT 2698 ENT FLT MGMNT FEB-APR'22 23Z494,25Q836(260-00-000-20201 343.4060-00-000-96142 140.8860-00-000-96143 42.0260-00-000-96142 15.0060-00-000-20201 343.4060-00-000-96142 140.8860-00-000-96143 42.0360-00-000-20201 139.9360-00-000-96142 72.7160-00-000-96143 42.02ENT FLT MGMNT FEB-APR'22 23Z494 CREDIT269860-00-000-96142 -114.14ENT FLT MGMNT MAY'22 25Q836(29-W),25P6582698.60-00-000-20201 344.94

7Page:





Bank code : apbank


197080 5/13/2022 (Continued)020508 ENTERPRISE FLEET MANAGEMENT60-00-000-96142 139.3460-00-000-96143 42.0260-00-000-20201 344.9460-00-000-96142 139.3460-00-000-96143 42.03

Total : 2,260.74

197081 5/13/2022 004176 FEDEX (FEDERAL EXPRESS) 7-700-33673 ACCT#628785953 SHIPPING COSTS PJM01-13-000-72110 57.02ACCT#628785953 SHIPPING COSTS TO IML7-708-0384101-14-000-72110 9.80ACCT#628785953 SHIPPING COSTS9-624-2712701-13-000-72110 26.19

Total : 93.01

197082 5/13/2022 020246 FIFTH THIRD BANK 040422 ****2177 GIFT CARD FOR EMPLOYEE ENGAGEME01-14-000-72974 50.00****2177 GIFT CARDS FOR EASTER EGG HUNT04042201-14-000-72974 55.00****2177 TAX REVERSAL INV#10811782460414202201-35-000-72982 -19.40****2177 TAX REVERSAL INV#108114677004142022.01-35-000-72982 -58.49S****2177 MONTHLY SUBSCRIPTION04182201-35-000-72720 27.72****2177 ADOBE STOCK04202201-35-000-72985 29.99****2177 MAINTENANCE CODE FORMS10128048401-33-300-73590 907.99****2177 WIRELESS HEADSET MICROPHONE SYS108181781101-35-000-72982 383.03****2177 3 UPS UNITS AND COMM CARD111-2622545-003623065-00-000-72525 1,168.30VTP-019088****2177 TABLE CLOTH COVERS111-6207583-609860601-35-000-73870 36.88****2177 3 UPS UNITS AND COMM CARD111-6987131-1392215

8Page:





Bank code : apbank


197082 5/13/2022 (Continued)020246 FIFTH THIRD BANK65-00-000-72525 443.85VTP-019088****2177 T3 RING BINDER111-9139219-765780901-26-024-73110 20.35****2177 DURAMARK CHALKSHOT112-0858820-441300201-26-024-73410 14.49****2177 PENCILS,SHEET PROTECTORS,HIGHLI112-0990884-236820201-26-024-73110 52.92****2177 TRIPOD ROLLER112-2760440-541623101-35-000-72982 79.99****2177 ZOMEI CAMERA TRIPOD112-2930222-555142501-35-000-72982 70.97****2177 BLACK GALLERY CERTIFICATE DOCUM112-3354814-648022601-26-024-73110 5.6001-26-023-73110 11.1960-00-000-73110 7.0563-00-000-73110 0.7864-00-000-73110 3.36****2177 3 RING BINDER112-4577339-943540401-26-024-73110 19.74****2177 TABLE CLOTHS112-6831601-338102701-26-023-73115 69.95****2177 ROLLERBALL REFILLS112-8190041-466506401-26-024-73110 3.0201-26-023-73110 6.0360-00-000-73110 3.8063-00-000-73110 0.4264-00-000-73110 1.81****2177 GARDEN TOOL COLLECTION112-9390331-687702701-33-300-73870 30.36****2177 YOLOBOX PORTABLE LIVE STREAM ST113-3022964-566983701-35-000-72982 799.00****2177 SIRE RACK FOR COUNTERTOP USE113-3142088-920343901-14-000-72974 193.08****2177 PENTEL REFILL INK114-2066878-149460901-26-024-73110 2.5601-26-023-73110 5.12

9Page:





Bank code : apbank


197082 5/13/2022 (Continued)020246 FIFTH THIRD BANK60-00-000-73110 3.2363-00-000-73110 0.3664-00-000-73110 1.54****2177 FELT TIP PEN,SHARPIE,POST ITS,E114-3267987-530503501-26-025-73110 480.65****2177 GREASE - MOVIE FOR SENIOR CENTE114-5117975-033940801-41-056-72937 15.98****2177 DIGITAL LEVEL,SURVEYING BOOK,ME114-6423013-929225601-26-023-73110 70.4301-26-024-73110 35.2160-00-000-73110 44.3463-00-000-73110 4.9364-00-000-73110 21.16****2177 LIGHT BULB,STEAMER,MICROFIBER C114-8522198-429062201-35-000-72982 141.76****2177 RULER,BUSINESS CARD HOLDER,3 RI114-99069579-471381601-26-025-73110 115.54 ****2177 VOICE TELEPROMPTER11753593268001-35-000-72982 21.24***2177 DOMAIN NAME RENEWAL VISITTINLEYP129212999101-35-000-72653 42.99****2177 TELEPROMPTER APP15753333821301-35-000-72982 8.49****2177 NOTARY STAMP N.OCONNOR2932601-13-000-73110 24.12****2177 IAMMA 2022 ANNUAL CONF 4/10/22323765031901-12-000-72170 75.00****2177 FACEBOOK SPONSOR POSTS5ZKFWBBK6201-35-000-72653 143.36****2177 GEN 10 SERVERB1436640010160-00-000-75812 2,840.38VTP-019097****2177 SIMPLIFILE SYSTEM 6801 W 180THE 220950402401-14-000-72355 103.38****2177 SIMPLIFLE SYSTEM 20008 BOYNE DRE R202202841801-14-000-72355 55.39****2177 SIMPLIFILE SYSTEM 19942 SILVERSE R2022028468

10Page:





Bank code : apbank


197082 5/13/2022 (Continued)020246 FIFTH THIRD BANK01-14-000-72355 55.39****2177 SIMPLIFILE SYSTEM 8701 FAIRFIELE R202202847301-14-000-72355 55.39****2177 SIMPLIFILE SYSTEM 19623 BROOKFIE R202202847901-14-000-72355 55.39****2177 SIMPLIFILE SYSTEM 8316 AMBERLYE220941705501-14-000-72355 103.38****2177 SIMPLIFILE SYSTEM 17718 BAYBERRE220961205001-14-000-72355 103.38****2177 SIMPLIFILE SYSTEMS 6630 W 171STE221081832501-14-000-72355 103.38****2177 SUBSCRIPTION 4/23/22-4/22/23INV1100270401-16-000-72140 1,737.00

Total : 10,889.25

197083 5/13/2022 015058 FLEETPRIDE 98739398 LUBE SPIN,FILTER,FUEL CARTRIDGE STREET S01-26-023-72540 495.67FUEL CARTRIDGE RV STREET - STOCK9873973501-26-023-72540 467.64FUEL CARTRIDGE STREET -STOCK9873977901-26-023-72540 51.96

Total : 1,015.27

197084 5/13/2022 012941 FMP 52-511322 FVP BRAKE ROTOR - PD STOCK01-17-205-72540 170.80FVP BRAKE ROTOR PD STOCK52-51149201-17-205-72540 173.26SENSOR - OXYGEN53-42150801-17-205-72540 54.99FVP BRAKE ROTOR - PD STOCK53-42160701-17-205-72540 173.26

Total : 572.31

197085 5/13/2022 020195 FOREST PRINTING COMPANY 111014 BUSINESS CARDS D.RITTER01-33-000-72310 72.30

11Page:





Bank code : apbank


(Continued) Total : 72.30197085 5/13/2022 020195 020195 FOREST PRINTING COMPANY

197086 5/13/2022 011611 FOX VALLEY FIRE & SAFETY CO. IN00508280 ANNUAL FIRE ALARM INSPECTION AND REPORT01-19-000-72122 215.00

Total : 215.00

197087 5/13/2022 002877 G. W. BERKHEIMER CO., INC. 7000609 HVAC FILTERS 80TH AVE01-26-025-72520 234.20

Total : 234.20

197088 5/13/2022 004538 GOLDY LOCKS INC 17695153 KEY BY CODE - SENIOR CENTER DESK01-26-025-73840 20.00KEY RING1772024401-26-025-73110 25.44

Total : 45.44

197089 5/13/2022 004493 GORDON FOOD SERVICE INC. 768188255 HOTDOGS,DRINK MIX,SOY SAUCE, TERIYAKI,VE01-26-024-72220 45.5901-26-023-72220 91.1860-00-000-72220 31.9163-00-000-72220 31.9164-00-000-72220 27.34

Total : 227.93

197090 5/13/2022 004438 GRAINGER 9005816435 STRAIGHT CHROME KOHLER INSIGHT BRASS01-26-025-73630 302.27

Total : 302.27

197091 5/13/2022 018962 GRAYSHIFT LLC INV00397 GRAYKEY LICENSE-EXPANSION PACK 20,ESSENT01-17-225-72655 18,290.00

Total : 18,290.00

197092 5/13/2022 019792 HANSON AGGREGATES MIDWEST INC 41307707 BACKFILL70-00-000-73860 127.9501-26-023-73860 383.8460-00-000-73860 483.6363-00-000-73860 53.7464-00-000-73860 230.29

12Page:





Bank code : apbank


(Continued) Total : 1,279.45197092 5/13/2022 019792 019792 HANSON AGGREGATES MIDWEST INC

197093 5/13/2022 017885 HARMON JR, MICHAEL 050922 REIMB: HOTEL,MEALS,FUEL PATROL RIFLE INS01-17-220-72140 812.52

Total : 812.52

197094 5/13/2022 019784 HEARTLAND BUSINESS SYSTEMS LLC 515237-H INTRANET REFRESH APRIL 202201-16-000-72650 878.75VTP-019024OFFICE 365,AZURE ACTIVE DIRECTORY PREMIU516893-H01-16-000-72655 1,564.20ST201 SAFE ID/MINI517880-H01-16-000-74128 442.00

Total : 2,884.95

197095 5/13/2022 010238 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 050622 ****2304 TOOLS FOR NEW EMPLOYEE SCOTT &01-26-024-73410 456.90****2304 TOOLS FOR NEW EMPLOYEE SCOTT &050622.01-26-024-73410 496.76****2304 TOOLS FOR NEW EMPLOYEE SCOTT &050622..01-26-024-73410 463.93****2304 TOOLBOXES9834401-26-023-72540 144.4560-00-000-72540 75.8463-00-000-72540 25.2864-00-000-72540 43.34

Total : 1,706.50

197096 5/13/2022 012328 HOMER INDUSTRIES S176144 DROP CHARGE - CHIPS01-26-023-72890 100.00DROP CHARGE - CHIPSS17660101-26-023-72890 100.00

Total : 200.00

197097 5/13/2022 001487 HOMEWOOD DISPOSAL SERVICE 7812687 30YD EXCHANGE HAUL,DUMP CHARGES01-26-023-72890 474.02

Total : 474.02

197098 5/13/2022 004978 ILLINOIS ASSOC OF CHIEFS OF 10711 NFLST TESTS,STUDY GUIDES

13Page:





Bank code : apbank


197098 5/13/2022 (Continued)004978 ILLINOIS ASSOC OF CHIEFS OF01-41-040-72846 2,000.00SERGEANT ASSESSMENT1071801-41-040-72846 3,500.00MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL S.TENCZA905101-17-205-72720 115.00

Total : 5,615.00

197099 5/13/2022 018836 ILLINOIS COUNTIES RISK RCB000000030234 2020-2021 ICRMT - WORKER'S COMP P1-1001201-14-000-72421 7,121.00

Total : 7,121.00

197100 5/13/2022 015497 ILLINOIS SECRETARY OF STATE 050922 COVERT VEHICLE LICENSE PLATES, UNIT 4C 101-17-205-72860 151.00

Total : 151.00

197101 5/13/2022 015497 ILLINOIS SECRETARY OF STATE 050922 2016 FORD TAURUS 1FAHP2D89GG14222101-17-205-72860 151.00

Total : 151.00

197102 5/13/2022 015497 ILLINOIS SECRETARY OF STATE 050922. 2011 FORD TAURUS 1FAHP2DW1BG190173 UNIT01-17-205-72860 151.00

Total : 151.00

197103 5/13/2022 015497 ILLINOIS SECRETARY OF STATE 050922.. 2014 FORD TAURUS 1FAHP2D80EG107161 UNI01-17-205-72860 151.00

Total : 151.00

197104 5/13/2022 015497 ILLINOIS SECRETARY OF STATE 050922... 2017 FORD EXPLORER 1FM5K8R9HGE00875 UN01-17-205-72860 151.00

Total : 151.00

197105 5/13/2022 015497 ILLINOIS SECRETARY OF STATE 050922.... 2016 FORD TAURUS 1FAHP2D84GG141932 UNI01-17-205-72860 151.00

Total : 151.00

197106 5/13/2022 015497 ILLINOIS SECRETARY OF STATE 050922..... 2017 FORD EXPLORER 1FM5K8D84HGA70999 U01-17-205-72860 151.00

14Page:





Bank code : apbank


(Continued) Total : 151.00197106 5/13/2022 015497 015497 ILLINOIS SECRETARY OF STATE

197107 5/13/2022 015497 ILLINOIS SECRETARY OF STATE 051222 NOTARY COMMISSION FILING P.YURKO01-17-205-73110 10.00

Total : 10.00

197108 5/13/2022 015497 ILLINOIS SECRETARY OF STATE 051222. NOTARY COMMISSION FILING M.MOTZ01-17-205-73110 10.00

Total : 10.00

197109 5/13/2022 015497 ILLINOIS SECRETARY OF STATE 051222.. NOTARY COMMISSION FILING M.MCCAHILL01-17-205-73110 10.00

Total : 10.00

197110 5/13/2022 015497 ILLINOIS SECRETARY OF STATE 051222.... NOTARY COMMISSION FILING A.HUMENIK01-17-205-73110 10.00

Total : 10.00

197111 5/13/2022 005186 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM 315374 BATTERY GC2-ECL UTL 2TRV PD01-17-205-72540 336.00

Total : 336.00

197112 5/13/2022 005379 KLEIN, THORPE & JENKINS, LTD 225593 5409-001 ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS01-14-000-72850 1,462.50

Total : 1,462.50

197113 5/13/2022 018292 KNICKERBOCKER ROOFING & PAVING 20116588 FIRE STATION #1 ROOF AREA SVC01-26-025-72520 1,053.93

Total : 1,053.93

197114 5/13/2022 016616 KURTZ AMBULANCE SERVICE INC. 10857 EMS SERVICE AGREEMENT 4/1-4/30/2201-21-000-72856 43,208.33

Total : 43,208.33

197115 5/13/2022 020509 LABROSCIAN, JAMES & AUDREY Ref001421189 UB Refund Cst #00469435, rfnd dupl pmt60-00-000-20599 217.96

Total : 217.96

15Page:





Bank code : apbank


197116 5/13/2022 017603 LAKESIDE CONSULTANTS 043022 APR'22 SERVICES INVOICE - PLAN REVIEW AN01-33-300-72790 17,175.00

Total : 17,175.00

197117 5/13/2022 020207 LENNY'S GAS N WASH 183RD ST 3045 CAR WASH - CD APRIL 202201-33-300-72540 8.00CAR WASH - PD APRIL 2022304601-17-205-72540 88.00CAR WAS - PW APRIL 2022304701-26-023-72540 2.0060-00-000-72540 1.0563-00-000-72540 0.3564-00-000-72540 0.60

Total : 100.00

197118 5/13/2022 016027 LEXIPOL, LLC INVPRA10295 GRANT WRITING ONLY & REVIEW 4/29/22-4/2801-17-205-72750 2,500.00

Total : 2,500.00

197119 5/13/2022 011258 LONDON, SONNY 051022 REIMB: HOTEL,MEALS FOR IJOA &IDOA ANNUAL01-17-205-72170 500.08CRISIS INTERVENTION TRAINING 6/8/22 LUNC051022.01-17-220-72140 15.00

Total : 515.08

197120 5/13/2022 012696 MAGALSKI, MARK 051122 REIMBURSE SUPPLIES FOR ANNUAL PW PICNIC60-00-000-72220 0.4763-00-000-72220 0.4764-00-000-72220 0.4001-26-023-72220 1.3401-26-024-72220 0.68

Total : 3.36

197121 5/13/2022 020322 MASTER AUTO SUPPLY 15030-115286 SPARK PLUG 1201 FIRE GATOR01-19-000-72540 3.92BRAKE PADS,ROTOR,FLANGE,GASKET,MANIFOLD15030-11713101-21-000-72540 341.90

16Page:





Bank code : apbank


197121 5/13/2022 (Continued)020322 MASTER AUTO SUPPLYAIR FILTERS STREET STOCK15030-11719501-26-023-72540 285.57CONVERTER ASMBLY ELECTRICAL UNIT 6015030-11725801-26-024-72540 604.47IGNITION OIL RV 28 WATER15030-11726460-00-000-72540 19.0863-00-000-72540 6.3664-00-000-72540 10.91

Total : 1,272.21

197122 5/13/2022 005844 MCDONALD'S 050722 APRIL'22 PRISONER MEALS01-17-220-72230 195.37

Total : 195.37

197123 5/13/2022 006074 MENARDS 21011 DRILL PRESS WITH LASER01-19-000-72530 127.69RS EFFLORESCENCE REMOVER2105001-26-023-73550 129.74MIX AND MEASURE CONTAINERS2107601-26-023-73410 5.97GAMMA SEAL LID,5GALLON PAIL2109401-26-023-73410 21.50PURDY PAINT COVER,ROLLER,FRAME PAINT SUP2109801-26-025-73620 80.50MUNICIPAL BLDG ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES2121301-26-025-72520 345.7201-26-025-73570 57.12LED 120V - MUNICPAL BLDGS2121501-26-025-73410 436.00PAINT FOR POLES ON 173RD PL2126701-26-024-73620 179.40MAG NUT DRIVER, FENDER WASHER, LAG SCREW2133301-26-023-73410 24.54COBRA DRAIN BLDR2134060-00-000-73410 7.5563-00-000-73410 0.83

17Page:





Bank code : apbank


197123 5/13/2022 (Continued)006074 MENARDS64-00-000-73410 3.60STEP IN POST 4'2138960-00-000-73631 9.1864-00-000-73631 3.94SPONGE SEAL2142301-26-023-73410 17.98LED 16PK2142460-00-000-72540 24.5063-00-000-72540 24.5064-00-000-72540 20.99

Total : 1,521.25

197124 5/13/2022 017651 MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. 5392061001 LOCKNUT,BRAKE CLNR,SEAL,HEX NUT,RAZOR BL01-26-023-72540 156.22

Total : 156.22

197125 5/13/2022 004518 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES IN1705795 REPLACEMENT HOSE01-19-000-74184 780.00VTP-01899801-19-000-74184 50.00REPLACEMENT HOSEIN170579601-19-000-74184 735.00VTP-018999REPLACEMENT HOSEIN170579701-19-000-74184 1,410.00VTP-019002

Total : 2,975.00

197126 5/13/2022 019756 NEWCOM WIRELESS SERVICES LLC 6873 <911> - SUPPORT/MAINT RENEWAL - STRATUS01-17-205-72756 3,484.00VTP-01910201-19-000-72756 3,484.00VTP-01910201-21-210-72756 3,484.00VTP-019102

Total : 10,452.00

197127 5/13/2022 015723 NICOR 09977410001 ACCT#09977410001 METER 5146885 7801 W 1901-26-025-72511 570.03

Total : 570.03

197128 5/13/2022 006475 PARK ACE HARDWARE 067882/1 ACCT#89143 INV#067882/1 SUPER GLUE

18Page:





Bank code : apbank


197128 5/13/2022 (Continued)006475 PARK ACE HARDWARE01-26-024-73110 2.8701-26-023-73110 5.7460-00-000-73110 3.6263-00-000-73110 0.4064-00-000-73110 1.73ACCT#891432 INV#067894/1 TOTE LATCHING 3067894/101-26-023-73410 25.58

Total : 39.94

197129 5/13/2022 014682 PITNEY BOWES 3105481285 ACCT#0010611388 4/30-7/29/2201-17-205-72750 540.87

Total : 540.87

197130 5/13/2022 006498 POLICE CHIEFS ASSC OF WILL CO 02012022 MEMBERSHIP - S. TENCZA01-17-205-72720 50.00

Total : 50.00

197131 5/13/2022 015995 PORTER LEE CORPORATION 26892 ANNUAL SOFTWARE SUPPORT BEAST EVIDENCE S01-17-225-72655 5,513.00

Total : 5,513.00

197132 5/13/2022 006507 POSTMASTER, U. S. POST OFFICE 101022 POSTAGE FOR PERMIT 34 - WATER QUALITY RE60-00-000-72110 3,111.9364-00-000-72110 1,333.69

Total : 4,445.62

197133 5/13/2022 019583 PRECISE MRM LLC 200-0002618 AIR AND ROAD TEMP SENSOR,WIRELESS INV#2001-26-023-72655 -525.005MB FLAT DATA PLAN US WIT NAF200-1035845401-26-023-72655 189.005MB FLAT DATA PLAN US WITH NAF200-103632201-26-023-72655 189.005MB FLAT DATA PLAN US WITH NAF MARCH'22200-103685201-26-023-72655 189.00

Total : 42.00

19Page:





Bank code : apbank


197134 5/13/2022 006361 RAY O' HERRON CO INC 2192122 HELMET,UNIFORM J.KELLEY01-17-220-73610 1,236.94UNIFORM - M.JONES219244301-17-220-73610 781.11

Total : 2,018.05

197135 5/13/2022 019246 REACH MEDIA NETWORK 78105 ANNUAL PLAYER LICENSE01-26-025-72655 700.00

Total : 700.00

197136 5/13/2022 006874 ROBINSON ENGINEERING CO. LTD. 22020288 21-R0430 TP SCANNELL DEVELOPMENT- VOLLME01-14-000-72840 947.5021-R0612 TP PETE'S FRESH MARKET JANAURY2202028928-00-000-72840 457.5021-R0681 TP OAK RIDGE SUBDIVISION (PAND2202029016-00-000-72840 281.5021-R0708 TP LOYOLA MEDICAL (179TH & LAGR2202030601-14-000-72840 7,443.7521-R0708 TP LOYOLA MEDICAL (179TH & LAGR2203019601-14-000-72840 5,441.5021-R0430 TP SCANNELL DEVELOPMENT - VOLLM2203024001-14-000-72840 3,231.5021-R0681 TP OAK RIDGE SUBDIVISION (PANDU2203024116-00-000-72840 388.5021-R0430 TP SCANNELL DEVELOPMENT - VOLLM2204041801-14-000-72840 2,966.5021-R0708 TP LOYOLA MEDICAL (179TH & LAGR2204041901-14-000-72840 2,648.25

Total : 23,806.50

197137 5/13/2022 016334 RUSH TRUCK CENTERS 3027620787 KT SHOE BRAKE,DRUM REAR WHEEL BRAKE STRE01-26-023-72540 545.64MOTOR CONTROL MODE ACTUATOR STREET #6302767974701-26-023-72540 71.04

Total : 616.68

197138 5/13/2022 007629 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 050522 WATER,OLIVE OIL,ZIPLOCK,VINEGAR,NAPKINS,

20Page:





Bank code : apbank


197138 5/13/2022 (Continued)007629 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT01-26-025-73580 16.6801-14-000-73115 26.4260-00-000-72220 20.5863-00-000-72220 20.5864-00-000-72220 17.6401-26-023-72220 58.8101-26-024-72220 29.41WATER,HAMBURGER,ONIONS,STORAGE,STEAM PAN05112201-41-056-72937 36.7260-00-000-72220 33.3363-00-000-72220 33.3364-00-000-72220 28.5701-26-023-72220 95.2301-26-024-72220 47.62

Total : 464.92

197139 5/13/2022 007453 SERVICE SANITATION, INC. 8388578 RESTROOM - FIREMAN TRAINING CENTER MAY '01-19-000-72750 197.06

Total : 197.06

197140 5/13/2022 008710 SHERVINO, ROBERT 051021 PER DIEM LUNCH ILEAS TRAFFIC INCIDENT MG01-17-220-72140 15.00REIMB: HOTEL,MEALS IJOA IDOA CONF PEORIA05102201-17-205-72170 500.08

Total : 515.08

197141 5/13/2022 019814 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP B15133777 MCAFEE ANTIVIRUS MVISION STND 4/29/22-4/01-16-000-72655 4,245.00VTP-019111

Total : 4,245.00

197142 5/13/2022 013190 SOLARWINDS IN561334 KIWI SYSLOG SERVCER ANNUAL MAINTENANCE R60-00-000-72655 74.9763-00-000-72655 8.3364-00-000-72655 35.70

Total : 119.00

21Page:





Bank code : apbank


197143 5/13/2022 015405 SSACOP 051022 SSACOP DUES S.TENCZA01-17-205-72720 50.00

Total : 50.00

197144 5/13/2022 007224 STANDARD EQUIPMENT COMPANY P35843 STREET SWEEPER AUX 10 PARTS01-26-023-72530 34.07STREET SWEEPER PARTSP3584401-26-023-72530 32.88STREET SWEEPER PARTSP3605301-26-023-72530 1,179.84VTP-019134

Total : 1,246.79

197145 5/13/2022 012238 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 3506688617 PEN,BINDER,POST IT01-17-205-73110 79.87CHAIR350668861801-17-205-73110 351.98

Total : 431.85

197146 5/13/2022 015994 STERNBERG LIGHTING, INC. 63337 12' TALL POLE ONLY01-26-024-73570 15,000.00VTP-019064

Total : 15,000.00

197147 5/13/2022 007438 SUB TRAILER HITCH, INC. 13589 10-36 SEALS UNIT 10301-26-025-72530 13.00

Total : 13.00

197148 5/13/2022 018878 SUPERION LLC 335043 ONESOLUTION NEXTGEN 911 INTERFACE ANNUAL01-21-210-72655 2,199.07

Total : 2,199.07

197149 5/13/2022 007297 SUTTON FORD INC./FLEET SALES 552641 ACTUATOR ASY EMA 10M01-21-000-72540 46.81HOSE ASY 13M EMA55264501-21-000-72540 87.79CABLE ASY,INDICATOR ASY,TUBE OIL EMA RV55277701-21-000-72540 68.75

Total : 203.35

22Page:





Bank code : apbank


197150 5/13/2022 000645 TED'S GREENHOUSE INC 524395 FLOWERS FOR THE BENCHES01-35-000-72923 1,760.40

Total : 1,760.40

197151 5/13/2022 018607 TELCOM INNOVATIONS GROUP, LLC A58562 LABOR CHARGE FOR BILLABLE REMOTE SERVICE01-26-025-72777 72.50LABOR CHARGE FOR BILLABLE REMOTE SERVICEA5857601-26-025-72777 108.75

Total : 181.25

197152 5/13/2022 017520 THE COP FIRE SHOP 208296 UNIFORM POLO - JONES01-17-220-73610 68.00POLO UNIFORM - KELLEY20829701-17-220-73610 68.00

Total : 136.00

197153 5/13/2022 014854 THOMSON REUTERS-WEST PYMNT CTR846309452 ONLINE/SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION CHARGES APR01-17-225-72852 205.94

Total : 205.94

197154 5/13/2022 013040 TINLEY PARK FIRE DEPT 050922 PETTY CASH REIMB: RIORDAN RETIREMENT,OFF01-19-000-72974 120.8401-19-000-73870 6.5601-19-020-73110 18.8901-19-000-72170 40.85

Total : 187.14

197155 5/13/2022 007800 TK ELEVATOR CORPORATION 3006579669 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE - 3 MONTHS PUBLIC S01-26-025-72790 1,295.42VTP-019137ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE - 3 MONTHS FIRE STA300658218701-26-025-72790 897.75VTP-019137

Total : 2,193.17

197156 5/13/2022 007930 TRANS UNION 04200281 CREDIT SUMMARY,EMPLOYMENT CRD REPORT, ID01-17-225-72852 273.96

Total : 273.96

197157 5/13/2022 010653 TRINIDAD, HEATHER 051022 LUNCH REIMB ICAC INVEST TECHNIQUES 4/25-

23Page:





Bank code : apbank


197157 5/13/2022 (Continued)010653 TRINIDAD, HEATHER01-17-220-72140 75.00REIM: HOTEL,MEALS FOR IJOA CONF EAST PEO05102201-17-205-72170 530.08LUNCH REIMB WRITING EFFECTIVE TRAINING 5051022..01-17-220-72140 15.00

Total : 620.08

197158 5/13/2022 007909 TRI-RIVER POLICE TRAINING REG 5130 TRAINING 5/3/22 H.TRINIDAD WRITING EFFEC01-17-220-72140 150.00

Total : 150.00

197159 5/13/2022 014510 TRUGREEN 156569811 SPRING TREATMENT HARLEM AVE MEDIANS4/28/01-26-023-72881 290.00VTP-019047SPRING TREATMENT VETERANS PKWY 4/26/2215660032001-26-023-72881 125.00VTP-019047SPRING TREATMENT 76TH AVE MEDIANS 4/29/215664999601-26-023-72881 250.00VTP-019047SPRING TREATMENT FIRE HOUSE #47 4/29/2215665468901-26-023-72881 40.00VTP-019047SPRING TREATMENT 80TH AVE TRAIN 4/30/2215670201001-26-023-72881 447.00VTP-019047SPRING TREATMENT TINLEY RETENTION AREA 41567031801-26-023-72881 575.00VTP-019047SPRING TREATMENT 179TH AND 84TH AVE 4/3015670527601-26-023-72881 225.00VTP-019047

Total : 1,952.00

197160 5/13/2022 002165 ULINE, INC 148257177 INSULATE SHIP KIT01-17-220-73600 120.93

Total : 120.93

197161 5/13/2022 008011 URBANSKI, JOHN 050622 REIMB AIRFARE TRAVEL AWWA ACE CONF J.PET60-00-000-72170 422.0763-00-000-72170 422.0764-00-000-72170 361.78

24Page:





Bank code : apbank


(Continued) Total : 1,205.92197161 5/13/2022 008011 008011 URBANSKI, JOHN

197162 5/13/2022 018250 VERIZON CONNECT NWF INC OSV000002752190 CUST ID TINL001 4/1-4/30/2201-26-023-72790 275.23

Total : 275.23

197163 5/13/2022 006362 VILLAGE OF OAK LAWN 1-9990015-00 ACCT# 1-9990015-00 4/1-5/1/2260-00-000-73220 673,893.3463-00-000-73220 622,055.39IEPA REICH LOAN PAY REIM L17-5080 FOR 6/786960-00-000-73221 216,204.19IEPA TRANS MAIN 4A REIMB L17-5082 FOR 6/787760-00-000-73221 181,673.89

Total : 1,693,826.81

197164 5/13/2022 012009 VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK 050922 FUNDS TO REPLENSIH COVERT INVESTIGATIONS10-00-000-72790 1,500.00

Total : 1,500.00

197165 5/13/2022 020100 VOLANTI, PAMELA 051122 REIMB SUPPLIES FOR ANNUAL PW PICNIC:APRO60-00-000-72220 26.4663-00-000-72220 26.4664-00-000-72220 22.6701-26-023-72220 75.5901-26-024-72220 37.80

Total : 188.98

197166 5/13/2022 010165 WAREHOUSE DIRECT INC 5227471-0 POUCH,LAMINATOR 5ML01-26-025-73110 109.19PAPER5230773-001-26-023-73110 8.1701-26-024-73110 4.0960-00-000-73110 5.1863-00-000-73110 0.5764-00-000-73110 2.42PENS5231835-001-26-024-73110 4.19

25Page:





Bank code : apbank


197166 5/13/2022 (Continued)010165 WAREHOUSE DIRECT INC01-26-023-73110 8.3760-00-000-73110 5.2763-00-000-73110 0.5964-00-000-73110 2.51

Total : 150.55

197167 5/13/2022 011055 WARREN OIL CO. W1471254 N.L. GAS USED 4/2-5/2/2201-17-205-73530 15,183.0601-19-000-73530 1,093.6801-19-020-73530 94.8101-21-000-73530 428.2660-00-000-73530 1,275.3663-00-000-73530 318.8464-00-000-73530 683.2301-26-023-73530 1,946.9701-26-024-73530 680.8401-33-300-73530 378.7401-12-000-73530 217.4901-14-000-73532 136.1201-14-000-73531 4,261.2301-42-000-73530 766.45DIESEL USED 4/8-5/3/22W147146401-19-000-73545 2,860.9260-00-000-73545 721.0363-00-000-73545 180.2664-00-000-73545 386.2701-26-023-73545 2,167.7401-26-024-73545 254.9101-14-000-73531 5,257.55

Total : 39,293.76

197168 5/13/2022 018995 WHITTINGHAM MEATS 051122 CHICKEN FOR PW ANNUAL PICNIC01-26-024-72220 47.6001-26-023-72220 95.2060-00-000-72220 33.3263-00-000-72220 33.32

26Page:





Bank code : apbank


197168 5/13/2022 (Continued)018995 WHITTINGHAM MEATS64-00-000-72220 28.56

Total : 238.00

197169 5/13/2022 020504 WILCZAK, DAVID 050622 SENIOR RATE VEHICLE STICKER OVERPAYMENT06-00-000-79005 23.50

Total : 23.50

197170 5/13/2022 020506 WINDY CITY POPCORN AND SUPPLY 55081 DOUBLE FROZEN DRINK MACHINE RENTAL PW WE01-26-024-72220 33.0001-26-023-72220 66.0060-00-000-72220 23.1063-00-000-72220 23.1064-00-000-72220 19.80

Total : 165.00

197171 5/13/2022 008226 WYMAN & COMPANY 46617 PUBLIC WORKS WEEK 2022 FRAME/PLEXI GLAS01-26-024-72974 23.0001-26-023-72974 46.0060-00-000-72974 16.1063-00-000-72974 16.1064-00-000-72974 13.80FRAMING4662801-98-000-99000 240.00

Total : 355.00

Bank total : 2,044,993.41118 Vouchers for bank code : apbank

27Page:





Bank code : ipmg


4006 5/3/2022 018837 INSURANCE PROGRAM MANAGERS GRP210421W008 PAYEE-ENCOMPASS SPECIALTY NETWORK01-14-000-72542 351.46

Total : 351.46

4007 5/3/2022 018837 INSURANCE PROGRAM MANAGERS GRP201019W041 PAYEE-GENEX SERVICES, LLC01-14-000-72542 190.00

Total : 190.00

4008 5/10/2022 018837 INSURANCE PROGRAM MANAGERS GRP210731W002 PAYEE-VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK60-00-000-72542 961.0963-00-000-72542 183.0664-00-000-72542 490.35

Total : 1,634.50

4009 5/10/2022 018837 INSURANCE PROGRAM MANAGERS GRP2104|2107|2011|2008* PAYEE-GENEX SERVICES, LLC01-14-000-72542 304.6364-00-000-72542 2.4960-00-000-72542 4.7063-00-000-72542 0.9064-00-000-72542 2.4001-14-000-72542 140.2163-00-000-72542 0.9301-14-000-72542 48.0060-00-000-72542 494.5963-00-000-72542 94.2164-00-000-72542 252.3460-00-000-72542 175.0463-00-000-72542 33.3464-00-000-72542 89.3160-00-000-72542 1,087.5463-00-000-72542 207.1564-00-000-72542 554.8660-00-000-72542 89.7263-00-000-72542 17.0964-00-000-72542 45.7760-00-000-72542 4.87

28Page:





Bank code : ipmg


(Continued) Total : 3,650.094009 5/10/2022 018837 018837 INSURANCE PROGRAM MANAGERS GRP

Bank total : 5,826.054 Vouchers for bank code : ipmg

2,050,831.14Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report123

The Tinley Park Village Board having duly met at VillageHall do hereby certify that the following claims or demandsagainst said village were presented and are approved forpayment as presented on the above listing.

In witness thereof, the Village President and Clerk ofthe Village of Tinley Park, hereunto set their hands.

______________________________Village President

______________________________Village Clerk

______________________________Date

29Page:




AN ORDINANCE DECREASING THE NUMBER OF CLASS “A” LIQUOR LICENSES THAT CAN BE ISSUED IN THE VILLAGE AND INCREASING THE

NUMBER OF CLASS “AV” LIQUOR LICENSES THAT CAN BE ISSUED IN THE VILLAGE (HILLGROVE TAP, LOCATED AT 9501 W. 171st STREET)





Board of Trustees


200 W. Adams, Suite 2125 Chicago, IL 60606



ORDINANCE NO. 2022-O-025

AN ORDINANCE DECREASING THE NUMBER OF CLASS “A” LIQUOR LICENSES THAT CAN BE ISSUED IN THE VILLAGE AND INCREASING THE

NUMBER OF CLASS “AV” LIQUOR LICENSES THAT CAN BE ISSUED IN THE VILLAGE (HILLGROVE TAP, LOCATED AT 9501 W. 171st STREET)


WHEREAS, pursuant to Title XI, Chapter 112, Section 22 of the Village Code, liquor licenses may be authorized by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Tinley Park and the number of liquor licenses authorized to be issued for each class shall be kept on record in the office of the Village Clerk; and

WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities of the Village of Tinley Park desire to amend Title XI, Chapter 112, Section 22 of the Village Code to decrease one (1) Class “A” liquor license and increase one (1) additional Class “AV” liquor license; and

WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities of the Village of Tinley Park, Cook and Will Counties, Illinois, have determined that it is in the best interest of the said Village of Tinley Park and its residents to amend Title XI, Chapter 112, Section 22 of the Village Code to decrease the number of Class “A” licenses by one (1) and increase the number of Class “AV” liquor licenses by one (1) authorized to be issued pursuant to this Ordinance; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK, COOK AND WILL COUNTIES, ILLINOIS, STATE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: The foregoing recitals shall be and are hereby incorporated as finding of fact as if said recitals were fully set forth herein.

SECTION 2: : Pursuant to Title XI, Chapter 112, Section 22 of the Village of Tinley Park Village Code, the number of Class “A” licenses that can be issued by the Village shall be and is hereby decreased from eighteen (18) to seventeen (17), and the number of Class “AV” licenses that can be issued by the Village shall be and is hereby increased from fifteen (15) to sixteen (16), (this


increase in the number of Class “AV” liquor licenses reflects the availability of one additional Class “AV” liquor license to be issued to Hillgrove Tap, located at 9501 W. 171st Street).

SECTION 3: Any policy, resolution, or ordinance of the Village that conflicts with the provisions of this Ordinance shall be and is hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict.

SECTION 4: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its adoption and approval.


AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:



ATTEST:

__________________________________ VILLAGE CLERK



CERTIFICATE

I, NANCY M. O’CONNOR, Village Clerk of the Village of Tinley Park, Counties of Cook


copy of Ordinance No. 2022-O-025, “AN ORDINANCE DECREASING THE NUMBER OF

CLASS “A” LIQUOR LICENSES THAT CAN BE ISSUED IN THE VILLAGE AND

INCREASING THE NUMBER OF CLASS “AV” LIQUOR LICENSES THAT CAN BE

ISSUED IN THE VILLAGE (HILLGROVE TAP, LOCATED AT 9501 W. 171st STREET)”

which was adopted by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Tinley Park on May17,

2022.



____________________________________NANCY M. O’CONNOR, VILLAGE CLERK


ATM

VIDEO SLOTS

100

EX ENTRY

WAITING EXIT

FA/FV


Bar

Gaming AreaEntrance


PLAN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT April 21, 2022 – Public Hearing Primal Cut – Front Patio Enclosure 17344 Oak Park Avenue

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Petitioner, Primal Cut (tenant) is requesting Variations and Site Plan/Architectural Approval at 17344 Oak Park Avenue. The granting of these requests will allow for a raised one-story building addition, that allows for the existing front patio to be enclosed. The property is located in the Legacy DC (Downtown Core) Zoning District. The Petitioner is seeking variations from Section XII (Legacy Code) of the Zoning Ordinance for requirements of minimum building height, building materials, and architectural guidelines. The design proposal is on the front of the restaurant’s east elevation facing Oak Park Avenue. The building addition will comprise of enclosing the existing front patio which spans the private lot and encroaches into the Village right-of-way. The brick base of the patio will remain. The proposed exterior materials of the building addition include a standing seam metal roof, steel columns, a telescoping Nanawall window system, and a guardrail with a structural safety glass railing. The Petitioner’s goal is to provide dining on more days of the year in that space. The addition will provide a better dining experience for customers who have coverage from weather and bugs. However, on nice days the windows will be able to be opened. Due to the location of the patio partially in the Village’s right-of-way, the Property Owner is simultaneously pursuing a revised easement agreement with the Village Board that would allow for the enclosure

Petitioner Paul Spass, on behalf of Primal Cut Property Location 17344 Oak Park Avenue PIN 28-30-313-008-0000 Zoning Legacy District - DC (Downtown Core) Approvals Sought Variations Site Plan & Architectural Approval Project Planner Lori Kosmatka Associate Planner


Primal Cut Front Patio Enclosure – 17344 Oak Park Avenue

Page 2 of 10

EXISTING SITE, HISTORY, ZONING, & LAND USES The subject property at 17344 Oak Park Avenue is an existing tenant space operating as a steakhouse restaurant. The business is highly visible in the center of the downtown core of the Village, located on the southeast corner of 173rd Place and Oak Park Avenue, near the Metra train station. The business is currently well-frequented dining destination within the area. The second floor of the building includes two residential units and a storage space. The site is part of the “Andres Block” development and is one of the most historic and visible area in downtown Tinley Park. The subject building was constructed around 1868 and functioned a general store. Over the years the building has also housed a grocery store, Bettenhausen Hardware store, Bogarts Charhouse, and a bicycle shop, among other businesses. In 1998 the exterior façade underwent extensive renovations to the interior and exterior prior to the opening of Bogart’s. The exterior was restored close to the early 1900’s appearance with the guidance of the Village’s Historic Commission and help of a Village grant. The property is in the Legacy DC (Downtown Core) Zoning District. The Legacy Code includes architectural requirements for the zoning district. The property has neighboring Legacy Downtown Core district to the north and south, and Legacy Civic district to the east (Train Station and Zabrocki Plaza) and west (Public Safety Building/Fire Station 46). There is R-4 Zoning District on 68th Court, north of 173rd Place. Nearby businesses include J.W. Hollstein’s Saloon (south), Ed & Joe’s Restaurant (north), Teehan’s (northeast). A portion of Primal Cut’s existing patio area is within the Village’s right-of-way. The history of the raised brick patios is unclear but have been permitted to be used by the adjacent businesses through the use of encroachment agreements with the property owners. Changes to the encroachment agreement are being sought by the Petitioner and will be presented to the Village Board at the same times as the zoning request.



Page 3 of 10

PROPOSED USE AND APPROVALS NEEDED The Petitioner wishes to enclose the existing front patio in order to provide dining on more days of the year in that space, given the variable climate conditions. The Petitioner estimates that approximately 19 dining patrons will be able to accommodate the space. Variations and Site Plan/Architectural Approval are required for the proposed addition. Based on the proposed design, three Variations are required from the Legacy Code requirements, which regulate redevelopment and additions on existing structures:

1. Building Materials per Section XII.3.B.7. (Legacy Code) of the Village Zoning Ordinance, where the minimum 75% of listed Primary Materials are not provided.

2. Architectural Guidelines per Section XII.3.B.8. (Legacy Code) of the Village Zoning Ordinance, where the style of architectural composition is not consistent throughout the structure.

3. Minimum Building Height per Section XII.2.A.9. (Legacy Code) of the Zoning Ordinance, where the minimum building height of three-stories is not provided.

SITE PLAN The Petitioner proposes to enclose the existing raised east front patio facing Oak Park Avenue. The 222 square foot patio footprint (32’-10” long x 6’-9” deep) and the slightly deeper brick base (approximately 37.5” high at the south end) would remain unchanged, but the proposed operable windows would extend overhead into the sidewalk area approximately 19” from the brick veneer. Based on staff field measurements, the width of the sidewalk would remain unchanged at approximately 7’-8” from the brick wall’s face to the back of the curb. The plan exhibit per the encroachment agreement, dated 7/7/2020 shows the front patio area in relation to the lot line. The existing patio has a narrow planter box, mounted to the top of the wrought iron railing, which sits atop a low brick wall base. The planter box is shown in the proposed rendering, but not detailed in the architectural line drawings of the proposed elevation and section. It is staff’s understanding that the proposal will not include planter boxes as they would difficult to attach to the proposed structure. The Petitioner’s drawings do not indicate any proposed exterior lighting, signage, or parking. Open Item #1: Drawings of the proposal show a discrepancy on whether the planter box will remain. Petitioner will need to clarify and update construction drawings accordingly with the building permit.

Plan Exhibit per Encroachment Agreement, Dated 7/7/2020, Marked up to show area of improvement

Existing Pedestrian Experience

Existing Front Patio (Overall View)



Page 4 of 10

ARCHITECTURE The Petitioner proposes to enclose the existing raised front patio, thereby creating a one-story building addition as the area of improvement. The patio sits atop a brick wall base, approximately 3 ½ feet high from the sidewalk. The architectural drawings show existing fill and a concrete grade beam behind the brick veneer. The Petitioner proposes to insert concrete piers for the new columns within the existing fill, but does not propose to change the brick veneer. The overall design of the structure is modern in appearance but the heavy use of glazing/windows helps to blend the addition in with the historic building’s architecture, while also being functional for Primal Cut’s restaurant use. Building Materials The proposed exterior materials include a black standing seam metal roof, steel columns, a 4’-6” high operable telescoping Nanawall window system, atop a 3’-6” high guardrail assembly with structural safety glass railings and balusters, and new storefront panels on the side walls. The existing low brick veneer base wall will remain. Section XII.3.B.7. of the Legacy Downtown Core District code requires that a minimum of 75% of all facades and roofs exclusive of glazing shall be comprised of any of the following Primary Materials: a) brick, stone, & fiber cement siding, b) cedar, slate & asphalt shingles (roof only), or c) copper & stainless steel. The code states a maximum of 25% of all facades and roofs exclusive of glazing may be comprised of a) concrete panels & decorative block, b) EIFS & stucco, c) wood, or d) standing seam roofs. The proposal’s materials will require a Variation from this requirement. The drawings do not identify if the northern raised stairway landing north of the patio will be open to the sky or not. The existing awning covers this space as well as the length of the patio. Staff recommends a condition stating that any awning or structure over the northern raised stairway landing be subject to review and approval by Village staff. Nanawall Windows A significant portion of the proposed materials include Nanawall windows. The drawings do not indicate how far the proposed Nanawall operable windows will project outward into the sidewalk area. The Petitioner has provided a Nanawall brochure for the SL60 model. The brochure illustrates this in door form, showing the telescoping to pivot completely to the outdoors, exterior from the system’s track. The brochure does not specify the window panel widths. The drawings show six panes over a length of 15’-11”, which staff calculates would be project 29 3/8” from the enclosure. There is 10 ½” between the outside of the enclosure to the face of the brick veneer where the sidewalk begins. The windows appear to project 19” outwards from the face of the brick veneer when opened. The window projection would thus further encroach in the Village’s right-of-way than the current patio. The window projection encroachment could possibly be reduced by increasing the number of windows to produce a smaller unit width that have a smaller projection into the right-of-way. The Village’s Building Official noted that the required minimum headroom from the bottom of the projecting edge of the window system to the finished grade of the paver pavement (sidewalk) is 7’-0” per the means of egress requirements in the International Building Code, based on estimates of the current wall height and plans, it appears the windows would be less than that required height.

Proposed per Petitioner's Color Rendering

Telescoping Operation of Nanawall SL60 Model (brochure)



Page 5 of 10

Staff recommends a condition that the number of operable windows and extent of projection encroaching into the Village right-of-way are subject to review and approval by Village staff as part of the building permit because it is currently unclear how this would comply with the building code or Public Works maintenance of the right-of-way based on the current design. Open Item #2: Petitioner to clarify “paneling” materials on the north and south sides. Staff recommends a clear, dual glazed storefront system to closely match the east elevation and a condition on the material approval by staff be placed on any approvals. Open Item #3: Staff recommends a condition stating that the bottom of the projecting edge of the window system to the finished grade of the paver pavement must be at least 7’-0” (84”). Drawings were not provided for the north and south side elevations. The section drawing notes a new storefront paneling beyond, but does not call out the proposed material, whether it is opaque (solid) or clear, and whether it is fixed or not. In order to provide a more transparent, open experience for pedestrians, and consistent materials, Staff recommends the north and south side elevations are to be clear, dual glazed storefront system to match the east elevation, and a condition stating the final materials of the north and south side elevations are subject to review and approval by Village staff. Architectural Guidelines Section XII.3.B.8. of the Legacy Downtown Core District code details the Architectural Guidelines, stating that “a consistent style of architectural composition should be applied throughout a structure. A mix of styles is discouraged”. The code states that the architectural qualities and details shall be deemed desirous by the Village for projects in the Legacy Code area. The proposal’s materials do not match the existing building since it functions as an enclosed front patio that is meant to be as open as possible, and not as a typical building addition. The structure does require a Variation from this requirement that requests consistency of building additions. The proposed glass (windows & guardrail wall), metal (roof), and steel (columns), are modern in design with minimal ornamentation, differing from the older, varied, traditional design of the existing streetscape. However, the glass will provide a sense of transparency to the area. Also, glass and storefront systems are typical in downtown areas. The proposed black metal roof will have a slight slope with a prefinished aluminum fascia as part of the front elevation. This color and material appear to complement Primal Cut’s existing first-story frontage immediately north of the existing patio. The existing brick veneer base wall will remain. The brick veneer is slightly over three feet high, and runs beyond to the north and south. Comparatively, the existing patio has brick veneer with setback glazing that is shadowed under a black and white cloth awning. Though the scale of the building addition is similar to the patio, the massing will extend beyond the other facades of enclosed structures. There is another patio immediately south of the patio, but it is open in nature similar to Primal Cut’s existing patio. The building addition will maintain an open feel of transparency with the operable glass. Heavy use of glass and storefront systems are typical in downtown areas along the main street frontages. This building addition is less intrusive to the architectural integrity of the existing building frontages. This building addition could more easily be removed than a typical building addition since it involves enclosing the patio on an existing footprint offset from the existing building frontages. Open Item #4: Any awning or structure over the northern raised stairway landing be subject to review and approval by Village staff.

Existing streetscape.



Page 6 of 10

Building Heights The drawings identify the height of the proposed one-story building addition as 10’-10” from the top of the brick base wall to the peak of the roof, with the roof sloping downward to the sidewalk. The height of the existing patio with awning is not provided, but is similar in size and location to the proposed roof. The existing surrounding structures are two-stories. A large second-story bay window is directly above the area of improvement. However, the Legacy Downtown Core District code requires that buildings have a minimum height of three stories, which requires a Variation to Section XII.2.A.9. (Legacy Code) of the Zoning Ordinance. Given the size, location, context, partial location in the public right-of-way and spatial constraints, a one-story addition at this location appears to be more appropriate than an addition of three-stories in height. Open Item #5: Discuss Variation requests for the building addition’s required materials, building height and consistent design with the principal structure. SUMMARY OF OPEN ITEMS Staff identified the following open items for discussion:

1. Drawings of the proposal show a discrepancy on whether the planter box will remain. Petitioner will need to clarify and update construction drawings accordingly with the building permit.

2. Petitioner to clarify “paneling” materials on the north and south sides. Staff recommends a clear, dual glazed storefront system to closely match the east elevation and a condition on the material approval by staff be placed on any approvals.

3. Staff recommends a condition stating that the bottom of the projecting edge of the window system to the finished grade of the paver pavement must be at least 7’-0” (84”).

4. Any awning or structure over the northern raised stairway landing be subject to review and approval by Village staff.

5. Discuss Variation requests for the building addition’s required materials, building height and consistent design with the principal structure.



Page 7 of 10

STANDARDS FOR A VARIATION Section X.G.4. of the Zoning Ordinance states the Plan Commission shall not recommend a Variation of the regulations of the Zoning Ordinance unless it shall have made Findings of Fact, based upon the evidence presented for each of the Standards for Variations listed below. The Plan Commission must provide findings for the first three standards; the remaining standards are provided to help the Plan Commission further analyze the request. Findings of Fact have been drafted by staff and outlined below for Plan Commission consideration.

1. The property in question cannot yield a reasonable return if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by the regulations in the district in which it is located. • The new one-story building addition can yield a reasonable return. However, the addition is within

the same footprint of the business’s existing patio and not being completed for property return purposes.

2. The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances.

• The one-story building addition is located in a spatially constrained area among existing two-story buildings with varied, traditional design. Given the size, location, context, and spatial constraints, a one-story addition at this location appears to be more appropriate than an addition of three-stories in height.

3. The Variation, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. • The new one-story building addition is within appropriate scale to the surrounding two-story

buildings, and will maintain an open feel of transparency with the operable glass. Glass and storefront systems are typical in downtown areas. The color and materials of the proposed design elements appear to complement the existing streetscape. The existing brick veneer base wall will also remain.

4. Additionally, the Plan Commission shall also, in making its determination whether there are practical

difficulties or particular hardships, take into consideration the extent to which the following facts favorable to the Petitioner have been established by the evidence:

a. The particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical condition of the specific property involved would result in a particular hardship upon the owner, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out;

b. The conditions upon which the petition for a Variation is based would not be applicable, generally, to other property within the same zoning classification;

c. The purpose of the Variation is not based exclusively upon a desire to make more money out of the property;

d. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by the owner of the property, or by a previous owner;

e. The granting of the Variation will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located; and

f. The proposed Variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to an adjacent property, or substantially increase the congestion in the public streets, or increase the danger of fire, or endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood.



Page 8 of 10

ADDITIONAL LEGACY CODE STANDARDS In addition to any other specific standards set forth herein the Plan Commission shall not recommend a Special Use, variance, appeal, or map amendment from the regulations of this ordinance unless it shall have made findings of fact, based upon evidence presented to it, in each specific case that:

a. The proposed improvement meets the Legacy Plan and its Principles, as presented in Section 1.A-B: Purpose and Intent, of this ordinance; • The one-story building addition provides dining on more days of the year in the space. The addition

will provide a better dining experience for customers and a more active streetscape that creates an inviting urban experience in the Downtown Core.

b. The new improvement is compatible with uses already developed or planned in this district and will not

exercise undue detrimental influences upon surrounding properties; • The glass in the one-story building addition will provide a sense of transparency to the area. Also,

glass and storefront systems are typical in downtown areas. The color and material complement Primal Cut’s existing first-story frontage immediately north of the existing patio. The existing brick veneer base, which runs beyond the property to the north and south and visually links the streetscape, will remain.

c. Any improvement meets the architectural standards set forth in the Legacy Code;

• The new one-story building addition is for a patio dining area and is less intrusive to the architectural integrity of the existing building frontages. This building addition could more easily be removed than a typical building addition since it involves enclosing the patio on an existing footprint offset from the existing building frontages.

d. The improvement will have the effect of protecting and enhancing the economic development of the

Legacy Plan area. • The one-story building addition is expected this will help the success of an existing business now

and in the future by providing a better customer experience and attractive frontage. STANDARDS FOR SITE PLAN & ARCHITECTUAL APPROVAL Section III.T.2. of the Zoning Ordinance requires that the conditions listed below must be met and reviewed for Site Plan approval. Specific findings are not required but all standards shall be considered to have been met upon review from the Plan Commission. Architectural

a. Building Materials: The size of the structure will dictate the required building materials (Section V.C. Supplementary District Regulations). Where tilt-up or pre-cast masonry walls (with face or thin brick inlay) are allowed vertical articulation, features are encouraged to mask the joint lines. Concrete panels must incorporate architectural finishes that comply with “Building Articulation” (Section III.U.5.h.) standards. Cast in place concrete may be used as an accent alternate building material (no greater than 15% per façade) provided there is sufficient articulation and detail to diminish it’s the appearance if used on large, blank walls.

b. Cohesive Building Design: Buildings must be built with approved materials and provide architectural interest on all sides of the structure. Whatever an architectural style is chosen, a consistent style of architectural composition and building materials are to be applied on all building facades.

c. Compatible Architecture: All construction, whether it be new or part of an addition or renovation of an existing structure, must be compatible with the character of the site, adjacent structures and streetscape.



Page 9 of 10

Avoid architecture or building materials that significantly diverge from adjacent architecture. Maintain the rhythm of the block in terms of scale, massing and setback. Where a development includes outlots they shall be designed with compatible consistent architecture with the primary building(s). Site lighting, landscaping and architecture shall reflect a consistent design statement throughout the development.

d. Color: Color choices shall consider the context of the surrounding area and shall not be used for purposes of “attention getting” or branding of the proposed use. Color choices shall be harmonious with the surrounding buildings; excessively bright or brilliant colors are to be avoided except to be used on a minor scale for accents.

e. Sustainable architectural design: The overall design must meet the needs of the current use without compromising the ability of future uses. Do not let the current use dictate an architecture so unique that it limits its potential for other uses (i.e. Medieval Times).

f. Defined Entry: Entrance shall be readily identifiable from public right-of-way or parking fields. The entry can be clearly defined by using unique architecture, a canopy, overhang or some other type of weather protection, some form of roof element or enhanced landscaping.

g. Roof: For buildings 10,000 sf or less a pitched roof is required or a parapet that extends the full exterior of the building. For buildings with a continuous roof line of 100 feet of more, a change of at least five feet in height must be made for every 75 feet.

h. Building Articulation: Large expanses of walls void of color, material or texture variation are to be avoided. The use of material and color changes, articulation of details around doors, windows, plate lines, the provision of architectural details such as “belly-bands” (decorative cladding that runs horizontally around the building), the use of recessed design elements, exposed expansion joints, reveals, change in texture, or other methods of visual relief are encouraged as a means to minimize the oppressiveness of large expanses of walls and break down the overall scale of the building into intermediate scaled parts. On commercial buildings, facades greater than 100 feet must include some form of articulation of the façade through the use of recesses or projections of at least 6 inches for at least 20% of the length of the façade. For industrial buildings efforts to break up the long façade shall be accomplished through a change in building material, color or vertical breaks of three feet or more every 250 feet.

i. Screen Mechanicals: All mechanical devices shall be screened from all public views. j. Trash Enclosures: Trash enclosures must be screened on three sides by a masonry wall consistent with the

architecture and building material of the building it serves. Gates must be kept closed at all times and constructed of a durable material such as wood or steel. They shall not be located in the front or corner side yard and shall be set behind the front building façade.

Site Design

a. Building/parking location: Buildings shall be located in a position of prominence with parking located to the rear or side of the main structure when possible. Parking areas shall be designed so as to provide continuous circulation avoiding dead-end parking aisles. Drive-through facilities shall be located to the rear or side of the structure and not dominate the aesthetics of the building. Architecture for canopies of drive-through areas shall be consistent with the architecture of the main structure.

b. Loading Areas: Loading docks shall be located at the rear or side of buildings whenever possible and screened from view from public rights-of-way.

c. Outdoor Storage: Outdoor storage areas shall be located at the rear of the site in accordance with Section III.O.1. (Open Storage). No open storage is allowed in front or corner side yards and are not permitted to occupy areas designated for parking, driveways or walkways.

d. Interior Circulation: Shared parking and cross access easements are encouraged with adjacent properties of similar use. Where possible visitor/employee traffic shall be separate from truck or equipment traffic.

e. Pedestrian Access: Public and interior sidewalks shall be provided to encourage pedestrian traffic. Bicycle use shall be encouraged by providing dedicated bikeways and parking. Where pedestrians or bicycles must cross vehicle pathways a cross walk shall be provided that is distinguished by a different pavement material or color.



Page 10 of 10

MOTIONS TO CONSIDER If the Plan Commission wishes to act on the Petitioner’s requests, the appropriate wording of the motions are listed below. The protocol for the writing of a motion is to write it in the affirmative so that a positive or negative recommendation correlates to the Petitioner’s proposal. By making a motion, it does not indicate a specific recommendation in support or against the plan. The Commission may choose to modify, add, or subtract to staff’s recommended motions and recommended conditions as they choose prior to voting on the motion. Motion 1 – Variations “…make a motion to recommend that the Village Board grant the Petitioner, Paul Spass on behalf of Primal Cut, at 17344 Oak Park Avenue in the Legacy Downtown Core (DC) Zoning District, three (3) Variations from Section XII (Legacy Code) of the Village Zoning Ordinance for building materials, architectural design guidelines, and minimum building height as listed and according to the submitted plans, and adopt the Findings of Fact as listed in the April 21, 2022 Staff Report, with the following condition:

1. There must be executed and active right-of-way encroachment agreement in place with the Village. If the right-

of-way encroachment agreement expires and becomes defaulted, the variation becomes void. 2. All plans are subject to final staff review with the building permit for building code compliance and public

safety review.” Motion 2 - Site Plan/Architecture Approval

“…make a motion to grant the Petitioner Ascend Illinois, LLC, Site Plan and Architectural Approval for redevelopment of an outlot to have an Adult-Use Cannabis Dispensing Organization at 16200 Harlem Avenue in the B-3 PD (General Business and Commercial, Park Place PUD) zoning district, in accordance with the plans submitted and adopt Findings of Fact as proposed in the April 21, 2022 Staff Report, subject to the following conditions:

1. Site Plan/Architectural Approval is subject to approval of the requested Variations and right-of-way encroachment agreement by the Village Board.

2. All plans are subject to final staff review with the building permit for building code compliance and public safety review. The number of operable windows and extent of projection encroaching into the Village right-of-way are subject to review and approval by Village staff.

3. The bottom of the projecting edge of the window system to the finished grade of the paver pavement must be at least 7’-0” (84”).

4. The final materials of the north and south side elevations are subject to review and approval by Village staff to match the proposed front/eats elevation.

5. Any awning or structure over the northern raised stairway landing be subject to review and approval by Village staff.”

LIST OF REVIEWED PLANS

Submitted Sheet Name Prepared By Date On Sheet

Application Redacted & Response to Standards Applicant 3/29/22 Architectural Drawings Ideal Designs 12/31/19 Nanawall Brochure (SL60 Model) Nanawall n/a Tinley Park Historic Guide Andres Development Tinley Park Historical Society n/a



ORDINANCENO.2022-O-034

AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS TO PERMIT A ONE-STORY BUILDING ADDITION FOR A CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED AT 17344 OAK PARK AVENUE

(PRIMAL CUT)





Board of Trustees

Published in pamphlet form by authority of the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Tinley Park



ORDINANCE NO. 2022-R-034

AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS TO PERMIT A ONE-STORY BUILDING ADDITION FOR A CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED AT 17344 OAK PARK AVENUE

(PRIMAL CUT)


WHEREAS, a petition for the granting of certain variations (“Variations”) to permit the construction of a 1-story enclosed front patio addition has been filed by Paul Spass on behalf of Primal Cut (tenant) (“Petitioner”) with the Village Clerk of this Village and has been processed in accordance with the Tinley Park Zoning Ordinance; and

WHEREAS, the Village of Tinley Park Plan Commission held a public hearing on the question of whether the Variations should be granted on April 21, 2022, at the Village Hall of this Village, at which time all persons present were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and

WHEREAS, public notice in the form required by law was given of said public hearing by publication not more than thirty (30) days nor less than fifteen (15) days prior to said public hearing in the Daily Southtown, a newspaper of general circulation within the Village of Tinley Park; and

WHEREAS, after hearing testimony on the petition, the Plan Commission found that the petition met the requisite standards enumerated in the Tinley Park Zoning Ordinance for granting the Variations and voted 7-0 to recommend to the Village President and Board of Trustees for the approval of the Variations; and

WHEREAS, the Plan Commission has filed its report and findings and recommendations regarding the Variations with this Village President and Board of Trustees, and this Board of Trustees has duly considered said report, findings, and recommendations; and

WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities of the Village of Tinley Park, Cook and Will Counties, Illinois, have determined that it is in the best interest of the Village of Tinley Park and its residents to approve said Variations; and




SECTION 2: That the report of findings and recommendations of the Plan Commission are herein incorporated by reference as the findings of this President and the Board of Trustees, as complete as if fully set forth herein at length. This Board finds that the Petitioner has provided evidence establishing that they have met the standards for granting the Variations as set forth in Section X.G.4 of the Zoning Ordinance, and the proposed granting of the Variations as set forth herein is in the public good and in the best interest of the Village and its residents and is consistent with and fosters the purpose and spirit of the Tinley Park Zoning Ordinance.

Section X.G.4. of the Zoning Ordinance states the Plan Commission shall not recommend a Variation of the regulations of the Zoning Ordinance unless it shall have made Findings of Fact, based upon the evidence presented for each of the Standards for Variations listed below. The Plan Commission must provide findings for the first three standards.

1. The property in question cannot yield a reasonable return if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by the regulations in the district in which it is located. The new one-story building addition can yield a reasonable return. However, the addition

is within the same footprint of the business’s existing patio and not being completed for property return purposes.

2. The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances. The one-story building addition is located in a spatially constrained area among existing

two-story buildings with varied, traditional design. Given the size, location, context, and spatial constraints, a one-story addition at this location appears to be more appropriate than an addition of three-stories in height.

3. The Variation, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. The new one-story building addition is within appropriate scale to the surrounding two-

story buildings, and will maintain an open feel of transparency with the operable glass. Glass and storefront systems are typical in downtown areas. The color and materials of the proposed design elements appear to complement the existing streetscape. The existing brick veneer base wall will also remain.

4. Additionally, the Plan Commission shall also, in making its determination whether there are practical difficulties or particular hardships, take into consideration the extent to which the following facts favorable to the Petitioner have been established by the evidence:

a. The particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical condition of the specific property involved would result in a particular hardship upon the owner,


as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out;






Additionally, the following Legacy Code Approval Standards as outlined in Section XII.5.D. of the Zoning Ordinance have been found to have been met as related to a Variation request from the Legacy Code.

1. The proposed improvement meets the Legacy Plan and its Principles, as presented in Section 1.A-B: Purpose and Intent, of this ordinance; The one-story building addition provides dining on more days of the year in the space. The

addition will provide a better dining experience for customers and a more active streetscape that creates an inviting urban experience in the Downtown Core.

2. The new improvement is compatible with uses already developed or planned in this district and will not exercise undue detrimental influences upon surrounding properties; The glass in the one-story building addition will provide a sense of transparency to the

area. Also, glass and storefront systems are typical in downtown areas. The color and material complement Primal Cut’s existing first-story frontage immediately north of the existing patio. The existing brick veneer base, which runs beyond the property to the north and south and visually links the streetscape, will remain.

3. Any improvement meets the architectural standards set forth in the Legacy Code. The new one-story building addition is for a patio dining area and is less intrusive to the

architectural integrity of the existing building frontages. This building addition could more easily be removed than a typical building addition since it involves enclosing the patio on an existing footprint offset from the existing building frontages.


4. The improvement will have the effect of protecting and enhancing the economic development of the Legacy Plan area. The one-story building addition is expected this will help the success of an existing

business now and in the future by providing a better customer experience and attractive frontage.

SECTION 3: The Variations set forth herein below shall be applicable to the following described property:

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1 BLOCK 2 IN CHRISTIAN ANDRES’ SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE SOUTH HALF OF LOT 1 LYING NORTH OF CHICAGO ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILROAD IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE 13 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS.

PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 28-30-313-008-0000

COMMONLY KNOWN AS: 17344 Oak Park Avenue, Tinley Park, Illinois

SECTION 4: That the following Variations are hereby approved to the Petitioner in the DC (Downtown Core) Zoning District at the above-mentioned Property to construct the 1-story addition, in accordance with the “List of Reviewed Plans” attached hereto as Exhibit A:

1. Building Materials per Section XII.3.B.7. (Legacy Code) of the Village Zoning Ordinance, where the minimum 75% of listed Primary Materials are not provided.

2. Architectural Guidelines per Section XII.3.B.8. (Legacy Code) of the Village Zoning Ordinance, where the style of architectural composition is not consistent throughout the structure.

3. Minimum Building Height per Section XII.2.A.9. (Legacy Code) of the Zoning Ordinance, where the minimum building height of three-stories is not provided.

Subject to the following conditions:

1. There must be executed and active right-of-way encroachment agreement in place with the Village. If the right-of-way encroachment agreement expires and becomes defaulted, the variation becomes void.

2. All plans are subject to final staff review with the building permit for building code compliance and public safety review.”




SECTION 7: That the Village Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to publish this Ordinance in pamphlet form, and this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval, and publication as required by law.


AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:



ATTEST:__________________________________ VILLAGE CLERK



CERTIFICATE



copy of Ordinance No. 2022-O-034 “AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS TO

PERMIT A ONE-STORY BUILDING ADDITION FOR A CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED

AT 17344 OAK PARK AVENUE (PRIMAL CUT),” which was adopted by the President and

Board of Trustees of the Village of Tinley Park on May 17, 2022.



____________________________________VILLAGE CLERK


Exhibit A

Per the April 21, 2022 Plan Commission Public Hearing Staff Report


1

TO: VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES

FROM: VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK PLAN COMMISSION

SUBJECT: MINUTES OF THE APRIL 21, 2022 REGULAR MEETING

ITEM #2: PUBLIC HEARING – PRIMAL CUT FRONT PATIO ENCLOSURE, 17344 OAK PARK AVENUE – VARIATIONS AND SITE PLAN/ ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL

Consider recommending that the Village Board grant Paul Spass on behalf of Primal Cut (tenant) Variations from Section XII (Legacy Code) of the Zoning Code to allow for a one-story building addition which does not comply with the requirements of minimum building height, building materials, and architectural guidelines located at 17344 Oak Park Avenue in the Legacy DC (Downtown Core) Zoning District. Site Plan and Architectural Approval is also being requested.

.

Present Plan Commissioners: Chairman GrayJames GaskillFrank LoscuitoKen ShawEduardo ManiKurt Truxal

Absent Plan Commissioners: Angela Gatto Andrae Marak

Village Officials and Staff: Dan Ritter, Planning ManagerLori Kosmatka, Associate PlannerJarell Blakey, Management Analyst

Petitioners: Paul Spass, Owner of Primal Cut

Members of the Public: None

CHAIRMAN GRAY introduced Item #2, and asked for a motion to open the public hearing. Motion made by COMMISSIONER SHAW seconded by COMMISSIONER MANI. CHAIRPERSON GRAY requested a voice vote asking if any were opposed to the motion; hearing none, he declared the motion carried.

CHAIRPERSON GRAY noted he received certification that the public hearing notice was published in a local newspaper. Anyone wishing to speak on this matter will be sworn in to speak but after staff’s presentation. He asked staff to proceed with the presentation.

Lori Kosmatka, Associate Planner, presented the report. She summarized the history of the site, provided the Legacy Code zoning regulations, the proposed changes to the building, and went over general zoning uses by surrounding businesses. She noted the structure encroaches into the village right-of-way which will trigger the need for a revised encroachment agreement.


2

CHAIRMAN GRAY asked the petitioner if there is anything that he would like to add. He informed the petitioner that he will be sworn in if he does choose to approach the lectern. He asked the COMMISSIONERS for comments.

COMMISSIONER TRUXAL commented it’s going to be nice looking. He liked the roof and glass. The awning would go which would be an improvement. Nothing against it, but it’s a step in the right direction. However, my one concern is what staff has already mentioned; The way the windows project out when they are collapsed is the only thing that has stuck out to me at this point. Not meaning to hold it back, but it needs to be addressed.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, noted we had our building official reach out to Paul regarding this as well. It is conditioned but I believe they are working on a solution for this problem.

CHAIRMAN GRAY commented he adds to the concerns that COMMISSIONER TRUXAL presented. The outward motion of the windows presents a safety concern being in the public right-of-way. If someone is walking and not paying attention they could potentially injure themselves. The staff report has 19 inches and you want to try and reduce that with what? More paneling?

Dan Ritter noted there are a couple options they could do to meet the minimal building code clearance heights, but they will also have to make sure that this is okay from an encroachment agreement perspective as well. The Community Development Director will be coordinating that process. However, from a building code perspective, 7 feet clearance will be required. This is just something in the initial proposal staff noted that may result in a slight change from what is being presented today. It’ll all be fixed in the building plan side of it.

CHAIRMAN GRAY noted it is conditional.

COMMISSIONER MANI noted that he agreed with his fellow COMMISSIONERS and the CHAIRMAN. He commented the petitioner should try to reduce that projection for life safety concerns.

COMMISSIONER SHAW stated he didn’t want to repeat anything the fellow COMMISSIONERS have said about the projection. Its been covered and he knows that they are working on it. He just noted for the record that he had similar concerns. It is an attractive addition, so that’s good in terms of being a more permanent structure as opposed to the canopy. He disagreed with the language in the Legacy Code itself which makes me more inclined to vote in favor of the variance. One of the issues is that the language has a preference for consistent building materials as opposed to a mix. He disagreed with that because that seems to me that is almost the opposite of what we are seeking to achieve in rebuilding the downtown. He noted he believed that a mix of styles mimics a traditional development style more so than having a cookie cutter face. He liked that it has a mix. It gives it some character. He asked how far off were we from the percentages of standing seam versus masonry requirements.

Dan Ritter responded we have not yet received building plans that specify exact percentages. It was clear they were not going to meet the exact percentage. It will be based on these plans that they have to meet.

COMMISSIONER SHAW noted personally, he liked the standing seam look. It may be too much of a variance from the requirements, so wherever the Commissioners land on that is fine. From his standpoint he didn’t feel this needs to adhere exactly to the percentage of the code.

Dan Ritter noted all three of those variations are not picturing this situation with a patio in the front. They are picturing a more permanent solid addition. That is likely more the intent of that code. We cannot get around this being a building addition, though as it has three walls and a roof. You would want a traditional building addition such as off the side to look like it blends and belongs. Rather, this addition is in front with glass. This is a special case as this is not the traditional building addition which means that there will be a need for variance from the code due to the fact that this is still classified as an addition.

COMMISSIONER SHAW noted that he understands the need for variance from the code. It is a nice contrast to the current style of the building as opposed to a random mix of style. He felt similarly for the three story variance.

Dan Ritter noted the goal is if you’re going to put a large addition, then you would want to be more verbatim to the code. In this case it is odd because it is just a small patio in front.


3

COMMISSIONER SHAW noted that if it was a three story addition with a front sidewalk, it might not meet the character of the block.

Dan Ritter noted the historic significance of the site and acknowledged that the proposed addition maintains the historic preservation of the building. It could be taken down and the integrity of the building would still be there.

COMMISSIONER SHAW noted it was a consideration for him as well is that it retains the character when it is open; he liked that it does not alter the character of the building itself. He is good with it and likes it.

COMMISSIONER GASKILL asked how wide is the area being enclosed, projecting out toward the street, and size of window panes.

Lori Kosmatka responded the patio is 32ft 10in by 6ft 9in, and believed the panes were about 26 inches based on staff calculating it by the two sets of six panes shown in the drawings. The projection out from the face of the brick below, based on the staff calculations, appeared to be 19 inches. The patio is 6 feet 9 inches to the window frame, plus about 10 ½ inches from the window frame to the face of the brick, and then 19 inches to the face of the brick.

COMMISSIONER GASKILL asked if beyond that is public walkway.

Dan Ritter noted that a portion of the patio is in the public right-of-way explaining the need for the encroachment agreement.

COMMISSIONER GASKILL: You have the sidewalk down below and in front of this building there isn’t or never was an entrance in the front of the building so what is the purpose of that walkway up on top?

Dan Ritter explained that the idea is that it was always a patio.

COMMISSIONER GASKILL: However, there is no need to have it a public walkway, there’s no place to go.

Lori Kosmatka asked if he was referring to the sidewalk street level.

GASKILL: No, the upside walkway. We’re worried about the windows encroaching on the public walkway and I am wondering why that’s even a public walkway because it doesn’t take you anywhere.

Dan Ritter noted it’s encroaching over the sidewalk that is next to it further.

Lori Kosmatka referred to the drawings on the presentation.

GASKILL: I believe we are referring to different things. I’m talking about the walkway leading from the stairs that takes you to the south of the building.

COMMISSIONER SHAW: Isn’t that what they wanted to enclose?

COMMISSIONER LOSCUITO: Yes, I think that is the patio that you are referring to.

Dan Ritter reiterated that the elevated portion is all art of the proposed patio enclosure.

COMMISSIONER GASKILL: So the windows would be swinging our over the lower sidewalk?

Lori Kosmatka: Correct.


4

CHAIRMAN GRAY commented that the structure has been raised and existent since the space belonged to Bettenhausen hardware.

COMMISSIONER GASKILL: However, Bettenhausen Hardware had an entrance in the front.

Dan Ritter noted that they are not familiar with the entire history of the structure but reiterated that a new encroachment agreement is being drafted and outlined the necessity of it.

COMMISSIONER LOSCUITO agreed with the fellow Commissioners. The window projection is a key point of concern. Make sure that none of the windows are protruding too closely to the lamppost.

CHAIRMAN GRAY commented a lot was said and he shares a lot of those concerns. He noted the building looks attractive and clean and the ability to use all year round is beneficial. He asked for clarification of the renderings of the project, if the North/South windows are fixed or will those be moving as well.

Dan Ritter answered that the drawings do not specify and there are no egress concerns per the Chief Building Official.

CHAIRMAN GRAY: Those are all my comments. It does look clean and I think it’s a good idea. It sounds like there are still some things that need to be addressed and finalized with the village engineer.

CHAIRMAN GRAY asks the petitioner if he would like to speak. He swore in petitioner PAUL SPASS, owner of Primal Cut.

PAUL SPASS: In regards to the percentage of materials used for the Legacy Code, one thing that I would not be opposed to doing is doing the bottom portion as brick. I know a lot of this is all metal and glass with the windows again, the whole purpose is so that we can utilize it year-round. We’ve really grown, within the past year, we have doubled our sales and we are running out of space. By enclosing this front space, not only does it give us the opportunity to have more seating; it gives us the opportunity to utilize the patio for what it is yet still have the ability to offer extra seating when the weather is not accommodating. It’s a great fit for everybody and I feel it’s a great look for the downtown area. I want to try to keep the consistency of the black storefront glass, but also not lose the consistency of what it is and that space to me is going to be used as much as possible to offer the outdoor dining experience as much as possible. However, when the weather is not permitting, we can still have a great look and good views for customers. We will also potentially use the area as a potential private event space since we will be keeping the overhead doors that are already in place. Nothing that is existing right now is going to be changed except for the awning and my only thought in regard to the percentage used, I would not be opposed to implementing full brick to the windows’ ledge. I spoke with the building engineer prior to this meeting and the biggest thing was that we stay within the 84 inches or 7ft which is to the bottom of the windows to the existing walkway.

CHAIRMAN GRAY: Excellent Paul. It’s great to hear that your business is booming.

PAUL SPASS: It’s a lot of hard work but its been rewarding not only for me, but for the town. I appreciate the opportunity to bring back the old tradition of having a steakhouse here in town. We also have three sets of additional drawings with renderings that are complete its just a matter of the phase we do them in. This particular phase will match the next phase which will be doing a rooftop over the corner unit where you see the triangle. These glass windows actually mimic the ones enclosing the patio. That’s a future project but we already have plans that have been submitted and approved, its just a matter of me pulling the trigger on those. I will just do this in phases that best suit me financially. The next step that we want to do in a few years is doing an outdoor patio in the back. I think it’s a great corner, I think we draw a lot of attention and


5

with these renderings, I did a lot myself. I think that the plan presented achieves the desires of the downtown area.

Dan Ritter noted that the possibility of raising the brick wall should be tabled until further discussions are had regarding building materials.

CHAIRMAN GRAY asked for comment from the public. Seeing none he proceeded to ask for comment from the COMMISSIONERS. Noting no further comment, CHAIRMAN GRAY requested a motion to close the public hearing. Motion made by COMMISSIONER GASKILL, seconded by COMMISSIONER LOSCUITO. CHAIRMAN GRAY requested a voice vote. Hearing no opposition, the motion carried.

CHAIRMAN GRAY asked staff to present the standards.

Lori Kosmatka presented the standards.

CHAIRMAN GRAY requested the first motion.

Motion 1 - Variations

COMMISSIONER SHAW made a motion to recommend that the Village Board grant the Petitioner, Paul Spass on behalf of Primal Cut, at 17344 Oak Park Avenue in the Legacy Downtown Core (DC) Zoning District, three (3) Variations from Section XII (Legacy Code) of the Village Zoning Ordinance for building materials, architectural design guidelines, and minimum building height as listed and according to the submitted plans, and adopt the Findings of Fact as listed in the April 21, 2022 Staff Report, with the following condition:

1. There must be executed and active right-of-way encroachment agreement in place with the Village. If the right-of-way encroachment agreement expires and becomes defaulted, the variation becomes void.2. All plans are subject to final staff review with the building permit for building code compliance and public safety review.

Motion seconded by COMMISSIONER GASKILL. Vote taken by roll call; all voted in favor. CHAIRMAN GRAY declared the motion as carried.

CHAIRMAN GRAY requested the second motion.

Motion 2 – Site Plan / Architectural Approval

COMMISSIONER TRUXAL made a motion to grant the Petitioner Paul Spass on behalf of Primal Cut, Site Plan and Architectural Approval for a front patio enclosure at 17344 Oak Park Avenue in the Legacy Downtown Core (DC) Zoning District, in accordance with the plans submitted and adopt Findings of Fact as proposed in the April 21, 2022 Staff Report, subject to the following conditions:

1. Site Plan/Architectural Approval is subject to approval of the requested Variations and right-of-way encroachment agreement by the Village Board.2. All plans are subject to final staff review with the building permit for building code compliance and public safety review. The number of operable windows and extent of projection encroaching into the Village right-of-way are subject to review and approval by Village staff.3. The bottom of the projecting edge of the window system to the finished grade of the paver pavement must be at least 7’-0” (84”).


6

4. The final materials of the north and south side elevations are subject to review and approval by Village staff to match the proposed front/east elevation.5. Any awning or structure over the northern raised stairway landing be subject to review and approval by Village staff.

Motion seconded by COMMISSIONER MANI.

COMMISSIONER SHAW noted that the petitioner’s name in the motion provided in the staff report is incorrect. The petitioner’s name was corrected in the motion as presented.

CHAIRMAN GRAY asked Staff for a roll call vote. All voted in favor. CHAIRMAN GRAY declared the motion as carried.

Dan Ritter explained that it is anticipated that this item will go before the Village Board on May 17th, 2022. There is one extra meeting because they have to get the encroachment agreement addressed so the items can go at the same time.


THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARKCook County,

Illinois Will County, llinois

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-R-049

A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN ELEVATED ENTERPRISES, LLC., AND THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK FOR

PROPERTY LOCATED AT 17344 OAK PARK AVENUE

MICHAEL W. GLOTZ, PRESIDENT NANCY M. O’CONNOR, VILLAGE CLERK

WILLIAM P. BRADY WILLIAM A. BRENNAN

DIANE M. GALANTE DENNIS P. MAHONEY


Board of Trustees

Published in pamphlet form by authority of the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Tinley Park Peterson, Johnson, & Murray Chicago, LLC, Village Attorneys

200 W. Adams, Suite 2125 Chicago, IL 60606


VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARKCook County, Illinois Will County, Illinois


A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN ELEVATED ENTERPRISES, LLC., AND THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 17344 OAK PARK AVENUE


WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities of the Village of Tinley Park, Cook and Will Counties, Illinois, have determined that it is in the best interest of the Village of Tinley Park and its residents to enter into an agreement regulating the encroachment of certain improvements located at 17344 Oak Park Avenue on the adjacent right-of-way for Oak Park Avenue; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Tinley Park, Cook and Will counties, Illinois, state as follows:


SECTION 2: The Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit 1 and made a part hereof, is hereby approved and accepted, and the Village President is hereby authorized to execute the Agreement on behalf of the Village. SECTION 3: Effective Date. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately up on its passage by the President and Board of Trustees and approval as provided by law.

That the Village Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to publish this Resolution in pamphlet form, and this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval, and publication as required by law.

PASSED THIS 17th day of May, 2022

AYES: NAYS:ABSENT:


By: _____________________________Village President

ATTEST:

By: _____________________________ Village Clerk


STATE OF ILLINOIS COUNTY OF COOK COUNTY OF WILL

)) ss)

CERTIFICATE

I, NANCY M. O’CONNOR Village Clerk of the Village of Tinley Park, Counties of Cook and Will and State of Illinois, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. 2022-R-0xx, "A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN ELEVATED ENTERPRISES, LLC., AND THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 17344 OAK PARK AVENUE.)," which was adopted by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Tinley Park on May 17, 2022.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the corporate seal of the Village of Tinley Park this 17th day of May, 2022.

_________________________________VILLAGE CLERK


AMMENDED RIGHT-OF-WAY ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT

17344 Oak Park Avenue

THIS EASEMENT ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT is entered into this __ day of

___________, 2022, between __________________, owner of the property commonly known 17344 Oak

Park Avenue, Tinley Park, Illinois 60477 , (“OWNER”) and the Village of Tinley Park, an Illinois

Municipal Corporation, with offices at 16250 S. Oak Park Ave., Tinley Park, Illinois 60477

(“VILLAGE”).

WHEREAS, the OWNER owns certain real property legally described as:

LOT 1 BLOCK 2 IN CHRISTIAN ANDRES’SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE SOUTH HALF OF LOT

1 LYING NORTH OF CHICAGO ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILROAD IN THE SOUTHWEST

QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE 13 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL

MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS.

(PIN: 28-30-313-008-0000(“SUBJECT PROPERTY”)

WHEREAS, by plat of subdivision for the SUBJECT PROPERTY, the VILLAGE has previously

recorded its rights to a dedicated public right-of-way adjacent to the SUBJECT PROPERTY; and

WHEREAS, there is currently a patio encroaching on the VILLAGE’S right-of-way as depicted

in Exhibit A; and

WHEREAS, the OWNER desires to make improvements to the existing patio in the VILLAGE’S right-

of-way by enclosing it with a 33’ x 7’ -6” single story glass & tubular steel exterior wall non-tempered

enclosure with a dimensional lumber framed standing seam metal fixed roof as depicted in Exhibit B; and

WHEREAS, the VILLAGE has determined to allow the OWNER to modify the existing patio and

by enclosing it and encroach on the VILLAGE’S right-of-way subject to the terms and conditions of this

Agreement.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration for the VILLAGE allowing the encroachment and mutual

promises contained herein, the OWNER declares that:

1. The foregoing recitals are substantive and are incorporated by reference in this paragraph 1

as though fully set forth.

2. The VILLAGE does hereby grant to the OWNER a right to encroach upon said right-of-way

to the extent depicted on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein so long as the proposed

improvements continue unimpaired upon the right-of-way and that any improvements do not increase the

encroachment of the right-of-way. This agreement and the rights granted hereunder shall terminate upon

the damage or destruction of 50% or more of the replacement value of the building or other improvements

which encroach upon the Village's right-of-way.


3. The encroachment herein acknowledged does not under any circumstances abrogate

or nullify the VILLAGE’s rights and interests in and to the dedicated public right-of-way, including the

parkway.

4. The OWNER shall retain all the risks and liabilities associated with encroaching on the

VILLAGE’s right-of-way, including without limitation, the risk that the VILLAGE may remove the

improvements that encroach the right-of-way without any prior notice to the OWNER. The OWNER shall

be solely responsible for the VILLAGE’s cost to remove the encroachment to gain access to any of its

public utilities in the easement for any purpose.

5. The VILLAGE shall not be responsible for any costs incurred by the OWNER to repair or

replace the encroachment if it is damaged or destroyed by the VILLAGE.

6. The OWNER shall hold harmless, indemnify and defend the VILLAGE from and against any

and all liability, claims, demands, and causes of action arising out of or related to any loss, injury, death, or

loss or damage to property resulting from the VILLAGE’s use of the right-of-way for any of its intended

purposes

7. The OWNER shall hold harmless, indemnify and defend the VILLAGE from and against any

and all liability, claims, demands, and causes of action arising out of or related to any loss, injury, death, or

loss or damage to property resulting from the OWNER’S encroachment of the VILLAGE’S right-of-way.

8. The OWNER have read and fully understand that this Agreement is an agreement to indemnify

the VILLAGE, its officials, agents, employees, and attorneys, and the OWNER fully intend to be bound by

the terms of this Agreement and that it shall further bind the OWNER’S assigns, heirs, executors or

administrators.

9. This Agreement shall be a covenant running with the land and shall be recorded in the office

of the County Recorder in the county where the SUBJECT PROPERTY is situated.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties set their hands as seals as of the date first written above.

OWNER: VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK:

By: _________________________________ By: _______________________________

Attest: ______________________________ Attest: ____________________________


Exhibit A


N

36"

(rol

l) X

24"

(L

=0.

25, R

=.2

5, T

=0.

70, B

=0.

70)

EXHIBIT

36"

(rol

l) X

24"

(L

=0.

25, R

=.2

5, T

=0.

70, B

=0.

70)

EXHIBIT

Project No.

Scale:

Date:

Sheet

Checked by:

Drawn by:

REVISIONS

No. Date Remarks

of

CONSULTING REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS

17000 SOUTH PARK AVENUE SOUTH HOLLAND, ILLINOIS 60473(708) 331-6700 FAX (708) 331-3826

AND PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS

ROBINSON ENGINEERING, LTD.

COPYRIGHTaILLINOIS DESIGN FIRM REGISTRATION NO. 184001128.

FOR:THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK16250 S. OAK PARK AVENUE

TINLEY PARK, ILLINOIS 60477708-444-5000

B.K.L.R.E.G.

1 1

7-22-20201" = 20'

20-R059920-R0599-EXHIBIT-01.DWG

2020

Project No.

Scale:

Date:

Sheet

Checked by:

Drawn by:

REVISIONS

No. Date Remarks

of

CONSULTING REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS

17000 SOUTH PARK AVENUE SOUTH HOLLAND, ILLINOIS 60473(708) 331-6700 FAX (708) 331-3826

AND PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS

ROBINSON ENGINEERING, LTD.

COPYRIGHTaILLINOIS DESIGN FIRM REGISTRATION NO. 184001128.

FOR:THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK16250 S. OAK PARK AVENUE

TINLEY PARK, ILLINOIS 60477708-444-5000

B.K.L.R.E.G.

1 1

7-22-20201" = 20'

20-R059920-R0599-EXHIBIT-01.DWG

2020

173RD PLACE

OA

K P

AR

K

AV

EN

UE

LOT 1

CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILROAD

N

173RD PLACE

OA

K P

AR

K

AV

EN

UE

LOT 1

CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILROAD

LOT 2

LEGEND

LOT 2

LEGEND


Exhibit B

Patio enclosure plans


DESIG

N C

RITERIA

SYMBO

LSABBREVIATIO

NS

BASE LUM

BER VALUES

DESIG

N LO

ADS

ALLOW

ABLE FRAMIN

G SPAN

S:T-1

ST-1

EX

ISTIN

G S

ITE P

LAN

DR

AW

ING

IND

EX

TITLE S

HE

ET

OWNER

:

AUTHORITY:

BUILDING CODES

Village of Tinley Park Building Codes 2006 International Building Code 2006 International M

echanical Code 2006 International Fire Gas Code 2018 International Energy Conservation Code 2004 Illinois State Plum

bing Code 2006 International Fire Code 2005 National Electric Code (NEC)

OCCUPANCY:

BUILDING DATA

CONST. TYPE:

USE GROUP:

EXISTING PATIO FLOOR AREA320 SQ. FT.

RESTAURANT

EXISTING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM

EXISTING FIRE ALARM SYSTEM

NFPA 13NFPA 72

AS PER IFC 903, 907

A-2

V-B

EXISTING

PROPOSED

A-1

FLOO

R P

LAN

/ELE

VA

TION

/DE

TAILS

SHEET NUMBER

19110

12-31-19

FRANKFO

RT, ILLINO

IS

20960 FRANKFO

RT SQ. D

R.

DESIGNS

SUITE A

A RENOVATION FORROCKS ON TOP WHISKEY BAR

17344 OAK PARK AVE.TINLEY PARK, ILLINOIS

AREC

EIVED 12/29/2021


AutoCAD SHX Text

T-1

AutoCAD SHX Text

TINLEY PARK, ILLINOIS

AutoCAD SHX Text

17344 OAK PARK, AVE.

AutoCAD SHX Text

%%UPRIMAL CUT STEAKHOUSE

AutoCAD SHX Text

30 LB/FT

AutoCAD SHX Text

ANNUAL MEAN TEMPERATURE

AutoCAD SHX Text

AIR FREEZING INDEX

AutoCAD SHX Text

FLOOD HAZARDS

AutoCAD SHX Text

ROOF SNOW LOAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

ICE BARRIER UNDERLAYMENT

AutoCAD SHX Text

WINTER DESIGN TEMPERATURE

AutoCAD SHX Text

DAMAGE FROM:

AutoCAD SHX Text

SUBJECT TO

AutoCAD SHX Text

SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY

AutoCAD SHX Text

WIND DESIGN

AutoCAD SHX Text

90 MPH

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

SEVERE

AutoCAD SHX Text

48"

AutoCAD SHX Text

MODERATE TO SEVERE

AutoCAD SHX Text

-4 F, 97 1/2%

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

REQUIRED

AutoCAD SHX Text

FIRM # 170214

AutoCAD SHX Text

HEATING DEGREE DAYS (HDD)

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

WEATHERING

AutoCAD SHX Text

FROST LINE DEPTH

AutoCAD SHX Text

TERMITE

AutoCAD SHX Text

SUMMER DESIGN TEMPERATURE

AutoCAD SHX Text

89 F, DRY BULB, 2 1/2%

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

76 F, DRY BULB, 2 1/2%

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

PANELS 0606H-0609H

AutoCAD SHX Text

12/16/2004

AutoCAD SHX Text

1750

AutoCAD SHX Text

50 DEG F.

AutoCAD SHX Text

COOLING DEGREE DAYS (CDD)

AutoCAD SHX Text

6,155

AutoCAD SHX Text

942

AutoCAD SHX Text

CLIMATE ZONE

AutoCAD SHX Text

INDOOR DESIGN CONDITIONS

AutoCAD SHX Text

100 - YEAR HOURLY RAINFALL RATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

5A

AutoCAD SHX Text

MAX. 72 F - HEATING

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

MAX. 75 F - COOLING

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

4"

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

OR 8:12

AutoCAD SHX Text

8

AutoCAD SHX Text

12

AutoCAD SHX Text

D-1

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

D-1

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

DETAIL W/ HEIGHT

AutoCAD SHX Text

CEILING PATTERN

AutoCAD SHX Text

REVISION

AutoCAD SHX Text

LEVEL LINE

AutoCAD SHX Text

ROOF PITCH RATIO

AutoCAD SHX Text

SHEET NUMBER

AutoCAD SHX Text

DETAIL LETTER

AutoCAD SHX Text

SHEET NUMBER

AutoCAD SHX Text

SECTION NUMBER

AutoCAD SHX Text

MINIMUM 3"x3"

AutoCAD SHX Text

OR AS REQUIRED

AutoCAD SHX Text

E.I.F.S.

AutoCAD SHX Text

SILLCOCK

AutoCAD SHX Text

GRAVEL FILL

AutoCAD SHX Text

BATT INSULATION

AutoCAD SHX Text

SOLID BEARING

AutoCAD SHX Text

CONCRETE BLOCK

AutoCAD SHX Text

EARTH

AutoCAD SHX Text

CONCRETE

AutoCAD SHX Text

BRICK VENEER

AutoCAD SHX Text

WOOD FRAME WALL

AutoCAD SHX Text

THE ARCHITECT SHALL NOT HAVE CONTROL OVER CHARGE OR AND SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES, OR PROCEDURES, OR FOR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS AND PROGRAMS IN CONNECTION WITH THE WORK, SINCE THESE ARE SOLELY THE OWNERS AND THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY UNDER THE CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION. THE ARCHITECT SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE OWNERS OR CONTRACTORS SCHEDULES OR FAILURE TO CARRY OUT THE WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE ARCHITECT SHALL NOT HAVE CONTROL OVER ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF THE OWNER, CONTRACTOR, SUBCONTRACTORS, OR THEIR AGENTS OR EMPLOYEES OR OF ANY OTHER PERSONS PERFORMING PORTIONS OF THE WORK.

AutoCAD SHX Text

1,300,000

AutoCAD SHX Text

1,400,000

AutoCAD SHX Text

1,900,000

AutoCAD SHX Text

2,000,000

AutoCAD SHX Text

1,300,000

AutoCAD SHX Text

1,500,000

AutoCAD SHX Text

DEAD LOAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

850 PSI

AutoCAD SHX Text

875 PSI

AutoCAD SHX Text

2600 PSI

AutoCAD SHX Text

2900 PSI

AutoCAD SHX Text

1700 PSI

AutoCAD SHX Text

2250 PSI

AutoCAD SHX Text

Fb

AutoCAD SHX Text

40 psf

AutoCAD SHX Text

5 psf

AutoCAD SHX Text

200 psf

AutoCAD SHX Text

40 psf

AutoCAD SHX Text

40 psf

AutoCAD SHX Text

40 psf

AutoCAD SHX Text

20 psf

AutoCAD SHX Text

10 psf

AutoCAD SHX Text

30 psf

AutoCAD SHX Text

30 psf

AutoCAD SHX Text

30 psf

AutoCAD SHX Text

100 psf

AutoCAD SHX Text

HEM FIR #2 (DOMESTIC)

AutoCAD SHX Text

S.P.F. #1/#2 (CANADIAN)

AutoCAD SHX Text

TYPE

AutoCAD SHX Text

MICROLLAM LVL

AutoCAD SHX Text

PARALLAM PSL

AutoCAD SHX Text

1.3 E TIMBERSTRAND LSL(4 3/4" TO 11 1/4")

AutoCAD SHX Text

1.5E TIMBERSTRAND LSL(11 7/8" TO 18")

AutoCAD SHX Text

WALLS-BRICK(STD)

AutoCAD SHX Text

WALLS-STUD

AutoCAD SHX Text

STAIRS

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

FOR SI: 1 PSF=0.0479 kN/m , 1 SQUARE INCH=645 mm

AutoCAD SHX Text

USE

AutoCAD SHX Text

APPLIED IN ANY DIRECTION AT ANY POINT ALONG THE TOP)

AutoCAD SHX Text

GUARDRAILS AND HANDRAILS (A SINGLE CONCENTRATED LOAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

FLOORS (SLEEPING ROOMS)

AutoCAD SHX Text

FLOORS (EXCEPT SLEEPING ROOMS

AutoCAD SHX Text

ATTICS(LIMITED ATTIC STORAGE)

AutoCAD SHX Text

ATTICS (NO STORAGE WITH ROOF SLOPE NOT STEEPER THAN 3:12)

AutoCAD SHX Text

ROOF RAFTERS (HEAVY ROOF)-EX. CLAY, TILE, CEMENT, SLATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

ROOF RAFTERS W/ CATHEDRAL CEILING

AutoCAD SHX Text

ROOF RAFTERS

AutoCAD SHX Text

DECKS

AutoCAD SHX Text

BALCONIES (EXTERIOR)

AutoCAD SHX Text

LIVE LOAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

7

AutoCAD SHX Text

7

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

15

AutoCAD SHX Text

17

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

PARTITIONS OR WALLS (INTERIOR), HORIZONTALLY

AutoCAD SHX Text

5 psf

AutoCAD SHX Text

100 psf

AutoCAD SHX Text

HORIZONTAL WIND LOAD (90 mph 3-SEC GUST) < 30 '

AutoCAD SHX Text

15 psf

AutoCAD SHX Text

HORIZONTAL WIND LOAD (90 mph 3-SEC GUST) 30' TO 49'

AutoCAD SHX Text

20 psf

AutoCAD SHX Text

ROOF LIVE LOAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

30 psf

AutoCAD SHX Text

10

AutoCAD SHX Text

GARAGES (PASSENGER CARS ONL;Y)

AutoCAD SHX Text

50 psf

AutoCAD SHX Text

SEE SHEET SP-1 FOR SPECIFICATIONS FOR SITE WORK, CONCRETE, MASONRY, STEEL, CARPENTRY, INSULATION, ROOFING, DRYWALL, PLUMBING, HEATING, AND ELECTRICAL.

AutoCAD SHX Text

DISCLAIMER STATEMENT:

AutoCAD SHX Text

ABOVE FIN. FLOOR

AutoCAD SHX Text

ALUMINUM

AutoCAD SHX Text

BOARD

AutoCAD SHX Text

BLOCK

AutoCAD SHX Text

BLOCKING

AutoCAD SHX Text

BEAM

AutoCAD SHX Text

BOTTOM OF

AutoCAD SHX Text

CABINET

AutoCAD SHX Text

CENTER LINE

AutoCAD SHX Text

CERAMIC

AutoCAD SHX Text

CLEAR

AutoCAD SHX Text

COLUMN

AutoCAD SHX Text

CONSTRUCTION

AutoCAD SHX Text

CONTINUOUS

AutoCAD SHX Text

CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT

AutoCAD SHX Text

DIAMETER

AutoCAD SHX Text

DETAIL

AutoCAD SHX Text

DOWN

AutoCAD SHX Text

DISHWASHER

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRAWING

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING

AutoCAD SHX Text

EACH

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXPANSION JOINT

AutoCAD SHX Text

ELEVATION

AutoCAD SHX Text

EQUAL

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXTERIOR

AutoCAD SHX Text

FLOOR DRAIN

AutoCAD SHX Text

FOUNDATION

AutoCAD SHX Text

FINISH

AutoCAD SHX Text

FLOOR

AutoCAD SHX Text

FLASHING

AutoCAD SHX Text

FOOT

AutoCAD SHX Text

FOOTING

AutoCAD SHX Text

GAUGE

AutoCAD SHX Text

GALVANIZED

AutoCAD SHX Text

GLASS

AutoCAD SHX Text

GYPSUM BOARD

AutoCAD SHX Text

HANDICAPPED

AutoCAD SHX Text

HARDWARE

AutoCAD SHX Text

HOLLOW METAL

AutoCAD SHX Text

HORIZONTAL

AutoCAD SHX Text

HEIGHT

AutoCAD SHX Text

HIGH POINT

AutoCAD SHX Text

INSULATION

AutoCAD SHX Text

INTERIOR

AutoCAD SHX Text

JANITOR

AutoCAD SHX Text

LAVATORY

AutoCAD SHX Text

LOW POINT

AutoCAD SHX Text

MAXIMUM

AutoCAD SHX Text

MEDICINE CABINET

AutoCAD SHX Text

MECHANICAL

AutoCAD SHX Text

METAL, MATERIAL

AutoCAD SHX Text

MINIMUM

AutoCAD SHX Text

MASONRY OPENING

AutoCAD SHX Text

NOT TO SCALE

AutoCAD SHX Text

ON CENTER

AutoCAD SHX Text

A.F.F.

AutoCAD SHX Text

ALUM

AutoCAD SHX Text

BD.

AutoCAD SHX Text

BLK.

AutoCAD SHX Text

BLK'G

AutoCAD SHX Text

BM.

AutoCAD SHX Text

B/

AutoCAD SHX Text

CAB.

AutoCAD SHX Text

C.L.

AutoCAD SHX Text

CER.

AutoCAD SHX Text

CLR.

AutoCAD SHX Text

COL.

AutoCAD SHX Text

CONST.

AutoCAD SHX Text

CONT.

AutoCAD SHX Text

C.M.U.

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text

DET.

AutoCAD SHX Text

DN.

AutoCAD SHX Text

D.W.

AutoCAD SHX Text

DWG.

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXIST.

AutoCAD SHX Text

EA.

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXP. JT.

AutoCAD SHX Text

ELEV.

AutoCAD SHX Text

EX.

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXT.

AutoCAD SHX Text

F.D.

AutoCAD SHX Text

FDN.

AutoCAD SHX Text

FIN.

AutoCAD SHX Text

FLR.

AutoCAD SHX Text

FLASH.

AutoCAD SHX Text

FT.

AutoCAD SHX Text

FTG.

AutoCAD SHX Text

GA.

AutoCAD SHX Text

GALV.

AutoCAD SHX Text

GL.

AutoCAD SHX Text

GYP. BD.

AutoCAD SHX Text

HDCP.

AutoCAD SHX Text

HDWR.

AutoCAD SHX Text

H.M.

AutoCAD SHX Text

HORIZ.

AutoCAD SHX Text

HGT.

AutoCAD SHX Text

H.P.

AutoCAD SHX Text

INSUL.

AutoCAD SHX Text

NT.

AutoCAD SHX Text

JAN.

AutoCAD SHX Text

LAV.

AutoCAD SHX Text

L.P.

AutoCAD SHX Text

MAX.

AutoCAD SHX Text

M.C.

AutoCAD SHX Text

MECH.

AutoCAD SHX Text

MTL.

AutoCAD SHX Text

MIN.

AutoCAD SHX Text

M.O.

AutoCAD SHX Text

N.T.S.

AutoCAD SHX Text

O.C.

AutoCAD SHX Text

OPENING

AutoCAD SHX Text

OPPOSITE

AutoCAD SHX Text

PLATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

PLASTIC LAMINATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

PLYWOOD

AutoCAD SHX Text

QUARRY TILE

AutoCAD SHX Text

ROOF DRAIN

AutoCAD SHX Text

REFERENCE

AutoCAD SHX Text

REFRIGERATOR

AutoCAD SHX Text

REINFORCED

AutoCAD SHX Text

REQUIRED

AutoCAD SHX Text

ROUGH OPENING

AutoCAD SHX Text

SCHEDULE

AutoCAD SHX Text

SHEET

AutoCAD SHX Text

SIMILAR

AutoCAD SHX Text

SPECIFICATION

AutoCAD SHX Text

STAINLESS STEEL

AutoCAD SHX Text

STANDARD

AutoCAD SHX Text

TOP OFF

AutoCAD SHX Text

TREAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

TELEPHONE

AutoCAD SHX Text

THICK

AutoCAD SHX Text

TYPICAL

AutoCAD SHX Text

VERTICAL

AutoCAD SHX Text

WITH

AutoCAD SHX Text

WOOD

AutoCAD SHX Text

WATERPROOF

AutoCAD SHX Text

WIRE WELDED FABRIC

AutoCAD SHX Text

OPN'G.

AutoCAD SHX Text

OPP.

AutoCAD SHX Text

PLAS. LAM.

AutoCAD SHX Text

PLYWD.

AutoCAD SHX Text

Q.T.

AutoCAD SHX Text

R.D.

AutoCAD SHX Text

REF.

AutoCAD SHX Text

REFRIG.

AutoCAD SHX Text

REIN.

AutoCAD SHX Text

REQ'D.

AutoCAD SHX Text

R.O.

AutoCAD SHX Text

SCHED.

AutoCAD SHX Text

SHT.

AutoCAD SHX Text

SIM.

AutoCAD SHX Text

SPEC.

AutoCAD SHX Text

ST. STL.

AutoCAD SHX Text

STD.

AutoCAD SHX Text

TEL.

AutoCAD SHX Text

THK.

AutoCAD SHX Text

TYP.

AutoCAD SHX Text

VERT.

AutoCAD SHX Text

W.W.F.

AutoCAD SHX Text

PL.

AutoCAD SHX Text

T/

AutoCAD SHX Text

T.

AutoCAD SHX Text

W/

AutoCAD SHX Text

WD.

AutoCAD SHX Text

WP.

AutoCAD SHX Text

2"x8" @ 16" O.C. = 15'-1"

AutoCAD SHX Text

2"x8" @ 12" O.C. = 17'-5"

AutoCAD SHX Text

2"x10" @ 16" O.C. = 18'-2"

AutoCAD SHX Text

2"x10" @ 12" O.C. = 21'-0"

AutoCAD SHX Text

CANADIAN HEM-FIR NO. 2 PER 2012 IRC SPAN TABLES

AutoCAD SHX Text

USE CANADIAN SPRUCE-PINE-FIR NO. 2 FOR ROOF RAFTERS THRU 2"x10".

AutoCAD SHX Text

2"x6" @ 16" O.C. = 11'-11"

AutoCAD SHX Text

2"x12" @ 12" O.C. = 24'-4"

AutoCAD SHX Text

2"x12" @ 16" O.C. = 21'-1"

AutoCAD SHX Text

2"x6" @ 12" O.C. = 13'-9"

AutoCAD SHX Text

HEM FIR

AutoCAD SHX Text

IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CONTRACTOR, OWNER/CONTRACTOR CARPENTER AND CONCRETE CONTRACTOR TO HAVE FULL SET OF DRAWINGS "MARKED CONSTRUCTION", WITH LATEST REVISION DATE MARKED. IF DIMENSIONAL ERRORS ARE FOUND BETWEEN DIMENSIONS ON FOUNDATION, FIRST, AND SECOND FLOOR DRAWINGS, ARCHITECT SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY AND WORK SHALL NOT PROCEED UNTIL THE DISCREPANCY IS RESOLVED. A LETTER OF DIRECTION OR A REVISED DRAWING SHALL BE PREPARED IMMEDIATELY FOR CONTRACTORS, OWNER, AND ARCHITECT'S RECORD.

AutoCAD SHX Text

RESPONSIBILITY STATEMENT:

AutoCAD SHX Text

1st FLOOR, FLOOR JOISTS - 40lbs LIVE LOAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

12" O.C.

AutoCAD SHX Text

16" O.C.

AutoCAD SHX Text

ALLOWABLE SPANS ARE AS FOLLOWS:

AutoCAD SHX Text

CEILING JOISTS - 20lbs LIVE LOAD

AutoCAD SHX Text

CEILING JOISTS, FLOOR JOISTS AND HEADERS SHALL BE CANADIAN LUMBER BASED UPON

AutoCAD SHX Text

2012 IRC SPAN TABLES

AutoCAD SHX Text

16"O.C.

AutoCAD SHX Text

12" O.C.

AutoCAD SHX Text

20'-4"

AutoCAD SHX Text

17'-7"

AutoCAD SHX Text

17'-3"

AutoCAD SHX Text

15'-5"

AutoCAD SHX Text

SPRUCE-PINE-FIR #2

AutoCAD SHX Text

12'-10"

AutoCAD SHX Text

14'-9"

AutoCAD SHX Text

2"x6"

AutoCAD SHX Text

16'-3"

AutoCAD SHX Text

2"x8"

AutoCAD SHX Text

18'-9"

AutoCAD SHX Text

HEM-FIR #2

AutoCAD SHX Text

21'-0"

AutoCAD SHX Text

23'-6"

AutoCAD SHX Text

2"x12"

AutoCAD SHX Text

22'-11"

AutoCAD SHX Text

19'-10"

AutoCAD SHX Text

2"x10"

AutoCAD SHX Text

FLOOR AND CEILING JOIST:

AutoCAD SHX Text

ROOF RAFTERS:

AutoCAD SHX Text

CERTIFICATION

AutoCAD SHX Text

APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES OF TINLEY PARK, ILLINOIS

AutoCAD SHX Text

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS WERE

AutoCAD SHX Text

TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF CONFORM TO ALL

AutoCAD SHX Text

PREPARED IN MY OFFICE UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND TO

AutoCAD SHX Text

MICHAEL J. ROOT ARCHITECT

AutoCAD SHX Text

ARCHITECT LICENSE EXPIRES: 11-30-20

AutoCAD SHX Text

LICENSE NO. 001-006715

AutoCAD SHX Text

PAUL SPASS 20121 E. BRIGHTWAY RD. MOKENA, IL 60448 Tel: 708-372-7541 E-MAIL: [email protected]@yahoo.com

AutoCAD SHX Text

30 LB. SNOW LOAD AND 10 LB. DL.

AutoCAD SHX Text

(SPACE TO REMAIN UNCONDITIONED)

AutoCAD SHX Text

TINLEY PARK, ILLINOIS 16250 S. OAK PARK AVENUE TINLEY PARK, IL 604777 Tel: 708-444-5000 708-444-5000 Fax: 708-444-5199708-444-5199

AutoCAD SHX Text

A COVERED PATIO RENOVATION FOR

AutoCAD SHX Text

ISSUED FOR PERMIT: 12-31-19

AutoCAD SHX Text

1. NEW PATIO ENCLOSURE FOR EXISTING COVERED PATIO. SPACE TO REMAIN NEW PATIO ENCLOSURE FOR EXISTING COVERED PATIO. SPACE TO REMAIN UNCONDITIONED. 2. INSTALL NEW STEEL STRUCTURE WITH STRUCTURAL GLASS RAILINGS, INSTALL NEW STEEL STRUCTURE WITH STRUCTURAL GLASS RAILINGS, RETRACTABLE GLASS WINDOWS, AND STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF. 3. NO CHANGE IN FOOTPRINT. NO CHANGE IN FOOTPRINT. 4. NO CHANGE IN MEP's.NO CHANGE IN MEP's.

AutoCAD SHX Text

SCOPE OF WORK

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXP. DATE: 11/30/22

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE: 07/14/21

AutoCAD SHX Text

MICHAEL J. ROOT

AutoCAD SHX Text

No. 001-006715

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

T

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

T

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

O

AutoCAD SHX Text

F

AutoCAD SHX Text

I

AutoCAD SHX Text

L

AutoCAD SHX Text

L

AutoCAD SHX Text

I

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

O

AutoCAD SHX Text

I

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

L

AutoCAD SHX Text

I

AutoCAD SHX Text

C

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

D

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

R

AutoCAD SHX Text

C

AutoCAD SHX Text

H

AutoCAD SHX Text

I

AutoCAD SHX Text

T

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

C

AutoCAD SHX Text

T

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXP. DATE: 11/30/22

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE: 07/14/21

AutoCAD SHX Text

MICHAEL J. ROOT

AutoCAD SHX Text

No. 001-006715

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

T

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

T

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

O

AutoCAD SHX Text

F

AutoCAD SHX Text

I

AutoCAD SHX Text

L

AutoCAD SHX Text

L

AutoCAD SHX Text

I

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

O

AutoCAD SHX Text

I

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

L

AutoCAD SHX Text

I

AutoCAD SHX Text

C

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

D

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

R

AutoCAD SHX Text

C

AutoCAD SHX Text

H

AutoCAD SHX Text

I

AutoCAD SHX Text

T

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

C

AutoCAD SHX Text

T

AutoCAD SHX Text

REVISIONS

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

REV #

AutoCAD SHX Text

REV. PER:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

PROJECT NO.

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRAWN BY:

AutoCAD SHX Text

ARCHITECTS|INTERIOR DESIGNERS

AutoCAD SHX Text

T: (708) 407-8028

AutoCAD SHX Text

F: (779) 333-7960

AutoCAD SHX Text

[email protected]

AutoCAD SHX Text

www.idealcustomdesigns.com

AutoCAD SHX Text

PREVIOUS NO.

SHEET NUMBER

19110

12-31-19

FRANKFO

RT, ILLINO

IS

20960 FRANKFO

RT SQ. D

R.

DESIGNS

SUITE A




AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING BUILDING

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING PARKING LOT

AutoCAD SHX Text

DUMPSTER LOCATION

AutoCAD SHX Text

CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS LOCATION

AutoCAD SHX Text

173RD PLACE

AutoCAD SHX Text

OAK PARK AVE

AutoCAD SHX Text

ST-1

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING SITE PLAN

AutoCAD SHX Text

1"=10'-0"

AutoCAD SHX Text

ST-1

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

NORTH

AutoCAD SHX Text

REVISIONS

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

REV #

AutoCAD SHX Text

REV. PER:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

PROJECT NO.

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRAWN BY:

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

T: (708) 407-8028

AutoCAD SHX Text

F: (779) 333-7960

AutoCAD SHX Text

[email protected]

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

PREVIOUS NO.

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXP. DATE: 11/30/22

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE: 07/14/21

AutoCAD SHX Text

MICHAEL J. ROOT

AutoCAD SHX Text

No. 001-006715

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

T

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

T

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

O

AutoCAD SHX Text

F

AutoCAD SHX Text

I

AutoCAD SHX Text

L

AutoCAD SHX Text

L

AutoCAD SHX Text

I

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

O

AutoCAD SHX Text

I

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

L

AutoCAD SHX Text

I

AutoCAD SHX Text

C

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

D

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

R

AutoCAD SHX Text

C

AutoCAD SHX Text

H

AutoCAD SHX Text

I

AutoCAD SHX Text

T

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

C

AutoCAD SHX Text

T

SHEET NUMBER

19110

12-31-19

FRANKFO

RT, ILLINO

IS

20960 FRANKFO

RT SQ. D

R.

DESIGNS

SUITE A




AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING FACADE

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING BUILDING

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING

AutoCAD SHX Text

T/ EXIST. GRADE

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING FACADE

AutoCAD SHX Text

BLACK STANDING SEAM ROOF

AutoCAD SHX Text

NEW GLASS NANAWALL WINDOW

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING STAIR

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING

AutoCAD SHX Text

6x6x5/16" T/S COLUMN

AutoCAD SHX Text

4x4x1/4" T/S BALUSTER

AutoCAD SHX Text

GLASS RAILING

AutoCAD SHX Text

GLASS RAILING

AutoCAD SHX Text

NEW GLASS NANAWALL WINDOW

AutoCAD SHX Text

4x4x1/4" T/S BALUSTER

AutoCAD SHX Text

GLASS RAILING

AutoCAD SHX Text

GLASS RAILING

AutoCAD SHX Text

A-1

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING DINING

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING ENTRY

AutoCAD SHX Text

ENCLOSED PATIO

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING VESTIBULE

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING BAR

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING OHD

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING OHD

AutoCAD SHX Text

A-1

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

6x10x5/16" T/S BEAM

AutoCAD SHX Text

6x10x5/16" T/S BEAM

AutoCAD SHX Text

BEAM CANTILEVER

AutoCAD SHX Text

6x10x5/16" T/S BEAM

AutoCAD SHX Text

6x10x5/16" T/S BEAM

AutoCAD SHX Text

2"x8" TR. WOOD RAFTERS

AutoCAD SHX Text

@ 16" O.C.

AutoCAD SHX Text

2"x8" TR. WOOD RAFTERS

AutoCAD SHX Text

@ 16" O.C.

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING CONCRETE

AutoCAD SHX Text

6x6x5/16" T/S COL. ON 12x12x1/2" PLT. ON 12x12x12 POURED CONC. PIER (TYP. OF 3)

AutoCAD SHX Text

6x10x5/16" T/S BEAM

AutoCAD SHX Text

UP

AutoCAD SHX Text

PRIMAL CUT STEAKHOUSE

AutoCAD SHX Text

ADJACENT TENANT

AutoCAD SHX Text

UP

AutoCAD SHX Text

4X6X1/4" T/S COLUMN ANCHOR INTO EXIST FDN

AutoCAD SHX Text

LIMIT OF WORK TO BE EXECUTED

AutoCAD SHX Text

2"x8" RAFTERS @ 16" O.C.

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

12

AutoCAD SHX Text

STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF ON 3/4" OSB W/ CONT. ICE & WATER SHIELD

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRIP EDGE

AutoCAD SHX Text

WRAP FASCIA W/ PRE-FINISHED ALUM

AutoCAD SHX Text

CONT. TREATED 2X6 CAP PLATE W/ 3/8" LAG BOLT @ 16" O.C.

AutoCAD SHX Text

6x10x5/16" T/S BEAM

AutoCAD SHX Text

4x4x1/4" T/S GUARDRAIL

AutoCAD SHX Text

1/2" TH. STRUCTURAL SAFETY GLASS GUARD RAILS

AutoCAD SHX Text

4x6x1/4" T/S BOTTOM RAIL

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING BRICK VENEER REMAINS

AutoCAD SHX Text

NANAWALL SYSTEM INSTALL AS PER MFR. SPEC

AutoCAD SHX Text

6x10x5/16" T/S BEAM BEYOND

AutoCAD SHX Text

1/2" TH. EXPANSION JOINT

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING CONCRETE SLAB

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING FILL

AutoCAD SHX Text

NEW STOREFRONT PANELING BEYOND

AutoCAD SHX Text

11/32" BEADBOARD PANELING ON 1/2" PLYWD SHEATHING. SAND AND PAINT

AutoCAD SHX Text

ENCLOSED PATIO

AutoCAD SHX Text

2X8 LEDGER BOARD

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING SIDEWALK

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING WALL

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

A-1

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

A-1

AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

A-1

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXTERIOR

AutoCAD SHX Text

SAWCUT EXISTING SLAB AS REQ.

AutoCAD SHX Text

A-1

AutoCAD SHX Text

7

AutoCAD SHX Text

BAY WINDOW BEYOND

AutoCAD SHX Text

1/2" TH. STRUCTURAL SAFETY GLASS GUARD RAILS

AutoCAD SHX Text

12x12x12" POURED CONC. PIER

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING BRICK VENEER REMAINS

AutoCAD SHX Text

1/2" TH. EXPANSION JOINT

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING FILL

AutoCAD SHX Text

6"x5/8" IMBEDDED ANCHORBOLTS

AutoCAD SHX Text

12x12x1/2" TH. BASE PLATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

6x6x5/16" T/S COLUMN

AutoCAD SHX Text

4x6x1/4" T/S BOTTOM RAIL

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXISTING CONCRETE SLAB

AutoCAD SHX Text

(2) #5 DOWELS 6" INTO EX. CONC. & 6" INTO NEW PIER FOR LATERAL SUPPORT

AutoCAD SHX Text

2"x8" RAFTERS @ 16" O.C.

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

12

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

DRIP EDGE

AutoCAD SHX Text

WRAP FASCIA W/ PRE-FINISHED ALUM

AutoCAD SHX Text

CONT. TREATED 2X6 CAP PLATE W/ 3/8" LAG BOLT @ 16" O.C.

AutoCAD SHX Text

6x10x5/16" T/S BEAM

AutoCAD SHX Text

PROVIDE HURRICANE CLIPS @ EACH RAFTER

AutoCAD SHX Text

3/8" LAG BOLTS @ 16" O.C.

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

2X8 LEDGER BOARD

AutoCAD SHX Text

PROVIDE FLASHING AS REQUIRED

AutoCAD SHX Text

(2) ROWS OF 1/2" THRU BOLTS @ 24" O.C.

AutoCAD SHX Text

6x4x3/8" WASHER PLATE

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

3x6x3/8" SHELF W/ (2) 1/2" THRU BOLTS

AutoCAD SHX Text

6x6x3/8" WASHER PLATE

AutoCAD SHX Text

A-1

AutoCAD SHX Text

ELEVATION:PROPOSED

AutoCAD SHX Text

1/4" = 1'-0"

AutoCAD SHX Text

A-1

AutoCAD SHX Text

1

AutoCAD SHX Text

FIRST FLOOR PLAN:PROPOSED

AutoCAD SHX Text

1/4" = 1'-0"

AutoCAD SHX Text

A-1

AutoCAD SHX Text

2

AutoCAD SHX Text

WALL SECTION:PATIO

AutoCAD SHX Text

3/4" = 1'-0"

AutoCAD SHX Text

A-1

AutoCAD SHX Text

3

AutoCAD SHX Text

COLUMN BASE DETAIL

AutoCAD SHX Text

1-1/2" = 1'-0"

AutoCAD SHX Text

A-1

AutoCAD SHX Text

4

AutoCAD SHX Text

FASCIA DETAIL

AutoCAD SHX Text

1-1/2" = 1'-0"

AutoCAD SHX Text

A-1

AutoCAD SHX Text

5

AutoCAD SHX Text

LEDGER BOARD DETAIL

AutoCAD SHX Text

1-1/2" = 1'-0"

AutoCAD SHX Text

A-1

AutoCAD SHX Text

6

AutoCAD SHX Text

NORTH

AutoCAD SHX Text

SHELF ANGLE DETAIL

AutoCAD SHX Text

1-1/2" = 1'-0"

AutoCAD SHX Text

A-1

AutoCAD SHX Text

7

AutoCAD SHX Text

REVISIONS

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

REV #

AutoCAD SHX Text

REV. PER:

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE:

AutoCAD SHX Text

PROJECT NO.

AutoCAD SHX Text

DRAWN BY:

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

T: (708) 407-8028

AutoCAD SHX Text

F: (779) 333-7960

AutoCAD SHX Text

[email protected]

AutoCAD SHX Text


AutoCAD SHX Text

PREVIOUS NO.

AutoCAD SHX Text

EXP. DATE: 11/30/22

AutoCAD SHX Text

DATE: 07/14/21

AutoCAD SHX Text

MICHAEL J. ROOT

AutoCAD SHX Text

No. 001-006715

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

T

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

T

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

O

AutoCAD SHX Text

F

AutoCAD SHX Text

I

AutoCAD SHX Text

L

AutoCAD SHX Text

L

AutoCAD SHX Text

I

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

O

AutoCAD SHX Text

I

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

L

AutoCAD SHX Text

I

AutoCAD SHX Text

C

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

D

AutoCAD SHX Text

A

AutoCAD SHX Text

R

AutoCAD SHX Text

C

AutoCAD SHX Text

H

AutoCAD SHX Text

I

AutoCAD SHX Text

T

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

C

AutoCAD SHX Text

T

17344 Oak Park Ave.,Tinley Park,Illinois 60477Address:

Nick Wnenk

9951 W. 190 th Street, Ste K Mokena, Illinois 60446

(708) 385-4079

[email protected]:Location:

Email:12908 S. Mason

Palos Heights, IL 60463

(708) 372-7541

[email protected]

Phone:

Fax:

Address:

Paul Spass

Primal Cut - Tinley Park, IL

Customer:

Project Information

NanaWall Contact Information

Shipping Information

The NanaWall system allowed us to greatly enhance the living space by seamlessly integrating the indoors with the natural environment. ?Chris Craver, C2 Designs "[NanaWall] help us to design big rather than having to build big." ?Michelle Kaufmann, Mic

To accept this quote and proceed with order, please check here and fax this form to (415) 383-0312 or contact your NanaWall sales representative. Order Agreement documents will then be sent to you.

4232719/14/2020

Custom Quote #Date:

800 873 5673415 383 3148Fax 415 383 0312

100 Meadowcreek Drive #250 Corte Madera , CA [email protected]

Local Sales:

Representative:

Phone:

Current Estimated Delivery: 8-10 weeks from order to jobsite in Illinois

1 of 6


http://now.eloqua.com/e/f2.aspx?elqFormName=QuoteLink&elqSiteID=1745&Description=Testimonial&QuoteSFID=&[email protected]&url=http://media.nanawall.com/quote/gateway.aspx?PageID=31%26QuoteID=423271%26QuoteSalesForceID=

http://now.eloqua.com/e/f2.aspx?elqFormName=QuoteLink&elqSiteID=1745&Description=SlideShow&QuoteSFID=&[email protected]&url=http://www.nanawall.com

100 Meadowcreek Drive #250 Corte Madera, CA [email protected]

800 873 5673415 383 0312Fax 415 383 0312

Date: 9/14/2020Custom Quote # 423271

2 of 6


$8,926Position 1 Subtotal:

Swing/Stacking Direction InwardMounting Floor Mounted with Stainless Steel RollersType of Sill Higher Weather Performance Sill, Thermally BrokenSill Finish Match to Profile FinishGlazing Double Glazed Low E Insulated Tempered 70Lites Standard One LiteGlazing Designation No Capillary TubesGlass Spacer Bar Finish Dark BronzeAluminum Profile Finish (Recyclable aluminum with recycled content)

NanaWall Standard Powder Coated Color: Choose from 50 Standard Colors

Bottom Rail/Kickplate Standard Bottom RailHardware on First Opening Panel(s) Two Point Locking with L Shaped Handle on the Inside and

Flat Handle on the Outside. Thumbturn on the Inside and Key Operation on the Outside.

Upcharge/unit: $351

Hardware Finish on First Opening Panel(s) Stainless Steel with Brushed Satin Finish.Secondary Handle Type 2 point locking with flat handleFinish on Secondary Handles Stainless Steel with Brushed Satin FinishHardware: Handle Height from Bottom of Panel Height in Inches: 18.0"

Notes: AT MINIMUM HANDLE HEIGHTCorner Connector Finish Closest Powder Coated Match to Profile Finish

Performance NotesU Value: 0.32

Configuration 6L0R

Keyed Alike Yes

Nbr of Units 1

Unit Width 16' 8"feet 200inches 5080millimetersUnit Height 4' 6"feet 54inches 1372millimeters

Number of Panels 6

$8,575Base Price/unit

Total Price/unitNumber of unitsExtended Subtotal $8,926

1$8,926

Configuration Notes (Net panel height will be less than 6'8")

SelectionOptions

800 873 5673415 383 0312Fax 415 383 0312

100 Meadowcreek Drive #250 Corte Madera, CA [email protected] SL60CL Product Details

9/14/2020Quote # 423271 Position 1Date

SHGC: 0.19

Total Weight: 450lbs Total weight is approximate and does not include packaging material.

3 of 6


http://now.eloqua.com/e/f2.aspx?elqFormName=QuoteLink&elqSiteID=1745&Description=Direction&QuoteSFID=a0A2K00001nmvU9UAI&[email protected]&url=https://www.nanawall.com/products/sl60cl/options

http://now.eloqua.com/e/f2.aspx?elqFormName=QuoteLink&elqSiteID=1745&Description=Sill&QuoteSFID=a0A2K00001nmvU9UAI&[email protected]&url=https://www.nanawall.com/products/sl60cl/floor-tracks

https://www.nanawall.com/sites/default/files/images/raised-sill.jpg

http://now.eloqua.com/e/f2.aspx?elqFormName=QuoteLink&elqSiteID=1745&Description=Aluminum&QuoteSFID=a0A2K00001nmvU9UAI&[email protected]&url=https://www.nanawall.com/products/sl60cl/aluminum-colors

https://www.nanawall.com/products/aluminum-color-options

http://now.eloqua.com/e/f2.aspx?elqFormName=QuoteLink&elqSiteID=1745&Description=Hardware&QuoteSFID=a0A2K00001nmvU9UAI&[email protected]&url=https://www.nanawall.com/products/sl60cl/locking

http://now.eloqua.com/e/f2.aspx?elqFormName=QuoteLink&elqSiteID=1745&Description=HardwareColor&QuoteSFID=a0A2K00001nmvU9UAI&[email protected]&url=https://www.nanawall.com/products/sl60cl/handles

http://now.eloqua.com/e/f2.aspx?elqFormName=QuoteLink&elqSiteID=1745&Description=SecondaryHandleType&QuoteSFID=a0A2K00001nmvU9UAI&[email protected]&url=https://www.nanawall.com/products/sl60cl/handles

http://now.eloqua.com/e/f2.aspx?elqFormName=QuoteLink&elqSiteID=1745&Description=HandleFinish&QuoteSFID=a0A2K00001nmvU9UAI&[email protected]&url=https://www.nanawall.com/products/sl60cl/handles

https://nanareps.s3.amazonaws.com/JSParser.html?sfid=a092K00001cgMXHQA2

http://media.nanawall.com/quote/gateway.aspx?&PageID=20&QuoteDetailID=0



http://now.eloqua.com/e/f2.aspx?elqFormName=QuoteLink&elqSiteID=1745&Description=Model&QuoteSFID=a0A2K00001nmvU9UAI&[email protected]&url=http://media.nanawall.com/quote/gateway.aspx?PageID=30%26QuoteDetailID=0%26QuoteID=423271%26QuoteSalesForceID=a0A2K00001nmvU9UAI%26QuoteDetailSalesForceID=a092K00001cgMXHQA2

$8,926Position 2 Subtotal:

Swing/Stacking Direction InwardMounting Floor Mounted with Stainless Steel RollersType of Sill Higher Weather Performance Sill, Thermally BrokenSill Finish Match to Profile FinishGlazing Double Glazed Low E Insulated Tempered 70Lites Standard One LiteGlazing Designation No Capillary TubesGlass Spacer Bar Finish Dark BronzeAluminum Profile Finish (Recyclable aluminum with recycled content)

NanaWall Standard Powder Coated Color: Choose from 50 Standard Colors

Bottom Rail/Kickplate Standard Bottom RailHardware on First Opening Panel(s) Two Point Locking with L Shaped Handle on the Inside and

Flat Handle on the Outside. Thumbturn on the Inside and Key Operation on the Outside.

Upcharge/unit: $351

Hardware Finish on First Opening Panel(s) Stainless Steel with Brushed Satin Finish.Secondary Handle Type 2 point locking with flat handleFinish on Secondary Handles Stainless Steel with Brushed Satin FinishHardware: Handle Height from Bottom of Panel Height in Inches: 18.0"

Notes: AT MINIMUM HANDLE HEIGHTCorner Connector Finish Closest Powder Coated Match to Profile Finish

Performance NotesU Value: 0.32

Configuration 0L6R

Keyed Alike Yes

Nbr of Units 1

Unit Width 16' 8"feet 200inches 5080millimetersUnit Height 4' 6"feet 54inches 1372millimeters

Number of Panels 6

$8,575Base Price/unit

Total Price/unitNumber of unitsExtended Subtotal $8,926

1$8,926

Configuration Notes (Net panel height will be less than 6'8")

SelectionOptions

800 873 5673415 383 0312Fax 415 383 0312

100 Meadowcreek Drive #250 Corte Madera, CA [email protected] SL60CL Product Details

9/14/2020Quote # 423271 Position 2Date

SHGC: 0.19

Total Weight: 450lbs Total weight is approximate and does not include packaging material.

4 of 6


http://now.eloqua.com/e/f2.aspx?elqFormName=QuoteLink&elqSiteID=1745&Description=Direction&QuoteSFID=a0A2K00001nmvU9UAI&[email protected]&url=https://www.nanawall.com/products/sl60cl/options

http://now.eloqua.com/e/f2.aspx?elqFormName=QuoteLink&elqSiteID=1745&Description=Sill&QuoteSFID=a0A2K00001nmvU9UAI&[email protected]&url=https://www.nanawall.com/products/sl60cl/floor-tracks

https://www.nanawall.com/sites/default/files/images/raised-sill.jpg

http://now.eloqua.com/e/f2.aspx?elqFormName=QuoteLink&elqSiteID=1745&Description=Aluminum&QuoteSFID=a0A2K00001nmvU9UAI&[email protected]&url=https://www.nanawall.com/products/sl60cl/aluminum-colors

https://www.nanawall.com/products/aluminum-color-options

http://now.eloqua.com/e/f2.aspx?elqFormName=QuoteLink&elqSiteID=1745&Description=Hardware&QuoteSFID=a0A2K00001nmvU9UAI&[email protected]&url=https://www.nanawall.com/products/sl60cl/locking

http://now.eloqua.com/e/f2.aspx?elqFormName=QuoteLink&elqSiteID=1745&Description=HardwareColor&QuoteSFID=a0A2K00001nmvU9UAI&[email protected]&url=https://www.nanawall.com/products/sl60cl/handles

http://now.eloqua.com/e/f2.aspx?elqFormName=QuoteLink&elqSiteID=1745&Description=SecondaryHandleType&QuoteSFID=a0A2K00001nmvU9UAI&[email protected]&url=https://www.nanawall.com/products/sl60cl/handles

http://now.eloqua.com/e/f2.aspx?elqFormName=QuoteLink&elqSiteID=1745&Description=HandleFinish&QuoteSFID=a0A2K00001nmvU9UAI&[email protected]&url=https://www.nanawall.com/products/sl60cl/handles

https://nanareps.s3.amazonaws.com/JSParser.html?sfid=a092K00001cgMXRQA2




http://now.eloqua.com/e/f2.aspx?elqFormName=QuoteLink&elqSiteID=1745&Description=Model&QuoteSFID=a0A2K00001nmvU9UAI&[email protected]&url=http://media.nanawall.com/quote/gateway.aspx?PageID=30%26QuoteDetailID=0%26QuoteID=423271%26QuoteSalesForceID=a0A2K00001nmvU9UAI%26QuoteDetailSalesForceID=a092K00001cgMXRQA2

Total, Supply Only: $18,902

Shipping and Crating $1,050

Subtotal: $17,852

This Quote contains NanaWall’s prices for products based on information, input and specifications provided by Buyer. The product details listed are based on NanaWall standard products and may not conform to project specifications in terms of requirements and/or product performance. NanaWall is not responsible for reviewing or confirming whether its product meets plans and specifications, applicable building codes, or regulations.

Review this Quote carefully to ensure all product details are accurate and correct. It is Buyer’s responsibility to ensure all product details described in this Quote are as requested and appropriate for the project. For further information or assistance on product detail selection, please consult NanaWall’s literature, website, local sales representative or customer service.

Drawings. Standard Product Drawings depicting the product quoted are attached.

Any changes in the dimensions, design or layout made after NanaWall’s preparation of any drawings may result in extra charges at the NanaWall’s discretion for preparation of revised drawings. Any additional charges must be paid before any drawings are revised.

Head Track & Sill Assembly. Head track and sill components may be shipped in segments that will need to be field joined. Contact NanaWall at (800) 873-5673 to request instructions for proper assembly.

Altitude. NanaWall assumes that the products will be installed at altitudes less than 2,500 feet. Notify NanaWall prior to placing your order if installing any products at a higher altitude so breather/capillary tubes can be installed in the glass. Argon is not available if breather or capillary tubes are installed.

PRICING & PAYMENTThe quoted price is valid only for the product details listed and only for 30 days from the date of the Quote. Prices are subject to change if any revisions are made, or if an order is not placed within 30 days from the date of the Quote.

Sales tax is an estimate only and any difference in actual sales tax to be collected will be reflected in the amount of final payment due. NanaWall must have a project tax exemption certificate, or in the case of a reseller a resale certificate, on file for resellers to be exempt from tax collection by NanaWall.

Please call NanaWall customer service at (800) 873-5673 Questions

Important Information

US Dollars

Project Summary (in US Dollars)

100 Meadowcreek Drive #250 Corte Madera, CA [email protected]

800 873 5673415 383 0312Fax 415 383 0312

Date: 9/14/2020Custom Quote # 423271

Estimated delivery time from receipt of signed Order Agreement, initial payment and signed product drawings is 8-10 weeks to jobsite in Illinois. Please discuss with NanaWall or your sales rep if a more definitive delivery date is needed within this time frame.

Estimated Illinois Sales Tax If Applicable

Plus Tax

$1,115.75

Estimated Delivery Time

5 of 6


An initial payment of 50% is due on order and must be received before NanaWall will process an order for production.

The balance of payment for all products shipped Standard Delivery is (1) wire transfer to NanaWall’s bank account to be received by NanaWall before delivery or (2) personal, business or cashier’s check on delivery to be handed over to the common carrier driver.As products are made to order, Buyer may not cancel or change an order once the Order Agreement is signed by NanaWall and Buyer. In the event of Buyer’s repudiation of the Order Agreement, NanaWall remains entitled to the full purchase price as stated in the Order Agreement.

Installation is not included in the above price. NanaWall does not provide installation services; however, installation may be available through independent Certified Installers who have received training on proper methods for installation of NanaWall product. Contact NanaWall or your local sales representative for more information.

SHIPPING & DELIVERYStandard Delivery. The quoted freight amount is based on shipping to Buyer via NanaWall’s standard shipping methods to tailgate/curbside only. Buyer is responsible for unloading the product from the delivery truck, and must plan to have sufficient manpower present for unloading. If the location is not easily accessible by common carrier, shipment will be made to the nearest freight terminal. Alternative shipping methods requested by Buyer may result in additional charges. Buyer can make its own transport arrangements from NanaWall production sites within the U.S., and in the case of international production sites Buyer can make its own transport arrangements from the domestic port of entry.

REVISIONS & SUBMISSIONContact NanaWall to identify any changes or corrections to be made to the information contained in the Quote. NanaWall will review, make accepted changes, and submit a revised Quote.

IF THE QUOTE IS ACCEPTABLE AND BUYER WOULD LIKE TO PROCEED, CHECK THE BOX ON THE FIRST PAGE, AND SUBMIT TO NANAWALL: fax to (415) 383-0312, email to [email protected] or send to your local sales representative. NanaWall will then provide the Order Agreement, a sample of which is available for review upon request. Once provided, the Order Agreement and applicable drawings will govern the sale.

Copyright 2019 Nana Wall Systems, Inc

6 of 6


PLAN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT May 5, 2022 – Public Hearing Schmidt – Corner Lot Fence Setback Variation 7501 Hanover Drive

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Petitioner, Eric Schmidt, is seeking a 10-foot Variation from Section III.J. (Fence Regulations) of the Zoning Ordinance to permit a six-foot-high, privacy-style fence encroaching 10 feet into the required secondary front yard, where a fence encroachment is not permitted at 7501 Hanover Drive. The Petitioner has requested the fence setback Variation to align with the neighbor’s existing fence, provide security from through-traffic along Olcott Avenue, and help conceal two air conditioner units. Secondary front yard fences are required to be located at the building setback line of 25 feet in the R-4 zoning district if it is a privacy fence. Five-foot open style fences may, with administrative approval, encroach up to ten feet in the Required Setback Line of the secondary front yard. Code compliant options could include constructing the six-foot high privacy fence at the 25 foot setback line, or else remain as existing per the previous approval for the five-foot-high open-style fence ten feet into the secondary front yard.

Petitioner Eric Schmidt Property Location 7501 Hanover Drive PIN 27-25-228-001-0000 Zoning R-3 Zoning District Approvals Sought Variation Project Planner Lori Kosmatka, Associate Planner


Schmidt Corner Lot Fence Variation – 7501 Hanover Drive

Page 2 of 9

EXISTING SITE & HISTORY The subject property is located on the southwest corner of Hanover Drive & Olcott Avenue. The lot is approximately 11,340 sq. ft., with 90 feet primary frontage on Hanover Drive, and 126 feet secondary frontage on Olcott Avenue. The home is oriented toward Hanover Drive. The property currently has an existing 5’ tall open style fence that is encroaching ten feet into the 25 foot Required Setback Line on Olcott Avenue (secondary frontage). The existing fence received a ten-foot variance from the Zoning Board of Appeal in 2004. The corner lot home abutting to the south at 7500 Prestwick Drive has an existing six-foot tall privacy fence which currently aligns with the Petitioner’s existing fence. That fence was permitted in 2008 under the previous fence regulations. Further south, the home at 7501 Prestwick also has an existing fence.

Left: View Looking South SW at East Property Line to Sidewalk, Right: View Looking South at 10’ into Required Setback Line of secondary front d



Page 3 of 9

ZONING & NEARBY LAND USES The subject property is a corner lot within the R-3 Zoning District. Residences in the neighborhood are similarly zoned within the R-3 Zoning District. South of 171st Street, there are residences in the R-1 Zoning District. The Zoning Ordinance requires primary and secondary yard setbacks of 25 feet each within the R-3 zoning district. The lot of 11,340 sq. ft. is below the required minimum corner lot size of 12,500 sq. ft. per the Zoning Ordinance, however it is a corner lot platted with additional lot width to help accommodate the corner front yard setback requirements similar to other corner lots in the area. 2018 Fence Regulations After months of discussion between the Zoning Board of Appeals, Plan Commission, and Community Development Committee, the Village Board adopted an ordinance in January 2018, amending the fence regulations for fences within a secondary front yard. The amendment provided clarification to the Code. Previously, the Code was not uniformly enforced, created aesthetic issues in streetscapes, and resulted in many non-conforming fences. It was known when adopting these newer regulations that many existing fences would become legal non-conforming and would be required to come into conformance with the current codes when replacement is necessary. The attached Staff Exhibit (A) indicates a timeline of the corner fence variation history. Section III.J. “Fence Regulations” states that for corner lots, fences are only permitted at or behind the Required Setback Line in the primary front yard and secondary front yard, however, per Section III.J.3., open style fences with a maximum of five feet (5’) in height can, per administrative approval, encroach up to 10 feet into the Required Setback Line in the secondary front yard in the R-4 Zoning District.



Page 4 of 9

VARIATION REQUEST The Petitioner proposes to remove the existing fence and construct new fencing. The Petitioner is requesting a Variation to construct a six-foot (6’) high privacy-style fence to encroach up to ten feet (10’) into the required secondary front yard (red on the plan below). The Petitioner has requested the fence setback Variation to aesthetically align with the neighbor’s existing fence, provide security from through-traffic along Olcott Avenue, and help conceal two air conditioner units (one of which is proposed) at the southeast corner of the home. The Petitioner notes that if complying by code for a six-foot tall privacy fence, it would misalign to the south neighbor, thus creating a ten-foot gap. Staff is concerned about setting a precedent for future variation requests in which there is no clear physical hardship or uniqueness of property. Hardships for a Variation must be related to the physical characteristics of the property and cannot be created by the owner (or previous owners) of the property. The Petitioner has multiple options to comply by code, either by constructing the six-foot high privacy fence at the 25 foot setback line (purple solid line on the plan below), or else remain as existing per the previous approval for the five-foot-high open-style fence ten feet into the secondary front yard (same location as proposed variation; purple dashed line on the plan below). Landscape buffering has been recommended if more privacy is desired with an open-design fence, however the Petitioner has noted previously installed arborvitae had challenges surviving and were removed. Also, while Olcott Avenue serves through-traffic, the adjacent section is residential in nature and not a heavily travelled arterial street. Lastly, a clear, physical hardship is also not present. Aside from the non-conforming current connection point to the south neighbor’s fence, the property is not unique. Furthermore, if the Variation is granted, if the south neighbor eventually wishes to replace their fence, that neighbor will need to meet the code, which would cause a ten-foot gap in the fencing. While new fence meeting code requirements will either misalign or be a different style (open as opposed to privacy) than the neighbor’s non-conforming fence at this time, upon replacement of the neighbor’s fence, that fence will have to comply with code and will have an opportunity to match the subject site’s fence, without needing their own Variation at that time. Granting the Variation may set a precedent for future variation requests in which there is no clear physical hardship or uniqueness of property.



Page 5 of 9

6’ Privacy Fence location Option allowed (code)

5’ Open Fence location Option allowed (existing)

Proposed Fence location (code)

Proposed 6’ Privacy Fence location (variation)

Proposed Fence Locations



Page 6 of 9

STANDARDS FOR A VARIATION Section X.G.4. of the Zoning Ordinance states the Plan Commission shall not recommend a Variation of the regulations of the Zoning Ordinance unless it shall have made Findings of Fact, based upon the evidence presented for each of the Standards for Variations listed below. The Plan Commission must provide findings for the first three standards; the remaining standards are provided to help the Plan Commission further analyze the request.

1. The property in question cannot yield a reasonable return if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by the regulations in the district in which it is located. The subject parcel can still yield a reasonable return under the conditions of the district it is located. The Petitioner has multiple options for a fence that are compliant with the code. In any of the compliant fence scenarios, the location of the fence will not limit the owner’s ability to yield a reasonable return on their property. The Variation does create a more useful property by expanding rear yard.

2. The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances. The subject property does not present a clear or physical hardship related to the property that makes it unique from any other corner lot. It is a corner lot platted with additional lot width to help accommodate the corner front yard setback requirements similar to other corner lots in the area. While a new fence meeting code requirements will either misalign or be a different style (open as opposed to privacy) than the neighbor’s non-conforming fence at this time, upon replacement of the neighbors fence, that fence will have to comply with code and will have an opportunity to match the subject site’s fence, without needing their own Variation at that time.

3. The Variation, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.

The Variation, if granted, will alter the essential character of the locality. Aside from the two properties to the south on Olcott Avenue, the majority of other corner lot properties in the neighborhood do not have any fencing or have fencing that complies with the required setbacks. Those that have been granted Variations have distinguishable differences in their locations addressed with those cases, such as aligning with rear yards. The existing lot is similar to other corner lots in the neighborhood and throughout the Village. The granting of a Variation may establish a precedent that may result in additional Variation requests of similar situations.









Page 7 of 9

f. The proposed Variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to an adjacent property,

or substantially increase the congestion in the public streets, or increase the danger of fire, or endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood.



Page 8 of 9

MOTION TO CONSIDER If the Plan Commission wishes to take action, an appropriate wording of the motions would read: Variation: “…make a motion to recommend that the Village Board grant a 10-foot Variation to the Petitioner, Eric Schmidt, from Section III.J. (Fence Regulations) of the Zoning Ordinance, to permit a six-foot high privacy fence encroaching 10-feet into the required secondary front yard, where a fence encroachment is not permitted at 7501 Hanover Drive in the R-3 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District, consistent with the Submitted Plans and adopt Findings of Fact as proposed by Village Staff in the May 5, 2022 Staff Report.”

[any conditions that the Commissioners would like to add] LIST OF REVIEWED PLANS

Submitted Sheet Name Prepared

By Date On

Sheet Application (Redacted) & Response to Standards Applicant 3/30/22 Applicant Narrative Applicant 4/2022 Plat of Survey (Marked) Applicant 4/2022



Page 9 of 9

Staff Exhibit A

History of Fence Regulations Related to Corner Lots

1956-2005 “Fences in which the opening between the materials of which the fence is constructed represent less than seventy (70) percent of the total surface may be erected to a height not exceeding four (4) feet along the boundaries of a lot, except that no such fence shall be erected within thirty (30) feet of a street intersection. Wire fences and other fences in which the openings between the materials of which the fence is constructed represent more than seventy (70) percent of the total fence area may be erected to a height of six (6) feet, except within thirty (30) feet of a street intersection.”

2007-2009 Corner fences are allowed 10 feet into the required side yard similar to the current regulations and allowed to be 6 foot solid with Zoning Administrator review of visibility. “Fences not exceeding six (6) feet in height above natural grade level projecting not more than ten (10) feet into the required front setback on the side yard street frontage of a corner lot in a residential zoning district, provided that the Zoning Administrator or his designee determines that the provisions of Section III.G of this Ordinance will be maintained and that there will be no obstruction to the visibility of vehicular or pedestrian traffic. If the Zoning Administrator deems that such a visibility obstruction would occur, he may require that portions of or all of the fence be constructed of an open design, or of a shorter height, or a combination of both, or the Zoning Administrator may deny the request. The determination of the Zoning Ordinance may be appealed to the Zoning Board of Appeals pursuant to Section X.F of this Ordinance.”

2011-2017 A chart was created which determined what accessory uses and structures could encroach within a required yard under certain situations. It was here when fences 6 feet in height were permitted as an obstruction within 10 feet of the required secondary front yard. The Zoning Administrator was left to determine if the fence was a visibility obstruction and if it was required to obtain a Variation or not. This process and the standards attached resulted in the inconsistent enforcement of the zoning code requirements and numerous issues that created aesthetic and visibility concerns.

2017-Present

Code Changes were initiated to determine what fences in the secondary front yard should be permitted going forward and to make the regulations clear to residents and staff. The new regulations were reviewed and revised by the Zoning Board of Appeals, Community Development Committee, and the Plan Commission. They were approved by the Village Board in January 2018. The result of the text amendments reduced allowable fences extending into the required secondary front yard to be a maximum 4 feet in height (4’6” posts) and open style (50% open to light and air). When approved it was known that there would be numerous fences that would become legal non-conforming in the Village and would need to come into compliance when their fence needed replacement or adjustment.




AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION TO PERMIT A CORNER FENCE IN A SECONDARY FRONT YARD FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY

LOCATED AT 7501 HANOVER DRIVE





Board of Trustees





AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION TO PERMIT A CORNER FENCE IN A SECONDARY FRONT YARD FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7501

HANOVER DRIVE


WHEREAS, a petition has been filed with the Village Clerk of this Village and has been processed in accordance with the Tinley Park Zoning Ordinance by Eric Schmidt (“Petitioner”), to grant a ten-foot (10’) Variation to permit the construction of a six-foot (6’) tall privacy-style fence encroaching ten-feet into the required twenty-five-foot (25’) secondary front yard, where a fence encroachment is not permitted (“Variation”); and

WHEREAS, the Village of Tinley Park Plan Commission held a Public Hearing on the question of whether the Variation should be granted on May 5, 2022, at the Village Hall of this Village at which time all persons present were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and

WHEREAS, public notice in the form required by law was given of said Public Hearing by publication not more than thirty (30) days nor less than fifteen (15) days prior to said Public Hearing in the Daily Southtown, a newspaper of general circulation within the Village of Tinley Park; and

WHEREAS, after hearing testimony on the petition, the Plan Commission found that the petition did not meet the requisite standards enumerated in the Tinley Park Zoning Ordinance for granting the Variation and voted 3-4 to recommend to the Village President and Board of Trustees for the denial of the Variation; and

WHEREAS, the Plan Commission has filed its report of findings and recommendations regarding the Variation with this Village President and Board of Trustees, and this Board of Trustees has duly considered said report, findings, and recommendations; and

WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities of the Village of Tinley Park, Cook and Will Counties, Illinois, have determined that it is in the best interest of the Village of Tinley Park and its residents to approve said Variation; and




SECTION 2: That the report of findings and recommendations of the Plan Commission are herein incorporated by reference as the findings of this President and the Board of Trustees, as complete as if fully set forth herein at length. This Board finds that the Petitioner have provided evidence establishing that he has met the standards for granting the Variation as set forth in Section X.G.4 of the Zoning Ordinance, and the proposed granting of the Variation as set forth herein are in the public good and in the best interest of the Village and its residents and are consistent with and fosters the purpose and spirit of the Tinley Park Zoning Ordinance.

1. The property in question cannot yield a reasonable return if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by the regulations in the district in which it is located.

The subject parcel can still yield a reasonable return under the conditions of the district it is located. The Petitioner has multiple options for a fence that are compliant with the code. In any of the compliant fence scenarios, the location of the fence will not limit the owner’s ability to yield a reasonable return on their property. The Variation does create a more useful property by expanding rear yard.

2. The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances. The subject property does not present a clear or physical hardship related to the

property that makes it unique from any other corner lot. It is a corner lot platted with additional lot width to help accommodate the corner front yard setback requirements similar to other corner lots in the area. While a new fence meeting code requirements will either misalign or be a different style (open as opposed to privacy) than the neighbor’s non-conforming fence at this time, upon replacement of the neighbors fence, that fence will have to comply with code and will have an opportunity to match the subject site’s fence, without needing their own Variation at that time.

3. The Variation, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. The Variation, if granted, will alter the essential character of the locality. Aside

from the two properties to the south on Olcott Avenue, the majority of other corner lot properties in the neighborhood do not have any fencing or have fencing that complies with the required setbacks. Those that have been granted Variations have distinguishable differences in their locations addressed with those cases, such as aligning with rear yards. The existing lot is similar to other corner lots in the neighborhood and throughout the Village. The granting of a Variation may establish a precedent that may result in additional Variation requests of similar situations.


4. Additionally, the Plan Commission also considered the extent to which the following facts are favorable to the Petitioner based on the established evidence:







SECTION 3: The Variation set forth herein below shall be applicable to the following described property:

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 212 IN GALLAGHER AND HENRY’S FAIRMONT VILLAGE UNIT 4A, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE NORTH ½ OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE 12 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED DECEMBER 10, 1997 AS DOCUMENT NO. 97929012 AND CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 98074589, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS.


COMMONLY KNOWN AS: 7501 Hanover Drive, Tinley Park, Illinois

SECTION 4: A ten-foot (10’) Variation from Section III.J (Fence Regulations) of the Zoning Ordinance, to permit a six-foot (6’) high privacy-style fence to extend ten-feet (10’) into the required twenty-five-feet (25’) secondary front yard where a fence encroachment is not permitted is hereby granted to the Petitioner in the R-3 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District at the above-mentioned Property, in accordance with the “List of Reviewed Plans” attached hereto as Exhibit A.





PASSED THIS 7TH day of June 2022.

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

APPROVED THIS 7TH day of June 2022.


ATTEST:

__________________________________ VILLAGE CLERK


STATE OF ILLINOIS )

COUNTY OF COOK ) SSCOUNTY OF WILL )

CERTIFICATE



copy of Ordinance No. 2022-O-035, “AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION TO

PERMIT A CORNER FENCE IN A SECONDARY FRONT YARD FOR CERTAIN

PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7501 HANOVER DRIVE,” which was adopted by the President and

Board of Trustees of the Village of Tinley Park on June 7, 2022.


the Village of Tinley Park this 7TH day of June 2022.

____________________________________ VILLAGE CLERK


Exhibit A

Per the May 5, 2022 Plan Commission Public Hearing Staff Report


1



SUBJECT: MINUTES OF THE MAY 5, 2022 REGULAR MEETING

ITEM #1: PUBLIC HEARING – 7501 HANOVER DRIVE, SCHMIDT – CORNER FENCE VARIATION

Consider recommending that the Village Board grant Eric Schmidt (property owner) a Variation from Section III.J. of the Zoning Code (Fence Regulations) at the property located at 7501 Hanover Drive in the R-3 Single Family Residential zoning district. This Variation would permit the Petitioner to install a six-foot (6’) high closed privacy style fence to encroach ten feet (10’) into the required secondary front yard where a privacy fence is not permitted.

Present Plan Commissioners: Chairman GrayJames GaskillAngela GattoAndrae MarakKen ShawEduardo ManiKurt Truxal

Absent Plan Commissioners: None

Village Officials and Staff: Dan Ritter, Planning ManagerLori Kosmatka, Associate Planner

Petitioners: Eric Schmidt, 7501 Hanover Drive


CHAIRMAN GRAY introduced Item #1 and asked for a motion to open the public hearing. Motion made by COMMISSIONER GASKILL seconded by COMMISSIONER GATTO. CHAIRMAN GRAY requested a voice vote asking if any were opposed to the motion; hearing none, he declared the motion carried.

CHAIRMAN GRAY noted he received certification that the public hearing notice was published in a local newspaper. Anyone wishing to speak on this matter will be sworn in to speak but after staff’s presentation. He asked staff to proceed with the presentation.

Lori Kosmatka, Associate Planner, presented the report. She summarized the history and existing conditions of the site, provided the zoning regulations, the proposed fence variation, background considerations for corner fence variations, and code compliant options. She noted that the Petitioner is present.

CHAIRMAN GRAY asked the Petitioner to approach the lectern.

Eric Schmidt, Petitioner, was sworn in. He explained that his neighbor’s fence is a white 6-foot vinyl privacy fence that is only 14 years old, and that the useful life of a vinyl privacy fence is approximately 30 years. By removing his fence and moving it in on the setback, he felt it will create a massive hardship and a tense situation with my neighbor as the fence along the back is ours, and that would be replaced too. Thus, it would create a ten-foot gap in their fence that under the current zoning regulations, they would not be able to repair a fix. It would force them to have to replace their entire fence to close off their yard. That neighbor just recently put a hot tub in their yard. He said because that gap is bigger than eight feet, they will not be able to repair it. He said, however, being allowed to put the fence where


2

the fence exists now creates no gap, it’s congruent and it’s in keeping with the neighborhood in general. Along Olcott, there are ten corner lots, currently six have six-foot vinyl privacy fences, and of that six, one has one that’s at the required setback per the zoning, but there’s no fence that abuts that. The people behind left their back yard open. As far as closing it off, we have three children at home, which is the reason for privacy. Sometimes it’s easier to have them in the back yard do their thing. Olcott does get a lot of traffic. It’s the only major artery between Harlem and 80th Avenue that runs from 171st to 167th. The Tinley Park Police Department has conducted at least two traffic studies over the last six years on the street. It’s a main artery for the kids walking to the elementary school, and we are right next to the retention pond where there’s flag football and lacrosse practice, general playing, and golfing. The biggest concern for him was the neighbors to the rear because that creates a massive hardship for them. That fence is nowhere near needing to be replaced. It was installed in 2008.

CHAIRMAN GRAY thanked the Petitioner and asked the Commissioners for some of their comments.

COMMISSIONER GASKILL had no questions.

COMMMISSIONER TRUXAL asked if the rear neighbors have an existing six-foot-high fence.

The Petitioner responded yes.

COMMMISSIONER TRUXAL noted the fence between the Petitioner and his rear neighbor is the Petitioner’s fence, so when he will replace fence if we change the setback, then there would be a ten-foot gap.

The Petitioner responded yes, at the back on the north.

COMMISSIONER TRUXAL asked if the Petitioner’s fence would be the same material and color as the neighbor’s existing fence.

The Petitioner responded it would the same material, different colors. Theirs is white, ours is a stone slate color just in keeping with the color of our home. It’s a little bit darker than khaki by about one shade.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, noted that in talking with our Director, they can replace the ten-foot gap with the six-foot solid fence. We’ve offered that solution as a kind of a temporary solution until the neighbor would move their fence when they go to replace it. We would essentially allow them to move that portion of the fence to their neighbor’s yard.

COMMISSIONER TRUXAL noted that the rear section of the fence would match up with the neighbor’s existing side fence.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, noted the Village allows eight-foot sections to get replaced. This is a ten-foot one so our Director and Village Manager would approve of it as a temporary solution so that way it still matches the neighbor’s fence so that can be replaced with the permit.

CHAIRMAN GRAY asked who would pay for the ten-foot gap fence.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, responded that it would be up to them, whoever wanted to pay for it and whatever side they wanted to put it on. There’s an existing fence out there now which they can keep, or if they were going to put a new one in there, to match what they were doing.

CHAIRMAN GRAY noted they could leave what’s existing there and when they take down the fence, they would leave the ten-foot section of existing and then replace with the slate fence.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, noted they could alternatively do a new one that matches either theirs or their neighbors. Whatever they want to do for that ten-foot, we could approve that temporarily, because when the neighbor goes to replace theirs then that will go away.

COMMISSIONER TRUXAL asked if the rear neighbor replaces their fence, would they have to conform with the setbacks and pull theirs back, too.


3

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, responded yes. When you move codes to become stricter, you can get some of these awkward situations. It could be fences, home setbacks. If you make it stricter at any point, you have things that are nonconforming out there and next to each other that can be different with ones meeting it and ones not. The goal is eventually over time you would be conforming over the years. It is tough with home setbacks because homes generally don’t get demolished and replaced every ten or fifteen years. Those can go hundreds of years where fences would be a quicker turnaround.

CHAIRMAN GRAY asked the Petitioner if he’s just requesting the variation so he can meet the fence line with his existing rear neighbor.

The Petitioner responded that is a main part of it. He asked to address what Mr. Ritter said. Arbitrarily granting a ten-foot extension is in direct violation of the zoning code. Where you can replace eight-foot sections, you just said we could grant a ten-foot permit, but that would require a variance under the same guidelines as this. He asked if this was correct.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, responded it would allow you to move the fence from your side.

The Petitioner asked if it would still require a variance for that neighbor.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, responded no. They are basically allowing it to shift if it would be one foot over, but the fence is there.

The Petitioner commented that seemed arbitrary. The code says 8-foot sections can be repaired, but Mr. Ritter just stated they’ll allow a 10 foot one.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, noted that it would be temporary.

The Petitioner commented that would be another 14 years.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, clarified at that point it would go away. It’s not a variance that would run with the land.

The Petitioner commented that he looked up a couple of the past ones. Last summer, there were variances granted on Carlsbad and Arcadia, near Ridgeland Avenue south of 167th.. In one of those cases, the staff recommended a twelve-foot variance instead of a ten-foot variance because one of the houses already had a 12 foot variance. The spirit of the regulation and the code requirement was aesthetics. If the houses are setback far enough there’s not a visibility issue, there’s no abutting driveways. Being a corner lot, we’re set back far enough that you can make a turn. We’re not coming to the front of the house. In keeping with the spirit of the code change, which at that point becomes aesthetics, the Commission has previously granted twelve-foot variations to match a neighbor’s nonconforming fence when they only requested 10 so it abuts and remains congruent with the existing neighbor’s fence. That occurred at 6342 Carlsbad.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, clarified that we did not recommend that.

The Petitioner commented that he has placed thousands of dollars into this property he just purchased in September to keep it looking nice. Corner houses set the tone for the neighborhood. He does not want to put a hardship on his neighbor. The lines remain congruent. It’s not out of place in the neighborhood. There are multiple homes in the area that fences went in in 2014-2017 on the corner of Olcott and 171st and 174th that are at the ten-foot line.

COMMISSIONER GASKILL noted that now the ten-foot section can be repaired, and we’re talking about a variance that you want to move the fence.

The Petitioner commented it is about aesthetics at that point which is the spirit of the code change. Now you’re going to have a fence that comes back at 25 feet, jogs over 10 feet and then goes back to the front of the neighbor’s property. This team has previously granted variances that are beyond the ten foot to keep congruency between the fences. The spirit of the code change was aesthetics. It looks bad if everybody has mismatched fences and things are out of whack


4

and out of line. Generally, aesthetics are subjective but we can agree what looks appropriate and what doesn’t. A ten-foot lag looks out of place.

COMMISSIONER GASKILL asked why he didn’t just come in for that actual reason.

The Petitioner noted that was the primary reason and was in his written response.

COMMISSIONER TRUXAL asked to see page 2 on the slides to see the images of the existing fences. He noted it’s to replace the existing white five-foot high fence. You can see down the fence line to the rear where it goes up to six feet. He asked if this is for a ten-foot variance. There are two panels coming out. Taking those away would bring you to basically the window well to the corner of the home.

The Petitioner noted there’s about six inches as it is setback 25.42 feet from the side of the house to the approximate 1 foot from the sidewalk.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, clarified the 12-foot request was the other way. They had requested 12 feet variance, and what was recommended from the Plan Commission and approved was 10 feet. They requested 12 feet and got approval for 10.

COMMISSIONER MARAK asked if we go with the current code, would the hookup be an angle. He has a hard time visualizing what the hookup to the neighbor’s fence would be. He asked if it would end up connecting the two by dissecting it at an angle.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, clarified it would only be a couple inches. They could drop it down and bring it over. It wouldn’t be a hard angle, but they could it a little on an angle or they could flatten it and do a little connection piece between. It would look like their fences bumped out ten feet or at least until they replace it.

COMMISSIONER GATTO had no questions.

COMMISSIONER MANI noted he understood the concerns regarding aesthetics and expanding the playground area for the children. He likes it and is good for him.

COMMISSIONER SHAW had no questions.

CHAIRMAN GRAY appreciated the Petitioner’s testimony. He noted Staff had a concern about setting a precedent. In 14 years or whenever the neighbor has to replace their fence, they may point to your fence and say it doesn’t match up and you get this domino effect of neighbors getting variations down the line. The code did change after 2017. He understood the Petitioner’s concerns and feels there is a good argument for this. He asked if the Petitioner has talked to his neighbor possibly about it. He asked who would pay for it.

The Petitioner said they have spoken and haven’t decided who would pay. The neighbor was very displeased on it being a gap and affecting the general look. A lot of this is aesthetics for the community. Fairfield Village is kind of tight. We moved in September but just from the other side of 171st on Ottawa. A lot of our friends are there. The aesthetics are important to everybody. When the legal notices came out, people came up and asked what they were supposed to do. A couple people called and wanted everything to look clean.

CHAIRMAN GRAY noted he understood. In terms of unique physical properties, there’s not a uniqueness, but he can’t imagine a neighbor would put up money to erect a ten-foot section when it’s not his project to begin with. There has to be another conversation or something. This puts a twist into it. He had no other comments. He asked if there were any other comments from the Commissioners. Hearing none, he offered the Petitioner to take a seat.

The Petitioner thanked everyone for their time.

CHAIRMAN GRAY entertained a motion to close the public hearing.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, noted that if the Commissioners want to discuss at all to see where you’re at because for the most part when Staff drafted the standards, we didn’t have anything that would meet those standards. It’s fairly


5

negative because we don’t have something that is unique related to the property. If you’re thinking that you’re going to recommend approval, then we need direction from a response from the Commission on each of those standards. That’s ultimately what you guys are voting and then sending to the Village Board. We want that go to along with what you recommend. If someone feels it does meet the standards, then vocalize that a little bit.

CHAIRMAN GRAY asked that if there were any Commissioners that would vote yes for the variation.

COMMISSIONER GATTO responded she would, that it would conform with the neighbors, and is a vinyl fence which will last years. Most people are going to come back in 15 years and ask for a variance to meet up to the one that he puts in if he does have to redo it. She agrees with it. There are variations for everything. You want it to conform and not put a neighbor out and cause any tiff between neighbors. It just causes problems. She didn’t see there being an issue with this at all.

COMMISSIONER MANI concurred with COMMISSIONER GATTO. It goes with the whole neighborhood. If it was a new development that everyone was doing fences at the setback and nobody was any different, and all were the same cookie cutter, then it may look out of place. But since this neighborhood has a mixture of fences up to the zero setback to ten or twelve, to him it falls in and makes it a neighborhood. Having the Petitioner meet the fence aesthetically and not having to jog, is great, plus he wants a larger area for his children. He would vote yes.

CHAIRMAN GRAY reminded that the ordinance that went in 2018. The fence is six-foot high so it would match it, as privacy style for his three little children. It would encroach on the ten feet, but it would be matching the existing. He wanted to make sure that is clear from what the new code requires.

COMMISSIONER SHAW appreciated the Petitioner’s concerns and interests, as well as the Commissioner’s comments. He agrees with Staff in that he doesn’t see a compelling argument here in line with the code. When the new code was adopted, there was quite a bit of discussion, public hearing. Many of these types of situations were considered. While he sympathizes, he doesn’t find it compelling under the code and would not support it.

COMMISSIONER GASKILL agrees and has no support for this.

COMMISSIONER TRUXAL feels it would be an improvement to the existing fence and it would match the neighbor’s fence line. It would not look as good if you had that ten-foot section stick out. He would be in approval for the request.

COMMISSIONER MARAK is with COMMISSIONER SHAW. If one could run an angle fence from the one to the other one, he doesn’t think that would be aesthetically unpleasing. Nobody mentioned about it having a larger yard. He finds that compelling as a property owner having a bigger back yard that you could use in that space. He does not support it.

CHAIRMAN GRAY noted he agrees with COMMISSIONERS SHAW, GASKILL, & MARAK. The code isn’t always forgiven for what was done in the past, but is trying to set new rules for a precedent. He agrees with the staff report. It will cause a domino effect even 14 years from now if your neighbor wants to swap out their fence. If you got a variance, then he’s going to get a variance. When we came together for these fence regulations and looking at whether there’s a unique physical property. Just because it’s a corner lot doesn’t fulfill that. The Petitioner makes a compelling case on having a hardship with the neighbor on if something changes with that gap, but there’s not a concrete solution on how that’d be resolved in his opinion. He would say no to it as well. This is informal as we haven’t voted on it.

COMMISSIONER SHAW noted each situation has to be considered on its own merits. While it’s important to be neighborly and be considerate of the impact on the neighbor, any property owner would be within the rights to remove their fence on their own. In that case, that would leave the neighbor’s entire rear yard unfenced. While it might be considered unneighborly, it is an owner’s prerogative to make that decision for their own property. It’s positive and good to be considerate of the impact on your neighbor. In the end it’s the neighbor’s responsibility for their own yard.

COMMISSIONER MANI asked staff for clarification. If people want to replace a fence that is nonconforming, can you only do an eight-foot section?


6

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, responded yes, you can do maintenance and replace up to eight feet. In this one we’re saying this is a unique situation.

COMMISSIONER MANI felt that if people want to update their fences, it will start to look patchy, if one section is repaired one year, and another replaced another year.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, responded the goal would be they have to replace it if it needs complete replacement and has deteriorated. The maximum amount allowed is there just to allow some small maintenance to the posts. A fence is required to be a consistent design and look.

COMMISSIONER MANI noted when we updated the code in 2018, he was one of the persons against it. Having property, I want to enjoy my property, I want to add a fence to contain my back yard. If I have dogs or cats, I’ll know they are within the confines. It’s your property. The Petitioner is keeping with the theme of the neighborhood and within the characteristics. If everyone wanted to replace it with the current code, then there would be a lot of homes that will have no fences because they have to comply, and it doesn’t work anymore. In his opinion, this code section is detrimental, personally and as an aesthetic of neighborhoods and such.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, responded that if a commissioner believed a request didn’t meet the standards but thought it was an acceptable proposal, the best thing would be to vocalize what they would like to see changed in the code for everyone in the village. A Commissioner could say the code is not what they like either and maybe here’s a recommendation of how you could tweak it that would apply everywhere. If most of the commission liked the idea, then staff could complete some research on making that potential text amendment. We still allow the fence to go where they have a fence now, it’s just not privacy. That’s where it was decided, if you’re going to bump out it’s got to be open because with all the situations of corner lots, you could get situations where that fence could be out in someone’s front yard. It’s difficult because you’re balancing a lot of situations. If it’s only two homes back-to-back, we may feel those situations are different, then that’s the type of feedback we’d like to hear to maybe discuss separate from an actual case, you could give us some guidance if you guys had a recommendation to change fence requirements. We’re getting these variations so we see a situation that makes sense why we would want a fence there but it’s not meeting the standards. Maybe we do a discussion when we have time about changing the code as it exists today.

COMMISSIONER SHAW stated we do have a code for a reason. There’s no code that can be perfect. It’s not going to be right sized in each situation. When we revised the code, one of the pieces of research done was the number of variances that had come through and approved for rather common-sense reason. We have a variance process because the code is not perfect. If the code was perfect, then there would be no such thing as a variance. If we have an application that meets hardship standards, then a variance can be granted. When we went through the process, one of the things that was added to it was giving greater administrative approval so that things that fell within what would be deemed reasonable by staff did not have to go for an official variance as it could be an administrative variance. From reading the report, staff has determined that there are a few different avenues to mee the administrative approach if not the code itself. The existing fence could be replaced as is with a spaced five-foot fence. A newer version of what’s there could be an administrative approval. It could be pulled back to the line for a six-foot privacy. There’s a number of options to meet code. He doesn’t see a hardship. He sympathizes the desire to be consistent and aesthetically pleasing, but he can’t see it within the confines of the code.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, noted that fence codes are difficult. One would think there is a universal code that keeps everyone happy for every town, but if you give more flexibility to have people do fences that can go all the way out to sidewalks, then you start getting visibility concerns. You start having fences that are really prominent in subdivisions that can take away from the overall look. Some towns don’t allow any encroachment into those front yards, such as Frankfort. New Lenox allows 20 feet, but it has to be open design, and if not it has to be setback. Joliet lets you do a privacy fence all around the property wherever you want, but then you have someone looking out their picture window and there’s a fence out there if you’re the second one in. You take all those options and ask where our community is going to fit in. In 2018 it sounds like there was a lot of discussion and different possibilities of what each looked like. He thinks we picked a middle-ground. It is unique to each town. He asked if we should allow privacy fences wherever we want or dial it back and see homes we don’t want fences to stand out and be the most prominent visible part. It’s difficult to look at all the situations.


7

COMMISSIONER MANI agreed there can’t be one code to make everyone happy. The Petitioner did his research on fences granted and just asked for something similar. Based on the poll it seems this won’t pass. He feels the fence code should be relooked at because it’s flawed.

CHAIRMAN GRAY asked if the Petitioner had anything to add.

The Petitioner noted the points made were abundantly clear that the code was in place for aesthetic reasons. Routinely variations are granted for open style fences. Radcliffe Place on the other side of 175th, open style fences are allowed to come to the sidewalk. 17501 Humber was approved in the summer. It becomes arbitrary at that point. I asked about an administrative approval without going through this process. I read the code and saw there is a path for an administrative variance. I was told that “we never use that, we talked to our lawyers and that shouldn’t even be in there because everything needs to come to the commission”

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, clarified that it was not an administrative one. That would be them approving that and it ending here. It’s for the ZBA cases. What you were quoting was a side yard setback which is related to a principal structure. It doesn’t meet state law.

The Petitioner rebutted that it’s still in there.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, noted it also says if something’s not compliant with state law. That would have just said if they said this is approved, it would have been approved tonight, but you still would have had to go through a public hearing.

The Petitioner noted it would have seemed more genuine for the Commission if you don’t like privacy fences, then say that because variations are routinely granted. 6342 Arcadia and 6342 Carlsbad was approved, and the underlying reason was the aesthetics and keeping in the form with what was already there. What didn’t come up in the staff report is the three houses n a row, so my neighbor to the rear and the neighbor across the street from them. Across the street from the neighbor, it abuts to 171st and down Olcott, their privacy fence is brick. It’s more than 10 feet off the property and it has ten feet sections in between each brick column. That fence isn’t going anywhere. As far as a hardship, having an issue with your neighbor is a hardship. Telling your neighbor, they need to replace a section to close an area off is a very uncomfortable situation. It is a massive financial hardship for them. Denying the request, you’re going against the spirit of the code, it’s to keep things looking nice because the Commission routinely approves fence variations.

CHAIRMAN GRAY noted to the Petitioner the report had options to comply by code or meet administrative approval. One of the options would be to bring the fence back in, so you would effectively lessen your backyard. There are other options. He understands the aesthetics. He asked if the Petitioner considered the options.

The Petitioner responded yes. Olcott Avenue is an artery as it is the only way in and out to the elementary school. The buses go down, there’s walkers, golfers, and the lacrosse team practices, the flag football practices. He likes to eat dinner with his family in the summer outside. That’s why he wants a privacy fence. As far as other options, arborvitaes go up all the time. He has about 12 holes alongside the fence along the house where artborvitae had been planted multiple times in talking to the neighbors. Part of the utility and drainage easement is that secondary front yard is incredibly wet. When Lori came to take pictures, it was wet. Arborvitaes will not row there. Building a berm would actually change the flow of water in the area, bring water back onto the property and put more water back toward the street. That’s not an option. Regarding him not mentioning the size of the yard, it is in the staff report. His lot is 1,100 square feet smaller than what are typically required for corner lots on houses being built. The required lot size for a corner house were part of the discussions when the new fence requirements were put in place. He thinks his is 11,343 square feet, and the required corner lot size for homes going up now in R-3 and R-4 is 12,500. There’s still 15 feet to the street. He’s not coming forward on the house and is not closing anything off. He's changing landscaping a little bit on the side of the house to put a swing there, so when the boys are playing football, we can sit out there and watch them. He’s not looking to close himself off from the neighborhood. He’s just looking to close off his backyard and keep things looking nice. It’s the most important thing to the zoning board. It was based on aesthetics. To say it’s not is disingenuous. Routinely, variations are approved and documented to keep congruency between the fences.


8

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, noted aesthetics is part of it. The concern is that the hardship still needs to be something related to the property. Otherwise, if it’s whether you have dogs or kids, it starts to become a personal hardship, which everyone understands. That’s where making decisions on personal hardships can start to erode the code because it depends on the person’s situation. It is a hardship, but it’s a personal one.

The Petitioner responded having to force his neighbor’s hand is a hardship and that could spill over. It’s a personal one for now, but if the neighbor becomes very angry and then the police are involved, then it’s a community hardship.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, responded personal hardships are people-oriented rather than related to the property. It depends on who is standing up here and what’s their personal situation which could change. The zoning code has to by state law not make it personal. It can’t be whether a person has kids.

The Petitioner responded noting the addresses 6342 Arcadia, 6342 Carlsbad, 6350 181st Street, 17501 Humber Lane. Those were done in 2020. He appreciated the time and thanked everyone.

CHAIRMAN GRAY noted each case is different. He is unsure what the uniqueness is or not. He noted Lori had shaked her head and asked her if the trees were very wet along the interior of that fence and trees that would be able to shroud or screen aren’t able to successfully find root.

Lori Kosmatka, Associate Planner, responded that it was wet recently, and she saw the holes. The ground was soft.

CHAIRMAN GRAY asked the Petitioner when he had tried planting the trees.

The Petitioner responded he never did. The people he purchased the house from did. You can see them on Google Earth as that wasn’t updated yet. They were golden. When he spoke to his neighbors before he knew about the arborvitaes, he asked what the holes were. The neighbor said the previous owner put up arborvitaes and then again four years later. They turned golden because it’s consistently wet. There’s a drainage easement on the back side that kind of runs off onto the secondary yard there too. It’s consistently wet.

CHAIRMAN GRAY noted he was curious because that is part of the property. He asked staff how they view it if there’s an issue where they can’t do a work around with the existing.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, responded he doesn’t know if there’s a solution such as different plantings that would survive there. If you could say nothing could live there, then that is something more related to the property and not a personal circumstance, but you could still have a solid fence on the property that meets the code.

CHAIRMAN GRAY asked the Petitioner if moving the fence line in along the brick line of the house along the yard is not an option.

The Petitioner responded no, that it would look terrible. We’re talking almost 90 feet by 10 feet it cuts off almost 1,000 square feet from the backyard now. He’s not looking to build there or put a patio in that ten feet or extend the house or building line, but it is usable space. He apologized that he didn’t reiterate that. We are 1,110 square feet smaller than what current requirements are in place for corner lots of 12,500 square feet. We’re 11,343 square feet. That was definitely a factor when the new fencing requirements went into place.

CHAIRMAN GRAY asked if anyone on the Commission had a change in their informal vote. There was no response.

The Petitioner thanked everyone.

CHAIRMAN GRAY asked if there’s no further discussion, then he would like to entertain a motion to close the public hearing. Motion made by COMMISSIONER SHAW, seconded by COMMISSIONER GASKILL. CHAIRMAN GRAY requested a voice vote; hearing no opposition, the motion carried. He asked Staff to present the Standards.

Lori Kosmatka, Associate Planner, presented the Standards. She noted the drafted findings are not in support of the variation.


9

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, clarified that the first three are state law required standards, and the others are just considerations which the Village has adopted.

CHAIRMAN GRAY requested a motion for the variations.

Motion 1 – Variation for Fence

COMMISSIONER MANI made a motion to recommend that the Village Board grant a 10-foot Variation to the Petitioner, Eric Schmidt, from Section III.J. (Fence Regulations) of the Zoning Ordinance, to permit a six-foot high privacy fence encroaching 10-feet into the required secondary front yard, where a fence encroachment is not permitted at 7501 Hanover Drive in the R-3 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District, consistent with the Submitted Plans and adopt Findings of Fact as proposed by Village Staff in the May 5, 2022 Staff Report.” Motion seconded by COMMISSIONER GATTO. Vote taken by roll call; the vote was 3-4. Ayes were by COMMISSIONERS GATTO, MANI, & TRUXAL. Nays were by COMMISSIONERS GASKILL, MARAK, SHAW, and CHAIRMAN GRAY. CHAIRMAN GRAY declared the motion as not carried. He noted that this item ends here, and asked Staff for further instructions.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, noted this will still go to Village Board Tuesday May 17th for First Reading. Since it’s not unanimous it would have to go to two meetings at the Board. He noted the Petitioner is welcome to attend. We can be in contact with you. He noted that with a 3-4 vote that may catch their attention and they may ask if you have anything to add.

CHAIRMAN GRAY wished him luck and thanked him for his time.


May 5, 2022 – Public Hearing

Oak Ridge Subdivision (DR Horton) – Final PUD Approval SEC Ridgeland Ave. & Oak Forest Ave.

The Petitioner, DR Horton Inc - Midwest, is a national home builder and developer

proposing to develop a ±39.19 acres of vacant land for Oak Ridge Subdivision. The location

of the development is on a portion of the former Panduit Corporation property located on

the southeast corner of Ridgeland Avenue and Oak Forest Avenue. The development

includes 162 attached single-family townhomes and 81 detached single-family homes. The

Petitioner received rezoning (to R-5) and preliminary PUD approvals from the Village Board

on January 18, 2022 for the development. The Petitioner is presenting final documents,

including HOA covenants and Plat of Subdivision, in substantial compliance with the

Preliminary Approvals.

The December 12, 2021 Staff Report from the Preliminary PUD Approval is attached as a

reference for the overall project, site history, zoning, etc. This Staff Report addresses the

final documents and any significant changes or clarifications made between the

preliminary and final approvals.

Petitioner

DR Horton Inc - Midwest

Property Location

SEC Ridgeland Ave. &

Oak Forest Ave.

PINs

28-29-200-030-0000

28-29-200-036-0000

28-29-300-041-0000

Zoning

R-5 (Low Density

Residential)

Approvals Sought

• Special Use for a

Final PUD

• Final Plat Approval

Project Planner

Daniel Ritter, AICP

Planning Manager


Oak Ridge Subdivision Final PUD Approval

Page 2 of 12

Special Use for a PUD

The Special Use is being requested so that the PUD allows some additional control of the development for the Village

in the future but also provides flexibility in the zoning regulations that are sometimes difficult to adhere to on infill

development projects.

There are various approval levels that bring different review processes and entitlements with PUDs. Most often, PUD

changes are minor and they can go straight to final approval. However, in bigger and multi-phased development

“Conceptual” and “Preliminary” approvals are important. By spreading out the review into different categories, the

level of detail becomes clearer. This is a benefit to the Plan Commission and Village Board to better understand the

specific PUD’s proposal and purpose. It also benefits the developer by having them only spend time and money

developing plans they need. Preliminary and Final approvals, including a public hearing and a recommendation, will

then be forwarded from the Plan Commission to the Village Board of Trustees for final action.

Conceptual approval was not requested by the developer and instead they went directly to the Preliminary Approvals

which give specific assurances on zoning. The preliminary approvals were given on January 18, 2022. The final plans,

plats, and CC&R’s are all presented and must be in substantial compliance with the preliminary plans, and public

hearing discussions. Preliminary approval essentially gave them the ability to construct what they are proposing and

the final PUD plans and Final Plat approval are further detailed and give a clearer sense of the development.

The Petitioner noted at the preliminary approval they will start the project in Spring/Summer 2022 with site

development and utilities taking around a year to complete. The project will be built at the same time the site

development was being completed. The sales program is expected to be 3-4 years until completion but is market-

dependent.

Phasing

The Preliminary Approval had noted the development to be subdivided and constructed in one phase. However, one

change from the preliminary approval is the development will be constructed in two phases with only certain utilities

installed under the first phase (phasing plan attached in packet). The reasoning behind the phasing is the difficulty in

getting materials and length of time with construction. However, the Petitioner has agreed to supply a Letter of Credit

(LOC) guarantee for all public improvements on both phases. Additionally, the entire development will be platted at

one time. The plan is still subject to final engineering review and approval, particularly in regards to utility routing.

Open Item #1: Review request to change from a single phased development to two phases. Staff recommends a

condition for future clarification that the LOC submitted shall include guarantees for the whole project, the project

shall be platted at one time, and the phasing plan is subject to final engineering approval.

Staff has reviewed the phasing plan and had one concern with regards to lots 77-81 and the adjacent public roadway

(Leinster Lane) and utility work. If there was no potential for redevelopment of the former ABC Supply parcels (17201

Ridgeland Ave), the preference is to have this work completed as part of Phase 1 so that the work around the public

park is completed to avoid active construction around it for an extended number of years. There are concerns that if

someone came to redevelop the lot and tie into the proposed roadway and utilities (separate from DR Horton), this

would be delayed an indefinite amount of time with a disconnected utility/roadway network. However, by constructing

those specific public improvements with Phase 1, there is some added time and costs with the additional cul-de-sac

roadway work that may not be needed if the ABC site is redeveloped.

As an alternative, staff has proposed, and the Petitioner agreed, to making a condition that adjacent public

improvements (utilities, roadway, sidewalks, etc.) will need to be completed for the right of-way adjacent to lots 77-



Page 3 of 12

81, within 1 year after approval of any redevelopment plan of the former ABC Supply property. In that situation, the

cul-de-sac and utility connection can be coordinated with that redevelopment.

Open Item #2: Review suggestion to condition the approval on the completion of all adjacent public improvements

(utilities and streets) will need to be completed for the right-of-way adjacent to lots 77-81, within one year after

approval of a redevelopment plan of the former ABC Supply property (17201 Ridgeland Ave).

Exceptions Requested

Any items that don’t meet the Zoning Ordinance are considered “Exceptions” instead of Variations and covered by the

PUD approval. While it is not necessary to call out every Exception shown in the corresponding PUD Exhibits and

plans, staff often outlines these so that the Plan Commission, Village Board, and future owners can understand what

specific flexibility is being given to the development through the PUD process. The three exceptions below were

reviewed and approved with the preliminary approval.

1. Waiver of First-Floor Rear Brick on Townhomes

2. Partial Waiver of First-Floor Side Brick on Townhomes

3. Detached Single-Family Lot Coverage – Allow lot coverage of up to 40% on all lots is proposed, as opposed

to a maximum of 35% permitted by the Zoning Ordinance.

PUD Restrictions Proposed

In additional to Exceptions from the Zoning Ordinance, PUDs can conversely have additional restrictions and

requirements. Most detached single-family neighborhoods are in R-1 to R-4 zoning districts, so most of the restrictions

include din this PUD are proposed to help note certain issues and control any negative consequences of denser

detached single-family home developments. Some of these “restrictions” are already Zoning Code requirements but

have been added to the list for clarity purposes. The additional restrictions were reviewed and approved with the

preliminary approval unless otherwise noted and are listed below.

1. The detached single-family home portion of the development is only permitted to have detached single-

family homes and does not permit attached single-family, semi-detach single-family, or two-family

residences typically permitted in R-5 zoning.

2. A minimum combined side yard setback of 15’ between two neighboring principal structures is required, as

opposed to the R-5 requirements of 5’ minimum side yard setback and minimum 10’ combined between

structures.

3. Public right-of-way aprons and private driveways shall be limited to a width of 22’ for two-car garages and

28’ for three-car garages. These widths shall include any “flares” at the roadway.

4. No detached garages shall be permitted within the development.

5. Attached garages shall not be permitted to be converted to living space.

6. Any single-family home additions shall be constructed of matching masonry on the first floor, including

sunrooms and three-season rooms.

7. Townhomes shall not be permitted any future building/structure additions including sunrooms, three-

season rooms, etc.

8. Only detached single-family home and townhome elevations approved with the original PUD shall be

constructed. Any other elevations shall require approval of a substantial deviation.

9. The association shall be required to enter into a parking enforcement agreement with the Village to allow

Police enforcement of parking and traffic violations on any private roadways.

10. Parking restrictions on all private streets shall be the same as public streets and limited to one side of the

roadway to allow for fire department and emergency response access.

11. A minimum of 50% of the front yard for single-family homes shall be pervious surface (landscaping, turf,

etc.)

12. Key lots as indicated in the submittal shall upgraded exterior elevations, full width front porches, windows

on the second front yard elevation, and a foundational landscaping package on the front and corner side

yards of the home.



Page 4 of 12

13. All utilities are required to be run in the rear yards whenever possible within developments. This may require

installation of conduit to be completed by the developer for ComEd electrical service, which will be the

developer’s requirement to coordinate and install.

Special Service Area (SSA)

A dormant SSA is recommended to be established by the developer and required to be in place for all future property

owners. The intent is to ensure that the associations maintain all common areas as proposed within the PUD. If an

association is dissolved or fails to maintain certain requirements like landscape buffers, fences, private roadways,

private utilities, open space, etc. the Village can activate the SSA to pay for the associated costs for the development.

This protects the Village’s general fund from being utilized to maintain areas that primarily benefit only a small group

of residents and designed to be paid for by a future association. The process of establishing an SSA can take a few

months due to a required extended “waiting/notification period” and is in the process. The hope is that the process

will be completed prior to issuance of building permits for homes. However, the PUD has been conditioned that the

SSA must be fully established prior to any changes in property ownership or closings to give a little flexibility if the

SSA establishment is delayed slightly.

The overall site plan has not changed with regards to layout, road configuration, access, structure setbacks, parking,

or signage. The private portion of what was previously noted as Galway Road has been given a new name of Ulster

Drive to avoid confusion by residents on the name, ownership, and maintenance responsibilities of the street.

Sidewalks

Sidewalks are proposed on all new internal public streets. The development is also required to install sidewalks on

any adjacent public streets or rights-of-way. However, the Village and county are already working towards plans to

install a multi-use path along Ridgeland Avenue. Additionally, there will be some changes to Oak Forest Avenue, which

currently has swales, and the utilities in the area. To avoid installing sidewalks in a manor not in the long-term interest

of the area. Village Planning and Public Works staff suggested a cash-in-lieu payment for the required sidewalks that

can be used by the public works department in the best way possible for the area. The Village Engineer has estimated

a cost of $82,279 for the required sidewalks that will be required to be paid prior to the issuance of any site permits.

A recommended condition was added clarifying this cash-in-lieu payment for some sidewalk requirements, same as

the preliminary approval. The amount is subject to any increases in construction costs over time. The payment is due

before the issuance of any site work permits.

At the Preliminary workshop, it was noted a preference to see

a more direct walking route to the Freedom Pond path (as

opposed to walking all the way out to Ridgeland Ave) as this

gives residents a path to the park and to the nearby Tinley Park

High School. One route was explored that removes lot 39 and

brings a path directly from the detached home area to

Freedom Pond along the east side of the townhomes.

However, there is a steep grade differential and utilities located

there with little space flexibility. The Petitioner proposed a

potential alternative route through the townhomes (as seen on

the image to the right) with an agreement to explore it further

before the final plans were approved. One concern of this

route was too much public foot traffic going in front of those

specific units, even though it would be known to the

purchasers ahead of time.



Page 5 of 12

The proposed Final Plan indicates a walkway connection proposed in front of building 102 that connects to the

Freedom Pond path. Staff has a few concerns with the current proposal outlined below:

1. The overall appearance and usage

at the proposed location. It would

be staff’s recommendation to

connect the path from Building 103

as well, so that both could be used

to access the park and path.

2. There is no easement over the

walkway that would ensure this can

be used by the public. This may lead

to the public not being able to

rightfully use these walkway

connection points in the future, or

them being removed. Staff

recommends that the Plat be

revised to include a public walkway

easement at the proposed location

to avoid concerns or conflicts later.

Open Item #3: Review walkway paths and connection from the Oak Ridge development to the Freedom Pond

park/detention area. Review staff concerns with needing to add a connection point and easement over the

walkways intended for the public walkway connections.

Publicly dedicated roadways include typical canopy trees, street lights, and traffic control signage. The proposed

design generally shows it is compliant with the Village’s standard details. Specifics of the roadway details, stormwater,

and public utilities are currently under review for final engineering and final approval. A recommended condition has

been added clarifying that this approval is not approving final engineering and that final engineering approval is still

required with the site development permit.

Open Item #4: Final Engineering Review and approval has not been completed yet, all approvals are to be

conditioned upon engineering approval.

The Landscaping will remain as proposed during the Preliminary approval with only minor waivers granted to

landscape code requirements with that approval. The waivers were granted due to offsetting the specific

requirements with other types and locations of landscaping.

The Commission discussed the fencing materials and locations in detail at the Preliminary PUD approvals. Most

commissioners prefer PVC fencing over wood board-on-board “shadow box” fencing due to less need for maintenance

and a more consistent look over time. However, due to the increase in cost, limited availability, and location near the

heavily wooded forest preserve areas, DR Horton requests using a wood privacy fence as opposed to PVC. They used

the wood fences at previous development locations that have been well-constructed with little need for repair or

maintenance over time. The pictures supplied are a fence that was installed in 2005 (regularly maintained) and owned

by an HOA. The PVC fencing was still to be considered and these details decided with the final approval.

Open Item #5: Discuss proposed fence to be owned by the future homeowner association to utilize cedar wood

shadow box style fence as opposed to PVC.



Page 6 of 12

Single Family Home Design

Models have stayed consistent with those supplied during the preliminary approvals (attached in the Plan

Commission packet). First-floor brick or stone exists on all models. During the workshop and public hearing, the

details of the anti-monotony plan and “Key Lot” home enhancements were explained in more detail. Color renderings

were given for a few of the model types as well to better understand how they will look.



Page 7 of 12

Key Lots

Certain “Key Lots” have been indicated by the developer.

These lots will be some of the most visible lots due to their

locations on corners or being in line with roadways. The

developer has noted these lots have some upgraded design

options that benefit the overall appearance and feel of the

subdivision. Revised plans with the new layout will need to be

supplied, along with the details on the model upgrades prior

to the public hearing. The Petitioner reviewed the key lot

criteria in the meeting including requiring the following

“upgrades.” These items are included as a requirement of the

PUD development.

Townhomes

Similar to other townhomes developments, the design of the townhomes will be consistent across all buildings. Brick

has been brought up vertically in several areas along with varying entrance styles to give it an appealing appearance.

Brick has only been proposed on the partial first floor on the side elevations, requiring a request for an Exception as

part of the PUD as previously noted and approved with the preliminary approval.



Page 8 of 12

Unlike the Preliminary Plat, the Final Plat of Subdivision formally creates lots of record, denotes easements, and what

land is to be dedicated to public uses. The proposed Final Plat is in substantial conformance with the previously

reviewed preliminary plat. A separate exhibit to the Subdivision is included due to the need of abandoning a utility

easement that served the Panduit property previously. As previously noted in this Staff Report, staff has

recommended a public walkway easement be included to connect the subdivision walkways to the Freedom Pond

Park. Due to final engineering reviews not being completed, this Plat may have some minor changes that still need

to be made and has a recommended condition clarifying that it is still subject to final engineer and Village Attorney

review prior to recording.

Open Item #6: Review the proposed PUD Final Plat of Subdivision to be subject to final engineering and attorney

review.



Page 9 of 12

Section X.J.5. of the Zoning Ordinance lists standards that need to be considered by the Plan Commission when

analyzing a Special Use request. Staff will provide draft Findings for the Commission’s review in the next Staff Report.

X.J.5. Standards: No Special Use shall be recommended by the Plan Commission unless said Commission shall find:

a. That the establishment, maintenance, or operation of the Special Use will not be detrimental to or

endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare;

• There is no danger to the public with additional residential housing and open space proposed per the final

PUD plans, allowances, and restrictions.

b. That the Special Use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate

vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within

the neighborhood;

• Residential housing surrounds the development and residential uses are less intense than the former

commercial and light industrial uses. The proposed zoning is a better fit for the area and has sufficiently

buffered future residents from existing neighboring non-commercial uses.

c. That the establishment of the Special Use will not impede the normal and orderly development and

improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district;

• The remaining land has been planned in concept to tie into the surrounding area’s roads, utilities, sidewalks,

and other development aspects. The remaining commercial areas have been planned for potential

residential development in concept with the proposed development as well.

d. That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, and/or other necessary facilities have been or are being

provided;

• There are adequate roadways, utilities, and drainage existing around the site and proposed throughout the

new development. The final plans are subject to final engineering review and approval.

e. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress so designed as to

minimize traffic congestion in the public streets;

• The ingress and egress access points have been reviewed by the Village Engineer for their best placement on

the site and for overall traffic flow for the area.

f. That the Special Use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in

which it is located, except as such regulations may in each instance be modified by the Village Board

pursuant to the recommendation of the Plan Commission. The Village Board shall impose such conditions

and restrictions upon the premises benefited by a Special Use Permit as may be necessary to ensure

compliance with the above standards, to reduce or minimize the effect of such permit upon other

properties in the neighborhood, and to better carry out the general intent of this Ordinance. Failure to

comply with such conditions or restrictions shall constitute a violation of this Ordinance; and

• All buildings will comply with all other code requirements of the Village not covered by an Exception to the

Zoning Ordinance indicated in the PUD documents and plans.

g. The extent to which the Special Use contributes directly or indirectly to the economic development of the

community as a whole.

• The development will add additional residents that help support surrounding businesses and add additional

property taxes where the vacant land currently provides minimal support to various public bodies and is an

eyesore to the overall area.



Page 10 of 12

Section VII.C. of the Zoning Ordinance lists standards that need to be considered by the Plan Commission for a

Planned Unit Development (PUD). The Plan Commission is encouraged to consider these standards (listed below) as

well as the Applicant’s responses (attached) when analyzing the PUD request. Staff will provide draft Findings for the

Commission’s review in the next Staff Report.

a. The site of the proposed planned unit development is not less than five (5) acres in area, is under single

ownership and/or unified control, and is suitable to be planned and developed, or redeveloped, as a

unit and in a manner consistent with the purpose and intent of this Ordinance and with the

Comprehensive Plan of the Village.

b. The planned development will not substantially injure or damage the use, value and enjoyment of the

surrounding property nor hinder or prevent the development of surrounding property in accordance with

the land use plan of the Village.

c. The uses permitted in the development are necessary or desirable and that the need for such uses has

been clearly demonstrated.

d. The proposed development will not impose an undue burden on public facilities and services, such as

sewer and water systems, police and fire protection.

e. The proposed development can be substantially completed within the period of time specified in the

schedule of development submitted by the developer.

f. The street system serving the planned development is adequate to carry the traffic that will be imposed

upon the streets by the proposed development, and that the streets and driveways on the site of the

planned development will be adequate to serve the residents or occupants of the proposed development.

g. When a Planned Unit Development proposes the use of private streets, common driveways, private

recreation facilities or common open space, the developer shall provide and submit as part of the

application the method and arrangement whereby these private facilities shall be operated and

maintained.

h. The general development plan shall contain such proposed covenants, easements and other provisions

relating to the bulk, location and density of residential buildings, non- residential uses and structures and

public facilities as are necessary for the welfare of the planned development and the Village. All such

covenants shall specifically provide for enforcement by the Village of Tinley Park in addition to the land

owners within the development.

i. The developer shall provide and record easements and covenants, and shall make such other

arrangements as furnishing a performance bond, escrow deposit, or other financial guarantees as may

be reasonably required to assure performance in accordance with the development plan and to protect

the public interest in the event of abandonment of said plan before completion.

j. Any exceptions or modifications of the zoning, subdivision, or other regulations that would otherwise be

applicable to the site are warranted by the design of the proposed development plan, and the amenities

incorporated in it, are consistent with the general interest of the public.



Page 11 of 12

If the Plan Commission wishes to act on the Petitioner’s requests, the appropriate wording of the motions is listed

below. The protocol for the writing of a motion is to write it in the affirmative so that a positive or negative

recommendation correlates to the Petitioner’s proposal. By making a motion, it does not indicate a specific

recommendation in support or against the plan.

Motion 1 (Special Use for Final PUD Approval):

“…make a motion to recommend that the Village Board grant a Special Use Permit to the Petitioner, DR Horton Inc - Midwest,

for Final Planned Unit Development Approval for the Oak Ridge Subdivision located at the southeast corner of Ridgeland Ave.

& Oak Forest Ave (excluding 17201 Ridgeland Ave), zoned R-5 (Low-Density Residential) and developed with 81 detached

single-family and 162 attached single-family units, in accordance with all plans/documents submitted and listed herein and

adopt the Findings of Fact as proposed by in the May 5, 2022, Staff Report, subject to the following conditions:

1. The PUD exceptions and restrictions from the Zoning Ordinance, as listed in the staff report, shall be included within

the Preliminary and Final PUD ordinance documents.

2. Final conditions, covenants, and restrictions (CC&Rs) shall be recorded prior to any transfer of ownership or any lots,

closings, or occupancy permits are issued.

3. The project shall be subdivided at one time with a single Plat of Subdivision. All performance guarantees for public

improvements for all phases due prior to starting Phase 1 site or construction work. Site grading work may begin

prior to the Plat recording but no road, utility, drainage, or other development work shall begin until the Plat is fully

signed, all property taxes paid, and in the process of being recorded with Cook County Recorder of Deeds Office.

4. The completion of adjacent public improvements (utilities and Leinster Lane roadway) will need to be completed for

the Leinster Lane right-of-way adjacent to lots 77-81, within 1 year after approval of any redevelopment plan of the

former ABC Supply property (17201 Ridgeland Ave) that requires such improvement connections.

5. A Special Service Area (SSA) shall be established over the development to begin at the time of Final Approval. This

shall be finalized with the county prior to any transfer of ownership or any lots, closings, or occupancy permits being

issued.

6. The public park shall be completed and approved prior to beginning any phase 2 work. The expectation is future

approval and acceptance by the Village and to be transferred to the Tinley Park – Park District. This transfer may

happen anytime from completion/acceptance of the park and completion of the subdivision (or at any point there

is a “turnover” from the developer to the association that is triggered.) However, if the Park District does not accept

the park’s dedication, the park shall remain owned/maintained by the Oak Ridge Homeowner Association.

7. A cash-in-lieu payment for the sidewalks on Ridgeland Ave and Oak Forest Ave be submitted prior to issuance of any

permits. The payment is currently estimated by the engineer at $82,279 but is subject to changes related to increases

in construction or material cost.

8. The final Addressing Plan requires final review and approval by the Village, Public Safety, and Post Office.

9. The final approval of all plans is subject to final engineering approval of all plans by the Village Engineer and any

other jurisdictional approvals, including but not limited to Cook County DOT, MWRD, and IEPA.

Motion 2 (Final PUD Plat):

“…make a motion to recommend that the Village Board grant approval to the Petitioner, DR Horton Inc – Midwest, Final PUD

Plat Approval for the Oak Ridge Subdivision in accordance with the Oak Ridge Final Plat of Subdivision submitted (dated April

15, 2022), subject to the condition that the approval is subject to the final review and approval by the Village Engineer and

Village Attorney.”



Page 12 of 12


By

Date On

Sheet

14pgs Preliminary Workshop Presentation (key lot exhibit, parking

exhibit, ani-monotony standards, etc.)

DRH 12-2-21

8pgs Application and Standards DRH 2-21-22

1pg Project narrative DRH 10-15-21

2pgs Plat of Topography Mackle 6-23-21

2pgs Alta Survey Mackle 8-5-21

1pg Site Data and Site Plan GRWA n/a

1pg Phasing Plan Mackie 2-21-22

5pgs Final Landscape Plan GRWA 4-18-22

2pgs Photometric Exhibit Mackle 2-18-22

16pgs Final Engineering Plans Mackle 2-21-22

1pg Signage Plans (Same as Preliminary) GRWA 10-15-21

72pgs Single Family Detached Model Elevations (B&W) (Same as

Preliminary)

Premier 11-5-21

7pgs Single Family Detached Elevation Select Color Renderings (Same

as Preliminary)

Premier n/a

5pgs Townhome Elevations and Renderings (Same as Preliminary) Premier 11-5-21

4pgs Final Plat of Subdivision and Easement Exhibit Mackle 4-15-22

1pg Roadway Naming and Address Exhibit Mackie 4-15-22

51pgs Traffic Study (Same as Preliminary) GHA 8-31-21

1pg Monotony Plan and Key Lot Exhbit for Single Family Detached

(Same as Preliminary)

DRH n/a

1pg Subdivision Specifications (Same as Preliminary) DRH n/a

1pg Estimated Child Generation (Same as Preliminary) DRH 8-31-21

7pgs Market Study (Same as Preliminary) HT n/a

3pgs Fence Details and Pictures (Same as Preliminary/In Staff Report) DRH n/a

DRH = DR Horton (Petitioner/Developer)

Mackle = Mackle Consultants, LLC (Surveying)

GRWA = Gary R. Weber Associates, Inc. (Land Planning, Landscape Arch.)

Premier = Premier Architecture, Inc. (Architect)

GHA = Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. (Consulting Engineers)

HT = Housing Trends LLC (Market Consultant)


SEE SHEET 2 OF 3

SEE SHEET 3 OF 3

1266

1265

1264

1261

1274

1272

1271

1273

1421

1422

1423

1424 1413

1414

1415

1416

1131

1132

1133

1134

1121

1122

1123

1124

1125

1251

1252

1253

1254

1255

1256

1201

1202

1203

1204

1205

1206

1181

1182

1211

1212

1213

1214

1215

1216

1241

1242

1243

1244

1183

1184

1185

1186

1191

1192

1193

1194

1195

1196

1221

1222

1223

1224

1225

1226

1231

1232

1233

1234

1091

1092

1093

1094

1095

1096

1081

1082

1083

1084

1085

1086

1071

1072

1073

1074

1075

1076

1061

1062

1063

1064

1065

1066

1162

1101

1102

1103

1104

1105

1106

1115

1114

1113

1112

1111

1171

1172

1173

1174

1161

1163

1164

1165

1166

1151

1152

1153

1154

1155

1156

1141

1142

1143

1144

1011

1012

1013

1014

1015

1016 1026

1025

1024

1023

1022

1021

1041

1042

1043

1044

1045

10461031

1032

1033

1034

1035

1036

1051

1052

1053

1054

1055

1056

1425

1426

1412

1411

1275

1263

1276

1262

0

SCALE: 1" = 100'

100100 50

1 3KJM

MRD

RPO

02/18/22

1"=100'

& 0.33'NFIP 0.35'E

EXCEPTIONPARCEL 3

TO

BE

VA

CA

TE

D

S88°12'29"E (M)S89°59'46"E (R)

345.00'

TINLEY PARK, ILLINOISOAK RIDGE SUBDIVISION

PLAT OF SUBDIVISION

CORNERMONUMENT

AT

SET CONCRETE

CORNERMONUMENT AT SET CONCRETE

MRDREVISED PER VILLAGE COMMENTS04/15/22

APPROVED

DESIGNED

DRAWN

DATE

SCALEDATE DESCRIPTION OF REVISION BY

OF

SHEET

ILLINOIS FIRM LICENSE 184-002694

C

(847)696-1400www.mackieconsult.com

Mackie Consultants, LLC9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 500Rosemont, IL 60018

MACKIE CONSULTANTS

4/15/2

02

2

N:\

3603\

Survey\

Proposed\

Fin

al\

3603-Plt-S

ub-1.

plt

12:4

3:3

4

PM

PROJECT NUMBER:

CLIENT:

MACKIE CONSULTANTS LLC, 2021

3603

ILLINOIS 60173SCHAUMBURG,

SUITE 9251750 E. GOLF ROAD,

S01°4

7'3

1"E (M

)

S88°11'11"W (M)

S88°13'43"W (M)

1446.3

6' (M

)

527.00'

521.3

0' (M

)

759.06' (M)

N01°4

7'3

1"

W (M

)1066.1

4' (M

)

N01°4

6'1

7"

W (M

)

S59°

43'03"

W (M

)

284.24' (M)

345.00'

S89°57'33"W (R)

S00°0

0'1

4'W (R

)521.1

2' (R

)

S90°00'00"W (R) 758.60' (R)

1066.3

3' (R

)

S89°59'46"E (R)

1285.59' (R)

N00°0

0'0

0"E (R

)

902.4

3' (R

)

282.49'(R)

N89°55'35"W(R)

545.2

5'

S01°4

7'3

1"E

747.91'

S61°29'52"

W (R)

1286.25' (M)

544.9

1'

901.4

5' (M

)

PA

RCEL 1

PA

RCEL 2

OAK FOREST

AVENUE

RID

GE

LA

ND A

VE

NU

E

CHICAGO

ROCK IS

LAND &

PACIFI

C RAI

LWAY

COMPANY

OF SECTION 29-36-13OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER NORTH LINE OF THE WEST HALF

(100.00' RIG

HT OF

WAY)

EAS

T

LIN

E

OF

RID

GE

LA

ND

AV

EN

UE

SO

UT

HW

ES

T

QU

AR

TE

R

OF

SE

CTIO

N 29-

36-

13

EAS

T

LIN

E

OF

TH

E

WES

T 577.0

0'

OF

TH

E

OAK FORES

T AVE

NUE

SOUTHEAS

T LIN

E OF

SO

UT

HW

ES

T

QU

AR

TE

R

OF

SE

CTIO

N 29-

36-

13

WES

T

LIN

E

OF

TH

E

WES

T

HA

LF

OF

TH

E

SECTION 29-36-13OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 703.00'

S

OU

TH

WES

T

QU

AR

TE

R

OF

SE

CTIO

N 29-

36-

13

EAS

T

LIN

E

OF

TH

E

WES

T

HA

LF

OF

TH

E

60.0

0'

50.00'

100.00'

50.00'

& ONLINEFIR 0.39' E

& 0.20' NFIP 0.12' E

& 0.16' NFIP 0.10' E

& 0.60'W0.36'S

FIP

& 0.77' WFIP 0.53' N

& 0.38'SFIP 0.23'NW

S00°0

0'1

4"E (R

)

N00°0

0'1

4"W (R

)S01°4

7'3

1"E

(M) 298.0

0'

S00°0

0'1

4"E

(R)

& ONLIN

E

FIR 0.57'

E

S01°4

7'3

1"E (M

) 683.6

5' (M

)

457.77' (M)

290.14' (M)

PA

RCEL 3

686.25' (M)N88°12'29"E (M)

PARCEL 2POB

60.0

0'(M

)

PARCEL 3POB

PARCEL 1POB

S01°4

7'3

1"E

(M) 358.0

0'

1, 2 & 3PARCELPOC

600.00' (M)

N88°12'29"E (M)S89°59'46"E (R)

S89°59'46"E (R)S88°12'29"E (M) 345.00' 6

0.0

0'EXCEPTION

PARCEL 3

RID

GE

LA

ND

AV

EN

UE

T

HE

EAS

TE

RL

Y

LIN

E

OF

600.0

0

FE

ET

EAS

TE

RL

Y

OF

LIN

E

PA

RA

LLE

L

WIT

H

AN

D

485.2

5' (M

)

491' (R

)

S88°19'18"W (M)

60.0

0'

EASEMENT PER DOCUMENT 1706715069STORM WATER DRAINAGE AND DETENTION

9000

9001

9002

9003

9004

9007

9010

9015

LONGFORD LANE

MU

NS

TE

R L

AN

E

LEINSTER

LANE

DO

NE

GA

L S

TR

EE

T

RO

SC

OM

MO

N R

OA

D

GALWAY ROAD

9005

9006

9008

9011

9012

9013

9014

9009

9016

10

10

9

1

2

3

4

5

6

78

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

293031323334

35

36

37

38

39

4041 42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

555657

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

6869

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

80

81

BO

ULE

VA

RD

ULS

TE

R

79

9017 LEINSTER LANE

LOCATION MAP

LOCATIONPROJECT

NOT TO SCALE

175TH

S.

CIC

ER

O

HA

RLE

M

IL-57

IL-80

CE

NT

RA

L

AV

E

RID

GE

LA

ND

OAK FORES

T

OA

K

PA

RK

AV

E

167TH

P.I.N.:

28-29-300-03028-29-300-03528-29-300-03428-29-300-031

RANGE 13 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH,

NOTES:

DEVELOPER

SURVEYOR

PHONE: 847.696.1400ROSEMONT, IL 600189575 W. HIGGINS ROAD, SUITE 500MACKIE CONSULTANTS, LLC

OAK RIDGE SUBDIVISIONFINAL PLAT OF

COUNTY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE

VILLAGE TREASURER'S CERTIFICATE

PLAN COMMISSION CERTIFICATE

VILLAGE PRESIDENT'S CERTIFICATE

SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE

AUTHORIZATION TO RECORD CERTIFICATE

VILLAGE CLERK'S CERTIFICATE

CERTIFICATE OF RECORDER

COOK COUNTY RECORDER______________________________________________

__.M. AND RECORDED IN BOOK ____ OF PLATS ON PAGE _____.O'CLOCK _____ AT 20___, A.D., ____________, OF DAY _____

THE ON AFORESAID COUNTY COOK OF OFFICE RECORDER'S THE IN RECORD FOR FILED WAS ____________ NO. INSTRUMENT THIS

COUNTY OF COOK) ) SSSTATE OF ILLINOIS )

VILLAGE TREASURER______________________________________________

_______________, 20___.OF DAY _____ THIS ILLINOIS. COUNTY, COOK PARK, TINLEY AT DATED

AGAINST THE TRACT OF LAND INCLUDED IN THE PLAT. APPORTIONED BEEN HAVE THAT THEREOF INSTALLMENTS DEFERRED

ANY OR ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL FORFEITED OR CURRENT UNPAID TINLEY PARK, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THERE ARE NO DELINQUENT OR

OF VILLAGE THE OF TREASURER VILLAGE ___________________, I,


CHAIRMAN______________________________________________

20___.OF____________, THIS____DAY ILLINOIS, COUNTY, COOK PARK,

TINLEY OF VILLAGE THE OF COMMISSION PLAN THE BY REVIEWED


VILLAGE PRESIDENT______________________________________________

20___.OF____________, THIS____DAY ILLINOIS, COUNTY, COOK PARK,

TINLEY OF VILLAGE THE OF PRESIDENT VILLAGE THE BY APPROVED


VILLAGE CLERK______________________________________________

OF____________, 20___.THIS____DAY ILLINOIS, PARK, TINLEY OF VILLAGE THE

OF SEAL THE AND HAND MY SET HERETO HAVE I WHEREOF WITNESS IN

SAID VILLAGE AT ITS MEETING HELD ON ____________, 20___.OF TRUSTESS OF BOARD THE BY APPROVED DULY AND TO PRESENTED

WAS PLAT ANNEXED THE THAT CERTIFY HEREBY DO PARK, TINLEY OF VILLAGE THE OF CLERK VILLAGE ___________________, I,


LICENSE EXPIRES: NOVEMBER 30, 2022ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NUMBER 035-002753EMAIL: [email protected] P. ORY________________________________________ DATED THIS _______ DAY OF _________________, 20__.

TO RECORD THIS PLAT OF SUBDIVISION.HEREBY GRANT PERMISSION TO ____________________________ NUMBER 184-002694,WE, MACKIE CONSULTANTS LLC, AN ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL DESIGN FIRM

COUNTY OF COOK) )SSSTATE OF ILLINOIS)

COUNTY CLERK______________________________________________

ILLINOIS, THIS _____ DAY OF _______________ 20___.CHICAGO, AT CLERK COUNTY THE OF SEAL AND HAND MY UNDER GIVEN

PLAT HEREIN DRAWN.THE WITH CONNECTION IN FEES STATUTORY ALL RECEIVED HAVE I THAT

CERTIFY FURTHER I DRAWN. HEREIN PLAT THE IN INCLUDED LAND THE OF ANY AGAINST SALES TAX REDEEMABLE NO AND TAXES, FORFEITED

UNPAID NO TAXES, CURRENT UNPAID NO TAXES, GENERAL DELINQUENT NO ARE THERE THAT CERTIFY HEREBY DO ILLINOIS, COUNTY,

COOK OF CLERK COUNTY _________________________, I,


BOUNDARY LINE

L= ARC LENGTH

PUDE PUBLIC UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT

DUE DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT

LEGEND:

(R) RECORD

FIR

FIP FOUND IRON PIPE

FOUND IRON ROD

SECTION LINE

EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE

EXISTING LOT LINE

PROPOSED LOT LINE

BUILDING SETBACK LINE (BSL)

EASEMENT LINE

CHORD BEARINGCB=

CL= CHORD LENGTH

PC

PCC

PT

POINT OF CURVATURE

POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE

POINT OF TANGENCY

ZONING BOUNDARY

R= RADIUS

ZONING:

LICENSE EXPIRES: NOVEMBER 30, 2022ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NUMBER 035-002753EMAIL: [email protected] P. ORY_______________________________________

ROSEMONT, ILLINOIS,GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL THIS ____ DAY OF ____________, 20__, IN

WITHIN 12 MONTHS OF THE RECORDING OF THIS PLAT AS PROVIDED BY STATE STATUTE.THE EXTERIOR MONUMENTS HAVE BEEN SET AND THE INTERIOR MONUMENTS WILL BE SET DESCRIBED THEM ON THIS FINAL PLAT AS REQUIRED BY THE PLAT ACT (765 ILCS 205/). I FURTHER HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL SUBDIVISION MONUMENTS WILL BE SET AND I HAVE

2008. SUBJECT TO MAP INTERPRETATION AND SCALING.INSURANCE RATE MAP, MAP NUMBER 17031C0709J, MAP REVISED DATE OF AUGUST 19, AREAS OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN AS IDENTIFIED BY THE FLOOD WE FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THE HEREON DESCRIBED PROPERTY FALLS WITHIN ZONE "X",

11 OF THE ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL CODE. IN ACCORDANCE WITH S.B. 908-P.A. 85-267.PLAN AND IS EXERCISING THE SPECIAL POWERS AUTHORIZED BY DIVISION 12 OF ARTICLE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK, WHICH HAS ADOPTED A VILLAGE FURTHER HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING PROPERTY FALLS WITHIN THE DESCRIBED COURSE A DISTANCE OF 345 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING).WE COURSE A DISTANCE OF 60 FEET, THENCE WEST IN A LINE PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST OF 345 FEET, THENCE NORTH IN A LINE PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED THENCE EAST IN A LINE PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE A DISTANCE THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 60 FEET, MEASUREMENT, OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4), RIDGELAND AVENUE (SAID EAST LINE BEING 50 FEET EAST BY RECTANGULAR THE CHICAGO ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY) WITH THE EAST LINE OF MEASUREMENT OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE 100 FOOT WIDE RIGHT OF WAY OF AVENUE (SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE BEING 60 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY BY RECTANGULAR FROM THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SOUTH OAK FOREST BEGINNING AT A POINT 298 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE SOUTH BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE 13, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, BEGINNING, (EXCEPT THEREFROM A PARCEL OF LAND IN THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF EAST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 60 FEET TO THE POINT OF OF 600.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE THENCE WEST ON A LINE PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE A DISTANCE SOUTH LINE OF OAK FOREST AVENUE AND THE EAST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE; OF RIDGELAND AVENUE AND BEING 358 FEET SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF THE INTERSECTION WITH A LINE, SAID LINE BEING DRAWN AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE EAST LINE FROM SOUTHWESTERLY TO SOUTH) A DISTANCE OF 683.81 FEET TO A POINT OF DEGREES 29 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WITH THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE (AS MEASURED LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG A LINE MAKING AN ANGLE OF 61 OF 290.14 FEET TO A POINT BEING 600 FEET EAST OF AND PARALLEL TO THE EAST WITH THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE (AS MEASURED FROM NORTH TO EAST) A DISTANCE OAK FOREST AVENUE AND MAKING AN ANGLE 61 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 50 SECONDS FOREST AVENUE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SOUTH DISTANCE OF 491 FEET TO A POINT IN THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SOUTH OAK FEET; THENCE NORTH ON A LINE PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE A ON A LINE PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE A DISTANCE OF 345.00 DISTANCE OF 298.00 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE EAST SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE A RECTANGULAR MEASUREMENT) OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE, SAID EAST LINE BEING 50 FEET EAST (BY RIGHT OF WAY OF THE CHICAGO ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY) WITH THE RECTANGULAR MEASUREMENT) OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE 100 FOOT WIDE FOREST AVENUE (SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE BEING 60 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY (BY BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SOUTH OAK BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:RANGE 13, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, A PARCEL OF LAND IN THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, PARCEL 3:

*AMENDED SCRIVNER'S ERROR

COUNTY, ILLINOIS.THE LAST DESCRIBED LINE, 683.86 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN COOK RIDGELAND AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST, ALONG LINE THAT IS 600.00 FEET EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE AFORESAID EAST LINE OF 29 MINUTES 52 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE, 458.71 FEET TO A AFORESAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF OAK FOREST AVENUE: THENCE SOUTH 61 DEGREES MINUTES 35 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED LINE 282.49 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID WEST ½ OF THE SOUTHWEST ¼; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED LINE, 902.43 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST ½ OF THE SOUTHWEST ¼; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 00 CONTINUING SOUTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST 685.65 FEET TO THE MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST 600.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SAID EAST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE 358.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 59 THE SOUTHWEST ¼): THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 14 SECONDS EAST, ALONG RECTANGULAR MEASUREMENT) AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID WEST ½ OF THE EAST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE (SAID EAST LINE BEING 50 FEET EAST OF (BY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE CHICAGO ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY), AND MEASUREMENT) AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE 100 FOOT WIDE FOREST AVENUE (SAID LINE BEING 60 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY OF (BY RECTANGULAR AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF OAK NORTH, RANGE 13 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED THAT PART OF THE WEST ½ OF THE SOUTHWEST ¼ OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 36 PARCEL 2:

1066.33 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS.DEGREES 00 MINUTES 14 SECONDS EAST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE, THE WEST LINE OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCE NORTH 0 LINE BEING 50 FEET EAST OF (BY RECTANGULAR MEASUREMENT) AND PARALLEL WITH SOUTHWEST 1/4, 527.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE (SAID EAST DEGREES 57 MINUTES 33 SECONDS WEST, PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 703 FEET OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCE SOUTH 89 LINE PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4, 521.12 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST* 1/4; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST ALONG A SECONDS WEST, 758.60 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 577.00 FEET OF SAID THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, 544.91 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 90 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF LINE OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 28; THENCE SOUTH 0 THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST 1285.59 FEET TO THE EAST SAID EAST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE, 358.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SOUTHWEST 1/4); THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST, ALONG MEASUREMENT) AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF THE RIDGELAND AVENUE (SAID EAST LINE BEING 50 FEET EAST OF (BY RECTANGULAR OF THE CHICAGO ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY), AND THE EAST LINE OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE 100 FOOT WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY AVENUE (SAID LINE BEING 60 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY OF (BY RECTANGULAR MEASUREMENT) COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF OAK FOREST AS FOLLOWS:NORTH, RANGE 13 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED THAT PART OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 36 PARCEL 1:

SURVEYED, SUBDIVIDED AND PLATTED THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: DESIGN FIRM NUMBER 184-002694, AT THE REQUEST OF THE OWNER(S) THEREOF, HAVE THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT WE, MACKIE CONSULTANTS, LLC, AN ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL


OWNER'S CERTIFICATE

NOTARY CERTIFICATE

TITLE__________________________________

PRINTED NAME__________________________________

DATED THIS _____ DAY OF _____________, 20___.

DISTRICT 146, 6611 W. 171st STREET, TINLEY PARK, IL 60477.SCHOOL CONSOLIDATED COMMUNITY PARK TINLEY OF BOUNDARIES THE WITHIN LIES

PLAT THIS IN INCLUDED LAND THE OF ALL THAT CERTIFIES FURTHER UNDERSIGNED THE

SUBJECT TO THE ORDINANCES OF THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK.ARE INSTALLATIONS ALL LOCATION. AND DESIGN TO AS PARK TINLEY OF VILLAGE THE OF APPROVAL THE TO SUBJECT BE SHALL EASEMENT THE WITHIN INSTALLATIONS UTILITY OF LOCATION RIGHTS. OR USES AFORESAID 94 THE WITH INTERFERE LATER OR THEN

NOT DO THAT PURPOSES OTHER AND LANDSCAPING SHRUBS, GARDENS, FOR USED BE MAY SAME BUT EASEMENTS, SAID ON PLACED BE SHALL TREES OR BUILDINGS PERMANENT

NO UTILITIES. OTHER OR SEWERS THE OF OPERATION THE WITH INTERFERE THAT EASEMENT THE ON PLANTS OTHER OR SHRUBS TREES, ANY REMOVE OR TRIM DOWN, CUT

TO GRANTED ALSO IS RIGHT THE LINES. NECESSARY ALL AND SWALES DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION TRANSMISSION, VARIOUS OPERATE AND MAINTAIN INSPECT,

REPAIR, RECONSTRUCT, CONSTRUCT, TO AUTHORITY AND PRIVILEGE RIGHT, PERPETUAL THE FOR ASSIGNS AND SUCCESSORS THEIR AND CABLEVISION COMCAST COMPANY, EDISON

COMMONWEALTH COMPANY, GAS ILLINOIS NORTHERN COMPANY, TELEPHONE BELL ILLINOIS TO LIMITED NOT BUT INCLUDING, VILLAGE THE FROM FRANCHISE UNDER OPERATING

ENTITY ANY TO AND PARK TINLEY OF VILLAGE THE TO GRANTED AND FOR RESERVED ARE PLAT THIS ON EASEMENTS DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PUBLIC AS INDICATED EASEMENTS ALL

PROVISIONS STATED HEREON.EASEMENT UTILITY THE IN STATED AS AND/OR DESIGNATED AS UTILITIES PUBLIC VARIOUS

OF INSTALLATION THE FOR AND USE PUBLIC FOR EASEMENTS GRANTS AND RESERVES ALSO HEREBY AND SERVICES PUBLIC AND ALLEYS STREETS, THOROUGHFARES, FOR PLAT

THIS ON SHOWN LANDS THE USE PUBLIC FOR DEDICATES HEREBY UNDERSIGNED THE

INDICTED.HEREON TITLE AND STYLE THE UNDER SAME THE ADOPT AND ACKNOWLEDGE HEREBY

DOES AND FORTH, SET THEREIN PURPOSES AND USES THE FOR THEREON, INDICATED AS SUBDIVIDED, AND SURVEYED BE TO SAME THE CAUSED HAS AND PLAT ATTACHED THE IN DESCRIBED LAND THE OF OWNER THE IS UNDERSIGNED THE THAT CERTIFY TO IS THIS

COUNTY OF ________ ) ) SSSTATE OF __________ )

NOTARY PUBLIC_______________________________________

________________________, 20 _____.OF DAY _____________ THIS SEAL NOTARIAL AND HAND MY UNDER GIVEN

PURPOSES THEREIN SET FORTH AS HIS (HER)(THEIR) FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT.AND USES THE FOR INSTRUMENTS ACCOMPANYING AND PLAT ANNEXED THE OF EXECUTION THE ACKNOWLEDGED AND DAY THIS ME BEFORE APPEARED INSTRUMENT, FOREGOING THE TO SUBSCRIBED IS(ARE) NAME(S) WHOSE PERSON(S) SAME THE BE TO ME TO KNOW

PERSONALLY ________________, AND ________________ THAT CERTIFY HEREBY AFORESAID, COUNTY AND STATE THE FOR AND IN PUBLIC NOTARY _______________, I,

COUNTY OF ________ ) ) SSSTATE OF __________ )

VACATION CERTIFICATE

TITLE:______________________________________

THE VILLAGE BOARD OF THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARKBY:________________________________________

TITLE:______________________________________

OWNERBY:________________________________________

TITLE:______________________________________

OWNERBY:________________________________________ TO AND EFFECTIVE UPON RECORDING OF THIS DOCUMENT. EXISTING UTILITIES UNTIL SUCH FACILITIES CAN BE RELOCATED, CONDITIONAL SUBDIVISION BUT RESERVING THEREFROM ANY RIGHTS NECESSARY FOR 2172152 IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS LYING WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THIS VACATE AN EASEMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 17, 1964 AS DOCUMENT THE OWNERS OF THE SURVEYED TRACT AND THE UNDERSIGNED DESIRE TO


PHONE: 847.362.9100SCHAUMBURG, IL 601731750 E. GOLF ROAD, SUITE 925D.R. HORTON, INC. - MIDWEST

MINIMUM BUILDING SEPARATION: 15'

REAR TO REAR: 50'SIDE TO REAR: 50'SIDE TO SIDE: 20'SIDE TO PROPERTY: 25'SIDE TO ROW: 15'FRONT TO SIDE: 50'FRONT TO FRONT: 50'FRONT TO ROW: 25'SETBACKS (R-5 TOWNHOME LOTS):

CORNER SIDE: 25'REAR: 30'SIDE: 5'FRONT: 25'SETBACKS (R-5 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS):

LOT WIDTH: 49'LOT AREA: 4,410 SFMINIMUM LOT SIZE (R-5 TOWNHOME LOTS):

LOT DEPTH: 125'LOT WIDTH: 60'LOT AREA: 7,500 SFMINIMUM LOT SIZE (R-5 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS):

RESIDENTIAL) ZONING HAS THE FOLLOWING SITE REQUIREMENTS:PROPOSED PLAT OF SUBDIVISION WITH UNDERLYING R-5 (LOW DENSITY

VILLAGE ENGINEERBY: ______________________________________________

_____________, 20___.OF DAY _____ THIS ILLINOIS, PARK, TINLEY AT DATED

COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS.PARK, TINLEY OF VILLAGE THE OF ENGINEER VILLAGE THE BY APPROVED

COUNTY OF COOK ) ) SSSTATE OF ILLINOIS )

LANDSCAPE EASEMENT.8. OUTLOTS 9000-9017 ARE SUBJECT TO A BLANKET P.U. & D.E AND

MAINTAINED BY THE OAK RIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, LLC.8. OUTLOTS 9000-9001 AND 9003-9017 ARE TO BE OWNED AND

BY CHORD BEARING.7. ALL CURVES ARE TANGENT TO ADJOINING COURSES UNLESS DEFINED

OR LESS.6. ALL AREAS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN SQUARE FEET OR ACRES, MORE

SHOWN OTHERWISE.5. ALL EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON ARE HEREBY GRANTED UNLESS

4. NO DIMENSIONS SHALL BE DERIVED FROM SCALE MEASUREMENT.

3. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE GIVEN IN FEET AND DECIMAL PARTS THEREOF.

ZONE.2. BEARINGS BASED ON NAD83 (2011) ILLINOIS STATE PLANE, EAST

FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS AND APPLICABLE EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE.COMMITMENT DATE OF FEBRUARY 26, 2021 AND HAS BEEN USED EFFECTIVE DATE OF APRIL 23, 2018, AND 21GSA680055LP WITH A INSURANCE COMPANY ORDER NUMBER 18005620LFE WITH AN COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY CHICAGO TITLE

1. THIS PLAT IS BASED IN PART ON INFORMATION CONTAINED IN

COOK COUNTY HIGHWAY CERTIFICATE

COUNTY ENGINEER_________________________________________________

APPROVED THIS _____ DAY OF ________________, A.D., 20__.

COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY.THE WITHIN CONSTRUCTION TO PRIOR PROPERTY THE OF OWNER THE BY REQUIRED IS ACCESS FOR PERMIT HIGHWAY A HOWEVER,

2; PARAGRAPH 109, CHAPTER STATUTES REVISED ILLINOIS TO PURSUANT ACCESS ROADWAY TO RESPECT WITH DEPARTMENT HIGHWAY COUNTY

COOK THE BY APPROVED BEEN HAS PLAT AFOREMENTIONED THE

COUNTY OF COOK) ) SSSTATE OF ILLINOIS)

VILLAGE ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE


SE

E S

HE

ET 3

60' 60' 80'

60' 60' 80'

125'

125'

5'

5'

5'

5'

10'

10'

2 3KJM

MRD


PLAT OF SUBDIVISIONRPO

02/18/22

LONGFORD LANE66' ROW HEREBY DEDICATED

1"=50'

900316,643 SF

LOT AREA

25'BSL

STREET

ST

RE

ET

LOT#LOT AREALOT#

LOT AREALOT#

5'B

SL

5'P

U&

DE

5'B

SL

5'P

U&

DE

5'B

SL

5'P

U&

DE

5'B

SL

5'P

U&

DE

5'B

SL

5'P

U&

DE

10'PU&DE

25'BSL

10'PU&DE

25'BSL

10'PU&DE

25'B

SL

10'P

U&

DE

10'PU&DE10'PU&DE 10'PU&DE

30'BSL 30'BSL 30'BSL

10'

VIL

LA

GE

OF

TIN

LE

Y

PA

RK

WA

TE

RM

AIN

EAS

EM

EN

T

PE

R

DO

C 20281186

10'

VIL

LA

GE

OF

TIN

LE

Y

PA

RK

WA

TE

RM

AIN

EAS

EM

EN

T

PE

R

DO

C 20281186


APPROVED

DESIGNED

DRAWN

DATE


OF

SHEET


C



MACKIE CONSULTANTS

4/15/2

02

2

N:\

3603\

Survey\

Proposed\

Fin

al\

3603-Plt-S

ub-2.plt

12:3

1:3

1 P

M

PROJECT NUMBER:

CLIENT:


3603



OAK FOREST

AVENUE

759.06' (M)

759.06' (M) S90°00'00"W (R)758.60' (R)

N88°12'29"E (M)N88°12'29"E (M)

N01°4

6'1

7"

W (M

)

EAS

T

LIN

E

OF

TH

E

WES

T

HA

LF

OF

TH

E

SO

UT

HW

ES

T

QU

AR

TE

R

OF

SE

CTIO

N 29-

36-

13

N00°0

0'0

0"E (R

)

EAS

T

LIN

E

OF

TH

E

WES

T 345.0

0'

OF

TH

E

SO

UT

HW

ES

T

QU

AR

TE

R

OF

SE

CTIO

N 29-

36-

13

S01°4

7'3

1"E (M

)

S59°

43'03"

W (M

)

284.24' (M)N89°55'35"W (R)

282.49' (R)OF SECTION 29-36-13OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER NORTH LINE OF THE WEST HALF

SOUTHEAS

T LIN

E OF

OAK FORES

T AVE

NUE

902.4

3' (R

)

S88°13'43"W (M)

S01°4

6'1

7"E (M

)

901.4

5' (M

)

S88°13'43"W (M)

CHICAGO

ROCK IS

LAND &

PACIFI

C RAI

LWAY

COMPANY

1446.3

6' (M

)

545.2

5' (M

)

747.91' (

M)

491' (R

)485.2

5' (M

)

S88°19'18"W (M)

LONGFORD LANE

MU

NS

TE

R L

AN

E

LEINSTER

LANE

DO

NE

GA

L S

TR

EE

T

60.00'

125.0

0'

60.00'

L=49.00'

60.00'

L=61.86'

128.6

0'

60.00'

L=54.85'

143.2

8'

54.68'

170.7

5'

54.07'

L=

50.7

5'

60.1

0'

209.3

6'

107.06'

22.63'

L=40.72'

129.5

0'

150.09'

L=40.71'

133.1

2'

142.0

6'

L=40.7

2'

178.8

5'

48.85'

87.9

3'

L=

15.6

0'

136.60'

60.0

0'

130.00'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

60.0

0'

130.00'

49.00'

49.00'

60.0

0'

130.00'

60.0

0'

130.00'

60.0

0'

130.00'

60.0

0'

130.00'

60.0

0'

130.00'

60.0

0'

130.00'

60.0

0'

130.00'

60.0

0'

130.00'

60.0

0'

130.00'

60.0

0'

130.00'

60.0

0'

130.00'

60.0

0'

130.00'

60.0

0'

130.00'

60.0

0'

L=

52.6

0'

130.00'

76.6

3'

132.38'

L=

48.8

1'

L=10.55'

138.67'

223.1

4'

L=

40.6

6'

179.7

4'

149.9

3'

154.9

2'

L=23.

50'L=39.72'

150.0

0'

20.88' L=39.53'

150.0

0'

60.00'

150.0

1'

58.51'L=54.80'

132.1

6'

L=54.80'

125.0

0'

5.80'L=49.51'

125.0

0'

60.00'

58.80'

125.0

0'

L=10.68'53.12'

49.54'

125.0

0'

L=93.62'

108.9

0'

L=

21.0

9'

L=80.53'

L=38.89'

128.7

1'

55.68'

130.0

0'

63.44'

130.0

0'

125.00'

34.6

7'

R=92.0

0'

125.00'

60.0

0'

125.00'

60.0

0'

125.00'

60.0

0'

125.00'

60.0

0'

125.00'

60.0

0'

125.00'

60.0

0'

125.00'

60.0

0'

125.00'

60.0

0'

125.00'

60.0

0'

158.43'

60.0

0'

45.31'

60.0

0'

125.0

0'

125.0

0'

80.00'

125.0

0'

60.00'4.94'

98.18'

L=26.86'

79.6

5'

125.00'

63.2

7'

81.4

3'

L=

58.4

5'

125.00'

52.5

3'L

=58.4

5'

133.25'

31.5

0'

77.4

9'

L=

47.9

1'

129.78'

63.0

0'

125.00'

63.0

0'

125.00'

63.0

0'

125.00'

78.9

7'

130.81'

L=

52.7

4'

125.00'

85.7

3'

151.78'

L=

58.4

5'

52.9

5'

66.64'

L=

74.8

4'

104.4

5'

125.00'

54.1

8'

L=

57.1

9'

50.2

1'

L=

94.9

2'

125.00'

61.6

8'

125.00'

54.2

5'

L=

13.9

7'

125.00'

125.00'

64.4

6'

125.00'

63.0

0'

55.7

5'

135.25'

L=

60.9

6'

24.2

3'

53.1

0'

18.0

4'

L=

71.9

1'

125.0

0'

125.0

0'

80.00'

60.00'

125.0

0'

60.00'

125.0

0'

60.00'

125.0

0'

60.00'

247.11'

125.0

0'

62.67'

380.80'

234.06'

L=92.87'

207.64'L=61.87'

131.1

3'

40.00'

10.0

0'

115.0

0'

133,867 SF

10,844 SF

13,255 SF

16,986 SF12,249 S

F

10,351 SF

9,354 SF

11,688 SF

9,194 SF

8,097 SF

1,40

0 SF

7,558 SF

7,500 SF

7,800 SF

2,3

00 SF

7,800 SF

7,500 SF

7,500 SF 10,000 SF

7,800 SF

7,500 SF 10,419 SF

7,500 SF

17,386 SF

10,113 SF

7,800 SF

7,888 SF 9,955 SF

7,800 SF

10,000 SF

8,913 SF

8,503 SF

7,500 SF7,800 SF

9,511 SF

9,900 SF

7,500 SF

7,800 SF

8,610 SF7,500 SF

9,215 SF

7,800 SF

7,500 SF

7,875 SF7,800 SF

7,875 SF

7,500 SF

7,875 SF 7,800 SF

8,058 SF

7,500 SF

7,875 SF

8,125 SF

7,800 SF

7,500 SF

8,698 SF

7,800 SF

9,162 SF

7,500 SF

7,800 SF

9,900 SF

8,517 SF

7,500 SF

7,800 SF

11,343 SF

12,281 SF

7,500 SF

7,800 SF

14,017 SF12,229 SF 7,948 SF

8,247 SF8,923 SF

9,035 SF

8,870 SF

7,666 SF

7,500 SF

8,588 SF

15,856 SF

18,511 SF

25,486 SF

10,064 SF

10,902 SF

9,269 SF9,064 SF

9,040 SF 9,000 SF

241.43'88.09' 60.66' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00'

188.88'

1.2

7'

158.5

9'

80.22'

89.47'

60.00'

L=114.37'

L=207.24'

R=333.00'

L=166.17'

R=267.00'

R=258.00'

L=160.47'

L=1.36'

L=119.42'

R=192.00'42.95' 63.44' 33.00'

40.06'

L=144.5

1'

R=158.00'L=63.03'

R=60.0

0'

L=173.0

1'

R=

158.0

0'

L=

63.1

5'

L=43.82'

60.0

0'

60.0

0'

8.3

7'

60.0

0'

60.0

0'

60.0

0'

60.0

0'

60.0

0'

60.0

0'

60.0

0'

60.0

0'

60.0

0'

60.0

0'

60.0

0'

60.0

0'

60.0

0'

37.4

0'

R=60.00'L=188.50'

11.23' 79.71'

R=333.00'L=165.71'

R=267.00'L=132.86'

L=106.00'

11.18'

60.00'

20.00'

20.00'

20.00'

60.00'

60.00'

60.00'

5.3

0'

L=17

6.48'

R=60.00'

6.54'

176.3

6'

81.0

0'

62.0

4'

L=

0.8

9'

R=

267.0

0'

L=

132.8

7'

R=

333.0

0'

L=

165.7

0'

125.0

0'

60.00'

80.00'

64.4

6'

63.0

0'

11.1

3'

63.0

0'

63.0

0'

63.0

0'

5.8

2'

L=

166.0

8'

R=

267.0

0'

L=

207.1

2'

R=

333.0

0'

23.9

0'

85.0

0'

12.86'

25.14'

60.00' 80.00'

44.2

4'

68.6

8'

60.0

0'

60.0

0'

60.0

0'

60.0

0'

60.0

0'

60.0

0'

60.0

0'

60.0

0'

60.0

0'

126.6

7'

40.0

0'

30.00'

20.0

0'

182.50'

124.75'20.25'

78

9

6

5

4

3

2

1

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

1261

1121

1111

1101

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

39

38

37

36

35

34 33 3231

30

49

48

47

46

45

44

4340

41 42

56 55

58

59

57

54

53

52

51

50

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

6869

79

77

78

76

75

74

73

72

71

70

81

80

9001

9016

9017

9000

9002

9015

389.15'

131.18'

177.94'

852.6

7'

139.39'

73.06'

45.86'

240.64'

188.0

0'

176.0

4'

205.9

5'

141.9

0'

R=300.00'L=149.28'

L=

149.2

8'

R=

300.0

0'

R=

300.0

0'

L=

186.6

0'

L=196.3

5'

R=125.0

0'

R=225.00'L=139.95'

R=300.00'

L=186.71'

293.7

9'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

1262

1266

1263

1264

1265

1122

1125

1115

1106

1123

1124

1112

1113

1114

1102

1103

1104

1105

980 SF

1225 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

1225 SF

1225

SF

1225

SF

1225

SF

1225

SF

1225

SF

1225

SF

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.00'20.00'20.00'

20.00'20.00' 25.00'

25.00'

25.00'

20.00'

20.00'

25.00' 20.00'20.00'20.00' 25.00'

25.00'20.00'20.00'20.00'25.00'

25.00' 20.00'20.00'20.00' 25.00'

25.00'20.00'20.00'20.00'25.00'20.00'

20.00'

20.50'

43.50'

41.5

0'

15.00'

25.5

0'

25.5

0'

14.75'

41.5

0'

21.90'

20.3

4'

46.00'

46.00'

10.50'

11.00'

57.7

0'

ULS

TE

R B

OU

LE

VA

RD

80.00'

66.0

0'

66.00'

66.0

0'

66.0

0'

66.00'

66.0

0'

66.00'

66.0

0'

66' ROW HEREBY DEDICATED

66'

ROW HEREBY

DEDICAT

ED

80'

RO

W

HE

RE

BY

DE

DIC

ATE

D

66'

RO

W

HE

RE

BY

DE

DIC

ATE

D

66'

RO

W

HE

RE

BY

DE

DIC

ATE

D


27.00'

93.1

0'

N01°4

6'1

7"W

FOR LOT 1ON PAGE 3SEE B.U.E.

67

LEINSTER LANE66' ROW HEREBY DEDICATED

901328,531 SF

901428,770 SF

20.5

0'

20.5

0'

20.50'

182.50'

161.0

0'

18.00'

59.3

6'

UNDER SEPARATE DOCUMENTTINLEY PARK PARK DISTRICT

TO BE DEDICATED TO THE

HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATIONMAINTAINED BY THE TO BE OWNED AND

15' PU&DE

25'

PU

&D

E

15' PU&DE 15' PU&DE 15' PU&DE 15' PU&DE15' PU&DE

25'

PU

&D

E25'

PU

&D

E25'

PU

&D

E25'

PU

&D

E

25'

PU

&D

E25'

PU

&D

E25'

PU

&D

E25'

PU

&D

E25'

PU

&D

E25'

PU

&D

E25'

PU

&D

E25'

PU

&D

E25'

PU

&D

E25'

PU

&D

E25'

PU

&D

E25'

PU

&D

E25'

PU

&D

E25'

PU

&D

E

10.7

4'

40.4

4'

19.6

4'

42.93'

10.00'

117.9

3'

158.88'

5.1

7'

181.5

9'

114.06'

110.44'

25'

PU

&D

E

0

SCALE: 1" = 50'

5050 25



NOT TO SCALE

TYPICAL LOT DETAIL


SE

E S

HE

ET 2

LOT# LOT# LOT# LOT#

LOT# LOT# LOT# LOT# LOT#

LOT#LOT#LOT#LOT#LOT#LOT#

25' 20' 20' 25'

25' 20' 20' 20' 25'

25'20'20'20'20'25'

25' 25'

25' 25'

25' 25'20' 20' 20' 20'

20'20'20'

20'20'

3KJM

MRD


PLAT OF SUBDIVISION 3RPO

9002

1"=50'

02/18/22

UNDER SEPARATE DOCUMENTTINLEY PARK PARK DISTRICT

TO BE DEDICATED TO THE

49'

90'

49'

90'

49'

110'

110'

49'

49'

130'49'

130'

1225 SF 1225 SF

1225 SF 1225 SF

1225 SF1225 SF

980 SF 980 SF

980 SF 980 SF980 SF

980 SF 980 SF 980 SF 980 SF


APPROVED

DESIGNED

DRAWN

DATE


OF

SHEET


C



MACKIE CONSULTANTS

4/15/2

02

2

N:\

3603\

Survey\

Proposed\

Fin

al\

3603-Plt-S

ub-3.plt

12:4

7:4

8

PM

PROJECT NUMBER:

CLIENT:


3603



RID

GE

LA

ND A

VE

NU

E

SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 29-36-13NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 703.00' OF THE

SO

UT

HW

ES

T

QU

AR

TE

R

OF

SE

CTIO

N 29-

36-

13

EAS

T

LIN

E

OF

TH

E

WES

T 577.0

0'

OF

TH

E

527.00'S89°57'33"W (R)

S00°0

0'1

4'W (R

)521.1

2' (R

)

521.3

0' (M

)

S90°00'00"W (R)

N01°4

7'3

1"

W (M

)1066.1

4' (M

)

N00°0

0'1

4"E (R

)1066.3

3' (R

)

WES

T

LIN

E

OF

TH

E

WES

T

HA

LF

OF

TH

E

SO

UT

HW

ES

T

QU

AR

TE

R

OF

SE

CTIO

N 29-

36-

13

N88°12'29"E (M)

S88°13'43"W (M)

S01°4

7'3

1"E (M

)

S88°11'11"W (M)

345.00'S89°59'46"E (R)

LONGFORD LANE

RO

SC

OM

MO

N R

OA

D

GALWAY ROAD

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.00'

49.00'49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'49.00'

49.00'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

58.80'

125.0

0'

L=10.68'

49.54'

125.0

0'

L=93.62'

L=92.87'

96.50'

182.50'

182.50'

205.5

0'

69.50'44.5

8'69.50'

153.5

0'

69.50'44.5

8'69.50'

258.0

0'

185.50'185.00'

146.0

7'

69.50'

69.50'

65.41'

69.50'

49.77'

48.08'

207.64'L=61.87'

131.1

3'

11,343 SF

9,035 SF

7,666 SF

25,486 SF

L=114.37'

L=207.24'

R=333.00'

L=166.17'

R=267.00'

25.14'182.50'

182.50'

205.5

0'

157.5

0'

157.5

0'

162.5

0'

215.2

5'

153.5

0'

248.2

5'

182.50'

69.5

0'

124.75'20.25'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

1421

1411

1271

1261

1251

1121

1241

1111

1101

1231

1151

1221

1211

1091

1081

1131

1141

1171

1011 1021 1031

1041

1201

1191

1161

1071

1061

1181

1051

39

38

69

9015

240.64'

215.50'

215.50'

683.0

0'

194.0

0'

R=300.00'

L=186.71'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.00'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

49.0

0'

1262

1266

1263

1264

12651272

1273

1274

1275

1276

1244

1234

1144

1156

1174

1206

1016 1026 1036

1046

1216

1226

1166

1122

1125

1134

1256

1115

1106

1086

1066

1056

1076

1096

1196

1123

1124

1132

1133

1112

1113

1114

1102

1103

1104

1105

1092

1093

1094

1095

1082

1083

1084

1085

1072

1073

1074

1075

1062

1063

1064

1065

1052

1053

1054

1055

1416

1415

1414

1413

1412

1426

1425

1424

1423

1422

1242

1243 1232

12331142

1143

1212

1213

1214

1215

1225

1224

1223

1222

1202

1203

1204

1205

1195

1194

1193

1192

1012

1013

1014

1015

1022

1023

1024

1025

1032

1033

1034

1035

1045

1044

1043

1042

1165

1164

1163

1162

1155

1154

1153

1152

1173

1172

1182

1183

1184

1185

1186

1255

1254

1253

1252

980 SF

1225 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980 SF

980 SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980

SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

980 SF

1225 SF1225 SF

1225 SF1225 SF

1225 SF

1225 SF1225 SF

1225

SF

1225

SF

1225

SF

1225

SF

1225

SF

1225

SF

1225 SF

1225 SF

1225

SF

1225

SF

1225 SF

1225 SF

1225 SF

1225 SF

1225 SF

1225 SF

1225 SF

1225 SF1225 SF

1225

SF

1225

SF

1225

SF

1225

SF

1225 SF

1225 SF

1225 SF

1225 SF

1225 SF

1225 SF

1225 SF

1225 SF

1225

SF

1225

SF

1225 SF

1225 SF1225 SF

1225 SF

1225 SF

1225 SF

1225 SF

1225 SF

1225

SF

1225

SF

1225

SF

1225

SF

1225

SF

1225

SF

1225

SF

1225

SF

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.0

0'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

25.0

0'

25.00'20.00'20.00'25.00'

25.00' 20.00'20.00' 25.00'

25.00'20.00'20.00'

20.00'20.00' 25.00'

25.00'

25.00'

20.00'

20.00'

25.00' 20.00'20.00'20.00' 25.00'

25.00'20.00'20.00'20.00'25.00'

25.00' 20.00'20.00'20.00' 25.00'

25.00'20.00'20.00'20.00'25.00'20.00'

20.00'

25.00' 20.00'20.00'20.00'20.00' 25.00'

25.00'20.00'20.00'20.00'20.00'25.00'

25.00' 20.00'20.00'20.00'20.00' 25.00'

25.00'20.00'20.00'20.00'20.00'25.00'

25.00' 20.00'20.00'20.00'20.00' 25.00'

25.00'20.00'20.00'20.00'20.00'25.00'

25.00' 20.00'20.00'20.00'20.00' 25.00'

25.00'20.00'20.00'20.00'20.00'25.00'

25.00' 20.00'20.00'20.00'20.00' 25.00'

25.00'20.00'20.00'20.00'20.00'25.00'

20.50'

20.50'20.50'

43.50'20.50'

20.50'

43.50'

20.50'

32.00'

20.5

0'

20.5

0'

20.50'

40.5

0'

40.5

0'

20.50'

20.50'15.2

5'1

5.2

5'20.50'

20.50'

20.50'

20.50'

20.50'

43.50'

43.50'

43.50'

18.0

0'18.0

0'

20.50'

20.50'

20.50'

40.5

0'

32.00' 20.5

0'

20.5

0'

20.50'

20.50'

20.50'

41.50'25.50' 25.50'

20.00'

20.00'

20.0

0'

20.0

0'

42.0

0'

46.00'

33.00'

25.5

0'

25.0

0'

33.00'

67.0

0'

20.50'

20.50'

41.5

0'

33.00'

25.5

0'

25.5

0'

33.00'

46.00'

20.50'

22.0

0'

20.50'

22.0

0'

46.00'

15.00'

41.5

0'

15.00'

25.5

0'

25.5

0'

14.75'

41.5

0'

21.90'

20.3

4'

20.5

0'

20.50'

20.50' 46.00'

46.00'20.50'40.5

0'

10.50'10.50'

10.50'10.50'

20.50'

11.00'

57.7

0'

5.5

0'

5.5

0'

5.5

0'

5.5

0'

10.50'

10.50'

41.50'

5.5

0'

5.5

0'

20.50'

8.2

5'

8.2

5'

10.50' 10.50'

10.50'

66.0

0'

66.00'

66.0

0'

66.00'

66.0

0'

66.0

0'

66.00'


66'

RO

W

HE

RE

BY

DE

DIC

ATE

D


25.00' 20.00'20.00' 25.00'20.00'20.00'

25.00' 20.00'20.00'20.00'20.00' 25.00'

25.00'20.00'20.00'20.00'20.00'25.00'

25.00' 20.00'20.00'20.00'20.00' 25.00'

901328,531 SF

901328,531 SF

15.5

0'

15.5

2'

15.5

4'

15.5

6'

15.5

8'

15.5

9'

15.6

1'

15.6

3'

30,799 SF9012

901130,334 SF

900816,217 SF

900916,126 SF

901013,532 SF

900727,085 SF

900523,203 SF

900615,274 SF

901428,770 SF

20.5

0'

20.5

0'

20.50'

20.5

0'

20.5

0'

20.5

0'

20.5

0'

20.5

0'

20.5

0'

20.50'

182.50'

900316,643 SF9004

16,642 SF

185.50'185.00'

86.4

4'

16.00'

161.0

0'

161.0

0'

18.00'

59.3

6'

163.00'

190.0

0'

163.00'

185.5

0'

156.50'

86.5

0'

156.50'

156.1

4'

HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATIONMAINTAINED BY THE TO BE OWNED AND

0

SCALE: 1" = 50'

5050 25



PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (PUE) PROVISIONS

PROVISIONSBLANKET UTILITY EASEMENT (BUE.)

NICOR GAS EASEMENT PROVISIONS

GRANTOR/LOT OWNER, UPON WRITTEN REQUEST.RELOCATION OF FACILITIES WILL BE DONE BY GRANTEES AT COST OF

MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT.OR POND, RETENTION OR POOL A AS SUCH STRUCTURES OR

DISTRICT BUSINESS SERVICE BUILDING, A BY OCCUPIED PHYSICALLY PROPERTY REAL EXCLUDES BUT WALKWAYS, AND DRIVEWAYS INTERIOR

WITH SURFACED PROPERTY REAL INCLUDES ELEMENTS" "COMMON AND AREAS" OR AREA "COMMON TERMS THE AREA". COMMON AND "PARKING GROUND", "COMMON ARE", "OPEN SPACE", "OPEN

ELEMENTS", "COMMON "OUTLOTS", AS SUCH TERMS BY PLAT THE ON DESIGNATED OTHERWISE BE SUCH THOUGH EVEN DEVELOPMENT,

PLANNED THE WITHIN AREAS OR PARCEL LOTS, OWNED SEPARATELY THE TO APPURTENANCE AN AS WHOLE IN RESERVED IS WHICH

OF ENJOYMENT AND USE BENEFICIAL THE PROPERTY, REAL OF AREA OR PARCEL LOT, A AS DEFINED IS AREAS" OR AREA ‘COMMON TERM THE

ILCS 605/2(E), AS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME.765 CHAPTER ACT", PROPERTY "CONDOMINIUM THE IN TERM SUCH IN

FORTH SET MEANING THE HAVE SHALL ELEMENTS" "COMMON TERM THE

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE THEREOF.PROPER THE WITH INTERFERE TO AS SO MANNER A IN ALTERED

BE NOT SHALL PROPERTY SUBDIVIDED THE OF GRADE THE FACILITIES, SUCH ANY OF INSTALLATION AFTER GRANTEES. OF CONSENT

WRITTEN PRIOR THE WITHOUT EASEMENT" "UTILITY MARKED LINES DOTTED THE WITHIN PROPERTY THE OVER OR UPON IN, OR FACILITIES

GRANTEES' OVER PLACED BE NOT SHALL OBSTRUCTIONS PROPOSES, SUCH ALL FOR PROPERTY SUBDIVIDED THE UPON ENTER TO RIGHT THE

AND GIVEN, HEREIN RIGHTS THE TO INCIDENT REQUIRED REASONABLY BE MAY AS ROOTS AND BUSHES TREES, REMOVE OR TRIM CUT,

TO RIGHT THE AREAS, OR AREA COMMON AND LOTS, ADJACENT ON OR THEREON, IMPROVEMENTS SERVE TO AREAS OR AREA

COMMON AND LOTS, ADJACENT ON OR THEREON, IMPROVEMENTS SERVE TO AREAS OR AREA COMMON AND LOT EACH OF SURFACE

THE UNDER OR OVER CONNECTIONS SERVICE REQUIRED INSTALL TO RIGHT THE WITH TOGETHER PRIVATE, OR PUBLIC WHETHER

ALLEYS, AND STREETS FOR PLAT THE ON DESIGNATED PROPERTY THE AND AREAS", OR AREA "COMMON A AS PLAT THE ON DESIGNATED

PROPERTY THE AND ELEMENTS", "COMMON AS PLAT THIS ON AND/OR CONDOMINIUM OF DECLARATION THE IN DESIGNATED PROPERTY

THE EASEMENT", "UTILITY MARKED AND PLAT THE ON LINES DOTTED THE WITHIN SHOWN PROPERTY THE OF SURFACE THE UPON

AND ALONG ACROSS, UNDER, OVER, IN, GAS NATURAL OF DISTRIBUTION AND TRANSMISSION THE WITH CONNECTION IN USED FACILITIES

TIME, TO TIME FROM REMOVE, AND MAINTAIN OPERATE, INSTALL, TO SEVERALLY, AND JOINTLY ASSIGNS, AND SUCCESSORS RESPECTIVE THEIR

NICOR GAS COMPANY

TOGRANTED AND FOR RESERVED HEREBY IS SERVICE GAS NATURAL WITH

PROPERTY OTHER AND SUBDIVISION THE SERVING FOR EASEMENT AN

PROVISIONSCOMMONWEALTH EDISON AND AT&T EASEMENT

GRANTOR/LOT OWNER, UPON WRITTEN REQUEST.RELOCATION OF FACILITIES WILL BE DONE BY GRANTEES AT COST OF

POND, OR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT.RETENTION POOL A AS SUCH STRUCTURES OR DISTRICT BUSINESS

SERVICE BUILDING, A BY OCCUPIED PHYSICALLY PROPERTY REAL EXCLUDES BUT WALKWAYS, AND DRIVEWAYS INTERIOR WITH SURFACED PROPERTY REAL INCLUDES ELEMENTS" "COMMON AND AREAS" OR AREA "COMMON TERMS THE AREA". "COMMON AND

"PARKING" GROUND", "COMMON AND AREA", "OPEN SPACE", "OPEN ELEMENTS", "COMMON "OUTLOTS", AS SUCH TERMS BY PLAT THE

ON DESIGNATED OTHERWISE BE SUCH THOUGH EVEN DEVELOPMENT, PLANNED THE WITHIN AREAS OR PARCEL LOTS, OWNED SEPARATELY

THE TO APPORTIONMENT AN AS WHOLE IN RESERVED IS WHICH OF ENJOYMENT AND USE BENEFICIAL THE PROPERTY, REAL OF AREA OR

PARCEL LOT, A AS DEFINED IS AREAS" OR AREA "COMMON TERM THE

CHAPTER 765 ILCS 605/2, AS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME.ACT", PROPERTY "CONDOMINIUM THE IN TERM SUCH FOR FORTH

SET MEANING THE HAVE SHALL ELEMENTS" "COMMON TERM THE

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE THEREOF. PROPER THE WITH INTERFERE TO AS SO MANNER A IN ALTERED

BE NOT SHALL PROPERTY SUBDIVIDED THE OF GRADE THE FACILITIES, SUCH ANY OF INSTALLATION AFTER GRANTEES. OF CONSENT

WRITTEN PRIOR THE WITHOUT DESIGNATION) SIMILAR (OR "P.U.E." EASEMENT", UTILITY "PUBLIC EASEMENT", UTILITY "EASEMENT", MARKED

DESIGNATION) SIMILAR LINES(OR DOTTED OR DASHED THE WITHIN PROPERTY THE OVER OR UPON IN, OR FACILITIES GRANTEES' OVER PLACED BE NOT SHALL OBSTRUCTIONS PURPOSES. SUCH

ALL FOR PROPERTY SUBDIVIDED THE UPON ENTER TO RIGHT THE AND GIVEN, HEREIN RIGHTS THE TO INCIDENT REQUIRED REASONABLY

BE MAY AS SUBSURFACE AND SURFACE THE FROM OBSTRUCTIONS CLEAR TO AND SAPLINGS AND ROOTS BUSHES, THREES, REMOVE OR TRIM CUT, TO RIGHT THE AREAS, OR AREA COMMON

AND LOTS, ADJACENT ON OR THEREON, IMPROVEMENTS SERVE TO AREAS OR AREA COMMON AND LOT EACH OF SURFACE THE UNDER OR OVER CONNECTIONS SERVICE REQUIRED INSTALL TO RIGHT THE WITH TOGETHER PRIVATE, OR PUBLIC WHETHER ALLEYS, AND STREETS

FOR PLAT THE ON DESIGNATED PROPERTY THE AND AREAS", OR AREA "COMMON A AS PLAT THE ON DESIGNATED PROPERTY THE

AND ELEMENTS", "COMMON AS PLAT THIS ON AND/OR CONDOMINIUM OF DECLARATION THE IN DESIGNATED PROPERTY THE DESIGNATION),

SIMILAR (OR "P.U.E." EASEMENT", UTILITY "PUBLIC EASEMENT", "UTILITY "EASEMENT", MARKED AND PLAT THE ON DESIGNATION)

SIMILAR (OR LINES DOTTED OR DASHED THE WITHIN SHOWN PROPERTY THE OF SURFACE THE UPON AND ALONG ACROSS, UNDER,

OVER, IN, SIGNALS AND SOUNDS COMMUNICATIONS, ELECTRICITY, OF DISTRIBUTION AND TRANSMISSION UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD

WITH CONNECTION IN USED FACILITIES OTHER OR CABINETS EQUIPMENT PEDESTALS, TRANSFORMERS, MANHOLES, CONDUITS,

CABLES, WIRES, ANCHORS, GUYS, POLES, TIME, TO TIME FROM REMOVE, AND RELOCATE SUPPLEMENT, REPLACE, RECONSTRUCT,

MODIFY, MAINTAIN, REPAIR, OPERATE, CONSTRUCT, TO SEVERALLY, AND JOINTLY ASSIGNS, AND SUCCESSORS LICENSEES, RESPECTIVE THEIR

COMPANY, GRANTEES,TELEPHONE BELL ILLINOIS A.K.A. ILLINOIS, AMERITECH A.K.A. ILLINOIS,

SBC A.K.A. CORPORATION, AT&T AND COMPANY EDISON COMMONWEALTH

FOR AND GRANTED TORESERVED HEREBY IS SERVICE COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRIC WITH PROPERTY OTHER AND SUBDIVISION THE SERVING FOR EASEMENT AN

WORKMANLIKE CONDITION. AND CLEAN GENERALLY A IN AREA MAINTENANCE THE LEAVE TO AND

SPOIL, AND DEBRIS EXCESS ALL REMOVE TO SURFACE, CONCRETE OR ASPHALT ANY PATCH COLD TO DRAINAGE, SUITABLE RETAIN TO AS SO CREATED TRENCHES ALL MOUND AND BACKFILL TO WORK

MAINTENANCE SUCH FOLLOWING OBLIGATED BE SHALL VILLAGE SAID THAT HOWEVER, PROVIDED, SHRUBBERY; OR LAWN TREES, GUTTERS,

CURB, PAVEMENT, OF REPLACEMENT OR REPAIR RESTORATION, THE TO LIMITED NOT BUT INCLUDING RESTORATION, SURFACE TO

RESPECT WITH OBLIGATION NO HAVE SHALL VILLAGE SAID GRANTED, HEREIN RIGHTS EASEMENT ITS OF EXERCISE THE IN PARK TINLEY

OF VILLAGE THE BY PERFORMED BE TO WORK ANY FOLLOWING

SURFACE DRAINAGE PATTERNS.THE CHANGE OR IMPAIR OR GRADE IN CHANGE ANY CAUSE SHALL

ENTITIES NAMED ABOVE THE BY EASEMENTS SAID OF OCCUPATION OR USE NO RECROSSED. OR CROSSED BEING EASEMENTS THE

WITHIN EXISTING THERETO APPURTENANT FACILITIES AND SYSTEMS DISTRIBUTION AND TRANSMISSION ANY DISTURB OR DAMAGE, WITH,

INTERFERE TO NOT AS SO MANNER A SUCH IN DONE BE SHALL ENTITIES NAMED ABOVE THE BY EASEMENTS SAID OF RECROSSING

AND CROSSING THE RESERVED. AND GRANTED ARE EASEMENTS SUCH WHICH FOR ENTITIES OTHER BY THEREOF USE AND

OCCUPATION THE PRECLUDE OR WITH INTERFERE TO NOT AS SO MANNER A SUCH IN DONE BE SHALL ENTITIES SUCH OF EACH BY ENTITIES NAMED ABOVE THE FOR RESERVED AND GRANTED HEREIN

EASEMENTS NON-EXCLUSIVE THE OF USE AND OCCUPATION THE

DESCRIBED. HEREIN USES THE WITH INTERFERE UNREASONABLY NOT DO THAT

PURPOSES RELATED OTHER AND DRIVEWAYS, LANDSCAPING, TREES, EASEMENT", BUT SUCH AREAS MAY BE USED FOR GARDENS, SHRUBS,

UTILITY AND "DRAINAGE AS DESIGNATED AREAS ANY OVER OR UPON, IN, CONSTRUCTED BE SHALL OBSTRUCTIONS OR STRUCTURES,

BUILDINGS, PERMANENT NO THERETO. APPURTENANT FACILITIES AND SYSTEMS DISTRIBUTION AND TRANSMISSION UNDERGROUND

THEIR OF OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENT, REMOVAL, REPAIR, RECONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, CONSTRUCTION,

THE WITH INTERFERE WHICH EASEMENT", UTILITY AND "DRAINAGE AS DESIGNATED AREAS THE WITHIN PLANTS OTHER OR SHRUBS TREES,

ANY REMOVE OR TRIM, CUT, TO RIGHT THE AND FORTH SET HEREIN USES THE FOR DESCRIBED HEREIN EASEMENTS THE UPON ENTER

TO RIGHT THE GRANTED HEREBY ARE ENTITIES NAMES ABOVE THE

PURPOSES.AND USES SUCH FOR REQUIRED AND NECESSARY EQUIPMENT AND

PERSONNEL THE FOR THERETO ACCESS OF RIGHT A WITH TOGETHER EASEMENT", UTILITY AND "DRAINAGE AS PLAT THE ON SHOWN

AREAS THE WITHIN SEWERS, SANITARY AND SEWERS STORM WATER, OF DISTRIBUTION AND TRANSMISSION THE FOR FACILITIES INSPECT

AND REPLACE REMOVE, REPAIR, RECONSTRUCT, INSTALL, CONSTRUCT, TO ILLINOIS PARK, TINLEY OF VILLAGE THE TO GRANTED

AND FOR RESERVED HEREBY ALSO IS EASEMENT NON-EXCLUSIVE A

LOT TO SERVE IMPROVEMENTS THEREON.EACH OF SURFACE THE UNDER CONNECTIONS SERVICE REQUIRED

INSTALL TO RIGHT THE WITH TOGETHER AND PURPOSES, AND USES SUCH FOR REQUIRED AND NECESSARY EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL

THE FOR THERETO ACCESS OF RIGHT THE WITH TOGETHER THERETO, APPURTENANT FACILITIES NECESSARY ALL AND LINES TELEVISION

CABLE AND LINES, ELECTRIC MAINS, GAS CABLES, TELEPHONE LIMITATION WITHOUT INCLUDING EASEMENT", UTILITY AND "DRAINAGE

THE OF SURFACE THE UNDER LINES AND SYSTEMS DISTRIBUTION AND TRANSMISSION UNDERGROUND OPERATE AND MAINTAIN INSPECT,

REPLACE, REMOVE, REPAIR, RECONSTRUCT, INSTALL, CONSTRUCT, TO EASEMENT" UTILITY AND "DRAINAGE AS PLAT THE ON SHOWN AREAS

THE WITHIN ASSIGNS AND SUCCESSORS RESPECTIVE THEIR AND ILLINOIS, PARK, TINLEY OF VILLAGE THE BY GRANTED FRANCHISES EXISTING OF HOLDERS AND UTILITIES PUBLIC OTHER CABLEVISION,

COMPANY, EDISON COMMONWEALTH COMPANY, GAS ILLINOIS NORTHERN COMPANY, TELEPHONE BELL ILLINOIS TO GRANTED

AND FOR RESERVED HEREBY IS EASEMENT NON-EXCLUSIVE A

DRAINAGE THEREON.SURFACE THE WITH OR THEREOF MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION PROPER THE WITH INTERFERE TO AS SO GRANTEES SAID OF FACILITIES

THE OF ANY OF INSTALLATION THE BY MANNER ANY IN ALTERED BE NOT SHALL ENGINEER MUNICIPAL THE BY APPROVED HOME SUBDIVIDED THE OF GRADES THE PLAT. THE ON DESIGNATED OTHERWISE AS

EXCEPT PARKING AND DRIVEWAYS GARDENS, LANDSCAPING, FOR USED BE MAY EASEMENT SAID GRANTEE. THE OF CONSENT WRITTEN PRIOR

WITHOUT EASEMENT SAID WITHIN HOME THE OVER OR UPON, IN, OR FACILITIES GRANTEES OVER PLACED BE NOT SHALL FENCES, INCLUDING

OBSTRUCTIONS, PURPOSES. SUCH ALL FOR HOME THE UPON ENTER REQUIRED INCIDENTAL TO THE RIGHTS HEREIN GIVEN, AND THE RIGHT TO

REASONABLY BE MAY AS ROOTS AND BUSHES TREES, REMOVE OR TRIM, CUT, TO RIGHT THE WITH TOGETHER THEREON. IMPROVEMENTS

SERVE TO LOT EACH OF SURFACE THE UNDER CONNECTIONS SERVICE REQUIRED INSTALL TO RIGHT THE WITH TOGETHER

AND PURPOSES, AND USES SUCH FOR REQUIRED AND NECESSARY EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL THE FOR THERETO ACCESS OF RIGHT

THE WITH TOGETHER THERETO, APPURTENANT FACILITIES NECESSARY ALL AND LINES TELEVISION CABLE CABLES, ELECTRIC CABLES,

TELECOMMUNICATION MAINS, GAS LIMITATION, WITHOUT INCLUDING EASEMENT UTILITY THE OF SURFACE THE UPON AND ALONG ACROSS,

UNDER, IN, LINES AND SYSTEMS DISTRIBUTION AND TRANSMISSION UNDERGROUND OPERATE AND MAINTAIN INSPECT, REPLACE,

REMOVE, REPAIR, RECONSTRUCT, INSTALL, CONSTRUCT, TO (PUE) EASEMENT UTILITY PUBLIC MARKED AND PLAT THE ON DESIGNATED

SO AREAS THE WITHIN ASSIGNS, AND SUCCESSORS RESPECTIVE THEIR AND ILLINOIS PARK, TINLEY OF VILLAGE THE BY GRANTED

FRANCHISES OF HOLDERS AND ILLINOIS PARK, TINLEY OF VILLAGE THE COMCAST, COMPANY, EDISON COMMONWEALTH NICOR, SBC, TO

GRANTED AND FOR RESERVED HEREBY IS EASEMENT NON-EXCLUSIVE A

TO THE RIGHTS OF THE OWNERS OF OTHER LOTS IN THIS SUBDIVISION. AND UTILITIES PUBLIC THE OF RIGHTS THE TO SUBJECT TITLES THEIR TAKE SHALL SUBDIVISION THIS IN LOTS THE OF OWNERS BUT PLANS, ENGINEERING APPROVED THE ON SHOWN AS EXCEPT

EASEMENTS, THE IN PLACED BE SHALL STRUCTURES, OTHER OR SHEDS BUILDINGS, ACCESSORY BUILDINGS, PERMANENT NO

SHALL BE NON-EXCLUSIVE.EASEMENTS ABOVE THE UNDERSTOOD FURTHER IS IT OVERHEAD. NOT

BUT SURFACE, THE ON OR UNDERGROUND BE SHALL INSTALLATIONS ALL EQUIPMENT. UTILITY PUBLIC SAID THE OF ANY WITH INTERFERE

TO THREATEN OR INTERFERE THAT SAPLINGS OR SHRUBS, TREES, ANY TRIMMED, KEEP AND TRIM OR REMOVE, AND DOWN CUT TO GRANTED

HEREBY IS RIGHT THE FINALLY, AND EQUIPMENT; OTHER AND VALVES, WATER MANHOLES, CABLES, CONDUITS, SAID AREAS EASEMENT SAID

WITHIN MAINTAIN AND OPERATE, RENEW, CONSTRUCT, LAY, INSTALL, TO TIMES ALL AT LOTS THE UPON ENTER TO RIGHT THE SERVICE;

WATER AND TELEVISION CABLE GAS, SEWER, ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, WITH PROPERTY OTHER AND SUBDIVISION THE SERVING OF PURPOSE THE

FOR EQUIPMENT OTHER AND VALVES, WATER MANHOLES, NECESSARY ALL WITH MAINS WATER AND SEWERS CABLES, AND CONDUITS

UNDERGROUND MAINTAIN AND OPERATE, RENEW, CONSTRUCT, LAY, INSTALL, TO (B.U.E.) EASEMENT" UTILITY "BLANKET AS LABELED PLANS, ENGINEERING APPROVED THE ON SHOWN AS CONSTRUCTED

AND/OR PLANNED BUILDINGS ANY FOR (N.E.A.) AREA" EASEMENT "NON ANY THEREFORM EXCEPTING 1, LOT THROUGH AND UNDER OVER,

ACROSS, UPON, IN, ASSIGNS, AND SUCCESSORS RESPECTIVE THEIR AND PARK TINLEY OF VILLAGE THE COMPANY, GAS NICOR

COMPANY, EDISON COMMONWEALTH COMCAST, CORPORATION, AT&T TO GRANTED AND FOR RESERVED HEREBY IS EASEMENT AN

EASEMENT (PU & DE) PROVISIONS

(PU&DE) PROVISIONS

PUBLIC UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT

THEREOF.TO INTERFERE WITH THE PROPER OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE EASEMENT PROPERTY SHALL NOT BE ALTERED IN ANY MANNER SO AS THE FACILITIES OF THE SAID GRANTEES, THE GRADE OF THE DRIVEWAYS, AND PARKING, HOWEVER, AFTER INSTALLATION OF ANY OF NOTIFICATION. SAID EASEMENTS MAY BE USED FOR LANDSCAPING, INTERFERENCE SHALL BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY UPON VILLAGE CONSENT OF THE GRANTEE AND SUCH OBSTRUCTION OR SAID EASEMENTS SHALL NOT OCCUR WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN GRANTEES' FACILITIES OR IN, UPON, OR OVER THE PROPERTY WITHIN OBSTRUCTIONS AND ANY AND ALL INTERFERENCE OF USE OF SHALL BE FOR THE USE AND ENJOYMENT OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC. PURPOSES STATED HEREIN. ALL SIDEWALKS WITHIN THESE EASEMENTS HEREIN FOR ALL SUCH PURPOSES AND ACCESS FOR ANY AND ALL GIVEN, AND THE RIGHT TO ENTER UPON THE PROPERTY PLATTED MAY BE REASONABLY REQUIRED INCIDENT TO THE RIGHTS HEREIN THE RIGHT TO CUT, TRIM OR REMOVE TREES, BUSHES AND ROOTS AS ON THE PLAT AS DEDICATED FOR PUBLIC STREETS, TOGETHER WITH EASEMENT" OR SIMILAR DESIGNATION AND THOSE PARTS DESIGNATED MARKED "PUBLIC UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT", "PUDE", "BLANKET THE PROPERTY SHOWN ON THE PLAT WITH DASHED LINES AND UTILITIES IN, UNDER, ACROSS, ALONG AND UPON THE SURFACE OF UNDERGROUND TRANSMISSION OF ELECTRICITY, AND OTHER PUBLIC STORMWATER DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND/OR BIKEPATHS, APPURTENANCES USED IN CONNECTION WITH WATER MAINS, SEWERS, REPLACE, INSPECT AND REMOVE FACILITIES AND ANY AND ALL TO INSTALL, CONSTRUCT, OPERATE, MAINTAIN, RELOCATE, RENEW, OF TINLEY PARK INCLUDING ANY AND ALL SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, UTILITY OPERATING UNDER FRANCHISE AGREEMENT WITH THE VILLAGE AND GRANTED TO THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK, IL AND ANY OTHER BIKEPATHS AND OTHER PUBLIC UTILITIES IS HEREBY RESERVED FOR SEWERS, STORMWATER DRAINAGE, STREET LIGHTING, SIDEWALK AND/OR PROPERTY AND OTHER PROPERTY WITH WATER SUPPLY, SANITARY A PERMANENT NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR SERVING THE SUBJECT

NOT TO SCALE

TYPICAL TOWNHOME LOT DETAIL

MAKE THE REPAIR AND/OR FILE A LIEN ON THE HOME.TO VILLAGE THE BY INCURRED COSTS THE FOR OWNER THE FROM

REIMBURSEMENT SEEK AND REPAIRS REQUIRED THE MAKE MAY VILLAGE THE TIME, OF PERIOD REASONABLE A IN REPAIRS REQUIRED MAKE

TO FAILS OWNER THE FAILURE, SAID OF VILLAGE THE FROM NOTICE OF RECEIPT AFTER AND, FACILITIES SAID MAINTAIN TO FAILS OWNER

THE IF EASEMENT. SAID WITHIN LOCATED FACILITIES LANDSCAPING THE OF INSPECTION AND TO ACCESS OF PURPOSES THE FOR

TIME ANY AT EASEMENT SAID UPON EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL WITH ENTER TO OBLIGATION, THE NOT BUT RIGHT, THE HAVE SHALL VILLAGE

THE THEREON. DRAINAGE SURFACE THE WITH OR THEREOF MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION PROPER THE WITH INTERFERE TO AS SO GRANTEES SAID OF PLANTINGS LANDSCAPE OF MAINTENANCE AND INSTALLATION THE BY MANNER ANY IN ALTERED BE NOT SHALL ENGINEER

MUNICIPAL THE BY APPROVED HOME SUBDIVIDED THE OF GRADES THE OSWEGO. OF VILLAGE THE AND GRANTEE THE OF CONSENT WRITTEN

PRIOR WITHOUT EASEMENT SAID WITHIN SPECIES LIKE WITH VEGETATION DISEASED OR DEAD REPLACE TO EXCEPT REMOVED BE VEGETATION

SHALL NOR PLANS THE ON SHOWN NOT ARE THAT EASEMENT SAID THROUGH OR OVER ACROSS ON, MAINTAINED OR CONSTRUCTED

BE SHALL FENCES OR STRUCTURES BUILDINGS, PERMANENT NO PURPOSES. AND USES SUCH FOR REQUIRED AND NECESSARY

EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL THE FOR THERETO ACCESS OF RIGHT THE WITH TOGETHER THERETO, APPURTENANT FACILITIES NECESSARY ALL LIMITATION WITHOUT INCLUDING EASEMENT LANDSCAPE THE OF

SURFACE THE UPON AND ALONG ACROSS, UNDER, IN, PLAN LANDSCAPE SUBDIVISION THE ON DEPICTED AS STRUCTURES AND PLANTINGS BERMS, LANDSCAPE MAINTAIN AND INSPECT, REPLACE, REMOVE, REPAIR, INSTALL,

TO (LE) EASEMENT LANDSCAPE MARKED AND PLAT THE ON DESIGNATED SO AREAS THE WITHIN ASSIGNS, AND SUCCESSORS RESPECTIVE THEIR

AND DECLARATIONS AND BYLAWS ASSOCIATION OWNERS' HOME THE IN DEFINED FURTHER BE MAY AS ASSOCIATION OWNERS' HOME THE TO

GRANTED AND FOR RESERVED HEREBY IS EASEMENT NON-EXCLUSIVE A

LANDSCAPE EASEMENT (LE) PROVISIONS




AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND FINAL PUD PLAT FOR THE OAK RIDGE

SUBDIVISION (DR HORTON)

MICHAEL W. GLOTZ, PRESIDENTNANCY M O’CONNOR, VILLAGE CLERK




Board of Trustees





AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND FINAL PUD PLAT FOR THE OAK RIDGE

SUBDIVISION (DR HORTON)


WHEREAS, a petition for the granting of a Special Use for Final Approval of a Planned Unit Development (“PUD”) to allow for the approved development of property located at the southeast corner of Ridgeland Ave. & Oak Forest Ave (excluding 17201 Ridgeland Ave), Tinley Park, Illinois ("Subject Property"), has been filed by DR Horton Inc – Midwest (“Petitioner”) with the Village Clerk of this Village and has been referred to the Plan Commission of the Village and has been processed in accordance with the Tinley Park Zoning Ordinance; and

WHEREAS, said Plan Commission held a public hearing on the question of whether the Special Use Permit and Final PUD Plat of Subdivision should be granted on May 5, 2022, at the Village Hall of this Village of Tinley Park ("Village"), at which time all persons were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and


WHEREAS, the Plan Commission voted 7-0 and has filed its report and findings and recommendations that the proposed Special Use and Final Plat be approved with this President and Board of Trustees, and this Board of Trustees has duly considered said report, findings and recommendations; and

WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities of the Village of Tinley Park, Cook and Will Counties, Illinois, have determined that it is in the best interest of the Village of Tinley Park and its residents to approve said Special use; and


SECTION 1: The foregoing recitals shall be and are hereby incorporated as findings of facts as if said recitals were fully set forth herein.


SECTION 2: That the report of findings and recommendations of the Plan Commission are herein incorporated by reference as the findings of this President and the Board of Trustees, as complete as if fully set forth herein at length. This Board finds that the Petitioner has provided evidence establishing that they have met the standards for granting the Planned Unit Development set forth in Section VII.C, Special use standards in Section X.J.5., and the Site Plan and Architecture guidelines as set forth in Section III.U.6., and the proposed granting of the PUD and Special Use Permit as set forth herein is in the public good and in the best interest of the Village and its residents and is consistent with and fosters the purpose and spirit of the Tinley Park Zoning Ordinance.

Section VII.C. Standards: No Planned Unit Development (PUD) shall be authorized by the Village Board unless the following standards and criteria are met:

A. The site of the proposed planned unit development is not less than five (5) acres in area, is under single ownership and/or unified control, and is suitable to be planned and developed, or redeveloped, as a unit and in a manner consistent with the purpose and intent of this Ordinance and with the Comprehensive Plan of the Village:

B. The Planned Unit Development will not substantially injure, or damage the use, value, and enjoyment of the surrounding property, nor hinder or prevent the development of surrounding property in accordance with the Land Use Plan of the Village;

C. The uses permitted in the development are necessary or desirable and that the need for such uses has been clearly demonstrated;

D. The proposed development will not impose an undue burden on public facilities and services, such as sewer and water systems, police, and fire protection;

E. The proposed development can be substantially completed within the period of time specified in the schedule of development submitted by the developer;

F. The street system serving the Planned Unit Development is adequate to carry the traffic that will be imposed upon the streets by the proposed development, and that the streets and driveways on the site of the Planned Unit Development will be adequate to serve the residents or occupants of the proposed development;

G. When a Planned Unit Development proposes the use of private streets, common driveways, private recreation facilities, or common open space, the developer shall provide and submit, as part of the application, the method and arrangement whereby these private facilities shall be operated and maintained;

H. The general development plan shall contain such proposed covenants, easements, and other provisions relating to the bulk, location, and density of residential buildings, non-residential uses and structures, and public facilities as are necessary for the welfare of the Planned Unit Development and the Village. All such covenants shall specifically provide for enforcement by the Village of Tinley Park in addition to the landowners within the development;

I. The developer shall provide and record easements and covenants, and shall make such other arrangements as furnishing a performance bond, escrow deposit, or other financial guarantees as may be reasonably be required to assure performance in accordance with the development plan and to protect the public interest in the event of abandonment of said plan before completion; and

J. Any exceptions or modifications of the zoning, subdivision, or other regulations that would otherwise be applicable to the site are warranted by the design of the proposed development plan, and the amenities incorporated in it, are consistent with the general interest of the public.



a. That the establishment, maintenance, or operation of the Special Use will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare;

There is no danger to the public with additional residential housing proposed.b. That the Special Use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property

in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood;

Residential housing surrounds the development and residential uses are less intense than the former commercial and light industrial uses. The proposed zoning is a better fit for the area.

c. That the establishment of the Special Use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district;

The remaining land has been planned in concept to tie into the surrounding area’s roads, utilities, sidewalks, and other development aspects. The remaining commercial areas have been planned for potential residential development in concept as well.

d. That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, and/or other necessary facilities have been or are being provided;

There are adequate roadways, utilities, and drainage existing around the site and proposed throughout the new development.

e. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets;

The ingress and egress access points have been reviewed by the Village Engineer for their best placement on the site and for overall traffic flow for the area.

f. That the Special Use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located, except as such regulations may in each instance be modified by the Village Board pursuant to the recommendation of the Plan Commission. The Village Board shall impose such conditions and restrictions upon the premises benefited by a Special Use Permit as may be necessary to ensure compliance with the above standards, to reduce or minimize the effect of such permit upon other properties in the neighborhood, and to better carry out the general intent of this Ordinance. Failure to comply with such conditions or restrictions shall constitute a violation of this Ordinance; and

The buildings will comply with all other code requirements of the Village not covered by an Exception to the Zoning Ordinance indicated in the PUD documents and plans.

g. The extent to which the Special Use contributes directly or indirectly to the economic development of the community as a whole.


The development will add additional residents that help support surrounding businesses and add additional property taxes where the vacant land currently provides minimal support to various public bodies.

SECTION 3: The Special Use Permit set forth herein below shall be applicable to the following described property:

LEGAL DESCRIPTION:PARCEL 1:

THAT PART OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE 13 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF OAK FOREST AVENUE (SAID LINE BEING 60 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY OF (BY RECTANGULAR MEASUREMENT) AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE 100 FOOT WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE CHICAGO ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY), AND THE EAST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE (SAID EAST LINE BEING 50 FEET EAST OF (BY RECTANGULAR MEASUREMENT) AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4); THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE, 358.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST 1285.59 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 28; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, 544.91 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 90 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST, 758.60 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 577.00 FEET OF SAID SOUTHWEST* 1/4; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4, 521.12 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 703 FEET OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 33 SECONDS WEST, PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4, 527.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE (SAID EAST LINE BEING 50 FEET EAST OF (BY RECTANGULAR MEASUREMENT) AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 14 SECONDS EAST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE, 1066.33 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS.

PARCEL 2:

THAT PART OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE 13 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF OAK FOREST AVENUE (SAID LINE BEING 60 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY OF (BY RECTANGULAR


MEASUREMENT) AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE 100 FOOT WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE CHICAGO ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY), AND THE EAST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE (SAID EAST LINE BEING 50 FEET EAST OF (BY RECTANGULAR MEASUREMENT) AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4): THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 14 SECONDS EAST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE 358.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST 345.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST 941.25 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED LINE, 902.43 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 35 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED LINE 282.49 FEET TO THE AFORESAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF OAK FOREST AVENUE: THENCE SOUTH 61 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 52 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE, 747.91 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 345.00 FEET EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE AFORESAID EAST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED LINE, 545.25 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. *AMENDED SCRIVNER'S ERROR

PARCEL 3:

A PARCEL OF LAND IN THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE 13, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SOUTH OAK FOREST AVENUE (SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE BEING 60 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY (BY RECTANGULAR MEASUREMENT) OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE 100 FOOT WIDE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE CHICAGO ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY) WITH THE EAST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE, SAID EAST LINE BEING 50 FEET EAST (BY RECTANGULAR MEASUREMENT) OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 298.00 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE EAST ON A LINE PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE A DISTANCE OF 345.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH ON A LINE PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE A DISTANCE OF 491 FEET TO A POINT IN THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SOUTH OAK FOREST AVENUE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SOUTH OAK FOREST AVENUE AND MAKING AN ANGLE 61 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WITH THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE (AS MEASURED FROM NORTH TO EAST) A DISTANCE OF 290.14 FEET TO A POINT BEING 600 FEET EAST OF AND PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG A LINE MAKING AN ANGLE OF 61 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WITH THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE (AS MEASURED


FROM SOUTHWESTERLY TO SOUTH) A DISTANCE OF 683.81 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A LINE, SAID LINE BEING DRAWN AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE EAST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE AND BEING 358 FEET SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF OAK FOREST AVENUE AND THE EAST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE; THENCE WEST ON A LINE PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE A DISTANCE OF 600.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, (EXCEPT THEREFROM A PARCEL OF LAND IN THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE 13, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 298 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE SOUTH FROM THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SOUTH OAK FOREST AVENUE (SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE BEING 60 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY BY RECTANGULAR MEASUREMENT OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE 100 FOOT WIDE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE CHICAGO ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY) WITH THE EAST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE (SAID EAST LINE BEING 50 FEET EAST BY RECTANGULAR MEASUREMENT, OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4), THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF RIDGELAND AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 60 FEET, THENCE EAST IN A LINE PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE A DISTANCE OF 345 FEET, THENCE NORTH IN A LINE PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE A DISTANCE OF 60 FEET, THENCE WEST IN A LINE PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE A DISTANCE OF 345 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING).

PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS: 28-29-200-030-0000, 28-29-200-036-0000, and 28-29-300-041-0000

COMMONLY KNOWN AS: Southeast Corner of Ridgeland Ave. & Oak Park Ave (previously referred to as 17301 Ridgeland Ave, 6301 Oak Forest Ave, and 6200 175th St but excluding 17201 Ridgeland Ave), Tinley Park, IL 60477

SECTION 4: That a Special Use Permit for a Final Planned Unit Development for the Oak Ridge Subdivision at the Subject Property, in accordance with the “List of Reviewed Plans” attached hereto as Exhibit A, and subject to the following conditions, is hereby granted:

1. The PUD exceptions and restrictions from the Zoning Ordinance, as listed in the staff report, shall be included within the Preliminary and Final PUD ordinance documents.

2. Final conditions, covenants, and restrictions (CC&Rs) shall be recorded prior to any transfer of ownership or any lots, closings, or occupancy permits are issued.

3. The project shall be subdivided at one time with a single Plat of Subdivision. All performance guarantees for public improvements for all phases due prior to starting Phase 1 site or construction work. Site grading work may begin prior to the Plat recording but no road, utility, drainage, or other development work shall begin until the Plat is fully signed, all property taxes paid, and in the process of being recorded with Cook County Recorder of Deeds Office.

4. The completion of adjacent public improvements (utilities and Leinster Lane roadway) will need to be completed for the Leinster Lane right-of-way adjacent to lots 77-81, within 1


year after approval of any redevelopment plan of the former ABC Supply property (17201 Ridgeland Ave) that requires such improvement connections.

5. A Special Service Area (SSA) shall be established over the development to begin at the time of Final Approval. This shall be finalized with the county prior to any transfer of ownership or any lots, closings, or occupancy permits being issued.

6. The public park shall be completed and approved prior to beginning any phase 2 work. The expectation is future approval and acceptance by the Village and to be transferred to the Tinley Park – Park District. This transfer may happen anytime from completion/acceptance of the park and completion of the subdivision (or at any point there is a “turnover” from the developer to the association that is triggered.) However, if the Park District does not accept the park’s dedication, the park shall remain owned/maintained by the Oak Ridge Homeowner Association.

7. A cash-in-lieu payment for the sidewalks on Ridgeland Ave and Oak Forest Ave be submitted prior to issuance of any permits. The payment is currently estimated by the engineer at $82,279 but is subject to changes related to increases in construction or material cost.

8. The final Addressing Plan requires final review and approval by the Village, Public Safety, and Post Office.

9. The final approval of all plans and the Final Plat is subject to final engineering approval of all plans by the Village Engineer and any other jurisdictional approvals, including but not limited to Cook County DOT, MWRD, and IEPA.

SECTION 5: Any future final approval of the Oak Ridge Planned Unit Development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plans and subject to the following additional allowances and restrictions from the Zoning Ordinance:

A. PUD Additional Allowances:1) Permit no brick/masonry on the first-floor rear elevations of the single-family attached

townhomes per the approved elevations.2) Permit partial first-floor brick/masonry on the first-floor side elevation of the single-

family attached townhomes per the approved elevations.3) Permit the 81 detached single-family home lots to have a maximum of 40% lot

coverage instead of the maximum 35% permitted by the Zoning Ordinance.

B. PUD Additional Restrictions:1) The detached single-family home portion of the development is only permitted to have

detached single-family homes and does not permit attached single-family, semi-detach single-family, or two-family residences typically permitted in R-5 zoning.

2) A minimum combined side yard setback of 15’ between two neighboring principal structures is required, as opposed to the R-5 requirements of 5’ minimum side yard setback and minimum 10’ combined between structures.

3) Public right-of-way aprons and private driveways shall be limited to a width of 22’ for two-car garages and 28’ for three-car garages. These widths shall include any “flares” at the roadway.

4) No detached garages shall be permitted within the development.5) Attached garages shall not be permitted to be converted to living space.6) Any single-family home additions shall be constructed of matching masonry on the first

floor, including sunrooms and three-season rooms.7) Townhomes shall not be permitted any future building/structure additions including

sunrooms, three-season rooms, etc.


8) Only detached single-family home and townhome elevations approved with the original PUD shall be constructed. Any other elevations shall require approval of a substantial deviation.

9) The association shall be required to enter into a parking enforcement agreement with the Village to allow Police enforcement of parking and traffic violations on any private roadways.

10) Parking restrictions on all private streets shall be the same as public streets and limited to one side of the roadway to allow for fire department and emergency response access.

11) A minimum of 50% of the front yard for single-family homes shall be pervious surface (landscaping, turf, etc.)

12) Key lots as indicated in the submittal shall upgraded exterior elevations, full width front porches, windows on the second front yard elevation, and a foundational landscaping package on the front and corner side yards of the home.

13) All utilities are required to be run in the rear yards whenever possible within developments. This may require installation of conduit to be completed by the developer for ComEd electrical service, which will be the developer’s requirement to coordinate and install.





AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:



ATTEST:

__________________________________ VILLAGE CLERK



CERTIFICATE

I, NANCY M O’CONNOR, Village Clerk of the Village of Tinley Park, Counties of Cook


copy of Ordinance No.2022-O-036, “AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT

FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND FINAL PUD PLAT

FOR THE OAK RIDGE SUBDIVISION (DR HORTON)” which was adopted by the President

and Board of Trustees of the Village of Tinley Park on May 17, 2022.



______________________________________VILLAGE CLERK


Exhibit A – List of Reviewed Plans (PUD Documentation Required to be Met)

Submitted Sheet Name Prepared By

Date On Sheet

14pgs Preliminary Workshop Presentation (key lot exhibit, parking exhibit, ani-monotony standards, etc.)

DRH 12-2-21

8pgs Application and Standards DRH 2-21-221pg Project narrative DRH 10-15-212pgs Plat of Topography Mackle 6-23-212pgs Alta Survey Mackle 8-5-211pg Site Data and Site Plan GRWA n/a1pg Phasing Plan Mackie 2-21-225pgs Final Landscape Plan GRWA 4-18-222pgs Photometric Exhibit Mackle 2-18-2216pgs Final Engineering Plans Mackle 2-21-221pg Signage Plans (Same as Preliminary) GRWA 10-15-2172pgs Single Family Detached Model Elevations (B&W) (Same as

Preliminary)Premier 11-5-21

7pgs Single Family Detached Elevation Select Color Renderings (Same as Preliminary)

Premier n/a

5pgs Townhome Elevations and Renderings (Same as Preliminary)

Premier 11-5-21

4pgs Final Plat of Subdivision and Easement Exhibit Mackle 4-15-221pg Roadway Naming and Address Exhibit Mackie 4-15-2251pgs Traffic Study (Same as Preliminary) GHA 8-31-211pg Monotony Plan and Key Lot Exhbit for Single Family

Detached (Same as Preliminary)DRH n/a

1pg Subdivision Specifications (Same as Preliminary) DRH n/a1pg Estimated Child Generation (Same as Preliminary) DRH 8-31-217pgs Market Study (Same as Preliminary) HT n/a

DRH = DR Horton (Petitioner/Developer)Mackle = Mackle Consultants, LLC (Surveying)GRWA = Gary R. Weber Associates, Inc. (Land Planning, Landscape Arch.)Premier = Premier Architecture, Inc. (Architect)GHA = Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. (Consulting Engineers)HT = Housing Trends LLC (Market Consultant)


1




ITEM #4: PUBLIC HEARING – OAK RIDGE SUBDIVISION (DR HORTON) – SPECIAL USE FOR FINAL PUD APPROVAL AND FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION

Consider recommending that the Village Board grant DR Horton Inc - Midwest, a Special Use Permit for Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) Approval, on property located at the southeast corner of Ridgeland Avenue and Oak Forest Avenue. A Final Plat of Subdivision is also requested as part of the development approval.




Petitioners: James Truesdell, DR Horton


CHAIRMAN GRAY introduced Item #4, and asked for a motion to open the public hearing. Motion made by COMMISSIONER GATTO seconded by COMMISSIONER SHAW. CHAIRMAN GRAY requested a voice vote asking if any were opposed to the motion; hearing none, he declared the motion carried.

CHAIRMAN GRAY noted he received certification that the public hearing notice was published in a local newspaper. Anyone wishing to speak on this matter will be sworn in to speak but after staff’s presentation. He asked staff to proceed with the presentation.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, presented the report. Staff summarized the planned development, explained the different steps in the PUD process then summarized the staff report.

CHAIRMAN GRAY asks if the applicant is in the audience and wants to add anything. Then proceeds to instruct the applicant to sign his name in the book and swears in applicant.

The Petitioner, James Truesdell, was sworn in. He stated I’m glad to be back since we were here in December. I think Dan did a pretty good job at summarizing everything. Basically, everything in front of you tonight is virtually identical to what was approved in the preliminary plan. Dan did bring up a few things, one of the changes was the introduction of a phasing plan. Initially we said we’re going to come in and do everything in one phase. We’re still going to plat it in one phase and we’re still going to put up our performance guarantees for the improvements all at one time so that the village has that control to make sure that everything does get completed. However, as time has


2

passed and they have looked at the reality of the market i.e., labor shortages, supply chain issues, etc., there was a concern on Horton’s part. Can they get all of the crews out there and get all the materials they need to create a subdivision of this size in one phase. The goal is still to do this as quickly as possible, but they want to have the ability to break it into these two phases in case there are issues of that nature as they move forward. Regarding the cul-de-sac that goes to the ABC Supply, we’re agreeable to that. We will make sure that goes in if anything should happen on that site in the near future, so we will make sure that’s a commitment on our part. As far as the walkway connections to freedom pond, we’re fine with the recommendation of the staff to add a second walk, an easement over that second walk to make sure everyone has the ability to get down there. We are agreeable to everything being subject to finalized engineering review and approval regarding the engineering and the final plat. In regards to the fence, it will be owned and maintained by the homeowner’s association. Petitioner stated that they want to proceed with the wooden fence as that best fits the aesthetic and was part of the preliminary approval.

CHAIRMAN GRAY thanks the petitioner for his presentation then proceeds to ask other commissioners if they have any questions beginning with COMMISSIONER GASKILL.

COMMISSIONER GASKILL expressed that he thinks the proposed development looks good.

COMMISSIONER TRUXAL stated that he thinks it makes sense for the development to be completed in two phases.

COMMISSIONER MARAK asks if the ABC property zoned for residential and if not, is the village open to zoning it residential and expanding the project? He also asks if Panduit is still open.

Daniel Ritter, Planning Manager responded yes, that is their innovation center. They still have a corporate headquarters, but this location is for their testing as an office kind of research type facility.

COMMISSIONER MARAK noted there’s much less traffic at it now than there used to be in the past.

Daniel Ritter, Planning Manager, noted the ABC property is vacant for sale. The discussion of this area has been that it is a unique situation where you are transitioning from industrial type uses to residential. That is what this area is going to become. This area is right by a high school.

COMMISSIONER MARAK noted he loved the idea of having sidewalks there. It would be an improvement not only for there but for everybody else who lives in that area.

COMMISSIONER SHAW had a question about the phasing. He understood the need for it. He didn’t question why there was phasing but just wanted to understand if the intent to do all the infrastructure and grading all at once.


COMMISSIONER SHAW asked if the roads for phase two would be graded but not built during phase one. He asked about the underground infrastructure.

The Petitioner responded the storm sewers would be put in as necessary to drain the site and get down to Freedom Pond. Anything that would be required to build any of that would be installed in phase one, the green area, any storm sewers necessary to drain the site to get the detention basin would have to be put in, any sewer and water lines that would have to come to the site would all have to be put in with phase one. The blue area, phase two, we would hold off on doing the underground sewer and water and streets in that area until we get through the first phase.

COMMISSIONER SHAW asked what the rationale was to put the five lots into phase two as opposed to phase one.

The Petitioner responded that in phase one they want to make sure they had two ways in and out of the subdivision to make a look so we can get in from both ends and for emergency vehicles. We didn’t feel we had the need to build that little cul-de-sac in there as it really didn’t serve anything. He noted Staff had brought up the point about the concern on ABC so we agreed if something would happen on ABC and want to build it, then we’ll put that road in.


3

Daniel Ritter, Planning Manager, noted the thought was that whether DR Horton did or somebody else was developing that, what is it and how does it relate to this might change what happens there. The only thing he thinks would be additional is you wouldn’t build the cul-de-sac, it would just go straight. It would be wasted if somebody else came in there and redeveloped it, but it was just how do those relate. Holding off until phase two was in the case they do get it, then it would make sense to do that all at once.

COMMISSIONER SHAW noted he understood the practical reasons for it, as it makes sense. He asked if procedurally the approvals being sought are for phase one and phase two from the beginning.


COMMISSIONER SHAW noted that if things accelerate, then there is no phase one or phase two, you would just go.

The Petitioner agreed and noted this is just a concern in case there’s an issue. If things go well and sales are going well and they can get the supplies then we will just keep going. He doesn’t believe this is going to be a problem.

COMMISSIONER SHAW noted he’s optimistic. The five lots would seem logical because they could hit right away as it’s somewhat of a desirable corner. If you would come in for phase two approval, he would almost say to throw it in there, but it phase one and phase two are going concurrently in terms of approvals then its kind of a moot point.

The Petitioner noted the guarantees would be in place.

Daniel Ritter, Planning Manager, noted that even final engineering has gone in pretty extreme detail at this point. Engineering is being done for everything and is all interconnected. The Commission is approving both phases here. The Petitioner won’t be back and will not have a separate permit. We will have it all happen at once.

COMMISSIONER SHAW noted if everything goes well then as a practical matter there is no phase one and phase two, however by phasing it, you have the option to pause.

Daniel Ritter, Planning Manager, noted that it allows us to plan practicality of the phases. If they were just deadending two roads that weren’t connected then that would be a concern. This is kind of a natural looped area.

COMMISSIONER SHAW noted that construction traffic doesn’t seem to be a concern for phase one and the townhouse section for phase two because you have a separate entrance, it doesn’t seem like construction traffic would be a problem. It’s the back, east loop for phase two. He doesn’t see that as being a major concern. He asked what their logistic thoughts would be on construction traffic. Instead of coming down the Ridgeland entrance, it would be more Oak Forest Avenue when you have phase two construction.

The Petitioner noted they’ll work with the Village on that. Typically they’ll try to work that street so they get homes done in one area along there so they don’t have to keep going over the area of where the new homes are being built and work our way back out of the subdivision.

COMMISSIONER SHAW noted that makes sense. He doesn’t really have any concerns about those things. He noted that he did bring up the option of connecting to Freedom Pond. He appreciated they have tried to accommodate that. He recognized what Dan Ritter said about the potential for homeowner’s association to say no and put up a fence to not get through. Having lived in townhomes, he can see it from that perspective. He is practically indifferent a little bit. That proposed connection is just so close to Ridgeland anyway as opposed to it being in the middle of the development. Even though he brought it up, he wouldn’t see it being a sticking point. He thinks it’s good if they could work something out. It wouldn’t be an obstacle for me.

The Petitioner noted they’d be agreeable to provide it and put an easement over it.

COMMISSIONER MANI noted he likes the project. It looks great and he’s excited to see it come to fruition.


4

COMMISSIONER GATTO noted she had a question on the phases. Interest rates are going up every week. Housing market is going to start coming down at some point. We all know that. Her concern is that in doing phase one and grading all that land out, we’ve already seen issues with that on 191st Street where that development was supposed to go up and they just up and ran from it. We had major complaints about people not upkeeping the land. That’s her concern. Phase one can go in six months and then maybe something happens in the market and phase two doesn’t get to start, but everything was graded, and the property is not upkept. That’s her concern with the two different phases. She doesn’t want to see things like that but wants to make sure we are realistic. Let’s say phase one gets completed, do we have a stipulation on how long phase two can take to start?

Daniel Ritter, Planning Manager, responded the grading itself wouldn’t be a problem. If it’s just dirt that’s been nicely placed, you don’t have foundations in the ground that’s not the worst thing. However, we do have financial guarantees in place for that reason. DR Horton is agreeable to that for the entire subdivision coming in at once. What that means is anything that’s a public improvement is covered by the financial guarantees. Otherwise, we would not allow them to plat for the entire phase we would require them to plat phase one then come back with a plat for phase two when they are ready.

COMMISSIONER TRUXAL asked where the surface level of topsoil will go once removed.

The Petitioner stated, unfortunately I can’t answer that question right now. I know the engineers are still working on that. We typically do try to find a spot that is hidden from public view.

COMMISSIONER TRUXAL noted that he would like to see that as an added stipulation so that it does not become unsightly.

CHAIRMAN GRAY stated, that in his experience, topsoil is staged onsite due to the cost of transporting it to bring it back to the site once construction is complete. He agreed with COMMISSIONER TRUXAL’S point that it needs to be strategically placed.

Staff mentioned that part of the financial guaranty agreements includes the disposal of dirt left on a site in the event that the construction is not completed.

CHAIRMAN GRAY noted that if something like that happened and there were pads built, there would still be a desire for topsoil to be filled back in so rather than buying topsoil its already in place.

Staff stated that the location of the topsoil will be dependent on factors such as elevation to avoid erosion.

The Petitioner stated that he would bring it up to their engineer as well to ensure it is not an issue.

CHAIRMAN GRAY states that he is okay with open item 1. He also informs the petitioner that he appreciates the willingness of the developer to enter into agreements to ensure certain protections. He continues to state that he is okay with open item 13 due to the workshop meeting. He states, it looks pretty good and it will improve that area in Tinley Park.

CHAIRMAN GRAY asked for a motion to close the public hearing. Motion made by COMMISSIONER SHAW seconded by COMMISSIONER TRUXAL. CHAIRMAN GRAY requested a voice vote, hearing no opposition the motion was declared carried.

Staff summarized the standards for a special use.

CHAIRMAN GRAY requested the first motion.

Motion 1 – Special Use for Final PUD Approval

COMMISSIONER SHAW made a motion to recommend that the Village Board grant a Special Use Permit to the Petitioner, DR Horton Inc - Midwest, for Final Planned Unit Development Approval for the Oak Ridge Subdivision located at the southeast corner of Ridgeland Ave. & Oak Forest Ave (excluding 17201 Ridgeland Ave), zoned R-5 (Low-Density Residential) and developed with 81 detached single-family and


5

162 attached single-family units, in accordance with all plans/documents submitted and listed herein and adopt the Findings of Fact as proposed by in the May 5, 2022, Staff Report, subject to the following conditions:

1. The PUD exceptions and restrictions from the Zoning Ordinance, as listed in the staff report, shall be included within the Preliminary and Final PUD ordinance documents.

2. Final conditions, covenants, and restrictions (CC&Rs) shall be recorded prior to any transfer of ownership or any lots, closings, or occupancy permits are issued.

3. The project shall be subdivided at one time with a single Plat of Subdivision. All performance guarantees for public improvements for all phases due prior to starting Phase 1 site or construction work. Site grading work may begin prior to the Plat recording but no road, utility, drainage, or other development work shall begin until the Plat is fully signed, all property taxes paid, and in the process of being recorded with Cook County Recorder of Deeds Office.

4. The completion of adjacent public improvements (utilities and Leinster Lane roadway) will need to be completed for the Leinster Lane right-of-way adjacent to lots 77-81, within 1 year after approval of any redevelopment plan of the former ABC Supply property (17201 Ridgeland Ave) that requires such improvement connections.

5. A Special Service Area (SSA) shall be established over the development to begin at the time of Final Approval. This shall be finalized with the county prior to any transfer of ownership or any lots, closings, or occupancy permits being issued.

6. The public park shall be completed and approved prior to beginning any phase 2 work. The expectation is future approval and acceptance by the Village and to be transferred to the Tinley Park – Park District. This transfer may happen anytime from completion/acceptance of the park and completion of the subdivision (or at any point there is a “turnover” from the developer to the association that is triggered.) However, if the Park District does not accept the park’s dedication, the park shall remain owned/maintained by the Oak Ridge Homeowner Association.

7. A cash-in-lieu payment for the sidewalks on Ridgeland Ave and Oak Forest Ave be submitted prior to issuance of any permits. The payment is currently estimated by the engineer at $82,279 but is subject to changes related to increases in construction or material cost.

8. The final Addressing Plan requires final review and approval by the Village, Public Safety, and Post Office.9. The final approval of all plans is subject to final engineering approval of all plans by the Village Engineer

and any other jurisdictional approvals, including but not limited to Cook County DOT, MWRD, and IEPA.

Motion seconded by COMMISSIONER MANI. CHAIRMAN GRAY then asked for the roll call. All Commissioners voted in favor; motion was declared carried.


Motion 2 – Final PUD Plat

COMMISSIONER GATTO made a motion to recommend that the Village Board grant approval to the Petitioner, DR Horton Inc – Midwest, Final PUD Plat Approval for the Oak Ridge Subdivision in accordance with the Oak Ridge Final Plat of Subdivision submitted (dated April 15, 2022), subject to the condition that the approval is subject to the final review and approval by the Village Engineer and Village Attorney.

Motion seconded by COMMISSIONER TRUXAL. CHAIRMAN GRAY asked for a roll call. All Commissioners were in favor, motion declared carried.

CHAIRMAN GRAY noted that this item will go to Village Board May 17th, and that the Petitioner should plan to attend.


PLAN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT May 5, 2022 – Public Hearing Anytime Fitness – Special Use Permit for Fitness Center (Commercial Indoor Recreation >3,500 Square Feet) 17823 80th Avenue

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Petitioner, Steven Novak of Anytime Fitness, is seeking a Special Use Permit for a Fitness Center (Commercial Indoor Recreation) location that is greater than 3,500 square feet. The Anytime Fitness is an existing business at 17823 80th Avenue in The Junction at 80th Avenue Shopping Center in the B-1 (Neighborhood Shopping) Zoning District. The proposed Special Use Permit will allow the Petitioner who recently acquired the business, to continue its operation. A Special Use Permit was granted to the previous owner in 2019 (Ordinance 19-O-011) prior to opening, Special Uses are granted to specific businesses and applicants and do not run with the property. To transfer ownership of a Special Use requires a new approval. Anytime Fitness is a national chain of fitness centers that focus on availability to members 24-hours a day, 365 days a year. This location is approximately 6,000 sq. ft. in size. There are various workout equipment and additional services such as group classes and personal training. The center is open 24 hours a day for members with key card access. There are many safety and security measures Anytime Fitness puts in place at all locations to make sure members feel safe at all times. The primary concern with fitness centers and other commercial indoor recreational uses is a potential for high levels of traffic and parking due to heavy peak times and quick customer turnover (less than 1 hour). However, the existing business has operated without any known parking issues. The new owner proposes no changes to the intensity of use and will still function the same as under the old ownership.

Petitioner Steven Novak, on behalf of Anytime Fitness Property Location 17823 80th Avenue PIN 28-36-121-031-0000 Zoning B-1, Neighborhood Shopping Urban Overlay District Approvals Sought Special Use Permit Project Planner Lori Kosmatka Associate Planner


Anytime Fitness Commercial Indoor Recreation >3500 Sq. Ft. – 17823 80th Avenue

Page 2 of 5

EXISTING SITE & NEARBY LAND USES The tenant space is located within The Junction at 80th Avenue shopping center which includes approximately 25,000 square feet of commercial space. The tenant space is approximately 6,000 sq. ft., the largest in the shopping center. The shopping center is located just north of the 80th Avenue train station. It was approved in 1997 and constructed in 1998. In 2019, the previous owner of Anytime Fitness was granted a Special Use Permit (Ordinance 19-O-011) to operate as a Fitness Center (Commercial Indoor Recreation) greater than 3,500 square feet. Current co-tenants include Union Bar & Grill, Chen’s (restaurant), Athletico Physical Therapy, Tinley Travel (travel agent), and Cambridge Dental Care. The shopping plaza is within the B-1 (Neighborhood Shopping) Zoning District. The Zoning Ordinance states that the B-1 Zoning District is “intended to provide areas for retail and service establishments to supply convenience goods or personal services for the daily needs of the residents living in the adjacent residential neighborhoods”. B-1 (Neighborhood Shopping) districts are typically more neighborhood and pedestrian-oriented with smaller parking fields, limited access points, and “non-objectionable” businesses. The surrounding area includes single-family homes zoned R-3 (Single-Family Residential) to the west across 80th Avenue. To the south is the Tinley Park 80th Avenue Metra Station parking lot zoned ORI (Office and Restricted Industrial). To the east are single-family attached townhomes zoned R-5 PD (Low Density Residential, Bristol Park PUD). SPECIAL USE PERMIT A Special Use Permit is required to continue the operation under new ownership for the existing use as a Commercial Indoor Recreation >3,500 Square Feet in the B-1 (Neighborhood Shopping) Zoning District. Commercial indoor recreation uses <3,500 square feet are otherwise permitted in the B-1 Zoning District. Anytime Fitness is a fitness and health club covered under the Commercial Indoor Recreation use group. Commercial indoor recreation can also include other uses such as racquetball, baseball cages, trampoline parks, dance/yoga studios, bowling, miniature golf, and more. While there is nothing specific about the 3,500 square foot number, a limit was included because concerns tend to emerge when a recreation space becomes too large. There are generally fewer concerns for smaller spaces such as personal training or a small group dance studio. Special Use Permits are required for uses that may or may not be acceptable in the specific zoning district based on the unique nature of the use. For fitness centers, the primary concern is a potential for high levels of traffic and parking due to heavy peak times and quick customer turnover (less than 1 hour). Special Uses are granted to a specific business and operator. If those change, then a new special use must be granted. The review ensures nothing has deviated from the original approval, any changes to the operations is considered, and any known issues with the use are addressed with the new business owner.



Page 3 of 5

PROPOSED USE The Petitioner, Steven Novak, recently acquired the existing Anytime Fitness location, and was unaware a Special Use Permit was required until submitting a Change of Owner application with the Village. The Petitioner has successfully operated other Anytime Fitness franchise locations, operating locations in Homer Glen and Oak Forest as further explained in the attached narrative. The Petitioner has reviewed the subject property’s operations, and, importantly, proposes no changes to the intensity of use. There are no expansions or additional classes proposed. The workout equipment and group classes, and personal training will remain. He states the business will still function the same as under the old ownership. He notes that under the previous approval, 29 parking spaces were noted and allocated by the property landlord, but has observed that the peak times thus far have only utilized approximately 15 parking spaces. He states the parking allocation with the landlord remains the same. The hours of operation will remain as 24 hours/day, and he will employ 3 staff members, in addition to himself. Parking in in this situation is not expected to be a concern as this is an existing business which has operated without any known parking issues, and the new owner has experience in the industry. The existing safety and security measures of key card access, emergency panic buttons, and security cameras will remain. Aside from removing a section of interior wall, no physical changes are proposed. The Staff Report and attachments for the original approval are attached for the commissions reference about the details of the original approval. Since the new owner is proposing “no changes”, these documents will be exhibits to the current approval as well. STANDARDS FOR A SPECIAL USE Section X.J.5. of the Zoning Ordinance lists standards that need to be considered by the Plan Commission. The Plan Commission is encouraged to consider these standards (listed below) when analyzing a Special Use request.


a. That the establishment, maintenance, or operation of the Special Use will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare; The business will have a multitude of safety and security measures in place to protect its members. The business not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the Community. As a fitness center, the business promotes health within the community.

b. That the Special Use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate

vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood; The business will not harm surrounding properties and is expected to maintain the property’s value and customer base of existing businesses in the shopping center.

c. That the establishment of the Special Use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district; The shopping center is existing and no changes are proposed to the exterior. The existing business thus far has not had any known negative effect on the surrounding development. The business under new ownership will continue to not have a negative effect on the surrounding development.

d. That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, and/or other necessary facilities have been or are being provided;



Page 4 of 5

The shopping center is existing and no changes are proposed to the exterior. The site is adequately supplied with utilities, roads, and drainage facilities.

e. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets; and The existing shopping center access and site layout is adequate to handle the proposed traffic of the use and will not cause increased traffic congestion on or around the site. The existing business thus far has adequately handled traffic and has not caused increased traffic on or around the site.

f. That the Special Use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in

which it is located, except as such regulations may in each instance be modified by the Village Board pursuant to the recommendation of the Plan Commission. The Village Board shall impose such conditions and restrictions upon the premises benefited by a Special Use Permit as may be necessary to ensure compliance with the above standards, to reduce or minimize the effect of such permit upon other properties in the neighborhood, and to better carry out the general intent of this Ordinance. Failure to comply with such conditions or restrictions shall constitute a violation of this Ordinance. The Petitioner has indicated they will meet all other Village regulations and cannot change or expand from what has been present at the public hearing.

g. The extent to which the Special Use contributes directly or indirectly to the economic development of the community as a whole. The business benefits the economic development of the community. Anytime Fitness fill the largest tenant space, and provides a needed service to the surrounding community.

It is also important to recognize that a Special Use Permit does not run with the land and instead the Special Use Permit is tied to the Petitioner. This is different from a process such as a variance, since a variance will forever apply to the property to which it is granted. Staff encourages the Plan Commission to refer to Section X.J.6. to examine the conditions where a Special Use Permit will expire.



Page 5 of 5

MOTION TO CONSIDER If the Plan Commission wishes to act on the Petitioner’s request, the appropriate wording of the motion is listed below. The protocol for the writing of a motion is to write it in the affirmative so that a positive or negative recommendation correlates to the Petitioner’s proposal. By making a motion, it does not indicate a specific recommendation in support or against the plan. The Commission may choose to modify, add, or delete from the recommended motions and any recommended conditions. Special Use Permit:

“…make a motion to recommend that the Village Board grant the Petitioner, Steven Novak of Anytime Fitness, a Special Use Permit to operate a Fitness Center (Commercial Indoor Recreation) that is greater than 3,500 square feet in floor space at 17823 80th Avenue in the B-1 (Neighborhood Shopping) Zoning District, according to the submitted plans and adopt the Findings of Fact as listed in the May 5, 2022 Staff Report.”


Submitted Sheet Name Prepared By Date On Sheet Application (Redacted) Applicant Rec’d 4/13/22 Response to Standards Applicant Rec’d 4/13/22 Narrative Applicant Rec’d 4/13/22 Existing Land Survey Tech 3 Consulting Group 10-15-97

Rec’d 4/18/22 Tenant Floor Plan (Mark Up) Wilkus Architects Rec’d 4/18/22 Anytime Fitness Business Overview (Gyms) Anytime Fitness Rec’d 4/18/22 Anytime Fitness Color Brochure Anytime Fitness 2019

Rec’d 4/18/22 Anytime Fitness Parking Study (Tinley Park) SE3 Engineers 1-28-19 (Original

Approval) 2019 Anytime Fitness Staff Report Village Staff 2/21/19




AN ORDINANCE GRANTING STEVEN NOVAK OF ANYTIME FITNESS A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A COMMERCIAL INDOOR RECREATION USE GREATER THAN

3,500 SQUARE FEET IN FLOOR SPACE AT 17823 80TH AVENUE





Board of Trustees





AN ORDINANCE GRANTING STEVEN NOVAK OF ANYTIME FITNESS A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A COMMERCIAL INDOOR RECREATION USE GREATER THAN

3,500 SQUARE FEET IN FLOOR SPACE AT 17823 80TH AVENUE


WHEREAS, a petition for the granting of a Special Use Permit for a Commercial Indoor Recreation Use Greater Than 3,500 Square Feet of Floor Space at 17823 80th Avenue, Tinley Park, Illinois 60477 (“Subject Property”) has been filed by Steven Novak on behalf of Anytime Fitness (“Petitioner”) with the Village Clerk of this Village and has been referred to the Plan Commission of the Village and has been processed in accordance with the Tinley Park Zoning Ordinance; and

WHEREAS, said Plan Commission held a public hearing on the question of whether the Special Use Permit should be granted on May 5, 2022, at the Village Hall at which time all persons were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and


WHEREAS, the Plan Commission vote 7-0 and has filed its report and findings and recommendations that the proposed Special Use Permit be approved with this President and Board of Trustees, and this Board of Trustees has duly considered said report of findings and recommendations; and

WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities of the Village of Tinley Park, Cook and Will Counties, Illinois, have determined that it is in the best interest of the Village of Tinley Park and its residents to approve said Special Use Permit; and



SECTION 1: The foregoing recitals shall be and are hereby incorporated as findings of facts as if said recitals were fully set forth herein.

SECTION 2: That the report of findings and recommendations of the Plan Commission are herein incorporated by reference as the findings of this President and the Board of Trustees, as complete as if fully set forth herein at length. This Board finds that the Petitioner has provided evidence establishing that they have met the standards for granting the Special Use Permit as set forth in Section X.J.5 of the Zoning Ordinance, and the proposed granting of the Special Use Permit as set forth herein is in the public good and in the best interest of the Village and its residents and is consistent with and fosters the purpose and spirit of the Tinley Park Zoning Ordinance.


1. That the establishment, maintenance, or operation of the Special Use will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare;

The business will have a multitude of safety and security measures in place to protect its members. The business not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the Community. As a fitness center, the business promotes health within the community.

2. That the Special Use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood;

The business will not harm surrounding properties and is expected to maintain the property’s value and customer base of existing businesses in the shopping center.

3. That the establishment of the Special Use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district;

The shopping center is existing and no changes are proposed to the exterior. The existing business thus far has not had any known negative effect on the surrounding development. The business under new ownership will continue to not have a negative effect on the surrounding development.

4. That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, and/or other necessary facilities have been or are being provided;

The shopping center is existing and no changes are proposed to the exterior. The site is adequately supplied with utilities, roads, and drainage facilities.

5. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets; and

The existing shopping center access and site layout is adequate to handle the proposed traffic of the use and will not cause increased traffic congestion on or around the site. The existing business thus far has adequately handled traffic and has not caused increased traffic on or around the site.


6. That the Special Use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located, except as such regulations may in each instance be modified by the Village Board pursuant to the recommendation of the Plan Commission. The Village Board shall impose such conditions and restrictions upon the premises benefited by a Special Use Permit as may be necessary to ensure compliance with the above standards, to reduce or minimize the effect of such permit upon other properties in the neighborhood, and to better carry out the general intent of this Ordinance. Failure to comply with such conditions or restrictions shall constitute a violation of this Ordinance.

The Petitioner has indicated they will meet all other Village regulations and cannot change or expand from what has been present at the public hearing.

7. The extent to which the Special Use contributes directly or indirectly to the economic development of the community as a whole.

The business benefits the economic development of the community. Anytime Fitness fills the largest tenant space, and provides a needed service to the surrounding community.

SECTION 3: The Special Use Permit set forth herein below shall be applicable to the following described property

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TINLEY CORNERS SUBDIVISION BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, OF TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE 12, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS.


COMMONLY KNOWN AS: 17823 80th Avenue, Tinley Park, Illinois

SECTION 4: That a Special Use Permit for operation of a Commercial Indoor Recreation Use Greater Than 3,500 Square Feet of Floor Space at the Subject Property in an approximately 6,000 sq. ft. tenant space, is hereby granted to the Petitioner Steven Novak of Anytime Fitness, in accordance with the “List of Reviewed Plans” attached hereto as Exhibit A.






AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:



ATTEST:__________________________________ VILLAGE CLERK



CERTIFICATE



copy of Ordinance No. 2022-O-037, “AN ORDINANCE GRANTING STEVEN NOVAK OF

ANYTIME FITNESS A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A COMMERCIAL INDOOR

RECREATION USE GREATER THAN 3,500 SQUARE FEET IN FLOOR SPACE AT 17823

80TH AVENUE” which was adopted by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of

Tinley Park on May 17, 2022.



____________________________________VILLAGE CLERK


Exhibit A



1

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THEPLAN COMMISSION, VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK,COOK AND WILL COUNTIES, ILLINOIS

May 5, 2022

The meeting of the Plan Commission, Village of Tinley Park, Illinois, was held in the Council Chambers located in the Village Hall of Tinley Park, 16250 Oak Park Avenue, Tinley Park, IL on May 5, 2022.

CALL TO ORDER – CHAIRMAN GRAY called to order the Regular Meeting of the Plan Commission for May 5, 2022 at 7:00 p.m.

Lori Kosmatka called the roll.

Present and responding to roll call were the following: Chairman GrayAngela GattoJames GaskillAndrae MarakKen ShawEduardo ManiKurt Truxal



Petitioners: Eric Schmidt, 7501 Hanover DriveJim Stulga, 7240 174th PlaceSteven Novak, Anytime FitnessNAME, DR HortonNAME, Atlas PuttyNAME, Atlas Putty


COMMUNICATIONS- Daniel Ritter, Planning Manager, noted that CHAIRMAN GRAY will be recusing himself from the fifth item due to him having done work for Steve Vernon and Atlas Putty in the past. CHAIRMAN SHAW will be stepping in as ACTING CHAIR for the fifth item.

APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Minutes of the April 21, 2022 Regular Meeting of the Plan Commission were presented for approval. A motion was made by COMMISSIONER GASKILL. The motion was seconded by COMMISSIONER TRUXAL to approve the April 21, 2022 minutes. COMMISSIONER SHAW noted a correction needed on Page 3 which erroneously stated CHAIRMAN GRAY had declared the motion carried, when it should in fact read ACTING CHAIRMAN SHAW. CHAIRMAN GRAY acknowledged the correction was needed. He asked for a voice vote to approve the minutes with the correction needed; all were in favor. He declared the motion carried.


2




ITEM #1: PUBLIC HEARING – 7501 HANOVER DRIVE, SCHMIDT – CORNER FENCE VARIATION

Consider recommending that the Village Board grant Eric Schmidt (property owner) a Variation from Section III.J. of the Zoning Code (Fence Regulations) at the property located at 7501 Hanover Drive in the R-3 Single Family Residential zoning district. This Variation would permit the Petitioner to install a six-foot (6’) high closed privacy style fence to encroach ten feet (10’) into the required secondary front yard where a privacy fence is not permitted.




Petitioners: Eric Schmidt, 7501 Hanover Drive


CHAIRMAN GRAY introduced Item #1, and asked for a motion to open the public hearing. Motion made by COMMISSIONER GASKILL seconded by COMMISSIONER GATTO. CHAIRPERSON GRAY requested a voice vote asking if any were opposed to the motion; hearing none, he declared the motion carried.




3




ITEM #2: PUBLIC HEARING – 7240 174th PLACE, STULGA – CORNER FENCE VARIATION

Consider recommending that the Village Board grant Jim Stulga (property owner) a Variation from Section III.J. of the Zoning Code (Fence Regulations) and Section III.H. (Permitted Encroachments) at the property located at 7240 174th Place in the R-4 Single Family Residential zoning district. This Variance would permit the Petitioner to install a five-foot (5’) high open-style fence to encroach up to twenty-five (25’) feet into the required secondary front yard (located on the property line around the existing patio). A Variation is also requested for the existing patio to be located in the secondary front yard and closer than 5 feet to a property line where a patio is not permitted.




Petitioners: Jim Stulga, 7240 174th Place


CHAIRMAN GRAY introduced Item #2, and asked for a motion to open the public hearing. Motion made by COMMISSIONER GASKILL seconded by COMMISSIONER TRUXAL. CHAIRPERSON GRAY requested a voice vote asking if any were opposed to the motion; hearing none, he declared the motion carried.




Jim Stulga, Petitioner, was sworn in. He noted Staff clarified what he wanted to do. He has an existing patio. He wants to replace his existing fence, and if he does it by code, he would have to slice his patio with 15’ of the patio outside the fence line.

CHAIRMAN GRAY asked the Commissioners for some of their comments.


4

COMMISSIONER MARAK asked if it was possible to approve the variance for the fence but not for the patio. Are they two separate things?

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, responded that it is entirely possible. We drafted the motions together because they are obviously connected.

COMMISSIONER MARAK noted that by leaving a patio in, and not having to remove it, you would not run a fence through a patio.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, responded that you could have two separate findings for each of the two variation requests.

COMMISSIONER TRUXAL stated that he saw in the notes the Petitioner would have to relocate AC units and some ventilation. He asked the Petitioner to provide more detail.

The Petitioner responded it was at the rear of the house. Financially, it is not possible for hm to move the patio. If he did have the funds, he would have to move the air conditioner, a tankless water heater exhaust, and a dryer vent. There are a lot of obstructions that would have to be moved to the west side of the house.

COMMISSIONER TRUXAL acknowledged that he sees that in the picture.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, noted that if the Commission denies the patio variation, he does not have to remove the patio. It gets to remain until he wants to replace it.

COMMISSIONER GASKILL reviewed the marked up plat of survey as presented showing proposal and option by code.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, clarified the green line is the proposed portion that would meet the code.

COMMISSIONER GASKILL asked what the dotted line was.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, answered that’s where he could continue the fence by-right.

COMMISSIONER GASKILL asked if the red line was where he wants to put the fence up by the sidewalk.

Lori Kosmatka, Associate Planner, clarified that the red line is what triggers the variation. The open design fence runs along the property line at zero feet

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, noted the replacement is where the variation is triggered.

COMMISSIONER GASKILL noted that the Petitioner would pick up on the old fence, jog out to the sidewalk, come down, and back and pick up at the old fence on the side of the house.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, noted some of the history of this. The Petitioner originally proposed it from the driveway all the way down where the fence is now. Staff had suggested he request the least amount of variation as part of this. This is why part of the fence is pulled back to meet the code and then just jogs around the patio. The recommendation was to request as little as you need.

COMMISSIONER GASKILL asked what the patio is made of.

The Petitioner responded it is concrete.

COMMISSIONER SHAW asked if there was a permit on file from 1987.

Lori Kosmatka, Associate Planner, responded yes.

COMMISSIONER SHAW noted that when he went by, he couldn’t really tell if it is the same patio from 1987. He asked if it is, as far as you know, the same patio.


5

Lori Kosmatka, Associate Planner, responded yes, that the permit had a plat in the file, and it has the same matching location footprint and dimensions.

CHAIRMAN GRAY asked the Petitioner if had been the owner since then, and if to his knowledge he thinks it is the same.

The Petitioner responded no.

CHAIRMAN GRAY asked the Petitioner if to his knowledge he thinks it is the same.


COMMISSIONER SHAW noted that when he looked at the standards, the one that really stands out was the ability to yield a reasonable return given the footprint of the property. He has trouble reconciling. It is possible to have a complying fence administratively as shown with the purple line, but as a practical matter it goes right down the middle of the patio. He liked the compromise staff proposed in putting conditions on a variance, that a fence variance remains in place only so long as the patio remains, and the patio can’t be replaced. It would need to be taken out at which time the fence variance would cease to be approved. The agreement that if he’s understanding that would be that at such time the patio was removed, the fence variance would no longer be in effect and would therefore have to be pulled back. He thinks that is a reasonable compromise. His only concern on that is that given the patio is already 35 years old, how far off are we from that, and if we grant it under those conditions, that to him would actually be an incentive not to replace the patio and it would therefore potentially fall into disrepair. He does see a bit of a hardship primarily with the circumstance here with size of the lot and the options under the code. He asked if the green line that jogs over is the same style of fence throughout. He welcomed the Petitioner to comment.

The Petitioner responded that is correct. He noted the patio is still in great condition. It just has two minor stress cracks with no buckling and no chipping.

COMMISSIONER SHAW noted that when he went by, it didn’t seem to be sinking, breaking, or shifting, but it’s 35 years old so it must have been a decent job when it was put in.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, clarified that we are not recommending that. We just pointed that out as an option if the Commission somehow connects them. He wants the Commission to have all the tools.

COMMISSIONER SHAW acknowledge that as a technical matter, Staff is not recommending that, but he appreciates that was put forth as an option.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, agreed it is an option, but there are still problems with that too. You could point back at that time and say I got a fence there so now I want the patio to stay.

COMMISSIONER SHAW noted that whether it is Plan Commissioners or Zoning Board of Appeals, there’s the functional approval and then there’s enforcement. Down the road while there might be conditions on the variance, then it becomes an enforcement and monitoring thing down the road.

COMMISSIONER MANI noted that this was something he was talking about on the previous agenda item. With fences, you should be able to replace it to whatever materials. He wants to do a nice wrought iron fence. It makes the property look better and to their liking.

COMMISSIONER GATTO commented that she’s ok with it and it looks way better than what it does right now. The five foot open style fence with wrought iron will look great. She agrees with Staff’s recommendation to do after the patio to jog in to where the property line is in adjacent with the sidewalk. She asked if that’s what was proposed.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, responded yes, that is what the Petitioner proposed. They jog it in so that it’s only nonconforming just around the patio.

COMMISSIONER GATTO affirmed she is okay with that. That is a great compromise.


6

CHAIRMAN GRAY noted that most of the Commission has echoed sentiments that he has. Looking at Staff’s option through the code or administrative approval, he thinks COMMISSIONER MARAK or TRUXAL had mentioned, we know you’re not going to put a fence right down the patio and leave the other portion open. He recalled the Petitioner also had stated moving the patio to the north would be cost prohibitive, and that he has some utilities and other structures that reside there so there is limited options here because of that patio that was approved in 1987. He had no other comments. The options here are a little bit more limited based on what Staff gave in the report on page four of seven. He asked if there were any other comments from the Commission. Hearing none, he asked the Petitioner to sit down.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, offered the Commission to look at the Standards. These are just Staff’s drafted ones. This is what the Commission sends to the Village Board. If you say you don’t like as a group, you’re saying you don’t like the way this is worded, or we have something else for this, try and vocalize that so we can actually send what your recommendation is, and what your thoughts are to the Village Board. That gets carried into the ordinance as well.

CHAIRMAN GRAY asked for a motion to close the public hearing. Motion made by COMMISSIONER GATTO, seconded by COMMISSIONER GASKILL. CHAIRMAN GRAY requested a voice vote; hearing no opposition, the motion carried. He asked Staff to present the Standards.

Lori Kosmatka, Associate Planner, presented the Standards.


COMMISSIONER MARAK asked if the motions could be separated.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager clarified these are two separate motions. The first one is the fence, and the patio is the second.

CHAIRMAN GRAY requested a motion for the fence.


COMMISSIONER SHAW made a motion to recommend that the Village Board grant the following Variation to the Petitioner, Jim Stulga a 25-foot Variation from Section III.J. (Fence Regulations) of the Zoning Ordinance, to permit a five-foot high open fence encroaching 25 feet into the required secondary front yard, where a fence encroachment is not permitted at 7240 174th Place in the R-4 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District, consistent with the Submitted Plans and adopt Findings of Fact as proposed by Village Staff in the May 5, 2022 Staff Report. Motion seconded by COMMISSIONER GATTO. Vote taken by roll call; the vote was 6-1 in favor. Ayes were by COMMISSIONERS GASKILL, GATTO, MANI, MARAK, SHAW, TRUXAL. Nays were by CHAIRMAN GRAY. CHAIRMAN GRAY declared the motion as carried.


Motion 2 – Variation for Patio

COMMISSIONER TRUXAL made a motion to recommend that the Village Board grant the following Variation to the Petitioner, Jim Stulga a 25-foot Variation from Section III.H.1 (Permitted Encroachments) of the Zoning Ordinance, to permit an existing 682 square foot (22 feet by 31 feet) patio to be located in the secondary front yard encroaching 25 feet into the required secondary front yard, where a patio encroachment is not permitted at 7240 174th Place in the R-4 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District,


7

consistent with the Submitted Plans and adopt Findings of Fact as proposed by Village Staff in the May 5, 2022 Staff Report.

Motion seconded by COMMISSIONER GATTO.

COMMISSIONER SHAW asked if the motion could be amended.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager responded that there motion is a motion on the floor and you could have discussion on it.

COMMISSIONER SHAW noted he’d like to clarify the conditions because for the fence motion there weren’t conditions specified. He noted his preference on the patio variation would be to include the condition discussed that if the patio were to be removed, then the nonconforming fence should be removed.

COMMISSIONER MARAK asked if that would be a third motion.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager noted that the Commission could vote to amend that one. He suggested the Commission vote on the patio and then consider going back to amend the first motion on the fence to include the condition.

COMMISSIONER SHAW noted he was the only one who mentioned it so he didn’t know if it was a moot point.

CHAIRMAN GRAY suggested a third motion because we may not have the same vote.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, noted we could do a third motion with the condition on it if everyone agrees they want to override the first motion. If it’s separate, then we can send both motions to the Board, and they can choose which one they like best.

CHAIRMAN GRAY noted to COMMISSIONER SHAW that he’ll have him restate the third motion. CHAIRMAN GRAY noted that we do have a motion on the floor right now.

Vote taken by roll call; the vote was 4-3 in favor. Ayes were by COMMISSIONERS GATTO, MANI, TRUXAL, and CHAIRMAN GRAY. Nays were by GASKILL, MARAK, SHAW. CHAIRMAN GRAY declared the motion as carried.

CHAIRMAN GRAY requested the third motion.

COMMISSIONER SHAW asked if we should revisit the same motion with the condition or just simply amend the previous one.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, responded you could make either of those motions. He recommended amending it and seeing if everybody agrees with it. If not, then make a separate motion, and we could send up both.

COMMISSIONER SHAW noted to CHAIRMAN GRAY that procedurally he didn’t know if it was necessary to go through the motion. He asked CHAIRMAN GRAY if he would entertain a straw poll. If there’s no consensus on the point, there’s no reason to go there.


8

CHAIRMAN GRAY asked who would be in favor, as COMMISSIONER SHAW mentioned, if the patio ceases to exist, if there was a fence that receives a variation it would have to be pulled back so that it would have to conform to the setback. Seeing reactions from the Commissioners, he noted he saw “Yes”es.

Motion 3 – Variation for Fence with Condition

COMMISSIONER SHAW made a motion to amend the previous motion regarding the 25-foot Variation for the fence on the subject property to include the condition that if the concrete patio were to be removed then the nonconforming fence would have to be removed and comply with the Zoning Ordinance.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager suggested language to include that it would void the Variation at that time.

COMMISSIONER SHAW clarified that it would then void the Variation at that time.

CHAIRMAN GRAY noted that in the straw poll, the only “No” was from COMMISSIONER MANI. The majority was “Yes” for the amendment and a majority “Yes” for the Motion #1 on the fence. He wanted to ensure that was in the record.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, noted that you will still have to get a second to that and take the vote for that.

Motion seconded by COMMISSIONER MARAK. Vote taken by roll call; the vote was 6-1 in favor. Ayes were by COMMISSIONERS GASKILL, GATTO, MARAK, SHAW, TRUXAL, and CHAIRMAN GRAY. Nays were by COMMISSIONER MANI. CHAIRMAN GRAY declared the motion as carried.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, asked COMMISSIONER MANI if he preferred the less restrictive motion, without the condition.

COMMISSIONER MANI responded yes.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, noted he will make sure the Board knows why there were two motions.

CHAIRMAN GRAY noted that this item will go to Village Board on May 17th.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, responded yes. It will go for First Reading since there was no a unanimous consensus. He noted Lori Kosmatka will follow up with the Petitioner to let him know how to attend.


9




ITEM #3: PUBLIC HEARING – ANYTIME FITNESS, 17823 80th AVENUE – SPECIAL USE FOR A FITNESS CENTER

Consider recommending that the Village Board grant Steven Novak of Anytime Fitness a Special Use for a Commercial Indoor Recreation use greater than 3,500 square feet in size at 17823 80th Avenue in the B-1 (Neighborhood Shopping) zoning district. The request would allow transfer of the existing special use to a new owner with no changes proposed to the current operations.




Petitioners: Steven Novak, Anytime Fitness


CHAIRMAN GRAY introduced Item #3, and asked for a motion to open the public hearing. Motion made by COMMISSIONER GATTO seconded by COMMISSIONER SHAW. CHAIRPERSON GRAY requested a voice vote asking if any were opposed to the motion; hearing none, he declared the motion carried.


Lori Kosmatka, Associate Planner, presented the report. She summarized the history of the site and surrounding businesses and zoning. She noted the business is an Anytime Fitness franchise previously had a Special Use Permit approval in 2019 under another owner, and that was recently purchased by a new owner. She noted that Commercial Indoor Recreation Uses over 3,500 square feet require a Special Use while those under 3,500 square feet are Permitted. She noted that the Commercial Indoor Recreation Use can include many other activities such as racquetball, bowling, etc. She noted that Special Uses do not run with the land, and are required for uses that may or may not be acceptable in the specific zoning district based on the unique nature of the use. She noted the new owner has successfully operated two other locations and does not propose any changes in operations or intensity of use. The previous parking allotment of 29 spaces remains the same, and the new owner has observed that peak times only utilize approximately 15 parking spaces. She noted that the Petitioner is present.



10

Steven Novak, Petitioner, was sworn in.He thanked everyone for their consideration. He’s been an Anytime Fitness franchisee since 2018. It’s been his passion to help people reach their fitness goals. Personally, he lost over 100 pounds and he understands how impactful that is in people’s lives for their physical and mental health. He loves being able to serve the community and help others. In 2018 he had the opportunity to acquire the Homer Glen location and then in 2020 he acquired the Oak Forest location. Both of those locations are rated in the top 500 of Anytime Fitness’s franchises, and are very successful. In March of this year, he had the opportunity to buy the Tinley Park location, but did not know he had to have a Special Use Permit. That was news to him and the seller. He proposes to carry over the previous permit and continue operations in the community. It is a vital business in the community. He’s had countless times of people sitting in his office in tears based on something that’s happened in their lives, and how important the gym is to them. To have a gym in Tinley Park is very impactful. Two weeks ago a lady cried in his office saying how the gym at Tinley Park has helped her get through the loss of her son. This business is a positive for the community.

COMMISSIONER SHAW noted it was good to hear the positive statements about the thankfulness in particular and the Petitioner’s passion for it. He recalled the original Special Use discussion. The good thing is that it being a franchise, some of the concerns that were voiced in the previous discussion sounds to him, sounds like everything in the history as it was presented as expected. There haven’t been any negatives coming out of it. It’s fair to say that nothing has really materialized from those reservations expressed back then.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, responded yes, that we have never heard of any complaints. There were a couple residents that had shown up to the previous discussion. Since that time, Union Bar & Grill is also open, and they use the largest amount of parking in the center, and we still have not heard of any parking issues. He believes their peak times are different than some of the other businesses.

COMMISSIONER SHAW stated that along with that, and the Petitioner having no intent to change the nature of the operations, it carries weight because it is also a franchise.

The Petitioner stated there are regulations of what I can and cannot do. He cannot have a pool, daycare, or smoothie bars. It is all based on corporate regulations.

COMMISSIONER SHAW stated that assuming the previous owner was operating according to franchise rules, and the Petitioner intends to follow suit, it seemed fairly straightforward to him. He is in favor of approving this request. Regarding monitoring and enforcement, he doesn’t know what we do as a community when we have these transfers of ownership. During the process it’s made abundantly clear that it doesn’t go with the ownership.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, stated that this isn’t our preferred way to do this, but when somebody signs leases and sells a business, there’s nothing that comes before us until we get to the business license transfer where it gets flagged. The Village struggles with this situation but rarely does it happen with Special Uses.

COMMISSIONER SHAW noted that it’s tough and it’s not Staff’s fault.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, noted our concern for Special Uses is normally with owners transferring without a corporate structure that keeps operations consistent. A dog daycare operated by one person could be operated completely different by another person. The operations could change. This one, with the corporate structure in place, will likely have no noticeable change so they’ll have their customers.

COMMISSIONER SHAW noted that lends stability in his opinion. In terms of him being supportive of it, he finds it less risky as opposed to it being a completely new business.

COMMISSIONER MANI commented that he appreciates the Peititioner wanting to keep the fitness center there and running it like mentioned. It’s great for the community and helps everyone.

COMMISSIONERS GATTO and GASKILL were in agreement.

COMMISSIONER TRUXAL asked what is existing there today, if it is the same Anytime Fitness, if the Peititioner is taking over the same franchise as a new franchise owner.


11

The Petitioner responded yes. Everything including the business structure will stay the same, just with a different owner.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, noted that 2018 is when they moved n for the first time. Previously it was the restaurant Sanfrantello’s before.

CHAIRMAN GRAY had no other comments other than what was already said. He is glad there is enough parking. It doesn’t seem like that is an issue though you might have fewer spaces because you are so successful with the other locations. He congratulated the Petitioner for having the two businesses in the top 500. He felt this, and the Petitioner’s weight loss was impressive. He had no other comments and offered the Petitioner to sit down.

CHAIRMAN GRAY asked if the public had any comment. Seeing none, he entertained a motion to close the public hearing. Motion to close the public hearing made by COMMISSIONER GASKILL, seconded by COMMISSIONER TRUXAL.

CHAIRMAN GRAY requested a voice vote; hearing no opposition, the motion carried. He asked Staff to present the Standards.


CHAIRMAN GRAY requested a motion for the Special Use Permit.

Motion – Special Use Permit

COMMISSIONER GASKILL made a motion to recommend that the Village Board grant the Petitioner, Steven Novak of Anytime Fitness, a Special Use Permit to operate a Fitness Center (Commercial Indoor Recreation) that is greater than 3,500 square feet in floor space at 17823 80th Avenue in the B-1 (Neighborhood Shopping) Zoning District, according to the submitted plans and adopt the Findings of Fact as listed in the May 5, 2022 Staff Report.

Motion seconded by COMMISSIONER GATTO. Vote taken by roll call; all voted in favor. CHAIRMAN GRAY declared the motion as carried.

CHAIRMAN GRAY noted that this item will go to Village Board May 17th, and that the Petitioner should plan to attend.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, clarified the first reading and adoption would happen together on May 17th due to the unanimous recommendation.


12




ITEM #4: PUBLIC HEARING – OAK RIDGE SUBDIVISION (DR HORTON) – SPECIAL USE FOR FINAL PUD APPROVAL AND FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION

Consider recommending that the Village Board grant DR Horton Inc - Midwest, a Special Use Permit for Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) Approval, on property located at the southeast corner of Ridgeland Avenue and Oak Forest Avenue. A Final Plat of Subdivision is also requested as part of the development approval.




Petitioners: name


CHAIRMAN GRAY introduced Item #4, and asked for a motion to open the public hearing. Motion made by COMMISSIONER GATTO seconded by COMMISSIONER SHAW. CHAIRPERSON GRAY requested a voice vote asking if any were opposed to the motion; hearing none, he declared the motion carried.


Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, presented the report. He….


13




ITEM #5: WORKSHOP – ATLAS PUTTY NEW WAREHOUSE, 8301 185TH STREET

Consider recommending that the Village Board grant Steve Vernon of Vernon Development Inc., (Petitioner/Developer) on behalf of Atlas Putty Products Co. (Owner), a Special Use for a Substantial Deviation from the Northstar Business Center PUD at property located at 8301 185th Street in the M-1 PD (General Manufacturing, Northstar Business Center PUD). Site Plan/Architectural Approval and Final Plat of Subdivision Approval is also request as part of the development. The development proposes demolition of an existing building at 8231-33 185th Street and reconfiguration of the existing lots to allow for construction of a new 87,267 sq. ft. warehouse building.




Petitioners: namename


CHAIRMAN GRAY recused himself and requested COMMISSIONER SHAW to step in.

ACTING CHAIRMAN SHAW introduced Item #5. He asked staff to proceed with the presentation.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, presented the report. He….


14

GOOD OF THE ORDER

Dan Ritter: _____ was approved by the Village Board. Popus Popcorn _____. Floor and Décor ____.

PUBLIC COMMENT - NONE

Motion to adjourn the meeting made by COMMISSIONER GASKILL, seconded by COMMISSIONER MANI. Voice vote, all in favor. The motion carried.

Meeting Adjourned at 10:08 pm


PLAN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT May 5, 2022 – Public Hearing Stulga – Corner Lot Fence Setback and Patio Variations 7240 174th Place

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Petitioner, Jim Stulga, is seeking two Variations at 7240 174th Place. The first request is a 25-foot fence setback Variation from Section III.J. (Fence Regulations) of the Zoning Ordinance to permit a five-foot-high open-style fence encroaching 25 feet into the required secondary front yard, where a fence encroachment is not permitted. The second request is to allow the existing patio in the secondary front yard, closer than five feet to a property line, where a front yard patio encroachment is not permitted. The Petitioner has requested the fence setback Variation to enclose the existing patio. The patio previously received a permit by the Village in 1987, but is now legal nonconforming per the current Village Zoning Ordinance, and thus would not be able to be replaced by-right. If the patio encroachment variation is not approved, the fence encroachment variation would not have a purpose if the patio is removed in the future. The Petitioner has requested the patio Variation due to its adjacency to the side door. The Petitioner states the rear yard has existing ground mechanical equipment, and the adjacent wall to the rear yard does not have a door. Secondary front yard fences are required to be located at the building setback line of 25 feet in the R-4 zoning district if it is a privacy fence. Five-foot open style fences may, with administrative approval, encroach up to ten feet in the Required Setback Line of the secondary front yard. As a 5’ open style, the proposed fence would not cause visibility concerns from the intersection. However, a code compliant option could include relocating the patio and receiving administrative approval for the 5’ open style extending ten-feet into the secondary front yard.

Petitioner Jim Stulga Property Location 7240 174th Place PIN 27-25-416-022-0000 Zoning R-4 Zoning District Approvals Sought Variations Project Planner Lori Kosmatka, Associate Planner


Stulga Corner Lot Fence Setback and Patio Variations – 7240 174th Place

Page 2 of 7

EXISTING SITE & HISTORY The subject property is located on the northwest corner of 174th Place & Oconto Avenue. The lot is approximately 8,069 sq. ft., with 65 feet primary frontage (45.49 ft. of which is parallel) on 174th Place, and 105 feet secondary frontage on Oconto Avenue. The home is oriented toward 174th Place with a second door on the east side toward Oconto Avenue. The home has a detached garage at the north end of the lot. There is rear yard area between the home and the garage. The property currently has an existing 4’ tall wooden picket fence that is situated alongside the home’s property line on Oconto Avenue (secondary frontage). The sidewalk is adjacent to the property line. The Village does not have a permit record on file for this existing nonconforming fence. The existing 682 sq. ft. patio was previously permitted by the Village in 1987, but is now legal nonconforming per the current Village Zoning Ordinance, and thus would not be able to be replaced by-right. The majority of the homes in the neighborhood do not have nonconforming fences or patios.

Left: View Looking West at Existing Patio (East Side) from Oconto Avenue; Right: View Looking South at East Property Line to Sidewalk

Rear yard area between the home and detached garage

Location Map

174th Pl

Oco

nto

Har

lem

175th St



Page 3 of 7

ZONING & NEARBY LAND USES The subject property is a corner lot within the R-4 Zoning District. Residences in the neighborhood are similarly zoned within the R-4 Zoning District. South of 175th Street, there are properties in the R-6 and ORI Zoning Districts. The Zoning Ordinance requires primary and secondary yard setbacks of 25 feet each within the R-4 zoning district. The east side of the principal structure encroaches three feet into the secondary front yard (setback 22 feet). The lot of 8,069 sq. ft. is below the required minimum corner lot size of 10,000 sq. ft. per the Zoning Ordinance, however it is a corner lot platted with additional lot width to help accommodate the corner front yard setback requirements similar to other corner lots in the area. 2018 Fence Regulations After months of discussion between the Zoning Board of Appeals, Plan Commission, and Community Development Committee, the Village Board adopted an ordinance in January 2018, amending the fence regulations for fences within a secondary front yard. The amendment provided clarification to the Code. Previously, the Code was not uniformly enforced, created aesthetic issues in streetscapes, and resulted in many non-conforming fences. It was known when adopting these newer regulations that many existing fences would become legal non-conforming and would be required to come into conformance with the current codes when replacement is necessary. The attached Staff Exhibit (A) indicates a timeline of the corner fence variation history. Section III.J. “Fence Regulations” states that for corner lots, fences are only permitted at or behind the Required Setback Line in the primary front yard and secondary front yard, however, per Section III.J.3., open style fences with a maximum of five feet (5’) in height can, per administrative approval, encroach up to 10 feet into the Required Setback Line in the secondary front yard in the R-4 Zoning District. Section III.H.1. “Permitted Encroachments In Required Yards” states that patios are not permitted to encroach in front yards, and in no case shall a patio be placed closer than five (5) feet to any property line. VARIATIONS REQUEST The Petitioner proposes to remove the existing fence and construct new fencing. Part of the fencing, north of the patio, will meet Zoning Ordinance administrative approval requirements, and part of the fencing surrounding the existing patio will require a Variation. Also, the Petitioner proposes to keep the existing concrete patio per a Variation which would allow the Petitioner to replace it in the future. The Petitioner is requesting two (2) Variations. Requested Fence Variation The first requested Variation is to construct a five-foot (5’) high open-style fence to encroach up to twenty-five feet (25’) into the required secondary front yard, located on the property line around the existing patio, where a fence is not permitted (red on the plan below). Rather than proposing a six-foot tall privacy-style fence, the Petitioner’ is attempting to minimize the degree of the variation’s request

Sample Design of Proposed Fence

Aerial

Zoning Map

R-4

R-6 ORI

174th Pl

Oco

nto

175th St.



Page 4 of 7

via the five-foot tall open-style fence. The open-style of the fence would not cause visibility concerns from the intersection. The Petitioner has requested the fence setback Variation to enclose the existing patio. Requested Patio Variation The second requested Variation is to allow the existing patio to be located in the secondary front yard and closer than five feet (5’) to a property line where a patio is not permitted (yellow on the plan below). The 682 sq. ft. concrete patio is 31 feet wide by 22 feet deep extending to the east property line. The Petitioner has requested the patio Variation due to its adjacency to the side door. The Petitioner states the rear yard has existing ground air conditioning unit, exhaust vents, and a tankless hot water unit. The Petitioner notes relocating a patio there would require rerouting the home’s exterior mechanical equipment. Also, the adjacent wall to the rear yard does not have a door. Staff is concerned about setting a precedent for future variation requests in which there is no clear physical hardship or uniqueness of property. Hardships for a Variation must be related to the physical characteristics of the property and cannot be created by the owner (or previous owners) of the property. The Petitioner could comply by code by relocating the patio to the north (rear) of the home, and receiving administrative approval for the five-foot-high open-style fence ten feet into the secondary front yard (purple on the plan below). However, if the previously permitted patio remains in place, it would be situated in the path of where an administratively approved fence could run. If the patio encroachment variation is not approved, the fence encroachment variation would not have a purpose if the patio is removed in the future. An approval of the fence encroachment variation could be conditioned to state that the fencing granted per the Variation can only remain if the patio exists, otherwise this fencing must be removed.

Fence location Option allowed (admin.

Existing/Proposed

Patio location

Proposed Fence location (admin.

Proposed Fence location

(variation)

Proposed Fence & Existing/Proposed Patio Locations

Patio location Option allowed (code)



Page 5 of 7

STANDARDS FOR A VARIATION Section X.G.4. of the Zoning Ordinance states the Plan Commission shall not recommend a Variation of the regulations of the Zoning Ordinance unless it shall have made Findings of Fact, based upon the evidence presented for each of the Standards for Variations listed below. The Plan Commission must provide findings for the first three standards; the remaining standards are provided to help the Plan Commission further analyze the request.

1. The property in question cannot yield a reasonable return if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by the regulations in the district in which it is located. The property can yield a reasonable return under the conditions of the district it is located. The Petitioner has an option for a fence and patio that are compliant with the code.

2. The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances. The subject property does not present a clear or physical hardship related to the property that makes it unique from any other corner lot. The existing patio could be relocated to a code compliant location.

3. The Variation, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.

The Variations, if granted, will alter the essential character of the locality. The majority of other corner lot properties in the neighborhood do not have any fencing or have fencing that complies with the required setbacks. Also, though the subject patio is existing, the other properties nearby do not appear to have patios in front yards. The existing lot similar to other corner lots in the neighborhood and throughout the Village. The granting of a Variation may establish a precedent that may result in additional Variation requests of similar situations.










Page 6 of 7

MOTION TO CONSIDER If the Plan Commission wishes to take action, an appropriate wording of the motions would read:

Variations: “…make a motion to recommend that the Village Board grant the following Variation(s) to the Petitioner, Jim Stulga:

a) a 25-foot Variation from Section III.J. (Fence Regulations) of the Zoning Ordinance, to permit a five-foot high open fence encroaching 25 feet into the required secondary front yard, where a fence encroachment is not permitted at 7240 174th Place in the R-4 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District, consistent with the Submitted Plans and adopt Findings of Fact as proposed by Village Staff in the May 5, 2022 Staff Report. [any conditions that the Commissioners would like to add]

b) a 25-foot Variation from Section III.H.1 (Permitted Encroachments) of the Zoning Ordinance, to permit an existing 682 square foot (22 feet by 31 feet) patio to be located in the secondary front yard encroaching 25 feet into the required secondary front yard, where a patio encroachment is not permitted at 7240 174th Place in the R-4 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District, consistent with the Submitted Plans and adopt Findings of Fact as proposed by Village Staff in the May 5, 2022 Staff Report” [any conditions that the Commissioners would like to add]



By Date On

Sheet Application (Redacted) & Response to Standards Applicant 3/30/22 Applicant Narrative Applicant 4/2022 Plat of Survey (Marked) Applicant 4/2022 Proposed Sample Fence Image Applicant 4/2022 Applicant Photos Applicant 4/2022



Page 7 of 7

Staff Exhibit A

History of Fence Regulations Related to Corner Lots

1956-2005 “Fences in which the opening between the materials of which the fence is constructed represent less than seventy (70) percent of the total surface may be erected to a height not exceeding four (4) feet along the boundaries of a lot, except that no such fence shall be erected within thirty (30) feet of a street intersection. Wire fences and other fences in which the openings between the materials of which the fence is constructed represent more than seventy (70) percent of the total fence area may be erected to a height of six (6) feet, except within thirty (30) feet of a street intersection.”

2007-2009 Corner fences are allowed 10 feet into the required side yard similar to the current regulations and allowed to be 6 foot solid with Zoning Administrator review of visibility. “Fences not exceeding six (6) feet in height above natural grade level projecting not more than ten (10) feet into the required front setback on the side yard street frontage of a corner lot in a residential zoning district, provided that the Zoning Administrator or his designee determines that the provisions of Section III.G of this Ordinance will be maintained and that there will be no obstruction to the visibility of vehicular or pedestrian traffic. If the Zoning Administrator deems that such a visibility obstruction would occur, he may require that portions of or all of the fence be constructed of an open design, or of a shorter height, or a combination of both, or the Zoning Administrator may deny the request. The determination of the Zoning Ordinance may be appealed to the Zoning Board of Appeals pursuant to Section X.F of this Ordinance.”

2011-2017 A chart was created which determined what accessory uses and structures could encroach within a required yard under certain situations. It was here when fences 6 feet in height were permitted as an obstruction within 10 feet of the required secondary front yard. The Zoning Administrator was left to determine if the fence was a visibility obstruction and if it was required to obtain a Variation or not. This process and the standards attached resulted in the inconsistent enforcement of the zoning code requirements and numerous issues that created aesthetic and visibility concerns.

2017-Present

Code Changes were initiated to determine what fences in the secondary front yard should be permitted going forward and to make the regulations clear to residents and staff. The new regulations were reviewed and revised by the Zoning Board of Appeals, Community Development Committee, and the Plan Commission. They were approved by the Village Board in January 2018. The result of the text amendments reduced allowable fences extending into the required secondary front yard to be a maximum 4 feet in height (4’6” posts) and open style (50% open to light and air). When approved it was known that there would be numerous fences that would become legal non-conforming in the Village and would need to come into compliance when their fence needed replacement or adjustment.




AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION TO PERMIT A FENCE IN A SECONDARY FRONT YARD AT 7240 174TH PLACE





Board of Trustees





AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION TO PERMIT A FENCE IN A SECONDARY FRONT YARD AT 7240 174TH PLACE


WHEREAS, a petition has been filed with the Village Clerk of this Village and has been processed in accordance with the Tinley Park Zoning Ordinance by Jim Stulga (“Petitioner”), to grant a twenty-five-foot (25’) Variation to permit construction of a five-foot (5’) tall open-style fence to be located on the secondary front yard property line instead of the required twenty-five-foot (25’) front yard setback (“Variation”); and

WHEREAS, the Village of Tinley Park Plan Commission held a Public Hearing on the question of whether the Variation should be granted on May 5, 2022, at the Village Hall of this Village at which time all persons present were afforded an opportunity to be heard; and

WHEREAS, public notice in the form required by law was given of said Public Hearing by publication not more than thirty (30) days nor less than fifteen (15) days prior to said Public Hearing in the Daily Southtown, a newspaper of general circulation within the Village of Tinley Park; and

WHEREAS, after hearing testimony on the petition, the Plan Commission found that the petition for the fence Variation with a recommended condition met the requisite standards enumerated in the Tinley Park Zoning Ordinance for granting the Variation and voted 6-1 to recommend to the Village President and Board of Trustees for the approval of the fence Variation; and

WHEREAS, the Plan Commission has filed its report of findings and recommendations regarding the Variation with this Village President and Board of Trustees, and this Board of Trustees has duly considered said report, findings, and recommendations; and

WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities of the Village of Tinley Park, Cook and Will Counties, Illinois, have determined that it is in the best interest of the Village of Tinley Park and its residents to approve said Variation; and




SECTION 2: That the report of findings and recommendations of the Plan Commission are herein incorporated by reference as the findings of this President and the Board of Trustees, as complete as if fully set forth herein at length. This Board finds that the Petitioner have provided evidence establishing that he has met the standards for granting the Variation as set forth in Section X.G.4 of the Zoning Ordinance, and the proposed granting of the Variation as set forth herein are in the public good and in the best interest of the Village and its residents and are consistent with and fosters the purpose and spirit of the Tinley Park Zoning Ordinance.

1. The property in question cannot yield a reasonable return if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by the regulations in the district in which it is located.

The property can yield a reasonable return under the conditions of the district it is located. The Petitioner has an option for a fence and patio that are compliant with the code.

2. The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances. The subject property does not present a clear or physical hardship related to the

property that makes it unique from any other corner lot. The existing patio could be relocated to a code compliant location.

3. The Variation, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. The Variation, if granted, will alter the essential character of the locality. The

majority of other corner lot properties in the neighborhood do not have any fencing or have fencing that complies with the required setbacks. Also, though the subject patio is existing, the other properties nearby do not appear to have patios in front yards. The existing lot similar to other corner lots in the neighborhood and throughout the Village. The granting of a Variation may establish a precedent that may result in additional Variation requests of similar situations.

4. Additionally, the Plan Commission also considered the extent to which the following facts are favorable to the Petitioner based on the established evidence:








SECTION 3: The Variation set forth herein below shall be applicable to the following described property:

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 14 IN BLOCK 17 IN SUNDALE HILLS ADDITION TO TINLEY PARK IN SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE 12, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED JULY 6, 1956 AS DOCUMENT NO. 16630341, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS.


COMMONLY KNOWN AS: 7240 174th Place, Tinley Park, Illinois

SECTION 4: A twenty-five-foot (25’) Variation from Section III.J (Fence Regulations) of the Zoning Ordinance, to permit a five-foot (5’) high open-style fence to extend twenty-five-feet (25’) into the required twenty-five-feet (25’) secondary front yard around an existing patio where a fence encroachment is not permitted is hereby granted to the Petitioner in the R-4 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District at the above-mentioned Property, in accordance with the “List of Reviewed Plans” attached hereto as Exhibit A, with the following condition:

1. If the existing patio were to be removed, fall into disrepair, or need replacement, then the fence Variation shall be voided and both the patio and fence shall be required to comply with the setback requirements at that time.





PASSED THIS 7th day of June 2022.

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

APPROVED THIS 7th day of June 2022.


ATTEST:

__________________________________ VILLAGE CLERK


STATE OF ILLINOIS )

COUNTY OF COOK ) SSCOUNTY OF WILL )

CERTIFICATE



copy of Ordinance No. 2022-O-038, “AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION TO

PERMIT A FENCE IN A SECONDARY FRONT YARD AT 7240 174TH PLACE,” which was

adopted by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Tinley Park on June 7th, 2022.


the Village of Tinley Park this 7th day of June 2022.

____________________________________ VILLAGE CLERK


Exhibit A



1




ITEM #2: PUBLIC HEARING – 7240 174th PLACE, STULGA – CORNER FENCE VARIATION

Consider recommending that the Village Board grant Jim Stulga (property owner) a Variation from Section III.J. of the Zoning Code (Fence Regulations) and Section III.H. (Permitted Encroachments) at the property located at 7240 174th Place in the R-4 Single Family Residential zoning district. This Variance would permit the Petitioner to install a five-foot (5’) high open-style fence to encroach up to twenty-five (25’) feet into the required secondary front yard (located on the property line around the existing patio). A Variation is also requested for the existing patio to be located in the secondary front yard and closer than 5 feet to a property line where a patio is not permitted.




Petitioners: Jim Stulga, 7240 174th Place


CHAIRMAN GRAY introduced Item #2, and asked for a motion to open the public hearing. Motion made by COMMISSIONER GASKILL seconded by COMMISSIONER TRUXAL. CHAIRPERSON GRAY requested a voice vote asking if any were opposed to the motion; hearing none, he declared the motion carried.




Jim Stulga, Petitioner, was sworn in. He noted Staff clarified what he wanted to do. He has an existing patio. He wants to replace his existing fence, and if he does it by code, he would have to slice his patio with 15’ of the patio outside the fence line.

CHAIRMAN GRAY asked the Commissioners for some of their comments.


2

COMMISSIONER MARAK asked if it was possible to approve the variance for the fence but not for the patio. Are they two separate things?

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, responded that it is entirely possible. We drafted the motions together because they are obviously connected.

COMMISSIONER MARAK noted that by leaving a patio in, and not having to remove it, you would not run a fence through a patio.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, responded that you could have two separate findings for each of the two variation requests.

COMMISSIONER TRUXAL stated that he saw in the notes the Petitioner would have to relocate AC units and some ventilation. He asked the Petitioner to provide more detail.

The Petitioner responded it was at the rear of the house. Financially, it is not possible for hm to move the patio. If he did have the funds, he would have to move the air conditioner, a tankless water heater exhaust, and a dryer vent. There are a lot of obstructions that would have to be moved to the west side of the house.

COMMISSIONER TRUXAL acknowledged that he sees that in the picture.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, noted that if the Commission denies the patio variation, he does not have to remove the patio. It gets to remain until he wants to replace it.

COMMISSIONER GASKILL reviewed the marked-up plat of survey as presented showing proposal and option by code.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, clarified the green line is the proposed portion that would meet the code.

COMMISSIONER GASKILL asked what the dotted line was.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, answered that’s where he could continue the fence by-right.

COMMISSIONER GASKILL asked if the red line was where he wants to put the fence up by the sidewalk.

Lori Kosmatka, Associate Planner, clarified that the red line is what triggers the variation. The open design fence runs along the property line at zero feet

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, noted the replacement is where the variation is triggered.

COMMISSIONER GASKILL noted that the Petitioner would pick up on the old fence, jog out to the sidewalk, come down, and back and pick up at the old fence on the side of the house.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, noted some of the history of this. The Petitioner originally proposed it from the driveway all the way down where the fence is now. Staff had suggested he request the least amount of variation as part of this. This is why part of the fence is pulled back to meet the code and then just jogs around the patio. The recommendation was to request as little as you need.

COMMISSIONER GASKILL asked what the patio is made of.

The Petitioner responded it is concrete.

COMMISSIONER SHAW asked if there was a permit on file from 1987.

Lori Kosmatka, Associate Planner, responded yes.

COMMISSIONER SHAW noted that when he went by, he couldn’t really tell if it is the same patio from 1987. He asked if it is, as far as you know, the same patio.


3

Lori Kosmatka, Associate Planner, responded yes, that the permit had a plat in the file, and it has the same matching location footprint and dimensions.

CHAIRMAN GRAY asked the Petitioner if he had owned the home since the patio was installed, and to his knowledge he thinks it is the same as originally permitted.

The Petitioner responded no did not own it when the patio was installed.

CHAIRMAN GRAY asked the Petitioner if to his knowledge he thinks it is the same.

The Petitioner responded yes, it all appears to be the same age.

COMMISSIONER SHAW noted that when he looked at the standards, the one that really stands out was the ability to yield a reasonable return given the footprint of the property. He has trouble reconciling. It is possible to have a complying fence administratively as shown with the purple line, but as a practical matter it goes right down the middle of the patio. He liked the compromise staff proposed in putting conditions on a variance, that a fence variance remains in place only so long as the patio remains, and the patio can’t be replaced. It would need to be taken out at which time the fence variance would cease to be approved. The agreement that if he’s understanding that would be that at such time the patio was removed, the fence variance would no longer be in effect and would therefore have to be pulled back. He thinks that is a reasonable compromise. His only concern on that is that given the patio is already 35 years old, how far off are we from that, and if we grant it under those conditions, that to him would actually be an incentive not to replace the patio and it would therefore potentially fall into disrepair. He does see a bit of a hardship primarily with the circumstance here with size of the lot and the options under the code. He asked if the green line that jogs over is the same style of fence throughout. He welcomed the Petitioner to comment.

The Petitioner responded that is correct. He noted the patio is still in great condition. It just has two minor stress cracks with no buckling and no chipping.

COMMISSIONER SHAW noted that when he went by, it didn’t seem to be sinking, breaking, or shifting, but it’s 35 years old so it must have been a decent job when it was put in.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, clarified that we are not recommending that. We just pointed that out as an option if the Commission somehow connects them. He wants the Commission to have all the tools.

COMMISSIONER SHAW acknowledge that as a technical matter, Staff is not recommending that, but he appreciates that was put forth as an option.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, agreed it is an option, but there are still problems with that too. You could point back at that time and say I got a fence there so now I want the patio to stay.

COMMISSIONER SHAW noted that whether it is Plan Commissioners or Zoning Board of Appeals, there’s the functional approval and then there’s enforcement. Down the road while there might be conditions on the variance, then it becomes an enforcement and monitoring thing down the road.

COMMISSIONER MANI noted that this was something he was talking about on the previous agenda item. With fences, you should be able to replace it to whatever materials. He wants to do a nice wrought iron fence. It makes the property look better and to their liking.

COMMISSIONER GATTO commented that she’s ok with it and it looks way better than what it does right now. The five-foot open style fence with wrought iron will look great. She agrees with Staff’s recommendation to do after the patio to jog in to where the property line is in adjacent with the sidewalk. She asked if that’s what was proposed.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, responded yes, that is what the Petitioner proposed. They jog it in so that it’s only nonconforming just around the patio.

COMMISSIONER GATTO affirmed she is okay with that. That is a great compromise.


4

CHAIRMAN GRAY noted that most of the Commission has echoed sentiments that he has. Looking at Staff’s option through the code or administrative approval, he thinks COMMISSIONER MARAK or TRUXAL had mentioned, we know you’re not going to put a fence right down the patio and leave the other portion open. He recalled the Petitioner also had stated moving the patio to the north would be cost prohibitive, and that he has some utilities and other structures that reside there so there is limited options here because of that patio that was approved in 1987. He had no other comments. The options here are a little bit more limited based on what Staff gave in the report on page four of seven. He asked if there were any other comments from the Commission. Hearing none, he asked the Petitioner to sit down.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, offered the Commission to look at the Standards. These are just Staff’s drafted ones. This is what the Commission sends to the Village Board. If you say you don’t like as a group, you’re saying you don’t like the way this is worded, or we have something else for this, try and vocalize that so we can actually send what your recommendation is, and what your thoughts are to the Village Board. That gets carried into the ordinance as well.

CHAIRMAN GRAY asked for a motion to close the public hearing. Motion made by COMMISSIONER GATTO, seconded by COMMISSIONER GASKILL. CHAIRMAN GRAY requested a voice vote; hearing no opposition, the motion carried. He asked Staff to present the Standards.



COMMISSIONER MARAK asked if the motions could be separated.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager clarified these are two separate motions. The first one is the fence, and the patio is the second.

CHAIRMAN GRAY requested a motion for the fence.


COMMISSIONER SHAW made a motion to recommend that the Village Board grant the following Variation to the Petitioner, Jim Stulga a 25-foot Variation from Section III.J. (Fence Regulations) of the Zoning Ordinance, to permit a five-foot high open fence encroaching 25 feet into the required secondary front yard, where a fence encroachment is not permitted at 7240 174th Place in the R-4 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District, consistent with the Submitted Plans and adopt Findings of Fact as proposed by Village Staff in the May 5, 2022 Staff Report. Motion seconded by COMMISSIONER GATTO. Vote taken by roll call; the vote was 6-1 in favor. Ayes were by COMMISSIONERS GASKILL, GATTO, MANI, MARAK, SHAW, TRUXAL. Nays were by CHAIRMAN GRAY. CHAIRMAN GRAY declared the motion as carried.


Motion 2 – Variation for Patio

COMMISSIONER TRUXAL made a motion to recommend that the Village Board grant the following Variation to the Petitioner, Jim Stulga a 25-foot Variation from Section III.H.1 (Permitted Encroachments) of the Zoning Ordinance, to permit an existing 682 square foot (22 feet by 31 feet) patio to be located in the secondary front yard encroaching 25 feet into the required secondary front yard, where a patio encroachment is not permitted at 7240 174th Place in the R-4 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District,


5

consistent with the Submitted Plans and adopt Findings of Fact as proposed by Village Staff in the May 5, 2022 Staff Report.

Motion seconded by COMMISSIONER GATTO.

COMMISSIONER SHAW asked if the motion could be amended.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager responded that there is a motion on the floor, and you could have discussion on it but it would need to be amended by the person who made it if it was to change.

COMMISSIONER SHAW noted he’d like to clarify the conditions because for the fence motion there weren’t conditions specified. He noted his preference on the patio variation would be to include the condition discussed that if the patio were to be removed, then the nonconforming fence should be removed.

COMMISSIONER MARAK asked if that would be a third motion.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager noted that the Commission could vote to amend that on. He suggested the Commission vote on the patio as presented and then consider going back to amend the first motion on the fence to include the condition separate from the patio motion that has been moved.

COMMISSIONER SHAW noted he was the only one who mentioned it so he didn’t know if it was a moot point.

CHAIRMAN GRAY suggested a third motion because we may not have the same vote.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, noted we could do a third motion with the condition on it if everyone agrees they want to override the first motion. If it’s separate, then we can send both motions to the Board, and they can choose which one they like best.

CHAIRMAN GRAY noted to COMMISSIONER SHAW that he’ll have him restate the third motion. CHAIRMAN GRAY noted that we do have a motion on the floor right now.

Vote taken by roll call; the vote was 4-3 in favor. Ayes were by COMMISSIONERS GATTO, MANI, TRUXAL, and CHAIRMAN GRAY. Nays were by GASKILL, MARAK, SHAW. CHAIRMAN GRAY declared the motion as carried.

CHAIRMAN GRAY requested the third motion.

COMMISSIONER SHAW asked if we should revisit the same motion with the condition or just simply amend the previous one.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, responded you could make either of those motions but was cleaner to make a new separate motion.

COMMISSIONER SHAW noted to CHAIRMAN GRAY that procedurally he didn’t know if it was necessary to go through the motion. He asked CHAIRMAN GRAY if he would entertain a straw poll. If there’s no consensus on the point, there’s no reason to go there.

CHAIRMAN GRAY asked who would be in favor, as COMMISSIONER SHAW mentioned, if the patio ceases to exist, if there was a fence that receives a variation it would have to be pulled back so that it would


6

have to conform to the setback. Seeing reactions from the Commissioners, he noted he saw all in favor his recommended third motion with the exception of COMMISSIONER MANI.

Motion 3 – Variation for Fence with Condition

COMMISSIONER SHAW made a new motion to amend the previous motion regarding the 25-foot Variation for the fence on the subject property to include the condition that if the concrete patio were to be removed or in disrepair, then the fence and patio would have to be removed and comply with the Zoning Ordinance at that time and the Variation would be voided.

CHAIRMAN GRAY noted that in the straw poll, the only “No” was from COMMISSIONER MANI. The majority was “Yes” for the amendment and a majority “Yes” for the Motion #1 on the fence. He wanted to ensure that was in the record.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, noted that you will still have to get a second to that and take the vote.

Motion seconded by COMMISSIONER MARAK. Vote taken by roll call; the vote was 6-1 in favor. Ayes were by COMMISSIONERS GASKILL, GATTO, MARAK, SHAW, TRUXAL, and CHAIRMAN GRAY. Nays were by COMMISSIONER MANI. CHAIRMAN GRAY declared the motion as carried.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, asked COMMISSIONER MANI just to clarify he preferred the less restrictive motion, without the condition allowing the fence and patio to remain as is.

COMMISSIONER MANI responded yes.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, noted he will make sure the Board knows why there were two motions and the general feeling expressed at the meeting.

CHAIRMAN GRAY noted that this item will go to Village Board on May 17th.

Dan Ritter, Planning Manager, noted it will go for First Reading on that day since there was no a unanimous consensus. He noted Lori Kosmatka will follow up with the Petitioner to let him know how to attend.


May 6, 2022 Village of Tinley Park Department of Public Works 7980 W. 183rd Street Tinley Park, IL 60477 Attention: Joe Fitzpatrick Water & Sewer Superintendent Subject: Dorothy Lane and Ironwood Drive Water Main Replacement Engineer’s Award Recommendation (CBBEL Project No. 160373.00025)

Dear Mr. Fitzpatrick, On Friday, May 6, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. bids were received and opened for the Dorothy Lane and Ironwood Drive Water Main Replacement Project. Three bids were received for this project. Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. (CBBEL) has reviewed the bid proposals and all documents were in compliance with Village requirements. The results have been reviewed and are tabulated below:

CONTRACTOR BID PROPOSAL Engineer’s Estimate $1,311,266.00 Austin Tyler Construction $1,353,353.40 P.T. Ferro Construction $1,475,438.00 Airy’s Inc. $1,699,851.00

Austin Tyler Construction is the low bidder with a bid amount of $1,353,353.40. We have reviewed Austin Tyler’s bid document and find it to be in order. The low bid proposal is above the Engineer’s Estimate. Due to current market conditions for water main materials and appurtenances, CBBEL has seen a significant increase in both cost and material lead times. Upon review, the unit prices received appear to be competitive based on current market conditions.


Therefore, we recommend awarding the Dorothy Lane and Ironwood Drive Water Main Replacement Project to Austin Tyler Construction in the amount of $1,353,353.40. The bid tabulation is enclosed for your reference. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely,

Alex Schaefer, PE Project Manager Enclosure as Noted cc: Arlan Schattke – Tinley Park

N:\TINLEYPARK\160373\160373.00025\Admin\Correspondance\LOR Fitzpatrick_2022_0506.Docx


Dorothy Lane and Ironwood DriveWater Main ReplacementBID SUMMARY

Village of Tinely ParkCBBEL Project No. 160373.00025

Bids Opened May 6, 2022

CONTRACTOR BID

ENGINEEER'S ESTIMATE $ 1,311,266.00 AUSTIN TYLER CONSTRUCTION $ 1,353,353.40

P.T. FERRO CONSTRUCTION $ 1,475,438.00 AIRY'S INC. $ 1,699,851.00


Village of Tinley ParkDorothy Lane and Ironwood Drive Water Main ReplacementCBBEL Project No. 160373.00025

Bids Opened May 6, 2022

ITEM NO SP PAY CODE ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL

1 20101200 TREE ROOT PRUNING EACH 10 150.00$ 1,500.00$ 165.00$ 1,650.00$ 175.00$ 1,750.00$ 259.00$ 2,590.00$ 2 20101300 TREE PRUNING (1 TO 10 INCH DIAMETER) EACH 2 125.00$ 250.00$ 200.00$ 400.00$ 1,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 1,037.00$ 2,074.00$ 3 20101350 TREE PRUNING (OVER 10 INCH DIAMETER) EACH 8 150.00$ 1,200.00$ 270.00$ 2,160.00$ 500.00$ 4,000.00$ 1,037.00$ 8,296.00$ 4 20201200 REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF UNSUITABLE MATERIAL CU YD 65 50.00$ 3,250.00$ 0.01$ 0.65$ 45.00$ 2,925.00$ 77.00$ 5,005.00$ 5 # 20700220 POROUS GRANULAR EMBANKMENT CU YD 65 50.00$ 3,250.00$ 0.01$ 0.65$ 50.00$ 3,250.00$ 116.00$ 7,540.00$ 6 28000510 INLET FILTERS EACH 16 175.00$ 2,800.00$ 130.00$ 2,080.00$ 170.00$ 2,720.00$ 219.00$ 3,504.00$ 7 # 42400800 DETECTABLE WARNINGS SQ FT 70 40.00$ 2,800.00$ 38.00$ 2,660.00$ 20.00$ 1,400.00$ 31.00$ 2,170.00$ 8 550A2310 STORM SEWERS, RUBBER GASKET, CLASS A, TYPE 1 10" FOOT 73 70.00$ 5,110.00$ 76.00$ 5,548.00$ 90.00$ 6,570.00$ 63.00$ 4,599.00$ 9 550A2320 STORM SEWERS, RUBBER GASKET, CLASS A, TYPE 1 12" FOOT 21 80.00$ 1,680.00$ 76.00$ 1,596.00$ 90.00$ 1,890.00$ 64.00$ 1,344.00$

10 550A2520 STORM SEWERS, RUBBER GASKET, CLASS A, TYPE 2 12" FOOT 30 85.00$ 2,550.00$ 76.00$ 2,280.00$ 90.00$ 2,700.00$ 64.00$ 1,920.00$ 11 550A2540 STORM SEWERS, RUBBER GASKET, CLASS A, TYPE 2 18" FOOT 15 105.00$ 1,575.00$ 96.00$ 1,440.00$ 100.00$ 1,500.00$ 78.00$ 1,170.00$ 12 # 56103000 DUCTILE IRON WATER MAIN 6" FOOT 104 105.00$ 10,920.00$ 120.00$ 12,480.00$ 140.00$ 14,560.00$ 120.00$ 12,480.00$ 13 # 56103100 DUCTILE IRON WATER MAIN 8" FOOT 2833 125.00$ 354,125.00$ 150.00$ 424,950.00$ 120.00$ 339,960.00$ 115.00$ 325,795.00$ 14 # 56105000 WATER VALVES 8" EACH 15 2,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 2,390.00$ 35,850.00$ 2,750.00$ 41,250.00$ 2,567.00$ 38,505.00$ 15 # 56300100 ADJUSTING SANITARY SEWERS, 8-INCH DIAMETER OR LESS FOOT 135 75.00$ 10,125.00$ 58.00$ 7,830.00$ 100.00$ 13,500.00$ 74.00$ 9,990.00$ 16 # 56400500 FIRE HYDRANTS TO BE REMOVED EACH 8 750.00$ 6,000.00$ 770.00$ 6,160.00$ 1,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 654.00$ 5,232.00$ 17 # 56400820 FIRE HYDRANT WITH AUXILIARY VALVE AND VALVE BOX EACH 8 7,000.00$ 56,000.00$ 7,720.00$ 61,760.00$ 7,300.00$ 58,400.00$ 9,238.00$ 73,904.00$ 18 60234200 INLETS, TYPE A, TYPE 1 FRAME, OPEN LID EACH 3 1,800.00$ 5,400.00$ 1,930.00$ 5,790.00$ 1,500.00$ 4,500.00$ 1,373.00$ 4,119.00$ 19 60248900 VALVE VAULTS, TYPE A, 5'-DIAMETER, TYPE 1 FRAME, CLOSED LID EACH 15 3,000.00$ 45,000.00$ 3,140.00$ 47,100.00$ 4,250.00$ 63,750.00$ 3,924.00$ 58,860.00$ 20 # 67100100 MOBILIZATION L SUM 1 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 54,000.00$ 54,000.00$ 59,000.00$ 59,000.00$ 45,275.00$ 45,275.00$ 21 78000600 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING - LINE 12" FOOT 108 10.00$ 1,080.00$ 27.00$ 2,916.00$ 27.00$ 2,916.00$ 26.00$ 2,808.00$ 22 # X2080250 TRENCH BACKFILL, SPECIAL CU YD 1810 40.00$ 72,400.00$ 0.01$ 18.10$ 75.00$ 135,750.00$ 79.00$ 142,990.00$ 23 # X7010216 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND PROTECTION, (SPECIAL) L SUM 1 40,000.00$ 40,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 44,500.00$ 44,500.00$ 16,589.00$ 16,589.00$ 24 # XX005431 LOCATING UNDERGROUND UTILITY EACH 5 500.00$ 2,500.00$ 1,200.00$ 6,000.00$ 500.00$ 2,500.00$ 475.00$ 2,375.00$ 25 # Z0013798 CONSTRUCTION LAYOUT L SUM 1 12,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 9,000.00$ 9,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 11,001.00$ 11,001.00$ 26 # Z0018400 DRAINAGE STRUCTURES TO BE ADJUSTED EACH 3 750.00$ 2,250.00$ 870.00$ 2,610.00$ 400.00$ 1,200.00$ 1,009.00$ 3,027.00$ 27 # Z0018700 DRAINAGE STRUCTURE TO BE REMOVED EACH 3 500.00$ 1,500.00$ 905.00$ 2,715.00$ 400.00$ 1,200.00$ 1,463.00$ 4,389.00$ 28 # N/A CLASS D PATCHES, SPECIAL, 6 INCH SQ YD 4340 55.00$ 238,700.00$ 58.00$ 251,720.00$ 40.00$ 173,600.00$ 88.00$ 381,920.00$ 29 # N/A COMBINATION CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT FOOT 686 45.00$ 30,870.00$ 55.00$ 37,730.00$ 55.00$ 37,730.00$ 47.00$ 32,242.00$ 30 # N/A HOT-MIX ASPHALT DRIVEWAY REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT SQ YD 30 65.00$ 1,950.00$ 80.00$ 2,400.00$ 75.00$ 2,250.00$ 99.00$ 2,970.00$ 31 # N/A MISCELLANEOUS ADDITIONS TO PROJECT AT VILLAGE'S DISCRETION UNIT 50000 1.00$ 50,000.00$ 1.00$ 50,000.00$ 1.00$ 50,000.00$ 1.00$ 50,000.00$ 32 # N/A PARKWAY RESTORATION - SODDING SQ YD 940 14.00$ 13,160.00$ 20.00$ 18,800.00$ 22.00$ 20,680.00$ 21.00$ 19,740.00$ 33 # N/A PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE DRIVEWAY REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT SQ YD 60 100.00$ 6,000.00$ 134.00$ 8,040.00$ 145.00$ 8,700.00$ 99.00$ 5,940.00$ 34 # N/A PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK REMOVAL (NO REPLACEMENT) SQ FT 107 3.00$ 321.00$ 5.00$ 535.00$ 2.00$ 214.00$ 2.00$ 214.00$ 35 # N/A PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT SQ FT 1750 10.00$ 17,500.00$ 14.00$ 24,500.00$ 13.50$ 23,625.00$ 15.00$ 26,250.00$ 36 # N/A PRE-CONSTRUCTION VIDEO RECORDING LSUM 1 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 7,500.00$ 7,500.00$ 1.00$ 1.00$ 881.00$ 881.00$ 37 # N/A RECORD DRAWINGS LSUM 1 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,798.00$ 2,798.00$ 250.00$ 250.00$ 2,841.00$ 2,841.00$ 38 # N/A SANITARY SEWERS, WATER MAIN QUALITY, 8" FOOT 42 125.00$ 5,250.00$ 165.00$ 6,930.00$ 100.00$ 4,200.00$ 118.00$ 4,956.00$ 39 # N/A SHUTDOWN CONNECTION TO EXISTING WATER MAIN EACH 10 4,000.00$ 40,000.00$ 5,400.00$ 54,000.00$ 2,400.00$ 24,000.00$ 6,768.00$ 67,680.00$ 40 # N/A TEMPORARY STONE LSUM 1 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 2,990.00$ 2,990.00$ 1.00$ 1.00$ 2,045.00$ 2,045.00$ 41 # N/A VALVE BOXES TO BE ABANDONED EACH 13 250.00$ 3,250.00$ 301.00$ 3,913.00$ 400.00$ 5,200.00$ 410.00$ 5,330.00$ 42 # N/A VALVE BOXES TO BE REMOVED EACH 1 500.00$ 500.00$ 603.00$ 603.00$ 400.00$ 400.00$ 410.00$ 410.00$ 43 # N/A WATER SERVICE - ASBESTOS ABATEMENT EACH 3 2,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 1,200.00$ 3,600.00$ 4,532.00$ 13,596.00$ 7,341.00$ 22,023.00$ 44 # N/A WATER SERVICE - INTERIOR RESTORATION EACH 6 2,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 800.00$ 4,800.00$ 550.00$ 3,300.00$ 7,341.00$ 44,046.00$ 45 # N/A WATER SERVICE REPLACEMENT (PRIVATE) - LEAD SERVICE REPLACEMENT EACH 6 3,750.00$ 22,500.00$ 3,000.00$ 18,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 60,000.00$ 5,333.00$ 31,998.00$

46 # N/A WATER SERVICE REPLACEMENT (PUBLIC) WITH NEW BUFFALO BOX, LONG SIDE (1.5" DIA. OR LESS) EACH 25 3,500.00$ 87,500.00$ 4,000.00$ 100,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 125,000.00$ 6,268.00$ 156,700.00$

47 # N/A WATER SERVICE REPLACEMENT (PUBLIC) WITH NEW BUFFALO BOX, SHORT SIDE (1.5" DIA. OR LESS) EACH 14 2,500.00$ 35,000.00$ 3,250.00$ 45,500.00$ 6,500.00$ 91,000.00$ 3,151.00$ 44,114.00$

TOTAL = 1,311,266.00$ 1,353,353.40$ 1,475,438.00$ 1,699,851.00$

P.T. FERRO CONSTRUCTION AIRY'S INC.ENGINEEER'S ESTIMATE AUSTIN TYLER CONSTRUCTION

N:\TINLEYPARK\160373\160373.00025\Admin\Bidding\Bid Tabulation_2022_0506.xlsx



RESOLUTIONNO. 2022-R-050

A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK AND AUSTIN TYLER CONSTRUCTION FOR DOROTHY LN. & IRONWOOD DR.

WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT





Board of Trustees

_____________________________________________________________________________________Published in pamphlet form by authority of the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Tinley Park



A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK AND AUSTIN TYLER CONSTRUCTION FOR DOROTHY LN. & IRONWOOD DR. WATER

MAIN REPLACEMENT




Illinois, have considered entering into a Contract with Austin Tyler Construction, a true and correct copy of

such Contract being attached hereto and made a part hereof as EXHIBIT 1; and


Illinois, have determined that it is in the best interests of said Village of Tinley Park that said Contract be


NOW, THEREFORE, Be It Resolved by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of



Resolution as fully as if completely repeated at length herein.


that it is in the best interests of the Village of Tinley Park and its residents that the aforesaid "Contract” be

entered into and executed by said Village of Tinley Park, with said Contract to be substantially in the form

attached hereto and made a part hereof as EXHIBIT 1.



Contract.

Section 4: That this Resolution shall take effect from and after its adoption and approval.



AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

APPROVED this17th day of May, 2022, by the President of the Village of Tinley Park.

Village President

ATTEST:

___________________________ Village Clerk


EXHIBIT 1

DOROTHY LN. & IRONWOOD DR. WATER MAIN

REPLACEMENT

AUSTIN TYLER CONSTRUCTION


STATE OF ILLINOIS )

COUNTY OF COOK ) SS

COUNTY OF WILL )

CERTIFICATE

I, NANCY M. O’CONNOR, Village Clerk of the Village of Tinley Park, Counties of Cook and


Resolution No. 2022-R-050, “A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE

VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK AND AUSTIN TYLER CONSTRUCTION FOR DOROTHY LN

& IRONWOOD DR. WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT,” which was adopted by the President and

Board of Trustees of the Village of Tinley Park on May 17, 2022.



____________________________________ VILLAGE CLERK


THE VILLAGE OF TINLEY PARK Cook County, Illinois Will County, Illinois


A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF A MOBILE BOLLARD SYSTEM FROM ADVANCED SECURITY TECHNOLOGY (AST)

MICHAEL W. GLOTZ, PRESIDENT NANCY M. O’CONNOR, VILLAGE CLERK

WILLIAM P. BRADY

WILLIAM A. BRENNAN DIANE M. GALANTE

DENNIS P. MAHONEY MICHAEL G. MUELLER COLLEEN M. SULLIVAN

Board of Trustees

_____________________________________________________________________________________ Published in pamphlet form by authority of the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Tinley Park



A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF A MOBILE BOLLARD SYSTEM FROM ADVANCED SECURITY TECHNOLOGY (AST)




Illinois, have considered the purchase of a Mobile Bollard System, a true and correct copy of such purchase

order being attached hereto and made a part hereof as EXHIBIT 1; and

WHEREAS, the Village was awarded $172,710 in UASI grant funds. This award was made for the

purpose of a Mobile Bollard System. This purchase is a reimbursable expense from the awarded UASI funds;

and


Illinois, have determined that it is in the best interests of said Village of Tinley Park that said purchase be


NOW, THEREFORE, Be It Resolved by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of



Resolution as fully as if completely repeated at length herein.


that it is in the best interests of the Village of Tinley Park and its residents that the aforesaid purchse be

entered into and executed by said Village of Tinley Park, with said purchase order to be substantially in the

form attached hereto and made a part hereof as EXHIBIT 1.



purchase.

Section 4: That this Resolution shall take effect from and after its adoption and approval.



AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

APPROVED this 17th day of May, 2022, by the President of the Village of Tinley Park.

Village President ATTEST:

___________________________ Village Clerk


EXHIBIT 1

PURCHASE OF A MOBILE BOLLARD SYSTEM FROM ADVANCED SECURITY TECHNOLOGY (AST)


STATE OF ILLINOIS )

COUNTY OF COOK ) SS

COUNTY OF WILL )

CERTIFICATE I, NANCY M. O’CONNOR, Village Clerk of the Village of Tinley Park, Counties of Cook and


Resolution No. 2022-R-052, “A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF A MOBILE

BOLLARD SYSTEM FROM ADVANCED SECURITY TECHNOLOGY (AST),” which was

adopted by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Tinley Park on May 17, 2022.



____________________________________ VILLAGE CLERK


www.adsectec.com

Bringing Advanced Technologies to the Security World

December 2, 2021

Sergeant Chris Butler Tinley Park Police Department Tel: 708-444-5325 7850 West 183rd Street Email: [email protected] Tinley Park, Illinois 60477 REFERENCE: Modular Vehicle Barrier 3X System - Price Quotation – 72 Unit Trailer System AST System #: AST3X-72/72-320206-40 Dear Sergeant Butler:

Thank you for your call yesterday afternoon and request for a proposal for a Mifram Modular Vehicle

Barrier System. Per our conversation, please find additional product information on the Mifram Modular

Vehicle Barrier MVB 3X System. Advanced Security Technologies LLC (AST) is the U.S. distributor and

sales arm for the Mifram product line.

A. System Advantages:

1. One person to install and dismantle

2. One minute for each section to be connected

3. Quick access in case of an emergency 4. System can be used as an active gate

5. Assembled without the need of any tools

6. Folds for easy carrying 7. Easy to store

8. Zero maintenance 9. Modular system - can be adapted to fit to any road width.

B. Modular Vehicle Barrier 3X Specifications:

1. Barriers must be certified to ASTM-F2656-15.

2. Barriers must be certified to ASTM/PAS 68 & IWA standards.

3. Barrier System must be modular and adaptable to any road width.

4. Spacing between barriers must be 21”.

5. Each complete MVB3X unit must weigh less than 55 lbs.

6. Each unit dimensions: L~46.5”, W~21”, H~32”.


http://www.adsectec.com/

mailto:[email protected]

www.adsectec.com 2

7. Tools shall not be required. System is to be assembled with pins.

8. Barriers must have the ability to be folded for transportation.

9. Property tag labelling service must be made available as part of this package.

10. MVB3X units must have the option to pivot and transition into an operational gate.

11. MVB3X units must have the option of slide wheels.

12. MVB3X pivoting section shall be modular (meaning user can decide how many sections to open).

13. Barriers must be capable of quick deployment (less than a minute to deploy a single unit).

14. Barriers must be able to be deployed by one person.

15. Bottom edges of the barriers shall be protected by aluminum covers (for pedestrian safety).

16. Barrier System shall have the ability to be deployed from the road and up to sidewalk in one

continuous line.

17. MVB3X units shall have multi-terrain capability.

18. MVB3X units shall be shipped in steel boxes

19. MVB3X units shall not require any maintenance.

C. MVB3X Transport Trailer Specifications:

1. The Trailer shall be made in the United States and comply with U.S. DOT regulations.

2. The Trailer must be New/Unused.

3. Trailer to include drip rails.

4. Trailer can hold up to 72 MVB3X units + Pivots.

5. 72-unit trailer will have 6 doors on each side.

6. Trailer shall be 20 feet long.

7. Trailer shall be 101.5” wide.

8. Tandem axel.

9. 14,000 lb. hauling capacity.

10. Electric brakes.

11. LED lighting.

12. 15,000 pound safety chain.

13. 2 5/16” Hitch

14. Spare wheel + Tire ST225/75/R12 (6 Lug).

15. All containment steel shall be powder coated.

16. MVB3X barriers can be loaded/stored from both sides.

17. Each MVB3X unit has its own dedicated slot for safe transport.

18. Each MVB3X is locked in place for transport with secondary retainment system.

19. Unit shall have Stainless Steel latches & hinges.

20. Zinc coated steel rivets.

21. Zinc coated nuts & bolts.

22. Dedicated space for pivot units.

23. Each door has a lock for safe storage. All keyed alike.

24. Single storage compartment shall be provided on the trailer. Compartment shall be 24” tall x 35”

deep x 96” wide. Compartment shall have dedicated slots for the pivot units.

25. Trailer shall be black in color.



www.adsectec.com 3

72 X MVB3X Unit Trailer – Provides Approximately 9 Lanes of Coverage

System Number Description Unit Price Quantity Extended

AST3X-72/72-320206-40 72 MVB3X Capacity Fully Loaded Trailer System

$172,710 1 $172,710

Freight F.O.B. Destination Included 1 Included

AST Services On-Site Equipment Training (Fee Waived)

Included 1 Included

Itemized System Inventory

MVB3X New Generation MVB Unit Price QTY Extended

MVB3X unit $1,455 72 $104,760

Pivot system $594 32 $19,008

Slide Wheels – fixed $435 2 $870

Slide Wheels – rotating $435 6 $2,610

Large Storage/Shipping Box $1,287 4 $5,148

[RECHARGEABLE] Set of 10 ICS Sequential Flares (Orange Side LED/Red Top LED) - Orange Plastic $650 4 $2,600

One-time On-site Product Training (fee waived) 0

Freight $875 1 $875

Transport Options Unit Price QTY Extended

Trailer for up to 72 x MVB3X units plus pivots. Trailer will have 6 door on each side. Each section will be two rows of 3 sections tall $33,639 1 $33,639

Shipping of Trailer to your site $3,200 1 $3,200

MVB-3X Total $172,710



www.adsectec.com 4

72 MVB3X Capacity Trailer with Six Compartments per Side

Notes:

1. Property tag labelling service must be made available as part of this package. If desired,

property tags and other adhesive labelling can be applied to each MVB3X Unit prior to delivery

at no additional charge. Property tags and other adhesive labels must be supplied by the end

user.

2. Number of pivots and sequential flares can be modified based on operational requirements.

3. Number of pivots are an estimate.

D. Terms & Conditions: 1. F.O.B – Destination. Shipping has been included in the above price. 2. Taxes are not included. Should any taxes are levied they will be paid for by the purchaser. 3. Delivery: 8-10 weeks ARO – depending on material availability. 4. Payment terms – 50% down payment 50 % net 30. 5. Prices are valid for 60 days. 6. Purchase of equipment is subject to Advanced Security Technologies LLC standard terms and

conditions.

Please do not hesitate to contact me should you require additional information.

Sincerely,

Randall D. Lofland Sales Director Advanced Security Technologies LLC Mobile: (804) 690-3055 I [email protected]



mailto:[email protected]


STAFF COMMENT


BOARD

COMMENT


PUBLIC COMMENT


EXECUTIVE SESSION

ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS:



Documents

Regular Village Board Meeting Agenda- May 17, 2022 | 1