Upload
bond
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Seediscussions,stats,andauthorprofilesforthispublicationat:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232831999
ApersonalprofileofsomeoftheinformalcollectorsincentralDurban—acasestudy
ARTICLEinSOUTHAFRICANREVIEWOFSOCIOLOGY·JANUARY2000
DOI:10.1080/21528586.2000.10419006
READS
4
1AUTHOR:
MichelleMcLean
BondUniversity
82PUBLICATIONS945CITATIONS
SEEPROFILE
Allin-textreferencesunderlinedinbluearelinkedtopublicationsonResearchGate,
lettingyouaccessandreadthemimmediately.
Availablefrom:MichelleMcLean
Retrievedon:09February2016
This article was downloaded by: [Bond University]On: 12 June 2015, At: 19:51Publisher: RoutledgeInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House,37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Society in TransitionPublication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rssr19
A personal profile of some of the informal collectors incentral Durban—a case studyMichelle McLean aa Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine , University of Natal , Private Bag 7 ,Congella , 4013 , South Africa E-mail:Published online: 12 Jan 2012.
To cite this article: Michelle McLean (2000) A personal profile of some of the informal collectors in central Durban—a casestudy, Society in Transition, 31:1, 1-9, DOI: 10.1080/21528586.2000.10419006
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21528586.2000.10419006
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) containedin the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make norepresentations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of theContent. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, andare not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon andshould be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable forany losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoeveror howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use ofthe Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematicreproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in anyform to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Society in transition, 2000, 31 (I)
A personal profile of some of the informal collectors in central Durban - a case study
Michelle Mclean
Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Natal, Private Bag 7, Congella 4013, South Africa. (E-mail: [email protected])
The sustained high levels of unemployment in South Africa have resulted in an increase in the number of individuals entering the informal sector. This study provides a profile of twenty informal collectors who frequented a newly established multi-material buyback centre in the Durban central business district. All but one collector had come to the city in search of employment, with only four being successful in securing formal employment. Eleven collectors had dependants, who generally lived at their permanent home. Seven collectors had begun hawking as a result of having seen or heard about the buyback centre, while one collector had been trading cardboard for 21 years. Most did not understand the concept of 'recycling', but admitted that their activities led to a cleaner city. Recognition for this 'service' was requested in order to legitimise their activities in the eyes of the community. The income generated was variable. Several factors, includ1ng a fluctuating market price, have a considerable impact on the poverty status and vulnerability of these collectors.
Introduction A recent report (PIR, 1998a & 1998b:l) on the status of poverty and inequality describes South Africa as an upper-middle income country, with a per capita income similar to that of Brazil, Botswana, Mauritius or Malaysia. Unemployment (conservatively estimated at 30% of the economically active population) is perhaps the most important contributor to rising poverty (PIR, 1998a: 6). An ailing macro-economy, inappropriate strategies of employment creation, political complications, high population growth, lack of growth of the formal sector and lack of skills and training have contributed to the classification of a large proportion of South African households as 'poor', or with the prospect of becoming poor (PIR, 1998b:27; May, 1998: 54). Between 1985
and 1995, jobs were lost at a rate of 0.3% per annum (Lucas, 1996:12), exacerbating the unemployment crisis, and this trend is predicted to continue (HSRC, 1999: 1).
A universal definition of poverty is difficult. The World Bank ( 1990: I) has defined poverty as being unable to ~ttain a minimal standard of living - measured in terms of basic consumption needs or income required to satisfy these needs. Based on monetary expenditure per adult equivalent, 40% of s·outh African households (± 50% of the population) have been classified as 'poor' and 27% of the population (20% of households) as 'ultra-poor' (PIR, 1998b:27). For international comparison, using a measure of I US$ per day, 24% of South Africans fall below this international poverty line (Klasen, 1997:54). The net
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Bon
d U
nive
rsity
] at
19:
51 1
2 Ju
ne 2
015
2
result of South Africa's urban influx and the concurrent decline in formal job opportunities has been an increasmg number of individuals entering the informal sector, currently estimated al 1.8 million people (CSS, 1998:59). In the mid-1990s, the Black South African labour market was reported to account for up to 40-50% (vs. 28% in 1950) of those not formally employed (Urban Foundation, 1990: 25; TURP, 1994: 66). More recently, estimates are that 86% of the self-employed comprises Africans (PIR, 1998b:79).
For many years, hawking of cardboard and paper in city centres and surrounding industrial areas has provided an income for many unemployed (largely African) men and women. The present study provides a personal profile of some of these collectors who visited a newly established multimaterial (e.g. paper, cardboard, plastic, etc.) buyback centre (MMBC) in the central business district of Durban.
Research methods To gain some insight into the personal profiles of the informal collectors who frequented this MMBC, the problems they experienced in their line of work, each collector visiting the centre was issued with an identification tag. At the time of the study {October/November 1997), approximately thirty-three collectors had visited the centre. On several days, twenty collectors were interviewed in Zulu, and the responses recorded on a structured questionnaire. Translation into English was carried out by the interviewer.
Results Personal profiles of the collectors Of the twenty collectors, seventeen were male, mainly in the 30-39 year age group, while the three female collectors were in the 40-49 year category. The two youngest collectors were 20-year-old males, and the oldest was a woman of 48 years. Of the seventeen male collectors, four were employed in the formal sector (three in full-time employment), one of whom had been supplementing his income by collecting for 8-9 years. Seven (including one female) collectors did occasional work in the informal sector, where activities ranged from washing cars, returning bottles to liquor stores for deposit, to selling 5-litre containers.
Soc•ety m trans•l!on, 2000, 31(1)
A female collector earned additional income by occasionally buying and selling eggs. Some collectors did not specify their other informal activities, so it must be assumed that this work was of a varied nature, depending on what was available.
Collection activities
More than half of the collectors interviewed had been collecting for less than two years, and 30% for less than six months. At least seven collectors had started collecting as a result of having seen the centre or having heard about it from friends. At the time of the interviews, a 32-year-old male with no family to support who had moved to the city to seek employment, and who was earning ± R8/day, had been collecting for two weeks only. At the other extreme, a 45-year-old male, supporting a family offour (three children, one adult) and who earned an estimated R20/day, had been collecting for twenty-one years. More than half (55%) collected seven days a week. Of these, eight relied solely on the income generated from hawking recyclables. The four collectors in formal employment collected on weekdays only, as they were out of town on weekends. A female collector went about her collection activities on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays only, as her domestic responsibilities (washing clothes for scholars, etc.) involved her on other days. Most of the others did not collect on weekends because shops were generally closed.
Income generated and families supported
More than half (55%) of collectors, including the four in formal employment and two of the three women, supported families. These 11 collectors supported 19 adults and 24 children. A 37-yearold male collector with no other source of income and who estimated he earned± RIO/day, supported a family of nine (two children, seven adults). Based on their perceived income, most collectors (60%) earned between R5-RIO/day. At the other end of the scale, a male collector earned in excess of R30/day, while a female collector earned R35-40/day from collecting a wide range ofrecyclables.
Origin of collectors Ninety-five per cent of collectors had initially come to Durban in search of employment, which,
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Bon
d U
nive
rsity
] at
19:
51 1
2 Ju
ne 2
015
Soc1ely '" transition. 2000, 31 (I)
in most instances, was not forthcoming. One collector had also 'come in search of a good life, like other people'. Another claimed to have been born m Durban.
Three-quarters of those interviewed originated from KwaZulu-Natal, with 'home' including areas such as the Natal Midlands, Northern KwaZuluNatal, and the North or South coasts. For others, home was closer to Durban (e.g. Inanda or KwaMashu townships). Collectors from other provinces (Eastern Cape, Orange Free State) generally returned 'home' during the Christmas season, while those living elsewhere in KwaZulu-Natal returned home more frequently (every second month or at the end of the month). Generally, the further the permanent home from Durban, the less frequent were the visits. Five collectors indicated that they returned home only if they could afford it.
During the week, most collectors (70%) resided in or close to the city centre (English market, Old Fort Rd, Durban Station, Workshop, Berea), presumably not in any formal accommodation. Others lived on the outskirts ofDurban (Inanda, Ekhaneni informal settlement, Umlazi, KwaMashu) and commuted into the city each day. On weekends, only eight (40%) collectors remained in town. Some travelled 'home' or to friends or family further afield (Hammersdale, Veralum, Klaarwater, etc.), but this depended on affordability.
Problems assoctated with collection
When asked about problems experienced during collection, seven (35%) collectors intimated that they were satisfied and had no problems per se. Of the thirteen who had experienced problems, eight highlighted difficulties with transport and the long distances over which commodities had to be moved. Competition between collectors was mentioned by two collectors (one female), where cardboard had deliberately been set alight in one instance, and another had to guard his collection against theft. One male and one female collector had experienced problems with the City Police.
The issue of transport and distances travelled was confirmed when collectors were asked what would facilitate their work. Fourteen (70%) specifically requested trolleys, while the provision of large bags was mentioned by four collectors. Only _ three collectors interviewed owned trolleys. One
3
collector would like the buyer to collect the cardboard from specific locations in the city, while another suggested that more centres be established. The Durban Station was most frequently identified (20% of collectors) as a possible site for a buyback centre The locations suggested for additional centres varied, possibly reflecting the each collector's area of collection or residence during the week. Most responses, nonetheless, related to transport.
Perceptions of collectors regarding recycling and their role in the community
Collectors' perceptions of the concept of 'recycling' were interesting. It was evident from their responses that the environmental benefits were not understood. Half of those interviewed saw recycling as a way of making money and 80% thought that it was about 'cleaning the city/community/country'. Of significance, is that for three collectors, the income generated ·from collection obviated the need to steal. The responses of two collectors in particular warrant special mention. For one, it was a way of helping himself, and for another, it contributed to personal development'a way to develop myself as a human being'. Such responses might reflect a deeper personal significance with regard to their activities (perhaps in being able to provide for a family?).
In response to items in the interview relating to problems, facilitation of collection and an understanding of recycling, it was apparent that many collectors felt they played a role in the community/society ('/am not shy that I am cleaning the streets'). Many would like their activities to be duly recognised, as most believed they contributed towards a cleaner city and country. For this, however, they were not remunerated or even assisted. In most instances, assistance did not necessarily imply a financial reward, but rather visible recognition in the form of a T-shirt or uniform, to legitimise their activities in the eyes of the community. In particular, several collectors saw Mondi, as the relevant commercial enterprise, as not taking sufficient interest in, and offering sufficient support for, their work. Some collectors specifically mentioned the need to be recognised by shop-owners. Presumably, if they could be identified, store-keepers would then
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Bon
d U
nive
rsity
] at
19:
51 1
2 Ju
ne 2
015
4
allow them to remove recyclables from their waste. One female collector was allowed to collect the cardboard from a store, provided she swept the pavement outside the premises.
Some collectors felt their activities were perceived to be socially unacceptable and frowned upon by local authorities (' ... even though they take us as mad people'). In this regard, a few had had encounters with the local police. Some collectors perceived Durban Solid Waste (DSW) to be in direct competition in that street-sweepers were being paid to remove the 'waste' upon which collectors depended. Another collector, on the other hand, believed that she was assisting DSW.
Discussion These informal collectors, sometimes referred to as 'urban miners', together with waste-pickers on South Africa's landfills, are probably amongst the poorest South Africans. There is no doubt that for some their activities are a matter of survival (de Kock, 1987:55; Khan, 1996a:l6; 1996b:5; 1998: 74). In many developing countries, recovery, recycling and reuse of waste material from cities provides a livelihood for large numbers of poor individuals and informal groups (Hardey et al., 1995:133). Several million urban Asians depend on waste-picking for a livelihood. In Calcutta, some 40,000 people rely on recovering and using resources picked from wastes (Hardey et al., 1995: 133), and in Nepal, waste-pickers, generally of Indian origin, roam the streets and dumpsites to recover materials (van Beukering & Badrinath, 1995:6). Waste-picking is an important means of income in other developing countries. In Bogota (Columbia), for example, it is estimated that 30,000-50,000 pc;ople earn a living reclaiming and dealing with waste (Hardey eta/., 1995: 133). For Gomes and Hogland (1995:876), besides contributing towards the alleviation of absolute poverty, scavenging may obviate the need for a sophisticated and costly recovery system. In line with this, there are those who believe that one of the most revealing environmental audits of any city is how efficiently its inhabitants and businesses make use of the city's natural resources and how and in what form and scale the wastes are generated, recycled, reused or treated and disposed (Hardey eta/., 1995: 132).
Soc1ety m transitiOn, 2000, 31 ( 1)
Many hundreds of informal collectors can be seen daily transporting their materials {often in supermarket trolleys) through Durban's city centre, the busy taxi and bus transfer areas, and more recently, through residential areas (McLean, 1999: 1). At least 200 female collectors registered with the Self-employed Women's Union (SEWU) operate in the city centre (DSW, 1998:3). Many collectors travel long distances to sell their wares, while others are serviced by other hawkers, who, because of transport costs, invariably pay below the market price. The twenty collectors of this study, however, represent only a small fraction of a large group of unemployed individuals seeking to earn an income in the informal sector.
Collection: the last resort? All but one collector from the present study came to Durban from rural areas in search of employment. ln only four instances (20%) was employment (three full-time and one part-time) in the formal sector forthcoming. For some (the women, in particular), several years later, informal cardboard collection was still the only means of income generation. The study group comprised a few young men, who, as newcomers to the city unable to find work, had resorted to collecting recyclables. Since collectors came to the city in search of employment, one must assume that they were either unemployed in the rural areas or earned low wages. Based on the statistics that rural areas account for 72% of the poor in South Africa (PIR, l998b:53), and considering that thirteen collectors had families to support, it is not surprising that they had left their homes in search of employment. Possibly, without any appropriate skills and lacking in basic literacy and numeracy training (a hallmark of poverty), collection was their only opt~on. Other more 'sophisticated' informal activities, such as street vending, generally require certain skills and capital to start operating. Although Lund and Skinner ( 1998: l 7) reported that most street traders start their business on less than R200, and many have little or no education, it is possible that those who have become collectors lack the elementary skills, finance or even the entrepreneurship to contemplate street vending. Informal collection is therefore likely to be the last resort of generating a legitimate income.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Bon
d U
nive
rsity
] at
19:
51 1
2 Ju
ne 2
015
Soc1ety m trans111on, 2000, 31 (I)
The market and 1ts effect on income and poverty levels
Since many collectors remained in the city, it can be assumed that they were generating more income than if they returned home. This income, despite being regular, is however, subject to unstable commodity prices. At the time these interviews were conducted, the average cardboard price was ± 15c/kg. In April/May 1999, the price fell dramatically (to 7c-10c/kg). Interesting results emerge if one calculates monthly income (daily income x number of days worked x 4 weeks) of collectors in terms of two poverty measures: the RDP ( 1995) household adult equivalent expenditure and the PSLSD ( 1994) Supplemental (SLL) and Minimal (MLL) Living Levels (income) for individuals. With a 5c decrease in the cardboard price (from 15c to lOc), more than 50% of the households become 'ultra-poor' in terms of the RDP ( 1995) household expenditure. If the PSLSD ( 1994) criteria for individuals are applied, then 69% of collectors can be deemed to exist below the SLL, an increase of 50% in comparison with incomes generated prior to the price decrease. This downswing in commodity pnce effectively reduced collectors' earnings by onethird, forcing individual collectors and households into absolute poverty. It has been reported elsewhere that almost half of the street traders exist below MLL (PIR, 1998b: 81 ). It is difficult then to imagine how informal collectors, as informal 'traders' with no assets (stock, etc.), are able to meet their basic consumption needs, let alone those of their families. Their survivalist occupation in our current economic market therefore makes them vulnerable to absolute poverty.
Urban vulnerability
If poverty is to be reduced, then individuals or groups must be able to maintain sustainable livelihoods. From the calculations provided, clearly, those who work in the informal sector are vulnerable to market trends. It has been recognised that poverty is not a static condition, with some individuals and households oscillating between sustainable living standards and poverty (PIR, 1998b:5). Informal collectors because of the nature of their work, are likely to remain permanently poor, while the households they support
5
will move between being poor and ultra-poor, depending on market conditions. The concept of vulnerability refers to the negative outcomes of the factors (social, economic, environmental and political) that bring about changes. These factors may range from illness of the breadwinner, to deterioration in the economic climate. Implicit in this concept of vulnerability is the lack of assets or inability to implement a coping strategy during a crisis. Applying these criteria, informal collectors, together with .waste-pickers, are possibly some of the most vulnerable individuals in terms of poverty. Thus, while the informal sector may provide an income for those unable to find employment in the formal sector, the majority of individuals will probably continue to exist below the SLL, and probably below the MLL (PIR, 1998b: 79).
Associated with poverty, with particular reference to those who are forced to move away from home, are several social considerations. Whatever the particular forces that either pushed or enticed these collectors to move to the city (presumed to be financial), most have left a family or dependants elsewhere, in some instances several hundred kilometres away. Since many visited their families on rare occasions only (at Christmas, during holidays, or when they had enough money), there are important consequences regarding family and community structure - fragmentation, single parent upbringing, etc. (PIR, 1998b:3).
Representation -the power to change
Perhaps one of the most important constraints of being poor is not having the power to change the status quo - 'The absence of power is almost a defining characteristic of the poor' (May, 1998: 56). Thus, as poorly educated individuals, often homeless in the city because they earn too little to afford accommodation, working long hours in a fiercely competitive market, and with no control over the prices paid for commodities, these collectors have little voice in ameliorating their position as poor urban inhabitants. From the interviews, it was apparent that not only was their work labour-intensive (long days and all week), but many had to carry their commodities considerable distances to hawk them, often for only a few cents per kilogram. Although most did not
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Bon
d U
nive
rsity
] at
19:
51 1
2 Ju
ne 2
015
6
understand the value of their activities in terms of the environmental benefits of recycling, many perceived that they were providing a service to the community and the city. For some, it was difficult to reconcile that street-sweepers were remunerated for doing similar work, while they are not. Recognition in the form of identifiable clothing was one way in which collectors believed that their activities could be 'legitimised'. So~e had been harassed by the city police. Others were aware that they were regarded by some with suspicion. The fact that three collectors admitted that the money generated from collection obviated the need to steal food, is not only evidence ofthe vulnerable nature of their existence in the city, but implicit in such an admission is a notion of an inherent honesty. Stealing food would thus be a survival strategy in the event of lack of income.
As homeless individuals, who spend many hours in search of collectable commodities, often wearing only rags, these collectors are vulnerable to abuse. This may take the form of criminal activities against them. Several collectors had had their goods stolen, presumably by other less honest collectors. As extremely poor individuals whose survival depends on regular collection, they may be taken advantage of in other respects and be powerless to refuse. Collectors must unconditionally accept the price offered by the buyer or the hawker. In another form of abuse, a female collector was allowed access to the cardboard of a storekeeper, only after she had swept the pavement outside the shop. Such abuse is deplorable since by removing the cardboard, the collector is doing the storekeeper a favour, as he would have had to pay the refuse contractor for its removal. A number of the female street traders of Durban are thought to be a 'front' for formal sector traders, mainly South African Asian businessmen (Lund & Skinner, 1998: 18).
Clearly, a representative organisation or body would improve the situation of these informal collectors. Collectors frequenting a residential area of Durban expressed unanimity with regard to the value of such an organisation, as they believed that this would give them 'voice', allowing them to make representation to the local council for assistance (trolleys, identification, etc.), and possibly negotiate higher prices for their commodities
Soc1c1y m trans111on. 2000, 31 ( 1)
(McLean, 1999: 5). The importance of representation is borne out by the recent success achieved by SEWU (established in 1994) in securing accommodation for female street traders, which was sorely lacking (Lund & Skinner, 1998: 21 ).
Involvement of local councils
Some responsibility for the amelioration of the living and working conditions of informal collectors (and others in the informal sector) lies with local authorities. TJ:!ese collectors undoubtedly provide a valuable service to the city, the consequences of which have considerable environmental implications (e.g. diverting thousands of tonnes of cardboard from landfills). By including their activities under the auspices of a local Agenda 21 programme (a protocol to which Durban subscribes), these collectors would be incorporated into the waste management of the city (UN, 1992: 57). This may already have occurred to a small degree with the waste-pickers on the Bisasar Road landfill. Although scavenging is reported to account for less than 0.6% ofthe total tonnage disposed at this facility (Strachan et a/. 1997: 421), there is no doubt ofthe importance of scavenging as a source of income for one of the poorest sectors ofthe population. For some, it is a matter of survival (de Kock 1987:55, Khan 1996a:l6; 1996b:5). In the Western Cape, wastepickers have been integrated into the formal waste management process, illustrating the inter-relationship between health and environmental issues (Khan, l996a: 17; 1996b: 13; 1998: 77).
Additional buyback centres would benefit both local waste management services and collectors. For collectors, travelling distances to sell their commodities would be reduced, allowing additional time for collection, which would ultimately augment their income. For local authorities, the recovery of recyclables iq~pacts on a number of aspects. In the DMA, an estimated R35 million is spent annually in removing waste not in the formal waste stream largely litter, but also illegal dumping (van der Merwe, DSW, per. comm.). Based on estimates of litter composition in South African cities (du Plooy, 1997:7), 40-50% (cans, glass, plastic, paper products) could be recovered for recycling. This would translate into less frequent cleaning of the city streets, deployment of man-
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Bon
d U
nive
rsity
] at
19:
51 1
2 Ju
ne 2
015
Soc ~ely m trans1t1on, 2000, 31 ( 1)
power elsewhere and a reduced impact on local landfill sites. The environmental benefits of promoting this recovery by informal collectors should not be underestimated. With some 960,000 tonnes of waste being landfilled annually in the region, existing landfills are approaching saturation (Hindson et a!., 1996:31). The KwaZulu-Natal region has recently faced several waste management crises, with four sites scheduled for closure in the near future and some of the newer sites having experienced problems. Long-term management policies are therefore imperative. Legitim ising the activities of collectors, by providing sponsored trolleys and identifiable clothing, will not only impact on their ability to collect without being harassed, but it would also provide them with some degree of social dignity, which is currently lacking.
While the South African economy has reputedly been resuscitated to some extent over the past five years, employment creation has not grown siJ:rmltaneously. Unionisation, the demand for higher wages and the reduced international demand for precious metals have impacted negatively on the level of job creation. The recent decision (July 1999) by the United Kingdom to sell a large proportion of its gold reserves, reducing the gold price to its lowest in 20 years, will have far-reaching consequences on many South Africans. Mines have already closed and further retrenchments have been forecast (Sunday Tribune, 18 July 1999:4; HSRC, 1999: I). Since many mine workers originate from rural areas, there is likely to be a renewed migration to the urban areas in search of employment. As these 'push and pull' forces continue to force or entice rural dwellers to urban areas, the level of unemployment will continue to rise (May & Stavrou 1989: 17). Without economic recovery, informal sector activities (both legal and illegal) will become increasingly important as a means of income generation, and possibly of survival. Recognition and legitimising legal activities such as scavenging and waste-picking will have positive social, economic and environmental implications. In terms of a number of the principles of the Agenda 21 protocol (UN, 1992:57), a policy of integrating these collectors into formal waste management would contribute to sustainable management of resources, while strengthening employment and
7
income-generating possibilities. In the final chapter (Vision for the city) of an extensive document on sustainable development in the DMA, in which the perceptions of different community groups are documented, considerable unanimity existed with regard for Durban to be a clean and green sustainable city that was economically successful with full employment (Hindson eta!. 1996: 57). In the middle and long-term, the solution to poverty alleviation is through government and business intervention and policy change. In the short-term, action is possible through the co-operation of local governments, NGOs and programmes, such as those offered by organisations such as the Keep South Africa Beautiful Association (Byrnes, 1995: 18). Buyback centres, through co-operation of all stakeholders, can provide some level of 'employment', and by implication, contribute to poverty alleviation. The bonus is that in addressing these socio-economic issues, there are numerous associated environmental benefits.
Concluding comments
While the more affluent can absorb economic 'knocks' such as the fall in the gold price, or a food price hike as a result of petrol price increases, it is the poor who inevitably take the brunt. In the case of informal collectors, who are dependent on the market value of the commodities they collect for their survival, government intervention might be necessary to stabilise the price. Other recyclable commodities, such as glass and steel and aluminium cans, are also recoverable. While the market for these commodities is far less competitive than for cardboard, the infrastructure is not always adequate (locally and/ or nationally). Both from an environmental perspective, and in terms social upliftment, the Government should strive to ensure that this infrastructure is developed. C3;n-recovery, for example, practised by few collectors in KwaZuluNatal, but which has nonetheless provided an income for more than 20,000 individuals (many previously employed) nationally, is currently the most sustainable in terms of price stability (up to 36c per kg) and environmental benefits (Kock, 1999:40). Other recycling organisations can learn valuable lessons from the infrastructure associated with beverage can recovery.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Bon
d U
nive
rsity
] at
19:
51 1
2 Ju
ne 2
015
8
Acknowledgments The author would like to acknowledge the assistance of MrS. Gumede, Department of Sociology, University of Natal, Durban, who conducted the interviews, including the final translation into English. The research was made possible through funding from the Foundation far Research and Development (now National Research Faundatton), and the co-operation of companies such as Mondi Recycling and Don't Waste Services and organisations such as KwaZulu-Natal Waste MinImisation, Reuse and Recycling Forum. Jenny Toms-McDonald, in particular, spent considerable time and effort to secure a location for this pilot buyback centre. Sadly, this buyback centre closed in the middle of 1998 for security reasons (damaged). Mondi Recycling has, however, set up several other centres in the Warwick Triangle area of Durban and in Pinetown, and a businessman is operating similar centres in central Durban and in the Congella area. Although at this stage, the centres are operating as cardboard and paper collection depots only, the volumes collected (in some instances, > 100 tonnes per month) are proving that the centres can be economically viable.
References Byrnes, R. 1995. Community co-operation on waste
collection. Warmer Bulletin, 45: 18. Central Statistical Services (CSS). 1998. Employ
ment and unemployment in South Africa. October Household Survey 1994-1997. Pretoria: Central Statistical Serv1ces.
de Kock, R. 1987. The garbage scavengers: Pickin' up the pieces. Indicator SA, 4: 51-55.
du Plooy, H. 1997. Waste: focus on litter and recycling. Conserva, 12: 6-8.
Durban Solid Waste (DSW). 1998. Report on Durban solid waste-waste mznimisation office acttvities. December 1998.
Gomes, M. & Hogland, K 1995. Scavengers and landfilling in developing countries. Proceedings of Sardinia 1995, Fifth International Landfill Symposium, CISA, pp. 875-880.
Hardoy JE., Mitlin D. & Satterthwaite D. 1995. Environmental problems in Thtrd World cittes. London: Earthscan Publishers.
Hindson, D., King, N. & Peart, R. 1996. Durban's tomorrow today. Sustainable development m the Durban metropolitan area. Durban: Indicator Press.
Soctety m transtlton. 2000, 31(1)
Human Sciences Research Counc1l (HSRC). 1999. Employment forecasts till 2003- HSRC. Media release, 25 August 1999. http://www.hsrc.ac.za.
Khan, F. 1996a. Recyclmg as a matter of survival. Conserva, II. 16-17
Khan, F. 1996b. Waste-picking for survival- a report on the waste pickers of Frankdale Informal Settlement. EAU Report No 02/96/11. Environmental Advisory Unit, University of Cape town, November 1996.
Khan, F. 1998. Public participation and environmental decision-making in South AfricaThe Frankdale environmental health plan. The South African Geographical Journal, 80: 73-80.
Klasen, S. 1997. Poverty, inequality and deprivation in South Africa: an analysis of the 1993 SALDRU survey. Social Indicators Research, 41: 51-94.
Kock, N.A. 1999. Recovery of beverage cans in South Africa. Proceedings of the R'99 Congress (Volume III), Geneva, February 1999, pp 36-41.
Lucas, G.H.G. 1996. South Africa. Econom1c and socio-political expectatwns for 1997. Bureau of Market Research Report No. 236. Faculty of Economic and Management Science. Pretoria: University of South Afnca.
Lund, F. & Skinner, C. 1998 Women traders in Durban. Life on the streets. Indtcator SA, 15: 17-24.
May, J.D. 1998. Poverty and mequality in South Africa. Indicator SA, 15 53-58.
May, J.D. & Stavrou, S.E. 1989 The informal sector socw-economic dynam1cs and growth m the greater Durban metropolitan region. Centre for Social and Development Studies. Rural Urban Studies Working PaperNo. 18. Durban: University of Natal.
McLean, M. 1999. Recycling as a means of survival amongst collectors in the Glenwood/Berea (Durban) residential area: a case study. Proceedings of the Africa Energy and Environment: Development Conference, August 1999, Port Elizabeth.
Poverty and Inequality Report (PIR). 1998a. Executive summary. May, J.D. (Ed.). Durban: Praxis Publisher.
Poverty and Inequality Report (PIR). 1998b Poverty and inequality m South Africa. May, J.D. (Ed.). Durban: Praxis Publisher.
Project for Statistics on Living Standards and Development (PSLSD). 1994. South Africans: rich and poor: baseline household statistics. South African Labour and Development Research Unit,
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Bon
d U
nive
rsity
] at
19:
51 1
2 Ju
ne 2
015
Soctety m transinon, 2000, 31 (I)
University of Cape Town. Reconstruction and Development Programme
(RDP). 1995. Key indzcators in poverty. Pretona. Strachan, L., Parkin, J., Dorkin, D. & Strydom, S.
1997. Bioreacuon and human reaction, a perfect balance: A case study of South African waste management strategies. Proceedings of the Sixth International Landfill Symposium, October 1997, Cagliari, Italy.
Trade Union Research Project (TURP). 1994. A user's guide to the South African economy. Durban: Y Press.
9
United Nations (UN). 1992. Earth summit '92. Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro. Quarrie, J. (Ed.). London: Regency Press.
Urban Foundation. 1990. Urban debate 20 I 0 2: Policy overview: the urban challenge. Johannesburg: Urban Foundation.
van Beukering, P. & Badrinath, G.D. 1995 Recycling in Nepal: The Indian connection. Warmer Bulletin, 46: 6.
World Bank. 1990. The world development report 1990. New York: OUP.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Bon
d U
nive
rsity
] at
19:
51 1
2 Ju
ne 2
015